The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About038-080-008PLANNING COMMISSTON ST7MMARY --SHEET FOR LAND DIVISIONS APPLICANT Dale Antonowich Log# 85-�07.-09..01 ADDRESS 2905 House Avenue, Durham, CA1�`Sr OWNER Same PROJECT DESCRIPTIO tV A TPM Tina I C ._188 acres on t?roLr zoned A-20 _ . LOCATION On the north side of House Avenue, approximateljr 2800 ft. j �+e s •L` its intersection with Pratt Avenue, Durham Area. ASSESSORS PARCEL NtTMB aR(S) A.P# 38-08-08 ZONING A-20 GtN PLAN ----- —_._.� � PROJECT CONSISTENT? DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED July 9,1985 Sierra. West u` rve�yln` , ;y r "'---•----�,� ac < a.ve r., ;"Par DATE PUBLICATION NOTICE WRITTEN PUBLISHED�� PLACE NL14SWER NOTICE,(S) P0'SLISHED - 0. Co P. G, B. DATE MAILING LIST PREPARED DATE rD1TL-OUT NOTICES WRITTEN.._, MAILED ..�...� NUMBER DATE P"'11ING DIRECT'OP � 8 REPORT p,PZPARED ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION AND DATE �j - CATEGORIGZ A, EXEMfiION - DAV FILED ------..._. NEGATIVE DECLARATION - DATE ADOPTED, -I wGr> MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION - DATE. ADOPTED ENV. IMPACT PBPORT DA'C'E CERTIVIED SND» COY14ITTEM MEETING DATE ADVISORY AGENCY H:;ARXNG DATE _ ADVISORY AGENCY ACTION l .BOARD ACTION -- CO�tMk;NTS APVJ,,,N1,n1X H NOTICE OF DETERMINATION POSTED: AEMOVE; 71 TO: Office of Planning and Research FROM: Planning Department 1400 Tenth Street, Room 121 7 County Center Drive Sacramento, CA 95814 Orov3Ile) CA 95965 or County Clerk ab Y" County of Butte F6t! SUMECi' filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with SeAon 21108 or of the Public Resources Code. AUG 151985 -/t 85-07-09--07. ,tip r ;'ty CIctW piojec't Title AP # Name Tentative Parcel. Map 38-08-08 Dale ;Antonowich ' tate Clearing 4Dse Num Contact Person Telep one hobe_ (if submitted to Clearinghouse) John Mendonsa, Public Works (916) 534-4266 'o eco Lcrcatlon. On the north side of House Avenue, al prox. 29:00 feet West of its intersection With Pratt Avenue, Durham, ect -Description - Tentative Parcel Map dividing 20 acres into two. Parcels, one of 2 acres and otie of_.18 This is to advise that the Butte County Lea .Agency or Responsi le Agency has approved the above described project and has made the following determinations regarding the above described project: 1. The project . will, will not, have a significant effect on the environment. f 2. An Environmental 'Impact Report was prepared ;for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provlslons of CEQA. Vto EIR or Negative Declaration and record of project approval may be examined at*- Butte County Planning Department 7 County kunter Drive+_ oroyi 9� bti_,- �• were not, made a condition of the approval 3. Mitigation measures ., wr►ere, ,,, of the project, 1. A statement of Overriding Considerations was, ,�; was not, adopted for this projector gJate 9ecelv,6d for filing 8.14.85 Si re Stephen A, Streeter Senior Planner.__ _ `' �tevlsed 3 anuary 1093 COUNTY OF 'BUTTE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 916-534-4266 516.534-4339 August 12, 1985 Dr�1.�: Ant+�nowa.C17 RE: AP 38-08-011 Tentative 1"ItTf,' Mtlr) 2905 110u. - Ave. Dur %%% CA 95938 Deutz Mil Antonowich: At the; regular meeting of the Butte. County Advisory Agency held August 12, 2965, the Agency adopted the negative declaration AP regarding review and approved the tentative parcel map for subject to the conditions as listed on the attached sheet. If no appeals are timely filed within ten (10) days of the date of the Advisory Agency's approval—with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors this action will be final. When 'the conditionsofapproval areco plied witho utte Coui county l l be int be for you to file you. final maprrwith the of Public Works for recordation within twenty-four (24) months of the date, of approval by the Advisory Agency If you should have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office: Very truly yours, William Cheff Director of Public Works 1 In en nsa itant Director JM/ns Attachment cco, Planning - Environmental Review Environmental Health Department sier:va Vest Surveying LD 1110 (Revised 24844') wie J!3 p�rriiie, �,a114orit►lA Dale Antonowich, TENTATIVE: PARCEL MAP 'House .Ave a , parcels on,t.hrs ltrartl► side of pprox 2800 ft, west of its intersectior► with Prntt Ave, Durham area AP 35-o8-o8 ingineers Sierra West Surveying Public Works conditions I. Deed to the. County of Butte 30 Vt, right"of-way fr' u► t.t►+= (at��►ter7 House Ave. ne of 2. Indleate a 50 ft. building Setback from the cenberlir,,(.