HomeMy WebLinkAbout039-080-046MM
• �
� „ . 611 � � �•
�
' *.7. .
•
i.
"
b
1
PLANNING COMMISSION SUMMARY SHEET FOR LAND DIVISIONS
� M' 2 6 - 0 2
APPLICANT Leo A. Gunther, Jr.
ADDRESS Rt. 3 Box 133 Da ton Road
Chico. GA 95926
OWNER s vine
PROJECT DESCRIPTION Tentative Paxcel Ma din 112.69 acres _to create 5
parcels; Rcl. " 1 @ 2S.79, pcl.2 @ 26 .16 c1 . 3 @ 20 .24 c 4 5 @ 20 .25,.ac
WOATION Approximately 2400 ft , north of the intersectioa', 01= Da ton Road
and Hegan Lane, on the east side of Dayton Road_ Chico area.
ASSESSORI'S PARCEL NUMBER(S) 39-08-46 & 58
ZONING 1-20 GEN. PLAN Orchard 8 Field CrOpS PROJECT CONSISTENT?
DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED _JuIx 26 1984
NortllStar Bn ,ineerin
577 Connors Ct Suite B Chico CA 95926
DATE PUBLICATION NaTIC„ WRITTEN Pt1BLISH;CD
PLACE NEWSPAPER NOTICE($) PUBLISHED - 0. C. P. G:
HATE MAILING LIST PREPARED
DATE MAIL -OUT NOTICES WRITTEN
MAILED NUMBER
DATE PLANNING DIRECTO.RtS REPORT PREPARED
ENVIRONMENTAL CATEGORIOAL LXE?,,jpTION _ DATE FILED
MMMINATIOIV
AND DATE - MATIU DECLARATION DATE ADOPT'
MITIGATED NMAIIVE DEOLMLTION - DATE ADOPTED
ENV: I, PACT REPORT DATE CERTIFIED
SUB. COWITTM b'1x,E'. jNG DATE .�.
ADVISORY AGENCY HEARING DATA; r --
ADVISORY AGENC', .ACTION � —=
BOARD ACTION _
3
AN D11 Ft
*NOTICP OF DF'iFR:�1TNl11'TON l
Secretary for Resources NOV 0 a 1984
1416 Ninth Street, Room 1311
Sacramento, CA 95814
County Clerk, County of Butte F,IEANUR M. BECKER, Ctittttly C:i :rl(
25 County Center Drive By -- A. JA --C—' Dtpwy
Oroville, CA 95965
FROM: Planning Department
7 County Centex- Drive
Oroville, CA 95965 (Failed)
SUBJECT: Filing of Notice of Determination 84- 07-26,in Compliance with
Section 21108 or 21.152 Of the Public Resources Code
L #e-02
Pr o j e c .t Title -------
Tent7tx,ve Parcel Ma
P AP' 39-05-46 & 58 Leo A lb
Jr.
State Clearinghouse Number (If stibraitted to State C"iee)
Contact Person T ,�.
Ca ,: c Works (916 53 e o
JPro j eohn lc tdLocati0n —K--- x .
p -+no - - a ' le 1n a ton ct Fatair Tan on the east side of, Dayton Rct,,e`Project Descriptair:entative Parcel Map dividing 112.69 acres to create 5 pcl,.@ 25.79, Pct. 2 @ 26.16, pcl. 3 @ 20.24, pcl. 4 & 5@s.
This ;is to advise that the Butte Co1ant• Advisory A
goncy
(L e a cF fi enc Y) --------
proect: tile following determinations regarding the above described
prgject:
The project t Will have a signiificant effect on,
1.
the environment.
will not
4• An Env.ironmenttil- 111ipact Report was Prepared ,for this
Project pursuant to the provisions o,l C8 A and
certil ied Ps required b ) was
ci y .5cct�.an 1.5085 fig) '14 Cali Fornia
Admini.strative Carle.
