HomeMy WebLinkAbout039-250-029All l'HN1)1 \ T'
wt'
,
13NVIRONriIiNTAL CIIl CK1ITST PORN!
(to he completes by 1,0,iU Agency
1ao9 # 86-09-17-0
x BACKGR0UN1) AA it 39-25-29
li
Name of proponentam,,.M,.—&neniae,_ ILynn_Dempse.
z
Address of proponent and reproseAl , tive (if applicable)
-^lm.—&_I2enisen.emp�s S, Prra WZst_5uxwey-ing_
2745 Burdick Road 5437 B1ack. 91. vP nri Sze -�
3.
Durham, CA 95938-
Paradise
Project tlescrrption Waived :AppJi,cat15)11 � _ �.,,m. ;.-
1't. MANDATORY 17114.12I.NrS OV ;'iTGC IFTCANCI YIaS 1`1A1`IiE N41
.
goes the project ha,vo the potenti.at to degrade the
duality Or the envi ironment r substailtially reduce
the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, curse a,
fish 014wi:l.dl i l'e popul.at i.on to dropbelow sel f-
strsta.aning levels, threaten to eliminate a. plant or
,Initial community, reduce the number, or ,estr;ict th�o
range of a rare or ,endangereo plant: ar aniiital or
eliminate important examples of the major periods
of 'California history or preltistor.y? )(°
b,
Does the project have tite potential., to achieve
short-term benefits to the detriment of l.ong-term,>
environmental. gods? (:A short-termimpact on the'
environment is one which occur:+ in a relatively
brief period of time while Jong -term irnptacts will
endure into the future,)
c.
i)oes the project have impacts whi(Oi are 'indi idu-
11111" but consid.arable? (A
cm
project 1ey ittlputtua01' more separate resources
wh'Ore the -impact on each resource ins relatively
sm1111 , but where the effect or rhe totlil or those
Impacts an the o'n"Vi.ronment is signi1 icunt.) W�
t1.
Hoes the project have on.N'i1'onnentlal errects Whicll
wit cause substantial vdvGrsc o(1*o.ts an '11(iman
bein0, Other Hire; tly or indirectly?
T T % lil;'rl" RNITNA I' f ONCro be cFtp l et t d by the I.r:�11 if Agency)
Cin
tate bilsis of t1i35 h0tlsti 'cwlrlitnticiri;t
i/l�lf_. fi.itd tl>cproposed 111'gjo t Cilli.O NOT ililve. a 441n NC,ant c4'l'eCt'
oil the erivi rotllM(Srlt ,,' and a NI;(xAa 1 1' ii1T;CLARA'I`1t1'N wi l I ale 111'epil-red. -
ifj�°l;i rtitw rfiat al[hoUfill HIC 1)1°salrtrSVd, papajoct Mild ila.vta:it signifi.
tant erroCt a1i1` tltr w)vi ronliIlo ti;�, the Irr, iv,il.l not, bo r,t.� s�igr°3,richnt
ci're, t in th1;
IV
+�r ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
xp anat'.ons :)f a l "Ye<s" and "maybe'" answers are tenured
on attached sheet(s))
I. EARTf{. Wi1.1 the proposal result in significant. YESYESMAB
MAYBE
>r Y No
a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in
geologic substructures?
b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or
overcovering of the soil`?"
C. Change in topography or ground surface
relief features?
d. Destruction, covering or modification of any
y
unique geologic or physical features?
. Increase in wind
y
or water erosion of soils`-
either on or off-site,?
£. Chnge5 in deposition or erosion of beach
sands, or changes in siltation, deposition
or erosion which may modify the,,channel of
a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or
any bay, inlet or lake?
g Loss of'prime agriculturally productive soils
outside designated urban areas?
h;. Exposure of people or
property' to geologic
hazardssttch as earthquakes, iandsl, des mud-
-'-- ----
slides., ground failure or similar hazards?
2. AIR, Will the proposal result in substantial;
a> Air emissions or deterioration of ambient
air quality
u :'he creation of objectionable odors, smoke,
or fumes?
c. Alteration ofair movetnent, moisture, or
temperature, or any change in climate,
--
locally or regionally?
MATER, Wil the proposal, result in substantial;
a. Changes in currents,
or the course or
direction of water movements in either
marine or fresh waters?
b. Changes in absorption rates drains e
a g patterns,
`---
c, or the rate and atnaunt of surface runoff?lei,
Need for off-site surface drainage improre-
�._..
ments, including vegetation reroval channel-
zataon or culvert installation?
d. Alterations
to the course dr flow of flood
waters?
e , Change in the amount, ref surface water in any
water body?
f. Discharge into surface wate'r�s, or in a.nY
al tera.tion of surface water qu91 1a3.ity, including
but not limited to, temperature,' dissolved
oxygon or turbidity?
g. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow
G, ground waters,7
h. Change in the quantity oruali,ty of .around Maters,
either through d%rect additaons'Qr with-
drawals,. or through interception of an
aquifer, by, cuts or eXcaLvations?
i. Reduction
ii, the amount of water otherwise
available for publid water supplies?
j� ;Exposure of people orproperty
to water
related hazards such asflooding:?
