Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout036-540-025.. ..M.. `r w. .. t'M'` Dick J4n11 s LOG 1 90-12-Z0-k...� �.., 12611, Magnolia Road, Grass Valley, CA '9594011 Laura Rivers fY W I)ESCRIpn_JON Tenta ti,067,sitbdivision for 12.45 acre's to be divided 44, 1 Arce ± P,aecels 44 Lots Located on Ghe North side of Mt. Ida Road a roxmatel` 1100 ft. ,East of Foothill Boal evard, East Orovil:learea m36-54-25 &: 26 Alt .......: 1''( Lo4 Defirity CONS STENT? .�'`'",--�-•� Gov cON---CP?�'P.xrCm ,fit" �p0�� � �• 1n1n 26/90 _ K N Y� � A DAT., OF �-v LICMT SICVATURZ ....�..�...... t7I V?3TzCl ACT cbUT �a TS=_v,�.._ Ron,, Graves ;;iz. AssociaCes . y P.O:. Bo:� 986, Oroville,(�=CA 95965 'OlE:CTGP.5 �^,PO.%T 2PXP Z1) ..... .� � .�.°''ltra �...-"Ivy«"•11r. C'.,A�� � s `"' -' �.'.ON — Dki�' .. t �': ,_,�,...�_,,,,........._..�. = "D+A I3 Ii7 aZA-- �w►s1.+r.n... l,l a %LTTG;T= M D CI DRAT Oil - D 'I' ' ADO sI'D E 13 RT STP b: ap) IS2.� . s. , r� .1 ., g + rw r 6 .L = is y�11i �. As NAME OF PAREs T' PUBLIC ROAD, r 71 Td1, ..; ,,..s..»� . DISTANCE TO NEAREST PUBLIC ROAD; 7 (For ' ormatian on'' iearest public road, check with Public'Wa ,� D'�partinl;nt IF ACCESS IS BY PRESCRIPTIVE RIGHT-OF-WAY,, ATTACH DOCUMENTATI��, TU TFiS APPLICATION. 1:F ACCESS IS BY A RECORDED .PRIVATE ROAD EASEMENT, INDICATE DFR i RF*j'Ei',EN�j; VOLM48 PACU IF THERE ARE ANY NO ACCESS, STRI]?S, THESE tdJS7 3E SHOWN OF 7;1i" TEPTlA'�'IVP, {MAV AND THE RECORDING''DATA IlVDICATED. BEIA4t . � tiiOtJME PAGE � DISTANCETO CITY LTMLTS: ,-Ifiiles: f -'POESL THE CTrPTER OF THiS 'PAROLL NOF ADJOUTMG THIS 1'RgEERTY? IN THEW y `i OR AAS HE in crWNF J] LAI�ID Pr , = 0 a , For "Dick Janus _ SIGNATURE OF AT 'ot La1�ra R _. 1vhnr SIMTUREr,QF O4idER OF R:l;CORD FOR OSCE USE ONLY To Subdivis:bdn Cotjt�ttee: To Ad„=isoz�` Agenic; �.._. Take, Action By: _-------------- Appeal. to ,Eoard of Supervisors; Exliixa`.'�ion date; Cotmerit s �ddeipt NLitaber; 0 ,7 I`of;a1 Rec eiVetl By; = puo7 .. LD 102 evised 7.24-80 r _ ` . Yep .���~PI�3L'rS ONF'a'Rtvr _ UOMS 1-4 to be completed ZOp b y applicant.., t r APPLICINT NAME AND ,ADDRESS. PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS �/�l7�J�' S� --^�. ASSESSOR IS' PARCEL NU ER(S):= � f+r PROPOSED USE: 11e following items are to be completed by ttie Plan11 ning Department• ORRM. ZONING( (D LAND��NP,RAL CONSERVATESIGNATIONS ION AGREEMENT. �,wei r' oament /Site Designation Criteria; YES 0 _ —"'�=="�� �a It is recommended that you erfo rm the following checked 'itemsp r` ARCHAEOLOGICAL RECORDS GHECIC BOTANICAL SURVEYGEOLOdICAL ' SURVEY --- ., ry --- YES NO WITHIN DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME % I)EVELOP�IENT ONE. lob Z 2. WITlIN FLOOD PLAIN: Sta,.f D Y �to eterminatione Substantiail eonforms GEtiE:4A1, PLAN: 1. Land Use ~� WITHIN ; SPECIFIC OR: USE PLAN: Z' Conservation 3. Open Space V_" a of Flan 1 2 4 Safety 5 •. Noise WITHIN URBA1F �---- RESRItt E. 6:- Housing -_ If Yes; /� 7� Circulation Name of Reserve. +Ctl4NTS, iAND' USE KLAN: y S Ty- tom_ D,yto Triz G(Itr`h'OpRMAN j17ii Tti>; GENE` REq �N ANDIOrl i nM AWARE Oh` TtTR jOVI sxnFl` bLrL'RhtYttl►Tatd RCC,�i1ZNG' ' - Aoted g ?n. S3 nature of Apple, '1'h3s top rt W 11 a>:pire and be discarded m,;rths frnm �D 1b00B (�ev:serl 6::-8i1 ttia dSztQ of t+ t �sttif } > .2 ENV RONMEPITAL IMPACTS vks :AAvnr ' DISCiiSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION .RTW, will the proposal result in 410110canl; a, unstable earth condMOAS h s I n k The Prgposal W1ii hol�'ef(ect subsurface earth, condjklons. _ geologic ;ubstfUcturest g. r ' b, +r t o' ac ton 6�sruptdon, displacement, otna n r. x This proposal'. Wtli result ;in some disruptloh, dlspiaddr6ant',I compaction and avercoverina of the site as a result, of develc. l� overcoverCng of the soli# Thetes. drivetiotpment Aec of dditional tdensitY { tileo deft staby a nd butldingypadsark�he prWillr atofotk homes) per acre WiII lel n rea"sel"the) rate• and amoU it lof �runof runoff hind n the Upper Wyoan RaV.ine drafnage basin.. The long lean cumulative impacts of surface runoft c inancia emnayibe��reduced ! andachannel teroosiong may`Adcele nd water quality. oulit o slghlficant, both f cutate die Ily'ate An a' by land' assessment of the changes In runoff brought, the, proposed made to do further mitigation development should be mn m A possible mittgation measure ddUld be. the considesatlon of creating i da3onnt} service area dor dta'Lnage WI thin the Wyman RavCne pratnage c, ':Mange )n topography or ground surface , ��"' - k 1 i The pfolect Ore is char-Acte;tized by hill tin Which Will require some gradlOg to accommodate the proposed res dantial deveiopment, � tie] [,at featUrest d. oestNctiOn, coverirtg'ot modlficat'lonany k The project s('te has no Unique phy3lcal features . unie:geologic or physical t�eatures# qu •. -e, fnktza3e In Wind or, water erosfori of 3oiis, k The pr gbUsaf will not cause eroslon-. eIthdr__on or -oft sItea -. fi dF of btaof Chanbei In lmaomodiferohe �j_ The proposal will not affect rtnV Watercourse, sands; or changes Cb ii,ltatIo deposition channel } Which arrives or stream of the bed of the ocean f p. or any, bay, inlet of lake# Lass of pttme agrCcUlttlrayf-_y Pr'CdUctiVe _ ;� X This proposal ,does• rjoi represent a sighi`flEant, `tlss of pt 16d SotIduIJutAI Solis. rhe tsroleot slle is located Wl(hln the urban - Soils outside deslgna`t16d'trrban areAt# ll e, area at orgy - h, txpbsuta of people of propertY to 7eologic X , Alt of but tdi, county r "in a Moderate €arihquake.Interislty zone Y131. Is IocAtO 7000 feet Of the'%vyman Ravine haze{ds such As earthquakkes„ landslides, The project site Within Is located *I1hln mudslides, ground daflUtQ, oi' stmtlar Fault fine to addition,'Vte SWa1n N111',Lineament tee) the ptolec sl to. aue close proitlmlIV of known :hazards? -.r2016 of .to.ihe earingU�tke fau)ts and �n accordance to Che gUtte County setsm(t f safety cenetal Plan ;Element It WHI be npcessA do A s UiVe detetm he �he �fUrther'm�t(gatfoh`'r1ea5Ures y to oetforta a telsmic rtikaa ofn�he survey,, geologic y'11 pro!&iCt,,t�te and tecomlend ah ai 7 necOtAry to,W& �tS the iddhtlfled selsinlo risks t'tl result In sUd stantfAlw , a, All tt emlprnposal ssfons or detarforat on of arablenk tdd y (lid ran A gUai iptroposed project W) I i caul'' ln•, a nuhlulat ydud to related Ihereates In trafficgeneratad`bV tltoArolect« , air gua)1tY# 'the Calitarrila Alt Resources Control beard has Identified c4unly as a Nonattalbfnenl Area (h meeling-. the s hrido tea butte tlf the Cal torn Atr 010AIIIV Act. The butte county Air pollution cont 61 1. —plan Bods, not Addiess air ual.lty Impacts of small resldenttaf. deveiopmentS for pass'Ible trtitigat►art measures, ti SS((( anmera>�41 ,Checklist' *` Evaluation, of 1Enyiz'onmez taY rmpac� w: ;d ENMONHENTAL IMPACTS (Con tlnued) vcs�&ALSTE NO DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION r (Continued) b. The uesP creation 4J ob)ectlanablre odors; smoke or frtj - x Some short term air quality impacts Will probably tesUlt during the cohstNetlorl phases of developing residential I1oUsing, Inueased vehicle and equtoment omisslons as Weil as increased dust durIn site grading 9 and pkeparation will occur, c. Alteration at' air movement,;or � n 16-clImi e, teteration, or any cha ge` to climate,, Y ;' The pr000sar of 1I hot, all fect the atmospherel- laca l or reglahalt Y Yt , w R Will the taposaj result in !