HomeMy WebLinkAbout039-060-0957
--ANNING COMMISSION SUMMARY ,SHEET FOR LAND DIVISIONS
APPLICANT Donald & Darrel Deter
'_"'_"—.---- _ � Lo g# 85-06-04-02
ADDRESS P.O. Box 1153, Chico, GA 95927
OWNER _ Same
PROJECT DESCRIPTION To divide 268 acres into 2 parcels; 1 'at 120 acres +
and 1 at 148 acres +;
LOCATION
On the west side of Midway, apProximateJ.y, 1/4 :mile south
0its intersection with Hegan Lane, Chita area,
ASSESSOR m S 'PARCEL NUMBER(S) AN # 39-06-95
CONING A-2 proposed
A- 20 GEN. PLAN - --�
PROJECT CONSISTENT?
DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED
June 3 1985 _
Ro r. g •a s _ 0
DATE PUBLICATION NOTICE WRITTEN —`
PUBLISHED
PLACE NEWSPAPER NOTICES) PUBLISHED 0. C. P O, E.
DATE MAILING LIST PREPARED
DATE MAIL-OUT NOVICES WRITTEN
MAILED NUMBER
DATE PLANNING DIRECTORS ,REPORT PREPARED
r
ENVIRONMENTAL
DETERMINATION CATEGORICAL UEMPT10h DATE FILED
AND DATA
NEGATIVE DECLARATION DATE ADOPTED
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION- DATE ADOPTED
ENV. IMPACT REPORT -• DATE CERTIFIED
SUB. 00101ITTEE MEETING DATE
ADVISORY AGENCY -HE.' RING DATEL -
ADVISORY AGENCY ACTION
I�
BOARD ACTIoN------"`�'---.
COMMENTS
« 'y
y
r
4 H. •
`y •
s r
i
r•
n
�� �,��� �,�+ri a •� 4un� Y � ",�,: i... �,.,�} ir'Wt ..�\,'Y 'u � w d f� «
j
_'�';�� "+♦yak t r � �,l '• `�� " s `l e'" �s � �'.`.,.,
•
4.,
on.Deter Tentative Parcp M
Dave Hironimus described the location of the PrOPOsOd project in
relation to Patrick Airport, adding that the COmff-Ission might wish to
Propose a no -development strip off the ends of the ru-,1;.1ay.
an-Datat stated that he owns the airport as well as the land
to be split. Hproposed
Protecting the
Fie said he was not concerned About
airport. It is used Perhaps once a week at prosont.
Acting Chairman Lando P.aktad if the zoning was A -24P Dave Hironimus said
Yes; Mr. Dater s," id it is now "U" per Board of Supervisors 4 action.
ROPet* and Associates, Who is working with Mr. DOtery noted
that there is a SOUthern Pacific tank farm at one end of the runway,
Comm's"Oh's' Hunter said that the FAA can require approaches And
takeoffs from a given end of a runway and indicate this on pilots,
maps.
it was moved by Commissioner Montgomery) seconded by Commissioner
Schrader and Unanimously carried, to forward this project to the
Advisory Agency with no special PeqUiremen'ts or, conditions,
N V-,'
TQ.
or
JL
SUWECT:
i ra E ® l�Ei'E11 $RitiiA ty r, • , < APPENDIX H
FROM: Planning l�e�artmen� a
Mice of Planning and _Research
1400 Tenth Street, Room 121
Sacramento, CA 95814 7 Count Center Drive
ar-.-_ °ville,:,.' 95 65
Caunty .Clerk V
County of Butte
Ellin of Notice or Determixtat
of the Public Resources Code,ivn In compliance with section z YA 05 §2,: r'
._.... }, ,-lig,.
Tentative Parcel Map Jy VO -95
ate ClearIng use Nuim er Conta
(if submitted to Clearinghouse)
PUb l i c 1V k
Donald 4 Darrol, Detot
ors John Mendonsa
KIVU554-4266
jet 1.ocatian On the ivest side of The �1�1idjva a.
south of its interseetiori.«titli He ;an Lane, Chroxico mately - mile
�j�Des�Iption Tentative Parcel mlap to divide 464...
