HomeMy WebLinkAbout040-020-135Y...
'
1'- H
Aft
�r D F NATURAL Vf AIT1.1 AND 8 FIA UTv
DEPAO'rFAE5NT 4F,wUFILtG WOrn$.
WILLIAM1811.0 90FEF=, Director
CER_TTPIED MAIL
7 c0UNTY cENTER DRrvy . MVILLE, CALIFORNIA W65
Telephone; (916) 534,4681
r r
RONALD DE McOf,rioY
DepUiy Drrocl�,
�' 16 $6
October .13t 198F
vru0144 lC41tOrsite
Houser/Johnsen
RiJ : AT' 40-Q2= L35
P, fl. Bax 5610
Ghito, CA 95926
'Tentative.P arcel Map
Dear Property Owners:
�
At the regular meeting of the 'Butte County Advisory Agenty held on
October 15; 1986, the agency granted a
negative declaration, of
environmental impact and approved your tin,tatittG pa'rGej map on the
above -referenced property subject
to the'
on the attached sheet,
conditions of approval listed,
Tf no appeals are timely 'tiled r- within
ten (10) days of L•he date o
the Adv:i.aoty Agency's approval -with the
;Cleric of the Board of
Supervisors, this action >Will be final.
'
When the 'cond-,4tions of approval are complied with; it will be in order
for .you 1.'o file your r'final map'r Butt 'CouttyDepartment
with the
Of Public Warks for recordation within
twenty --four (24) months of
the date pf approval by the Advisory Agency:
If yc�u have any questions regotding this
office,
'mati:er, please contacb this
Very truly yours
j+�illa ain, Chef f
'Director of Public Sdorks
Oh Merid.onsa
"AssistantDirrectar
co"° p186h3.n'dDepartment
nvironmehtal ilo,al.thDepartment'
M, Donn Marshall
1. M11111
i1 n
T Butte Cauy1ty Adviabry AgericyW
FROM: pl.ann1n,S D3.rvct.or
31J,10JECT: l eport on6' ntgtive .Parcel Map
for Joh nsexx Hauser, on AP
40-0»13a
UA"C1E: September ' 29; 1.9ib:
This is a proposal to-,e:ivide 6t� .acres
present zori; llg .;3 s U (Uricl,ass!f,:Led) . The
to arcate 3 The
ea
L.ar i Erse
Cou+�ty Genera] Ilan designates' t�iis area
There
Paan, .Map �f the. Butte
as Orc'harci, ani F`iold Craps.
are no specific or cotiunun t;Y p] ans
far th-
e area.
The prcaposaY does not confl icb with County zoning nor any, acloptesl or
proposed etemont o,f the Butrte Cauhtyr
General Plan nor any Cr linty,
:Spec ifs ar communit.Y pin.
Recacnmend'PPb"oval.
;
DRH!xr`
ca ► Johnson Houser
Bohr,Iarshal:l
I
i
NVTRONMENVd�),
GTS :
xp,:ana ons, q a
Zb�xpa`n�-tt��jff yesvi r! may be!l ant(v(ets� are reqti
rA 41;t x red
attached
h y
Will the.MAY.BB
'propos a'
I result in sdgjji�f i cant
iT 71Jn s t b i
a earth �conditiOns or I n, h
art changes in
geolb9i'C' subs trudtux6s?,
'6
i8rdptions Aisplaco t
, , men s,
ov f so I.- r
etr,,qvering, o :the, M�
:c i :CjjapgeAn itop -raph, ground 41 ' f,,
't' Q g y� icT�
` ' surface
xc_
'I
r e E features? ea, qres?d. -
Destruction,
c, ion ,,Qr mo
;covering,d lo
' ", -1,-. 3.1ficat
u I... . m,of, any
lqua,,,ge .4 O'g I C, or h f
e. in water erosion ,wind, Or,
, ;- 1 11 1 r. ion bf, Is
eitheli-,� on, or q f�;8it-e-? -
. ....
M n d
ig ge't. kpn t erp SA PA,,o f, he3cic.
sands, OT, c a'ge: 111
h.,n s,j
siltati deposition
on'.. -e Do,si ion
h' h May modify I e c iann
w 3-C the`, 61 of
a, river or -§'t ream QT�, th.e,.bed,'oO the ocean or
any bay; ,.i n a t, o a 1, o,
-3. CUI t
ZA Loss O,f-prime.,,agr' urall ,Pro d�.jctive
,.stAlg,
.outside designajed-��&an' areas?
