The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About038-190-051id/Y ' ��,e � _ .. � � �1. I �:.dl � a � �;. . � ' • \ up � •� 'n1 ,'• n .�� • ' + � ,� � ,C 11 .. - I t � .. - f 4 - •�' .A �, � � �` .. • '�, `.. �� 4 a �' IIS A a • I` Nxry � !' rb r h ^ a '. ti� • ��, .I. • a, •d ' r ./ � ,,b y I � ,r � a � � y t �s .��n,. t+'y,y� . «T± .. .. V �;�� F _ � r , r . ,. , �, 1 ,. � i r _ Q ` � .t ,. ^ i � 1 ,. I . 1 ' M ` � � � T � ' 1� 1 �� .1 � a ._ ,A t .. PLANNING, COMMISSION SUMMARY SHEET POP LAND DIVISIONS row ins 85-_04=05-05 APPLICANT Mike SC ADDRESS P.O. Box 786, Durham, 'CA 95938 OWNER Same PROJECT..�. DESCRIPTION Tentative Subdivision r4a to divide 2 .88 acres. into .Parcels at 5.09 5. S55. 50 S. 74 acres res ect-i:vci LOCATION on the west side o Stanford Lane, a roximatel. 1800 feet siut7, Of itsintersection iyitlt S camorre Lane, Durham area. ASSE8&ORIS PARCEL NUMBER(S) 38-19--51 " ZONING A-5 GEN. PLAN Orchard F Field Cro a'R0jECT CONSISTENT? DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED: ti. - 4 - 8 5 I+licliael htoonc650 Lincoln Street. DATE PUBLICATION NOTICE VTp'ITTEN t�rtri PLACE NEWSPAPER NOTICE(S) PUBLISHED - d. CR P. G. B DATE MAILING LIST PREPARED DATE MAIL -OUT NOTICES WRITTEN _ . MAILED ,a,---------._ NUMBER DATE PLtM ING DIRECT'OR'S REPORT PREPARED ENVIRONMENTAL �"` DETERMINATION CA.TEGORICAi� EXEMtPTxON ,. DATE FILED AND DATENE GATIVE DECLARATION - DATE ADOPTED MITIGATED NWATIVE DECLARATION - DATE ADOPTED 'f.» %.14 ENV. IMPACT REPORT - DATE CERTIPIED .,..., - SUB. COMMITTEE MEETING DATE ADVISOR' AGENCY HEARINJ, DATE _ ADVISORY AGENCY ACTION BOARD ACTION COMMENTS (22' riV c �. c. x i ✓�✓� 7--,r'y� i�'� � �� r-`...�.'��`,t`.:�."�—..�.'�'',�tirti,<� Are' 7- Inter -Departmental Memorandum � To: tr'cr � � Co` airtg Carm FROM: JUL 9 1987 tE1OKCT: SC/1dGCPMS S(//�Cll �✓r 5 eve+ a GA7La �%f12 coif rz isa 7`"v Ut/✓ a ^0Veer tic Gr'' C%veytr��arte /u fZwsy� /du."'Ir IW, ��rcc t� u 5 c �c� / e C�rrrr.� er� ✓ t. 1� �/1 �C Y 4�Gt+FC (i ,�s`� rl7�G%vr�. � '✓Gr"l��i��y� /v%f/i�%R-G /S SC✓��O'� Pc(•!t � ii'� /p !TE / d [ e,✓ rpt t�r7 rr l' C2 !/d �"e 10 DURHAN MUTUAL WATER CO., LTD. 1 97 Durham Dayton Hwy. P.O. Box 612 Durham, California 65938 pultca Co. Hanning Carroa JUL 2 019f31 Proville, Calitornia July 16, 19$7 Mr: Stuart Eden Land Deve3opment Section Department of Public Works 7 County Drive Oroville, California 95965 Stuart: Re*Scr098ins Subd,i vi sion on Stanford Lane The Durham Mutual Water Company does not maintain or control the drainage facility at the west end of the Scroggins property, Therefore, Durham Mutual Water Company has no objection if winter runoff waters are diverted to this drainage system at the. west end of the Scroggins subdivision propert;, Also, I might add that there are no Water company liens or delinquencies agains the Scroggins subdivision property. Sincerely, Don Bollerud Secretary/Treasurer r - .. 6?7 , s NOTICE OF DETMMINATION APnNDIX11 i d T Cfflcct of E'lk.;+nng and Research ' FItUM. Pl.ann � De � 1400 Tenth Strut, Room 1.21 i artment Sacramento, CA y'581µ 7 Cou Center Drava or Oroville, COUnty Clerk County of Butte ELEANOR M. BECKER, Counly Clerk scaler: a., Pilin of %�Otic,y or / Filing i Determination in compliance with Section 21108 or 21182 of the ,public t.esources Code. lett Iltle AP .._ 85-04-05-05 Name Tentative Subdivision 1-•1,ap AP 38-19-51 Make Scro tate Clearinghouse Num --� gins (If submitted to Clearinghouse) Contac: e;son - 7'elep one Num '.r John Mendonsa, Public Works (916) 534-4266 9-1 UlecT � tl� On the west side of Stanford Lane, approx. Midway and approx. 2 miles south of Oroville-Durhamwy, Durham, 3/4 mile east of r�olect Description Tentitive, Subdivision Map dividing a A 21 of a2L)rox. 5 acres each. 8 . acres into four parcels Thls Is to advise that the Butte County Lea Agency► or itesponsr le Agency -- """"— gardiingrothe above describe�dribo I.oj�t and has ...........made the following determinations P 1 l' The project . wvll,l, , will nota have a significant effect on the environment. An Envlronrnental Impact Report was to the provisions of CF -QA. pa for this project pursuant A !Negative Declaration was prepared for this projoct pursuant to t provislons of GEQA. he The EIR or Negative Declaratiat: and record of project approval may examined at. Butte County Planning Department Cnjint �• MItigation measLTes of the project. were were not, made n tohdition of the approval 4. A statement of Overriding Considerations ., was this project.. ► was not; adopted for Date recelved for Filing _ 11-20-85 Sigtiia re Stophob A. Sfi.reoiox c fte iced 3ahua . v ry :1985 .. v y Mike SCrO � , ` ggins AP#38-19-51 Tentative Subdivision, Mi.tigatioti Measures r. i• Provide a permanent solution to drainage including the Protection of downstream properties from flooding as a result Of this project. MICHAEL MOONrY CIVIL ENBINEER RCE 20647 Butte vn"Mt' Rra-, SCROGGINS SUeD.NISION kttn. Dave Hironimus rhis transmits a ry=tt Of the Butte Lounty Planning Department t: cannidor the mitiqation moasurn for the shcave? Wid WhOISJUIOn M' :h 00) "Provide a permanent solution to drainage including the protection a+ downstream properties from Coath ng as a result Of this project" In this u"d E wtur thu fallowinq diMCUSSIOn- illn W111votys hossim CK Mich this. "CIjuci ic; a part is 00 acre; " stjo, ThV onin is bounded on the north by thn Uruy> i1v li"vilant :-ea, thr uouth my Wtu Lrooku thn west by WON- HIpway -w, and %to onst by Stantnrd Kano. Runoff is go"erally dirvotc" tu tho wont vAwruit is rarvied by a drainage swale along