Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout030-350-102t, - S _ 1 4 90.. , � � � : h r ... ^, 1 6` I� � �n � ,, • t _ •i- .. a y1' "o R q7W i i Y . y Y �i f 'v PLANNING COMgISSI-- SUMMARY SHEET FOR LAND DIVISIONS APPLICANT Ruth Stanton Log#86-09-05-02 ADDRESS ve.nue, P.O. Box 282, Oroville, CA 95965 OWNER Same. ,PROJECT DESCRIPTION TPAs to divide z.0 acres to create 2 --- ,...� parcels, both 116. Ol x 355.46 each LOCATION on the north side Feather Avenue a �.PProximately 300 feet west of 12th Street, Orov lle. ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER(S) 30-35-102 ZONING A-R .�.'.�.._,. ,� GENERAL PLAN Low Density PROJECT CONSISTENT? GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE REPORT -GSIen la -.. DATE OP APPLICANT SIGNATURE LAND CONSERVATION ACT CONTRACTS? DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED SePtember 5 1986 AGENT/SURVEYOR/CIVIL ENGINEER; Michael Mooney W) Lit►-� Y � - _ �. _. _L .... ADDRESSOrovilley CA 95965 DATE PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT PREPARED ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION - .CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION - DATE FILED AND DATE _... NEGATIVE, DECLARATION - DATt ADOPTED - - MITIGA"J BD NEC. DECLARATION )ATE ADOPTED ENV, IMPACT REPORT — DATE C:.RRTTVj x;D STATE „ry p p A yy q ^vUSL, No SUB, COMMITTEE MUTING DAj'E AbVI80,RY AGENCX REAPING DATE c�e � ADVISOR' AGENCY ACTION J APPEALED APR IAL IIBAR.IG DATA; BOARD ACTION COMMENTS VOR PLANNING DIRECTOR18 REPORT ��� �....�.��41:�;,�-* � .,,,,�`�L.�W...�..�. .- a w�^+,•� � r14011 (CE, 0 -J" Office: Of Kanning and Reso iGh County 40 1400 Tenth Street, Room 1211 Mli.ttjlj.illg Department Sacramento, CA 958V4 or 7 CQUIlty Center Drive 000Villeo CA 95965 XX County Clerk County of Butte Ll ZYAINIOR M. BECKER, Cour6y Clerk Deputy SuBaJECX: Piling of Noo f tice of Delermination in complianno with S or 21152 the Public Resources Code, ection 21108 Project Title - AP _// Tentative Parcel Map 30-85-102 -',)r-aCe Clearinghouse Numb er (if submitted to Clearinghouse) Contact rson RU'Lh Stanton Telephonr� aohn Menaohsat Public Works (916)534-4266 Project Location On the north side Of reather Avenue ai 300 feet west of 12th Streeti OrOvlllPPrOxmcitely e. I Project Description Tentative Parcel map to div 2 parcelso both 116.01 x 855.46 each. divide 2.0 acres to create This is to advise that the I�Ut-re County Advisory 0 r �YA ge n cy has approved the above-described (Lead Agency or Responsible Agency) project on 12-8-86 1 and has made �ate the following detarminations regarding the above-descriDbed) project: The Project _yill, will not, havo a environment, significant; effect on the 2, _ An Environmental 1plpact Ropol.t Prepared for this project Pursuant Lo the Provisions of CEQA, A Negative neclatation was pr PrOvisiOns of CgQA4 8parod for this Project Pursuant to the 3, hIitigation measures ,.twt'rf,, _yere not, made a condition of the approval Of the J)ro,J_e7c, 4- A Statement Of ok'arviding considerations for this project, �_�_was, -.4—wa8 not, adopted This is to certify that the final tUR with comments and responses And record of Pro-Jbct Approval is available to the general public at; AU'LLa County Planning Department 7 Couoty Center Drive CA 95965 Date Received fol, -V1114 and Posting at OPI! 29- 6tePheh A, Streeter Sohior planner kovited HOfth 1986 Mitiga,.ion Measure TPM, AP*30-35-102 Ruth Stanton 1. Pay $25.00 Per 7.ot into the Thermalito traffic signal fund. C!,R"TT.FIED MAIL ;. . t� alt lylfr, ,1f 1.ti�4t19 i4 FMall ! _i p ,4 DERAh.Th1ENT OF PUBLIC WORKS WILLIAM (Bill) CF18FF, blreclor 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE . OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 25965 Telephoner (916) $34,4681 {r"plorl. RONALD D. McEI.ROY �Q r�+o.Unflil1� Deputy Director orogae, CaVioT015 December 9, 1986 Ruth Stanton RE: AP 30-35-102 P. 0. Box 282 Oroville, CA 95965 TPM Dear Ms. Stanton; At the regular meeting of the Butte County Advisory Agency held on December 8, 1986, the agenny granted a mitigated negative declaration of environmental impact and approved your tentative parcel map on the above -referenced property subject to the conditions of approval listed on the attached sheet. If no appeals are timely filed --within ten (10) days of the state of the Advisory Agency's approval. --with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, this action will be final. When the conditions of approval sire complied with, it will be in ordor for you to file your 'Ifi;nal map" with the Butte County De-artmen't of Public Works for retardation withiii twenty-four (24) "It iths of the date of approval by the Advisory Agency, If you have any quostiofls regarding this matter, please contact this officer Very truly yours, William Choff Director of Public Works Jo i i Ll As isLaiit pii-r, clot JM/d cc; ` Planning 'Departmont I;nVIronmental fleal.th Department Mike Mooney Ruth Hazel Stanton, Tentative Parcel .*p, AP 30--35-102, 2 parcels on t`1e north side of Feather. Avenue approx. 300 ft. west of 12th St. Thermalito area. Engineer: Mike Mooney Public Works conditions: 1. Frontage on. Feather Avenue to be constructed to RS-'9-LD-.TI standard, i.e., curb, gutter, sidewalk and required street section for parcels with gross acreage of one acre or less. Submit drainage plans to the Department of Public Works for approval and install. required facilities. 2 Deed to the County of Butte 30 ft. right--of=way from the centerline of Feather Avenue. 3 Indicate a 50 ft. building setback from the centerline of Feather, Avenue. 4 Show all easements of record on the final map; 5 Provide permanent solution for drainage. Pay Thermalito Drainage District Fees. h Pay off any assessments, 7 Obtain encroachment permit for all driveways, new or existing, and construct to county standards, 8 Pay any delinquent taxes or current taxes as required. 9 Meet the requirements of the Butte County Fire Department. Health Dept. condztionst 10 Provide a letter or other documentation from the Thermalito Irrigation District stating that they are willing and able to supply domestic water to parcels 1 and 2. 11 Provide a letter or other documentation From the Thermalito IrrigationDistrict stating that they are willing and able to supply sewer service to parcels 1 and 2. 12 Place a note tin the map that states "development of 'parcels 1 and 2 will require connection to a public ;unitary sewer," 13 Place a note on the ,nap that states "Jlevelopment of p7icels 1 and 2. will require connection to a public water supply," The following mitigation is required! 14 Pay $25.00 per lot into t,heThormali.to traffic sigrm'L Lund: Inter -Departmental Memorandum TO: Butte County Advisor: Agency PROM: Planning Director SUBJECT! REPORT ON TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP OF RUTH STANTON ON AP 30-35-102 DATE! October 28, 1986 This is a proposal to divide 2 acres into tWo.arcol of 116. x 355.46 feet. The present zoning is A -R. The Lands sUse Plan01 Map of the Butte County General Plan designates this area as Low Density Residential. There are no specific or community Plats for the area. The proposal does not conflict with County zoning nor any adopted or proposed element of the Butte County General Plan nor any County, specific Or community plan. Recommend approval subject to the following mitigation measure. I. Pay $25.00 per lot into the Thermalito traffic signal fund. LMT/sj Ce: Ruth Stanton Michael Mooney 0 AfIl'T?Ni11. X 1? COUNTY (ala 13U`1'Th BNVIROWriNTAh ClUPTICIAST I1ORNI (to be completed .f.cnt;ency) ],09 It 86-09-05--02 1. BACKGROUND AIS It 30-35-102 I. Name of proponent Ruth Stanton 2, Address of proponent and representative (if applicable) Ruth Stanton __..._-Michael Moane_y _ 1250 Feather Avenue 600 Bird Street orov iie, CA 95965 Oroyille, CA 95965 ;3i tali , .pro j cart description io Te -n � ve Parcel. Map , Ti. >IANDATOIZY FINDINGS or, SIGNfPICANCE YJ'S NAYBI-i NO a, aloes the project have the potential to degrade +heti quality of the environment, substantially roduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, catise a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- subtai.n .nb levels, ti-reaten to eliminate n plant or ani111a1 community, reduce the 11LIMber or restrict tate range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the mitjor periods of Cali foi•nia history or vrehistory" b, noes the project have the potential to achieve short-term benet"it; to the detriment of.' long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact ail the environment Is one which occurs in a relatively brief period or time white loth-terill impacts will endure into the future,)- c: Does tile project have impacts which aro ind.ivlc111- ally I united, btit c;ilmuLat.ii oly cons idernblc? (A projhct may impact oil two or more separate resources ivhe.c they impact oil each resourco is relatively small, belt whero the effect Of the total of those impacts oil tho otivironnlent is signll'icant,) -rte cI. iovs tite pl-clIv t have onvironmentol ol'I'e is which witt eats~ suhs'ttmtial adverse erroc•ts oil hom n beings, rithei• directly or indirectly? i'iI. 11I1,r1•R011NATt0N ('lit) lab k-ompletod 1)�- t1lo I-vn,l Agency) (in the basis of, this: initial (-valuntlont I/Wl, t'ind tht propo';e l (MUH) NOT il,tvv a !,igTli i'k-nI t O'loct On thv and a Ni'(iATfVI: UIJIAIIATION will bh prrp;ived. l�hl. f'inll that tlitilough thc1lrupashcl i1r17,ihct 1•lrlalcl have .i Clint ul(,oct oil t"hv i:` ilvii•[lnlllont, thereWill not be a signil'icant et'ror:t in tills t ose hocatlse the HITIGATI0N deserihod on the attached sht,vt have heed addrel to thlr 1ar,rjc c t. A Nl,l(lATlVI" DIA, LA10TI ON is i l l be '11 vvjitr 1'vd . I/Wli rind thlt 1)x111 *sod 11voioc•t NIA) lin vv a sIgnII"l(-ant C,rfee t 01 the v-11N i i x11111 alt , ,111k1 an I:Nt I RONPilN'IAL Tlcil'ACT 131:11111+"i' lis rcclu i red i1AT11c October 1-,, 1586 (ViN'I`1 01' Itii'111?, !i,ANNlNG Illil'At3TNIriNT Laura ' ut 1e Associate Planner Re i owtici by t r ` IV. ENVIRONMENTAL 'IMPACTS � eS�� and ,maybe" answers are -required -61-all Y xp anatx.ons attached sheet(s). YRS MA. E� NO on �. EARTH: Will the proposal result in significant; or in changes in a�. Unstable earth conditions substructures? geologic compaction or b. Disruptions, displacements, . overcovering of the soil? in topography or ground surface Change c. Chang.. relief features? or modification of any d: Destruction, cover�no features? - unique geologic or physical in wind or water erosion Of Soils, V V e. increase either on or off-site? in deposition or erosion of beach f. Changes deposition S, or changes in siltat5.or,, C nel or erosion stream ohich r theibedthe of thenoceanfor a river o any bay; inlet or lake? productive soils agriculturally ---- _ g. Loss of prime outside designated urban areas? Qologic to g- h. Exp�yure of people or property haza-rds- such as earthquakes : landslides , mud- hazards? slides, ground failure or sImIlav 2 ATR. Will the proposal result in substantial. deterioration of ambient a, Air emissions or —N air quality? The creation of objectionable odors, smoke b: or fumes? c. Alteration ofoaira movementchange)inticlimatejor temperature s y locally or regionally? 3. NATER. Will the proposal r�e ultcit substantial Changes in currents, ©1 direction of water' movements in either marine or fresh waters? dvainage patterns, Changes in absorption rates, b. the rate and amount of surface runoff'? Need for off-site surface drainage improve channel-- C. vegetation removal., trtents , including b installation izatioxi or culvert to the course or flow of flood d, ,alterations waters?--- Change in the amount of surface water in any e, vtater body?any f: Discharge into surface waters, or in including quality; alteration of surface water limited to temperatiate, dissolved but not 0:KY$01k► or turbidity? .... or rate of flow Alteration of the dir4ctlo gi of ground watexs? utility of rdUnd vaterse in the quantity or � thy h l Clla.nge ,ons or wi either through laiTec add."cept1on of an through,.. drawal,s,or aquifer by cuts or excavations? of �vater otherwise i. Reduction in the amount available for public water supe to water j, Exposure of people or prulpeo related hazards such as l:looding? - L YES MAYBE No 4, PLANT LIFE, Will the proposal result in substantial; a. Change in the diversity of species, or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)? b. Reduction of the numbers of an), unique, rare or endangered species of plants? x c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenish- ment of existing species? d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? S. ANIMAL LIFE, Will the proposal result in substantial: a. C ante in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shell. fish, benthic organisms or insects)? b. Reduction in the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? c Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? d, Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? 