HomeMy WebLinkAbout039-240-0177`7* 1
WIN
..........
...........
Pw
R
EX 1.57-INCw WATIFA iJAIE i
A
-//V G
WELL 70
j5A.504EM' FROM EV57
60)331a�r RA RZEL,
LfoTA1
cx15r1Na WF -.,U - P)KOP05ED
�MIAL AREA=0.91 AC. 'IX
WM-E-q SUPPLY 5009CE M9LOTl. MSED - �t 11,
E"P0,0Z AC.
NErAR64 ;-0,9" AC, T
J1 R.
epf
Ilk.
0- T 2m 7
rOTAL AUA=O," AC.
Nrr AMA AC,
AWM$CD WEL4 SITES
U)
Z44,2'
Vol MrAL. 49&A" 1,41 AC,
rx1s-r1Al6 ew, -.ro,,c;o A:,
j(j
Pnoposro esmrrodl Ac.
NO' AREA= 0,eo Ac,
10
Fawn
.&am
LY
LOCATION)VAV
NO SCA4E
NOTE"
NO IVOTICEABLE st-OPS TO S08-AEC7-
PAKMIC 09 SURRO(J�fOIAAG
't
30
4R,
zz
)PA)qcfl Lr 11, �57 71
rr%
AP J-91'mw-24
�py MEANS OF SEWAGE DISPOS BFINg 'J" A POR r/O SEC rION
SED AL - N
INDI VIDUAL SEPTIC 5 "Yz"i TEA f 5
T -21N, "I NIP jo
/ m o" 8,
POSED IVEAA15 OF WA7-ic..R .450PPLY.Pow?
PRO
LOT I EXISrIAA C-7 WELL AS 590 WN
LOTS ZE3-ft-INDAYDUAL WELLS
14fERZE LARLIC
R 0, 8 0, X 151
&WHAIV.4 CAUAWMVIA 95939
FILE
.rAN,, 14M
10
ts
APPLIcAm,
AOMSS
�6 5
PROJECT DB8CRIPT10:f V -------------
L1�3'IaLIELL,�bo allow 81 acr
to be divido(j
u ur an ei;
LOCATION -re
L9.A�lrlin Ave. &
ASSEssoRtS PARCE1.
ZONING GEN PLAN
PROJBICT t*%'ONS1STHNT'?
DATH APPLIC.-MON 1),p.0.r:jj
VED 1=21 -So
DATE REzoiql
NG PETITION 8XGNATUAL,
DATE LEGAL D9sCR1PTXrN pnBpARED OR CL7,BCK -Z===,
DATE PUBL-GATION NOTICE WRITTEN
;) rd(TRUsHED
DATE DXSpLAI P�D VREpARED
PuBLISHEI)
PLACE NEWSPAPER N0,j,ICE,(,q) - — -------
0, P. a, B.
DATB MATLM�I LIST PRBpAnnD
DATE -OUT NOTICBS IM -3, MAXLET)
DATE 'Q NUMBER
(I EXHIVI'T PUPARED
FpXfg STAFF FINDING$ PRUPARBD
Murii-xa—
tip
DATE
AND DATB CATEXORICAL —
DECLAPATION DATE
INPACT REPORT ))AT8 Cj,,'kTTnr-,D
OTHER.........................
COMIS,"310H HVVM�Fc 1) A U,
Co-�IHISSXOX AMTON
BOARD ACTION
COUMENTS
1,
APPLICATION FOR
VARIANCE
Butte County PlaninFlIg Commission
File No.
Date filed
Hearing date
Action by Planning Commission
Action by Board of Supervisors
[A:1 - - "'. I Lijanin(j Comm.
lCi8o
PRESENT ZONING.-iiii-S-R-t-1 Assessor Map Book —2.2— Page No. 24 Parcel No.
REQUEST: -A_xaZi.&=a_ st hp-proh-ir _o,.-
APPLICANT'S NAME:—MiChael Glaze PHOW., 589-2AA)
ADDRESS: __3275 Yerifaap P�nr..q�
STATUS OF APPLICANT'S INTEREST IN PROPERTY: NO renorel 4 "q!. _i�.
- ro A -4 -
development cons 11 -ant- '
OWNER'S NAME. U for owner.
PHONE:
ADDRESS: 0i ox 151 - novi (1 -
DESCRIPTION Or- PROPERTY,
_Ln
. . . . . . . 1, 4rL. A atil. -j
M 'A WACL OJ A%iii A -i TAiii
EXPLAIN FULLY REASON FOR APPLICATIOW
A!+-_hough,A_Iie parcel is 1111111'Per than ith _acres
easements a:nct thosq e' t_'__Z_e4_due t e. ist'
required for PkbPosed parcels *ndi
the sulting lota o IndividUal net areas of
t 'on b- rtal m
sl ly _9�J�La will not be
0 one acre or larger, Other parC611-3in the vicini e ual
''1 .6
tibinin tign are both larvii—rthan a d sm
clasgifida ty and Under identical
cause of Ee shape 1 :111 f e pro 1!11.11,11 n o e
yer yj excess area in
thtts a 1, - , - a m st be
,fl -M -51i --- !-J2_r1v:Ln9_ this pr''opeft X aevOtOd to easements
lorivil On �0. e
129 —es __ other prhrsay-+..i
he net areas resulting from the roPosed A ivition v Le are
p in the at
(I ObA fZ010- Ould be onlY slightly
Tie above sliefernants are cerflified by the u"d
- M1,61ii +6 66 correct.
140M Pl-a� t"hillf 66tewlth 0 ehech
detall: � th f6d arn(Wht Shown below, poyn6le to County Of buff6i; also o
j plot plan showing the 10 driJ 0ii6pdS
prop6riles. O�D bdatich of exittItig dd StrUdh4res oh Your 'pe6peiify alld on tho adjacehi
$
By
OPICE 1-0 APPLICANT-ftANCE
1. It applicant Is other than owner, a proof of agency must be supplied in writing
in order to legal ly s Ign the 1, Variance ",
Application shall be considered void it not signed by owner or his legal agent.
24 All Items on application shall be completed, It an Item is not applicable, Indi-
cate by the symbol n/a,
3. Expl-in briefly yet completely the nature of the porposed variance. 'This is very
important and a ecluisite.
