HomeMy WebLinkAbout038-190-044Of
It
o jo,
-of J4,
t (v
to
D.011, Brandt
Jr
mi;z.— - -- — prop
t,- IMI
e"F,
0C c
at i Ve De
t L ti%,%Dp�
''to -
MPaO and e*. t�latation regarding:
rmi a 4.0w - e 8,
�j�.0
too,
'an A�S r(Agri.. Itu egregbtidn of-,
on ert ral. atreparcel acre
tj rop ty located on , the, s,outh s) zoning �Jstrlct
rc
JSaq Imegrto ro side of Stanf�rd Lane, West of
rham. itinued 0 rr, 'Ral.1 a identified
pen. from as AP 38-19-44, 48,
staff Said, n, Apri . 1. 14f 1988):
Conunissioft h I" the letter to, the
ad request applicant, it st
at this ed the applicant ated, t1lat the
meeting and that the his reP-'rezenta
final decision, 0 en of tive be presen
n this the. comnisll 1, t
appiicatiOn 1' -ion was to make a
cOtt6SPandence, from the appli today. There
cant. has beezi no
The hearing -iiias openp
d to tho
Pub ic.�
It 'Was' noted that
no �oilo
staff, Otitld J�or Mr.
noted that., tile 'not
hearing
wa 'flcatiOn. -10,�bl�r to the appli
s n6t Veturnll�d to the 'County upop t calit regarding
The bearing was clljsed, e ed. -
Chairman Lynch said that this was an applica-
Owned by
hi I two Members,of the same tion that involved property
family regarding the covenant -family. The applicant was to consult�
applying tolbotE parcels
the reason, this was Continued and this was
qualify for an, agricul lie said that neither parcel would
tural, :E�eqkegatio
n Without
sJ - ze 1'e suggested that the Commission, den Combining
y this witho t
U
said
9PPQ,ttu - enia Vithout Pit-djudildb t�duid diitw th,6
nity to app,
IY, again wi jn� t' aPP AC nt" -t he,
penalt, 6 hdkt,16
PY Of gul addltioa'al, 4earin L ne yl�iat.peltjo
as r - , d
equied' - - I . onal
-d by, th6 county cddd�.
Tt moved, by Ch -i
unaxljmousl�y carri d 4 rMan Lynch SII�tonded by
e to del thi' omm
ly s project withouC i8sioner �Vdltet, and
A- Pind that, the requirements t Prejudice, as, follows.
Considered;, and Of CEQA have been COmplet I ed and
Find that +-he Proposed projOc' does
Butte County Code section 24-S'- hot meet the re'
made tI-Ie effort to CO 4 and X10tiftg that the C quitements of
to respond- Atact the appl*ca ommission,has
and' at and the aPPlicarlt failed
Co Deny, Without Prejudice
38-19-44 an the Proposed use,
d; 4s Permit for b -
On, Brandt, AP
fog,
-DC -)r t -an 4L -a-t 4 d I a
ror, proposed
envi --!i— tn
imenta 1, 1 d )JIM!
Per- ri§001�,d�j
2 �acre homes.1te on orope t 'all -t t CY aillow, thL,-
parcels , Y 70hed A-5 (Agricult
) located on tho� side of -Stahfo uraj -
Sacramento, NfPt-tkern Rai roa,�,, r I Sht rd Lane W eS +- Of thL-
44, 45$ Durham., _C)f_"Ys, Identifl
1 ed as AP 38 -1.9 -
The Commission wa 1,ve
d the read I ng a r the sta r f f i
Th n,d 1 ngs
, I S 119 i the f I rst hearing uh
51:-aregat I on. der th
e new regulations of homt8tto
Chairman Lynch
questi oned the maP' aha�qinq
the applicat : I ",on show,109 only 44 and 45. Pa(�lcel,s 43, 44, and 45 and
,Commissioner Wa-Iter asked when the app I I c
February 24,, 1987. S at 1 on, iqi*s f ed and staff sp-id
taf f e I -a! ned the Pre-appl I c
XP
The hearing stIOn Procedure.
Was opened to the PublAc.
Dan Br,andt sai d that Parcel 4.3 was not a Part of
said this was for 9,,77 acres total. this application. He
I He quelat 1 oned, the c
allowing any adclit-jonal buildings for, I vemant not
standard. Years and 0
I f th I s Was,
Chairman Lynch exPla. ined the sPec I a I, till
or, Inance for homesite segr
and he said there will be no new dwelli ega"; I on
10 years. 11.9ts. not buildiqOsp allowed for
Commissioner Walter asked Mr, Sr8ndt hovt long they have lived there
Mr.. Brand t said they 111ved on the� property I from '1972 to May of I
nd that Is why this has take e final
He also sai'd the Planning Department had lost his check for th
fee a
so 1009 to come to hearimq.
Commissioner Lynch sa:1d
III n4nce was more liberal in
building,s, not dwel�llngs,, a
allowing additional that this Ord
mot allow either, 9 the old ordinance did
The hearing wa
s CIOsed.
comm!ssl�Qner Lambert questioned What Parcelt Will be- under, the
covenant.
Cam-t'S-51100er Walter, asked, ,if Mr.
Srandt's- faMrily Has tj
Brandt said ths-.,y �4ero until *jjst r vin'o on Parcel
bePore the, ,�pp I c Mt i; -on
IU$ AftithtY, 14i"
for', the. !togrepatton. COmm 1, s 5' V'Oni�t�- Wa I ten v4as �coocer ecs w i th'
n
app I I cat� i on meeting, the t�equlremoftts for Occupancy.
Chairman Lynch explained the dlffO�e-nce between the Old and new
ordinances. 'He Said-j,f the famllj� has been on Parcel 38-19-43 for ton
Years prior to application,, then i�he resi,den.cly reqwlrements are met.
C-6mmissioner Walter asked staff If' the re,miEt 1 Mder of the property could
bei s6l d.
Staff said that 'her ro is nothing Prohlbltirvq the sale only the
development.
00mmls-slloner Lynch asked about removjn4 the parcel l'ines. and making'
this one parcel.
St-aff did not know I f 'th I s was I e9a I Staf f sa I d V -:ie covenant,
11fe Of its own and does govern what happens on the'-/ property.
Chairman Lynch said that It is uP to the applicant to work with the
Environmental Health Department on any problems they might have.
Commissioner Lambert had a problem with the parcel size,
The hearing was re -opened.
Mr. Brandt said that a half -adre Kas,; AP 38-19-48, v4at his parents.-amd
could riot be included.
Chairman Lynch Informed Mr. Brandt that theparcel VJOUJ d have to be
Included because the oHnership is In the family pursuant, to the
Ordinance the covenant would cover this parcel also, He said that
without the parents property they do nqt have the 10 years occupancy
prior to appilicattan and would not hav,,A the bases for approval of tl-jj�s
application*
Mr. Brandt asked that this hearing be contl-owed so he could discuss
this with his mother.
Chairman Lynch said that to'have. approval of this aPPlication they must
have his mother's consent.
Thlit hearing Was continued to Februar�,y 11, 1988 at qtoq a.,
Vtr
OUT
TZ 'com uA , xw "tss,
PILE NO. AP 38-19-44 and
45
BUTTE CoUNTy PLANNING COWISS'I'(3N,
STAFF FINDINGS
Decemb er
29�1 198,7
APPLICANT:
Don Brandt
OWNEPt.
Same
REQUEST:
Ulr�e- P a r m t to allow the seoregatlo'n
Of a. tNo I
acre, ho-mas I te In an A-5
zOA Ing, di rict.
AP NO.:
45
SIZE:
9��27
LOCATION
S 0 u t h StaniFord Lane, West
the, S8CramehtO
Northern
Durham., Railroad,
EXISTING ZONING:
A-5
ZONING HISTORY:
SURROUNDING ZONING:
'Zone, A-5 July li7v 1984 Ord.
A-20, A-5', A,-40
SURROUNDING, LAND USE.,
Rural residential
Lane, Orchards to Ono Stanford
the
SITE HISTORY:
r�-ear.
Brandts took title to the
property
I n 1971 . Thera ctt'e no racords of
building
permit., division
requests.
GENERAL. PLAN bESIGNATjoWz
Orchard and Field Crop
APPLICABLE REGU4ATIONst
Butte County , Sections 24-4,,, 64
(Ordinance 2600,adoptad
-9�N�TS R�E�CC-IVED--
6/2/87)
"Parcels
to be
created in co,
nfOf7*Mande with
JI
BUTTE COUNTY) PLANNING COMISSION
STAFF FINDINGs
Deceinbor 29. 1987
Chaptet-,20 Of the Butte, County Codo.rjo
9924 Lrc)nM�Qnta,1_1__Hea.Jth_, "Prov
elevations to the Heal.th verl,fitation of Kint- U
winter Ground water� Mo ePartrilent 143 satisfaction. Th 9r Water
-the n t -tor I I s
2 homesite,#, ng prior
to approval of the s6WOgatloft of
No
oth..er comments were re
celved.