� W6UR p `Ubstantjai ; a. Changer in cukrentc, or tlhe coUrse or direction of seater movement s to el thele x 7tae pr'bposal W II not' affect. any Watercourse._ marine or fresh waters? b* Changes In atrtate' an rate's, dratnage The runof��s' of the kart and a 1h got surface _ft proposed project WiII change the ,Absorption rates of the ptojeGt subsequent cod s� tflclent of runoff due. to ch!inges In lantl use And eIand cove . beve r lopment of the pro)ect st'te will,:also impact the concentration lime producing larger and more fregileht peak flows, Slormwatdr man to develop a ndt�my, lead to signitj a efieOvers ad eg the ekisting;; a� les sho+ltd be to tle r da ind,t hc% borated Into the g ad of Ptltc, As m(tlgaticyt ttIgatres ortrtialer discharge „ C . Need for aft=site dg tail dt'alnage Improvements, l np vegetation t oval, _ offsite, A pbsslble mitlgatfon measure could be the consideration of creating a county setvtce area" lot drainage within the Wyman Ravine 'oraihage Basih+ in Addition, adhetenee to drainage standards of the tiutie County public Works bepartment is anticloated to mltlgate posslbie_ImpAct drainage system. _ s to the bralnage Improyemenis'Wtll be necessary to accomnodate thL proposed NOTOCC. see MscUssibn of cU chahneltYatibh at culvert ins aijatlon;• l on 3b above, fid. Altdtatlans tb the copkse or�ftow of -llood waters? x .. The propOsaf (nay CGmG1atlVely Impact flood control channels ori Watercourses. rhe project site drains Into the Upper WYaIn having" bralnage basin which Is known for frequent flooding. see above, DlscUssIon on Sbproposal o, Change In the a"#moot of. to race watdt In An h f Y Water body? _�� x � - The r osal Hill add to the cumulative amount of Water in the Upper Wymah Wind drainage system by Increasing ttotmwatet rUnotr and the ihtensftV of peak flaws. 1. olscharde Into surface walets. of ih any a terattan or surface water qGa It loll-liding �_ _ t�rhe proposer( vri�fect WCII not 'Impact sue face water qua 11ly, but' not 11hil ted to temperature, � dIttoIVed bkYgen or ttirbidliYfi tr Al terr IIUndh aieos;diFectionvr late of -flow W �i k proposal w'i'jl hot affect lit_ T+te op' a dlteelton of tloty or grollhd waters. h, bhahge l'h'ihe quantity°ar qualt.IV 01 gEouhd lyaters, dither through dl rest cddllons,br X ,The proposal Wl nbt directly atrect any aquifer, Wi'thdra'wals. 'of through lntefi,eDl jon of i�ah aquilef by cuts of excavatio-I, itedtictloh ih lheamoUnof w l a er atheFWi'sd � public Walet sup �t 4 The bloposed prosectWf I i not sfgr►tl.�lc'itt1Y Ifidac't pUbl Ic ivatct yilto supplies 11, exbotUbdeofbpe people at Ptopett Water related hazards shell as rloodingt - k 7fle prop` p brat may IntehslfV loading doKnstteaic In Uig Wyman 'awlne Wifltout proper drafhAil canirols and slahtlards, See dlscUsstbn on ab,d, and a above, , i1 a�. Checkla,st EValuata�an o� Env a �c� wi.