HomeMy WebLinkAbout030-461-012� \ . •�
� , . P: � ,
.r
� / � ' � .
0. - ... pY
LL r
• �4� �
'. l
.�i ^ �
• ' � • _ +
• � � `
r
' •� d
• y �
• � •A �
•s �
�s�
o '
'�
� �
r J
,6 V
• �
1 s ,
�+
` � 1
•i
• `
�.
n'
i ,
I
����:. •f . � �
. 1 _ y _. _tea.... _ - ._�: - ';` �� .:.� f5
�I
I tl
_ � ' • � '�
,
r.
PLANNING COMMISS7
APPLICANT Charles Carey Jr.
S
ADDRESS P.O. Box 2601, Orovil,lei _CA 95965
OWNER Same
Log#86-0421-02
PROJECT DESCRIPTION TPM to divide 0.90 acres to create 2
.- parcels.,
1 @ +--•0.25 acres and 1^� -- 9
+-x.59 acres
LOCATION two parcels on the north side of Tehama Ave, approx., 0�
west of its intersection with 20th St.,
Orovi,lle area.
ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER(S) 30-46-1-12
ZONING A R Low Density .----..
GENERAL PLAN _Resi. PROJECT CONSISTENT?
GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE REPORT"
DATE OF APPLICANT SIGNATURE
LAND CONSERVATION ACT CONTRACTS'?
DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED 4-21-8:6
AGENT/SURVEYOR/CIVIL ENGINEERI G.D.A. --
ADDRESS; 220 Grand Ave., oroville, CA 95965
DAVE PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT PREPARED
ENVIRONMENTAL,
DETERMINATION
AND DATE
_. CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION . DATE VILtb
NEGATIVE DECLARATION -
BATE ADOPTED
MITIGATED NEG. DECLARATION - DATE ADOPTEb 7p ;,
ENV IMPACT REPORT -- DATE CERTIFIED
STATE CLEARINGHOUSE No,.
SUP. COMMITTEE MEETING DATE
AN
6
r
w....
Co.
LAND OF NATURAL WIAITH AND F1EAUTy
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
WILLIAM (Bill) CHEFF, C)lr(jatot
7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE . OROVILL
Cr CALIFORNIA 95965
TelePhonet (916) R838-7268
RONALD D,MeELROY
Deputy Ditetlui
June 27, 1988
GDA,
220 Grand, Avenue RE. AP 30-461--12
Orovil.le, CA 95965 Tentative Parcel Map
Dear Gentlemen:
At the regular meeting of the Butte County Advisory Agency held on
June 271 1988, the Agency granted a time extension of 36 months in
order to file the final map on the above -referenced property. The
new date of expiration is July 14, 1991,
If no appeals are timely filed --within fifteen (15) days of the date
of the Advisory Agency's approval ---with the Clerk of the Board of
SUPerviso,-S, this action will be final,
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this
office:
Very truly yours,
William Cheff
Director of Public Works
,J n Mendonsa
Assistant Director
JM1ds
attachment
cc Planning Department
Environmental Health bepartment
Cha.les Carey Jr:
NOAICE: or Dn�rnn[TNAOTOK
TO: Office of Planning and Resrxch FRO= Butte County
1400 Tenth Street, doom 121 JUL1 71986 Planning Department
Sacramento, CA 95814 7 County Center Drive
or " �t!N41; M, Ei GKER, Ccu�niy Clci-k OVOVille, CA 95965
X County Clerk ,y A. J,.fit:►„NOM Depui
County of Butte
StJ-ssE;Cacc Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21108
or 21152, of the Public Resources Code.
Project Title _
� AP 4l 30-46-1-12 Name
State Clearinghouse Number Contact Person
Telephone Number
cif submitted to Clearinghouse) -
� Public Works John Mendonsa5 1,»4 hti
Project Lor•ation On the north side of Tehama Avenue _
Of 20th Street, Thermalito area west of Oroville. approximately 300 feet west
Project Description --------:
P Tentative Parcel 1 -lap dividing 0.90 acre. to Create two parcels,
one of 0.25± acre and one of 0.59± acre.
This is to advise that the Butte Countv Advisary Aonnr,%,
(Lead Agency or Responsible Agency)
PP p j ct on 7-14 �- 8 6 and has made
has approved the above»described ro'e (Date)
the _following determinations regarding the above»described project:
I. The project —will, ,will not, have a significant effect on the
environment.