B eas�?
exposure peopleor
Property to ogic
hazards geol,
such as P-4rthquakeS, landslides, ''-' mud',
S ij d,
1 es,. d
--
grojan failure or.'similar hats I?
arO
AIR. h
t, e proposal resin In substantial
Air emissions fox d 6 3'r
1 --
t 1-0 r, at� :on of ambient
air quality?
b. creation actionable. -
The on o f ob-,Odors, smoke
or fumes?
c. Alteration. Of air, movement,, mo.is,ture, or
tem p�eraturo 6
r' Any change in -i
locally or, regionally? ,.1ma, e
3. ;ATEZR W, 'result :in sub,st
"I t Pr(�POsal antial t
Changes VA
,currents,., P r the e course
di f W or
direction 0 water movements in either
marx�ire'S,
,e or f. h :
waters?
ChM19,'$ In Absorptioli-r
Changes I c 1
Att 8 dra terns
ot the rate 'in PAt
n
a -, e 'a d am , ount 6:6, .�urfa ce runoff?,
c Need 0 f"-"S:L d;
-1 1 r 'to iace� drainage
V,
. z improve,-,
IntluAirig vegetation
on removal
-t. , I 'h awiej
it a, ign Or culvertc
'installation?'
d. Alterations to th
q Ppa*rt or flow.
e of flood
Waters
Chang it the' e Amount! of surface
'ka t e- f 1, bwater in
h,
s.,c arge into surface waters, orsl, or iii ''any
alteration of
L y, including t
but t qual'i
no limited to temperature,
ratu dissolved
t mpe, e d ed.
oxy.gqn or "t utbi d y-
Alterationg. .,, of the t1c
rL t1lon
OT, 6W
ciao _6 f f
ground waters?
Ch. ante ift� the quafttity'br, qtj
Ofthox-1 a 6,f dkdundWatoiz
th"rougli direct addi tions h or w
drawals, or through interception f atj
cept,idjft� 6
44ui-EOTI, by Cuts, dt, 'v:avcqt1ot
, d -"
:R.Oduction in the amount of Water, otherwise
" - I , -1 -' ' ; MO uAt h-
erwiso,
X
A'Vailab -
I I I le for public water s - 0 ,
tipplids'l
qre, o or
peop.. 'water
pro Perty to
related hdtatft�,�,,Su Ch. as PlOoding? , I
YES
I�iAYEE 'NQ
4.
PLAINT LI I:..; Weil the 'pzopasal re!WIt in substantial';'
a. ,;' ange in. the° dive, S:L,ty 'o.£' $pe.r
es, ox number
'.of>any� speca.es° of plants (.ncl�acli°ng trees,
, gra`ss,y craps , `and �ar{ua:t c plants)
Rd,'
U. Re,dac.tion a,f th11 e 4 numbex.s of ° ar1�r'
uniQuo.;..rare;ti�
oreridangere.d' species�f pants?
c; Introduction;
o,,new spaeoes o,f plants into an
-
are or in a, ,ba,ex 't, o the normal, replenisl
,,Mont, Of exa ting s;peces ?�
,t
,
d. Reductor an acreage of any agrcultuxa? cxop?
'
✓,``<G
5.
ANIMA L7,IFE.., `Wal] the propQGQIal result in subst`antiais
a`. Change in th
vers i.ty,of spet, ies, or nttm��ers
o% any, s.p,ecies .of anliMils (birds, land animals
�ncldirig reptileIt-s, £ish and shell 'dish,
bend is
organisms :or' insdet's.) ?
U. Kecluctior in the .numbe.rs o£ any. unz.go, rare
or endangered`.specaes of animals`
C. Intxc duct,ibn "6 nepe
new_g' pf animal "int.o
._,.
do area,.' car result `in a 'barrier` to the ,mxgra ion
ax movement of animals?
d.. peterztration
to e, I ting 'fish or �+ri'ldlife
habt-1,
G.
NOISE, Will the proposal result in, substantial:
a: Increases: bi noise levels?
.existing' a
Exposizr� o� pe,ople to severe Horse levels?
T.
LIGHT AND: CLAM, jVill the .proposal ,pr.oduce
sign . zcan't 7, g t and glare?
B.
LAND USE, IV' 11 the- proposal result in a
su stantial alteration of the
p7res.erlt or planned
land use of az area?
9 .
NATURAL R>✓$OURCES t Wi11 the pxposal xesul°rins
su stanti�a1,
a. Increase in V e rateof us,e of any natural,
b. Depletion of dnYL Han -renewable, natural
resoU."Ces
10.
RISK OF UPSET,.` Will th e proposal involved;
'A risk
of explosion or the release of hazard
ous .substances,, (includirag; but not la;mit,ed: to,
o;a 1 esti
p cuesi chemicals or radiation) in the
B rent of an accident ofuliset cdnditions?
b, Possible,interference with.an
�+
emergency
response pX,an or. Emergency etracuati.on p1,an?
