Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout030-290-042,� � r°9x 1 .• p F VIII �1..♦.1 �~�WI��''��.}�;"'r � ����� q - t, .�' .� ..•w � .. ' Y .�, N �i - � � ' a Q, �9.. � 1 ri v. _ nr P •1 ti � . 131 ..Q t - , o: 1 I . '1 � '� .P j � �, � i"� r�. •4. . ;r„'; '`�xw � �''. 1 � ',r, '. ' ;. 4, � '1 I�1 t ' r . 1 .�' i 1 f �. 3 r. � 1, n . i�� �,� {r� �• .. N 1 N • � 4.��a 1 .. 1 . • ��h.� ��1 �11 _ 1\ � ;1 *' � . .1 1 � .. . .I� .� .}��. � � 1 - 1 1 �. .. • W •�'� n � .. 1 ^j�. • � 1',..i i 1 t . . � 'ua' � �, , . 1 �' _ .:�«, �, f"'�l «,'� .- � ,1 til , a ' ,� � r°9x 1 .• p F h y �r �F� :.. ` y► rte. h ,, ` a... r7.-,- C44C- CK(A A- L .GZZei2, � i b At'�It?j c..i=`"i.Zc�k; 't7.� iI�Y7� i�c.C�� ? u,J �` �,`a" s3 �1�►� �c - t,�,: S1 y i� If a i M, Y�u�l-.+-.4,Fy¢.'r 'Yaie4lia�i>dJldWMrt(A'�!Q" *`'4 t 'Y 1 J61 (me of - - LAND 0K NAIUkAI YVEAl. hil A'40 6EArUTY DEPARTMENT qF PU13tjC WORKS WiL i IAM (13111) 0HG1 1=, giCr mor 7 COUNTY C NIER DRIVE .ORUVILLE, CALIFoRNI"A95?5 �. �, fiel�phor,rt' t!7iG') $34.4G�i RONALD D. MCELROY bepu y Dired6v 1 BUffqCm'P1a"nkjCwm April 8, 1986 APR J 19be Stephen AndtirtaotY �royii�li C�b3{r4rnii 10 Ate 30-1,?9-42 e 2023 Buena Vista 1pentiatiVe T�arCol Map ; AlavAedta, CA 914501 Deur Mr. Anderson: At th,? regular Meeting oV the Butte County Advit3ory Agency }lead on April 7, 1986, the agency denied your tentative pareal, mup witboi)t j 1 prejxjdi,!o- on the above- teferpnood ,property in ticeordanoe *With ae„t,lon 1. 15109 of the rl,'(�A 11' no appeals are timely i`iled--within ton days of Lhe data or the AdvisorytA enty':l action --with the Clerk oi" the Board int" t'luporvZoorn, 1 hi. Ij noti ,ion wi J.I. be 7f 113ve 4nv rojYrxrditti'r, mdo %-it;er! ploas o vontavt thin tyo'+i vrvoy truly ;yr'ttarn;, W l i l i pant '1"fivrV ) �ti11rA t A;"t",inUinre Nrhotor } C`D lr�1DCdCaikl� �'' 11r+a Ltfi , Ot'li T I rN ZJ) MAIL 1 r47' TO; Butte. County Advisory Agency FROM; Planning Director' i SUBJtCT'i Report on Tentative Parcel Map of Stephen Anderson on AP 10-29-42 DATE March 250 198E 'This is a pioposal to divide 9.12 acres to create 4 parcels of 2.5 acres each The present zoning is AR -10 (Agricultural Residential - '10 acre parcels). ,The Land Usj Plan Map of the Butte County General Plan designates this area as Agricultural -Residential. There are no specific or community plans for the area The Orovi,'lle Airport Environs Plan indicates clear zone, approach zone and overflight areas affecting, the property. An EIR for this project was required in 1980. The applicant has not prepared an EIR as of this date. In the meantime,ultt, ththe Airport Land Use Commission i th c� has adopted an Airport Land Ilse Plan 'and its companion EIR. As a res e j Butte County Board of Supervisors adopted the above referenced General Plan Designation and zoning in January of 1986: It should be noted that the adopted { zoning does not permit the creation of parcels the size of those requested by this application, and the EIR certified by ALUC does not address the site specific ,impacts of parcels of the size, design, and density of those requested. Since the environmental document's for this project have not been completed, denial is recommended pursuant to Section 15109 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines t Suggested Motion Find that the applicant has not submitted the fees and information requested by letter of December 8 1980, and deny without prejudice the tentative parcEl map for Stephen Anderson, AP 30-29-42 in.accordance with section 15109 of the tEQA Guidelines. DRH:lr ccz Stephen Anderson i IIx. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENT)M EVALUATION Project Description stdties 1. Brief fromcA-2ttonAR-mII-lntooallow 1+acres acreAparcel.developm) development ' of these existing twenty 9 to 16 -acne pparcels. .2". Location: West of Larkin Road off After Ay 'llrive, 3-4 miles southwest iof Orovi.11e, east of the DWR Thermalit'o, Afterbayand south of the Oroville Mur'icipal Airport. 3. Proposed Density of ;Development: one acre parce]sjthough actual development potential is restricted. 4. Access and Nearest Public. Road(s): Existing access via Larkin Road; a recently developed gravel Afterbay Drive provides + direct access to 'existing parcels,. S. Method of :Sewage Disposal: Seepage pits 6. Source of Water Supply: lt_3ividua1 wells '7. Proximity of Power Lines: 3j4 mile Considerable 8. Potential for further land divisions and development' further divisions probable, though actual land divisions are restricted by specific sewage disposal capacity :of sites - 260t parcels potential '(20 existing) Environmental .Setting 1. Terrain a. General Topographic Character:' -deftly, rolling grasslands slopes less than 10%. b. Elevation: 140 to 190 feet above sea level. G� Limiting Factors: tevelopmoit restricted to 155wfoot elevation and aboveo based o11 sewago disposal limitations. 2. Soils y ' nts, Exhibit B. a: Types and Characterxstios: lefer to a�tachme b. Limiting factors: Shallow soil restricted permeability, -Clay/ hardpan subsoil andgro,undwator table. Area -wide limitations for onsite sewage disposal; seepage pits .have bee. _approved for use on land above the 155. -foot surface e1evationlexcluding approximately 65 acres of land that lies below l55 feet (23t of total area) , 3, Natural Hazards of the 8't6,'- a.. ite:a.. Erosion Potential: ;MOderatc �b pine azar -d: h10'ddrd,'to O'%r c. Proximity to the Oroville Municipal Airport (south of main runway) di hydrology' ai. Surface Watero Local swales leading east to OtOVI.11e }Vile life Area and west to 'Mdrmalitb Afterbay b. Ground Watext Croukldt.