HomeMy WebLinkAbout039-310-015ID"4
41,
Tv TN"- On. I
lop 'A".
1j,
-16
it
10
to
�yl
Ali
OW,
Ail
Ay
Its
th
stoCK
Mofl6n by.,
Ayol No Abo 7tnj Absont
rl
a
Wax
TOTA,Lt
liQlRUCTIONS TO VIARIANU APPLIC0.3
1
If applicant is not the owner, Written authorization -by the owner orother proof of agencYMAt be tub -
mitted in order for tho applicalt to legally sign the application Application shallbe con�ldored void It
hot signed by the owner or legal agent.
2i
,All items on application shall be filled in as completely as possible, ]f an Itorn is hot applicable, please
Indicate by the term "NA",
3,
It Is important that tho applictint tuppi nni accurate description of tbfj location of 111(y proposed- project,
y
including the following:
parcel number'(s) (from the tax bills or Asse3sor's Maps),
b, Street addresses (if Dvallalcife),
d� Distances and directions to named streets, bodlog of water or tailtoads�
C
roarteen '(U) copipi; df' a detailed plot plan of adequate scale to clearly show� p! -oposed bullclibos and
Improvements, folded to BK x 1.1 Inches, she 1 11 azcompany and be made part of the "Application for Varl,
ante". The plot plan shall include the following information;
0. A scaled drawino.of the p4woe,l(s) bounclarlds.
b, Location and dimensions of all existing and proposed improvements on the property,includ.
Ing buildings, driveways, parkino, aeens,-wallt, septic wks and leach fields.
C. Location and borne of bordetIng strects, access roads, nearby crossroads, streams, bodies of
water and rallroAdg,
d. North arrow and scale of draWipg.
5.
The "Application 4or Variance" is subject to public hearings and approval 4y,iho Planning PiJimmisslon�
Any special conditions of, approval shall be made a part of the approved 'Variance" and' shall Jbg binding
on the a plif a stated in Chapter 24
p r,,ant. The procedures for County action On Variance applIcatioris ar
of the Butte County Code,
6.
VARJANC�S from the ternis of the zoning ordinance shall be granted only When, because 'Of tPeCial
circumstances applicable to the property, Including si2e, shppe, topoqNbhy, lcicatl6ii or surroundings, the
deprives such property of privileges ehjoydd, by other property
strict application of tile johing ordinance
Ir the vicinity and under Identical zoning classification,
Any variance granted ihall be subject to such conditions as Will assure that the adjustment thereby nuth
orized shall not constitute a grant of special privileges Inconsigtant with the litnitaildris Upon other pro,
pertlot In the vicinity and zone In Which such property is tituatod, Any such ConclItl6h imposud upon .
issuance of a v6rilahcd must be related to the use of the property for which the variance is requested.
A va'dahce shall not be granted for a parcel of property which authorizes a use or activity which is hot
otherwise expressly authorized,by the zone ro-quiatlon governing the parcel of property,
1,
Application fees at o (ddtO qre $ Fees may be paid
In cash or by check,made payable'to "Treasurer Of Butte County"..
8,
Before submitting a variance application, opplicarit it requested to discuss with staff all questions about
application reqUh,0M0ht$, COUhtVP;,'OUrd`u�t;t, icinlrig provisions and "special circurnstaricos".
NNING Oovllisaxox StMMARY 'I.E�
Jean Favilla
1379 S tanley Avenue, Cb1coj CA 95926
n n io*
OWN LR' -Same
yRojBCT 'DES(,
111:pTON Variance to the one acre minimum lot area requiriciment
to allow the creation of four .9 acre parcels, zoned SR.,,I,.
On the West side of Miller Avenue, approx. 1000 feet Sou�th
LOCATIiii
of,Chico River Road, south of Chico.
ASSM$OR's PAIRCEL NUKBER�S) 5
ZONING _.SR -1, GIZ.' PLAN P R OJ M-1 T CONSISTENT?
11ATE-A,)?PLICATjOX PMv, I V F, D 871.8-81
DATE R.EZONIN4, PEPITIO14 . 8TGNATURES OU -MED FERCENTAGL
DATE 1J,,'GA!j -�OBSCRJ
�TION PiED OR OMEED
J)Allt PUBLICATION NOTICr, WRIVIn"n 3"'q �;Opr- lwl�lsam
DATE DISKLY AD T-REPARE-D
PLACE NEWSI'APER NOTIOX(S) PUBLISIMVID 0.
P-� G. B-1
DATE MAILING LTST RREPARED
DA TS MAIL -OUT XOTICtS WRITTEN MAILED NUMBER
DATE COMISSXON I;XHIBXID IREPARS-D,
DATk,", STAIT FMING31 PRMAX�ED
-��AVIRONKENTAL ft�—,QATEGORICAL I= PTION - DATE' V ILED
S&TERMIa.&TION
AND DATE 'GAV DR -,L TION DATE ADOPTED
Ph IVL ARA
A /4
IMI A14 - DATE CERTTFIED
IWV P T REPORT
OTHER
COM11118SION M�kli ING DA;TB$
COMMISSION ACTION
BOARD ACTION eL
5-14F./I 4:71 A I
;7-
Pro i o v t
APPBNOIX I;
Date Viled (tt
f."nvironmewa]. TnformnVion F orm
(To be. oompleted by nplAicAnt)
6ENEIb%t INFORMATION
1, Name and addross of developer or project sponsor,
of
Assessor's tlock and LoF
3. Pame, addr.o.T.o, and telop mo numl-)er of persati to be cont,,;icted
c lzz�
oncerning this pro cot; 42.4,
42
4 Type of projoct,, (i�e. rOv,0nitIFI, B'UbdiVisiOil)
V
5, List a,- sribe any other related pOrmilts and other public
approvals�i I for this project,
thoso required by
city, regil a "Ind fode-i-141 nnILmicies., 4UIL4--
6. Existing zoning district:
7, Proposed usm o f site,
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
J
Site size. 7-/ X 3'� 7
9. Squate footage of building(s)
10 Number of fA oors of coq.5�vucti=
lli Amouat of utf-street park�lhlr, Provided.
12. Attach site d-evelopmont plaii.
oed soboduling OU
13, fte Col. Plinning 90�ft
14� As.qocia'tod project -Is. AUG� i 8 mi
15 AntioiPated iticrem6ft tal dc -Volop mont
A -n ag
n'blo, idi% V, -,0 "o
k
APPENDIX t
16, If residential, �neludci Hie mjijjj.)cr op VnItS, schvdule of 'unit
sizes) and type of household si,ZU expectLid,
17, if 60MMerCial, kndiCAtO, LhQ t�VI)e t4h(it nofi,01borhood, city
or regionally orienteld, square fooia,p'
facili t ,0 'Of, Sales axon., and loadin�,
ties.
