The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About039-060-009lit q1,111 I'lli'll��iiiiiiii�itlillill[�l!,I!,Il', c 4s I FP Owl W i P- -i r it 71p 5 'i CIO '�jff � ji-I -T .1, 1 '�VIPOV�'I:'I I , A,��: 40� Ic I CO, trio P" On "11�j 'i' , Ot A � Tr, MICR, ERN a Al uge "P T177i 7- "F, �* 4i f'T TM ion, f 111�1 � PIPES! Ems pi I il -111.111illpiq11111 111111111p 'I 1 11 , 111,11111,111,41ij I 1j1qjq1f1 fill , ry ma 0 , .., " I., , 1 � I - 7 1 1 � . 1',, 4 1 � T.'', , �, , W : JA , , 1111[11 1 1 ff � I , TO FT 1141=olu p lep 6drfmir z c: a Proc 0 mmm �sitb rewn f", tp You)& rs i,- �sc torthobestirj, P U $4 VZ '44 oT , Tu r i b 1. f: r I F1 IT, F, T R, 06 r. 21N, R. IE 8 T 2111. R. 2 E. M. D. B. 11 Af Tdx Areb Code (9119 62-06 62 - Pi ----ARNOW 6,? - 04 1? —03 860, . 10 "s, 10 Ole A 7" 93,73Ac 0, I 0,Y 4W INV 47 A P 30 38�5 AC 69 00' -r F -5 K (y 5 32,15Ac. 4-7 K 5: AI Q) -06 Assessor's Map No. 39 15 NOTE—ASSESSOR'S PARCEL BLOCK County 0�, 4utte, Calif. Og.17 &, LOT NUMBERS SHOWN h 1953 42,6AC, C 3"', -As IN CIRCLES REQUEST: APPLICANT'S NAME�,.--. Fio2rrraq— At -k /ay 4 11 e P I A 0 N E.- 34- 41 24, ADDRESS, STATUS OF APPLICANT'S INTEREST IN PROPERTY: OWNER'S NAME: ADDRESS - DESCRIPTION OF PRO PEP -Y.. '7- 1 AJ EXPLAIN FULLY REASON FOR SPECIAL USE-, ki 0- U,/- 2� ---- ax,�� Tho above statomenis are certified by the undersigned to be correcf. NOTE., Please su6mif herewith a cho In t o�qyyoub)�Plo. Couqfy of fluf to; al so a ck or money order he amount shown below detailed plot plan showinq the lodcitiin of existing and proposed sttocturo n 0 toperty and on the. adjacent Properties. T Receipt No* APPLU.ANT; Ema M. Wamer ADDRMS: Route 3, Box 40� 0hje_,0, Ca. 95026 Same. TYPL Or APPLICAMN-. Variance tO Minimum PiWcal of 8 acres al lowad iri. the A-3 zone., to allow 1.22 acre za�rqeQ. LOCATTO'Ni sovtheast comor Qf liegan Lane F, 1�-�-uce Lane,, Chico AP 39-06-09� Chiqq FRI"'48UT ZONINO: A-3 DAIT, APPLICATION RECEIV)M:__.,_ 9/5/74 DAM NOTICES MAILED.- rp 2 6 17 VDIRRS SENT OUTt POSTING NOTIM FIRST H14ARING: Oct. 10, 1974 SECOND HEARIN(l.- ADDITIOUAL HEARINGS: Z0919G MITION SIGNATURES PERCENTAGE: COMISSIOU ACTION BOARD ACTION: OPDMANCE ADOPM: Alk APPLICATIow POR L"NVIRONMENTAL RtIvIk"11 When applicat�.on has been made to t1,10 County 0 f 13 U t� ',.0 f of a projeat whicql is not ministerial and is not, Or approval . 04tagorically exempt from environmontal review requirement,, the appliotint i - the r f Submit this 4d4tional applioationi toqathu. , required to "Re of $10-00e tO Env'ronmOntal Review Committee, c/o the plarIl-kij- � I ft(j �e County Center Drivet OrQvillO, CaliEornja, par�timent and 5C of tile County of Butte pursuant to sootionv, 5B Califortia Bnvironmental Qualipro'edur0s, for im"I'Imontation of the ty Action of 1970,,* APPLICANT To CoMpLLTE NaMe & AP NO._ 1. Project DeScription L 7 -2 A.- t---) 2. Applicant's status (local publi % 0 aqOncY, statc aqancy, private firm Or individual) 3- Punding Source (FRA, I -IUD, etc.) 4. Lo I cation, general description (Location map to 13C VrOV3�'Ied) 5. GencraliZed Physical description of t.11(:� project terrain, Outstanding physical features, ata, type of 1— ee e- �011* 117.1k.111 14 Lmmol-itmNTAr, xMvX8W XNr, ORMTXON SITSET EIR REQUIRE66 APIIENDIX, D, NEGATUE 1) CLARATION 118GARDING ENVIRONMENTAL TMPACT 1. NOTICE is llm�t.fw GIVEN that the Environmental Review Committee of the County of tutta has reviewed the project dascribt�id below pursuant to tile provisions of tile California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 (Public Resources Code Sections 21100) at seq.), and determined that it will not h6ve. 6 si8nl�oicant effect upon the, environment. An environmental impact report will not be re- quired. 