Parcels, l at 120+ acres and l at :1.43+ acres.acres into twa
e t
Is to advise that hCounty
This �Butte _��
Lead Agency or Respons Ie en
has approved the above described project and has made the follow. ng determinations
��
r�egardir;g the above described project.
1• The project — will, , will not, have a signl;fkant effect on the environment.
z — An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this ro�s
to the provisions of CEQA. P j ct pursuant
A NegrativeDec=laration Wes prePared for this project p►.rrsuant to tt •
' provIslons Of CEQA.
The EIR or (Negative btclaration and re -cord of project approval ms
eXaralned at; y be
SUtte County Planning nepertment
7 Count Center briire _--.-..�....
3. Mitigation measures .were
of the Project. . '� : were not, made a condition of the approval
4i A statem.cnt of Owrlding Considerations
this project, was, wFA oat, adopted for
r
Date Recelved for Filing
si re
tephen A, Streetet
.. Senior �.nnner
Reprised January 19113
W
-40TICE OF ®E INA APPENDIX x
•rc��,
Office of Planning and Research FROM: Platninf t1jartm`erit
1400 Tenth Street, Room 121 7 Cou
Center Drlva
Sacramento, CA 95814
C'rovi�,�e, �
or a....
, _ County Clerk
County of Butte ELEANOR M. DECKER, County Clerk
DY A. JACINTH Depot/
SUWEC .- Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21108 or 21152
of the Public Resources Cole,
Project Title
AP Uy_QG-95
Tentative
Parcel ;Tipp
Donald f JXrrel Deter
Rate C earing
(if submitted to
use Nu-mber
Clearinghouse)
act Person
Tel�p lone _Plummer
Public wor•-s
John Mendonsa6
534-4206
PFoJect Location
south of
on the west side of The Midway,
its intersection
approximately 1x mile
with iogan Lane,
Chico area.
ee:t Descri
j p
parcels,
on Tentative
1 at 120+
Parcel Map to divide
268 acres into ttv�
acres
and 1 at 148+ acres.
7111s Is to advise that the Butte county
ta.eaa agency or Responsf6leAgency)
....�...
F�as approved the above de~scAbed project and has made the following determinations
regarding the above describe.! project:
1 The project — will, & will not, have a 'significant effect ®n the environment.
Z An Envlronmentajpa Im ct Report re
Po was Prepared for this project past
to the provislorW of CEQAi
A Negative 'Decltiratlon was prepared for this project pursuant to the
provlslons of CEQA.
The EIR or Negative Declaration and record of project apnrovdl may be
examined at;
butte County Planning Department
7 Gntiit t V t'c enter r b y
............... ...... �"'..'"d......
-- r.."ve, or�,..,..GA 9�
3 Mitigation measures were, were not,
of the project, made a oonclition of tine approval
4 A statement of Overrid€; Considerations was,
this project. was not, adoptee! for
Date Received io,r Filing R z/ /Jlo
t, R
Fre
phen A, Stroettt
.. squint Planner
w Ra-Vised j'asntiary 1985
0
COUNTY OF BUTTE
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WOARS
7 County Center Drive
Oroville CA 95965
916-534-4266
916-534-4339
Auguat 72, 798)
Donald and Darrel. meter
P 0 13ox 2153 RE: AP 19-1161 95
Chico, CA 95927 Parcel. Mip
Tear MZ" aad Mra. Deter:
At the regular meeting of the Butte County Advisory Agency held A^ugust 7.p,
1985 , the Agency adopted the negative declaration regarding environmental
review and approved the tentative parcel map for AP 39-rj(j-95
Subject to the conditions as listed on the attached sheet,
If no appeals are timely filed -.within ten (10) days of the date of the
Advisory Agency,s approval --with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors,
this action will be final.
When the conditions of approval are complied with, it Will be in order
for you to file your "'sinal map with the Butte County Department of
Public Works for recordation within tWenty-four (24) months of the date.
of approval by the Advisory Agency,
If YOU should have any questions regarding this matter, please contact
this office.
Very truly yours,
William Cheff
Director of Public. Works
n en on s a•=-.
ssistaht Director
JM/hs
Attachment
cc:4Lahning - Environmental Roview
Environmental Health Department gutlnCo. Naming Comm
doper Aae,)ciatr
11th G 13 1985
Orov�IJa, Gcliian
LD 1110 (Revised 2-28-84)
Donald and Darrel Doter., TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP, 2 parcels on the west ajd(e
of Midway) approx. 1/4 -mile south of its irltersectirin with Ungran Lane
Chico area.