181. If industrial, indicate LypO, e,,;Liuiatecj crilloytIle
DL- per shift,
andloading facilitias,
If institutional indica�o tjj(,1
111".tJor
'Jon, e�9ti'm".1tod
employment par shift, OsLimated occ�upanc
y, IoAding focilitieso
and co'mmuni-y benefits VO be derived rromthe prc)JOe't,
20. If the project involves a Variance, c0ndl[ional Use or rezoning
application $,�ate this and indic
requ Ired. lite clearLy why the applica,tion is
Ate the follouting itemi applicable to 10ie project or its effects?
Piscuss below all items c1locked yes (attach additional sheets as
'necessary).
YES No.
21- Change in existing
, fe:atti.ros Or- any beacheg, lakes,
or hil is, or sub-9tantial alceration of ground contours,
22, S / ignificant change it
�j scenic views or vistas, from
existing residential areas or ptiblic laids or roads.
25i Significantly clUMAL- Pattern, S ale or
f . c tharacter of
general area o . pro�, ect
24. S'
,nificant: amounIs of solid waste oi- litter,
25, Chango in dust, ash, smoke, fumovs or odors iti,
vicinity,
26, Siqnificant chzilnge, J' lake, stream or ground water
n
quality or quantity, 01: 471teration Of existing drainage
patterns,
27. Substantial Change in existing ftoise, or vibration
levels in the vicinity,
28,1 Site on filled land or on slope of 30 percent or mote,
29. use or diaposal of pot materials
entiall,
y hazardous
such as toxic &ubstancos, fl4ammables or explosives.
'Appendix r� Oge 2 of 3
P,
BMW.,
jr!
�4
UY Durham 1 v;.' 1,
v
arxilse T-11
v ov—, k
'.'Il.vnlu Irr.
Vavo U 0C Tur
Tablij Mn -
0 un 1;.y
2VAnSP0
0 11ITTI,
WATI�R
reek Water f7;
o, r � t1kal water 0!0- Durham Ave� Mot
i�ev Mn. Dx "arx
pa.00 VOICT
'C 'tt Park
"02— van? , , s t Par a rl 1. .0 , 11
— 1�zuwue wul t or Re�'* �Ffirt
e
'A � 'I., —, State !-avh" vc,
Its, 'Is ov Ile)
urt"Au p 4 �%Irar*-
sh
SCHOOL DIST910TS
-"'tat�her Falls .4- ed
Butte ("oMmua
orest 14amoh Butte 00,1413ty u I
GVVA 1"TUA"Ma-1 CA %� sity,
0
't1QrLwr0d
Green 7.7
Durham Unif'ieil
Cridley Viarr, Labox, UMP
v 'Dist "Fal1c, UnIon
Lnke MdrOne �40te
Wprev DJ�81t# Foathel' 1111i0l�
rMhual k.C1iPPL':v i d 1, QY U i Sh
mills) Gridley
Chic -0) Orov y
Mul'berri Water (SE ille E'lemcrAm
�vorezi; Ranob i OroVillre "100 1iiF'h
ZT___ 3rmo
r5nF W -at (wo jj0je=o Uniot
Sp.rings) �Iloneew 'Union
Thormal; to U140A
EE
,rj a t 1 or.
�Diamo&, Intel. n1) A
61 W UR Di 3 b.
Dist
Ser..".
S%�b. (MA
MA Z kGj" $'terlin$ City
ro"epwr, 'UmLn8"k
Dit
RL Gourues Dept.
A. u
1PIRB 1VOTBOTION
, —of"' v ca r 0 t ec' t T) i f, Oatq
co ty 11jre D11c)a0mem U'S. ftreau ot lia
00 vorortvy
$tatc Divi.OiOl - 0 M104
e or
ftinty
ate 1,G
Slier Iti
.1 IaA
Count
AV'
PLAN NING COMM
7 COUNTY CtN'rER DRIVE — OROVILLej CALIFORNIA 96965
PHONE: 1534,4601
Atig U S t 2 7 19 8 1
,loan
1379, StonloY, Avqn(10
CA 95926
It Va ri. a n cc
AP
4 r Nis,, Pay.1.11a.:
I'll i s -is :to notify y0Q that wo
Ilave rccolvod, your applicati.on
ror a V.,Iriaylco, to til o o�nc acrci
mi,1111111.1111 lot A,1170,a requi,rement
t 6 al 1, o w . the I c r e a t i o 11 or Four
.8 aqro pa,rcals zoned SR -1
(Suburban Residential, acre
pal -col,$), loc-a,tod on tile we§t,
S ide r I lei approximatolY
o Mj Avenue
1000 ro'-f- south of Chico
River goadj south oc chi.co.
A
Ali initial study of,potential
onvi-ronmental com.4,cquencos
anti.cipated in connect.Lon with
this p-rojo-ct is b0i,ng c0I1IPT0t0d
by the AtIttC Count)' Plo,nning DopartIllent
und 1411,1 be
to you.
Should you have any (IL105ti-0115
regar,(Vilig this nvrlttor� please
feel -frcQ to' contact thi.s office.
Sincerely,
t t y �1, ma'i'r
D r 0 Vtor, of 'Planning
BB-1kt
PLANNING
DEpi�krMENT!91NTE R DEPARTMENTAL REMIEkLREQUEST
TO: Jqbn---Mendonsa,, Public Works
REQUEST, RgView'&s&mm=
APNO,:�i 39-31-15
b.ESCRIPTION OF PROJECT,-� A variance to the pne acre min'w.um lat area.req� irement
to allow the creation, of four .8 acre parcels,zoned SR -1.
LOCATION: 'On the West sideof Miller AvenUo,, apRrox..1000 feet
southp:f
Chico Rivet Road, south Of Chico.
APPLICANT, Jean Favilla.
ADDRESSi. 1379 Stanley Avenue, Chicoi CA 95926
oWN18R; Same
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION SCHEDULED
RETURN DATE REQUESTf-,D,,)&W IF N& RESPONSE IS RECEIVBD BY 9/1:0/81, i
IT SHAL,�
".
BE,.IA88UMBD THAT THEAB ARB NO tON I
CERNS;RlgGARDING
-
DATE DISTRIBUTED.- 9/27/81 THIS PROJtCT.
