Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout031-290-001a 1+ ] � a. r :a w y. o �i -' v, t C, T � i i�q�Ytl �p"� k 1, _. R - i } t � Ay , � � u 19 �"�� yj�� � �F� k�� ii r��� � o Yits� `�� ( � it 1 .. - ,al �, '�:� �-_ �� �� r p d Y f ti'1i � ,f . ; 2 !�� � A � e d � �� j 'lY'..r -.C� y . . . •i4 �," S , �/ 1s., / `.;l�.: i i i :�,. 'u' '�• �,•.:.Y �'� i + %+ -` ..1 �. /J/ '' - � 1.I . �/ ,rW Y �' r .�,�. �' F :" �"� t 1 r ^ , k' ht Y�'. t'.'.� l / r m F / L '. ` ." � � l � �� f ✓� 1 r .. � i 1,�1 , T h t t � M � p i• �, ��4�� ,�"�' ,� 1 '• �.. , •� �, s' �! e ♦ _ _ .a;,o�.a I �-.. *.• � r' �- 6 ��!�� . .� i . _e � Q �� � � . =. " ; s�� a a 1 x aIF d». NING,cGGt�y'Py'.I�'} �(OA1 SUMMARYET n q IIdAIIQi-0{��-01-03 .t1ramtcsr:kll mr. fn' Lo A APPLICANT I,r.ry_D. McKinney a 466 Manzanita Ave., d5 Chico ta, 95926 ADDRESS � , OWNER Same PROJECT DESCRIPTION Use permit, to construct 22 duplexes N PROPERTY ZONEDAR-MH 'LOCATED`approx. 200 ft., west of 7th Ste, approx., 400 £t„ north dz Plumas Ave. ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER S LITDENT�,�FIED' ( ) AS AP 31-29-001 - CLTY ;Thermalito GEN. PLAN PROJECT CONSISTENT? , DAT19 ; APPLICAT,��IION RECEIVED 9/l/82 irr.6 r �Ala 41t , , 1 q r%r s, cW I. -- Via... .. � DATE REZONING PETITION SIGNATURES CHPI kLD PERCENTAGE - $ DATE LEGAL DESCRIPTION' PREPARED OR CHECKED:- , DATE PUBLICATION NOTICE WRITTEN` PUBLISHED DATE DISPLAY AD PREPAREr PUBLISHED .�._... PLACE NEWSPA;`7ER NOTICH(S) PULISHED CP. G. B. DATE MAILING' 'LIST PREPARED', DATE- MAIL -OUT' NOTICES {VRTTTHN _._..�...�.�,... MAIT.HD NUMBER�i -r _ ENVIRONMENTAL CATEGORICAL I:�cLt 11°°V10 - DATE PILEll DETERMINATION -------- AND DATE N GATIVE DECLAR t1\0 1 - DATE ADOPTED c � IMPACT ZPOKV :- DATE CERTIV-1tD OTHER COMMISSION HEARING DATES �� 8 I a �*r COMMISSION ACTIO t �Ca� ' jc.Ts. '.�.���; Gni BOARD ACTION t. 3 I5' �.3 32 ORDINANCE (S).ADOPTED e� e7 ff' i_ . APPLICATION' FOR USE PER , NUiTE COUNTY PLANNINf� COMM�SSIOir , APPLICANT Bond and follow ;insteua iter ctlausot forth on reverse side of this forms ' Applicants name._ Larry D. McKinney —Phone number _ 891-1983, Applicant's mailing address 468 Manzanta Avenue, #5, Chico, California 95926 Applicant's interest in property (Owner, le"sscc, other) Offer �_ Owner's name and address . Larry D. McKinney, 468 Manzan'ita Ave. , #5, Chico Assessor's parcel numher(s) Present r..c yng AItMH 31-29-001 Location and size of parcels) 5.86 acres west, of 7th 'Street'., Thermali.to l Z i Street address None at present . W Description of proposed development and use TO construct 22 duplexes . & 2 ingj. jE� _ family residences. �., z a J y _ Q t3 Building construction (stale dimensions, square footage and nintel'inis used) u,. Existing buildings None Dta- le es: 21-56 x 32o.1792 sa. ft; 1-48 x 32, 1536'. sex. ft. ;r b Proposed buiRings Single Fatriily Residences: 2-32 x 60, 1280 8�. ft' Hazardous materials to be used (inflammables', explosives or strung chemicals ne Daily {tours of operation N�A 'jVumber of employees NfA, Number of oif-strecl porkitig spaces provided. 2 Per, ttn7t 1 hereby declare under penalty of perjury that 1 have rend kind uon`lerstand tite ii foregoing istructtons and that the fore' oin statements tire true complete and correct to tho best of m belief. A r,40_4 Date _ 8f 24f 82 ..__ - Applleant's signature ' r in y Projeet file NUniber: ��► Ljobatl0h Mid size of parcel(n) ' W Verifyt � � �� o dhitber(n) PrnZoning and eot Description wnei` p ` ltetluiremeuts W Proof et Agency (if mated) v'' hilentiau Description lu Copies of Plot Pian ODate fleceiviscl Appiieatiait Taken Dy V INSTRUCTIONS TO 0 PERMIT APPLICANTS 1, II applicant Is not the owner, written uothorizatioh by the owner Of nth& Proof of agoncy most be subnil?ted in order for the apiilicant to legally sign the application, Application shall he considered -void it not signed by the os-,mr;or ',egnl agent, 2. All items on nprlicntiori shall be filled in tie ctttitplctoly ns possible. If nn item is not appli-: cable, please indicate by thr. total "NA'% 3, It is important that the applicant sa i sl an nacurnte desert tion of tilt. Itinntinn of ilia rn inb p pp supply p p i e1i p roJ, � a, ssleslsorgllclowingt it isPtrcalnuaibcr(s) (front the lax bills or Asscost)r's non s), i b. Street addresses (it available). c, Distances and directions to named streets bodies Of water or railroads, 4, Sixteen (16) copies ofa detailed plat plan of atictlnato settle to clearly ,§ht►w proposed build - logs anti linpirovoinenis, folded to 8 x it incites, shall aaeolnpuny'Intl be- nu)do part of the "Application for Use Perinitfl, It (be Use, parnod, is npprltved. Ilio plot kion becomes the up�; , proved develnpnlent plan for the property,`I'he plot pion shall igelude Ila following iuforniatiant A settled drawnlg of the ptlecel(s) ho'll"10. (es, b. Location and dimensions of all exigtin; Anti sropelsed intirovoti i f. 1 1 lents on the property, lredtij Heptle tnliks all(] lenehl fields' iveWay r►eecsSells, ngislrlol; e, Location Anil ntttlgtsvt of t roads,, nearby crossroads, streams, bodies of ,water and railroads. d, North arrow and scale of drawing, 5. The "Application for lase i7e1110I" 113 subject ltt'public hearings and npi)roval by the planning Cotnnllstlloa, Any special ctintlillotis of approval shall be made it ,part Of the approved "Use t The procedures fof county salon 00 Use per= 1ermic and shall be binding oil the Itppliennt, I t ti tint o lIcations ore stated in Chapter 24 of the l3utle. Count Coda, b, 'Che Manning Coolinisslan, on the bliss of tilt: e'videncc submlt10d at l.11opublic hearing,wlay i t' grant ague perrtiits when 1t fhldt, That the proposed U1srs of the ire, irGy will not impair Nlc integrity and ohnructer Of the zone in Ivlllt'I, the Has ts Innd Ha(Ilia that IIID ttso voold not be 6n"C' ` rensantrhly �ncalnpnliblc. 1%,1 or uljliriaur� t itrroundiiig properties lii)r drtrinrenlal to the health and aneriYl ivelftiru of the pel'aouS wwltnb+ or tv>,irkiiig -Ctl thp: ne'ighborl}and her to Ili e• general health, safety and wajitirn of tfrauoisniy, I 7, In upprovilig it ;Use, perttllt) the 'Planning Cnailolsriioti may inelntle Stich aoirrlillonS lig are i the I'MeAt`Ily 'Intl - itcaled ronsonable tend AticaSSili'y Under tiie Litelltiistaltees to Ipregt''rve 1 of the 7.od 11011 it) iicc ra die g?:Ileval purposes of 'ilia liUtt4- County-Gencrai. flan and Clmpicr'24, of the llulte (;oilut.y lode, Such cotidlliony nifty loplodo, ba are it;)[ 1111d "I to, Iliac, llinitatintim, do wdopment plan approval',, peal's of opurat ell, tolicing, tludicallon of riglit, of -way, and Attica ;roll dralvage irnpetwowtats. Coodliloati hap' sed Upon Issuance of a � nsn permitmost. lie eonaetlably felawil it) the uric stir whiLdl tho pUrniil is rutluestnri H. (it ,11t,) tiro t4ppllcntiirn rnhtr nS pf-..–�_1�i- t�� Vacs ;tiny be lin_id lav ensh of by cheek mado pilyi'ible to `}'I'rcilsl, r,Of Iltitlu ,Ctytllrly". I afore stlbmlttiiig U Ilse ,p4t'ifllt i11I)lit'titinll, ultjiiilsiui to rt,tlulssteit it)ilst atm with sniff till tluesiN)nS, about itpplitFst llsn t4tj'iihenl1311,18, Cuwti'ty procutlures, ''Adan IIItivisiniiis and passllrld eiilitillltrns tit aplipelvalr �... .. .:.. ......_ :,.n. ..., a n.. r. n: , �...� � ...,..., K .. .. ....... .. .. ..:_,. . ,..,r ....,:. ._.,.., Receipt Project APPENDIX Date Filed Environmental Information Form (To be completed by applicant) GENERAL INFOR14ATION' D. McKinney, 1, Name and address of developer or project sponsor 465 anzan to A�reriue, 45, Chido, California 95926 2. Address of project; West of 7th Street,-Therm%alito Assessor's Block and Lot Number 3, Name, 'address, and telerhone number of person toL bu contacted concerning this project: r W. BACHMAN AAC't" & ASSOCIATES - 342 -4236 3012. The Esplanade, ,Chico, California 95926 4+ T use permit Type of project (i,e. rezonirfg, subdivision) 5, List and describe any other relatwi permits and other public approvals required for this project, incltading those required by city, regional; state and federal apences; None 6, 9xistin9 zoning district.!'ARMH 7, Proposed use of site; To conatruct 22 duplexes & 2 single family res idencoas PROJECT DI SC UPTION 8. Site size,' 5.86 acres c, ing(s) 21-1792 sq. fb; L-1536 sq. £t. (Duplexes) >, Square footage of build 2-1280 sq. ft"(Single Family Residences) 10, Number of floors o£'const7ructon: one ll, Amount of off-street parJta.ng provided. Two per unit 12. Attach site development plan: ls. proposed scheduling: S,jting 1983 sion map14� Associated pro•ects riling final sbdiva. 15, Anticipated incremental devel:opment� Noma Me Cd. MmMIn9 Cairn,, sip 1s�z iorayo o Appendix rE :. page 1 0£ 3 APPENDIX E w 16 If residential, include the number of units, sche#z sizes, and, type of household size expected. 22-56 x 32,ft , Yr ,�'•;y ft. t 17. If commercia11, indicate the type, whether neighborh(,%t,fr` city �v or regionally N/A sales area; and loading or re lonall oriented, square footage of 18. Ifindustrial; indicate type., estimated" employment per shift<, g and].oadin facilities. NSA 19. if institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated .occupancy, loading facilities}, and community benefits to be derived fromthe project. N/A 20 if the project involves''a variance, conditional use or rezoning' application, state this and indicate clearly why the application is required. N/A Are the following items applicable to the project or its efiects7 ' Discuss below all items chr'cked yes (attach additional sheets as necessary), YES NOX. 21. Chan ge in exist-�ng, features of any beaches, lakes, or, hills, or substanti.-Al alteration of groixnd contours. 22. Significant change in scenic viewa or vistas from existing residential areas or 'public lands or roads. X 23. Significantly change pattern; scale or character of general area of project: X 24: Significant amounts of solid waste or litter': X 25, Change in dust; ash., smoke, fumes or odors in .vicinity', X 26. Significant change in lake, stresim or ground water!? qualify or quantity, or alteration of: existing; drainage patterns. X 27. Substantial change in existing noise or vibration; ovenls ithe, vicinity. X 28. Site on tilled landor on slope of 30 percent or more. X 29. Use or disposal: of potentially hatAHous materials, g.uctj as to},ic substances, flammable$ -or eitplosives Iq u ;I Appendix E page 2 of 3 YES NO, X 30. substantial change in demand for municipa'L services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc. ) 1. 3ubetantially increase fossil fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural gasp etc.) X 324 Relationship to part of a larger projector series - of projects. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING 33 Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site, and the use of the structures:. 14 Describe the surrounding properties, including information ofl plants and animals and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects* intensity of land use (one -family, apartment houses, shoes, dr Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc. . y apartment stores, etc.) , and scale of d;;lvelopment (height, frantagak, set -back o rear yard, etc . ) �ERT.IVICATION• i hereby certify that the statements furnished aV aToi an—'� dTn-the attached exhibits present the date and information required for this initial evaluation to the best oil my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presenter are, true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Date 8/24/82 g a re Larry Do McKinney For Lams{ D. McKinney '`981e Appendix E - page 3 of 3 DSw. *"1%]'�' ON LjSgl l+CR i'�"V�4] .R AF �'P, ��t)Uxli� +Public 'w,Cd7., w 1 x'� Cj..ay Cad ter n. ani CI t- 01-73:1p,� "�" iiu4 Water Diol;. t;j� 0ity of Gridley Oroville-Wyatd. Irv. Dist. +X W1ity cD Orovi lle Paradise Dasa ,� � City af' Parad.a.sr �.7ic2�vale :Crr J}intn county Tablo Htn. 1rr. Mot �n iota e "trans cx'atioza. Dept. Therma:lito lrr* Dist. DQM ITIC. WATIO RI,'C1RLA�1 LON VAOILITIES er17"Oreok Water Go.iiia o Ze & Ptrk Dist. .3loomer Mtn. Mutual Water Co. Durham Area Roo. & Park Dist.. gush Greek .Estates Feather River Reo„ $; Park Dist' ..,. :Butte Water District "�' Pavadiso Rein & Park Dist* F " CA Water ServL3e Co. (Chico Richvelo Rec. & Park Dist, urtna area & part: of Oroville) Stat: Warks &. Rec. Dept. . Dei `aro water CO. .,,.... State Fish & Game Dept. C'ax"acii„so k'ita s� SCHOOL DISTRICTS Falls (Louisiana Paciac) Bute Oommun ty Colle e Forest; Ranch 'Mutual Gran Mutual (Sl atasen h<�aub. to County Gup, or achoolb � Dut Green Acres �Cxlenv ood Dr. -Chico) CA i.o TnifiUniversity, C % o , Gridley Varm Labor Camp Ghiha tlraa.ifie Lake Madrone Water Dist DuLtihnrn Unified :. ` e Feather Valls Union Magalira Co. Water Dist*. — t�ct�.det:t � V.athex* Union Mom Mtn. Mutual. kolipFor �r , �°�' A. Mills) a. Gridley Iiigh {{ Mulberry Water ($E Chico) Gridley un16u C' �.�fy.,.. Jjor,. thtgoocs 11, itu a- L (Vo aestRanch F'alormc Una ond hOloville Union High Wates Springs oiDxva7g Waters P lermo Union (RichardsonSprin o t Stirling C:i ty Pionoer Union (Diamond Inter.�rta� io�xa�.) i"hex+mala tt� Tlti ara Vista Mutual (Durham) S�ta��tS i C; rhMllN ' : ST V CSS chva 1.e i�3ani t;ary Dist. �a.l'me comm: Set"�r U eu. X. Btirbarik `Vb. CJ �;a J„l t�� Dist. � (S, 0roville &. doll Ridgo) DRA11TAGE Skta a o on Sub. (OSA 15 � Witte C-oeek Dray nose Dis4a Sterling City f3ewer Mai,nto Dist. Thormtal i:to Tr`I', Dist* , TRIC, , POWER (Cc. Seg v oe area C) V16 rr ticcourcot.� :`dept. 0-10 Aire PpoteCt. Dist. �,Dc=atxxtmoub tJ.Sorest M �:rvice county' Fire *. v' +.« il. i ur atx of i, aixd Managemont S ta. to Division or :Foros°tr� o, ti ur air o—',(fi—tte County k �, County Sherili }3lf i 'I,f." COUNITY I'1.ANN I PSG CO[*Ji S$ I Gi�1 ' COUNTY GUNI '* ' tw Ive 4 Olin t, tw vx LU,- GniwIr� 711 85,16 Ono? pt TO'. Thermalitb Union. School Dist. DAYE.