HomeMy WebLinkAbout039-150-010k
N
,
NOft Go pinnniny Comerl
�tOV�� fwt9�1�0311{ti
tre
i A N d O F' N A T U P, A l W E AI 7 H AND B A U T �Y
Y�
f
.A �L•
DEPARTMENT OF FU,gLlc WORKS
WILLIAM (Bill) CHEFF, Direntoe
7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE _ OROVILLE,CALIFORNIA.95965
T61-06-ne: (916) 53F}•7h61
RONALD D, McELROY
Deputy Diroclp,
Jule 10,;'"19$9
Nets Leen'
680 Rio Lindo Ave. #3
RE: AP 39-15-10 and 12'
Chico, CA; 9592E
TPM
Dear Mr. Leen:.
At the regular meet .n9 o£ the Butte "Count}r-,
July 10; 19$9, the
Advisory Agency held on'
agency recognized that
that the application be' Withdrawn, and Withdrew
the applicant has requested:
consideration.
the application, from
If you 'have any questions regarding this matter, .lease:.
office. - P contact this
Very truly yours,:
1.4111,am Chef£
Ditedtor of Public 'Works
J
ri. Mendonsa
A sistant Director
cc Planning
Health""
RFC Surveyors
, ,
IV. ENVIPQNMENTAL IMPACTS
(Explanations of all "YES." and °`(U1AYBE" answers are required on attached sheet(s
. EARTH, Will the proposal result In significant;
YES f1AAYBE
NO
a. Unstable earth conditions or in chahges In geologic substructures•? ,,
b. Dfsru bony, dis lacements com action or ov
P displacements, p ercoverng of the soil?... ,, D:
❑
, .4 a.
c. Changa in to" o raP 9 Ph y or ground nd surface relief features?
......... : . . . . . . .. . . . . p
❑
d, Destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? , , . , , Or
❑
e, Increase in Wind :or water erosion of soils, either on or off site?, . , , ,, , , , , , , .. , ,;,. Q
® ❑
{ ,
t; Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in sfltation, deposition°or
erosion Which may modify the o'hannel ofa riverorstream or bed of the ocean or any
boy,or
y lake? ,,..y.,,. ,,. <.... ............ F, Q
.;
❑
g. Loss of prime agriculturally productive soils ofttside desinated urban are
g "as? ,.,,.,,,,,
h, Exposure" of p4opleL or property to geologic hazards such as earthqual�es, landslides,
m,u.dslitles, ground fallure. or similar hazards?
... <.... . . . . . ...... . ..... , , D
D
2: AIR. Will the,proposal result In substantial_
a: Air emissions or deterioration Of,annbl 0 air quality?.. Cj
❑
,,,,
b, The creation of of idetional odors, smt� a, fumes? .... . O
..:.. ... .....:........ , ...
❑
c, Alteration of air movement, moisture, or te,r ,jarature, or any change in climate, locally or
..
regionally? . , . ❑
❑
3; WATER, Will the proposal result in substantial.
a, Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements In either marine or
fresh waters?,
b, Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff?, . ❑
❑
c; Need for 'off-site' surface drainage improvements, ncluding vegetatlon removal,
channelization or culvert,installation?
,iif, i• ,
d, Alteralions to the course or flow of flood Waters ,,, ,)
❑ fl
e. Change In the' amount of surface water In anY Water body?,
..;,:,,,,, ,
❑ ®\
f. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, Including bUk
not' invited to temperature,, dissolved
P ox en or turbidity?
g: Alteration of the drecti.an''or rate of floWof ground waters?
p
..
h: Change in,the quantity or quality of ground Waters, either khrough, iiirect addi4ions or,
withdrawals, or thraugh interception of an aquifer, by,cuts or excavations?
Q in'
I. Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public Water supplies? , .. , ,;, ❑
O
,
j. Exposure "af people or property to Water related hazards such asflooding? '❑
(]
4.: PLANTL FE. Will the prapogai result In substan"tlaf.
a. Change In the diversity of#ecles, or nu.inber of any species of ;planks (including trees;
shrubs grass, crb ps, "and aquatic plants)? D
❑
b. Red'uc'tion of the ntimbers'of any unique;: rate ar endangered,"
pecies of plants? ,,„, ,, ❑, ,
jA ,p
c, In4rdduttjori of new species of piants Into an' area, or In 61 bal'rlor to the norma[
replenfshmenk of existing species? .: , , , ,. , , , , , , , ,
d. Reduction" in acreage at •anv :Ultura(°crop?,,
aoricu
IJ
•,2, ,F. Y,Y,
,� f..J
S AMI.MV Off- Wilt iii6 result
proposal ,in substantial:
1(6S IviAY9E NO, ..
