Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
031-010-032
APPLICANT Betty Davis Log#86-06-X20-02 ADDRESS P.O. Box 1743, Oroville, CA 95965 OWNER Same ----_. PROJECT DESCRIPTION+- acres to create an existing acre parcel 4s-�er. TPM to divide 42 , pa3�ding to 2.0 acre plus 1-5 acre, 2-10 acre and a 15 acre f3-T=m :LOCATION �ertili�J�Z` on the northwest side of Long Bar Road -.-approx., 6001 north of Can oh HirThlanrls Drive Orovill.e area, ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER, (S) 31-01-32 33' ZONING AR -1 GENERAL PLAN Low DensitY PROJECTA CONSIS 8NT'? GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE REPORT Residency ai- DATE OF AP,PLIGANT SI(3NAtCCJRE LAND CONSERVATION ACT CONTRACTS? DATE APP1,ICATION RECEIVED .. Junes 2U 7 986 AGENT/SURVEYOR/CIVIL ENGINEBR. G.D.A. ADDRESS: 220 Grand Avenue. Oroyille, CA 95965 DATE PLANNING DIRECTOR',, REPORT PREPARED ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION CATEGORICAL }CLMPTION - DATA; FILED_.. ANIS DATE .. f_-. NEGATIVE DECLARATION -'DATE ADOPTED MITIGATED NEG, DECLARA,11.TON ,M , DA E Arr)PTED w 3 .., -7 - ENV. IMPACT REPORT -- DATE CERTIFIED . _. STATE CLRAPTNGHOtTsL No. SUB. COMMITTEE MEETING DATE _. ADVISORY AGENCY HEARING DATE ADVISORY AGENCY ACTION APPEALEIO 4 BOARD ACTION COMMZNTS FOR PLANNING t)IREC:TCjR':,+ RLPORT PLANNING COMMISSION I A til D 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965.3397 PHONE. 538-7601 May 4, 1987 G.D.A. Rill Geddis 220 Grand Avenue Oroville, CA 95965 k P-: AP#33L-01-32,33 Dear Mr. Geddis: In regards to your refund request, the Planning nepartment only refunds application fees when our bepartment accepts an application in error. It is our understanding that you chose to revise your project from a B.L:bf. to a T.P,M. in order to secure a favorable recommendation from Planning: No refund is in order, Sincerely, B.A. KIRCHER Director of Planning Laura Tuttle Associate Planner LT : j imc IN "s y� C/1 ENGINEERING o o SURVEYING 0 0 PLANNING ' 1..:: /z Buf+o CO- Plenniirg Comm APR 2 9 '198/ April 27, 1987 Oroville, Cnlitomia FDepartment Butte of Public Works Center Drive OroV lle, CA. 95965 Attn: Land Development John or Stu Pla, l It r i' ✓ 220 GRAND AVENUE OROVILLE, CA, 95965 (916) 533-2068 Re: B.L.M. AP#33-01-32 & 38 entlemen- As the Planning Department has determined that the B.L.M� submitted on behalf of Betty Davis Was inappropriate, I respectfully request a refund of ally unused portion of the application fees Please make check payable to Betty Davis and mail to G.D.A. Engineering, If you have any questions, please call aur office. Sincerely, 'Zoe": William W. Goddis, L.S. G.D.A. ENGINEERING & SURVEYING WWG%dm 004-8i WILLIAM W. GEttioic jvnty u. k-"K15TOFFERS0N KrzNNfGTN C. L�,MARDT DEPARTMENT OF PU6l.IC WORKS WILLIAM (Bill) CI-1EFP, 040clor 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE . OROVILLE, GALWORNIA 95745 guffe Co- Pu , TeIepltone„ (916) 334.4681 nning CWMM RONALD D. MaELROY APR I? 1987 atputy Director April 7, 1987 01.0010, Califor4uq Betty Davis P. 0. Box 1743 RE: AP 33-01w3.2 and 33 Oroville, CA 95965 Tentative Parcel, Map Dear Ms. Davis; Please be advised that the six mitigation measures were Inadvertently egardi from the letter rto you from this agency dated March 30, ,1987 regarding approval of the above-refcronced project,' Those mitigations aro: 1: Note on Map: All dwellings shall be constructed to resist lateral forces as outlined in the Utiform Building Cude, Note on Map: Building; sites should not be located in areas Of poorly drained soils of hih clay content, 3, tote on Map; Any mobig le homes installed on the property shall be tied down, braced or otherwise treated to resist lateral, forces from earthquakes, '. Nbt•e on Map; All structures to btu set back a ,inimum of 50 feet from the sroale on Lots 1, 3 t, d 4. 5. All hats to lav, a 6, Mminimum ;130 feet. 6f frontage, 1.Me thh requirements of the Butte County Mosquito Abatement District tf You office. have any questions regarding this matter, Please contact this Very truly yours, tJillism Cheff Director of Public works 1�j/ Y V �. J til Mandons:a JM/ds A ,8i8ttant Director cc: Planning , Health ODA iy r`NOK G7E OrDErr>E',RMZA(. ;ON X0 - Office of Planning andar 1400 Tenth Street, Roam EFP Butte County Sacramento, CA 95814 Planning Depart,111(Int• 7 County Centre; Drive or APR Oroville CA 95965X County Clerk 6 198r County of Butte CANDACEJ, GRUBBS, Butte Co. Clerk su$-TE Cx - F g �y A. JACINYht Deputy lin of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21108 or 21152 of the Public Resources Code. ProjectTitle AP #Tenta.tive Parcel Map and 3 Name Boundary Line Modification 1-01�32�33 State C?earinghouse Number Batty Davis Contact Person �..... (if submitted to Clearinghouse) Telepbone Number Public Works John Mendonsa '- Project 'Location On the 538-7266 e northwest side of Long Bar Road ---approro x. 600' north of Canyon Highlands Drve,..Oroville area, d i Project Description Boundary Line Modification of 15 acresdi` remainder of original 42± parcel into four lots of 2 r 5 � g; ; division of d 10 acres. This is to advise that the Sutte County.Advisor enc has approved the above-described prolLea(lect Agena y or Responsible Agenc,y)' and has made katethe following determinations regarding the above-described) project: I. The Project project _will, X will not, have a significant effect on the environment, 2w An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project Pursuant to the provisions of CEQA, X_ A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. 3, Mitigation measures X_ were, :.:.were not; made -a condition of the approval; of the project. 4. A statement of overriding considerations for this project, Was, h _was not, adopted This is to certify that the final. EIR with comments and responses and record Project approval is available to the general public at., of Butte County Planning; bepartmet°tt 7 County Center Dr1t;e Oroville, CA 95965 Date .Received for Filing and posting at OPR i Signatute Steiohen AL Streerrer, Benior Planne:i cx Title t � %' �, • i'�' t.1e '� A,i f��t�,d taaxt� 1a R 'q; W Betty Davis Tentat_ ve Parcel Man Mitigation Measures 1. Note on Map: All dwellings shall be construct -ed 1;0 resist lateral forces as outlined in the Uniform Buildi,ng Code. 2. Note on Map: Building sites should not be loca•Lod in areas Of poorly drained soils of high clay content. 3. Note on Map: Any mobile home, installed on the property shall be tied down, braced or otherwise treated to resist lateral forces from earthquakes. 4. Note on Map: All structures to be set back a minimum of 50 feet from the swale on Lots 1, 3 and 4. 5. All lots to have a minimum 130 feet of frontage, 6. Meet the requirements of the Butte County Mosquito Abatement. District: y, t SSW .» LAtoL DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS WILLIAM (Bill) Ch1CF1=, Director � eCo.7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE . OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95.965 P14nn%g COM I'm T61ephone! (916) 534.4681 APR 2 1987 RONALD o, MaELROY Deputy Director ©royals, California March 30, 1987 Betty Davis RE: AP 33-01-32 & 33 P. 0. Boar 1743 TPM Orovil.le, CA 95965 Dear Ms. Davis: .1t the Yregular meeting; of the .Butte county Advisory Agency held an March 30, 1987, the Agency adopted a negative declaration with environmental mitigations and approved the tentative parcel map on the above• -referenced property subject to the conditions listed on the attached sheet. tf no appeals are timnly filed --within tern (10) days of the date the Advisory Agency's approval -_with the Clerk of the Board of Of 8uperv,isor8, this action will be final, Whon the conditions Of approval, are complied it be in .for you to file your final map'' with the Butte County �vDepa tmentorder Of Public iti'arks for recordation within twenty -fedi (24) months of the date of approval by the Advisory Agency, T1 you have any tiuestiOnS regarding this matter, please contact this is Very truly yours, 1411l.iam Cheff Director of Public 'Works fin Mondonisa ssistant Director ,1hf;ltl �tti~ar.hmont twµ; 3'lranna.ng. Department EnvironmeriLa.1 Health Department GDA 111tty Davis, Tentative Parcel; Map, AP 33-01.