2 An Environmental Impact Deport was prepared for this project
Pursuant to the provisions of CEQA;
„ A Negative Declaration was prepared for thisro ect
provisions of CEQA. p .� pursuant to the
3. Mitigation measures were, were not, made a condition of the
Approval of the project.
44 A statement of overriding considerations tsas, was not, adopted
for this project.
This is to certify that the final ElR with comments and responses and record of
project approval is available to the general public at
Eutte County Planning Department
7 County Center Drive
Oroville, CA 95965
Date Received for Tiling and
Posting at nPR ... 7-15-86
GFS r
Signa re
Stephen A. St-$oter
Seh1614 plenne,r
= Title `
kevised March 1086
?litigation Measure
Charles Garey, Jr,
TPM, AP#30-46-1-12
l• Pay pro rata share towards trai'fic stud: or
in Thermalito area. Y :tight instillations
Attachy°
cc'i �.Pl.anning
Department
Environmental Health Dept,
GDA
i•••M�AsI •�.t !•� �. meq.,
4 • w
� n4
coun
"-
LAND Or
NATUkAlt
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
WILLIAM (Gill) CFIEFF, Director
7 COUNTY
CENTER DRIVE . OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965
Telephoiia' (916) 534-4681
RONALD D. McELROY
Deputy Director
Jj4"0 t!OI F'tanning Conm
J U L 17 1'Jba
_
Oroville, 'Uif orale
Charles Carey
P, 2601
Re AP 30-�46 —1-12
le
Oroville, CA 95955.
Tentative parcel AJap
Dear Mr. Carey;
This is in reference to our July '15, 1986 letter we se,1L• you.
On the attachment listing the conditions of
requirement was listed as a condition Which
approval,, planning 'Department's
a mitigation measure. (See attached sheet).
should have been listed as
If you have any
questions rr gard iig this matter,
please call this office,
Very truly yours,
William Chaff
Director of Public Clarks
7l
;t
Jbhn Mendona
JM/ss
,assistant Director
Attachy°
cc'i �.Pl.anning
Department
Environmental Health Dept,
GDA
r
Public Works conditions:
1• Access to be reserved in deeds as per county ordinance And offered
for dedication on the final map.
2. Show 50 ft. building setback line measured from centerline .of access
easement.
3 Frontage on Tehama Ave, to be constructed to RS -9 -LD -II standard,
i.e.p curb, gutter, sidewalk And required street section for parcels
with gross acreage of one acre or less:
mit drae to the
Department of Public Works for approval and binstallinarequirednfacilities.
4. Indicate a 50 ft. building setback from the centerline of
Tehama Ave,
56 Show all easements of record on the final map.
6. Provide permanent solution for drainge. Pay $450 per acre storm
drainage fee.
7• Pay off any assessments,
g. Pay' any delinquent taxes or current taxes as required.
9, Meet the requirements of the Butte County Fire Department.
10i Provide access to parcel 2 per Section 20--136 of the Butte County
Subdivision Ordinance.
Tht following mitigation measure is also required:
11i T'hermal. ($25600
Pay pro rata share towards traffic studies or light installation in
Health Departmentlto conditaions per parcel)
12• provide a letter or other documentation from the Thermalito Irrgatoh
District stating that they are willing and able to. supply domestic watre
to .parcels 111 and #2.
13. Provide a letter or other documentation from the Thermalito Irrigation
District stating that they are willing
to parcels 111 and #2, ,and able to supply sewer service
p i� p ., p
14, irlaceill aote oh the ma that states develo men O(parcels I and
requireconnection to a public sanitary sewer." N2
154 place a note on the trap that states "developmeht of parcels 1/1 and #2
will require'cohnection to a public _Water suppl,y,n
r
TO. Butte County Advisory Agency
FROM: Planning Director
11fJHCTe Report on Tentative Parcel Map for Charles Carey Jr on AP
30-46-1-12
DATE: June 5, 1986
This is a Proposal to divide 0.,90 acres to create 2 The
Is A -R (Agricultural Res;identia:): The Land Use PI an Present zoning
County General Plan designates tris area as Low Density Rsthe Butte
There are no specific or community flans. for the areawAsi dential,
The proposal doea not conflict with County zoning not, any adopted or
Proposed element of the Butte County General. Plan nor any County,
specific or community Plan.
