HomeMy WebLinkAbout033-010-06577777
021425:
Conti Hued hearing 4 Barn town. & ;Associate on b6half.
of Charles and 8.: 1 rler 1'hsesher = cans der tion of an
appeal, of condit3a;a ,ho.. Y2 (.provide;' two -dray trarsabl,
accessS 9 LD -I to each parcel from a ceaunty maintained
road or state highWayj' "an conditions 'no . ° 15;' (provide a `
letter or other .documentation from oroville Wyandotte
Irrigation D stl.3ct sf tinq that they are willing and
able to suppj:y doiaes 3 c water i o parcel -,A) on tentative
parcel map ''` (propose begat1ve` declarahion' with. ,
enviranmental mitigations) , APr r33 0] `--65, teao' parcels
ro ert .
prop P y located' 'on the xioxtherly side" of ' fang Bar` Road
approXirjat#ly 800 feet rtheasterly of Canyon lHi 'hlazads
Driw'e, crovi l'le area: t7�0'2
S }
X 253
(SUPERji' SO4 McLAUGH=K PRESENT)
MOTION. I MO'V'E TQ UPHOLD EALA
` P, DOPT A 'EGATISiE .
`THE AP
pECLARATI01�1, AND FIND °THAT THE CHMGIE IN THE
TWCI C01�3�ITIGN5" WORLD NOT BE DETRIMENTAL TO, THE
µ :HEALTH', . SALTY ,AND WELFARE CSF THE CI'I'iZENS OF
BUTTE COUN'T'Y.
S.
" TE: .1, Y I Y . 1Y' �! Y 5 Y (Unaniltgixusl art%eci)
I
i
II
u
i
RATE CC?.TJN9"t,�BOARD OE; SUPERy:�SORS %f2ifUTES - Udrie 23.,, 10,192
ti
t
+ n
10 C�1Vri2 AL'r xv '�QNl�"C3MAIQC
RE1�axa2
POIRPAitCET� :MAP, OR- �C78I7Tti;]CS T 6Nv MAP
Item 1-4. to be, completed by applicant; f
l# APPLlcMd s AND ADDRESS: A
PROJECT DESCF2IPTxox:
A88ESSORI 3 PARCEL NI3ttAER('S) t
1M..:
following items are to bee completed by the Planping Department:
CGLRRENT `-/ LAND CONSERVATION AGREE2=:
_
?N'g,S'•AL PLAJ� DESIG2iA�0N:
�w 10 meat SitsA Desi nation Criteria: YES No
a
• Q
It is redommended that• you erfoi*
x -----
the following checked items:
ARCHAEOLOGICAL REcons cEiEck
r---
BOTANICAL SURVEY _
i
w r,
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
YES NU
WITHIN DEPAR7 WT OF FISH
'---
AND GAME AEVELOP;iENT ZONE:'
WITHIN FLOOD PLAIN:
WITHIg AREA ; SPECIFIC OR
:� aif Detezr�ination: $ubstiintiall}i con£or to:
Z USE PLAN:
GE�i' 1 A FLAN: 1� lAiW, Us'
I Yes, ` y„
I. Conservation
Name of Plan
Open ;Space r
k, Safety `
_
�tITHz N 'URBAN VE •
RESER
5� Noise' �c
If Yes -
9,
5. Housing Sr '
Nmal of Reserve
7. Cirdulatit'n
J4� %"�7�" � ' m1 k.. .✓ -ar wok
staff Signature�G�>Yi :s(
t7ate
y
dS M APPLICANT FO THE RESTED .LAND DIVISION, I A AWARE
OF THE ABOVE STAFF DE Zpg.lATZON REG r1�DING `
T cOfIFOR.'WICE WITHGENLitAL
Dated �` �� y'` Signature of Applicant •`.'� "� ��
*£his report Will ®xp re aril bel, iscardecf six fi "m -ths . £rom
the dans of the stiff signuturo, _
D 7.00OR e 6-87
_
wwr.