A
,ANA_L',(ql e
ThIs Use Ferm I t is the
adopted homesite f'I rst to be cons I cl
seqreg4tj 6- ered Under t
cOmPlete' n ordinance, rhe recqnt,ly
1011318'7, the ordinance went I The aPP I I Cat I on Was deeined.
ntO effect 7/2/871.
The subject parce I I
Is developed with a house
for Irri9ated Pasture. On the shop, she
sheep were vlslbl 00y Of the fl d and utilized
e. The pi-operty -eld Visit) appro _ImttelY 12
,Which is located withl totals 27 x
n the acres, 2.77 acres of
vers both p _Creek�' The Use Permit
aPPlIc0lblon co floodPlaim Of Butte
ropertles and would
property ('40th the remaining agrjcult�' comb1no the flOOdway
b0mes I te) and 7.27 Ural land$ to create a 2
ConOltl Ons 2 and 6 of acre remainder. The propo..; acre
ed division meets
t�he properties, and BLItte County Code section 24-54 reQaf�dinq s1ze of
ProposOd Parcel site.
Condition I of 24-54
--ont'i nuokis, yea requires that the owner
rs immediately prior I Ive on -s it for 10
subject to application and hat fe
P�I'OPerty- The Brandts recorded armed the
and qualified for a h title to the pj��,oPerty In 1,571
the hoRleOwOers exomptloomeowners exemption In 1974. BY the 06-87 Rol I,
thO Brandts have hot n was removed - based on the a '
rented out the house du 'lived on-tite OPlicatIon filed,
r f Or the I ast three Yeart
states that the app, 11' Ing that t1me6 Condition #1 of and have
exi cation lis to allow the 1 24-54 further
sting home and cont,'Inue the remainin!g acreage Owner to retain the
The Or'andts have Indicated in a9t,,itultural Wse,
difficulto and they ��Jsh that manoolnq the home IonQ d I stance It
doesnOt Meet the tw 'to sell the homesit6 off. The a
0 e-equ I _eME'
COO d I t i on #
The f -c -M8 1 M 1110 cond It I Of 24-5 1 4 are as follo
The proposed segrega
t'On W not reduce thel
Icultur6l� use Of ' the, capab I I It I es, for,
proper ties. Parcel and surrounding
4. The proposed gregated Parce Is meet
County Hea,lthpse the
epartmont for' seHaee dispo requ" remeOts of .-�,he
Sal and watE�r tupply',
13UTTE COUNTY PLANNING CoMmTsSION
STAFF FINDINGS December VU -19% '1987
The Proposed Z*e gregat I On is consistent w.,
Butte county General th the c
Plan because 0 Poll' 1'0 of the
Section 24-54 (d,). f the co e
Oht required in
The divislon as propose
'd may' reduce the agriCultura
r'emaining Parcel. APpr- cap
Oxlmat',41y 3-5 acres of abl"MY Of the
would be Usable 'for, irrigated pastut6,et_ or- t the rema0ritng Par6e'j
I"arcel MaY not be 1 1 ree crops,
ar,S,f,�, enough -to lease out to A 3, atre
or
Health Department has indtcated that j, eq farmer. The
PMPosed, Parcel t is questionable Wheth
z sn
Meet the Subdivision Ordlnanc6i teNOQA�t dispq4al
standaros due to ht-,.gh t-41nter, Water tables and hoaVy clay, t
Water monitoring and
act I Orf on a s Pe�'cOlatl6n tests. would .0 1 Is, - Grouno
ubsequent Parcel map. Oe,requlred pojot�
Conditio(I 05 requires that a
Properties disalloWing oddl - covenant be recorded over the Subject
Parcel (h t1ohal dwe'llimq from beii719 located an el'
omes:lte Parcel Or agricultural Parc ther
fVledan ahY contl�quou �el)- The Cdven4nt shall be
The sM s Parcel under the same
811 triangular Parcel AP 38-19-43 or related ownersi-lip.
this Property, Is owned by the BeL�andt fa' located to the horth�.jest of
AP 38-19-48, 44o and 45. M11Y. The covenant would cover
r
In, addition to the conditions listed In Butte
54, the PlannIno County Code Section 24 -
sizes are Commission must consider whether the requested Pa...,
parcel- Consistent and compatible with adjoInIng,land u
Zoned A"5 fronting on Stanfor S
Tile, median par(zel slze however * d L8neavera Mse The 75
Is one acre.. ge 4456 acres eath,,
should be cqmpa The OrbPbted divIs'
R5CO tibl-e 1141th adjoinino lot, sites and
MENDATION8-
A, Find that t,'10 requirements of CEQA ha'
COOsldered'$ and Ve been completed and
Find that the Proposed projed
It does not meet the requlr"�emont-s of
Butte County Code Section 24-54 sPecl
resided On the pro' ficallY the OWher�has.not,
Perty for 10 cont-1,,juous
to application. is not lhtondihg tc, immediately prior -
proven that the prop 0 the exIst1ho hcLmet zind
has not
Osed Parcel' ;Sizes Will meetthe
requirements of the Environmental Health Department; and
C. Deny the proposed.Use Perm
't for 00h Brandto AP -�8-119-44 and 45.
ovk�nt the PIOnni : ng-COMm�Itslon do
ate mot I
should be approved the appropri, termlines that the Use Permit
,10n Would be as folloWS�
A.
.that the requirements '.1f' CEQA have boen, d0ffiPleted
ao.ns, Idered and adopt aNeo ativO Declaratlon';.and, and
jlg�
BUTTE COUNTY PLAMING Co
mISSION
STAFF FIND-INGS, - )D4-cember gq, i
B. Find that, the
proposed ho,eslt, segregatlon meets the requirements.
Of Rwtte CouritY Code S,ettlon 24-54 and 24-43 spetifital
and
C. Approve the I prop . osed I Use, permit to 'a
acre homesite In an A-5 zone IION the segregation of
subject to t 'on AP .38, 19-4+ and, 45 t)6n 2
he, -fty'llowing cOilditionst I
Orandt)
be, treated pursuant, ta,
County code. Chapter 20 Oft
he Butte
2.
Prior, -to, the division being effeati..', the 0
the propertY 'under re I at W1, n e r, O1-*.`6wners,oF
45) s-haj, I ed OWner-.8,h 1 p < Ap; �eS-19-48y 44* and
execute and cause to be'recorded '
the RecOilder a covenant in the Office, of
bindIng upon the original owners and
their- hf�rit_t, SUccessors, and ass
add I 1-- 1 ona, I lontl which
dwellingr, frolp being 1; d!SallOKS
propert,,y or the, agni ocated on the ogri
cultural seoreeation Parcel. cultural
The Use Permtt and covenant sha
Years minimum I be in force for
i from the time of tOn (16,>
the kecorden*s Office and . I reOordlno of the coven
Will C0MtiML1L- ant at
until the applicant
applies to the Planning Department to be agendized at a
meetlng:04� the Planning Com
COmmIssion options (OISSIO11 for revieN,, The,, Pl ;�3nn I ng
for actlon are. -
a4. TP-rmInate the covenant and r-
amOver conditiorbs from Use
Pet -mit. Appl Ications for termination to�� be
by the fee set. tompahled
by ResolUtrion Of the Board Of SuPervisors
to b'e deposited In the County general fund� no part of
which, shall be reituroed t
for termination to be 0 the applicant. Applications
Code Se cons Idered' as
ct�on 24,4 for Use permits,,
3 et secl- and, Code Sect,,,On .2
the appeal Process, 4-48 for
b.