A Negative Declaration iv7.s preliai.ed for this project
pursuant to the PrOvis .ons Or CEQA A co
Nepartt ( Dee7 anon nab. lits e"aln'nerl at the Planof ning
neti��rrtmt�x).t 7 County Center lir;ivt+, Orovillcy, CA 95965.
i. � A Notice ori:x Srrl Jeri wits Fi `ted illdicatirl la , Project
is e.Xoir►pt t'r�cxrri e,tiv.i ra'nMerital t°ova ei��. P i t
4 A s tnterirrnt Of, overt 1 cl in, ' der
at Cons, � tats
rrctopted rooV tlris pro or: t., �vefi not;
51 14liti.gatxon mekst►tes adOPtod tiv tht, Lerict Agency to reduce
tho impacts of the �rpCit'arrcd 1��,o�irrc't aet
Notre 'ar
Lire
amt'^T�, �-���rIF� , f'�
shra.
e
.4 , . a:tophen A. Streeter
�OVe�1l�.ier t �';t' '� .
Itat `�. ,. SOniOt planner
e
Af)
tie & oun
LAND N A T U i- A L V� 1� A I T 14 A N 1) b
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
W14LIAIA 1611" CHEFF', Director
7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE , OROVILLr, CALIFORNIA 95965
Uephaner (916) 534qe I
October 22, 1994
Loo A. Gunther, Jr.
RRE: AP 39-08-46 6, 58
t. 3f Box 133 Dayton Rd.
Chico, CA 95527 Tentative Parcel Map
Dear Mr. Gunther:
At the regular meeting of the Butte County Advisory Agency held
October 22, 1984, the Agency adopted the negative declaration
regarding environmonLal.,review and aproved the ta'
Map for AP 89-08-46 & 58 subject to thpe conoitionsTentive Parcel
attached sheet. as listed on the
It no appeals are timelY filed --within ten (10) days of the date of,
the Advisory Agency's aPPtoval--with t" Clerk Of the Board of
Supervisors, this action will be final.
When the conditions OF approval are complied With, it
order foe you I Will be in
to f'10 your "final map" With the Butte County
Department of Public Works for recordation Within tWent.V-four (24)
Months of the date of approval by the Advisory Agehoy.
If You should have any quosLions regarding th'Is
contact this office. MaLtOr, Please
Very truly Yours,
William Chef r
DitecLor of Public works
John btendons��..
Attachment
e C* Planning. - Environmental Review
Environmental Health DesparLMont
North/Star p,,nqin(,0ri'ngr 377 ConhorS Ct., #8, Chicok CA
Duffo Co. Planning Comte,
OCT23 1984
LCO A. Gunther Jr. IT21TATIVE PARCEL MAP, 5 parcels apProx:_IE00 f1,.
no rbh. of the intersection of Dayton Rd.
and Regan Lane,
Of Dayton Rd. Chico area.
on the ease ride
- Ake 89-08-116 and 58
EXIL'ineer INorthStar Engineering
Public Works conditions:
1. Tridicate a 50 ft. build -n6 r H � setback from the centerline (W Chico-
13utte City Hwy. and H Lane.
gran
2. Show all easements of record on the final map.
8. Obtain encroachment ,permit for all driveways, new ar existing, and
can.struct to county standards.
4. Pay any delinquent taxes or current taxes as requi,reti
,
Planning; Dept; condition:
5• All parcols to conform to the Az20 zoning.
He8lth Dept. condition
6-. Provide a 100 ft. leachfi,eld free setback around
either within the Property or within 100
oxist ng wells
b oun*lar i e s ft, of
the property
DU00 Cn, Manning Cwnm
3 1984
t7roviNp+ l�tt�raia
TO: Butte Count
Advisory Agency
FROM Planning Director~
SUBJECT: Report On Tentative Parcel
on AP 39-0e-46 Map of Leo Gunther, Jr.
end �8
DATE. October 5
, 1984
This is a proposal to divide 112.69
acres to 26 acres each. acres to create fxvo
acre Par"col 7 The _ Present zoning is A~-2 parcels of 20
The
ultural
designate
this hand Use Plan i lap of the Butte CountYCGotteral plan
area as Orchard acid Field Crops. � l an
tar community plans for the at -ea, p There
are no Specific
The Proposal does not Conflict with Count
Prcji,)osed element of the Putt nor Gene
PuCral zoning
an nor
any County, adopted or
��pc�cYfic ar commtanit;Y plan. or any C'ounty
Recommond approval..