Recommend approval subject to the following mitigation from checklist.
,
1. Pay PVO rata share towards trafficlight Thermalito area. fight installations in the
DPFi lr
CC; Charles Carey Jr
GDA
ENGINEERING
SURVEYING
PLANNING
Butte County Planning Dept.
7 County Center Drive
Oroville, CA 95965
Attn: David Hironimus
Associate Planner
FL9: A.P. 30-46-1-12
T.P.M. Charles Carey
220 GRAND AVENUE
OtROVILLE, CA. 95965
(916) 5332068
May 22,, 1986
"a Co. Planning C,"
MAY 23 1�bn
�rovilly, Cationia
Dear Dave,
We acknowledge that Mr. Carey is creating onµ (1) additional parcel.
Wefurtherbelieve that it is appropriate for Mr. Carey to contribute
a pro rata shore of traffic light cost for the one additional patedl
created by this action.
We accept this mitigation. Please schedule Mr. Carey's tentative
map for the Advisory Agency at your earliest opportunity:
Sincerely,
William W. Geddis, L.5.
G.D.A. ENGINEERTNG�
SURVEYING & PLANNING
WWG/JM
;1,01-85
CCi Charles Carey, ,fir.
P.O. Box 2601
Oroville, CA 95965
WILLIAM W, O 0015
JoHt4 C3, CIjKj$'Tor-FP.RSON KENNETH C. L VINHAROT
c APPENI)Ty r
COUN'.l'Y Or. I uT`l'B
ENVIROWIP3N'CAL CHECKLIST r-oRM
(ta be eomp.teto(J Dy Lea llgency)
BACK--KOROUND Log, 11 86-04-21-02
AP 30-4G-112
1. Name of proponent CHARMS CAREY Jr.
2, Address or proponent and representative
(if applicablo)
1T.
F Project descriptionurovi 11e:, CA 95965
Tentative Parcel Ma�
MANDATOPY VImniNGS OF ,SIGNIC'TCA_NCh
a. noes the project have the potential
quality or the environment,
to degrade the
substantially reduce
the habitat or a fish or wildlife species, cause a
,fish or wildlife
population to drop
sustaining, levels, threaten to eliminate,
below self-
animal, community, reduce the number
range of a rare or endangered
a plant of
or -restrict tht
plant
eliminate .important examples of the
of California history
or animal of
major periods
or prehistory?
b. Does the project have the etential.
Short-term benefits to the
to achieve
environmental goals? triment
(A $, ,t -term
environment is
of long-term,
impact on the
one which oc4Urs in a
brioi" period or time while Yong -term
relatively
impacts
endure i:aato tine future,)
will
r Does life ro
V ,sect have Impacts which are indiv dtt-
altY T mited, but cumulatively considerable (A
projer:t may impact on two or more separate alesources
where tine impact on each resuurcc� is relativelystnali,, but Where the effect or the total of those
impactsonthe environment is significant.)
d, nods the P"oj'eet have environmental errects which
will. eause substantial adverse e i reCts an suntan
beings, either directly or indirectly?
TTT, WN'T.RMTNA` ION ('reg he e•oinpieteci iso° tile I,e',aci Agency)
On the basis- of this illitial c)v,aluation,
Y..=.hS MAYBE NO
I/Wli riIld thc, proposed prc)jVct COULD NOT have a -; 41,111 ri Clint efrect
on 'kha c "11'ottment, and ,i NFGA'i TVI'. 1 .'C'LARATTON will: br-' 'pa'epui°ed,
_X idlvl; I"Incl that although thc� pl'opcsct�l Irto�cct ccatji�i have a sil*it7ti
c',Yttt ("Vct can the envi I,onmc�nt , t'here, will neat be =a sigill I is nT
el`i'ert in this rasa bc�cautir the MITIGATION MIiA.�;lillT;: cle;�,.iliecl tit.
the athnchecl shc�e�t ltcrwr. hrcrt ,Odell tet the I)rcajc�ct., A scribed
DM.I.A.IZAI'ION will, bc* lareaparc�i,
- i'IViR l'3ttcT t" propuwcx,l l)raiQc•t DLII have a signiricant e(re*c°t arl.
the cant'ir0nmrn t , 'nd all T:NVIRONMI.NTAI, IDIPAC."I' i'tlil'Cip'J" is required:
17A'l"Ti , �... ,
...-Nay 16,� _M86:. 4itla BUTT11) V y ANN TNt T1iipAit C ��11"sN"1'
"1'I's pl.
