Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout038-120-049� :. •� � � ��.. orb. � � x �� �� . ' P . 1 B • . � l 1' ^a6 ' •r I o• a� •x a 1 A • q .0 � •1 1 1 i 4 f r ♦ , • .. , ,FIS^ � • 1 •t'�.°d`y^.Gi�X '•`f•Ygi�4� �5 itf,^"p! 11 ^r Cl!.r ��il ��'Y1�•�Y�_4 i:i.;' 4 riWN ri i� :v '� �_ ,� �'�..,�� �r %i ... ii. �.jx. f•-! V i,+ r L ti •. .77 ,. PLANtd � � _ ING COMMI�uS3C?I� SYUIIRARY SH ;JET FC►Xt LAND t VISIONS APPLICANT C•W �7ohnsari Lo µ#86-1I-13-03 ADDRESS P., 0, Hoy 6~33, Chid,, CA 95927 -. A��ThTER Same PROJECT DESCRIPTION ',TPM Waiver APP cation `to 'diVa,de- i�6 acres to create parcels; .Z� Ares+-; 1-200 acres+--1---4-00atbyg'S:�- LOCATION:, east. of. Aguas Ferias Road, south of, Ora nland Rodd and west 0 f Butte Creek, Durham area ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER(S.j 38 12-�i i r,TF)l3r 4149,50 & 38-07-10 A-40.. Orchard & , 7t?NiNG `GENERAL PB.�N, PROJECT' CONSISTErTT'? GENERAL PLAN CONpORh1ANCE REPORT VATE' OF APPLICANT SIGNATURE ,LANA CONS8RVATION ACI CONTRACTS? r PATE' APPLICATION RECEIVED NoVembei: 1.2, 1986 AGENT/SURVEYOR/CIVIL-ENGINEER: Rower A;�'soci.ates ADDRESS P.O. Box 885, Chico,' CA 95926 DATE PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT PRLBARELI ENVIR I�RONMENTAL CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION �_ DATE FILED . AND ION DATE NEGATIVE DECLARATION DATE ADOPTED MITIGATED :NEG. D8CLARATION DFTE ADOPTED ENV. IMPACT REPORT DATE CERTIVIED ST.A'L#', CLEARINGHOt�SE N0: SUB COMMITTEE MEETING DATE ADVISORY AGENCY HEARING DATE ADVISORY AGENCY ACTION - APP ALE D CTIONPEALED APPEAL HLARINO DATE BOARD ACTION GOtWDNTS FOR PLANNING DIRECTOR S o .' M�" N7E•' D E'TIMZd u 'X0: Office of Planning andea hL' 1400 Tenth Street, Room 1 '""" F Butte County Sacramento, CA 95814 r Planning Department 7 County Center Drive or MAROroville, CA 95965 _ County o f rk Bu CANDACCJ° GRUSBS ggaits Co. Clerk County of Butte A. JACIFAI gY _ Doputy j SY.T,8..7ECT - g � Filin of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21108 or 21152 of the Public. Resources Code. Project Title AP fl Name Waiver Application 38-12=5 et,:!. State ClearinghouseC.W. Johnson ` N `-- n umber Contact Person (if submitted to Clearinghouse) Telephone Number Public Works John mendonsa Project Location5344266 _ East of Aguas Frias Road, and West of Butte Greek, Durham area. south, G?'iriland Read Project Description TPTVI Waiver Application +.:o didid(-: 1.6196± create four parcels, at 400, 240, 400 and 656.89 acresres to This is to advise that the Supe Count Advisor: A enc ha approved the above-described (Lead Agency or Respponsible Agency) _scribed project on March 30, 1987 and has ;made ate the following determinations regarding the above-described) pro0ect Thero ect P j environment, _will, _?C Will, not, have a significant effect on the 2• An Environmental linpact Report was prepared for this Pursuant to the provisions of CEOA:, project X A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project Provisions of CEQA. Pursuant to the 3. approval o measures were, X_i�eee not, made a condition of the approval of the project, 4, A statement of overriding considerations for this 'o_ct: as, ro,1 P X—was not, adopted This is to certify that the final EIR with comments and responses and record o. project approval is available to the general public at;f Butte County Planning Department 7 County Center Drive Otbville,, CA O;v965 Date Received for FiII,,ig and Posting at OP Signature Stephen A, streetet, 26, yj[y YYS ff µµ II y Boo Co. plAnhin� NAR' �M1:.