AP 39-06-95
Engineer: Roper Associates
Public Works conditions;
1. Indicate a 55 ft: buil,ling setbaok from the centerline of` Midway rind
50 Pt building setback ,frog, the cent•�arline of lingar, Line
2, 2110w all easements of record on the firr,il mar,,
3. Obtain enrcoachatent perm-;t,, f0r X111 driveways, cjeyr !r,' {bxj8t'wng, ante
construct to cut,nty stvnJards.
4. Pay any delinquent take; or current taxes as reqqir,gj1
5. Meet°, the requirements of Ordinance 2463 and Pes,j,4r,ir n 85-40 regardi r;g
Chico Minified School District a mate rjrt the final reap tivit
iusJarlce 01 developmert pejmit, ,l,ay recd Aro pay.TAnt of
Health 1-��pt_ conditi!,n;
t:. lt'S) i'* t,,•�ctafifi h' , fvr, not bt)ckp� tava i a
eith'2,r within Lho rroperty ;;tt' w fw.l rz �{1 '�.. �` t:if�k i2'iypfri;y b°!la"''.ia3`iu^
s
0
rug utte CoUntY Advisory Agency
planning Director
%r.lE+ tmC'a"I" Rr_rpart can Tentative Parcel Molp
for Donald and Darnel Deter, AN 39-06--9,-,
r�rtirt, my 1, 198
Ihi i, a prcrpo-,.al to cli+ri:da 268 acre into twO ��p:,
acr�r rr end anu at 148+, 4�cr s. The r�arryt � ryx Cit � r.'
prscnt ::cninq i r,d r:' Ctarict� 4il w the
�,�rrrrf i)r f ars it l �� 'the BUttO COUhty Gar•raral �1arr iE t:Jr.jnntr_1z this ar e-a
�tf;lr Mica° d and Field Cr•.caps. Tht�ra: are no Mpeti•fl.t. c°,r° s~t3mrijunit.y plans
fr�r tho ar°ua.
The prz,pcjs-r�rl dour rr:�t ron+'I iat; wi-ch Gmtnt
Y zatt9.ntr rrr.Ir} �InY adcrpte;,d orpr"Op050d Ml, enront of tho Botta Cc,a,cnt�y tuner al Fxl n rarar° any Ct��►ntY,
Z�reCi�f'ic: or cOmMUni,tY plan.
Thu* Oi,,,-pnrt Land Elis,) C;omngi:ssit3n has reg°icrr,qpd thepr•er nosed F�
i tM pra;cimity t� t-"atra c! a Airport and dc?b""Wmined(-hAtprc�.t ��nd
uur►dit•9or�rs un °i.hL- reap WP.re rrecezzar�y. RecoMmcnd ti�pi�'"p�al special
V.it! a16�•t-
cr:
Donald ,jnrl t)zAj,r. l Tll tear
Ropor it ism.
r.Ry
VFW
CHICO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT suifia Co. f'Ionblrig C°�"
1.163 EAST SEVENTH STREET
CHICO, CALIFORNIA 95-:8-5999 JUL 30 1985
(916.) 891-3004
Orovllo, Cblitarnle
July 25, 1985.
Butte County Department of Public Works
Attn: John Mendonsa
7 County Center Drive
Oroville, CA 95965
SiiBJECTe Tentative Map for the Donald & Darrel Deter Parcel
AP No. 39-06-:95
Dear Mr. Mendohsa:
The referenced development is located within the area served by
Patkview Elenm ntary School, Chico Junior High School and Chico Senior
High School. Please be advised, as per Government Code Section 65973,
the, schools in the District are already overcrowded; however, Butte
County Ordinance No. 2463 was enacted to enable the District to meet
elementary housing needs and those needs should be adequately met
during the 1985-86: school year. It is anticipated that the junior and
senior high schools in the District will, be able, in existing
facilities, to accommodate projected enrollment increases during the
upcoming year. The school overcrowding is substantiated by comparing
the District's enrollment and increased numbers of students to be
esidential devlopments to the District's school
generated by proposed r
capacity data.