thc,, oLd raitros- viqhk no waV to tho south. At a POint &PrOmimatelY 10ut) fu'ot thz- ftuw irwnm Wevt and runs through n ,.a, hi el w i. to I vuvrt . En i ing tho raiLroad right of way flow ond v ruayrn &I anfra rcwQ '41i Ct ILWC) 1 4 In. rnncruW rnnning 1" 0 dit"n to Nuttu i_ rmek. vilij, locals in thp arnn Lonrurning tloodinn of Phu vroniinq and in 40 Vearn no one could recall nuci happvnimg. Flooding of downstream propertiou in a common accurremcp as tk,' are, mauth of thy project in pasture land and orcharOm which or +loud irrigated during thp mumMor months. Conslorrtnq tho nizm of the bauln, the negligiblo inarwasu in r"nuftv sand to hintoryq I must conclude that the increase in r"nufl resulting from Lhe improvoments duriving frnm thig prniect will not rouue dam app to life and property,, Thereforc thvW improvements h6ving presunted no prablam, require no am1ution, Appond d is a Location Map and a Site -s Map. Yours, 600 gird Stj—e �f F GA y , ,y r' rt LAM N l mn LAND OF NATURAL VVIAITII AND BEAUTY DEPARTMENT OF 131113j je WORKS WILLIAM (BIII) CHBFf r C'i,It�o 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE . ORDVILI,t, for Telephone.. (916) 534., Ieq r�LIFDRNIA 95965 RONALD D, McELROY 7 Ili Deputy Director November 18, 1985 Mike 'Scroggins P. 0. Box 786 RE AP 38-19-51 uurham, CA 95938 Tentative Subdivision Dear Mr. Scraggins At the regular meeting of the Butte County Advisor November 18, 1985, the Agency adopted a mitigated negative decd ra regarding environmental 'impact and approved your tentative for AP 38-•19-51 subject to the conditions Of a declaration attached sheet, subdivision approval listed on the If no appeals are timely filed--within ten (10 da Advisory Agency's approval--with the Clerk of the Bo of the date of the this action will be final, and Of Supervisors, When the conditions of a for you to file your "finalomap" Wiithotheig�t��tCount Will labe in tinder Works for recordation Within twenty-four (24) Months by the Advisory Agency, y Department Of Public n hs Of'the date of approval ns regarding this matter.. If You have any questions ,please co , ntact this office. Very truly yours, William Cheff Director of Public Works Men_onsa JM,/ds 4sn stant Director attachment cc Planning :Elea 1 th Mike Mooney a Mike Scroggins, Tentative Subdivision Map, 4 parcels on the west side of Stanford Cane, approx. 1800 ft, south of its intersection with Sycamore Lane. Durham area. AP 38-1 Engineer:51Mike Mooney Public Works conditions 1. Indicate a 50 ft. building setback line from the centerline of Stanford Lane and access easement4 d the developer at all street 2. Street signs shall be provided byate street intersections per County tytheUCountyts. addressbcoordinatornfor approVal Warnes for each street to of street names.') et section on access road to R5 -7-A standard. 3. Construct full stre 4 Provide monumentation as requiredbythe Department of Public Works in accordance with accepted standar. 5. All easements of record to be shown on the final map. 6. Pay off assessments. 7. Pay any delinquent taxes or current taxes as required. g, provide cul-de-sac at west end of access easement. Health Dept. conditions g; Show a 50 ft. leachfield setback from the drainage days on parcels 1 through 4. 10. Show the usable `sewage adispos n areaproven to meet the requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance parcel 11. Prove that the required usable sewage disposalarea existsnot on each parcel. Combine with an adjacent parcel any parcel to contain the usable sewage disposal area required by the Subdivision Ordinance. The following mitigation measure is also required: 12: Provide a permanent solution to drainage including the protection of downstream properties from flooding as a result of this project, DURHAM MUTUAL WATER CO LTD 1807 Durhartl rJa , ,r- RO. Box 61l on ► lwy. Durflam, California 95938 ?` la 16, Michael Moc�tt ne 0 1,inooln Street Or, ov.1110, California 0,5965 r. Deer Agri ljyj0Oney, Th.s letter croggins re is` n answer to your re :, propert quest 'r� w rr chae.l regarding she abandonment of �h,:� , y in Durham, , ditt.huu an his The subject w.s. s meeting with the o discussed a� a recent ��'ater �o board abide b i'o�lowing docision; the board y t; long standing y deco deo to easer,�ent5 Policy pf not re men Us, prescribed to the Water Co lingtt.�7hxng the Ther mP.ny in the 1 . eforo, we are reut�rna.n.� the grant dF��d9.�o agree- r1 t clazm deed, unsigned iovve Y er wo and the Lr1��, dxtchos on nage 110 ob ;ectlo;, to ry is�a drainage ditcher perty, 1), tch "� onocx,oggins changing Wa ter Compan and is no ; poured ox map appendI ",fir' y It could be chap ' maintained by the g0 along the northerl 'edt as you suggested, eatif action cx~ other y line of Itis Propertgested, to _�roRaictte water t local lendoivn.ers y Ari meets the ' o anyone eXcept the Scro �ich does not a.r as we are. concerneda �.`t ma bein. , : >btst remember y plowegi . 8 Property, as g d" aches or it x his Plowed to `.crogans pipelines to any o f +, Provide water subdi,isi0n of areas he creatas in the his property, h1TPe these arrangemen r S t� ll meet she nous of rox F $inoerejy; l'e Nelson octet ry,/`0L1rea_-,ur0r `�cr'eggiiI5 µ 1f R � raq• Y` k' �l.•ap � TYM . +�♦ 'r.r. f7�M v v F.krF MW�x.L" , ? Yy ra:L1 r. 