HomeMy WebLinkAbout036-050-081IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IM ACTS
xp anations o a 1 °'yes" and "maybe', answers are required
on attached sbeet(s)j
YES
l EARTH. Will the proposal result in significant;
MAYBE NO
a. Unstable earth conditions ox in changes in
geologic substructures?
b. Disruptions, displ acenients , compact:ion or
overcovering.of the soil?
C. Change in topography or ground surface_
relief features?
d. Destruction, covering Or modification of any
unique gealogie or physical features?
e , In in Wind
or water eros
either on or off-site? ion o soils
��
f. Changes ,in deposition or erosion of beach �___,
sands, or changes in siltation,deposition
or erosion which may modify the channel, of
a river L)T stream or the bed of the ocean or
any bay, inlet or lake?
g. Loss of grime agriculturally productive'soals
X�
` outside designated urban areas?
X
h. Exposure of people or property to geologic
hazards, such as earthr{ualtes, landslides, mud.-
y slides, ground failure or similar hazards?
2. AIR. Will the proposal result in substantial;
a. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient
air duality?
b. The creation of objectionable odors, smoke
or fumes?
Alteration
c. of air ,movement, moisture, or,
- temperature, or any change in climate,
locally or regionally'
3.{PATER. 'Viii the proposal result in substantial;-
a., Changes 1:n currents, o,r the; course or,
direction of water movements in either,
marine or fresh waters?
b. Changes in absorption rates dramg patterns,,
`--
,
or the rate and amount of surface runoff?
c. Need for off-site surface drainage mpro te-
�(
ments, including vegetation remrval channel-
jZatYon or culvert installation?
yCc.
d. Altr rations to the course,o flow of flood
wate>"s?
e. Change in the amount of surface waterixI;any
water body?
Discharge
G
f. into surface'Agate`xs, or, iii,; any
alteration of surf Water quality, q y, including
but
.not lima ted to temperature,`dssolved
oxygen or• turbidity?
g .>
.4lteration of the direction of irate of flow
-
of ground waters?'
h.
Change in the Quante ty ox• qua la ty of ground waters,
a
Oct a d.i ion oz tint
either throug� da r° � s ' �
�ith-
d>c'awals , or through in eroeptioi`t of an
aquifer by Cuts O r ox a, t " is ?
,. Red AC 1'On ill the, amount of Nater otherwise
available for° public water supplies?"
�
people or property to Water
related 'hazards,
azards sl3cli as flaod"1 7
4 • PLANT LaF.E, YES
Will the p
change
MAYBE(j
�ILYB -
in the diversitysof speciosl,resultnoru s;tantial:
Of
any species of plans p umber
shrubs (incl ding trees
grass, crops,
,
and aauatzc plants?
b• Reduction. of the numbers of an;�r unique
Or enda"ngered'
species of Plants? .rare
c• Introduction
of nett' species of „
aria, or in a barrier 'to the an
`
_
ment- of existinto
normalrepleni h-
�,ng sPeCies 7
d• Reduction in
acreage of any agricultural crop? `"'"'
5. ANTiw}A.L LIFE. }Dill, the result xn substantial
a. C ange in the'ciiversityoof
species,sal
of any species of animals birds' numbers
including reptiles, lalld gnj,j)tals
fish.. and shell fsh,
benthic organisms or insects)?,
b. Reduction in
the numbers of any uni ue
or endangered species of a r ��•rc.
ana.mals?
c. Introduction of new species of animals into
an area, or result
in a. barrier to the
or migrati.an
movement of animals.
d. U;eter oration
-�-
to existing g f.:i,sh or iv�,1;c11if� "--
habitat?
6. NOTSE • Will the proposal result in substantial:
a� Increases ,n existing noise
X
�.evelsr
b- EXPosure Of people to severe noise levels?
7. LIGHT AND GLARE. Will,the p ro osal
s`xgni._xcant light P produce v
and grave?
8i L. _ .
�g�')tUUSe'4Vx11 the Proposal result in n
al aeration
of the prose�zt arantIal
ansof a n area? Planned
0 • NATUPAL RESOURCPS : Will the proposal result
su sista ----
a. Increase in the rate of u,so of
resources? any natural
b•
Depletion of arty non renevabxe natural.
resources?
10, RTSK_Ofi UFS:ET, Will the _
X
proposal involve:
,' Axis - of explason or th.o
release of }'azar H
ous substances ( rtcludin r d
oil, ��: but not lima
Pesticide ed to,
or a titian
event o an,, �CC� C�el2tmo�"aupset
) in zltC
Ionl �
dat .ons .
Possible', int;erfearence
response, With sri merge ._�.
Plan or emergency, evacuation p3.an
POPULA,TTON Will the pxdposal alt`r the 1n .._...:
xdTs` b on, aens.t y.;, or uatio.n,
o grow Gh r
P pu1a, Ion oto of the human
1i. NOU8-1NGh Wi�� the proposal affect
or create a demand fob additional
housing7'hausing,
i b
1
r
3. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION«
MAYBE NO
Will the
result in; proposal
---'-�
a• Generation
movement?, of substantial additional vehiele
b. Effects on existing
d'emand far a parking facilities
--
new or
parking?
