HomeMy WebLinkAbout039-370-004I
EF� (GPAS)
RESOLUIICII V
ADO?=-
ORMNANCI: WMM—ER
NATION VPPend'-.t HI
�,oV-Cl OF DEr�=-Ml-
Q
ME NO.: AP 039-310-004
U
BIr TTE' COUNTYPLANNIING COMM ISSION
RXIDINGS 7, 1991
APPLICANT:
Edwin Akerson
OWNE R.
REQUEST:"
variance'to the Minimum lotNvidth and:frontage.
AP NOi:
039-370-004
SIZE:
2.33 Acnbs
LOC8TION.
On the SouthL side -of Marian Ave.
1500 feet r-� . , approximately
as,t of Harper Valley Ln., Chico.
EXISTING ZONING:
SR -1
ZONING WSTOIM
Zoned SR -1
1 Feb, 5,1985 Or&,2458
SURROUNDING, ZONING,fli
SURROUNDING
6 I -AND USE:
R esidentIal and orchard land,
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION..
AgrIcultural Residential,
APPLICABLE �REGU LNTIONS.
Butte County C ode Section 2449,
`24-40,
00!VeMment, C de
0 Section 65906
c0mkrP.NTq P
Cify :)f Chico., "gocommen
f ini ct on, Fire Departm,
pi ent"
-jLnvirofim6n1al q6alth.- rid
iltmont. 0 1 n
fh,b.pa 9 f6r:tewage d isposal, and d, t*
omes ic
J
i�,, s 4
J
, r
RWN
OUTTECOO, PLANNING DEPOTMENT
cWFQR IA
�*,,i , 4l
, N
ollo
4, E,;v
4 1
J *4
14,
P �;lj _.L1 n.
$Xh," 9
Or
fl
'46-, ov� 4.
It -
Ilk
if;
ip
It
V�
J,
ti
Xg.
F4
40
ip
A-4 '04.
A A
nz�
A
CONASsEt".
Tb Ro CO UNT Y
Bluff A -MA
00
J-6, Yandeig ift
N� Mb
c
Wookey Rd. 4
010
\Rod7
r
r�ookey RO.,
Lake
cc
o ej Brovies'Road_
LA-
MUn ar Road
0 M It Ln.
a way
Rock Creek Rd. 0
n High Roa /*
Z
RMHARDSON
-eel
0o"
k� 'a 4 son
01 — SPRINGS
c ontr
copmrV
Benne Creek ride-agm
Road K a 0 f r
a C t
"a 'n -1011ow J "�l
L
Road Anita Rbad. a—ndmark r.
A
A�Its 1
k1sk,
1�:. -I—, oustv j 32
F 0
06, w1ke I
wlisc
< d: A: Und' Oad
I Caba111O q
CHI 0
41
By MON.
6,0
Road, b
Non Gianoll� Er
0
d
ve. < ORD
aton,IR
0
Guynn AVe.
0 r -Lb
'd� 0
r
HOBO Ea
10
tsVe Bed Rd.
x
0
4*
> 0
Road 16 HAM LITO
> way -V Um
/ E Oak
w 0
Rd 19 CIT ;T Rtf,—
X 1�j tAcI 7,,
DIDIVELL K 'Yon k1l,
_77i i5 , . I ;r— — — "ry,
ST kT'E PAR s -V W,
Rd,
JR N c q
Cp.
Rogd� 28 0 P -I!, CP 0
A!RPLORIT iiou, n
Sti John Rd. -09, 06
IRO
f
0
> > 10'T L014.L
> < v
VICWASTE doat 0
TREAT -5�
PLAN NT'
0
V) c I /V I T
M A P AKG
VA R I A M
IF
0 �19 �57
2
$X
e va
nv A;VAJ
MAYOE W DISCUSSI
8 YES ON OF ENVIRONMENTAj, VALUATION
ENVIRON -MENTAL
IMPAC��,
will the proposal resulA, In significant.
'file proposal will not affect subsurface earth condilloins,
unstable earth conditions, of chanaes in -X
geologic jubst I rut I lure%? oposal w1l; resul 1. In some d I sruptlon. dlspl acemant,
ment, compactIon or Yhl.i or
DIMPtldn displace compaction and oYer�covetlng of ilia site as a'jesUlt of deVel-60111lent
over, -Covering of (he:sollf or strudturei. driveways. parking atreas. diti
C. chang6 In topography' or, ground surface X The proposal wl I I n6t: at fact topography because the building site Is
nearly level.
relief features.i
d. C)e5trUCt loll', COVLetf6gor modIfIcal(lonofoO x I ih I a site I has no unique Physical teaturesi
unique geologic at physical features?.
el ncrease In wind or watet ernsIrNn 61 L 5003, x 1rhe proposal will not cause erosion.
a I that On OrL Of I' S I it I a?
