HomeMy WebLinkAbout031-180-080PLANNING
ING COMMISSION SUMMARY SHEET FOR LgD DIVISIONS
APPLICANT Richard Hood
ADDRESS 18 Forest Creek Circle, Chico, Ca. 95926
OWNER Same
PROJECT DESCRIPTION Tentative Parcel Map to divide 3.27 acres into 4 parcels
LOCATION. On the south side of jl'iskiyou Avenue, approximately 300 feet east of.,
- its intersection with 12th Street, Thermalito Area
ASS'ESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER(S) 31-18-80
ZONING A -R GENERAL PLAN Low Den. Resi, PROJECT CONSISTENT?
GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE REPORT 5-22-86
DATE OF APPLICANT SIGNATURE
LAND CONSERVATION ACT CONTRACTS?
DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED- June 5, 1986
AGENT/SURVEYOR/CIVIL ENGINEER: Bachman & Assoc.
ADDRESS: 3012 Esplanade, Chico, Ga. 55926
DATE PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT PREPARED
ENVIRONMENTAL CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION v DATh FILYD
DETERMINATION
AND DATE S NEGATIVE DECLARATION DATE ADOPTED :-A
MITIGATED NEG. DECLARATION - DATE ADOPTED 7-24j&
tVe IMPACT REPORT - DATE CERTIFIED
STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NO.
8U8. COMMITTEE MEETING DATE
ADVISORY AGENCY HEARING DATE
ADVISORY AGENCY ACTION- AM
APEXLED APPEAL HEARING DATE,
BOARD ACTION
mss.. r.....
-'Y�(' ``•' - �//�B�/fir/�/
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
WILLIAM (Bill) CHEFF, Diroolor
7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965
Talephune: (916) $'&VM5:38-7266
RONALD D. McELROY
Qut�Q Co,Deputy Dtra6tor
Planning Cixr►�ra
J U L 1 ,,) 1988 July 18, 1988
Orov llo, C' a forujA
Bachman Associates RE: AP 31-18.80
3012 Esplanade Tentative Parcel Map
Chico, CA 95926
Dear Gentlemen!
At the regular meeting c,f the Butte County Advisory Agency held on
July 18, 1988, the. Agency gra-ted a 4»xme extension of 36 months in
order co file the final map on the above -referenced property. The
new date of expiration is July 21, 1991.
If no appeals are timely filed --within fifteen (15) days of the date.
of the Advisory Agency's approval --with the Clerk of the Board of
Supervisors, this action will be final.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this
office:
Very truly yours,
William Cheff
Director of Public Works
Il�
XMendonsa
sistant Director
.M/ds
attachment:
cc: Planning Department
Environmental Real.th Department
Richard Hood, 18 Forest Creek Circle; Chico, CA 95926
S,
NOW OF DJ=Y-4 RM=N _ON
Officv of Planning and Rest ch f 3 0 Butte County
1400 Tenth Street, ',00m 12 Planning Department
Sacramento, CA. 9581., J4
3 01986 7 County Center Drive
or Orovil.le, CA 95965
X County Clerk r K.aANOR M. BECKER, Couniy CINrk
County of Butte
',y X JACINTH Nputy
StM_T]ECT : Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance wl.Lh Section 21108
or 211.52 of the Public Resources Code.
Project Title AP # Name
Tentative Parcel Mag 31-18-80 Richard Hood
State Clearinghouse Number Contact Person Telephone Number
(if submitted to Clearinghouse)
Public Works John Mendonsa 534-4266
Project Location South side of. Siskiyou Avenue apptoxilnately 300 feet
east of its intersection with 12th Street, Thermalito area.
Project Description Tentative Parcel Map dividing 3.27 acres into four
parcels, two of 0.43 ac. each, one of 0.68 ac, and one of 1.73 ac.
This is to advise that the Butte County Advisory Aeenc
(Lead Agency or Responsible Agency)
has approved the above-described project on 7-21-66 and has made
(Date)
the following determinations regarding the above-described project:
1. The project will, Wil! not:, have a significant effect on the
environment;
2. An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project
pursuant to the provisions of CEQA,
A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the
provisions of CEQA.
3. Mitigation measures were, ,. Were not, made a condition of the
approval of the project.