- Soptclillor 2'Q, 1982 �� IIIY `rd �i�t4liit'a►Y�I li l� LV.�l11V +1i1�.LV1Vt i ��'. 1hllo7 Ci 1E1t1 ,lrt )91.`Cl.alidhUn1`'y, 'da U, citlr arpi.cv �!�',t� d'C a�z?h.VC'ti �t11' �G11E �tti'�t� CClilbkL317 tho t'o7Jo-ring lll,oject: AP 31-29-01 - LarrL 1). l} ' Uso� curl► t t;o ccii struct 22 clupi rats on px•ollol. ty xeric;i. A):4111 located ry 4+ w. -. ..: ,• +Li.•r+.u.. L+...wa4.Mwa.w„_te.r�.iMr.x+»...w.e»MLi..�+L.Mw.v.s irM.y li{/pra..�� 4x»Yr_:yLn ww.L,ruy4»w..i.�r.rtWL.rwyi4.4��.+1Y�NrrLr.t41. .. :a 200 ft. , frost o� I01 St., l x•cl+,. n00 -. north of lli Thorma±l at o L.._:.r.....4...1u:u..�.1.u....MMiwL...r...x.,.�WMvi,i,.u4..L..aLLu.�:..wuaLw.i.+4r:�,a1,W..�wiL,.:iA...w.Y...w.....+r_.u>Li{.WaL.LL.r..w..�,.._.`•._+cw:;1rri.... _._..�...u,._w3 �' �. 4 Wo aro 111:06 118 118 rill aCtiiom{11CY11 it t1J ,��oalc, i' 1l l G� G+t1V»1'UY►11iGI1 L A L J ►t1f1ClC i ri altld 1'8,11 be � }lrG� �1ElY 1Yi ; aul t'►lvi ��csriutr,�i 4.TL dc��attt►�riE y a i.l, 1or tk Nt e"Itolvo Dooldi., at i.on i Kti.tig,4tod Nutt � V �)i B� ill'L�t;>till- or vil 14ttli1po►ltl,oli l a l ThipvA Rvpor 1, M }�i.oilF;C j:rov.ido ally .ralot,ual SlttttlnollLn, :140no for illva�. Wlt;tlHOft, or, opillicill-o you Call <i.i`iC:1' ill yolll` nt,c . or culaooru bi` 1+%XpOJ*LjFIo th'A rolato to cilllot plies -ac l q ooi'ilai, fel'otomopl'Lla ;t{i9roE ,,Ill ttlr,Ct Titt'sfttol, way gollorrato rovIl,bild wi,i:)lhl VI days of the atbovo-)IoLud d a�to. It 110 1"or lonba �. - tell or iAod by r;il7,Fl jjjjuJ vY,1.11i'1ll It ra)ral' 1 bo rtmt,t oriod that talo'd rine ' ho - ti 011e � i b►xn l cllv5 ronli, n i.►�1. � ih)yairs Lt; kttta.oh ore po l a11 l L&I ! 1'ctpl tilt pt'o Jbb . 4tr at�r)ir���rJol�. lily rlrl�t9 �i�ilirr You Cam provIdt"; I�S:+�G1.Lt�l. Il�:i111y1C)I'. , Gonimcltl°cr1: ia.e.wYur'.:�rv_.rrw wa++:w .w.a.+M�.rv.yy»M.wrn i+LMPh.+4tl�lweirs ai.`.r.W.M. Y.�w+':iw M.+lwu.4.L.w4.a�.�.. .. ••.. 1rYi�MiWlwri_yy �. {.:1 -ir..�•ir4+'LAYfW�'yYiri,Lruu++ir�f'srAiw..wir±liw.:Jc1sG.W rr VW+kv M..0 K..aM.w.»rL..rL...aaJrAnhi.a..uWr+pl.ai�r�.+,a..,+..wrwiwwWw. .... { i 4 AI� i»L.- ••..• •i�vWsi'rLw Ma1��.W.'rLrMLnl.L.ilMr�uIU.YI�k,i.44,w uw4rwr.+:.u.S4f�vM . 1 a1i, WiW - r i WW F - k.Ylu4'+x w.. YYu:LWw2-...k+y�i��sLLc.Lr''•.+.ai�Lr-'�»Y...i.�wM.w1:r Y. YLY�#4..Y�yi�.M+Wr«Y Wrw,i..L:WAr�Ll+w4.M.KNi..'M.W..waiW:y�.wMwnaL'.ryl_.y,yy„�y`y� til' MME COUNTY Pte'-f,, SING COMMZSSIOff! % C64T'Y CEN'TER' DRIVE - OROVILLE CALIFONIA 95965 PHONE; 534-11601 9!0.- OtOVllle Unior High rm�st. September 20,, 1082 Vla : P11OLIECT REVIIN AND ]rticlar�od a.rs pI,(Ai,tniner,y dat.0 our offive hays recoived or genevabod colloe'rning the ro1,10w),.lIg 1Yro oo AI' �1y29-Ol Lar��y D. McKinney, - Use �rmit to construct 22 duplexes on prurerty zoned AR-MH locat,l approx. 200 ft., west of 701 St.i appioa. 400 ft. north of Plumas Ave., Therm,, ]I xta We aro mala ng Fitt awl-01ssmanL• of i.mpac to and t43.1J, be preparing an envirowitenLal document:, wither a Ne alive Peolapation, Mitigated Noftativr. Doolaratioll nr all 1111vivollmental lntpan t: Ropol-t i. Meade provide ally racLuaL nttatemenasi iderio Per invoct .t;abion, or opinions you can or. rali 7n yout aceta n!' tiond vil. or expowt i on, that paltitb to � ither phyaicati social, ov econonic i,mpacLn that thin project may p;enovate. P1.6awo roopond within "its days of the above"t oLed date. Ir no respohso in genovatod by titin inquiry, thou it t;hnl1, be to autnod that there twe Ylo s nif:ir tnt onvaroi7ittotaial'. impactn whicll Giro potolitia:l. frow thus ptaiject We apprnoiat.e nhy 6n8inLanc e yoo oan provide;. Sticere7.y, Da t, it. 11�..ranimus .; j.: Atsoca.dto X lanncr Nrltts or type+ :hI 13P:vo JJJ'oVttintt c rol.nli► tahi,s BUTTE. GOLiPd� Y r L !' (VC; COmm i ss I O� y c�N`r'k�i DR TV -� anovzl_� cA�wtr001A 95?G5 7' cot�N�'� PHONE: S0 Feather River Rec, Park Dist. 1• 1) A'1'},; ; yy��yyt ynSYye yyl t c��ym7�;bC^^'Y�r1 2(�0��tt; 1982 RNVi 0N- —14TAL }IVALUATSON Ilnclz�rod b pr,'elAmillary tlal'a out, ofra•tre I[utr recti ed or concern'kng the ol,l.crwittf; pro''.. ctt Ah 3l-2eJ 0 - I,arr)� n. McKinney Use permit town struct 22 cluploxcs onpra �trty zoic � AR -rile located 4pprox 200 i't., west of 7th St. approx. 40.0 ft. north of Plumas Ave. Tlermal �, to � We are roaring tui tionesomont or porton bl o impacts and wi-11 Ue propati.118 all r nv ��-o7itrtental documents ea t hey a t e t ivr Dec l ar.�ati on, t iti}�ate Negative ]1ne "lGtr iti.e5r, ,or txn I;tivirorr 1wil l'al lmp�lr l• Veport; Please provi.ttti may lhotuoal- o ttr{,errterrl°rt adono i'o•r invcnti,gtrtioni or opilrioria you coli of far ill yo1w urea or mtprrtiew that rolato to tithe 1jo phyaieoj OV cobAOMib iltnperr{•,t ;{}ant jlsis priojoct may terterate. -r 1�7 r sc y'taripoxid 1ri,tlll.n ils dr yr', OP {.lib t�bovt}-Vetted -iate. If uo 'Peopome is< - gb tni%t6d by thiti-irlejuirys Onn, i.t trhall' hti of o lim'd that tltcl;d are no sa ►lily.at rit onvirbt mfM 'ilnl hpuctts tthi.clt Vre poterlLial Prom the project. We aper cci ato city Psaiotartces YOU cnn N'Ovi r3c . Sirrer^d�.y�, Davi R. Hirenimu: Associate Plannot r (47HAO art *110 ill t.j,tit;o r0i•ri*11 thas ttlwe};.) II a k buffs► Goy P�gn�tng Comm . :. �%fT C171)1��';Y IxI E A�7� LiJT 1 8 -., FIIiF,' p'RtllPfiigW SI;INnllilb�a .fi{cv'iCwI?;�� �� :1 ri DEVEfOPMENT NAME r_,rir All fk 1- C�-�h �` :OrnYil®� tiIl..MrKitunayµ.���.� toChttgN..,74h..lain�,o This prD,iect must MoetUre requir>'Ments iI'4hc'Unifornt �i g � Buildirl,g COO amended to DUtte'�,County sl,andhrds, In acdoi'daitbe Sii.t}i 5odtiion 13,Utl (fire �5ta'ndands) >5f Oil;'#17Atlli� iIISINESs ChRi� HIRE) a°IIMproyyetnent Standards, '�thd WAtef' requl.i�ements for this'. parceij:pfoiedt 'aroi `(pplidable stand5rds �are'cfredk?~d:),F,; tVa er suS for-tire '"w�, I 43, g_ "dnt Clan l t I'hly 9J tll .l a UIr ( i >tie proy t�ctOn w not a requiie', however, f I — i doMestic�water. storato $,ytteM hn5 a aapadity'of li,660 yaltons Or more; a )i.re delict+'uner�t oatl[1etien tb�' "' Butte County ['udlic Works Standard S40 chap be G" 9hstalled. The ;fi'rt deparfinen't. must "be' notified of cry suth contiodtioli, `;udh' oliodction point mbtt be lotot98, f w a 3o that ,it is readily addtss,bidto f0oe, op lm,6nt.equlpmeiit, ' E:He° uireinpnt Class ,, ,A lil'eatdei ed Watb± tysLehi witlr adeglia0 00libbe of hydrai is #s �lreferred� but if "s not fewasi�ile� t e to1low ng optlon,Will ,9eMTY Zlte firei depar{iuefst reoUiremeht far water, (:, a,� Watiir�3terage tanks with a capacity Oflq,btln�Ualleh� or nroi�d equipped with direct all weather actess I i4, and fire depaf:unrnt'cpilikO tl (S�2b?3 r` ) `bti trl Uro;und swipn�tiii+i po5;ls ogUipNed with` a draftlhif coi111ect{gh qr deaftlilU dcddi, tlr, } dppY,; ta+idp(pb typteip piil60 to .a re�liabid Water soiirciati SUcit s'tandpipe sYst�M vii 1;1 'nnt ettdopd 1'�pbU;feOt ih �ilength.� There must be et lgast l0,DD4 g5 ton df. water;avaliable ,and s`Era*oUltatly ltic ted for each 10 tt bo ✓es, or ' k,a pnrtihns..there6i, '(tkamplei 11;. dwellint would' rewire two a aratNd �soUl'Us), erovisi.ons fnu`st b� made to ll; inure that the w+rter stored tways Ovailabip an attest:10 for use under ali weather conditt,oiis, 13,b1�':he uireiiteh" 5s�',A'pressuried cougndnity Winer 5yaleM ia'requlred,." 7ehtrtve aiydri+nt lbc'tions'arp ; � hiiiaate on"the atLaC Fie irr li)ttiharY ntap, tih6;l lntstinns ttlutt be 'ekaetly ind:;i�atdd 811d rer tird4d tlli the ,fidal { ' inapt NuM 'bf hydrahts rttriufired -t� ,, flrnxinrum hyslrunt ta'ityslrnnt-'sp,�oiitq, C hS+ai4nt�,ixe , ..��� ��Q+�_'and 1`�istallttfJ gcctii�dinU to .�ht1,� CiluntY Puhl�'�`�rk�5pecifica,.�dh =� <` mit n�F d nm IN), C! �5�2i aid 1equlf`thierti� ni' ldntrl tuatol� aF,lency, , ! I3,tll�A-�iZe Uirentent Cl sb A, Watnr inr iiru ifwOtn&tiOtt`ly requited l'll0� pt`efgrable by`stePr i§ ashYdeait 4 iy11s5� � �Capa O'nf nFce"tin � %f lri� {1iiW ht�U��^L; me1115�; IV this ls; not �fc'Asib(> t1 SY; em invOlvitlJ lridtl en 11 p .' 1 sta.tif 4iatiir 5tiuragi dryAOtltldisiyts,� lnay ISp auhstilti;Niid�. $uelr a aysl elq i Fullnnst01 per IU111tit i.re7h ii#jii8lutn dap rt1lent, fhe avai140o Wa,wr ilUw�fi,rnn utih'�a systF.ht g9st flaw �.,,; J R. VO, little of wdtr?r�3n.atoWyi? anust be w^ aailun5,,.rirhyls'3dha muse b nlad�e to irts'uro tha�,sy,eM �proVided thairtiaitied to its tle'�{igii frippcIty� i .�73 Di-,5 ite uirdmelt.rl�as a, 1'tiesur( Wa'la for tiro, l�,rotpdti ri i5 dvFilable wititiir l,tld0 feet of tii5 dreaCtid 1� p5 ei. F In :eu u � trarinh tl+h po i b'I tnst�illmy a t1ie iiykiW�n (sj flit dev npef IIdy pay liifo tho firs riepa t� ' liy nt Fulwdgsed dh :51 a E5 pq�r fFontdye meht hydrant fnttd, r�'ey Iii 1'ir u- i e�ttCt, l �itkittr ���IFtraii 1`i hal ` tont, Fr'Ogtage, is 'iitditul,dd Ity tho rod ir)Ilr ill, the atttFthud ni�jlr nisprOxiltiatb-'fee is b frohtag'b caltulptidn It,)''` bki Itldd(i ily SurCcybv and roCtmiod nl> filo Mdp.- I rOiitu�lo t�+ldiF:lpt' pn hi l.itde hotli; ori dea e the tN of gii itwlrrl ided atiee s y ( ) � ' Dtiier G�sltdi tlOkis► � ,�,�;�r��,..��-.�,...«�.:�� ,a �whT.lF .. kun .�, 1 I 'Nµ d iw Ii:.,e.Fa�•rIO weyW ...#Jac .+.r?✓.. .I ,� .l i i � Joy{' � H.�lert+i M(.Ji.heH trk/.Y d W+y s,(. -�"FVY Mc4 MH k kaF tl !.h I r��- �'A""�n..ryMWY.AUfi }l�`'V..�F..++ahW is.ak J, ,+ • V'k iv: s M. y,ril�nhK +4 Mrv�^.L+F•L-x...nSUF�i-rk rM Lwh 41k' .sla �W('!hk1sW+�� �. ! fieshottse.� titFiaS .tor i.il>s lir tt .r i i rS� ul�d i n6 pis as i('l11iW$; Cbf/riGh'li � �° i tOtioii 1w� xw�.„.a .a.«; w •� ra r t1w W F't �_.. 1iuto.� o,j ut sl 1” AA `"5t°altl Oh H° - h .. la r A {11S � lh:;LµM f,hY -1. +rw�*Wrae. L.«Jv uF4 +-Y R, Yx+p r:+-t �'t4 (!�L'.o'k .-AYi-�Ax «A �-•• 'r ;Y,..�l�:ie,aLua> kau'+eK+p;M.k �WWlrsn ' fhb 'fot,�T-)po nC 6f tho,d:tltte'rgnNtty tiortirtai [Bari', this Farv�ert soba iK las ifl:tH as at. iina fil9e;ha�ar�l aroo� � =Witi,fi��i'�� 'tLi� t6bhty Fite Wafl$dil F5 � 1ia�Lal iet'i Chit'f hyi _,a''� � ✓i� ',,«�.,:;�.,w,�,..:� , .. ti ntoli the i' 1l iarrrrl wdt wld efley worjoR..Loolits for tltn Ula,y, a More r tri tlVe. lit 41v)0.1' u' i Ito (omim'Iss"I OR f ``+rye +� `Yty t �)`� r , t, 15 \f Y{ `4o'� v 1 y 'lr'eFrl,. J!Il 7 V i",.. � 1 Li.� } ���.r� �`"��i\R J,1 J��i `{il` ,1 1� 1'� 01" .: '} r R c 7'O: I."4rinantia'x, �inv� l�ea��th I),Is11i1.cjitrtii�ei '�q;, 1. R iNiN1 y���1 raov la t 1 (I t-t'AIlli6i tL: a� _ y h:s 'A"O l tats l,61,0)`td,tid ctiirr�Yttj:h� ; j3re�.a�n � s; c t � •� f '�1•>}��^'1 Aly l,a� '�' lig lett l:atIi 1�� a s I �,�; ��a�tsI" Kiss: 31. 7.%*0� r��x�'�rtati err. ry.u. »-u.. s:aL ...,b.Lwa.i.Ve+s..... .w,»«k.u+.JM1 arna.rwy r tti 'C,bit�at`i'1tCL 7.<! tltli)1t:ti ' tiri �?_]b�ti~�`1y 7UYlGtl' Alt-llll ��C,iattttl tl,) 1,tb��l { 1.r.. 4K ai.N?4 a.rW Lr.}�.i:.ii Ki+-",z.�?M+'fw'+i.> ��,.......i.y.w.«.+.r.,iciw•l 1 vidid I 41 Ot9+ 2U0' i j A U(lit � r tr n«rl.r-:: .ly.ah.* .w1� 4ti`G.�..Sww3iw.�..bW.:cµ/JNiI�..' :.M+t.MY.•w#�..Iry.J,r�a+.'w.r+.riw W1 r a.ar.r.:lwx.h...NWw.�+...�zlw.rW1..+1 __ •iMr.1.. w:✓iK'�Wa.ri1.�..+'3+Y .i4e+�w . 1'is.+s,51..r�eN+.4P.iLih i 41:%: ,. tr r W iit�d 6-1 t „ text ;<<tlr;ors,siltciil, 1 ,j�i1,bo ll I r� �:r ri li. oi�ut it�.a7 a th 7 i r:1 t iii Vill, 'l)c 4 t ��a ,fcxztig -tal ,. wr}ilt tz ; it I. �i�r,iliti tsar 01-1,11011 ti t�cl+a l vc Uoi. f^iz�;;i all i 1 U It ll�ctt 3 ! 2 �1,.1 - Pic, ;i�.1Ct11 �� tiU 1aa1 �i5"C71rl�irtjtilitlr � liflji N � I R nit Cali itti,chMt 1�J.drtttt� lii•nya c1R ttttiy � ter. i;,i�tk� t�'ltttsttti�nl7l.ci ti i;.clt�ttr5 J'Ctt � 1t���Kt�S l*;�tl i btw � ir I t, .t�z,.tt �i-r�t� a,,},��t�tw(tt O(mi 0,wt ins its4,,t�t� �1 ttt�xi� roltd,a, 't,ti�,l at�ttt.t �ha;t t� L ,I)t1d; > �y edti`t z�i":s�i tori �iti'l lti,►i ''int t1c�i;'t it < Plitt al)u'uo =31't)iLud Onto* I1 1,16vuwjaatt�e a,.t ' lit ��;tlxir,^rr�htt`tl 1�' iliatt� �Itc�it�`i"Y t' {hcJt ;its tol►ta'Ll. 4�r, c'��E1ufl�� lilt�� �.it�t•��ii�' nb '�fi� s:Vu 1 Oi .c�ttr�I� tlSt'V,�,��,c�i�Nitt'tE�� h�T11pt►t� Ltat.lt i.+alt is.i,tt "�i�J 1 ,, l",a:�l l i t C►Yt i j ,� -,. Wea��jirti# tr't. lmis, .h �l.axl:t�itf:C� ;yrtit 'ct; it rlr� �yt�3 ftr ,;' ' plpnhinq Cetnr : `M 4 ` dlil t bv i...i..�� �. li �n� ntta Uau'y��.{c3. It , J��j�j♦♦ t�)5 :11,011 . ♦ .,..... h r>yr 4aW4ryu•j4W..Yh``+ai�1.LW4riUw ,..4}•., J' 41.4 iWW':n46isa:i..%+1wsw.Lx+"..W�t1rrW xArt�us+iWiL+Hi'� i.iY•W�.i1GL'+n+i4. J...+i',-. uk:xty..:bri:.l:waLk�iA:Wpr�Pf"'1idR44^1 ar W. �n�i+i:�.dvi,. s.`i�14i 43M it .�>i'L '.H w4yrA3-uW: FrwY�l'�.LLL i4+NAV.GuyY.'.w+��'+11+�:�4+Wi.i•:ww'4ww�::i:.��w t r !.I y t'i�+�y�kL�Y44wrWLVs1.t+�`i4r...al..ri+�:wtl}�.w+.-twi'•'•'F •Y.)G.G} •,.a`� ewiw cuk puN viFAI� h.As.a:.�+.+M,4 i.i wY�i eL+it4+,w.r«riv+iw'ii�N1- ,Lf5 W+4+«M�'. 's4..i.LN�rH4+w.L..i I I Ic, � i 1 t"ki ,�(!Iw i 1T t, N I, �it . � �`�7:" ` �'1 : ovS dirk�l `{w' t�6,i 4All It = tr�� �'�i it" I:, I aQ Inter�De��r I„ M�erno�orer .r P'larinirig' 1Co'mmss"�on,, L ,I aoM, llavid ,ii. ronimus , Planning " 4 J ",sll�a�c�4 nvironmental'�Anhtysis Use' ri.ormit Pot 27 �duplexes�° ' AP 31 10 01 (Lary ,McKiniToy pA9:B, r Novemb 8, x.982 �! t u + le`XeS 44 units, tori 2'2 owe, .7 2 Au ( � �. . This �.s � use � perin�.t to' ali , p �; lots of the tj eba'y -vista 5ubdiv.i+s ibn, aa7 24� lot � SU al })5.86 `The is ��i�cated� at `the titest and , o sores property) ib .,approximately 20'0 feet west of ' 7th street, St „I approximately, 400 deet notch of plumas Avenue, "Therin61tt,5 ?I The,at'taehed inati;al onvironmentai study,i�as prepared for that original project Land can b,e, bti�,ited in conside atiori ?: o chi's current project. I I, r EIt 'bn `en t al i -armati , Su lem �' p'p ' Some construct; on, "," T tand'erground dc- tit ,has °t'al:on p'l'ace ori-si.te and. rou,h, grading o t streets �< compiete ,I ;14r 2, The ,consi uction of duplexes "ia.l ad' approximate) 1'54 04 trips to ;the. °eistiinated 1.70 At, generated .by the 's.0 day rxsior� ` for �a to�ei �.,ncreas�e of �'�4' AIT on A�enne _.Suburban°� T 3. Since the appr,orai -off the sl,tbdivx►, the ,densis of the area"ti�as redesignated 1 edxum��iMeis ty tte`sidential� bye'ndr menu tb the .