Extend the coVenant,for 8 perlod hot to
years. exceed 1,6n (10)
Cons-Ider the 8rea� for ch
anQe 10 deslghatiort,frOm Orchard
and Fle�d Crops, Orating and 00�eO Land or AgrIcultur-al-
ReSidential to a I non-agricwl
General Plan, tUral designat,lon under the
The Use Permit Ahd colvenant, sha,l I
upon ti'me U biE�. 1 n force for the a%rieed-
n1eSs, the General Plan is amended and the Ind
question is no longer desi I* In
should occ.ur,, gh,Oted a, r1'r,-WJtU :
the applicant I . 9 1 ral� : y
may app,l f th1s,
Y for termination of the
MEN namm
4
Aft
APPEINM F
�0_11_11TY (Lr BU�T
BNVTRONmTAL CHECKL18T POR4M
J
06 e COMJ�IeTeM aa _A�,Wcy)
BACKGROUND 1.0g 11 87-03-09-01
#38-19-44,45
1. Name of proponent _�pogN .1 &
2. Address of proponent and repregpritativo
If �IPPIicable)
P-Qr1__&_C2AUdia_Bi:amdt
__17—U—STable M,
,kll_ountq�in
953��7
S. Project description
—._Ise gqrmit
MANDATORY I�VVDINGS or- li
_111_,NIr-TCAt4CE
LIAYBE 1()
.11 to d&grdde the
a. Does tlik� project have the Potent!"
11 uaUtY Of tfic enviroTiMent, subs
t tAntially reduce
ber habitat or a fish or wildlifo, specie
_s, cause a
fish or Wildlife population to drop below %elf�
,ustaining jejels, threaten, to eliminate a plant o�r
onima.] eomt.h,.Jty, -�educe the number or res�trict tile
range of .1 rare or endangered plant OT animal or
climivatc il-Vortant examples Of the major periods
Of Californi'l hi.
story or 'prehistory?
b. D
00S the Project have the PG-tential to acilieve
hort-tcrm b0nerits to the detriment of lo�ng-term,
onviron.mer�tai goals? (A short-term impact on the
environment is One Which occurs in a relatively
brief period Of tiMe while long-torM impacts tvill
endure into the future.)
c. Does tile project have impacts which are indivi(ju-
ally lillited, but cumulativelY, considerable? (A
Project may impact On t140 Or More separate resources
where the impact oil each resource is relatively
�Mall, but where the effect of the total of tilose
impacts on th 0 environment is Si8nificant,)
d- DOOS the Project have environmental effects whicli
will. cause' substantial adverse effects on buillan,
beings, efthor directly ol., indirectly?
[W -TERMINATIO
___L2_4 (TO,bc completed by the Lead Agency)
On the basis of tbi,6� initial evaluation:
I/Wr; Mid tile Proposed project COULD NOT have a significant errect
oa the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will, be Prepared,
T/WH fi d that although the proposed project could have
n a signirl
cant effect On the environment� 'there will. not be a signifi.c6t
effect in this case because the MTTTGATION mEASURES described on
the attached sheet have been added to the PrOjOM A NRGATTV1'
11ECLARATION wil! be'Prepared.
1/hIF: � f ind' the proposed project MAY have a Significant afrect on
the en.vironment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REVORT is required.
DA11'. November 3, 1987
CUNTY 017 BUTTtl, pLANNING DHPART�JENT
By,
4U_
tle, Asso
ciate Planner,
Apvxo�qdd by:
Afth,
IV - ENVIRONMENTAL IMICTS
LExplan , a::: ions of-=aItyestr and, '*maybe', answers are required
on attached sheet(s)),
XES
I. EARTH* Will the PrOPOSaj TO$Ul' n S1 'I' f.
t J 3, icant
—Uns'ta'ble
MAYBE NO
ai earth ion's or in
Condit' chp�hgets In
g eo og'= substructurej?
b. Dis'r'-upiions,
di.splaceMent's, compactio n or
Pvetcoveritg of - the
C. Chanid-in tOP69TAPhY' O'i gTOunds:urfgce.
r0L'ef features,?
d* Destruction, coveriini-or 'Mo'di"i of' any
iC4t1,Qn
-uAique geologic: or Phy-Sical f ea ures,,9?
e, 'Thcrease
in wind or water,
9 e . th" soils
I , or on or o..jt,6$ite?,
�ha"ges -in. deposition or:,. atos'ion� ofb.ea C
sitnds, -or changes in sfltation,- de"P�sition.
*
or �rosion which may %odjfv th hannel.bf
--V� e' C
a river" or str6va or th6. dll�q'f �th.e ocean,or
any 'bay,, Inlet, o�r. lakel
�g. Loss f, tiVe qi I s
q prime, ag Itu turally produc
outs-id:e
-designated urban areas?
h. Expos'ure of Odo�le o' r PTOP6rtY V "-geologic
hazards such as earthquak,�s,. 1�.n� - -ides; mud -
'slides "ground: failq`
re or similar-n"zavds?
2. AIR. Will the�proposal result in,'substantial:
a. Air emissions: or deterioration of ambient
air quality?
b. The creation'of WJectibnable
3 odors, smoke
1
or fumes?''
c. Altera'tiori 'or
of'air movement,, moistureo
temperature, or any cha Re in clima-e,l
iOC4117 Or regionally?
3. WATER. Will the proposal,result in substantial-,
Z_ -Changes in currents, or the course',or
direction of watermovements in either
marine or fresh waters?
b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns,
or the -rate and amount of,surfAce runoff0.
c. Need for off-site, turface drainage impTove-
ments, including vegetation removalP �hannel-
izatiOn Or Culvert ins-eallation?
d. Alterations to the course or. flow of flood
waters?
e. Qhan�re in the amount aff- sur,�'ace, water in any
watei body?
f. DischArge 'Sur
intb fa6e� Wate, rs', or in any
alteratioa,of sur�acewater,qualit)t, including
but not limited to' tempei�ture, dissolved
9 oxygqp Or turbidity'?
9, Al,teration�of the direction Or rate of flow
of ground, Waters?
h. Change in the quantity or quality, o:� ground wate—rs,
either through direct tAditions or w'ith,.
dTaival.s. , or thr6ugn,� itterceptioti, of an
'aquifer by t-kcavatio"?
Reduction ijt�! amount. of water othervise
available for Public water Supplies?
EXPOSUrO
Of PeOPle or Property to water
rel,c ted hazatd� such as flooding?
YES.
4.
PLANT. LIFE', Will the ptop,o.,;al
A, in th te-SUlt in Sub.S1 ta-AtIal
divorsity� of
S'Pdciesp or n mber
specidis of u
plants, (kndlildijjg� trees
grass, crops., and aq tiatic Plants)
of the numberst" of any
unique., rare
orrendal%gered species of plants?
C. Introduction o P nelf species of, plantslnto�ran
area..,. Or ift a ba, rriev
to the normal,'replen'sh-
ment Of exittitg species ?
d Re'duction in. acreage of any Agtidultural," qrop?�
4L
MAL LIFE, Will the propotal result in substantial:
A. Cifa—nge in the dive 'y
rs it
of species� or numbers
Of -,any spec' ,
les of -animals, (birds, land animals
including, reptiles
fish And shell'firh,
s
benthic organisms or insects) ?
b.. Redu Ction. in�the numbers of any u i ue,
n q
or endangered species 'of
animals?
C. Introduction of ne w sPeciOS of into
'area,
an or result in a 'barrier 'to tjj'� t"okfio'n.''
Or movement :,
o C- animals le
I
d. rat3-011 to exis,ting fish or
habita.t? wildlife
6.
NOISE, Will the proposal result in,:,substant'ial..
a Tncreases
' in existing noise lovels?
b. Exposure of people tO
severe noise llevels,.?
7t
LIGHT AND GLAE. Will the Proposal produce
signIT Fa—Wt `-Might and
glare?
8.
Ublb USE' 1'ill "'he Proposal result in'a
Tu-5—S-Tintial alter-ation
Of the Present 01- planned
land use of an Area?
9.
NATURALRESOURCES: will the proposal r'
subs t - giniti. esult in
a . Increase in the rate of use, of any 'natural
resources?
b. Depletion of Any non-re'newable natura"
re5ources?
10.
KISK OF MET. Will the, proposal invo Iv ej
- _T
a A _T: sT- _o
L explosio n or the T'OleASO 0i hazard-
ous substances (includingo but,"oot limited,
to,
Oil, Pesticides , Chemical,
event 0 s, r, radiation) in the
I an accident Or,�,'Vset
'C,�nditions?
interferenc
b. Possible ' e with an emergency
response Plan or omergency evacua,tion plan?
11,
POPULATION, Will the, proposal 'alter the location
dist-rij, �UtFon, density., Or
growth rate of the huima�
Population?
12
HOUSIN,G. Will the Proposal affe Ct exist ing ho using
or,cteate a demand for additional housin
I gL?
to
151.
TRAN8RORTAtION/CIRCULATION, 'Will th -,A
MAYBE NO
pl,-Opos
r0SUlt in:
d. Generation of sub$tafttial additi.0 nal vehicle
movement?
b. Ef fdOts On 6:kisting park! g f4 Ici litiesi 0
demand for Aiew parking? �V
C. Substantial in' act On existinit transportation
systfts?
d. Significant Alterations to pre
, rsent patterns
of circulation or movement of peopl e,and/or
goods"?
e. Alterations to waterborne,' rail� or -t�
ir tra 3.