4. A statement of overriding considerations _ was, ;_was not, adopted
for this project;
This is to certify that the final EIR with comments and responses and record of
project approval is available to the general public at:
Butte County Planning Department
7 County Center Drive
Oroville, CA 95955
Date Received for_Pilingg.and
Posting at OPR 7x23-86
S3.g at re
Stephen A. 8treeter
,,. senior P1a3,ner
T le
Revised March 086
A 0
Mitigation Measure
Richard Hood
AP43.1-18-80, TPM
Pay $25.00 Per lot traffic study/traffic light fee.
I
Suite COUUN
LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
WILLIAM (Bill) CIIEF=, Diroctor
I COUNTY CENTER DRIVE . OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965
Tcicphona'I7tG) 534•4681
BuoeCo.plan�py�m RONALD D. IdcELROY'
Jul_
�yb6 Depuiy Direclor
22 `V
0,..'Me, CCislltarplei July 21, 1986
Richard Flood RE AP 31-18- 80
18 Forest Creek Circle Tentative Parcel. Map
Chico; CA 95926
Dear Mr. 'Hood:
At the regular meeting of the Butte County Advisory Agency held on
July 21, 1986, the agency granted a mitigated negative declaration
of environmental impact and approved your tentative parcel map on
the above -referenced property subject to the conditions of approval
listed on the attached sheet.
If no appeals are 'timely filed --within lien (10) days of the date of
the Advisory Agency's approval --with the Clerk of the Board of
Supervisors, this action will be final,.
tdh.en the conditions of approval are complied with, it will, be in order
for you to file your tfi.nal maps' with the Butte County Department
of Public Works for recordation within twenty-four (24) months of
the date of approval by the Advisory Agency.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this
office.
dM/ds
cc i Planning Dept.rtment
Environmental Health Department
Bachman and Associates
Very truly yours,
William Chef f
Director of Public Works
Jin Mend risd
A sistant Director
RICHARD HOOD, TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP, AP 31--18--80, 4 parcels on the
south side of Sxski,you Ave. approx. 300 ft, east of its intersection
with 12th St. Thermalito area. Engineer; Bachman and Associates
Public
Works conditions:
11
Provide two-way traversable access RS-9-LD=II to-each parcel from
a county maintained road or state highway.
2.
Access Lo be reserved in deeds as per county ordinance and offered
for dedication on the final map.
3.
Show 50 ft. building setback line measured from centerline of access
easement.
t,
Provide road maintenance agreement.
5.
Frontage on 12th Street to be constructed to RS-9--1,D-7I standard,
i.e., curb, gutter, sidewalk and required street sectiorl for parcels
With gross acreage of one acre or less. Submit drainage plans to
the Department of Public Works for approval. and install required
facilities.
6i
Deed to the County of Butte 30 ft. right—of—way from Lhe centerline
of 12th Street.
1.
Indicate a 50 ft. building setback from the centerline of 12th-
Street.
8
Show all easements of record on the final. map.
9.
Provide street name signs poi requirements of the Department of
Public Works prior to recordation of L1 . 'incl map.
10`,
Provide permanent SoluLion ,for drainage or pay $450 per acare to
Thermalito Drainage fund.
11.
Pay off any assessments
12,
Provide cul.--de-sac at the end of the ,street.
13,
OIain encroachment permit and con8truct road appronr,h
providing adequate sight distance at the intersectaion of 12th. Street
and access road,
14,
Pay any delinquenL taxes or current taxes as requirutl.
15.
Meet the requirements of the Butte County Fire Department.
16.
Provide 60 ft, access to parcels 1 and 2.
RICHARD
HOOD,
TPM
Health
Dept.
conditions:
17.
Provide
a letter or
other documentation from the Thormtjjjto
Irrigation
District
stating that they are willing and aj)'W, to
supply
domestic water to parcels 1, 2, 3 and 4.
18.
Provide
a letter or
other documentation From the Ther.'mtI'I ito
Irrigation
District
stating that they are willing and tible to
supply
sewer service
to parcels 1, 2, 3 and 4.
1.9.
Place: a
note on the
map that states "developments of pui°eels 1, 2,
3 and 4
will require
connection to a public sanitary sewer."
20.