ATTACHMENtg-�'.Qopy of application.& plot plah4
AETURN M. 9'– 4-01
COMMENTS:
7-0
A. -
e NY 2 1A A '0/tt
V/ -4 tt-Yi 0 , orS e)
A
0
b
PLANNING
�DEPARTMENVS INTERDEPARTMENTAL BEVIEW R80UEST
TOi Calif.__Dept, of Forestry -
REQUEST: Beylow & Comrnpnj
AP Noi
DESCRIPTIONOF PROJECT: Avariance tb thoone Acre minjaUm lot Ards. requirement
td 9126V Cis dfGAtiOn,of foUr .6,40opartelij sonod, sh-1.
LOCATION-, On the ifert, gide ot,�jijjet AVellueo gppr
0x* 1000 feet south bf
Chico �Rjve,i _Road,, south of dhico.
APPLICANT, Jeaft FaVills
ADDRESS: 1379 Stanler Avenuen
-Chico, CA 09926
OWNER: Skma
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION SCHEDULED
IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED BY 0/10/81v
RETURN DATE REQUESTEW IT SHALL
BE'ASSUMED THAT THEREARB NO CONCERNS REGARDING
DATE DISTR18UTED., _jL27Z81 THIS PROJECT
0 C01+
ATTACHMENTS: COOV,,)f iapplication & plot P18n,
RETURNED:
COMMENTS., The following conditions will, '�o met nrice td�qcoupancy o any dwelling qn,tho
c ated parcels.
re
Presstirized watot for tird Protection is Avail -I
7' able, The ,pa e is locatqd,�:
within 1.000 'of a priyasurized water 6 'e�protect on purpo'ses. In
ystem suitable, for fii
lieu 'of carrying the entire Oostot a tire h llation, the applic' into��
drant ihsta mit, nitist, 2ay
the Vire Department Hydrant Fiindi, total to b;,3 Taid is based
on length af street ,fro:
nt��e of
the involv
ed_pardeldi, Pay t!t��5:ihto the Vire Department H�drA'tl'Ufid,ir. lieti, of venviding..:,
.,&.fire hydrant(sY._F*9ure.is based on
line'al� feet ot frorjta8&,tinies'$1.25_, per lineal footi..
u0un'tY FL"'i Warden.
I
APMDU F
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST.VORM
(To be
dom�pleted by Lead Agency)
BACKGROU ND, AFP�O�
�Vropohont. JOari Favilla
AcfdrOs and Phone NUmFe—r-WFPropo,ja,,-jL.,,- - ------
137, 19 Stanley Avehue
C Ico,
-------------
3. Da te of Checklist s
1 Ubmitt6
4
Agency Requiring Checitli,st'
5. Name Of Proposal if appliFa
c
ENVIRONM2NTAL IMPACTS
(Explanations Of all, 10yotill
On Attached sheets.) and "maybdOl answp-e.s are
required
Y M, S MAYBE 90
Earth. Will the proposal re'
sult in signj
ificant:
a, Unstable_earth conditions o r In
chan-es in
ge ogi, trU0 SI
01 6 sub's _tUre
�b. bisruptions# displacements, com-
PaPtion Or 6vercovering of the soil?
d. Change 'n
f,L 1 topography or ground sur-
Ud relief 4eatures,or
removal of'
topsoil?
d. Destruction, cover ing or modifida�,
J of
-Oft any UnL.q
PhySi Ique geolog or
cal features�
n
Incke, asLe Wind or wa er erosion
Of soils, either or
AV&
-�n off the 3.
Changes in ddpOs,.itfOh-ot,�eto . jo
s n
h
Of be'aC L' sands, or changeg,in silt
t1on"L dopos ti ' 10 , _ a
On
r erosion vhich
odi�y the c -
may L m hatinel. of a river -
6
stream or the bed of th: ocean or
Any a ,inlet or J_L e
ake?
g. f
'OSS Q, prime dgticulttirally pro-
Octive soils outside de�
urban a-,das?
A%
Appendik V page 1
of �9
0
YES MAYBE
NO
h,
Exposure of people or ptoperty�to
geologic hazards such as earthqualteso
landslides, mudslides, ground failure.,
Ahk
or similar hazards'?
2. Air. Will, the proposal result in:
a.
Substantial deteriforationof
ambient or local air quality?
b.
The creation of object'ionable
odorso smoke or fume6l
c,
Significant alteration of air
movement�, moisture or temperature,
or any change in climatej either
locally or regionally?
Water. Will the proposal result in substantial:
a,
Changes it, CUI.,ren 't'- sj or the course
t
direction of water movements?
bi
Changes in absorption rates, drainage
I tternsL, or the rate
pa and amount of
surface water runo�f?
c.
Neeld for off-site surface drainag&L
improvementsi including vegetation
c ion or'culvert
remova hannelizat
installa tLioft?
d,
s
Altagations to, the,cour e or flow
Aft
f o fiood watets?
VP
:e.
Change in, the amount Of surface
water inlany Water body?
f.
Discharge into surface waters, or
ift any alteration of sutface
-
w I ater quality, including but not
limited to temperature, dissolved.
AMIk
OXygen Or turbidi tyi
g,
Alteration of th& direction or
1W
rate of flow of ground waters?L
h,
Change in the 'quantity or quality
of g round water s either through�
hd als,
di Oct, additions or W't r-aw
�or through interception o anL
f, a
:Cuts L eXC L-Vaf OnS?
er by or
Ap idix F'- page
2 of 9
"0
,
41
YES MAYBE
NO
i,
Reduction in the :amount of water
otherwise,available for public,
water supplies?
J,
Exposure 6f people or property
towater relatedhazards such as
flooding?
4. Plant"Life. Will the proposal result
n
su stantial:
a.
Loss of vegetation or change in the
diversity o f species or number,
o,'F, any species of plarts (including
tvee s, shrubs, gtass, orops,
mic I roflota and aquatic plants)?
b.
Reduction of the numbers of any
unique, rare or endangered species
of plants?
d.
Intrjoduction ofmew species of
plants into an area,.or in a,barrier
to, the normal replenishment of
existing gpdcleq?
a.
'Reduction in Acreag e of any agri-
cultural drop?
Animal 'Lifei W4111 the proposal result
in
substantial,
a.
Change In the diversity of S, peciesj.
ornumbots of any §pedios of
animals (birds', land�anlimals
includl , pt leg fish and shell-
ing rep i
fish, benthic organismsj, insects or
mic,rofauna)l
b,
Reduction of the ntutb er s, of, any
uniq'uej tare or endan8lered species
1 S'
of animal'
c.