2o DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Variance to minimum parcel. Size in agricultural zone to allow parcel -to be 1, 23 acre, located. On Southeast corner of Ilegan Lane an(A Bruce Lane, identified as AP 39-06-09, Chico. PMASON: The division of tho land would be setting out existing improvements on the proper -by and allow the remainder to revert to agricultural use. I -l") M M F E 3i NA14E AND ADDRESS OF PROJECT APPLICANT, ERNA M. WAGNER srp 1, 7 19T4. Rt. 3, Box 40 Chico, cA CLARK A. 95926 M. MAYDAK Doputy, 4. A copy of the Environmental Review Committee's determination regarding tile environmental affect of this project is available for public inspection at the Butte County Planning Department, 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, Cal- ifornin. Copies thereof will be provided to any person upon payment by, him of a fee of-, 01.00 for the first pago and *.50 for each additional page. 5. Any person wishing to contest this Negative Declaration may file a written protest spacifying the reasons therefor. Such i4ritten protest shall be .filed with the Butte County Planning Commission at the Planning Department office %-iithin fifteen (15) days from the clata this Negative 1eclaration was filed with the County, Cleric. if a wr 1 ,itten protest it; timely fileds a hearing regarding the Negative Declaration will be hold by the Planning Commission. Objections may be presented either orally or in writing at the hearing. 6# If no Written protest is timely filed regarding this 'Negative Declaration, t . he applica.tion for the project may be approVed without hearing regarding the Negative Declaration. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE DATE September, 16i 1974 BY T, Director of Planning LtNDINOS Erna M. Wagner Variance Applicant' a Name Type 31-1��oi-eci Rt6 30 Box 40 AP 39-06-09 Address Toc;tlon '' Or --' Pa L rcel No* Chicof CA 95926 __1/5,/14, Date Received I Y98 NO I . Does th e project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment or curtail the rafige of the environment (narrow the range of beneficial uses of the environmont?) x 4 2. Will the project cause impacts which achieve 011ort-torm, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? A short-torm impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatIvoly brieft definitive period of time white long-term impacts will endure well into the future# —x 3. Could the project cause impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerabla? A project may impact on two ot, more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small. If the eftect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant, an EIR must be prepared, This finding does not apply to two or more separate project's where the impact of each is insign!,ficant. x 4, Could the environmental effects of the project cause 8ubstan- tial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? x NOTE: If any of the above four findings questions are answered 11YES11, the project will be found to have a significant effect on, the environment. DETUMINATION This project will not have a significant effect on the environment. A Negative Declaration should be prepared,, because the divis�on, of �-,he land would be getting out mxisti-nq improvemerl-b-, t-1he P'rope--' r X allow the i:ertiu%ndt�r L%J re�vez,"" 4qZ'UW1ltuta1 Use., This project Could have a significant effect on the environment, An EIR is required,,. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW CoMmtTTEZ Date 8e2tember .16, �1974 By, -Lawrence J. Lawson DMdtor of-PTHnnl'n;y 9/$/74 ERNA� M. WAGNER AP 39-06-09 DETE RE,� SIGNt ;AT EFFECT ON 9Y.MLR_0NMR NT ,&LNATION Vrna 01-Zagnere R't.. 3, Box 40o ChJ-00 t CA 95526 Amplica4o' aloe and Addroas Varianoe AP 39-06-09 9/5,/74 Type of Pro 40ca ion or Parcel No. An environmental impact report to required for any project which may have a sig. nificant effect (substantial adverse impact) on the environment. gffecta include environmental consequences of both primary and secondary natoro.. The following questions shall be used as guidelines to docido whether to snake a negative declaration or. an envirOJIMental, impact report, (19 a"AWat to Unhhown, write "unknown" in yes/no column.) �JHECKLIST X -EMS NO ko Could the PVOJOct significantly change present uses of the Project area? Wee Noteso) X 2. Does the projeot significantly conflict with the Butte County 00neral Plan or any element thereof? X 3. Could the project Affect the use of a recreational area? (see Note8.) X 4. Could the project have a substantial and demonstrable neg- OtivO effect On aft area or feature of aesthetic valme? X 5. Will any natural or man-made features in the project area which are unique, that isp not found in other parts of the County, Statet or Nation, be Affected? X 6o Will the project involve construction Of facilities on a Slope Of 25 percent or greater? X 7. Will the project involve significant cots or fills? X 8, Could the project cause substantial flooding,� erosiono or siltation? X 9- Will, the Project involve construction of facilities in an Area 09 geologic hazards? X 10. Could the project change existing features or involve con- 6truction in special building permit area's along the satra- MOntO Rivers the Feather River Floodway. in Any area subject to inoodation, in an area in close proximity to any river, stream, lako, reservoir or natural drainage channel? It. Is the project one of a series of cumulative act . ion$, I vbicb although individually small, way as a whole have signifi cant eftvirotmentell, impact? X 12. Could the project breach any published national, state, or local ataodards relating to Solid wasto or litter control? X 13, labttat$ Does the project aim or the project site serve at food source* nosting place, source of water, etc. for vare or endangered wildlife or fish apecies? —X 14. Could the project significantly affect fish, wildlifeb or P140t life or cause substantial interference witb,tho Move- ment Of tiny resident- or migratory fish or W1,IdI1,f0 species? 15. Are there noy rare or endangered plant species in the pro. jact area? M Will the project remove substantial amoUnLs of vegetation includ�ng tround cover? x 17, Could the project change exintiag features of any of the r0giOn'0 Watercourses or other bodies of waterq* x It. Could the project result in significant change in the hydrology of the area? (see Notes.) x 19. Could the project significantly affect the functioning of an established community? (Sao Notes.) x 20. Could the project physically or economically result in the displacement of community residents? x 21. Could the project significantly affect an historical 07,. arcbael6gica! site or its setting? (See Notes.) x 22. Could the project serve to encourage development of presently undeveloped areas or intensify development of already deveLm oped areas? (See Notes.) x 23. Are you aware of a substantial body of opinion (present or anticipated) that considers (or �All consider) the project or ito effect to be adverse to the environment? x 24., Will the Project create new or aggravate existiog health bazords? x 25. Will the project involve the application$ use or disposal of Potentially hazardous materials in an amount sufficient to cause a substantial adverse offect? x 26, Could the project generate significant amounts of dust, smoke, gash odors, Or other air pollutants? x 27. Could the project generate significant noise,? x 28. Could the project cause contamination of a public water supply system or adversely af feet ground water? x 29, Could the project significantly affect the potential use, extraction, or conservation of a natural resoarce'. 