�'-�,.23198, HU _ — -�D,EPARTMFNT OF pUL3LIC WORKS WILLIAM (8111} CHEFF, Director 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - oROVILL11, CALIrORNIA 95965 ,. Tclepbonev 19i6��J�1�-%6gi RONALD Do McELROY Deputy Director CERTIFIED MAIL. March 23 1987 Re; AP 38-07-10) 38-12-3, C. W. Johnson 5►9,31,32,33,44,49 & 50 F. 0. Box 633 _Chico, CA 95926' .Dear Mr. Johnson-. Advisory Agency held on At the regular meeting of the Butte County' March 23, 1987 the Agency adopted a negative declaration of environmental roved the tentative waiver application on the above- mpact end approved approval listed on referenced property subject to the conditions of aPP the at"tached sheet. It no appeals are timely filed—within tell(10') days of the dace of the Advisory Agency's approval--with the (lerk of the Board of ; Supervisorgi this action will be final. The conditOur ions of approval must be compl.iod with within enentyrWhen (24) months from the date of approval by th Advisory Ag Y• the conditions of approval are complied 1�r.lth, the land division will be considered complete. If .you have any questions regarding this gia.tter, please contact this office. Very 'truly yours, William Cheff D;irec or o£ Public Works l hn Mendonsa A ,sistant Director JM/ss Attachment Went cc 01anning Depar environmental Health Department Romer Associates .... ....... a C. W. Johnson,; Waiver Application, AP 38-07-10 and 38-12-3, 5, 9, 31, 32, 33, 44 and 50, 4 parcels located east of Aguas Frias Road, south of Grai.nlf;ind Road and west of Butte Creek. Durham area. Engineer; Roper Associates Public Works Conditions: le Verify legal access;. 2. Provide two-way traversable access RS -8 -LD -I to each parcel from R, county maintained road or state highway. Note may be placed on map regarding road construction as a condition of building permit. 3. Access to be reserved in deeds ase P r county ordinance.. 4. Pay any delinquent taxes 5. Submit deeds for checking to Dept. of Public . Works. 6. Verifythat at, partial reconveyance and/or modification of trust deeds has been accomplished, if necessary. Health Department condition: 7. Either prow :ne required usable selvage disposal area exists on each parcel or provide ,for compliance with the Subdivision Ordinance Standards for the Creation of Agricultural Parcels fore Continued Agricultural Production, a "inter-Departirmoni ! Memorandum TO: Butte,C6unty Advisory Agency FROMc Planning 'Director ,. SUBJECT; Report on Tentative Waiver Application for C.W. Johnson on AP438-1.2-3 38=07-10 DATE; March 9, 1987 This is a proposal to divide 640 acres to create 2 parcels. The presew,, zoning is P.,-40{Agricultural. - 40 acre parcels) . The Land Use Plan Map of the Butte County General Plan designates this area as Orchard & Fiel_d Crops. There are no specific or community pans dor the area. The proposal does not conflict with County zoning nor any adopted or proposed element of the Butte County General Plan nor any County, specific or community plan Recommend approval. LT : j mC cc: C.W. Johnson Roper Associates •r APPIINDIX to ` COUNTY Or' BUTTN' 13NVIRONMENTAL CHECKLTST FORI`1 (to ,)e complete byLendAgency) Loi #86-11-13-03 AP #38-12-5 etc. x , 13ACKG Rte._ 1. Name of Proponent C.W. JOHNSO 2: Add ess of proponent and representative (if applicable) C.W. Johnson _.Rnp�r Assoc.a.a.#�s`es rP p�_BGLX��.�.� , P.O. BOX o33 CA 9�7 Chico, CA 95927 Chico, Project t.211 t desorpta.cll� Waiver App�.ca s or �Ir,NTPICANc� Y15 D1AYii NO II. 1`iANDATORI� pTNl)TNC `� __.. a Does the project have the potential to degrade the substantially reduce quality of the environment, ,• cause a the habitat e{ a { slulati.onxdtoidroppbolOW self .fish or 1Vildli f;e p p sustaining levels, threaten to el i,millate a plant or animal. community, reduce the numor restrict the number l Or ra`rlge of a rare or e►idangered plaint or animariocis eliminate important examples of the maijor p Orr California history or prehistory? ` >>. poos the project have the potential to achxovteltrrF short-term benefi-IS to the detriment of long- environmental goals? (A short term impact on tilt environment is one which occurs in a relatively' brief period of time While long-term impacts brill endure into the :rutu re , ) C. Does the rprgja:ct Have impacts which are ina'i.vidttr ally limated, but Cutttulatively considerable? IA project may impact on tuor or more separate resources , av elv tVtere the impactelresource lilull but �v1ere theeftectofthe total of t is significant.) xnlpacts on the ettvironmonthoso d, 1}ocs aIle project have env.ironmen;tal effects which will cause substantial aCinal,ieffects on human boinias y either directly ot �tll'i'T?T:Df1NATCGIN �(To bet eamidcted by the l,o�ad Agency) oil tile laasis or thisi1titiatl rv,llu,it lont 1 't"lVl? t) -MAWI l't1W wi 1'1 be preparexl fijWi1 l'incl they l,loilc,5rci llruJc+ct t"tytfi..ly NOi' have ,:G 411;t1ti`imilt e(`i'eCt till the env i e0litt►ent , It d ai Ni G A r.