MS.. 1 Itt
Cv - Let) Gunther, fir.
Nc'thSta. Engineering
i
b tie
DEPARTMENT OF PUDLIC,HEALTH
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMCNTAL HEALTH
Address. IN 196 Memorial Way 0 7 County
Reply to Chico, Col1(ornia 95926 n Y Cornet to 9 IJ 747 C11roll Road
Telephones 916/891.2727 Telop of Col16/S o 949¢5 (anrnt(Ise, Cult(ornm 91969
Telephone; 916/534..j28j
'Telephone: 916/8724961, Cki, 58
September 27, 1;:9gij
DIr, I,eo Guntil,r, Jr,
Rte. 3 Box 133 Dayton Roa4tfeCo. Planning Comm, L,
Rte. Gunther, Jr , Ijdl.rcel Map
Chico,'California 95920 ..!s Dayton Road, CI17.Cc�
OCT 1 1984 All e,
Dear �Jr, Cunther Qrovi,.a, California
This department has advised the Butte County nepnrtment of Public Works Land.
Development Section that we are prepared to act oil the above application,
Based on present information, we can recommend approval or conditional approval,
Reonnlmended Conditions for Approval:Pp
1+ Provide a one hundred. foot (loot) leachfield free setback around existing
Wells either within the property or within ane hundred feet ��DUr of
Property boundaries ) the
if vOu halte any questions regarding this lett r
at tho above erl�ire5s or. telephone number bettvecn 41CUSa«montact the Ghico office
and 9:pd a+m« Weekdays,.
Very truly yours,
Tom Reid, It. .�S,
Division of Environmental health
TR%1e
ccs NortIj Star Engineering
Public Works
Planting
---�11GC0
AdIninistrwuve offl:e
163 EAST SEVENTH STREET
CHICO; CA,LIFOFNIA 95926
Area Code (916) 891-3000
September 17, 1984
Buf a Ccs. P1,anning Comm.
s 1384
County of Butte Orovilla, Galitorntat
Department of Public Works
7 County Center Drive
Oroville, CA 95965
Attn: John Mendonsa
SUBJECT: LEO A. GUNTHER Tentative Parcel Map;
Assessor's Parcel Nos. 039-08-0-046-0 & 039-08-0-058-0
Dear Mr. Mendonsa:
As the result of the Developer having entered into an
agreement with the Chico Unified School District to meet certain
specified conditions relative to the subject
District is now satisfied that this Project, the
adverse impact upon schools in the District. project C nseque tly,not a it is
no longer necessary for the County to consider school mitigation
measures relative to this project.
710,
yl
Obart J'. lqof
upetlnte derz<
RJalkh
CC.' Neil R4 McCabe
Robin Thompson
/Butte County Planning Department
4 e 69L411
AV FA M W
1 W4
QutFo Co.Planning
4
North S r SEP 1
11984
Engineering Orovatl®, Gahfornia
Civil Engineers Planners • Surveyors
September 17, 1954
County of Butte
Planning Department
7 County :Center Drive
provillei CA 95965
Attention; Craig Sanders
R66 Tentative Parcel, Map; AP 39-05-46 & 5$
Dear Craigs
In response to your letter of September 6, 1984, with reference to
Appendix F item 14c, the necessary paper work has been submitted to
the Chico Unified School District's attorney, Mr. Neil McCabe. After
these papers have been prepared and signed by the applicant, you will
be notified by the School District to proceed with the tentative
parcel. map,
IE we can be of any Further assistance to this matter, please contact
this office at your convenience;
Very truly yours,
NORTNSTAR 9NG1NtERSNG
Myles L. Puste,� vs y.
MLP d
377 Connors 0()uri, Suite C
Chico, CA 55926
(595) 893-960Q
+t' APPENDIX Ia
COUNT (IF BU'l'I'1.