301. Could the project result in damage to soil capability or loss of agricultural land? x 31. Additional remarks: October 20� 1974 Erna `v% 4appor ��.tl 31 BOX 413 Ca. Re: Variance on AP 39-06-01 This letter io to confirm the fact that thp- BAxtte County Planning Coi,.imission, durin�- their repular maot- m-ty on Octol)er It, 1174, grantI ynur request for a variance to minipmm i-aroel of 5 acres allo-wed in aii A-1 zone to allow a 1.23 aare T)cxroel to be located, on the f3ownezaot cormtr of T,,(-,rqn Ume rind Brunm 1-onne, ll� you have W)tl plo-,tic, -, conc-orming this matte'r please renl free to vmll'�lact this office, $illcoralyj Lawrence J. Lawnoa Director of Plvinli4.ry C C Butte County Nealtll Dept. PeT)t Of Publip 'Jorks, 0 Z6 %,0 t Mike,,, MoBne Butte County artment of Public Worics PXOVV,,8Ti Review Conmient All NO AP 39-06-09 D:S9CRTP'VXOIq OP PV,,OJRO.Tt Variance to m.4'nimum parpel size of 5 acres allowed in the A-3 20ne to allow a 1.23 acre LOCATX0K-._2a_tie outhoast corner of Hogan Lane and BnL(�e containing 20 acres, more or lessi Chico. APPUMAMT._ ERNA M. WAGNE z Rt. 3, Box 40, Chico, CA 95926 COMMI.I(SISICYN ACTION SCRILMULED'., 1 ..j,Ql3Z 4 _,peclaration Filed 9/17/74 lq,TUM,I' MIT XBOVEST.RMO. Before Commission meetipq_ DAT'R A111TACHURNTS- ApA-_j�.j:,avi and lloatim. "IMIM KnMrs AND, COWIMINTS .0 ®R LILW�3 MPARTMENT'S ly "ougT TO,pl,,_Q41 -.t. - _Djyisiqp�of V(M qst�M.,_2,j(LLje 7L, Ar NOW DVSCRXPTxON or, PR011atcT, to alLqkL 9 LOCATION: NOWAKUM PTO�NMNO "MIEST TO 'T0USSAXN-,P o DOM 00 IIIIALVI MPT. I CTTICO "QU sl.� t Rnviow & Comment AP NO, AV 39--ng-0() Z( A- 3 MrsanxMICIN OF PROUMIxt 'It-'rtrianco to minimum parcel, aize of: 5 acron ill tho A-3 zorto to all -w a 1621 a0re parcol.4 On the sotithea4it oornqr of neqan Lane axid Bruoe Lane, contaiainq 10 acres, Yiore or less, (*Jjjcc,�. L"IMAk 14. ADDIM, S.01 Rto Ir 13ox clit.co, i.A 951 9 P. r� COMMI'SMON ASIIIPIC�7 134CHBI)MCD. October 1, 107A P.NV-TTL0XMM,PV!'AI' RI;VXPI-1 D Negativo noclaratioll pfled n/17/7A TMTTIPIT DATE ;W), jr,"011TRID 1.11 Begore Commiggiot meetitq DATE, DISTRIBUIP,. ATITACTIMENI-PS - C W oi: X t_p and a I ica _�4n and a tioll. RE T ( YAN: 8 T) MMEM110' DBTART%'.� IT':3 INT11"t-)p -Py�!'A Bw '21�ftv t�tvmj Rm"y"t T/),,- Y)avo f1tratton, Air �')-nalitv rmqinoorr AG OrPT(M noviow & commont All H0,04 AP DVSCRXPTXON OP PWaBCT-.' Vilriancc tO miniPtiuM, a al aiZ� f 5 alloworl in the A-3 zone to allow a 1.21. acro parcol. LOCATIXON -, r)YI f -ho Sontheast. oornor of fincyan Lane, 'And '111ruce Lano, lorer" roro- or less, Chico, BUM, COUNTY KAMM COMINIT SOMP. 0V PUBLIC Hr!ARXMG AND vxtxxo OF NwATnp, MOMPATION RMARDING UMMOMMM ITAL XIAV)�,OT WOtilr-e :LIZ hOrObY 'ViVerA bY tho- 'Butto County Planmtnq that polic hca.Vinqm wilt bo bola *)p Thilv0dayp Ootobor 100 1974o4 at a7�3 0 Butte County Board '0 ti-�h' - A ou atyAdWinia ,5�vle6gardiwj the follawingi 3., SMM M, WAIMa - V7artanco' tO 5 -acre 904imin lot a4we require - no ad� ment gor. proparty :,!;0)a6d l!", -311 (Agriculturml) loq,%te, on tjAV _d 0outhenut cotnor bf mqgd� Leine eina Druce zano# J40a tif tod aQ The, i4bove rdantioned application, petitiono ana Mp L , j:re on file and available fot,pablic vic�wing at tile Offtce 04 t1le gutt(ta County Vlanoin'q 00partmento 2279 Dol Oro 9-A,7 orovilleo califorzi4., BUTITt. COUNTY PLMUNG comaxoslos LP.M MIMMOR or, P-LIANNxiia, '90 HE PUBLISNED XW IWIM Cjj:CC0 �"X 1j,8jjpjjXSg. RE�COUD 03 SATURDAY4, MMMER 289 1974. SeptOutbor Ilp 1974 11ma 14, Tvagner. .Rlcmi�O 3e BOX Chico r califi, 95926 Variance Ar 39-ob-09 Dear Baclose�4 plea'so, fin"I vour chocli. :V"� '�10.00. This armunt �,Zz intalided to clovax, the k-ost'o of onvironmental Your varicance to vinimum parcc-a sizt.