11�U1d0�dA8{] .1'
61
Reed 74-2,4 0
1'st
r t,II
� 3 .,
5UDDIVInER'S STAYEMENT .x ..
t
hir*7 r & Charles 'thresher Date 10/29/90
1me s r
Project Tents^L'isr8 Parc' Maty
h
AP # o3�-oi0wos
Existing rase of the. land Residential
pr,opased use (s) cof the 1an;d Residential
3.. I'mpro ements proposed ;(see Ch: 20% County Code.)' Future 110me
c o' nts.tructi.on on new parcel
4
Public, des Proposed none
J
I �
Tree plant 't#1D/or removal (approxi ,numb'er) none .' ..
E
I
6, P�elimina�y' c� py;of an Cbadit,' restrict7ve res2rvatipns or r;ovenon ts
ex.i st;rrt9 or' prP.sed : s't?a i ] 'be attached i:o this state�tent.
, I•
cd X' , _' none
7. Mate :t'Pe' of dision, 1 .e, y private` "road,' ur'aan rural, etc.."Pry voce
clr.veway. ofd e�tint� roadway:
x
F
LO t 040
trimytvr« .�..�
tI(t,
.Mlz
-i--
,P-u it 1.IC
r,
•nr GA.FCG
�fG`-rt'C�AA'IIAt�16'Q
MElIIAIYA
gY.1C 2(9ff flG„^
CbCYJI!b'IJTU 1 NL'AIi.TN
.AN
APP4..1 T
I Il:l"�'4`GY Vie F4xoM
-w`F --
..
4
2'85�
�t
RECEIPT
O,MCIAL r i CEIPT ,
COUNTY OF BUTTE
S. 16 Fr cALIf=.OFl? NIA•
OF1 EGEoF,PLANNfftG
E'
Barnhart -Brown ... & Associates
ay161'..,J, 99Z
RE- Charles & $hi rl e`1: Thresher
TPM A Pp Page
if, you - h ave any questions concerning thit matter, please contact
7
thi s 0 ff ice "at Ol 6-538-266
Very truly yourt,
Williahil Chelff
Director of Public Wo.rk8 .
Stuart 'Ede 1,1
At is:tant b i r&ot o r
S5AP
oo La�
e
ni n itne n t a 1; k' alth- b e�artmdnit.r-''
— 11
clerk, of the Board
Charl esi 8hi rl eY T,6�tesh6i-
i"'
L
e
j
APPENDIX i
EAx SMPACTB YE5
�P «AMEX NT
►inrrs No
D? CT 388 IN 01' ENV -I OMIENTAL . EV-4LUA°Y'rON
f, ButTH
Wl111the proposal result tn:'signIfIcan(.
a<
Unstable earth condtttons , or changes In
Y-„
The proposaj:Will not affect e.Ubsu�: ",.ee earth c6ndillonss
'"
geolG9'ia sUSsttuctUfast'
'a
b,
019tuptIon, disylacement. compaction or.
overcovelirYg of th<soil?
_
This proposal Will result Pn some dlsrupt�tore dfipjateinent,
Cornpactiop and overcover,ing, of the s�1te asa resul'I oP"de/elopmerlt
n
of an add? ional homesite, dr NeW*,;s, parking areas, etc. The
project rit.o is characterized by sloping te.rraln which WI,VI
,gently
require tnTnor earthwork to provide df1VdWays an'a"build ng pads.
;';f.
The density of one home.sIte per rlv$ acres Wili,tcduce the amount of
o runoff reaching the Feather River dr'atnage:basln.
cw :
Cha ige in opography or ground surface;
x,
Theprotect "site Is' characterized';hy gently si,op[ng terrain whicit)
relIla 10AIU't01,
Will .requlr,e only minor 'grading,to ac,c ,Agate' the propo4ed';
-
resldentiat 'development.
d,
oest;rUraion, cover$ng"or, modlf. lcaMono6anY` ,
X
the protect 3iia hasno unigUe phys'icai fea_turas.
ury„Ig1Ye geologic or phYslcal tcrluresz
e.
inc(6ase In wlnd oc'iter erosion of so'tisx'
X
The proposal vill hot cause erosion
„�
el tt>9r on an, oC.t sitez
t,
Cha )as In ;oepositf;on of er6siOA of beac?,
rt
'deposition:
x
i'he proposal WiI1 not offeet any Wa'iercdurs,e. °
al
=
91NIV� or 6handes in S I tat ion -
4; �
or erosion wlii'ch maY modify the Channel ods
U
a tl;tipr of stream or the bed oi" the ocean'
or bay bay, inlet or take?>
�t
L'o"ss' a ' "rime' /a ,f.NcU(fU[ai I DradUclI've "
y
x
not tepresent a' stgnirtcant loss. of prtne
Th,.s proposal does '
saiS aitslifa desidnated urbanareasz
?rgrioulturab sour,.. The prole�t s.jle Is to, to :wI Itln the urb n�
area of, oro'M .