4, Fourteen copies of a detailed plot plan or adequate scale to clearly delineate
proposed building and improvements, folded 8%1'X11" shall accompany and be
made part of the "Application for Variance." I'lo-ling Comm,
The plot plan shall Include the following,
a. A scaled drawing of the parcol(s) boundaries,
b. Location of all existing and proposed buildings and lmprovementi6�i�n'ft�, k-
c. Location and size of existing and proposed access to the subject parcel(s).
d, Identify streets bordering property an(] nearby crossroads, Provide a loca-
tion map It necessary, Show North Arrow.
e, Preliminary desgin for ori,.site, off-site improvernents and Sturm drdinage disposal,
(It shall be the responsibility of the developer to provide detailed engineering
plans for on-site and offsite improvements arid storm drainage disposal to Butte
County Department of Public Works for approval and install required facilities,
lEngineering plans must be done by a Registered Civil Engineer.)
5. Applicant shall fUther understand that tho "Appacation for Variance" shall be
subject to tile approval of the Board of Zoninq Adjustment, or, upon appeal, of
the Board of Supervisors. Any subsequent special condifloc�, ordered by the
Board of Zoning Adjustment shall be mac!e a part of tile -pproved Variance" and
shall be binding on the applicant.
6, VAR I ANCES from we terms of the zoning ordinance shall be granted only when,
because of special circurristarices opplicable to tile property, including size, shape,
topography, location or surroundings, tile strict application of the zoning ordin-
Cn
V Ln ance deprives such property of privileges enjoyed by other property in the vicinity
%M' E and under identical zoning classification.
0
U Any variance granted shall be subject to such conditions as will assure inat the
OT adjustment thereby aUthori2ed shall riot Constitute a grant of spe'.181 privileges
inconsistent with the limitations upon other properties in tile vicinity and zone in
which such property is situated. Any such condition Imposed upon issuance of a
BE
variance must be related to the use of the property for which the variance is
requested.
A variance shall not lie grantud for a parcel of property which authorizes a use or
activity which is not otherwise expressly authori?,nd by the zone regulation gc irn-
0 ing the parcel of property."
C13
M 0
46 C 7. Fees may be paid in cash or by check made to "T, easurer of Butte County".
.10 1 hereby declare under penalty of perjury that I have read the foregoing
Instructions and statementri and understand their meaning and context,
DATr=D,.
A 11 1 ,
40
te
ble
,rf'
41 11 ;)�x �,S
-7)
ronvtu
ni "
0
G N&
ENY-TRONMENTAL IMPACT
1. NOTICE
been re -T' 'ZU" r_rIVEN that the project described below has
viewed pursuant to the provisions Of the California
Environmental Quality Act of 1970
21100, et se (Public Resources Code
_q.) and a d termination has been made thatit
not have ' 0
li_637'_�Ilfi cant effect upon the environment.
2. DESCRIPTION Op PROJECT: :GO9 # 80-01-18-03
Variance 4- 0 allow a 1.81 acre Parcel to be divided into
two Parcels of equal net size, neither Of Which ha
size Of I acre Or greater, on Property s a no
3. LOCATION or, PROJECT: zoned SR -l- AP 39 -24 -?l
ApprOXiM&tely 600 feet west Of Mc-Aztarlin Avenue and Dayton
Durham Highway intersection, Dutham.
4. NAME AND ADDRESS 01' PROJECT AppLICANT:
Michael Glaze Merle LaRue
3275 Heritage Road P. 0. Bo_�c 151
OrOVille, CA 95965 Durham, CA 9.9938
5. MTTIGATION MEASURES:
none.
6. A copy of th�_ Environmental Review Director#
regarding t1le environmental of s initial study
This study was feet of this 'Project is attached.
x Adopted as P -resented.
Adopted with changes. Specific modifications and
SUPPOPting reasons are attached.,
7. A public h aring, on this Negative Declaration was held by the
decision ma0kitig body.
X0avixIS body __ Butte CountIV p1mvAl"'n 061=1
1881on
Dabe of netoxmination ,;�/19/80
On '(,ho basin of the Y,1nv;jr0nme.11tal
the 'n-fo-1�ZatiOtPresentod at hearin Orta It:Ltial study�
88� Comments r(Isceivoa on the
proposal and Ouv Own knowledge and independent resea�vcht
Appendix a - page I Of P
xx We find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant
effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECIARATION is
hereby adopted.
We 'ind that the project could have a s SnJ,,ficant effect
on the environment but will not in. this case because of
attached mitiga#on, measures described in, item 5 above
which are by, thib reference made conditionm of project-
approvau. A conditional NEGATIVE DEOLARATION is here,,')y,
adopted.
DATE: A-nril ')Ilq&L-
Signature
Geovge Gilbe-.t
Name
0
Chairman, Butte County Piallning
Title
I
Apendix G " page P- of 2
ITTICE S�F E'TERKINATIOr.q
TO: /7 Secretary fLr Resources
1416 Ninth Streot., Room
1, s) 11
Sacramento, Q'A 95814
/ 3�7
I
SUBJECT:
otovillet Gpfitorja
County Clerk
I :
County of 100
C
oun-;,-Z,
Tra. V e
V 71"t
�4!
FILEID
AAR 1�
CLARK A- NELSON, county Clark
-'Dapvty
F ROM: (Lead AMY).
evie,;
rl I�c
------------ 1-114 �,-11
Piling of tjotico of DeteMination in compliance with --------
Section 21108 or 21152 of the Public Resources Code
"RD L or. 8o-01-38-03
-F —ro Te —cE Yi—t f –e
Variance AP 39-24-71
S t a E—eC I L' , Zi r I n F Merle LaRui
,,nOUSe NUMI)Cr 11 9 U Michael Glaze
State C earing
CO . n Ea c 'tP e r —so n— C2 tiouse
L
11. TeT-p LULIQ'IJUMI)er
lot
Pro. i * �I (,- %'),;? I -,; t�� -t7
JeCt Loca xon" ApprOyiM,,j,tf
t 1, I;D TL3 r 6-0 0 1 Ce e —tw Of McAnarlin Avenuc and
,nY buo 1 1; e us:t
,-LaY—ton Durbinm HiGL;a Ct,.On J) r
--P-r-0ject Des Ej?—jp Iiam.
Variance to allow a 1.81 acre parcel to be divided*i
Lher Of Which has a net ri7,C
parcels of equal net Size, nei nto tj.jO
1 acre Or great
or, on 1-0 erF-v On— SR -1. LI
'rhi s is to q -]Vise that the I'l. * o COf Planning Commi - Ssio
n
has made the follo�qin Ueacl Agency) --------
project- 8 detctminAtions regarding the above�described
I. The ptoioct will
have a significant effect On the
fkI 'Will not;
0114viroftPlIent .