�irunent nnenta7L :...: / , _B DISCUSSION , OF ENVxR ONMENTAL EVALOARpZON FMVIROMMENTAL TMPACTij (continued) ves UAVs Nd , 7 (continued), A. ANr L�rt. wilt t proposal result in ' suhe s an a Change in Efts of species, of ---- x The diversity of (IIanC species Will be ekpanded as residential Installed, a, of any species of plants (Including species native landscaoos are trees, shrubs, Ora 55 clops, and aquatic hlantst7; b. Reduction of the �of any -Unique, rare x Th proJeGt site �:ontains no rate or endangered: ptanis. .numbers or endangered species of planist i4 C. of plants of �exparr x The proposal Will,not affect sx stthg plant ill,e+ liotnto a�lr�oduactfp� ere to rmal ecies� r,eplentstiment o: I king to -clot?, 1t a n an comms clad Viable agrlcuitUra(crop.' The site does not coht (. V t Y d: Raduct(on In acreage :or any_agrlcultUral _r. i crops 5 ANIAM, OFF., Will (be Proposal result In subs tan a nr° .ri the diYersl'iY . of pedes„ or +...,� a Chdh_ ti; ., • ot. a f n mat ill e heceusg dhc 'si to dqT¢. ntit T4, t Ostl,.,vlti I n f I I a cant. dn�mal I Ito os �Rdtt.t.+,t " umbst._.0 ani {+n t•5°,�,at�hal tblyds. � land anlrmals to IUdtngteptfhe�, 111h and � �,r, .� sheilttsh. benthle or or Insects)t lcontalns''no b RedUctlon in the numbers of a y Unlque, rare X. , the sl is rate dnimtts, Or anintna-1St � 1f UCtion Of neW Sped les of ahimals ihlo _�_._. x anlmal 11 ' h fe.. The pfopOsai Wlll� of aTtCCt exist an area,; Or In a barrier to the migration or moyement of wilmalst, ;a beketir3ratibn ot; existing fish or Wildl!(U i � X The %I to contains I)o signlllcarSf�Wilrjil'le hab�aal. � habita►t' ' W'IIl the btoposal tesULt In substantl:~I: : a� incFcases In existing noise ievelst :_.___ --Z— The �t bstantldl increase i treated on site of In Ihe�vlclnity.. n noise _. ., ". 1. b. trxposttre at people los eVere noise IeVelst x 7hCi proposal will h6i 69' osei people to seVete not'se levels, i p 1. i'Ic n ANO ctuir, �r►.ii Elie bloposal produce -x ,rho',ptoposal WIII not restiltiiI a subtifintlaI increase In light or gfato Created on sl tip o signiticant fight. and glatet reatllt in stibslanl(al X 7hcl1p�oposal.Wt,ll naY. altat file iand'Use In the aces, The ptb(ect square feet g AnbUs .. will the proposal a cera on of the present or planned Land use of art ell's s zoned Art WhIch.Aliow£ one dwel('Ihg Unit per esoo ah11 s designated by ,the dutle CoUhty General Plan as lour Dens llY a ear., Re'I�entiai. The ptopbsed pro)ett conforms to both the general Plan y, MA' 'kes"gs. will the proposal tdtult In su s ant a t rf itltrea&b In the tale of Uto of any natural X 1ht� pr °oral wit not Watt a riY natural resoiJrces, a. 'resourcest lt. bepielton of any noh»tehoiwable hiitUral x _ , fh�� 'i proposal Wlll hot deplete qhY natflral resources. resource s t 'J �I 5 Impact „ ental 1 nenta I CaEnV3X �uata.on (Conti yFR Hued) ��ViRONMRa',yT,x►;L IMPACTi3 ,MAv13E No . DISCUSSION OF. ENVIRONM ENTAL EVALUATION , tconlihut.dt y�, Risk OR lq' �a wlII the proposal involve a,Isk of ekplosloi or rc+ease of itaxarcjous x. The proposal Wiil not Involve the use of hazardous materials, nor Is r such located c16�e to arty facilities which store or utftize Su yl6nces clncludlhe, blit.not ltmttod to, Ali+ 1t9s11cides+ ahamical4'er tatllatlonj Ih material , 1j1e dYd6t bf an accident of upset Wridlllpns3 , b, Nsxlhfe Interference With an `emergency X The propola1 wirl 'riot affect any emergency "services, "tosponse plan or emetgency evacuah on plant POpt1L WIll' the p oposal all IocatIon, X 'Thell not hcaslh proposal Wopo ed !enilkicdoesynolfnc�"a �tpatUrittn+z C +Iu h a�q�Y ., p y s r u I¢n, dens)iy or growth rate 4f the human poputatic3nt � developer in -"he Wa, s�� �� HaUsr x'.3r+11) or^''at',act�d_�isttn9houstng, �1 � X The propas61 W 111 ndt sis's f .4+�� °r ilfie�' It=1llyin� 4•Vrtardu. or r Ai, ti,N'4 'r , r.