I7av3ti ;�: Hi;ronimus, Assoaiatc Planrte�
Reviewed by
i
JIV. ENVIRONMENTAL IM CTS�� eS�, and ►maybe„ answers are required
o ate]. Y
xp anat�.ans
on attached sheet(s)) YES MAYBE
NO
1, EARTH. Will the proposal result in significant;
or in changes in
V.—unstable earth. conditions
a._
geologic substructures? compaction or
b. Disruptions, displacements, 'comp
overcovering of the soil?
in topography or ground surface
C Change
relief features?—
d. Destruction, covering or modification of any
unique geologic or physical features? ..
in wind or water erosion of soils,
e, Increase
either on or off-site? _.�.
of beach
f,. Changes in deposition or erosion
in siltation, deposition
sands, or changes
which may modify this chinnel of
or erosion
a river or stream ox the bed of the ocean or
,
any bay, inlet or lake"? __ ...
of prime agricultuTally productive soils
Loss
g. outside designated urban areas? -
or M geologic
--�"
h, Exposure Of_ people property andsl des mud -
hazards such as earthquakes,
hazards?
--�
slides, ground failure or similar
2, AIR, will the proposal result in substantial:
deter'oration of ambient
is
T.— Air emissions or
air quality?
b The creation :f objectionable odors, smoke
or fumes?
c. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or
change in climate,
temperature, or any �.
locally or regionally?_
3, NATER. will. the proposal result in substantial;
a. ChangeS in currents, or the course Or
direction of water movements in either
_XL
marine or fresh waters?
b. Changes in absorption gates, drainage patterns,r�
r.; or the rate and amnunt of surface runoff?
Need for off-site surface drainage improve-
c. l�annel-
merits including i, egetatio:� vol..
,
izatibtl or culvert installation?
Alterations to -the course or flow of £l.otd�
�
d.
waters?
Change in the amount of surface water an any
e,.
water body? ._.._ �.�..
f. Discharge into surface waters or in aAV
quality, including
alteration of surface water
limitea to tempera.ttVrre, dissolved
but not
oxygp_o or turbidity: 1
Alteration of the direction or rate of flow
..
of ground waters?
in the q oreground W eXs
h. Change anti with-
either through aad tions
an
drawals, or through interception of
�- -
agttifer by cuts or excavations?
Reductionin the amount of waterotherwise
i,
available for public water supplies?
of people or proVett'y to water
-
J. Exposure
related hazards such as
YES
TP p p Xt J.t, 1.11 subs tantial, -
4 . PLANT LL E, Will the proposalsubstantial-,
a� aannge in the diversity
�iA� N
o£cs, or number
of any species of plants (incl.uda.ng Tees,
shrubs, grass, crops, and aquat4c plants)?
b. Reduction of the numbers
01 ani► ul-iique , rare
or endangered species of plants?
c. Introduction of new species of plants into an
area, or in a be–Tier
--
to the normal replenish-
ment of existin;y species?
d.
Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop?
x
5.
ANIMAL LZl~E, Will the proposal result `ial:
a. C��in the diversity of
�
species,�orsnumbers
ofany species of animals (birds, land ani)mjls
including reptiles,
fish and shell, fish,
benthic organisms insocts)?
or
b. Reduction in the numbQrs of any unique, rare
or endangered
species of animals?
c, Introduction of new species of animals into
an area, or result in a 'barrier to the migration
or movement of animals?
d, Deterioration to existing f s11 or wildlife •----
habitat?
-�--.
6.
N IS.E . lVill the proposal result in substantial:
a• Increases in
existing noise Levels?
b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels?
-�-
?.
`—
CtaGLARE Yllithe Proposal produceSn�r–crtl'gt
and
–.. ..
glare.
--
8.
LAND USE. ",Vill the proposal result in a
su stantial alteration Of the
present or planned
land use of an area?
v
9.
NATU;RAI. RESOURCES t Will the Proposal result a.n
su stantYal;
a Increase in the rate of use of any natural
esouroes?
b. Depletion of any non-renewable natural
resources?