I ntroducHonl'of new.' species of
animals into,an,atea, or' rmqultin
a barrier' to the migration or
Adak
movement of ranimals'?
d
I
tL d dtion of encroachment upon . or
e u i
'deterioration to, eXistlng
wildlife, habitatl
Appendig F
page 3 of 5
YES MAYBE
NO
Noise. Will the proposal result in
s --Fs—ta
u, ntiaL-.
a. increases it noise levels!
b. Exposutaof people to severe noise
levels?
71
Li;,,ht and, Glare. Will the proposal
produce significant light or glare?
8.
Land Use. Will the proposal result
in a sIgnificant:
a, Alteration of the planned land use
of an'area or establish a trend
1
-C
411 demonstrably l.ead.to such
w hi Ii wil
Ash
Alteration?
b. Conflict with uses,on adjoining
properties, or conflict with
establi:;hod recreationali educa"
tional, religious or scientific
AMk
uses, of An area9
9.
Natura 1 Resources. �4ill the proposal
result in substa lalo
A. Demand fdri or increase in,the rate
fit,
Of use of anynatural resourced7
Depletion of any nonrenewable
natural resource?
I G,
Risk of Upset, Does the proposal
%
involve a -'risk ofan explosionlot
the,releds6 of hazardous substances
(includingi but,not limited to oil
pe I stic�des,,chemjdals or tadiation)'
in the event of at accident or Upset
conditions?
po 1''tid'n 'Will the -toposal,
pu a , p-
- --
signitican�ily alltdr the l6catI.oh,
I
distribution, ddri,sityj, 'or growth,
rate, of the human. population of an
area Or physically di,vidd an
established community!
12.,
H(5u6 in4,, Will the Prpposal,
y a'ff ec, exis ingL
,nit icantl _'t t housingi
or ,create a demand for Additional
housing?
F
page
YES MAYBE
NO'
13. TransOortati6n/Ci :L
rculat, 6ii. . will the
proposal result in.,
a. Generation,of substantial addi-,�Iohal
lam
vehicularmovemen,t?
MW
b6 8ignifiedht effed,ts on existing,
parking facilities, or demand f
now parking?
C Substantial impact upon oxisting
AM�
transportation systems?
d. Significant alterations to present
3.
patterns of circulation or movement
of peopl C! faiid/or goods?
e, Alterati6n8.to waterborne, rail -or
air traffic!
�fi increase in traffic hazards to motor
vehicloso bicyclists or pedestrians?
14; Public aervides. Will the proposal have
an effect upon, or result in a substantial
need for new ot altered p
�e .,oVernmental
getvid.es in any of th ng areas:
f6llowi''"
a., Fire prot6ction?
b. Police Protection?
c. Schooll,,�`,I
Parks or other- r6creatIonal
facilities!
e. MAintenance' of public facilities,
including roads?
Other governmental services?
Will the proposal,result , in,:
A,, �Use of'substantialatountS of fuel
or,enetSy?
b. Substantial increase ;Ui deinafid u'
Pon
existing soutces� of endtg y or
require theAevelopm8it of' n
n
J
sources of energy?
Appendi r
0
page 5 f -'q, —
YE9 MAYBE NO
16.
Utilities.' Will the proposal result
IF a neeZFfor new systemso Or' sub�
iono to
statitial alterati the following
utilities:
AIL
a, Power ot natural,gas.?
Communications: systems,?:
ci Water?
di Sewer (will trunk line be extended,
providing capaci,ty to serve now
development)'?
e. Storm water drainage?
17.
Human Health, Will the proposal
result 1.57—
a. Creation of any health hazard,ot
Dotential health hazard (excluding
mental health)?
b, Exposure of people to potenti,al
health hazatdsl
W
18.
Solid Waste, Will the proposal-resuIt
in any sig—ni�icant impacts associated
Mith,solid waste disposal or litter
control?
194
Aesthetics. Will the proposal result
in the obstruction of.:any public
designated or recognized,sce'nic 'vista
open to the public, or will, the
proposal result in the creation of an
aesthetically offensive sit,
3. e open to
public view?
Will the proposal result
the qua y or
in Mpa`ct� u lit'
quantity of existing Vublic�,-recrea-
tion fa—litiog?
cl,
2L
'Archoblogical/Historidal, Will th e
proposal result iLn an.a tetAtion of
a, 4igniificant archeo' logical or�
historical site, structure,' object.
or.buildtng?
A oiJ
ppi� ix V page 6 of 9
YES �MAYBE
NQ�
Mandatory Findfngs of Significance
a. Does the.pi?oject have the potential
:to degrade,the quality of the
environment,, substantially reduce.
the habitat of a f,�sh�or wildlife
species., cause a fish otVild.life
population to drop below self
sustaining leVellsi threaten to
elim ihate a plantor animal com�
munit,y, reduce the number or restrict
therange of a -tare or,endan.gered
plant Or animal Or eliminate important
examples o� the major periods of
Milk
California history or prehistory?
bi Does the pro3e,ct have the t.
po enla
to achieve 'short term benefits to
the detriment of publicly Adopred
long-term environmental goals,?
P. D6es.the. project have i��Pacts which
are iridividiially limitedi 'but
cumulatively d6nsiderabl.e? (a project
may impact on two 'or mote separate
resources wherc, the impact on each
resource is telatively small, but
wher6 the effect Of the t�,,tal of
n
those impacts on the environment is
1
0 "gn4ficant
3.
d. Does the ptojo ct have environmental
effects which will cause substantial
I
adverlsd effects on h4man b6ingo,
3.
either directly or, ihdit�
A e
PP'hdix' V
'Pagd' 7 of 9
"AN
AP 39-31-15
DISCUSSION OF 9NVXRONIMENTAL EVALUATION
The applicant proposes to obtain a variance to di
vide 3 + acres
of land into four separate parcol8- The PTOj0Ct site is—locatod
approximately 1000 feet south of River Road On the:west side of-
Miller.Avenuei, The -site is designated Low Density Residential in
the 'Current County General Plan, and zoned SA -1 ($;jburban, Residential,
minimum one acre per parcel), The site would be re�vised to
Agricultural Residefitial (minimum one acre -el) in the pro -
Per Part.
posed amendment for the Chico Area Land U e Plani : -
Surrounding land
Use designations include Low Density Residential- wrid Medium Density
Residential, zoned 'SR -1 and A-10.
