Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout039-270-023Mal PLANNING C OMITSSION SUMMAlkX 9HCI:.`T 1 7a'Y,IC11 d� � IIugh, P.�.8chuyler W)DR SS: Ord Ferry Stage,'BoX 23, Chico, Ca. 95926 �—.WWw✓•YwrrtWfilMeinFh.MWM�iuYMwMiw�+M�MMWt'.�.�'yR}ry1N" .wv..�wUr,�Aw�W s�wywwL�N�o} OWNER » 3 ame aI3` pLi ki,, C�Yat Variance to minimum parcel size to allow a 1.60+ Ww.WMM W " 1 h LL '•—.••...•.••••••tia. �q��hro/MW.rq acre: parcel and a .76+ acre parcel in an A-40 zone. ��f.MfiriVW."� LOCATION: on the east side of Front S t between Yocum St. & Gerke St. Dayton ....�,.} - - - - �..Ir;.,.,....�.a:..wry......�,..,r".._.qr.....�..,...;....._ _.,.. ,„MYWYpM.,YMa1Yw �..:::___ _.. �_...�_.:.......,.,......uumWii/a.yit.;.rWl4a.rF„scv.W� ...__ .. _..c.a..-�.Y,...a.Ya'--.....��.--'---•-',1..nwrwwraYr.dn..a0...,...�M. WM�rrMWl .�..uy...«»r4.�.wbly."•n_••:•.�`••.IWYWYL.M:M1��Yugr+plWG.�itWf+uf4i414 I�,GM. �'�. i)Nrs 1WPLICATION RECI+JMM11/17/76 PATS NOTICBS r alTam.. 1.2/30/75 NTJI�IERs 25 : XMT HEARING. January 15, 1976 ADDITIONAL HEARINGS: � .. W...d �...�. w.......W« ,.. 2CINI ; 'PE7.111IXON SIGNATURUIS PIfC� ENTAGEn COMM:991 N ACTION: APPLICATION FO F; VAIRIA N1 k Butto County Planning Commissi®n I File Date filed -fearing doto _ Action by Planning Commission Action by Board of Suoarvisors PRE8)EI1T ZONING, ''TGA ,/ 4 � Asset,soe.Map Book + ��., Page No»C,/ ,:� Parcel No, REQUEST: _G//''��CG�G.��C'-`f�• _� - ,�°-7 �LL�•� �` 2 APPLICANT'S NAME, �-� PHONE:,+ ADDRESS,,, STATUS OF APPLICANT'S l TERE;ST IN PROPERTY - 57 E : 4 a ti. tri �-� " J C' OWNER'S NAM PHONE: �j •� �. �It. +1r ADDRESS;, _ a DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY:- - 01 �r c EXPLAIN FULLY REAaON FOR APPLICATION; 62122 t The above stafern nts arra certified by e udbe c brrect.i n 0114 G Signature Applicant. NOTA:: Please submit herewith a check or money order in the amount shown below, payables e t County of Butte; also a d�tallad pint plan showing the location of existing and proposed structures on your property and on the adjacent properties. 4a erties. I Receipt No. NOTICE TO APPLICANT - VARIANCE Ordinance No 1-1333 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 47c KNQWN AS THEEi1TTE COUNTY ZONING ENAMING ORDINANCE "16.1, Vhi�IANCES from the terms of the zoning ordinance shall, be granted only whui-x, because of special circumstances applicable to the property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings, the strict application of the zoning Ordinance deprives such property of Privileges enjoyed by other property in the vicinity and under identical zoning classification.. Any variance granted shall be subject to such conditions as will c -1 --sure that the adjustment thereby authorized shall not constitute a grant of special privileges inconsistent with the 1` limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and zone in which such property is situated. Any such condition imposed Upon issuance of a variance must be reasonably related to the use of the property for which the variance is requested. A variance shall not be granted for a Parcel of property which authorizes'a use or activity which is not otherwise ex- pressly authorized by the zone regulation, g governing the parcel. of property.!, x HEREBY DECLARE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT Y HAVE READ THE FORBGOIJTG INSTRUCTIONS AND STATEMENTS AND MDERSTAND THEIR MEANING AND CONTEXT. Dated App �-i.c NOV 17 1975' OROVILl_r. rahMw1 NOTICE TO APPLICANT 1• If applicant is ottier than owner, K1 Proof of urgency must be Supplied In writing In order t0 legally sign tllo "Application for Use Perm It/VaritincGo Application shall be considered void. If 'not signed by owner or his legal agent, 2. All items 011 application shall be completed. If an item Is not -applicable, indl cote by the symbol n/a, S. Explain briefly yet completely the nature of the proposed u,la»varlance, I lits is very Important and a requisite. 4 Ten coples of a detailed plot plan folded 81tIv,x11,, shall 1G Qmpany and be made a part of the "Application for Use Permit/Variance" The plot plan shall Include the following; a. A scaled drawing of the parrei(,) boundaries, b. Location of all existing and proposed buildings and ImprrJvom(mt'i c. Location and size of existitlg a►►d proposed a;;c uss to the subjr,ct parcel(s). d. identify streets bordering property and nearby crossroads. Provide a loca- tion map if necessary, Show North Arrow. 5. Applicant shall further understand that the "Apprication for 11:3e Permit - Variance" shall be sub1ect to the approval Of the Planning Commission, 0r, Upon appeal, of the Board of Supervisors, Any subsequent special conditions ordered by the Planning Cotnmitislon shall be made to part of the approved „Use :Permit/Variance" and shall tae binding on the applicant. 6 Unless conditions of approval have been complied with, In a one-year period;, the "Use Permit" will be deemed expired. I hereby declare under penalty of perjury that I have read the foregoing Instructions and statements and. understand their meaning and context, w 4, .. t�t�ry?�xzrur►►� 0AJ 11r.1, loll tear&x,��s�.��P�ab I?iJt.�T-T r scT•rT�x��n AD Box ro2 3 ...__� S�.ar�.....� Chi.�o�R:AL�,.�..g,�a:w,.,e�...., 342-3212 Ai? No— OR Tl0CATX0N: AP 39-27-23 R yytt IIA -te•� u y ?10: )) bo-ur $10.00 ��Ji'?MY.,'',�. �'°'RfY 7 d0 ; }�1 g1 �ry �p� r..ann✓Mxenw«+�wwm.w. .... r�.