�loizsi Element. The densi APPENDIX F ENV'IPONMENTAL CHRCKt ST. ��ORM (To be completed by Lead Ageoty) . :.. ERI? Log 1. BA CKGk6UNT) Carl E. Pullen and Orval HUghes Name of ProponenC(Forcbay Dista TSM) 2; Address z�hone Neter of roponentr _i _ 156 tann C o FrederickH. Pizzi c/o MirkIsso,_ E ico, urt Str9p _ Ilzrain Assoc, Redding ;CA 96bi11 a?'92 ...Rio :Lindh ..... r` 95926cA Date 3, Date of Checklist Submitterl�__�___�_��_.�.� � ...�....;...,. 4 Agency R gwlring checklist . 5 , Name of Proposal, if appli'ca5�T, ; v . Sohdigi s; an ht: n AR n.. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT'S ��y (Explanations of all es" "maybe," ma}rbp�� answers re are tired q � on attached sheets.) YES MAYBE , NO 1. Earth. All the proposal result irL significdnt a . Unstable earth condi.tions or in dhanges in geologic substtuctures7 � . Misruptions , di'splacement*.z) comms pattidn or overcovering of the soil? c. Change in topogtaphy or groilr.�1 sur= face relief fea;ttires or removal of topsoil? d, Destrtida dovering or modifita tion of any uni4ue geologic or phyaical fedbites? e. Ihtred ase in vind or water erosion of sails, ether on ,or off the site? f: Changes in deposition or erosion of bedch sands, ,or changes in silta tion) d6p6siti6n or erosion whidl 'day modify the ;channel of a river of stream -,or the bell of the ocean Or -any bay, inlet of lake? i g, Loss of prime agritultUrally pro- ctucti've soils outside designated ;. Urbdit areas? Appendi�c E Page ). of 9 YES PTAYBE NO h. Exposure of people ar property to ologic hazards such as ,earl quakes, ge landslides-, mudslide -q, ground failure, azards? az similar h :_...., _.._. , —�-- o! I, 2 Air, Will the proposal result int a. Substantial deterioration of. ; ambient or loca'1 air quality b. "the creation of. Objectionable ors; smoke or Al"VAg"t c. Significant alteration of air of temperature, movement, moisture 4' or any change in climate, eiCher locally or regionally? 3` dater. Will the proposal result in substantial: a, changes in currents, nr the course 'canter or direction of movements? G b: Changes .t1 absorption 'rates, 'drainage '..r Mr } the rate and amount of ati:e`rtts, or E3url;.IaCe Water runoft7 Need for'o -s to suriacz dra ilage inAuding vegetation �i improvements o retovalj .channol.ization or culvert , installat�l:on? lterati oils to the doiA> se or float of flood waters? --' Change in the amount of surface water in any eater body? ..r.-= f :: Disclza�rg into surface wafers , or of surface in any, alteration hater uaIity indludia?_g but not qq totempexatureo ' dissolved_ , limited 6xygen or turbidiry7 — --- g; Alterat3.cn of the dirdetion or flow ground oatoks?' rate of :Of h. Chat ga in the quantit. ;or quality through of ;ground VYater:s; cithex direct Addi,t.ions or withdrawals f or through interceptirin of -aft tions' . �. acquit-er by cuts or e!�cala, 1 nretlkiit 1� page Of 9 i YES`MAYBE No ' i Reduction in the amount of water utherwiae available for public ! watet� supplies-? , I. Exposixe of people or propercty, to wM;er related hazards such as flooding? 4. Plant'.44.fe. Will the proposal result in`substa`ntial,: a. Loss of vegetation or change in t diversity of species or number of any species of plants (including trees:, shrubs, grass c',ro s microflora and aquatic plants)?► i b. Reduction of the numbers of any ofiglants'�re or endangered species p s M. .. Y c c. Introduction of,new species of , plants into an area.- or itt a -barrier - 9 to the normal. replenishment of existing species? $ dv Reduction in acreage of any Agri- cr; ural crops !' 56 Animal ,Life, All the proposal result In "substant al; a. Change in the diversity of species,, or" numbers ofany species of animals (b,irds, land animals including reptiles, fish and ,shell', fish, Vent,g is or anisms, in8e6ts or microfsuna? 7 b. Reduction Of the numbers of any unique, rk e or endangered species 4 c: Introduction, of trawl' spee�jes animals into an area, or result in a bar):ier to tl e Migtdti.on or w6voment of animals? d. fteduetion of, en roaehment U." . or detw`ria',�atori to existing fish or, ifs hab itat.� - 4e.•�..,F'?NYy A nds X l: pPe. .. r'(lCu>.o.au..l:.i1*..4 wi r .. --.. page 3 of YES MAYBE i' L4O., 6 Noise, Will the proposal result in substantial: a, Increases i'n noise levels?' b Exposure of people to severiinoiseCID levels''? 7. Light and Glare,. Will the prc-posal pr— oduce s gni -scant light or g,'Lare? 8. Land Use, Will the ptopoeal result in 8 s -'I nificant; a. Alteration of the planned land use of an area, or establish a trend which will demonstrably Lead to such alteration?, ---- --w- b: Conflict with uses on adjoining properties, or conflict faith established recreational, educa- tional, religious or scientific uses of an areal _..:.r 9: Natural. Resources, Will the prdpodal resi t in su stantiaL: a, Demand for, or increase in the rate of use of any y -net natural resuurce�7 ,_ -._ b, Depletion of any nonrenewable 1 natural resduved? l0. Risk of Usets Does the proposal nvo ve a risk of an explu�sion or the -release of hdZdedous substances (inL-luding, but riot .li.:mited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals Or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset ri .. .1 40 ll. .. po�»»u_.latiofi �,li.11. the proposal s�gn:Cf 3 raptly alter tho location, distribut `on; density, dt growth ate of the Erman population of an divide an 4 9 tea orp�iysically , establishod Comrnunity7 12 Housits" ► 'Jill the proposal sig�cattly affect existing housiti i� or create a domaild fog additional ra ` �. � �,operidi Yak �aeo . YES , T�tAIBE Nth , „ 13,. Trans ortat�i6tifiCirei k<,' ,,t on; All this proposal resu n r" a. Generation' of substantial additional vehicular movement? b, Sigrificant effect's on existing parking facilities; or damand for • new.ptarking7 c. Substa:ntiai impact upon existing _ transportation systema? ....� .....}�' ...�. d, Significant alterations' to present P, ar mo ,. 44 oftteortleoaridlo�ulation obds7 people goods? _ a Alterations td Oate'rborne , rail or air t affic2'� f , Increa;se in tthMc batards to motor vehicles i bicyclists or pedestrians? ti} I 14. Public Services, VIM the proposal have- avean aneffect uponj or result in a substantia need for ti'ew or alteredgovernm+snt�al services in any of the following areas A , �1 6 protection? b, Police protection? �.. .ri C , choOls c �. d, P�arks or ether recreational Y'a.Cil�ties? '+r" e, Mainteiridnee of pubis Ac facilitids i irid-Itiding roads? f, Other tovt'tnttoitdl sorvices7 1$ finer ., IJi'll the ptopotaa, result in; at Oo of substoitial amounts of fuel ,t r` energy 7 sy _ kip b, Su'bst ant'g1 increase in demand upon eicist .ng botiirces of �nergyi or roquire µhe development os new Fes, Bl7�lrCGB �7f energy? ., . ' 1 i tttiiitiea , Vill the proposal rdeitit in � a or neW sy oto-nis i or siib stantial alteretiono, to the follotAng ` - utilities; Appendix r w page YRS MAyi N0 `: A, power o e natura'1. gas?. bo communications systems? ..r..; � ..� c* Water? - d. Sewer (will trunk line be extended, providing capacity to serve new development) ? _ e, Storm nater drainage? ]7. Human'Health. Will the ptopnsal ;. result In a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health) ? -�-w b. Exposure of pc4ople to potenti,dt health hazardil? 18. Solid taste. Will theeproposal result { gg impacts associated vtithsodnwsCendi+osai or litter " coiitxol2 L9. 5 �, Aesthetics Will he proposal result n the o struction� of ttnpublic desf;�rt,ateclor reco�t�i.ed' e�cenic vi��,ta� , open tea . the public, or will the proposal, result in the creation of an: aesth6tigally offensive 'site open to public view? 20. Recreation. 'Kill the proposal result n an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing public Ocrea- t an facilities? A4 Archecila cal 1416torf ca9. � ` Will the torat�i6h Of 'proposal resu t n an a ,. g historical sited st.ructuttij Object jec 1 .or building?1 22, Mandatory Findings_ of Si , i i.fi.carice; a: 'Does the project have'the potential to degrade the quality of the envi.tonmet t, substantially reduce the habitat of a fi.16h or wildlife spdci."es, cause a fish oY Villif e popult�tion to °drop bel+,w self � 7 of 9 k YES MA:Yh X10 �i i sustaining letrels, threaten to p_� iminete a plant,or animal come "reduce the number or lee'strict"� hnity, � e range of a rare., orndang�tilf.f.,d „ plant or animal or el;imina a '��t :or�:ant exnmpl,es of the mejor periods nk cnl.i.fornia history or prehistory? b, the project have the potential { tl term benefits to Doachieve tr the detriment of publicly adopted long-term environmental goals? c Does the pro3'ec:t have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatilvely considerable! (a project may impact on tWo, or more separate resources where the impact on each l resource is relatively suing. -1, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on 'the Onviron meat is v significant,.) d; Does the 'pr63 act have er►rriV'onmenral effects which will cause substnnti&l. adverse effects on human beings, either dkrectly or indirdeelY? k �i �I �, endi�t �' pp page 7 09 $ ` � .rY 1 i•' � i � 5n 1 ' .s i trxi r+w"/,•+' �,� fu .i. i i «�/.� '� :•iy1.�i.A✓�+�'aA .......... t i i. ; �.: 1 wSi i i'::t 19'.� t . YL v i At ' i k �6'�t r,ic A+ (!`y✓y.i . i ��� i.r i .i. .rj • "\ .•w- r\A f i . a1 rl Y +f*1,iiY• N"Y «f rs .,. arr • , r L•Ic {'• S�A +i +.,. - 1 /\+ .c • ♦+ f A'" a i ':i!•. •si ..f.si.i,4f'^ .e. .i.. c, .....A r . +y wr+ �.r k V.: ,A `a ,✓'?.. A. ,.. i \(�iSws11.1 U , C 34� $'ll � Wi A I I' � r 4 r:\t;y �`�•A ��./r.j`� hlly �. r `��• .:l�n CEJ blrA 32130f1E so it,I�O i, 341 , ``',•.:. . +� Folcb�y n ��� a ' . Y`i` li; r x ✓) y �� f'416*n . Jv ,, I'• � / Al � I, 1 .• i ri Sj . i �+ � % W �� � k CA); L4 hR •� ,fYd!"r i i * i.,r �� �„ • „ M w .. « .,r , t y Nr, i� �{ e1 , a r I A r AW k prxr * .+' ` ✓r `wJ" �a 't +�" i ✓`~ .r J- Ohm U+ ��i 1�` � "' 1i lltnP iY-Yi lw.3+y.,. a ,ray. , �,. ` r"'... A �✓i°�`"�is0 r..-:/ („«�, w i k 1 i Ap y .f Yii «SUt•'IrtOaf u5 1 c �w ,i r` �tt.'.� ,}.' J. 1� :a y RaNA/' :' 4 Y} �.A ,,, s� � , i/ �'�e ...r....—«.""' « • �{ ,. �nr�f+ .•4�'' _,r,s., NClboh�;k i,�, ,. .� � �Il:i { �� iJ l� ;�.✓ ' '�1 `�v� OR it >.a.`K.-. {. ✓,i•`'•'�• ��"-' e � Y}r>s,..w« "d. ++urm �(,�,y,,w,uµ,w . l�+' �-•yy'—�w;y ],,1 jy� + 1{ a`� 0, r• •-�.y�...k,Ni+r:,k'f'fy�P.i �Ut\4,A R.+fl+"1��Mb4...L_+i%.\r"Li''wL;. , '�. ;A•?. i S fx M` .1Y ! /1✓4'.j `off -_a U 1.iWiw' .I ' �' i ii moi- rr(pyµil WGCLa..�f ILI 1. T ,, , i A�, A" ♦ w 1. sua j} i 1 t �+ ri•' rJ v �r-r �' . Y �w 1 �, ; i • i to Aa' iYwY. rJ•� 1. - J�� ,..:,,. ,✓�" wt. �'� ++ .FA\\. � w w «�r�.� iya•.='*.y isY h,^I u+�r+tr «w t. �. I c,.cl`-;,,✓'" 1 t trll+ ����,At, ¢ tti"iii li.,« ( ..�•!`p • �7.� r � + r4�ir .jr:yk i"o � ««,qdF "���h^t''1i1r •t''� MJC? rj', iRi �j! i. r W �1W& io i�.. •A iJiS Y'�a +,°{ :ii\," r ir • (,,,7'1-HAM '�.i74 i ii 1 •i ii rlfiY .� Irl'A Y�f i �� il• y L •Y*A. R. \iii if•iiY I.i{ •+ pi tiiAii iYi AY"�i •i �, 'di'j• r rl , f,• ii,•lt ' • tl °f�'f✓ i�{,�. Ai k �Y �Y` �.. X ti + i •• •i+ i w` '�{:i II;.� 1�• i, i f1r�Ni+v «��*i�V�'�A��h rt.iY.iY�iti.t�iiLt•'1 /1 r� Y.'... `�.' �,,.. •') .,' .... i.� _ i•i.A,,.iWX. r�TNi it last .•Nat.; Y�:P� A•} 7 .�.`JA�y. y A • O r k r«S.i $ �Ai� Y"'a'iku1 A I !"✓ Y .ypOtli�li &��ry. i �, �11J�'fFY I s .i k Y-�1rl AA.lN ii' to �a'4 �/ �yi+4rii �. ,fk' '�` .. 1 � � 1 Y`k¢'�I •. •'st"G'��"'l'+1; � a+na i`'""5 I,.1� 1t�'•�•+" .Yr � �Y . Tfi��tnititdFbrpbiy5euilt �ri:i l \tiRH!` r►J } , rr i ,i i 11 t .,.Y boil.Ftih1D .+ y llMy•'W •Y„ �i l'•i 1 t, { �':( :Af"t^y� . V 91 MF. j►Y k . �r A•' ta: � t. �,y A".+ .lwJrdMrr"'•'pna . J55 �.i ,+ (q,t : ! F d : f A y."....:.' +rl�n,Y` •F{ya �•A> •;� _ YIlt"0 ,�� t` I tit iY r i 11,�i Aa'1,'isl,v. s++ r' t v Y7 I• i illi�i7 Y Y. fYAVE 1:.,►ii r i r rA ; N� Cly, r q! i 1 rtr•.A+hra:.k, : nrw'F.. o, v!a b- ns •te.f ,k L •f 'i (' X 11:� ,i Wit ii'.'i►"!!iN «i R+a<' w4` f'.. •Ni 670CYY�0 w..A"•>•r„ rJwi- �. Y y \a.%t+{f { .yhyY,„p rA-.w'i G °i«.. �' Ll.:.l;.r�'"il 1 VO!+t� - +� b1r'''RSt« f' • i! i� 1 i'{ YyY Y � � A F V e �l IS'�' �'XY ixiJ U,iY '• 64: iflp ,j" {{) v Y'A •rr• r � � F � iy. F ` tt•:°C{ i r[ M�t •C '1u•ri ri d t 1 ^r4r �,�.i.+•a1 t'k`iA,i� + ; A • v too✓�Y'+ %i1rp,NIRi.. •I�\1 LAi II,L�1 A I'r ��-.�++• 'la nairiuw..+•« e , ,,,-, ..Ww..�wwa».«.,•�. / 6Xl Via' r�7 tr Afa n e r 2b mol ped, and published by'thO GWO9101 8U",y 1 t Control by USd% 600 UtC-&G- �e liolh hot , i`GhOiliNjrhyby�lhrit6�tdMliyCi7l�.hA��thUilt~ hok r�plil+ lakr rs 150.I+iold'; i 'r. d. "1006 lHA uhdefiffil t Goirldt!►l; Ly C lit�i:nlr��fltln�;nt nl w�1ur t ti.our >ls u 4,�� tias 5tlp4rs�'d l: mop daltod '104v In sitz , Pr�,R�trb•S t,ni! X�'��;S�lnbl �i,il'kAt�saJilrit),hl� �r,aldrhryib , Ap "Jlpant :, a Hukyo� y':,_ Pu1Ion . �o8� / 80 053•--w--_-�... 1 p., X22- AU 0 re A. Pro, `OctD�e�'sariptio 1. pe ,f Pro.ec Tentative Subdivision iia' 'L 2. Btiof Deaorition: Creation of 24 resident l iota p (minimum o£ 6000 square feet) on 5 acros. . T,oCa'tiorl; jVcsterjy-eXtensiotl of Suburban Avenue. NJ!. -CO of Plumas Avenue. and . 7th strbetj Thermalito.i it. Proposed, Donai,ty o� Development; 4 8 UU/acre 24 riU/5 acres' AmImpervious pount of lm Surfacig: .�.. Y w `------- i mypical Urban Densit j40t..) fi Aoeoas and Noaroot public Rodd(aj fronta,R6 along Suburban Avenuo. a culademsuc street extenclintdes from 7th 8txeet. ". Method of Sewage Disposal.: Cot nty_�ery 8. Souroe of Water Supply: Thermalito xrr_qatiot► District_ g Pxoximity of P !` oto o+r►ient hep Noriginal �a�r�cel b�ver Lines 1�x�.st to tko bo�tndarp of '�..�..