Place a
note on the
mall that states "development of parcels 1, 2,
3 and 4
will require
connection to a public water supply."
The
following
mitigofi.on measure
is required:
21:
Pa 25.00
Y � per lot traffic
study/traffic light fee.
0
TO: Butte County Advisory Agency
FROM Planning Director
SUBJECT: Report on Tentative parcel Map for Richard Hood on AP
31-18^80
DATE-: July 14, 1986
This is a proposal to divide 3.27 acres into 4 parcels. The present
T The band Ur�c� Plan Map of the
zoning is A -R (Agricultural Residential). .
alit -be County General Plan designates this area as Low
D nsity area.
Residential- There are no specific or community Plana
The proposal; does not conflict with County zoning nor any adopted or
T County'
proposed elemeiit of theto County General Plain nor any
specific or community plan.
Recommend approval, subject to the following conditiono
1. Pay
�NC1 per lot traffic study�/traffic light fee.
DRI lr
cc', Richard Hood
Bachman and Associates
I'
I.
v
AhI'IiNDIX 1
COUNTY OP B7Cl
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST PORM
(i o `Cie rc�mpl:ete 1y I.Rid Agency)
Log 118G-06-09-03
AP II 31-18-80
I. BACRI)
1.. Name of proponent _ RICHARD, HOOD Y
Address of proponent incl representative (if appliCnhly)
RichardHoo_d�..���-�.-.�.--�.---- —.$achman—&=,Assc�ias -
18 Forest Creek Circle d9� 2rhe_Esp.i.iiaci�--
Cl�ic4 CA590.
Ch�ic6 CA 95.92
cam-
3. Project description , Tentat Ve__P.ax_ce.2—'lap..
1 "C 1`IANNDA't'O1z v 111x111 Nti i C11 51(i
NCrIC.ANCI,, yes ritAY13Ts NO
a, hoes the project have the potential to dOgracle the
alu#al .ty or the environment stabs tante Kelly reduce
the habitat or a fish or wildlife species , cause a
fish or wildlife population to drop below self-
sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or
.rnimal community, reduce the number or restrict the
ryanle of a rare or endangered plant or animal or
eliminate importKanr examples of the major peri -ods
of California history or prehistory,
b, floes the project have the potential to achieve
short-term bonefits to the detriment of land; -term,
nvitonmental goals" (A short-term impact on the
enviraaamtnt is one which occurs in a relatively
order period Of fime time lona-term impacts tval:I
1
c. hoes the project have impacts which are individu-
ally limited, but Cumulatively considerable? (A
prryjOct may impact on two car more separate resourecs
Ode the impact on each retcltarce is relatively
small, hilt where the effect of tho total of -thcrso
impacts �on the environment is sllnifkant.i
d, floes the project have environmental erre is which;
will caQ substantial adverse ur rects on human
beings, either directly Or InAlrectly?--
11C, 111=,I'l'RD1'!hA'ilt1N t"I'c�
be r,,pl'otod by the Lend Agenc'y'1
Gln t114' basis o1' tills initial vt aluut inn;
lil rind environment, Irrc7l>l+";►ttali�.rtSVCcA IVY IUCLARA'I'itlN will rtbe prepared-
ant crioct
slat the c rrt a r � Ilmclit ,
un find that although till �l'r�'Wed p!'cs,jec�t vould have a signii'k
cant effect an tiler t;ltvarcrnmc,t ,
the^re will lint he a significant
x<I'tect l,lt this c°�a:ac� lrr�Fru4r thc� `11'1'It��'1f`lC1N �tlA�yllRf`� clr�.cr;lbecl on
the attached shvvt have heou ;acldVJ t+ c4rr projectjc`c't NrtlA'l'TV>
lriit.l ARA'! 10N hill be propa rej
l lV'l: I Incl the l'ropocic tall vo ilN\ctaNr`ll.,.1' a IMPACT
etket ort
1 1 1 �l a c c t �t;'1t have a Ka
PORT" is required,
�the srtry 1 r'1S1t111c. U t , rl
RI.
► 98�_ cOUN`I'l ()I; PLANNING WcAR(1NI
DXM 5JX1e
vy R,3 ronmus, Assocl.ahe P� stiller
Ratrit:t,Qd by: .�.
IV.
ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPT.S
(.Explanations o al1W"yes" and "maybe" answers are required
on attached
sheet(s))
YES MAYBE
N0
1. EA'"Tl.
Will the proposal result in significant;
T7
Unstable earth conditions or in changes in
geologic substructures?
X
b.
Disruptions, displacements, compaction or
overcovering of the sail?
X c-
c.
c.
Change in topography or ground surface
relief features?
X'
d.
Destruction, covering or modification of any
unique geologic or physical features?
X
e.
Increase in wind or water erosion of soils,
either on or off-site?
f.
Changes in deposition or erosion of beach
sands, or changes in siltation, deposition
or erosion which may modify the channel of
a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or
Xc
any bay, inlet or lake?
g.
Loss of prime agriculturally productive soils
outside designated urban areas?
X
h.
Exposure of people or property to geologic
hazards'such as earthquakes, landslides, mud-
X �-
slides, ground failure or similar hazards?
2. AIR, Will the proposal result in substantial':
a.
Air emissions or deterioration of ambient
X
air quality'?
b.
,...�
The creation of objectionable odors, smoke
or fumes?
c.
Alteration of air movement, moisture, o`1'
temperature, or any change in climate,
locally or regionally?
3; WATER. Will the proposal result in substantial:
T=
Changes in currents, or the course or
direction of water movements in either
marine or fresh waters?
b.
Changes in absi rpt4or rates., drainage patterns,
or the rate and amount of sur.wa�_ . rL: 17P'
_ X C
c,
Need fo-e off-site surface drainage improve-
ments, including vegetation removal, channel-
ization or culvert installation?
jC
d.
alterations to the course or flow of flood vW
waters?;
e.
Change in the amount of surface water in ally
water body? _
X
f.
Discharge into surface waters, or in any
alteration of surface water quality, including
but not limited to temperature, dissolved
turbidity?
oxYggn or
g.
Alteration of the direction or rate of flow
of ground waters?
X
h.
Change in the quantity or quality of ground waters,
either through direct additions or with-
drawals; or through interception of an
)C
aquifer by cuts or excavations?
i.
Reduction in the amount of water otherwise
available for public. ,rater supplies?:
j,
Exposure of people or property to water .
hazards flooding?
related such as
YES
MAYBE N(:
4. PLANT LIFE. Will the proposal result in substantial:
a. hailge in the diversity of species, or number
of any species of plants (including trees,
shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)?
b. Reduction of the numbers of
any unique, rare
or endangered species of plants?
Introduction
C. of new species of plants into an
area, or in a barrier to the normal replenish -
Ment of existing species?
C,
)<
d. Reduction in acreage of any agricLiltural crop"?
—
S. ANIMAL LIFE, Will the proposal result in substantial.
T.—Cli—ange, in the diversity
of Species, or numbers
of anv species of anima]
Is rbirds, land animals
incluuing reptiles, fish and shell fish,
benthic organisms or insects)?'
b. R -duction in the numbers of anyunique, rare
or endangered species of animals?
c. Introduction Of neW species of animals into
an area, o., result in, a barrier to the m5gration
Or movement of animals?
d, Deterioration to misting fish or wildlifo,
habitat?
x
6, NOISE, Will the proposal result in substantial:
a. Increases in existing noise levels?
x
b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels?
7. LIG14T AND GLARE. Will the proposal produce
sign U—t-11-i—,ght and glare?
8, LAND USE, Will the rroposal in a
sugstantial alteration or the VrLigent or planned
land use of an area?
9, NATURAL RESOURCES: Will the Propusal result in
gubstEtial: L
a. Increase in the rate Of use of any natural
resources?
b. Depletion of any non-renewable natural
'resources?
10, RISK UPSET Will the proposal involve:
a, ion or the Velease of hazard.
OUS iTncluding, but riot limited to,
011, PesticV.,S, hemicals or radiation) in the
event of an acciaol... ),r I upset conditions?
Possible interferei"- , th an emergency
response plan or emerg,,ni. Pvacuation. plan?
11, POPULATION-, W".11 the proposal 11 .-,, the location,
d stribution, density, or growth r:,t,., c' the human
population?
1.2: HOUSING. Will the proposal affect existinp, housing,or create a demand for additional hoosing?'
-X—
X
7; 3 .
