HomeMy WebLinkAbout039-090-012� 1. _ `® � ,
'. y r �� .
� � �J
i
A
� e r � + � w
' i� � . 1
6 • , 1'
�'.
s .i
� o
0' � ,
. r w _r '
r �% ,
V ..
. i r
r� i
r � e ,
r � �-
,� � a
r F ! ,
r .� � .
,.
. .. e
. � � r S
� �� �'�• w
.. r .
�� ,
r
rd
r n � .,+ + �
..
.1 I ' I � � +
i •,�
_ �wJ�' J � � � ,
i " �
APPLICANT Mark Merl,
Lo 85-10-14 O1
ADDRESS Rt 3 Box 130 M, Chico, C1 95926
OWNER Enrico & Diva Merlo
PROJECT DESCRIPTIONTPM �dividing 13.5 acres to create ].
remaining lands @ 12.5 ac. parcel @ 1.Q ac.
- _--�
LOCATION On the North gide of BreslauerAvenue, appr5x.
5f its intersection with Lone pine Avenue- 000, East
Avenue, Chico
ASSESSORIS PARCEL P,:TMBEprG) AP#39-09-12
ZONING '"/
CEPS . PLAN-------
4-k
LAN4k
PROJECT
DATE APPLICATION Rr:CEIvED October _11, 1985
Northstar Engineering, onnors
• ,fie=C 3855,
DATE PUSLICATIOC7 WTli'r W1 IT Et1�
Is 118, D
PLACE NWSPAPER NOTICF CC) SHED - C). (;, P. C R.
DATE ?11AILV'G LIST PREPARED
DATE MA1.-t..CtiT NUIVICEC WPITTEN
MAILED
DATS PLANNING DIRECTOR'S
� � REPOR'T~ J?REi?AIiEL)---------------
---
EN'VIROMIENrA ,
DETM- MINAT OR CAT%GORpIA_L EUMPTION ' DATE FILED
AND DATE
NEGATIVE DECLARATION - DATE AI3c.411ra1)
SGA'T'ED NEGATIVE' t:EOLARATIoti AUi)RSELD z 3 ,
L,2?�4-,
1•;I`3V: IMI;WT REPORT - CL%`I'IVYrgr"
u`tFB. °7ONMIT`. EE MEETING DtImE
ADVIGori AtT1�t'Cy UEAI7IN DATE
ADVI ORy ACa.iXY ACTION �f(
BOARD ACTION
CWMENTO r( C
V�
t9F i" APPENDIX it
TO, Office;,. of Planning
1400 'Tenth Stret-t R d R2ars:h t'R�4A4s Pla
r ostn 121 ening Department
'amento, CA 95814Count . C
or enter Drive
Orovi , C 95 5
.. COMMY Clea; -
Cotn ty of Butte
gt l CTs Filing of Notice of DeterrnI
ion in aom FEB 11 1��G
of the Public Resources Cade. plane with Section 21108 or 21132
REANOR M, BECKER, Cdunfy Clerk
ect t py , Ai�, �Nr��
Deputy
Tent -n#-4— n -
Name.
(if 3tibmltted� to Clea
Public
WMA nenaonsa
(916) 5Z4-4266
rru)eCt Local M---,
intersect an With Lone Pine Ave uer Ave., approx. IOQO �i
On the north std® of $rQsla
nue, Chico area, �,st of its
e,Ct P �
Tentative Parcel Map divid5ing 13.acres to create 1 acre and the remaining lands at 12.5�aat
--�...,.--,.e...e..a.,�. acres. e 1 parcel. of
This 13 to advlso that the Butte County Advii3ory Agency
5 ncy
hap appMding the the above described ncy or es e" t g�c,
regarding the above described project `bed made the aollo In
project;
R g determlfttlons
1. The ;Project — will, X w'illnot, have a sjgnifk:Mt tr'lieet on
z ._... An Environmental Ire the environme nt.