�. ' posed ti.e, 5Ilc�Could tli fa atlthuvitipro not not beaSgniric nt ljyYl, find that Cat1t effeet oil theIitnmcle doscvibed C111 rkrecr in this case becauothedrTVCNAN11MATTVII the attached �heot have he rllto tile project, � lyi1Ci,ARATION wilt be ilr'c+ilnt rcl.r 11-13 rind the proilosc+d project h:,i`have a sign riewit orrect oil `r the 011vi1`otlntent; and un 11011V O N'C.Ai. ` MPNCT REPORT is required. j 8 6 :G�11N1'Y Ola 1111T1 l:, MANNING, TVIIAR MI r �' Docernber 11 Lauta >~?:� T. tCle AsSoc�a Fl ilner Rev.i owed by .'r. i d"'"� r "f .r^.. -o "`s" ''�'� �' ,..�,.'� �` ..,,., r A� art'._:,;, � ...at � ��..+t�'t 41 .� 1•�9 �� �7or i �ar"��-r 3n, e 7 ,-.'"r K"? 'tl�^; ,^. � � ♦ .'t 1 it + � 4 4 w ,� �7 X Q t r 'i, � A + r +i Y r* a r' � m+ � '+, , ', o � d .d � + . ,. ': w' � � . R ; q'I� � wS; } 1`'M , � �!� �j i� ' � •V r /,rµ c" , . '� . � r r FACTS IV. ENVIRONMENTAL xp anatxons o a Tl"and "maybe" answers are required on attached sheetCs)) 1-. EARTH; Will the proposal result. in significant; YES Unstable MAYBE No a. earth conditions or in changes in b. Disruptions, displic acements, compaction or -- - overcovering of the soil? c Change .in topography-or ground surface "-- relief features? d. Destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? e Increase in w•ind.or water erosion of sails, either on or offs-site.? g p f Chen es in deposition or erosion of beach sands. or changes in siitati.on, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or ybt y: lake? g. Loss Of primeagriculturally productive soils outside designated urban areas? h Exposure of people or propert)T to geologic hazards,such as earthquakes, landslides, mud- slides, ground ;Cailure or similar hazards? Z. AIR. 'dill tho proposal result in substantial- Air a. emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors, smoke or fumes? c. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or --- - temperature, or any change in climate; locally or regionally? 3 WATBR Will the proposal result in substantial- a.—Changes in currents or the course or direction of water movements in either' marine or Fresh waters? b. Changes in absorption rates drainage g patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? C. Need for Off -Site surface drainage improve- (1�, ments; including vegetation removal, channel- ization or culvert installation? d. Alterations to the course or flow of flood Waters? e. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? f. Discharge into surface waters- or in any alteration Surface Water quality, including but not liMlItedtotemperature dissolved tY$ e turbidity? g• Alteration AOf n cis direction or rate of flow ` of ground, y,faters ? h. Change in the quantity or quality Of ,`round waters, .. �1 either through direct additions or With— drawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? i. Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public wat"sr supplies? j. Exposure of people ar property to water related hazards such as f`l ood� ng7 6. NOISE. Will the proposal result in substantial: T.—Increases in existing noise levels? b. txposuto of people to severe noise levels? 7. LIGHT AND GLARE,. Will the proposal produce S1g � jc`ant 'light and glare? 8.I)USE: Will theproposal,result in a nn -ed, su staritijjl alteration of the present or pi,a land use of an area? 9. NATURAL RESOURCES! the proposal result in su stant all a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural tesourpes? b. Depletion of any non-renewable natural resources? 