2. L-7 Art E-nvil'OnPlon tn' IMPAct RWPOrt Was preparod for thi.8
pursuant to
the PrOvIsiOn$ Of CNOA, and was corti�iad
recluirod by Section 15,185(17
C,d,I � ) � 14 'Califoriia Administrative
A 008 1 'iltive Doclarntion t,1L,18 PrOPired for this roj Ct I)L r u
LO the provisions of GN%� A copy of t1jo .1 n
tion ri-�,,iy bo cXal�tined at ttle LMtirorimerltal CIt(T)dtiVe Declar:j-
Oview Depar�-M*TIL,
COtIntY UQntQr Drive, Orovilto, Caliiforni.a -95965,
A Nlut'cc or Exempt*
'Oft WaS filed indicitting
"OMPt CrOtil OhVironNenLal roview.
4//�?
I of',
4. A statement of over
adopted fo* riding Consideration L7 was, //JV was not,
r this project.
5, Mitigation measures adopted by the Lead Agency to reduce the
impacts of the approved Project t�re.
None
I
Signature
tar! D- V01801it Director
T =L(1 -4—
F1 v1X'U)lrll('JIt'-AJ R(Vim"
�4
2 of
4b
APPENDIX F
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FOJ�X
(To be completed by Lead Agency)
ra, Log 80 -01 -le -03 & 04
BACKGROUND
L, Name of Proponent Michael. Glaze
4. Address and Phone HUmber of Proponent.,
3275 Heritage Road Merle LaRue
Oroville, CA 95965 P. 0. Box 151
Durham, CA 95938
J, Date of Checklist Submitted
4, Agency Requiring Checklist
5. Name of Proposal, if appliMle Variance to 1 acre ize
for 2 parcels and Tentative Parcel Map to create 3 parcols on
Ail 15�)-24-71, Durham.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
(Explanations of all "yes" and "maybo" answers are required
on attached sheets.)
'YES MAYBE NO
1. Earth, Will the proposal result in significant:
a, Unstable earth conditions or in
c I hanges in geologic substructures?
b, Disruptions, displacements, com- A&�
paction or overcoveritig of the soil?
c. Change in topography or ground 8ur-
face re lief features or removal of
topsoii?
d, Destrtiction, covering or modifica-
tion of any unique geologic or
physical features?
o� Increase in wind or water erosion
of soils, either on or off the site?
f. Changes in deposition or erosion
of be8ch sands, or changes in silta-
tion, deposition or erosion which.
may modify the channel of a river or
stream or the bed of the ocean or
any bay, inlet or lake?
g, Loss of peime agricultu-.-ally pro-
ductiva soils outsi'(1e designated ML
urban areas?
Appendix V - page 1 o1 9
i'.
rl
YES 14AYBE No
h. Exposure of POOP10 Or Propert-.y to
geologic hazards such
as earthquakes,
landslides, mudslide8 ground failure,
Or similar hazards?
2. Air, Will the proposal result in:
a. Substantial deturioratiom of
ambient 01: local air quality?
b. The creation of objectionable
odors, smoke or fumo8?
Ci Significant alteration of air
movement, moisture or temperature)
or any change in climate, either
locally or
regiolially?
3. Water, Will the Proposal result in substantialt
a. Changes in curronts, or the course
or direction of wtIter
movements?
'bo Changes in absorption rates, drainage
Patterns, or the rate and amount of
8 urface water runofr?
ANN&
c, Reed for ofr-site surface drainage
improvements,
including vegetation
removal) channeliz at ion or culvert
installation?
kL' 4X.Lterations t,,) the Course or flow
Of flood watevO
e, Change in the amount of surface
water in any Water body?
f. Discharge into surface waters, or
in any alteration of surface
water quality, including but lot
limited
to temperature, dissolved
oxygen or turbidity?
g. Alteration oL the direction or
rate Of flow Of ground waters?
h, Chahge in the quantity ot quality
of cround
waters, either through
direct additions Ot withdrawals,
Or through interception of ,In
aquifer by cuts or excava4tioas?
4V dIx V Page 2 of 9
a
2
4b 0
L. RaducLion. In the amount of water
otherwise available for public
water supplies?
Exposure of people or property
to water related hazards such as
flooding?
4, Plant- Life. Will the proposal result
17ri—s u_Fs —tan t i a 1 .
a. Loss of vegetation or change., in the
diversity of species or number
of any species of plarts (including
trees, shrubs, grass, c; 4*ops
microflora and aquatic planLs)?
b. Reduction of the numbers of any
unique, rare or endangered species
of plants?
c. introduction of new species of
plants into an area, or in a barrier
to the normal replenishment of
existing species?
d. Reduction in acreage of any agri-
cultural crop?
5. Animal Life, Will the proposal result
in substantial:
a. Change in the diversity of species,
or numbers of any species of
animals (birds, land animals
including reptiles, fish and shell-
fish, benth-S 'c organisnis, insects or
microfauna) 7
b� Reduction of the numbers of any
unique, -rare or endangered species
of animals?
c. Introduction of new species of
animals into an area, or result in
a barrier to the migration or
movement of animals?
d. Reduction of, encroachment upon, or
deterioration to existing fish or
wildlife habitat?
YES MAYBE NO
AUL
W
A
Appendix F - page I of 9
1.2
7,
8.
91
10.
11.
12.
YES MAYBE
NO
qc)ise. Will vhe Propos,11 -result In
JUMs Eantial .
a, Increases in noise levels?
b, P.-.posure of people to severe noise
levels?
Ujf,rht and Glare. Will the proposal
7 2' ant JJV
, roTu'ces3_-F7,n1TTc ,ht or glare?
Land Use. Will the prop osa-1 result
n a, i f i c an t:
a. Alteration of the planned land use
of an area, or establish a trend
which will demonstrably lead to 8uoh
alteration?
b, Conflict with uses on adjoining
propprties, or conflict with
establ-i,-1-tud recreational, educa-
tional, religious or scientific
uses of an aiea?
Natural Re8ources, will the proposal
Feguit in Mb'staEntiali
a, Demand for, or increase in the raLe
of use of any natural resources?
b, Depletion of any nonrenewable
natural resource?
p, 4 L -_U s�t, Does the proposal
i8i
_2f .V_'
involve a riEk of an explosion Or
the release of hazardous 6tibstances
(including I but not limited to� oil,
pesticides, chemicals or radiation)
in the event of an accident or upset
conditions?