to the provlslon3 of EQ� t Prepared for this project
Fur►nt
r � A Mnstive
De amtIon WAS Prepared for t1U WMMt to the
Provisions Of CEQA. project
The E1R• or Negative Declaration and rec oefj of project ec�t
e
xamine�d at P approval may be
Butte Co1Ynt" n1 ---j
Mitigation were not,
were,
Of the Project. .....r , tM Ide a condition of the approval
A statement of Overriding Cwt1derations _
this project.W630 11
.4. was not, adopted for
Date Received for Fil.lrig , 2----7-86
Sign t ,e � - ----
S{tephej, A Streeter
Senior. Planner
z#
Revised Januriry 198
}e'h
Mitigation Measures
Mark Merlo
Tentative Parcel. Map
AP# 3:,-q9-12
1. Contribute $75.00 per parcel to the West Side Z�ixe Station
Improvement Fund.
2. Designate a 25 ft. no deve?opment area from the top of
Edgar Slough and Little Chico Creek's bank,
h . y
r JN...
LAIRD OF NATURAL WEALTH AND 4LA,UTY
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
WILLIAM (Bill) OHEFF, Dirlclor
7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 9696)
Telephone; (916) 534,4681
RONALD R McELROY
Deputy 011MClo,
February , 1986
Me ed. planning c
'-.ark Merlo FEB 5 1986
Rt. �, BOX 130 M PX':il) 30-09-12Chico,, CA 95926 prrn+illo, Califanaa `. entlatiVe parce . M;rt
bear Mr. Merlu:
At the regular meeting of the Butte County Advisory Agency held on
February 3, 1986, the agenc,,r granted a mitigated negative 40claration
regarding environmental impact and approved
your
tentative
f'or AF 30-09=12 subject to the conditic•ns ofapprovalisted onethea
attached street,
If no appeals are tilrely filed --within ten day,; of the date of the
Advisory Agency`s approval --with the Clerk of the Beard Of Supervisors,
this action will be final.
When the conditions of approval, are c-,r.plied witti, it will be in order
for you to file your"
finial, map"
with the Butte County Dept, of Public
Works f. -,r recordation within t entY four months of the date of approval,
by the Advisory Agene,}
1f you 'lave any (Plestie ns regarding this matter, please c _,, tact this
Office.
jl, J/d a
attachment
cc Planning
Health
No1r`thst-ar Engineering
1. ;
d! 11�Wa 1!'f2lilfJl z !I� . 7 �`�"'�� t Yj a�` a"t �i,(k� M,1 x'ilr
y� p 3'y
A � 1rC, '1�kS1 '� Y Y 1a ■ �
�{spa �7
.. ,... >� r{' 4,��iS7 �1� tl9' %.:.F � FAI� �F?"Y1.t1'1 4Mt.}�.. deSK. ai al. r�, 4 Lav„ 1.�.. x 1. Tw+uk
Very truly yours,
Willi im Cheff
Director of Pobl.i Works
c
4hn t40 dorlsa._
40., tltant biractor
ki
• Mark Merlo
1000Tft- easti Parcel Map, 2 parcels on the
Papprox.- t. of its intersection with north
side of Hres
AP 39-09-12 laucr Ave,
Engineer: North3tai� Engineering e Ave. Chico 4lrtio
Public Works condition;,;
1. Verify legal access.
2 Provide two,wtt
count b traversable access R8-8_ld)_
y maintained road or state highway. I Uo each Parecl from.a
3• Access to be
reserved in deed: as per county' ordinance
for dedication on the final map,
and affeiied
4'. Show 50 ft building setback line measured from rom centertine of access
5. Provide road maintenance agreement,
6 Show all eAsementn of
:record on the final map.
7. ray off any assessments.
8: pay any delinquent taxes c)r current takes as required.
9• Place note on final ma
county Ordinance 2�F� and
regarding school impact fees
$ Resoluti'n No. $5-l+O, as per Butte
10. Place note on final ma
for sale p that states "Land shown as
lease or finance,rr remaining is not
Realth Dopt, conditions.
]1. Provide a 100 ft.