1,0 •
RISK (1P UPSET, Will the proposal. involve;
A tars r a
explosion or the release o£ ha ard.
ous substances (including, but
not I*ma.ted to
sticides chemical or radiation) in the
event of an accident or upset condition01
s7
b. Possible interference
with air emergency,' �---�
r or emergency evcG
zesponse p lacuation plan?'
la .
_
&!PULATTqN, Will the proposal, a.ltbr the location,
strz ut�.on, density, or
growth rate of the hum
population? an
lG
HOUSING. 14111 the propos 1 affect existing housing, -
or create a demand for additional housing?
11 thea. -Creatxoniof any healthohazardosalrorult potent al
health hazard (excluding mental health)7'
b. Exposure of people to potential health
hazards?
18. AESTHETICS, Will the proposal result in the
65 t-118of any scenic vista or view open to
the public, or will the proposal result in the
creation of an aesthet
to Public view? ically offensive site open
_ y4-
YES
1.3. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATTON.
DTAYI3E
N0
._
Will the
result in proposal
a• Generation of substantial additional vehicle
movement?
b• Effects on existing�C
king facilities, or --�-
demand for new
----
-, M
parking?aar
c, Substantial impact on existing transportation
systems?
--
d. Significant alterations to terns
OF circulation Of�peopleaand/or
k
or movement
goods?
e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air 'traffic?
f.
Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles,
bicyclists or pedestrians?
y
4. PUBLIC SERVICES. 1" ry t.;, the proposal have an effect
upon, or result in
a need £or new or altered
governmental services;
a. vire protection? _
b. Police protection?
X>c-
c. Schools?
X c
d. Parks ot other recreational facilities? w�
e. Maintenance
of public facilities, including
roads?
_,x c
f• Other governmental services?
15, ENERGY. Will thew...
a . proposal result in:
Use of .substantial
amounts of fuel,or energy?
b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing
sources
--
of energy, or require the development
of new sources of
energy?
UTILITIES. Will the proposal result in a need for
new systems, or substantial alteratiolis
following, to the
a. Power or natural gas?
- b. Communications
X
systems?
c Water availz' _ty,
d. Sewer or septic: tank?
e. Storm water drainage?
f. Solid waste and disposal?
17. HUMAN HEALTH W"
11 thea. -Creatxoniof any healthohazardosalrorult potent al
health hazard (excluding mental health)7'
b. Exposure of people to potential health
hazards?
18. AESTHETICS, Will the proposal result in the
65 t-118of any scenic vista or view open to
the public, or will the proposal result in the
creation of an aesthet
to Public view? ically offensive site open
_ y4-
ig• RECREATION. {Ui11 the YES MAY—Pt NO
upon _therualit or proposal result in re impact
Opportunities? Y quantity of existing recreatioz�;�l
20. CULTURAL RESOURCES',
a. h'i11 tie propcsax result in: the alteration,
of or the destruction of a
historic archaeological site?ehi5toric or
b. Will the proposal: result in adverse phYsacal
or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or
historic building, structure or object?
C. Does the Proposal have the potential, to cause
a physical change which would affect unique
ethnic cultuval values?
a. Will, the proposal restrict existing re • i r° ,,
or sacred uses within the poten
area: tial amtrg�aact
`,--
V= DIS`CUS81ON OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
AP 30-46-1.12
1b,e,f3b,c,f: Creation of an additional homesite on the Property will lean to some d s-
ruption, displacement, dom actipon and�oveandvslzn of the soil 'which will in turn l�+ad t
located Within the Thermalito Drainage. Plan: Areatandawilltbetsubject to meet o
require-
ments of the plan. As such; this project will not have a significant Meat tial. The subject property r q is
facilities in the areal meeting the requixe-
g nt effect on drainage
1h: All of Butte County is Located within a Moderate Earthquake Intensity ' Zone VZIT. The:
subject property is located 1 to 2 miles southwest of faults associated with
Zone which
pported
75
fohrmrBuilding Codeustandardst�for9seismieallQ earthquake. Construction of buildings Foothill
to U'ni-
to occupants in case of seismic activity, Y act1ve areas should provide adequate
_protectiot.