�R,s.�„",,,w,„,R„e:,, , ' TXOiti T`:L"y mj) 'WX'. R Ot)(.r ” C ', n t. y ..,. •..�pEC,a,�8,w9x5 x': s�R.a<a_Wa'ntwyaWti1«c1N.La..�Im.,_=in.: 'c,w.�^s, '. �' �aaanzv.staa,.ro-v-ow.r$c•r.4..k cm. 'tst1_-.n9M.ti..uap.ar.a..wrwa-v.a2�AX'r"I•� u,+tw.lYa'.v.rav:,r.. - „».�._....:..... Bat« .iuc Y +...w.�esAw.tR.MewIMYYar:me..tirh+, ec wuaWMMww^m^s+wW.+r.x» RMMTx,.,."✓+u.,w.Wi'H.:... A,TsT?,i`.,�r'a mT, Mt)T z,pXI'.'}y ; ' . aW fe»w.vayde�swrer....a+'rw:.a:wwl,.r....vnntn.Rw�:ewe>v�.-: l)BTP'illq,h"1'XQTSt "TICE Ort7�'�T�?tPR�TrT7a`T' +:�s�7 �FwwJ wrv.pp.w.xs l.w�wtu,xwwr..pa�.v �p�w.,n�MfieY.s.R.ax •aaGwr,��s:� .. NOTICE OF 1JE'%ti�gZVA' �f�r¢ . ..w...ua+w»-rte..."".w".R".`:""e.'"'=,.'=r'.^-wAas.r«n:sr• ,an .ca..�:,��: yy T 1F�g; 01 � A App TO �t1JRC �f;s,.,tt�4i'h�y��Y .{. 47 .l:r�iy4Ra. DRAPT VIR TO EPIC: tp5�yy1)qq t�}}++��pp����R 0��y CY4RP,L ICZ Or' 1�y'YV ��y i ..w.,w.m « w..... quoj�, Tf+�- 7ry �Y»y �y� 5� y �¢q �y ""x -=..r '.^•^�«.w>ww.«.www„.....r.» ,�w.r...x< KE �d , aS �s ,:9�''>«. ('` ?{,1 i" r!eq�/�t�y y��ry+� 4^y�af 7�a " d xLV bV TDI Y 4. Wl i..!.ptir3.bO 6yyi.11S f.t�,0, [ ;M 4noT '.11", R� 'tt wRny A rust v:wvs�c+s,�n.nranuaw?T+an+e �,euaw sn^#.f, y � �'k. � �� BOARD or �,fi�kT���'"$`�F,%a�T� YInArt Ln, )PAVT MR; wy.,• �hl"� �� y{��qjn. y�w.gj�p�„,t /.`p�j�•'.»'.a"'"""m`.4wrynam'tvav�atp�p.wwe-'+.w.vcMa.a;-anR->.r�f*..yw'+Fmn+iM1V w.4Mt'tlr:Yinayswaw.n,'a. arW.w++w�.ti:gy ' waW'kwawi'+zM'.4'r:q>=ti�«iPw..nwr.4pegwytywssRwvpyy4.M.R.ii+yau+r.Y.no.. urfmtM1aM1W_�M:{.:h/lq. ' �www+A...+.r.+r.+!.�y�xwrra.s«"r.�°�rtx.....twwr�•..x ' SCTXi yLr-'1R, HUGH P..� VARIAT7C4, XP 19-27-23, to �t iniml= parcel. size to r allory, a 1..60* r� Arcal and a 76, aetre parcel in an .x,-40 zot,% :located on the V side of Front St, Betweell yocum St. & Gerke St. Dayton Mr. McKeeman requested that this i tom be cantinuod Zor one week in Order to allow him additional time to review 'cjae siteq was tP4;�a �l,ane ' 91u,estioned why this area Zoned X�•� 0 when l is t,;�th rx t®Vr4la .te an,d the lots are alrtaax y Oreat0d. Mr- nIcXeOR'axl reefed it waat due to tine existing W1,103 in the area which is Mostly agricultural tural pr:ith a yew scatt.ated residences. NIS,,.. PRanery also stated he des:trQd to secs the v POP-mrty before action. Vhis item wash continued for one week. ERC MINUTES 12/1/75 76-,1.2-1-936 'L. 9CH{7YL R, HUGN F.re" t NCEO ,P 39-27.23, tO miniMum parcel size to allow a 1.60+ acre parcol, and, a .76+ acre parcel in an A-40 2:OnO r located an the S ride of I.� ront SE". between Yocum 5t,. & Gerke St. o Dayton. Mr. McKeeman stated that he sand Mr. Fl ancry viewed this site tocrather last week and they, found that the whole area betweGn Gerke & Yocum south of the Chico--:Szatte CJ,ty iii;Vy is pretty W011 developed.Xie also sta�ed d.Iaat there are several new houses in various s t -.ages sof constcwvctican and the basic land U36 Of the area is ,residential rather than agricultural. Mr. Toussaint asked about all the strae.tsshodm by danced 1:1 'nes. Mr. Flanery explained that most of them had boen abandoned or have never been develo pd. lire McKeeman sta.ted, there was a ver yo -Ong almond orchard to the rear of this propertya Mrb Toussaint stated tXaa' his depaztiur nt, could not approve per mics c this Property t- z ,, _ a s r unle,� the esnzera zoo �+ P .� , 4 tzx cars the- aitap could be. ccat�s°ited as part ox the parcel.. Mr. Flanet stated it , ct illd mince the casement has been abondened Mr. Plariery then made a Motion; to f110 a 1\71e9ative Decl ars- tioal on, this pro jcet finding that tho proposal is in confonmance with uses in the areae subject to the lots meeting minimmn regtiirertments of the Sub- division., Ordinance. Mr a Stratton seoonded this motion. AYES taay McKaema.rx, Gam Flasnervo Dave Stratton, and Haoard !Voussazint DOES & r Wong s ,Motion caartiedA ERC MINUTE.' 12/8/75 In APPENDIX D NEGATIVE DECLARATION REGARDING ENVIRONME!jTAL IMPAC1-u-" -1 I NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Environmental E T Review Committee of the County of Butte has DEC 81J15 reviewed the project described below pursuant to the provisions of the California Cnvironmen- tal Quality Act of 1970 (Public Resources Code CLARK Ai NELSON, County Clork Sections 21100 et seq.), and determined that, 0. NICH03 it will not ha' Vy e a significant effect upon the environment. An environmental impact report will not be required. 2. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Variance to minimum parcel size to allow a 1-60± acre parcel antl a .75+ acre parc01 in as 11,,-410 zone, locatod on the r,, airle of Frnot St. bet:wean YticoMSt. & Werke Sto, identified as As A -P 19-27-�.Ar nayton. 1107t, The lots must 117eet, the minimum roquiremonts of the Butte Co. Subdivision Ordinance. 3. FINDINGS: The oroposal is in conformance with uses irl the area. 4. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PROJECT APPLICANT., 11t.Jr,1,1 F. scHUyLLR c/o Tedd Thpmpf3on R4,:. 