►ator at 125i foot elevation. Appendix R - page 3 of 9 g0u0�J'-Z9-�, pISC�l$SION OP DNVIAONMENTAL VALOATION (continued) S, Visual/scenIc Quality: Gond. Open vistas of foothills and valley lands. G. Acoustic Qtxalityt Larkin Road corridor fronts property, Oroville Municipal Airport fli,glit path traverses site, causing infrequent noise. f 7. Vegetation: Natural grassiand Within an identified vernal P sensitive area. Survey previously conducted and clearance was grantid. (Refer to attached letter, Dxhibit N) 8. butte County General plan designation: LoW Density Residential 9. Existing Zoning: A-2 l0. ptristing Land Use on-site. Undeveloped exCept for primary circulation roads. 11. Surrounding Area: it ` Afterbay. a► Land Uses. Open undeveloped grassland Thermalit0 b Zoning: A-z c. Gen. Plan designations: Low tensity Residential. Public to east across Larkin ltoad and to north (airport environs). A. Parcel Sizes: Various: 5± acres to 40+ acres lan(I -area near 12. Character of site and Area: Rural outlying 'Orai the existing ' Thermalito and Orovilic Airport with very development.1 Relevant ,Spheres of Irnf uence site lies just outf side the City o' Orovi:ile spheres. Outside T.r.A. and CSA 025. 14� ire protection Service: Nearest County (State) Piro Station: Orov,lle headquarters, 5 miles. b. Water Availability: No community Nater system exists in the area: ,1514 Schools in Area sierra Avenue hlemer�tary School, Thermalto, and Diggs 'Unified School nistri,ct. The following concerns Have been identifiedt 1b,e So'i1 disruption and potential erosion increases from the Increased lb e,. sof development will accur JJOWever, this area }Jas only a moderate SusCact eptlbxlity ru erosion due to the gentle terrain and natural ct�UT soil r,}iaracter. Primary access exists, though circulation withi�i the existing subdivision is limited due to the dead-end cul-de-sac roads, `Therefore, additio'tal road ;development is necessary at the proposed density of use. M 2a Area vehicular emissions and generation 'of dust twill result fro the ,increased intelisity of residential use and froltt r-Otistruction activity, in an area where very limited use occurs. Appendix P - page Sa of 9 r DiscusSlori Or. b 7VlgolgMENTAL EVALUATION {cotrt nued� to a T.ncreased development density Will increase site rtzno£f p' . r y ag r y 3b�c: Lo,c:tl�si?ales will accontmod:ite drainage, area rdadtJa s limited extent:, m roveMents The soil ahead exhizts a high have existing culvert i p rate of natural runoff due to its �compa'ct nature. conditions lin on-site setvahe disposal. 'Che Butte County 3h: Soil i roved seepage pit scw,'agc disposal Environmental rnnmental kicalttt Dep'artnent ELI) with the rer e subdivision, Afterbay l;state;s', , systems .for the ot`i ie pits be developed only on terrain at elevations r striction that seepag pits increased development densx'ty allot�ed ?' aii:5ve 155 feet. }towevcr, oral cataci, q I)f this site. by this arezone ts�generally at thd `0XCo ced the so �J2 �*4 foat clevat ori Groan wi h4bitati project site t4as identik`ied as potient al verna, pow 4b: The Etotie�er rt:alysr reale possibly, •'containing rare and end;angcreci p vttys rct.aled lents in the 5u1' tants. $cfer to the atxachei botanical sur y the original Aftetbay tstates subdivz.sxcn. no rare or en lange,rcd p A letter. from `• -4d: potential graL:ing land ll be reiiiotie,ci nt picoduct�.on SII capability.across 5d; phe property lies adjacent �o i�?it aOrUe1 1 It�ioft h abitatecantained £r0im Larkin R )ad. !lotJcver, t d feet £irther east. The`refore� within the ti'i�.dlife Area does tnotdro .occur in close proximity t4 this property, but lies setitt,ral hUe ,rasslattd habitat on-site is no • � 'Cite impacts 'should be minimal. unique or sensitive habit -tit, 6b , 1713. 'Cite p xo j ect site is located. tie�:r tile rou�gednl�omesoites}twill UroVille Dtunicipal Arrport, t2esldentis o£ any prop be su}i�octc l to airport noise a nd aircraft hazards• 11-lost tO ntreverhetlie�e I }t't pattern traverses" the central area of lite site: does not: lie directly tti�it}tin the airport light pati. just east o£'_ tete standard arrival fl'911 -. p to an -d lite doparti.ite flight,i,�crmal:} tos1�'i:sttA ttte\ntio is °�l Prezo to property. (tie£ is used for larger aircraft landing The nearest existing ?un1`'a°-�and orated ltjti .feat not e£ the northern project bog da- y ► _ ,ntterns t, }ten the mai. as tell as for crasstivind g1ternative landing i runi�ay is unavailable. tPtOPO�e�fex7 �tlrunrcaywions ol(t��U�fcet�furth�rasouth, port runway, t� i ll. tl:i� erg 40t) feet front the property, i Increa�sittg the �ettsi.ty� Of ilei*eiopttont in this ter , from the ex-rd-.0te l c easi parcels to l aut'e parcols as ajl.ot��ct,1 :in this A}tett}wl rewotie, ill impar lite le�ol, oC residential exposure to ai�`irratt }ta�ar'd:;. t`y to be le�s,tlritit and noasc; Actut;,l t}ettsity' of development iS li)tiea�ce1 The Citi. the i• ac ie ni}ntyttbl�riettsi ty (probable 2-5 act`e 1 of Or ovilie hits 'ctlltosted ;tvig,tticti eati5in-re�b�ceratportion or t}tLect site and tits deoding bt clear toivo aix p Ohl},exsj sifie (ret:e-r to tile tttit�tcStrt} letter irottt Clic Apiir,ttclt.;� � yr S ;,"uss r ENVIr EVAL(C ;ft itIU0d) 0 p� iiatial i;;q)Z�fic:tnce frot de�`e?o;"er.t at greater densities ;. 071 iii: site is the ostii`e of peLple tend �ot4ope�'ty to aircraft h -areas and -oi.se, oarticulatl; of it the aitport runtqay is eatendCd t+ within 400 �Cct of the s)uta. `"`:ercw�: "j 'Uttildr study is n C a r` to dt.ter i710 speclri,c a: x>.: W? t We 'a)tcl hazard llbdtatioll i2C5 0)1 the project oft -site the need fOr app;'rru.