Population. Will the prol)osrl.l
. icantly alter the location,
distribution, density, or growth
rate of the human population of an
area or physically'divide. an
established community?
0
'Rous in Will the proposal
i-ign—ificantly aftect existing housing,
or create a demand for additional
housing?
Appendix F page 4 of 9
I
13. Trans'00r tat ion/ Circu I a Wil� the -Y—ES
tion
�!LYBE NO
a, Generation of substantial additional
vehicular
movement?
b. Significant eEfects oil existinp
parking fa,cilities,
Or demand for
new parlting?
C. Substantial impact upon exist4
ing
trp-nsportation
systems?
Significant alterations to present
patterns of
C*rculation or Movement
of people and/lor goods?
e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or
air traffic?
f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor
vehicles, bicyclists
or Pedestrians?
14. Public services. the propos al have
upon� or result in a substantial
need for now o'^
ilovernmontal
services in anY Of the f011owin,-
areas. -
a. Fire Protection?
b. Police protection?
C, 0"Chools?
d. Parks Or other roorekcional
facilities?
e. Maintenance of Public facilities,
�-P-cludin- roadsl
Other governmental service.?
15 Ener Will the Proposal resul t in:
a, Use of substantial amounts of fuel
or
energy?
Substantial increase in demand upon
existing
8ou4ces or- energy, or
reqilire the development of
new
sources Of energy?
V--- � I
IS- t1tilities. 11ill the proposal result
in a Fe'eld—Eor
new systerr or 8ub-
uta'(1tial alterations to the r011oving
.L
tilities:
Appendix
V Page 5 of
1.7.
18 �
20
21.
2 2
I a
- POWer 0 T- Tiatural gas
b Communications syll',Mems?
C. Water?
d, Sewer (will trunk line be extended,
Providing, capacity to serve new
development)?
e. Storm water drainage?
Human Health, Will the propos,11
Te—S U-1 —Ei —n- 7; � � �
a. Creation of any health hazard or
Dotential health hazard (excluding
mental health)?
b. '�,Xposure of people to potenuial
health hazar d8?
Solid 14-Iste- Will. the Proposal result
,Tnany8--,'_—P-�ficant impacts associated
vit'1_1 soli(j�waste disposal or litter
control?
Aesthetics, dill the Proposal result
in t O-Eyttuction of any public
designited or revOgnized scenic Vista
open to the public, or will the
proDosal, result in the creation of an
aestheLically offensive site open to
public vj.etAt?
Recreation. Will the proposal result
17T 'animp��t upon the quality or
quantity of existing public rearea-
tion facilitLesl
Ar. -CL- - q 0 1 o! �Ylcalljjis tPrical, Will the
Proposa resu t in an aA:eration of
a significant archeological or
historical siteo structure, objent
or building?
Mandotory Vj'�heH,,,, of 8' Lcancc,
_a �-*i �ni f _
a, Does the prOJO" have the potential
to degrade the quality of the
environment) substantially reduce
th,t habitat of a fish or wildlife
8�DOCiO8, Cause a fish or wildlife
Population to drop belov4 self I
YES MYBE
No
AS&
Aft
, I
OQO�
AMML
. - -IW,
Appendix V Ige 6 of 9
b .
c.
9
Olt.
L7
YES M- YBE NO
I
sustaining levelsp threatcn to
eliminate a Plantor anirial. com-
munity, reduce the number or restrict
the range of a rare or endangered
plant or a.,*n,iIIIal
., the Maioz periods of
examples of or climillate important
California history or prehistory?
Does the Project have the otential
to achieve short term beneNts to
the detriment of publicly adopted
long-term environmental goals?
Does the Project have impacts whiLh
are individually limited, but
cumulatively considerable? (a project
may impact on two Or more separate
resources where the impact on each
resource is relatively small, but
Where the effect of the total of
those impacts on the environment is
significant,)
Does tile Project have emvitonmental
effects Which will cause gut tantial
adverse effects on human beings,
I
either directly or indirectly?
—so
— 10
Nw-
Appehdix V Pago- 7 of 9
17
80-01-18-03 & 04
111. DISCUS$ION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
first part of this proposcril is a varitince -to the 1 acre
mi.nimum, parcel Size, Oxclusivo of rights-cf-wayj for two parcels.
Tile Gross acreage for lot I is proposed as 0491 acre wit.h a net
,acroage of 0.89 acres. Lot 2 would have a Gross acreaGo of 0.99
acre,o, with a net acreage of 0.92 acres.
, consisting of 3.3 acres,
The total 8itO is located oil bile south
oide of McAnarlin Avenue about 600 feet west of the 111lo-Anarlin
Avenue and Day -ton Durham Highway intersection, Durham.
.1-crtative parcel map to create -three parcels on tho, total parcel,
AP039-24-71, represents -the second part of the proponal. A favor-
able decision by the Planning Commiscion on the -�rariance is needed
I n order to process 'the parcel map as designed.
Surrounding land uses and a description of the $ite are described
on the attached page of information submitted by the applicant.
parcel sizes are generally I acre or larger nearby in accord with
the SR -1 zoningi There are a f ew parcels of less than I acre within
-the SR -1 zone to the southwest along Dayton Durham Highway. Parcel
sizes in this locality vary from about 1/3 acre to 40 acres or More.
The SR -1 zoning district in this area has been in eff ect since
Aagust 1973. gxoept for the acre to the east of Layton Durham
Ilighway zoned SR -I I most Of the area is zoned for larger parcels
(A-5 to the north, west and south and A-20 furthe:o west). The
Butte County General Plan designation shows this site. for low density
residential use transitioning -to orchard and field crops to the
north and west.
lb � 3b 1 16e! Development of the - three parcels will cause increased
runoff. no natural drainage owales or channels exist in the Lxea
and no smn drainage . qcilities have been developed in the Durham
areai, During the fiF.Ld inspection� standing pools of Water were
evident throughout the site from recent iains- Natural drainage
of the soils is restricted. A drainage study is currently underway
for Durhami A permanent drainage solution will be difficult to
provide in the short-tOVm until facilities recommendr,,d by the Durham
drainage study are installed.
lgj 4db. This propqsal� for a variance to allow two par(., -.els less
than one acre in size and for a three parcel iand diviaion tr allow
three single family residences, will reduce by, a small degrc% the
mount of land available for a6vicultural production in the Durham
area. Thia property lies on the fringe of the urban residential area
as designated by the Butte County General Plano Soils On the sitO
are gencrally Conejo clay loam with ,�ome Vina loam toward DlcAnarlin Ave.