C.. Substantial
impact. on existing
systems, sting transportation"
— x
O -f cirRif l at alterations to present patterns
o£ circulation or
movement of
goods? People and/or
e:'terations to waterborne, rail or air traffic`
. Icrc
.`" ��
traffic hazards to motor Vehicles,
.bicyclistsor pedestrians?'"
14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Wall theakre
5pon' or r�esul,t in a need foronewaorhalteredeffeCt
rnmental services;"
a. .Fire protection?
b« Police protection? _
Schools?
d• Parks off -other recreational facilities?
e, Maintenance
. _;K
of public facilwt.aes, including
roads?
f. Other governmental services?
15. ENERGY,. Will the prpossl result in:
Use of substantial
b amounts of fuel .or energy?
bf Substantial increase in demand upon.
sources
of enev existing
gf� or require the development
of new sources a£
-
energy^
16;
UTIill the
Proposal result in a need for
newLsystems,l+Ior subs
follawi:ng, bstantial alterations' to
tlie:
Power or natural ;gas?
b. CaiIIMUTIications
'
s
c, {V`ater' ystems?
availabil itY;d.
�(
Sewer or septic tank?
e « Storm water dxainage?
-.
f. Solid waste and dsposalFa"
HUI40 HE LTH« 1V� l l t he proposal resu; t in:
a.. Creation of
any health hazard or potentiGl
health heard_ o «
(;X ludi g mental�
b: Exposure ol: peop l to
hA atds ?'-, potents al health.
l s . AESTITE.TxeS . Wi
in, the
a s"tructlon of anytsccnicpvis
k
�arasosalult
the publ c, air will the yew open to
pr�posa resin t
cxeatian of an
ae ...
esthetically offensives to,opento p:ulie view?
'YES
MAYBE �f0
19; RECREATION. Will the
UPC -the proposal result in an impact
p quality or quantity of existing retreat icon
opportunities? X l
20. CULTURALRE
Will the pxoposal result in the alteration
of or the destruction
of A prehistoric or
historic archaeological site?
b. Will the proposal result in adverse physical
or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or
historic building,
structure or object?
c. Does the proposal have the potential to
cause
a physical change which would affect una.que'
ethnic cultural Values'.
d'. Will the Proposal restrict existing,religious
or ;sacred uses within the potential
area? amp act
V. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONTviDN`tAL DVALUATION
"_
AE 36-,05-81
See attached.
I
►App i i cant?; Joe S i t ver i sJlssessor. s Narie'I �#
Log it8/ _ V b _ •1 b` 06'
Dr A�'A SHFE"f
A. j�o
iect Dascr ii pt i on
i -
�_
I'Ype of Pro ject: Tentative Parcel map ,
Brief Description'., O i v d i rtc� '1 0
. E, acres into two paPhce'i s .of
b. acres each.
3.
Location: On the east side of Qakvale Avenues apprOxinately
500 feet north of the intersection
of (v1t. Ida poad'and Oakvale
Avenue, In the 'Orovi11e are
4.
5':,
Proposed Density+ of Development.' b acres per dweFlinc unit,
Amount of impervious Surfadtn9:
6.
11in'1ma1:
Access' and Neat-est Publ i c Read( s?: pr�oper�ty i'r~onts orr, Uakva1 e
Avenue,:
7..
S.
Method, Of Sewage Disposal. Individual septic systems.
Source Of %MerSW t
9.
PP Y= Individual wells.,
Proximity Of Power Lines: To
1�1.
property.
Potential For further land divisions and development: The
ex i st i no Genera i
P 1 an and zo 7 i ng 'would allow clevel ptnent of -
parceis as small as: 6500 sq.. ft,
on Publics sewer and water.
tul LrwI ronrirental Sett?n4
bmgi ca _ Eriy'i ronment
�«
Terrain
a. General: Topooraphic Character
b: Slcspes Generally I0.`15
slopesRwithnsomeareas o1^rain,
steeper slopes to the SOuthea:st and northwest.
.:. E1 twat i orj : 450`525 feet shove Bea Love 1 .
d. Limiting Factors:
2.
Areas of So1s steep slopes:
'
a- Types and Characteristics: S
urn �o i l der l es,
genera 1,l y
well drained with moderate Permeablit of f
I dee i' rom 'I 0 to 28
p:
b, Limiting Factors Areas of shallow soils.
Natural
.
Hazards of the l,aFrd
a.arthgiaa.ke Zone: (`'ioc;arate Earth oaksni;i
�# n: i i,
ta. Errwior Potential: }�'igh..' w '�' done VIII.
c. Lands 1 1 de Potent i a 1: Low`
d.- "za%1'1d: Extreme'.
4.
®, CxPans i ve So tPotent !a I : � Law.
Hydr6iogy
a. Surface Water ays ci^oss the F�ropPrty and, abut
the.so.utherly
,prdperty.iir;e.
b. Gr'iourldwater 1Jnk nown,o potent ia 1 1 y limited.
c. F�r'a l'nage'' �Ilal^actQr' 1 St I C�:; Property rdra'I ns � o oh,�s i t5
swales thence
west anti south t,o tribtrrtarie:'of�lyman`
havihe.
-i-