10, RISX..OV UPSET: Willtheproposal involve: explosion of the release of hatard a, bus substances (including, but not limited to$ oil; pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or Upset conditions? b. Possible interference with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? proposal alter the locationi ctvjh POPULATION. 11'11 the p - or growth rate of the human ,A-, �ut3 -on densIity, population? 12, HOUSING. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a. domand for additional housing? YV 7 -A- X.- YES MAYBE NQ 4. PLANT LIFE. Will the proposal result in substantial. divers,ity,of species, or number a. Cha in the of any species of plants (including: trees, shrubst -grass, Crops, and aquatic plants)? of the 'numbers of ani unique, rare b. Reduction or endangeT-ed species of plants? Introduction of new species of plants into an c. area, or in a barrier to the normal replenish- d. ment of existing -species? Reduction in acteag6 of any agricultural crop? 5. ANIMAL,LIM Will the pc oposal result in substantial: numbers a. ange in. the divers it;` of species, or of anipials ",�Litrds, land animals of any species 4" hell fish, including reptiles) f�'�.sh and S. 1 insects)?- benth*c organisms or b. e Reduction in the number* of any Unique, rare or endangered species of animals?. of animal's into c. 5pecies Introduction of new a barrier to the migration or result in a. an area, or movement of animals? Deteri6ration to ex',sting. fish or wildlife habitat? 6. NOISE. Will the proposal result in substantial: T.—Increases in existing noise levels? b. txposuto of people to severe noise levels? 7. LIGHT AND GLARE,. Will the proposal produce S1g � jc`ant 'light and glare? 8.I)USE: Will theproposal,result in a nn -ed, su staritijjl alteration of the present or pi,a land use of an area? 9. NATURAL RESOURCES! the proposal result in su stant all a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural tesourpes? b. Depletion of any non-renewable natural resources? 10, RISX..OV UPSET: Willtheproposal involve: explosion of the release of hatard a, bus substances (including, but not limited to$ oil; pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or Upset conditions? b. Possible interference with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? proposal alter the locationi ctvjh POPULATION. 11'11 the p - or growth rate of the human ,A-, �ut3 -on densIity, population? 12, HOUSING. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a. domand for additional housing? YV 7 -A- X.- . YES MAYBE NO 13.- TRANSPORTATION/GTRCULATION. Will the proposal result in: a. Generation of substantial additional vehicle movement".??( b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? c. Substantial impact: on existing transportation systems? d Significant alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? 144 PUBLIC SERVICES. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services: Fire a. protection? b. Police protection? c. Schools? d, Parks of other recreational facilities? e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? f. Other governmental services? 1S. ENERGY. Will the 'proposal result in a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel.or energy?,_. b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energ,.ry or require the development of new sources of energy? 16 UTILITIES, Will the •proposal result in a nee.1 for new systems, or substantial alter.ttions to the following: ai Power or natural gas? bo Communications systems? c. Water availabi l ity c d4 Sewer ox septic tank? e. Storm water drainage? V f. Solid waste and disposal? 17. HUMAN NEALTH. Will the proposal result int a.' Creation of any health haza-td or potential health hazard. (excluding mental health)? b Exposure of people to potential health hazards? 