Grade Level
Kindergarten
1-6
7-9
10-12
School Enrollment -Capacity Comparison
School
Cat e5
Students
1;083
4~419
21388
2,702
Total School. Enrollment
plusProjected Enrollment Difference
From Developments 1,415 (332)
7,243 (21824)
3j529 (Itl41)
31578 (876)
l
60
Butte County Department of Public Works
July 25, 1985
Page 2
Given the current school attendance boundaries
the impact of
residential developments on Parkview Elementary school, Chico proposed
Junior High School and Chico Senior High School is as follows:
1. Parkview Elementary School can accommodate 40 additional
students in specified grades and the proposed residential
developments in the school attendance area will generate 278
additional elementary students.
2 Chico Junior High School can accommodate 53additional
students and the proposed residential developments in the
school attendance area will generate 333 additional
Junior high school students. however Junior
projections indicate that additional juiorhighgschenro
oolllment
facilities will not be needed in the 1985-86 school. year.
3 Chico Senior High School can accommodate 549 additional
students and the proposed residential developments in the
school attendance area will generate 395 additional senior
l ig.h school students.
The District is not opposed to appo�al of the referenced development
if said a a. to Section 9(b) of Butte
count Ordinance No. conditional pursuant
oudinance is m2463. 1n this regard, we re est t
hat the
developerbe required to place a notation. on his :final. map stating that
issuance of residential building permits or mobile home installation or
hookup permits for residential dwelling
payment of school fees pursuant to Butu subjecto the
eCountyunits sOrdinancetNo. 2463 and.
Resolution No. 85-40.
Sincerely;
Robin G. Thompson
Business Manager/Comptroller
RGT :Iry ,.
Cc: Developer/Appl,icant �
Neil McCabe
DATE,
Lo -W -I OF BtPrr'r:
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 1701Z�J
(to - con ete . y Lea' Agency)
BAGr�ND Log I1 85-06-04-02
AP 11 39-06-95
Name of, proponent Donald. el Deter
2. Address of Proponent and representative
? cld -F_ Darrra1 n -.t-- fzi appl i�ar�kiTr.)
WLIC0, CA 0 -QX
.k..� Chco_.,.._.X5927��
—�-_
Project description I'anA . bll%isii. �
MANDATORY FINDINGS 01-_ `IGNIFTt""a1NCE
a.
YES the project have the potential: to de M hlil`lil" NO
quality of the environment., substantial, lyRreduceltc
the habitat of a fish or wildlife speties, cause a.
xish or wildlife Population to drop 1.leloia self-
sustaining lr.vels, threaten to eliminate a plant or
animal. community, reduce the number or restrict the
range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or
eliminate important examples of the ;itaioi= periods
of California history oi` Prehistory"
la, Hoes
hort t}ie pz'oject have the i)otential to achieve
sterm benefits to the detriment Of lona-term,
environmental goals? fA short-te;m impact on tht,
environment is one which occurs in a relatively
brief period of time while
long. -term impacts taitl
:into the ftrture,�
c. Does the PrO ect have i,nvpacis which are individu-
ally lnvited, but cumulatively considerable; (A
Project may impact on two or mord separate resources
where the impact ori each resource is relativol-v
small, but where the efteet of the total of th;
Impacts on the t,nvironment is significant.)
d, Does the project have e1lvir01tmLntz11 ,i,`e�
will eauso substantial adverse e:i`fects oittliumfl
heings, either directly,
t r indirectly;
OhiCl7l+iT��� It1�y r"1'r� kat tc�mplvtetl by thFa Lead A «
On the ba;iis t)I" t1ii; i11:Itia1 c�v4tluntion tenrWc°1
1.�It'F
find tilt, Iarr�lst�;ed ptt'Ject COL11,II NOT 11nle a signi I`icxa
ori the onvironment, and a NE ATWE M1 UAILiT ON will be preparod,
_.. t/wi. rind that although the propci5ed Project Could have a signiri»
Cant effect on the. environment, there will not bo a significrint
effect In this case because the MTTTt;ATTbN AIPASURI.,;q described ori
th4l attached Sheet have been attclrcl ttt the project. A NT1f;A7'1"d
DEC!.ACt1Ti3ON 10'11 be prepared.