8: This area is planned for low density residential uses surh as this. The 60 -foot -wide
lot proposed by this project was a
on April 9, 1986, pproved by the Planning Commission in granting covariance
13a,c,f: Creation of an additional homesite on the Property wi11
Thermalito area. Currently traffic congestion exists at several pints i traffic in the
Thermalito area. Other similar Projects have aid Y add to
funds for these areas including Highway 70 and Crd r p n and around the
p a pro rata share into traffic light
162 at 18th. Highway 70 and. Nelson, and Highway
14; This project represents an incremental increase in, demand for public service
area is planned for development such as this and will not create a significant i
in demand beyond what facilities are alreadys• The
Planned for, increase
16e: See Itemi 1 and 34
Su��ested hirt�ation M`ea`d
Pay pro rata share towards traffic light installations in the Thermalito at
ea,
QD—
Applicant CHARLES CAS EY A sso s P4v
'� Cel- 30�46-1-12
DATA SHEET FRD Log
Ai Pro ,�Lec�t D1 criPtion
•
Type of Project: Tent-;: Lvo, Parcel Man:
2 Brief Description:, Di4 ,.�i� µ 0.90 acre o cre7te twow a
and one of 0.59±acre
,
j. Location: On the ncrth side of Tehama Avenue an„>roximatel 3�0 feet west of 20
Street, Thermal�if n_r __ 4th
4. Proposed Density of Development:^A roximatel 2 A.—IIA. . units er
5. AmoImpervious S agrel
unt of
.'f acing . A roximately 10-,5% �
6. Access and Nearest Public-----
Road(S) :Pro+ arty fronts an '.l'elyama Av�n.ie
7. Method of Sewage Dis osal,
p «_ Thermalito lrriQationDist��t
8. Source of Water Six l
pP y �hermalito lrri ansewer sYsterns:
on DistrYct.. ��
9. Proximity of Potter. Lines_To proper�v:
10 Potential for further sand divisio�,a and devel opment-T Minimum -e M
Parcels of 6500 square :Feet arP possible in this area due to the presence of a
B. Environmental ,Settin> public sanitary sewer system.
_Ohysical. Environment;
"1 Terrain
a. General. Topographic Char,. ;ter; 'G-erally level valley lands
b ...
. Slopes: 0-2%: _
C. Elevations Aiinroxiniately 2 0 feet ab v;-. 4,
d. Limiting Factors None.
2. Soils
a. Types and Characteristics:,
Redding Graven San'
hard an.la. er.
--------------------
b Limiting Factors: Excessive drainaRrs n"A 1,::.: ;
Data Sheet continued -
b Ground Watery Unknown.
c. Drainage Characteristics: Land s es, to the ort tows
drainage Swale. Roadside ditches alon -each _roc �iJ11;�t1
d. Annual Rainfall (normal) �� surface ws Litt
'_�� 2.6 conve ed ;to .natural:. dra��,����,u
e. Limiting Factors: Excessive drains e
5. Visual Ss • channel. locatei
enc Quality:_ Moderate to
reference- 'I"hermalto D, stet^
6. Acoustic: Quality: Good
7. AirQual..ty: Good Drainage Study.
Ex- ` olo ical En'Virbnment : --
8• Vegetation: Annual grasse�nd for common to vane
._. ands.
9' W l.dlif e Habitat:, Small birds and animals common to litban' va
lle lands.
Oultural Environment,
10. Archaeological. and .Ii-Stor: cal. Resource, in the ��rca:L�wens
s r
area. itiv
ity
11. Butte 00unty General. Paan designation: Low Density_PL
-tdential.
12. Existing LoniIg: A -R,
13.Fr S`iSti
`�, Lanu. Use 0r—:a1.te:0ne sin le`famil dwellitLY and accessor
buildin s.
X14. Surrounding Are,,: -
a. Land Uses: Sin le -family A,w jlin s at suburban donsities.
b- Zoning:. A -R
c w Gen. Pity, deSignationo : Lo. w Density Resident
d. Parc el Sizes.i Varying front sp roxlmatel 1/S acro up to 5 -acre a'
C4 Po Mata.
p (..)n . _. Suburban densities. reels:
1 Character ofSite and Area: Urbaniz3.ng .fringe_ area west of Or
16.
leareet Urban Area: Oroville. oville.
17' ROlevarlt Spheres of 111fluerlt.e. Thermalito Trr, 'anon Distri
off, Orovi.11e.