_n
4. PLANT LIFE. Will the' proposal result YES
n subs tiantial
a. C ante in the diversity
NNAYBE' No
--
of species, or number
Of any species of ;plants
shrubs (1ncluciing trees,
b, Reduction grass of thesnumbersand
or ofanvic pi'ants)?
unique,,
rare
endangered species of plants?
o. Introduction
of new species of
aPlants into an
or in a barrier to the
—
Mentrea,
normal repleniof exastin0 species? sh
d. Reduction
in acreage of any agr,icul tural ,crop?
5. .ANIMAL, LIFE, Will tile- proposal result iii substantial::
a. Mang, in. the divers ..ty ntial ::
of species
I any species of animals (bards , or numbers
including reptiles land animals
benthi.c organisms c'rfinsects)?hell fish,
b. Reduction
in the numbers of -
or any 'unique., rare
endangered species o animals?
=
C. Introduction of new spec..es of o
a
animals ninto
an area, or result in int
a barrier to the
or movement of animals? brtxtion
d.
Deterioration to existinT
habitat? f� f i'sl1 or Wildlife
w
6 " NOISE Will the propos a1 'result t in subs to
a • ntiai„
Increases in eX'sting
noise l;evel:s?
b. Exposure of people to severenoise levels? '----
-_
?. LIGHT AND GLARE. Will the osal
s gn `ica— t ight p produce
and glare?ro
a. LAND USE . Will the Proposal result in a
susuu staH`Fial alteration
of theresent or
land use of- an area? D p Lanz ed
'• NATURAL RESOURCES, 1�ill the pro osal result
substantial i' sul.t in,
;
A4 Increase
resources? he rate of use of any natural
b.' Depletion of any norl renewable natural
resources
.
10 RISK OF UPSET. Will' thease I
a. A ris of
e=cPl,osion ortile,ln�volve:
of
ous substances (including, butenot hazard.ite.
Oil, pesticides, 'chemcal or radiation')in
n.4 event of art accident or
upset ;condi;txoris?
b PO 8i,ble iriter:ferencewith" an emergency
response plan or emergency evacuation plarii
11. pOPULATrON: Wild the proposal' alter the location,
is ibu on, densa,t.y, '
o growth rate o; the huma
population? n
U. H0LTS,ING Will the proposal affect exjs��irig, Nous` `ng,�
or r reate a demand for addxtio'nal
husng?
Q+
YES
MAYBE NO
13,
TRANSPORTATIONICIRCULATIONWill the proposal
result in';
a. Generation of substantial ad4itiona1 V,ehi'cle
movement?
b. Effects on existing parking facilitiesy or
demand for new parking?
c. Substantial impact on uxisting transportation -
systems?
d. Significant alterations to present patterns
of circulation or movement of people and/or '
goods?
e. ,Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic?
f. Increase in traffic hazards t0 motor vehicles,
bicyclists or pedestrians?'
y
14.
PUBLIC SERVICES.- Will the 'proposal have, an effect
upon, or result in a need for new or altered
ove.rninen tal services
a. rn
�
e
_. protection?
b. Police protection?
C- Schools?,,
d. Parks or other recreational facilities?
e, Maintenance of public facil tios, including
roads?
C..
f4 Other governmental: services? ._.r.
C
15,
ENERGY. Will the proposal result in:
a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel,or energy?
b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing
of energy,, or -require the development
of
sources
of new sources � energy?
,
16:
UTILITIES , Will the proposal result in a need for
now systems; or substantial alterations to the
following;
a. Power or natural gas?
b. Communications systems?
c. Water availability.,
d . Sewer ox septic tank?'
e. Storm water drainage?
f. Solid Waste and disposal?
--�-
17.
HUMAN 1 VAITI-i Wii1 the proposal result in
a. Creation of any health hazard or potential
health)?
heal.;th hazard excluding mental
b. �Exposure .of people to potential health:
hazards?
18 :
AESTHtTIC5. I+1a 17 the pxoposal resin t in the
o strucon of ariy scenic Vista or, glow open' to
the public, or will the proposaY result in the
c.restion of an aesthetically offensive site open
to public v7,eo?
.. 4 ..
YES
19. RECREATION. Will the
LIAY,8EN�
No
upon the Proposal result in an impact
auali.ty or quantity
Opportunities y of existing recreational
20. CULTURAL`RBSOURCBS.
a. willt eta e proposal result in the
Of or thalteration
e destruct.ior.
Of a p7 -eh stork oY
historic archaeological site?
b.
Will the proposal result in adverse nhys� gal -'-
Or aesthetic effects tc�
�.:
a Prehistoric or
historic buildin
c• boas the 9) structure or object?
proposal ha.Ve the potential t -....
a physical changeo cause
which.
would affect u
ethnic cultural vaiues'? `que
d. Will ;he proposal restrict etistin� aeli7b}ous
r sacred uses �lithn the
--
areal pntal -
otei:,,pact
V: DISCLiSSION O1� BNUIRO NMENTAL �VA,UATTON
AP 3'9-25-29
See attached
5
i