OIL Leach 'At wilt not affect V wat rcoUrse,
11 changes In deposItIon at erosion b X The p i qp 0,1 An a
or changes In siltation., deposition
land; IL of
of erosion wIllCh'may Modl.ly the,channe
a rtyef or stream of the bed of Ilia acean
or any bay, Inlet Of take? x this ritaposal, does not represent a flginificant loss Of Prime
9A L Loss at prime agfICUItUt8IIY OrOductlye Agricultural 50111.
outs IdeL des I gnated urban areas?
111, L txDosure of people at property to geologic x All of DUtjd�,,�OUnrjy Is In A moderate Cat't60dake Intensity Zone VIII,
hazards such As earthquakes I And$ It del constrtictfoli of buildings to Uniform Building Code standards *111
MIS Inceseot selsiritcactlylly.
mud slides. ground fallur� of similar provide adequa to! protect lorr to OccUplZ
hazards?
�Aj�g WIlIvihe proposal result In sub%taklIAI;r
Air emission I s at dot arib , I ent X L "L'The proposal WI[I not at (act air qua I lity because the Increase in the
a, erlorall'an of number of vehicle trips; Is not Significant,
air quality?
b. Th6cteallonot objectionabte odors4 L s; mok 0 x The proposal wilt not create objectionable odors. smoRe Of I uttle S.
or lumes?
MOIS, 'L a I I not aftecIT the atmosphere.
Ci Alteration Of Alt movement, ure, or Th
te I M.Petature. at any dhanaeL In tllrnate.i
locally of regionally?
WAT E A Will the proposa I I result Irn substantial. L
W, 1 A
ange 'In currents. of the toO r s a, t x The PrOP0381 no any waletcoUttP-L
C" s mavlomeritt In 0
direction of water CLI tW
martne or ffeth,Watersl
rates, drainage X The proposal may result it, an Increa So (n suffAtaWater runoff due
b, changes In absorption to. ted�cvd Absorption fro lmodfVILOUS surfaces. and In a chande,,10
pAttefils, of the fate and amount Lot SotlaCe
site.' HoWdydr. no significant Adverse
the drablade 0AtLtdf" Oil the dWO1,11no Will Lb
tIcIpa(dd be L djUS6 ant I V and 11OW
lWac It are an a
ton Itucted, the parcels arez over I acre And the lolls, atisdrb
1110 1 S jut a 'We I
The OfL6100, W! I I I be tonditioned to med t the I)Op6ttriept 61 Publ IC- L
C4 Need . for 6ft-sile tot I ace dratnage
Improvements, IncI6dIhg've�MaIIcq! removal, war k s drainage Improvement -slandaidl,
channelizWon or culvert. Instal lationt
�D
.. ................ ..... .
tit
At R a 0
t
to
'V
U?L,'
"A n
vnLUAT
.1 OF, VNVIIONMENTAL I
EEEICUSSION
YES _Nq
IV- ENVIRONNEUTAL IMPACTS c.continued) (cori nued)
tly affect any !food control channe I I
'The Pr oposil I W, not s I gni I I can
d Al ICIAtIons to the c0"I'50 of "ON Of f lbod cr� watercour I SO$- ercourse.
water$? x The proposal WI I I not affect any wat
Change In the amount of surfacewater lh.anV -t (108
water body? . Ix The pr000sal,will . not t0grifficont1y affect surface wate
ii waters, or in any
DISCh3tOe Into Surface qual I IV..
alterallon -of surface wa to tUrLe,
I I ted to terr-era
"tioding but POL liml v
dissolved oxygen Or turbldltYt 'the propdsa I VI 11 'not Affect the direction or 116W Of ground watO s
AltL�ratlon of I�Ile d1t6ttion Or rate r Of flow n Area Identified as hAV109 hIghtlilrdle
of ground watelst The- proposal Is located In a entrations between 45 M911 and
concentrations in shallow wal It. cont Tile presencC 0 thl 5
change 11 n the civan II tY Or 0811 ty Of ground found In the area In 1983a, , tank and I I old
Wough direct addItIons Or 60 mgt,l were , Ic each I
wator.s. either I ;h Intetceptlon of an concentration has been attributed to Sept the
or throul SySteMS� The DrOICCt will be conditioned to M�eat
withdrawal$.' �sawage dISPOS311t the Dutle county Environmental IH40alth Departmolit And
aqulfel' by Cut$ Or Cx"vatlons' requirements 01 Ittille plan. one'new sewage disposal system WIllbe,
the'ChICO Area N It or this project. -this, is not considered a
as 9 fesu
significant 190act.
