HomeMy WebLinkAbout039-270-058ij-
Ai
UT
V'V�Tll
zll�
40
Axl 11
I VAI
40
F� RIP
00'*�d 'b
t, 4W "op
55
WYKIK, Ap'? '90
Ito,
4J�
Jj
Av Z, w
3w A
It
34—
Pp A,
IF
I #
lo,
L't
-:70 "I�: MMFW�
:'Z4 W
AM-
APPLY'CANT _-John Crowo
ADDRESS SGrout Day -ton (chico),
_CA
Oame
r ..........
PRO-TRM DESCRIPTION vapiance to
................... allow four
-45
—011loss on p.ropert, Zoned "A-4011
acro
acre
LOCATION on the south side of O.rd Fel:,ry Road- be-twc,an Y2LUM
LGerke
Sts.
ASSVSSOR,S PARCEL NUM,�,'IBR(S) 9-27 —58
....... .
ZONING A -LI -0 Vir-M. PLAN �Lel PROMplall, CONSISTENT?
DATE APPLICATION R CEIVED 13
------ �� -8-80
DATE REZONING PETITXON Sl ------------
FNA7ii7
PHRUNTAGE
DATE 1490AL DESCRIPTION PREPARED OR CjjF,,Cj(E
DATE PUBUCATION NOTICE, WRITTEN --------
�' - "
- -9-:12
DATE DISPLAY AD PREPARED
PLACE NtWSPAi)Ejz NOTM!(�,7)
DATE MAILING LIST PREPARED _ � -
DATE MAIL -OUT NOTICES 119IMN
MA T LE D ...........
DATE CoNr,�IISSTON EXHIBIT PREPARED
DATE STAPP PINDINGS PREPARED
ENVr ------
ONMENTAL CATHGOPICALLEXEMPTrON
Dr-TtRMINATION DATE
PrUn
AND DATE MATIVE MCLARATION DATLt ADOPTM)
BNV- IMPAC"J' REPORT - PATE CRRMITEI)
----------------
OTHL- k
CO L
ION 111ARING DATES
COMMISSION AMON,
J30ARD AMON
ORDINANCE($) ADOPTED
-------------- �—P
.........
COMENTS
0.
APPENDIX G
ojova4o
NEGATIVE
EWMINGr 'RMtTVQ�=,NTfiT
111111=01
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the PrOJect described
been reviewed pursuant to - below has
Environmental Quality Act the PrOvisions of the Calitornia
of 1970 (publia ReOOUrces Code
21100, et a-nd a dete=inatjo
not have -j—eignifica n 11as be -en made that it will
nt effect upon t -11v environment
2- DESCRIPTION or, PROJECT. 1109 #80--08-08-02
Variance to minimum parcel
of 0,45 acr0s± for e.id.,ts'" to. allow creation of 4 parools
AP // 39-27-58 ial use on 1.75 acre site.
,4TION OF PROJECT:
Sr4atheast of Front StVeet� between Yokum and Gorke Streets
DaYtWl area� southwest of Chico.
L�. NAtIE AWD IWDRESS ()V -PROJECT APPLICANT:
John Crowe
Ord Ferry Stat,. McOain Assoc. - Mike Metnespy
Box 23 492 Rio Lindo Avenue
Ohl' CA Chico, CA 95926
5, MIT`Ic6o�TIOY 1;,kUSURES:
6i A o�jpl- of' the Envivonmental Review Directori s in't'
rFSaTding the environmental effect of t ial study
ject is attached.
s Study was his pro
Nx Adopted as Presented,
Adopted with changes. Specific modifications
Supporting reasons are attached. and
74 A public hearing on this Negative Beclar'
decision making body. ation Was held by the
Hearing bod
y, Bu,
Date of Determi
nation Septembet 240
Determinationt
On, the basis of the Enviro el,�tal Director,
the 'infoination presented at rjm s initial study
-he a ring. s , comments received on I
proposal and,our own knowl edge, and lndepOtdent research: the
Appendix G page of 2
1qw
APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE or ZONING
But,te County Planninq Commission
Fi 1 e No,
Date
Flooring date
Action by Planning Commission
Action by Board of Supervisors
PRE$ENT ZONINQ:�, Assessor Map Book Page No, �:L— Parcel No,
R�OUEST; \—'Az i
—A)
-P�
'Z c
APPLICANT'S NAME:. PHONE. -
ADDRESS,,
STATUS OF APPLICANT'S INTEREST IN PROPERTY;
OWNER'S NAME,- PHONE.,
ADDRESS,
DESCRIPTION OR PROPERTY, v:'
A
A 7 ry"Y'
EXPLAIN FU1..LY REASON. FOR APPLICATION'.
kF z J,
The a6ove'sWernehfs are cerfifW by the undersigned fo be r
40 recfi
Signature of ApplicAnt
NOTE: Ploose submit herewith o check or mono4fder in the amount shown below, poyable to County of Butte; dISO a
detailed Plot Plan showing the location of existing and proposeJ structures �n your property and on the adjacent
Properties,
A
By
Receipt No,
U
APPENDIX F
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
(To be
completed by Lead Agency)
I. EIACKG90UND ERD Log
80-08-08-02
I. Name Of Proponent John, Crowe
2. Address and Phone k1ulliDer 01., eropont-_LIL.:
Ord Ferr tate McCain Assoc.
Box,, P:� . ........ ... ..... . ... .........
Mike
1 1 ............. .
9 2 6 nj_ 4 111151,
3. Date of Checklist Submitted
4 Agency
'TICE
Aven�ue *__ Y
Requiring Checklist
5: Name. Of Proposal, if appliCaule va-r-I Anna q --
size AP
ENVIRONMENTAL IDTACTS
(Explanations of all "yes" and "maybell answers
on attached sheets.)
are required
YES
MAYBE NO
I. Earth. Will the proposal result in significant:
a. Unstable earth conditions or in
changes in
geologic substructures?
b. Disruptions, displa ments, com-
paatior, or overco 00
Vering of the soil?