h�
@%posurt of,poopI or. property to geologic
._ _ 7t
Atl'o
todUnlfotrnaW11ding code s5tandone tilt t
of abut 'will
a east uakes, fandsl ides;,
hazetJs such s hq
tnuo`sIides. '' gro6pd' tajlute or, similar'
�,,
CcsnstrtictIdh,, Idinysa ards
ptavtde adequate protect. Ion, Ito occupants irtcase of seismtc_ectivity, ,
hazards?
�W11,i
t4%propo,'sal r suit In Ls:llbstag tia1t
�
ar
an of��amb a t
Alr pmtsslorts or rtetdtlorati i p,
st" ,�
.�`"�
The proposed: proiec,t W1I1:retult .Ir ra cumuiat yd Impact on oar'
01111tyduet'af.ela"t edInciriases-lntraffic,;deneratcdbythe, proiea.t,
aIrailly#' err
The.taliforofa Air"Resources control .Boa:rd hes �identtfIad Butte'
'as lh standards the
>"�"•I
COU n1 a tion-attafitment. Area meetth9: the Of
��Iifornla Atr Oual'l.ty Act. Ilid Ir:W soil t,ees of afr Ofiutants
should be, mltUgatad to achieve canp'liance�for Ozone and Carbon
h
Monoxide emi;sjont,
^ * br
i.` ,.
The of foo, amble odpl,!S. 0.'
ob,
sr
some,.sUCtllo etro,alr'`qualil�'�?imp
ah babf result duti the
.ts Will pfo 1�_,,., I ilg ie
,crpatlon
or ttimef t' f
consirU¢t(ao 'ptiates..rot
vehlole and gqulpment`eh4s`sl;ons
developing rasl.deotial housing, .�"fncteasGd
as W,el1 as lncreasad dint, gyring the
gratll'ng atrd.preparatlanWill occur..
c,
Alteraticn of At �.inovemCh'k ma15tiire",or'
X,
affect 'the atmosph. l� ��
The tyf 6po 'liWlli n6t ere
--
tempetatUre or anY chahye, irr clima.�e>�
focal ly, or t;eglonal':iY"
a trxhrrt.
Will the propotat �ja$UIt In substantial
;
a:
�,. ;
changes tn,4urregfks, or ?lie, course ur
OU11 i11 either
i x
Theiproposal�vrlll not aTfeO any watorcour'
.r
dlrectiori of :Watej,' moveni
matin# or fresh-Wa�efi;lt 1
5 :
..
r�anmeiTxil CinF�lxmt < va�Uatasax� a;insJ'iraxtmen�g�
im>Aa�t
. 3wFMSMONMENUL i'MAiOWS (continued) vEs. MAV9t rio
DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION,
(cont InuedY
RepotI. (EnIR) prepared In 1983 for, the zoning and the Oroyille Area
Land use r�lan indicated that the present circUlationsystem's
capaclty was not balanced with the:, traffic volumes generated by the
land uses. allowed by the General Plan designation and zoning
''
classificatiom
The 061 EiR rscommended is;A mitigation measur�,that the county, and
CiIY of OroylIIe undertake an area wide trafIIc study to ei(amine and
-
plan for future circulation needs, it Was recommended that'' the
Transportation study identity future transportation corridors.
s
system to finance necessary
raglonafttranspotn an on int�oveme Cs,
mp
;.
The proposed project and resulting cumulatlVe traffic Impacts rti111
Alto Impactthe existing freeway Interchanges along state:RoUte 7;0,
the 983!R stated that by the. year 1000 Without substantial. ,.,
transportation Improvements the Level of sery ce onfreeway
Interchanges and local streets would decline to 0 or lowet. The
eall,fornia, Ttansportatfon commisslonrs policy ,far interchanges
requlres folal jUilsdletiohs� to 1-fhance the lmprovetmht costs sof
Interchanget at 100x, currently, tppe County of Butte, has no proor'am
to assess,'financial responslbliit.y to' Local development for
to the
inte'rchange'Improve mept costs. Iri order. evaluate cumulative
irafflc Irnpacld .of" the project on the OrovO le urban area - a
transportation system.comodter model will need to be deyeloped 8,nd
a sl a impact analysis performed.
b.