-32 and 33, 4arc 'the northwest side of Long Bax Road, p els on approx. 600 Ft. Highlands Drive. Oroville area. Engineer; GDA north of Canyon Public Works conditions: 1 Provide two—way traversable access R8 -8 -LD -1 to eacharc a county maintained road p el from or state highway, Ar„cess to be reserved in deeds as per county ordinance for dedication on the final incl offered map. 3 Show 50 ft, building setback line measured from centerline casement. e of access 4 ProN Ae road maintenance agreement. 5 Deed to the Countv of Butte 30 ft. right;-of—way from t17r� OF. Long Bar Road. conte rune b Indicate a 50 ft. building setback from the centerline+ _. Road. of Long Bar 7 Show all easements of record on the final map. Provide street name signs per requirements of the Dep r.ment: Public Works prior to recordation of of the final map. cl Pav Off any assessments, 10 Provide cul--de—sac: at thc end of the street. 11 Obtain encroachment permit and construct standard road Providing adequate sight, distance at the intersection of road, and Long, Dar Road ad 12 ray any delinquent taxes or current tares as required. 13 Meet the requirements ofthe Butte County Tire Department. 14 Place note on final map that a "Certificate of Com lia c. ll required prjojt to issuance of development p n e may be r Parcel, p permits on the remainder Health Dept. conditions: 15 Show a 50 ft, leachfield setback from the drainage w 11 3 and 4, g ay on pa:rccla ,16 Provide in letter or other documentation from Lite Oroville WyandottQ Irrigation Di"'ttict stating that they are willIng, and able to supply domestic Nvat:er to parcels 1, 2, 3 and 4 later -Departmental Memorandum TO: Butte County Advisory Agency FROM: Planning Director SUBJECT: Report on Tentative 'Parcel, Map for Betty Davis DATA: on AP#31-01-32,33 March 18, 1987 This is a proposal to divide 42+ acres, expanding an existing 1/2 acre parcel. to 2 acres, and the creation of 1 parcel at 5 acres, 2 at 10 acres, and 15 acro remainder, The present zoning is AR -1 (:agricultural,-Resa.dential, I acre parcels) adopted in 1984. The Land Use Plan Map of the Butte County General Plan designates as Low Density Residential. There ate no specificeory community plans for the area. The proposal does not conflict with County zoning nor any adopted or proposed element of the Butte County General Plan nor any County, specific or community plan; A Negative Declaration with Mitigation -Isuresattached is recommended for this project. The M. gation Measures are as follows: 1. Note on Map: All dwellings shall he constructed to resist lateral force-; as Outlined in the Uniform Building Cade. 2. Note on Map: Building siEes should in areas of poorly drained $oils of high bGlaccontent, 3. Note on Map: Any mobile homes installed on the property shall be tied down, braced or otherwise treated to resist lateral forces from earthquakes. 4. Note on Map: All structures to be set back a minimum Of 50 feet from the swale on Lots 1, 8 and 4. 5'• All lots to hs;ve a minimum 130 feet of frontage. 6. Meet the requirements of the Butte County Mosquito Abatement District. LT j Inc 0 ENGINEERING SURVEYING PLANNING ✓���,..--;�r,•, ` 220 GRAND AVENUE ORGVILLE, CA, 95965 (916) 538-2068 February 26, 1987 Butte County Planning 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 Attn: Laura Tuttle RE: T.P.M. A.P.#31-01-32,33 Betty Davis Dear Ms. Tuttle, Z have discussed the project mitigations with my client. Mitigations 1 through 5 and number 7 are acceptable. We do not feel that number 61 relating to oxpanling road right of ', yq to the Western Pacific Addition, Is a mitigation to this'ptoject: If Public Works wishes to place this condition on the project, we will plead our case accordingly. Please place the Parcel reap on the earliest hearing date. Sincerely) William 14. Ged(!•i.s, L.S. G.D.A. Engineering, Surveying & Planning WWG/jm 004.86 WILLIAM W. CV0015 JOHN 0, CHRI TOPPER50K h KENNETH C. I.t-NHARO*r Ai'fIiNI)TX C(ltwl,Y or l3vrTli ENVTT(bN) M'I'AL 011:CKI TS'C FORM (to e compl.ete� �iay I:ead 4ency) r Loi; N 86-06-20-02 . 13AC( Gltc�uN AP #31-01-32,33 1 i Nameof proponent BETTY DAVIS 2. Address of proponent and representative Cif applicable) Bet t�Dayi s GDA " . Box 1743' �.� Orovi e, CA 95965220 Grand Avenin Oroville, 3. Project descript on Tentative Parcel Ma F and Bound_ ary Line 4Modifcat:on li MANDAIWYFINDINGS Of., STGNIhICANCIi Yl -,S MAYI311 NO a. floes the project have the potential to degrade the duality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop beloly self- sustainint, leifels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, redL-.e the number or restrict the range or �I rare ter endangered plant or animal or eliminate .important examples oC the major periods Or California history or prehistory:' b, boes the pro,;ect have the potential to achieve sCnrt 'Get 't t�enefXt; to the detriment or tont-terns, envi SIV, MENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS p. anatYons �� on attached sheet(o a sj�'yes and "maybe" answers are required 1. EARTH. Will the proposal result in significants YES a. Unstable earth conditions --E N(5 or in changes in geologic substructures? b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? c. Change in, topography or ground surface relief` features? d: Destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? e, Increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on "'- or off-site? f. Changes in deposition or erosion of 'beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? g. Loss of prime agriculturally, productive soils outside designated urban areas? h. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards'such as earthquakes, landslides, mud- slides, ground failure or similar hazards? 2 AIR. Will the proposal result in substantial: a Air emissions or deterioration air quality? of ambient b6 The creation of objectionable odors, smoke or fumes ._ c. Alteration of air movem�rit, moisture, or temperature, -- or any change in climate, locally or regionally'? iVA7'FR. Will the Proposal a. Changes in cureo orethe courseboTential direction of water movements in either marine or fresh waters? b. Changes in absorption e patte g rates, arainaof or the rate and amount surface runoff? o• Need for off-site -au-lace drainage improve- _ .�.�.. �.. ments, includin ► ization or cu?verteinstallatibriolral, channel- d• Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? e Change in the amount Of surface water in any water t ody? `—' Discharge into surface waters or in any alteration of � ' surface sater w qualr.ty) including but not limited to temperature, disolved oxY8011 or turbidity? g: 4lteratlon of the direction or rate of flow of ground maters? h. Ch-.nge it .%a quantityor �iatex5; either througY direct add � additions 'or with drawals, or through interception of aft aquifer by cuts Or excavations? i. Reduction in the amount of water othLrwise available for public water supplies"' EXposure of people or property to water related hazards ...: such as flooding? 10 RISk OF UPSET, Will the proposal involve. a. A rte:- Of explosion or the release of hazard- ous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals of radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? b, possible interference with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? POPULATION, Will the proposal alter the location, :t�` tr!BUtion, density, or growth rate of the human population? HOUSING. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing au�rri. w]m� YES MAYBE NO 4. PLANT LIFE, Will the proposal result in substantial: a Cha ge in the diversity of species, or number of any species of plants ('including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? C. Introduction of new species of plants into an axc , or in a barrier to the normal replenish - menet of existing species? d. Reduction, in acreage of any agricultural crop? S. ANIMAL .LIFE. Will the r proposal result in substantial'; _ a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals J.nciuding reptiles, fish and shell fish, benthic organisms or insects)? b. Reduction in the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals?' c. Introduction of new speci^.s of animals into an area, or result in. a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? d, Deteri6vation to e fisting f1sh or wildlife habitat? G, NOISE. Will the proposal result in substantial; a, Increases in existing noise levels? b. Exposure of, people to severe noise levels? 