The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About038-170-031VAPIANCE,� APPLICATION FOP- ning COT,, ssiari swe County Man File No.. Date filed Hearing date Action by Planning CommissiOn Action by BocrJ of Supervisors Assessor Map Bo&3� Page No. PorcelKo- PRESENT fil ST: 4,Z-71 �qv s. PHON APPLICAMTIS NAME. )14 Iq 59 3 k 0 rj 2;i ADDRESS RTY: awn- �.ATUS qF APP CANT'� INTEREST IN PROPE -5 -12- PHONE OWNEWS NAIAEz n -a An-DRES$-, DESCRI-i-TION OF PROPERTY: T e)/(, rQ)i and W 0 S, Q .0 W1 r EXPLAIN: FULLY REASON FOR SPECIAL U -SE. rn Ell f, ]L!h� are cerlified, bly the under-sioned 10 be carracf- [he above statements signature. AV L below, paycible to County the DTE: Fleasa submit herewith, a check or money order in the amount shown property and adjacent detailed *lot plan showing the locution of e--i-sting and proposed structures on YCL properties. 1p $ SL X--1 -1 "IC15— By -1,221- 1pt NO. In AL'T. L BA* te for j,* not k;V1,jt�K --dj Ilgd c4ategorical ly exe:::�p thie� AppUcisat -it required tO Wbtzll thi& a4d%tit—wl to th ee A fee vt f,evl,-w t t Oroville - Catlff.�.Az.av' C�X4-t;ry cvatter urtVeP � .3 for ipplev-er-tAXICri tiop -�jl of J�-jtro, FrOCCdMfeg Acc$na Of'I - 97rv- AAa I pLo,,blic Ageacy, t -tate agemy, PT kv-tte -am all J"vf iork 10-catiort t.,,,tp to be PT.Otridz-�-*e the ev< J�r T I the u-Itimate pr,;--Jeat cv��a ,yet,; Oyclijacta �,ijj r " " 21 �. -, " OR ---------------- AP '31 -17 4 17 RECEIPT lzo. Bac NEGATIVE PROTZST� ------- FIVED waTu couTLY" MERX -- ,TH, -pla INC, DZPAW-21 T- if- Eap" ywoul-R7.0 -T -UPLIC m ate) A -PT 'qFT BIR DV"T B:E' T-0 0 DPM, --P nmm FILED --- L NOTTCE 0 F om Ty c m SBcpwTARY OF c;ml7ll-7w-' AGM -My pyRmxtl;G MPAMME-RT Th T p,l.yap IMARING JDTRRJ�6 'EIR B07-LRD 01r- SMB-l'VVlSoRS ---- to -are i FINAL BXR� ADOPTY-011 MAIM FILE Co Aft APPENDIX D NEGATIV, �,TION REGARDING ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT 1. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the: Environmental Review, Committee of the County of Butte hns reviewed the project descrlbed�below pursuant to the provisions of the.California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 (Public Resources Code Sections 21100, et seq.), and, determined that it will not have a significant. effect upon the.eavironment. An environmental impact report will not be re- quired. 2. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: VARIANCE to irtinimilm parcel size allowed in the "A-3; (Agricultural) which -is 5 acresi for Property located on the west side of Taylor Ave., South of'Ranlon Road, identified as AIP 38 -17 -31, -Durham. REASON- If approved, this would enable the agricultural pursuits on surround-ing-property to increase and It would lessen the -possi- bility of residential uses expanding into agricultural land. 3. NA14E. AND ADDRESS OF PROJECT APPLICANT: MELVIN J. BOLES 1H Rt. 1 0 , Box 104 1 UJ Durham, CA J U 2 Ff-"f I 95948 CLAM A. NELSON, cur& Ck,.k BY KIM� W. A copy of the Environmental Review Committee's determination regarding the environmental effect of this project is available for public inspection at the Butte. County C� y Planning Department, 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, Cal- ifornia. Copies thereof will be provided to any per.%on upon payment by -him of a fee of $1.00 for the first page -nd $.50 for each additional pagm. 5. Any person wishing to contest this,Negnttive DeclaratIonmay file a written Protest specifying the reasons therafor, Stich w;ritter. protest shall be filed with the Butte County Planning Cormission at the Planning Department office- within.fifteen (15) days from the date this Negative Declaration was filed.with the County, Clerk. If a written protest istimely filed, a hearing- regarding the Negative Declaratinn will be held by the k�ct;,-cning Commission. Objections may be presented either orally or in writing at the hearing. 