Ill re will not be Any IMPOct to Any public water SUPPly 0 6 'esuft
f: to f'loodIng.
nt of water Otherwise this Project. pose people of prcodrty
ttedUction In the amOu I I'les? Th OtOp6sal will not ex
aval table for publ IC Water SUppi x
ef Y to water -
Exposure of people (it Prop
related hazards."such as floodingt
It In the Slit contains. n
PLA�r LIFE. the NOPOsal resu not affect P Ian t I I (e because
_Ns I -T
su �x ilia proposal will
significant plant 11 lei
I sity. of spelcies, or
t4.�ange In the d ver
$,of plants (including
ntlnibP - r,,:Pl, ggs specie
treei, 'sn grass. crops. 'and'soudlic
pf.ents) f The s(le.cont3InS jo, fare plillits.
4eftc I I. Ion ()I the numbe r s of Any unlQu0- farO
�b. e"d species of plantst It x
or e . ndanger of plants Into 'rho proposal Ill not a(fect e Istihi; Plant 'Ile'
Int(Oductlon of new,-specills , normal
&n area. or In a batf,lof to the crops and is presently
i ent of existing "ectes' not contain Any A00cultUthl
161) 1 en I ij.m Thesite doeill ndtlyd and nOn-nAtIVO Wastes An A law iteds
Itutal, veg tatpd W1.1
d. ReducItion In acte3ge of Any agrlcu
crop?, . "Ill the proposal 't 60, 1 L
AWIMAL'�� L I FE., lit because the Site does nbk�
affect animall U
Ile or habitat.
int7a -the proposal, not
rsity of ipeclas� or' support sIg"'Ift0int animal
Change In the dive at%
numbers Of atill species of anim 'I sh And
land, Animlls including Q011les, I ects)z
shellfish. benthlO ofiatil.sins or the 4,td contains no rate a"ImAlsi
of animal's?
b. FtedUction In the nutribeli 61 inirunl4tie. We.
or eildarIpted spetles existing WPM 1110i
not Affect
the- proposal Will
als into
c� introduction of new sotcles''Ot' 8011M
ea, of 16 a baftler. to the;,01,91-atiOn
all at
or movement of a"Im I alst a I ns� no sloillf,can i wl . Iditle babitall,
fish of Wildl Ile I _X� I a Ote to nt
betet Iota t Ion Of stln
habitat?
-:77
i7
iv
7 ............
. . .........
(continued)
110
will Me proosa
rx�Ro
Increas $ubstan
Costing hot S: L
b
Tile
7, CF4r A to,$ Vete noise levels? creafpe�do'ivsaf Will hot tejul
e
011 can 0 and W1 I (he prop6so on Of to the vic' it! a su4t
1,71arar I Ptodoct mity, anitai
The Ptoposa
Increase It,
ly1f, he noise
401,
era or, 61 the Propcfal res6 —X -expol
a people to
Area? Present of pla I in a $fibs lant )a I 011,16rarpou"! will not —sev2fd not
)e fined land u c1dated On resuit in ;P,Ieveli,
so Of An or In .,Ile a substantial Incr
Tile Proposal I flahl 0,
w
PTOPOSed land 61 fhot after the land
"SaActs the pt ne $ion d
4-Uys k �-'-OCCS
To n
Coosa! wh I ch 130 Use in the area
a. C�q I feet oes hot Meet the mlhlmu�n I t, tfowev,et the
Iftroas In la ned In Olt -der 01- * T46 lot ifOUld be, Width r
to 0 1n the ta,le I . "" , . : cmPlOte (46 p"Folocl. redesig 0
tour Cal l or us, or any na I. 'vd or a VAOr, he
b. u ra, 1, Nance
Depletion of any . . ---- I--- I I I I
'ejourtis? ClOn-terlewabl'. The propdla I hot a(
ILLIL 10.