%atet l ' ;� d„ �,t -you tdx `;g or powor lAnc s a. ernati�vc Oni. �;ii7�4e1: ,yetc, .v �r T"((` �y.t ;,bou'10 be con- I, J. `Y ��NI 1. �':` .4`•'i.i �a .1 ~x. tn' t� 1...14 . .ua. 4 sie.e,red as a ~itigvtio,t reaS,ure i Lighting o£ resiclenccs would croate a re`;,f source of light during rite e;-oni;ng 1: wd night hours, paxticulc:xi security lighting. Potlex tiros td power poles pose ah .addtio;al a yard to ai.l Craf t. ga .? This rezone kill allow greativ ini.rcased development densities ana rza - generate adct,itional rec{uest$ wor rediVision of these 10+ acre subdivision ien lots to ra7,tier •avrcaI stirula'ting a gLotvth pattern. This gr 11 inattcement nab• result in nature land use conflicts in thi: arca co;tsidering the proti', i , o£ the a' -i3dr. Oroville Wil.dli°,'e l�rea a;fterbs'", aii,3 Other open l.ar.,,' t:se sur- .:i:gig Afterbay Estates, Sub- '�-t, Sril coftditicr8 and lana c__SC t�- for sewage disposal d V-ISiC 5y"¢te7v5 0)l y:�+p Total: area Irt- G�eveyCp L 12 11tat1071S. Sis e4e.,t1� ;; t sl 4 t. e Lois Oerisity Residential; This L S v rc � 1.e i �� , g some lard a,e ��4tegor,' of ti�aLttMe (.ou,;- �e .Lral Plan, altliou h ot,:r on -trran designat_e)t ��cluld e ,eppropri.ate category. rstxing that requires lar,c) -arcus �..o:^-d Ge considered for dais y to oth.or non- t7rlsan pro\ -nitJ area; -6nsiUrring t Fe outl�a°:g l.oca� cn lard us:t l.i i4 es; a7:d site cle�`elo��7wc;a.ticns` t- eY' ks nclu�.�r ;axed toning di set` cts on-site) Alternstite 3nang p, ti and a7 And ent to the iaut4,� Ccur.t� r,� :era4 plan merit further study. 11, Lu. �t full buildout, �'�' l-c�rc residences are the"oreti,call.y potential, adding 500 or ,..ore people tt t* -is non urban; ti7ldoveJoped trea. The re Mone lav ift'tiate and s�i�'a�.�te a development and groWth rattcYn in. the area; - 1 3a c• The �'xopoaed t`e�c:sul'4c tjo..t development of 700 total lot$ would add a.pproxi,tate1v 1800 .�Oi to �-sz`�in Road (existing traffic oil Lar'in was rteasu.rud at ?0 ,0 AN in 1a` ) . pacause of the Currant ffac t`olu)es on Hese roads and e existing 1fterbay Drive, thi'sttGpact C. -I area: roads is not 6� ected to he significant. However, better c rcula' i.o"n ',�i tlt t X11 site aftd as ,itional across to Larkin load would ba necessary upon full detyelcpr..ent. page 8o of 9 4 DI8COSSION Or INVII:O.NMENTAL E-VALUATXnN (continued) • Project traffic would be distributed over seiveral routes, including oro-bam Blvd. and Grand Avenue to the east into Oroville, Oro -Dam Blvd; to the west to Highway '99, and Larkin Road south. Traffic increases onto any one road 'could not cause substantial congestion, though increases on. Oro -Dani Blvd. West and the ,Loiter Thernalito bridge into Orovill.c would occur. 13fcThe rets traffic could result in :increased congestion along the routes and intersections into Thermalito and Orovilleparticularly at Larkin and highway 162, and at the ili.ghway 3,62 - reather River bridge. The Public Forks Department notes that a left -turn lane on Larkin Road may be needed at this Afterbay :Drive; itntersection, depending on the ultimate deve',opment, 14i Public service demands ''gill itirreaso as densities are allowed to increase in this outlying area beyond the City of Oroville where very little residential use has actually been developed. The level of existing public services in this area is low. Fire hazards are low and no unusual hazards exist lit the area,. Increased impacts on local sc,',obls will result, primaril?* on Biggt Unifloa School ,District: Tho estimated 200+ additional. residences will. generate an estimated '013L school-aT,e children, Net; bus , routers would need to be established or e.ctended into this undeveloped are n. lGa,'b, 11z Dvnto;ptri,cnt of the site requires extension of utility lines an estirirltt, 1 ! - 1 rule, f; tpatision of utilities would be growth inducing to the general; area, 16cyd, 17a: Nater will. be Prov ded by individual Uolls 4 M, 'sewage disposal by septic tanks aitri seepage pits. Sewage d'ispos;al las been apptoved by the Butte county Environmental health Departrietrt, having dotoxmined that seepage pits will be a suitable sewage disposal method for development on land aref-.s above the ir5-foot above -sea-level contour (304- feet minimum above the highest knollri groundwater tables), Bxist11gI parcels havo sufficient area above the lss-foot contour to meet the sewage ditiposal roquiretrents, though ;several have vary` limited area above this elevation. 'Theroforc, jti`ithout sewer, potential fur -further d'bvelopnlettt is restricted, especially on parcels and T. Approximately 23 percent (65 aces) of this prOott} is cons,iclered by the Ilutte County lIcdlth De,partt:ent to be utiiecceptable for soepage pit s use (acrd -the entire site ,is unj,etoll tahJo for standard leach Golds). 17b Refer to itch 6h, The property is iu'i.tliin tl►e Or.ov lle Airport oilivi. ro s loctetecl at the 50.3.;,110 rn et>,d or: the rt nw,hY O 19t DOVLiopriotit at•. tIll i's ze csity ill this outlyitig rural area gill markodly alter tate visual ChAriic,tcr Or this open laitd area.. t 1 IV. n7i�RhSi1�A'>'TOry cort}71c:uod by 4h� 'x,�'.�:c t crr,c'ti On the basis of: ;:his i;•iitial evaluation: I find the prcLiosed ro �Ct, 1Ci vaDNEG 'have rt oi:gnifi cant, a P 7 xVF 'DxCLAIIATTOO effect oil the crvJ t0hMe, , is rccbmendea. I find that althoxigh the proposed Project coulI have a significant effect on the ervironrlent there ti4' 11 nc>t he a sigriificaxt effect in this case becAAlbe the mitigation neasures described on an attached sheet il have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE bUCLARATION IS IGCI�Wo��J. i I find the propo Sed project: "LaY haVe a siclnifioant n_ffect .on the enviz:onmoslt; and 6n, t;t vLRbrit�',Eta'�AT, :C1Sk'ACT' AtpORT is reLUired 1'. i Date. •..",'Ji-i;;c`:�';IE1JmAL t3>rVTF:W bi:i'AYt'I`1�F;�'>` Ido7i�wad iby:_S_ _ arl D. Nel aon wr�•�l.ron*�c;ntai. f?cv�.ovt J�irr:c�;nz Quc'st3.ons of project corpa llblllity With °tzho OroVal.'le �,itinxci.pal l� r'por}r. the effect on ail-I)O �'t oper,ltions from de c—IZ ineilt �t grear.e"r dei��it �e� an the1)roperty:� anti airc:raf lla�"avds an �wisis eii`ects oil fciture s3te residents are t,lt i i ri.inary