7. LIGHT AND GLARE. Will the proposal produce signi?icant 1d,jht and glare? 8. LAND USE. Will the proposal. result in a su`�ntial alteration of the present or planned land use of an ares 9. NATURAL RESOURCES: Will the proposal result in su stantial a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? b. Depletion of any non-renewable natural resources? 10 RISk OF UPSET, Will the proposal involve. a. A rte:- Of explosion or the release of hazard- ous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals of radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? b, possible interference with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? POPULATION, Will the proposal alter the location, :t�` tr!BUtion, density, or growth rate of the human population? HOUSING. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing au�rri. w]m� ti YES, MAYBE,S NG 13. TRANSPORTATION/ CIPrITTATIO N is, 16.. 17. result in: N' W3.11 the Proposal. a. Generation of substantial additional vehicle movement? b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? c. Substantial impact on existing transportation systems? d. Significant alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of goods? people and/or e. Alterationsto waterborne, rail or air traffic? f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? PUBLIC SERVICES, Will the proposal, have an effoct upon, or 1esult in a need for new or altered governmental services! a. Fire protection?' b, Police protection? c. Schools? LL d. Parks of other recreational facilities? e. Maintenance of public facilities roads? , including f. Other governmental services? ENERGY. Will the proposal result in- T7—Use of substantialamounts of fuel .or energy? b. Substantial increase in demandupon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? UTI'LITI'ES. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following: a. Power or natural gas? b, Communicat' X L: Q-1 ions systems? c Waver availability., � —•- d. Sewer or septic tank? e. Storm water drainage? f. Solid waste and disposal? UUM HEALTH Will the proposal result in a. Greatiop -f any health hazard or potential health h=.ard (excluding mental health)? b. Exposure t,. people to potential health W hazards,? AESTHETICS, tall the proposal result in the OL`btru`�yi o," any scenic vista or view open to :ho public, o gill the proposal result in the �:reation of a„ aesthetically offensive site open 1,o Public view,,, .4- 92 0 YES MAYBE NO 19. RECREATION. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities?' 20. CULTURAL RESOURCES, a. Will tie proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site? 0 b. Will the proposal, re- ult in adverse, phys-4 ea] —` or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric o• historic building, structure or object? Does c. the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect un:rlue ethnic cultural values? d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious --- Or sacred uses within the potential impact area? V. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AP 31-01-32;33 See attached. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL V LU I N AP 31-01-32,88 The Property has been designated for low density residential the Oroville Area Land Use Plan. This Plan Has prepared the zoning following uSes in 1984. An Env8 in 1983,, With 11-OnMental Impact Report has L10011 Prepared On this land use plal,1 and zoning layout. projects which are consistent Residenti- Hith the General Plan and zoniM8 'ro regulated I by Government Code Section 15183, Which states; (a) In approving a residentialproject this section, meeting the a Public agency shall limit t I t. et" ,eqW I reMents of environmental Ml,atlo, of effects under CEQA to effects which: are Pect-illar, to the project or the Parcel Project would be (In Which the located) although the efr(3ut Or off "o site Of the project) and May Occur on (2) were not the analyzed as sigmificant, effects zoning) general 1 n residential project Plan Or community plan a Prior Elk on I 8 consistent. with which the (b) This section shall apply the following conditions.only to residential Project, J which meet (12 the project is Consistent With. - (A) A Community plan adopted as Part zoning action Which zoned general plan or Which the project Or designated the Parcel on Particular density would be located to accommodat(� a A general Of residential develOPmentr or" C2) AM ETF;was Plan of a local agency� and agency Certified by the lead action or the general plan. For the zoning The initial Study Hill therefore focus on Projects rathot- than lm"CtS PeCUIJor to this lbt Cievelopmer,it of impacts t-esultiog from development per 80.. fowr* homesites and their, in an Insignificant amount or sail accsruptieness roads will result 10: The Sobranto Soil It not Considered to be Series has a hi gh eras on Potential. Eros, s I gn I f i cant M th is large Parcel sizes and tjopet� aver P"'oJect bOCaLASe Or theon 1h: The Seismic aglhO less than 10,-., identified muffiorouarety tElemer"It Of the OWtte County GenerA�al 8 active and Inferr, _d of-operty. Becauto of the scale faults In the vicinity 04� the could not be dotormim0d* A geolop this Map' their exact placeMer`lt Although 9 1 C sUt"Vey has been prepared. the f)oldMuMerOQ$ lineaments He 0 inspection did r0 identified rr�om aerial not reveal the presence PhOtOOraPhs, AM extension Of the PraI110 Creek 170WIt has been of any active faults, qual"ter--mile Of the property, The SWa1h Ravine LIMOOMOnt Is approximately three M110Mapped Within 8 $ to the east, 1`00OMMendod the meaThe Consulting Mltjoatlon geologist o.64 1 1. All dwellings shall be constructed to resist lateral For,,,, 00 Outlined In the requirements Of the Uniform BW1IdI 119 Code, 2. Building sites Should not be located in areas Of poorly drained s011s and soils Of high clay content. 3. Any mobile homes installed on the property shall braced or otherwise 'treated 80 as to resist be tied down) rs. eathquake. lateral FOr`ces from The presence of the active faults on the aerial Photos in the vicinity and 1-1110aments shown Property. represents a moderate hazard to pe Lj r-01IS and 8b! Development will reduce absorption rates and MO(jify drainage Patterns. UX,, The drainage st 1 me Mapped as 0 no-dovolopMent CrOssing Parcels 1, 3 and 4 should be area. Any minimum Of 50 Feet from centerlirle* structures Show1d t)e set back a Large-scale chanUer�� In absorption rates and drainage Patterns ar-e not anticipated until divided down to Its Zoned density, the Property is 5d: Based On information in the OrOVille Area Land use plan maps submitted by the Department EIR and rare and ond8m9ered Plan+.0 Of Fish and came, there are no known 6b! The property Or animals In the area. resulting from 1-s Subject to sPOI"ad)Q noise levels or proposed Parcel railroad Operations. Noise is not a , 57 to 64 d8 however, at, size and development, Potential _Once rn) 01YOn the -MFI)er Parcels are Of this property; noise will � Created from this original Parcel, Element est, J to be further addressed. The Gemeral Plan ,rhes 55 to 60 dB a-9 8 normally accepted noiseNoise env 'lrarlment for low density residential uses, 8,* The property is Zoned For 1-8cre residential Oensity Residential General PI 1. Qse8i and has a Low district awe u i res a minimum 1. an deli gilati On, The AR -1 zoning X30 root or frontage, that Proposed Lo`, 4 ma0t��-' this requint. FOremeit does. not arpear frontage will be permitted an cul_do_�S:aC rty-five feet of requlromemt 10 Met at the bu;ldi S where the minimum frontage Setback line is not the standard 20 Setback line, IF this building Shall be shown on the final map, 20 feelto the building setback lino The Primar4y consid.rat,., these parcels; in General plan ConformIty as Pr'OP08edo is simply. do and donsitlest Of Course, this policies boom COMfOl"m With zhe Land Use Element ' SlMPI)fied; hoNovor) it is concept f General Plan conformity hat plan consideration It Whother�- "0080081AIY Ocourate, A second General ImploMentatiOn Of the pi the propo sod partels Will fatilitate the IdOCLIMOnt has set the property document- In this ta8et the Planning The 1 -acre tomin QPertY Out for, low density residential uses. 9 district Is either,, a tlm1n0 mechanism or reflects a, do'volopmomt cohStraillt. In making a finding on this PrOPorty, one has to consider Whether these pareel themselves to further, d1vi8toh 10 or, efficient majtjo Should be desigood to Sizes and cOMPIOut-ation8 lend � that the _r" . These Parcelt become 8 Probletj -��Oob Frontage I qquIrement will not 'and ror ffilhimiZed, and ongL through �jeaoss Is provided .3d I are to One Of the north-,t,-Quth N7" trending roads ao- Jacent to Parcel 5. 