Within the ,leachfield free
propert. setback around existing well„ ,
S or within 10o ft, of the existing "either
12. Slow a x,00 ft. leachf'e7d Y boundaries
setback from the highwa ter 1a,ne oi` the creek
l3 , Provi•
ae the required usable s,3
based on the tentative ma rcge'disposal area on each parcel, ,
Provide the required p� parcel tine sq . �N ate.
quired usable sewage wally wire enlargement to
g disposal arca.)
4 : Locate
and if ncceesai'y reloc,
the existing dwelling onto its respective
te the respective
disposal system serving
.pax. cel.
fMK NIERLO, '.CPM
Planning Lept. condition.;
15. Prior to the division being efrective, the owner or owrtern ui' the
property included in the ,approved development plan shall Oxe:cute and caul
to be recorded in the office of the recorder of Butte QoUnty a restricti()n
binding upon the original owners and their heirs, suct,c;;,ztors and assigns,
which disallows additional dwelliiigs from being located Ott the property
until either of the following conditions occur:
a. The property is rezoned to any other zone; or
b. At least ten (10) years has elao,ed From date Of rocordation, and
the Commission finds Circumstances regarding said property and other
properties in the area have changed sufficiently 40 Vaconsider the rv;�tricti+ �.
Thr- following mitigati�urn measures are required
16. Contribute $75-00 per parcel to the west si
Fundi
de Fire 9 ta Uon Improvement
17. Designate a 25 ft. no development area from the top Of Edgar Slough and
Little Chico Creek's bank.
•t ". i,^. ,. .,r, `...^F. +� 5.",..��y Y a.wrrybw•itu�,Gti"'1 �h ...,xF:.'. vY', ++n'...
Inter -Departmental emorandue
ro: Butte County Advisory Agency'
FROM: Planning Director
suaJecr: Report on Tentative Parcel Maps s 4
�+12
oA'rk: December 13, 1985.. 1 Mark Merlo on AP 39'09 -
This is a proposal to divide 13.5 acres to create 1
mailing lands @ 12.5 ac, parcel
pacrels), The Land Use Plan The tonin is 1.0 acre re -
The
this area as Orchard and Field p g ugly �cultUral
Map of the Butte Cou,�ty General 1q acre
plans for the area,; Crops.There are no specificplan designates
or community
The proposal does not conflict with County tonin
County General plan nor an g nor an
plan, y county,y adopted or proposed
element of the Butte C
specific or community
RF,commend approval subject to the following conditions and
Nate on ma
p Residential development Mitigation Measures: (M)
fees,
pment sia11 be subject to school. improvement
2, Contribute $7500 per parcel to the �4e,^,t side. Fire
Fund,, (M)j Station Improvement
3, Designate a 25' no development area from the top ' of Edgar Slough and
'
Little Chico Creek's bank. (Ff)
4• Prior to the divisionbeing: effectivei the owner
included in the approved development plan shalXe owners of the property
be recorded in the office of the recorder of ,,,
xecute and cause tt
binding upon the original owners and their heirs, sutcesso
which disallows additional dwellings from be ..e County a restriction
until either of the rs and assigns,
following being located on the property
g conditions occur.:.
a, The property is rezoned to an
rs y' other done; or
b, At least ten (.1U)
the Commission findsacircumstancesdre
has p from date of recordation
properties in the area have than ed garding said and
restriction, Property and other
g sufficiently to reconsider the
LMT;1r
DUN* co1rng
DEO 2 1985
Address
Reply to
RiAI)¢Y,
DIVISION OF -•_r " VU1»IG HEALT14
Q 196 hlamorial wdy ENVInQNMi`NTAL HEALTH
Chine, California 95926 0 7 County Center Drive
Talaphgn/891-2727 Oror,llc, Coli( 95965 X47 Elliott Rond
Tolephone: 916/534,4281 P" adfse, Calliornia 95969
Tolophono 916/87?,7961, 8xi, 58
Mirk Merlo Ptovember 27, 1985
Route 3 Box 730 M RL:
Chico, CA. 9 Maria Merle
5926 Parcel Map
Oreslauer Avenue and Lone pine
Ch1Co area Ave.