-r but tbo $1400 you qjjbr�jjtfv ,kj, tqlth yonr map a1lready 00vers oixvirompent,,il rG,,vir�w Col, projects. We hopo th�is doe'l rwt� inconvonience Y01.. ,�n -p--- DUTTr, COUNTY PLA1,111M COMrTS1$:r.VV Staff Findings - Octobe%4, 10$ 1974 2, VARIMMS 1:rna 11, Wagner Variance to S -acre mWmum lot size requirement for Proper', ' ty zoned "A -P (Agk�jqujturaj) lo0ated on tho southoast Wrbelt of Hagan Lano and 3ruco Lane.,. idbntifiod as AP 30-0$,0q) Chico Thie variorice roquest ifs 'to the $-acre mill -q requirement ijuum lot aj�r, fOr proporty Zolned "A-3,11. The appl.�cant isI requenting a v"iaooe to create a 1000 advo Pardel fronting on kleg�m Lane. This is mi area, �that was recently rezoned '%_S" (Agricultural),, it is contiguous to ayi "A-211 Zone to the northe4rst and the City 11wits line of Chico is on the oppoalte Gidt� og 110.gan Lane. Seotion IS of the onabling ordInaioa, Varjancoso dt4t.dq! O�arianaea from the terms of fte zon$.ng ordinwicd sh411 be Only when, b6cause of spocial applicablo to -tile propert�v, including size, shape topographyo location Or Outroi,,.vidings , th6.6tria.t application of the zoning doprives such property o�6, Underi tdG Privilegras, e4joyed by other property ntical loning OlassificatioO. If tile Commission can make thowe findings it 0ould be a propriat p e to grant this variaAco taqueat. FLE 000"PY BUTT -4 COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MUM - October 10, 1974 75 4:0� a Ema M. Wagner - Variance to 5 -acre minimum lot size requirement for property Zoned "A-811 (AgPjL-* oultul 'al ) located on the southeast corner of Hegan Lano and Bruce Lane, identIfied as AP 89� 06-09� Chico. Mr. Lawson read staff findings. Proponentsi, Jack Day, Hegan Lane� Chico, spoke in favor of granting Lhe, variance, (488) Oppos.-A., None. The ht�aring was closed and motion madie by Commissioner Camenzind, v4ith -a second by CoMwIssioner Smitbi to grant this variance., His findings were that the home is existing, therefore) there would be no change i ,, I'n the area, and that to grant this variance would not be granting special privileges not enjoyed by others in the area. AYES: Commissioners Camenzind, Hanford, Moore, $mith, Thebaoh, Watson, Wptters and Chairman Sylva, xozs:� None, ABSENT: Commissioner Gilbert. motion carried. ool APP11CAVON' FOR VARIANCE Ruffe County Planning Con, Mission 60 Date Filed Hearing date Action by Plannina Commission Achon by Board of Supervisors PRESENT ZONING: Assessor Map Book Page �,to. Parcel Na. REQUEST. PHONE: APPLICANT'S NAME: ADDRESS: STATUS OF APPLICANT'S INTEREST IN PROPERTY -- OWNER'S' NAME: PHONE: ADDRESS: SCRIPTION OF PROPERTY,:—Z—,a�� A,1 & OZ, e: A 1. EXPLAIN FULLY REASON FOR SPECIAL USE - 7 e at; ? 74— The above statements are certified by the undersigned fa be correct. Signature i0/"4jPnCa:11" NOTE: Please submit herewith a check or money order in the amount sh,wn below, pcya6fe, to County of Butte- also a detailed plot plan showing the location of existing ond proposect s.ructures an youf proPerty and on. the aljacer.�. prope-ties, Reer-,1,7f Na. L SST—: SF APPL -7 CAk. N T Erna M. Wagrier iiDDRIESS.- Route 3 Box 401, Chico, tj- 9 5 9 26 Same �P-.l 7 Variarice to minimur, Larcel size acrea allowed in the A-3 zone, to allow 1.23 acre varcql 4 �,' CAT 10: southeast corner of Piegan Lane & Bruce Lane, AP 39-05 39, Chico LZ PRESM'i'l ZONTXP A-3 'A' VPLIC RECEUMM: 9/5/74 AT DATE NOTICES '-IA*-7'LED-. SEpt 26 17 POSTING NOTICE: FIRST HEARINM: Dc-. 0,, 1974 L L SZCOND HEARING: JMITIOZIAL HEARING -S: ZOVfjt4l- PETTTIM-1 SIGNATURES KEAMCE.�Z7,111AGE: COMITSSIOU ACTION; BOARD ACTIGINT, GRDIINNVICEE ADOP%D; APPLICATION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL REV'12"I'll When application has been made to the CountV of But, -e for anproval of a project w'.1lich is not ministerial and i; -Qot categorica-' Lly exe.