Will
the ptopos The p arly natural re,,U(c6s,.
a, at Involve.,, r opo $at W11 n
" " I' (It expl.51 W deplete
Subs PeiticidL on of release, or InAlurj
Ol farces (IncjUd%, bot not flazard6Us resources,
it 1,
ca I 111fled to
condi ty0t Of an ac Or todlatjo.,))
t1onst c I dC 13 1 or, n e pr op OSal Wit 'Of Involve be
b., Upset 10ca Id
'cc
0c`s*lbfe tmt., ,,,,Close 30 of har
respo ference 10 any facill ardou
nse plan or erh with At, lie 3 which store IMAier
OPU[Atl ergency eva efttgency I'allsi nN it
W1 11 the CuationplaA? Of U. If ze, such
4'ful
P—�T� ---� __x
Opura t luo,on dens I $ y or pt 1,005 a 4 1� ter location- The Proposal
J2 ra 16 of mo AUM,11i any emerbehcV se
Lq 'd. the' -
or LCS-AiNt --Z— I 101ce.bropotal Will
I. crea a
Alk D a d PfQvOsal Affec not si
'Mand for addi t exist the Pf 901 f I
V 0
TRA?g ona Ing,41juling develO'06ed it, tf0Ojed d c y at( ect, the�
P -M T housingr 0 atea,enljj� daoneS'
MsWrl-" �ILWLqwqk
AT -104 not 0 population Or the Are
Off I I [tit X Tile Propos exce d that Planned, And boinga
f a. I Proposal a? wm not so
'Cenerati 11hilic4r; I I
nof,s -fly all � I
16-vemen I ."bi lant fal addl lonaf veh and
Ocle 6c! rousing dem
Effects The Will
On existin, Parking tat,, Area. Appro
deMarld tot rl�w ParKing? Mes, Of �)Mafej Ford"" all Ineremen
s ProjeOlt Thisv 1,0 additj ` tat jn,�r
C'. Ona I ic Fri I t. rse
S no G� to fisei he
Stlb� lanj 1 6.l Tile pop I I a 5191711 11 v: n1crL Irlif t.fAttic In t
transportatlon i4mfiadt 1� not Affect Part I leca . I 'as e In .1 0� generated by,,,
on e x I s I I g C comj)t 0" W If parking ng because 1h rarti
yslemio e see With �he
d. lion �41 35 e Proposal *$it
s I gn If I can I the �pr oritalned wi Ill avd
01' c I f cill a I I a r IP ations b0ojaj W1 In U1. t e Cojin I
, r '1$ 1 mainto 11 r6bl'Osent
on Or 10 P.Uesdnj�,I)a I teens ,h,,,na"ce
good MOVOthl reqUi a $4 ION nCf
lca�j. rettlents, or, CPA road, I
e. of �6000 ahblo. case In,
Art —x The imp COng6stion I
tratra,tions ',A, The Drop Rct Will hot Oti
elbdtrne,, 034, W1 I t no!
it ter the Present
the proposal, ter" 0 4 011. 1 h, Jilt
c ir cul, t
4- 1, 0 not Affect rail or� air
4
4.�;,!W.X, xMp: X
nm Ch b
5
ENVIR'OHMENTAL IMPACTS (continued),
�YES
MAYO I� NO DISCUSSION OF :ENVIROM, 4ENT
AIL EVALUATION
(Con I I n,ued),
Increase I a I c hazards t o mo I o r
vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrianst
X The 0 osal Off resul I In a ml not Incremental Incrvase in traffic
And fe-111paled traffic hazards In the area'L
PUOLL1q_S_LR_V_(CMS_1 wl 11 the Proposal have on elredt
upon, or , resull In a need for new or leted
Fire Pirott
Ictionr
The Oropoial *111 resul I In a IncreMnt�aj increase IQ'LdeMand for
13Ut Ie t,
prolertion 141 the, The �OU!j I V Fite pepartmonticallio*®ra
61 YRTZ'n of -
,FotegVLfv has Indicated that cumulativej development �n
rural OeOi Will Impact their ab I I I,iy to provide fire ProjeCiff �n
Se ry I ces They have stated that
. thstallation oU v.-Adma I I C'L f I fe
10 preislort sprInk,ler systems in res�Ontlal MUCILQLres.�, the use of
I 11r.le Islance ,,
rei but [ding mater let s aNd *a td upp Y ;Ystem!
to! $UPPott the 'sprinkler system Wit r dr S i Adequate
'I
jkf Protection SO.rVICCS.L uce: the .0emand (or (If e
b� �Poflce'Ptotectfon?