(Source: Soil Survey of -the Chico Area� Appendix I? - paqd 8 o� 9
iI.S.D. A. � 1929 . )
f qb 46
80-Gi-.18-03 &- 04
DISOUSSION OV LVVIRONMENTAL LVALUATION (continued)
il.a: Development of homesites will require the remov-al of the wood
frames and nther structures oil thO site associated wdth the prior
kiwi operation. Though kiwis were apparently -unsuoc-ousful on the
site, Oonejo clay loam is a rich, productive soil Xoi greln) pasture
land$ alfalfa and some deciduous fruits.
8a,b: Due to the areas deducted from the gross acreage for road
easement under the SR -1 zoning, the variance is being sought. Lot
3, not a part of the variance request, actually has more gross
acreage (1.41 acres) than lots I and 21 but, less net acreage
(0.8 acres). The applicant believes the variance request to be
reasonable since other parcels in the vic.-Inity, under the SR -1
zoning, are both greater than and less than one acre in size,
!?a: The Environmental Health Department indicates Uhat adequate
usable area for sewage disposal ekiStS L' each parcel..
References: Initial study for Steven McNelis TPM, AP 39-24-18)
Log # 79 -11 -09 -08 -
Initial study for Richard Jones rezono� AP 39-2-4-4-0,
Log If 3 -05 -11 -01 -
Appendix F - paCe 8a 09 9
LaRue Parcel Map
AP 39-2 `1-71
Jan. 13 1980
Appendi'ofes
APP,C.NDIX IAf
The subject parcelvas created by a series of parcel maps vIlich
produced lots on which single fami
structed 1Y residences could be con -
The previotis owner Of the propertyp howevert attempted
to use i� for the productioll Of Itivis- lie constructed several
agricultural sheds as well as a large grovii, "I-ena for kiwi
seedlings. The site is covered b type frames made from
treated pole$ which were y tee.-,poe
apparently to be u
Of Supporting tile mature pi Sed for the purpose
ants. The soil apparently proved to
contain too much adobe, for the plants never Prosperedp and the
kiwi farm "was abandoned to Weeds. After the enterprise failed,
tlAz parcel was sold to the present own(,r who
a Lot contiguous to it. Owns and resides on
The projoct site is relativol
, y level� having no obvious Slope.
The soil is apparently Stable and non-expansivp and is sane,y loam/
adobe mixture.
The site is barren of treesp and is covered quite predominantly
b -V a variety of weeds and grasses, Some dormant kiwi plants are
btill apparent$ although very small
'the soil for kiwis in that those plants
the illcOmPatibleness of in size. Their size verifiee
still in existence are between four and five years old.
There are no apparently vignifioant cultural, historical or scenic
aspects which can -be assoe4ate(j to the Subject parcel.
APPENI)IX tBr
The surroun(Jillp
, properties P.4re also very Similar
-to the project'site 'topographically
don -tial ) b0illg Ul'ied for both agricultural and resi�
purposes. Vie property to the north and west- contains:
sinAl" family rosidoncos, while tile properties to tile South and
OM,t are used for orchard crops,
'h--rc are no apparently 6ig ificant cultural,
n historicaj or scenic
-4-)p �ts which can be associe.tod vith -tile Surrounding properties,
I1'-*0I'InaU0II OULZitted by Micjjel Glaze On behalf of Merlo
IV. DETERMINATION
0
(To be completed by the Lead Agency)
On the basis of this initial evaluation;
I find the proposed P,rOjEtCt COULI NOT have a significant
effect on the environmento and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION
4S r6c6mmonded4
0 1 find that although the proposed project could have a
signiricant effect on the, environmente there will not
be a oignificant. effect in this case because the
mitigation measures described on an attached sheet
have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION
IS RECOMMMED,
0 1 find the proposecl project MAY have a significant
effect on the environment, and an MVIRONMtNTAt, IMPACT
RtPORT is required.
Date February 25,_..1980 A
— (�' 2" Li� � �"
(0i-9natUre)
For: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW DEPARTMANT
H8vieved by', J
� e-" �- � �
84rl D. Nel8�on
Enviromehtal RevieW Direc:tor
Appendix F - paqo,
. 9, of
40-18-1
Luigi & Gina Filippin
VL�7'W 4th Ave.
Chico, CA 95926
40-18-2 & 30-24-67
Helen P. Harrington
PO Box 124
Durham, CA 95938
39-23-16 & 85
.E.R. & F.J. Harris
PO Box 57
Durham, CA 95938
39-23-85
Susan Powell
Rt. 2 Box 526
Durham, CA 95938
39-23-92
D.J. & J.M. Martellaro
Rt. 2 Box 550
Durham, CA 91938
39-23-93
D.W. & X.M. Gray
Rti 2 Box 552
Durham, CA 95938
39-24-58
Mid Valley Baptist
Church of D'W,,ham
PO Box 565
Durham, CA 95938
39-24-64
Nancy Leap Batha
Rt. 2 Box 507
Durham, CA 95938
!L'9 -
Patrick &- Gloria Barris
PO Box 361
Duvham� CA 95938
39 -'24 -'*10
D,R. ml L., Antonowich
Euov?iaomx�78A 95-938
A.B. & P.E. Fulbright
Rt. I Box 16
Durham, OA ' 95938
39-24-72
Merle and Floy LaRue
PO Box 151
Durham, CA 95938
11 Jeffries Construct'
Rt. 2 Box 525 ion Inc
Durham, CA 95938
39-24-74
Linriea M. Jefferies
Rt. 2 Box 525
Durham, CA 95938
39-21�-71
Michael Glaze
3275 Heritage Road
Oroville, CA 95965
h
6 0
Janitary 2L, 8 1 1 � R n
' ,�l c
"Chael rilazo
.127' Jfl:rittigo� IMa(l
Oroville, Ca,
n q (M "I
Pe: Variance on All 111-24-71
Dear �Ir, Glaze:
i I
is to 710tif,' YOU tha.t WO havo rcc(.Iiv(,,(l your
ation ror a variance to allow a 1.�RJ ncre
parcel to Ue di
Lvi(loki. into two parcels or oqu.-ij liat
t L, ither of whicli. 11tir, ,i
,, nol a 110t giZO of I acre or
greater, on pro'oerty ioueki (sjjj)urkux1 POsidntlal
I acre parcel',q) locatod approximately 6,00 foet wost
of �IcAnarlin Avonuo 4nJ Dayton Durbaw 114,11way inter-
,*oction, Durlian.