14-
f. Increase in traffic hazard'
5 tQ mOtOi,vdhicles,
bicyclists
Y,
or pedestrians?
14.
PUBLIC_ SEVICES,.. Will the PrJPOSal have an eff ct
>n)- 67 r I Ulf in a nded f -of new 'or altered
governmental services,,
a. Fire protection?
Police Protection?
c. Schools?
d. Parks or Other recreational facilities?
e. Maintewince
of public facilities, including
roadg?
f, Other Ovemmental services?
15.
ENERGY. jVij�ll the PrOPOtal TOsult
i7-9—se of_substantjal,,� amounts o:F. fuelor
?nerg:y?
b. 8ub8tantial incr,'ase in demand upon existing
JL
sources of energy, or require -the develoPment
of new
sources of energy?
16i
e
UTILITTLIS, Will th' propogal result in a need for
H�7systems, or substantial alterations to the
following:
.a, Power or natural gas!
b.
Communications systems?
C. Water availability,,
JL
Sewer Or septic tank?
e. Stort water drainage?
f. Solid Vaste and disposal?
174
FUMN HtALM . Will the proposal result in:
a. tion": Of any health hamrd or- potential
4
h6alth,hazartl (excluding mental health)?
b. Exposure of peo i
Ple, to potential, health
hazards?
18.
XtSTHETIM Will the proposal Tesult in the
Of aMr,scenic� Vista or view open, to
the public or will the
PrOPOS�alr tdsult, in the
creation ofy Mi:405thetically offensive site open
'
to p ublic view?
)tS
MkYBB, No
19. RE CREATION. Will the im,
upon the qual-ity�or quailtity pact
Of
opportuniti existIng re -creational.,
41
20. CUtTURAL REs Off cts'.'
a . M111 , t -e-F-r—oposal resultjv� the�!,alteratjLb`
of�or the d&$ trut�tl I
On Of A��/prehis toric, dr
histotic
resti,
P pos.al in adv'e�se Ph
ysi'cal
or 4ie'$tfiet'�c effects a prehistoric.Or
Yll*
e -or P, e, ctl
th�t'PTOPOS&I-haYe ther POt'enti'al, to,
I
cause
4 Physical,change Vhi Ch. WOU1.4 A'fflect u niqu
�e- thtit tu1tur'OLL
vAlues!
d. Will -the ptopo,s S
Al re trict 6xisting r�i:riious
or sacred
uses -within, the po--
area� tential imp act
V. ISCUSSION A'V Ev I
i EA
-L -a -A -T —ON AP 38-19-44�A5
See attac,h6'd.
Alm
-�Al I 1A T
JON AP 38-19-44�45
Use Perm) t t�b al I O'H the selgregat I on Of 4 2 -acre homesIte f rom
5-5-atre Parcel , in an A-5 zoning distrIct, If the Use perm 1 a
aPPrQvedy the parcels WOuTd be crA�Bated via map. t is
At the time of map
recOr�datTons, a covenant thal I -be. reicorded whlch� Pr-ohlbl,t!-� the
construction oi� additional dwelling units for a ml
hlmum:Or ten Years.
=k I i at -t. te
Tb Disruption), dIsPlaceinent and compaction or the SOW
result from the.constr s surface May
Uctidn Of a dwelling on the segregated Parcel.
If this dwelling ls.construated$ the.level of
be, s I an I f I cant srjjpt,l on w 1. 11 not
19: The Purpose of the, Homes I te Segreopt 10 6, Ordinance �is to conserve
agr 1 du I tWr6l 8611 n Product I OM wh 11 e pro*., I d ing
financing needs. f'Or retfrel'nont and
Sc: Surface Water ��unoff generated by a new residential structure It
,not anticipated to be, sign"Ficanti. Aebording to the
Durham- Dayton - Ne I son Mastev�` Env 1 rOnmental Assessment, the so I I s are
deep and well draining. According to the Health Departmentp the soils
are a heavy Stockton Adobe. If the soils are Stockton Adobe, surf
'Nater runoff would be greater, but still no t, s I Gin, I f I cant. ace
3d)J: Butte Creek is located, at th e east property llnE�. It has been
designated as a Zone A flood, boundary on� the rederal emergency Ma
The floodi,4ay, and, floodwaters are contained by the levee. pe 11 Ps.
should not be subjected to flood hazards. ople
4b North and south of th 1 s property 81 ong Butte Creek a riparian
forest, Immediately adjacenti the levee Is bare. I CO I nstrwotloh of one
dwelling unit in the future should not have any measurable Impact on
the stands of rlparlai.,, vegetation#,
4d: An IrrIgated,patt
ure i is
Visit, aPproximatel,y one .Z.,UrrentlY On site, The day Of the field
sheep.were visible.
'proposed showid,have no Measurable I Division as
Property for pastui-e Or' its. abl,lity Impact on the suitability Of the
to support sheep., Und6r the
Proposed A-5 Zoninfa District and live
sheep Would be stock provislons,, as many as 22
POr(il 1 tted on the homes I te Parce I
The project as Proposed 'Would alf.w the croatibni of a 2 -acre
Parcelin a 5-atre Zoning dlstrict-. 0
as no ad The short-term Impact 1sM*1Mj Mal,
develOPM dlt'onal development Would be permitted, H _)Keyer, after the
ent re8tr�lction Tlfted� an add'
ItIOMal hOMOsite could be
built on the'r-lemalndor parcel. This area has bee
rosi'dential uses 00 S-aQr . � 'I n Pl'ann'dlfor rural
e parcels.
I - 6 o
ia�
134:" Traf f! c is not expected to I.ncreo-0e untl I the additional 60 1 t- I s
constructed. �At that t I me,, traf f I c . In creases are estimated'at 10
trips per day* As a condition of the maps Public Works wIll reqol�re
i=pr&vem6Mt Of $tanford Road along 'the frontage to County standards,.
14a -f: Residential development will result in an Increased demand for
all governmental services. The addition- of one unjt Is not
sl �G)n If I cant.
1,6c$dj17'a: According to the -Health Departments it is questionable.
that, the proposed parcels canr meet Subdivislon Ordinance sewage
disposal standards. High winter groundwater levels reduce the usab,le
Vel
area f or leach 11 nes and sept. I c systems. - . Depend, i nb on the I e
the oroundwoters an 8601tional septic system may or ma
not be
Installed. Health will require groundwat;er monitoring Prior to
approval of any land division, . With, implementation of the subdivision
Improvement standards sewage requirqmentss. there should be no: health
hazard generated,.
20al Accordin-9 to the Durham,�Dayton-Nelson,Master EEnv 1 ronmenta I
Assessment, thIs property 18 an area Olt' rhigh SenSlti V I ty for
-s to
archaeological resources. The magnitude of potentlal Impact
aPchaeologjaal resources cannot be determined until a professional
survey has been prepared. This survey should Indicate the level of
clearance and whether or not any mit1gation measures are required to
protect resources. A list of I qualified,consL41tants 1,,4111 be sent with
this checklists any of whom would be able to prepare this survey.
rl. MANDATORY -FIN INGS OF -SIGNIIrICAN,��_E_
a,- As noted under Item 20a, there is the potential for Impact to
archaeological resource54 A survey will be required to determine the
nature and extent of Potential IffiPsqt.,
�7-
h
Applicant: Don and 6'IaUd a
I Brandt, AP it, aa-�.19_44%45
Log # 87-0,
P_&
T
A. �Pro, innt -Pggcr Lpjtj OU
1. Type 0(f Project: Use. 1 4_. f or a
2. Sr I of Descr i pt 1 on S eg r o
5.5-licre 'Parcel Of a 21 adre homostte from a
S. Location-* . On the south Sidl�t �bf Stanford R
Sacramento Northarn �Ra "A 1 road 1 1 nL-,, Dwrhami oad) West O -P the
4. Proposed 'Dens! ty, of De*e1i0P1qontZ 1 dHe lling
wh I t/5'. 5 acres.
5. Amount of IMperVious Surfacing: LON.
6. Access and Nearest Pub14C Road(s): Both PrOPO� 50d Parcels
will have frontage on Stanford Road,
7- Method Of Sewage Dl,sposal: $0PtIc - leat--hfields.-
Source of Water�SUPPIY:� InOly1dual Hells,
9 ProxI,MItY of Powor L I nes: To or 191
10.. 'Potential for further land 'divisions and development: Use
Permit is first stop in ToG4111Y separating house from
remaining acpeage.
