Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout036-310-007::2- IV. ENIT: RONMENT.4L Ii l?ACTS 'rxplanatloons" of a 1 "yes" and "maybe''answers are required on attached sheet(s)) the proposal result in significant: YES I. EARTH. Wil --S MAYBE NO a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substrPctures? b..Disruptions,'displ.acements, compaction or overcovering e of the soilg t C. g Chane in topography o;r mound surface xel'ief features? d= Destruction, covering or modification ox any unique geologic or physical features? e. Increase in wind or water erosion of soils,, either on or off-site? f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach - sands, or changes in siltation; deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or Jake? g. Loss of prime: agriculturally productive soils outside designated urban areas? h. Expo,sure,uf people or property to geologic " hazards, such as earthquakes, landslides' mud- slides, ground failure or similar hazarcls7 2 . AIR, Will the proposal result :in suubstantial i a, Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? b. The creation of objectionable odorssmoke or fumes? " J� c. Alteration of air: movement, moisture, or temperature, or any change' in climate, locally or regionally?' 3.' 'PATER. Will the proposal result in substantial; a. Changes in currents or the course' or direction of water movements in either marine or fresh waters? b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patternss 'a or the rate andsurface runoff? ci need for off-site surface d-rainage impro`+re- ments, inclu6ing vegetation' removal, channel- izati'Oh or culvert 'installation? d. Alterations to the course or flow o£ flood waters? e. Change in the at(C'0 1t of sur ace water in any water body? X Discharge- into surface waters,, Ox' i.n:ally alteratiox'i of surf 4CO water quay ty, `in4lud I ng but 'not limited to .- temperature, d%solved° oxygen or turbidity? V g. Alteration of the"direction"or rate of flow of graund xa:ters ? ' h. Ghang'e in the quantiity or duality of ground wbe s either through direct a[tditi bns or with- drawa;ls, or through irtexcep`tiort of an agtliler, by cues or Oxcavboils? k., ] . gedliCtion' in the al,oun'k of water, otilerwise a'vai iab e for public water 5uppli es? )( `. • Eposuxe a£ people °or property. to water, related hazards such as flc�odiilg? ::2- -3- YES MAYBE NO 4 PLANT LIFE. Will the proposal result in substantial; a;—range in the diversity of species, or number of any species of plants (includingtrees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, `rare or endangered specie's of plants? c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenish- ment of existing species? d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? S. ANIMAL,,LIFE. Will the proposal result in substantial: a. Chan e in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shell ' fish, benthic organisms or insects)? b.' Reduction in the numbers of- any unique, 'rare or ;endangered species of animals? r. introduction of new species of animals into �. an area, or result in a barrier to the migration. or movement of animals? d. Deterioration to e:tisting fish or wildlife habitat? 6. NOISE. Will, the proposal result in substantial;' a. ` Increasers in existing noise levels? b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? k' 7. LIGHT AND GLARE. Will the proposal produce sagni icant light and glare? 8. LAND USE. Will the proposal, result in a substantial altevition of the present or planned land use of an area? 9, NATURAL RESOURCES, Will the proposal result in substantial. a, Increase in the rate of use of ;any natural, resources? b. Depletion of any nons-renewable natural resources? 10. RISK OF UPSET, Will the proposal involve a. A rissk of e,plosgn or tl1e release of }lizard ot.s substances ;�nclu'ding;' but at limited to, . oil; pest cite , chemicals, or radiation) in'tile event ofancc.ident or up'_s,et conditions'?. b. possible interference with an emerg'en.cy, response plan, or emergency evacuation plan? 11. POPULATION. Will the proposal al teTi the locataott, -vi tion', density, or growth rate of the human population'? }{' 1. HOUSIN(y: Z�i7.l t}e proposal affect existing housing, Or create a deimand for additional housing? Ads k, -3- 13. TRANSPORTATION"'" LATTaN. Will the YEs rIA� No result in: proposal a. Generation of substantial additional vehicle movement? b Effects on existing C. parking facilities, or demand for c new parking? C. Substantial impact on existing transportation systems? d. Significant alterations to prese ofnt patterns circulation or _XC movement of people and/or goods? e Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? f Increase in X traffic hazards to moor irehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? X 14: PUBLIC SIJRVICES.Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result- in a need for new or altered governmental services a. Fixe protection? b. poi ice protection? �( c. Schools? d. Parks at other recreational facilities? e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? -'' f. Other governmental services? -�-y 15 ENERGY. Wi11 the proposal result in. - Use of substantial amoun*,s of E'ue1 or energy? b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of enorgY'o or require the development of new sources of energy? 16- UTILITIES. Will the 'Sri osal new systems, proposal result in 'a need for terns ox substantial alterationq fo llowing.-, to the a. Power or natural gas?' b. Communications systems? c. {Vater, avaiial,+i� ity: d. Sewer ox septic tank? X' e. StOTM water dx•aitt;age f: Solid was te and da„sposal? 17., HUMAN HEALTH. Wi�1 the proposal result 'in: a= Creation :. of any health hazard ox pot;cnti'al heft th .hazard (exclud.i ig mental he:al,th ? ' .b. EXposure of people; to potentials health hazards0 � I 8, AESTHETICS. Wi11 , 4he proposal ':result in Che OL strL�ctan of any scenic vista. or view open to the public, or wit the proposal result in ;e creation of an aes,theteally offensive sate ;pen to public view? ... ,'4 „ YES MAYBE NO 19. RECREATION. Will the proposal re�ul't in an impUc upon the quality or quantity of existing; recreational oppo•rtuni'tiew ? 20, CULTURAL RESOURCES. a. Will tile proposal resullt in the altexation of or the destruction of a prehistoric car aeological site?. b. Will the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric ox historic building,- structure or object? c, Does the proposal have the potentialto causC a physical change which would affect u.nique ethnic cultural values? d. Will the proposal ,restrict existing ,religious or sacred uses within,tihe potential impact area? V. D-ISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION See attached