BTtects,on existing 0tkln'd tacit;itIel 6f x
The praposaj: will not affect parking because the proposal wlil'haye
r'equi ntthin autte ccSurlty,
demand tot new par(tlriya
to comply wish the parktn9 rerne n, s corjiaTned
Cdde,sectIon 14-35.
sutis.tantfa'i Impact � qn :existing. , M �t ._ __.
see ^taa.
tra nspor"tatrion sy$'temsi
d�
si6niticantaltet,alstdns toifresent�'ph lter, n X`
See a3a.
of cirCulatton or, people and/or
-
goadsa
_
e,
Iter tons to w._alerb0r.ne tali or a.i',r
fratfci
The cl.ty of,;ordvi'tle has s,evera_I,a-gtade`iail'road cross'ingsw The
he
Inc'reinental-Increase in t.raftiG,at hese arossings will Intensify t
coritlictg between traln movements. and traf`ltc, ttUlking in irat"f c
i
.
congestion A tr2jtic ripdel' rot the 'd(bYflie Ur area 'Is•
anti:cipatea'''to`evaluate pe eh �.confIlets between train,mOvementy
„
and tratflc,
t.
Increase I`n iraFflc hazaNs fo awtof
see 13a, �
velitcles t>'lcyctisfs or Dedesirtanit
t4. PLx3LiC
SERVICES. IW li the 'or opdsaI have an'eftJac t
of resin t in a ;treed for rSf- ',al tared
uport� „nein
go�+ernmentseryices'
a.
Fhrhrpr0tectidnt '' tC
tlieproposaI wijl result )ha incremental Increase -in demand for tyre
protecifgn]n' the area. The BUt0a Country FIr.e pepariment1r* lforhla
DIV.irsl0n of Fores.tr, alias „indicated that 'cumulatisvor�aveiopment.l.n
the Vr111' (nip" f their. ability ta' provide wre "protectian
.County
servicer. The development of ,a community Water $y"stein'with ire
ltydt'8rits wt 11' oat Itally mitlgate the demand for Lire pku Ione
S�r1(iCes p ,;
b.
pill proiect(ona k
' —
Theproposa'I wi jl result jh a Incremental Ih&d''As6, In
police prolectlan f6 t q�ti"�,a which cannot be 5ervtcc, b
demand
the ptesetit
jot 11
she1:1, `s Department rt.tes 1980 the popu;lalion of Uute county fias
at the same,.: pas
increased by. OVer t5i., white time the ,PofIce (orae-
6
nits �f
DZBCUSSION ENVIY20N14EN'I'AL ),�VALUA'1°, Z,OM
1'�s''. gRpgl�E'da'1'�� AC°t'S,SContirued) �'"
r,o:
tcohtinuedl;'
been decreased in,personnel' by 50% dud to 'fiscal difficulties being
by suite County, currently, Butte county hat" the lowest
eXperlenced
officers per Capita' In the state. t recent Leglilative tejti IComItled
county' of (icI•als• testified
<7
Hear,fngs on �sUG:;< Cdurity's F[scal or.'ses,
Lhat•poliCe protectldn sery;ifes arepresehtl inadequate and do not
total
meet the serV)te exaectattons of the publlc, continued
in cumUla.11ve tnipacts onp0licepr�tectton
tleVdlopmenthas tesu)(ed
serylces which continues tq: reduce the snachelCur ujatlVee lmpapt�°1
to provlde adequate police services,
development oh PO Ice protection fiat been documented by,tltP Cc�?tY
�countY,gt suite. �rsrtusr„.r
ndminlstrative Olt1ce, In the regdtt
kevlew.'