ENVIRONA1h'NTA1. CIRIC11.,IST VORM
CF) is completed by l.eaTF3' g6licy a
1.09 184-07-•26-02
1 BACKGROUND AI' '+39.083 46 iT 58
1. Name of proponent Leo A. Gunther, Jr
2. Address of' propon.:rrit and represerit.itavv f i .(' applicable)
Rt. 3, Box 133 NorthStaT Hngineerjng
Chico, Ca 95926 377 Connors Ct..—Stiite B.
C]i co, Ca, 95926
.i, pro i ect (Iv�;t. ript i on Tentative Parcel i41ap � _.
ll, MANDATORY FINDINGS OF $IONIrICANC1s 1"1?yi i'tAY'It1 N(1
N
it Docs the prciJe t have the potential to dograde tht"
duality of the environment, substantially reduce
the: habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause ai
fish or wildlife population to dlrop below self-
sustaiinitig levels, threaten to eliminate ri plant or
animal, community, return the number or rostri.et the
range of a rare or entlarik;c red plaalit Kir ainimol or
cl:imimite important examples of the major periods
of Calil`orni,a hi;,ttiry or prelii5tta.ry:'
h. Iroog the project ,lsatvo the potential to aachievt.
short-term heiel'its to the detriment of 'Fong-tc
onvironmentM 4 gals? ( short-term impact inti ti,
onvirtinmont i:, gliio which o, -curt. in a relatively
brief' portod oi' ti are whilr long term impact.,; will
endure into the fature.j
I)ti,,A tilt' III°nivel have imisaicts which n •c individit-
aI.ty limitt.,1, bti,t rntmulatively cdnsiderible? (A
project marc impaawt on two or mote aertiarate resources
when., tilt, ia,parc,t on each resout,v it, rolaatively
4mal l , but whert; fliv t' ,rftc� t of' tl,iv tot -al of tho v
impacts on tho t=nc iroirmont is ,, igiii ricant. )
d, Duos tiie p`rojot•t have Oniirtinmentail errocts tellich
will cause sdvorsv cit"I'ects airs liuiri;rtr
heings, ei.tlit-i- lirt�e;tly or intiirectIO
I t 1 ('11, lid- I.,mililett•,l iro Olt, t c>:ad at;vas ,v r
till the- hasi:: o, thI!, iititi.11 V1atlu,11ion.
T�%F t�ind tlic l+r,,I+,-sod proivvt COM -11 NOT have at signil'ic°ant On -Vet
on t.ho or ti s•riukv tit , and a NI:I;AI M! Ii *.CI.Aite' TI ON will bo prepared.
I'm, f.intl 'Chat ,11though 1-110 piroposed pro.im•t could have a sit'llil'i
cant c1'1' -.t ort tho t,nv°irornit,nt, thot-v will 'n not he ai signifie�autt
ori,ok,t iii livt'am.st- tilt, 41TWATICN MliglSURPS deseri'bod oil
they artt°aco sheet 11.1,ty bvvii aitlJt,dto the proje t:, A N1ICATI'%T
lilt°11,AV,A1'IW call lid• hrepatvd.
111VE 1`ind they proj%osvd prai:ied MAN halo a s:ignt1'icant vf'rovt till
tho onv i ronmviJ , ;ind a r tNcVt lztiNMt.N''TAl, 1111'11("„I' REPORT is reelua red .
1A11 8eptemher 6; 1984 ( OT NTY OV' hUT,rp., I'LANNIN(, I)PPARTNII NI
Craig B y 8and'er8
PlanitiAg Techna c� do
ttt�v i exivc�tl h� a
CTS
IV. ENVIRONMENTAL
CExplanations of all `'yes" and "maybe" answers are required
on attached sheet(s))
YES
IMAYB1; N0
1. EARTH: Will the proposal result in significant.
a.
Unstable earth conditions or in changes in;
geologic substructures?_
13.
Disruptions, displacements, compaction or
overrovering of the soil?
._._
r..
Change in topography cr ground, surface
relief features'
'
d.
Destruction, covering or modification of any
unique gaoingic or physical features?
r�
e.