Ap#39-09. l
Dear 'Mr, Merlo:
This department has advised the Butte
14
0
rks Land Development section that the ar
County 0epartitient of Public
above application. e prepared to act on the
Based on present information, we can recommend end approval or condition j
I. Provide a 100 feet leachfield free.setback at
either within the property or frees loo existin
boundaries, ct of the g we11s
2• show a 100 feet leachfiold setback from property
Of the creek the hi
3� Provide the required usable selva On ter line
(Note: Eased art the tentative ,, disposal area on each parcel,
4� to provide the required usable s IaPwa reel one will re
Locate and if necessaryporal area),quire enlarfgernent
serving the existi lllocate the sewage disposal
ng dwelling onto its respective
sytni
If you have any questions regardin parcel,
Chico Office of t~nv7 ranlnen to 1 B this letter },
am, Health between e- 001a.m. and t0. the
0
Very truly yours,
Thomas Reid, R.S,
1"ft:,i1 Division of Environmen�;a1 Health
ccM planning department
Land Development
NortihStar rnginoering
�navivaCsli#oras
November 4, 1985
Planning Commission
Uroville CountCentPer Drive
California
Ro : Tentative parcel Jgap
P 39-09,12
.Log No. 85-10-14-01
In reference to inter -departmental m
emorandum c t� Cc toberJ ,198
I. That we will ray,choo�. improvement5
fees,
2. That we v�il1 contribute
75.00 to the
station improvement Ives oida Fire
area.
That there will be
to 8dgar 51ou a 25 foot no -development area
bank. gh and little Chico '^eek from the adjacent
ton of the
t
;1
Inter Deparimental Memorandum
TO: Advisory Agency..
FROM; Laura Tuttle, Planning Department
SUBJECT'
Tentative
Parcel Hap for Mark Menlo, AP 39-09-12DATE; October 31,°1985
i
The Butte County Board of Supervisors approved a Use Pe
homesite segregation on August 6, 1985+ rmit to allow a
on the Use Permit which is sufficient for�considera,_stud t,
�' Was prepared
Additional information:`ion of this map.
I. Residential deare1apment will be subject to school im
2, Thispr4vement fees,
property is Vithin the West Side fire station imhroveraent area.
All developments are requested to contribute $75.00
Mitigate impacts to fire department service capacityg®x parcel to
3• Development adjacent to Edgar Slough
the potential to cause water quality and Little Chico Creed has
riparian ve ettetion, y impacts eroslon, or remove
8 A 25 -foot no-devielopment area should be
designated from the top of c,Lja hanks,
A mitigated Negative Declaration is recormended,
hHT/ss
cc: /Mark Mesrlo
NottfiStar Engineering
1
Inter-DepartfflentitI Memo
r���d�
rb, Advisory Agency
FROM: Laura Tuttle
Planning Department
Suejr:
DATE« ;
Tentative Parcel Map for Mark Merlo, AP 39-09-12
October. .31 1985 9 12
The Butte Count
hoe Butt se y Board of Supervisors approved
g egat on on August 6 in a, Use Permit allow a
on the. Use Permit which is � 1985, An initial stud
sufficient y wa.,j Prepared
Additional information; for consideration of t);is map..
], Residential development will be
subject
to school improvement fees.
This Property is within the r:.
All developments are West •�xde fixe station
.gate m requested to contribute improvement area,
Pacts to fire department service capacioyper parcel to
loPfient adjacent to Fd
potential to cause Ovate -r Slough and Little Chico Creek has
01parian, vegetation. Quality impacts
designated from the t A 25'-� yot ryo-devel,opment areaoshouldrbmove
op Of the banks.
A mitigated NEgative Declaration is recommended.
ed.
cc N! irlo
Not. gar :engineering
L ---J
October 31, 1985.