6. If no, written protest i&timely filed regerding this Negative Declaration, the application for the project may be approved without hearing regarding the Negative Declaration. XIF ENVIROMI,1ENTAL RL W CO?k1ITTEE DATE July 22, 1974 By Lawrence J. Lawson Dire—c-tor -o-f-P-1—annIng EINDINGS Applicartt-ts Name Variance to parcel size Type ot Project I Ir Box 1040 AP 38-17-31 Address Location or PaTcel No. Durham. CA q;;QAIQ 7/9/74 Date Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of NO theenvironment or curtail the range of the environment (narrow the range of beneficial uses of the environment?,) 2- Will theproject cause -impacts which achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? A'- short-term. impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future. 3_ Could the project cause impacts which are individual�ylimited, but cumulatively considerable? A project may. impact on two or more Separate resources, where the impact on each resource is relatively small. If tbe-effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant, an EIR must be prepared. This finding does not apply to two or more separate projects where the impact of each is insignificant. 4- Could the environmental effects of the project cause substan- tial Adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? NOTEz If anYof the. above four findings questions are answered _X "IES", the project will be found to have a significant effect on the environment. DETERMINATION This project will not have a significant effect on the environment. A Negative Declaration should be prepared, because if approved, this would enable the agricu" x Ltural pursuits on surrounding PropertY to increase and it would lessen the Possibility, of'xesidential Uses ex� panding into agricultural land. This 3-C ,pro 4ect could -have a sigQ' ant effect on the environment. An EIP, 19 required. EDIVIRONMENTAL REVIE� COMMITTEE Date 22, 1974 ELWson Dixector Of Planning 7/9/74 MELVIN J. BOLE& AP 38-17-31 M - APPENDIX C DETER14TNATION PIE SIGNIFICANT EFFECT _aN__:tT_r Melvin J. Boles, Rt. 1, Box. 1040, Durlhal-P, CA ga- 9 48 ApplicantrsNameand Addreei; Variance AP 38-17-31 7/9/74 Type of Proieci: Location or Parcel No, j have a s4 -g - report is xe AnenvIronmental impact quired for any project wr.!Cn mw include nificant effect (substantialadverse impact) on the environment. Effects, environmental consequences of both primary and -secondary nature. The following questions enall be used as guidelines to decide whether to me-ke a I environmental impact. report. (If answer is unknown, negative declaration or an flu 'knQwr write n t"in.yestno column.) YES No 9-EC_KLIST 1. could the project sianificantLy change present uses of the X project area? (See Ndte__F f1cart1y e__nflict with the Butte County 2. Doesthe project sig-ni Ceneral Plan or any Could the project affect the uae ofarecreational area? (see Notes.) 4. Could the project have asubstantial and demonstrable neg- ative- effect on an area or feature of aestbetic value? _X ral or fflap_mg�c jeatures in the pro ect area. 5. Will any natu U I L, _� 11 --.t fb d in other parts of the, wbicb are uniques, tb_�a_ - un X County affected? State, or 1v:5_- 6., will t oject invo ct, of faccillties on a , he pr Ive cQnstru ion X slope of 25 percent or greater? X 7. Will,the project involve significant cuts Or fills? 8. Could theproject cause substantial flooding, erosion, or X siltation? 9,., Will the project involve construction of facilities in an X area of geologic hazards? or involve con - .1o.. Could the project change exizting features ermit arc -as along the Sacra- struction i7l, Special building P mento River, the Feather River Floodway, in any area subject to inundatidmj. in an -area in those pro-ximiDi to any -river, or natural drainage channel? X streaq, lakel reservoir 11. is the project one of a series of cumulative actiov-11, which although individually small, may as a vinole have sienificant X environmental impact?' 