C, Change in topography or ground sur-
face relielf features
or removal of
topsoil?
d. Destruction, covering Or modifica�
tion of,any
unique geologic or
physical features?
A0
e. increase. in wind or water ros-on
e I
Of Soils, either on or Off.the site?
f. Changes in deposition or erosion
of beach s ands, or changes in silta-
tiolio deposition
or evosioj�. which
may modify the channel of a river or
Stream or the bed of the ocean or
any bay, inlet or lake?
g. Loss of prim e a9ticulturally pro-
ductive solls outside desi,
,gnated
urban are S?
Appendix F page .1 of
'YES
NO
h. Exposure O:ff PGOP10 Or Property to
900:1-ogic. hozards such
as eAtthquakes
landslides mudslides, gtound failure
Or similar'llazards?
2. Air. 'W"ll the Proposal result in:
a. Subntantial deterioration of
ambient Or local air quality?
AIN
b. The creation of obj(alctionable
odors,
smoke or fullies?
Significant alter4tlon of air
movement, mOisture, or temperature,
Or any change in climate, either
locally or re,g,
ionally?
3. Ha -ter. Will the Proposal result in substantial:
a. Changes 411, currents, or the course
or direction Of water
movements?
b. Changes in absorption ratest drainage
patterns, or the
rate and amount of
surface water runoff?
a. Need for Off-site surface drainage
improvements
including vegetation
removal, cha'
nnelization
. ot culvert
installation?
A. Alterations tu the course or flow
Of flood
waters?
e. Changein the amount of surface
water in any water body?
f. Discharge into surface waters" or
in any alteration of surface
water quality, including but not
limited to temperature, dissolved
oxygen or turbidity?
Ask
9. Alteration of the direction or
rate Of flow of ground waters?
1-1 -, Change in the quantity or ql'UR�lit. Y
of ground
waters, either through
dirO�ct additions Or -,.,�;,�hdrawals,
or thtough1n,terception of
an
aquifer �Y cuts or excavations?,
Appendix p p�
age� 2 of 9
Ip
i.
Reduction in the amount of water
otherwise available for public
'A I I I L,
water supplies?
Exposure of people or propert , y
to water related hazards such as
flooding?
4, Plant';�
Life, Will the proposal result
in
Ys't`a`n t i a I
a.
Loss of vegetation or change in the
diversity 6f species or number
of any species of plarts (including
trees, shrubs., grass, crops,
microflora and aquatic plants)?
b,
Reduction of the numbers of any
unique, rare or endangered species
Alk
of plants?
C.
Introduction of new species of
plants into an area, or in a barrier
to the normal replenishment of
existing species?
d.
Reduction in acreage of any agri-
cultural crop?
5i Animal Life. Will the proposal result
in
stibTEn—Hal:
a,
Change in the rliversity of species,
or numbers of any species of
animals (birds, land animals
including reptiles, fish and shell -
f ish, benthic orge-qisms, insects or
Ask
iiii a ro f auna) ?
b.
Reduction 04! the numbers of any
unique, rare or endangered, species
of.animals?
c.
Introduction of new species of'
animals into an area, or result in
a 'barrier to the migrati6n or
movement of animals?
Alt
d.
Reduction of, encroachment upon, or
deterioration to existing fish or
wildlife habitat?
Appendix :F
page 3 of 9�
YES MAYBE
NO
6.
Noise, Will the proposal result in
subs Fantial
a. Increases in noise levels?
b. Exposure o:6 people to severe noise
levels?
7.
Light cind Glare ' Will the proposal
produc,e significant light or'glare?
8i
Land Use. Will the proposal result
in a sigr1if icant:
a, Alteration of the planned land use
of an area, or establish a trend
which will demonstrably lead to such
alteration?
b, Conflict with uses on adjoining
properties, or conflict with
establiched recreational, educa-
tional., religious or scientific
uses of an area?
9.
Natural Resources,, Will the proposal
result in substantial:
a, Demand for, or increase in the -rate
of use
of any natural resourced?
b. Depletion of any nonrenewable
natural resource?
'10.
Risk of,Upset. Does the proposal
involve a risk of an explosion or
the -release of hazaz�dous. substances,
(including, but not limit -c --,d to, oil,
pesticides, chemicals or radiation).
in the event of an accident or upset
conditions?
ME
Population. Will,the proposal
signiffc—antly alter the location4
distributionj den6ity, or gt,owth
rate of the human population of an
area or physically divide an
established community?
liousin Will the proposal
slgni icantly affect existing houting,
or create a demand for additional
housing?
A pendix F
P
-:page 4 o. f 9
Aft�
X MS
9 LY NO'
13. Trap��pqttat16n/Circul"ati6ii.. Will the
-In,- -
_U
p r o p o 8-aT-r—e s5T IT � -
a. Generation of substantial additional
vehicula-" movement?
be Significant effects on existing
Parking facilities, or demand for
new parking?
c. Substantial impact upon existing
transnortation
systems?
d, Significant alterations' to present
patterns of circulation or movement
of people and/or goods?
e. Alterations b6.waterborne, rail or
air traffic?
Increase in traffic hazards to motor
vehicles, bicyclists
or pedestrians?
14, Public Services, Will the proposal have
iiyf�ecEpOn.
an or result in a sub
-stancial
need for new or
--Lltered governmental
services in any of the following
areas:
a. Fire Protection?
b. Police protection?
c, Schools,)
d. Parks or other recreational
facilities?
e. Maintenance of public facilities,
including roads?
f. Other governmental services?
tie -M. . Will the, proposal result in:
a. Use Of substa:fttia amounts of fuel
or energy?
AN . L
b. Substantial increase in demand upon
existing sources
of energy, or
require. the development of new
80utcQ8 of energy?
16 Utilities Will th, e Proposal result
U-7-n—eZU-for
new system.,
I I L I , or sub-
sta-btial alterati tis to the follow,
ing
Utilities-,
Appendix
F page 5 of 9
YES MAYBE
NO
a, Power or natural gas?
b, Communications systems?
c, Water?
d, Sewer (will trunk line be extended,
providing capacity to serve new
development) 7
e. Storm water drainage?