+ii duutt u r t�� hJus I fig? thiroN/Clrts71LA7�QN i`� M 1.11 the f 9 ; resu c a cenE ".a.tYonot subs anti 1, f� Udit op:� �ohtcle _____ 'a t { ._._ �,,, The proposal Wlil represent an incremental Increase in tta(ilc In the Vehicle a; area. The proposed project will Jenerate approklmatety.44o trips per day, The project site is located on the Southside of the oroVllle Urban area wilh`VetV few Services, Which Will 7equlfe the �r ,n Occupants of the proposed development to commute LO Way Gl ie of Chico tot. emptoymenf, AIM other serYices, Although the 'eXlsting street And day - roadway nelWork ma accommodate 44e more vehlr•le trips per y dividual9y': cUmUlatively the existing Streat network W111 not. addiU on, due to the lack of fUhding,MinsportatIron mpr0ements have not kept Up WTth the groWth ;ih traffic to date. cut rox1rimtelY 1600 how residential lots are beIng created Urban Area. The OtoVllle Area ;: ;. - suntly, to p ih the broville has the potential for sbyerai thousand lots belpg, cteatedF "rhe proposed project WIII contribute to the cUmulative traffic impacts • ''�-� within the broYllie Urban_Arba._ The EhVit`onmentat Impact Report (E1R) 'prepared 16 1963 for the yoning And ,the OroVllle Area Land Use Plan fhdldated th6t the,,presenl.clrculatlon system's capacity' was hot balancetl with the traltic volumes generated by the land lrses allowed by the eeneral Ptah,designatlon and zoning classification, The i4a3'tlR recommended as a mitigation ii�easo"re that the runty and city of Orbv Ile undertake an area Wide traffic 'study t,^+ e,tafitne and pl'An for future circulation needs, It Was Ieconmbnded that the f� Transpot(atlon Study Identify future transportation corfidprs, tfihSnorta'tlon llnprovements, and a Sys to. flnahcp necessary reglbnal transpottatlon imoroVement.,,, The proposed project And ;tesultfrig cumulative traffic impacts idyl alio Impact the yk_Istl g freeway Interchanges along state Route 76.. the ,OAS 'FIFE stated hat by the Ybar 2606 Without sub'stahttal i ahspottatIon_ ilhprovement3 the Level of Set yl Ce on freeway ihfefehanges, And local stteeis Would ddelfho to b or lower. The Cal'IIor01a Ttarrfpbrtalion Comnis'sIonIs policy, fof interchanges reoUlres i_ocal jurisdiction`s to finance the Improvernerll.cb9ts of 164erci�anges at i00%. currently, the county ref 13utte has hap? - i1 to assess tt6ahclaI responslbiflly to local deVeiopment tot thlerehangb.lmoroVeme t costs, I'h order. to evaluate fhe cumlita,A ltafftc I'mPacts got �Ite ppro)ect.on theneed to be developed an t 1 a �Ite lmphct anlr-lysis pe-rtortned,: i q . til n Envxxoremefi."a Chck�.'s c * :valua�� c� off,{i �"nvxronmt,r�ntal JCv ENV°M01dMENwAL IMPACTfi con tInued> yEs MAIL tJ0 DISCUSSION OV ENyikoNMENTAL EVAI,>Z7ATION (continued) ih, effoets,on ext stlno parking facIIIti es, be _ k demand for new pafkingt �` Tho proposal will not affect parking because the proposal will have to comply With the parking requirements contained wlfhin Butte coUnlY code sectlan 24-35. MJ substantial Jmpact on oxlstlltg X sod la6. transportation systems 1p ptesenl patterns X see 13a, _ movement of peopl"e Arid/or, gond3pcuiatiantorailons Allerattons` to t'rierbbfne, rayl of alt X traffic# Tho 'city, Of OfOVllle has seVeraf at-gradd railroad efossings, the Incrremental increase Ill traf f is at 'these crossings;wi.11 Intehslfy the trainmovements and traffic, resulting In traffic antij)d I .cts detWeen coh,bi lion,,, A traffic model lot the oroville Urban area is evarUate potential conflicts between train movements and traffic.to fw increase Gn trafIIc hazards to motor X,_ see 13a,. _ Vehicles, tticyclls s or pedestrlansr —` j%w $ERi=. 