Butts count
PLANNING COMMISSION
7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE — OROV11 I r, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397
PHONE! 53A.dit)J
(dark Merlo
Rt. 3, Box 130M
Chico, CA 95926
Re Tentative Parcel Map
AP 39-09-12
Log No. 8-10-14-01
Dear Mr. Merlon
A previously prepared initial study of your Use Permit on the above -
referenced property is sufficient for consideration of this map.
Potentially adverse ,impacts to the environment are referred to in the
enclosed Appendix F, items 4 and 14. To reduce or eliminate these
impacts, suitable mitigation measures are required as part of the
project, Otherwise, an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is required
pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act.
An early response to this notification, sent to the Planning Department;
will expedite the scheduling of your project. Please forward your
written response within 15 days from the date of this letter,
If you have any questions or comments, please contact this office,
Sincerely,
B . A KIWIER
Director of Planning
Laura M. Tuttle
Associate Planner
LMT/ ss
ghtlosures
Oct Northstar Engineering
377B Connors Court
Chico, CA 95926
APPENDIX l
COUNTY OF BUTTE
ENVIRONMENTAL, FORM
ORM
(to e complete by Lead-Agency)
Log 9 85-03-27-02
L. BACKGROUND AP #39-09-12
1, Name of proponent _ Mark_ Mer10
2, Address of proponent and representative fif applicable)
NorthStar. En&jng�g__ __
Rt, 3, Box 130 M 377 Conners_Court-Suite B ..
Chico, Ca. 95926 Chico, Ca 95910
3. Project description Use Permit
11. MANDATORY FINDINGS. 0V SIGNIFTCA\CI: Yi S MAYWR NO
a, Does the project have the potential to degrade than
quality of the environment, substantially reduce
the habitat of a .Fish or wildlife species, cause u
fish or wildlife population to drop below self-
sustaining levels, threaton to eliminate a plant or
. animal community, reduce the number or restrict the
range of a rare or endang, red plant or animal or
eliminate important examp es of the major periods y
of California history or prehisiory?
b. Does the project have the potential to achieve
short-term benefits to the detriment of long-term,
environmental goals? (A short-team impact on the
environment is one which occurs in a relatively
brief period of time while long-term impacts will
endure into the future. )
e: Does the project have impacts which are individu-
ally limited, but cumulatively considerable? CA
Vroject may impart on two or more separate resources
w}zero the impact on each resource is relativOly
smal l , but where the effect of the total of thaws
impa-ts on lire environment is significant.)
d, Does the pru jeTt iia„, r.n-VirOnMental effects WE ICE
Will caLioe substantial adverse effects on human. ,✓
he*Ings, either diroctlu or indire4t1v?
l i l , ISL"I' �1`11;�iA'I lit4 (To be completed in th Lead Agency's
on the basis of this initial maluaticrn
Ly"!/WE find the pail osvd pr`ojvct t:tlULP NOT have a significant et'fect
on the environment, and it NVGA"ITVF DECLARATION will be prepared.
t/WR find that although the proposed project could have a signifi-
cant effect on the environmont, there will not be a significant
effect in this case bec:ttctse the HT`'IGATION MHASI1RRS described on
the attached sheet have been ridded to the project. A N1GATTVt
DECLARATION rill he prepared.
rind the prrposvd project ALAI have a Significant affect on
the envi runment, and ,en HNVIRONMONT"AL. ;� PAC'T REPORT is required.,
DATE: April. 18, 1985 c in WIN OF I111'iTF.,, PLANONtl DE-PARTM11INT
Mil
Rick Ro iguez
pl.atib ahit! 3 n
a.
1kovi awed by”
IV.
ENVIRONMENTAL iMP5
•
xpIan ations o a 11yeS,r and "maybe" answers are required
on attached sheet(s))
1. EARTH. Will the proposal result in significant; YES MAYBE
a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in .�
geologic substructures?
b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or
overcov;aring of the soil'?.