&
17.
Human Health. Will the proposal
result in:
a, Otleation of any health hazard or
T)otential health hazard (excluding
I
mental health)7
b. Exposure of people to potential
health hazards?
18.
Solid Waste, Will the proposal result
in any significant impacts associated
with solid waste dis-posal or litter,
control?
19.
Aesthetics, Will the proposal result
w— f
in the obstruction o any, public
designated -or recognized, scenic vista
open to the public, or w" I L. 11 the
proposal result in the creation of an
aesthetically offensive site open to
pUblic view?
20,
Recreation. Will the proposal restilt
in an impact upon 'the quality or
quantity of existing public rocrea-
ti
ion facilities?
21,
Archeological/Historlicali' Will the
proposal result in an alteration. of
a significant atcheological'or
historical sitel structure, object
or building?
22.
Mandatory Findings,Qf SigAi.ficance,
a, Doe �s the project 'have the potential,
to,degrade the quality of the
environment, suhstantially reduce
the habitat of a fish or wildlife
species, cause a fish'or wildlife
population to drop below self
Appendix F
page 6 of 9
AIL
YES MAYBE
NO
levels$ threaten to
elitaining
minate a plantor antmal com-
munity,'reduce the number or restrict
the range of a rare or'.endangered
plant Pr animal or eliminate iMportant
ex,amplas of the major periods of
California history or prehistory?
D-,ies theproject have the potential
t,..: achieve short term benefits to
the detriment,of publicly adopted
long-term environmental goals?
c. Does the project have impacts, which
are individually limited, but
cumulatively considerable? (a project
may impact on two or more separate
resourcesi Where the impact on each
resoarce is relatively small, but
where the effect of the total of
those impacts on the environment is
significant,.),
d. Does the project have environmental
effects -,Alhich will cause substanLial
adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
Appendix F
page of
80-08-08-02
X11. DTSCUSSION OF ENVIRONME"ItIAL E-VALUATXON
�LOJL)ct DescriPtion
1. BXief Description:
of 4 parcels of 0* Variance tO minimum parcel size to allow er
eation
.45 acrqs± tW? residential use On 1-75 ac;ve site.
2. Location: Southeast of Front Street. between YokWil and Gerke Street,-,,
Dayton area; southwest of Chico.
3. PrOPOSed Density of Development: I DU/0.45 a0re+ (2.3 DU/acre overall)
4. Access and Nearest public Road(s): Front Street (15-16;)Wide paved
road), Yokum Street (12, wide Paved driveway 'to 2 house
Street (12, wide gravelled road) Gerke
5. Method of,Sewage Disposal: Septic systems
�6. Source of'Water Supplyi Common well thrOugh homeowners a
or mutual -water Compan'
Y- ssc-iation
7. Potential for further land divisions and devbj pment!
curre'A-f' standards for parcel sizes involving so MinlInal under
systems. eptic tank�leachfjeld
Environmental Setti
Setti
PhYSiCal- Rrorj-v,,,- nti
1. Teriain
a. General Topographic'Charaoter: Relatively level With gentle
depression along Proposed boundary line betwe
and 3 & 4. en parcels I & 2
b. Slopes: Less than
2. Soils
a. Types and Characteristics: Vina loam, soil depth generally in
excess,of 6 feet, 'Well adapted to irri
'W011 $Uited to Variety of crops. gation, good permeability,
3- Natural Hazards of the Land
a. Earthquake Zone, Possible fault about I mile tc, e6(st.
b. Potential Subsidence Ar3a.- X
Expansive Soil Potential: Moderate
4. Hydrology
Surface Water: Shallow�dr(-Ainage swale, traverses S ite from
Oast-wes� intermittent drainage to South flo-wing to southwest.
Appendix, r paqe 8 of 9
13
0
a
80-08-08-02
Ifl. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMEUMAL 3VALUATION (continiaed)
b. Drainage Qharacter,Istics: Good natural drainage of soils;
no storm drain bystt,�m, in Day -bon area.
a. Annual Rainfall (normal)-. 20-22"
Biological Environment,:
Vegetation- Almond ort�hard, oak tree,, eunalyptus trees, underlying
grasses, landscaped pla�nts and garden aro and house.
Cultl1ral Environment:
6. Butte County General F_'
an designotioni Crzhard and Field Crops
BxistiDg Zon--,'ng: A-40
8. E.,,tisting Land Use on-site:, Resid-nee wi�h garage, rnaall almond
orchard
9. Surrounding Area:
a. Land Useso. Single family ro.sidences to the northwest, west and
east, almond orchardo, graii4 and other aGricultural pursuits
to the south and further awny to north,, :,last and west.
b. Zoning: A-40
c 'Gen. Plan designations: Crohard -,nd Field Crops
d. Parcel Sizes,: 0.2 acre+ tG 216 at-resq-
10i Nearest Urban Area: Chico, 6 rilles±
114 Relevant Spheres of lnfluence.- Durha'n Recreation District� Butte
County Mosquito Abatement Dist3,..�ict.
12i Fire Protection Service:
a. Nearest County (State) Fir(z. Statio, btation 45 (Durham,)
b. Water Availability: Wells, fire trucx capacity
13. Schools in -Area: Durham Unifa:,4, Schools
The following impacts have been ioentifi,3d for this proposal. Due to
the eux-rounding parcel sizes,and i,esident-41al, uses, the:litaited amount of
lard involved, t-�e protection afPc,rded t.o large agricultural. parcels
in the vicinity by the A-40 zoning and Grobard and Field Crops desig-
nation, (Land 'Use Map of tb-- Generc�;I Plar.) � the feasibility of'the, ,
0.45 acre± parcels to accommodate, septic' 8YE'teias and the availability
of a water supply for th- three r4ew parcels proposed, the project '-q
r-ot expected. 'to have significant, envirorzental e:tf ects.