1 e Box 5 9 0 Durham, CA 95938 5. A copy of the Environmental Review Committee's determination re- garding the environmental effect of this project is available for public inspection at the Butte County Planning Department, 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, California, Copies thereof will be provided to any person upon payment by him of a fee of $1.00 for the first paqe and $.10 for each additional page. 6. Any person wishing to contest this Negative Declaration may file,a written protest specifying the reasons therefor, Such written pro- test shall be filed with the Butte County Planning Commission at the Planning Department office within fifteen (15) days from the date this Negative Declaration was filed with the County Clerk. If a written protest is timely filed, a hearing regarding the Negative Declaration will be held by the Planning Commission. Objections may be presented either orally or in writing at the hearing. 7 - If no written protest is timely filed regarding this Negative Dec- laration,, the application for theproject may be approved without hearing regarding the Negative Declaration.� ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE DATE, Deg. 8, 1-975 BY Lawrence J.Lawson Director of Planning 3 �d'1�l:NDxK C FINDINOS Hugh F. Schuyler variance Applicant's Name 'Type of Project c/o Tedd Thompson Rt. 1, Box 590 AP 39-27-23 Address Location or Parcel No.: Durham, CA, 95938 11/17/75 _.... . Date Received YES NO 1. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of, the environment or curtail the range; of the environment (narrow X the range of beneficial uses of the environment?) 2. Will the project cause impacts which achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while hong-term impacts will X endure well into the future. 3, could the project cause impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considltrable? A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each-esou"ce is relatively small. if the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant, an EER muse be prepared. This finding does not apply to two or more separate projects X where the impact of each is insignificant;, 4�, Could the environmental effects of the project cause substan- tial adverse effects on human beings., either directly or X indirectly?' NOTE; If any of the above four findings questions are answered 11YES"0 the project will be found to have a significant effect on the environment. DETERMINATION J This project will not have.6 significant effect on the environment. A Negative declaration should be prepared, because the proposal is in conformance with uses in the area. X This project could have a signifiddiht effect on the environment.. An EIR is required., ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE Date...�.> � �.1,275. By--, Lawrence J: Lawson Director of Planning W 11/17/75 HUGH F.?CHUYLEit AP 39-27-23 DF,T1,'1LNTNATlOIY R: luNxj71CANT EFFECT ON ENVxRS(vHiE +r Eltxclh r . S chu .ler c o ".0 ad Thom son. Ri:. 1. new 9 0 h Durlaam Ap(alicant 10, Name and Address938 CA g 5 Variance Ali 39-27-23 Type of Project 17/75 Location or parcel No, Date Received An environmental impact report is required for an nificaht erect (substantial penvironment, roject Which y have a Si- adverse impact) on the Effects environmental consequences of both primary and secondary include nature, The following questions shall be used as guidelines to decile whether to make a negative declaration or an environmental, impact report- (If answer is unknow write ""unknown'" in yes/no column.) n, g1lEC� KL15T YI. S NO 1 Could the project: significantly change present uses ofthe Project (See Area? Notes.) Z Does the project significantly conflict with the Butte County General flan or any element thereof? X 3, Could the project affect the Use of a recreational area? (See Notes.) 4. Could the project have a substantial and demonstrable neg- ative effect on an area or feature of aesthetic value? X 5, Will, any natural or man-made features in the project area which are unique, that is, not found in other parts of the County, State: or Nation, be affected? (See bores.) X 6. Will the project involve construction of facilities on a slope of 25 percent or greaten'? X. 7 Will the project involve significant cuts or fills? 8. Could the project cause substantial f'loodinl;, erasion, or siltation? X 9. Will the project involve construction of facilities in area of geologic hazards? an 10 Could the project change existing features or involve coni struction in special building permit areas along the Sacra- mento Feather (fiver Floodway, in any area subject tonInundation, in an in close Proximityto any river,' streem, lake, reservoir or natural drainage channel? X 11. Is the project one of a series of cumulative action, which although individually Small, may as a.whole have significant environmental impact? X l�. Could the project breach an y published national, 'state, or local standards relating to solid waste or litter control? x' C-2 13. Does the project ._ ea or the project site ; servra habitat,food source,nesting pl4Ce! source of Wate'%', etc, 40r X'gr.e or endangcr€:d wildlife or fish species? 