A variety of, commercial, residential and agriculul! ral activities
occur in the vicinity of the project Site# The site is prim-ar.ily
vacant except for an abandoned dilapidated dwelliilgl. The North
State Hulling Cooperative is located across the street from the
applicant0s site. A mobile home park is located Immediately north
Of the site, while single family dwellings exist 6n adjacent pr
to the south, operty,
Access to the'site is- provided by miner Avenue, just 1,000 feet
south of River Road, The pro'ect site
from central Chico. is approximately one mile
Environmr,ntal constraints associated with the project primarily
concerh.,Pbtential land use conflicts. These and other issues'are
reviewe'Al in the following discussion of individual checklist items.
1 g,, 4 0: The project site, i
I s located oil Prime agricultural land
Composed Of Vina loam, The loss'of three acr,es Of prime production
Soils
to urbart uses is hot,consideted a serious 'Impact.
5b,t, l6e: Compactioti
� 9 and OvercovOring of thelsoll will iyicre:dqe
storm runoff aftd,dectease absorption rates. The County public Works
Department reqbires that residential projects developing p rceis
less than one acre In'slize in an urban sphere of influenc,d: a c6ftf I orm
to the Subdivision Map, Act for drainage and 'a c
other public
improvements., To reduce potential impacts from poAding after storrosi
Off -site � drainage improvements may be- imposed , on the project by the
Public 'Works Department,
6b!� Noise from heavy truck, traffic and operations at !a hulliftt .
plant across the street from the project may, pose un.,accep:table petib
'noise 'levels for t�UtUre project residents, Wic
The hulling plant facing the project s'
Millot Avenue I�te oil the oftst side of -
=.y produce unacceptable periodic light Intrusion :1,nto
the living.,quart&rs, Of-, f"turb PrOJO'Ct re'sident�,141 during hours of
darkness
Appehdix F pag6 8 ok
ll-
YoUce in Grelly !riven by the "Utte County Planning Comaission that
�'OUTA'Igs will he helf in "PAnasky. Acral,or 27,, ()Ai, at ?:tp
in Of Qtto Qunty,>W af4upervisurs, Ponmi lutta Sun,
center, Tro"Aw renter OrAve, nroville, raliforpla,
Willa Variande to M110v the creation of foup h,A
sere parcels an property zonaA vOPM f9tauuRnn pesidnntial-
acrr parcels! WSW an CIO want We OF "Mor Nvenum
loon feet SOM OF Mca RMP U000, IMM44
ao AP MUM, Chico,
"Uph'ind Faren Pjacl - WO i''Ormit tO allow the segreggtion
of a I ante bomosIte Un rror-rty Lone, "A-5- t�'Iricultnral-
locate,!t on 1.'11V he)rth si-le of nal"' llaiy' noroix.
0aW OF MT AVOPUP. identifled as AP Q-13-54, ruicb.
.1, � It I
FT.04"l * 41, r uxioqvyl�' Nknsity vlosi.40'ntiel
anA -A-P" (41ricultural-fosilevtjoll tq
Area-r1yote-1 poop..t. jjcateA an t,e souf%enst
Of 0st AvInUe AN Mara WMO, WratIFY4 as AP 42-07-
161, and 17P, mory par&eilirly jescribno
Velug a portion or Lots IS anj 20, acco-Inq to Out certair,
% entltlk "%p of WOO tract", which map was MUA in
the office af the Peconer to toe rounty of Rutte, qtatv of
"!ovnlrillj�'T 71, IM in Volume I of�nnq, at Page
mary 1yrticulorly Qscribe4 q follow%.
1,' 2, 4 1 as Wwn, im ihat cat tj InVir-6.0
in the 001.6 Of 00 WNW of the WAY of vottej 4tats of
rnij an i "74 In "nut 72 n F Parcel "ans, at
paw, Mcro "r Ws", Kin
"It 00 (If the Apner Plon
�Tracing dad Wen Val," to -Wustrjul' ou Pronerty locatid
nortt of Urh6m AN -Way, an too Uest 00 p It -
jt,
—Ono also property 14catoo kP hot, silts OF SpAts Unadl, on too, —
elot We? of state KY. qq 50"Wiptl as AS 40 -IT -32, 21, SAA
+rQnW Real
re"arm; espapow ale fill
� ailable Poo PAM viesinp "t
"tv'v � 4"
Njoning *rn,ej
PIWrInAnAt
"Try C1112WTV PLA, VITT! "001MUM
;qTTYP MATF, IYOPly, I- MANUM
ROa(I
Don Donald tjeWis
Donna Smitil
p 0 Box 3,906
ChUao,, CA, 95926
b Box 1211 3070
Norman) O.K 7
Qli:!,co, CA 95927
AP 39-31-45
Ap 3.4-31-50
Charles Nina Lambert
F,,Va,lyti Hydrods
iatob & DorothY Wall
1643 River Road
C jco,� CA, 95926
h
1645 Gain oil- Lane
530 �Jjller Avenue.
Cji�jcoj CA 95926
Chico, CA 959,26
Ap 50-31-9, 25
AP 59-31-47 -
AP 59-51-60
gobeTt Perry
Pat � Vicki Pritchard
604 �Jjjler Avenue
Win. & Joan LeWls
Road
1637 Chico.Rivor Road
Chico, CA 95,926
U33 River
Chico, CA 95926
C1 lico, CA,95916
AP 39-31-48
AP 39 -3i -6l
AP 39-31�10
Jean Favl*llA
Henry F, Maiie Picanco
V
1635 CaMper Lane
Albina J., Gates
1319 Stanley Avenue
Chicot CA 95926
560 Pomona Avenue
Chico, CA 95926
Chico., CA 95926
AP 39-31-15
AP 30-31-49
AP 39-34-27
W. Bowser etal I
Riley F, M. N. Yancey
580 �tliller Avenue
R. & C. Hartman
609 �jijjer Avenue
230 S. Clovis Ave.,
Chicoj CA 0S926
Chico, CA 95926
#144
Presno, CA 93727
AP 50�31-016
AP 39"31, -Sl
AP 30-34-28
John Hanania.
Shasta
told Pcg Y Clar�
-14,w 9
North State Hull,Jng
ooperative Inc*
NO West
ico,j CA 95926
P 0 Box 3780
Chico, CA 95927
P - 0 Box 5522
C ico, CA 95927
AP 59�3 l-17
Ap 39
A� 39-54-29,
AP 3 9'- 4 8'-'0 0 1
Donald & Phyllis Metcalf
Transamerica
Develop.