Drainage is, an existing dilemma 2".n the J),ayton- area. A storm drain
system does 4o6 exist and there Is not o,nearby natural drainage courme
to which runoff can be di:oected. This -Ls a key factor'to consider in��
allowing the creation of additioiaal lotr,, for residential u e in.,Dayton..
App endi,x F ipage 8a of
80-08-08-02
11.1. DISCUSSION OF EN111RONMRNTAI, LOVALIJAITION (cor,)JUxiUf�id)
1b, 3b, 16e: Compaction and, ovevcovering of the soil by, buildins
structures and related impervious surfaces with an increase i -a surface
water runoff. Thou�h -the loam soils have a good natural drainage cap-
ability, reoidential devel(jplaetit� at -the density pro ' p000d, will CUM-
ulatively add to the drainage problem in the vicini�Y. Xxisting lots,
most of which are smaller t.han the sizes proposed for this site, were
area -Led as part of the Town of Dayton. Vilder current standards for
land divisions to provide a permanent drainage solution. and provide a
leachfield area on a parcel which includes 100% replaaement area, tho
nearby- parcels (many of 8125 to 8700 square feet±) may not have been
approved,
IS, 4d: Reduction in agricultural productivity of a 1-75 acre site
with Vina loam soils; rcmoval of many of the almond trees for homesite
preparation.
3h: Feasibility- of septic tank-leachfield systems for the parcels.
The parcel sizes and loam soils indicatethat septic sys-Lems for thTee
additional residences can be accommodated on the 1.75 acres.
According -to Tom Reid of -the Environmental Health Department, one
well for four houses may not be workable. If the agreement were
to be cancelled in the future7 a well on each lot will probably
not work due to setbacks from the leachfield systems. A permit
for a public water system normally requires 5 or more lots.
8a.0 Alteration of planned land use in the area. In the absence of the
varianeb application, a General Plan Amendment and rezone would be
required. At present, a rezone.could only be considered for a zoning
district with a 5 acre minimum under the Orchard and Field Crops des-
ignatior- thas a variance woulct still be needed...
t
There are currently two homesites to the south-southwes-. These two
residences adjoin an almond. orchard and grain -growing land to the
south. Developmentof three resid-ences on the project.site should not
impair -the agricultural prcductivity of surrounding lands.
14a: Increased demand for pifolic services in an outlT,,ing area. The
Butte County Fire Department haa no requirements fo,? fire protection
at -this time. The Bi�tte 0oun'I"", Sherif f Is Department aommett,ed about
-trol services to the area.. Increased staff to al'104
the lack of pa
patrol coverage to the Durham -Dayton area is recommended as a condition
of project approval by tht, Sheriffiz Department.
16e Ref er to, lb, 3b'.
Appendix F page Sb:of 9
•
oll
•
TO,. Secretary for Resources
p'; 19
436 Ninth Street: Roo.m 131.1
Sacramento, C.A� 9580
CO&
sv:.P. �' 0 1 au"=Auft"m "Oft"
CXT County clerk �'O�tlorail
County of
25 Couxif7-v eL.-C.- r'ROM (Lead A n�y)
�� ""Lu ILL -urive
E. L
V-1 r 0 r1r, t�n
Orov I 7n �r� I �_dl-
----------
SUBJECT: Filing of t�lotice 0
f,Determination in CO"'Pliance with
Section 21108 ;Ir 21 52 of
the Public Resources Code
EP1 LO'7. JJ 80-08-08-02
0 ect f h'
r
Fa r
a iance AP
at 5,
ringhouse John Cro,,je
rate clea�_r"I`ngho`us�
7 1 -t -ted to Stal . .. ... .. . . ..... . .. . ..
0 t_ House
n EWC_'�
-t Person
Eavl L.. D.
! r a ox, e ep, one NUM er
ro
.10-ct: Locati-on—T.—E.
:1 .1
Daytox, area,' Southwest of 0 ama
P P *o�� f e c� -5 �e s Fr _iP t fo-n-.-
Variance to mirimllm p, I
Of 0.45 acros± for res--- size to alloW creation of 4 parcels
use on 1.75 acre site.
-------------
This is to gdvis a
that the Cow'Itly Flannim- corL -;'ss
lorl
has made the f011Owine, d e t e r-L;I ina t i o n s Lead Agency
project: regarding the above-described
The Project
have a significant effect on
not
the
environni ent.
2.
L7 An Environmental Im
D_ Pact RepOrt WrIs prepared 4:
ursuant to the D �or this DrojeC._L
rOvisions of CEQA, -and was certi 'ied.
required by SectiO-LI 15085 r
Code. (A) 14 dalifornla �-&MinliStrative
A Negative Declaratior, was
to th"'e. Provisions prepared for this t)roj
I Of GMA. A copy of ect Durguant
tion may be the , 'N*e,,a
examined at the Envi 1 6 tive D
ronment,,11 q eclarA-
evieW Departr...e ,.
7 County Center Drive, OrOVille,, Calif n.,
ornia, 55965,
A Notice of Exe,
not.
e*xempt fro '-On was filed indicating
is project is
m envir�onmental review,
Appendix TI
1;:? P Of
7-8 '*15
D.W. Sharer 0 A Cabral
'BOX 50 B Ord ycrry 0
d'
Chicol CA 959 61? �y &ago
0?1100� CA 9�qp(� BOX
0, A aw
39 -PG -g 9 926
C.L. 39 2r�-/i,5
Ord INu'ory S-bace & K Dodd John Marsha Crow"
Chico, CA 95926 nox L:),6 E Ord Ferry &tj
tag(.