B. Enyi onme t I
'Phys -I -c-@_IEnv IMOMMgnt.:_
Terr-a 10
-a. General, Topographic Character: Level V,01 ley 1 an d.
q. Elevati,oh: 1401� elevat,
lon of levee unknown.
d. Limiting Factors*. None.
2. Solls
a. Types and Characteristics.* Honcut Association,
Moderately coarse to moderately -Pino sandy loam, slow
ru 'nof f * Clasl�� I Prime ag soll, well drainirlo accor,dihq.
to the Durham- Dayton -No I too fvfitster Environmental
Assessment. Stockton Adobe accOrdine to Health
Department*
b. Limiting Factors." Gravel along Butte Creek.
S. Natural HazardSrof the Land
a. Earthquake Zone.' Moderate Class V111.
b. Eroslon� Potential,. I Slight.
c, Landsl I de Patent Val None.
d. Fire Hazard: Moderate.
e. EXpaht 1 ve So i I Patent i al S I I �qhtl y eXpans I ve.
4. Hydrology
a. Surface Water^. Butte Creek is east property line$
b. f I .06dwater's contained by 1 ovj��q�., ,
Grounrdwater" Excel I ent waters qua I I ty 1, low, tota I
dissolved sol Ids
C,
Dra I nage Character"stles'- Drains s
d,. Annual Ralinfal'
/, inormol,)w. 22-24-1
Pactors: High groundwater,..
5'- VIS"Llal/Scienliz Goal ity: Butt
6-* Acoust! a Qual I tv:1 e Creek Is vary scen I a.
Fair.
74 Air QualMy'".1 Fair, r-apj!d local
Poor air t-rculatlon and high atmosPho d0gr-iad
a,t ion
rit Stability.
8. tri-leated , ��Rjparl
Creek; rare a an f'01-08'4- along Butte
Ind Icihity.
9* Wildlife 14-5jbitatt, Important h �fn I- I I Iva
a r P, r" I an area.
wwta
Archa001091cal and Ht-storical' Ras��Urces in tho area; Area of
high sensitivttv.
Butte counzvl General Plan desleha��v.Ion: Or
Crops, chard Flaid
12. Exist -
Ing Zoning: A-5.
8- ExIsting, Land Use on-sitez One h
14. sheep. OLMe �N shed, shop, Pasture,
Surrounciing Area.,
a- Land Uselsz Rural residential . a I I one road
agrj,tujturL-/Orcha
A-5,
b� ZOn'IT19 rd$ On remainder,
c- Gen. Plan desigimiati,hs*
d. Orchard and Field Crop.,
Parc4�1 Sizes.- 20-50 acres,; 1-20 to the north,
e' POPulatlohz Rural donsitles,'
15. Charact r of Site and Area: Aer"'16WItUral.
16. Nearest
Urban Area QOmmun Ity Of 01 -0 -ham 2 m I
ph
17. Relevant S Ores of Influence; Durham Park and r,�
18. District, Durham Mosquito Abatement� District. acreatton
tinprovelfients Standards Urban Aroat n/a.
19. Fire Protection Service.*
aii Nearest County cStato) Fire Stat- -
northwest. ton: #40, 2 miles
b- Water Aval
labll-tly' Engine capacity only.
20, Schools In Aretat I
0urham Unified School District.
-9-
ink
k Gfial doi, d asorl be any ot h
er
per,,61ts and'other ppblic-i
aPPrOva S, r0tiutred for this p0ject, in
OltY, 1`0910nal, State and Pederal age
ClUdIng those e6quIrod by
IF RESIDENTIAL, includ,., the number of Units, whether units are ,4
tYJ , ?0 Of , 110�usehold size expected. inote Or,multi-story in 1101ght, schedule Of' n1
U t SIZ06, and
COMMF
-RCIA4, Indicate the tYP�,, Whqther,
nef�hbor*d, city all r1gionally oriented, aqua
loading JaoJlJtlb!j. rp footage
of sales area, and
IF INDUSTRIAL, Indicate typ&, pstimated employment pershift, and1dading fawi Itles,
I F INS
fU tlo
Indicate th
. e -major no 'timilied �em I
and community benefits. to be der] n' 08 P GYmOntper shift, estinia'
ved f rom the projeoc ted obcup'a
acyi loading facilities,
_J
ENVIRQNMENT�L IMPACTS A
NO MITIGATION MEASURES*
LL. co nditions of n mPtfta! i!.n._Pi6Wa§s'o6l6,1ed With lh-$
Usd 1?6�11rt.-
PrOjOct do
sign teotUrog or
aPPrOval (Mitigation Measures) QreVoposed to allev14te�poteti(ia,,OnYtronrri4,.i
I
Impacts?
'J
ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING,*
Describe the project sl"L�"ag 't ek"9t"OfOrO thO 3tOJPct, includinq Informationon topographyi soil stab
IlItY, Plants and pnl.
mals, and any cultural, historical or scollic, aspects, q asor be any ex
Isting structures on the site, and the Use cot the structures,
CL
g. P6ierti6s, lhctu' d1n'ql'fi('06at1 n 66rplants�, and animals and any oulturol, hist Ic 1 rs 1 as
CL InOluate,111P tYK.-Pt,land use, (Taqtdgntlalj� pommeralaj,, Or a 0 cen o �pects.
Ptc,) J"tensitY Of ]land US0,(ting ffifilily, apartments, shops, de
MOnt stores, etc,), gndscate '01 development pielght, frontage, setback, rear yard, etc�). Part -
Use SoParatO -sheet for tonger responses,
hereby declare-, under penalty, of perjury that I have read 6nd understand tho instrUcIlolls and that
Are true, COMPlete and correct to the best . of my knowl6doe and belief. the foregoing stateirne
htO
Ap r6
pi lcqnt�s Sighatu
Date
Property owner's signature
Use Permit Number
Request. Use permit to allow��'.
_J
21 Location and size of parcelfs)
CD
1JJ VERWY:
A.P, Number($)
:M Ownership Project 00sctiPtion
Proof of Agency (if needed) Zoning L�,,nd Requirements
Location Description
16 Qoples 0�. $3101. plan
Date 1`16celved
U_ Receipt Numb�,,-
Application taken by
List and describe any Other related permp,-14 and other
city., regional. St - . 'Public approvals required toe tills pro
ate and Federal agencies. -Nonf;� rinnI14"-A ject, Includinq thosO, (Oquired by
IF RESIDENTIAL, Include the number of units, whether: Units are single or itlulti-story III
typ
e of house
,hold �,sjze expecteo. 8chedule of unit, s1zoes
and
IF. COMMERCIAL,. IndIrat6 the type� Whothed neighborhood, city or
.loading facilities. regionally. O,,,I� "tOdl square JoOlage �of sales ardilo and
IF INDU . STRIAL�, Indicate type, WOE" d O.MPIOYMeht per shift, ahtl loading $0111tibs,
IF INSTITUTIONAL, Indicate the'�Major function', estimated emPloymert! r shift, estimated otc
and Community benefits to be derived from the project. Upancy, loading facilities,
ENVIRONMENTAL, IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURESP
Identify Potentially sIgntfiCant environmental, impacts wIln nilto What Project dO sign features Or special
EA. Conditlons of app�oval (mitigation measures) ate ptop the Use per
No change from present use P� 74 to, UlleViale Potential environmental imp
acts!
ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING*
De3cIlbe the project site as It eX[sts tt,.org the project., Including Informatlo,1 on topography, s011 8 r tablllty, Plants ind anl�
'malsi and any cultural, historical or so 016 Atp0ots. Describe oil
1. 1� Y existing structure$ I on the site, and the use Of the structures.
CL Describe the surrounding propertles�r flAr,tuding Information on PlOnts and animals and any
< hist0ricHl Or scenic aspects.
CL Indicate the type of land use commercial,, etc.) Intensity of land use (slngle-famllV,
ment stores, Otc.), And scale c�-,' Ob"Lltopilidilt (height, frontage, setback, rear yard, etc.). apartments, shops, depart -
Use separate sheet for lon.r,,�r N.,Sponses.
Existing buildi
�'e sho'VM on. -Plot Plan- NO additional buil
ng"! 8"
No envirOnutental changes Vill Occur* dings are plannedi
I hereby declare une�lr penalty Of Perjury that I have read and understand th,e InstrusopS and that. the fore I going statements
are true, complete rajd correct to the best Of my knowledge and belief,
Date 7
-------- Applicant's signature
Data- 07
PtbP&tY owner s signatur
,Use P-)rmlt Number
P4eqie8t*. Use permit 10 allow,
Location and tlZe of parcel(s)
R I F Y,.