concox `ts in this s propcisa .F I�ortaont of the �°sex property r1lay iaqui7e C�.edt° wone :�o Davelcp:°nellt colrldot, (arld%or l.ot r.o111)lg) tri limit deve'lcp1le it dall ,hies It 4li -L tltc airport flight pzatli and t o iiyot c:t 'ut:ux°e ro8i fent s fro- d3 �scj�ft ltaxards Mid ito3 se panic>ul:atly as t;lic x'unt,aNIS are expanuedy ar�ei ai.rpox"t; oxi Yzt3,on and leve Ls of a ,o iijcrease y n'"�1ietlture ,Altornat vos ltaed to 'lie analyned. A C�eireTal i�l Aft ,ll�rmentIALIlt of t;ho site to a. ntaxu cotnpa'tj.131e lttliti tlse�categon. s. ctlld be coils°Ld3ert 1. • ^ 1 r 1i L aY (t i a;, 1e p � !',e � C> i. f d + i r APPLICANTII: Phil RA, xith c/o Cook Associates PRWEM. Rezone from A_3 to AR-MH-1 { LocATTM. West side of Larkin Roads approximate`�y 2 miles south of State Route 162 O„ y T J Th,e 'pr?,yject site is located immediately south of the Orovii:ie Municipal Airport and a prolongation of Runway 1-10 passes through the site. The end of the runway is currently 1,400 feet (along the prolongs ation from the project, but a 1;000 foot extension y which would bringof thisrunwa , has been proposed the ruAwa ehYj to within 400 feet Y To 'protect the ifutilre lvc: ° 5,G ar r.•.� i r•;.• 1a• Yla i , +"\,•, ° } + t i{. � • �- � i • 1 t y a "` r.: •� +' ., i»�. i i irha�':c�..�i....ur.+ riM�L,r�ra" �,+ } I 1 „ r1w i - ! i. ,i�,"•, , ir• 4 4t ',' i. 4 K µ ` n • Y .}. .° Y rw` { 1, ^•• t � f 1 r Y r. + �, �, �" ` i+4 \� � '4 �1 -.. I ` 41, f}r;,C til+ • '. f YY 4 `}J:t i y4. M t, i' \ iii " \' 4 �, �\� ('� Y ' 4,� i 1 ,: a •. Y \ .ap} �( i YY. � a i '1 a ,t O�_��'a ••'t +1 ! 1 44,r l . • L i. " I ar i C M r • f . V,♦.' S • a F r • 1i • • �` . + lat :, r`y t , i 4 ��I: lc —h 4w ' � y i 'Ys. ,�,• 1 + 1 • � •I� '/� .. I+Yi 4.}',' 1 •} k. i{rs \ " + •y♦ ," `� ., +;. , r i '•1 ., liYr ? t • �' r '� ♦ tt.•i �i 4 �,, fi 1, �}.• IL' `wr1. M 5.y w tt yYa •P .� ♦.,t•y :�P ♦ 1r , V • \ �",l hY"'1: yYj i 4•y ` 1 *'\ v � f"'� 1 i. � .4a' J , f ,� by V F 'w, • r ♦ p , i w;t} � v� is r �'„ +' 4,. 1 ✓.' #.. Y'i�CL .1'.55 °h11 4 tt` 5 "� T s S+ •ti r.•}� " + s. .a u4•{t. f t � "/? ,i4 ,w° r•° \} } � 4 y 4 I{.+ I'�W .°+y . � iSr �', a..• ° �'• Fat � '1. i .r ��°` .�• lr •' ,' V a �' •r�' „ I n. 4Y I L 4 ° Av+ + '• , q f;+H W:' s, i. t i "4 �} ♦� L 'J`: ° +t 1 h „li 4 '�. , v 1 •4t k1 •'.� ', '" Hyl Y ` � rIS; L}, xi! .•! Y r� •y 4 ".M 1 ••1 •:' Asr ..i - Iw • ' °. v> L vf a i f .. i ,+•.a L�7. , '.'4 +, + . 'a'. ' y f . ' 1 ♦ s�'4+' :W k .+ aY, , i . w' f FF< w,p ,.'x 4 i - •5•: .. ',,, t, ,-` � .y=•J r �' ` .' )� •.� r. y.Y -17 x Y 1 I ``• i; Yr• '. t o r "'� L } ,{. 1 r ;,. a '4 . 11 �;} } }F •r .Fin y Yi { . P c . ' a 55 t+W r.., rs } .i ""'} "i,, .c♦ r� L'r. `ice < �``'_F Si4 •KY4�Y iT4 � 1fie / �� �yr' � •fZ ii5t M*uc } ' �f S x Y V 1Y r f i I - .5 ict y, + r ♦ y ' 7 i x x, , +'f , +, yY- '„ I Y � � Y I' N \ •Ian• �•� j•,' � `tp, Yw• 'i+SH } • IG"9 1 �. F�F+lr �,♦ �r a_�.. I / } i l 1 iL i+ vt�� } •� 5+}u,� + F - ''I t J1".:•• � t • • �. 1 '"Y�Y:: +•'..D•..r.+:•. I • •}� I .a�}.. w}} \ .I - • r Y s. 'I 7 it . v �". � ♦Yy •L}} � � 5.. .. Tyr I �# + ^+ ' 1' •:f Y� ` xr• r I i' •iYfF F � 11.E ' l .,I + 1... •� * � , a � r }+ i' r r TT•.Flitk S •4r♦�+"r vF.+.r rcr..�, �� j'Y r / + Y' " 4* • , e s• • 1-: iry " .'--'rr�+i•^'i sr �l:.r ' ' V ,y il,� ♦.� •.'•va.�' r Y 1 f• ♦ ".i t .•".. Y 4 r ii' S � yYkk• t'r i � }�%, • .'� - � � y" . � _.115 � ,1• w ° ,.F t ♦.•,�. sr r1,, , •i� � } k 5; a i ,� • ;r. ,°Yr Sty; 1r y. a. Y i (1A '• i s is a5 1 i •rt'Y,ii •. �• 'i a 1 y � r.F + „ u r 4' 'v < 1 .. • °+ kir•. • yrYMr��'w`°'i r ♦ , m ♦ r • Y�Yir, t�1 Y'li � y yy M a Y r Y • * K 4 r • .r Yk 4 �. 1 r+ i i 1i ° 1 \ 5• et ju vy,,.�i:r fi, • ,• / �'f ai 1 r'it Y' 41 9 ° r r�°`++'4 +i •r Fi �y�Y `♦ . ? I+ir'�T4' (ii !f.l Y , ^ r q r x t ti Z " •:• a ,�YV. y a s 9 41 y r'f.S�I��hf�4b111tt1, bEi'AftTl141°iV ,00 T OIC keE kL ESTA'iT OB TEiB (rra'viile� Qodtof►hih STATI OF CAL, FOR 414 f 9a ta) 3�2-2505 STAN bARb in thd>,a Hart of the gpplicafi of F'INA'L S'UTAIX l' 16 PU110C it'EL'nRT Y PRIL AMR V= NO. J16', 655 SAC ISSUEb O'UVL 2.3t` 1980 I XP CBEs ` n. LY n.' 19 for a Final Subdivision Pcibl c Ritpo`rt on l kSdb 3D OP SUM-Y' 01 AVTERT3Ar ` : ESTAT88 .(A POit�. ION OP SOUTH' TRERf�I�l7 1TO 81113I)I ION ) BCTM 060NTYs CALI OANIA l' This Report is iYot a Recommendation or Efidorsement of the Sobd visiolt But is h �brmative.Only. y: 1 buyet or Lessee Must Sign tr iat Eie Has Rece t'ed and Read Till, Repor j 'This iRtport Expires on Date Sho rt AboVe. if There Has Beeh a Material Chane in tiie Offering►, art "ended Public Report Must Be Olbtaltted and Used, in Lieu of This Report, Section 35700 of the California Health and Safety Code provides that the practice of,discriMlnatIiorY becausa of Face, calor, religion,°sex; rnarital status, national orldlo or ancestry in housinru accommodations Ie j against public poilcy, unser Section 120 of the California 0ltsiness and professions Code, Catifoenia 1 O'bstate (iceMe64 are subject to disciplinary action by the Beal estate CoKlniss oner if they make any ci 5Mrnination, distinction or reA'riction in negotiating a salt; o' Wase of real 2proptrty because of the ractO,.color, sek, relirgloln, AhbOtey 'or hatlonal origin of the prospoo.tive buyer, If Utiy tirospertl��4 buyer or lessee believes that a iicansee is aullty of such conduct, he or`sho should contact the Dapertment of ttrA'kstatc' informetioh RegWiog, Sclibols Cyn be found on Pige ri a;` this Y epot^t Hi AD TH8 EN'I'lnl NV0131' on the followling parols before contmotiha to purchase a lot in this SU130IVISION, lyago I or 11 Pages We: 1�ohri (ate EMOTT "Aft w. v i 1. tri i 1 c C,_�s �lr ;.,� in Butte county �phra..ima ,e� y yhe � i e �orL and Subil3�ri s' 1 s£ x TIUO t 'ii a,.... ton t-: Boo 7 �4' o£ v RA51;12i,!l'Sa: 1;aSements j'jr0 '�1o£t�4hanl3uLt,c.