C. Change in topography or gronnd surface
relief features?
d• Destruction, covering or modification of any
unique geologic or physical features?
e. Increase in wind or water erosion of soils
either on or off-site? --.
f. Changes in deposition or erosiont.f beach
sands, or changes in siltation, deposition
or erosion which may modify the channel of
a river or stream or the bed of the
NO
any bay, inlet or lake?oc van or
g,. Loss of prime agriculturally✓''
outside designated urban aras�odu'ctive soils
h.
Exposure of people or property to
hazards such as earthquakes, mud-
landslides,
slides, ground failure Or similar hazards?
r
AIR. W'll the � _
a ' Air emissions Or dctcriorationult insubstantiald
air quality? of ambient
b. The creation of object'' on«bl odors, smoke
Or r fumes ?
---.
cAlteration of air movement, moisture or
temperature,
''✓''�
or any change in climate,
locally or regionally?
3. iVA1'BP.. Will the
a= Changes in
tcourse in boxantial;
`.�"" ✓'
currents, ore the
direction of water movements in eithor
marine
or fresh waters?
b Changes in absorption rates,
� ,
or the rate and amount at drainae surface rnnopatter s `—
to Need for off -bite
✓'
surface drainage improve-
ments, including vogetation removal channel-
ization
or culvert installation? '
d• Alterations to th
✓'"
�.`ourse. or flow Of flood
waters? .,
W.._
e. Change in the amour, �, of surface water in any
water body?
✓.
f . Discharge into surface waters o3- in any
Alteration of surfa-e
-
water quality, including
but not limited to #',mperature, disoived
oz
g Alteration
n of the d fiction or rate of flow
of ground waters?
�
h, Change in the quanta µ., of ground waters,
either through di.rec�
� `�✓'
additions or With-
drawals, or through i,lterception of
an
aquifer by cuts ar excavations?
i. Reduction in the
ami,+nt of «seer otherwise •---
available fol'ub
Public water supplies"`
'
Exposure of people A a:,
related hazards such €�s rf ooding7 water
4h
YES
MAYBE NO
4..
PLANT LIFE. Will the proposal result in substantial:
a` Change in the diversity of species number
or
of any species of plants (including trees,
shrubs, :grass, crops, and aquatic plants)?
b.
Reduction of the numbers of an), unique, rare
-
or endangered species of plants?
c. Introduction of new species of plants into an
area, or in a barrier to the; normal. replenish=
ment of existing species?
d Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crap? `—
Si
ANIMAL LIFE. Will the proposal result in substantial:
a. C a�nge–in the diversity
of species, or numbers
of any_5pecies of animals (birds, land animals
including reptiles, fish and, shell fi!ih,
benthic organisms or insects)?
b-. Reduction in the numbers of any unique,, rartM
or endangered species of animals?
c. Introduction of new species of animals into
an area, or result in a barrier to the migration
or movement of animals?
d. ,Deterioration to existing fish or wil(ilife
habitat?
6.
NOIR„. Will the proposal result in substantial, i
a. ncreases in existing noise 1;mels?
b, Exposure of people to severe noise levels?
;
✓%
7.
LIGHT AND GLARE. Will the proposal produce
signi icint light and glare?
►f
8
,ANE U8E. Will the proposal result in a
s' ubs� -,tial alteration of the present or planned
J and L, ,e if an area?
1/e,
9
NIATURAL RESOURCES., Will the prof. osal rest),lt an
su atantial
a; Increase in tho rate of use of any natural
resources?
bi Depletion of any non-renewable natural'
resources?,;'
10.
RISK OF UPSET. Will the proposal, involve
a. A ris at explosion or e release of ho ard-
ous substances (including, btxt not limite,l to
oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the
event of an accident or upset conditions?'
✓'
b. Possible interference with art emergency
response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
,.
11.
POPULATION Will the proposal alter the location,
;stra buts on, den
1* tri n7 sty, or growth rate of the human
l
12.
HOU8INi) Will the proposal affect existing housing)
or create a demand for additional housing?
v
4h
13.