Ord Yurry
Chico, CA. 95926 Cbico) CA 9�926
39-26-32 39-W-11-6
1� 39-27-58
Gilbert
9205 Aguas Deborah L. -Pi
Chico, CA 'hias Rd. Box 26 F Ord - Ferry Stage Jobn Crowe
95926 Front Strep
Chico CA ,I.,
7 95926 Dayton, CA 926
39-26-38 15
7,.m. Mead 39 -2? -47 39-2/-61
Rt. 2 BOX. 3L��? Brian Lance Benson
'errY Stage
Chico, CA, Box 26C Ord r S -R- & D-Ro Arnold
9,5926 Box 23A Ord2jerr
Chico, CA 95926 Chico, CA �y S -L,,
95926
39-27-3
39-27-48
Everetb L. Pearson 39-27--:62
Ord Fel.,ry Stage & 06.'M- Bethard Neil A� Morgan
Chico. Box 261-1 Ord Fe
I , CA 95926 Chico, CA rrY Stage 1 Box 926
39 -2? -S 959P-6 I )Urham CA, 95938
39-27-49
Derek & Jean cymbal 39-27-63
1412 Salem St. B.G. & N.j�' Silvius
Chico, CA Box 2613 Ord, Fe--rr S -M- & P.L. Sim.ith
95926 Y Stage Box 23B Ord Ferry Stae.;(,
Chico, C"'I 95926 Chico��CA
39-27-9 95926
39-27-50
& V -'J- Cartwright Geraldine W. 39-27-64
10294 Belcher St. Reasor Jon & R.M. Voi
Do tvney CA P.O. Box 1412
90242 Chico) BOX 23G Front St.
9�927 Chico, CA 95926
& 39--2?-51
Calvin Gail -ason 39-27-65
L�,Jpo pinel Joh Mark PaT�tal
Allen & Terry
Box 27 Ord Ferr
Sacramento, CA Y Rd. Box 2 �I
95838 Chico� CA 95926 3 Ord Fe,rpy Stage
Chico , CA 9�9 '
2 G
�9-27-P6
39-417- 5?3,
James 41'. P) 'a a k
J�Iox '19 0'r' -d 2erry stago 3911 i:,Ironb St. M-'
J.'char--1 Kc
BOX 26 jj R
40A 915926, Ohico� 'OA 95926 8 �n, d('
Chico,. CA
959P,6
David M. Mosiet, f? - ri - Vol 39-27-76
I�Ox Ord Fe-t%ry ;�tage BOX 231T Ord Fe, Se illian, 'D
'C�hicoj 0,A: stago asoatir
P
�592G Chico, OA 95926 Stage
A
�O :'
Ch Lc 01 CAr -
959-26
39-27-40
39, 2?�-57
James
1 &� G-M� '.1,jiller T.1'
2 .0ox 352 ,,14, & Thompson
Ord F Teri a. X
St,�(90 BOX 26K Blox 50
t Ord., Ferzy
1 4
DISTRIBUTION LIST ZoR �aEVI
RE, TS
.44�-Oounty Env. Healtij
-"'dounty Public Wor IRRIGATIOX WATER
'ks
998 �
ico ..B Wqtor Disto
�.utte Wate D st.
ait7 Of Bi
city of ch
CiV of aridjey D
city Of OP6ville urham jrr. Dist.
0:00ville TiC Irit, Digt..
citY of Paradise Dist.
:TJ71 County Ric"Va'o rr4 Dist.
TabIG Mtn!
2ansT)Ort"ItiOn Dept,
DCMST.T, Zhermall-to Dist.
er eek Water C06 ORM-TION PAOILITI
BlpoMex Mtn. Muttal Wrter 00. rea
Creek 8states tUVham Area R park Dist.
Butte Water j -),is oc- Park, Dist.
trict Feather River Roo. & par�'t Dist.
V — 7� Paradise Roe.
CA Water servi6e Co. (Chico
urban part of OrOv�lle) Richvele Roe, & Park Dist
Del Oro Water Co,, -7= stato parks & Rec# Dep
(Parad1se Pines) state t.
F pish & Game Dept,
Gather Falls �Louisiana 80'HOOL J)1ST11.TCj�,9
.v6cific)
FO j' 73- 99- *E7 r1f i e d
rest Ranch Mutual sutto oomw"�t7 college
Gran Mutual �Skanoen Sub.) ::=:Butte Count -y sup. of Seboojs
Green Acres �Glenilood Dr,._0hj,,) 0,A State U,,jj'*
Gridle� Fr -m Labor Camp lversit Ghi
Lake Madrono, Watel, Dist. ri -0 14
Magalia 00. Watei? Dist. Durham Unified
Merry Mtn. M Zeather Fal.js Union
Mills) utunl, �Clipper GoIdOn Feather unior,
Mulber Gridley High
ry Water �SE Chico) -Gridley Union
Worthweeds Mutual (Forest Ratch) OrOville Elementary,
Ramirez Water
Sp 16 Urion High
rings Of Living Waters 0110"Ll
'Richardson Springs) 0 Unified
Stirling City 11'alea-'MO Union
(D' P.'(,Qneer Union,
I&MOnd I-ater 1,in�ional)
ZT—Z Thermalito tfnioj3.
Vista � Mutual (Du'-011'am)
COM WITY . S13XVICPS
Richvele Sanitary Dist.
N. Burbtbic -pub. Utilit
COMM, Serv. Dist'. :M_
DRAINAGE Dist.
(S.'Oroville & XeI15 M'Ldgo)
02?eok Draj aage Dist Skansen St1b. (08A 21
FIBOTR' CAL PoWa Sterling City Sewer KRint. Dist.
ac ThermalitO 1,rr. Dist.
Woo SeTVico Area 26)
FIRE PROTECTION RESOURCE lv"Aqgq�mv
Departme b Dept,'
Fire Protect. Dist
Coun�y Vire U. S.
