Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout038-210-012Yr;S 1viAYT3;' Z�?0' 22 . t�fan atory I� indi nt�'s of ni fULga�;: r1, Does; tl�e p�;ojeGt; la va' the potent:Lal to degrade trlie quality of the cnv:i,roniweii t , .subs Can tial ly reduce tl-,e hdb, ,Lat :of a. t- i�sh :or w;irl d,li;fe species i '.caus:e a ,Ci.sh Or w Idl;Lfe popul.atior1 to drop blelow self ` sustaii-ting levels; threaten to eliminate a plant or animal_ com- munity, vo_duce the number or restrict the range of, retro or endengerod Plant or, animal o eliminetle iMpbT tent examples of the ma.jox periods of California. history or prehistory? b, Does the'project; have'the potential to achieve short term' 'bene 1L �' ;to the ,detr mgnt; of ;publicly adopted long-term env iro^,mental goals?' c, Doc8, the project have impacts which are individually Limited, but cumulatively ,cons.derablo? (a project may 'impact on two or Moro scpa.r1te resources where -he, irnpact on Hatch resource is arelat _�tc�y sma7.1, but where the ef'f'ect of the total of those impacts on the environment is s igni f ie:ant , d., Does the pr, o j ec t have envirori�ental , effects which dill' cause substantial adverse effects on human bei.nga, , d � n ire t 'either drectl y idor _ .l;• r Appendix. F - page 7 of 9 v4tacy i{os11 e,r, TerIta ive �c+ ,1 i�tu � (;4� peracls� On 1�7eiroon , G, ' aY S 100 ft. Shi ,bpgo Road, .. Mi pproxi R East�. went of 0�oe, E�opg East 1101oon area. tngi, oer Max AXI)u i; Assessor" s Paroel Nb;l:.c Wo.vlo conditions are: -• Deed to the County of tutee 30 ft»way G..`om �lae ec>tterlane of Drolson 0111ppee Road. � x n19,cate a 50 ;Pt, building setback; from the cents•°'W Wire of Nelson. ' 01,,hi' ee Road. Sho�4 all. easements of r'acord oil the faa,tj =p. �. Pay off any assessments, 5. Obtain ene'roadbt nt permit Oor all drip eviaySnejj or e eistar g, azid construct, to coun-by standarc'is G. Pay any delinquent taxes. N"k I 1 J I 1 Il yss MY 'NO 22, t a tic e t .nd;i x =C S:i. ;;rrjf ic , a. Dies top 'o.7trclha c 010 potent'i,a 'to 'de ,r l�lc the CIU11ILv a too'' environment,, s �tb,s t,antiallwy r-OdLIce fish Olt, wi ldl ifa the habit,"t habit,"or a species, ca sa a .,sh arwildlife populAtion to drop below self sus taining levels, thrc"Mon to eliminate a planLor or animal corm mutti,ty, rCdUde that ,ftumbe7 or restrict, ered, the range of a,rar6 or endangy plant or animsl or eliminate 'important examples 0f the ma j ar peri_ods of California. his tory or prehistory? --w- b, Does the project have the potential to achieve short term beneflLb to the detriment o oub'J�icly adopted l.or►g-norm envir-,-. ental goals? _ c toes the project~ have impacts which are individually limited, but Cumulatively y co`4s * derable? (a pro j ec t may im Pact_ on two ormore separate resources where --,he impact otl each resource is rela M:_vel y small-; lath where the e Eoct of the total o£ those impacts on the environmezit is S ioniil.Cc1T1.t � ^'-' d, Does the p roject have environmental e facts which gill e:ause substantial adversa effects dn human beings,; .,4 either directly or 'indirectly? _ Appendix F page 7 0 9 X MAYB' tdo 22, Mandatory Z�"i.nc a;n ;s ; o, S ni ics ice. m . Does the pyo j ect; have the potent ial t:o degrade r 1.