12, Assessor Parcel No. 33-01_33 will be enlarged by thl-,; map. 13a. Development is expected to generate 40 vehicle trill per day. This level of traf-rlic increases Will not require substailllal road Upgrading. HoHever$ with further division and devolop"10tit; of the Property) substantial road work will be reqWIred. As porb of rl`18P, all additional 30 feet this Butte County along Polk Of r'9ht-Of-w8Y should be dedicated to and South Perkins. 13c; The map configuration isolates Parcels 1, 2 and 4 adjoining nel-qhbor-hood. This is ("I"Orri the standpoint. Undesirable from a Circl .1 Without providing through access , _41,�tjoll divided down to its zoned density. The Subdivi a ParcOl 0011 never be not permit that many lots along a cul- 1, sion Ordinance would also requires that all de -sac.. The Circulation Element properties have tHo ingress and regre!�ts points and be attached to other proper-tios slated 4- . for develOPMent. in order to Preserve future circulation Options, a road extension In should be designated from the terminus of the Cul-de-sac Avenue. North to Polk 18P; With buildout of the land at the zoned density, thti access road and its Polk, Perkins, substantial intersection with Long Sar Rood will require improvement. The property is 1-41thirl the designated urban area by the Subdivision Ordinance and subject to the installation of curbr gutter and sidewalks UPON achieving a 1 -acre density. 14a* The 8utte Of County Fire Department will require the a fire hydrant or payment Into the _ Installation fire hydrant fUrld.. The in -I fee payment to the OWID hydrant fund is estimated at *.4,$83 eu In demands for governmental service, adequately identified a Here recommended mitigation and addressed in the 198P EIR. Thope are no measures for Projects* All mitl addressing Impacts to Services are of a pt"Ogrom Matu..'GiatiOn measures 14a: Correspondence has been received School from the Or-OvillO Slemontary 01.�t;tr'ct indicating the Stanford Avenue School is r-eselltly Near capacity. They aribicipate that-, it next two Years, No mitigation m May exceed c �itY within the OasUrOs are ident ifiod. 16c: The proposed Source of water, Is OW10. Tho district has Indicated that they have treated water and the Mec0s,--ary conveyance to provide service to these parcels. to be extended The existing Hater line will have across the road fl"OnttlgO Of the water foot, The mocossar-y about 400 in -tract facilities will hw#e to be constructed. Based UPON the Sphere or Influent mop Formation commission, the prope s OdOP'ted by the Local Agency rty is ofwithin the Sphere f Influoricca but outside the Current district bouildarles. Arinexaticar, to OW, be required prlor to provision 'Of water service. 0 will ..8" 17b The Butte Cou,7ty Mosquito Abatement District has exprossed a concern about tree -hole mosquitoes, which are a vector of canine heartworm. These mosquitofa are found in water -filled tree cavities. The district recommends plugging or drilling and draining of tree cavities. 208: An archaeological purvey has been conducted as part of this project. Three prehistoric site, were recorded. Each contained three bedrock mortars 'wh i cia, were utilized by native People for Processing food resources. Two pestles were found at the largest site. Each site was re--ordedi mapped and photographed in the field Archaeological clearance has been recommended. Reference: Orovllle Area Land Use Plan Environmental impa"L Report, 1983. NOTE: Boundary Line Modif cations are m i rlor lot line ad j�1.31jments i.�r. moving a -side property line 5 feet. The fifteen acros do not cue1ify as a BLM because of size$ separation from AP 33-06.4,6,7 by Polk Avenue, and inability to attach one piece of property to three separate ones. The BL.M should be withdrawn and the map redesigned for .1_ or 5 -acre lots, or submit a 4 -lot Ten remainder. tative Parcel Map with a Applicant Betty Davis Assessor`s Parcel# 31-01-32,33 Log # $6.06-20..()2, AATa 'S ESEI A. Pro. iet ..Qescr i pt on 1'• Type of Project: Tentative: Parcel Map/Boundary Line Modification. 2. Sriefi Description: BLMof 15 acres to AP 33-55-07 divis`ot� Of remainder into four parcels at 2, 5 10 and 10 acres. 3• Location On the nor-thwest side of Long Bar Resid approximately 600 feet north of Canyon Hlohlandz Drive, Oroville. 4. Proposed Density of Development: 'I d . u . ''perce l , 5. Amount. of Impervious SUrfacing; Minimal' 6. Access and Nearest Public Roads) Access ft"om new road to be constructed over existing dr►veWay. 7- Mothod of Sewage Disposal: Septic tank, leachfi'eld. 8- Source of Water Supply: District Or�oville-Wyandotte Irrigation 9.; Proximity of Power 'Lines: To original parcal High-kv lines on both sides of parcel. 10. Potential for further land divi:�ons and development: Extensive development potential Up to 42 lots and 40 dwel 1 Ing ►.►n i ts. $. Env i rortmintal Set 1 'Inn Physical Enyiro�m_ 'ante, I Terra rt a General Topographic Character: Slo 1n undulating bluff above Feather River, A terrain, b. Slopes: 5_18X c,Elevation: 3100-400 feet above Sea Laval; Soils d. Limiting Factors Nor?e. 2. a. Tyres and Characteristics« 5obrante Soil, 40-4011, red, -brawn, silt loam, clay 108m, moderato Pormeabillty, poor to Well draining, b, Limiting Factor5t frock outcrops: 3 Natural Hazards of the Land a. Earthquake ?.one". High ha.:vrd area; see Itorn 1g under 01SCUs81011 of Environmental B'valuatlon► b. Eroslon P'otontial= High, C., Landslide pot;orit i 8l Moderate. d. F1re Hazard: Extreme. e• Expanslve S011 P tent:ia1 LoW to high, 4. I-1ydrq I ogy 5. 6. T. a. Surface Water: Feather• River and Thermalito Diversion Pool 900 feet Nest. b. Groundwater,: Unknown resource. Drainage Characteristics' Drain.,ziges on site, direction flow is to the south�sout-hwest. Annual Rainfall (normal): 28-SQ,Y. e. Limiting Factors: None, Visual/Scenic Quality: Scenic area. Acou8tic Quality: Fair, subJect to 57-64 de from Air Quality: Good. . trains. 9LQIIo ic. l vronrnent; 8' Vegat8tion: Blue Oaks Live Oak, Poison Oak old grasses, Coanothws, Digger Pine, N 9- Wildlife Habitat: 011VO Orchard. , animal o knowil d rare anendangered plant ork species On site, 10- Archaeological and Historical Resources 1 See Item 20 Und0r, Discussion of In the area; High. 11- Bu-�,te County General Plan desig Environmental Evaluation, Residential. n8tiong Low Density 124 Existing Zoning: AN -1. `3- '*<Ssting Land Use on-site; One OccwPied and one abandoned 14i. Surrounding Area., a. Land Us0st Residential. b4 City or nrcyjlla, c. Gen. plali .pies i onat i u, L ON Dens I tY Ros!dent i a 1 $ Public. '"Orth d' Parcel Sizes' and L" less than 1 e. 1/p to 8 acres. West: 20 acres4"-. acreo South: Population: Rural t 15. Character of Site and Area: M9 b I u f f s aboyi�s �-aather 16. Nearest Urban Ar housing. 'V' R010va"t Sphereseat Orov"lo in immediate viclMity. Orovjlje-W�tandoOf Influence.