011=the proposal have an e/fectllll' upon. or resurl lit A need for naW or altered gov�rronent services'r A. tire protecllan# x_-, The prood$Af WIII result ln,a Incremental increase 16 demand for hire protection in the afeal, The BUtte County Fire Department/california division Ol Forestry has indicated that cumulative development In the county Will Impact their ability ib provide rife ptotecion n SOVlces. The project $Ito Is located within the crovillewryandtioio Irrigation ptstrict Which provides A water system for pressurized tied hydrants„ The Installation of fire hydrants will reduce the Impact fa the flee department tit+ increasing Che tate righting capabilities of the fire-depattment. b, polYce prbtectloni, x .. The proposal WIII result in a incremental Inceease in demand for " � police protection In the area Which cannot be serVlced by the present sheriff's Dep artmehI;. since tgeo the Poo uIA t1,on or au t t o. coun tV has _ Increased by Ovar 254, while at the same time the both 'decreased In personnel by Sox due to fttcai''dlffl police force has cut tlet beFng eXperlerrced by butte County; currently, Butte county has .the IoWest bitleerl per eapila In the "state At recent LegillatiVe-comm tree FieatIngi on tsutte county's Fiscal crtset; county at:?Iclals testified that police ptotectlon setvicet are presently litadequate, and do not meet the 'service ekpectatlohs of the public. continued Np at devetbprrient has resulted In cumulative impacts an police protection Services Which cohtlhUe3 to redlice the Sheriff s Department capacity . to provide adequate police setVlcei« tile ptesent numbef' of subdlVisioh& and p4tedl maps being conslde.ted toe approval th the Oroville AtdA Land Use plan Will o ulation b epptoXtmately Increase the population2,500' people The approvat o of the res denttal 1013 ih the DroVl t I e Area would 600011h6tely 4,000 serVice Wit to, the: Butte' County result to -shetift's nchai3,tment. This rolecti0h Is based on a , a of 1. service will o ' nt will have to peovide m t0a�r oil m I to of year. he ! el i lhh Polito ct lin services of lite bounty to the ap Rtovalaofsthe nU(te,county pro�eianat �t shetitt. sane mitigalian measures`rritght n impact folie addlt oiled _lac 1 tt0 [[ cruder _ps to lurid p i i s and equlpmentr ettabtlsh special finahclnp district such As A6140 -Robs for financing brlIdet t ala` 11101 •;1 provide private }ecurltY pattols� adequate street Ilghilnp, u co0fii.lnate public iln0fNdMe11t9 carefully with the r;hntlff�s Cepartment Ili minimize possible del4Vt to, to$oonse Minas to o'ssttte :a i _ a �sr roriinenta� `� Chec�C� VAI, �zx o, ExaV� rrutton�a� Impact � t ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (continued) ves MAYBE No DISCUSSION Off' ENs1IRONM1bNTAL _EVALtiAT±ON (continued) ematgency access Is 01aint.1ned, and subdNiflon design deters diI(to by enhancing intra-nelghbor`observa'tion hnd recognition, p, schools'? x The proposal will result In a incremental Increase In demand for School services .In the area', school,Impact fees collected "by the local school district Is ant'lcipated:ty,only part ally reduce school ;,. Impacts, P('esently the school % strlct is a capacity and It cutaptly seekintl expansion of t, Tota) school facilltles. TIIe �4> 8%rlIcan I.wlII need to coo dInate w 4 the oroVllle Union, Elementary to f ully ant the Impacts - - st.