'k'•1`':q SIl S3 cl f q , �l 1 _ ��'r` a .1� a.. `�''� %Y'�¢•. r, � .. r «�° * •'w ;k [ 113""1' t «�➢� .a .. %- � til � � < ' ,.a s. n 11L i z•K t,�� y � t r - tis t"�cnn lit' rano �� l 1 w° Ntg1' t lit°� 1 k1.g1"i; 1 fir: 'u R%k1Y r"il'ityflit?11t ;t l +ktkx, t, 110 ;Jrri ! lierly I Y. rt- �. r' �ia'"= To off c;t tilt' ),nqucst I hG1vc included neces'-snary} (I.) Dur1l a. :1,a1 Wcttcr C'onll'aak1V (i�}7 t1,c, iia t. hcs "A" C4 tsv or i mo t o, 11111'114ti11 i1�:! :1 q' i` r�'Canll�;lt1 ' �(`1`t?klt;t_ kltl; 1T C rt rC Ir1t 1«F: 4 1 l c)ng Xor t.hr r1 v 1 11 �a l 8c 1 oggi.n.s property ) 1'Cy1 s�tfi:a: IY the Title COMP,"ny the C1OOC1;4 %vi l," il"Vr— t,� ,jppOnrjr,rl with ( 1.) A Rr; solt1tiOn Of dibanclonmont ( 2) A 1"tosoluti.on o� Accr:,ptc-ince by t;1`ir_, 13r m"d of' Diractors wC the Dt1r11..)-n1 Mu lain. W,1 L014 COMP-itllY S110111A you 11O.VC ally questions) x may l.itl iaoachocl at. < 111 following mimbors: OX.Cice: 533-2131 tlorno A3 -.1,2,1;C ":l'lir1nk yo>:1 fOr votiv cc�rl�a cl��•� l; ,rr► your;;, 1t1C11t10a1., 11OONV lnc;,:lvlrlcrl t Appendix "All p,- real �1rtp 17'7-01 n • r� 1 �" � r� 1.' (�'3 J.,'-: r �.. x U IANCS OF N A T U k A I Vv i DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH 196 MeDIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH Address .Ci m,eRal Way ' Reply In Chicoi California 95926 0 7 County Center Drive 7 T le hone: 916/8 ? Oroville, Colifornia 95965 '� , ar Elliott Rand Talephonc 916/534.4281 1'arodise, Cclifornia 95969 NoVember 11, 1 �5 +aiephonei 916A72,2961, Ext. 58 Mike Scrog[! ,qjs P.O. BOX 786 gg ins DRE: Mike Srrourham, Cal fornla 96938 W/s Stanford Subdivision Lane Durham Area AP# 38-19-51 A*GCO.'Pt ingC�yim, Dear Mr, Scroggins orovihe, Califarpla This Land Development has advised the Butte Count Department p Section that vie are prepared too act on Of above Works, Based on present information,, we can recommend approval or cc�love applicai:ion. approval, ditional Recommended Conditions for approval: is Shaw a 50 on parcels (fifty) foot 1eachfield k setbac1-�4 from the drainage ways 24 Show the usable sewage disgosal area proven to. of the Subdivision Ordinance on parcel 1,' meet the requirements 3• prove that t•le required usable sewage disposal. ora= parcel. Combine with an adjacent parcel an cl exists on each Contain the usable sewage u Parcel. not proven to g_ dispo5a] area required b Ordinance: y the Subdivision If you have any questions regarding thi,er,' me, Tam Reid, a is 1e the Chico Office of Env r'onmentaP]fleslthontact 8:00 a^ and 9!00 a,m, weekdays, between Very truly Yours, , Tom Reid, Ritmo, Supervising Sanitarian TR.-JI of Cnvronrnontal j] Divi Health cc! Ladd bevelopmont Planning Michael Mooney, Cavil engineer n Inter-Departmec tat Memorandum To: Butte County Advisory Agency FROM, Planning } sueJECTI Report on Tentative Subdivision Map of Mike Scroggins on AP 38-19-51 DATE: November 5, 1985 This is a proposal to divide 21.88 acres into 4 parcels at 51.09, 5.55, 5.50, and 5.14 acres respectively. The 'present zoning is A-5 (Agri- cultural - 5.acre gri_ p'arcels). The Land Use Plan Map of the Butte County General Plan designates this area as Orchard and Field Crops. There are no specific or community plans for the area. The proposal does not conflict with County zoning nor any adopted or proposed element of the Butte County 'General Plan nor any County, specific or conununity plan. Recommend approval with 1 mitigation measure 1. Provide a,permanent solution to drainage including the protection of downstream properties from flooding as a result of this project. DRH lr cc; Michael Mooney .i ; 11 • Ai I l,NiLX l*' COUNTY OF BUTTE EsNVIROW]INTAL CHECKLIST FORM (to be complete v Lea Agency) Log 4 ATS N 85-04-05-05 1, 11ACKGROUNI! 38=19-S1 1. Name of propellent Mike Scrog. �g'ns 2 Address of proponent and representative (if applicable) P. 0, Sox 786 Michael Moon Durham, CA 95938 1650 Lincoln Street Or:oville, CA 95965 1. Project description Tentative Subdivision IT, MAN.iATORY PINDIN`GS OF SIGNIFICANGi YrSS MAYBE NO a, Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause x fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, rtiduce the number or restrict the range of a tare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods or fai i forni 'iistory or prehistory". hoes tilt, pi feet have the: potential to achieve vhort-tevin oenerits to the detriment of long-term, ivira,Mental goals? (A short-term impact on the tviro*'y,lent Is one which occurs in a relatively r` rle f" 1 ,rind of time while long-term impacts will ndure li to the ru ture ,) _ X c. aloes the oroju. have impacts which are individu- ally 1 milted, 1w ,,. nnulatively considerable? (A project tr iy impa4,t on two or more separate resources where thL impact on each resource Is relatively small, but where the ofroct of the total of -those Impacts on the environment is significant,) - �r d, aloes the project ilave. environmental effects wifiielt will cause substantial adverse erraets oil human l)eings, e1ther dirveti, or indirectly" i'if., DET['.iZMINAI ON (To lie eoiupletesd lay the, l,cad Agency) on the basl.s of this initial. vvalxuiticiW l'/IVh rind thcr p,-oposed pro iec't t''Otil,it NOT have a signi ricant effect on the environment, and a K'>:GA IV1, DEC1,ARA'T`T IN will beprepared. 1i1vp find that although the ploposed project couldhave a signifi- cant efreet on, the environment, t1l,ore will not be a si.gniricant effect in this case because the 1,11.11GATTON MVASURI-S described on the attached. short have been addod to the project. A N11-GATIVII,. C1F: 1.AttMON rg111 be prepared, 1,/W[i rind the proposed pro ioct MAI have a signi ricnnt errect on th;e environment, rind lin VN1'il ONMliN'TAl, IMPACT REPORT is required. IlAi1.