14.
is,
16.
17.
18.
ENERGY. Will the proposal result in:
a,. Use of substantial amounts of fuel ,or energy?
b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing
sources of energy, or require the development
of new sources of energy?
:TIES. Will the proposal result in a need for
systems, or substantial alterations to the
fL_lowzng:
a, Pow,r or nattiral gas?
b. Communicati,.ns systems?
c. Vater avail.a.bility:
d Sewer or septic tank?
e, Storm water drainage?
f. Solid waste and. disposal?
HUMAN HPALTH. Will the proposal result in:
a. Creation of any health hazard or potential
health hazard (excluding mental health)?
b, Exposure of people to potential health
hazards?
AESTHETICS. Will the proposal result in the
6Tstiuctlon of any scenic vista or viers open to
the public, or will the proposal, result in the
creation of an aesthetically offensive si.t+• open
to public view?
x
YES
MAYBE
NO
TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Will the proposal
result in
a. Generation of substantial additional, vehicle
movement?
b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or
demand for new parking?
>C
c. ,Substantial impact on existing transportation
systems?
d. Significant alterations to present patterns
of circulation or movement of people and/or
goods?
'.
e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic?
f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles
'
-X—
bicyclists or pedestrians?
PUBLIC SERVICES, Will the proposal have an effect
upon, or result in a need for new or altered
governmental services:
a. Pire protection?
X
b. Police protection,?
X
c. Schools?
h•
J. Parks or other recreational facilities?
S. Maintenance of public facilities, including
roads?
i'. Other governmental. services?
ENERGY. Will the proposal result in:
a,. Use of substantial amounts of fuel ,or energy?
b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing
sources of energy, or require the development
of new sources of energy?
:TIES. Will the proposal result in a need for
systems, or substantial alterations to the
fL_lowzng:
a, Pow,r or nattiral gas?
b. Communicati,.ns systems?
c. Vater avail.a.bility:
d Sewer or septic tank?
e, Storm water drainage?
f. Solid waste and. disposal?
HUMAN HPALTH. Will the proposal result in:
a. Creation of any health hazard or potential
health hazard (excluding mental health)?
b, Exposure of people to potential health
hazards?
AESTHETICS. Will the proposal result in the
6Tstiuctlon of any scenic vista or viers open to
the public, or will the proposal, result in the
creation of an aesthetically offensive si.t+• open
to public view?
x
yEs MAYBE
NO
19, RECREATION. Will the proposal result in an impact
of existing recreational
Tp—on—the quality Or quantAty
X
opportunities?
20. rijilrYIPAT. RESOURCES. alteration
will the proposal result in the,
a.
of or the L:estruction of a prehistoric or
historic archaeological site^r adverse physical
b. Will the proposal result in
or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric Or
obir;ct"
historic biiilddrig, Structure Or
t. Does the proposal have the potential to cause
a physical change wh4�h would affect unique
ethnic cultural values?
d. Will the proposal restrict existing religiOU3
or sacred uses within the potential impact
area?
DISMSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AP 31-18-80
See attached,
RONMENTAL EVALUATION AP 31-18-80
1b,e,fO3b,c$f,'I6e: The development of one additional homlas;lte on t,, -ie
property w!'Il result in some overcovering, compaction, dimplacement
and disruption of the soil which could lead to accelet•atod erosion and
siltation of the drainageways which service tha area. Tho zoubject
property is within the area covered by the Thermalito Maotor Drainage
Plan, and will be conditioned accordingly. Likely condli.lans Include
deeding of drainage easerrents to cover the area of the swtle on site,
and payment of drainage fees towards off-site 'improvemont#.
1h: All of Butte County is In a Moderate Earthquake IntansIty Zone,
Vill. The subject property Is located approximately two miles
Southwest of the Foothill Shear Zone, which was associated with the
1975 Oroville earthquake. Construction of buildings Lo Uniform
Building Code standards for seismically active areas should provide
adequate protection to residents in case of seismic activity-
136,cife. The creation of .an additional building site on the property
will represent an Incremental Increase In traffic and traffic hazards
In the area. Since several Intersections In the Thermalito area are
already Impacted by heavy traffic, traffic lights will be necessary in
the near future,
10 This project will represent an incr-emental increase In demand for
public services.