� G qual 1, ty o �- the c tui,.rotimento s'ub,4tantI11llY reduce the habitat of a fish -.or Wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self 5liStainin;, levels, threaten to eli inate a plantor animal com- munity, reduce the number or restrict the range of a. rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or, prehistory? b; Does the profec't have the potential to achieve short~ term bcnep is to tie detriment of publicly, adopted ,. long-term environmental goal? c; Does the project have impacts which are individually limited., but cumulatively considerable? (a project may impact ;on two Or more separate resources where. the impact on each resource is relatively small-, but- where the effect of the total," of those impacts on the environment is s;igna�ficant . t d, Does the project have eavi,ronmental. effect which will cause substarit;.a1 advetse effects on human beings, either, directly .: or indirectly? :Appendix F -- page 7 of X IV. DETERMINATION (To be completed by''the e Load Agency`) On the 45isof this initial. eval.uatiori: [ I find the propbsed project COULD NOT have a s9.gnif cant effect oh the efivironment, and a NEOAI'ZVE DECLARATION �.s .r�cemmenclsc�. L I find that although:the proposed bro i ect could hav a significant effect on the environment,; there will. not be 'a significant; effect iii this case because the mitgatozx measures described; on an attached sheet have been added to the ro7 ect . A NEGATIVE DECLARATION p IS R.ECOMMENbEI) [] I find- the proposed project MAY have a signifioant effect on the environment,, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, Date— August Si gnatuxe) or: Fnvx rgnme7lt al ` Review Divis i0n c�u71 y arming' epf ,MCO Reviewed by: APpendzx F -page, 9' 0;�f 5 y, Louis Camen�zind T' DITAT I PARCELM�#p',, 4 parcels an O�av� � �c-Chico ��wy. a�sp� a�. 1200 't, a east of ,'Midvay. .Worth Durham area. °66 Assess ro $ parcel: number: 1.1.0-06-64, 65 and In ind x: Ringel and Acsoolatu? Publc wor%s cone' ita.ans are: 1: provide t�-0-away traversable access 'RS4-L'0-1�C t4 as h, parec.L�tom a county maintained, road or state highway. 2. Access to be reserVed in deeds as per county ordinance and offered for dedication o1a ,M10 final _mep: 3: ShcW 50 Vit. building setback line measured, from centerline of access ea s ement ,. Provide Yaadma3.nteaaaae agreement:. rj P?oed to the dour LY' of iSwWbE! j0 f"1;.. i'l tit-vl^-Witty f1}(�II) �Llv CCi2tP.t`�»`t.nF Gi Oro-,Chico Hwy. 6 l rldicate a SQ °t . b. uilding setback from the centerline of Oro Chico Hwr. 7Shaw all easements of record on the ffinalmap. 8.. FroVide street nanie signs per requirements of the Dept: of Pub] c Woajks prior to ,j ecordataon of the final 'map, 9: Pay off any asse,5sinents. 1.0. Provide cul.-de-sac at the end of the street. Obtain encraackun�}nt permit and construct standard _road approach providing addqua, sight distance at tYip ir�tersectian of access road and Oro-Chico Hwy`. 12-. Pay, any, taxes. 13. Meet the requirements of the Butte County tire, i7ep1:. Health,pept• conditions are: Provide an area fox, vel s .and a lbb ft» leach 1' 16free setback around . those areas on parcel. 3. 15•' e chfieId free setback around'. xisting wells either Provide a 100 ft.,l a within the properly or within 1,OOft» of the property boundaries: 16. Omit the oragin€tl.proposed well site as pr,evdiusly shown on,;parcel:7,. 17; provide the usable sewage disposal area_ ori eachparcel; as required by the Butte County Subdivision Orcirlance. FarCG'7 -dG a, SSOL`� io -Q i��CtlS.(�X�T LSD Loi, � 75�U3.30��a ,{� . Li an,,. .. r Type Of P3�OjOct. be�divid.ed into z 1,0ts 1 c and. 7 .1 ac �3 .e Desi^ kat .ar,:2. a.G1G5 :o L ali.on:pn 1,hc sough side o the Chico-Oroyille 1 ,g y betwOen Butte Creek and Midway iA.. pro- p pes:si'Ly of 'Devclop;aen L I. , _ �- �� l�znotz_nG Of -anp0-rvi�ou Surfacing N./ Chzco-OrovaJ 1e ilxghyaa_y C Access atzd lee" s ,'uUi c�oad�) :alien th . Metb,od oz Sev,iaee Disposes : Septi:c Tanks 8, Source Of 1!15Lter Su.pplY. Indi.v�,d,ual Chico-f5z`ovi�7,� kli�;hWay ;�;. Pro:cim ty of r?owsx' La�zes:F?wer Fines run aimig 10. 