T iv1': 1`t10 the proposed pro iec•t MAY have a si
r,n.ificant cfree.t On
the c�n1°irunni(xnt, and an T,NVI ON INTAr, IMPACT R1={ GRT isrequired.
June 27, 955
,� C't111N'1`1' OV 1;11'i'T:l; PLANNING D11PART
NInNT
C�evlo treil by'-
r
rnner
4•
l'.
DATE,
Lo -W -I OF BtPrr'r:
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 1701Z�J
(to - con ete . y Lea' Agency)
BAGr�ND Log I1 85-06-04-02
AP 11 39-06-95
Name of, proponent Donald. el Deter
2. Address of Proponent and representative
? cld -F_ Darrra1 n -.t-- fzi appl i�ar�kiTr.)
WLIC0, CA 0 -QX
.k..� Chco_.,.._.X5927��
—�-_
Project description I'anA . bll%isii. �
MANDATORY FINDINGS 01-_ `IGNIFTt""a1NCE
a.
YES the project have the potential: to de M hlil`lil" NO
quality of the environment., substantial, lyRreduceltc
the habitat of a fish or wildlife speties, cause a.
xish or wildlife Population to drop 1.leloia self-
sustaining lr.vels, threaten to eliminate a plant or
animal. community, reduce the number or restrict the
range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or
eliminate important examples of the ;itaioi= periods
of California history oi` Prehistory"
la, Hoes
hort t}ie pz'oject have the i)otential to achieve
sterm benefits to the detriment Of lona-term,
environmental goals? fA short-te;m impact on tht,
environment is one which occurs in a relatively
brief period of time while
long. -term impacts taitl
:into the ftrture,�
c. Does the PrO ect have i,nvpacis which are individu-
ally lnvited, but cumulatively considerable; (A
Project may impact on two or mord separate resources
where the impact ori each resource is relativol-v
small, but where the efteet of the total of th;
Impacts on the t,nvironment is significant.)
d, Does the project have e1lvir01tmLntz11 ,i,`e�
will eauso substantial adverse e:i`fects oittliumfl
heings, either directly,
t r indirectly;
OhiCl7l+iT��� It1�y r"1'r� kat tc�mplvtetl by thFa Lead A «
On the ba;iis t)I" t1ii; i11:Itia1 c�v4tluntion tenrWc°1
1.�It'F
find tilt, Iarr�lst�;ed ptt'Ject COL11,II NOT 11nle a signi I`icxa
ori the onvironment, and a NE ATWE M1 UAILiT ON will be preparod,
_.. t/wi. rind that although the propci5ed Project Could have a signiri»
Cant effect on the. environment, there will not bo a significrint
effect In this case because the MTTTt;ATTbN AIPASURI.,;q described ori
th4l attached Sheet have been attclrcl ttt the project. A NT1f;A7'1"d
DEC!.ACt1Ti3ON 10'11 be prepared.
T iv1': 1`t10 the proposed pro iec•t MAY have a si
r,n.ificant cfree.t On
the c�n1°irunni(xnt, and an T,NVI ON INTAr, IMPACT R1={ GRT isrequired.
June 27, 955
,� C't111N'1`1' OV 1;11'i'T:l; PLANNING D11PART
NInNT
C�evlo treil by'-
r
rnner
IV.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMRCTS
CExp a� na ons oE "yes" and "maybe' answers are required
on attached sheet(s))
YES
1. EARTH. Will the proposal result in significant:
a. Instable earth conditions or in changes in
geologic substructures?
MAYD11 NO
U D' d' 4. �...
isrupt..ons, a.:3placemen6s compaction or
overcovering of the soil?
c. Change in topography or ground surface
relief features?
d. Destruction, covering or modification of any -�
unique geologic or physical features?
e. Increase in Wind or water erosion of „soils,
either on or off-site?
fi Changes in deposition or erosion of beach
sands, or changes in siltation, dep��sition,
or erosion which may modify the channel. of
a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or
any bay, inlet or lake?
g boss of prime agriculturally productive soils
outside designated Cuban areas?
h. tx-posure of peonlp property to geologic .
hazards such of juakes, landslides, iniad:.
slides, ground or similar hazards?