722 Miller Avenue
Njolvin Ruth Thorpe
164Q CalopeT Lane
COM any
1111 Mth Orand Ave,
Chico) CA 9,5026
Chico, CA 55926
D31,amond BarA CA
AP 39-51-19
AP 39-51�53
91,705
jaspey F, Jessie 'Coon
Sgininip J. Gugliotti
'Box
826 Miller Avenue
CA 959,26,
p 0 463
Wheatland, CA 95692
Chicoj
AP' 59 -'S 1 - 2 3
All
Le 1 8 1 lie,& Janice Ha��, s
c
ely S ott IV ayne
60S Not thgra'ves- AVe -
633 NbTtb'raves
9
Chico, CA 9 59,Z6
Chic,o, CA 95926
API $5-31-56
ja.spOT jds:�i6, �Coon J,
Wmi Smi g ta g 0
Box 100 Cohft8sbt
751 NoTtl i$raves
Ch ilcoo�CA 959216
'A
Chico, :CA 95926
AT) '39- 31 - 5 7
AP :5,9-31-2,7
I I
Lind a Myers
!a
Robert 4 Le on
E , splanade
1085 B, Sth Avenue
6
9592)
Chicoj CA qs926�
Ch icoo, CA
Ap m)-31-43
AP
FILE N04 19-31-15
TO: BUTTE COUNTY PLINIIIG
COMMISSION
STAFF FINDINGS October 21, 1,981,
APPLICANT.:
Joan Favilla
OWNER:
Same
Rt -QUEST;
A Variance to the :One acre Minimum lot
area requirement. -to. allow the creation of.
two 068 acre parcels and two 0.7 acre parceli�.-
AP NO.:
LOC ATIONi
The sita is located approx. 1,000 feet south
of Rivet Road on the west side of Miller
Avenue, one mile from central Chico,
SIZE:
3 + acres
E.XI'1NT'TN6 ZONB-
$R-1
ZGNINO HISTORYI-
Zoned A-2 Augi 29,, 1055,� rezoned $R-1
Juno 13, 1972 by Ord. #1274i
LAND USE:
Vacant except for one abandoned* 'dilapidated
dwelling.
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATIONi.
Low Density Residential in the 1071 Chico
Area Land Use Map; designated Agricultural -
Residential iq the proposed,rovision to the
Chico Area Land Use Map.
SURROUNDING SIZES:
North - .25to .15 acres; East - 1.5 to
10 acte,s; south - .5 acres; west - 14 acre.
SURROUNDING 20NESi
SR,1 and A-10
LA ND USES i
Commercial, residential and agricultural
activities occur in the vicinity of th6
subject parcel. The North State Huljillg��
CooperatiVd I S lotat ed ditedtl' y across the
street from the applicant's parcels A mobile,
homopark 1 s located linmediatel north of
y
4
the 8-fte while single f.'amily dWolling�, exist,
on. 4jadent proPerty.to, il�he southo
Residential uses �als,o exist east of the
proj�tci Sit e
FILE NO. 39-31"15
STARI,' Fl�,IDINGS October 2i -j 1981 1 Page 2
GENERAL PLAN DE8IGNATIONi Low Density lZesidential east, south and
West of the ProJett site, Medium Density,
nofth of t -he sit(,,,� (MucJ'I of this land is
proposed, for Agri'cultural-Residential
desIgnation in thO revised Chico Area Land
Use ,44pi)
APPLICABLE RECULATIONSI: Butte County Code Section 24-49; Butt'd
County Subdivision Or6,, Article VI,
�ection 2'0-122.
COMMENTS RECEIVED-
De'Pt- of Public Works: "Deed to the, County of Butte 301 of right-of-way
T—rom the centeF1'ine of Millet, Axnnue. Pa-fcels shAll be created,
Pursuant to the requirement�s of the 5'tnte Subdivision Map Act and
Chapter 20 of the Butte County Codei"
EnVirOnmental Health. "Any division or development shall comply with
e o—unty ivision Ordinance,,, the Sewage Disposa , 1 1 Ordinance,
the Butt C KuTdl—
and Health,Department Regulations and Ro.quirements.01
City of Chico: "The City,of Chico GenevAl Plan designates the area
as rural residential with one acre minimum lot size. As the subject
site is S-003 'acres in size., it is recommended that the land be divided
into three. parcels of one acre each, conforming to to , ning and General Plan."
Calif. Water SerVidClto. !.'We wish to advAse that We have�a water mai'll
in front- 3. ilable u 'on -�equost. 11
this*property and service s
P
Calif. De t.:o,f L Forestry -
"Water Supp y:� ,ressUrized water for fl
ire
protection fs—available.
The pareb! is locetod within 1,00,0 feet of a
Pressurized Water system,sUitable for fire Ptotection, purposes, ln�
lieu ofcarryingi�the entire cost of a fl.ro hydrant iric;
0 1 tAllation� the
applicant must pay into� the Fire Department Hydrant Fund. Total to be
paid is based On I,Ohg.th of street fro
a ntage of' the involved p.arcols'.
Pay '$4 71. 2 5 into, the Fire Department Hydran't Fand in, i ieu of Providing
a fire hydrant (s) . p
igure is based on, 577 IiVOal feet of frontage t' iL!§
$L28 per lineal footill
Sheriffll,g Department: 0�110 significant impact oil law ellrotce-ent: services
�at this time,"
Ile 1374 1
FILE NO:i 39-31-15
STAFF VINDINGS :- October 21, 1981 Page 3
ANALMS: This project is a request for a variance to develop two .7
acre parcels and two i8 acrn parcels on 3 acres of Imid.
The project site is located on prime agricultural land, comno8ed of
VinA loam. The. loss of, three acres of prime production SOL is to urban
uses, however, is not considered a serious impact.
Ce,
Since the parcel site is withIn the Chico, urban 8phere of. influen.
necessary improvements to the site must conform to the Butte County,.
Subdivision Ordinance and requirements stipalated by the County Public
Works Dept.
Noise from heavy truck traffic and operations at a hulling plant
across the street Prom the project may pose unacceptable periodic
noise levels for future project residents. The Plan May also produce
unacceptable periodic light intrusion into the living quarters of
future project residents during the hours of darknessi
Although mixed land uses occur in this area south Of Chico,, development
o less than one acre parcels near a hulling plant may not provide
sufficient buffer space on each parcel for mitigating impacts from the
plant, Setbacks from Miller Ave. for dwellings would help reduce noise
and light impacts from the plant.