1DOtenti,al :or furthbv land da_vi,s3.o7a.s and developrment:. i'hexe is a small. potential for _.uxllzer development 1?tia�� si calnvir. onmet a,. G-eiieral. Topogrpphi.c Clzaracte:�: Nearl�r lczi�eL b . Slopes: "Less than 1 % ____- _--- _- V. a . Limiting f actors :11. None 4 oa.ls a. T pes and Charactevist cs; Honcut;As.saclation draxn.a�'e moderately rai,id ,ubso.il nermeabil.itY . slo7a high 'inieren•t fext`ility, bt Ii�n bi xa� Fae Lcr,s None �3.3atufia lZsaxti o ��Ze La}yn, -- , ''L `i:,:R d.. F e l za. ,d, Low V'er 10� . X08 on. �o �e�1t ial *: � - , 1.0 c. T,��a,d gil(le Pq 011ti L SOS-1]b nIod'er ate there %=s ---= s Bence paten t- al 0, -------''�- k , RIIItII1111. Y S I. 1�SF NO sus to ini,t leve ls , tlt,roa ten �.o o- eIrni.ne to plant or ao.�;cval cm OV ')„o,;trw(w- " t e rar%ge of a rare or earlee -GPI I plant or.-waintal or el.iLlint ate important r.xample,� of the major periods of Caluorni a history or pz: ellis tory? b Does fire project have the pater�Cia to achieve short term benefits to - the dotrirtent of pr k7licly adopted M, 1on��texm 'envi.�ont�ento,l. goa�.s? ,�,. �4 c . Does bhpproj ect have impac ts which. axe indiva uzjl.ly limited, but d Gumulat�vely considerable? (a Sroj ect may impact- ar% ttgo or more separate 'resources " wbeve the impact on each resource i:s relatively 'small, but where the effect of the total of those: i,mpocts on the ervii Tient is' ,si ;ni ficant t d. Does the project have environmental. effects Which TAII cause substantial adverse effects otI human beings, `33 either directly, of indirectly? f I Appendix F 1 1 - page 7'o,f 9 Ila i'L.. t 1 r -------------- 1 (nca i ir' .) M-1111111 S 6. Acoustic gtiajity-----w=--' r Aix Qvallty:- Biolovical Enyiton�ient: 8. Vegota� oxi: Most1 lve, grasses and -a .:Eew latae •trees' �. 4Uldlife Eiabl,ai; : o`en i eId and a feta trees CUl.tural Er'y i.l, =en t 11r"c aeoloTical. Oxid Historical cal Re,-OIACCea^ iz _ the a,-ca,- xes s`I'I. 11. 331tt :e Co Lin Ly :Gene; all cles i "na tions lioiJ deft ~ w revs icienti ��1 1 w a d 1j,n uri'i s peacre `l,= Ex i c tiijj-�P, 7,oaiinez : A- 2 Rist -Ing LaM, Use on-site h �ty���__��.rn : �•ror• v� ah rracant land, 14. Surrounding Area a. and U es: Scattered, resa lence;s and aa, 'Id -_orchards b. Zoning: A2' c. Gen. PIap designatio,nss Lm� ,.densIty resiclentia� units P.ex acre d. pa.rc-I Sizes : Varies from � �c to 15 ac PoL'd r C%. aon: Low '15. CharGter- of Site and Area: Rura7.,.resydent381 area 'i 1. ears) s t Urban Area: Chaco 1?e)-avaxit $pheres of IllfluenCe s h; cis • n,irh�,m 'I$. Tmix'oeierits Standards ?khat Area a. >`1earest Count' y° (tate) Fire , Station : ittte Cc • Fi<rP D e x�1 Pi b;. 'later 'A�rai3_hi�'it? Fire truck capacity. nnl y 20. -`- Sc 00,1 s i _ None Appendi: ' �ag,a r,7b o I . DETL':RMXNATION (To be epmpl.ete.d by the Lead Agency) On the basis cif this initial pval.uatione [] I find theproposed project COULD tOT 11avea signifi,can effect on the environment,and a N-GATIV'E D-CLATtATION I find that although the proposed 'project cauls have; a significant ,effect on. the environment, there will not be a significant'effect in this case be the Mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A DECLAkATION .NEGATIVE Ts COMNIEN'b�17 - _ Q I find the proposed.project MAX have assignificant effect on the environment, and an DNVIRONMDNTAt,'IMPACT REPORT is required. Date, DOCC- )O (Slgnature) m, San cls Assoc;i'ate Pla' iiner For Su"uOuTilty Planning i3G"pf. Reviewed by... Ap enelix Pa pge of. g