"
The”;applicant +Wil l -r� �� ;'r ,�r? �'Tde� s�iI ble mitigation measures to
`4 impacts on the her If department. such
I
reduce the G�»-� V�•
trsoas.ures as Mello=Roos"bistri t ihpanO ng for Roi1Ce Protection
serVi rs mi9ht,be cob3itlered`
X
The ,�ropdsat wfli result "in a incremental increase ih demand -tor
in the atea. 5chddl Impact fees collected, by the
c, Scteotsi ^i
School services
local school districts is anticipated to only Partially reduce school
t0 Provide mitlgatlon measures
Impacts, The, applicant will need
Which fully mitigates the 1nPacts ort educatIona se"iylces, 7tre
'coordinate closely With the oioville Union high
aPalic�nt should
applicant
SchOoof shout and the otoVille Union Elementary school 4i5tticl try
mltloating impacts on educai,lonaf services,
>l
The proposal wI l l result ih a lncretnental -increase in demand lOr park
thearea,
ParKt,ot diner ecieationai taclj`Mlties7;
and-retreatlon (ac,illties;tn
dF
X�
The proposal will retulit ler a i6,eto ental increase t the need,fot
in the area.
e. Aialntertarice of PUb.11c iac"ilitt0s.;tncludi'ns
maintenance of roads and other Public faculties:
roadst
The proposal will resultl,n a incrementai' increae 1n derhand lot= alt
t r`esx
�. f K o het 9oyernmenf?if sabl'vi ti,; .� ,
Other governmentat servicrf in.lhe area.
�. ' r EtiERCY. 1Nii jr lite-ptOppt2i"'te'sul f lna
The proposal will 'hbt utl'tize substantlai fuel bt energy.
Use of substan'iat ainoeYnts o1 lei of r.__1
epetgYt ��
---
substantially increase the dernandtor enetsy•
b4 sribstantl l lncreatd ire demand up irA xiit3ngf -
reculre the
x ", The proposal wtli�'not
ee ot
n �.
dtircrstot t>;'9'
development of nevi sources of el�ergY
"
��.~° tlTilrTIES Witt `tlye_oroposat [esutl in;' 3leedtor
afteratlons 'lo `ihe -
new systems, or .5ubstantlat
fofCoWthd
K The proposal Wilt pot '�aitecl eleclrltaf PPW& "Dr `nalutal gas
�a P4wef or (raatriiai`Vol
dlstr•ibut�ldn system5� 1"
501 will not""aftett, tor(m unicat
X The Propos
rxsmmuntcaf,ipns "systems
b.. i
eir systeems
X The pkopo-ai wi11 not aI ec pubtic Wa t ms
ci Water aV*si labs i l;ty, ----
X The ptopo�sal Wi1i have t o medt the.fequ�itcment"s, of thesutte'Counly
`ewer br s@Otic systems �._
".--
tnvlronmental ry0AItit bep1,
impact storm, water drainage
X The, ptoposai Vr111 not tisnillcantly
e.tbtm"tiratet dta'ina4ev
sy5leets.
"the, impact on ;oitii waste" disposa'1;4 '
Wit 1, have a cu
The, prdposal
5olitl waste and"'dispasaf7x�
.tea-�--�--.----
Z.. $HVIRONEWTAL ACTS (CCpttnued)
vis M v tn;
DISCUSSION "OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
-,
(Continued)
1 . HUMAN FIEALTH. WIAI the proposal t'j$Ull In.
5: bisatlon of any health hazard or potentfa.l
x -
The proposal will not ctatte any health hazard,
haz�.rd (ek�Fcralnp'mental heal(h)7
b, EXposure of people to poientlai health
_ X -
The proposal, Will not Opos,e pool to any health hazard.
hazardsl
-
s$, A�5THETrCS_. Will the pscloosat result in the
x
The proposai will' not res`ufi -to an aestheticaiay of1`dnsive Vldw
o s ruC ton;af any scenic vista or view open to [he
deCaus6 it 1',s con si�stent with surroundipg devdlopment,
public, or will the;Oroposa,i "resultIn the _Creat oil
of an ansiheticali.11 offensiye site open to the
pubI l;C vlew7
19, RErAtATICN. will the ptoposal`tesult In an impact
.6xistlog
x .