�county 1jecorder', ta, Ma rec;nrded ,its Lh Mab of Resi maps, page 5'dtions ir 7 ' on af--�+ R,STRSCTCINS: "Ci�ere are no retarded nec.arat7 fee'i,�ri th3 s sub'�?iVisiOn. TA��S: The .ntaXi.rftUbj..al�ountt,3.csaiY tax olltreaful� er 4h� that; c�nthe µ.. prol5cr value o.. collectied annually' by coupthe to- a roved by � �1yp .i 7 ,t ran on charge! bft property. voters prior t°ro71, 1, yli25% of the ��)ith the a�dd:i.tion of �.ni.erest and � e' any indebtedness, pP ,irrtal.e�y tal property, tax rate �,n most counties 3s apn full cash value, e Itful.l V:Ur the purohaser of a lot or unit` in this subdivision, theflected s r dash �talue" of the lot or unit will be ty ahb ssessorroas off' the date . on the tax roll, determined by the county t ��urs aftox' the of purchase,, of purchase o.f the loOr unit or that !aors of the date of completion o an iMprovemerit; on thetlimpound all funds re- pURC11AS1 lAoNE;Y 14 ANnI71`tGccrohe subdi an e depos3toryruntil leiral title is ddeliv- ceivedi f rotn you in eyed to you. (Refer to Sec vie"n 11013•;2Ca) of the Business Professions code .i service tb this tract. 'Pri.vate Y, j+1ATERt 'there is no regular water water wells are the only source of wal:er in this tract and you will: be required to pay all cbst, to lasve a vtell -ins tal..1ed The subdivide -r' s well clr3ller had submitted the following informa g tion; ' i�'fhe rice for a single well is W '�00` � pack and concrete encasea per toot inclueing $2U 00 permit fee. Casing to full depth grave p menti according to 13titto County regulations with a minimum depth of` l.0"0'i,►.. urs: pump The subd3vide'r advises that tlae e;,timsted cost of a prem he sl ub it v de between r' �0 sand $1400 .Car � well at a:� average dept',h andof 800 feet. well The State plater Code t^eqult'to het` filed WiththeDepartment tion tb lOfa'later` and a Report of Completion Resources. FlRla •PRbTri Bute County ,1+1 re Tepar'tMent OAS! Natilral ga`s service is not- avallable, Pa d: of I4 Os VI -le AJo;. lb )6136 I -A A..2 ELECTRICIT�t: Pacific Gas and i•.lectr.c Company advises as followsst� oa The electric and natural gas service can be supplied to the shove ; mentioned parcels. The electric extension can be furnished as in ' o.� cated in Rules 15 and or ` Thew is an existing electric overhead type distribution line in '444 approcimate area. The nearest natural gas is now located at the irk teres},ion of Larkin Road and Oris ,Dam Boulevard (Highway 162) W TELEPHONE: pacific Telephone and Telegra:ph Company advises a: fol— lows: This is to advise you of the availability of telephone 'facilities along Larkin Abad, Butte County. however, the Pacific Telephone Company has no current plans to place telephone Facilities in the above development\prior to receipt of: request for service from indi- vidual 'applicants. Since this development it still in i`ts initial. design stages it w2iuld be very diffIcult to determine an estimated cost of service to purchaser. ert is outside of. our base rate servingn charges -be— a, Our filed tariffs allow for line e�ktensib areas until. cause this prop y such time as amore detailed map showing information such as zoning, proposed roads, and density is prova.ded so we can make an appropri- ate engineering study, we are unable to ;provide the ebtimated cost to the ;purchaser. NOTE: 'It will be the responsibility of the lot purchasers to pay 40T the extension,of electr, Ity and telephone lints to the tract and to their particular lot, SEWAGE hISPt"'4L` Septic 'tanks will be used for sewage disposal. your septic tank. You must The estimated cosh of aseptic tank system is $2,075.00. Prinz to commencing construction, you should` contact the 16da''l health department for specifications, re- quirements, acid any local problems -+ y ;fol to'Os The Count Health Department advx,es as Setaage disposal by individual. 'septic tanks `and seepage pits is pro -- posed. because of the water table and the use of seepage pits, sewer ale disposal permits will be issuer? only at surface elevations above 15`5 feet.tomes, consequently,, must be cohstructed at elevation 156 feet or above• This would particularly effect parcels F!, M, 140 T, S and R. Also effected to a lessees -degrr would be Parcels A,.G and H. Locations of Names on theca lots at`._ be restricted. STRnZTS AND ROADS. the roads Within t1?�, sUbdivris%bn .ate private. rhe repair and 'rlaihterance of then p iVtte roads t4'1 be �n actor: p g e r a :r � dance tivi�45� �pade'ba 6plhe'nance a reemenu 'T►ta..� a rcetnent is recorded in Book g Tmmng' 8Un0!FV`!b8z SHOOLt) Mavlat, ',,OU tllttl A CO1:)Y o ��»» No 11�J ��36 A ry 1 rYt t�T L±i++ 1ylt Y1 T iie ail. 1 .e;15ec ul: s'd pi�'1 7.isG t'ti`artsiaor, °..� .,, � ( •I.x Ci• .. not: ':ava.il'able. � 5��1.FDLSs '�'he 'Thermal.ito Elementary School District advises at foL w 1, loci 2z w t. • .e tract to the nearest ele The ai`stance from the farthest lot i.n L -lx menta'ry school �tSiGtr��Vehl )f is 4.',0 theetracteto the. nea '... route. The di., rade school (�xe1so`n .venue) i 5. a .mil.cs 'by the,,' est '71,. and 8 tlx grade , closest ex sting l School bus transportation is available to each of the,aEorem'ention- ed sthoolsy at public expanse. The Bigg s Elementary and High Schools are eleven (l'l) miles south- r west of ;your tract. Rich.vale Elementary is eleven miles to fixe nortlrw.e1t• The bulk of the tract appears to be within the Biggs it within the UnifiedDistric(K--12) �n 'nd a small portioof t Thet,,ta'1;%L-IN Elementary 'School District (K-8) four miles distant. Schao] Pius transportation is available upon Board approval at dis- It ,vould appear anminimum rtat onf 26 tcostsaforut en— trict r�apense. ? pp the neta able t) -,ie district to break even o st,oderits 7.9.ocated in your tract, . t. The Oroville Union High School District advises as tollo�ts Parcel l5 would be serviced! by the Oroville Union High School Unified School District. Distric.,t, Parc e.t ?0 the Biggs Union Eiwgl School District and provide education frort tile is available to ninth tla,: a1Yt 't ne 1Welfth •grads. ; which is more 13us service than ttvo miles from the 'school ,, , ,,,' any &yea to attend. 