18, AESTHETICS. Vill the proposal result in the tn '" scenic enic vista or view open to thepublicor will the proposal result in the creation of an Aestheticlly offensive site open to public view? �- "4 t _ YES MAYBE NO 1.9REGREATI'ON. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? 20. CULTURAL RESOURCES: a. Will the proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site? b. Will the proposal result in' adverse ° Phys --cal or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure or object?' c. Does the proposal have'th- potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values,? d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? V. DISCUSSION OF E'NVIRONNENTAL EVALUATION AY 38-12-5 eta;. See attached. 1; ctr�e iBAT ON AP 38-12-5 etc , U i tIN Di= ENLI�� E AL r � t,, will combine and The waiver of parcel map r6quiremen parcels Of appr,oximatelY '1700 acres into fo!ar aresubd1vide six existing P Ti:.1e division will have no parcel s of 240 to 656 acres each.voted to agricultural measurable impact on the amountare ofnthe eStockton-Sacramento rroduction.. The soils on site ver deeps nearly level soil of fine-t;oxtured clay. It ,Association, a Y rice and grain. is well suited to the growing o 3b� TV, properties are currently planted In riceo alnagwhich has and dr ,ece ssitated the construction of irr�tternnhave alreadyebeon imadeQ�and Changes from the ori9 nal drainage �ai11, t. not be increased. by approval of this nand division r^eques Mapped along Butte Creek, the A Zone A flood boundary has been should be Bd,,i* The Zone A flood boUndery h .east" property 1 i,ne of parcel `� mapped as a no-develnPment area. result ricultural_operations will notrm5ato�therLandyas a Conser'vation of this mA9ap The lot configuration conforms o, f thi Agreements on site nt The recently theprepared Master Environmental seas�j�arianrforest along ..Area, has mapped Durham -Dayton N son Planning R i pr,ri an habitats are diverse ca d • coMp ants the Butte Creek frontage' tude ov i d i n9 feed and cover for a rn y.ae i f orestf i nc i udef many a are and tat t on pr the stands of veg typically found within the r Par rotectin8 ,endangered species. Some means of P t strip of property to the be secured. Some alternatives thaclutle easements conveyeia t'o has to or deeding . the Native plant Society, . agency • The Veg'at'at i on coif l d be notedon a records appropriateo-building area. document as Ce the conversion of wetlands s are found in wetland's areas. The Federal Governmsn: Riparian p olicY of attemp�;ung to reduce permits bas made a p enforce their policy by requiring p r these lands, and substantial penalties for to aaH cul t� ~ti l 1 ands . They prior to the convur' 3, ;. , pe i ty, The "s.Watnp-bust:10 9'` -Program pet -soils who do not p Ursue P � = r 1 wf. i ng them from penal i'zes farmer's for cohvers i on of wetlands by r esti participeting i'h Federal' farm subsidy P rograms- 6h In emovai of the riparian habitat Would cButte Creek. Theihabitat 5d' R and wildlife regime along serves to shade the ex 1 st l rig fish second benefit of besides providing food and cover for numerous animyi als; the stream, making it a mOrincludestprovisive ionrof 'food 'for the fisherYa vegetation alono the craek and land stability adopted General plan designation of g: The Propsieldcompl ie coand mplies a-40 zoning Orchard and -6 14.a-fd Provided each lot is developed with one homes`,;e, there will be a slight Increase in the domand for public servlce.s. This demand !snot slgnificant, given the extremely large parcel size. 16a. In the vicinity of the properly Is the Durham Car: Field, a productive field with operating and abandoned )gulls. The field1s connected to processing and distrIbut Ion t"a0111tIGs by way of gas tines. The fleid,a any lines, arrtd any gas wells shall be )napped on the property As a no -development area. 16ds The Solis on site are a severe constraint to septic ieachline Installation. The soil Is highly expansive and poorly drained. 