UJ
kP. Number(s).
ow . nership Project DOscriptlob
Zoning and Requirements
Proof of Agency (it t.eeded) Location Detorlptibil
144 16 Copies Of Plot Plan
Date Received
LL Receipt Number
Application taken by
BE OR ATION, or ITE IN AGRICULTURAL ZO:NM
ADDITIONAL, INVORMATTON
In the "A-511, tIA-100 JA-�201111 ikA�4011, and "A-160t"Agricuit al.
Ur . zones the subdivision
or property in order to legal)ay segregate one homP8ite from remai
ning farmland may
be allowed with the approval,)of a use permit by the Plannin . C 11 ''. , .
cation for the use permit shall Innlude a proposed. 9 Mmisplon. The appli—
the entire area of existingparcels, Plan of development and it -,e for
under the same or related Ownershi'p*
contlaining
the site of one or more existing or Proposed dwellings. Tlv�li Planning Commi86
grant such a Use permit only if it d6h f.-ih inn may
d that:
'The existing parcels show
roquirement4 of the zone. n oft the development Plan together meet the lot area
2. 'The Proposed segregation and development wIll not reduce the capab
-agricultural use of the no ilities for
n—hoMesite parcel(s) and surrounding properties.
The proposed segregation and development is justified or made
occupancy of homesites, oxrne h6oessaryby the
,rbhlp of property,, or 'tati ondl structure of the.__:�.,
ganil,
farm businosss finano-*
LPg requirements, retl
irement plann' g, or riMi
in
The proposed parcels meet the requirements,of the County Rbalth Department for
sewage disposal and, wat er supply.
'The proposed segregation and development is consistent Vith th; policies of the
Butte County General Plan,
6. The homesite parcel is'not less than one acre and not more than two acres or
the minimum lot area allowed by the County Health Departm6ritt whichever is greater.
PLv�A`SE SUPPLY DIE "FOLLOWING INF OMIATION A8OUT y0tTR PROPOSE,) H014ESITE SEGRE - GATION:
'What is the total area (in acres) of all . parcels.under the same or related . ownorshi
covered by the development p:Lat? 8.5 acres
2. What agricultural use(s) is/are conducted on the parcel(s) shown on the develo . meat
plan, and surrounding properties? P
seasonal "Ayqv%g_
Agricultural use of the 'property Will, not be feeected by the proponed segregation.
What are the reasons for this segregation of a homesitel (Check the approptia
reason(s))
____pccupancy of homesite8 (Please explain)
---------------
____pwnership of proparty (rlease explain
structure of the farm business (please explain)
inancing requirements
X retirement planning
—similar clrcumstanc6t (pleast explain)
JA
Date
pature of O.PpAl io
Buffo COW MaMTR9 C -MM
necesgitat 4,a move to' FEB. 24,1987
A little over three years, ago we made a career chan e which
Jamestowno California. !We -have purchased a orolu Ca9foraw
home and propet,ty it Tuolumne County, and are, -planting for
ment in this areai our retire -
For the past thr
ee yeays the hormesite which �we are tequestihg, be
segregated has been utilized as a re tal Un
and costly to mal. n it- It is very difficult
ntaih 6 residence in rental condit, n troM this dir
ance. The sale of the homesite voulcl be very beneficial to
greatly enhance our � plans. Us and
A sUrvey of the,,�djoining seven Properties directly north of ours
along Stanford. Road
11 show that the' existi�ng, pair -eels
from 1-5 acres, to vaxy in size -
5'. 2 acres.
Our two parcels consist of approximately 8.5 acr
_es. If
we are
allowed to segregate the 2 acre homesi-te Approxi-zately 5-5 acres 'Will
remain in otir Ownership. We have 6hdvili continue to op0ate this
acreage as an agricultural unit as we have in the 'Past for the prod.-
Uction-of sheep and, related agriculture.
,We feel, that the most logical and beneficial solution 1,or us is
to 8041, the homesite portion of the property and continue to operate�
the temainder as an agricultural unit. Thi
redud ) �e s will not appreciably
the Present size Of the agricultural Operation and Will not be
adverse to the present use of adjacent Properties.
Thank You very much for your consideration in this request.
3B-19-05
Robert 8 k en
I
Transam6t'ca min rals
e
8941 Stanford Laifte
Comp any
11 so
Durham,. CA, 95,938
so!. Olivell Ste 2J, 2 3
LOS Angeles, CA 9003.5
38-19-06
38-16-19,
Dale Nelson
'8911 Stanford Lane
Ivan Sohnrey
Durham, CA 95938,
2409 serviss, St.
Durham., CA 95938
38-19-22
38116-27, etc.
Stock Petroleum Co.
3301 Watt Avenue
Eureka Savings
Sacramento, CA 9582,_1
1250 San Carlos Ave,
San Carlos,
CA 94070
38-19-370 etc.
-16
38 -21-2, etc.
Billy Jones
9,874 Stanford Lane
Stock Petroleum CO.
Durham, 'CA 95938
3301
1 Watt Ave.
Sacramento, CA 9582,
e4-�c.
Richard Smith
8896 Stanford Lane
Durham, CA 95938
38-19-43
George Brandt
8860 Stanford Lane
Durham, CA 95938
38-19-442i etc.
j Donald Brandt
17128 Table Mt. Rd.
Jam stOwn, CA 95327
38-,17-19
Gregory Ward
8761 S�anfotd Lane
Durham, CA 95938
38-17-20
Delbert Siemsen,
8791 Stanford Lane
'Durham, CA 9L5938
38-16-01
Sohnrey Brothers
2405 8erviss st,
Durham, CA 55938
W,
IM,
tv)
41f
Eu
At
i A N 0 r;,' NATURA -AITH, AND
WE A 0 T Y
PLANNING COMMISSION
1 COU14TY CENTER, DRIVe - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA
PHONE. s38-7601
J
April 28, 1988
Don and Claudia Brandt
17125 Table Mountain Road'� ,
Jamestown., CA 95327
Re: Use Permit, AP 38-19-44, 45
Dear Mr. Brandt:
At the regular meeting of the Butte County Planning Commission held,
April 28, 1988-, Your requ,,ast for a Use Permit to allow t
of a two acre homes* the segregation
Ite in an A-5 zone located on
Stanford Lane, west Of the Sacramento Northtrnfti the south side of
Iroad, identified as
AP 38-19-44, 45, Durham, Was denied without prejudice,'
The term "Without prejudice" is to, allow f or reappli
se'ation, 24-41, 0 zeqi within I yeat wntt-6u cation putguant,to
Section 24-60 (Rea fl -it tgcessity Of invoking
PplicAtion special haarangl ff th
4� "a County Code.
Should you deslltl� to appeal this decision you must do so, with an
I In
APPOal,fed of $75.,00, in wr4t' 9, to the Clerk of the Board
Center Drive, GrOville, California, prior to , 25 County
day Appeal. period which is at 5:00 the expiration of the 8-
P -mo* Priday, May 6, 1988.
Should You have any questions regarding - contact,
a. and 3.ioo p.m.
this office between 10:00 m this Matter, pleasP
Sincerely,
K rcher�e
Director of -Planning
13AK,,Ir
oun
;L A N D 0 F N �T
lop. URAL W-�-,AltH ANP
LANNING COWISSION
�p
7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE 09.,J""�ILLE, CALWORNIA 95965-3391'
PHONEA 538-7W
December 29, 1987
Don and Claudia Brandt
17125 Table Mountain, Road
Jamestown..CA. 95327
Re: Ust� Permit, AP 38-19-44, 45
Dear Mri and Mrs. Brandt:
Enclosed is a copy of the Staff Findings concerning YO1-1r application
for a Use- Permit to allow the segregation of a two acre lv�mosjtts in an
A-$ zoning district located on the South side of Stanfovdtahe, west
of the Sacramento Northern Railroad, Durham.
A public hearing has been. set for January 14, 1988 at Ln p.m� I This
meeting will be held in the Board 'of Sapervisors' ROOM�,25 Count
Center Drivej Oroville, California. y
The Planning QOmmission recommends that the applicant or their
authorized representative be Present at the hearing to respond to any
questions the Commission may have. In the event that no one will
3.
represent the applicant$ please contact the Planning, Office prior to
the scheduled public hearing*
Should you have any questions regarding this Matter,, please jv=tact
this office between l0!,00;a.m4 and 3.-00 p.m.
Sincerely,
B. A. Kircher
birectorof Planning
Laura ft- Tuttle
Associate Planner
Enc.