Z1,
l?OPULATION. Will the proposal ail,ter the 1oca.tion,
Tistrbuton dense or
gowth r`ate� o£ the _human'
population?
lz.Not,18XNC,
fi the `propo`sal af` 6ct existing housing,,
ox create a demand for additi.ona'1 hottsirig ...
F
y
.
fA
,
x
YES MAYBE
NO
TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Zy,i11 the pr.o os:�
result 1n. _
a. Gene'rati011 of substantial additional vehicle,
movement ?
b, Effects on «:xis.1 ing' parking £acillties, or
r
demand for new parking?
k
c;:. Substantial impact on existing transportation
sys tems'�
XG
d. Significant alt ;eratio'ris to present patterns,
of circ.xlat:�on or movement of people and/o`r
goods?
e. A1te.rations to waterborne, ia.i1 or air txaffic;?
Ir cxe se in traffic ;hazards to motor Veh:iclt,s
bi,Cyclists or p:edostrians?
14.
PUBLIC SERVICES. 1Ii11 the proposal have an effect
upon, or "result; in a need for new or altered
governmental services,
a. Fire protection,?
b, PoliceProtettion?
c. Schools?
di Parks or other' recreational facilities?
e, Maintenance of public faeilities,`in4ludin
roads?
x
f'. Other governmental services?
15:
ENERGY. Will the proposal result in;
T.-Use of substantial amounts of fuel{'or energy?
b Substantial increase
�'
in demand upon existing
sources
of energy, or require the development
of new sourcos of energy?
16.
UT%LITIES.' Will the proposal result in a need
:£or
t.
new systems, ox'substana'l alterations to; the;
following;,
a. Power or natural gas:
b.: -ommun .cations systems?
X
Co iUater availabILI ity,
d. ' serer or, septic 'tank?
e: Storl water drainage?
X
f Solid' waste and disposal?..
17,
HUMAN HEALTH. Will the proposalxesul't in:
a:.rG' eat n a , any ;health hazard , or, potentia,
health 'hazard (exclud ng mental health)
b.
E__
x 'oSLtG�
x of people to potential health
`
hazards?
18�.
AESTHETICS }Vi11 the pxoposa'1 result �;in the
o `5-G txuctibn of any scenic rris'ta or va,ew open to
the public,' o.r tvi11 ',the proposal result in tle
creation of an aesthetically offensive site opon
to public view?
-4y`
MAYBE
NO',
t t
14,, RE( EATT0N. Ivill t , proposal result � in an i paq
e.o 3* mg: te lona,
the = �hd Or quantl yx IS
upon duality .,
p ortunities?
CULTuRAL Rt--80URCE 5'
—a—I-AF1'!.-l—tWjj�p—r6pos ! theAl t 6 t
kilt i ra ion",
o oi the Ae�tt 1�c otj 61, a -pre ;.Isitbrlc or
historicarchaeo7 ogit'al
t in>a, verse' ph sJ ca I
y
I
or aesthetic eHects to a prehistotic Or'
�i
ipropo,s:a,l!resU
hjstoTc building, structure ot6bL eCt?
-7
Dci,es pie propo,ss7 have'e- p.oten., i cap ti a I �t6 c
h a 6t ''unique,
a, physical h" la, f i'd
change h
J,
ethivi.d 41 Va :Ues.
topdsal,�: restrict Will the p. �jS�'tjrjg� roj` gi'OUS
impact 'Within" t116 pbtelitial,
or sacred uses
a- e.a ?
V. DISCUSSION -OF ENVIRONMENTALEVALUATION AP 40-02-135
See attached.
'r
i
e. L i cci1 ting=- i•tactors Uncertain drat nage character i,st i cs due
to regrad ),ng, J n the area and :distance to naptural'
well-dof"fined drainageWays.
.
vi qua /Soon i'c Gu;l •i ty'=
6.
Acr'Usti c Waal
77.
AI r Oual lbty:, Good.
S i c31 ora r�,'� Eny i r•an gnt w
8..,
Vegatat i on : "' It r: aote,d fOrin l and and orehards, r l par i an Nab i tat
to the north along M"l- b, 111 Ranch Road.
9.
Ulldl i fe Nab,] tat:: Lbk4ar, Sonoran Ll fe Zone, rl par t an habl tat
along Mar-ybi,' 1 Ranch Road;.
Cul turAl Env 1 ranma�nt:
10.
Ar•ci�aeal jog i cal artd Hi st6tril dal Resdai es i n tlhe area'; H i'gh
-sen.$ i t v4 i ty' :oroa.
11
10utte County Genera I Pi an des 1gnation;,' C9rcharc and. i e 1 d
,Crops.
92.
Existing Zon'1n9- U.
is.