�c�'` X10. potential for further land divio, joxya and. do l de ve lo" inert ,. otenti D. Pnvi:xionmontal -bet divisions .and-_dyeioument,are,�f�asibie io.l�e�su�rr��tn. nr,vicinity, Phyi5ical tnvironment I 1'evrain - a. C enhx'al 'opog ipf�iri Charaoter:�,_GtjJtIyL, rolling to relati;wel�_1_eVel terrain. _ b. Sl.opos :. L _t_4 , *jhatt o. P`evatiorl 24 feet i A.S.L. cl. Limitiing riactbrs; None: 2. Soil n a. tlypeo and dharactori.stios: trecldin� sandy t=rayelly loam; a -- relativety, compact soil underlaiN 'by hitrd an xestridted subdrainage surface dt ainage tonds�to sheet flay, 1oi� to fair fertility for crops+, b. Limiitlhgaotbra: � rating of soils versus building. h� ayisiye foundatiotls and other im rovootilts. Natural. llauvda or the Lance �ai3acen to Pdov,i.ils Shear gone kjnd a, 'Earthquake Zono: o-roville�entor 1zegion l b. Erosion' Pbtential, l a iansi �rr�ror Potential ,o o. Lauda ici i Potential : . e. ft _ �ene�ally High. ._ 1F 1tyd.rolo�;j+ a.. Surparo Water . Ura`ina .e. stale_ ofudd _.:. ... eo't to N Appendix P pagb 7a of 9 ater Som%►���,«..>��Ak��w • Y *` ,;,: 4tttltl��, c«±i�,eA as OVA .� artist►t 00 Ca '�q � w*W" «�� � .sti 4 LAY ..s'ii?\\��. • e�Miea �a^'� MkEWk ��.te+klL,M•%I�«,kMMi��Ak e ii♦« i« `t, « ��, tt.�tt.Y t�Et1:t.Y rc��i�►��a;tl ♦) �}k " ryt�t`�k \y (1 ]qtr �..fifiwnB�KN'�«��''•�M ., 1� «C'�► �i"�w 4�"����1 i 'y\l�i� � �C y" \ ^ y=x !¢««�.�r^',1•�.��.^MF« Air l'yt`1� itt11t1 rtttta�� tt�C t'latt) U1 I (I;a it .iii"tAWit"C� a�'2z St"�ni1kTMi'tXAla '!,tyrt a�t,w,r � ,�,�t+�,�t�t���yhettlt�a«.t 1, "1`r1c?t1'Ittt►1�+ AlAII �� �� � i �����►���"�t� �����t�� ,r;�,�:��,►qtr t���ti: � �a,.:�� ,k!�, , „ r n "epi MM . w. / two � •e�:x �° y "+ �Ai k a.► � l ......,,�v.+�..f '�.++` eke+K.�»Ft'.asv:�� .�di . �dr �::• �L�+1 ���a°i �it�w 4,X �'it t*r.+•�tCl a �G�r1 t��► �r•'tt �«tii .��tittit �\•���t�1���.ril,�,,,�L,.*+aare�e�.«�*+w+nu r,. .x-�k:.szM�. '\ ` -�.w: .t.�,. a. .�^+.+n.«gas, wa�'«�w r xxA,+Elft d i1i►iTttr� li1i�,�,tttrtt�'l - �� i`tt dr�,tl t►►ttr .� ��1 C�i,��',tr � Cn t ..� « _ �4 .�i.;t ` p ",.X+ rr�r►t mottt tt►rtr int�Yt �tlruiAY� . +�c< 3►►t, of h��`�ta� kind t0wura i '1«h�t�1n�t t ���► r�t rt��� ,"oh' re11c)11tE`41 ..�y�y.pyy}cW Yiw?wMM,A �M.. Wl I;l�r • '' wc.'sas+wan =e+� �� ��-xa a.�+�k+.,K e.�.bnsiiN+�.r w. raw—amt-.+i. �- �w tl hint' l qtr „'t "►tit'r t 4��t4i i rrt�►" 8. t+wa*.w an r,t��t�3t r���..�►rt*t�r:�.:►a cttt%rt0t ry X , w cr ki�tx``{two i.wkxtl.Y..�'t, C�t1.,�;t'it��::�•T.,� ;,��tY,�a.1'�lY �ea�c.x -a. a. � �^nr�►ielb�.f�a'x�F o,v 1.$ . � : �lt�l. t�t"e to r-.er. _.an'. a+mnamx x ' ►tC rti titi:lta , qty, on� � " •� � t �l►� Omtov t111rti sky\S` C`I al��" JCe�ltkiit'r�t�xh �aY1lltwt"t`�� t�_;. r'tr'�ttr"atr � .�� ,,,�,_ �, .� � �r tlit�� , ,� tt,r eeyy � " ��lltl � 1, lltt�t;talrtI�tt�,t�i>► t3t.,tl►aeitr►�ltt 1Ct�la,att �1tie,+�t►„:w.�a�`p�rllttt plc � 1��3 +p .��+�1.b474�'l.ht�a1 i t"`�°V�.�'l�► r C tw�1aloIt �rv0� « ,� r�' 11+��� Irl �tl � t�tt��', ,�t;�►V,1 tett �. M.- - �. •_���� ; t Y � � 11.E ttlrtl r i r c ,11� y. • ._ �, .., �: .�.� .� it : Avon, `I`l► a«ut,l i !«i,t► r t+5r�r� k�rrr�'k f11 �, ��, r�,�q,t'� `rti ��,►� ,► 80-12:-22-05 a d 1EN 2AL EVALUATION b%SCIiSSON O>~ ENV2RONt�f � 4N I '' This project is a proposal to create 24 residential logs ort Gy the Advisory Agency for property g y ,,The a 5 acre s$te* Two prior proposals Mere tentative) approved including this situ. f first approval was on July 25, 1077 for a 43 lot subdivision 61 11*6 acres. The second approval �ra5 on August 21, 1978 for j * a 24lot subdivision on the lama 5 acres as this p ro act s1t,e Y 1b, 3bocoj, 16e A significant amount of compaction and ovQr� covering of the soil may b�-realized upon complete, developihent of the property at the proposeddensity (e.g. streets biei9ldin9 structeres# residential improvements, etc*)* The relatively compact soils on the site tend to sheet flow during heavy periods of precipitation; Currentl,yo a drainage channel of Ruddy Creek, passing to the north of the subject site collects the surface water runoff for this vicinity, lh'c The proje'et is withit► oho iql; ,v of the V.6othilin Shear Zone ;�a ttro� ini:l,ea aw�r-,, from the eg�i aerator reg? on; of the August _ 2a Tho 24 unit subdivision will -cause a on Qf ambient air gadlity due to the inc-ie: i" : lh yohicuiar traffic* 11,: The growth rate of Thermalito will be affected by this project. the prior extension of sewev lines thtoughout Thermalito w14,1-con. to have growth -inducing effects. 1.3a,d i f , The proposal wf.11 Increase local traffic counts by an estimated 110 voli,itular, trips per day* 'Che only access roAd planned to serve' the si. tilVision is Suburban Avenue, Alternate acco,ss points to improve traffic c' ;culatioh 0 a's Well as for etrergen cyaccess, have beers considered* Ptovisirans to extend Suburban Avenue to the north or west are not considered necessary by the: public Works Uepartmehti An omergencJY access viva the Si,slciyou Av;nue� extension has also been determined as unfeasible.. 0,66 to emulative traffic increases I- -The. the The�malito areal Caltrans has recommended., the, futuro installatnn of t"ruffic signals at the intersection of Grand Avt:Yrtue and the true freeway rahips (Nelson Highway 10* ',or two other subdivisions in the Thotsoalitb ,1rea (Nelson Avenue pa`ytnership and Nevis Industries, rad 0) Ia'ltrans recommended th) installation of the faciiities mentionbd, Iib Advisory Agency add1..t-Itthe folloWing mitigation measure for those subdivisions in September and October of 1050: oocdntribute Ord rata share, .based an tltb arhount of traffic generated by the ,., 'subdivisions toward tate future installation of traffic sigmas at the intersect oo of Oran,) Avenue and the two freeway xaifips to kki.ghway 70. Coordinate future traffic insW. A nF o,g gatfilf-of :9 ,77 .y 80-12-22-05 G DISCUSSION OP ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUOWN (continued) 4 g y f �3utte and City of Orovilie''. s3 nals with Caltrans Count o determine to Caltrans for their in ut to det p (A letter has been sent . . if a similar w asuro is reasonable for this subdivision. 'ihQ Advisory input from Caltrans will provide the basis for the t Agency n this factor:) Aenc action o 16es For the previous 43 lots subdivision proposal, the northerly portion of the subdivision was planned to drain r , to an existing, 15 inch concrete pipe. The southerly. portion iotas to drain to an existin ditch alon Plumds Avenue, s planned c 22c.Potential environmental imparts n of considered to be: significant include,' . open land to an urban residential f the . ].. Conversion o p - subdivision. , 2. Change of the area's rural aesthetic character: ,'. Increased suburban noise 4. Population growth and expansion of the urbanised area. 5. Public service demands, R QUIRL1A M1TICATIION MEASUMS } 1. Provide a permanent solution for drainage, including protection of downstream properties from any f _ B � may occur as u result of this land division. 2: Any drainage channe''1 improvements to Ruddy Creek donee at times on or off the site are to be made in conformance ' this ' the Thermalito.W sten Drainage pl n. Such improvements with i.h may include enlarged tulVerts clearingthe channel of some vegetation and debris, etc* t. SUddr--SM) MITI,dXrION MCASURES' 1» provide for emorgency addoss to S'i,ski.you Avenue 2: Contribute pro rata share, basott qn the amount of Appendix n - page 80of F w'+��rwn��9`�.r.rs�.� •»rH:,4:ai.�'+v..mw,+lr:..�v. �.;wUF...-d".,.•..•w:+w...v+m.„,�u..,-n ._.c.....';1w:•.'a...�m :.... .,w1........x,,. ..- dmcn+�nnena:.,,,. ,fie 21�1eio-rm h+V.#.r•,-;2flnnu.nrn;.i�X'w1w Y -1, «4��. .. f,A',. .».at+n.-moi .,.n.rrr.... 40 Ume counk _ • r 7 ... IANbbE NAt`URAI WEALTH AND BEAUTY `�. OLANNING COMMISSION 71t OUNTY UNTO DRIVt » OROVILUI CALIFORNIA"95CSS i` PNGN t: 514.4601 November 8, i98 Larry McKinney 468 Mantanita Avenues #5 Chieo, CA 05926 Itl.: il�e pr.rtnit Ah 31-20.,01 Log # 82.00-01»0 Dent Mr, McKinney C have completed the initial, sturdy: OF potential envitonMentat imPaets eciatod to your proposed, Uso f».yrmlt to allow 22 duplexbs (44 units) on 22 lots on p,a»opefty .lbea'te_d at the 1vest end of 8ubuarban Street; approa [Vitrly 200 root west or 7th 5trectI approximately 40`:0 feet north oP Pl.umos Avenue, Therntalito. The x»esults Of our CVa].uat Lo11 arc expi,ained In the encl;t�sed Initial, study claeckl,ist, Appendix '`V"' anal meinorandubi, BccausC or potentially $1)ni ri.0 ant etivironntontal, impacts, ptlrticulariy growth inducoment and culitmltitive e1'Cccts, 'an r impact rcpot't iS recluit0d put'$Uant tb' 0101 requi,rinlents of'the CAlrornia hnvironmcntai Oualit.y Act and the Butte County Environmental, Review Cuidelincs: You, as the applicant, arc rerltit e(i to sttbiflt 1mrotmation iii the form of a drn.ft ti��l»R» within 200 dtiys ftft the da't�e o.f rdeelpt of this notice that an V. l».It» is retluired We require a deposit of the estimated costs of 8,1,R » processing pt'ior to fittdilting your sub-mitted dtritt. This cost may Vary depending on the compietenoss of the materiai sutbmitted. The customary minimum doposit„Cor projbcts ol` this typo is,, 60000. When the y p`ro i ect is compl.'t'�ted , we will re fund 64 unu;;ed remainder or bill you ro'v any, costs i.;n excogs of those dcpositdd, if you tvi,sh to 4',,veal the retitt some t f6i preparation of an 9, you may lei• in to written protest speci Cying the neasol s tllcr , ror` With the, Plalinin}l, ileprlrtttte fit » This inust be dona withlb 1.8 days Crean the duto� oY`` this notl ee � T( no written, protost is titnoly riled, an E» t,it» will be ieoquitlod . Lpa`i ryr McKinnoy ;,. RgNombetii 80 qw Thc 8,1'It. Should fully addedss' _alt the iniptico, identified oit the theckl.:ist, including school impacts, Projoct ailtcrnativos should he fully oxplered in the 18,1.8, Also, the 8,1,R, should 8c s5 -ca. lble project design eature5 01' ruture land Uses that Wouldreduce onvi ronmental impacts, We tai,l.1 contittiie processing, your proieCt upon receiving 'your h.T.R, submittal inid deposit, It you halve miy quegtions, ptbo8o contaet tll:i.s or-rice. j Sincerely► David R. H,lronimus Assoc,iatc yslanite`r ,, IMI. ce tachma n Assoc ADMINISTRATION80AR0 n Therrhali�® ElOmentarV School Jls�tri+rt OP TF!i1 tie T LEONARD F. RATNBUN 1050 Terra AVenue .�... ELDEN J, BROWN t9ttrxt4uWntwownc OroVllle, Callfarnld 95965 Phone 533.2212 RAlPiicpMPBELI 9.V. 2ANGANELLA sugeFvmnoPrintWw November 18, 1982 DuFfO Co. Planning RALPH OOLOOVIN cNARLEi 0, MAW JR. Comm. RONALD GRAVES ' Pnndna NOV 19 102 DONALD MgRT014 , s ,' OiYrrille, Celifornie u pavid R. Hironimus Associate Planner Butte County Planning commission 7 County Center DtiVe orovilloI calix. 95965 Dear Mr. Hironi'mus I , In reference to your coitmuhioation 09 8 ptethor 20, 1082 ooncoxning the assessor's parcel #AP81-29"0]:, the school � boarhas issued the following statement: d , "i'She Board fools that the proposed dovelopment I identifidd as AP31-22 -01 Will ultimat:oly have an impact :on the schools of� Thermalito school.DiS ++� - �rillin Work with gt.oravie,, All concerned. in attem ti,nr p �e adequate scl�taoldi'ao�it�.eaorg q � , Please advise: if l can be of further assistance: sj L. P, Aothbun bistrict Su�or'intertdont i UV -,dw L COUNr "I OF BUTTE FD Board of Supervisor"Supervisotb 2 025 County Center Drive Oroville, California ELEMORM. KER, County CIwk 95965 w o•aM i RE: Larry m6xinney Use Permit Suburban Street, `I"hermalito APO 31-29-01 environmental Review Log 482-09-01-03 Our job 482-037 honorable Members: On behalf of my client, Mr. Larry McKinney, '_ wish to appeal the decision of the Butte 'County Planning Department# by notice dated NoVember 80 1982, to require an environmental impact report necessary for the contination of processing this project. "^hanic you for your consideration of this matter., 'fiery truly yours, n,. C �� BACh>!�:�1�T �0�`p�nnn�n9Gam ENG IN�iNG SURVeYINO PLANNCNG bESIGNfNC tirr. s X11.: 'L"aw'Ir4wd d. i+W;i 5 f".cillf�YHla ghd?R + `f ili�rilyrinas i41g1- d7 d A _. BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING' COMMTSSTON NOT. CE OF PURL C:.HEARING Notice is hereby given by the Butte County Planning Commission that public hearings will be held oil Thu'rsda December 16, 1982;, at 7:30 p.m. in the Butte County Board of Supervzsors,' 'Room, Administration Center, 25 rive, Oroville, California, County Center D regarding the follow,irig jvHjcH ITE tl ON A y AN EWIRONFiE TAL IMPAC REPORT ISTBE NG APPEALED ]. perty toned. (Ag'ricultural--Res' tarryit property th Street approximately 22 up exes on ocated approximately 200 feet west ;a£ 7�dent�aentifd ase 400 feet north 'of Plumas Avenue, Thermalto, id AP 31-29.001, Use Permit to increase density of previously; 2, Dennis Sharp. approve,3 mobile home park to 6 nU/acre (from 60 to 90 units), on property ;ioned "A�-2'i (General) , located at the southeast corner of Grand Avenue and 20th Street;`Thermalito:) identified as AP 30-12-44. TTV ON WHICH NEGATIVE DECLARATI, REGA_RDT, G; EN�'1'kONA1E'N AL PAC HAS BEEN ° i3OAlh1ENDED 1. Thomas M. O'roarke. Variance to a11ow��a X1,47 acbothir el and h,, an 11.2 acre parcel in an area zoned FR 20 j( Recreational, 20 acres , oCated on Jordan Hill Road, 2.5 x, Miles northwest of 'Concow Road, in the Jordan tti11 axea, identifibri as A' 58.16-72i north of Oro'v 11e t' "otitions, maps, and. negative, The above mentioned appliZations ) 'P re oats are un file and available for public v:.ewing at the office' � p of the Butte Gouinty Planning Department>, 7 Couhty Centex Drive, brovi�.le,, Ca�,itornia, BUTTP, COUNTY PLANNING COMMTSSTON B, A KIMIn't DTnCTOR .OP PLANNING To BD' PUBI;I5HBD IN 'THD OkOVILLE MDRMY di�f ''�MURSDAY, DEGET BER '> `19.8 2 BUTTE COUNTY_ PLANNING CObI1ft8SION Planning Commission ,Notice is hereby given by the Butto County January 6, 1983, that public hearings W3.11 be held ori Thursday; Boa of Supervisaxs' Room, at 7;36 p.r�: in the But25 Countlounty Center Drive, Oroville Administrat'l'oa Cedingnt the foIIowing California, regarding ITEM")ON 111-11C14 NBGATIVR DLCLARAx'IONS. , ,,_..om E ► (1�'ihjN- RLGARDINV - Use permit to Construct 22 duple es, 1 Larry D btcItnney xicultural, Residential, onpropertyzoned AR -MI (Ag 200 feet of 7th Street, 11 1 (tome) located approxi i h l )t °t;s 'ft 1lanco ri. �i ll. � Poppclre ter ltoait zt C�; yt B%s1i �;p Box 1'706 . as1i)�au Ave. �95'3G5' �,, G80 Sa �1;lyc�u St. Oriwi.11�, Ca, 9��5'96'�5 .