a. ;Change'in the diversity, of spec*es, or numbers of` arty species of, animals (b'irds, land
animals Including reptiles fish and shop fish, benth(c organisms or insects};T....., , ... C1
❑.'
b. Reduction in the numbers ofany unique, rare or endangered' specios of animals? ,,, , , ° Cl
❑:''
c. introductionofnoM�speciesofanimaisintoanarea,orresultfpabarriertothemigrationor
tl. D eterforation toexistfng fish or wildlife habitat?;..~,.,,,,.,...: ...,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ❑
❑ [
,,,,,
B. NOISE: Will the proposal result -in substantial:
a,. ncreases fn existing noise levels?,,,„.:.:..:.............:.......:+..,,.,,,.:,,�>,,, ❑,''-7❑
b. Exposure of people to severe levels?
.noise
7. LIGH1; ANS GLAZIER Will the proposal prodUce,Significant light and glare? . , . , . , , , { , , , : , ❑
❑,; LSiJ
8. LANiJ USE. Will the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the present or planned land
use of an area? .. ......... ,..,. +: ❑
�j. ❑
9. NATURAL RESOURCES, Will the proposal result in substantial;
A. Increase in the `rate of use of any natu ❑
ralCesources7
❑ 1i9
b. Depletion of any non-renewable natural resources? ... . :: ... L7
❑ (8!
. . . . . ., , , . , .. , , .... , , , . , ,
16. RISk,OF UPSET: Will,the proposal Involve;
a. A,rlsk of explosion or release of hazardous substances (including, but not linilted to,�oil,
pesticides, chemicals or radiation) In the event of an accident or upset conditions ? «. , . O.
0 29
b. Possible Interference with an emergency response pian or emergency evacuation plan?. , L]
L7 1>�
iI. POPULATION, Will the proposal.alter location, distribution, density, or;growihrate of
human population .. , . ,.,11, p
❑�
12. HQUSING, Will the proposal affect existing hou trig, or, create a demand for additional
housing?
13, TRANSPORTATION/CIACULATIOi ,i Will' the” proposal result in;
a, Generation of substantial additional vehicle movement? ; D
(� ❑
....; , , .., . , , . ,;, :.. ,
,
b. Effects On existing parking facilltles, or demand fot` new parking? . , :, , ., , CI
❑ i
, , , ,-, .;, . , , . , ,
C. 5 ;las#antlai impact on existing transportation systems? , , . , , , , , , , , ❑
in: C]
d, _Significant alterations to present patterns of cledWation or movement of people and/or
oodS? Ci
❑ l
e. Alterations to waterborne, call or air traffic7,±: C]
❑' [?�l
. .:. . . . ...:..... .'... , a , , .. , , .. , , , , ... , ...
f, increase n: trafffo hazards to motor Vehicles, bicycil§ts or pedestrians?, .. '.., . , . , ,, . , , O
❑'
y
, , -
14. PUBLIC SERVICES, Will the proposal' have an effect upon, "or res,:;',(n a need for nein ar. .#
,
afteretl,,'9ctYernment servlces: YES MAV13040
a. Fire protectioh? .. , , . , :.;, ❑
❑
b. Police,protection? , .. 4 . .-. 4 . ❑
1]
,
a. Schools?•,,, . „ ,.r...i, ❑
0
d: Parks'or other recreational facilities? ❑
e: Maintenance;of public facilities, including roads? . '..: _• ❑
i, L Other governmental services? , , i . y . • • • • ❑
`15.ENERGY{ Will the proposal, result in; ,
Use amounts fuel orenergy?. ..,.,.,....._...,..:„•„•• i,y C]
❑
a. of substantlal of
b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the
development of neIW sources of energy? ...... { .. 4 4 • . , : Y s • .. • , . ; . , , , , , }
ifi..UTILITIEt. Will the pr6posalrosult 10 a need f or newsy stems, orsubstaotial alterations to the N
following!:
a , .. ,, , ❑
❑
a. Power or natural gas? } , ....., .... .. ,,,
b. Communications systems?= .,,. x444{. ❑
❑
❑
❑
c. Water aValiabll(ty? .}, {, . , , r, .. , , ., , { .
d, Sewer or septic system? , , Y-, , . , : { . , , . , . } , }a, ❑
❑
,,,,..,... ❑
❑
e. Storni water;drainage?,.,,:,.,,,, 1.,}11,4,,,pc.
