HomeMy WebLinkAbout036-240-017• TV, ENVIRONMENTAL
TMPD S
xp anations o ""
`�ryes •r and "maybe" y " ans wers are required
on attached sheets
1 EARTH. Wili the proposal; result in significant: YES
' MAYBE No
a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in
geologic substructul-as?
b,Dis,xiiptons, displacements, compaction or
Ove cover:of the soil? -
c. Change in topography or ground; suxface
relief features?'
d Destruction, covering or mod1ficatioli of any
unique geologic or physical features?
Increase in wind or
e, lncher
water erosion of soils,
ei on or off-site?
f.' Changes,in deposition Or erosion of beach
sands, or changes in siltation, deposition
--
- or erosion which may modify the channel of
a river,
or stream or the bred of the ocean or
any bay,,, inlet or lake?
g Loss of Prime -agriculturally
y productive soils
outside designated urban.
areas't
h.E:�posure of people or property to geologic
hazards such
.r`..
as earthquakes, landslides, mud-
slides, ground failure or samiiar hazards?
-~.•
w, aAIR,. ll the proposal .result in substantial:
Air emissions or deterioration of ambient
air quality?
b. The creation of Objectionable odors
or fumes`? smoke,
—.- k
c. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or
temperature, or any
change., in climate,
locally or regionally?,
3. WATER. Will the proposal result in substantial
a. Changes in
-
Currents, or the course or
direction OZ- water movements in either
marinewaters?
or fresh , g
b . Changes in absorp
absorption rates drainage aGt.erns,
Patterns,
Voo
or the rate a
off- sdtamsur£aof surface runoff?
c. Need for drainage impvoveu
met
n s, including vegetation remr)val channel
ization
o.r culvert`: i.nstalla;tion?
d: ;Alta -rations to th e, -Course or flow o flood
water8? -
e . Change, in, the amount of surface' water iD any
water body's
�. riischarge into surfacetvaters, or in any
alteration of: ; surf ace water qual ity,_ including
but not l,i,mited
to temperature, di,ssblved
oz,ygen or, turbidity?
g. 4ltieration of ,the directiOn:or rate of �1ow
of
- - --
ground waters 7
h. Change in the'quantity "of ground' eaters
,
either, through. direct additions :or with
draWal$., or through, interception` of an
aquifer by cuts
or;excaNations7
i. Reduction i.n heamount of water otherwise ..—.
available for public water supplies?
..__.-
j .atposue of peiple or property to water
gelated hazards such as 00
YES
MAYI No
4.
PLANT LipB., Will the: proposal. result in. substantial:
aa:` age 9n the diversity of species, or number -
of any species of plants (including trees,
and aquatic plants) ?
shrubs, grass r roes ,
b, Reduction o£ the numbers of any unique, rare`
or endangered species of plantsl
introduction of new species of plants into. an
---
c,
area, or in a, barrier to the normal repleni.sh-
ment of existing species?
d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop?
S.
ANIMAL LIFE. Will the proposal: result in substantial,
—an
a, C ge in the diversity of species, or r1.umbexs
of animals (birds, land G�,nim is
of any species
including reptiles, fish and shell fish,_
K,
tenthic organisms or insects) ? _
b. Reduction, in the numbers of any unique, rare'
or endangered species, g cies :of animals? �_
e
Introduction of new species of animals into
---
c,
an area,, or result in a barrier to the migration
or movement of animals? .�...
d. , Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife
habitat?
6.
NOISE. 1�ill the proposal result in substantial.:
a. Increases in exis ting noise levels?
levels? �
X
b, Exposure of people to severe noise
LIGHT AND GLARE. Will the proposal produce
slgnizz.cant light and .glare?
8.
LAND USE,. Will the proposal result in a
su s�antial, alteration of the present or planned
sand use of an areal
9
NATURAL RESOURCES; Will the proposal resit t in
sur stantial
a, Increase in 'the rate of use nf" any natural
,
resources?
b. Depletiozi of any non-reAoWable natural
resources l
w--�--
l0 .
RISK "OF UPaET . Will the proposal invn] ve
o explosion or the release of hazard-
a. A risk
ous substances (, nclud`ng;, but not limited to,
st' cider chemicals or radiation) in the
oil , pe ,
event Of an accident or upset cond?.tions .
b. passibi.e inter: erence with an emergena
-n ei. acuation plan?
.
reponse plan o emergency
1]`:
��7PULAT"CON, IUiXI the proposal alter thQ lacatian,
"the human
e� stxbutidn, ddnsity� orgrowth rate of
papulation?
1L,
HnUSZNC. 'Wi11 tlicroposal a fect e -' fisting housing,
of create a "deMand dor, additional, houSing't
4
AML
YES
MAYBE NO
13.
TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Wi11 the proposal
result in
A. Generation of substantial additional vehicle
movement'?
b. Effects On existing parking facilities, or
X �
demand for new parking?
c. Substantial impact on existing transpaxtation
systems?
d. Significant alterations topresent patterns.,
Of circulation or movement of people and/or
goods?
e. 'Alterations to waterborne, raid Or air traffic?"
f. Increase in traffic hazards to :motor vehic;l,es,
bicyclists or pedestrians?