State D,1r,b,Oa .. n U rest Sor�_ir
,e
eau c7 Zand Man
Bur
MM'TJITO AB'ATEV[ENT DISTRICTS OTHER- agemont
"'Fu rh a� 74�� V If o`&� tu t t e Ootint
99L-102 PROTECTIoN y
"_71M
ff.&_,1tway pal -
.74
WAMW�
Ask,
1w
PLANNING DEPARTMIHNT'S INTERDEPARTMENTAL REVIEW
REQUEST. LtoYjgw-&-QommaM
APNO.: -AC4�99—';A
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: —j=janZe- +6 MinJM113M g e31q size to al I-epw ow"A5�qare_
4uLt=a1-,4Q o4ro-p=ze14-
LOC ATION: on -C)LA-- vtzt Road,
APPLICANT: john
ADDRESS:
OWNER: same
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION SCHEDULED
RETURN DATE REQUESTED' ASAP
DATE DISTRIBUTED:
.-o
ATTACHMENTS: Copy of application & plot plan,
RETURNED.:
COMMENTS: Due, to our department being Inadequ ly staffed, we -currently do not
...Provide patrol services -6o this area.
Without a staff increase that would
a1low natrnl r-.mrz-mqaP +^ +iqn
R—LA—N�NING 09PARTMENTO,� INTERn PDA
T
REQUEST: fla&&-&LDmmmA
A P NO.
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
fffterfry cpnnizel 11A�IiAh f A—i
LOCATION,, On thA PA114-h n4 Af
--Of Ord k2rr Rp
------ __X _ad%—b—etweerL Yooum & Gerk6 Streets
Dayton
APPLICANT:
ADDRESS:_.
OWNER:
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION SCHEDULED
RETURN DAT� REQUESTED14 ASAP
DATE DISTHIBUTED:
ATTACHMENTS: COPY of application & Plot plan.
REM iNED:
TO:
R�QUEST:
APNO.:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJ8CT, --Y-ajL:LLan(
-11.0 A
-� E"
IVIAT OF FORESTRY
BUTTE COUNTY
ME IPJTERDr!!p
IMENTAL REVIEVV ?EQUES'r,.-.':r.'j'lA
-al EhVivc-rmexitaj Ilealth
REQUEST:
AP NO, 0�0 'q'tv�Uj
DESCHIPTION OF PROJECT:
_tr
62 A I
a
?/ad/ro A
SLIP)
TO
1pprc)v;l
...... Necessary action
-i .... Prepare reply,
7;9 58
I""'Note And retur, 1 "17
Otte
t
"Note and file � Ojn
lv�8,c, Ing
....,.Investigate 01� led it
.",—Signatt tt "
ire j; J- 1011,
4L
.-Ii.,confer
"I
....... 4s requested
3-ZonMett�,j
`711E'Or infor
inatiou Oil 11
"Pe" telephone
cOnversatiotj
Su, rTe COUN7.y
Memorandum
fay. ronmenfal Rsvlew POPf-
SLP 5 1980
J�40,w—i 1,;nvironmen-tal Peviev DeP
SUBJECT. -,�cheduling DUN COU*
b AT F-*. September 41 1980
The f 011OWing proj ect is ready �,o bo sc,�Ied-Ljlnd f olo hez vixu�'-
Variance J!iD Log 80-08-08-02
john Grove AP ft 39-27-58
Thank You-
—G D F -"PA-. F -
TER
T --k M_F- N'T A L R Evs
_-D S i�A_R XM L�.Q Lk
To. I- EST
01ijaelital I'lealt-11
REQUEST:
AP No, IVI
D�SCRIPTION OF PROJECT.,
...............................
LOCATION: �0rd.-ILleggy Bo ai.
—bpj�
eg �y
APPLICANT:
Roviow Dopf.
ADDRESS, L_a&aet, .0a
SEP 111980
OWN E R:
ou"o courity
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION SCHEDULED
RETURN DATE REQUESTED! ASAP
DATE DISTRIBUTED:
ATTACHMENTS: COPY Of OPPIlultion & 1 lot plan,
RETURNE00
COMMENTS: L"-1(2�,-,
kat.
-ZIL ele
- ----------
_A. 4,4A J--� Lot L
�161'1 "I -
au—
WAW
00TmITY 1:).TIVK*MG COMMISSIOX
Notlice is hereby given by -the Butte County 141anning oompliosion
thalu Public he,rings will be lAeld On Wodnesday,
1980 SOPtemb1pr 24
at 7:30 P.M. t tte 00untY Board 8jjpexvjsOrsI
he Bi;L
ROOM, L'4bte County Administration Center, 2� Oounty aent&r Drj've,
OrOville, Oaliftrn,�af regarding thefollowi,s, I
19 John Crowe � Variance to Mininum parcel 0,jze to allow tot,"
-45 acre parcels, move or lesso On P:vOPeI'tY zoned "41-40" ,
Uglcultural-40 8cre POMels) 100ated on �.he Bo7jth side of
0.
rld 71erry Road, between Yo1mm and Gerke StS., identified as
'AP 39 -2? -589 Dayton.
ITMI ON WI -11011 AN -r!VVIRONM22TTALnjPA0,1',1
12
-N—IM1" 1
I I MOTj 7 9 r
Butte CounLY Board 09 Supervisors - General Plan Amondment
from GraZing, & Open Zand to Agri(.,Ultupal-Reaidential Property
located 200 to 3000 ft, east of Hvrbr. 32, approx" 4 Tailo's South
Of YOrGst Ranch� idettified ,�s AP 63.01-101 & lopt more par-
tiOUlarly deneribed as;
Parcels 2 & 3 of parcel map Of record on page 7? ofMap
BOOk 63 in the of9ice of the EtItte COUntY Recorder,
Containing 119.42 acres$ more or lesst Forest Ranch.
The above mentioned applica
ronmental illipact repo-, t'On's' PetitiOnsv maPS� draft envi-
rts and/or negative reports are on file aud
available for Public viewing at the office,of the PVI�te
Planning Department County
1 9 7 County Cente!r� Drive� Orovillo, California,,
Impaeb Reports axle also availabl
COU*At�k libraries, e at 0011le8e and
BUTTE COUNTY SILANNING cojjjqjjjS,(�j0jj
BE, TTYE B U -JR
DIRECTOR OF PTAITXINra
TO BE PUBLI1812D IN TJT_Ci 011100 ENTERp
,RISE
SEPrIMMER 11 1980, pj.,00RD ON THUMDAY
AML
elm
September 17o 1,180
Mr. JOhn CTOWO
Front 8treet
nayton� Ca,
Re Variance at AP
Dear �Ir. (�rowe:
Enclosed is a COPY of
ings collcOrning your
request for a vArian to
-, �4n mum parcel size to. allow
four 45 -acre Parce 5 11
�\,sotjtjj side or Or,l Ferry
poado 'between yolmy
n (I ("I
CW�?ireatsv in Dayton.