""0, 1411 5610(11,110 Pulilic hoa�rin�ys at $uch tivic a.4 the
onvironmental det'o-mination and recormandations of
the Do-iartmont of Public 1.7orIcs awl Environmental 5ani-
ta-tl-.ion liave, .1 -on roceived by I
this
. ee.
"T A
, Ad
si!acorely,
Pott,,,re Plair
Director or, Planning
MV IE D
JAN 3 0 1980
Divinion- --of
Vollesbr7 -'---%,,9MENI OF FOREM
-------------
r,GUEST: Review& Comment BUTTE COUNTY
AP NO. '. 759-24-21
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Varj�_,qnCp tCt a2low a 1,,81 anrp pp ran ;AL_Wj-djjzided into
�J-,lqn qjve4- neithom-of whinh 1 -ins ra---np aLjz.0--Q,.t-'L Pn-rp nr
RL(-,a-bpr_, on, --property zoned "SR -111 (Sifourban Residential 'l acre parcelo)
LOCATION:, aRi)rox. 600 feet west of McAnarlin Avenue and Dayton ji:qxham Highway,
intersection _Darham.
APPLICANT: _ttt_Qha(,�l. Glazie
ADVIESS.1, 3225 jjprita,�:e Road, Qroville� CA 9596
OWNER: M,,rle lialpme ---
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION SCHEDULED
RETURN DATE REQUESTED: ASAP
DATE DISTRIBUTED: 1-29-80
ATTACHMENTS: COPY Of aPPlication & Plot plan,
RETURNM
COMMENTS,
i� 1%
PLANNING -D kL _rAr-Vlr-VV I'll -
TO',
IIMI
AP NO. '. -�2=21 �--lll
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Variance to. allow a 1.81 acre parcel 'be be divided iTyto
-,g ne size of I acre or
no -L- Bize - nei LgL oi I
t, _jich has
areater, ot, -111 (Suburb i Residenbial I acre-R�Lll�s)-
_pKnert d "SR
,y_12Le
--600 feet weat of KcAnarlin Avenue a_nd 1)..gyton Durham Highway
LOCAT 10 N: -am-rox -
int rhami
APPLICANT: I Mi-(hael--
e
ADDRESS-. —3225 HPrita'
OWNER: morl P LaB=—
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION SCHEDULED
Zu,,o Co. Div. r
RETURN DATE REQUESTED: ASAP E,jv, Health
DATE DISTRIBUTED: j -p
9-sn j Ali 2 1980
ATTACHMENTS: Copy of application & olo�_Plal�- oroville, callfornit
RETURNED:
0
COMMENTS: At Lr -1, llfaAk.
�,ea jk-IA-41
pv-e� T, t4
sp,
Comm -
u.
0
LLANNING DEPARTMENT'S INTERDEPARTMENTA "I EW R EQU EST
TO : _J ohp_jjo L ri E
REQUEST: Bk&WALDMM0131
AP NO,: 69-24-71
DESCRIPTION Of- PROJECT: - Variance to. all 1.81 acre
gator, On PrOPertY zoned "SR -111 (Suburban Residen:tial I
LOCATION; ap-pcoximak0l 600 feet wmol- n,r
Highway intersection, Durhaju.
APPLICANT: --Michael Glaze
ADDRESS: ___3225 Hcrjt� 9z
OWNER: —_VLqLje taRjja
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION SCHEDULED
RETURN DATE REQUESTED: ASAP
DATE DISTHIBUTED:
ATTACHMENTS: COPY Of aPPII'Cafth & plot plan.
RETURNED,,
COMMENTS:
T" "(�PLANNING OLE 1INTERDSPARTMPNITAI
-OMENA
-1)
To..
REQUEST: IN � VA - \-6 -
AP NO. ; -1
DESCRIPTION Or PROJECT: - Variance to allow a 1.81 acre parce '-o be divided into
�f,--�I�net size. nAl-Hip-P of ig -
IQ MS a 11Mt Pi'ZP 1-1-P -1 acre -or
greater on222Lopiort- "SR -111 (Suburban Residential I acre parcels)
,y zoned
LOCATION: -apn
'get
_ .600
we,
9 Of-KcAnarlin enue and Da ton DurhgM_jjjg]j�.
Intersection - nirr*h.-m
APPLICANT:
ADDRESS:
Lagajio.
OWNER:
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION SCHEDULED-_
RETURN DATE REQUESTED: ASAP
DATE DISTRIBUTED: . I -P,
q,qn.
ATTACHMENTS: Copy of application & plot plan,
RETURNED: )I-FC3
COMMENTS�
0 Ik PA-L��e
a
6UH0 Co. Div. cf ��Iy. Health
JAN 2 12, 1980
orovIlle, 0111fotnla
I
&
I
Inter -Departmental, Memorandum
TOt Planning
FROW LiivironmeDtal Review
SUEU ECTI Sched ul -ir1r,
DAM 11 ebnxary 271 1�)80
!�evivvt vopf.
Buffo counily
111he followinG pi,u6uct, is readVL ror.
2LD Log ri 60-01�iS-03
Oko
s b
0104tAft
I]
L I
a
" OUNTY PIAMUNG 0 Ssiox
Notice is hereby 9J.ven by the Butte COunLY Plarming Commssion
that 'public heari.ngs irill be held on Wednesday, March 19, 1980�
at 7:30 P.M., in the Bu�te County Board of Supervisors, ROOM,
Butte County Administration Center. 25 County Center Drive,
OrOvUle, Oalifottial regarding the following:
I. David Sil-,verberg - Use permit to allow sie;nc Mid ligh-u
standards 33 feet from the 0enterline Of Conners AveaAle
and Connera Court o*a property zoned 110-P-11 kGencrai Commercial)
1009ted on the S,�ubheast corner of Easb Avenue nnd Conners
Avenue, ident fied as AP 44-21-60 (Portion), Ohico.
I. Michael Glaze - Variance to allow L-1,10 pArcels Of a three
parcel iIina division project to be of a gross are& of less
than obe sure on ppope.rty. zoned IISR-Itl Suburban Residential
ocre parce1s), located approx',mately 250 feet south of
McAnarlin Avenue, oppro��ImatOly 900 feet es8t of D6yton��..