1.4.
PUBLIC SERVICES. 'Will.. the proposalL have an effect
upon, or rkjsult in a deed for new, or altered
governmental.services
a. Fire L protection?
b. Palice protection,
C-
c
c. Schools?
d. Parks or other recreational facilities?
Xc.
e. 'Maintenance of public facilities,
p s y including
manse
..G
f. Other governmental servicesR
��
15.
ENERGY. Will the proposal result in;
a: Use OPL substantial
amounts of fuel.,ox en,orgy?
b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing
saurces of,energy'LL.O.rrequire L the development
of new sources of energy?
16.:
UTILITIES. Will the propsal result in aL need for>
new ,systems, or substantial alterations to the
following:
a. Power, or natural: gas?
b, CommuriicationS systems?
C, . Water, availability,
d.. Sewer or septic tank? ----
----�
e. Staxnt water drainage? =--=-°
f. Solid waste and disposal,?�--
1x,.
HUHEALTH. Wil
MAN l the proposal result ln:
a. Creagan of ani health 'haza„rd or potential
health hazard excluding mental healthj?
b . >rxposure iof pe�lto P
;o `' otential
p health
hazards?
18.
AESTHETICS: Will, the proposal result in the, ;
o s"�tr"`u,ct`'' n of any scenic vista or view open to
the 'pub Iio, or will 1 the
proposal result in the
creation of an aesthetically offensIve site Open
'to
public views
L -fes
Now
YES
MAYBE NO
19. FtECREATIUN. Will the proposal result in an impact
upon the `quality, or, quantity of existing recreational
opportunities?_
20 CULTURAL RES.OURCES .
a. ill the propo al result in the 'alteration
of or the destruction of a'prehistoric or:
IYistoric archaeological site?
b. Will the proposal result ir. adverse pYiysKcal
or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or
historic building, structure or object?
c. noes- the proposal have the pat, tial to cause
a physical: change whichwould affect unique
ethnic cultural, values?
d, Will the proposal restrict existing religious
or sacred uses within the potential ampact
area?
V. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AP 36-24-17
See ,attached.
k
bi C 1!�SiON OF NVr��ONM -fV7 � �'ye� � �
��A ____'7N At'6-���17
a
_}
Aft
IMF
i o o
at En i nmg�t,,,_
8Vegetation:
Gass os and ..other associated barba ocraus plants,
Blue Oak , I rater i' or Live Oak , Buck Brush,, Pa i son Q.Ikl ioyon ,
White Leaf.Manzanita:
9.
W i l:dl i fe Habitat: Lower Sonoran Life Zone.
Cultural,
. Shviragmen :
10
Archaeological and Hi stor i call Resources i n the area LoW
archaeological sensitivity area.
11
BUt,te,Gounty General Plan des'lonat'ion:-
Agr i cul tura 1 -Res`1 dent i al
12.
EkIstinb Zoning=_ AIMMH-5.
13i
Ex1sting Land Use on"site: Vacant open !and.
14.
Surround i n9 Are;,.
a. Land Uses: Open land and orchards'.
b. Zon'ng ARMH-5 and AR -5:
c. Gen; Plan designations: Agricultural-ResIdontI al
d. Parcel Sizes: Generally 51� acre parcels.
eo Population: CuPrentl y sparse bum °i n-fi 1 t i tib.
15.
Character of Site and Area: Agr i cul tural and opera area>
raps' dl y developing Into 5 -acre hothes i tes.
16.
DearestUrban Area: Orovi 1 l e.
17
Relevant Spheres of Influencer, N/A,
18.
ImproveMenta Standards Urban (Area;: Nc. -
19>.
Fire Protection Service.
a. Nearest County (State) F=ire Station: E1 Media Fire'
Station, ,South of ' Orov i 1 l e and Kelly Ridge Station on
Walnut Avenue.
b- Water AvaltobiI ityl Fire. tanker and Wal is onIy
20
SCJoo i s i n Area OroviII:e Elementary School District and
Oro'ville Union H1gh School District.
LIST OF LOCAL CONSULTANTS
FOR ARCHAEOLOGICAL, BOTANICAL,
AND GEOLOGICAL SURVEYS
B. P. Enterprises
Dr. Kingsley Stern,
;Archaeological
Specialist
(Botanical Survey)
P. 0, Box 1865
Chico State Univ rsity
Chico, CA 95927 -
Chaco, CA 95929
(916) 894-5355
(9'16) 895-5381 (5356)
(9'16) 343-5358
(9'16) 343-0056
Peter Jensen
Jim Jokerst
Research Archaeologist
(Botanical uurvey)
Chico State University
Rt. 1. Box 3720
Ch`3co, CA 95929
Oroville, CA 95965
(916) 895-68.11, 345-9515,
(916) 534-902.9
845-4300 (Office),
Professional Archaeological
Services
6635 Quail Way
Paradise, CA 95969
-
(9`16) 872-3154, 342-'0273
Geologists
Wesley W. Paulsen
Jon Anrierson,.