A public hollritOgnn
tter has been sci for the
Planni C, Oil
"r retul,ar mooting on
8eptevibe'r 080. TIds
17100tinlq Wq be ."Ield in tbe
Board of ;u rvi,,;o, Roolli)
2.5 (*otpity Conter '),rive,
s c eduled
to begin at
Should you have any �ql'0-5tions, Plea$O—fltel fr.Oe to
contact our offices
Sincerely,,
�Botty(t Blair
piret-,tor of Planninfr,
Ad
Enc
60PUOmber 2�7
John crowc.
k0hico), CA MX!G
Re'.
Ap
3
Dear Mr. orot,,,e:
At; the, rcirulnp
of n -he, Bu�,�e ao
Oil 6opt, 0-htj,pj- ntir Tionninr 00mmimsion
1980s your V71plic, J,
fo- Vp -i3OLC(
ncro on
Ito allow
n PVcV�1t,7 :�oned A-4011
sj("o of
0,1"d Verxr". Road, .11
ky
ze
VMS
1-o are 110 n
Ls af i;er 0 PP 0- dElY Appeal Poxiod, wilic.,11
jo P.n. On oo,
c011W,-J,,d(-;r(A4. E,�;rnrited o tho -Jar!uTX0- Will be
Official approval dat;e ()f ihe
Of ;;he Plaxining 'Commission
Of Septomber 24, 0,;r
Should you have a, que. t onn
feel freo. -�o 0ont
Director Plann-"k,;,
October 17,
198(i
Pront Street
Dayton (Mlico)
Ca.
Re: Variance
on
Dear Mr. Crowe:
Fuclosetl are
the otig*
n e copy of your Variance
No. 31-4 to
allow f
LC arcels, on the south
ido of nr<l.
s 3
per,ry 0, be
w en �okum and GeTke Streets,
in Daytoni
You will plea
11 1)
copies and return them to
us . 110 will
t,
on h, I them
valid-ated by tl)e. rhairratn
of tho Btitte
C
iinty P aming
Conmission atd the original
will be rettir
ou for
your records.
1�'You have
any questions,
please feel froo to contact
this Offices
Sincerely$
Bettye Blair
Director of r1annilig
Ad
Enc
VARIANCE
BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COmMIsSION October 17, 1940
31-4 'Ji MOO.
VARIANCE No,
AS-�E�ISOA'S �PARCEL �NO,
Pursuant to the Provisions of the Zoning Ordinance of the County of BU tte and the sPecial
conditions set (O.rth below:
—ILOL4N CP.Mqj
NAME hereby granted a Variance
Jn, accordance wl th appi IcatlOn f I led:
—.toalloW four o4ri-acre
�d�ate ---------
-Darcels. on the South si"" f
1 0 0 Verr�r R6ad betWeen Y k
I rke st:roets, in Dayton
SPECIAL CONDITIONS:
Subdivision Of tile parcel JquSt confol-m to, tile conflp
'Vrat,01,
Or the variftnce ,,ranted ancl co"1151y with tile Butte
Sul�di,vision OT(IL'Iance and Resolutlon or, T)eslgn St rl , C' n t)r
Applicr.11t InUSt also colaply a card.S.
With all other State aild
ordinanceS and regulations,
I hereby declare Uhde
r Penalty Of perjury that I have read JhO foregoing conditions,
that they are in fact the conditions which were impos
and that I agree to abide fully by said conditions. ed upon i,he -ranting of t I
his Variance,
C,
Dated.,
4
-ikp-p'11-1C �t
N 0 T E'., Iss
Vance o this V&ibhce'does not wa'
ive require'rnent of obtain! 'nq
1011ment Pormits before'st ng BUIldi
a 9 coptrUctjoh,
an'Y�bther requirements. nor does 't�vaive
CC: Health Depattrhent
Departm.ent of Public Works (2)
Fire, t)epattment
Chairman, of monming tornm15810.1
n
BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING CO�J�JJS,9101V
STAF17 VINDJ�Jos - SoptomLor 24, 1.9,11)0
John Crowe - Variance to minimum parcel size to allow fotir
.45 acre parcels, more or less, OTI PVOPOrty Zoned IW -4-011
(Agricu.1tUral-40 acre parcels) locatod on tile SOLIth Sirle
ot Ord Ferry Rottd, between YoJ:um and Gerle S'ts., identified
as AP 39-27-58, Dayton.
TI) c applicant states that the reason for the PPlication is to
81low parcel to be divided into 4 parcels. 11a' also states that:
Surroundi
.ing parcels are approximately .20 acres.
The area was rezoned from "A-211 (General) to "A-4011 i 1974 as
part of one of th,e first large rezones initi,"ted by thTle Mpunty
(Southwest Chico) . The Gall eral Plan desipnation for the entire
Dayton area has beqn Orchard and Field Crops since 1,971.
The Project site represents three-quarters of the one -lot block-
originalily shown as a 1'8eminaryll site on the Dayton Subdivision
'filed on June 25, 1868. The present 1.75 acre parcel vyas created
in 1976 via a parcel map and a variance to the 40 -ac -re minimum
lot size.
Most of the original lots in 'the Dayton Suhd.ivision were 661 x
1321� Sj712 square feet or exactly .2 of an acre, At least 20
of the Subdivision lots are owned separately and occupied by
single family residences.
Public Works commentg that most roads In this area are substandard.