The proposal may less"ult In an incremental increase -in demand for park
and recreation facilities.
upon te=quality' or quafjti(f of
recreational opporCunities7
20. COMRAL AESOLRCES.;
a, wifll�the proposal FesUit 'i:n the alteration
r''"' x,
the,ptoJeet;slto Is lder ll)ed As an' area oso,f high 3ensl tvtty for y
de caf ob �fiteif �rehtstorlC or-tilskorfc
orcliaeorUctl6 l��
fl,
of the
projecti0 to.I teIs necessa; yeto oato r�formga records checkathrough,the
Depattment of Anthropology; California
Univarsity, 'cltico, A
records check.wlll determine Whether
,sta a
an ar'Chaeoioglcal• survey of the
property i1,11 , bd necessary and
_wtjether' any furthdr mitigalt,'on
.:
measures wl11 be needed,
,
I .
b, Wilt thepfdpasat fasult In-adverseph.VsI61_
X
r;
The:.oposat will not a1fe8t iiIstorld sites.
or aesthetf-.c, effects to a, prehistoric" sof
hi s`tot l c h i idf,60, t rue tui a of ob ddtr
CM Does the proposal' have 'the pofdhtlai, to
.. x
ihe,ptaposal will pot afIact cuftura! tes4urces,-
causo a physical chance Which WOUI'd afiec,t
uplGue ethnic Cultufal vatuesl
A, wit thea proposal testrlCA existing
f
x
The proposal wilt not affect, rel igious-rps'.&t ces,
iefgioul .or sacPed uses Wlthlp the
potenliai-jhPACt area?
'.. SUGGESTED MITIGATION MEASURES
#�r_epateall Ehvlronradntal impact, )teoor`t -ar propose
d
bit i,00tiorr measures which "-address the,,,isayes, !an,
cor cer.hs OU t►lned`aboVi
a
"s
,
11 I
z-rol ,.
OFENVTR®DTMEIdTAT, IAI,UA�I�L�T
IR0PTM�N'1'�+ pA'8 (continued) VE5 MAYB[ WO
IV MV _
(cootlnued)
BATA SHEET
a, Land Uses: residential
U� zoning: A' AR -t
c, ccn. Pian besignation oensltY Resi
�, .Proiro�Iotion
I
typo of Protect TentaliVe Parcel Map
dltllde 10�9a acres to create 2 lots of
rLowes
d. Paccel sizes; t t0 5 acres.
e, Populaticxst Urbah population
s.
Brief description: TNM to
5,ga acres and 5.60 acres. roville Area.
e 0f Long ear Road Irl the o
Location: North side
acres
15. Character of siteand Area, urban
1e, Nearest Urban Areal:aOrovV11e
17. Relevant Spheres of Influence; OtoylH e,• 0}yld.
5.
proposed density of pevelopment: I'iniI
Amount of Itnporvious� Surfacing minima!
Long Bat Road
1g improvements Standards urban Areas.Nlo
15, ,tire Protection serVlce: Mb2
G.
7.
Acces3 and Nearest publio�Road(s): ,
Method of sewage otsPosai: Septic/Leachl)eld
Supply: Ow1d water
a wrest county (state) Fite Slailon's
b water Aval1ability: Nib Nyrlrants
district andOrovllle
4 a.
g,
source of Water
Proximity of=Pwrer lues polaeenLaa property
divisloas And development: Current
zo, scitoois II Arca: Orovll,le ISt,r sehou)
Union ',lemepta'ry school Rtstr�cty
10,
Potertlfal for further land
Potential allows one acre parceis.
By E^nvlronmentai..5ettin9
-
Phical EriVironrnent:
j.n
Tetraln
ceneiai Topographic character. Cent 10 s11 loping terrain
a,
b, Slopes. 0 (0 5
Elevation 30o to 380" ASL
G,
d. LIm1Nng Factors`• None
x.
Solis
Types and charactorlstics:-SOtlranO soil ser les: drains
a:
W61 , wt tti;moderal6 petmeabi Ii ty.
3,
Limiting NactorsF Notre
Natural hazards of the Land
Earthquake. ditonBit/ done
a, Ear'thUuake,zone:_IAoderata
o
b Ero3ion Pete nttai.'Moderate
ode`a.te
a M r
Landslide Patentl_i
g;
d. Fire tiazar.d:. unclas3,l,lled
Expansive soil P atentlal:,High•
�
�{,
c
tfydro10gy
a. surface Water- r�raInage swale�
b. Ground water N/A:. diatns trnvards the
dra I nage characteristics;: Proper'tY
c,
s bilthwes t » . .
d, Annual ttainfall (normal):'za'
o, Limitind'Factors:'None
visual/scenic Quality: Excel tent"
5.
r �,
'6
Acoustty: ic qua CO.