Since Miller Avenue is a rural toad su pporting light Volumes of trafflc,
-ffic and turning movements
and having no sidewalks, an increase in tra'
onto 'and ffum the'stteetwould marginally increase traffic hazards to
d btcyclists casually using the street and
pOdOstrian4., oquesttians an I
road should,�,�ts.
The proposed parL�el dimensions do not confotinto the Butte County
SubdiVision,Ordinance design standards (Article VI.. Set. 20-12,�).
The Ordinande requires that parcels less than 2.50 kleet in width,
11shall not exceed three times its 'width..."
The subject parcel is located, in a transitional at -da on the southwost
sido of Chico. j between atban and agricultural uses.. 'The propo.sed
Agricultutal.-Rdsiddntial land use design.ationfor,the project site
�(mn4 bne,dcr6 parcel site) reflects -the,site:ls status.
Surrounding parcels tang,e from .2,5 to 10 acres 'in size, and, are,
primaxily� devoted to residential uso86 The majbt exception, is the
hulling Plant directly, across the, street, from the project site There
ate n -cum! s i evidenceo uftiq e to this,p4rcelj that,
_0 special cir
I 5,tanto n u
would qualify thd,project for a Variance based on site, sha,pe,� topographyj
location Or suttoundings,," Development 09 the subject, parcel underL
eXisting Cenozal 'Plan Designation and toning, tonqtraints would not, in
ahY,tangible Vespocti identifie"d thus far, deprive the property "of'
privileges enjoyed -by other property in the vicinity and under identical
zonxin; clas8ifldatioft, The proposed number of parcels also represents
400)
F, I LE _N
STAFF VIN0JNCS Octdbor 21, 1581
4
an increasle, in te8itlential density through the avenue of a vat
iande.
While the proposed Urcels do not appear to meet variance criteria for
overall 16't size ari'dp, dimehsions'o I this determin-
a.tioh does notnece.5sarily
preclude il' I'si the %Ubject ptbperty into parcels,that c
xvi ion of onform to
the Genet4l Plan d4l;tsigna.tjon, zoning andother applicable Butte County
codes.
Environmental revi-
�.,w of this project has resulted in a recomm�e-ndation
of a Condi,�,:ikonal Negative Declaration Of- Envi-11ormental Impac�t,.
Mitigatioit measures are included and should b; Considered prior to
any getiofi on the project.
RECO�IMEN[),kT IONS:
A. Note that roview of environmental concerns required under GEQA
has been cobfp,letod and considered inthis application; and
Notelthe proposed liarcels do not
conforra to the parcel design
81tan4ards ditscribed 'n the Butte County Subdivision Ordinaftcej
Artie.le V1, Section I
20-1224 and
G,� Find, that the subj,oct p-rop-efty,18 not 'being deprived of, -privileges
611jc4yed by other Property in the vicinity and under identical zoning
Clai;siEiPatlon (Code Sec. 24-49); ancl
D.; Deny the, Varlance to create two parcels .8 acres in size And two
pareel!� .7 acres in size in an. SR -1 zone on AP 39631-15 (Jean Favilla):
If -the ,Planning' LOii,.Assion tan make the findings -.required by B�utte County
Code Se't
r, ion 24�49, qPptoAral of the variance Would, be ptoppri ' If so-,
A.� Mak'01 findings required by Butte County Code Section 24-40�, 'and
B. Ado"pt and 6'6'rtify the Conditional Negative De
I* I 1 3, � Clltati0h, of Eilvironmentlal
I t�,'(Lctj fiTid.ing that the mitigations hay'
Applicant pursuant to the cgLliforq* e been agreed to by the
ia Envitonmen dl uallity Act,
andL shall! be,,incotP6tatdd into the, conditions f
Variance: or approval of the
When sl.Ae; developindnt occurs, insulation and/or design 'of
r ide n the PtOLP.,
os -�jicos, o
0 -sed parcels shall roduce interior L
noise levels to 48 dB,i And -dn
2 When g"Ito d.evolOPMOnt occursj tesidential, d- e
w.11ift9s shall be
sited.and/or designed in a mdMILet that effectively shields
inte-Hkot living s, t L * d ' 1 * ht *
pac,bs fToM ou si e ig intrusion, and
Ce Ap.P Ir 0 VLO t 10 Va-riaftcO* request 'to crbate two
d�44 7 acre p4tcals and two
ve p�Arcels on three acres of larid, a 8R -
I %6nd o'n,
AP
Page 5
subject to the following conditions:
1.
Deed to the County of Butte 301,of right-of-way from the
centeTlifte of Miller Avenue� Parcels shall be created pursuant
to the requirements of, the State Subaivision,Map Act and
Chapter 20 of the Butte County Codei (Public Works)
2.
Any division OT development shall comply with the Butte
County Subdivision Ordinance,the Sewage Disposal Ordinance
And 'Health Department Regulations and Requirements. (Env. Health)
3.
Water Supply: Pressurized water for fire protection Is
available. The parcel is located within 1,000 feet of a
pressurized water system suitable for fire protection purposes.
In lieu of carrying the entire cost of a fire hydrant intal-
lation,, the applicant must pay into the Fire Department Hydrant
Fund. Total to be paid is based on length of,strett frontage
of.the involvedparcels4 Pay $471.25 into th e Fire Department
Hydrant Fund in lieu of providi g a fire hydrant(s) .
in Figure
is based on 377 lineal feet of frontage times $ji25 per lineal foot.
(CDF)
4.
Applicant must also Comply with all other,applicable State and
local statute$, ordinances And regulations.
ATTACHMENTS: Development Plan
Environmental Documents
.Location Map
Le�tter from Jean Favilla dated 10/12/81
WRS/at,
r 1"J
l BUTT9 COUNTY PLANNING COMMIS81ON
2649
COMHUNIdAtiONS
Jean Favilla, Chico. Ms. Favilla writes appealing the Planning Commission'
negative
declaration and denial of a variance to allow the
creation
Csubutbdt
of four OaB acre parcels an property zoned "SR -111
residential � one acre parcels) , property located 'on'
the west
side of Miller Avenue, approximately 1,00o feet south
of Chico
Rivet �oad# identified as A? 39�-31-15 Set
for hearing
-(hico.
November 24, 1981 at 104'
.30 a:,%.
�V
j.
