HomeMy WebLinkAbout031-180-089• , -
, /
b
,A
e
. d
r
r
PLANNING rOMMTSSION
SUMMARY SHEET FOR LAND,DTVISIONO
APPLICANT Ernest Jovicli
85-04.23-02
ADDRESS P. 0. Box 1144, Orovillp, CA 95965
OWNER Same
PROJECT DESCRIPTION Tentative Parcel Ma __dividing .66 acre ",o
Parcels at .33 acre each
Thexmalito area;
ASSES80R) S PARCEL NUMBER(S) 31-18-89 �w
ZONING— A -R GEN. PLAN _ LDR
PROJECT CONSIST? T7
DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED 4/23/85
Eng,' Ron Graves P.
0. Box 986 orovslle CA 95965
DATE PUBLICATION NOTICE WRITTEN
PUBLISHED
PLACE NEWSPAPER NOTICE(S) PU"BI,TSFiI7 - 0. C. P,
G. B.
DATE MAILING LIST PREPARED
DATE MAI1,:.OtfT NOTICES WRITTEN
MAILED
DATE PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT PREPARED --- -rw.- NUMBER
ENVIRONMENTAL�--
DETERMINATION - CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION .. DATE FILED
AND DATE. C
NEGATIVE DECLARATION DATE ADOPTED
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION DATE ADOPTED
ENV. IMPACT RpPORT DATE CERTIFIED
SUB, COMI ITT E M8ETING DATE
r
T-,_ .. I -
APPENDIX H
' Z40TICE OF DETERMINATION
and Research FROM= planning DeparCment
Office of Planning 7 Count Center riv
1400 Tenth Street, ROOM 121 Oroville , 59
Sacramento, CA 958141
or County Clerk
,lu'i
X- County of Bu t to _.._.
l I�ance with Sec��Al�(���, g�{�jt1�aunty Clerk
St�ECT; Filing of `Notice of Determination in comp ' B Doputy
of the public Resources Code, y .---�---
85-04-23-0
LSP li 31-•18-89
TolecL it le Lrnest Joviwll
Ircntativc pared A}ap •elep one Num r
u Num 'r Contact _ erson
St—ate—C-1 earing house) �•
(if submitted to Clearing
Pub1.5.c l�iorks, ,�Tolln Dlen,donsa .,31-426 •�
ject 1„ocati Un
t}ze ;out}���rest corner of NOlsoil Avonue iyl�l, Gang Way,
Thermal.to area . 66 acre to create t}vo
j� Descrbp
tton Tentat ve Parcel filar tTivid �n
parcels at .33 act+ each,
Butte County Advisor
�en orr Responsible Agenc
This is 4o advise that the �� Ag Cy
describer) project and has made the following determinations
p� approved the above
regarding the above described project:
�
• will, will not, have a ' significant effect on the env
ironment•
The protect ,�..-
h
Report was pr1pared for thi3 project
pn Environmental Impact pursuan
to the provisions of CEQAe
project pursuant to the
A Negative Declaration was prepared for this
" provisiorm of CL'QA. be
EM or Negative Declaration and record of project approval may
The
examined at pl.annin peparttnent
Butte County
7 Count Gentor Drive
' were not, made a condition of the approval
Mitigation measures
�. ro ect
of the p j not, adopted for
A Statement of Overiding r
Considerations �. was,
a
this project,
6 ------ 5„�, ure
Date Received for FilingS•
Stephon ASlieeax
5enioY
Planner
,it
- IgB,S
Revised u
fanany
r'
M
N�
AA
Quf Q CO- PlanningC
nt,
JUN 4 198
Orovlllo, Californl&
bdae eou�
_�
LAN1) OF HAI"URAI, V/LAL1II AND ntAUIY
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
WILLIAM (1311I1 CHEFF, Director
7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVC .OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965
Telephone -
(916) $34.4681
RONALD b, hieELROY
June 3, 1985 Deputy oiraetor
Ernest Jovich
P• n. BOX 1144 RB: AP 31-18-89
Orovil,le, CA 95965 Tentative Parcel Map
Dear Mr. Jovich:
At the regular meetingof
June a regular
the the Butte County Advisor
environmental Agency adopted the negativeY Agency held
review and a the ti decl�ttation regarding
31-18-89 subject to the conditions as listed ian the reap for AP
attached sheet.