Z AIR. Will the pros result in substantial
a. Air emissions o.. Deterioration of ambient
air quality? m
b. The creation of objectionable odors, soke
or fumes?
C6 Alteratio�t of air movement, moisture, or
temperature, or any chonge in climate,
locally or regionally
3. WATER, Will the proposal ,cult in substantial.,
a Changes in currents, or the course or
direction of wate- a,iovements in eithe r
marine or fresh waters?
b Change, in absorption, rates, di°ainage patterns,
or the rate and amountofsurface runoff?
c. Need for off-site surface drainage improve-
ments, including vegetation removal; channel-
ization or culvert installation?
d. Alterations to the course or flt,w of flood
waters?
e. Change in the amount of surface water in any
water body?
f. Discharge into surface waters, or in any
alteration of surface water quality, including
but not limited to temperature, dissolved
ozygen or turbidity?
g. Alteration of the d.,.rection or rate of flow
of ground waters?
h. Change in the quantity of ground waters,
either thmigh direct additions or Ivith-
drawals, or through interception of an
aquifer by cuts or cxcavations?
Lw««t i
i Reduction in the amount of water othetWise
available for public water supplies?
j. Exposure of people .,rr property to water.
related. hazards such as floodit!g7
X.
YES
MAYBt NO
4.
PLANT LIFE. Will the proposal result in substantial;
a. ange in the diversity of species, or number
of any species of plants (including trees,
and aquatic plants)?
shrubs, grass, crops,
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare
or endangered species of plants?
c. Introduction of new species of plants into an
area, or in a barrier to the {{ormal replenish-
X
ment of existing species? cultural crop?
d. Reduction in acreage of any a ri
5.
ANIMAL LIFE. Will the proposal result in substantial:
numbers
a C ange in the diversity of species, or
of animals (birds, land animal
of any species
including reptiles, fish and shell fish,
benthic organisms or inserts)?
—�-
b. Reduction in the numbers of any unique; rare
or endangered species of animal-s?
Introduction of new species of animals into
.-
an area, or result in a barrier to the migration
Y,or
movement of animals? ��
d. ,Deterioration to ex--A ting fish or wildlife
habitat?
b.
NOISE. Will the proposal result in substantial!
a. Increases in existing noise levels?
h, Exposure of people to severe noise levels?
7,
LIGHT ,AND GLARE. Will the proposal produce
s i .cant 1 ght and glare?
-- -
8,
LAND USE,I the oo
tial4teratn f the present or planned
land use of an area?
--'
9,
NATURAL RESOURCES: Will the proposal result in
substantial".
a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural
resources?
b. Depletion of any non=renewable natural
resources?
10.
RIsX OE UPSET, Will the proposal involve:
A ris~ of etplosion or the relea8t of hazard-
a.
ous substances (including, but nog limited to,
oil., pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the
event of an accident or upset conditions?
b. Possible interference with an emergency
evacuation plan?
response plan or, emergency
11,
POPULATION, Will the proposal al',:er the location
1str1 utjon, density, or growth rate of the human
population?
^.
1 Z ,
HOt15INtl . Will the proposal affect existing housing,
housiftg?
or create a demand for additional
_...
.. nom. .. -. .,..
13.
TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION, Will the
YES MAYBE NO
result in: proposal
a. Generation of substantial additional vehicle
movement?
b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or
demand for new parking?
c. Substantial impact on existing transportation
systems?
---
d. Significant alterations to present patterns
Of circulation
or movement of people and/or
goods?
e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic?
—`—
f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles,
bicyclists
--- C.
or pedestrians?
Ci—
14.
PUBLIC SERVICES. Wi11 the proposal have an effect
upon, or result in, a need for
new or altered
governmental services
a. Fire Protection?
b. Police protection?
C. Schools?,_
d. Parks or other recreational facilities?
e. TIaintenance of public facilities, including
roads?
—�-'-
f. Other governmental. services?--
S:
ENERGY, Will the proposal result i:n
a. se of substantial amounts of fuel,or
energy?
b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing
sources of energy, or require the development
of
new sources of energy?
16.
UTILITIES, Will the propsal result in a need for
new systems, or substantial alterations to the,
following;
a. Power or natural. gas?
b.