R A i
TH
'DEPA.ATIAENT OF !PUW�ic HEAL
OlVIS104 OF ENVIRONN(fNTAL HEALTH
t3 7 County Coniv Drl�a L-) 741, ElMloll'k*od
a 196 Mornotial Way )raVille, C Sal5a, �'t
Addrais ',allfornla L95965 . Poke fl�_,�,nja 9596gr
Chico Collibinlo 9.5926
'Reply to T. I.ph'601'916/891*2727� Tolephonol% 916/534-4201 Tdiaphonst?P16/872-6308
May 7 1987
Mr. Don Brandt RE,. Agri' Itl3ra Segregation
.w � 1 ' "
17125 Table, -,'Mountain Road
amestown, CA 95327 S tanford 1,400
Durham 4'Area 4'
-19-44, J
AP. 38
Dear Mr. Brandt:
I have made an initial re : viev, of this proposed",ilgricUtural
Tiendation
segregation, Before this department ran make apos�,tive rt�, ny
o th� Planning Department for use permit it All bO neaea8ary to
t bdivision (,,wdintnce
ver I -
.ify that soil conditions meet county su tedrLo ve if -
ill, be requi
standards. Soil depth test holes w
soil type and depth Additional soil Information Will Probao-,
be required (that is.t percolation tests and winter groundwater
monitoring Exrperience in this area has showft %t is questionable.
ed ubdivision ordjnajjcj�� sewage
that thelpropos parcels can meet s Ln
ards due to probable high W- ter Nqatc.)V tables 6nd
disposal stand (St on 'Adobe)
heavy clay soils Ockt
-2727 when t he requi'l-red
'Please. contact this off jcLt., at, 891
test holes have been dug� or if you, have any qtiest!�Ons re?Parding
this Tnatter6
Yours very t—AY
Vance SevOtini Rr.So
Division of 1:-nvirotnetital Re'ralth'
Planiling Dopartilient) oroville
cc.
MAY 1.987
Win
BUTTE: COUyry PLANNING CO*IISSION
NOTICE OF Pu
qotice is hereby given by the Butte County Planning Commission that
public hearings 'wi
.11 be held on Thursday,, January 14, 1988,, in the
BUtteCOuntY Board of Supervisors' Room, County Administration
Center, 25 County Center Drive, Droville, California; regarding the
following items at the following times:
7 -1 ON WHICH A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WITH MITI'GATION' MEASURES
E
IMP?
REGARDIN ENVIRONMENTAL— ""T.Yi:
.. .. .... ... . ... i'%cTB N �D�
900 a.m., Dave Manthei - Rezone from 11U-11 (Unclassified), to FR -_3
(Foothill. -Recreational, 3 acre parcels), located on
Lots 2 and.3 of Richardson Hills Subdivision, approx-
imately 1/4 mile north of Richardson Spring Road on the
east side of Cohasset Road and the West side of Panorama
Drive, identified as. AP#047-23-0-OS9$060, northeast
Chico.
1:30 p.m. Family Sei,,%Y,,;
ice Association,of Butte '2 Glenn Counties
Use Permit to allow administrative and counseling
Offices fora public -quasi -public organization on
property zoned SR -1 (Suburban -Residential,. 1 acre
arcels)
P located.on the south side Of Chico River Road,
400 feet'west of Miller Avenue, identifie
ico. d as AP#039-31-0-061,
Ch�
1:30 p.m. Nina Lambert - Use Permit to:,ailo-1v the segre
gAtion of a
homesite in a agricuit;,Ira,
L Zone. and a Variance' ta the I
acre minimum lot.31-_,ze, on property zoned A-10 (Agricultural,
10 acre: parcels), locanted-otl the east side of Liberty !,ane,
1,100 feet southof Chico
River Road, identified -as
AP"T039,-10-0-006, Chico,
I TEM ON IfflICH A NEGATIVE DECLARATIONREGARDING
Don & Claudia Brandt - Use Permit to allow the
4. segregation of.
a 2 acre homesite on Property zoned A-5 (Agricultural, S
acre parcels), located on the south side of S tanferd Lane
west of the Sacramento Northern Railroad right-of-way,
idOntificd as AP#038-19-0-044,045, Durham.
ITEM ON WHICH A DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL
ALEUKT HAS BEZIN VXhFAKED
1:30 P.M. John Flogan - Use Permit to allow a private club, recre-
ation -and campin -acilities co-
g nsisting of 249 spaces
on Property zoned 11U11 (Unclassified), locatedon the
r
no th side Of Cohasset Road approximately I mile South
of Vilas Road, and, 1/2 mile'south of the Cohasset
Store, identified as AP'056-18-0-1004,005,007, Cohasset
area.
The khove-mentioned.applications, maps and Negative Declarations with
Mlt-�Lgation �4,
easures are on file and available for public viewing at
the office of the Butte County Planning Department, 7 County Ce-
.nter
Drive, Oroville, Califernia. If You challenge theabove applicatlons
-ill court, You -may be limited to raisingonly those issues you or
�someone else raised at the public hearing described in
or in writt - this no -Lice
en correspondence delivered to the Plaiming Commission,
or prior to, the public hearing, at
BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COM�IISSION
B.A. TOR OF FLUMNY—NG
To be published in the Chico:Enterprise Record on Thursday,
31
1987- -December
"Y'
Archgooldgicai Reoonnals
Of Brandt's ProPosed
Land, Spht,
AP 438-19-449451w nvarL Durhp.,,q
�UUO County C411forni
Prepowed For, -
Don and Claudia Brandt
17125 Table Mountain Road,
jamestown� California 95327
Pre0ared By:
Jensen & Associates
Archaeological Consulting
And Research
41 SkYrfibuntOln Circle
Chico, 'California 95926
23 N.OVefUb 0 1" 987
caf,014j,
�_
�.�'.��., •A
. . . . . . . .......
IOU
AO U
A N;
PLANNING CoMmissION
1 COUNTY CENTER D91VE - OROVILL'
Ei CALIFORNIA 95965-3397
NOVember 3P 1987 PHONE: S38-7601
Don & Claudia Brandt
17125 Table Mountain Road
Jamestown, CA 9.5327
Re: Use Permit AP 3819�44r45
& Mrs. Brandt:
An initial study of your pr
the segregation of a 2 -acre OPOsed, Projectp a Use Permit to allow
indicates, homesite from a
Potentially adverse impa 5 -acre parcel
cts to the, eftvironm�mnt (refer
to the enclosed environmental checklist).
these impacts, suitable To reduce ot eliminate
of the mitigation 'measures are requil,'Od at Part
project. Otherwiset aft Environmental Impact Report (EIR)
is required Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act.
Ali early response to this notification,, sen
Departmeni-j. Will OXPOdite t to the Plann-
forward your wtitt the scheduli Ing
ng of Your PrOJOct- Please
this latteZ. en response within , 16 days from
the, date of
Your
P lies in an alea where
recorded Or Potent archaeological sites have been
ially exist.. In Order to assess the Potential
for adverse impacts and to
determine What, if any
ures'wQuldb? appropriate, an a'rchaeolo Mitiga n meat -
ducted. A list Of qualified "Oal survey Must b.eocon-
persons can !local consultants j -luded. These
rM an archaeological s
for such a be hired to perfo s inc
survey- In the event of an 9IR urvey or arrange
letter will be sent 0 t1i requitemente a subsequent
u ni,ng the Procedure for the County to select
the Consultant to prepare the EIP
If You have, -any questions or comments, Please contact this Office
any weekday between the. hours Of :10:00 A -M. and 3tOo p,M.
Sinderely,
B -A6 KIRCHER
Director of,plahnin
............ .. :;:;;:; .......... ,
Laura M. Tuttle
Assotiate'Planhek
Enclosures
BUTTE� COUNTY
Consultant List
SPECIALIZ80 SEkVIcE.S
Jensen and Astoclatbs
Peter M, Jensen
41 Skymountain Circle
Archaeolool'cal Con I s,u I t, I ng
Chico, CA 95926
and Research
Professional Archaeological Services;
Alfred Farber
6635 QUall Way
Archaeology and Cultural
Paradiseq CA 95969
Resources Management
3.
Holman & Associates
3615 Folsom Street
Arch4e0l6QY aMd Cultural
San'Franciscol CA 94110
Management
4.
PublicAnthropolOgicbI Research
P-04� 8ox 160756
Sacramento, CA 1 95816-0756
Cultural Resource Studies
5*
a-. Keith Johnson
CdII-f'ornia State University, Chlco
Archaeological Research Program,
Archaeoloolcal ConsultIng
Department of Anthropolog
and Research
CSU, Chico
Chico, CA 95929-0400
6.