�, May 10, 1985 C'llU l'Y" oP 11UTTV, MANNINO n X'%BTI.11rNT - ,. ?' Da id 1t. Hix onimus y Aoeiatt mann Reviewed by n IV. ENVIRONMENTAL *S 0 IMP •xp an.atzons o a' ,tye5" and "maybe" answers are required . on attached sheet(s)) I. EARTH. Will the proposal result in significant. YES a. Unstable earth MAYBE N0 conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or X overcoveri.ng of the soil? C. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? d, Destruction, covering or modification of any unique k geologic or physical features? e. Increase in wind or water erosion soils, either on or off-site? -- f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in k siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? g. Loss of prime agriculturally productive soils —" outside designated urban areas? h. Exposure of people or property to geolo iG hazards such k G as earthquakes, landslidesg mud- si ides, ground failure or similar hazards? G 2; AIR. Will the proposal. result in substantial; a. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors, smoke or fumes? c. Alteration of air, movement, moisture, or temperature, -- or any change in climate, locally or regionally? 3. WATER. Will the proposal result in substantial; a. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements in, either marine or fresh waters? bi Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? c, Need for off-site surface drainage improve- �Cc. ments, including vegetation removal, channel- ization or culvert i.nstallation`? d, Alterations to the. course or flow of flood waters? e Change in the ,amount of surface water in any water body? - k f. Discharge ,into surface waters, or in anti alteration of surface water quality) including but -.-- 'k not limited to temperature, dissolved ozygen or turbidity? g• Alteration of the direction or rate of flow Lc Of ground waters? h. Change in the quantity of ground waters ; either through direct additions or with- drawal,s, or through interception of an aquifer by cubs or excavations? i. Reduction in the amount of Water otherwise , available for public water suppl.ios? J6 Exposure of!' peo le oet to related hazards asrflooding? water YES MODE NO 4. PLANT LIFE: Will the proposal result in substantial; a.Change in the diversity of species, or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass; crops, and aquatic plants)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenish- ment of existing species? d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? �G S. ANIMAL LIFE. Will the proposal result in substantial. a. Chan the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shell fish, benthic organisms or insects)? )( b: Reduction in the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? X c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? X d. ,,Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? x 6. NOISE. Will the proposal result in substantial: . Increases"in existing noise levels? b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? 7. LIGHT AND GLARE. Will the posal produce significant light and glax: 8, LAND_ USE. Will the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? 9.. NATURAL RESOURCES-,, Will the proposal result in su stantal a Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? b, Depletion of any non-renewable natural` resources? 10 RISK OF UPSET. Will tike proposal involve: a. A risk of explosion or the release of hazard= ous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? b. Possible interference with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? 11. POPULATION. Will the proposal alter the location, acT'stribution, density, or growth raise of the human population? 12 HOUSING. ti.'ill the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? X 0 YES MAYBE No13. TRANSPORTATION/CTRCU CATION. Will the proposal 14 Ise 16, result in: a, Generation of substantial additional vehicle movement? b, B�fects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? c. Substantia! impact on existing transportation systems? -d. Significant alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/rr goods? e Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? PUBLIC SERVICES. Will the proposal, have an effect upon, or result in a need: for new or altered governmental services, a. Fire protection? b. Police protection! c. Schools? d. Parks or other recreational facilities? e. �iaintenance of public facilities, including roads ? f. ether governmental services? ENERGY; Will the proposal result in; a.' Use of substantial amounts of fuel .or energy? b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development Of new sources of enorgy? UT:ILITTES, iVi11 the propsal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following: a. Power or natural gas? b, Communications systems? c, Water availability; di Sewer or septic tank? e; Storm water drainage? f'. Solid waste and disposal? HUMAN HEALTH, Will the Proposal result in a. Creation of any health hazard or potential bo health hazard (excluding mental health)'? Exposure of peo le to hazards? P Potential health ` _ �-- y the AEITI'ETICS. Will theproposal result in OF struct�on of air scenic vista or view open to the public, or wi.l.l the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? FF A YES MAYBE NO 19. RECREATION. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? 20. CULTURAL RESOURCES: a, Will t e proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site? b. Will the proposal result in adverse physycal or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure or object? c. Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values i. Will the proposal restrict p p existing religious -- or sacred uses 'wit."n the potential impact area? V. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AP 38-19-51 - Soe attachment s 11 AP 20-19-51 Ib;&jcjf;16e: There will Q some Overcovering and compaction of the soil due to construction of four homenites and approximately one-quarter mile of access road, This Will lead to an increase in runoff , since soils in the area are generally poorly drained. At the Present time, the drainage rams to the West to the Sacramento Northern Railroad right -W -way, thence South to creeks and swales that eventually enter Butte Creek. This additional runuf+ may require that drainage structures at Stanford Lane be enlarged or improved, 19-- At the present time, the subject property is used as irrigated Pasture land. This project will remove approximatel, 22 acres to irrigated Pasture land from productivmConzidering the amount of grazing land in Butte County, this is not a Significant amount. 10 All Of Butte County is within a Moderate Earthquake Intensity Zone VIII. The subject property is located appromimatoly two miles northeast of a possible limeatiOM Associated with the Foothill Shear 20"1 and approximately Six to eight miles southwest of known traces of the Foothill Shear Zone. These traces are of unknown activity* Construction of homes to Uniform Building Code Standards for seismically active areas should Provide adequate protection to residents in case 0+ seismic activity. 4d: See item Ig. 6b: While the Subject property is adjacent to the Sacramento Northern Railroad rQht-o+-wayj the railroad is no longer in operation and it Would not represent a m0ife! source in the area. Q This Project will ruprosemt a continuing trend toward development Of 5 AM* rahchottoz And hOmelit0s in the area along Stanford Lane. MICIT; This project will gehorato an additional 20 to 40 trips a day on Stanford Came. Portions of Stanford Lane are narrow, and blind curves 0xiNs The increase in traffic will lead to a small increase in traffic hazards in these locations, M Though not Significant, this projott will represent to incremental increase in dOmamd for public: sorvir-es, it, , A rural area. 20as The Subject Property is located in w -i area of high archaeological %0hQKVjty% An archaeological survey should be performed to determine whether any arthavolooical sites exist on the property, and if %a, to determine suitable mitigation measures. App6hdix P Pd9d 6 Ar- 38-19-51 I. Provide a permanent solution to drainage and solve any drainage problems on Stanford Lane affecting the property as well as downstream problems resulting from the property. (3c) 2. (Mitigation measures may be required. An archaeological survey is necessary in order to determine :-L+ significant archaeological artifacts are present, and if so, appropriate mitigation measures Must be adopted.) (20a) 1!7#A T ORY E- AP 38-19-31 ai The -1-.he potential to have a signi+icarlt impact on that MAY be located on the site. An archavologica, 4hiniOd be performed in Order to determine if any archaeological _., t�I On the -" he property. d, The project could generate additior,1.1 runoff which Could adversely a'r+ect neighboring properties if the drainage system is adequate. em riot DDH -. 1, k t AIL Applicant: Mike Scroggins Assettor'5 Parcel # 38 -it? -Si Log 0 85-04-oS-OZ5 :DATA. SHEET Ap -/Pe Of Project-" Tentative Subdivision Map Er-ief Desrription: Dividing appro-imately 2,p acres ,y 5 acj-es , into +our parcels of appro,Jmatp*l , each. Location: On the West Side of Stariford Lane, approxifna,y 3/4 mile east Of Oroville-ourhp Midway ar�d APProXimately 2 mileq Southteja+ ,m Highway, in the Durham area. 4. Proposed Density of Development: 5 acres per dwelling unit 5' Amount Of ImPe'-viols Surfacing: Minimal 6. Access and Nearest Public -jad(s)- property �rk.ont Stan -ford Lane. s an 7. Method of Sewage Disposal: I ndiYidual Septic Systems S. Source Of Water Supply: Individual wells 9- PrO"mitY of Power Li nes: To property 0. Potential for fLlrther land divisions and under e)<istihg zonina, development*. Nono irgumont: Terrain as General Topographic Character. Flat valley I't and b. slope$.- ca to Elevation-. 14C) feet AS!_ d, Limiting Factors: None 20 Soils Types and Characteriztic,z: Vina clay loam, oor drainage, and Poor subsurface drainages Somewhat %lowSurface b, Limiting Far tors, poor dr"Jinago and slow 5. Natural of Percolation the Land rzal-thqvake Zone.. Moder=ate Earthquai,e Intensity b. Erosion potentialt Slight Zone Vill rz- Landslide F'OtOntialt None bM Piro Hazard* Uncja%si+i0d e. F;;pannia (3o11 potential: McJdF-"-LAt* to high AP 38.19-0 4. Hydrology a. Surface Water; None on-site b. Grouri Water: Abundant valley aquifers C Drainage Characteristicsc generally poor drainage. Drains to the south to roadside ditches. d. Annual Rainfall (normal)i. 24 to 26 inches per year e. Limiting l~ actors; Area of high groundwater withdrawal and area of potential subsidence. S. Visual/Scenic Quality: Good 6i Acoustic Duality: mood 7. Air UUality; Goody except during periods of agricultural. burning, - g aY oU qgl _ Fnv_i Cg[jgtent` 8. Qegetati can a Small birds and animals comr0on to the valley lands. 94 Wildlife Habitat: High archaeological. _v'lsitivity Cultt.�ra). Fnvi e 104 Archaeological. and Historical Resources in the area; High archaeological sensitivity 11. Butte County General I=Ilan desa.gnatjon% Orchard and Field Crops M. S; fisting Zoning: A-S 1 . E�:: i sting I-and Use on-site.. Brazing land 14E. Surrounding Area; a. Land Usos Oe-chards and fieldcrops and residential uses at rural densities b. Zoning: A-5 C. Gen. Iwlan designations: Orchard and field. Crops d. t`'arcel Si ,es„ Generally S to 0 acre parcels Ow PdPulatiOrit Rural residential 15. Character of Site and Area: rringe area rural residential on small ranchottes. 