18: Improvements Standards Urban ,Area No
19• Pire ProtectionService!
a, Nearest Cotulty (State) Ville r 4 •
Stata.ol°1 c Nelson ,Avenue Station IEfiS, Oros
star Availability? Therma�ito 'Crt igstion nistr�j ct k
d� Schools in Area.,. Tltermalito Union "I- District and Oroville _.
union High School, District,
App etdiX
�d.26Yr CcJas C IY'C ���
Cts C.-6,C 30 ,
co
310
G�a.4 a y. des J. lk
2-2 3 . arca ~csc� �` 30-
l2
CQ) `" a
Co Rey,., J J� s s
SNrlK�. K¢cu �. k
uri ttE, iYx k. 3N/
3c�-c
zlxN-l0_7 N svrc,rv�/�
`T ► ✓.a a 14f, 1Y.LG is NC fNa�riQ
`D 2.k
IVI.C�3Rr NI;�LL.{rg � �/
10
n
i �iv�rt.G, G��y� rsE
Kcyi)1"�7� t
)�.
i
' �llc�t.a �2okz►,y�V� (2 C�
ry
ti.
2-7
.�•'"�L'
1
C."toY CHAS J. J4 f-
Ze?S-Gf�F- 7G,ca�r,
Ge�+aS J. JR, 5;5'
n
d
Meal
Gaq�Yoltfds J . �/ 5S
7z 7,-3, 1 -7 2
�0 7 4
_
Y, G�HkS J & pxa7Z7-
"t(K
It)D6
67.27-30 gZ:
7^:Z:I
lcLC, Z--6-�rr--
$R 0 77"c--N,,o�
4
1 .
1, Predominant 5-10 A.c. Parcel Size
2. Vicinity of urban Boundaries --
3. Aeric, viability clot impaired -----
Staff Ueterminati0r1: Project does 'L--_ does not
substantially� conform to the 'General Plan.
Staff Signature - cza;,'� .�`r�'� �.....-��.�y., Uate , t
AS Tilt :APPLICANT FOR TIC; 1^`.rQi'E:1T.b LANlt DMSIONo y AIM AWAR5 OF lilt At= STAFFUl i`I1Rlll t<t1 1(?t�'` n1t CO,.FO%IL, �Cc inn! i1tt CthEl'A.L PLAN.
bated 44- �� 5itnature of Appl.icattit t .✓,_ �..._
� � %_�. _____.__, ._.
��.
Engineers - 5urveydts • Plmnning
220 Ct7nd Avenue
oiovillti c6litorniiy 59b5 _
BUTtE COUNV
GE,'�ERAL PLA,,:CO',:FOK!,jAjJCE FSPORT
fiOr, PARCEL MAT' OP SUBDIVISION MAP
items 1-4 to be completed by applicant:
KCL w,
ly Applicant, name G/J�2Lr5_� 1-� 2--�----
2. Project Description
WWG _......... .
3. Assessor's Parcel riumber(s)
Proposed Use
�._.._.-.`.__.
t
The ,followirig 'items are to be -completed by the Planning Department;
AV - Land Conservation Aaruement.
Current zoning _
Gencral Plan Ues gna ion �
Aonlicable Conditional Criteria: Not Applicable
Agricul YES
tural-Residential
NO
4P� 114Z
` r9
1. t%gricultural Compatibility .....
2. Water & ISewer Capacity
--
3, Adequate Fire Facilities .�._
.-.-.
4. Road Capacity b 1Jaintenancc ..
---
5. Access to Corrmmtrcial 6 Schools
tjkchard 6 Field Crops
1, Predominant 5-10 A.c. Parcel Size
2. Vicinity of urban Boundaries --
3. Aeric, viability clot impaired -----
Staff Ueterminati0r1: Project does 'L--_ does not
substantially� conform to the 'General Plan.
Staff Signature - cza;,'� .�`r�'� �.....-��.�y., Uate , t
AS Tilt :APPLICANT FOR TIC; 1^`.rQi'E:1T.b LANlt DMSIONo y AIM AWAR5 OF lilt At= STAFFUl i`I1Rlll t<t1 1(?t�'` n1t CO,.FO%IL, �Cc inn! i1tt CthEl'A.L PLAN.
bated 44- �� 5itnature of Appl.icattit t .✓,_ �..._
� � %_�. _____.__, ._.
��.
Engineers - 5urveydts • Plmnning
220 Ct7nd Avenue
oiovillti c6litorniiy 59b5 _