12. Could theproject breach any published national-, state, or, X local standards relating. to solid,wasqte or litter control? AT, RZTM �Fv DIVISION OF FORESTRY D jo, Fpres-�r -ls0T1. e. 0 .v 'of ZONE 38 allowed in A-3 o orl West side Durham .................................... ......... ..................... ............................... --------------- Hely:i_n_j.. Rt Box 1040., urhEk� ITLET) — ---------------- -7 21:7�ijpj-n -!tpc - — ---------- --------------- _j All ---------- BONN% Beal th Dept., Ch-icb m TO! Howard To nt tLs s a j t, T UR E S ma*t z RMA ZM.: A-3 A? ING AP 3 8 -17 - 31 _p,�rcej size (5 acres) WEM D-SGpjp-*0H OF P AR II_j:ctrikrjSf� to minimPL wA� alla�Led jn-3 q_r.,��cjtu�najLjqne. _Rf HanLqn Rqad, P H: On h )je�; t q i d e &V- P� u -t h �IUPUCAHT*- mELVIN ADIEDRESS., Rt 0)� �j CA 95938 0 133,11 Ir. P. MLrthik Mewes, AXI REIj iF Gjj S -i cta-- Before SchedulgLf-R-r -comir PAJ E 1 S R BUT E-� L' L T 0.�� x S0 been sent attached to -parcel map application. Ael et U. I P, E PIE ir_e_ us' T-TTT13 v 31�0 + Air -on ".0 ES I e v A-3 17-`1 acres) s�i 7 Inir! namel -1 an ricult e - u I a owp J n d Ave., sOu" ;t of Ta%llor on AT I ON VIA Innn D'urhaq, of RETURNED 4k P" E Q u E, T IfT ---------- ------- Co pr y BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMKISSIOH NOTICE OF PUBLIC IJEAP,,IHGS AND FILING OF NEGATIVE DECLARATIONS REGARDIIIG ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT Notice is hereby given by the Butte County Planning Commi-sion that public hearings wi I I I 1 -he *held on Thursday, August 15, 1974 - at 7:30 p. I m., -ft the Board of Supervisors' Roorag Butte County Adm'o'nistrat4on Buj1ding, Oroville, California, regarding the following: A0114 cturi ng, and G. E. WEISS - Use Perw"_ ". &'low manufa of farm equipment. on property zoned 'A.-:21 (General) "ocated on the south side of Country Drive,.5001 east of the Park Avenue. intersection, identified as AP 46-43-06, Chicf�- 2. COUNTY OF BUTTE - Variance to miniinum parcel size (5 acres) allowed in the "A-3" (Agricultural) zone in order to complete public property located on the south side of Wtst Sacramento Avenue at Muir Avenue, identified as AP 4.�L_17-73, containing 0.72 acre, more or less, west of Chico. ar-,aj Size (5 acres, 3. MELVIN J. SOLES - Variance 'to minimum P opert,� leoeted allowed, in the 'A-3' (Agricultural) zonu for pr on the, west Side Of Taylor Avenue, 200�0 north of Wh,te Drive,q identified as AP 38-17131. Durham. The above mentioned applications., petitions., and maps are! on filt e of the But�-e C*M�,Y and available for public viewing at the Offic Planning Depall-ftl0n.t, 7 County Center Drive. Orovillex Cal.-fornia. BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COffISSION PHCE J. LAWSON LAWRI. DIREVITOR OF PLANNING SE RECORD ON SATURDA11, AUGUST TO BE PURLISEHD IN THE CHICO ENTERPRr. 1974. jobn & Mildred �B-Heisl Bo"",998 a 9,593 AP-- 38-18-01 Ewa AOL Ameaughlin. Edward C lam Box'T-K,G Rt 1, Durhar-, Ca. 95938 AP 38-18--02 Melvin J. & Mertie I Boles Rt 1, Box 1040 -Durham, Ca.., 95938 AP 38- 18-15 Robert K F- Eldora G minto Rt 1-21 Box 980 'Durham, Ca. 95933 AP 38-lR-16 Maude Ford p 0 Box 16 Durham, Ca - 95938 Ak 3 Lloy d C & Lorraine Hutton, et al 1690 Ash Way Marysville, Ca. AP 38-17-08 AP 38-18-20 Shery-, Douglas A & S Carroll J Bult ema-� etal Jones Box 368 Rt 11 Box 1044 Durham, Ca- Durham, Ca.- 95938' -9 5.9 3 8! AP 39-17-09 Ap 38-18-21 Hubert F & parbara T I rlon R Sancoub 4a Weinrich Rt Box 1030 Rt 1. Box 1042 Dutham, Ca. Durham,., Ca. 95938 95938 AP 38-17-21 VARIANCE Carrol J & Josephine -Tl---T7---31 iT I Bultema HELVIN J. BOLES� p 0 Box 3 6 8, Dur -nam, Ca. AP 38-17-3'1 Martha Mewes, tal Rt 1 Box 1032 Durhar-4 38-17-32s Melvin j S 14 Trene Bole -S Rt 1, Box JOI40 Durbam, Ca. also 34 95938 AP 38-17-33. V jobn & Mildred �B-Heisl Bo"",998 a 9,593 BUTTE COUNTY -PLANNT-N'� -COMMISS10N MINUZES AUGUST 15, 1974 b. Melvin J. Bales Variance to minimum parcel size (5 acres) allowed in the.11A-31' (Agricultural,) zone for -property located on the west side of Taylor Avenue, 20001 north of White Drive, I identified as AP -28-17=31, Durham., Mr.. Lawson -read. staff finding ,�s Proponents: Melvin. J. Bales (141) Route 1, Box 1042, Durham, ex - at hia orchard property now surrounds the subject prODerty plained th on -three sides, that the owner, Mrs . Mewes,whlo is an elderly widow has requested him to purchase a 'Dortion of this -proplert-v,, leaving her a homesite 110' x 158. 