16. nearest Urban Area: Chico 17. Relevant Spheres of lnfluencet Mane ).S« Improvements Standards Urban Area: No 19« Fire Protection Services a. dearest County (State) Fire Station: Durham Station #4S b. Water Availability: Wells and fire tanker% only 20. Schools in Area, : Dl-trham Unified School District Appendix a± (b) Archaeological Reconnaissance of the Proposed Scroggins Subdivision, near Durham, Butte County, California, Prepared For; Michael C Scroggins' Pao, Bax 786 Durham, California 955,58 Ptropared By Jensen & Associates Archaeological Consulting and Research 41 Skymountain Circle Chicon California 95928 may 19135 Inter"oduction in order to assess the archaeological impacts of a proposed subdivision project involving approximately 22 acres of land located along Stanford Road and Butte Creek south of Chico and east of Durham, Butte County, California, Mike Scroggins, acting on behalf of the owners contracted for a complete records search and on—foot reconnaissance of the parcel in compliance with recommendations received from the Butter Crtinty Planning Commission. Accordingly, on Sunday, May 12, 1985, tho author conducte-d an intensive, on—foot reconnaissance of the project area for the purpo,,;e of locating and recording any evidence of prehistoric or significant historic use, and/or occupation. The 22 acre parcel consists of a roughly rectangular piece of lard located south of Chico and southeast of Durham, and is bordered on the east by Stanford Road and Butte Creek and on the west by the remants of the. Sacramento Northern Railroad Companys right—of—,ay. The current proposal calls for subdivision of the parcel into three or more separate ,:tercels, each of which could later be subjected to homesite development; In view of the potenticl adverse affects of future construction to cultural resources which might exist Within the area, and in view of the general archaeological sensitivity of the region, Butte County and other regulations required that cultural resources 'be fully inventoried and formally assessed prior to project approval, pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 ,, as amended (16 U.S.C. 470), and procedures of the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (36 CFR 800). This report details the results of the required archaeological survey and inventory and provides appropriate recommendations, All fieldwork' procedures followed guidelines provided by the State Historic Preservation Office (Sacramento) and are in conformity with accepted professional standards. Locoti:or The Scroggins parcel is located Within a portion of Township 20 North, Range 2 East of %fie USGS Chico, Ca. , 15` quad, within portions of Al lotments 52 and 53 of the Third Uhit Durham State Land Settlement area, as recorded in the Butte County Records, Book 97 of Parcel Maps, at Wages 8 and 9, Tho Project parcel and general locations are indicatod on the attached project location maps (2)4 Ilecords Search Prior to going into the field the archaeological records of the Northeast California Information Center (CSU—Chine) were examined for any eXisting record A prehistoricor sig iificant historic sites within the project area, In addition, the National Register of Historic Places was also consulted. No sites are currently recorded for the project area or immediately adjacent parcels. The well known Patrick Site (CA -BUT -I) is located to the northwest, and to the northeast are other major native village sites such as those recorded within the Mendocino National Forest's Tree Improvement Farm southeast of Chico (Jensen 1978). Ethnographically the project area falls Within territory :which was occupied by the Northwestern Maidu, or Konkow Indians (Riddell 1978: Figure I ). Although the ethnographic data do riot identify ,any sites within the project area, this information in combination with the results obtained from previous archaeological surveys and excavations within the region (e.g., Jensen 197% 1979; 1983), suggested that a number of prehistoric site types could be located within the area, including the following; (1) aboriginal middens located on knolls near Butte Creek; (2) aboriginal milling stations (3) isolated finds of aboriginal lithic flakes and artifacts, and (4)` various types of historic sites dating to time periods between about 1855 and the present. Such sites have been recorded within the immediate project, vicinity and throughout Konkow Indian territory generally. Fieldwork As noted, fieldwork for the project was conducted by the author on May 12, 1985. The on—foot survey involved criss-crossing the parcel from north to south in survey transects spaced approximately 15-2G meters apart. Examination of the surface involved inspection of all disturbed areas (including road cuts, rodent middens, etc. ) for evidence of subsurface cultural material. Vegetation consisted of dense irrigated pasture grasses which effectively concealed most of the surface from visual inspection. Nevertheless, none of the parcel Was excluded from the survey, and hence no exclusionary notes appear on the attached project maps. Survey Results and .Recommendation No evidence of prehistoric or significant historic use or occupation was encountered within the 22 acre parcel. In view of the negative results achieved during both the records search and field survey, archaeological clearance for the proposed subdivision is recommended, with the following provision. Should future construction activity reveal evidence of subsurface prehistoric or historic material, a qualified archaeologist should be contacted immediately in order to assess the impacts of the project to the cultural resources involved: This is particularly important In view of the fact that Inspection of much of the surface was prohibited by dense grass and cultural accumulations could therefore have been missed In some areas. References Jensen, Peter M. 1978 Archaeological Test Excavations at Three Prehistoric Sites within the Mendocino National Forest's Chico Tree Improvement Farm, Butte County, California. Report on File, Northeast California Information Center, CSU -~Chico. 