-ifli f applicant cannot offer lect esewhichion servuce mfYlg tion Ch Impacts on schools to a less than signlIlI level an EIR will' be required. d. Parks or other recrea.tlona;l facilltlest X The proposal'Wiil result IwA incremental inctease In demand for park and recreation tacllltles in the area, 0, IYintenanceof pUbfictacllitles, X 'the resultIn Incr'publementalcre st In the need for Increase (ncludfng pfhancelotill 'k ea. t, other g ovet nmental `iefvlcest _ X The proposal will result In'A Incremental'ihctease_In demand lot all other governmental services in the area, it.r 96Yc KI'I the proposal result Inr ; a, use of substantia l amounts of `fuel or X the pr oposal velli not utlflze Substantial fuel orerlergy, energy# b. substantial Increase ln demand upon eu.IstIIn X_ The proposaI Wl 11not substantially Ilacreaso the demand for energy, sources of energy, or require, the development of new t6ufdes. of enef,yyt 16, =,t'tl�s. G+III the 0r0potA resUI,t In1�a need fast n+fw systems, or substantial alterations .to the frsllot!.11lg. - a, PoweG or n atUral Oast X the p t affect efzctrlcal power of natural OASroposal will no b. conmuli'lcati'pns systemst X ~� rbu s d,lst. I tion Sys toms, Th,._pFoposal� ilial not affect commun,icatlon'syswems, c, °, Water avatlabilltyt X The 'proposal will not affect pUbll'c.Watet system,s� riaztemst sewer or septic sy The proposal will have to meet the requirements of the butte county, _tom, EnVlro mental Health Dept, „1 t_ is proposed„ the project WI If be severe by Lake orovlll e Area h,gbile UtIIItv'bitItIdtti e, 5lor Water 'drafnaOez X . see Ib: ab;> & r. f. sof l:rl wait.e and dis '� iresUl X z a I` :w) l l have a cu" � ton solid waste Elis o the pFop mulatlVe' impac pial', osal` t ln�r� 17. i-r.A" HEAt2N, WI I I the otoif a, ctdatloh of any health hazard of potential X ._ The ptopdsal' Wlft no( creatd Any health, hazard, hazard (ekoludins mental health)3 is. ozute .olpeople to potential- health X _ The proposal will hot ekpose poop le;io any ,heaIth hazard, ha�Eli ardst - 16. qtr-brwltres: will the proposal result in 6e X the p}oposal will not respl"t In an aesthetically otfenslve view co true Ion bt any scenlc.vi�tta o' vl'ew apart to the because It It consistent With surrbUndlhb deveibpmeM , + of. at) f:l the proposal 'resu t 1h the preatlon aticalty site ad otrenslvd open to the; pub] U0 vlewP f �w• , _ to i v. , � (� • ' Checkla.St Evalt� �ra,��rz><mentai NO ©ISCYJSSZON OF E WIRONMENT�AL_E'6'ALUATION 1JV IRONME NTAL IMPACTS (continued) YES Mi1YBE' .r s (cont Inuntl> 11 aE �rloN. wlll the proposal tesula In an Impact x The proposal may result In"art Ihcremental ihctease Mn demand 'for petit recreation faciljlies. upan the quality or. quantity of eXI$ ting and recreAti'onal opportunlllpst 30. ciJ,TtttAt �.t c JnCEs. 1' WI III the proposal result 16 the alte;atiah -�-- The prolert� s - h sensitivity ty fol I to IS Identified to th area of unknow to a physical characterlstics o1 the de'strue(Ion of a prehlslotIC or,historlc- archaeologlcal ptOlett si to 'such a3 a nearby stream', °flat hill top', and relatively the project Site Indy archaeological I!I te? undisturbed area It Is highly IIkeW the contain archaeological resoutces. To determine the potehtlal for 16 rcheological resources it will be'necessary to perform a recortIs check- through. the Department ofAnthropology, califorila state wether University 'chi ca, A record check will Determine An I afchaeologlcai survey of the bropetty will be AecessarV. b, I Wil l_tite proposairesult In adverse physical x'. The proposalwll► not affect historic slte3� or aesihetle efifects to a prehistoric or historic bui`idl+W, structure or obleclt 4 boes the ptopoiial have the poten:tlal to �_ x-.