�.. Sa�ra�n�;B'�o B, C`n:' Ori) �1e, CA, 311'-,2 31-1-5 31-��9.6 7 ; s vrltrik 1ve. S. isbo11 1204 �oCasternr. Morris h , 263? n�4mnei e 816 1itmas tl �vi11o, Ca. 95955 'San Joao, Ca. "!5127 Stockton, Ca,, 95'2�i9 31 � 10 -71, 31,'9.2!2 t - 31.19-23 1), +Cti 6 M. L. ,Long C Iv1. Itcnonald . tV: D. L. M. Dodd 2032 IiArdn"ett �Ct, ' 2(}+i8 '11�1rcbelt court 95965 2047 IIardnett Ct,, Orav3.11e, Ca. 95JG5 . Oxovilla•, Ca 5.Jb5 tJik� llcs, Ca. 24 -203 Wa) a Blair Jto,y n . Hobby Ave. xr: Carolina Burka -y 803 1'J,u�na 1 ' 10_<Iiardtilett tt. i; '�195965 811 hluanas Orovill e,, ca. ,5tJ5'S Droville, Ca, 950:6 5 203.46 31-211-1$ R3, M� $ h. (3,i`iort.a�i1 1r `G S: L. noble 1� n. 1. I�f�� Stit�.)�lt 1 75 Atli St. 831 p.luntas Avg. 0yovjlle, Ca. 95'96`5 823 Plum -as Ave, 'Orovill.e., 'Ca, 9;5oG5 Oroville,p Ga;. 05965 31=211.-2 31 -21125 31-211-27 D. 1fI 6 M. Urn 13 Cargcni Ave. '% 1 X�1U ta5 Avg': 7-47 P1'11mat Avo, 95965 7713 Plunta5 . tJG.5 Orovil-1 id CaJS O'roviile, �Ca,. 0'5965 Oro'v lle, C ,. 31-21.1-28 3'1411.-29 31 -212-'39 Dopa 'Of 'Veterans Affair's N Z', L. 1:. `Moralcts , J. 5, Cov1) t A1�in .J.� Grantps 71.9 rluntas 71.1 Plunttls Ave'. 95965 19.76 SCUaritl St: OTOVall.e, Ct1. 95965 Oroville, t,a 959('5 O?ruville, Ca. 31.-7.9-1 31-29-3 3] Lary :M4ICin1loy J . IV It, rI. S-1 nc T jV 7.80 phltmas 468 �1•,1an rii Aye Sts 792 1'7.� waa Avo�: tlrov7.a 1e, Ga. :c)5965 Ox,pirile Ce. 9'a9 5 0113 00, G'a: 95926-' 31-295 31-29-6 1X29- , 9, 10 A. el, .Ii. T, Millar U, B. IJ. A, ThoMps011 2214 13 Mai1'nliita Way 11� 13..6 I�. 1�. t) �uc�► P,04 Box ,55 766 1�1.Utittls AVO. Orov�llo Ca 951365 Aiitlochi Ca. 134599 Iris C,attt�s, Ca, 9503A 31-29-11 31 29 .1.3 31-2044 Lilida B Kart11at1ser 1, A,: F, � to Ullidin lobi, 'M, ,le nlcin: 201.2 7t}t Si:i 0T.Ovi'l1G, .Ca; 9513.65 , ., 679 .S'18kiYOU 950G.�i 2682 7.11 St:. Orovl,lloy .Cr1, 95965 t rov l.ja ':Ga., . u,+s 31-2915 �I. aoua� 1'��11t of veterri�►s i�C1t1;11S apt of votbrans A1'1t� .`'s X » 1�, i,., .t•1�� 2t18G Ith ; t N 4 4, 14: illallrmv 2Oxt�syl I L. prudori Orov lley Ct1: J59�i,5 ... ; 5965: `1 -Ca, D -29 18 31-2'9 -l.9 31-'29 -2,0' 'Th-otesa. M. .Witxsche C. it. F C S. Gaines, it. ri•. 6 P. I. t a�nero a,� 204A 7th. St. 95965 2040 7th St. Oxlov lle '�bSJ65 2031 7th° St. � Or6v9,1'10, Ca- CA,, Oro`v'ille, Ca., 95965 31,-2.9-21 314 9=22' 3.1-'2,.9�-23 pent oI Vat� Affa1-t! , x Di, P. 6 D. S. Stoke5 N(irfone Bateman R. G. 6 Pli 1). Gordon ' 2037 7th St. � 3,070 Cleao Av►onue 720 Subtirbaft St. Oroviiie, Ca, 0,5:966 Orov'ille, Ca. 95965 Orova`lle, Ca. 9595$ 31- 2 4 31-29-2!5 .31-29-26 Dept of Veterans A -fa. i.r9 C. &I B. G. 8isemore Diane iD,. Pounders ti.,7. $ P, L:. Scott j 2067 7th St. 2075 7th St. 2083 '7th St. Oroville, Cd. 9S;96S Orovillep Ca. 95965 Orovzlle, 'Ca. nr9Cn5 ';1 31-19-2`7 31-2�)-29; A, eT J. G. T.amdin A. H. B, 1.. (Razes; Bachman la ;Assoc. t '� G7' 5iskiyou Ave. 664 Plumas Avenue ' 3012 Esplanade jolkovil ia, Ca. 95965 Orovai.11e, Ca. 9.5965 Chico, Ca, 95"926- Pius 'bestyi RaeVFtte r». 207'5 7 th Street Oroville-,; Ca, 9196;5 i i BUTTE COO NI MINUTES 'becembe�l6 ;COMMISSI�i� 7, , 198i , 52-114.1-267 Larry McKinney Appeal of the "rogUirement for an`Environmental Impact Report on a project for a use permit to construe 22 duplexes on 'property zoned "AR-MR11 (Agric'ultu'ral Rbsidthtial- Mobile;'Home), located approximately 200 feet west of "nth Streetr approximately 400 feet north of Plumas Avenue, ThIrv4alitor identiified as A:P Mrs. Karcher explained the background of this item, t p public. Hearin o ened to the Cal Bachman, 3012 Esplanade, Chico, remarked that the Appendix P was p p with page addition with re axed for a Tentative Subdivision Map a one the supplemental information on 'it, then in letter dated November 8,j due to growth inducement an tIR is required, Ile stated that when he talked to the Planning Department the only concern was over the school district, and he did not think that an FIR would solve this problem. He'felt that thi''s should be at the least a negative dl;aration and at the maximum a mitigated negative dedlarat bn. Mr.`%�Aachman stated that to his knowledge the School. District still has -not replied to this project, Commissioner Lambert read a letter she had received from the School Board. The letter stated that the School Board felt that the project would ultiminately have an 'impact on the`Thermalito School bistrict. Commissioner Schrader questioned negative declaration being marked on the checklist. Mrs. Kircher` explained that.the checklist was ;fora previous project, same place,, Mrs Kircher also explained tho mandatary findings under the CERA 1a;w section 1,5082 sub ;section C paragrap�i 2. . e negative declaration deterniin;�tio mmassiohet Schrader asked Y£ the n war, made before the letter .from the School District Mrs. Kircher stated correct. The school board had a meeting which staff was expecting a policy direction for the .Commission, but has not received it as yet, CoMmissioner Behunin stated that what is being talked about i8 a diale.,j6,c between the developer and the schools, so Ote school understands what the impact is, and he,e.pesnOt think enough. justification for a full E Ilk, µ At the most we should 'talk about a mitigated negative declaration. rt BUT` 8. COUNTI PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - December 16� 1992 Mr. .Bachman asked if they could 'have the statement made "at►d 'a Mitil ''' meesUre of "We the developer would comply with whatever the Board o'' Supervisors 4 School District has in:effoct at the time the: use permit Is in effect". ; Commissioner Schrader agreed with Mr. Bachman, ke did not foes in Blit would solve the school problem. Commissioner Bennett stated that it would be very unfortunate for this COMMIssion to set a precedent for demanding BM's everytime a School District said there i4as an impact, Frank Lamdi.n, 670 SA sk,iyou Ave., roville . opponent stated he oun6d Property at 2001 7th Street vh;ichO"Just behind the project site, Mr. Laindin was concerned about 22 duplexes with several 'hundred people and only 1 exit, he feels that there is an environmental impact on access: Commissioner Schrader pointed out that this was a hearing on the environ- mental determination and the access problem would be discussed at the. time of the use permit hearing, The meeting was closed to the public, Commiss<ioner Behunin made a motion for a negative declaration, 'seconded by Commissioner Schrader, finding that the impacts as discussed in. the letter from the Thermalito School Board that impact will beL discussed and hopefully mitigated by the hoard of Superoisors. AYES; Commissioners Avis, Schrader; Behunin, Bennett and Chairman' Lambert NOES; No one Motion carried r .2. .. to . . 1 e 1 ✓ , r `1 colm lANIO O t'.4 PLANNING k Y colt s5;I ON 000NTY'`CENTER DRIVC OROVILLE, CALIP60NIA15960 PHONEI 5J4.4601 ' r. December '17, :1982 Larry McKinney 468 M6hzanita Avenue 5 Chico, Ca. 95926 Re: EIR Appeal, AP 31-29-01 Dear Mr. 'McKinney At the regular meeting of the Butte County Planning Commission held December l6, 1982, your appeal of the requirement for an Environmental Impact Report on an application for a Use permit to construct 22 duplexes ca 'property zoned " 06MH" (Agricultural Residential Mobile Nome) located approximately 200 feet west of 7th Street, approximately 400 feet north of Plumas Avenue, Thermali'to, was upheld. The planning Comwsission has scheduled a public 'hearing on Jan- uary 6, ,1982 to consider the above mentioned use permit appl - The,meei ng will be held in the Board of Supervisors' Room,, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, and is scheduled to begin at 1:30 p,m Should you have any quest',ons, please feel free to contact this office_. Sincerely, . :" ✓'"ter B : A. Kirciier� " Director ;of, planning gAkato i. Bachman A Assoc. r December 3�, � 1962 JAN6" 1883 Butte county Planning Commission 7 County Center Drive Oroville , CA 95965` Gentle:nen,x Iii regards to the new housing project that is proposed for 2,0.0 feet West of 7th Street, Thermalito, known as the Larry D: Vokinney Project, ` Wes as adjoining property owners-, wash to voice opposition to the proposed project. We will be unable to attend the 'meeting on January, 6 and thus are stating our opposition in this letter as well: as by petition. We are strongly opposed to the MICItinney Project for many' reasons, specifically the followings 1. The Natural drainage ditch that runs through this project would be eliminated thus giving the Winter runoff nowhere to 14 got l { 2. Devaluation ,of property in the area due to overcrowding of I housing in our back yard 3 tkoossive traffic on 7th Street (the County office estimates an average of 300+ vehicle trips per'Iday in ane out of this housing projct)j, 4, Sewage anii water system overload in the areal Load on the neighboring school, (The school district also objects to the overload this project woulO, produce as statedat the last meeting) f a Vetter - vs- McKinney Project Page Two These are just a few of many future problems that would arise if this housing project is allowed to be built as it' is proposed-. We are strongl.-r against this project the way that it is We are not; opposed to building on said property but would at least ask that single family dwellings with large lots be built in order to fit in with the existing neighborhood. We think that much thought' and consideration should' be given to this project before any decie on is made regarding it Sincerely, Destyn Rae Vetter Kenneth M. Vetter :1 2075 -'7th Street broville j GA 95965 THS:, UNDERSIGNED• R8SIi .' AND PHOPEHTY OWNERS I LIVE ADJAl�NT TO THE PMPOS& llMtKIPLUMA kf PRIN CTS% LOCTO. , , a, �S�UHGN� '� , ` y �� �µ 0 ��'�"�` NONTH OF AVE. ALITO.D`WEGSTHONGLY THE BUTTL COUNTY COMA ST MISSION TO DEFER APPROVAL OF THIS CONSTRUCTION UNTIL kCOMPROMISE CAN BE REACHED ON ITS UIRIMENTAL FE&URES, WE OBJN''CT TO C1�•!9ING 44 DUPLEX Hg'gI- . DENTIAL UNITS INTO THIS SMALL AREA WINCH IS SURROUNDED PREDOMINATELY BY SINGLE FAMILY 11Nxx',3,. SUCH A P1iE'CEDENT WILL INEVITABLY LWIAD TO A PO ULA'iTION DENSITY I'AR 1N LXCI;SS OF CURRONT LAND USAGE. IT WILL ALSO PLACE A STRAIN UPON EXISTING WATER, SEWER -0 5'CHOOL$ DHAINAGE, AND ST14LLV SY ri *95j � H1 iE 15 ALSO THE MATTER 01! ` FIRE AND p0LICg p1iUTEC'1'ION. 46 FAMILY UNITS Allo PLANNED. THE AVERAGE FAMILY. CONSISTS OF 4 PERSONS, 184 PEOPLE WOULD BE LIVING IN A CUL-DE-SAC, WITH ONLY SUBURBAN AVE. AS AN EXIT. THIS WILL WITHOUT DOUBT HESULT IN HABITUAL TRESPASS BY -CHILDREN SEEKING A SHORTCU!V TO SCHOOL. WE DO REALIZE THAT THIS AREA COULD BE .DEVELOPED FOR RESIDENTIAL USI;, BUT FIRMLY ;BELIEVE THAT SUCH USAGE SHOULD BE HES'PNICTED TO SINGLE FAMILY UNITS. x NAME ADDRESS DATE 2 t yyl �+ .Y �R / 1 'I fi 1' J� M -m �'.%<•�wM Sr 5. Zla 6. r v t )''l L'�to '`^� �i� S9 "� C � � 4� i M'."• 4pnr, :. �*a.n�Mr_r" 4�� 12. ,y �� v'',« ,��r. r• �t^]•�'...,� r�°.'fe„i�Lls f�Y•�.f..`.�.�..+d •.:� :.,. ''JC, a. 14..P ��'l. '�'i �f' { l: r�i� %�I l ,✓ ,4 x/ '2' ri l4 f .=ice -,ti = x ''I�.... ""--�C .) . 15 ;i 18. Z, 4 dlLzt— Tr d :x M ' • Y p r b dr' 24 �— I tixculated the above petition, tli signaturbe Mere made in my protd"do e,nd to the beet of my knoW'l.edjso and. baliO, bath sighature lit thH� genuine nignaat'd or the person who" name it ptirparte to' bo. c '� v Silo-nedt - i PETITION ' NLSIDI� AND PROP 'My OWN LIVE ADJA a TO THS'PRO THE UNgE'1tSIGNCD s� " N` MCKINNCY PHOJCCT'� LOCATED 200 81E11!,�-WLS'T OF %TH STHENT AND 400' FEET NORTH OF PLUMA$ AVE. IN THERMALITO. WC STRONGLY URGE THL BUTTE, COUNTY PLANNING COM- MISSION TO DLFER APPROVAL OF THIS CONSTRUCTION UNTIL A COMPROMISE CAN BE. RMACHED ON ITS DETHIME'ITAL FE&UH '. WE OBJECT TO CRAMMING 44 DUPLEX RESI- DlJNTlAL UNITS INTO THIS SMALL AREA WHICH IS SURROUNDED PNEDOMINATELY BY SINGLE FAMILY UNITS• SUCH A 14tL'C8D WILL INEVITABLY LEAD TO A POPULATION DENSITY t�AFi IN LXCE55 t�F CURRENT LAND USACL. IT WILL AL30 PLACE; A STRAIN UPON EXISTING " WAT �' 0 uEWEEt� SCROOLO .DHAINAGCR AND S"1'HELT !'Yb?EM8. THERE IS ALS�°J THE MA` TER OF' rICE . THE AVERAGE FAMILY CONSISTS UPFIRW AND L4° PERSONS. 184 PEOPLE WOULD BL LIVINGLINNADCUL-DC-SACS WITH ONLY -:;UBUNktAN AVC. AS AN <1XIT. THIS WILL WITHOUT DOUBT NLaULT IN HABITUAL TRESPASS BY CHILDREN 88EKING A SHORTCUT TO; SCHOOL. WL DO HI;ALIZE THAT THIS ARCA COULD BL Ui.'VELOPE)D FOR RESIDENTIAL USE, BUT FIRMLY BWLIEVE THAT SUCH USAGE., SHOULD BE HES'THICTED TO SINGLE, FAMILY UNITS, NAME ADDRESS DATE' P&TITION _ SkiSICHLD HI�SIU THE, UNDERSIGNED AND pHOPERTY OWNERS LIVE AD3l TO THE PROPOSED "McgINNLY` PROD EcrN p LOCATED' 200 j;,L,, ' WEST OF T'H=-lPHEET AND Wp FELT NORTH OFr PLUMAS AVE. IN THERMALITIP. WE STRONGLY URGE THE BUTTE; COUNTY„`PLANNING COM- MYaSION TO DEPEH APPROVAL OF THIS CONSTRUCTION UNTIL A ComPHOMISE CAN BE ROOM ON' ITS DLTHIM10TAL _FEATUit E1WE OBJ8CT TO CRAMMING 44 DUPLEX n9sI- DLNTTAL UNITS INTO THIS �'"";UL AREA WHICH I5 sUHROUND8D Pk1EDOMINAT Y BY. SINGLE FAMILY UNITS. SUCH A PRI CE D �`NT WILL INW`VITAI�LY LEAD '1'U A POPULATION DENSITY ", �+ iQ - S PLACE A STRAIN UPON EXISTING,, t"Ak IN UXCESS Or CUHRONT LAND USASL• IT WILL ALSO WATE:li� SLWEij SCHOOL, DRAINAGE, AND S1Hi,WT SYSTEMS. THERE IS ALSO THE MATTER OF FIHF: AND POLICE PROTECTION. 46 FAMILY UNITS AHE PLANNED. THE AVERAGE FAMILY CONSISTS OF 4 Pt-RsONS. 