Communications systems? ----
C. Water availabil ity
d. Seger or septic tank?
t, _
e. Storm water drainage?
f; Solid waste and disposal?
--�.:
17 .P
HUMAN HEALTH. Will the roposal result in.,
a. Great�on of any health hazard or potential
health hazard (excluding mental health)?'
b. Exposure of people to potential health,
hazards?
18.
AESTHETICS. Will. the proposal result in the
o-T�stru T1 o'f
any seeti,c V'Sta or View open to
the public, or will the proposal. result the
n ,in
creatioof an aesthetically offensive site open
to public view?
.. nom. .. -. .,..
ry 4'
YES
RECREATION. Will the proposal result in
A'}A1'BE No19.
-__
an impact
upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational
opportunities?
20. CULTURAL RESOURCES.'
a'-- Wall t e p,xoposal result in the alteration
o� or the destruction of
a prehistoric or
historic archaeological site?
b. Will the proposal result in adverse physics]
or aesthetic effects
to a prehistoric or
historic building, structure or object?
c.
Does the proposal have the potential to cause
a Physical change tNhich
would affect 'unique
ethnic r,,itural values?
d, Will the proposal restrict existing religious
or sacred uses within the
J
area? potential impact
.�y DISCUSSION_ OF ENVIRONMENTAL EV'ALUATTQN
AP 39-06-95
See attached.
i
"a6
AP
1g,46t The property is now in-
i ul l production. Development
of hoNesitesHi11 convert prime --agricultural soils to resident�re,
6b: Immediately north of the property `i/sPatrick's Airport. Flights
Will take off over the site generating noise, dust and vibration.- IM
order to mini impacts tof�'tu�� � �den��sv dwelling units -t�W1d
be developed out of all approach �zones. Consideration should 6-iv��n
to granting avigation easements to Patrick's.
- �
7aw. Any outdoor light1ng Could pose a safety hazard to $1rcraft.
Household lighting could bemistaken for runway lights with disastrous
results.
^ - ^
g: Development of the site is governed by the Breenline policies.
Established OS a Means to protect prime agricultural soils f1-001
conversion, residential uses on small 1ots will not be permitted~
Twenty acres 1s the minimum parcel size absent more r^es-trict1Ve
, ~
zoning.
i1: The project wiI1 allow for additional residences on the
Breenz1he's alricu1turaI siccl~
13a*f: Additional en�troar wnentz onto MiMway'and use of the
M1dNaV/Hegan Lir- interso%,�tion May i,,crease safety hazards, The
HogAn/Mzx1way i.�.` sect.on is already busy.
1:S,ei Future air patterns may be modified�f this parcel
uont1rTues to � 11�
� a�d �nuel7p~ - -
14ct Deve1fipmont will 6eli subjp� to tachoo1 improvement fee� .
16c,d� WO11s and 0,0ptics shall be ^ns;+a\z*si under '-
permit � ^
inzpettionby E]1*ironmenta1 Health.
~-
11b: The airport May constitute a health/safety hazard to future
residents �� � result of t
du�, noise* Vibrat1on and risk o+ im'tfon°
The Butte County Airport Land Ut�e Commission Will consider this split
and any suitable mitigation 0eaSures necessary to minimize safety
haz!ards�
'
'
10
APPXicant:
0
Donald and Darrel Deter
QKO-guEgi
0
Assessor's Parcol 4
39-06-9s
Log # 85-06-Q4-02
AN
IN Type of Project: Land Division.
2. Brief Description.- Tentative Parcel Map dividing
into two parcels of 120 and 148 acres. '1 260 acres
3. Location: On the west side of the Midwayl approximately f/4
mile south of its intersection with Hegan Lanw, Chico area.
4. Proposed Density of Development. I dwelling unit,/parcel.
'Acing., Slight,
IMP9rViOUS SUr+8
6. Access and Nearest Public Road(s); Parcel I.- Midway7 Hogan.
Parcel -,It Midway.
7. Method of Sewage Disposalg Septic systoms.
e. Source of Water Supply: individual wells,
9- Proximity Of Power Lines: To original parcel.
Potential +01' further land divisions and development:
Dependent On zonimg and location of Groenline.
Terrain
ao General Topographic: character: Level,
b. Sl OPes: 0-2%.
