HomeMy WebLinkAbout031-203-019Nor 3: ,n OF DETERMt TXoN
L' : 1
Iv.
ENVIRONMENTAL. IMP CTS
xp anat ons o a l 'eyes" and '"maybe'l answers are required
on attached sheets)
YES
1. EARTH. Will, the proposal result in significant:
a. Unstable earth conditions
MAYBE NO
or in changes in
geologicsubstructures?.
b. Disruptions, disp7.a_cements, ;compaction or
.. _,
overcov'ering of the soil'j
'Change
in topography or 'ground surface
r;elief creatures?
--. --
d. Destrictior, covering or modifi:ca,tion of any
�
unique geologic or physical features?'
e Increase wind
.in or waiter erasion of soils
either 071 or off-site?
f. Changes in deposition or -ros.ion of beach,
sands, or changes
in siltation, deposition
or erosion which may modify the channel of
a river or stream or tate bed of the ocean or
any bay, inlet or lake?
g, boss o_f prime agriculturally productive soils
outside design, ed urban
,..
areas?
h. Exposure of people or property to geologicµ
hazards, such
-
as earthquakes, ;larµdslides, mud -
Slides, ground failure or similar hazards?
2. AZR. Will the pro osal result in substantial -
a. p. p
Air, emissions or deterlo;ratio of ambient
air quality?
b;. The creation of objectionable odors, smoke
or fumes?
C. Alteration of a it movement, moisture,, or
temperature-,
A
or any change in climate,,
locally or
regionally?
X
3.7 WATER. the proposal Ult in substantial:
a Chang., %n. currents,
or the course or direction water movements in either
marine or freshwaters?
b Changes in absorption rates elrai nage
, patterns
or the rate and amouxt of ��ur rce runo.f?
c: Need for off-site surface d'.xa ;nage improve-
4A
rnents including vegetation removal., channe'l-
ization
or culvert installation?
_.
d. Alterations to the course or flaw of flood
�---°-e
wateI's?i
e: Changein the amount of surf°ace coater yn any
water 'body?:
"- -
f: I?isc]Iarge into surface waters, or in ahy
41terat.ion O,f surface'
`
water qualityy including
but not limited to temperature:,, dissolved
oxygen or tttxbidity?
g. Alteration of tho direction oar, rate of1014:`"'-
'ground
£AC,
o'f waters ?
h: Change in th'e quantity ok qu&3' iIty ,of :ground aters �
either through di;rec;addtio�soa� L}-
drawals _, or. throzlgh JAterceptJ? ori a an.
aquifer by cuts or,
excavation -0
i. Reductign in, the amount of water oth.erwis� --_„
availabl
ie o^° public watea^ siip�alie5:?
Exposure of people or
propex'ty to Mater
rel4ted ""hazards such as flooding? ��
�.._.
YES MAYBE
NLS
4.
PLANT LIFE. Wi11' the proposal result in substantial,;
a; O�iange .in the diversity of species,, or humUer
of any species of plans (including trees,
and aquatic plants)!,
shrubs , x'a �s.> crops ,
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare
or endangered species of plants?
Introduction of new species of plants into all
r r
area, car in a barrier; to the normal replenish-
ment of 'existin,r* Speeies? , _ .._.•
dReduction ;ion acreage of any agricultural crop?
5,
LIVE, Will' the proposal result in subsrantial,:
,4NTNiAL
a.' G ange in the diversity of species, or numbxs
animals (birds, 1And an.7nls
of a.ny species of
including reptiles, fish and shell. f'shs
benthic organdsms or insects)?
b: Reduction in the.-numbers of any unique, taro
x
or endangered species of animals? -
c. Introduction of new species of animals into
result in a barrier, to the mi.gratioxt
a.n area, or
or, movement of animals?
d. Deterioration to existing fist or �uilcilif.e
habitat?
6,
NOISE. Wi11 the proposal result in substantial=
a Increases in existing noise levels!
b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels?
..
7
LIGHT AND GLARE. Will the proposal produce'
X
sYgnx scant light and glare?
8
LAND USE. Will the proposal result in a
s- sem` tan�tial alt ratiox c?f tht present.or planned
land use of, an area? --'-' —'
NATURAL RBSOURGIS- Will the ;proposal result in
su stantia.1'.
a Increase in the rate, of use of any natural
resources?
b. nopletion of any non-rerietvabIa natural
resources? r-- -=-•-
10.
RISK OF UPSBFT. Will the proposal, involve,,
a A, ''r explosion or the reiease of hazard-
aus substaxices (in ludin 'but not Iinl].'to to,
in the
oil, p sticides chemicals or radiatio,n7
accident or upset conditio,s?
event of an;
V. Possible interference with at emergency
response plan or emergency evacuation plan?`_:
l
POPU LA'PI"N', Will the proposal al ter the location',,
'of
GstUrbutxo'n, density, or growth rate' the human
potul.ati.on?
l2.
HtUSIN Will'' the. proposal affect exx$tin� horsing,
X
g? ---�
oar e.roate a demand :,fax additional housan .,..�,�
,i
WI
l3.
,TWSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Wi�,1
YES MA.YB,b, NO
th
result. iA.: proposal,
a• Generation of substantial. additional, vehicle
Movement?
b. f:Eecs on existi
demand fong parking faciliti
res
paror
new }cing?
C. Substantial impact
on ecisting transportation
systems?
d. Significant alterat o s; aesent pat terns
Of ci rculation
or movement
goods? people and/or
e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or, air traffic?
f. Increase in
traffic hazards to motor vehicles
bicyclists or pedestrians?
1
14. PUBLIC SERVICES, Will' 11 the
h
----
p
pra os`al have an effeot
' taPon, or result In a need.for noW
g ve,rnmental serv'cesar a] te.red,
a. Fire Prot ection?
b. Police protect;ian;
... �(
C, . Schools?d.
Parks 'ot ot her
...,
e. recreational facilities?
Maintenance of Public facil�roads? ties, including�
--�-
-—�
f. Other governmental services?.
lS. ENERGY, Will the proposal result in.
a � Ll- of substantial
amounts of fuel . o enemy?
b. Substantial increase in demand upon,
sources
e;�zstin;`
of energy, or require the development
of new sources of
energy?
16. UTIL� TTS, III the
pr000�al result in a need for
new systems, or;;substanfial
following-.- alterations to the
,
a, Power or natural gas?
b. Communications
system's?
c . Water—�
ava11abil gty.
---- ..
d. Se�,rex or Jeptic tank?
>C .
e . Storm water drainage 7 -
--
f. Solid ws.ste and dis as
p a1?
D`
17. Hur2AN FrL.ALTIi, Will theproposal result
a,reat,con of any
health, hazard ar
health hazard 'excluding
mental hearii) ?al
bEXposuxe of people to Potential,'
hazards ? health
18.AES` A—'TTCS. Will the proposal result iri
o sTi t uc`t o of the
any scenic nista or
the pub? Vic, or wl.1l ,the VIOW open to
creation of an aestheticali� Offensavets tete
tQ public view?
pen
. 4
YES
MAYBE, NO
19. RECREATION. Will the proposal result ;in an impact
upon the qualityor quantity of existing recreational
opportunities?
x
20. CULTURAL RESOURCES._
a. Wil tie proposal re ult in the alteration
of or the destruction' of a prehistoric or
historic archaeological site?
b. W111 the` proposal 'i•es'ul't in adverse physical "
or aesthetic effects to aprehistoric or
historic building, structure or object?
c Does the proposal have the potential to cause
a physical change which would affec-t un.iqute
ethnic cultural values? -
Y
d. Will the proposal restrict existing rel'gious
or sacred uses within the potential-impact
area?
V. - DISCUSSION .OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION ISP 31-20-3-19
See attached.
�TY
.5-
a
Applicant:
Scot 01ry Assessor's Parcel' It
31-20-3-19
Log # 86-06-16w01-
DATA SHEET
A. Proaect cr i pIt ion
1.
Type of Project: Tentative Parcel Map.,
2,Lir
i of Description : D i v i d i n9 4-1/2 acres to create three
p re or
parcel of 1 acre each and one of 1/2 acre mo
leas.
3.
Location: On the, northeast corner of 10th Street and Butte
Avenue In the Thermalito area.
4.
Prbposizid Density -of Development: One dwel1)no UnJt per acre
a."
Amount of ImperVious'Surfacing: Approximately 107.,
6,
Access and, Nearest Pub l i c Roack s) a Parcels 1 and 2 front on :
10th Streets Which is publicly maintained. Parcels O an,d 4
front on, a private portion of Butte Avenue thence
approicYmatel y 300-400 feet to 10th Street
1.
Method of Sewage Disposal Public sanitary sealer
8.
Source of Water Supply: Thermalito Irrigat.lon District..
q.
Pro¢imitY of Power Lines: To property,.
1U»
Potential for further land divisions and development: The,
General' Plan and zoning allow the creation of parcels as small
as 6500 square feet.
' B. Env i r�anmental Satt i rens
Phys I cal Env i`ro mento -
1
Terra i n
a, General°Topographic Gharacteri Gently 'r011'109 Valley
lands.
b. Slopes- 0-5.
C. Elevation: Approximotety 220 feet above Sea Level.
d. Limiting Factors; None.
2 .
So i i s
a. Tyrpes and Character i .st i cs P; 04 ti no Grave 1 1 y Sandy Loam .
b.l.imiting Pacators, Mone, providing, the sewage disposal 1s
via public sewers.
3.
Nat,l�rai Hazards" of the 1,,„And
eke intensity
a. Earthqu,alie Z'on0T �iod@Taira Earthqu Z��Oe: VI2 T.
t3. ErQa,l On .,POtE}F. £! + MOd@rate .
c. Lands l 1,d6 Wetent 1 Al None : ,
d. dire Hazard: Unclassified.
e.,:.Expansiwe Soil Potential: HU hM
4,
, N)ydro l ogy
a, Surface WaterNone nn s1tr.
b. Gresurtdwaiier: Un{tnoWn'.
C. Drainage Cha -act' stl es: Property dry i cls to roads i de
d i tche� thence W.osterl y towards Ri.�ddy Creek . a
-7-