194 PA)PLL.WOULD BE LIVING IN A CUL-DE-SAC. WITH ONLY SUBURBAN AVE. AS AN WRIT. THIS WILL WITHOUT DOUBT RESULT IN HABITUAL 'TRESPASS" BY CHILDREN SEEKING A SHORTCUT TO ScHOUL. WE W HWAMS THAT THIS AH:A COULD BL OF,11 .oPED FOR EiEs llENTIAL USE. BUT FIRMLY B IEEE THAT SUCH USAGE SHOULD BF; HESTRICTED TO SINGLE; FAMILY UNITS. ariuss �; DATE, 10 roti. �svl c 11, :� x t tell i, � tea, r 1 .* y 19. f ' r1 (yy {{ *KK s 20. Y • .. 21. T 'i�'fly.. Q7 lr ✓ { '. y e lacy r✓I y rJ T circulated. the &bode Pdt�.i,�.on. the befit of ' ny Hktr�wledge anri, t el ie#' eiEn tti o:� More inane in my presence. rnd to Lure t� the genuine signeQtur H e of eti.oh ai na the t,ho Pnr,-eon whoec nalne-it, purpe�te tq ` 9igttedt r tl(,.e Al, Addtes _ r, M W PETITION rp IS TO THE PHO�'OS,�D {, "McKINNEYsPRO ECT""I�PROPERTY 200I SH W98TNOF7TSTHE T AND 400 FEET NORTH OF PLUMAS ,AVE, IN THERMALITO. WE STRONGLY URGH THE BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COM MI85iON TO DEFER APPROVAL OF THIS CONSTRUCTION UNTit A COMPROMISE CAN RE 11LACHO ON ITS DUTHIM O' TAL FEA'I'UR198i WE OBJLCT TO CRAMMING 44 DUPLEX RESI- DENTIAL UNITS INTO THIS SMALL AREA WHICH IS SURROUNDED PREDOMINATELY BY SINGLE FAMILY, UNITS. SUCH A PRECEDENT WILL INEVITABLY LEAD TO A POPULA'T'ION DENSITY FAH IN 2XOE88 OF'CURR NT LAND USAGE,, IT WILL ALSO PLACE A STRAIN UPON EXISTING WATEH, SEWERi SCHOOL, DRAINAdSo AND STREET SYSTEMS. THERE IS ALSO THE MATTER OF FIRE; AND POLICE PROTECTION. 46 FAMILY UNITS ARE PLANNED. THE AVERAGE VAMILY CONSISTS OF 4 PE9SONS6 184 ,PEOPLE WOULD 139 LIVING IN A CUL-DE•SAGo WITH ONLY SUBURBAN, AVE. AS AN EXIT* THIS WILL WITHOUT DOUBT RESULT IN HABITUAL TRESPASS BY CHILDREN SEEKING A SHORTCUT TU SCHOOL, WE DO REALIZE THAT THIS AREA COULD BL DEVELOPED FOR RESIDENTIAL Mo BUT FIRMLY BELIEVE THAT SUCH USAGE SHOULD BE RESTRICTED TO SINGLE FAMILY UNITS. , N' .tE, AD SS DAT1r C'-� 60 If oe .'" a wy r�,7 - •t 10 • ;!b LYµ *V fy".�wr4Mk"i Olt �• 'u.�c2+..�n.» r t 12 ► - "� " . !' � • 1 r P ^ --A tea. t, Y � • " � `2' %t cr 1,36 • ` ` amu_ .i r°d ��.! _ , "le 15.v ,.. J'eL • A. k^r` r Sy f 3 I oirculatecl tha above petitiono the sighatUroo wore made in my presonaei and tO the b©Gt oe mV koow�.ed a and, bolioto each oionatura �o the Eehuine signature oI the putporto to be. person Whose nlno it Signedt Address t i �� � ljate ,� ,� ' . ,•° PETITION THE UNDCi- CiiSICN�ll Hj.,SIn ,�rS ANll �I�tlpCx�'Y OWNERS L'l.VE' ADJAc.LNT TO THE PROPOSED 111 t FEW i i 9 t 1 ��i '�MclCxNN�Y 1'ROJEC7 , I.;GGAT1vU 200 1lL�,I WL57 OF 'pTli 5'1kC�`T A�ill 400 FEET NORTH OF PLUMAS AVE, IN THCHMALITO, W21 STRONGLY URGE THE BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COM.- y MI�a3IUN TO DE:N'luli APPROVAL Off' THISCONSTRUCTION UNTIL A COMYROMISM CAN" BID REACHED ON ITS DETRIMENTAL k"2A'P0RL3. WE OBJECT TO CRAMMING 44 DUiaL8X 11291— , DENTIAL 'UNITS INTO THIS SMALL AREA WHICH IS SURROUNDED PREDOMINATELY BY SINGLE � FAMILY. UNITS, SUCH A PhECLDENT wjjjL INEVITABLY LEAD TO A POPULATION DENSITY FAIL III EXCESS OF OUHR2NT LAND USAGAii IT WILL ALSO PLACE A STRAIN UPON EXISTING WATLH� SL++W ' � C�tiUC)L, DRAINAGE, AND S'ltlti!;L'T :;�1>;a° M�3 � THERM IS ALSO THE MATTER OF FIRE, AND POLICE PROTECTION 46 �1�AMILY UNITS ARS' �+1rAi�ty��:,iw mhtE. AVERAGE FAMILY CONSISTS Off' 4 PERSOR86 X814 1�DC1LL WOULD BE LIVING IN' AG�UZ�1Sti� , t:�, _WT.T',H ()NLY SUBURBAN AVE. AS AN EXIT, `i'11IS WILL. wiTROUT DOUBT 1183UL'r IN HAHI'rUAL :a .,al'ASS BY CHILDREN 6241'CING A, SHORTCUT TO 'SCHOOL. WE IYJ REALIZE THAT THIS AREA COULD BE DL'VELOPCD Will RESIDENTIAL USE4 BUT FIRMLY BELIEVE THAT SUCH USA08 SHOULD BM RESTRICTED TOINGLE'' PAMIL'Y UNITS, N�M ADDRESS DATE 777 " , t THE UNll1diSIGM RUSIDIOUTSD "AND PROPERTY OWNE S LIVE ADJA TO THE PROPOSED�� � 1 ' it til 'v i � � ��� y •• j+ McklMlY >E'RUJE'CT . L200 H L04 WEE OF '7TH STREET AND 406 FOO- NORTH OPS PLUMAS AVE. It; THEIIMALITOo WE STRONGLY MO; THE BUTTE COUNTY 'PLANNING COM.- MISSiON '1'0 DE@'ER APPROVAL UN' THIS COMITRUCTIM UNTIL A COMPROMISE CAN BE HLACNEb ON ITSIEN'1 DIVItIM'AL FEATURES. WE OBJECT To CRAMMING 44 DUYLEXl'REJI- DENTIAL UNITS INTO THIS SMALL AHEA WHICH IS SUHROU14DED M'DOMINATELY BY $INGLC N"KMILYw UNITS& SUCH A PHEOWDENT WILL INMVITABLY LEAD TOA POPULATION DENSITY V%Aj IN NXUASS OF 6UH98NT LAND USAG114 IT MILL ALSO 'PLACE A STRAIN UPON EXISTING 1 WATERT SOW9110 LOHOOL+ DHA NAGE. AND STROW--T ',4'YSTEMS. THERE IS ALSO THE MTTER OF FINE AND YOLIGI ,PRuTl Ecr o'N. 46 I, AMILY UNITS ARE PLANNED. w iC AVERAGE FAMILY y + CUL-Mh SACT . WITH ONLY CONSISTS Ol+ 4 T?l.�50NS Ifi�F T'1�p1�I,�, Wu,lLD B� LIVING IN A SUBURBAN AVE. Ali AN EXIT. THIS WILL WITHOUT DOUBT RESULT IN HABITUAL TRESPASS BY CHILDREN SOMlNG A SHORTCUT TO SCHOUL. WE DO REALIZE THAT THT8 AREA., COULD BE DEVELOPED ATR RESIDENTIAL U840 BUT FIRMYiY DN1LIEVE THAT SUCH w4aa ,SHOULD BE RESTHICTtO TO 'SINGLE FAMIO VNI`�S• _ NANIL ADDRESS DATE i� Ill; Adi 31 20.001 To Butto Count} Planning Commission Staff Fb dings, January 60 198 APPLICANT: Larry D. McKinney' 01IN811Same RPQUDST Us'a P'ermi't to cohattOct 22 duplexes: A.P. Ntl,.1-29µO01 SIZE; S.86 ac LOCATION': Approximately 200 ft. West of 7th 'St: o bpproximately 400,'ft. north of plumas Av`: Thermallto: DX18TTNG ZONING: AR -M1 ZONING HISTORY: A -2y August 29,, 1955, ftdinartce 522, AR=MHO March 20- 1916, Ordinance 1657. SURROUNDING 20NING: AR -MH' SURROUNDING LAND US> '4 Single and Multi-Pamiiy Residential,A vacant grassland to north. $1T8 HISTORY`: Forebay Vista Subdivision approved February 23, 1981 With 19 conditions ktinal Map not yeti recorded) GFNDRAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Medium Density Residential - 7 to 13 dwelling units per acre. APPLICA3LE 11141GULATION8# Butte County Code Section 24.47' D_e_f)'t�. of Public Works: 01. If the neveloper intends to have the ua plexes on separate lots as sh6wn, he must meet the conditions of approval and record the Forebay nista Subdivision Map: 2 i If the n0veloper, intends to havi, all of the units on one lot, we Will steed to further 'review the lirojoct.": Environmental Health t_a_ept_. 0',13o objection to Use permit. All we lings to be connected ti Thermalito Irrigation District Sewer and Comintiriity Wo,ter Service." Th rtnal' t'o 'I"rr a io'n _'Di 'trict� No comment: �► Nater and Sewer lines were previously installed oil -r Pile No.,; Staff Findings, 1/ 6:/83 Dago 2 See attached fire protection standards ' Co'un't ` '5lieri'ff "Negative Impact; Not enough staff to »rovide proteCt an. Cit of rovilie: "Proposed density is consistent With proposed p -Density designation in revised Orovilld General Plan, d 60 ft. radius on both cul-cle-sacs, and 60 ft. radius on the e um Recomm,,n knuckle," butte County rtes ui.to_Abatement District., "Although the project '„'ite is not w r'nin our District boundaries, the drainage from this project st�,rict. does came into our DiTherefore, we feel that an appronliate mitigation would be the establishment of an adequate drainage ditch to replace the natural swales that now exist on the site and downstream from the site an,ithe establishment of a county service area to fhturo continued maintenance of the draijing- ditch.i► ANALYSIS: This is 'a proposal to construct 22 duplexes and 2 single family dwell in gs on the 24 lot Forebay Vista Subdivision. The Tentative Sub- j division Map has been approved by the Advisory Agency, but the final map has not yet been filed. The project will result in a density of 7.8 divy7ling units per acre which is well within the 7 to 13 dwelling units pe,r acre range allowed by the Medium Density Designation of the. Butte County General Plan. The draft proposal General Plan Map ppre'pared for the City of Oroville General Plan designates this area as r "Urban Resi- dential }Medium Density” which allows up to 14:52 divelli,ng unl s per acre. IMA,tn occupied, this project will house an estimated 117 people and gene'L'ste an estimated 324 automobile trips per day along Suburban Ave., the project's sole access. Tta'ffic will then use 7t]i St4 to go either north to Siskiyou Avei*r or south to Plumas Ade. Development along 7th St. is all single family dwd1li'ngs ' No sidewalks ,exist on either 7th or Suburban Ave. Possible conflicts exist to the east, west, and south of the subject sitPossible solutions include requiring on relatively fen�in ts•here e�ti.sti�g single family dwellings exist sight obscuring. laroewloalon t g g he perimeter of the project, ad;lacent to 'existing developments or limiting. the location of duplex structures to the interior lots of the subdivision and allowing only single family dwelling adjacent to the existing single fhmily uses, it should be noted, however, that a second dwelling could be constructed without review, on any single dwelling lot �' + Y g , pursuant to Butte CaunYy Code Section 24-202, which provides for additional housing,for the elderly, This Would result in sinlilat densities as the proposed project, Since the final subdivision main has nc4: yet been recorded and this project 'I's designed for the lmbdivisin`ji; this nrojcci should be ` conditioned upon the completion of improvements and the filx,ng of the. final map, thus assuring the construction of the streets; drainage facilities and other public utilities p 1e No. 31-29 Oat tua pi dings, mage RbCtlMM)•IJpA1'ION - ; A. Find •that the to Itementk'ofr nQA liave been completed and }} considered inmaking t1iig ,ale yjs.' on and adopt a Mitigated, i Negative Declaration abt ; B, Find that the project"'c0dl,d 1i~xve a significant effect on the' environment, but will' no . in .t ills case becau$e of the adopted mitigaAon measures atbf,�bh`edt lld c. Make the findings regl)ifvud b,/ .Autte County Code Section 2441; + and U. Approve the use permit; to a1'�.oW` 22 dtpie�ces .as shown on the Site De"velopment Plaq - Ap S'].-29-01 (McKinney), sub j ect to the followingr =onditions 1 Record the final msp fit xt parebay Vista Subdivision of publ),,o 116rks j 2' Meet the requirs::'ments of the Butte County Aire bqpti. (Butte County F .rd Department) 3 A11 dwellings tri be connected to The rmaxato Irrigation_. 4 District S;wer :end Co�•.y�iunity water 86tvlce, (Fnv. Health DQI+t� j 4. Applicant Mitt also ct,mply with all applicable state and local stacutes,r ordintffices and regulations. If the Commission wishog to create a buf£or between existing development and any dupIPX sttmttllto` J„ thou; A. Find that kecbeojn n maiy'gthispdocisin and aDJti;ated�egativeosidredA Declaration and c B. p'nd that the prb�e.ct'could have a significant effect on the envr� onment, but willn):'rt in this case because of the adopted mitigation measure Makelk the findine,s're;uircd by'I3utte County Code Section 24 47, and s C. $ D. Approve the use pe .m�.t� tv Al low duplex dwe;ll.iy gs only On Lots 9 `thru„12 and 17 tl�xu 24,, ds shown on the Site bevelopment Matt 1 A 51. 29.01 (NcKi%tiey) ►subject t.o the followilig conditions; 1• pplicstattitr�s ao ditciOMOY With 03.1, applicabld state and, j. pp �regulationsi. I the Comma ssi,on car►r�t�t make the fiiid,tfigs voq,ttired by Butte County Code Section 24»4.71 then A. Note that the requiromohts of V%OA hdve been completed and 4-a,nuary 6, 1983 ,Butte County, 'planning Commission County Center Drive taa�ovi°1.1e, tln Wit roppeptInIlly submit the attached Petition in opposition to Ltyo 4'McKinney Project", which proposes construction of 14. duplex rental units in the area West of 7th St., and,north of i'lumas Ave., - in Themotilito I' tour petition includes sir,natuihes of iia resid,ehts and pr;,,I,aerty f owhoto livi.ntl in the i,mmeLliate vicinity of this priject, Butte County Planning tont ;nQtice or tonight's maei- ng to 4 property owners. 'hair drat ihralurled the two promoters of th.s project, a: well as six other out oO town landowners. Uf the remaining 37 local property P 35 g ply tion] owners who rt►:r3ivad natio©e We resent si natures' in e ai or 9% We were unable to contact the other' two in the shorn time available; We round rooldottts or the surrounding area, to be in almost universr,l oppositioh to thio pvojedt6 uoms voiced objections in addition to those 1,ioted in our iatition. The property owner on the north ha�i- tremendous and, t-q.p a.rontly appropriate concerns about the dra nage problem, Concerns Ware aloo expressedabout encroachment upsn right of Way for a future oponing or Sislt you Ave., west from 7th fit. 8OM6 even beliowid that the ontiVo project should be re jetted. But the majority felt L�,�t a reasonable number of single family homes in this area Would dohotitota appropriate use of this undeveloped land. This is air. area compoead largely ,of single unit dwellings, prino-ipally oWndr occupied. Niu ti plc unit rentals drasti cabby chenge the<<`tAha- tar of a net iiborhood t►pproVall or Ll1ie project as presented would open thO door for a-dditiona,j, applicatiOns Ot a similar detrimental naturQ anti for even mono radiala;lLorta.tion or the character of our living area; We therefore strongly urge the planning Gommisnion to k,ive serious consideration to the 'objoctions Df thoso Petitiofiet ; andsto wlthholtl approval of the "McKinney Project". in our opinionr the majority of Qur signators would, not object to thea oo.notruction of 24 single unit residences on the 24 lots shown on the plat of this proposal. Your attention, to this petition All be sincerely appreciated, llee.ectfully, Harold aScott 2083 7th St., Oroville, CA' Wit✓ ''rank A: Lamdin i 679 Siskiyau Ave.f Croville, CA r, i I 41 IF I BIITTF. COi�NTX PLANNING COMMISSION - /f r 10 8,3 f MINUTES. T january �` 5. Larry D, McKinney .. Use permit to construct 22,duplexes on property zoned AR-l•��i,. -(Agricultural, Residential, lief Home) located approximately 200 feet west of 7th Street, approximately 400 feet north: of Pliamas Avenue, identified as AP 31-20-001, Thermal to. .lys s and Recommendations from Staf:� Findings of Mrs. Kircher read Ans 1%6/$3, and called attention to a letter in opposition from Destyn Rae and Kenneth M. Vetter, 2075 7th Street. There wa's no other corres pondenceo that t Chairman Bennett Announce he would conduct the hearing on this • t to then opened t heGax�se of his former association project but would abstain from votinghe hearing to the public. with the Applicant. "Proronents : Cal Bachman, 3012 Esplanade, representing -ady ithe nptheant, stated that installations for wat had been ap ground and emphasized that a tentative subdivision map • two= proVed allowin 24 units; and added that his client feel3w`ith the that g bedroom duplexes (that uch more affordable athan the largerielp ox 4' bed - payments) woullOf one to d b fanned: room. units original ly p Chairman Bennett read the letter from the Vetters mentioned above. Ther text f011Ows ''Gentlemen f� 'regards to the neva hourling 'ect that proposed £o'r Street, Thermalito� known as the rod I. g 200 feet West of 7th �. i owners � D, �c3Cinney Pro�ecto wei as adlo�ning property Larry ,' ro used prdjeLt. We will be w1oh to °coke opposition to the p.