YES
TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Will the
DIAYBE NU
~
result in: proposal
a Generation of :substantial additional vehicle
movement?
h. Effects on existing parking facilities,, or
demand for new parking?
c. Substantial impact on existing transportation
systems?
d, Significant alterations to present patterns
Of circulation
or movement of people and/or
goods?
e,. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic?
f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles,
bicyclists or pedestrians?
14.
PUBLIC SERVICES. Will the proposal have an effect
upon, or result in a need for new or altered
governmental services:
a. Fire protection?
b. Police protection? ---
c. Schools? --
dµ Parks or other recreational facilities? �"
✓
e. Maintenance of public facilities, including
roads?
f Other governmental, services? `--.
1S
ENERGY, Will the proposal result in:
a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel.or energy?
b. Substantial increase
in demand upon existing
sources of energy, or require the development
of new sources of energy?
16.
UTILITIES. Will the propsal result in a need for
new systems, or substantial alterations to the
following;
a. Power or natural gas?
b. Communications systems? ---
c. Water availability; --
d. Sewer or septic tank?
—�
e. Storm water drainage?
f. Solid waste and disposal,'
17.
"tJ 4AN HEALTH. Will the proposal result
a.
eata.on of any health hazard or potential
health hazard (excluding mental. health)?
b. Exposure Of people to potentials health
hatards7
18,
AtSmMcS, Will the proposal, result in the
o structon of any scenic vista ar
view open to
the public, or will the proposal result in the
creation of an aesthetically offensive site open
to public view?
YES
MAYBE NO
19. RECREATION. Will the proposal result in an impact
upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational
opportunities?
20. CULTURAL RESOURCES.
a Will the proposal result in the alteration
of or the destruction of a prehistoric or
historic archaeological site?
b. Will the proposal result in adverse phys;cal
Y
or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or
historic building, structure or object?
c Does the, proposal, have the potential to cause
a physical change which would affect unique
ethnic cultural values?
3. Will the proposal restrict existing religious
or sacred uses within the potential impact
area?
V: DISCUSSICtJ OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
D1SGL15ra'Tghl C1F
09-12
lb,g. With the construction of a single family y � g i 1 y residence the-�r� Will
be some additional compaction and over covering of proclUctive Anil but
the impact Would be minimal.
J: Although 'the project site is in close
the area is not within a flood hazard area. proximity to Comanche Creek
0: The Chaco Land Use Map designates this area as
Crops. An additional homesite will not alter or hindr
e-�theaexisting
Land use.
1'3c, Although B=-esiauer Avenue is a narrow
vehicles that will result from the additional re
roadway, the additional
significantly impact the eXisting system. sxcl+.ncp will not
17a, b : The Department of Environmental Health will require a 10(.) f t .
leach free setbacl, from Comanche. Creel: to eliminate any potential
health hazard.
As a result of 'this project there will not be
land Use or a reduction of agri cultural capab i l i t yes There fore, the
project could riot have a significant
Negative Der_ l arm. L i on is recommended effect on the environment and a
RR4 1r
�6���,
^ + '-r- ' ~~ �^"='~^*" Assessor's ' ~ �ant: ~ A
r° ' 2
P8J8_2HEET
A.
1. Type of Project: Use Permit
2. Brief Description: To allow a 1 acre homesite segregation
from a 13.5 acre parcel in an A-10 zone.
3^ Location: on the south side of Breslauer Avenue, 1000 ft~
east of Lone Pine Avenue, southwest of Chico.