1979 Archaeological Reconnaissa re and Overview for the Proposed Southeast Chico Developmegt project. Report on File, Northeast California Information Center, CSU—Chico, and Cook & Associates, 0roviile. 1983 Archaeological Reconnaissance of the Proposed Masek Subdivision Project on Keefer Road, Butte County, California. Report on File,, Northeast California Information Center, CSU -Chico, Riddell, Francis A. 1978 Maidu and KonkoW, IN, Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 8: California, Robert F. Heizer, Editor, pp. 370-386. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D. C, Un;ted States Department of the Interior 1983 National Register of Historic Places. Federal Register tbrou h December, 31, 1983,; Washington, r). C g .. w • k� f1...,..• r aI 1O / 11 ii4r 1.2 « f ..,•-cQ0o+�f,`; + ,y o o �., „y �eM /' \r\ ..� �o° } •r j 094 86 / ,G■t Weil ( `«s.•.. pM 166 ° 11_ . —� -- _' AM 192So _ r ILC4193 y t I 99r 1_ o IS.•.. C-i,o•�. 1 t E L 1a, I I omni 1)kti am aM i' Il 4392 kt Q i •6M 143 1 I Z1 �' ► 4 w ter• i" Aayto ° rs. 1. ,-• ,se �64 ~ fat � { W. �� = � g 26 1 r 1taf�5ch.• C•. ,''... rrl '+^1 „r- ries .� I ✓� , - • I f 2� I's 1 25 1 SCe�• :««f r p� �,,,t y a� uu/ o • I ' JI • . 30.. ` ,x, r a , ' • •..o • E. *% 32• 33.E 34 36 d m' ^ °° oo 2 «.. w . DM 144 • s _ ELI WNl a t'13 , 499 t e : ( : < .r' «�• ,Jr am 1 75 J p1. m4385 l P P rr N � i ..... r iq r .....: 44.E M1 •n V a 6% 132 + O lit Wrlt f o tS1 '�i $ l te `"4 %P • We i r • oottt _ 1 .CANAL � _.... .... J A ,v4� {�'�'. J u»` N - , 0 4` ( r� ' •� LCv Ij, s ,fro Y0 f::f�4l :fi:�it:{4lflki/na; ! «w 1142 4 --.W_a++ldr�nkaaad aaau.—_,_:,•��aa. °...,QA/„�Al i.,a. ♦ a•r•a a r-� 19 .. +'j�a�� I,< I - N)/L! 1• L1iQAN I a A� ,,... I il' r9 �'� � • '. i'iT.i.•TTt•� L... J11 ' 1,"•. ..• l i V� 11 ✓a 8u �� y 130 J �' 20 tiQj .4tI pM ��. .•� •i .• as c,� 31 32 L .f •1 p • 1+;y. . tri 7.:p..x 11 n.j,(f,� 11 Sh1. no, ii 1 t 51 or m . r`w ....,•• �. i tl r ..• 'o o'oo a :ros•al—"...--- r_,,,,..+•-+^ $ o rlv7' �1 /IA=� 1 ,vF#" .�-r-"' 1 _..... '•..-- 8 c r All S, ' 1 /'v N, a1,On'a1 5 IGnH !+ rt •ry yF i ,. PARCEL 011 '. `s e` PARCEL 2' o m c i+` • \e 1 1 • � c rtr rl "Oil o. a •w �`. 1 \.`.� 1 1 . • 0.s1 Ai F 1 , *\ i\\. t ` tl i i Ste••. _ Yii1. fin, ,. naa e5 . I% s.$ SJ \ BASIS OF BEARING i t sr.nfe•L.6.ui J.—, 5f'00'C MNVrr'w.f M.t-s"' tiwl. yr•r. rtc N:i1 ,+f0 Vw"m sryb La.a: Sottle.twp. a...! Nibs. of )OW 44• ! tr +•pi1 'p, t'7!3 ••+1'1 UN• Y f S + ! it r• .111 i•/�• 2 `c LEGEND » at 11 • •,r...0 jr.' i 4i 411 P Lf 33-6,a• L! r 'C a 49 e. ie r.Bu. -..rra 'PARCEL 614P +• -• ► +. d J14* * 11. IS , LS 3 49 A-0'il � t.r.li !) FOR O SN C, n.N h6w LS ]HL Dfth —so.I -:\` ►. Crul.lri, DwN. tis•.d nNi it JII LJ ..,•,.•O,•,y„ iyN.l Ari,wp.1 - DALE W,: DAIGH ET. AL. w«.itdr,b'NL!'a SN.1i+r Lr.JP art.6!- NOTES Y PORTIONS OF ALLOTMENTS 52853 THIRD UNIT r 1.Is O i,i4.',.e.:`�.litre�i•+l«"Y1i0 W ryl..j i+a a.rar•e .0.li 6.0 DURHAM STATE LAND SErTLEMENr 5 ' �•• 7r + , f'+ 1. 1. I.li L4ii. rMi +WNN 'R b•.Q.Ir.r h IN C M A./11. Y ' .%`iLIT 1 E G4`.lNT(r C1: Lr�DRi1'IA •. ,. Ir 9. t.e.ry HiriuL Ps+Iptn.l Iw i•r i.rl.vtrr/. A,J r R K N +%ii✓i1.i btALt i kV •. n.C..f sr1. iM•ui Iw .�.fNM•..i M hnnl 7, . #.i. r,yy S" ayr,•i1 N .I.IN.O.ryt.1 .y+luMti !/ Yl.:•+ ay.h1 Ir..Yn.lwy 'ii. 1 Jr' MiYL05 S1iRYEY1NG JCe: 9VIC[ 1-pootl•.1 � IlV.. W3 w •t...Nirtll IMHr M1 e.M—4M4'.A .4 twsiMll 1•I+iii, sten souox leoip ouaHiu, cxLiroaru f teisl sis,'o�ar .• 1 rRoi is. E Jensen & A,ssoriat Archaeological Consulting�� and Research 6ut�ieCq.�iranoitlg Associates: Peter M- Jensen, Ph,D, t�!�M Cidcld nA.p Amar UIt744-3714 41 Skymouiltan CirclePaul H. Chico, California 95926 oruvillo, CaUfernla pn6etutaI, Ph,D; P00111c Sasin 916/345-9515 008/066-8038 -_ J, ZAncanBlla Groat Basin 707/280-8636 project planning & development field survey excavation overviews Professional tours May 13, 1985 Michael C. Scroggins Box 786 Durham, California 95938 Dear Michael Enclosed are two copies of the archaeological reconnaissance your 22 acre parcel southeast o£ Durham, p .,a. re oxo for Butte Count y California.. As noted in the report no cultural resources were encountered durin` an the survey; d archaeological clearance has been recommended proposed subdivision project. y ur for Your If there are any questions concerning the project or reco donit hesitate to Call or Wite. mrnendat]Oris Regards, Peter M. Jensen cc.: David Heroninus Planning Commission County of Butte Oroville J 1� r ,l b ' �1 I 1. �±� � � � �. •. ,. ;� , �wi 4 �S� :.,..-,•- 'N1laT± Via» 6 14 %ft]� <.•u. ,.�1� ._ITS`�1• : '� /1 A�Y.� r1=,HT,wh♦ •, w�Y>r ;•• •1 !j � I.w t •.n �1'. •�. '1` '..,. � ,. 1.,. �� '�• R r � ♦4��ae ''.. ri �(I'Z�. •.W.�4,� �1+ 1• , In •1� � `� , \ �j, ,• i. .