If no appeals are timely filed ---within ten 10
the Advisory Agency's a i ) days of the
Supervisors, this actionpwilllbewithfin the Clerk of the }3oard date of
final.
When the conditiOns Of approva) are complied with
order for you to file , it will be in
Department of Public j10rIC8 for al map" withon the Butte County
months of the date of approval by the Advisory
n twenty• -four (24)
If Agency,
You should have an '
contact this office. Y questions regarding this matter,
please
JM0ds
At tachmen t
ec : Planning - Environmental
EnvironmentalReview
Health
kon Graves and Associateartraent
Very truly yours,
William Cheff
bisector of Public Works
J n Me onsa
Assistant �trector
a
n
0
Ernest Jovicli, Tentative Parcel Map, 2 parcels on t11e Southwest
corner of Nelson Avenue and Gang Way. Thermalito area»
AP 31-18=39
Engineer: Ron Graves
Public Works conditions:
1. Provide two-way traversable access R5--9--LLQ-11 to (10c 11 parcel
from % county maintained road or state highway.
2. Show 50 £t. building setback line measured from 0011ter.ine of
access easement.
3. Frontage on Nelson Avenue to be constructed to I(S-9-LD-II
standard, i.e., curb, gutter, sidewalk' and required street
section for parcels with gross acreage of one Acre or less.
Submit drainage plans to the Department of .Public Works for
approval and install required facilities.
4.,, Deed to the County of Butte 40 right-of-way from the
centerline of Nelson Avenue.
5. Indicate a 55 fti building setback from the centerline of
Nelson Avenue.
Show all easements of record, on the final map,
7. Provide street name signs g per requirements of the Department
Of Public Works prior to recordation of tile final map.
8. Provide permanent solution for drainage And pay Thermalto
Drainage District fee of $450 per acre.
5. Pay any delinquent taxes or current taxes as rec;uired
10. Reet the requirements of the Butte County Fire Department.
11. Show 1 ft. no access strip for Parcel 1 along Nelson Avenue.
Health Department C6rldttions
12,
Provide a letter or outer doeum.jntation from Thermal:ito
Yr°riga tion District stating tha; they are willing and able to
supply domestic taater to pa'rcel� 1 and 2.
13 Provide a let -tot bt other documentation from Thermalito
Irrigation District stat fig that they are willing and able to
supply sewer service; to parcels 1 and
2.
14. Place a note on the map that states "d4velopment of paresj,s 1
and 2 will requite connection to A publie anhitary sewer,.i'
15. Place a note on the map that staten "development of parcels 1
and 2 will require condection to a public Water supply."
n�� -
�, yR
4
lb. Prove that the existing dry well and septic tank serving the
mobile home on parcel 2 are on parcel 2 and at least S ft.
from all 'property lines.
a
TO: Butte County Advisory Agency
FROM;C"? anni. ng Director
; rL1BJECT„ Report an Tentati «e Parcel M +.p
+or l r~nest Jovich, AF 1--18-eq
DATE: May 20, 1.9135
This is a proposal to divide .66 acre -to create two parcels at .35 acre.