14. Could the project significantly affect fish. wildlife, or Plant life or cause sut;stantial interference; with the move,. ment OR any resident or migr4tory fish or wildlife species? X 15, Are there any rare or endangered plant species in the proms je t area? X 16. Will the project remove substantial amounts Of vegetation including -----_.. ground cover? X 17. Could the project change existing features of any of the region's watercourses or other bodies of water? X 18. Could the project result in significant change in the hydrology of the area? (See Notasi, X 19. Could the project significantly affect the functioning of an established conwiunityry (See Notes.) X 20. Could the project physically or economically result in the displacement of community residents, X 21 Could the proJOat significantly affect an historical or archaelogi,cal site ox its setting'? (See Notes.) X 22. Could the Droject serve to encourage development of presently undeveloped areas or intensify development of already devel. oped.areas? (See Notes.) X 23, Are you aware of a substantial body of o inio,•esent or anticipated) that -- � -, considers (or will consider) the project or its effect to be adverse to the environment? X 24. Will theJ ro'ect create p' new az aggravate hazards? existing health X 25, Will` the project involve the applicatic.. .,se or disposal ,of Potentially hazardous - materials in ,an amount suffic ,:zr ter cause a substantial adverse effect? (See Notes.) X 26. Could the project generate significant amounts of dust, smoke, gas: odors, or other air pollutants? X 27. Could the project generate signi£iennt noise? �`.� 28. Could the project cause contamination of ,13 public water su .system or adversely affect y Ppl _._X y ground water? X 29. Could the project significantly affect the Potential use, extraction, or conservation of a natural resource? (See Notes.) X �.. 30. Couldthe P al land? ,, damrae t1 p ] eresult int g4 soil capability or lossOf X 31. Additional remarks; APPLICATION POI{ LNVInONMENTAL. REVIV-,J1 When application bas been mark to the COUnty of Butte for approval of a project which is not ministerial and is not categorirxempt from environmental review requirements, t:he applicant i.s submit this additional application., together with a fee o0, tothe: Environmental Review Committee, c/o the Planning Repa, 7,. County Center Drive, Orovil,le , 'California, pursuant to Secbt4ns" b and 5C of tha County of Butte =)rocedures , for implementation of the California Environmental Quality ,fiction of 1.970. Receipt No,��/ > APPLICANT To COMPLI;Tl,; Name & Address Ake No. "`� �l i Project Description tl ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FARM C;0 be completed by Lead Agency) k x BACKGROUND ISM ISM Log 80-08-08-o2 1'. Name of Proponent John Crowe 2. Address and Phone Idum er o' Praponen`µ" ----------- rd Zerxy McCain Assoc. - Mcr�es w —��-- Mikeoc _ --- aa,bc.o Ch co, ti� Chco CA;- Avenue 3, Date of Checklist Submitted 4. Agency u.irino, ire ' g �' q Ul Checklist 5. Name of Proposal,, if applicab..e VG.ran'c i- size APo_� �e ,o minim m nar�l xI , ENVIRMIENTAt IjrpA.CTS ,p (Ex lanat:i.ons of all "yes" and "maybe" answers on attached sheets,) are required YES MAYBE No 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in significant; a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic sub tructures? b. Disruptions, displacements,, com- paction or overcovering of the soils c. Change in topography or ground sur- face relief features or removal of topsoil? d. Destruction, covering or modifica- t ion of any unique geologic or Physical features? o. Increase in wind or water erosion Of soils, either on ar off the site? f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in silta- tion, deposition or: erosion which may rpodify ,the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? g. Loss of prime agriculturally, pro-. ductave soils outside designated urban areas? —�-- Appendi};, F - page 1 of 9 YES MAYBE N PCOPle Or propert:y to �1E3A:i'1'rCalwq such as G*art'JIgIIaI,,<es �1.i.i{! i',�i .l.ides ground fni.lttre, or ,a i mi l 'ar Z, Air, ';� 11 t1le prolaosal a;rsult in! ti. S:obstanL:ial deterioration o 41t.:bient or local. qJr quality. b. she creation of objectionable odors, st.2olcc or fumes? C. Siad fxcant alteration of air' ttOve!A~nt, Moisture or ' e=pe,rt at ure y or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? 3. 1,a�. Will t1le proposal result in substantial a. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements? b. Changes in absorpti ion rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface witer riinoff? pJ `4', nidi 1..d c, 'Noed riot off-site surface drainage improvements, including vegetation removal, channel.ation or culvert installati.cn? °. a. _ lterat,ions to the course or flow Of flood i.'aters? 11� . ,r� e. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? Di,schatge, into 8urface Haters or in any alteration of surface, water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? g. Alteration of the direction ar �. ? rade of flow of ground water,., h, Change in the quantity or quality of ground waters, either through • direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an - aquifer by cuts or excavations? �.; �,•; A e , nd�.�,r =F r Page PP 2 of 9 YES MYYBE No i. , Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public crater supplies? j. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as floodin? C� Pl,"nt Life. Will the proposal result in suTa tial; a., Loss of vegetation or change in the diversity of species or number Of any species of plaits (including trees, shrubs, grass, �:ropsa microflora and aquatic plants)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare;or endangered species of plants , C, Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment: of existing species? d. Reduction in acreage of any agri- cultural crop? 5. Animal. Life. Will the proposal result 1n SL1i7Stanticil ; T a, Change in the diversity o species, oz numbers of any ,species of animals (birds land animals including reptiles fish and shell- fish, benthi.c. organisms, insects or microfauna) ? - b' Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? c,- Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or resiil.t in a barrier to the migration or move mon t of animals? d. Reduction of, encroachment upon, ar deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? , L)�_1 . Appendix F page 3 of -9 YDS 'KAYB t 1,40 6. Mc) i.s0 Will the PrOPOh;-11 r csult �Y sutra ;M r ;tial �*+ a. Increases in noise levals? b, rxposura oi. people to severe noise levels? 7. Light art (71.a t��ill the poposl produ�.e Sl riZi;il,anG light: or glare? Te­ S. Land Use. t=fill the uroposaj. results in a s .gni;£icant a. Alte:;ation of the planned, land use of an area, or establish a trend vhich will demonstrably ,lead to such p alteration? ' b>. Conflict with uses on adjoining properties, or conflict with establi_-,h d recreational, educa- os or scientific tional, reli,;iu. R uses of an area?I�' 9. Natural Resources . t.i ] l the proposal result in substantial. a. Demand for, or increase in the rate ., of use of any natural resources? b' Depletion o£ any nonrenewable w* natural resource? ,. 10• Risk of Lpset Does the proposal —a involve risk- of an explosion or. the -release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) �e� s' p'r ino � an accident or u t conditions? 11. Population. Will the proposal signFtly alter the location, distribution, density, or growth ` rate of the hur,161n population of an area or physically divide an . established community? 12. Housing. Will the, proposal sib— n icantly affect- existing housing, or create a demand for additional. nous izg? ' Appendix F -;page,4 of q YES MAYBt h0' 13 Trans aoxtation/Citculat an. , Will- the proposal result in: a. Generation of substantial additional � vehi.cul4r movement? b. Significant offect•s on existing parkin; facilities, or demand for neer parking? c. Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems? d. Significant alterations' to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/orgoods? .."_ e Alterations t6 waterborne, rail or traffic? air f Increase in traffic 'hazard; to motor � vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an efTect upon, or result in a substantial need for neT or altered governmental services in any of the following areas a. Fire protection? b. Police protection'?', c'. Schools? d. Parks or other recreational facilities! e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? f; Other governmental services?" 15. Energy, Will the proposal result: in" a.' Use of substantial amounts of fuel q,•. or energy? b. Substantial increase in :demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the: development of new sources of energy?., 16. Utilities." Will the proposal result in � need tot neva systems,or sub= stantial alterations to the following u.t'iliti.es , Appendix F page 5 o 9 YES MAY N0 a . POWQr Or 114t:ural b . CoiLl_CiiunJ,1'. ate ons sYs tu"I1 s w c , i4atcr? . _.. d. Sewer (t,t,L11 trunY line be extended, providing capacity to serve new development)''? e. Storm water drainage?'�.-- 17. Human Health, C•Jill the proposal result in: a: Creation of` any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health) ? ---- b_, Exposure of people to potential hPa:lth hazards? 18= Solid Waste. Will the proposal result atec3 1n any sinnfi cant impacts assoc with solid waste disposal or litter control? l9, Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the o s— ruction of any public desiwgnated4or recognized scenic vista open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? 20. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing public recrea- tion facilities? 2 Archeolo ical/Historical.. Will the reguk tail a�tpxatio� of proposal -nt 1 cheolog cal or a signi_f4i,.gwa h sto.rl al site, structure, object m7 of building 2 iiandator�� '; �d nes of Sip_t�i£ic,an.ce, a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of: a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife aro: b clow self _ population to p Appendix F - page 6 of 9 YES MAYBE N0 sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal com- muniGy,'reduce the number ox restrict: the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of Cali;forn,a history or prehistory?r b. Does the project have the potential: to achieve short germ benefits to the detriment of publicly adopted long-term environmental goals? c. Does the project have impacts which are individually li:caited but cum.latively considerable? ca project may impact on taro'or more separate resources where the Impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the Environment is significant.) d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? •' Appendix F .� page 7 o.r g Std -08-08--02 Ill.rr DISCUSSION OF ENVIIRONMEN�M, EVALUATION Brief Deccwipt;or: 7,;j,Itan0e to Millimum PIrcel. size *to allow cro tion cf 4 parcels 01 C."' acre -w for residential. use on 1.75 acre site. Z' ocation: ��,ul_*_,,.eaEt of Front Street,o betwon Yokum and Ge:�,ke Streets7 ]_' Zayton area, of '"hico. �Z. 