* City of Orovi:11 tte Irrigat ion Dis 19 18 rnprovements 'tr*ct, Standards Urban Area: ',�'roritaoe I-ema i ndGr 1, not, 1 s �-`! tH urban F 1 re Protecti �n $ery I ce * Nearest County (SL�a* I L"O) Fire Sbation" east; 41 3 i 4 1 es Hest. 4641 1-1/2 miles b4 Water Availability* Engine capacity, hydrants: O - Schools in Areat Oroy. Ille Elementary and High School, -11-- ,A F Buff© Co. Planning Corm.. SEP 1.0 1906 ..;`W Oroville, Calii�rr ARCHAEOLOPY SURVEY OF A.P,N. 33,01-3,? BUTTE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA BY JAMES P. MANNING PROJECT DESCRIPTION, The proposed project is for a boundary line modification and division of approximately 45 acres of land into .Cour parcels. PROJECT LOCATION: The project site is located adjacent to the north side of Long Bar Road, approximately 0.5 miles ' north of the intersection with Orange Avenue, northeast of the Coity of Oroville, in Butte County, Tile property covers all of the SW 1/4 of the av" 1✓4, of Section d Section 9, T. 1.9 N., R, ; t;., �.ov lie Quadrangle 7,5 nsnd �oet on of the NW 1/4 of PROJECT APPLICANT; P.O. v Betty Davis }} L".O. Box 1743 Oroville, CA 95955 PRIOR DATA tsite record Prior to conducting a .field survey of the project site the archaeological site retard files maintained by the Northwest Information Center of the California Archaeological Inventory were consulted to determine if, any Previously recorded cultural resarltoes were located within, or adjacent to, the Prc at area. No previously recorded 'cultural resources had been recorded within, or adjacent to, the Project boundaries, DATE OF FIELD INSPECTION; SenfAmhh" A "On" ENVIRONMENTAL SET-11:XG: The project site lies within the lower foothills of the Sierra Nevada with elevatioh.< ranging from 300' to 400% The ,area is characterized by gently rolling terrain with a generally gentle northeast to southwest slope. The vegetation consists of an oalr-grasslfanc1 riparian plants along the drainage chwith small paCrhes of chaparral and some annels. The area contains numerous outcrops of basalt and mudflow, Two ephomarrrl drainages cross the the southwest corner of the lsroProperty and converge 11, herty, neither of these draiftages contained water at the time of the field inspection, The nearest permanent water soitrco .is the Feather River locate d- aPProximately 0"25 miles to the west of the Existing buildings on the property include a Currently occupied ���, ;dente and rum abandoned residvhce. Remnants property area and a cumber of fiof an olive orchard were found throughout torn the P-oparhy. g trees were located in, the we stern portion of ,,otrs of •leo tie SURVEY M1'i`IlObO1.OGY. The ft 4 cid sttrvey was a visuraI inspection of the ground: saccate for mer, "rials o�^ f^ "�rrs� historic activi'•v. The survey was.. acro,, byindicativewall �n�* of y�rrre��jYtoric or early spaced linear ILP. N(At1:ev d. Aggh r P42Y Cmguog@fi OCA 0592T."009 Ph NO "@-59956 0 transects with an approximate 10 meter interval spacing aver the entire project area, The gentle scope of the property and Open vegetation allowed access to all areas of the property, Ground visibility was fair over most of the however, areas of dense grass provided generally poor visibility, , property, FINDINGS; Three prehistoric sites were recorded during the inspection of the property. All three .of these sites consisted of bedrock mortars, which were utilized by the native people for, processing fond resources. All of the sites were located. adjacent to the drainage channels, Two of these sites consisted of three mortars. each that were all less that 506 szl. in 'volume with no associated artifacts.. One of the sites contained three large bedrock mortars, over 15 cm, in depth, with two associated pestles. All three of these sites were recorded, mapped and photographed in the field and no further mitigation measures are recommended. Materials and features related to historic actio -4 include the abandoned house, the olive and fig trees, and a small ditch,. The abandoned. house is of a relatively modern style and may date back to the 1930's. This abandoned s structure has been for a number of years and does not meet the requirements for inclusion ab in the National Register of Historic Places. This structure is possible Over 50 Years in age, but does not represent a unique architectural style, and is not related to an Important person or event jr, national or local history. Olive growing began in the Oroville area N the 1880's and the remnant orchard located on the property could date from th ut time, The Orchard has not been, maintained for many years and the trees only source of water is from ;ground water and rain, The fig trees, in the Western portion of the area, are mixed in with olive trees and it was difficult to determine if they were cultivated at one time or not. The ditch is located in the northeast portion of the property and was utilized for irrigation of the orchards, A section of cement pipe was found as part of this ditch at a dirt road crossing, RHCOMMENDATIONS; It is recOnimendcd that archaeological clearance be granted for the proposed project site, The proposed project will not impact any significant cultural resources and it is unlikely that buried cultural resources, not visible on the surface, are located an the project site. The cultural resources identified Within the project area were either mitigated It :he field or are hot ,recommended for further mitigation, t� J,1xmOs P. Manning Archaeology Consultant 0 A hit x IN w , .. _ ♦ fin.. -7 M M1 ,�� �� • OROVILLE ELEMENTARY SCHO OL DISTRICT yl \ A A A 4 4 v'n'A` S `Q y.S 'y > �'N,}v � :>. V Y}'� �iL24 .nv+S.{..XSvwvs I ��ia.��jYrF • /1 ; .,nY e'tYn.n....+7c .�. hrl.•, St;iNi�:v`.C� y kr,y, r;ra M°^YZAWA14 ^ �y�at rr r�rn�rs� m scNnu. ROARrY OF TRUSTEES: WIL .,IAM A. TURPIN DONALD L nWLEY, Ed.D. Sopoatilondonr Ptos+dant 1 Ju t y 3, 1986 DAVID F. MC-NNUCCI, O.D D. FiC1P1ALD FULLER rbroclor a Instruction then Prosrriant CWP ILt?13 n GENTLES SUSAN XFFEnS Dimness At :gagor Clark Idlr,ldAELC BLAZE Mr. John Mendansa, AssiaLant. D.irecLor CounLy of` Dui Le 841-k Co. Planning , AI4l0.914ANNON DeparLmenL of Public Works 7 County Center Drive JUL 8 1996 Qrovill.e, CA 95965 0!rwgle, ciionda Re: F3eLt� Davis Tent.pLive Parrel Mai Dear Mr. Hendonsa Y have reviewed Lhe Lent•aLYve parcel map which was Submitted by Mrs. Rnt.ty Day.18. the ares involved 1n Lhis sutyrt,rvisi,iih is currenl:ly .in the Stanford Averwe School alLendanub, area. St arlford Avenue 5ct�ooj is present;Ly ner4r ca,pAcit:y arwta will pp htipl-) wxrepri rspsrity within the flexl Lwo Years,, AlLhou•tir Lhut e .it; t,ut r,elO ly ava,t�tab.lP Space wit.hin the schmil Clair- �omSt- you should be awars of Lhe ove'rcrowd6d conditions, P1688r; contnct. Wiry it T care be or rurLher a; bi ,Large 1.0 you. Sincerely, Dona d L. kemley Cd. 0 .1 SuporinU-mc]enL DLR., cl Di E 007 Q PHILIP A. LYDON Consulting Geologist 2948 San Verbena Way, Chico, California 95926 (916) 343.9277 i ' 1 October 31, 1986 Buy, C.. pIa►m ng S T A T E M E N T JAN 2 6 1987 0U4, Califoradq _ TO Betty Day? s P.O. Box 1.743 0roville CA, 95985 Field examination of property (AP 33•-01-32 & 33) and preparation of geological report on Potential seismic hazard 460..00: ....... �.._ Phi 13 P A . I,ydnn Calif. Registered Geologist # 144 Report enclosed 0 yD S rf $ ^•3.• �. �..:: PA C/F C i,« ". _�,,.•�,_._., P , w i Polk AVE / I /s 14 • ,I �' i r/>.•... .• ^yer �,ittr: , , ,htR.lf,° 3'il•ril•"+ ,�! •� .'' / 3 ,. " ' •, ,i ti 1:l to mud \ To A Ft'Y L E I+ IrlV � BOIi•No .QD✓ClfTME T .,. r c ,, .« ,I*i• fir' ,.:° , AIR o5.5-0,7 eAs r ,� h �6sY Q,f of 3901 Y h ^ i o `�`• 0 '` OAF' h` i 7. Xk + .` e \. ' r O , i \�r 1 (. ` i tt F LRS ' ii�p �. 4! t I • + r •r tt; ht t.l,;e+-+, °• `� wL ras�'� "•\ ♦ ,: t' .. ," t r 7 . . iry',I I+3...�. ./�R t!t+. „.� , `t'S`:,�10 •""•. c 'k:y,, V�+��+.'*..t-}`• \ `� xJ it �i• � h. �i� } �'{tL i P•r 1': \ 1 „ \ .. T , • w •:1-..n ,t.L a._' .Ii`IIFt �'t�' �'`'ti..�„hi r. i .. t ,i V • SL� ^1 i, r ResfOrmc[ ' 1 it ;'s r r 7 + ,.I• 9 r R � .r r,k5 ,. / • h / iI f '� Rct.nriri< N �• �. �1 is�i u 3� t l c ..".`r• .� ' w' F O ,. � {�\h ift'l •'% R ii t. � 1i,.,�� . /' :'y n� Olt It'+_,Y`ya.� i�► '+;j�! �I •.r _^�a ..... �_ > ! i� !/r Sy�YR•����i ��. .S �): W\tiR. .. ., �-.Mfk� iS :r ii q,. i ''�*1 f3ff'(.%Oil A ci z41 1 F Vie• 721 r •• re 'x°i4 t17 , et ! • i . • '..` ` i' �O''s �1 "V +tea „� .� _ ��µ�t �t a+l i�. y t 4.. ., 1 t .. t F it t F i • ' 1 .3 ..i 21'F. ,;. � R. �4' 7kfb,, t � ' r � �„ ''"r✓ ,✓� ,�pAs Y'�°r rr � ,,..'