Mach. The present �ani.ng is A—R (Agricultural Residential). The LM.and
Use Flan liar of the S itte County General ,P
Low Density Re,si.dential. There ��n designates this area as
the arca; are n specific or cOmmunity plans +01-
The
orThe proposal does not Conflict With COUOt
propcased element 0+ the Butte County Ce►7s�ratonian nor any Counted or
speai+ic or community plan. y,
13O ccmfie
nd {approval subject to the following condition:
1.. Access to parcel 1 to be limited tc ' Sarrg Way"
L,MT lkt
ce; r" ►lest Jovi cFt
Ron gave:
ANPENWX IF
COUNTY -OP Bwrm
ENVIRONMENTAL CIIECKLIST FORM
(to ii-e—complete -d-Ty--Len -FAI,,ency)
Log 1/ 85-04-23-02
I. BACKGROUND AP 11 31-18-89
1. Name of proponent F-,rnest _Jovich,-
2, Address of proponent and representative (if applicable)
3. project desclipi-4,on Tentative Parcel Map--_
MANI)KrORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFTCANCE YES MAYBE N_O
a, Does the project have the potential to degrade -00
quality of the environment, substantially reduce
the habitat or a fish or wildlife species, cause a
nisi; or wildlife population to drop below self-
sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or
animal community, reduce the number or restrict the
range of a rare or endangered Plant or animal or
eliminate important examples of thf., major periods
of California history or prehistory?
b, hoes the project have tile potential to achieve
short-term bene -fits to the detriment of long-term,
environmental, goals? (A short-teriti llrpjict on the
environment is one which occurs in a relatively
brief period of time while long-term impacts Will
endure into tbO future,)
c, hoes the project have illip.lets Which are Individu-
ally limited, but culqUiatively considerable? (A
project may impact on -wo or more separate resources
who -re the impact Oil 0,11ch resource is relatively
s '11 of those
,mall, but where the orrect of the tot.
impacts on the environment is Significant,')
d, Does tile project have environmental effects Whicil
will caltse substtftntiftl a,(Ivc,rsc effects on human
be i r
.gs, eltilel- klirectl-, oi- indirectly?
(,ro lie comple-(c>Lj 1), ' %� tilt! Lead Agency)
oil tile basis of tills Initial VVi'0UatiOTl*-
iNh find the I)rollosed CoOLD NOT have a S19ftiriell t rfect
OnM
, JIL L -tild a NRGATTVE CLARATION wi it be prepared,
im, rind that uV)IoLigh tile proposed project could have a signifi-
cajh effect on the environment, there will 110i. lac t' significant
-
erfect J,,l this case because the P11' 16MON MrAISM111.8 described on
l
the attached sheet have been added to the 0-0,10'et, A NPOATM,
IWICLARAVON will he prepired,
,/�Vlj I,i, I tile I-kropos%.,d project Njj,tN have a. significant effect oil
the environment, gild *,in T-,NV1RoNMVNTAL IMPACT R111,11ORT is requi.i,ed.
III ANNING D11PARTNIVNT
By
Suttle, Associate Plannet
I
Reviewed by*
MIN
IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMP TS
xp anatxons o a 1 '�y „and ►►
on attached sheet(s)] es "maybe answers are required
1. EARTH. Will the proposal result in si nif'
a. Unstable earth conditions
YES MAYBE N0
or in changesCa
geo],ogic substructures? nt
b.
Disruptions, displacements,;
compaction or
Overcovering of the soil?
C. Change in
topography or, ground surface
relief -features?
-- _
d• Destruction, covering or modification of
Unique geologic or any
— --i
e. Increase in wind or wateaerosion featurof/soils,
either on or Off-site?
A_
f. Changes in deposition or erosion Of beach
sands, or changes
x
n siltation, deposition
or erosion which may modify the channel
a river
of
or stream or the bed of the ocean or
any bay, inlet or lake?
9. Loss of prime agricultural)
outside designated urban soils
----- �(
areas!
h Exposure of people or property to geologic
hazards such as
r�
earthquakes, landslides, mud-
Slides ground failure
or similar hazards?
2.AIR. Will the proposal result in substantial;
a. Air emissions or deterioration
air quality? of ambient
b.
The creation of objectionable odors
or fumes? smoke
JL
C- Alteration of air movement, moisture,, or ---
temperature, or
�(
any change in climate,
locally or regionally?