'Kirs. Bales substantiated (202) her husband's statement,, and added that they wished to extend their rows of trees across this particular Property, Motion was made by Commissiolner Cam--D-Zind, with a second by Commissioner Thebach, for approval of this Variance, finding that to do so would increase agric�dtural lands and because of its unique location there would be no adverse afffects to nei-�7-hbdring properties. AYES: Commissioners Camenzl7qd, G-15 lbert, 11core, Thebach, Watson, Hanford, Smith, and Chairman Sylva� NOES. None. ABSE14T: Coirms-sioner Watters. k ,lotion Carried. -p]C -t - _a-nni-acr comm!.�Lion 7 -ounty Gentar Dr! -'Te 'j i f ornia Oroville, Call Dear Sirs and T Martha T7I--;T-Tes WOuld like to sel-L' Hewes s 14-ould like to -purchase her proDe u, husbandis dead and she is too elderly to take care of the propert-.�T herself. * She cannot any Uo keep it UP- -me0ne -onger afford to hire so 11, 19,9, 1 -parchased 10-072 ac -r -es from her 0 -l- T -would -,iop oth Of us thav - ,;h th, .nit of b hol- later buy her e, I -,no-L-j own the -proi-I bo3: -�ng her Pr0Pe-Pt,v on t-hree siBes and t1he ci d by I-Paylor Avenixe. is� bord-are -gould like tUO P11,ehase, Vals, -property.9 J - plan to continue my a-Inond tro-- rO't-'s c across the, property. - Sincerely. Bol -'s Box IOILO 1 71 a GalifOr- 1 yLJB-.bw t4j /a 0 7,2 A e 7L, 03 A F � � -- Ze?sr Z07 1)7 A/I Z Z�- A1,4 IL czf-D zeE 7Z?4 -o)v PIR.E m4, t�L Y. IRA, F,=,,e z> ^7 A-31 -IVES BUTTE COUNT Y PLANNING COMMISSION �HEARING DATES:Ac,,,5 APPLICANT - OWNER: REQUEST, EXISTING ZONE: SCALE APPLICATION FOR Butto County Plann'ing Comm SSj()n e No. Date filed Hearing date Action by Planning Commi ssion Action by Board of Supervisors n PRE:$ENT ZONING;— Asse,,sor MA77 Book Poo* No. Parcel No. I1r_Q I 'oe APPLICANT'S NAME: PHONE: ADDRESS. k�,ATUS OF APP.,�JCANT'4 INTEReST IN PROPERTY: PHONE:._!k3_q_ OWNER'S NAME. ADDRESS: L DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: 1,10 ®r X -r!, LCx1P_( EXPLAIN FULLY REASON FOR SPECIAL USE� A. _x The —arocorfiflad -by- the under�iqned to 6o correcf.' 71 (A -2-L- 1. 41 S gntal e jr 40f�Ap 11�m �jq NOTE; Plaose Submit herewith a check or moritty order let the amount shown below, ptat le to County o u ISO- dotolled Plot plan showing the location of existing and proposed Structures on your prope rty and on the adjacent $ �' ') By Y STIBBT ct)mmxs$xo:q slut Ca IIQ mu arcel size (5 '�o allowed in A"3 Qg A I -W. I VATYVI 13, 4 0 T I C 8/ 5 qg gg r "IM �T' f t� kit J�V% b4t 1?004 941�IjP #Aj ii i"r. to moift, t, y t"mt or f `vo rov Mv o (Or tot rvvtwj)#%we Mr-Atin Ot L970. lu mo iption, �I.SawuL I lmcfl P%O�Ixc f4sency, vo�te allettlLy p 1 4 Vft t 4t n i t A& o.i. 1( 4 -oot v 1. Ai- v; x ipt 104t 104 At I On ZAP b(' [IT bv project! 6 tP tjqjk4 �,vf 1 -A, I u t 0-4 cm t c4 -4-0 tf- $00gV" 6C 13MA44 IllIx?, No ADTATISS,., - NO. OR LOCIRIM014 !Pjrflar CA' 4) .1 1 P� AP Wsman No. V!,RC Rp M:P,r.ATXW!, Mr.4XAMMOR PIUD IIIXT7.4 WIT11 MAJIMIM70, Mop.V01 M, UR MOVIRVID APPLXCAMI WYMPUT) APPLXM'NT DMPT IMI, TO VIRC Lj r,,qc nvj-NvT 2:m v xvo. o_- V."-wh -'ITa-t* LJ man, i-ar, P-mrm, NoTrM or COMMOU Mpn: szopm"ny or CALIVORNIA RESMU-8 AOUNCr PLAMONG 3M VIAMING COMPUS118Ixos Imuxl4c; a -town, num APPIML (into FILE COPY A011MM D NEGATIVE DBC1,ARATjQN_ IiIUWARDING ENYILQ�MENTAL TIVACT 1. NOTICE IS IMMEBY GIVCN ttat the $Ulli_Cotimental Review Committee of the County of Butte has reviewed the prbjett described below pursunilt to the provisions of the California C-Ovironmerital Qual,ity Act of 1970 (Public Resources Code Sections 21100 at seq.), and determined 01aV it will not hove a significant 0 re - effect upon the environmOUt- An envirolimdnU1 tmpoct vaport will not b quived. 2. DESCRILITION OV' PROJECT', VAajANCrj -to minimufa par001 SiZO all0wed in the "A-3" 'Agricultural) which is 5 acres, for property located on the wes*?,. Side of Taylor Ave:, south of Hanlon Road, identified as AP 38-11 -31,, Durham. REASON: 19 approvad, this would enable the agricultural, Pursuits on surrounding property to increase and it would lessen the possi- billity of :,vasidential uses expanding into agricultural land. 3. NAME AND ADDRE!