Increase in ti+rind nr water erosion of soils,
either on or off-site-?
f.
Changes in deposition or erosion of beach
sands, or changes in :siltation, deposition
or erosion which may modify the channel of
a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or
yr
any bay, inlet or lake?
g
Loss of prime agriculturally productive Soil,.;
✓
outside designated urban areas?
h.
Exposure of people or property to geologic
hazards such as earthquakes, iandslides, mud-
slides, ground failure or similar hazards?
2. AIR.
Will the proposal result in substantial:;
a.
Air emissions or deterioration of ambient
v'
air quality?
b.
The creation of obje:tioiia'b;le odors, smoke
or fumes?
c.
Alteration of aar movement, moisture, or
temperature, or any change in climate,
v,/
locally or regionally?
3. NATER, Will the proposal result in substantial:
a.
Changes in currents, or the course or
direction of water movements in either
�,•°
marine or fresh waters?
b.
Changes - :,, absorption rates, drainage patterns,
or the rate and amount of surface runoff?
fi —�, -=or off-site surface drainage improve-
ments, Inc. uding ;vegetation removal, channel-
ization or Culvert installation? w�..
d.
aklterations to the course or Mow of flood
Y+jr
e.
Change in the amount of surface water in any
water body"?
f.
Discharge into surface %-raters, or to a.ny
alteration of surface water quality, i.neluding
but not limited to temperature, dissoly ed
g.
ouygen or turbidity? -
Alteration of the directionor rate of flow
of ground waters?
h.
Change in the quantity of ,ground waterso
either through direct- additions of With-
drawals, or through interception of an
�
l or excavations.
Ic; LlL e � v
i
Reduction In the amount o.l: water otherwise
.
for public r�rat;ex' supplies?
available f i 1 lip .....,_.
j,
Exposure of people or property o tvater
✓�
rd
related hazards such as flooding? .�
YES
MAYBE NO
4.
PLANT LIFE. Will the proposal result in substantial
a: Change in the diversity of species, or .y ; .iber
of any spe4ies of plants (including treo-
►�''�
shrubs , grass, crops, and aquatic pla.nts)'
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare
or endangered species of plants?
c. Introduction of new species of plants into ai.
area, or in a barrier to the normal replenish-
ment of existing species?
d: Reduction in acreage of any a.g"'.cUltural crop?
_
5.
ANIMAL LIFE. Will the proposal result in substantial:
hanFe in the diversity of species, or :iumbers
of any species of animals (birds, land animals
including reptiles, fish and shell fish,
benthic organisms or insects)?
b. Reduction in the numbers of any unique, rare
or endangered species of animals?
c. Introduction of new species of animals into
an area, or result in a barrier to the migration`+
or movement of animals?
.
d. Dete=riovation to existing fish or wildlife ---:
;1 ab it a t ?
6
LQLSl . Will the proposal: result in substantia=l:
a. hereases in existing noise levels?
b. Exposure or people to severe noise levels?
c/
?,
LIGHT AND GLARE. Will the proposal produce
ssign� fic aitt light and glace?
8.
LAND USE. Will the proposal. result in a
substaiitial Alte`ta.ltion ,Y f the present or planned
land use of an area?
0.
NkkTUR.AL RESOURCES: Will the proposal result in
substantial:
a. Increase in the rate of use of any natuval
,
resources.'
b. Depletion oaf any non-renewable natural
resourcus?
t/
10.
RISK OF UPSET. will: the proposal involve:
risk of explosion or the release of hatard-
ous substances (including, but not limited to,
oil, pesticides, clt emicals or radiation) in the
event o! an xcc idont or upset conditions?
b: Possible interference with an emerger
response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
11..
POPULATION, 1Vi ll. tho propCasal alter the location,
MMM ufi yen, donsit; .T, or growth rate of the human
popnIatpion?
l".
HOUSING. il.1 the rroposal affect existing housing,
or creato a der►at Lar additional, housing?
•'
0 YES
MAYBE !��
13.
TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Will the proposal
result in.
a. Generation o£ substantial additional vehicle
rneato'
LZ
h. Effects on existing parking facilities, or
demand for new parking?