6. NOISE. Will the proposal result in substantial,, a, Increases in existing noise levels? b. Exposure of peopl.,, to severe noise levels? 7. LIGHT AND GLARE, Will the proposal produce sibnillcaplight and glare? S. LAND USE. Will the proposal result in d substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? 9. NATURAL RESOURCES: :l Will the proposal result in Kiba. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? b. Depletion of any non-renewable natural. resources? 10, RISK OF UPSET. Will the proposal involve, a, A 'rls ' or explosion or the release of hazard- ous substances (including, but not limited to, Oil) pesticides, Chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset Conditions? b, Possible interforence with an omergency response plan or emergency evacuac.ion plan.? ll, POPULATION,, Will the proposal alter the locatic)n, irtBa on, density, ,)r growth rate of the human population? l7,-, HOUSING. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? r , ��W Ila Loa YES MAYBE NO 13. TRANSPORTATION,/CIRCULATION. Will tho proposal result ini a. Generation of substantial additional vehicle C movement? b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new park:Lng? c. Substantial impact on existing transportation systems?. d. Significant alterations to present patteTns of circulatiop or movement of people andlor goods? e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? f, Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, ' bicyclists or pedestrians? 14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for now or altered governmental: services: a, Fire protection? b. Police protection'. ... C. Schools? d. Parks or other xecrea-tional facilities? e, Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? �• f. Other governmental„ services? 15, ENERGY, Will the proposal result in: h.: UUse of substantial amounts of fuel ,czr energy? b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? —�- 16,. UTILITIES. Will 'the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following: a. Power or natural gas? b. Communications systems? c. Water ,gra :.I ab:1 ; ty d. Sewer or septic tank: M e; Storm water drainage'? f. Solid waste and disposal? 17, HUMAN HEALTH. Will the proposal result in: a, creation of any health hazard or potent, health. hazard (excludingmental. health)? b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? 18, AESTHETICS, 111,11 the proposal. 'result in the o struct on of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or %,ill the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site o'pep. to public vie10 Loa YES MAYBE No 19. RECREATION. Will the proposa;. s* Isult: in an impact upon the quality or quantity o,,-Xisting recreational opportunities? 20.. CULTURAL RESOURCES. a. Will tFi'e proposal result in the alteration of or the d.e�,ti-uction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site's` b. will the prop al result in adverse phys4cal or aesthetic ei-Fects to a Prehistoric or historic building, structure or object; c. Does the proposal have the potential tocause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious Or sacred uses within the potential impact area? V. DISCUSSION OP ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION C DISMSION OF EHVIRQNH9N1' AL-EY-AmumnioN 0 AP 30-36-102 1b.9 Division of the Property into 2 lots Will allow the construction of 1 additional homesitej Overcovoring of the soil surfa(to is estimated at less than 3000 squaria- feet. In the event Lot 2 should further divide, ultimate overcovering is estimated at 8500 square feet' an insignificant amount for an urban area. le.: Soils on site are Redding 3ravelly sandy loam with a moderate erosionpotential.poltential. Given the lot size and level terrain, eronion should be m 3b,c.: Thermalito Is characterized by Inadequate drainage structures, 10call-'ed ponding during heavy storms is a common event. Drainage fees of aPPtloximately $450.00 per acre will be assessed to contribute to the improvement of area wide drainage structures. 