Susan Lindstrom
PAO. Box 3324
Truckee, CA 95734
Archaeological Consulting
Jam ' es P. Manning
C/o ECO-Ahaly;.c3ts
Archaeological C6nsultlno
1025 Village Lane
Chicoo CA 95926
Public Anthropological Research
P.O. Box 160756
Sacramento, CA 95816-0756
?
DEPARTMENT Op PUBLIC HEALTH
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMEN I TAL HEALTH
El 7 County center OtIve,
I Way9 0 747 Elliott' Road
Reply to f3 196 �Iembr�oo
Cf'i"
Tei'P"�tlo �,t910891�922�627 Or"111do Celifornio 9596S Poradise, CoNfornid 95969
T61OPhOhdt 916/5344281 Tblop'hono. 916/872,�430S
MaY 1987
Rr. Don Brand t
17125 Table Mountain Road
JamestoWn, CA '95327 RE., Agricultural Segregation
Stanford Lane
Durham Area
45
Dear mr. Brandt.,
I have made an initial review of this propo
sed agricoltural
segregation. Before this department can, make a,
to the Planning Department for use per
'Mit it WiPositive recommendation
11 be necessary to
'verify that Soil conditions meet county subdivision ordinance
standards. Soil depth test holes will be required to verif,v
Soil type and depth . Addi t'onal so" 'nfo,�MatiOn will prob6ly
be required (that is Percolation test.8 and Winter groun&ater
monitoring ). Experlience in this area has'shoj,�j it is
that the proposed parcels can me questionable
disposal standards du et subdivision ordinance sq
e to probable higi-I Igi I Slage
heavy clay soils (Stock -toil Ado - be). nter water tables'an'd 0e,
Please contact this office at 891-2727 when the requited
test holes have been dugj or it you have any quest' �
this matter. ions regarding
Yours very truly
Vance Severi-n R S
Division of E' ' *
nvironm,ental Health
Planning DePartfi)00t, OrOville
Buft's Co. Fla"Ma C�Wnr&
MAY 19 1987
Omo,11011 Caf"4
AF N
17
PLANNING COMMISSION
7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVC — OROVILLt, CALIPORNIA 959654397
PH6NEi 538.7do I
Don Brandt
17125 Table Mouhta-
3.n Aoad 14arch, 10, 1987
Jamestown, CA 95327
Use Permit
AP#38-,19-44145
Dear Mr. Brandt. -
We received you
r Pre -application review toque
subject Use Permit. at for tho
Butte county Publ'
received t -1c WO7,*ks and F,v-
he informaticin 3--rOnmentpJ-Health, have,
.- uIs app-licati The Planting
Department will cOnside Y(:)u SuL- titted.
after we have assurances f-rom th' I On complete only
the Project complies e above departments that
any conditions impose with appropriate ordinances and
de can be met.
It is the aPPlioants responsibili
additional information te tY to provide any
Environmental ilea I I eded by Public, Works, or
th to meet their requirements.
Public Works may be cont&,Oted by telephone at 538-7266
and Environmental Health at 538-7281 for further
information as to theix� eval'uation of the Proposal and
their 3:equirements.
The. Planning Departme
the application for ant st-7-f-Z will also be revie
ny spe wing
that ate aPPropri cial conditions or mod
ate. Should you iEicatiohs
have any questions
about the Pte-applicatl6n review, Please Contact this
office.
Sincerely',
RiA. KIACHEp,
Director of, Planning
Craig :-rs
nde
Plann'
ing Technician
CS'.. jmc
TRIBUTIO'
ounty Public Works
County Env. Health IRRIGATION WATER
City of Biggs; ___'_'_1ridley Water
I , Rggs-r,
City Of Chic ,�Autte W,"ter Dist.
Pitt.
0 a
City Of �Gri dl ey Durham jPr D -i s t
.0 r I Yand. Irr. Dist.
City of Groville OVille.W'
Town Of Paradise Pavadise Irr Dist.
County Richvalo Irr: Dist.
�T_ Table Mtn
"ita—te-7—ransportation Dept. 77 �- 6 Irr. Dist.
I CT WATER -7- nermal+to Irr. Dist.
'REMATION FACILITIES
BerrY 'Creek Water Co.
B OoMer Mtn.Mutual Water Co Area Rec. A Park Dist.
I Brush Creek, Estat 4�Durham A p
Butte Wa es & ark. Dist
ter Dj.ttrict 7— F. Rec .
ather, -River Rec. & Park 'Djjt.
CA Water Service Co. (Chico P�aradi , s�,d Rec. & park
Uvban'a,rea & part of OrOvill 7T— Richvalb Rec. & Park Di,st
e) - & ec,
;Del Oro Water Co. t a te ParU, R '
Dept'.
(ParadiSe Pines) State Fish A Game 4 Dept.,
Feather Palls (Louisiana
S
P:actfic) jUOOL . DISTRICTS
Forest 'Ranch Mutual B i ggs _5 —if ted
Gran Mutual Skanse . n Sub.) Butte Community College
Green Acre's Rlenwood Dr.-Chjco) ButtO County Sup.
Gri'dley Farm Labor C CA State Universi Of. SchoolLS
amp tyi,"Chico
ronq, Water Dist. Chico Unified
M496lia CO� Vater Dist. 17— Durham Unified
Lake Mad Fe ther Falls Union
Merry Mtn. Mutual (Clipper, 1_7 a
mills) — Golden Feather Upion
mulberry Water (SE Chico) Gridley High
Gridley Union
Northwoods, Mutual (Forest Ranch)
Ramirez Uater Oroville Elementary
Springs of Livilng Waters opovillO Unio
n High
Unifi d
(Richardson Sprin§t) POlerM�, e
Stirling City Palermo Union
(Diamond Internatiwial) Pioneer Union
---LtZV'9t8, Mutual (Duy-ham) Thermalito Uhion
COMMUNITY SERVICES
L - ' SEWERS
6 Saddle COMM'* Sarv. Dist.
E RRIVA G E Richvale Sanitary Dist.
�Utte Creek Drainage Burbank Pub., utility Dist.
ELECTSjLgAL POWER Oroville Kelly Ridge)
,-L_ Pacjfi`�j�s &
'Electric S'llansen Sub. (6SA 21)
FIRE P-ROTECTION =7 Sterling City Sewer lialnt,. Dist
_L__ Theiimalito 110r�L Dist, (CSA 26)
El Medio Fire Protect. DiStr' RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
County Fire Department -
State Division of Fo restry J State Wat r Resources 00pt.
MOSOUITO AAATPMVM1 U.S. Foree
TDISIRICTS st Service
Purham,, OrOVille_,_� U S. Bureau of
or Butte County Land Management
POLICE PROTECTION
State H-1-ghway patrol 2THER
CO"'ty SL.het*iff
OF
Ff-�--- -7-77
-all
A IT
17
go
99
Road 27 T- Ui.
CY -I sm 11
Rd.
z
A
�'() 7 Konnin Acke'rn
Road 29, 39 '�Jov. #VUL I
ztm
In Rd
Rd. 30 X acrarden, 6) E
River Da ------- U1 blesa
State y n West d IG di Ut.
Rd. 307h, Durhairl LL.... Rd
I ife z t 0 lr�
w , Q k .6 '
ORO DA Y A Knifus �Ur�a
n_JL Ln.8 Burdick Roa
31 SCH. p D
ayton
Durham
colaw
ir 32 cc
ri _.' Z reilIZ
Rd. 3�5;Yl
'cv I I � r,� , Rd 2
I OUR
33 U 11 1 W q
Rd. "dmIfn Rd.
H
Rd 34 d campro
Duncan House Ave.
Rd.
=0
Zt E
Won raintand
bad
36 Ag 4. i L .1 1 1� _31. -- rj jo ,
Api gh
Rd A;'10 Dr..
3
-6 Pe;- co
Rd
BAYLISS-`
Rn d)
Rd
Nefso
414,
d. 4a.
Pd,
X
_44 X.
Rd. lake
45 Eddy,
0
Nelson I
> Aoa
d Ro.4
A Dad
pea ,
NELSON
z- X tic 48A
ippee RD
CO UNi sh
tz cc, G
i .5c)
0 co
Road
> fit -
fl - # '
- . -.1 1.. 1 L t - ,
c
Rd, 54
52' 1
Rd. 5� N -
!i 0
Rd. 56 .2 -
/—CI&
X-1
q, X
c
1� Carlson
> Rd. 57 -2.
0
y
>
0 d:
N
h M., Fruivat
av Rd
Richvafe� HwV
R
Ex
Logrea
Ch,
VALE