C. 51evationi 185-200, A-S.L*
d. Limiting Factors: None.
2. Soils
Types and Characteristics:
Vino '-Oam, small amount
Deep, well -draining soilr., Clasqi+iod prime
Nord Loam.
agricultural, rime
be Limiting PactorZo Moderate liquefaction Potential,
M. Natural Hazards of the Land
a- Earthquake Zone. Moderate I , V111.
b. ErozibM
C. Landslido r-ot-entia*l* None,
d. Piro Hazards irrigated unclassified,
ON E"tpan%ivo Soil Po 'terit i al Moder at ow
4. Hydrology
a4 SQrface Watel*t TWO drainages were on site, may have been
relocated by cultivatioho
b- Ground_Water; Overlies area Of heavy groundwater
Withdrawal.
c. Drainage Char attbri st i tt: Drains South and West,,
d, Annual RLM.n+all 22 -24
0. Limiting ractOrs: None.
VnsHegancis'scC)uenityO
pairly sc:Ohic induqtrial a d public
64 Acoustic QualitYt ImPW--'tod by railroad 000t"atibhs.
7v Air clualibYt Good,
^ `
'
�
fi/�1d Old graceful oak tre
cefu
a. Vegetation: f1oWerted icultural
9. Wildlife habitat: Limited
��t:
��
=~~-----' ces in the area: Low
l0,rc
Archaeological
and Historical Resources
including unknown" 1designation"-Orchard and Field
11~ Butte County Genera
n designation"- _
Qrops^ �_2 Planning Commission considering an
1.2. EXisting Zoning: H *
agricultural zone~
'
,Sunflower fields.
12w Existing Land Use on_s1t
l4~ Surrounding Area:
. �dustr1Il
a" Land Uses'. Cemeter, Chevron, U~S~A', s�1p
orchardss south~
b* ZpninQ: � and Field Cr and
c ��n~ pI�n designations: Orcharx�Industrial
adu�tri '1 n""r~ --~-��st~
" o � 1 Resid�m�ia1 n � �'^.. _.- _
- 1 1�ura - ' ^ ----'- - '-30
West� Agri �u � p�=^°~'`~--- line� remainder^ --- �' west of Greenline,
�-���-1 Sit
Large w ,^.._ �_.__�
~~ , .. _ _
res
e, 'opu1a�ion: Sparse" Agricultural land between Durham
' f Sl�e and Area:
1�5. Character o -
and Chico. : Chico Milos north.
16" Nearest Urban Area
f Influence: N/A^
i7~ t Spheres o � N/A.
l, Improvements= ~^~.-_ _
Urban 1~^ t�ion 8or«icet�� Fir tt i on r, #4�� 1 m1l�� north.
a, NeAr«m County (State)
''
^-^^~~ �� 'gan/y�idWa9"-
6* Water AYatlapz ��y° (dram Unified school District^
��l�° Schools in Area". Chico »Unz
i
. a
139-06
21N. R, IE a 41N. R.2E. MD. a am.
c
M'rP.847AC r
J� 4(1-
1.711 40-05
Too pardst
(' Ocpa 4rQ255 A:
l
Y
�lty
° s 0 �. T n !J F� F� cp f porl:on of Parcel 21)
I
>a�RifOt1
er 1 1
PA RCEL.
r •g h
4 4 �r3 07 I (90
268 441AG 04 64 A..
LQ
84
y�� � �+W^ "A v ,M r,. �� 8 � r j�A!9t' Lb
a«�—i r 1 i b' +
v a 4 f -
F. 0 304
F
from 2
36 CL
�,. s* w `� !„ ty � r'y �lj. C �i' ��✓..1i. ,:.r "."�,s /�� a,. '�., :.r�'n j� K
�, 4 ft.
J9'' e R,�. d y t' Ta �'. �,r' 10.7AG m
��
4 * it tz'� •. a- � � ''
° r
rn a - tirw 3 r '
G,Jt.4 , �� r,yr Q21 1
� 1 5
1501
'° 1 P N % -r4PA h AA A
Assessor`s Map No: 39-06
. ��°v � e�r.��� rR.
IV 6A ear, a PO. j5. �. County of butte,
r f COMP T0N sU8. M, 0 rT r 8r 19 pg�l� rch, �9