PRD Engineers & Geologistso
Inc.
Jerold Behnke
13$6 E. Beamer
968 MyrtleAVe►iue
Woodland, CA 95605,Ghco,
GA 96926
( 916) 273-7206
(916) 3434396
( 91,6) 345=2362
Philip Lydon
M
294$ San Verbena Way
Chaco, CA 9592G
(916) 343-9277
7185.
.. -..• f' � }. � i . �,; � +yi n...... ,J "`.' rye ,
. ��.r.... _X_.- • - \' ----�H��� �.� � .�... /_+• ter"—"��a`•.:�.�.: � nG=.K. ..
5'
MODIFIED MEKCALLI EARTHQUAKE
INTENSITY
SCALE
4 `X •.�
"
VIII.
Damage r1inhi in specially designed
L
Not Celt except by a very few under
'
'structures; considerable in ordinary,
specially favorable ctrcumsran ces.
'
substantial buildings, with partial
_su gYt
(I)
collapse; great in poorly built strut.
U.
Felt only by a, few. persons at rest;
tures. Panel :walls thrown out of
especially on upper .floors of build-
frame s'tructur.=, Fall of chimneys,
invs Delicately suspended. olsjectsti
factory ":stacks, columns, monuRtenu,'
may swing (L to IL)
walls. Heavy furniture overturned.
III';
Felt quite noticeably indoors. es.
Sand ,and thud ejected' in theft
pecialiy on upper floors of buildings;
amounts. Clt tti.,r.•s in well water: Per.
but many pcoolei do not recognize it
tons drivintq motorcars disturbed::
as an earthquake. Standing motor-
(VIII-#- to (X}
cars may rock slightly, Vibration like, ,
1.
Damage pmodcroble in .specially
passing of truck. Duration cstimatetL
designed structures; well-designed
(III)
frame structures thrown out of
IV.
During the day, felt indoors by many,
plumb; ,great in substantial buildings:
outdoo z by a few, At night;. some
with partial collapse. Suildings. shift- -
awakened. Dishes, windows, doors
ed off toundations. Ground cracked
disturbed; wall's make creaking s
conspicuously, Underground pipes"
sound. Sensation like heavy truck`
brokest- (IX+)
striking building. Standing motorcars:
X.
Some well-built wooden structures
ruckednoticeably. (IV to V),
destroyed; most masonry and frame
V',
` Felt by nearly everyone,: many
_
structures destroyed with their Coun-
awakcsred. Same dishes, windows,
dations; ground badly cracked- Rails`
etc„ "broken;. a fnw' instances oC
-
bent. Landslides considerable from `
'
cracked plaster, unstable objects- -
aver banks and steep slopes. Shlfted
overtumcti Disturbances of, trees.
sand and mud. W2ter splashed (slop -
poles, and. other ? tall objects;
Ped) over, banks. (X)
sometimes noticed. Pendulum clocks '
XI.
Few, if any, (masonry) itrueiures
,- ay stoo. (V ;to VIj
remain standing. Bridges destroyed.
VL
Felt by all, many frightened and run
Broad fissures in ground. Un.
outdoors. Some heavy furniture
derground pio ines' completely ouE
moved; a few instances of fallen
of service. Earth slumps and land
plaster or darriaged chimneys.slips
ft a►nd Rails 'bent
in oar
Damay. slight (Vt to VII)
greatly.
V.
II
Everyoody runs outdoors. Dama ge
negli;We in 4uildinms of go� design
XII.
Damage oral. Waves, seen on grourr.
and cpnstruction; rlign to Maderala in
surfaces: Lincs of sight Ind :iev -
well-built ordirtari� structures; tom-
distorted, QC jecu thrown upward
rCa`arabla in' poorly built, or„ badl
into air.
designed structures; soma chimneys
..rsons drmn
brbke,,j.. Noticed byi?' 3.
nYotorcarx (VIII—}
TABI;E 1
.u. r
L . _
ca
r
f�1 -RATTLESNAKE
POINT-
X'�YAN6OTTt~`
SWEDES;
GLEVEI AN,
iir (n = FLAT
dQt�'QL RMO r :ILL
0
V' N
a
EF 7
-C Pwic
0
Figure.3A Gaomarpni`c sU-rf+ac-s; Cleveland Hill
area, BUtte CoUr%ty, 111 il9rl indicate end
points or cross-sac ion, Figure
Q
2000 RATTLESNAKE POINT
CLw',rEt ANO HILL FAULT
)s00
WYAN OTTE SURFaC,,ANGOR SURF SWEDES
ACE
1000 TE RFr C 1 ,
500
_ ► r
'pure 3B Cross•-secon view of' the ;,lyandotze and Bangor geomorphic surfaces and the
dissecteal moUntrn fr~:onr to t#te_ east. View.Ng northy, in v;ciniy ei-`-C,2eveaand Ffi ti
cion; end pciints '�An1 uEu
fault. Crt%ss�s arL shown _:on mao, i" i.gure'
REVERENCES