-pt from environmental review requirements, the a-�Op7icant is re-,Tujred to submit this additional application, together wH� a fee of to the Environmenta-1 Review Committee, C/o the Plan-n.ilq epn�airitirken-.t, 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, California, pursuant to Sect-I'Lons 5B and 5C of the C-ounty of L,,utte Procedures, f-nr : -- - t -- California Environmental Quality Action of 1970"'�. APPLICANT TO COMPLETE Name & Address All '2r AP No. 1. Project Description es E --al Z, Z 2. Appli-cant's status (local Publ4c =!9c4"cYf st'-Zate agencv, or individual) //9Z'-Jf vivo, 11-T 3. Funding Source (PHA, HUD, etc.) - 4. Location, general description (Location rarA to be c 5- Generalized physical description of tilc nrc4e=- terrail", Outstanding physical features, �tc. "RAP Total pro---ected cost Anticipated scheduling I Associated projects (include the ultimate nroject e7 P-Miect is to be completed in stages or nhases) an if the Siqnature APPENDLX D NEGATIVE DEC'LARATION REGARDING aIVIRON,�,J_-UTAL IMpACT NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Environmental Review Committee of the County -of Butte has reviewed the project described below pursuant to the provisiGns of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 (Public Resources Code Sections 21100, et seq.), and determined that it will not have a significant effect upon the environment. An environmental impact report will not be re - 2. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT- Variance to minimum parcel size in agricultural zone to allow parcel to be 1.23 acre, located on southeast corner of Heagan IlAane aind Bruce Lane, identified as AP 39-06-09, r-'hico. REAS01,': The divisIor- of' the land !,,'ould be setting Out eXisting imprO74.sments on the property and allow the remainder to revert to agricultural use. F1-..( L I T` 3. NAME ��ND ADDRESS OF PRGJECT APPLICANT: ERM M. WAGNER Rt..J, Box 10 SEP 17 19?4 Chico, cA CLARK A, C;0uriff Clerk 95926 M. MAYDAK ... Depufy - BY 4. A copy of the Environmental Review Comittee'& determination regarding the envir -,mental effect of this project isavailable for public inspection at the Butte County Plan-ning Department, 7 C-unt- Center Drive,L Oroville, Cal- iforaia, Copies thereof will be provided to any person.upon payment by him of a fae of �1,00 for the first page and �.50 for each additional page. 5. Any pe,-;-scn wishing to contest this Negative Declaration may file a written protest specifying the reasons therefor. Such written protest shall be filed -with the Butte County Planning Commission at the Planning Department of-fice within fifteen (15) days from the date this Negative Declaration was filed v-7ith the County Clerk. if a written protest is timely filed, a hearinD, regarding theNegative Declaration will be held by the Planning Commission. Objections may be presented either orally or in writing at the hearing. 6. If no �-_itten protest is timely filed. regarding this Negative Declaration, the application.for the project may be approVed withouthearing, regarding the Negative Declaration. ENURONIMENTAL REVIEU CO124ITTEE DATE__ Director of Planning DZTERMINATION This project vill not have a significant effect on the environment. A Negative Declaration should be prepared, because the division of the land would be setting out existi-ng improverrients on the property and x allow the remainder to revert to agricultural use. This project could have a significant effect on the environment. -An EIR is required. ENVIROMMENTAL REVIEw COMMITIEE Date Se-ptember 16, 1974 13Y Lawrence i. Lawson Director of Planni-ng 9/5/74 ERNA M. WAGNER AP 39-06-09 FINDINGS Erna P'14. Wagner Variance ,Applicant I a Name, Type of Project Rt - 3, Box 4G AP 39-06-09 Address Locationor Parcel No. —Chico, CA 95926 9/5/74 Date Received