17be Potential health hazards on site incl,sde the flood boundary along autte Creek and the productive gas field. 20a l The Durham -Dayton -Nelson Master environmental Assessment has mapped significant and potentially significant archaeological sites and areas with high archaeo l oq l ca 1 sensitivity thrrowehot;i; the region. y Along gutta Creek and tl- am Slough iodated on Parcel 4 has been Fj mapped a high tens>itivi, A-prcfessioval survey will be required on Parcel 4 to ne the extent of arZ-* resources. Appropriate mitigation I ,, should be identified for later implementation. Conduct a survey will serve te, implement an adopted goal and objective Of the Board or ?upery ► cors for the Durham -Dayton -Nelson Planning Area whit --h states' "Protect the archaeo 1 og i ca l resources ►F r h I ri the area, and provide for the appropriate preservation or reconnaissance of these significant resource,." 11. MANDA i' RY rINDINGS OF S1,-, IGANCE a The prq,}eet has the potential to 'Impact archaeological resources; and riparian vagetation; a rare and endanger<d habitat statewide.. _replicant. C.W. Johnson Rssessol. Parcel 38-12-5 etc Log # DATA SNEET_ A. Pro iect Dea�cr i of i ori 1. Type of Project: Wa i ver. 2. Brief Description Wa *v ver• of Tentative Parcel M91P requirements of redivislon of 6 lots Into 4 lots:. 3. Location: East of Aguas Frias Road, south of: Grainland Road and west of Butte, Creek, Durham. 4. Proposed Density of Development: E�;treme l y' low density. 5. Amount of Impervious Surfacing". Minimal. b. Access and Nearest Public iRoad(s )= Frontage on Aguas is r i' as and Grainland. 7. Method of Sewage Disposal Sepalc tanks iea�i,f el d. 8. Source of Water SUpp 1 Y: I mcl i v i dua 1 wells. 9. Proximity of Power~ Lines: To t:.,r i g i `nal parce l s y In v i c 1 h i ty 0. Potential for further land divisions and development: Development potential dependent upon solls and access. B'. E2y i ronmenta 1 Sett inn Phys i cal Ens i atm 1 Terrain a. General Topographic Character: Level valley land. b. Siopes: 0-2%* c. Elevation.* 1 05-1 20 feet above Uea Leve l . d. Limiting Factors: ["one.' e , Solis a. Types and Characteristics; Stockton -Sacramento Assoc l at on , very deeps near 1 y level so i 1 , fine-tErxtL1t-a-J, clay, Class III, well salted to r'ke and grain. b Limiting Factors* Poor drainage, severe cohstroint to septic leachline installation. 3. Natural Hazards of the Land a. Earthquake 20ne Moderate Class VIII» b. Erosion potential: None. c4 Landslide Potential: None d. Fire Hazard: Unclassified. e. Expansive Sol! p6tentiale High. 46 Hydrolo9Y a. Surface Water: Butte Creek at east prUperty line of Parcel 4. b Groundwater: Available. c: Drainage Characteristics': South, southwest, d. Annual Rainfall Cnorhal is 19-20'x6 e i,imlting F=actors: Flood zone along Butte Creek. meg.. b. visual/Scenic Duality: Highly scenic pastoral views 6. Acoustic Quality: mxcallent 7 Air Quality: Excellent. o�ra� 1nV iron ne_rY. 5, vegetation=Crane Rice, riparian forest. threatened>a 9 W 1dlife Habitat: Greater Sandhil1vat1ey frr�shwa wintering waterfowl marsh . , i' concentration west of Aguas Frlas Road. Cu lwurai �.nv a ronme t h 10. Archaeo109Historical Parcel 4 i cal and H i stor' i cal resources i rr the area: H i g sensitivity .a10+�9 Butte Creeks Orchard and Field 11. Butte County General Plan designation'_ Crops. A-40. 12, Existing Zoning"" Ia. Existing Land Use on-site= Rice, two tomesites 14. Sul ground i og Area: Orchards, ards a. Land Uses" b. Zoning: A-40ice land, and Field Cropsp +c. Gen" Plan deslonations• Or d. parcel 1�°jzes: 40 to 410+ acres. a, population: Sparse. Area'- Chico, 9+armland. Site and Area: F miles. Charade Butte Creek Drainage Dis rict. 16 W lyearest Urban 17. Relevant Spheres of influence- is. Improvements standards Urbae+ Area nra- 14. r1re Protection Service: 445. a. Ne.r est '3ounty ( State) Fire Station: b. water Availability: Engine capacity. 2.0. Schools 3n Areat Chico Un'ifiod School pistrict.