7r
Alr,Quallty: COod -
a
n of oq
310
�
ii
Vege tatlans Urbati rton native planks.
birds and �nimat s"common ,;to -Urban areas a
ti 'R
q�r
yri idI i re�Fla61 tat: small
t
Cultural FnVironmerrIn t:
#
10
chaeologlcat and f-ilsl,ortcal R esource area Ni gti''
��
densho
SensII ou ly Cener.aI f lane designation. �, i�tY fros_ldehtlat
Se r� ,
rx1�stin9Zoning: Art "t
Fxi'sting Land Use on-site; Vacant
13,
1Ar
surrounding Area.k
t
.:rates
r -
•��
-9
4].J40@A1� <IPCC�:1S�" +� "$�a�.lr,StlQ$1 ,�1 $YLVI%`aY�d@i1R�.-`
�►�%� ;'
.. A,
vas r��vgF �a
F
Da8CUt3STOP1 OF ENVIRONMEIJTY�I, E°JALUATIOI�i
Y20 ' MJ Yk4PACTS ccootlnued>
Ue
ENV >t?RENCF 14ATERIAI,
igdu NTAL REF
at I I-I Earthquake ,ar-d Faui t• Acti ty'z SSIMS mi
Eie enti�utte aunty Genera Pian revised
a e:ty
f-77, by 2M HI
211
a e S
M emerit2't3uttnu�CountyGenetraltPlan reveiis'edi .'7 byy
,til H i I i ;
3"
i ety
hEEtJemi nt,t�u iQSC unty,Gener.a, IdlenO eviNe '(- 7
Cle %'Hi1(:
:9
Map'1 (I 2: Er son Dote ti'.a Safeg Ei me t, Butte
In rev se i -77 : b CFi A t 11.
5�
y I�
count Genera,
Butte `
Map, 1 I I-3�, Ex ansiVe 8011 S.yafe�YY e� Hnitl>I
Plan,,revised f-17. �'
6f
County Gene,rai
M a`p. IV-(,. Nolse, Noise Eleit�evt Butte CountyGeneral
-77, by CHP I �.
7
an: rev used I KI
Map see i c HI h� ys seen I H i uh�vay Ee n,
�ner� Pan revised ci -77, y CHRI �.
g„
But;ce ciunty e
kt p I t I- Natural F"Ire, Hatar�l Clashes;. Safety
County Genera E' an rev 1. sed t 77, byy
g
E e teButte
CH,M H hs
Qrchaeoioglca.l"Sen iti'�C'tty It4ap by James.P �fiannin�,
n9 Hepar tment 198
for gut.te Coup:ty .Panni
school, fists ict Map, Butte. Caun'ty Planrlit�� ,
; x
1 tfi
Depa r me.n t
NTCraC `stud t�4ap Nitrate Goncentrtioi in
siva �ow e.l" s.. t 83,,.. b Depar tme t o afar
.strict, Resources.
-
Resources or. hive r11 TW,
Agency Sate o " Ca of ia.
a
12k
fl
ir.tc It 78 P�utte eCounptV, Btoardisoefd uRerYisorsn
1987.,
Decemer=5, . ood n
ted f ps�rence Rate J�1aps Nat �oRa'I` PI I stitanc`e
Fe„eras >=mgrBency:Managemgnt-gettcy, '1988
.lragram,
1 A.
Cf G5 ''OU d' daps , t7>G^a,V.i (l e.�. 1970 r
1"Srt
Sof'1. Mai,_ Cti'co :`�195)IbIOVi I le C192b') `.Area. U S�
cu tura.
>7elsar im nt o,agr
soi,tSUCeY bfrChico��92a)�OroVi l (e ;192i).Are_r ilk5..
17','
Department of A9rrcu turea
Batt i t;oUntr�ap i utterocaurr��ttjy �f i rer �Dse rttment an
County
C rnla Department of Forestry. utte
ann?ng`Depar•tmeat
4