. r / " OO GEOLOGY .AND SOILS OF r W S PROPERTY We(TGO AY ,�Y .,til. , M 'i oed sheet for >! +i I virclAlrry MAP. ok symbols titiAlr / r xo0o' "i�" • `�' It i r, 1 i W N ;4PPLI A Mr \ p, Ai LYdCjNIF t' BETTY DAVIs t7Rbvltcr L.IVTAT1 / . r c•q�.�F •ARCED. MA 3 2. / /Nr: A PORT%oN OF, ►'' D/V' :,qR� J»�" •� 5 C1 NW 14 DF' ;S ' 9,/ �1''•°,!, ,., h'�',, •ASE � / T �' fl n ti r r n ,, • � 7'T�" •"r l �'�.. GEOLOGY AND SOILS OF D&VTS PROPERTY EKPLANATI ON rock type soil type Pvs pebbly volcanic sandstone pale -brown, sandy loam ►hv5 metavolcanic rock tnv c ( FOWES . ' TESL AOLK _C/F/(.4',16o i AvEy ,• s :fit +`, mvc in d K' "," 1 t�• .� 7 "f , (� 1 YI, Yl, k .F k 9 f Y .8 .,tw ..' + / + , "• i ':i �+•' ,i k. t y Y ,i� 3F111,.y �k T'S: Stt • �' ~ • ! y t .� ,t ,r�r II'1 , 41 y� i �ii~• {,� r'1". " k 1 tkSiA" ✓c LP VS row" rv�•o wir,V � h � '' " `+,� %j{ ,,� :1 �t Ogg + i , 485+ CAST , a� +,� w,,.• " e,, + i , �•e • •y � I o aOtt 0 .r 470, • tOjL,. • "a• O'' O-/ t .•tom i,rt j(( \` ! 4i� K ' , j/8 • \ 1 � , i " + " . , "+ r y + ,,fit 1' � ' ck , n• �` •.� V ' `^i �` to .�+ !. 1' � 'tN Ir `y; +'l yr• L1 ' 1 h I' �F � `,y"tYt• \ " }}p ~,,,M +•�t,�" �J !1'V'�,'„�.��4� �kY �'�� r+ �. O ^`Y'� " �: Til+ ','�k!`+ri � "+,�.s �,� •k' �t �,� .� �/ (� •{ , r'� "•' /' yk 1+woayl4 "� � .. f'4..` " I 1 + � + t„ Kra + , ,{ '`" •+.��"�.�� i� SCS/O[NCA {�+ �1 •� •� Ii+rtS ��'+ + t ' !t , J ,�, r� �. �?1 + ry."_— •i. � �' ® •� «�'a• :may • `"r'/'% .. r ! I'�"'s.�_i/ a y 1 \ t�j" w"t °ti � •+ '1 ,,,,, -`. i. + °1.! + i. �� � r� !•"'•'R•• R1Sid�,l�r"� , y. .+ 1.k'�y 'h :i` k•r�"' C�'{-t �t �i"�` + _ j 1 rah 1,10%10. �i 3'i Citi+' "' r,"+y#' t'•`a, '�•'a s'' ,a,i.i .1i 3•" n )) «`.. � /f ,M,y.� ..(yt".7�.`'r ') r'.wk'I,'. f.+L-..1'-�) ".� •�•yi 4 04 l r tir-�.l • '., , r .•" i s1 Ryr 'C;{ . :! 1l .v t, a• v %S . +, � � r �. � '� , " ,: , • ;r t •+ fir, • ; J Y °" ... �.; 127ol+ ", �. c. fie• loch � � � � : t••l ° " t" ,; tr +� . i ° 1� + , + f c,• {,;, " \` `4 4� `C' :I E l ,fie � " k i>'�'Y. , t . W � t, 1. yV ,Y. ` /1" V,G� ". ems' t ".. ,t•,tr �y\y�l � 11 ,�,1�- O P. 1 • ,. t t"+ l i t t� k,, 1 i • ," f `' + i \ i'1. "V p " �>•.•: .+ r ..fir ' , " ,�`, 1, d ';'J a"! "'nI A�'f�it'�..: `"�„�, iy tt':'t�. IN + • r' 1 ��Ai ` 1 ' .,✓�, ✓ +L10 • i p ��� l by � j,j1� + `+��GL • � �j�`+U! GE _. , �• �+'t, + "LLs. '�yy Y 1 rt.. v r. O;GGi`Y AND SOTIS OF DAVIS PROPE.RxyLV Sea attached A j �tcrr �'I•., ex lariat h of symba�s i IN y MAP r P- LYDON t: l t 2000 � ,j.0 �' � t. R /,4 PACK. ,tlr BICTTY DAVIS n• � e •y N +,c P, df,©mak �r4� .• •.. ,. �... " " OR of CA 4/r PDR r16N, dr 7`yel�E �el , 4 y r : �YW r¢� d � 9 9fN, + CF' S , r 1 R D" F r� kFA { GEOLOGY AM SOILS OF D VIS PROPERTY EXPLANATION rock type soil type PPalvs pebbly volcanic e-brown sandstone sandy loam f MVS metavolcanic rock mvS: Sobrante series II My c (cross hatching , indicates outcrop) mvct poorly -Grained, clay rich, expansive soil �,r"'�,,,,.•� contact, separating rock or soil types �, •,i lineament, from aerial, photograph ,ter Philip �,,. ydoft Calif. Registered Geologist # 144 October 1986 MW GEOLOGY, FAULTS, AND LINEAMENTS NEAR DAVIS PROPERTY t' See attached sheet for��``� tV explanation of symbols° P. A LYDO Geologist git ll .".ffC�_:rti " "� �I�xFee .,•�``4r� itr�" Y".'r�' �• // -(/ Itpl � �'i ..� Ilri i '.y�•'e. ore-.li �''��'Q� � \l��t.. � ii10 � r���A � •.;11,1 IL\r.J"""...� � T. 20 N. i;';'�i •I i\.,"+,�� r�k rr,r�., u a ' ;� f "`�"�c'k,, i '� :1 � a 32'30h •� p u/ c� c. „ l t'Cr � i14U� �, � � �J/yy 0 . 11(j1 � �%l 1 114 ���. •'r'' Y r 'fit. I;I' .._. ttw �/O '`-"'..;ii'-�,�Y�c �` �t. +.+D�`rt. -," C J' n�'.M`' 1 i.v r •�.�„ lY `/�•1 `, �� �• Ill ( i. �`., __ ��� J„ �, .� . , TMs N. Poo � ' l X345 Thom o r- w� m r1 het �4 14411 ` i . t , , , , - [� .. _ - N+� •{ 5 i X16 1 �� ��a - 1`r�`` ! 8 o i, •,. `� q' �f 3 to .7y� �� �s•: � � - Swain Ravine £� �.�, •`�' ,, xis .; i• lineament r a l �Y1 �� ,1��, •! C a t �• i! 0 t ,. aa s 111. �.P,, ..�� rr t 1 ., � t r ir• � �.t�{/ "Q� 'r --B y .1, � •-`"�' "w�+i �.� a �`i: '� ��:�....•✓/ � %J � r 1 �• f� ♦) -�/`" {R�6 .,�� 1 + � ��'� B;gj ��� `:�gt�� y;t 3f��:°` i �r-:��.'�,. �.��� I C!.^�. 1.\ � I ..%-\'�,i• �. • � 3 .,. �'' �� 9M .., i.✓ 3 a,,�: � r�G `�i'�"lR,i .'y /. ��'i `�w; i � . f�S ji. i 8 w(" � ,, a • iici���((lr.��%tet r � t ,�•,,. �i � ��'isr� H., ya _EAAW Bch I �t• ..,.i{ .1 ./ .. , _ i , 4,":, 1 -it •, 1'r! (k N F2 �t1,1r\� i wry, w. Vi'i.j+G•."� tp 1,� (�. y� j� a- pi . Y' �'1� •!•'r17 j jar ' .rw.iV *,.•,f("1 � i. !i ,i'i t y...� V .00 ry � .. g;, ..� , ._+-..�`�, i ..,rte✓ rt� Epu„ • .� •,^+�,�', -� I '^r. :. /,. % feet `�.+.....:.` . : P+,�.d _�� w�., .�. "y 'i6' ��.ii.. y'�`gi. `i a (!F �4'•� `./`^"•�y'y ,,, ..r'� '.•�i .���i �,� �M� 1 .... W �s .• 1 e t ��. c•} � ��. � :w � `"".+� "'wi p r' ,�"' i '� a✓../ 1 �,/�i ' i � � ' !b f•G /t �/ .,ter 3s AA9'� � ��� ; r `�'°' 1/• "✓ �tl.0 A ,t �.i °1 Gri �r ... {� 5�'` S •�' r��lJ 1 irk •, .a. •111 O aT k4' •" t'' � -•fie, .. U �n �, 1 �. � Ceattal y 1 WC ,�;,,v + +y r✓ I N \.I $@h C Iry �`w 1 Ci +`, '' .1'�+`,>y.';.x...,-C'^*"`._ •�` . iYCii'i:,".��+711► 4 ... ,�i 1 i � Q. Tr..::.: Vf(t 1L�.,��,.,M;!�' �A, y i i�.w I .,,• � .�L�. t i �,L �', • J � r~ •..r = _'ruv+t v.. w , ate.` 11 ��, { _. ►' , .. , r . • • .. , MOB 'Ml. 4 GEOLOGY, FAULTS, AND LINEAMENTS NEAR THE DAVIS PROPERTY EXPLANATION vs volcanic sandstone and younger rock Mv metavolcanic rock y (includes minor metasedimentary rock) Faults and Lineaments ,�'` Fault; activity unknown (Map II--=1, County General Plan) Ancient fault; no evidence of mode �rn activity (Dept- Water Resources 1979) PC � �'`� Possible extensions of Prairie. Creek lineament fault zone Lineaments (black-and-white aerial photographs) Contact, betweeza rock types Davis property Geology from Dept. Water Resources 1979; topography from U.S. Geological Survey Oroville 7.5�-tnin quadrangle Compiled by Philip A. Lydon Calif. Registered Geologist # 144 October 1986 PHILIP A. LYDON Consulting Geologist 2948 San Verbena Way, Chico, California 95926 (916) 343-9277 October 81, 1986 SEISMIC HAZARD AT THE DAVIS PROPERTY NEAR OROVILLE C ONC LUSIONS No evidence of an active fault- was found on the property, A fault shOWn on Map 11-1 Of the General Plan does not cross theProperty. Ground shaking is the principal potential seismic 'hazard. It can be mitigated ted by constructing dwellings resistant to lateral forces, not placing structures On Poorly"drained, clay -rich expansive SOilt and installing 'mobile 'homes (if anYy in such manner as to r,,!sist lateral forCti,4,, INTRODUCTION The Davis property AP 33-01-32 & 33) consists of 42.8 acres Proposed for division into five parcels. It i the north side of Long Bar Road and east of s on the Feather River, about 1/2 mi north-northeast of Oroville$ in SWI/4 SWI/4 Sec. 4 and a portion Of NWI/4NWI,/4 Sec. 9, T19M, V4E. A Preliminary assessment by County planning Department 'aff led to the conclusion that potential, seismic hazard exists because of the proximity of faults associated with the Foothills Shear Zone. Betty 'Davis, the Property owner, retained ino to prepare a 'geological report on the Potential seismic haza,:t, at the Property. preparation of this report included surface OXAminatior, Of the site and nearby areas On October 1!