13us service is provided without thedsturieljt s ar(,. asked dThis tract is approximately 7 males frotri cost to th+ °stu.I;-ts . ore fii lle lUgh Sty, `01 t`l0'T ;chis Sr;hool kf"t 3rmatiott t'tas correct as of the elate �,E t`<l i�. 4pbtt. purchasors may contact aocal school di'striot for current infor-- matiot, or, :school as ignmentsr facilities and l,us S e'r %Ki cf pot further In ormat on 1h regard to this 8uj)djvj'bX1,ono You MY call. t8 at thd dtftAe (�J6) 3Z�--2'8:0,5 or LIMA oriL Ftosd °Suiteo25t0 h5acratt�o.utol)eG rt 5 of . E�al 4s'tatep 403 a s. [; rage 4 of 4 17age,s pile .too. i G X56 LA y tip J stnp A-4 i tom'• t A + Orw�tic, �+toi►it 't I EklInIT rV, The project site has a gently rolling terrain with ail elevation differential of 50 feet, The soil is structural-ly stable and non-expansiVe. The upper 21 consists predominantly of "Rocklin fide sandy loamii with iav spersing areas 'of '4'ki;mball T.oam'" and "Redding gravelly ` sandy loam''. Lower levels encounter cemented gravel, clay and "hard panel. Plants consist of local weeds and wild grasses. No trees exist except for a few at an old ;abandoned home site (see Exhibit N for Botanical survey).. There seem to be no significant culturdl, historical or scenir ar. p project site, or surrounding properties; the as ects to ,,, The probable 'use of tits parcels will be for single family residences with agricultural involvements;. EXHIBIT iiC" r' The surrowiding propetty 1:8 of the same general: description as the sub,j:ect parcel. It is all of an :agricultural or non -,use ;, nature with no residential or business structures dxtstl g. ^ 0 l�urch� 1980 Earl Nelson vi xatuttcni,al Rev"," county 18-? County Center DrANo 'Oxov.11e� �� X556 �y ,vJ 1 subject% B teal cal Survey & .),mrbaY Estates ljauch Parcel " ap A.p. 30-26-413 and A.1'� 30-25-15&20 bear Mr. 2lelson z oerty 'ajaa the results a second visioL to the subject p "'' initial, habitat This letter concern inY too st dratnagUS WId pools which had h ly r�P of n rare 'plant search X cc tiducted. Aa preti" sus 5 >' ted m analysis revealed several veXIIB"Y ,s rare -and ,endangered plantsb ThL pontt:ntial to Support two of Butte County were Limnanthus° tloceosa s.� calfnrrca tartd Orcta't�ia tngist dxo.'E•na8en J Oh the 2tl of Larch x Condo cted s search ot: 't le sevcral vernally yes iot s -in `. :,for �,rhabi as RVailable o n the pro,, on the subject property r the rare' Li�tt�t�'t1�us..A.l�thou�� tlii sp'eciea s to Hoer at this tithe and t1le proper no ,j et at, uals were °zoen. I made a ot:ct�nd l oil 'to tkic ;mall "vernal pool on ;lie prop. poria», this survey , 4tttntial to support Oxy ci_ itti eneLd e;:ty and k1MY feel n reei131uat3nn �, P,rt�rnal pool. wtxs early %n Jf�uary. �e.caus original Visit to i �Sr",e58 th,a is bccess rY- iy, ort Orctitt h in floe saa$ata it was da,°«i'ilcu�.t to aderiut�te].y it was so etnr y ra'aing ur d the eal. ty' of the pool to sulip ..------- j decree of ittip'act fr,cm reen.e I3nv� tli:�t X have :st:en t1�e pba� at It2 crelatter date i do not considex it posaiblt far Orcti.att''r� r.G c o oc,c_ r Of the proposed Asa result of ttty zo Marcl, survey 1 can ,gee no 'posribilty 66. Cou�tt'Y t y xare at,d entIsn&e�°cd plants . and project impsCain g any -a£ 13titte w Juno. if there Ore any 9uest". not fotl shy need for an, adda.t oi7:tl .yurv' y ions please Leel free to call hies -ly l . 5nccre es +7okerst Conoultint� Botanist w w P a A . rt -r-s, PLANNING COMM I5SI ON 7 COUNTY CENTER biilVE w O OVILLE, tALIFORNlA 95465 PHONE. 53b•460i I7ccember 13, 11)82 Robert DIS 1-iuskey 3656 111.1la'le Ilvenue Orovil.lc, CA 98065 RC setter received Docem'ber 6, 1082 concerning seven tentative parcel maps (Afterha;y Cstat.es) Dear Bob we ;arc unable to comply witli your request to sc oduld an OR appeal hearing with the Advi,,sory Agcmcy roe the tentative "maps or biotite Gabviclsoti, mal, Gabri.olson, Stephcn Anderson, 1Robor't Beever, Uua'd Millet, Marvin 13ushooll. and JUd th CO)IMA The reasons at'c as roll.ows 1, As indicated in pariigralali '3 of page i of the attached copy oC ti Letter to Stophcn Ancleyson datod 0ccombee 8, ,... , a written appeal to the retlui rement for an SSR w nust be filod witty tho Coonty within 15 days from the date of the letter of determination. The 15 day period expired on Oocclnbot' 23, 1980. rhe butte County bnviron- mental RdViLcw huidulinc.s, as roviscd May 0, 1978 and - August A, 1081 by Resolutibn $1.182, s'1aec.ifi" the above-not'od apps -al pi•ocodui.c. 2. A subscgoent tetter was sent to all of the applicants it t1i copi;c8 tri you o,n October 2'1, 1981. expl nini.ng that the IM rcquiretttent Was still valid. The Lettbr-S wore sent due to tic w i tlid rawal or tl�o rozono appl kation by )'1ri1, Rauch wit:lch would have rozoticyd Artbrbay hstntc froth A-2 to AR -MI -1-1, 1t was expected that an hR would be forthc.omilig for the rezone applboation of Mr, Rauch Since he withdrew the project, tho letter;; served as notification of that ra.ot tincl spcll,rd out the 'time re= mai"r►ltrl; to subiji.t ati 1,111 rot, the subioct parcol Intips Ile did not rocoi.vt a written responsr, to thy of the letters, Robert M. Husk vv Pago 2?1 Decembev 15, V"J� } s. lactters t,+� re stilt taut on Nifty ;i, 1982 by the Tk+partin'e'nt oC' i P111)1.1,c 110rks :i nnu 1 vIq, about the status or tho tentat'ivr Maps , No response was received Withinthe to day pei tod running through May13, 1982, Robert licovcr dill send a lottoil r On September ', .1982 re(lucsting 1118 Wlixati,on be