3. NATER, Will the proposal result in substantial,
a• Changes in
currents, or the course or
direction of water
movements in either`
marine or• fresh waters?
b. Changes in
absorption rates, drainage patterns
or thy, rate and amount of surface runoff?
c. Need for offsite
surface drainage improve-
ments, including vegetdtion prove") �^
removal,
ization or culvert installation?
di Alterations
to the course or flow of flood
waters?
---
e. Change in the amount of s
water body? urface water i any.
f. Discharge into surface waters, or in anv,
alteration of surface
water quality)L
but not limited to temperature, diolveduding
ozygen or
turbidity?
g• Alteration of the direction
Of ground waters? --,
or rate, of flow,
h, Change in
the quantity of ground wKttel+s,
either through direct additions it with.)
drawals, or
through interception oi' an
aquifer by cuts or excavation.?
i••
Reduction in the amount o:E Wates: otherwise
available for -=-
public
'Exposure
- - JL
J • hater supplest
of people or property to water
related Hazards
suc{i as flooding?
YES
MAYBE No
4.
PLANT LIFE. Will theproposalresult in substantial.
a• y species,
or number
of any species of plants (including, trees,
shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)?
b. Reduction of the numbers
of any unique, rare
or endangered species of plants?
C. Introduction of new species of plants into an
area, or in a barrier to the normal replenish-
ment of existing species?
d. Reduction in acreage
N
of any agricultural crop?
S.
ANIMAL LIFE. Will the proposal result in substantial;
a. Chan `ange^in the diversity of species,
or numbers
of any species of animals (birds, land animals
including reptile;, fish and shell fish,
benthic organisms or insects)?
b.
Reduction in the numbers of any unique, rare
_gerspeciesP
of nxrnals ?
Introduction
ce .. of
of newssecies of animals into
an area., or result in a barrier to the migration
or movement of animals?
d.
N
, Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife
habitat?
6.
NOISE. Will the proposal result in substantial;
a. Increases in existing noise levels?
G.
b : ExPosure o f people to severe noise levels?
N
7.
LIGHT AND GLARE. Will the proposal produce
si,gni xcant l:ight and glare?
_....
8.
LAND USE. Will the proposal result in a
suFst.antial. alteration ref' the present
or planned
land use of an area?
9.
NATURAL RESOURCES; Will the proposal result in
substantial:
a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural:
resources?
b. Depletion of any non-renewable natural
resources?
N'
10.
RISK OF UPSET, Will. the propo, al involve
a. A r1 oT explosion or the release o hazard-
ous substances (including, but not limited to,
oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the
event of an accident or upset conditions?'.
N
b. Possible interference with an emergency
response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
11.
POPULATION, SVil,l the pruk.,;sal alter the location,
istrx uton, density, or growth rate of the human
population?
12.
HOUSING. Will the proposal affect existing housing,
or create a demand for additional housing?
N
YES MAYBE NO
13. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Will the proposal
result in;
a. Generation of substantial additional vehicle
movement?
b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or
demand, for new parking?
c. Substantial impact on existing transportation
systems?
d. Significant alterations to present patterns
of circulation or movement of people and/or
goods?
e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic?
f. Increase in traffic hazards 'to motor vehicles,
bicyclists or pedestrians?
14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Will the proposal have an effect
upon, or result in a need for new or altered
governmental services.
a Eire protection?
b. Police protection?
c. Schools?
d. Parks or other recreational facilities?
e. Maintenance of public facilities, including
roads?
i. Other governmental services?
15. ENERGY. Will the proposal result in
a. UsUse of substantial amotytrts of fuel .or energy
b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing
sources of energy, or require the development
of new sources of energy?
16. UTILITIES, Will the propsal result in a need for
new systems, or substantial alterations to the
followings
a Power or natural gas?
li.