4ai., 1mprovement of Feather Avenue and installation of curb, gutter and sidewalk may remove two street trees now in the right-of-way. 8-t The Butte County General Plan designates this Property as Low Density Residential, The zoning is A -R. Up to 6 dwelling units per acre can be constructedDivision as proposed will not fy::ilitate the u2tim6te development of the property. 13a.9 Traffic generationpotential is estimated at 10 vehicle trips per parcel per day. Widening of Feather Avenue at p-,-Ojo- ._ct frontagep and IhstallAtiorl of curb) gutter and sidewalk will offset local traffic increases. i8f.6 The creation of additional building sites on the property Will represent an incremental increase in traffic and traffic hazards in the area. Since several Intersections Within the Thermalitb area are already impacted by heay., 4;raffit, traffic lights Will be needed In the heWll future. 14a,bjcodye�f.: Urban services are currently provided In the Thermalito I)rea. Additional development Will not result In A need for new or altered governmental i6c,d.: Community water And sewer will be extended to the property. 16e. 8tOrm Watet, facilities will be required with road Work. As noted e und V Item 3, storm dt,aihage fees will be assessed as a condition I I of Public Works., . Roq6mmbnda_tj6Dt 1- Payment Of $2.15 Pell parcel to traffic study/traffic signal fund, Ilit rnt Ruth Stanton 0 A.Beesor ° s Parcel 30-35-102 Log 4 86.•09"05,-02 A. o e t-yn p� tib ��sct. Land Division' dividing 1,69 acres to Type, of ProJ *% Tentative Parcel Map 2. Oriel Descriptionof .94 acres each. approximately 300 create 2 lots ©ether Avenue app Location' On the north Oroville unit/•9t4 acres 12 Street, dwelling feet aaecst of �f Developuaent=' 1 4 Proposed Density Less than 'ta w 00 Feather im,oun$ of Irnpesrviaus Surfacin6" Both loth fra .t 5. 6. Access and }��arest. Pudic Road(s): Aveilue » . C . S e DisPoaal- 7. 'Method of Se ng D parcel* Source of Wmtmr Supply''` original P ant Zoning 8 o f Power Lineal a devl�'� 9. prox9.mitY ,, a acre Pro"icled subdivision standards cart be 0 Patearrt3.s�. for fur�th ]Land divisions and i units to allows mets B. orrnsnta Sett3n tt Q. 9:. Terrain xa,hic Character Laval valley land* general 2% b.b. S10000% 200feetA.S.L. c.+ Eievat3.onFactara% Done d LyEnitinC ra"Ily sandy loam's ,� $oi l s Redding into a very Types and Characteristic'mto 20-26" gr�din� .. rd an a cumVact subsoil ravel iron ha... P slightly from 4_24 cbmpact lower subgoi:l with cobbles and g thickness es, poor in at 28-35'. which tarHardipan retards st�bdr�►lna b Ly,,,�a.ting Factord organic matter the Landfore,; Earth4uake Zone mile wedt of Foothill ill Shear 3. taatural �?itszarda of a. Moderate. b ^ ErOO'On potential: Ali r Low. C7 Landslide Poteunalasgified: Fireaxs�rd G "igh;r e. E,�ps,,na�ive $0�:�. rotE3i1tg.812. h. 1ydre,'logY a Ne'areat natutral drainage 1 /2 block south cross surface 4�a�teY` itg l2th 5g 'aailable. as �ater% }�istorica1lY- a b. aroundrlt�t3ca Nearest inlet is at Feather and c . Drainage Characte •• 12th Street. views~ d. Anncal lia .nfa7ll (n'OMarmalito draiaa ga e Linxi.ting r�tctotrs=. Subur'ban vid"a" 5 Vimui�l/`ioen#.c Qualit�v 6. Acoustic Quality,- Fair. 7. Air Qualitya Fair. �' "'n., kronment Grasses, u=''rl alnds:apin 8 Ve�etaticn= ri.�Yar or important habi+:at in vicinity, q:, bi3.1d7,ife ikiabitaurban development.comp'r'omised by dsnignat,c.Ojjl Low Density R�sid +r►tial. Aa•cixaeological and Sistor�,;.cgl Resaurc�s in the ��r�sx Low. 10. Genes al Plan 1 Butte County A -R. 12. Exist .rx� Zoning= Homesi.te on Lot 1 13. Existing .and Us;e on --site 14. Surrounding Area: den Cal plant at lith Str,(:et a. Land Ilees" S -F Res olive oil P and Feather Avenue - b. zoningr A -R, Low: Density Residential - c. Gen. Plan deaignations= d. Parcel. Sixes= .5-5 acres e. populationg I I S�.rburban residential area. 15. Character of Site and +rnaof Orov.11e, 1 mile east. #26, City o Clroyille C.S,A. 1 �, . dearest Urban ..Area = Y 17. galevant Spheres of Influen_e ter 2 of ie. Improvements Standards Orban A"rau� pursuant to Chap the Butte County Code. 1g. Service: mire Sj jationz 463, 1 1%2 miles eas' F Protection Service:ice= n. Neare=st County i 064, 5 m ile6 east. r, ,g ine c � 1r;c itY b. Water Availability'- �., nrie 5c1eoo7., Thermal to 26. Schools in Area,,Sierrre, e S