$ 1086) search of "he geological literature, and examination Of low-level black-and-whito aerial photographs. Lydrin page two October 31, 1986 TOPOGRAPHY, SOILS, AND GEOLOGY The total elevation difference on the 90 ft, Two low rid9es in the northeast property is about from the more -subdued south portion b port, are separated' channel that was Y awest-trending stream dry at the time of the field inspection. Soils mapping in the area (Smith et a., 1979) covers only Part of the property. The pert not covered is "urban area, soils not ma classed as pped"; the remainder, corn two-thirds of the comprising about the central. two-thirds series soil. Properi�y, is classed as Sobrante This soil is generally as much as 40 inches deep, has a reddish -brown silt loam surface layer andeowrsh-red clay loam subsoil, is well. drained, and has moderate tY. it is a residual soil developed on metavo?ca perrneabili scattered outcrops and clusters of abundant boulders rock; where the soil is absent or very thin, boulders mark areas Three areas on the property, which are outside the mapped by Smith et al-, have different soils, portion ` .part (see enclosed In the northwest map of geology and soils)' , a largo flat is underlain by a grayish -brown displays , plastic, clay to clay loam that prominent 1/2 -inch -wide s' rink e cracks. south, a similar soil showing only thin shrinkage c Farther ihCldes with about the westernmost 300 it oft Lsracks co- setback area. Such soil indicates moderate toh�tenptc-free g shrink y' characteristic of areas having impaired drainaswell �et�.v. t and is , 9 Paired g The southernmost 200 to 300 ft of the property (in parcel 3) a_s underlain by a weal-drajned loam► Its distribution coindides , pa 1;e -brown sandy sandstone, from which it is deriv with that of a pebbly volcarl3.c ed as a residual. soil, Only two rock tYPes were seen on or mmediatel ,,a to the property, Although ex Y adJ cent g Posures are poor because of extensive soil and vegetation, it is not likely that additional rock types are present, and none is indicated b y previous geo1- ag�.cal mapping in the region (Dept. waterources l9`7�es Dusacda 1982), 9, Vletavolcan 0 rock, which .is poorly e,Xpooed but unde�- y li es ,Lydon page three October 31,, 198E ., most of the property at only shallots depth, is a massive to moderately -jointed, hard, dark- to edium� teen rock stone") that weathers to shades of brown or orange.UTOin s are fractures in rock that are not related to eathqua te=nts movement of the rock.) The second rock t, caused type, e-`cposed in cuts. along Long Bar Road, is a relatively -sofa, 10 01 t --brown volcanic sandstone that contains pebbles in a wide varietyof colors, these form a conspicuous part of the loamy soil derived from the sandstone. FAULTS Enclosed is a topographic map (copy of part of the Orov lle 7.5 -min quadrangle) on which ar'c shown.. the distribution of geological units near the: Davis property; a fault ("activity unknown'') from Map ll -1 of the County General Plan; three faults mapped by Dept. of Water Resources1979 ( ); possible locations of the unexposed Prairie Creek lineament, based on a discussion by Busacca (1982,, P. 1.67) 173, 175); and several small lineaments seen on black -ands -white aerial photographs (1.975; 517/2-136 & 137, 5147/3-201. & 202). A lineament is a Line or band,, usually seen on aerial or satellite photographs or on a topographic map, that results from alignment of features such as vegetation, tonal changes, ridges, saddles,. .and se , gments of streams or ravers. A l,nea- Ment can be caused by a variety of geological features, includ- frig but nc' Limited to faults; No evidence of an active faun {; was Found on or inirediatel adjacent to the Davis property, y Fault 11-.1 (" q) "activity ty unknown" , carefully scaled from Map ofIthe Genera . Plan) is probably the same as the old, parentl a Y 4 ive fault Mapped l`izst to theeast; by Depart- Mont of Water Resources. Excellent ex posuxes of rock along the Old railroad cuts beside the Feather River did not revoal any evidence of a fault at the location indicated for fault rx_l and no ihdikOdt- evidence of a fault (Such as aligned z+ret Zones, .low scarps, or shallow depressions) was found in the southeast Lydon . page four October 31, 1986 portion of the Property where fault �=-1 �t would be expected tcorrL`:ta,y located, o cross it. A narrow band of Yneta or sandstone is adjacent to the Department of Water to phosed vault, immediately on its west side this P_sources extend into the Davis rock type does not property. Two other ancient faults for which there is no evide�lce of movement during g�logicall 1.979} were y -recent time (Dept. Wat.erReso�xrces Mapped .farther to the Basta at closest approach, they are ax -out 1.0 and 1.5 mi from the property. The northerly project, on of the Prairie Creek ,7,ineament Probably passes west of the distant. property., either 1/4 or one The Prairie Creels lifreament is a male wasY De rmapped b 4d -mi -long lone that Dept. of Water Resources (1979) 3 mi south of Palermo. tr,� a point about Tt is one of three "lInlf ament raul,t zones" in the oroville region, so called because they cons' "complex bands of discontinuous consist of faults" formed more than 70 m; ' intertwined, Steeply -dipping million years ago (Dept. Water Resources 1978} . '1 W:e Cleveland Hills souls . a ,; , ane of these ancient fault zones (the Swaan � yea�i.avatl.on of Ravine lineament, Which trends north about 3.8 mi east of the propert-- i 1975 as a result of the ma ,), noved in finitude 5.7 Palermo ea t^thgsiak-e The Prairie Creek lineament is considered ca fault movement (Dept, Water ResourceS gable of future 1979, P. 79) because: it joins with the active Swain Ravine lineament soul County] scattered ground cracks' Originating Of Butte earthquake series, Formed a during the 1975 northerly fro crude alignment that extended m the mapped northern end of q the li heament,� a small earth. ua]tes have occurred along the �:ineam , and northerly projection, ens and its The northerly extension of thePrairie Creek matches with an. in Aped lineament base of the hills by Busacca just east of Palermo. (1082) at the e"'act location is not well defined, because of there, its .Younger it it covered by sedl,mehtar Y rock and surface ev�.dence r its exis is vague, Hiisacca did not show the location c,t the Prairie hce Lydon Page five October 31 r 1986 Creek lineament on his section (1982pgeological.. map, however, on a cross. . 170 �, he marked an ffapproximate Prairie Creek 1' approximate ,zone Projection o f based on a slight,", with the location being west -side -down flexuee in the seditnen rock layers Scaling that point onto a topographicla.ey- • P ma extending the trend northerlyalong a 'weakl p, +�r�d graphic lineament brings the Y`exPressnd topo- graphic positithe Pr�i3.r�.e on of Creek lineament to the south margin of the Oroville quadrari (see encloser' fault ma gle p for its location. From that point, the zone of deformation associa the lineament might extend, northerly to coincidewith with th north -south reach. of the Feather River (Busacca e short 1982 from whence it would be aligned with the 21 -mi -lo p. lF-7), Magalia lineament. ng Paradise Linear elements of the Paradise-Magalia i include '�a section of the Feather River x�neaiment the .east edge of South Table Mountains a at Orovll.e, drainage on North Table Mountain and a, linear ridge on the west side of Magalia Res voir'o (Depti Water Resources,1979j P. 77).er- BusacCa (1982, p 173 175 notes that the Chico rfonoclinQ a prominent west -side -down Chico, is the surface fle0cure in rock layers gust east of eX pression of e major geological, f Probably a fault, and that the southeastward �atu.Ye, trend of this feature passes through the ga proof the Mountain and the Campbell Hills P ctween South liable j Projection of the prairie Creek lineament. with the nor-thward There is at Aresent no sound choose unequivocally ween the Possible basis On which to eq y bet westerl Passible northerly and :north- Westerly Projections of the Prairie Creek lineament, Botha __. shown on the enclosed map of faults and lineaments; re cuts or` is immediately adjacent to the Davis neither one property. Low-level aerial photographs show a "ea tures (lineaments group of short linsar northeast o f= the Property p Y (see enclosed map), Their trends range from northerly to easterl Passes into the northern portion of the Davis y. Cne property, follow- ing a draw between t wo low ridges., The. drati.+ is :`ver filled 'Winy brush a _ d th coll.uv3.,al sail, so that the small lineament Y n evident on the eament is not ground, No wet zones, scarps) p , or other evidence I,Vdon page six October. 