� ...a Iii •'` ��'� �I g� 1/`-/ _ a I J� 1.. IN " • •`,11 r^ r11.J� .. ��` .�I• r' 4' 1,I4�� I Of I •`1.f1 ! '',if •,�IJ.M iil',H ,,., /��., ti ... t+a .I.. , + b• » �4 J,' � » tJ+/FHnM <_^I , •c i.....rn.. +,...*...awl ' �„. ' ,i5�'•' I ± "�,,q �� 7 41, e� s I 11 ._rfmHAWAy i - lam .r�...r�:�•-.+..:%'��lf.. • I 1 � rl', ± ...._ ''», . e is �* I � lyl y ' I ±t ��•,,„ 3 t` CJ) .... 1T ..o `I,. ': 11. rs �� 1'' p C '1C Y �• •' i��t . BM 14,1 jq ,'"""..�". ' w,*Y�'"` I 35 31 , 1 _..� r✓ y y -,�� • + Y r� 1 � 1 y N{ct: .r,: ±i.. y.«�., 1 •1 �,.1wT±tet a 1 r Y•,rkc l Viµ, y» »�.:" .� }�, f �� rl�: r lid aIA 1 Ao IIDim, j� V. t ! % r , WF a. + •_f_ •. • r • t • • • • I is _. .. ... • e 1 Il it it .• , + �� r • . i . / � 11 I � �.�--,. �...r .. ! �%• f Pr1 .e•••r r 11 1 ��— �,� ii x� M to ii a~ n I ✓ J �' 0 r torr... ., ill �•"" No .: . • o Y P r .t it • it ••t ....., (, _'.... � i • it i it { aa••t.110 jj �Y cn m Y/ e•► •'c r• 1 � s•• i► tl1 r ,.....a.1 �,:c•,, t1it i to •7- . . • r w a r i M 1.. • ♦ I • , ' 1, 11. J _I ! � �. t �. � � �'�... 13 .wor►r.•/a I • I /'� � Ci W . • •• • • r i ► r; it . • . ... .oc ':.,' � V 2 ---- -- • r r � 1 F.. � • ► 'C• r .,. e• t Y i • P i r I�� C"1 J ! �• r r M iiV•f••a • a r � ^ l• t Li/a 1Y •1,.G�► y�' "` .i r. f I P{Q• • • t r y., T• L �J _ • Y ,i t r t ii e � ! ►. ♦ 1„F I,r, • • • r r ,• !•� r t • a S,V4 r � ► i,.. _ '�' • � ��. 4 \. t v L / er • r a ee o ► r r Ti r •i o a c ser- +♦li�' rr.••"' o - � � �, t r 6 �'n e t P t a �r • a f o ►► t i R p � • •.'. �'^r1 ,1 ! �{ f'~' �i Y Q • �R t i t srY b y r• Y r ' i c a .✓""'tea • a , � � "' :a a�Pu•ptY • ►••♦ I•a•k_ t•t�' �' \� 4 ��. r ! v!)-' , r • �1 46 ZP r k l • iii t r i ► M • a R 1:. .a00 �...jv it . • ► • • P ♦ v1' ► • • • `' .,• .'.. , f +* 1 l { a./ a • c i I -':, = = `~' CV • e• r o•• l' r + .....•- rT F� a ►1 r►♦ •Y •••'•t ►[ r :' I,. ^�:,..��"._ � 5�� ,... �. @,•• A 0 b S in .. i rbR .•. Y,�t.�.. �•! w+••: 1 �.-1 Y tR: (7 : i •ii � 3 _C ' �-� Q _ _ ♦ • :' h r•. • G/ • a rf • a• r rt. ! r n • I ca i r Y • F f ♦.t l a r Y ('. 1 ,. _�, : .tlr ♦r!/:�a• .•!t}• :Y�t: r �r r►w.ri i•►.►i ►► 11 I co t +. , . , ^..� ► ♦ ► ! i R r S i t i• •a E a a.. • a` rt t r w " 1 , r 1. t 1 r a i t ' ('� i '�-.. r -,r.'' , • • .r~^� .. \. 1 \ .�. i ► • ►• ♦a r'• ► Y`-• • • �t '•►►Y ♦ i , ,,}" moi• I • „....-� Soul, / • s w t ► Y ► ♦ ♦ ► r a • i f a r i ■ t a 1 ,t Y 3► [ ► t w t i t a C 1 ♦ • • t. ► ► _ ,. 4 1 Y • • ► ♦ :' (+a •' , .�• +•Y7it •►t. u•1'k•••ip rc►•i Ni Y. C •rt♦tkf•Y.Y i•�tt Yr '�'.. tl Ytiit+'' • 1 9 t V ►' « a ► • Y i ♦ • • ► b i • i r ► i t ... , - . / Y i r G • . [: ( t 1..'/ w • ` ��.. � �l . T ► � . 1 • • > r r r,• r r « t • 4 •,i : � ►- r'. sr 1 t Y fi • ► t c r i ► • ♦ , , f ,i � ., •,'r--�+,,, kfrQ•••►IJ► - f• . . "fit tlf►1•►'i ir.;u. ►i,,:;� �►��.+.�• �-rt. ` i ►s Y k • r.Y t ♦ • [ • • • r ► a i Y SY t • yi ` ►1 1� Y 1 •. 1 ► • i - 1 • • ♦►aaat •.i'i • r► 'r b+ .4r►►• r i r , •„�.�v •►:i-' }►► v•••�a♦ •i' r ►� •i• • `.•i• rte. II • • G ♦ i 1. P i t i i ► • i d ► • • 1. 1 • • L: t Y �k„y, . i v i a l • e a '• • ► M'• P ► io ►i••/r.•r••• k ♦-t•a►r•.Y•••aio•r. ►e1•':�• t•♦1• �. "^"�jt rl►r r•1• Y.ii �� - II - �. •`. _,• . ♦ •►ra:JaPlt 1 • �. i ti.►•►.i►r • t -.. rr• • • ► Yt • ey► • • 0 t ► • a / • • • !. ► • ►.4 i r . t { t • L 1 i :. a r"' "-. • .. u f i. i e.'> .r f ti"`\ p�'�� 4 w i T • • • �► • t ♦ • • r • 1 L . 1 ► • • ! • • / i ♦ a • � � • a ,a ► i a V r i. a + _.,, w M • e r r • Y �: + + 1 . ' 1 1 i n a 0 P ► t •,,,,•.1tiA� ♦ • ♦ • • • • • • ► • o ► a f • i. • • Y k / : � Ary C Y • • k • r ► r � �� Y.r r►f0r• •1 t • i i"�/,u. . Ri1'j Ykt►- .: ^- d Y•►..l Y+rea ' ` .J •+.' `•... • T • Rt ► ► ri / 1 • L l Co • h ♦ a F. y �. 1 � � • :^• • . r 1 • a type r•S �. ••ii ••►►••♦♦►r ►r ► i 1 • 1 k 3 r► ✓•''"`• r F t • ♦ • • Y ►'ll • • M �. ► ► i ♦ ►' e •- • f r 1• i, Y 'i t i in P. ptq Sf tr1.♦iY •ii►a it ' ... .\14►1t •i t. i•.ia • •� "�• •.r �` .� cba •t►t- 4•�r•►ii_ t=1i t i•i i tai ! ; r1 / i `'('� ;, (r • e a a- Y to r i t ii 1 t c i# r i l x i i i Y i 1 . ♦ Y ►aii ' MI' . 't i t � 1 t�Y .C. .. + - i / 1 a a t Y 1 a Y ♦ ♦ , �.a �+ ,-•. �• •a • r �,, !•• i t • + • t► Y• � is , r` e V' • i j}�.jy�j( � .. ✓ 1 ♦:i Ir a �I k i •Yam t•M ��`—� � k l r 1 ti s l i.l i •. C s 0. ► i a r► r i i �, i '� t r• y M Y W � •♦ . i 1 ♦ a\�> •► Y• ►• } i,,.,.,, r I V Y Y i u e t i R Y l ,♦ r• Y t Y i c { 6 ,•• i }. r'f ,'. 1 a• C.�..+ u 1 L t+ r 1 a 1)+ r f i • ♦ a 1' t• 1. i►! f} Y R a l• i • r• !. Y tr a.++" Y i l t\ 1!• Y. Y 1 1 ( ) k, i 1 -` � . .� r➢, i; i' i�! i t t a �. Y i 1� l i i i Y a• ' k s i f` ` 1 C 1 t►_ • ► : , l r " � D •• a ►.1 h r Y V a .� c a: t• c }• `• ( + t t ► M( 1 • i i1Ylr tC ii ifk a/ • iLvaieti �: • • li. ►►e it f ... 1 • it . rtM•.1 •:: • • �•. ri•' l ►,!'rtc•Y1 ,►t�tii ,Y`. .►1Y•aitrt , , ►. . r, ♦ � : r i •1 r • , ,.. • r i i , K ♦ i a . s t � . • t • . t i i -Ir Y a ► • i • i • l) . '/' • ► btl.., •,.1 ►r.•t••i • • Y.+,I•lir.• i S dTY "► i, �l,Jd��... ,ir.i}Yr1.' '.. �: '. 11 tt • i; r...�.. ,a� • a• ♦ r . R �;: a t i � �fi i . ;,...a . � , a • . ± . I,c. t i , ' i 1 . . i Y Y 1 ` •OWN ` •• �' 11 sl' It , F®R z 4V7T'f;� '710,W 19 PC4TION OF DURHAM S'TATE LAND SETTLEMENT T2ON,R2E D.B. I N\l 638 00 2 9] NX 99 P rN 2 -AAC �0. 70A C O.7n X OOAC 4 AC 110 C--� 4 32AV.00 Aq 58 / /ko o 80'AV Y 1 "x 633 \ 6.77AC 00AC1§ Y"4 1/ 0) Cat) A '. 44no 15.ZOAC I-00AC SO )�p "i, 4 00AC X31 V I SION M 53 A; 0' 88AC I P IIA c Xl ®r, 31 193A C 28"3iAc I-50AC .175 PM 97.9 6ab0 X83.70L "I'M 3c SACRAMENTO 4020.00 NORrHERN HAR.R040 994,10 659' W Assessor s No. 38 -19 NAC 9, $7A C tot CA, OURHAM SrArt LAND 5CMeMENr M.O.R. SK 041, PG l7