��', ,)F PROJECT AI�PUCANT: tmLVIN J. BOMS Rt. 1, Box 1040 Durham, CA j U 1. 2 2 19711 95948 CLARX A\. NELSON, County Clot!., By— - C. KING' Deputy '4. A copy of the Environmental Review committee's determination regarding the environmental effect of thl's PrOJect is available for public inspection at the Butte County Planning Department, 7 County Center Drive, OrOville� Cal- ifornia. Cbl)ic$ therGOE will be Provided to any person upon payment by him of a fee of $I.oQ for the first page nnd,$.50 for each additional page, 5. Any person wishing to contest this Nagntive t)iaclaration may file a written If rr,f .1 protest speci-ying the reasons the 0�r. Sucv 1-yrittan, protest shall be filed, with the Butte County Manning com.mtssion at the I'looning Department office within fifteen U5) days from the. date this Ncgative Declaration w 'iled 'with t Ule , a as f he Countv Clark. if a written �)rotost in timely f d hearing regatdlng the Negative Dedlatntioll Will br�- lield by the Planning, Commission, Objections may ba prnsnntt�lcj cithor orally or in writing at the heAringo 6i if no written protest is timety filed repording t1jiq 14ogative Declaration, the application for the project mny t)o approved Without hearing regarding the Negative VaclaratiOn, riMIROINIMENTAT, REVIEW C01MITTEE DATE Lluly 22,,_ By tawrence LT. Lawson Di�eRoi� &F-1 _annln� IL Fl. 761� FINDINOS variance to arcel size Applidantlo Name Typo of -project 1, Box 1040 AP 38-17-31. AddrC56 Location or Pari�al No, Durham,CA 95948 7Z9Z74 Date Received YES tio 1. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment or curtail the range of the environment: (narrow the range of beneficial uses of the environment?) , x 2, Will the project cause impacts which achieve short-terino to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a raLatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future. x 3, Could the project cause impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small. if tile effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant* an EIR must be prepared. This finding does not apply to two or more separate projects where the impact of each is insignificant. _x 4. Could the environmental effects of the project cause substan- tial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? x NOTE: If any of the above four findings questions are answered 11YES11* the project will be found to have a significant effect on the environment* DETERMINATION This project will not have a significant effect on the environment. A Negative Declaration should be prepared,, because if approved, this would enable the agricultural pursuits on surrounding property to increase x and it would lessen the possibility of residential uses ex" pandinq into agricultural land. This project could hove a significant effect on the environment. An EIR is required. ENVT,,RO'NMZIqTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE' Date July, 2 2 19�4. By Lawrence t7. Lawton Director of Planning 7/9/74 MBIXIN J. BOLES AP 38-17--81 _APPENIIIX C DETUHTNATION RE SIGNIVICANT 917PECT ON ENVIRORMENT Melvin a. Solese Rt.,It Box 1040, Dprham, CA )5948 Appli,dant's Name and Address Variance AP 58-17-31 Type of Project Location or Parcel No* 'Date Received An environmental impact report is required for any project which may have a 018- nificaht affect (substantial, adverse impact) on IIhe environmoot. Effects include environmental consequences o�� 'both primary and seo6ndary Oawro, The following questions shall be used as Suidelioes to decide whether to make a negative declaration or an environmental impact report, (It' 0)�JSWOr is Unknowng writo "unknown" in yes/no column.) CHECKLIST YES 140 I. could the project significantly change present uses of the project area ?L (See Notes. X 2� Does the project significantly conflict with the Butte County General Plan or any element thereof? X 3, Could the project affect the use of a recreational aveal (See Notes.) X 4, Could the project have a substantial and demonGcrable neg. ative effect on an area or feature of aesthetic value? X tUre Proje&'. r04 ,5. Will any naturat or man-made fea a in the a which are anique$ that is, not found in other parto of the County, State� or Nation, be affected? X 6, Will the project involve construction of facilities on a slope of 25 percent or greater? X 7. Will the project involve vigniEicnnt cuts or fill,9? X 8. Could the project cause 6ttbstantial flooding, erosiont or' siltation? X 9. Will the project involve construction of facilities in an area of geologic hazards? X lO,, Could the project change existing features or involve con. struction in sp�*cial building permit areas along the Sacta- mento River,, the Feather River Vloodvayo in any area subject to inundation, in an area in close proximity to aoy river, stream, Lake, r PServoir or natural drainage channalL? X Is the project one of a series of cumulative octioh,, which, although individually small, may or. a, whole have significant, environmental impact? X I�Z Could the project breach any published national) state$ or local Standards relating 11,o solid waste or litter control? X r: DIVISION OF FORESTRY Div'qion of ca, Av RUH E-COUNTIt 38-17�8 vAr -jtg�40q, to_:Mj allowed in A-3 zone i�Mt.g�_de qfjAyjQr— d Durham At 1 Bo 04 h. Sa Im h p -it p"lays ape awilication. N, eA HUTTF, C I)tmy .O,,,.Heal th 'Dep,t GbitO H o wAy�d_ T.P,u a or e s VArianc,,e,,,t,o,, al z,o n 0 —,C,y I h -Of_ 4e o, 0 u r,4 rqli,,-,, A x 'AN f J�- V!, 95938 Rt qp 4 o h m! OWN k�, R t rth vix, r Bef o r e �1@,CLLJO- f s s F i u R r,,.e A T TA C I t I E S�I? bee� sent attached tO parcel Map aPplication6 VTU RUN C. 0 $Mall Pgrg.0; L b&-., III EJU-11 FLE C(71 APPENDIX C. DEMSTNATION A STONIFICANT BtTgCT ON, ENIVIRONKENT Melvin J. BoLes, At. 1, Box 1040t.Durham� CA 9 5 9.41 8i A6plicanOs Name and Address, Variance AP 38�1731 N9/74 Type of Project Location or Pardat No. bate Received An covironmental impact report is required for any project which may bave go sig- nificant effect (substantial adverse I impact) on the eovironment4 Effects tnclode environmental donaeqvencog of both primary god geoond4ty nature. The following questions 0611 be used as guidelines to decide whether to make a negative declaration or an eitvironmental impact report, (If answer is unknoloni write "unknown" in yes/no column.) C14r. OKU ST YEs NO, I* Could the project significantly change present uses of the pro4cdt area? (See NdtOS#) 2* Does the project significantly conflict Vith the Butte County General Plan or any element thereof? X 3. Could the project affect the use of a recreational area? (See Notes.) X 4. Could the project have a substantial and demonstrable neg- X ative effect on an area or feature of aesthetic Value? 5, Will any natural or man-made features in the project area which are unique, that ls� not found in other parts of the County� State, or'Nation, be affected? X 6, Will the project involve construction of facilities on a slope of 25 percent or greater? X 7. Will the project involve significant cuts or fills'> X S. Could the project cause substantial flo6dingo erosion, or' siltation? X Will the project involve construction of facilit4,es in an 06-- of geologic 4,zatda? X, 10. Could the project change existing features or involve con- struotion in special building permit areas along the Sacta- mdnto Rivet, the Feather River Floodway� in any area subject to inundation$ in an area in close proximity to any river, streamt lakso reservoir or natural drainage channel? X It. is the project one of a series of cumulative actidn, which� although individually smallt may as a whole have signifitaht environmental impact? X 12. Could the project breach any published national, state, or local standards relating to solid waste or litter control? X 13. Does the project no or the project site serve as Gabitato food source) nesting pl.ace� source.of water, etc, tor r4ro or endangered wildlife or fish species? X 14. Could the project significatitly affect fisho wil4life, or plant life or cause substantial interference with the- move. ment of any resident ozr migratory fish or wildlife sppcieg-I 15. Are there any rare or endangered plant speci es in the pro" ject