« if i° m.:u'e Avo 3. Sh*w all e�ise:r;cnts of record on the fir►al ;nap. 1�. Provide permangnt solution Por drainage. construct to cnanty Standards. '' � new ar r�xi;'ting, and 5. Obtain encroachmierit errrlit for all drive,,m y'VN r► 6. ,Pay any delinquent tars or current t xes as regjrir,,rl :lealth Dept coed i ti ori Pr.avidr a 100 ft Ita Etyl.rl,9 free n-tb5ck aro,md exin ingwellseithor wit::hirz :tie propor'"y or witrfjin J(..n ft. �f f;hrY pr°:,prr. f,y boandarie.- FlInnning Dopt, er+rrditlo'.tr t ell Prior t,,-, t:h�- divisiou Zt°ir►t Ctiv�,, t'}9('. jwner- or awrp r. =f th(, k,r: perty it cl.udr:,j in t;he ap-pr:,�ved df>uf�la)p: ont plan ;.€:xl L nr..c Jtej and eal�Se to be rete urd(:d in f hE� Iffile i>le of th�� .c�ar�lr>r of R,, te ( ar�nt:y 4 restriction binding „pon t.ho �.riginral ti': (*'rs, th(fir h+,,irs suceessorr- %ad asci gno, whioh 'idd itinna l ' l.d inac f"r )m being l.w.; I t,e i 'Zn the pr,+pr�rtY Until ri th r f" the VA I)ringor.curs; a? the property i� rezoned to any )t,her "i-rlub) at ]�,� t ten yt°,,jr� has elapsx,� frr.,r date of rcc.rdutik�n, and the c"+amrrxiti� it r� fin,jr; circ ;}tarrrr�: regarding miid proporty and othf,r properties in thr, antra havil 'hinged ^�u.fficientl.y recansµ.der bier Matrictiort. show On the final map Ulat Tolildi ig;I lit, parorel, P t), 'b"3 11mit1 d t,-) thorO „qtr awn on t,ho reap di It nd Mair 23) 1.98�i .:,ubrri.t'ted by ,'i -ra Wa ,tet, Surveying, on Vile with the L'Ztte C'u'te►ty Planni4r, Pent;, ltd. Plracr, a note on t4he f it'al iwip that, building on Prcr,i, 1, to be limited to one dwellings %mo Col, b�tiiny may" TO; Advisory Agency FROM Dave Hironimys, Planning StafQ SUBJECT: Environmental Analysis and Nanning Director Report for Dale Antonowich Tentative Parcel Map, Ap 39-08-09, Log # 85-07-09-01 DATEt jttly 29, 1985 The attached initial study was prepared fear the'Use permit to allow this segregation, and is sufficient for consideration of this current project which is a Tentative Parcel Map to allow the division of q0 acres into two parcels, one a+ 2 acres and one of 18 acres. The present zoning is A-20 (Agricultural, 20 acre parcels). The Land Use Plan Map a+ the Butte County General Plan designates this area as Orchard and Field Crops. There are no specific or community plans far the area. The proposal does not conflict with County Zoning nor any adopted at, Proposed element of the Butte County General Plan nor any County, specific Or community Plan. Recommend approval subject to the fallowing conditionst 1. Prior to the division box, vQectivol the owner or ownonz a+ the Property included in the approved development plan shall execute an(j tatIss to be recorded in the office of the Recorder a+ Butte County a restriction binding upon the original owners, their heirs, successors and assigner; which disallows additional buildings from being located on the propyruv until either of the +allowing accurst a. Tile property is rezoned to any other zone; or b- At least ten (10) years has elapsed from date of recordation# and the 0041miWan, finds circumstances rogaredinq said property and other properties in the area have changed SuNiciontly to rocon5idor tho restriction, 2, Show un the final map that buildimgs on Parcel I to be limited to those shown on the map dated 5/21/05 WbMitted by Sierri-.t West Surveying, On file in the BMW County RIAnn 09 Department. 