- p January b and thins are On, stating unable to attend the meeting et3,16ri: our oppos4tion in this letter as We11.As,by p osecl to the �1o1 lnney Project for man We. are strongly 0 Pl? BUTTE COU "VT PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES japliary 5 1983: � reasons, specifically the following: I. The Natural drainaige ditch that runs through this project would be, eliminated thus giving the winter runoff nowhere tc go'z '~ 2. Devaluate on of property in the area due to overcrowding of housing in our backyardi 3. Exce sive traffic on 7th Street (the County office estimatea an average of 300+ vehicle trips per day in and out of this housing project); 4. Sewage and water system overload in the area; i 5. Load on the neighboring school. (The school district also, o11 bjects to the overload this project would'produ.ce as stated at the last,meetng)& These are just a few of many future problems that would.arise, 1; if this housing project is allowed to be built as it is proposed: W� are strongly against this project the way that it is. We are not opposed to `building on said property bu:t would at least ask that single family dv,ellings with large lots be built in order to fit in with the existing nt4,ohborhood We think that much thought anal consi&ratlon should be given. _ to "this project befo;,ce any decision is made regarding it. 8 enc etre ly ," : BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - January 6, 1983 It was noted that the County is empowered to make special assessments. for school purposes, and thaf'most of the concerns were taken care of by the conditions' of the subdivision map. Lary, yMcKinne y, + 1129 Hone. y Run Road in response to a question a sto ry a sion ffu�m . one of the Commissioners,- said that the units would all be ., except for one in the notcheast corner along the drainage easement_ whl'ch would probably be a split level. He also emphasized that hiss -proposal`, would be more affordable than the original orie and staved that* xthe p because of hg only 2 bedrooms --would not have as avin much, of an impact on the school system. In oppositions A. letter from crank hamdlPM' ,nd Harold Scott was read as follows: Butte County Planning Cu. mission County Center Drive Oroville, CA w We respectfully submit the attached Petition in opposition to ; the "McKinney Project"; which proposes construction of 144 duplex;' rental units in the area west of `nth St., and noi.th of Plumas,Ave , in Thermalito. Our Petition includes signatures of 118 residents Darn: property 'ate vicinity of this pnject�. Butte. County owners living in the �:mmedi r. Planning sent notice•of'tonight's meeting to 45 property orne.rs. Their list included the two promoters of this proieot, as well a,c, six other out of town landowners. 'of the remaining 37 local property owners who received notices, we present 35 signatures in opposition,. or 95%x; We were unable to contact the other two in the short time available. 'Oe found residents of the surrounding area to be in almost universal opposition to this project., some voiced objections in addition to those listed in our Petition. The property 'owner on the north has tremendous and apparently appropriate concerns about the, drainage - problem. Concerns were also expressed about: oncroachment ttpon right of { way for a future opening. of Siskiyou Ave., west from 7th S'E. Some even believed that the entire project should be rejected. Btit the majority felt that a reasonable number of single family homes in this are& I .. _._y-� __._�itl.�.. _. �u.�........i ., �: '.: n-� nk' i•hic fit'fr'i iSVp�7'111Pf� '�r'11'ICj_ This is an area 'CaMposem large -V oz sinGJu ucir u 1 yam..+.++••+y --J owricr occupied. N,%%tiple unit rentals drast cally.change then ohattcter }; of a neibh`borhood. Approval of this, prdCect as presented wot,`ld open } the door fox adi itibfttl= applictitions of a similar detrimental nature, and for even more radical alteration of the character of our living { area. G, We therefore strongly urge the Piarining Commission; to CIvel serious r� ;i BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COnIIISSION MINUTES - January 6, 1983_ !' .�i, consideration to the objections of the 4d Petitioners, and -to withh6ld �� approval of the McKinney Project". In our opinion, the major3,ty'\af our signators would not object to the c6n6truction of 24 single unr`,t residences on the 24 lots shown on the plat of this proposal; Your attention to this Petition will be sin^erely appreciated. R60ectfully The text of the 'petition which contains 118 signatures is: �. 1 THE PROPERTY LIVE DJAC;r!iT TO THE PROPOSED ' ]U(3E McI�INNEYUNDERSIGNED PROJECT25 ATPD 200 FEEWESOWNERS " "� WEST' H STREET AND. E 7r 400 FEET OF _ _. _ .NORTH PLUMAS AVE. IN THERMALITO. WE STRONGLY URGE TRW BUTT: COUNTY PLANNING COM- MISSION TO DEFER APPROVAL OF THIS CONSTRUCTION'UNTIL A CONPHOMISE CAN BE, REACHED ON ITS bE'THIMENTAL FEATURES. WE OBJECT TO CRAMMING 44 DUPLEX REST- DENTIAL UNITS INTO THIS SMALL AREA WHICH IS SURROUNDED PREDOMINATELY BY SINGLE FAMILY UNITS. SUCH APRECEDENT WILL INEVITABLY LEAD TO A POPULATION DENSITY FAR IN LXCESS OF CURR&NT LAND USAGE. IT WILL ALSO PLACE A STRAIN UPON EXISTING' IJATEkt, SEWER, SCHOOL, DRAINAGE, AND STREET SY5r9MS, THERE IS &LSO THE MATTE? OF FIRE; AND POLICE PROTECTION. 46 FAMILY UNITS ARE PLANNED. THE AVERAGE FAMILY _ CONSISTS OF 4 PERSoNs. 184 PEOPLE WOULD BE LIVTNG IN A CUL-DE-SAC, - WITH ONLY SUBURBAN AVE. AS AN EXIT. THIS WILL WITHOUT DOUBT RESULT IN HABITUAL, TRESPASS BY !CHILP:tEN SEEKING A SHORTCUT TO SCHOOL. WE DO REALIZE THAT THIS ARTA COULD BE: DEIPIOPED FOR RESIDENTIAL USE, BUT FIRMLY 332LIEVE THAT SUCH USAGE SHOULD BE NES Pldrm To SINGLE FAMILY UNITS, fir. Lajr.0 *n 'sand 'that he has been in this location since196;5; And was particula%11Y concerned that there would be rental unats - -noting that the aparf,FAents in the neighborhood had become a real detriment. Jack Stine, 791 Plumas,for'over 20 years, was concerned about the density And also said that there had been a steady deterioration of the area since the apartments were built. Harold Scott, 2083 7th Street,s'aad that one of the houses on Suburban= � Avenue was now empty, that there is a world of difference between homeowners and renters and also noted the unsavory conditions existing in the apartment development nearby,- 1 June Olson, owner of property to the north of the subject parcel,, sAid that there is how a lake behind us, that some have a lake almost to their door and another house is an island' Robert Cordon, 720 Suburban, said lie is all for the development, that 1 anything Would be better than the holes Left by t!ie unaomplot6d 3-'yea"r old development, but that he 14ould like to see « s"inglb-family neigh- borhood. Jf - w r i 94TTF. COUNTY PLANNING'COMMISSION MINUTES - January 6, 1983 ,A Marlene Taylor, ill Nelson,,felt this development would only create more, substandard it further out of the reach substandard housing and noted that it takes more money down for a p ch of the young homeowners, and others. There was noone else desiring to speak. It was suggested that the compromise for this nts and attempt to work out an acceptable applicant meet with reside project. The applicant opted to hold his rebuttal until the next meeting., Staff was instructed to furnish the Commission minutes of the Advisory Agency meetings which would include a copy of the conditions of approval. Cottg%issloner` Avis cautioned that the Commission not get involved witFi the problians of drainage because of the recent formation of the drain- age district for this area. Commissioner Behunin said that he would be available for a meeting with the applicant and residents of the area. Hearing, no comment tothe contrary, Chairman Bennett, continued this heAring OPEN until January 20. ^1M3nutes for January C, 1983 were approved with the following addition. "Coinmissiorxer Arris requested that page 12 indicate Commissioner Schrader's concern about the single road into the project particularly from the standp.�oint of fire protectioh> adding that he too shared. Sehrader's ConreY`115::.+� Fuge 3 EUTTIE COUI3TY ADVISORY AGENCY =OJTS5 ' February 23, 1981 „- C. :UBDIVISTON x,OR CONSIDRRATION; 4 Ford Vista mentatiye Subdivision (Re-submission)y AP 31-2g-013 2 lots northwest corner of plumes Ave. and 7th St. 'rhertnalito area: Engineers McCain Associates iMARING OPEN TO THE PU.BTIIC Mars Risso, of McCain Associates, had no problems with the conditions. Mr: Mendonsa said an addltiOhAi condition would be for the applicant to pay , a pry rata share of the future traffic signels, at Grand Avenue. Mr. Risso said that would be alright. , Mr. Hironimus wondered about the Minimum frontages Mr. Mendonsa said the criteria Would have ,to be met for of frontage at the' ' right»of-way liner. Mr. Streeter wondered if the suggested mitigation measure about the traffic signal should be included in addition to the Public Works condition. The Environmen�al Review Dept. had noted that the measure might become a required mitigation measure. Since written comment had been received from Cad. Trans, . it is recommended: that the-measurebecome a requirementt p+ es rit-woul b drainage are condition Of approval, as htr. Mendonsa saYd that it would be a Public We also. in fact, the measures, Mr. Streeter said the Public Plorks. Condition is not as specific. H^ also notedthat on Public Works condition #10 the word "solution" was incorrect�5i spell ea in the .letter to the applicant ftt. Mendonda noted that the number of lots would stay the sabre in this re- submission. Mr. Reid stateds hdVi'ng revienrnd the Environmental Review Director's Checklist And cbztversations at this meetilig I will make a motion to grant a conditional ynegative declaration of environmentai impact for the Vorebay Nista Tentative Stibdivisiori to create 24 Lots on AP 31�-S9-Ol-, finding that nihicantdect could i ` but will not have a s 6 .:have an effect on the enviranment3 provided the required mi.ti.gdtion Measures are c,omplied with: Those measures are to be #1 and 1#2 as itemized within the Ehvir6=,ental Review Director's Checklist. The motion is mane noting, that the project is in conformance with the Eutte County Ceneral Plan and Butte County Zoning. 4 �r�tt:�.d�beeincludedAsked if fibs r.#.tigation m..s.§ ure ,i'egarcting the trai'fic signal �. htendonda ssi.d he would add it as A jnblic Works condition `bar \, 1•,otion see,»)ndecl ' V�'y 2ii.rona.inus and carnied unahimdusly. Peb . A17VIS022Y AGENCY MIIVtiTES 010 V y. Page 4 f BUTTE COUIQTy 4bI VTsoRY AGENCY MIt�UT�S rebruary 23, 1981 Ncr'. Reid stated: not that a conditional negetive declaration Vas adopted this date, I Vilake a motion ,o approvf: the Forebay Vista Subdivision to l_ic crpatk°. 24 lots on AP 51-29-01. Approval of the subdivision is subject to th'e folaowing conditiohs: Public Works conditions are: 1. Provide a letter froni the'Thersalito irrigation District--prior to filing the final rrap--ind3:catin9 that se«ur and Water service Will be provided and a latter to include any prerequisites that the Thex,.,alito Ir;. '-igation District may have. , 2 siibmat road anti, djainage plans to the Departtent_ of ?:txblic Works for ! approval and install.the required facilities'. 3. Provide 20 ft. radius property line returns at all street intersections. 4 Provide right-of-v:ky,;,for standard 'No. S-5 at all strett intersectto:�a; 5 Indicate a,56 'ft, building setbac?, line Eros the centerline of a1~7. meds: signsprovided by the developer a-t all street intersections 6.; . pereet ntyshall Unt's . (Subrz t 5 alternate street n-=:-s for each street per Count` rY aireme p L � .) to the County addtess coordinator for approval of street nam:.s '7= Construct full street section on: Loop Road and SabU ban Road to R5-2 local. acceis geometric standard. D!Inimum structural section to be 91' 'AC and 8" AB, SO 270 prize and fig seal and SSS, realtImi compaction. Submit desit t to C-Ounty DePartyant of public tlorks far approval. "R" value deter--ibAtions and othe; data may be required tJ suppor section design. 8: P!ibVId.e m6niarentation as raquis:ed by the bepartt eat of public Works in accordance with accepted stataardso 9. Street grades and other fest+.i.res shall co=p7,y with the Butte County Okainancea, design resolution anA other accepted standards. 103 1pto vide pei-tra hent solution for drainage. 11, All easptvents of record bo be sh-yra on the fi.tlal ;tap. q B' A yy p she -p 'sib le 12 heF� re tt3.rr_nts of att_ Coun�v Fire be a:rttien� or o� r res an agency. 