Durham 914y., idettified as -AP 39-24-711 Durham.
2. John Mwithei - Use Permit to allow storage Of ittIgmmable8
on Propevt�y zoned "A-211 (General) located on the solithwest
cotne-r of 00hasset Road and Rock Creek Road� identified as
,AP W/423-831 Chico.
The above mettioned aPplications, petitions, maps, draft exivi-
rOtM('nt9l imPROU reports and/or negative reports eve on tile
and Ovailoble for public viewing at tht office of the Butte
Count�r Planning Department, 7 County Center Dr -"vet Oroville,
California. Impac!'- pteports are also available
at college end county libraries.
BUTTE COUNTY PIAMING OOMIto�IXog
BETTYt BtAn
DIMOTOR OV P.1"WING
TO tt PULIS=-' 19 TM OR100 MTER�pRISE R=Op
MARCH b, 1980. �t ON IUM�SDAyl
march lit 1080
mr. michael Claze
312,75 HoriV1,10- ROad
Oroville� C','-
9.5965
iRei AP 47-2�-81
Dear Mr. G141Z01-
Enclose(I I's a copy of titaff Findings concerning your.aj)-
t`10 of a three
a variance, to A11011
1,111,Cl division projoct, to 13c of-
PaTce's
& gross area of 10,55
pa-rcel
t1till, one acre oil thO above-j,-(�,,ferenced
PatcOl
A hOf1TiW- Oil t1liv, i�mtter 11A�, bc'("!
FOT
":""ll 1(1'
Of tila Planning ('O1AV1S;iOI1
Ileltl in the j,,(jArtt of Smpervise)TS' TWO",
lit,
2S County Center Drivol nrovilloo and
I's sell cc] to 1wixin
;it 7:010 P. H.
Shoul'I Iv -VC, anv (mostions, pleas'a
fool, Croe to, contact
our Otfi.co,
thd
rinc.
Sincerely$
nettyo Malt
Pirector of mAnning
)-larch 21, 1980
b1t. Michael Glaze
71275 floritage Roa(i
orovilje� Cn. 95965
Re$ Variance for AP 47-23-83
Dear bIr, Glaze:
At the regular Meeting of t1jo, p�jjft(*
I , COUntY Planning, COMMS-sion.
heIrt March 1q, 1580, Your a)l)licati n for ft Variance to allow
two Parcels Of a three 1vircol land diviSion Project tO 100 of a
E(I.Tosr area of less tjjqnojje
urbati Resi.dotit"a2 sicro on Property %oned "SP -111 (StIll-
ncta parcols) loca t0(! M)PrOxlmatoly 2,so
f'"'t 3011t), OF McAparlin Avontloo 9pproximatolY 000 feet east of
T'41Yton-Durham �Iighiqay, Durliatn, was approved,
Tf are no appeals 1-jithin t1ja n IPPdk
I I Ct Period, your
var""ce W'li b(0 c011sidered granted",qfter April 2$ l9got t�
dato of t)je off e,
, i jal approval O -C
COmmiS$J,On for March 19',"1980. t"a 11Inutes Or the Planning
81"Ould Vou have any quostions Concerning flifs M, -Atter, Please
f'ed�! friee to Contact this off,
ice
8ifttoroiy'
AettYe Dlair
Director of Planning
April 14, 1980
Mr. Michael Glaze
3 3
275 Heritage Poad
Oroville, Ca.
n 5 9 65
Re.- Variance J'or AP 47-23-83
T)ea-r Mr. Glaze:
Pnalo%ed ato t1te original, and ono copy )f your
Varianc(* No. 80-3.2. to allow tlqo parcels OF a three -
parcel, split to be of a Progs area of loss than
ore �tcre, Incated approximlatoly 25P ft, -South of
�'C,Ararlin Avenue and approxirmtoly POn ft, on -5t of
I)a�,14011-tjurjjaM TTighway, Durham.
You will please sign 'hoth copies of the variltance
an(I return thorp to us. NO will than have thom,
vnlitlmted I�y tim Chaiman of tht 'Planning Commi.qsion
AAd tho original will bo roturne(t to ywir for your
rocordg �
Should yoa haveany questionsj, please. feel ft-oo t -a
contact our office.
Ad
MICS 4
Sincovely,
Bettye tlait
Director of Plaftning
May 10 1980
Mt. Michael Glaze
3275 Heritage Road.
Orovilloo CA.
95965
Re: Varianco, AP 41-1-3-04
Dea-r Mr. rilaze!
tnelosed Is yuur validated VaTidnco No. 80-12 tn
allow two parcels of a throo-parcol split to be of
a grosg &rea loss ' than one acteo located approximately
250 ft* south of McAnaTlin, Avenue and approximately
000 ft, east oil Dayton- Durham Highway, Duthami,
Should you hvcve Any qaes;tiov5j ploaso fool froo to
contact our office,
Sincerely ,
Bdttye Blair
/hd Director of Planning
End4
del Dept. of Publid 1,16rks
tnviroftmoltal noalth
ViT6 Department
Gill
BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMM'iSSION
VARIANCE
DATE
811- 1 1?
VARIANCE NO,
73
ASSESSOR'S PARCr-L. 1,10.
Pursuant to the provisions of the Zoning OMInance of the County of Butte and the special
Conditions set forth below;
— NAME Is hr-eby granted a Variance
In accordance with application flied: 1/ 421 Isn two parcols of I tl'l"No
pnrcej lan(j rli j.;j0Tj t
,0 Ile. ()�r (date)
a gro.ss ;ire,,l
lPq�s than Ono acre,
SPMAL CONDITIONS:
CoiV iance iiflj 7".IVi Mnmc-ntal 11oalth I s 1-0timireplents
Apj)1,icqjjt 11111st rjjF,,)
.Ojwjj)jv With 4ll otlior
"10 local ov�111 "ITIC-CS' and ropililrjtjo��j�,.
I hereby declare under penalty of perjury that I have read the foregoing conditions,
o 1 0
that they are In fact the conditions wh Ich were imposed upon the granting f this v6el, n 6,
and that I agree to abide fully by said conditions.