—, _X e proposbl will result lh,A' inctementa I Increi,,ifi, In demand. for
if
"�POIICC Protection In the Area,
C� Schdolst
proposOf wit 1 resul t in a lh(IrementAll lncreap,l; In fe-t
�demapd
5 chool services In the areeti
d. Parks or OthetL "recreall'onal facIllt les?
Prqqo L
x The $81 Will result In a Incripnental increase No demand foj'6ark,
And recreation facilities In the Area,
a, MaInt enance of pub I I o fac I I I t I es , ILnc I udl riSf
the PtOPOSAI wl If result in a 146remen(al IncteasO In th (I fiej,� I or_
main(anwe of roads And other WpIld: fdcl:.l Itles 1,1 the avea�
other governmental .qe f V I ces ?
L
X 'the proposal WI If t6sul t I h a I tit, d lid it a, I I
Irelachtal Increasai4n d ma
other govetomeAls'l service$ IQ he area.
fMEAM�4 Will It '0541
,e prop result In.
a',, Use' of substantial Udi or"
amounts of f
energyj
x the proposal will not utilize #ubstantial fuel dirl Ainergy.
b. tubsi antial InLC j demand
0 a, 0 I n upon exi it I hil,
SOU (des ofof efie(QV� or require the
The propoiAl Will "C"t substAnClally Increase the tj� nd for lkn�`,�
L' Y".
dev olopm.-nt new sources of energy?
i UT L'
�i_, T"S
I MtS still -the Proposal result In a need. for
11 �Yl
11 or substant al altera: Ions to I h6��,
'A I x new sys elas
following,
a4 POW or naturaj� gas?
The proposal will �no affiidt electrical 00%ye r or n G (a a!;;
- distribution $ystemD.-
7
b� L Q
mIMUnIC-Itioils sys(ems?
c
_X The PtoPotal Will nol Affect, ommuhicatl6ri 9 Y
V�ter avallabliflyt
L L
The proposal will not 41 reol'
I public water sysj&ti,
Sewer or �Seotic systems?
I I L
_et V u
'X the Proposal WIILI haVO, to Me (� C OUL
the reqqIreme"tj U- the 8 it
Environmental Heal(h mpt_'11
e* d6l"agel
The proposal Will hLgVe I ap ;c!eldd a PermAneni tokitIoN
I '604
t 16 drii f ljd_oe
.1 4
$ol d' waitt dl sp C53 a I t . . ... ......
x no! *A r i ! L � , I .�
-7 74,r Pt opos a I M 11 Miect so$ ld'
'LL jjiol or oposA I
J!&At!. _HFALTH � f.LWl I I . Le L ;1
165ul I In,
std.djsposa�';. j
� 7 k,
Creation bi, any"heAlth 667atd'orl Potential
d (exclu'dInO menial health)?
YfieL Orplect Is Iodated ln�aq Area of high n I I r a Ifi:
the g6bijndWAtOt, DtInkindiwater WIA high hitratiijevO i I, ,4,jfflljy
onay produce. rr�mk emQO 1 Ob I lot
77
6
0,
itat onp-p
'Onmen a]
3-�
1�.Nq
V:;
IV* ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (contInued),
—yes B "Vn Dial USSION Or -ENV,
ION
(continued),
4
'blUel b abY 'sy ndrome,
ro rCd1Jce.,,'Ahe Potential I
contaMl floni new,weils, or donkIng water
08 aredtill,,,iddeeper and-Irg sealed to -a depth
of 00 feet,
b. Exposul 6 of Poo 'to P
'Plo .Otdntlal hetalt j/
hazards i h X See the discussion Item lot 17
AEATHETIC9 Wl 11, the Proposal kesul t In the
obs I's uct of Any scenic Vista of vlew Open to the The proposal will not resul t ;),In an aesthetically offensive View
pubIle, or will the proposal because It I onsistent with VarroUndIng
or resul I In (116 Veal Ibn i C deyeloprmnt.
Ask an aasthe(lcaIIy'orfehsrVe site Opel,
public vlew? to the
19� Mc RE WT MIP. W1 11, � lbe propola I resUJ t I n' brr Impact
upor, quallt !be proposal may result, In a i
rpereatlonal r �unl Of1d, Oujill I tV Of existIng for Park and recr
OPPO t eallon fAcIIJ(l hl,�Ancf6mehlal Incte . ase I n� derpAnd
-es.