•, The ptWoial,wili not affect cultural resources. C, cause A physicall change wh(ch V:ould affect unique Pthnic clllltufal valuest ' x The proposal Wf not a(fect religious resources, l� d, Wily_ the prdbosa"I fes(It ict ex.istlno religious or saGfed uses within the ai a act areas potenll matt ' \ M, is • „ 1 : , 9 a rc+amental cneC}c1il * Evalu2t�ox o EV II t En'V'ixonmen�al` `7maGt ' I.: ( F� k� V.. E14VIRONMENTAL IMWACTS (IGontinued) ves. MAVes WD DotBCUSSTON O F' ENV7CRONMENTAr� EVALUATION IT. Sri7C3 "aESSTEIS MSZ°:IOA'i' ON MEASURER a. Prephr0 a traitic site, impact ahalYsis to adtlrrtss cumulative impacts of tratflc on tiros l� areaWldo (ranspollatlOn network, 2. Deveiop dralnAge plans to the approVai of the .� p(µ Butts. Caunty pubt3c Works De atlmenl d�� I e nest the to matloh of a county SerVlce,-Area for �in dtalna9e the Wyman Ravine Dral"nage Basin, A. Tu determine the Potential i'or archeologlea) resources it will be nded5sary to perform a Pecor,ds check through the bepattment. of$�,r- Anlhropology, Chico, caillornia State university, A record check -wIII determlAe whether an arthaeological survey of 'the Property wlll be necessary. 5+ NOW& mltlgatlrrn measures to the ar)proyal of ����� the dutte county sheriff to reduce !Impacts oh police!protedtlon services. b. measurestott )lie = theyoiov Unlibn Schon) Distil'cis. -'- conduct A ceologlc survey to determine the seismic r1sk of the project site and prepare mitigation measUtes a necessary to address the Identified risks, U Evir9nmena� Checklist" �r Evaluation,'.of .Enuasznmexitl "Impacti XV. '' �_ — ENVIRONMENTAL IMsACTB (continued) YEs Av9E 1DIStU88ION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION (continued) ENVIRONMENTAL.RErERENCE MATERIAL;. q afce a d Fault ActI ity: Sef$mi ty EIe ent,, utte �ounty Genera _Plan rev Iseo ge71I�� c!'art Map 1'i -2y L1 ueC tfo Potent I: S 'jsmi SSafety ME p( !! i t 11 an revssed o1-77; by Elem t, Bu t� Countyenerai P M p 111-1 subsidence & Landslide Potentia Sg fe t,. butte County General Plan reylse I'-7�, em . bx efi 1; ' CH M i f g Ma lI;1-2, Er son Potrptial: Sal ty Ele t. Butte co�inty Geneca�Iah revised I�77, ebY CHzA1 f a ' Mabb 1I i�8, ,EX arfsive. soils- f'ety Element, Butte, COUnty General Plan reYised:I-7� by CN,M Hill'. M p lV-i, Noise Nofse f=1 t Butte County MIn Plan revised 1--77, by CII I I i, Gene ,. _t Map V-1, Seei,�h v s. Scend c� -1 ! ghgyYCHF v1ep? I I Bu G t Colin VY �enera n rdV i seT. p 111 ', Natural r1re Ha a Clas' es: ` Safety L�%Ine at,utte county General Pan revised i-77, by H i l i 9, Archaeological Se ftfVity h9ap by James P MannCngr for Butte county �l�atining Depattment, 1981 " 10« 'cho l 01 Butte CoUnty' Planning blstrlet Map, epar 11 • i Nf tra� stud Sap, N esou°ce1 83 b�,i t6a ca Concent 16s, Ua ,in T? w Vye�,s, e artmeht o . aters r hweste Te Resources rn lstr�ct, Agencji,.fate o Callfornfia, 1 AN rljc, tura'f P eserve N1ap,�estabi`i'shed b+ResoIutlon -178, Butte county Board of Supervisors, q =' eceer 51 11987: 13. Progr�q, Federal mergaency Management`'Agency, 1 988 141 USCS Quad Maps, gahgor, 1969 Photo -revised; 15, oil lapp: r�`hieo �19 5)IOro'VI l le' (1926) Area, hepar meht I Aat cu t. e, 16 6) A't"ea f Q 5. 5 d"roVe f1�; soil Survey o chirocu 9 2 f Agr ur.., ' U, f l .r 17_ .Department O ;,. gtjouti _ i=i e Protection..jurtslic•ttins an ;lid rsp Butte Cou ty f.i re De a€anent and e art H a County en> of orest►y• Plahnng Department,