1. Solid waste:and disposal? s ,,,,,,r..Y4i,,,.},{+l,e.,.,,t:. ......... 0
❑
17. HUMAN HEALTH'. Will the proposal result In
health hazard (excluding mental health)? } ,'. , ❑
❑
a, Creation of any health hazard or potential
.
b. Exposure of`people. 'to potential health hazards? Y.,.,.,,.:,Y,,i,,,},.:,,,,,,R, ❑
❑
-
18. AESTHLTICS,,Will the 'proposal result:ln the obstruction of any soenlc Vista _or view open to
the p�ublic, or the proposal result16 the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open
/will
t0u b lio” view? { 1. .. X .. K , . t i'., . , , , , ,” , ..
p,
19. ;RECREATION: Wili'the proposal result in an impact.11pon ,the quality or quantity of,existing
recreational opportunities? . i< . , ... ,i... , ..,, . i .. •`, , • K .. ❑
O L�1
X,
2o; CULTURAL RESOURCE•.
Will the proposal result In. the alteration of or the �destructloh of a prehlstoric or`histoelo
a.
aeghaeolp 'i „ Y •.:.. , , , p , ),4 , Y f 4 . H :::.
b. lNill'the proposal result in adverse physioa(or aesthettc effects to;a prehistorlc or hlMoric
C]
❑ 91
buf din structure or object? "„ ,
c, Does the proposal have thepotential to cause a physical change wlicli'woultl affect unique
❑
"
❑
ethnic cultural Yallies?........ .YY.,,,,,.iff,,..,r.Y.,.44.P4....;.:;..},,..,....,..:,..:{.
d: Will the restrict existing;, religlo��s or sacred uses within the potential (rrMpact
❑ �
proposal
Area?.,{,..,�{.,,.,,, ❑
4• ,{f }144, Vi4e"AY V, �. :{}., „ i:.f lr,l,i,e •i4Y„ 4.4i•ii:
AMIL
u
14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Will the proposal have an effect upon; or result in a need for new or
altered government services,. ';` YES MAyf3E NO
❑
�
'a. Fireprotection? , •
b. Police k-. 6tectiori? , . ... . , . . , is .. ❑
❑
❑
c. Schools?, i. IJ 1 ,
r
d. ('arks or other zcreational;'facilities? .. . . .. . .......... ; ...... , ... • . ! • ..... , .. • . ; . ❑
❑
e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? ... , ,',....... "; .. « . , : . , . , .: • .. ! .... ❑
10 ❑
:,....F
L Other governmental services? :..: . ....:. . ..:: ... . ; ...... .. «:. , .. , :. ❑
�
15.'EN0101yi Will the proposal result in
Use substantial :amoun s of fuel or energy? .: ! ... , .:.... , . ! • . i . • .:: ! .... « :. ❑ _,
❑
a. of , t„ ,
b. Substantial increase in demand Upon existing sources of energy, or require the
of ,. ❑
development of new sources energy ,..
❑
16. UTILITIES. Will the proposal resultinaneedfornewsystems,orsubstantial:alterationstothe
following.
a. Power or natural 'gas? .:,, . :. (❑
O]
b. Communi4atlons systems? . ... •:. , , P;'. , ❑
❑
c. Water avagability? . .......... , , . ❑
❑ \'
\
d. Sewer or sOptic system? .: ❑
❑
e: Storm water drainage? .............. ......... .:....... .... ,,:. ;,. ri
13 Ip
L Solid waste and disposal? : : , . , • C]'
Ci
17. HUMAN HEALTH. Will the proposal result 'ins
a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard) (excluding mental health)? :... ❑
❑
b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards?' : « . • • • • • •
❑
18. AESTHETICS, Will the prapcsa( result in the obstruotlon.of any scenic vista or vieW open to
the public, or will the proposal result In the creation of anaesthetically offensive site open
�ybj,� I . w1
t� 1.P'J l i a V � e � . . . 1 . , « 1 3 1 , ! , i « , f • r . _r . , . .. P : ! , . . v P , f t • P „ 1 . , P . _
public
1.9. RECREATION. Will the proposal resuit in an impact upon the quality or quantity o'f existing
recreational opportunities? +! , . . •
cr❑
❑
10,CULTURAL
a. Will the proposal; result in the alteration of or the destructiOi of a prehistoric or historic
archaeological sites
b. Will the proposal result in ativerse physical or aesthotic effects to a prehistoric or hlstorlc
❑
❑
building,a:ructure or oti'Jeck? :', : , . : _ .. •i-, . .:.: P;. , :
c. boesthe proposal have the 'potentiahtocauseaphysical changewhichWoUldaffecttinique ❑
❑
'thnlc cultural •. i :::.(•„"Y:..,.i,,,..,31.c: i9Y l.,. i'•.:.:.,Y.P.ai (L„,.a i:,
-, e,ues?
d, Will the proposal restrict existing religious or 'sacred uses within the potential impact
-9-
App7;;icant: Nets Leen Assessor's Parcel #
33--15-10, 12
Log #
DATA SHEET
A, Project
Descri tion
l..