'Froposed Densizy c_f _'evelopii!ent: I D*0/0.45, acre- (2.3 DLT/acre overall) Access and FXtlic, Road(s): Front Street (15-16, wide paved ­oad), Yoku= S,zre(I2' wide paved driveway to 2 houses),,Gerke Street (121 -ride led road) 5. I'lethod of SA_ a;:e 7­4sposal: Septic systems E. *,";ource of Wager S-ur_ pl I: Common well. through homeowners association cr nutual ."stszG,- any. t. Potential f, -,r far -.her land divisions and development: Minimal -under. current ,.- pa- cel. sizes involving septic tank-leachfield Eystoms. E,nvironme-ntal F-7sical Environment. --errain a. General Character.- Relatively level with gentle depress -'on alcng proposed boundary line between parcels'l & 2 and 3 b. Slopes: Less Soils a. TYPOS aMd Cha-2actt'leristics: Vina loam, soil depth generally in excess Of 6 f eet. -v.-ell adapted to irrigatior, good pemoability, Well sup -Uc viriety of cropq. .A. ,natural Hazards of t're Land a. Earthouake Zone: Possible fault about I mile to oast. b Potential Zubs-fde--ce Area.- X c., Expansi-.-e SAL Potenrial: Moderate Hydrology a.. Surface atar: Sia? low drainage Swale traverses ,,ite from east-weadralhage to south flot,,ring to soutiliq0st.' Appendix 7- page 8 of 9 IM DISCUSSION 010 E>~rVIRONFIL''ITAL EVALUATION (continued) b. Drainage Characteristics: Good xititural, drainage of soils •, no storm drain system in Dayton area;. c Annual, Rainfall (normal) : 20-22" Biological Environment Vegetation: Almond orchard, oak tree, eucalyptus trees;, underlying grasses, landscaped plants and garden around house. Cultural Environment: 6. Barre County General Plan designation Orchard and 'Field Crops 7. Bxisti ng Zoning: A-40 8o Existing Land Use on-site: Residence with garage, small almond orchard 6 Surrounding Area ; a. Land Uses: Single family residences to the northvtest, west and. east, almond orchards, grain and other agr culuural pursuits' to the south and further away to ror't;?-, east and ;test b. Zoning A-40 c. Gen. Plan designations: 'Orchard and Field Crony d. Parcel Sizes: 0.2 acre± to 216 acres 10. Nearest- 'Urban Area Chico, 6 mile-,,-;- 11. iles11. Relevant Spheres of Influence: . Durham Recreation District, ButteCounty Mosquito Abatement District. 12. Fire Protection. Service: y (State) Fire Station: S�ta�tion a.5 (.Durham) a. Nearest Count b. Water Availability: Well$j fire truce capacity 15. Schools in Area. Durham Unified Schools The following impacts have been identified for this proposal, Due to the surrounding parcel. sizes and residential. uses � ,y � �� limited amount- of land involved, the protection afforded to large a ri It _- � �_ �..�u�, �u_ al parcels in the vicinity by the A-40 zoning and Orchard and6 Fieid Crops desig- nation (Land tiro Map of the General Plan), the feasibility of the o 5 wat parcels to accommodate sept:i.c systems atd the availability of a �ratOr sIxpply for the threens111 parcels propcse ,, the project is not ex to have significant e vironmental elffoot Drainage is an, existing dilemma in the Dayton area, t. storm drain system sloes not exist and there isnot a rearby nam r to which runoff can be directed.. This is a hey factc�rJto�consider � Ks� al.l.owing the creation of additional, lots for resa.dont�al use an Dayton;: Appendi,:e F - Page 8a of 9 L 1UALUA'1'X;ON (cyanl"Oinuod) CC':.p Vti'w :1 ofle Y.�.�' vo�..l. byl�7„.� iJ j. z '�' tin inG`i'<'a.">C n �+u3. fa.cf c..a.uQ,_Lr0s ai.ti rely dt:r 1�..uc,x`t ,(ali Lil t iXC�G vii. h :runoff . i`::eL `}xe� to .. oil.s havo a good natural drainage cap- at �,y a�rasidoi,� i a � a cw;;c = , at tho denrity proposed., wall cu:m-- . °ely add to :• ew°a'ti_�a a� px-,ol)I(,,m in the vicinity. Existing lots most cf llici7 are rler� a�a n the size:S proposed for this site, were cWeawed ars p ,apt Of .al,` lav, of ,.aytoxi. Undea current standards for laud r.��,i.vision$ to pwov-'d,e a permanent (�a�aizaage solution and. provide a le`tchC i e area on a z .rcel ,-,tach includes 100/v replacement area, the leach. parcels (navy �f 812" to �S`�o0 square feet:L-) may not; have been �-d: Reduction r rr cu; tt� al produc L i:vii�y of a 'i .j acre site w'"Uh 1lina loam soilt; removai ca: many of the almond trees for bomesite prrparh't-ton. '��easibil.it4' c" srr,i ~^ -ant-1c�clfa eld systems for the parcels. _ T!,.e cancel sizes at. ;w 4oi is is dicate that septic systems for Three a. di �ioi: l resit:oric: can be accoimmod.a�t;ed on the "1.77 acres. Tc-- z�: d .-he 'E_ vironraentaa: Health 1�epartrienc, one According to Te v. ell for four be workable. if the agreement were to lcM cancelled� r- ':%: -�_fl %-�Ux W a viell on cacti lot will probably r yt ;,=k due to :...� 4:, .� �2_y' _S rcm t-,e lead-fiold systo s. A permit i'or a public ,,ra- er -: �e:�n ;r�aily requires 5 or more: lots. 8a: Alteration of h r ply er l l d use in the area. In the absence of the "��-�� va i c a lice k : : Cenera7 Plan Amendment and rezone would 7 e Pp ' required. At present- rezone could only be considered for a zoning drst_ict with a G ="'e ----i=u under the Orchard and. Fuld Crops drys ignatioh; thus s Nrvnis,nce v,-ou? d still be needed. There are ou.rrenyly t„o ,omesites to the south-southwest. These two residences ad o'. a_” -d -retard and grain"growing land to the So .�, =S - o" ;,',,-wee residences on the project site should noir _ .u�._. Develop_ g - t �- t • y surrounding laz'�d s. a.�.pa, r the a �r�.cu,i:.�r� • U_ocuc ��v�:t of 'i-a: Increased demand. fc` r uubi ic` services in an outlying area. The Fane County Fire yep-rt .