The Environmental Health Department does not.t0commend approval
6-6 this variance for th,�, following reasons:
1. Applicant may have prohlems. meeting the Sul)divison
ordinance -requirements for the Proposed (4) lot division.
2. Lots are not large enough to place an individillal well and
sewage disposal system on each.lot.
3. A community utell with an easement agreement may not be
approved. The Subdivision, Ordinance requires that where
individual well's are proposed that there be a well site
ot each lot .
4. Development oF a water company as pr,oposed under, a Mvtual
Water Company agreement wou*,Ld :1',e Possible, however, it, may
rot I)e economical to, develop and nay,the.monitorina and
PossDIC future permit, fees for, sitch 4 snalli publioc water
system.
0113y,
BUTTE COUNTY PILANNINC, c'mimissiniq
STAFF FINDINCS - September 24, 108o
�Division Of Forestry has no Objections.
Pacific Gas 4 Electric (Cllico) has no comment to the project
at this t'llte' 1101kreverlp certain easement along Proposed lot
lines and Street Er
orktages will be needed for 1) blic utilit,
in the event th u 'Les
e PrOJect is finalized.
The County Sheriff states duo to Our department bein
staffed, we c g inarlcOtlately
uryOntly do not provide patrol services to -0 ,
Without a staff incr�aso that would all I I's area.
patrol coverage to the
DLIbliam-Dayton area, we request that thioslvproposal be denied.
Section, 24-49 of Ordinance 1750 "The Comprehensive Zoning Ordinancet,
states:
"Variances -from the terms Of this chapter shall be granted
Only when7because Of special circumstances
the Property, includ, applicable to
surroundings, ing size, shape, topo�,raphy, location or
th(I strict application of this chapter deprives
such property of Privileges enjoyed by other
,fi.property in the
vicinity and under identical zoning class ation.
If the Commission can make these findings,
approve the var' it Would be proper to
condition5i iance. Approval should be subject to the following
Subdivision Of, the parcel must conform to the configuration of
the variance granted and comply
Ordinance and Resolution )E ith the Butte County Sub(Ii
Des�iglln Standards. . vision
2. Applicant must also comply With all other state and local
statutesi ordinances and regulations.
BUTTV. COUNT'Y PLANNING COMM-TSSION
,MINIJTE!� Se'ptojnibe't 24, 19so
ITM ON WRI011 NEGATIVEJ D T ON
John Cro�wo - Vex.janqo tO millimum parcol size -bo allow f 0,ar
.45 acre parcels, mo'M or loss, on properl;y zoned . ti
(Agri 0UJtUV&l-.L�0 a "A-40
oro Paroelts) located on the solxbh 111,de of
Ord Fer:rw Road 11otwoon Yokum. and Gorlte 81t -s., idOntilLed as
A.P 39-27�-58-, Da'yton.
Staff findings were read by Mr. Gaiser.
Proponents jol I In (Crowe , 3939 Front S eet, Dayton, said that in 1976
Whe7l they Purchased this PrOPertY andtPlanted tlle!T oTchard it did not
appear that anytliing in the area would, develop, but that they are now in.
undatedL by children, do
gs) trash, bicycles and liabi"itY insurance be-
cause.the children like to climb the trees. He added that his Proposed
110t size 'would be about 2.25 times tj
In the area .10 Size Of the Other existing lots
�, and that 110 was just asking that he be relieved of his job
Of "Curator and caretaker Of the Dayton Public Park".
Mike McEnespy,, Ivith McCain & Associates, and speaking as a neighbor, I said
thOt MT- Crowe liad all the problems that lie had enumeratedo and later—
in response to a, question—said that to his know,
-) use Of one ivell for 4 parcels as was the proposal
County Prohibition on the edge there was no'
for this development. It was also' noted that there are both wells and
Septic tanks On the surrounding o20 acre Parcels.
Commissioner 'Wheeler questioned whether thl
is Problem could be s.*olved by
an 1,11tetim zonei Commissioner Bennett commented that the applicant is
'tt the mercy Of� the Health Depa-, tme.nt--no matter what.
Commissioner Wlieeler said that we should grant the variance.
Lambert� finding that becaus COMMISSioner
this pro e of thc-,size, location and surroundings of
PertY AOt to grant the variancewould deprive this property of
P�rivilOges enjoyed by Other Property in the vicinity and under identical
classification, and ade a m6tion for approval subject to the
Cond4'tiOTIS as recommended by
Bennett. staff. Her motion was seconded by Commissioner
AYES: Commissioners Bennett� Wheeler, Lambert and V*
ice Chairman max.
NOES., No one.
ABSENT: COmmi5$.Ioner Gilbert.
ABSTAINED' No one.
Motion carried.
Conditions are,,,
Subdivision of'tbe parcel
must conform to the configuration of
the va,riqzice granted and comply 'with the totte County SU Ision
Ordinance and Resolution Of besign Standards, bdivi
2. Applicant must also
COMP1Y with all 0 h
ordinances and regulations. t er State and local stat:tes'
U
AL
%
A
.,00e
A3
� ll—,
ell
/*
0000
7 P.
DAY-rm
6 qp
AO",,
�0\
XN
61
00 99
9 0
66
76 �5. ��o/
ok
'oole,
54
WW' p)F.- rK E C T
�2
DAYT04( SITE
\00� \k6
10
06\,
�06 kk
Ok
.00
r
BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING CO
m
HEARING. -DATE -S. ISS(ON
TE/A &e 771) ]Igo
/Y ko w F
T -To
APPLI -AIN
WNFR.
In
RE'
—QUEST. IFA, �IA NC C
'EXISTING �Z
NE.,
0 L
E
Lb, N
1%"-.%^OUNTY OF BUTTE
r COUM CENUR Dnra
e55vo� An -rum
OROVILLE, CAIIFOIMIA 95965 rc TO
Div
44
0 FICE OF
PLU".40 Comossiou
39-27-40
JamOs &. G.M. Miller
Rt. 2 Box 352 0 -
Chico, CA 95926
AND&
t Q,
4!j
o
14