1.8.
b, Communications sy •� �.� ems ?
r,. Water availability:
d. 8ei,•ec i.-., t-nk'
e, Storm water drainage• ,.
f, Solid waste and disposal?_
HUMAN HEALTH: Will the proposal result in,.
a. Great n of any health hazard or potential
health hazard (excluding mental health)'
b, Exposure of people to potential health
hazards?
AES AETIC5. Will the proposal result in the
obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to
the public, or will the proposal result in the
creation of an aesthetically offensive site open
to public view?
4.
X
X.
C,
M
19. RECREATION. Will the YESMSa`l3r
;t
upon the qualt quantity proposal result in an impact
Opportunities? antity of existing recreational
20. CULTURAL.RBSOURCtS.
a. ^Will t e proposal result in the alteration
Of or the destx`uction
of a prehistoric or
historic archaeological site?
b•
Will the proposal result in adverse physical
or aesthetic effects
to a prehistoric or
historic building, structure
or object?
c• Does the proposal have the potential to cause
a physical change which
-
would affect unique
ethnic cultural 'values?
d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious
or sacred uses within the
- --
area? potential impact
V. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION'
AP 31=18-8
See attached,
rn
A
s
EN'Vr O UAT EVAt rr
I�CUSSION OF T -1 -0 -N -AF' 31-18-89
1b- One addltiorral homeste c,
Approved. Overcoat h oul.d be developed if this
square feet g for both Parcels is estimated topbe�� 1"Mp is
v an insignificant amount for an
urban -suburban a�� t�iltl
1h: The Foothill Shear Zoner„
Potential ford is lo
damage to Prcated 1 mile east cf}�ia
operty is moderate. tPpoperb!, •
3b,c,16e: Drainage
is
accordance with the ThermalitoiQraill be required
be assessed, quireci by Public Wor+ics i.rr
Th¢e improvements '� ped"~parr
drainage -related impact.,will be sufficient t el foe will
... o mi.�igate
4: Four trees on site .may be rei;yOved by dev
6a 7• elopment.
One homesite will increase area light insignificant amount. Residents and noise levels an
may b
noise levels from night use en e subjected to
the, s
baseball fields poradic high
8: The proposed ma at 6th and Nelson.
use -rf Low Densit p is consistent with the
Density Residential. zoning and planned land
18c'
3c: �� �,
appearsGtoghaveybeen�constructedn unsigned r f in need to
potholesi. of o,l maintenance. It
and gravel, The approach has
1af: Access to Parcel
on Nelson would re 1 should be limited to Gan
quire cuts and could pose a ngWay. An approach
14 Demand forde reeall safety hazard:
insignificant g governmental services
. Services Carr be Will increase to an
eft=entiVely than in the can
provided to
this area much more
rov
..Water and seKer lines s
�^,.ili be extended to a new parcel..,
Applicant: Ernest JoVich
Assessor's Parcel 4
31-18-89
Log # 85-01-23-02
DATA S �HT
A Project Da,,, (z r i ntL
on
1. Type of Project: Tentative Parcel Map.
2. Brief Description: Dividing -66 acre to creat�j bNo parcels of
-33 acre.
3. Location: On the southwest corner
4. WaY, Thermalito area. Of Nelson Avonue and Gang
Proposed Density Of Development:
5. Amount of Im erviout Surfacing: dwelling Units Per acre.
6. Access and Nearest'Public Road(s)+/_50 00 Square reet,
i
7- Plathod of Sewage Disposal: T.I.D. Nelson AVOnue,
8- Source of Water Supply:
9. Proximity T.I
Power Lines: T'D.
Of
10- PotentialOriginal parcel.
for further, land di0 visions and development: None.
1. Terrain
a. General Topogi,,aphic Character:Fairly level valley land.
b. Slopes: +/_5X4
c. EleVAtion: 2201 above sea level
.
d. Limiting
2. Soils FaOtOP8t None.
ai Types and Characteristics,
. Redding Gravelly Sandy Loam,
red -brown, 7-121TS compact subsoil to 260, containing
grave -is and cobblesq hardpan at 28-a6",.
b, Limiting Factors! Hardpan retards skib-drainage.