31, 1986 of the existence of a fault was found during the field exalnina- Lion of the propertyi These features are interpreted as joints-- ftactutroo in rock not related to earthquake activity-- because 1) their 'gelid varies widely; 2) they are short, none longer than 0.7 Mi and averaging 0.4 mi, in contrast to the lineament fault z()jj(,�s that are tens of miles lotg; and 3) their dominant trend (northeaster- ly) is at variance with the trends of lineament fault Zones and active faults in the region, which are north to northwest. SEISMIC HAZARD The preceding discussion shows that movement from an active fault on the Davis Property isnot a likely hazard. The prina- ipal potential seismic hazard is ground shaking from an earth- quake originating on a nearby fault zone. Numerous studies (summarized by Division of Mines and Geology Staff 1979) indicate that an earthquake of IIIFLgnitude 6,$ should be considered possible anywhere in the Foothills Fault System. Dent. of 'Rater Resources (1979f p. '19) concluded that potentialfor futlate earthquakes is greatest al:on-q the Swain Ravine lineamjnt) north and South of the part that broke in 1975) and that the Prairie Creek lineament should be con- sidered capable of the same kind of movement that occurred along the Swain Ravine lineament in 1975. Following the 1075 earthquake, a consulting Board for Earthquake Analysis recommended (Dept, Water Resources 1979) that the maximum credible earthquake in the Otoville area should be considered as a magnitude 6.5 earthquake producing a, peak horizontal ground acceleration of 0,6 g. This would be a significantly stronger earthquake thaii the magnitude 5,7 event in 1975, Saturated, Poorly-dtainod, clay -rich soils subjected to strong shaking can fail by spreading (lateral movement under load):) leading to differential Settling of structures. In additionj Ireb weak Soils tend to amplify the ground motilins Lydon page seven October 31, 1986 occurring in rock during an earthquake. MITIGATIONS Constryctio.n of dwe.l.lings resistant to lateral outlined in the retirements of the UniformBuildinf'orces, as should provide areasonable mitigation of the grade, potential hazard from ground shaking. Specific building sites should be so as to avoid areas of placed pgorly-drai property. ned clayey soils on the If mobile homes are to be placed on the Propertyj i1nother Mitigation would be to require that they be tied do wn or otherwise treated so as to resist laterad forces , braced, earth Steinbru from quakes gye et al. (1980 relation curve relating earth ) have prepared a cor- quake intensity at an affected site with average monetary loss, when mobile homes have been made earthquake resistant. The General p1 not a maximum inten8it y of an dates that VII1+ should be anticipated for future earthquakes in most of eastern. Butte County, this isene ,� agreement with the e�tpectation of a magnitude 6.5 cart g ra The expected loss :among non.-Yesistar�t Mobile homes hauake, an earthquake would average from such ge 12 percent, according to the curl"e Of Steinbrugge et a1.3 loss from injury in mobile homes 'C4 generally similar to that p kenced in wood -frame dwell n s. ex r g. REFERENCES CI'T'ED Busacca, A.,7;, 1982) Geologic history and soil development, northeastern Sacramento Va11e unpublished Ph.D, Thesis, 348 p. California- Univ: Calif. scale 1:62,500. plus appendices and map, DP -pt. of Nater Resources, 1979, The August�. earthquake investigations= Calif; DopSRCoxvCcl�se Bull. 20 -78, 660 p, a. Watees Division of Mines and Geology Tec of the seismic safes' Staff, 1979 a . y oflzeu,ury amsite; �Cal� f Div► Mines and Geology Spec, Pub. 541 , p. C 5 -- r _ �I ti Lydon page eight October 31, 1986 Smith, B. F. et al., 1979, Soil vegetation map and fables, Oroville 7i.5 -min quadrangle (40D-4), Butte County, California: U.S. For. Service, Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, 1.1 p. plus map, scale 1:31.,680. Steinbrugge, K.V., et al.$ 1980, Mobile homes and earthquake damage in California: Calif. Seismic,. Safety Commission, SSC 79-07, 29 p. Philip A. Lydon Calif. Registered Geologist # 144 Encl.t Geology and soils of Davis property, & explanation Geology, faults, and lineaments near Davis property, & explanation li .,M.A., J• , •.. DU W. LAt',ID OF NATURAL WEALTI-I AND BEAUTY DEPARTMENT 4FPUBLIC WoRI<S WILLIAM (dill) CHFFr, 01ractor 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE . OROVILLF, CALIFORNIA 95965 Telephone' 19161 534,4641' RONALD D. McELROY September 15p 198/):' Deputy Director 2P0 Grand. Avenue ate; Betty Davis 'tentative Parcel provill.e, CA 95965 Pfop-AP// 33-01-3P & 33 Attn: William Ceddis Wt. have received your appl,ica t on for a tentative acemap line modification or> the above mentioned parcels andrPPurl suantato a boundary We have the follwing comments; your request, I. The boundary lint; mrr3ifir,ntjon as props eci wnu.11 require abandonment Of the Publics rights to FOrnwood Aventie and a reversion to acreage map to combine these lot, in }dock 37 of the Western Pacific Addition with the northerly portion of 53-01-32. 2, The parcel, map as proposed could be modified to call the 15 acre parcel as xwemaining lands of owner with a note on the final map to read: "A certificate of compliance may be required prior to sale, lease or finance of this parcel.." The parcel. could then effect the boundary lint modification as described in item #1. 5, We have received two separate applications and county ordinances do not allow two separate approvals on a piece of the boundary line miodifcatiot is a property, therefor if approval should be complied with pr.orotodathen all conditions of parcel map. != - approval, of the tentative you should have any, questions, please at 534-x+261?. contact Stuart Edell of this efface #0* truly yours William ChefP tirector of Public Works John Mendons�i Adsastant Director BOARD OF TRUSTEES: .. WILLIAM A TURPIN President % /1 � � C.../ DONALD L REMLEY, Ed,D. Suporinlondenl ,','? July July �y �,g8 DAVID F. ME•NNUCCI, 0,I). Vico PresidentDiteeror RONALD FULLER o/ InstruCllon CHARLES D. GENTLES Clock SUSAN JEFFERS BUSM0as bihnngur MICHAEL C. GLAZE Mr. John Mendcnse, Assistant Director County of Butte ANN C. SHANNON Depar meat of Public 'Works' 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 Re: Betty Davis Tentative Parcel Map Dear Mr, Mendonsa. I have reviewed the tentative parcel map which was submitted by Mrs. Betty Davis. The area involved in this subdiviripn is currently in the Stanford Avenue School attendance area, Stanford Avenue School is presently near capacity and will perhaps exceed capacity within the next two years. Although there is currently available space within the school classrooms, You should be aware of the overcrowded conditions. Please contact me if Z can be of further assistance to you. Sincerely, - Dona,d L. Remley, Superintendent MR ct MR0o7 3 Staff Determinatiory, Project does X does not substantially conform to the General Plan: :Continents o Z-,,,�.; Staf# SigttatuicX AS 'M APPLICANT FOR T11E R:t:QUESITD LktiD DlVISYOA; 1 A,.1 AWARE OF THE A13,OVE STAFF DE '1'E*aNAT,101i plGAP,DING ` tE Co',,, L,1�ICE 14111 `I1%E GENERAL PLAN - w Darted Signature oil Applicant Gi D: A, tbgineets- Surve0ri a punning 2�A '^oai1d Avenue Oros ifoenia 95965 LD 10 0 reV fled 6189y f4i,.a a •068 - '47 BUTTE COUNTY GENEML PLAN co,,FOR:'u1I3CE VXPOFT FOF. PARCEL MAP OP SUBDIVISION MAP Items 1-4 to be completed by applicant:•+%{ 1. Applicant Name 1/677t� "2/�y/.S --JUN Abu 2. Project Description 7 1. 3, Assessor's Parcel 1;umber(s) 33-0 /-32 ,V .;23 4'. Proposed Use A5XI - e--- ,he following items are to be completed by the Planning Department: !�:3 0i- 3 A I a Current zoning .:= C'-� `�'� l l Iand Conservation Agreement . General Plan ,)esignarion _ c ok Anplicable Conditional Criteria: Not Applicable Agricultural -Residential YES NO 1. Agricultural Compatibility ----- .-- 2. Water & Sewer Capacity 3. Adequate Fire Facilities ► '" Road Capacity & Maintenance 5. Access to Commercial & Schools Orchard & Field Crops 1. Predominant 5-10 Ac. Parcel Size , Vicinity of Urban Poundaries ... -- 3. Agric. viability not impaired .... Staff Determinatiory, Project does X does not substantially conform to the General Plan: :Continents o Z-,,,�.; Staf# SigttatuicX AS 'M APPLICANT FOR T11E R:t:QUESITD LktiD DlVISYOA; 1 A,.1 AWARE OF THE A13,OVE STAFF DE '1'E*aNAT,101i plGAP,DING ` tE Co',,, L,1�ICE 14111 `I1%E GENERAL PLAN - w Darted Signature oil Applicant Gi D: A, tbgineets- Surve0ri a punning 2�A '^oai1d Avenue Oros ifoenia 95965 LD 10 0 reV fled 6189y f4i,.a a •068 -