YES NO I., Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment orcurtail the range of the environment (narrow the range of beneficial uses of the environment?) x 2. Will the project cause impactswhich achieve short-tera, to the disadvantage of -long-term, environmental goals? A short-tex-a impact on the environment is one which occur's in a -relatively brief,, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endurewell into the future. x 3. Could the project cause impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? A project may impact ontwo or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small. if the effect of the total of those impacts on tha-environment is significant, an EIR must be prepared. This finding doesnot apply to two or more separate projects where the impact of each is insignifitant. x 4.- Cozild the environmental effects, of the project cause substan- tial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? x NOTE. If any of the above four findings questions are answered tTYES11, the Project will be found to have a significant effect oi� the environment.. DZTERMINATION This project vill not have a significant effect on the environment. A Negative Declaration should be prepared, because the division of the land would be setting out existi-ng improverrients on the property and x allow the remainder to revert to agricultural use. This project could have a significant effect on the environment. -An EIR is required. ENVIROMMENTAL REVIEw COMMITIEE Date Se-ptember 16, 1974 13Y Lawrence i. Lawson Director of Planni-ng 9/5/74 ERNA M. WAGNER AP 39-06-09 APPENDIX C DETERMINATION RE SIGNIFICANT EFEECT ON ENVIROMENT E-rna M. TATagner, Rt. 3, BQx 4-00, Chico, CA 95926 Applicant' -s Name and Address Variance AP 39-06-09 9/5/74 Type of Project t�t_ion or Parcel No. Date Received An environmental impact report is required for any project which may have a sig- nificant effect (substantial adverse impact) on the environment. Effects incl ude environmental consequences of both primary and secondary nature.. The following questions sbaLl be used as guidelines to decide whether to make a negative declaration or an environmental impact report. (If answer Is unknown, write "unkno-cin" in yes/no colump..) CHECKLIST YES HO 1- Could the project significantly change present uses of the praiect area? (See Notes.) X 2. Does.the project significantly conflict with the Butte County General, Plan or any element thereof? X 3. Could the -project affect the use of a recreational area? (See Notes.) X 4. Could the project have a substantial and demonstrable ne'g- ative efff�ct on an area or feature of aesthetic value? X 54� Will any natural Dr man-made features in the project area which are unique, tb&, Is, not found in other parts of the Coun't" y, State, or 'Hation, be amfiected? X 6. Will the project involve construction of facilities on a. slope of 25 percent or greater? X 7. Will the project involve significant cuts or fills? X S. Could the project cause substantial 4 -flooding, erosion, or siltation? X 9. Will the project involve construction of facilities in an area of geologic hazards? X 10. Could the project chenge existing features or involve con- struction in special building permit areas along the Sacra - menta River, the Feat'her River Floodway, in any area subject to Inundation, in an area in close proximity to any river, stream, lake, reservoir or natural drainage channel? X 11. Is the project one of a series of cumularive action, which although -individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? X IZ.. Could the project breach any published national, state, or local standards relating to solid waste or litter control? MIN X as 13. Does the project aIK, or the prf�.;ect site SeTve a0l.labitat, food source, nesting