20, WMRAL RFS"CES,,
a. Will -the proposal result In tlje� a
Iteration
or des1tuclion of a prehls(oftr I —x ThDVOPOial Will not Offeq�,"archeological sites*
atchaeologtcal site,
b, Will thepropol;j! result InadVorsapbYtItal
or aesthetic effects 'to a preliftlor-Ic or The 'PrOPOSa I Will not ar f ef--�t historic sites,
historic building, structure or object?
C, Does the proposal have the Potential 1.0
cause a physical Change w T06 P
ITICh Would affect rOPOSRI will not, 0140 Cultural resources.
Unique ethnic cultural 'Values?
d. W1 I I thei proposal restrict exi S t I hg
religious or sacred, use.s' within the X *he Proposal Will not at C t religious resources.
potential Impact, arear
F
AMIL
qW
�7777
7
ApplicAnt: Edwin Aker."'o Mtessoes Parcel 039-370,004
Log # 90-0-06-07
kA3A3 H E FT
A. Pro iect De ripat)L
1,
Type of,Project- Land divi SLOO.
2.
ive
Brief Descrlptiont' Tentati Parcel Map to divide 2.38 acres.,into two parcel$ -,one
at 1.33:acresand one at..10,,aCre.
3.
Lomdom, Located,on. the south side of Marian Avenu "mately-2,100feet east
e, aPProx-1
o,f Daytoelk Road, south of Chico.
4.
Proposed, D
ePsity, of DeVelopment: One dwelling unit, per acre.
Amount of1mpe *out Surfacing.
rVi Slw t,
igh
6.
1.
Access and Nearest.'Public, Road(s): The parcelbas access
H -to Marian Avenue.
Method of Sewage, Disposat; Individual septic tank and 16 � �1,
a.ch field systems,
8.
Source of Water Supply: Indi idual Wells.
9.
wet
Proximity of Po' Lines: F--,dsting to the property.,
10.
Potentir.1, "or further land di isio s a
ivi i n developnienti nde the current zoning,
Non u r
Envir6nmerital ing
PhysLic—al Environment:
Terrain
a. General Topographic Charactl� Level.
er.
b. Slopes: 0 to 2 per cent,
C. Elevation: 180 fe,6t above sdv'�Jevel.
d. Limiting Factors! None.
2i
Som I
Ins
a. Types and Characte ties: Vina clay loam, dark i�rown'clay , loam two to three
feet thick,. granular and vnalAe, re ains moistu
t re Nye surface and tub -drainage
poor.,
Limiting Factors: Drainage,
Tqaiura1-Hvards of the Land
4,, Eafthqadko. Zone: M d
o erate Earthquake lntem�;Ilt �Zone VIII.
1�, Erosion Pdientiahl Nond,, 'y
C. Landslide Potential.- None,
�Ha'ziard-'
Vire Ujncla�,-tif'jed,
e., Ex Soll teni*
pansive PO ialb, Moderate,
4.
Hydrology
a. Surtke WAier-.. No ne�
'b. Ground Water: Area of hi, h ate &)ncerjjrjL-j'* of 45 to
ig nx r ion
C. inage Cfiaract.eristics�.. Pa tcel, draih�' to tfio",�s6ulhwest
d h
Annual, Rai ,
I I (n na 1146,24
. , i c es,pefyoar,
L m t' g Ptj jorj.- ,
e., i in. ;a e'r quality,
t
Adak.,
5.
Visual./Scenlic Oualify: tair.
6.
Acoustic Quality: Good.
7.,
Air Quality: Generall, good, wiith,� tir es, of poor air
n quality due to 9' 'cultural
gn
bbrniiigi
Bioloeical Environment.,
Vegetation: Native and non-natiiie grasses with a few trees.
.9.
Wildlife Habitat: 'Site provides 1.1inited. habitat. fo birds and small ammals.,
in
Cultural Enviropment:,,
10.
Ochaeological and Historlcal')�esoui 'Sensitivity for the area is low.
rces in thewrea:
11-
Butte County, Genera I:Plan de.0 r -Residential.
gnationo A& icultural
t.).
Existing Zoning: SR -1.
13.