=nom has no requirements for fire protection -;she u��e %%"n.ty Sheriff's Department commented about S time. the =ac1c of patr:l'':? oew -,o the area.. Increased ,staff to allow e Du-'=a-Dw-ytoz� area is recommended as a condition patrol coverage wo th cY project s.pp rc-,r ';v: ire Sheriff' S I}epartment. Appendix F - page 8b of Y y IV. DETERMINATION (To be completed by the Lead Agency') On the basis of this initial evaluation: 3 I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant ` effect on the environment, and a :iEGAT:IVE DECLARATION a.s rEc6mmended. 0 I find that although the proposed project could ;have a significant effect on the environment, there will, not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been, added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION IS �ECOM ENDED. Q I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an M771 ONMENTAL IMPAC REPORT is required. Date September 4 19807"- _ .. Y For. �_ r' r::rVTP �:� ::..� 'AG AEVI��•f DE4T Reviewed by: Earl D titllson Enviro e%1 al Review D.iroCtoZ' i Appendix F page of cf 39-26-09 0 3S- " 39-27-1.0 * 33 C .L. &Rosa 1 e Caxtwrig Arthur & Juanita nita Taylor 04 t Chico, GA ✓x926 Chico, CA 9526 Or .Petr Stage r Ferry Sta �; Box 11 s 39-26-10 39t-27-11 Neto Bella Pylp J.J. & PPg Arthur y TIornback !' 3thur29 � Sit. 3 Box 125A Ord Vprr�y to p. ' &Juanita Taylor Chico, CA 95926 Chico, CA 99926 Ord FFrrry 8tagp Chico, CA 95926 39-26-32 39-2715 39-27-31 Vnicp of the Pro hpcy At, Darrell. McEnespy 'P. O. Box 1511 � alb NimshPW Ste In. *'j Nellie Hanslwggy Glendale, CA 91200 Chico, CA 95926 Ord Ferry S95925Box 3 �K" , 1 39-26-38 Kpnn7th6& Norma x`v ,....._.._ . r � 39-27-32 Barry & 7,Uplptta Mped eit 4 Ruth Orr Rt. 2 Box 347 Ord Fprry Ste p Box 27 • Chico CA 9526 ;, Ord Farry Stage Box 9 } Chico, CA 9S926 ' Chico, CA 95926 39-27-01 4 3'4� 39-27-17 & 18 x ��,140, JpsaP Carrtwright Malvin Johnson etal , .��:g ^', A, ''��`» -0 Star Routp 25 "�' •� y ' ,<, Ord Ferry Ste a ;�.ta�, Chico CA 9526 Chico, CA 95926 ,.. " ' 39-27=02 & 03 39-27-20 Everott Pparson {.; Henry & Dollip Brimhall r= Ord FArry Sta'. Ord Ferry Ste e Box 13 x' ggg g Chico, CA 95926 Chico, CA 95926 r i h.4 r. 39-27-04 39-27-21 „, P Walter RAinpmpr David & Daisy Congas 1 Ord Ferry Sta P Box 51. Box 274 g Durham, CA 95938 Chico CA 95926 J 39-27-05 zw 39-27-22 r � JPann= Garaicotchpa pta1l M.W. & Elaine Bethard ' Ord Forry 'Sta a �,I Ord Ferry Stage Box 5 Chico, CA 95926 Chico, CA 95926 tr 39-27=06 & 07 39-27-23 Eldon Wahl etux 1:,.) Hugh & Sup Schuyler � 1153 E, 9th St k Ord Farry .Sta Chico, CA 95926 Chico, CA 9526.x' 39`-2708 " 39-27-26 `� _ tt',I Jean Cymbal Dppt. of Vetprans Affairs !, 1.41.2 Salem St. /.Harvey Lucille i Chico, CA 95926 1 Ord Ferry Stage Box 19 Nr Chico, CA 95926 � � �9d-g7-09 r inia Cartwri ht tpAiVI: g g D ,, ;�, h �a"y;'�' Pt of Veterans Affairgs•r,,,�•".. y►,�r. 10294 Belcher St. Raymond , Raymond & Susan Hammons ,, Dorney, CA 90220:a Ord Ferry Stage Boas*41 "�`' ¢_ An11w1e�wl�maAnme �r ��'tti en _. ,rA—_b'tz nA[ ^. Mwrr. courery I0T,AIIIfjjCCON,1T �xa RX s6tce is h©'roby C: iVN). by 1- J3�.r.. to 4ot....#CK.. planningioa ,f„ public 1mt7:il ill bo hold oxo ',�I�.Ut4d+��rA�Januaryl.5 1976, at 7h3Q pp"m:s It t th* B9,3 t^ Comity Board of s4upprvisorgl R�apira� 8u�:t� County l�dmxnf;qra oza Budding, 1859 Bird ,'c.roesto OrOv�ll:0 Califrogording t7l* f01101,11.09:aarn3.aa x'C i�. f3N ?d Cll VWATIVIa D.ML'LARtsTIDMS RIM,ARvIhr, Hugh Fu 6chufler trarjo acp to minimum l ,> 6 corn parc�y;' and a 4a pr�x�op 1 as �� to al 1.r+�r a 7G e Parc al in an "1'�-4010 (Agricultural-- r.`sC acrp min3.msxr,i) zC�nr� jC3cil�i:r�4� on tla� � ��� � baLYr-nn Yci�"tilf�l .��"t "rangy ,�liCi or, � ca�a�j; C� t: (� r'� kik' 2�r `�� NytonA 0 2 DOnsl.d and Travor B. smith � Ua uq^d car �A33.�a«v lot on ro _rt _ zonnc? ave,,» on Formi.t to all.ov ,I th- gouthoa qt corn-r of r, p 2 (w"f nnrral) l.oc�at'd on ,a i- � v�z� z aar �? �tatFMy 32p idpntj; j4d as Al' r�42 -Q�3 -'i2„ Chico. Thp abovo Montionod applicationln P,tltionq mea draft oma' ronj1p nal. _ imr act rAportq and/or nogat:ivn rbper;� t,,4. ar,nok� film And �trr��;�abl � �rrx pu 1.3�: V141-1-Ing at the ficin of the Butto CoaLvIty p azo? .. artm rata 7 Oounty cpntPr Dr. vA� Orovijj_ r,+ CaUfornia., .�wirommental, Impact Rpaa. t p arm al.go availabl- at col.l.+-90 and county librarjmq., BUTTI, CIMNTX M' NU COMM IJSIO LAVQENCE it. Lffif> by TO Bld k JBI, i HED 1N I CT 3 CC 3i'IT PRI,'; RP4 ORD QIq 1347 JpDAyD JAN�.i"ART � 1976n ��+'i'?�1��;?"� •,�, �l'�, '��,1 d�A°i� 4'"'K�J1iYtit�il4'L P ac��^� —�-- nPraLIC'ANT. rluGri r - cxaxL� yS»t-a n� 33ox 2 jr righico , cA C OtWlcly op B1i111T O.\♦0`V XY1TJXX:" 'kY wi.1 MS.1.,Oh'�{ d M. .�'j p•yy.: -)ata November 19, 1975 ni s :_4oll l )s^ i n.q 19,011C:a'i ion har,4 b ei i Cr?,'�'{JcY� by this ty Q P LIC,AANT . HUGH F4 SCHUYLER, Ord Ferry Stage, Box 23, Chico , CA 95926 P OJECT DESC IPTZONA Variance to minimum parcel size to allow a 1..60+ acre parcel and a ,76+ acre parcel in an "A-40" (Agricultural, 40 acxe minimum lots) zone; located on the east side of Front St. 'between Yocum St. and'Gerke St., identified as AP 39-27-23, Dayton,. rr i 3 D' t77 G'L CC7ing 'lei'C� is Jul"v'3.i: �111�' l Ravi w• s c December.' 1 1.9 75 ul t Y Coimn �GY onir ! n d �. �w wish YaSi t1 ) aciy �';i/ Hle project, i are � `t able ai . i.c �`1`�Vt , (� dilis.