✓f
c. Substantial impact on existing transportation
systems?
d. Significant alterations to present patterns
of circulation or movement of people anti/or
✓.
goods?
e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic";
f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles,
bicyclists or pedestrians?
14.
PUBLIC SERVICES. Will the proposal have an e foot
upon, or resalt in a need for nein or altered
governmental services:
a, Fire protection?
,/
b. Police protection?
C. Sc,Itoo1s
d. Parks or other recreational facilities?
e. Maintenance of public facilities, including
roads?
f, Other governmental services?
15,
ENERGY. Will the proposal result in.
a Use £ substantial amotints of fuel.or energy?
b; Substantial increase in demand upon existing
sources of energy, or require the development
of new sources of energy?�
16.
'UTILITIES. Will the propsal result in a need for
new systems, or substantial alterations to the
following:
a, Power or natural gas?
r
b. Communications systems?
c. Ikter
w'
d4 Sewer or septic- tank?
e. Storm water drainage?
f: Solid waste and disposal?
17.
HUMAN`HEALTH. will the proposal result in.
a. CreHtxor of ariy health Hazard or potential
health hazard (excluding mental, health) ?
b. Exposure of people to potential health,
hazards?
18.
AESTHETICS. Will the proposal; result in the
oUstrt.IGtlon of any scenic nista or viewopen to
the public, or will the proposal result in the
creation of an aesthetically oEfensive` site open
to public view?
YES h4A1t0'
'NO
19. RECREATION. Will the proposal result in an impact
upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational
opportunities?
,.
`lU, CULTURAL RESOURCES.
a. fi' 11 the proposal result in the alteration
of or the destruction of a prehistoric or
historic archaeological site?
b.
Will the proposal result in adverse physical
or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or
historic building, structure or object?
c. Does the proposal have the potential to cause
a physical change which
would affect unique
ethnic cultural values?
d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious -
or Sacred r es within the potential impact
area?
DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
t/
4d; T,ht� current land use on the parcels involved in this project is a
mature walnut orchard. The
creation of 5 parcels •from the ttvo
existing parcels will allow for 3 more homesites than currently
available.
The loss of agricultural land or crops will be limited to the area devoted
to residential
Purposes and is not expected to be si.gr'exicant,
l4c: Chico Unified school District has indicated that this land division
may create an incremental
impact to overcrowding conditions that
it�at the Rosedale Elementary School and Chico
exs
,junior High School.,
impact mai* be 'best mitigated by contacting the Chico Unified School.
District or their
attorney, Neil McCabe.
'Applicant:_ Leo A. Gant} Jr.
A`-�3sorIS Parcel. #3'9'08--46.58
DAT
A. Pro Iec" DPa��+ ��. A SHEET ERD Log 8'1-07-26-6 2 ----
rtion
I" Type Of Project: 'Tentative Parcel
2• Brief Desoripton: Land division—i
accts t c'r'ate 5 naxcc7 �
1 0 20.24 acres, - 2 @ 20.25
I @ 25.70 a.cr'es and l @
3• Loca4lon: On Hogan Lane 26-16 acres froin 2
Of P : approximately 2000 feet
�m�le Road, Cllico area.. noxtlie� st parcels.
z}ti/-2-0-
. Proposed Density
5* ofDevelopment: Poss bilit 7mpervnous Surfacing:
-a-. �-------�--
.,�
AccessPublic Road
($): Nearest `--------
. Lane. ($):
Dayton Road or Hogan1 parcels }tray
access to either
%. Method of Sewage Disposal: Individual s ..,.
8. Source of Water �Su sa c
pply�` Individual zve:17L s
9' Proximity of ,Power Lines -
10. Potential for idivisions
`urther land ~�
'-_
current zoning, and devejol.lent:
gon en e--- t Cl r
E. Environmental Setting
PIYZ_6:,tical Environment.
Terrain
a• General, TOPOrraphic Character level
b.
c • Elevations 1 -r -r L , -------w--
d. LimitingT �-
. ao hors : Nano
• Soils
a, _
Wipes and Characteristics: parivell Clay,
brown 2-5 feet thio loam/'Vine loam, dark
granajar (Viable ---__.