Type cif Project Tentative :Parcel Map (reconfiguration)
.L .
Brief Description : Recomb3 nation of 4 lots of 9, acres and 1
1"ot of 12+ acres each.
3 •
Location. At the southwest `:orner of Chico Airenue and `Lone
Pine Avenue and on the., north side of.Edgar Avenue, west of
Edgar Slough, Chico,
4.
Proposed Density of Development: 1 dwelling 'unit per, 9 acre
average.
5.
Amount of Impervious Surfacing-: Minimal.
6.
Adcess' and; Nearest Public Roa6`(, : Frontage on Chico, Lone
Pine, and Edgar Avenue:
7.
Method of Sewage Dispibsal: 'Septic tanks.
8.;
source of Water Suppl!�r: ` Individual Wells,
9.
10.,
Proximity of Power Lines: Along road frontages.
Potential for further land divisions
and development:
division will entail the removal. of one house, outbuildings,
and construction of'four 'houses.
R. Enyirozlmental Setting
Physical Environment,;
1.
Terrain
6. General TopographicChar: acte r : .Level valley ].and
Slopes : lis bank.
; creek are steeper.,
c.: Elevation: 155;-160. ft.
;A.S.L.
d, Limiting Factor : None.
2.
Soils
a. Types and Character ttics Vina loam, classified as a
prime agricultural soil, a deep, well: draining; soil ,
well Supplied witli organic matter.
b.' Limiting Factors: Moderate c4. Jon potential.
3,
Natural Hazardsof the Land
a. Earthquake Zone; Moderate..`
b. Erosion Potential:' -None.
c. Landslide Potentiate, None.
d. F3 re Hazard;: Unclassified.
Expansive Soil Potent al:
a,. Moderate'.
4.
Hydrology
a. Surface Water;" Edgar ,5]ough is the southern project
boundary.
b.. Ground Wate;ri. Overlies an.area of extensive groundwater
wi hdrawal,
-9-
M
drainage rharacterstics,; Araitis to Edgar Slough.
d. Annual
Rainfall (normal): '20.-22"
e, Limiting Factors: None.
5.
V sixal/ Genic Quol9ty: Pastoral views of orchards,._ barn:�
and farm animals..
�. 6
Acoustic Quality: Excellent.
7.
Air Quality: Excellent,, reduced perodically'by
operations• agricultural
Bio logical:Environment:
S.
Vegetation: Almond orchard, some mature. walnuts, urban
ornamentals i.e:,
(. Persimmon),w northeast
property co,rnor,
riparian, vegetation at Edgar Sloi;zgh.
9,
P
Wildlife Habitat: De artment of'; Fish and Game has mapped
Edgar Slough as supporting riparian vegetation. :
Cultural. Bnvironment:
10.
Archaeological and Hist:or,ical Resa_urces in the area: Low
including unknown.
11
Butte CounhyGeneral Plan designation: Orchard and Field
Crops.
12.
Existing Zoning: A-IO
13.
Existing Land Use on=site: 1 YiousEyr numerous ,out buildings,
barn, rri ation
g pipe, orchard trimmings.;..
14-.
Sqrrounding Atea:
a,; Land Uses: Orchards, farmsteads.
b,, Zoning: A--1.0, A-5
c. I Gen. PlanDesignation: Orchard and Field Craps.
d. Parcel. Sizes: 14:75
acresaverage within 1000 ft.
radius:._ ,
-
e• Population: Sparse.
15.
Character of Site and Area: Rural, farming area.
16.
dearest Urban Area: Chico 6+ miles.
17.
Relevant Spheres of Influence: N/A
18.
ImptoVement Standards Urban Area: -N 'A
19:
Fire Protection ServYce:
Nearest County (State) Fire Station: #44 6 miles east,
#45 5+; miles south. '
b. Water AVailability: Engine"Pumpars only.
20.
Schools in Area.: Chita tJni fried School Dis'trrict .
-10-