Place, source of water, etc. for rare or endangered wildlife or fish species? X__ 14� Could the project significantly affect fish, wildlifes, or plant life or cause substantial interference with the move- ment of aay resident or migratory fish or vildlife species'? x 15. Are there any rare or endangered p1aut species In the pro- ject area? x 16. ifill the project remove substantial amounts of vegetation including ground cover? x 17. Could. the project change existing features of any of the, regionts waterc(rarses or other bodies of water? x 18. Could the project resvlt in signi.,'Eicaat change in the hydrology of the area? (See Notes.) x 19. Caald the project significantly affect the functioning of an established community? (See Notes.) x 20. Could the project pbysically or economically result in the - displacement of community residents? x 21. Coald the project significantly affect an historical or archaelogical site or ita setting? (See NOtGs-) x 22. Could the project serve to encourage development of presently undeveloped areas or intensify development of already devel- oped areas? (See klotes.) x 23. Are you aware of a substantial bodV of opinion (present or anticipated) that corsiders (or will co-risider) the project :or its effect to be adverse to the environment? x 24. Vill -the project create netr or aggravate existing health hazards? x 2-5. Will the project involve the avr)iicarilon, use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials i --I an amOU--t sufficient to cause a substar. _'al adverse ef-fect? 26. Could the project generate significant aT-:munts of dust, smoke, gas, odors, or other air pollutanes? x 27- Could the project generate sirnifIcant noise? x 28� Could the projectcause contamination of a public water supply system or adversely affect ground watero x 29. Could the project significantly affect, the potential use, extractiono or conservation of a natural rescurce? x 30, Could the project result in damage to soil capability or loss of agricultural land? x 3L. Additional remarks: A 1971; 3, ca. -tariance -::ni "pttell Confirm tle fact tha ;,_;_ e * - re,,-ular T-,,2et- ly' 1 9 u" t "e crp:l F� -icr+ l.'e locatec 2 3 c to I,a n e rn and 7�ruce cc -1-43 7atter -lease tc 0 -if ci�: !iutte COIL-Ity OF 'S 40 September j.:Ll, 1974 4 ance -car %2XS4 Wl-agnerz 192 for the Amant iyllloant aF Int,andad-tr, cover t�---osts raview -e of :-4�Ox Variar,,Ce to -,- the S-nbr X'I �a t�ovex-s -Parael PrQ-4 f6r tbis, 40e.- riot yot, MA. TP. PLAMMZ. IT BY Dodson --- QUO- BUTIT COUNTZ P Staffrindings Oqtober 10, 1974 Z.; VAURMANCES a* Erna 14. Wagner Variance to 5 -acre mini=m lot siz7 r'L'!'1uiT'eme-nt for PrOPerW zoned "A -a" (Agricuiltural) -"-ed Ors the southeast corner. of He Oc(=L gan- Lane and Brace Lane,o identified as AP 39 -06 -os, Chico %Ixis, variance request i's to the S -acre imum :Lot z*ze requir.er for, -property zoned ran .1. _&nt 'The applicant is requesting a. variance to cmate a 1.08 acre parcel fronting on He,gan Lane. 'This is An area that was recently rezone -0. nA-311 (Agr .icujtux,-j),. It is- coritiguous to an- "A-20 zone to the northeast and the Ci-,ty -imits line of Chico is on, the �opposite side &Z Hegan tane., sedt_,ion 26 of the enabling ordinance, Variances, statfas: "Varf-ances from the tepms of the zoning M-dinRnce sha2l be granted,' OnlY WbWn, becaUse of special circumtances.. aPplicable to the e, ShaPe tOP0graPbY, location or surroundings, 's Ot' aPplication of the zoning deprives such propertyL Of including siz Priviiego-s eZtjoyed by otbell- pmperty undexr identical zon' g c am latsification ifthe Commission can Make these findings it would be appropr�ate to grant thiS Varlaftee tequest. FILE COP ik 0 a -Olt f BUTTE, HEAri,*Ntl r DATE COUNTY PLANNING COMIM(SSION AP -111P - Az OWNER foo