�N
4-s
MY OF MCOo CAUFORMA
VCHIC0
OOPICE OF THE MAYOR — P Or nOX 3420, 9592�01A
TELEPHONE 10161 800-4815 $Lr
November 23, 1581 too
f
'A;
Board of Supervisors
Covoty Of Butte
25 County Center Drive BU06
Oroville, Ca. 95965 Co. pidnnrngc.,"4�
2
Dear Board Members:
I am WHtihg on behalf of the Chico City Council to requp-st that' You s,et a sil de,
approximately one -hal I f hour at your scheduled December. - 9th hearing on the Chico
e merits
Area General Plan to allow the City to address th of thd Compromise
plan to establish a green line on the west tide of the Ch:ico urban area. It
is my:uode�standing the meeting begins at 9:,00 A.M.
At you"are aware, the compromite plan resulted from the Wqrj� done by a joint
County/City committee which included Superviso" Wheeler iod Dolan, After
listening to the Planning- commission.- s and discussf'm the City feels
hearing
the� action taken by 'the committee in early 1980 was quite �farsighted. The
com romise green line, in only a slightly modified form, h,�s been supported by
suN diverse grou I ps as the Butte 86siness Alliance, the Bv,(tte County Farm
la Wo eh or AgHculturei
Bureau and the Californ m f
Twolpoints should be emphagizedand kept,in mind in discussing the compromise
plan. The first tsthe City's strong efforts to open Up land 'On the east side
of the community, for arbandevelopment, bated in part,�on the, "green line" and
the definite desire to avoid the heed to- develop on, p,�%e,aqricultural land.,
Through the formation of the southeast and -Nort,heast. Sewer Assessment Distrittsi
which are in the process of completion, the Citty has o I p e I ned up an additional
3-4000 'acres o,f land, for urban developmenti fhese;'�ex�ensions in themselves
will, presenf,,major challenges in providing prbar,, s�,�Vices Without sp�eadiylg
46ve-lophient further to the west. t
As dr w on he compl,
'urban a n �omise plan, there
will besuffi,cient developable land�in the urban area.to handle growth through
tly,ear 2000, and even then this will be at much,as 50% above! the projected
tent will tontinue.
hee, to that competitive develop
The, second point to cont der is the Clity"t Wil'lingness .o.c. miseo The
!',an , agreed to by the committee of the Board of Sopervisors an d. Ci I ty:,CoUhci I
n I v I olVos tedesig�atihq I a'poroximately 2400'ac I r . es of land, in the C,ityls adopted,
6ener"al Plan to more intense land use 'Classifications.
Supervisors
Bard,6f
November 231 1981
Page Two
I In conclutioni the City is obviously pleased that the Board is preparing to take
action on this issue 'of such importanceto the Chico community. The County is
to be commended for the time and effort ithas put into the Chico Area General
Plan. The City is requesting the �opportunity to appear before the' Board to
document our ba s is for believing that the compromise plan is reasonable: as v1dj),
as workable.. 1, appreciate your consideration of this matter and look forwarJ
to seeing you on the 9th of December.
Sihcerelyi
Y
Mayor
MW be
cc: City Council,
Ptanning,Commission (7)
General Plan CAC (18)
City Manager
Planning Director
Public Works Director
County Admin. 'Officer
County Planning D ir.
ILI
2741 PUBLIC i I [BARING: JEAN FAVILLA APPEAL OF PLANNING COWaSSION'S NEGATIVE
DECLARATION AND DENIAL OF VARIANCE tO ALLOW CREATION OF'70'.UR Oo'8 A05
PARCELS ON PROPERTY ZONED 11,SR"l" (SUBURBAN RESIDENTIA1., -I ONE ACRE PARCEtS)
PROPERTY tOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF MILLER AVF�NUt 000 FEET SOUTH
v APPROXIo
OF'CHICO.RTVER ROAD, IDENTIFIED AS AP 39-31-15., �CHICO
The pubV-d-hearing on Jean Favilla appeal of the Rlanning
Commission's negative declaration and denial of a.variance to allow the
creation of four 0.:8 acre 'parcels an property zoned "SR -l" (suburban
residential - one, acre Parcels), property located on the West side. of.
Miller� Av nu-ei 4ppio'Ximately 1,000 feet south of Chico River Road,
e
identified ad! A -P 39-31 15, �Chi�
q Was held 64 advertised.
Bettye Blair,,, planning director, set out thebackground of Oe
appeal.
Letter from William and Bonnie Smith toted at this time.
Hearing open to the public. Appearingi Jean Vavillai Ms.
FAvilla stated her property was located near a trailer park And very
small lots. The th;ee parcels would not be equal, because of the location
of the maia house. On the other side there are tvp old houses. There
are -three houses plus a Vacant lot. -The land is tot good for agriculture.
She Presented a Petition from the residents of Miller Avenue. They had
no Objections to the Variance. It the property verd divided intin three
parcels it would not be a good configuration and one line Would go behind
0
the:dx.isting hou8ej The t uld tot be divided into three lots
,, proper y co
because of the location of the house.
Supervisor Dolan stated that the Board had to make specific
iindingsi There must begomething pArticulat about the lay of the land.
Ma, Pavilla stated the l,and was not good for agTiculttre and
could. -not be, made into three parcels.
Supervisor Dolan did not believe that thil, question of agricultural
use came up at any levelbf Mating, This prbp6tt is a little more thiui
three acres. The- case that was made was that this is in an exis:'ting one
acre zone and t�e
property has similar uses to those bn,the street.
HeariAg dlosdd, to the public and ionfino-d to th.6 "Board.
Supervisor Dolan stated he had difficulty taking the tit
s dipgs
for,thd variance. She understood the :pro-'
t 's, desires'.
per.y owner She Was,
r0tinded of the, advise, of��ounty Counsel that when all lotg do not con f
t, o �t I he 2ohe it, is in off Oct a rezone udles I s the"Board c.-Ul make orm'
findings
�df hardship., She felt the commission was right,
on, motion Of Supervisor Dblarl, sedondd�, by 8upervi.sOr Wheel
er
Ana utani-mbusly carriedi, noting the 86sH tevido,�.d the ehvironrqei�tal eoAderns'
under C90A And, considered; the proposed, i)4rdels do not conform: to the
parcel design standards described in the Butte County Subdivisj&j Ordinance,
Article VI', si�ct,46n.26-.122i, and finding that the subject property is not
being deprived :of privileges, en oyed,by other Property 'in the V,4Cj
nity
And under identid! zoning classifications: ;1 and the v, 'a denied.
-ar 4nce wa
tt
Apo or st pnwl am "W -N -'n' s f