11e11 suited for a , retains inoistu're well.
g1{xcUl,tUral, tis
b. limitinC Factors: None
'"ural hazards of the Land
a• Earthqu.aite Zona: General ButteGottr
b., Erosion Potexxtial :none t;o slig}it d.
Landslide Poi; rwnt:tal none
tv
ism,� activ
Fire E'aZard: unclassified
sive Soil. pot(_
nti.mj W
i,'Data .sheet continued
y
b- Ground Water
c. Drainage Characteristics..�We1I drained so �1 d z • -------
Crouch Ditch
d._ -§=ual Rainfall (normal): 22 inclies/year
e. Limiting Factox,8i None "-.....-
5 Visual/Scenic Quality:
6. Acoustic Quality: Goo _
Air Quality:Good --
Biological Environment: -----
•
$. Vegetation: mature walnut trees
9. Wildlife Habitat
Cultural Environment.-
10-
nvironment:10- Archaeological and Ri.storical Resources in the area; Moderate to
low sensitivitlr including unkr,,otan
11. Butte County General, flan designation: Orcliard and I;field Crop
12. Existing Zoning: A-20 --
15. Zxist:i.ng Land Use On-site:, �n.te: mature walnut orchard
14. Surrounding Area: --
a. Brand uses:I.Valnut and almond orchard 1v'tla scattered residences
b. Zoning-. A-20
ce Gen. ;Plata desi.gnatioll Orchard acid Field
d. Parcel Sizes., generally av
era.ging 20 acres
e. Population
Character of Site and. Area:aqricultural
16- Dearest Urban Area,; Chico
1?6 Relevant Spheres 0f lit"luence:
'1S • Improvements Standards _ Urbaxa Area: No
19; File Protection Services
a. Dearest County (Stage) Fire Station: Sta 44 Pais St
b Water Availability?, Tanker Truck`� appro� l/2
e
20: Schools in Area: Cli .co Unil•i �d School Di s� r ici
Appendix Fb
(
._. ... .. w _ Y e+.•h•`F,f .>^ ,,n.- . - • -t4�'q t +..-::, ,rq ,�,�S• T'.,:;,r19,. - ;•;
„-.
h' T
•
"7
'r. i L� >3m:7s.4' mJa+ixr.sa`-xl'ri..... p4�poa •. - y;;A
4
♦ r
t "
11,
Jot
r } 0 �P• flr/! 1 a `0./V"" 3.
Tax Area Code 62-03
21
t 64
r
• s 35.45r�t'`
At lve
65
r / 1600
IA
4Z 6 A-,
A PART Ce
r
7,71"
ysh O N
60
i'�" 6 7�1,� 110.44 AC r �.
//, ,. ••^"-''' /4..V r."°
fr r r. r♦ 4 � � � � ,tea r� �"„� ,,:s�� ;�I� "a �i ♦ 11.•5u� r �
4816A-
L:r t✓ 61-
y
F s%
�AC
?6 AC
Al
�
�7 f • .�_ SSC' „�'
. �� � �.",. 4Sv%I�{iai • //J iii' c pp �1LjX' z y� I��. +�� b� . i R 'w /
nit. ! :4 ' G r ' �i' � � � R� w, 4 rw .. ♦,
«. r
,u
r n�
r r
�' ryy �4�J� xt� i �y� " ,x, ,,;r� A u �`F• � ,. �,� Gg �.. i w
4
e "" � M �Y...♦r+h,�,+,ld+b4. ra.t ' 'A.:cr ,ckµWy..k4,p•y+..'^ xiw+4.r:w , ,.r ♦ , - Y rC �`� � d
AC
Y " -.- I"R__ •fl"!,L♦4x♦fd. _.nh.�«W+n+rYiV°•r�AeV+" i',. ,� VV �f',iV
-14 P4 4
ti P
uwI
`.w.-
.. f. R
OR's` r Nr C�� ►'.i}'g. +.
V � 1' 1 '