Existing Land Use on-site: Re�sidenfial uses surround the parcel on all sid I es.
14.
Surrounding Area.
;L Land Uses: kolidential.
b- Zoning: SR -14
C., Gen. Plan Desighatilorct� Agriculturalm-Res' ential,
id
d. Parcel Sizes: Parcel oizes range, from less ih,an 1/2 acre to 2+ 'acres.
e. Population: Ruj at tc� suburban densities.
'15.
Character of Site and Areao, Suburban., -Residential.
16.
N
Varest Urban Area*, Chicf), three miles to the, north.
17
Relevant Spheres of Influ6tice! NIA.
18.
Improvements Standards Urban Area: No.
19.
Fire Protection Serviceii
a. Nearest County (Sliato,) Fire,Stalion: Station 44, Fair, Street� Chico.
b., Water Availability: Tan1ter truck.
20i,
Schools in Area: Chico; tnified School District.'
IiWIRONMENTAL REFERENCE MATERIAL
9
Map 11�4, Earthquake and Fault'A titilt Seismic'
Safety Element, Butte co-un�ty GL�.rjc
1-77, by ci.�,,M "III, er.a.1 Plan r6vlsed
14. usGs maps, cillcoo cai,,��, 1969.
AwAkk
MOP 1,1-2--, Liquefaction Potential- Sefsmlt� Sajety�
OeMent, 5Utte Count-Y,'Generaj
Sol' MaP,,ClllcO,(192,5)/Oroville (1926)
Area, U -S Departmegj,tL of Agriculture.
rEny
IiWIRONMENTAL REFERENCE MATERIAL
9
Map 11�4, Earthquake and Fault'A titilt Seismic'
Safety Element, Butte co-un�ty GL�.rjc
1-77, by ci.�,,M "III, er.a.1 Plan r6vlsed
14. usGs maps, cillcoo cai,,��, 1969.
AwAkk
MOP 1,1-2--, Liquefaction Potential- Sefsmlt� Sajety�
OeMent, 5Utte Count-Y,'Generaj
Sol' MaP,,ClllcO,(192,5)/Oroville (1926)
Area, U -S Departmegj,tL of Agriculture.
CH2M HI H. plan revised 1;�-77, 'by
.
SOII :Survey� of chic90925)/Oroville
31.
Map 111-1, Subsidence Landslide Potdntfah
Safety Olementj4, Butte
(192 6)
Area, U.S. Department Of Auriculture.
V,
county
,I �77,, by CHM ;'I General Plan revised
Butte
a d County, Fire protect on Jur Isdict foils
FACI"t
MAP 111-2, tOSIon Potentla,- 1;- $afetY. Element,
Butte-CoU"ty
n Neheral.
eS Map. Butte county tire
el a.rtmeht and
g
ror California Department of
e -s. t r Y, Butte County p annIng
Plan revl�sed 1-77, by GIM
Department.
Map ,111"3, Expans Ive Sol Is. Safety Element, Butte
County General Plan revised 1-77,. by CH
'M Hill,
Map IV NOI-Se: Nolse Element, Butte County
General Pfamr,ey.1sed 1-77,
by CH2M Hill.
7.
Map V-1, Scenic Pllghway,'S: Scenic HlghwaY Element,
Butte County. General P an,revIsed 1-77, by cIjM
,'Ma
ElePr,1111746utlatural Fire kazard classeg. Sa fe-ty
ent , tte County Ceheral P h
CHA HII Ill .,I a, reV.S_
I.ed J-77, by
ArchaeO101OICal Sensitivity Mao. e
'am S Mannino,
for But te� Cbunty-,�'p I Ann I D-oo
na rbttyn
A ent" J,P
h ML
SC d(Il-'�DistrIlet
Depa rr tmeht, Butte County Planning
Chico P41trette Stud )Ma trate Concentration I n
Sha 11, byj We, I Is, 3, by epat'tMeot,
J
ResdUf ces, Northwe s ter. Of Water
Agency, st te n' District, The
a Cal R6,SoUrces.
of M
AU'ric,hitural Preserves Mj
RetolutiOn'No, 67-1 78,,, BOP, &§tablished by
"Stjpe�v ttO�
I Sots, Dec COUhtY' Board of,
ember S, 1,987..
'13.
P I n s u t a nce, ka te MAP
Or,opram, Fede ra.[ s, Matlonal Flood, Insurance
Ether 9eh-y MaPAOeMent,
Agency
lift'