area? �X 16o Will the project remove sixbstanitial amounts of vegetation including ground cover? _X 17. Could the project change existing features of any of 4ho region's watercourses or other bodies of water? X 10i Could the project result in significant change in tht, hydrology of the area? (See Notes.) X 19.. Could the Project Significantly affect the functioning of an established comDunity? (See Notes.) X 20, Could the Project physically or economically result in the displacement of community residents? X 21. Could the project signiftcantly affect an historical or arqhaelogical site or its setting? (See Notes.) 22. Could the project serve to encourage development of presentLy undeveloped areas or intensify development of already devel- oped areas? (See Notes.) X 23. Are you aware of a substantial body of opinion (present, or anticipated) that considers (or will coagider) the pro�ect or its effect to be adverse to the onvironmonto X 24. Will the project create new or aggravate existing health hazarde X 25. Will the project invol e the application, use or di posal o. V s potentially hazardous materials in an amount sufficient to cause a substantial adverse affect? X 96. Couldthe project generate significant amounts of dustA smoke, gas* odors, or other air pollutants? X 27, Could the project, enerate significant noise? X 28. Could the Project cause.contamination of a public �.Iater supply system Or Adversely affect ground water? X 294 Could the project significantly affect the potential use, extraction, or conservation of a natural rosourco! Ciuld the Project result in damage to soil capability or loss of agricultural land? X 31* Additional remarks: E I Divigion of Fore s tpy.,_17 q Nels_Qn DIVISION OF FORESTRY ZONr Varianoq.tp allowed, in, A-3 -on Durham Rt 1 Box .1.040, Durham D - LL "y /vo J 'W kk aurri. I,-IfJMTY c fl -TH 1111-11A 0 IL, 1174 F1 ICO,'6-0�bfkA A-3 AP 38-17-31 Variknce to mjnimuok.gar,��'I,._size eS), a A7 �Lrlp,u- -1 -t1u, r. a n LOW ofja so th P r hA�i q M LY II _B -Q S D D f t C S 1) 040 Pqrha.mo,_CA 9 59 38 r�ha_,Mewes Go HINX S A C �1' 10 ti S D V. L UI Before Scheduled-fo,):-Comm!L��si-O.,n-,.,,,., R D UT D A R%x X�vxxx x 11 PP b e On S'e n' i tia ��h e d to pa ce map application. R,V,TU RUF 0,� qgj. i�Rpt;:Lpg. th AM �PY . . ... ........ ewntg-d 'the-, Jlowar—&J TEL' Aj q�ualjt coo M, ni 1, r. '1! 41 1 �---k--' A R 3 A 7 ZOO A-3 Ui V'ROU�C'r* Vari (5 'jo I i h J. IT, --A X,- vlest ,Vq of TAylor Avo, LOCAT00: MRM, ,.—. 11 '. ju of Hanlon.P.pad.t. Durhar. 1111VUl pt. 1, r ,�ox nurbam, CA COMMi A�, T IM S v, VUL U) 7 11 for rnnrissior DAk. 0 AT L 9 1 S 1� P 18 W 1,. 5 IA ell f 1 0 I'S coo"t" of, i�o 4�, �i I�p FTL` Copy BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING Comftl�SSTON NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS AND FILING OF NFOAVUE DECLARATIONS REGARDING ENVIRONNtNTAL IMPACT Notice It her'eby gIV6" by thQ BUtteL County Planning Commirsion that public fidgrings will -be hold On ThursdaYo Ao9j4st l6v 1914, At 1;30 P.M.a-in- the Doao�d of Supervisors' Room, Butto County Admidnistration Buil Ingo Orovilles., Califoroia, regarding the following: lo G. E. WEISS - Use Pomit to allow manufacturing and !,)elling of form equipment on pitoporty zoned "A"2" (General) 1,ocated on the South side of Country Drive, 5001 east of the Park Avenue Intersection. id 0 ntifled as AP 46-43-06t Chicn., 2. COUNTY OF OUTTE - Variance to rainimum porcel slie (5 Acres.) allowed in the "A-3" (Agricultural) 20 no in order to complote sale of pgblic property located on the south side of West Sacrament Avenue at Muir Aveoues, identified as AP 42-17-730 containing 0.72 acres, more or loss,, west, of Chicoo 3. MELVIN J. BOLES - Varitince to minipum parcel size (5 acres) allowed In the "A-3" (Agricultural) zone for propertt� 1coated on the west side of Taylor Avenueo 20001 north of Whtite Drivap identified as AP 38-17-31s, Durham, The above mentioned applicationss, petitions* and maps are on file and available for public viewiog at ihe Office of the Buti`:e County Planning Departmento 7 County Center Drivao Oroville., Call,Jornia. OUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COH�,-.IS810H LAWRENCE J. LAWSON DIRECTOR OF PLANNING TO BE PUOLISEHD IN THE CHICO ENTERPRISE RECORD ON SATURDAV, AUGUST 3, 1074. AP 38-10-01, Uward C If aughlln P't 10, sox 0 04rhams Ca. AP 38-18-�02 'Helv4n Jo S Mertie I Soles Rt 11 Bolt 10,40 Duvbam,, Ca'. 