4, Proposed Density of Development: l d/U for home�ide
zegregation
5" Amount of Impervious Surfacing: N/A ^
6. Access and Nearest Public Road(s); PrqoosOd homes1te fronts
on Bres1auer Avenue which exits onto Lone Pine Avenue'~
7" Method of �ewage Disposal: Individual Zepttc tank
8~ Source of Water S!JpplY: Individual �well
-''
9* Proximity of Power Lines: Adjacent to BreG%aUer Avenue
iD~ Potential for further land divisions
n and development. None;
the remaining area is not sufficient for a land division under
A -l0 zoning~
° �no
'
}L
1^ Terrain
g~ General Topographic Chayacter~ Flat agricultural `end
b. Slopes., ��, U2% to the southwest -
C. Elevation- l57 fz^ A~�S,|_°
U° Limiting Factors: -
2. Soils
a~ Types and ChaYacterist£csu Vina Loan - Well Supplied with
organic matter, retains moi�tu�e Nell, easily -- -^�tivate6°
_ 6. Limit1ngFactur%: Sometimes gravelly
Natural Hazards of the Land '
a. Earthquake Zon� Intensity Zone VIII
E,, Erozion Potential; None
c~ Landslide Potential: None
d. F=ire Hazard: Unclassified '
` o. ExpansiV$ Ek ^ & PotentiaIu Mbderat4�?
4. Hydrology
a^ lSurface Water,., Little Chico Crook b d
' c� � �r erws on north, Edgar
Slough the Creek) borders an ouw
b* Ground| («atert - -�
c* Dra1nage Charatter1sticz: South into Edgar Slough
d, Annual Rainfall (normal)* 2(*,) to
22 Inches '
e^ LiM1tfng Factdrst ~
S. V1s4al/Scen1m 1it\y; Good
6° Acoustic Quality: Fair because of Various farm equipment
noise
7^ Air Qual1tv: Good
_� Hiolog�:ca1 Envireni-
5,
Vegetation: Almond trees, assorted nut trees
9.
Wildlife Habitat: Limited Riparian along Comanche Cre k iMo
south
Cot_.:LUCaI_Envi
ronment_a
10.
Archaeological and Historical Resources in the area: Moderate
to low.
11.
Butte County General P"l an designation: Orchard and 'Field
Crops
12.
Existing Zoning, A--10
13.
Existing Land Use on-site; Orchard with laborers' residence
14.
Surrounding Area.
a. Land Uses„ Orchards
b. Zoning.- A'-10
r
C. Sen. Plan designations: Orchard and Field Crop;
8. Parcel Sizes: 82+ ac. to 8 ac'.
e. Population:
S.
Character of Site and Area; Agricultural
16.
Nearest Urban Area: Chico 3, miles northeast
17.
1a.
Relevant Spheres of Influence: Chico Unified School district
Improvements Standards Urban Areas -
19.
Fare Protection Service:
a Nearest County (State) Fire Station: Butte County Fire
Station #44 and #45
20.
b. Water Availability: None on site, truck, capacity
Schools in
Area: Chico Area Schools
0 r
i �YJ/�.it AA (/$0111/ .
. L�4]
xYCi EE
Tax Area Cu39-09
g
[3�
-
n
Q M ad 62 03 �II✓TO5H
l
yy 2 � � f � HVL. '
EB: 4P-22 g4.�
800'
h _
s
� q
Flo
35 T 22 h1
�/E l
a f
o.' T2/N R/ E �
6r23 r2
5.77 AZ
r
y
' MARIAN
I2 AVE.
3&
105 �WALNur ,
Q � 50a c.
=12
37
� 3rsA�, AYE
,�SAct o� g
t
1
ROAD 7
A�� RIS 33.'611 1
io
to3l3
s'fsF * y t 2t97%r'�` r 145,65 Act
7081 .---
a '
7 -p�1 " " ° � ' 1 ria , + F r �� � � � e Alt `
Q is � P-12.2-4
-S"G. 2-G Az J
�''.''�V.� - � �_i ..., +_.•; r,.+Y ._waus.z LYraJ :Ye.
ILI
O ,
Recordof SUrrVeyw l;%S 22r28 Recorded 16, December 5i � "�''x".-max: _ �'��•��y.; .,.,.�-`
. , ,Assessor's Mcr p
39-09
Record` of Surveyt-fi✓� 3,�-fid Recorded 29, Doc amber 69 �4� � � t� ���,::`"�""'"• , ,n 1�e1� ' �
d�
4
- y alie
Butte, �,
rr A .
x }}