Sugggqgted IV! ii.gat I on measure
1j, pay a per -lot traffic _ study and traffic light fee (amount to be
deter-'rillihed by the Department of Public Works prior to the hearing
For this project)a
A-pplicarit: Richard Hood
Assessor's Parcel 4
31-18-80
Log # 86-06-09-03
DATA SHEET
A. Er-Q-he-C-t-D-e-s-r-r-1Rti-0-D
1. lypa of Project'. Tentative Parcel Map.
2. Brief DescrlptVon: Dividing 3.27 acres Into four parcels, tvio
of 0.43 acre each, one of 0.68 acre, and one of 1.73 acres.
34 Location: On the south side of Siskiyou Avenue approximately
300 feet east of 12th Street, and on the east Side Of 12th
Street approximately 200 feet south of Siskiyou Avenue, In the
ThermalitO area.
4Proposed Density of Development: Averages 0.82 acre per
.
dwelling unit. facin9t As much as 259.
5. Amount of impervious Sur
6. Access and Nearest Public Road(s): Lots I andi,,,, front on
Siskiyou Avenue, which is not publicly maintained. 12th
Street, which Is publicly maintained, lies approxImatOlY 300
feet to the West. Parcels S and 4 front on 12th Street.
7. Method of Sewage Disposal: Public sanitary sojiwer�
H. Source of Water Supply*. ThermalltO Irrigation District -
9. Pro>6mitY Of Power Linest. To property.
10. pO-,-ejjttaj for further land divisions and development: The
General Plan and zoning would allow the creation of parcels as
small as 6500 square feet,
.ptlysical�nvi�ron Environment -
1 Terrain
ok General Topographic Character: Gently rdillIng foothill
valley lands.
b. Slopes: 0-1094
c4 Elevation: 220 feet above Sea Level'
d, Limiting Fattorso. None,
2. Solis
a., Types and Characte,Astics'. Redding Grayl,!Wy Sandy Loam.
b. Limiting F6ctO1`S*. ,"One, providing the StWE190 disposal Is
via public sewers i
3. Wazords of the Lood Intensity Zone V1110
aatu�ar�thquako ZohOil 1,jcjerate Earthquake
bo EPOS110h, Potential: Moderate.
c. Landslide patootta'. None.
d. Fire Hazar4d' Uncl ,slfled
-
ei Expansive Soil potorjtial,- High,
4. Hydrology
a. Surface Watert A V!--ainage swale crossel the property.
�7:.
0
b. Groundwater: Unknown.
c. Drainage Characteristics." Property drains to the on-site
swale thence westerly towards Ruddy Creek,
d. Annual Rainfall (normal)". 26-2810.
e. Limiting Factor!i;; Setbacks from dv*alnaOeway.
5. Visual/Scenic Quality: Moderate.
6. Acoustic Quality: Good.
7. Air Quality: Good.
Biological Environment:
8. Vegetation.* Valley grasslands.
9. Wildlife Habitat: Small birds and animals common to valley
grasslands,
1Tail tura) Environment:.
10. Archaeological and Historical Resources in the area: Low
sensitivity at -ea.
11. Butte County General Plan designationt Low Dems0ty
Residential.
12. Existing Zoninat AR.
1L3 . Existing Land Use on-siteo. Throe existing single-family
dwellings6
`14. Surrounding Areag
a. Land Usest Single - family dwellings at rural der ,sities
th scattered duplexes.
b. .,unina'. AR.
C. Gen. Plan -Jesignationsi Low Density Residential.
d. Parcel Sizes". 1/4 to 4 -5 --acre parcels.
a. Population: Low density residential.
15. Character of Site and Area: Urban fringe area.
16. loareAt Urban Area: Oroville.
17. Palevioq,t Spheres of Influence:
OrovIlle, Thermalito
it -riga, "br, District.
13. lv.:proVeiwa4y;bs Standards Urban Areat. Yes.
19. rlt-d Protection Service;
a. Wearest, County (State) lzire Station: Noalson Avenue Fire
Station 468.
b. Water Availability." Thermallto Irrigation 01-ttrict
hydrants.
20. Schools in Aroa., Thermallto Union Elemen,':Ary School District
and Oroville Union High School District,
IM