3. Natural Hazards of the Land
a- Earthquake Zone: Noderate,
Zone. I Mile West of poothill Shear
ci 8)-Os'on Potential-' Moderate
L. .
b4
Landslide Potential! None.
d- Fire Hazard: Unclassified urbanized.
e. Expansive Sol' Pbtontialt High.
4o Hydrology
a' Surface t4ai-,PI-4 None on site, small 3W
within Feather- River ale to the north
b. around Water: N/A, drainage basin.
co, Drainage Characteristics: Within ThormAjito
Study Area, _ainAge
d, Annual Rainfall; (normal).,
e. LimitilIg Factors;,;�6-2841
S* Visual/Scenic Qualityi POOr area -Wide drainage
6, Acoustic Qujljt�r: Views Of TAble , MoUfttain,
Air Quality: Good.
a
D• Vegetation: Grasses, 1 walnut, 2 fruit trees.
9. Wildlife Habitat: Urban, quail seen the div Of the field trip.
ent�
nm
� 10. Archaeological and Historical Resources in ti►e ar(7a Low
Unknown.
11. Butte County General Plan designation: Low Density
Residential.
12. Existing Zoning_: A-R.
13. Existing Land Use on-site: Mobile home.
14. Surrounding Area:
a. Land Uses: Single- and multi-;family residential
on adJoining lots to the south. duplexes
b. Zoning: A-R, City of Oraville.
C. Gen. Plan designations:
Low Density Residential
Density Residential and public to the east. ; Medium
d. Parcal Sizes:1/3 to 3 acres
e• Population: Lowdensity,
15. Character of Site and Area:
Suburban n
filling into zoned density, neighborhood slowly
16. Nearest Urban Ares.: arov lle 2-1/2 miles S.R.
17, Relevant Spheres of Influence:
CSA
18. Improvements Standards Urban Area: #26, T.I•D,
19. Fire Protection Service:' Improvements required.
a. Nearest euntyt. (stat
1� 1 /2 mile ease) Fire Station: ##63 Nelson Avenue
b. Watet, Availability Yes.
20. Schools in Area Thermalito Uniun, oroville High School,,
y
'BUTIM COUNTY Iluffe Co. Planning Co:aatkl
GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE; _ 1 FPORT
FOR PARCEL MAP OR SUBDIVISION MAP I'1AR r 6 1955
Items 1-4 to be completed by applicants "forwg
1i Applicant Name andaddress ECgq)t= -UUIZ-4 p.0,
2. Project Description PA(-ce-L. 'm R Y �-' I r`t ie-e-L-L.S
3. Assessor's Parcel. Number(s)
4. Proposed Use r AruD r 7-1yN,►aL 40 1"�-�:.
The following items are to be completed by the Plannint, Department;
Current zoning ZA— /11 Land Conservation Agreement i0o
General Plan Designation ti
Applicable= Conditional Criteria: Not Applicable
Agricultural -Residential YES No
1. Agricurtural Compatibility
2. Water & Sewer Capacity
3. Adequate Fire Facilities
4. Road. Capacity & Maintenance
5. Access to Commercial. & Schools
Or hard & Field Crops
1. Predominant 5-10 At. Parcel Size
2. Vicinity of Urban Boundaries r.
3 Agr c . viability not, impaired
Staff Determination: Project does _ does not ,
substantially conform to the General Plan at:d zoning.
Comments: A 1 z -f
L1'
. 2r
Staff Signature bate t' /A
AS THE APPLICANT FOR TRE REQUCST%b LAND DIVISION I AM AWAlm OF Tim- ABOVE STAFF
USTERZ"IINATIO RCaARDING THE CON) CtlNANCC i+IITA THE GENERAL P ANb ONING
Dated `� Signature of Applicant
alts Co. Pteroning �o►r�nt.
APR 2, 3 1985
0,0vtilo, Califatnln
W 1000 (revised 6-80)