9$93.8 T AP 38-18-16 Robert X & VIdora G Minto Rt 10 Box 980 Durham, Ca. �4$930 AP 38-18-16 Maude Ford P 0 BIOX 16 Durham, Ca. 96938 A 38-18-17 Lloyd C & Lorraine Hutton I etal 1690 Aah Way Marysville � Ca. 96901 AP 38-17"08 AP 38-18-20 Carroll J Sqltemaj et&l Douglas A &, Sheryl Box 368 Jones Durham, Ca, Rt 11 'Box 1044 95938; DurhayAl Ca. � 96938 AP 38-17-09 AP 38-18-21 'Mar,"Lon R Sancomb Hubert F & Barbara T 'Rt 1, Box 1030 Weinrich Dut-ham-, Ca. I�t 10 Box 10 4 2 9S938 Durham� Ca. 96938 AP 38-17-21 Carroll i s Josephine VARTARCE, Bulaoma 31 P 0 Box 36 8 NFILOVIN i. Boas Durhamq Ca. :9 AP 38,*17-31 Mav'tha Mewest etal Rt 1 Box 1032 Du%kham) Ca4 AP 80-17-32 Melvin J�G H Irtine Bolos Rt 1., Box.1040 Durhams, Ca. 96938 also 34: AP $OoA7-33 V 'hn 6; Mil-drad Olieisl ttu r?j & J)'o t; a�* BMU COUNTY �L NXNG COMMISSION STAFF FINDING$ - AuZust 16) 1074 b. Melvin J. 13oles - Variance to minimum parcel size (S aorea) allowed in the "A-311 (Aericul- tural) zone for property locatdd on the West side of 'Taylor Av4rmaj 20001 north Of White Irive, i- dentified ,%z. AV 30-17"21 , Durham. niis request Is I for a var�anqe to minimum 5 acro parcel In an A-3 zone, The contiguouo parcels are used for aSricultural purposes. 'rile Enabling Ordinance� Section 16% WEiriances, states - Variances from the -terms of the zoninly ordinan e'shall be granted only when, because of special circumitancest applicaj:�Je to the property, includin�, aizdo Shape., topograp'v*. location or surroUndings, the strIat application of the zoning deprives such property of privileges enjoyed by other property under i,4",xtioal Zoning ciao st ifJ cation. If the Commission can m4ke these findings it would be appropriate to gvant this variance request* �UTTE COUNTY PLANNIN(3 COMMISSXON MINUTtS - AUMST 16� 1914 b. Melvin J4 8oles Variance to minimum parcel 4:0,ze (S acres) allowed in the "A-Stl (Aprioultural) zone for property located on the west side of Taylor Avenue, 20001 north of White Drl'VO) identified as AP �'8-17=31, Durham, Mr. Lawson read staff findings. Proponents�* Melvin J. Boles (141) Route 1, Box 101,12, Durham, e -x" plained that his orchard Droperty now surrounds the s-ub'ect property 3 on three sides, that the owner, Mrs. Mewoswbo is an elderly widow has requested him to purchase a Dortion of this property, leaving, her a bomesite 1101 x 1581 - Mrs. Soles substz,ntiated (202) her husband's statement� and added that they wished to extend their rows of trees aeross, this particular property. Motion was made by Commissioner Camenzind, with a second by Commissioner Thebach, for approval of this variance, finding,, that to do so would increase agricultural laiids and because of its i,inique location there would be no adverse affocts to neiphboxing properties. AYES: Commissioners Callienzind, G-!.Ibcrt, Vcore� Thebach� Watson, Hanford; Smith and Chairman Sylva. NOES: None. ABSENT: Commissioner Watters, Motion carried. 6rovill�o Oalifornia Doar Sirs: Martha -Mm-yes would like to sell, cmd T would like to purchase her property, Mro, MeVrests hmsband is dead and she Is too ojderl-,� to take core of the property herself. She cannot any, lonsor afford to hire someoxie to keep it up. In 1969 1 Purchased 10-072 acres from her with the Intention of both of ua that I would later buy hex, horle, I now own the Property borderIng her property on three z;Ules and the fourth side is bordered by Taylor Avermoo I would like to purchase this propertyo and plan -be contimie vq almond tree rowo across the property, olvin S Bole$ Rbb I Box 1040 Durham, California MTB bw FILLE/ 11";" J* �rN' �-'O ovo it A' SA Al 4'*1 "a lot. 'M4 Fc) A z> f III 40 0 .0 'Y a s, Aw 3 BUTTE COUNTY--., PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING DATES A AP PLIC� ANT OWNER,, U EST [�XISTING ZONE., "'A-3"' SCALE 4'o o