reactivated. nQdnUisparcel ati)le wo the forap dIsooponupPabanrrcomendreapplying and project procossing., in L110 event the Planning Department s holds to the recommendation for an tlkl Based p'rinlar•ily o'n potential aircraft hazards and rl0i5e levels, an appeal could then be made, within lS days from the date of the not;irication letter, to the: Advisory Agoncy. Their decision on an MA appeal, is now appealable to he hoard or Supervisors. If turthcr info-tmatib-n i,s neceled, please contact our, office. � ,I Sincerely, fir. i tbphcn A, St cater, r Sci�a.or l?1nnn.er ,SAS t lkt At`tachttreht ; cc John lclenclonsa, Public Woi'1C5 piles of! m, Gabrit lson 1, 11, 0 ab r i o 1. s oat Tiff}� R,, Keever t D,'I I11.ct Df, 13u:;hnol.I { ,1 , Cohe7t (i a _. _ { bEMrIiBLR ~ y �9 t 1: , 82 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DEPT. ATTN: STtVE S'IRhtTtR 7 COUNTY CENTFR DRIVE � OROVILLE, CALIF. 95967 RE AFTtRBAY' lSTATES sT-VE , AS LNGINELR FOR THE FOLLOWING VROJECTS, I WrSH TO APPEAL THE PLANNING DEPARTIVaNT REQUIRMENT FOR AN hIR. 'PILASE SET THIS FOR ADVISORY AGENCY HLARING AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. APPLICANTS; RhVtHhNGE: hRD LOG 80-10-23-04 MONTE GABRIALSON j HAL GARRIALSCN' ✓'STtPHFN ANDxi'ASON RORMT ML VER DUARD 1 ILIET MARVIN BUSHrMTjL J UDITH CORE 14 R REkT (. HUSKEY CC JOHN AbNDONZA AL SARACTNI i � oma D� 19t2 h � 4 Inger-Departrn nt, emnrandora TO Karl Nelson FpfCME Charlie Woods SUBAt;ri Planning Issues in the Oro -trill 0 Airport Area. DATE: December 26, 1980 I discussed your memo with Bettye. This'same issue has come to our attention through conversations with Public Works and a:letter from the City Administrator. We cannot, at this time, speak to the Specific proposals outlizred in your memo of December 2; , 1980: It is the Department's view that such issues require a more comprehensive, long range e-)camination before spa- cific zoning, easements and other requirements are im- posed. In particular, the City of Oroville should be „( involved to more fully articulate their future plans j _ for their airport, much like the bity of Chico and cthe � Chico Airport. Without the City ofOroville'8 parti- . La such a study, Butte County Will be forced f:hese issues on a piece meal basis, 'never : quite cry'ta<u.x� that these measures will in the long run be effect r�:w result, the epat ment is M ;a ylanning Die Air ini.tiatin a �b � ro-u s stud � - i port jointly with the u�+.� r obi ^rotrille., This study should provide both jurisdiot,"L6 , �d h sufficient infor- mation to mini mize the land use t;,tnf1. cts;and protect the public health and. safety. it may also require a moratorium or interim regulations to .presetvt� t!1FS status quo during the hiatus.: Attf-,,ned. is a co of ;Rett e s letter on this suhjct. copy y Attachment r.. - w..r+s.., n:r. s. 1. ... •....,... . ... . w . ...ci«+«..n......+yu.F� Ywwiwr+n ,.--.., r...erw ,w._ r.M.ri "w IMS Lw •yu,yL,� . y. 1 Inter-nepadmefital Meftro du Toi Charlie Woods Okdmt Earl 'Nelson sueEcT: Esnvironmeital Findings for Ytac}i Xtexone eA�tF:becetuber 220 h980 V T}tis- :is to confirm our telephone conversation regarding the above referenced matter. As I indicated aver the phone; this office reaUlre'd all MA for Mr. Rauch's original application for AR-Dt}�-1 zoning for Afterb"ay hstates, located just south o Oroville Airport: Our determination was based primarily on objections from the 'City de elopmele and pilots regarding airport campati.bility o£ dense development in the airport vicinity, specifically "the direct flight "path of the only local runway that will 'accommodate corporate jet`s. Tn out opinion one -acre, parce'ls are extremely dense given potential problems with noise and safety Of 'pl'anes miss the ai;t'strip or hAVLI to abort on take=off) On Thursday, December 18, 1980, I met with r}r. Rauch''t r:ptese».tat Ve, Mike Glaxo of Cook Associates, and officials from t}9'a Ci C' of Oroville including -Dave ;linkens, the Cite AdministrItor, Charles Lueder, the City Attorney, and Cl if Sellers, the City's Ettvirort- Snental coordinator. The City's represen natives „indicated their objections would be sat;isf4o'd if 'they received from Mt-- Rauch (or 'his successors in interest) the following; 1 Noise easements: 2, Avi at ion' 1 easements limiting the' heights of obstructions in the" flight pati: 4w nt to undergroiand utilities. 3: A commz.t me 4. Establishment of' 'an open strip 15'u.feet Hide crossing Aft�:rbay Estates in line with the center 'of the 'ruiitvay as shown on the attached map, toned to preclude de"velopment of structures., although uses such as farming would be- permitted. epermitted. 5 Density limitation on the balance of the development, As long ;ts item 4 above is take11a cre Of, 2� nerds seemed to be an aceopt.ible aeilsity to thoso present. 5peeaking for the l ytvironmentat govi.ew Dnp i:ttmeitt, true iitditate . to ld 11r G1a�:e that if items 4 and 5 coulthe"�12ezone n}�p1 catiaiii.oiiItems 1 y d a NegatIV6 'Declaration on recommen . g seem to be more applicable to sul�soquont parcel map's than raurezone, There ate a number of Marcel maps pending i�ihich probably should be processed subsee uant to 'resolUt].0 of the toning . ` ,+ _ Charlie Woods page 2 Ikecember 22► 1089 s8tie, sitice the Plnrining CominiSslon or Board may wish (thl;neigh to allairport: zoning) to Ca°°'*�..blish-07,7,parcel Sites tllis close zoning, 1 see no prob- Once the density' issue Ls re`sol"ved t}lrotth but until Iem with a libmltive declaration for the paA'cel maps, 1 ed l4e do 11:6t. �A resdisizesthat 1beiing15reatel�Jou]d '+ 1 �� b e con. xdered�latllsign f?icanthadVersel environmental effect" by the pldithing COmm1.ssion and Board of Supervis'o�rs. � You will be contacted by Mike Glaze, 14110 intends to `"submit .a Rauch. T. am hopeftal modified zoning request oil behalf of her. you and lie can Work out the-appropritate mitigative zoning, ,that so this "somewhat tenuous comprotn'ise can be accomplished for the benefit of all concerned, t l swill be on vacution until December if you '►Dave quest �:o;n- between now and then, please direct them to: Mikb Glaze, wave Jlnkens and/or Ilan: Mackstock. Dick Molcar is alsosomewhat familiar `1�ith the project, alghough lie t�as not present at the December 18 meeting. F Sincere-ly, para 1�'. Ne1,�;on RnVirdnMental Reviely Director EbN:1mG 4 YY 1 a, b v J rteic �tiicr�•ru:+� ._ scrx cottr�'er 1 caeo��rt� 7cT . A/Fi PoRT , P�so 76 4 vat( .