�+ E7C� s 1 � •int,. Jf � ^"f t� ``n �'._ „ t� e t ty r ac p 4 are av °.l7 1 ab i e h '� c,=J. y.. 9 r 4U v Pt rxdd, ^,2 Wily .' z,ci3i Se'elt U, trl: a yIf YO" y pew Zi E 't 3.,t f-or: �� r,.io' n of cor,,,Apr t B on t:,-Ie roject phase ::iww3iO�s1 iJ ;M�I.'G eAu I' a 3 r:y 1. �n r roil �..n tal ,. eview�� we do n o t hear 2 om your O "fice r"A '- ly g t. t.0 h b said da4e we :�� 21 o haveleo doir'arants 'Gro, r'-a]ce t�:lzis2�'. .I;Ju for Your time.,ci.i,.r_�2 �`© JAY McKEEMAN ENVIRONMENTAL COORDINATOR' �3y t Mar Dodson, Clerk ' December 1, 1975 liueTh F. Schuyler c`)rd Ferry Staqe, Box 7. Chico, CA 959E Re: variaa ce, AP 39-27-23 Dear Mr. ",ohuyler At the regular meeting of tate Butte County Pnvironmental Review Committee` held this morning, your application for a Variance to minimum parcel. sitie_to allow a 1.60± acre parcel and a .76e., acre parcel in an A--40 zone, located on the E side of rrnnt 5t. between 'locum St. & Gerk� : St. , 'Da.y t,on t was continued for one week. The reason for this cont'innanoae is that the Dept:. of Public: Works and the representative from the Manning Dopt. . has roqua3tci addition- al time in order to thoroughly review the site. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact this office. Action trill be taken as soon as possible. Sincerely, JAY 1cI43 t' i.d ENVT.RONMM' !AL COORDINATOR BX...._ M-:. -.-� , Mary DodsonClerk cc* Health : bPt. 1^edd Thompson Public Works Rt. ,1, Sox 590, Durham Air Quality Sheriff U OA January 2G., 1976 V, F Hugh b" 30huylo or Furry Stage, Box 23 Chico, Cly 95526 Re AV 39-27-23 Thii lot~tgr will bt.-? your e fftc' nl a otUicatlon Owt your 1."r3 �sUl t for a 'vara a nco. to mi 2�imuvi pgrcol ? fzo to allow a 10 , 0 (plu,) acre Pares?l and a .76 (pltvi) acre parcel, in a A-40 zone ate the emit , ida. of � iyroast 13treet between, Yocw:q .3treot and Gl-'rke wt:raet °Ln loyton, is conci de—rc ,r antaid q ince no r1ppEat, U w re, received wt<thin the Appoal pt?c1„`iod. Jhould you have ranygtxt s'i:lons regarding. t��i7 mat�trcr, pleas� roe to contact t:Yzis cfftce. Jiacerelyp /In cc: Health. rapt* a .ibiLe .40ricd Dopt. .�...«. fir. S"'LAPP VINDXNCV, aanUary 15e 1976 C d VARIANCE 1. Uogh F. 5chuYler - ilirianco to minimum parcel site to all a�u a, 1.6 acre a.rcel and a 0 76 acre parcel x set "A-40"(s^ic Mural--40 acre mJ.nimwti) zone located oto the bast side, of Ft^ant Street between YcaCUM Street and Gerke Street, idezz• ifierl as A-P 39-27-23n pnayton This i.s a variAnce request to parcel size Zoneregaa$rement Of the A-40A-40, no aPP"Cant Proposes to divide a 2 1/2 ,a0re parcel.„ Section 16 of the Butte County traaW.Jrdg +Srdinaetce, Variances, stuates s "Variances from the t.erMs cf the zoning c►rciixaarace Shall be granted only when a because, of Special circumstances applicable to the rshd a tm• o .� u p:�:opert�ra including size, P o p �'�aphyp location o� a r�oundx�gs a the str:i.ct..applicatiOn of the ordinance depraves such Property oke PriVil.eges enJOYed by othe:r: pgroperty ,in the "Acinit~y and t nejer I- dentical classification." 3:f the 'COMMi.ssion can make these t*indi.ngg, i� ca©u�d via appropriate grant this variance request. A Negative Declaration ROgare3ing Environmental filed ed ��. 1 wtiGh the Butte County Clerk efts Dac®mImpactber 8, � 975 and t was e no appeals. AOL BUTTE COUNTY PLANNXNG COMMISSXON MINUTES -- January 150 1976 j� C. VARXANCE Hugh F. Schuyler Variance to minimum parcel size to allow a 1.6 acre parcel and a 9,76 acre parcel in an A-40 (Agri cult ural': 90-acre-mihimutt) zone, located on the east side of Front Street between Yocum Street and Gerk.e Street, identified as AP 39--27-21, DAyton 16-23-1.--999-665 Mr. Lawson read staff findings. Schuyler said that there were other small parcels 'i Proponents: Hugh P. in the area---that the area had once been subdivisded. Opponents None closed and mo Tile hearing was tion made by Commissioner Camenzind, seconded by Commissioner Gilbert, for approval of this variance, finding that due to the size not to approve this teauest would deprive -this property of privileges enjoyed by other property in the vicinity and under identical classification. AYES Co;nmissa.oners Camenzind, Gilbert, Moore, Smith, 'Thebach Watson, Watters and Chairman Sylva NOBS: None. ABSENT: Commissioner Hanford. Motion carried. K' , y • \ / `+ �\ iii , 00 5j (� ` `� AZA i Co oe ool LID Y / • 14 69 TO/V a9'EST t,ROAD` i�to 6 6 + '" �t �mJl 0 \ \ 26 to `+\ gig' �� •� • ? � ITI i A 2 \ 6p ,9 93 '\i' , / `t �,/ 66\+ 9gi l� + g� 1o� `�\ �.16901 0 � sem° /`` tili \ �` �.1 `\ `+ � ¢ rO „ "' �I`•js JA ' \ r 0z 00 se 5 04 o > , o00% bp `\ 6 19 to is pay ' . dop pg ' �. .. se3So��s Map l�lo 39 27 �- ,lo . � - E- ASSMW'S PARCEL Bcotx Count of butte, Calif. a NUMBERS SH<)WN y Y 8 Yor , hlorch. /,9 .- 0 / \ \ \\ Y J 1,7 .,6Mminh \r / 7 23 s j � \ \` ��\ \ �•� � ::;:eiiiiiiiii9iE:6��i / _„-►-_ ..... � C4erwrr{c07— Ti's t%r e ar a F PRO POCC Y, ETA L BUTTE COUNTY , F�l.../�f��NV CC�1�liMl��!®til HEARING DATES JAN t 976 NEF �QPLIp-,tpL�I�}Cw►� Ie1 �p�..� A SCALE Apw� R� UC.r • �/q/•��NGfo.7'17 /N1lNdM✓M LO•: /6 ��J .b �I Veld..: Zoj\1E= ,a��TO,• SCALyE =200' �4-27�z3 COUNTY OF -e . A BUTTE �. �� '�."� �` ',{,k,,,F, ► �' 7 County Center Drive p oville, Ccllifoxnia 959 5 OVrICE OF �L61Ut?�r�,� pL11 MMG COMMISSION TO O ��1�GNOCR tdOVEb, LER NO ADO1Irss, 39p27DP of V tarans Affairs -26 %Ha rvPy uc i11 P Ord Fy Sta ge Box 19' �pr� C� Chic CA 95926 197 No LOW -fl VYI� ✓ Moved, +lp Mo f.1%n, t'Adre7sw- ur,knuw ti