18. Street light ng sha11 be prov3'ded in accot6dhdt jtith Attu County ra�ireWa_t;t5 cr_Gpted des�,n crlteria of vo��r• Y tk. 0v� rlii;,� ei.is"Ah etlw`tt'dt ;)tt to 70% 8treet. (c L t-AIboltig page for rattaitta&r of cOn:titi hsj p' it 1 i Y � •COUNTY ADVISORY AGENCY MUTES Bags 5 ; BUT'' r TES February 23_, 1981 (Forebay Vista Tentative Subdivision) i 5. Applicant shall pay pro. rata.share tovrard traffic signals at Grand Avenue and Hightaay 70. Planning'condition is: 16, All lots must meet the design standards fhr lot width of the Butte County Subdivisi.dn, Ordinance. Health Department condition is: 17. provide a fetter or other doe:itehtati 1 1 7D r �,ItltTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTRS January 2n, 1983 til 1 IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS CONTINUFD PROM Januar 6 Larry .D. �1cKinney - Use permit to construct ..2 duplexes" Residential-P4obile on property zoned AR-Mll (Agricultural, Home) locad "a tepp roximate7. 200 feet West of 7th Street, approximately 400 feet north of Plumas Avenue, denti- Pied, as AP 31 29-6010 Thermalito Steve 'Streeter called the attention of the Commissioners to; the following' nemorandum;receved;by them earlier in the evening: + TO: Planning Commission FNOW Stephen A. Streeter, planning SUBJtCTI Use Permit for .Larry AP 3i- 9-01 DATE, January 20, 198 Four addit anal gond 'tions for your- cons-ideration; 1, Lots 1?419 to be single family residences with 'balatice.of lots (1-11, '20-24) as duplexes. 2, All alvel.liftg units, both s`i;rtgle family and duple e, to be, �1 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMN,ISSION f' MINUTES January 20,1983 one story structures. �Pls+r 3 Constructha 6 foot high, cedar board fence around the periphery of the site: 4 Resurface the pawed portion of Suburban Avenue; between the easterly property boundary and 7th Street (a distance , of 1.40 feet +) , at the time theinterior streets are patted. The hearing was opened to the public; Larry McKinney said that he would have no objections to these proposed conditions, but did,nuestion the addition of "and maintain" in"fNo. 3. He reviewed the Declaration of Conditions, Covenants and Restrictions for Black Butte'Estates Subdivision, Unit #2, recorded in Glenn County 8/2/82 (copies of which were ,given to the Commissioners), He reported that these were working exceptionally well and indicated that similar CCf1i-' would be 'riled for this project. He described proposed sizes for the proposed structures. It was also noted that there had been a neigh boyhood meeting, attended ty Commissioner Behunin, at which some of the problems had been worked out, Opporientst Mr. Beachamp, 2026 Hardnett Court, said he purchased his property secure in the belief that development of the "subject property would. be restricted to 24 single family houses, that all but 2 people at the community meeting were in opposition,, and asked that there be at least a batter ratio of houses to duplexes than was proposed. Charles F. McDonald, 2041 11drdnett Court, said that he had been there since 1.970 with the understaiding that no'th'ing but single family homes would be built on property bordering his. 14111 am Dodd, 2032 Rardnett, next door to K.n Beachamp also oxpressed the same condotns and was particularly .fearful that there would be devaluation of the property in the area if rentals are canstructed. Mt, Beachamp also spoke for a Mrs. Blair in opposition boris Jenkins, 2082 7th Street since 19660 said all the neighbors are appased to duplexes and sXpressed particular concerns about the traffic that would be generated and also ;possible property devaluation] Date Stokes, 2031 7th Street for 8 years; said he and his. neighbors with 1/2 to 1/4 acre are as close to country living as the1can be without being in the country; that the only problems they have ever had are from the ay the dwellers--renters who do not respect the property of others. Hie was also concerned about safety of his children ;kith the add'ei traxf,c. Robert cordon;, atrriss the stroet from Stokes, felt the 8ame �day��was AWNk .7. LN BtJTTI 11 C�1�TY 1 LANNf; CO.PRPIISSION PJINOTFS - January 20$1,081 concerned about. traffic 141 going out on 7th Street. June Olsen, 702 Si'slciYot, �„was concerned about drainage problems. Commissioner Behunin suggested that if the drainage ditch were cleaned but flow would be increased by at least 1/2 Frank,Lamd�.n, 679 Siski.you, Veminued the Commissioners of the 119 signatures 'of the petition received lastm.et.nn ani? questioned the necessity for building duplexes ".just because the Master Plan alloy's them". It was no<+ed that mobile homes could be placed on the subject property, if desired. Marlene Taylor called attention to the guidelines for development that stress compatibility with the'neighborhood; said that she is vice-chairman of the Thermalito• Action Committee seeking to incorporate Thermalito and asked that this project not 'be approved. Jerry Lamdin, 679 Siskiyau, expressed appreciation for the courtesy.. extended by,the applicant and Commissioner Behunin in meeting with the commdhity; but said that she still felt that 49 additional homes(families).on this 5.$ acres { would ruin the neighborhood and that she would prefer 24 mobiles to 24 duplexes. Mr. Stokes agreed that mobiles were o.k, if nicely done. E In rebuttal; Mr. McKinneysaid that this proposal was at the, lows,end of th�Adensity scale, that with present zoning an application for end under a C could be requested, that it is not his intention to create a slum, I that pavments on 1 -,he single family units would be 660 dollars 'a month --out of ach of many; that his proposal would be attractively landscaped and a low maintenance development that would, not detract from the neighborhood. Cal ha,cr�mdn; e:tgitteer for the that both he and his client appreci, ate the concerns of the area residents, but Khat, unfortunately>the 4-plexcs in the',,jielighborh6od had left a bad taste It was' also noted, that conditions were placed on the subdivision map predicaYcd on 8in81e family residences. Conterning a second access into this property, both Mr. Bache -an and hir: Streeter said that there appeared to 1)d no reasonable alternative. Commissioner Behunin proposed changing the designa�,3on of Lot 21 and foot 8 from a duplex to a s"�ingle family dwelling and lot 12' through 18 to a duplex. Mr. Mcilonald said that would make him lot_happier, Tho' applicant agreed that the change would pose no problem for him. Coi>imissioner Bennett reminded the Commission that this 24 -lot subdivision has been apptOVdait is on=stream, it is real, but that the "appl1cant is BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ' MINUTES - January 2001983 now asking for a use permit to put up 22 duplexes, and the only concern of the Commission is the approval, or disapproval, of the use permit. He also commented that the general Plan designation does not guarantee a particular density to an applicant. Commissi.orcer Avis said that both ,Section 2447 of the 'Zoning Ordinance,, as Well as the criteria listed under Medium Density Residential in tho General Plan Land Ilse Element address themselves to compatibility with surrounding properties, and that'this area does not seem to:,be one that is in transition, but that it -has a semi -rural; character with the ability to have animals, etc.; and this just might open the door and we would be a unable to say "nb" to anybody 'else. Commissioner Schrader agreed that there � .question of compatibility t addressed �'t this community meeting; that here• and noted that the compromise su estet by staff was not even t prefab homes might be a Iit- tle more affordable, and that he would be inclined to keep the 24 single -. family dwellings. Commissioner Lambert felt that this is not an appropriate project for this. area, thatN, based on.past,experience, she had little confidence in CC&Rs, . . that the community di;suussion still resulted in 35 of 37 property owners against the proposal, that, plus the 'Possibility of adding,an additional bedroom for people over 60 --which would increase the density over that u which We. are. looking at now for this pro,ject�-added to all the other reasons mentioned tonight she could not go along with this proposal, Commissioner Behunin said he was disappointed i,n some of the comments received tonight vs those received earlier in the.day with regard to lots across the east end of the property, he th'opght agreement was closer than it really isl adding that he had talked tet people who are not at the Mee --ting tonight who had no objections Motion was ;made by Commissioner Avis, seconded by Commissioner Schrader toi A Note t3hAt the requirements of MIA have been completed anis considered in making this decision! and 6.; Deny the Use permit to allo7,r 22 duplexes on`,AP 31,A,29=01 (Me -Kinney) 1 0E83 Commissioners Avis, Schrader and Lambert. ���S: fOltlmission•3:r Be�uriin. AHSTAINEOt Chaitman Bonnett. Notion carried; 1 i The applicant was apprised of the appeal Procedure by Steve Streeter. �w y ` r ? µ Aga tier .»« rte..... .. �.. PLANNING CaMMISSION ; 3 COUIi'rV bi+NtCR gRIVE � oftbVlL:I:LF �ALIFbN�NtA ��5ol�k' pHbkt ; t544601 ' January 2l, -183 Mr i Larry McKinney 469 Man'tanita AVe,: #5 Chico, Ca !1Sg2�i Pe: Ilse rerMit AP 31-29-C1 bear Mr. 1kk nneyt As you are aware; the Planning Comtni5si.on at Wd N inteet' �t On January 2Q 8on1ad your application t -or a use peimit to Allow the corstruotion of x2 duple�ces orr propert'► toned A -Mi4; located tipjyrox ;mate`ly 2no feet west of 7th' Street appreximately 400 feet north of Plumas AVenue; Thertttalito, ifyou tiesi're to appeal this decision; you must do so, in writii�' p7-ior to U1.e close of -the eight-day appeal period which is 806 P. M. 0 Friday, daytua:ry 28; This appeal ynust be niAde to the Cl+rrk 1of the Board of pr , Supero sorry 25 County Center ))rive, Oroville. It' you ha` eany t�iiest;iorrs_ please 'e01 free to contact our off ice, Siricereiy, 1 J*tphon . Ai St- betet 'Senior Panner Ad cc Cal Bae'hman ,ioJ2 The rsp9., e C�'ico,; C;� ► �592fi , 04"4\� January 3io 1983 Chairman Jane Dolan Butte County Bilard of Supervisors County Center Oro��illei CA 9965RE Item 3.43,0 Feb, i Board Agenda To set Public Hearing on 'Appeal by Bachman & Associates The undersigned re ress4its a concerned to du r U8 residents of the � p P immediate area affected by the proposed p s. We petitioned the Planning Commission for denial of this project. It is our firm intention to carry our strong opposition to the Appeal Hearing. 'We note that Item %03 of your Agenda proposes to set the t*Yme half hour for this appeal at '10!00 A.M. on Dtasch 89 19830 to be ;followed at one haythat. intervals this allows far too l p We ros»ectfully suggest p t her public hearings. ittle time for this im ortani matter. The Planning Coiminecessary to continue dssion opened its hearing on the original request on Jan. 60 grid foundU .soussion to 20. A 1 total. of almost tjj,tee hours was required to hear bath project sponsors and petitioners. The ocommissior, then acted to reject the proposal. We will have a-substantial number of petitioners present at the hoaxing,, e►zd many of them will with to address the Board. WE eubmit that an hour or p' q it case, perhaps more, will here aired to enable both sides to present the We appreciate the pressures on yoilr Board which necessitate tight �eduling' However, citizens coming befOre the Board have the right to be fully heard. In sdditibn, continuation of hearings to a latex hour or date may Work a severe hai-dship on those Who must take time off from work. Your cons3cieration of this request will be apprecia,Led. Respectfully- submitted, �1 Frank A. Lamdi.n 679 siskiyou Ave. Otovillbs, CA 95965 FP LAND Of NATURAL WtALTN AN) bIAUTY 5 t „o ELEANOR M. SttKEK COUNTY CLERK - RECORDBR' ADMINISTRATION BUILDING M COUNTY CENTER ORIVE OROVILLE; CALIFORNIA 95965.3375 r TelepholVil W49si Atalstent County CI■rk, Nlcan Llndqul.t 834.4051' Ar.Nitant Clark, Board of SUpervjson, Cathy Plttu 534.4371 Aiilitent Rerorder, awon Perlend 534.4691 February 2, 1983 Larry McKinney 468 tjanzanita Ave. OS Chico, Ca. 95926 Re: USe Permit AP 31•29 0] Dear Mr McKinney: (I At the regular meetingof the Butte County.Baar4` f Supervisors � held February 10 1r83. A VUblit- hearing was Mi ti- for March 15,t 1983 at 11:00_a.m. to consider ybur appeal 02 the Planning, Com- mission's denial of a use- ,Iermit to co:i f��sect 2'2duplexes an property zoned "AR-Mgfi (Agr cultural Residential-Mo ile° Haiwa) located approximately 200 frret west of 7th Street, approximately 400 feet north of 'Plumas Avenue, identified as AP 31-29410 Thermalito. The meeting will be held in the Board, of Supe,N,,!Asors v Robti .� , ter Drive' Oroville, Co,�.ty Administration Center 25 Count Cen California.' Should you have any questions regarding this matter, pleiai'se con tact this 6tf'ice. Sincerely, �' MANOR . M. BECK'E Cqtidty Clerlerk �Butte 'County $oata of k ofthe S"t�pervi�It�s, BMS`: lr n , -�- ELEANOR 'M. DECKER COUNTY CLERK -- RECORDER ADMINISTRATION SUILDING 25 COUNTY CENTER.DRIVC OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965.3375 Telopli-W 534.4551 AWstent CountY CierkF Nieaa Lindquist 534,4661 Aulstant C14M tloard of SunaNUors, Cathy Pitts 534-4371 Amiptnnt Roe order, Gwen Pori and 934.4691 i Aa s March 16, 1983 Lar1^y McKinnLY 458 Manzanito AVC. #5 Chico, Ca. 95925. Re- Use Permit AP 31-2-9-0 pear Mr McKinney At the regular meeting'of the 5utte County Board of SuperVisors, held March 150 1983, your request to withdraw your, appeal of the planning Commission's denial of a use permit to ca,nstrU` 22 duplexes on property zoned AR -MH (AgH cultural Rd' sideW,, al Mobile Home) located approximately 200 feet West of 7th Stri.et, approximately 400 feet north of P1 umas Avenue , Therhta i i to ► wras honored: i Should you have any questions concerning this matter~ 00.0ke feel free to co"htact this offioe. _ i Sincerely► ELEANOk M11 HcktR Count' Clerk -Recorder and t9- off vc'Cd Clerk of the 5ut.te County Br�aw�u of su{�erVi saps LMB:Ih