3. Place a neat o on the final map that building on Parcel I to be limited to Ono dwelling. DINH: I k act Dale Antonowich Werra West Surveling APPENDIX P COUNTY OF BUTTE ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST DORM (to e complete y Lea Agency) Log 985-02-26-01 AP #38-08-08 I: BACKGROUND 1, Name of proponent Dale Antonowich 2. Address of proponent and representative (if applicable) 2905 House Avenue Sierra tdest Survjl Durham, Ca. 95938 5431 Black Olive _Drive Paradise, Ca. 95969 3. Project description Use Permit :,p: _— _, ' II, MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNILUCANCE Yrs a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause n fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eli'mina'te a plant or animal community, reduce the ,number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b. Does th:u project have the potential to achieve short-term benefits to the_dctriment of long-term, environmental ,goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief period bf time while 'brig -term impacts will endure into the future.) MAYBE NO x c. Goes tite project have impacts which are individu ally limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) d, Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human 4?C beings, eitlrcl' diroetly or indirectly`' ItI, ItITi:RIINATIO'N ('ro ho .completed by the Lead Agenrv) oil the basis of this initiarl L%valuation: I,�IVI; find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NVGATIVF NCLARATION will be prepared. IJWI: find tlint al>thou911 the proposed project could have a signiti.- " - Cant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the MITIGATION MtASURI:S described on the attached sheet have boon addOd to the project, A N11GATIVII Hl?CLARATION will lie prepared. Ll1V . fins, tite proposed project MAY have a significant offect ed the environment, and an r -MI OVIII,NTAI, IMPACT RhPORT is required, iiA'Pi . i�Inrch 19> 7985 �. t'Ctili 7'1' cw IIIIT'ITi PUNNYNi! DppAlt'11.1HNT c s Hitnni:mus Assoo�dte 1ldhter4 // y RoV10w0d bt ",M ON //l IV. ENVIRCNb!ENTAL IATSr xp anata.o� nsU-�al 11yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached sheet(s)) 'SES MAYBE N 1. EARTH. Will the proposal result in significant: --`""" �' a Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? b, Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil?cr c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? d. Destruction, covering or modification of any ""— unique geologic or physical features? e. Increase in wind or water erosic,, of soils -`` either on or offs -site? f. Changes in deposition or erosiofi 0.0 beach sands, or changes in siltation, depo pit -ion or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or an bay, inlet or lake? g. Loss of prime agriculturally productive soils `-`- outside designated urban areas?, h. Exposure of people or property to geologic —' hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud= slides, ground failure or similar hazards? XC, 2 AIR. Will the proposal result in substantial; Air a` emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? b . The creation of objectionable odors, smoke or fumes? C4 Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperature, or :any change in climate, locally, or regionally? 3. WATER. Will the proposal result in substantial: a Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements w either marine or fresh seaters? b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns,' or the rats: and amount of surface runoff? � C, Need for off-site surface drainage improve- ments, including vegetation removal, channel-' ization or culvert installation? r d. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? e: Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? f. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? gAlteration of the direction or rate of flow` of ground waters ? h. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or !V,th- drawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? i-. Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? j Exposure of people or property to water related 'hazards such as flooding? ........... YES MAYBE. 4. PLANT LIFE. Will the proposal result in substantial, a. Change in the diversity of species, or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass,rops,, and aquatic plants')? b. Reduction of thecnumbers of any unique, rare or endangered species Of plants? C. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenish- ment of existing species? S. RE i. 8. 2 10. d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? ANIKAL LIFE. Will the proposal result in substantial, a. C aange—in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shell fish, benthic organisms or insects) ? b. Reduction in the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered.species of animals? C . Introdu--tion of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration. or inovement of animals? d. .Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? NOISE. Will the proposal result in substantial,-, a, ncreases in existing noise levels? b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels?' LIGHT AND GLARE. Will the proposal produce signs leant light and glare? LAND USE. Will the proposal result in a su stantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? NATURAL RESOURCES, Will the proposal result in substantial ! -' a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? b. Depletion of any non-renewable natural resources? RISK OF UPSET. Will the proposal involve, a. A ra.sTt� explosion or the release of hazard- ous substances (including, butnot limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? b Possible interference with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? POPULATION. Will the proposal alter the location, T1s`tribution, density, or growth rate of the human population? HOUSING. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or oreate_a demand for additional housing? NO YRS KIM NO 13. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Will the proposal result in: a. Generation of substantial additional vehicle movement? b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? C. Substantial impact on existing transportation systems? d. Significant alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? 14. PUBLIC;SERVICES. Will the proposal have an effect upon, r T� in a need for new or altered governmental servi,c-s a. Fire protection? b. Police protection? ~-- c. Schools? d, Parks or other recreational facilities? e, 'Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? f. Other governmental services? 1S. ENERGY; Will the proposal result in: ai Use of substantial amounts of fuel,or t, ,rgy? b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the devel;opmelt of new sources of energy? 16, UTILITIES. Will the propsal result in a need for newsystems, or substantial alterations to the following: a. Power, or natural gas? b Communications systems? c. Water availability; d. Sewer or septic tank? --�- e. Storm water drainage? f, Solid waste and disposal" 17, HUMAN HEALTH. Will the proposal result in: a. Creation of any health hatard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? 18. AESTHETICS. Will the proposal result ill the oT�s`tru !if any Scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? .4 _ YES MAYBE NO 19. RECREATION. Will the proposal result in an impact upon t F— upon or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? 20. CULTURAL RESOURCES. a; Will the proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site? b. Will the proposal result in adverse phys.;caX or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure or object?' c. Does the proposal have: the potential to cause - a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? jam' d4 Will the proposal: restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? V. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AP 38-08-08 See attached AP 38-08-OQ lb,Zb,+: Parcel 2, the two acre site of the huller 40d dryer, is currently mostly overcovr-ed and potentially could boCamw totally oyercovered resulting in Rome increase in runoff into the roadside drainage ditch. Because of the proximity Of the ditch and the existing degree of overcovering any increase would not be considered to be significant. Ig: No further lost at orchard land in expected since the huller and dryer are already can -site, lh: All at sutte County is within a moderate earthquake intensity zone VIII. The subject property is located in the general vicinity of a possible lineation. No historic faults have been recorded along this lineation and it is not considered significant, The property is located approximately 10 miles northwest cat the Foothill Shear Zone which supported the 1975 Oravillo oarthquakei Construction at any new buildings to Uniform Building Cadiz for seismically active areas should provide adequate protection to residences on people working in the area in case of seismic activity, 4d: The huller and dryer in already onsite and no further reduction in agricultural crLPS is expected, 6at Noise from the huller and dryer is already being experienced in the area and is such thorn will be no increase in existing noise lovely. iza,alf: Trucks and workers accessing the site currently use roads in the area and no significant increase in this traffic in expected. l4al4volq While thorn may be come increase in iJ-. future in traffic due to expanded operations no significant increases are expected- z,oat The subject property it located in an area of high archaeological significance. An archaeological survey is necessary in o"dor to determine whether this site tootains any significant archleulKical artifacts- (The engineer has indicated that an archaeological nurvey has been ordtrUdi but that it will not be cQmplotod until after the 10 day review period is COMPIKOM DDH : I r - 7. Air Quality: 000d" except during time of agricultural burning and spraying, | 8. Vegetation: Almond orchard ' 9~ WildyifeHabitatg Small birds andn�m 1 orchard landsa a s common to valley 10, Archaeological and Historical Resources in the area: Area o+ nigh archaeological sensitivity. 11" Butte County Geh~ al Platd i Crops � e� Qnation: Orchard and Field ` 1 ^ Ellisting Zoning-. A-20 ' A. Misting Land Use on-site: Almond orchard Arid IM almond ' huller and dryer 14. Surrounding Area-. a~ Land usest Agricultural usos and scattered residential ^ uses at rural densities~ b" Zonirig t A-20. A -4D nearby to the g~~~~egt "C. Get. Plan designations: Orchard and Field Cr ops.d" Parcel Sizes: General 20"80 acre Parcels to the north east and west, 520 acre parcels to the southand ' southeast° a|. Population: Rural 15- Character of Site and Areas Agricultural ' a area with residential uses at rural densities, ~ 164 Nearezt Urban Arceat Chico -�~�~~" 174 Relevant Spheres of Influence: None l8° ImPOOYemtnts Standards Urban Area» None M Fire Protection Service: ' a° Nearest County (Stake) piro Btationt ��ta��oo 45 l�D�rh m - ~ 6^ W� er Av��i��l�� Ws�l1� �n6 fire t� ~ + � ^ �0 Schools ^�x~ anker only ~ o� � �n A�^ Durham \�Ml�i dG�.-�- - __ ~�.. , � School District `- BUTTE COUNTY' GENERAL PIAN CONFORMANCE REPORT FOR PARCEL MAP OR SUBDIVISION MAP I'tems'l-4 to be completed by applicant: 1. Applicant Name bnd address /'f/'o_ I)r,-AD n U tv/ c � 1 2. Project 'Description /4 '-e r• // L4/ 3. Assessor's Parcel. Number(s) 4. Proposed Use The following items are to be completed by the Planning Department: 9"' Co. I fanning Comrm AN .6 '98S Prov ' I Cdilinr 4 Curtenit. zoning - t' �} Land Conservation Agreement: e+. ` General Plan Designation s" if la[" kr f " , IA, 1-Joa Appli lible Conditional Criteria: Not Applicable r Agricultural -Residential YES NO 14 Agricultural Compatibility ,- 2. Water & Sewer Capacity 3. ,Adequate Fire Facilities 4. Road Capacity & Maintenance 5. Access to Commercial ;& Schools Orchard & Field Crops 1.i* Preclominar�r 5-117 Ac Parcel. Size 2 Vicinity of Urban Boundaries 3. Agrid. viability not impaired Staff ])eterm nation: Project does .l_.: does not substantially conform to the General Plan and zoning. Comments y — r,' -:3-- f / _T, � l Staff Signature=-- Date . AS THE APPLICANT `ORS = REQUESTED LAND DIVISION, I AM AWARE OF T11E AtOVr STArF DETEAMNATxON REGARDING THE CONFOV ANCE WITH THE GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING, bated ------ gApplicant.( . 1 Si nature of LD 1000 (rev"i.sed 6-$0) MMIWI ', dA Woo