Ap011efml
NOT8: Issuance of this variance does hot waive requiremdrit of obtaining 8uildihg
and Health bePartMeht permits before starting construction, ribr does it waive
any other r6quirements,
CC: Health Department
00artmeni,rif Public Works (2)
Pirt. bepartmeht Chfilrmfin bf Plbnhlhg Carftlsfluh --111,
r7.
Inter -Departmental Memorandum
'rot Butte County Assessor's Officu
FROMI Butto County planning Department
SUBJECT' AP 39-24-71
DAM May I t, 3.9 8 0
0
Purstiant to Section 65863.5 of the 6overnment Code, the
following parcel/171y,17�7 identifiea as jq-24-11-
Rezone from to zoning astrict
Orantod a variance to &110W w . 11 ' c0l
S 0 f., CL thT e e -
1.qess� j�hznil acre.
%
IIUTTE COUNTY PLANNINO
STAF17 FiNDIIGs - �Ial,,r
.11 1980
M i I ti o V,� to o 1,
0,�01-L PVOiuct 1;0 of
than a EPO"J avoa (J1 lo'f
a"'O (11 PrOPDXIty zonod "OR -1 I' (Suburban 90sidcntial
Ocre Parcels), !Ocaitod approxITIIa-u(,41y ?��o f(,�Qt r,
_,Ou.t.,h of'
MOATIRr2n Avenue,
Durham 11v appl'ox'mat(14 900 f0r4t Oa8t of Dayton -
y. , idelltiftud av AP 39-P�-171
I , Durham.
The applicant says the reason for tho application is,
"Although the parcel. is larger than three acros ill size, due to
existing easements and those required. for prc)posed parcels individual
not areas of the resultill I
9 lots of a three-wtty division by parcel
niap will not be equal to one acre or I larger. Other parcels in the
vi Cillity and under idential zoning c assIfic,-.1tion are both. larger
than and smaller than one acre, Because rif 1 -,he shape of the property,
excess area must be devoted to easements t1,1,U
I.L - s' depr
Of Privileges enjoyed by other IVing this property
resulting from the Propose Property in the a'
,roa. The net areas
d division would be Only slightly less
than the required. one acre."
The subject site and surrounding properties are relatively le.,I,
Properties to the north and west contain single f0M31,V residences while
Property to the South and east contain Orchard crops.
Section 24-49 of L,rdinance 1750 - The Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance
sti:,tes:
'Variances from the,t0r= of this chapter shaii.
granted only Wheho because Of tpepIAI c* 'be
applicable to the Property, Includi Itcumstances
topography, Jocat, ng size., shape,
3,011 Or Llrrouftdings� the strict
application of this cha s
of privileges Pter depr'VC3 such property
enjoyed by otho I
vicinity and Id r property in the
ndetr Identical zoning c1as8if,cation.it
1r- approv0do th'-s variance should be subject to:
Ih Compliance with -8nVIrOftMnIatqLJ 14ealthvs requ-lteme-nts�,-
Applicant must als Ply With all other applicable 8tate
and local gtatute 0 com
si ordinances and regulations,
couny PIANNINC C(IMMISSION
March 190 1980
'Xichael Glaze - VaViOnCO to allOA4 two palro-01:8 'or 0, three
�8ion pvojeot to be of a EMS$ area of less
Ihna div'' I ty zoned IISR-I" (,Subvj:,bau Residential
tbarl one aawe on Proper �xjmately 250 feet 0011th Of
-1 ac:re paveel$), jot,,ated apprc
900 feet east of Dayton-
%tAnarlj.a Avenue, OPP, A:� 39-24-?Ij
Durham 11,4y4$ identified as
80-49-1-01
Mrs. Blair road sta;f fin4ings.
I I i Ing denials of
Mike Glaze Pointed out that apIpeals -to the Board. regardi
such requests as this� had been uI)II01d.
Mrs. Blair colitillonted that t." to SubdiviSIOA Ordinance was nom being studied
with tile view in 1111nd of havIng less harassmont of the applicants.
opponents: No ono. The hoaring was closed�
ve a
Wbooler, findlIlly, that the proposed project coul(I not tin
Significant (Iffc�ct on tho ejivironment� made a motion that a negative
Geclarati—a be filed. Ilis Itio-tion was seconded by, Comillissioner Bennett,
AYI,' 1 8 CommisoloneTs Bennott3 Wheeler, Lambert) max and Chairindn
Gilbert.
NOES; No OnO4
ABSENT! No one.
Motion carried.
Wheel . er�' then, noting that a conditional negative is to be
filedo made a 1-ftotion to grant tile variance, finding that because Of ,;he
special cjVcut�St_ajjcps applirablo to this PVOP0rtY) i�Jlcludijlg size and
shape .nd 16clltlon� not to grant tile vai�iande would deprive this PrOPOttY
prop��rty in the vicinity and under
of privilegeg �;,,njoi
tea by other
ifiCa 11 5 Motion was secontled by COmnigSiOner
identical zoni�ag class �tiO H3.
Bennett,
Comr.jiss*Oners jVfteejer� Bonjett� Max, Lambert and ClAalTman
AYPS:
N0118.1� No 'One
08ENT; N6 one
Motion carried,
-- ---- - � � mm;." . &- fn
G D A E -.11, 1. 9 h vk .
7N T F-0
T: V HP, ML
, - A �IW C�e -2�0- L 6 E
,L, owtkw,
Vil tr to 0— 0,1 --7 1
NNI
9. B. a A f. Tox A, '00 C d -24
70- 0— 59
74
73
01
2 6
p
OAYrON 041 HAIV
5824 3 5 00,'7
67
0 70
0 58"
155A 51 11 S9AC
ut)
.fn 5 0
cb
��l I 1 -1 1- N x 1, 1 6 4 �1741
40,76Ac,� 12OAc�
IC r)
A
AC
/0) I'l/
2.z Ae
24 95AC
26 Ac Ae
v 74
C46 i IS 9 2 At. 0 At
1412 A c, 41 5Ac,
L
0 RqAD
P, C4 P 1 0-*
9,94 A C 76) pvv Qz
e i t- li�8,JeAo QD I - ,
lip
10
,,j CiAt
Y5 E46]
25A
9,0Ac
6 lj�l
4 !
C
lit
7.
OVA/ rc
Assessor's Mcip No, 39-,�4
47/cd NOM-- ASSESSOR'S PAP(tL BLOCK
R. /Y. MINVER'S 2j1d. S County of 8utte, callfi
Rl 6*. 9 Pg. /0 LOT NUMBERS SHOWN
IN CIRCLES march � /9 53