• e i�xG'''.�QIJd""�'�Co G F' Erb' �f'"C•1=d �' GOR�t/E,Q p 45 f�1.4GEL A Za� .Y 12. de •(' fri✓U 6'� x ?rl'�CGiWG, GGL'e ?t fti I tJ�''�� `� j55; 988. 741 1' ".E'G 1' � r''�',c'CEG ✓ �' ��: , J�?�JRCE'G K a ��' `� .�?G�L � p �., - r<'CEG � �`� Frd -�, ✓��' AY-',, b 11,04 Al & 914 A- i 'e '^ r � a � �✓,.,',.�w��k�"� n���i�tVCS�y � ��`'¢l��'/� /.%�'10 ,� ���Il+,f ��. ��i�, � " � � t�*•,� 40 "�2a e�4vV46' eb - A5y e>r%`4t r% � 4 �l3°'��.,.. � �,.�' .��"'�it4r� f::�Cf."�' � ... `Cak>O�i�rs'I. �L - ` C�i�ck,riG'r✓#° .�� rJD�'�;t� I���r Yy� i�`•�• �,�4'�� },r�`7�"�r�i v�.C.v'1' . ,Y�` ��� �A'�J �w�!'�1�, ��J �r{ �� = y ��, �. 475'ilYts :i�Tr�rJ A?e5- � 7e7 t'9 i �'r tt �ii'Ylr�Wli'�" ,"✓KfiS' r4' r .., ""`Y` � �' d waw•"' �,} Cl .f ler5 j f for y 'Lstates Ca"villc' � X70: fo � 80�c rro'f >aeceex a Ci.y of to f '►75 rtontomex'-,� ut,. p_,..-0 02 0roti*ilit:I Q 95965 J Ly -ax' Cil yy.. Mahe City and County plc Vcln r� nt 'pxeaUuxes Pre ,x l ,� vc.lvin lend UOe to mAko some definitivc c:cc a' n�. around .�„he Cxo�vil.le 1►x� pori. w� , olint�y's�Genraral llan cuxz�enf+ �` does not x�Sl e e ' %' sy' 0 plsn foie whe a.ir-� posy`. I %oiild Eike to c_ r " inaf;roucii a.� the City is note: �aox'F Ing itn coni c"zon '� the de)uni;,y 1 Lannin;M Department on.- the "Oro ri 11 e t all General Ilan, glint ho { City tight vt�.oh rc� �' I�. jos lbilit es Of ,a rlannan I'L'nt tns' v11C CI' e 1 "i ��]`C?chi This Could �rov,.dF. funds for c c�pl . on a an ltiixpbr�� .n� irons l•lati trh; ch �;ould�sect�ena.'igu�ide . or o�ebo-til the Cid` and Coun�y in the deli siO � You r�:r retell that a Chico 'airport Lnvirdn atUdy Wes s ,e 1,LEned with a ��rant; of 33,E+8C.00 Prot TAA, the P 20,00, being born, by th^ xom:�iudbr of the cost, j�? cityof Chaco and the County of Hutto to finsnco �h�? I Study. �ht subgequeiit Genera]. Flan Arwndm6t t and spO ci.fic x,oiiings -volved-It cf froth this :lady. i 1"-- n dpov.11,ti 1 ,he need f or oti Vin" � ount,porobalt b or,ebo pili« of both the C� Ly of Ch�.co atici:the "y Out only Optor e private vl iplica�.' pan for iutenc�if� tzcl Arid use in the cloee proximoy tothe ct� ti ocn Apra e' po J Wao on f-li t-, by the Coun fid' tot oof th chic glen ate ��,,dc��tl�rstedi„hetir�ty�re��ement of i,he Uhico Rixpbrt C. quickly as possible» 1 1790 MONTGOMERY OTREET ORpi7ILL5c', CALIFORNIA 95965 ..AREA eOOE 616 eao.eee Butte Co. Picnning Cgmry . UEG 91no OroVillp� California December 8i 1980 Ms, Bettye Blair, Director Butte County Planning Department 7 County Centex, Drive Oroville, California 95965 RE, After Bay Estates (AP Nos. 30-20-0-015,,020) Dear Ms. Blair; 'The City of Oroville is greatly concerned about the further division of lands at the referenced site. The site is m►nediately adjacent to the Oroville Municipal Airport t south boAndary and beneath the flight apprtach pattern for runway 1-19 (northeast/southwest). this runway has a length of 5,935 feet and is suitable for utilizati n by ;jet and transport aircraft, The runway it -3 structurally sound and was inspected by the FAA within the past :six months. Improvements to the runway, including asphalt overlay and VASI lighting, are included on Cal Trams and BCAG ttans portation improvement plans. Application to the FAA ha been made to .fund n: portion of these improvements. ,.- Clear zones for this runway are delineated on airport maps including master plan, improvement and layout maps. Aviga- tion easements for a portion of the clear zone on the northerly end ,of runway 1-19 have already beoh obtained (copy of deed enclosed). The City is concerned that land diVi,, ons in After Bay Estates could lead to levels find types of development which would severly jepordize future airport utilization and possible Wkpansion, Decisions involving land divisions ,and zoning in this area shoUl.d include ,consideration of ,.:die immediate and eventual r a+. Duitb t�or isic'�ning Comm. + .. •vArl.. _Y716 MbiJTGOM6HY SI'iiEF7 ORbVILLC+ CALIFORNIA 959 5 AREA cabs oie. eafl.bflst, December 8, 1080 .i r; Mr. Earl Nelson County of Butte Environmental 80,0,1 1 llepartmeint 18Fcounty Center Drive orovill.e,, California 959:65 RE: After 'Bay Estates (AP Nos. 30-390-015,, 020) Dear'Mr. Nelson; This of flee has received several tentative 'parcel maps for the further divisior> of the After:Bay Estates: it is un'&r stood that the record of survey ,.merely a confirmation ana identification of an existing subdivision, vas not subject `to environmental review. However:, subsequent para el maps, ,are subject to environmental revieNv and due to the high ,pot'e:ltia'1 for :cun;ulative impact's feirl it is appropriate' to require the prepi,�,v� itton of an Environmental 1mpa.ct Pteport. Amonxr 'thosir, impacts whit have th.e :pot,entinl' ,for cumulative impa:'cts are; 1. The impact :of airport related liaise and overflight r on residential. :development, 2. Restriction off tutedeveport :use a:rtd expansion by adj ac lopcnent . 3+ Impact of .overhead utii.11ty lines on airport .safety. 4. Impact of residential lighting on aizport runway li.ghtiWg and identif-Leatian„ Substantia niterations '.o .utility systems. G; t<laintenance of p'ubli'c fairilities, ;parlizul:l-ly roads and dVaina.ge+