,
Exll st i ng Land .Use bh-s i te': Farfn land and OX i et i n9 haines i tes
14
Surrounding Area"
ZI Land Uses. Industrial to the :north, agri cU1 tural uses
elsewhere, scattered residential uses of rural densities.
b. Zon. mpl U, M-2 to the north, ft-I to the east across' Butte
Creek•
d. Gen. Plan dos IOnations= Orchard and Field Crops,
Industr i.a1 r; and-,'Low Density Res.i davit i ali ,
d. Parcel Sizes= 1/4 to 150 acres, generally 20- to K0`-Leta
iaarceI s.
e-, Population: Sparse: '
5
Ctisragter of 5 i td and Area= Agri cul tura l .
16.
Nearest Urban Area:: Chico.
17.
Rel,avar`tspheres oiP In l trance» Chico „
18.
Improvements Standards Urban Area. Na.
14.
Fire, Prgtection Servide:
a.! ` Nearest County C state) i=1 re Stat i on - "Stat i on #44.1.n'
Chi-co, Stat �n 4415 in Durham
b. Water Availability: :'.Piro tat�iters,only
20
School s, in Area= ChIco 'Unifp,ed School District`.
IV.
(ERONM—ENTAL
xp an.all acid "maybee answers are re uirod.
on itt adheO,sheet
the in significant,: 1. EARVI.,, Wil e proposal result
ailt,;
0s MAYBE No
'
1astable earth' d""
�con,-Xtion8`h :changes L
or �d n. ,c an In
b
igeologic substtuct,tvre,�-?`-
Disruptions di8pl,acements c I)acti6, or
oVercove,.ring of, thG
,Change in topography: oT, roue, d surface'
d":
Destruction, c o v e, r in d - f modification of of'.ay
g 0 T' mo' 1
uni4ue, geologic or physicsle,aturos,?
e
09
Increase easo 1� wind,, r W't,
- a er erosion of sods,
le,
ither on or -site?
Z
Changes in epL S'l t o of :'b cli
sands .,or 'changes
, Ing. eS n, s ' a, 'ita ) tio dPpds, - Tt.
�,t'�
ox. may
ro ion which mo dify ;the chann:61
river oar Str6cm or- the beA'o-f th,e
e ocean or
an bay,. inlet or lake?
9
L mes of ri -o 'soils
pe8ignageauTan
outside areast
h
txposure Of "POOPICA orr ty t -1
prope o geo og;Lc
hazards such as earthquakes, landslides mud",
ground faildre, or slmil,ar. hazards?
Will the proposal 'result it substantial,.
a.
Air emissions Or deterioration of f ambient-
air',qual'
b
The creation of objection.able' o ors, smoke
or fumes?
c.
Alteration of. air Mo 'vement.t
mo is tire I or
temperature - or any L n,gein cha climate
,LL,
'7
G,c.a I y' or T e g o n al ly
3. WATER. Ivil 1 the proposal .,result: n- substantial
Changes in Currents, ox th' e course, or
direction of grater . m6ve.Ments in. either
11i or, -fres'
maV3 , e 11, waters?
-b.
Ch ip. a . z o �pt,o atterns,
anges, 3", b n rates, 'drainage p,
or. tho- rate, and, amount of, surface runoff?
I
c
Need fox Q.ff si te surface' dral,nageimprove-
ments, including vegetation removal, ch«nntl-
ization or Cul 'OLrt in8,taj,,j, at JoA?
d.
Alterations to eCOur, flow flood
e.
clx'
,ei I
Change n the amount , ;6:f f 6 waster
L er in., any
Water body?
f.
Dis°ch atgo, in o f tors 0
L Sur Ae 14ca any -
alteration 6
surface wat erA19 ity n d U 1. ng
butnot
btemperature, tutedisi6i4ed
oZygon, 1 Or turbidity'?,` ,
'Alteration —
g
of,, 16 d L �
't. 3. On or rate
ground wasters'?
h
the e quantity,6f g-1,6,, waters TS
dither rough 'dj' ect. additions 0, W1 t
'L
0 L' t
-dr awals, thxbu . all L
9 in erceptioit
aq 1 0' -
uif6j, by, cuts r e.,, �cav4tiojis 1
i.
t c., ,4pji in 0 fVjtjeT otherwise,
41 0 UfttL
.
availab] e for publicwater supplies?
�'
XP6SUr0 ofpeoplebrprop0ry to i ato.t
related, L hazards h 'as L fl Ob:d g?Lq
YPS
AvlAYBE NO
4 .PLA�17''
L.I WAL11 the proposal esu '`t :in s, b' i
t'
a. Change ori ,the da.verS , o es, ox` number
; .
--pe,
pf an. .species" of plants (nclud ing 'gees
shrubs , .grass ,' crop,s ,' and aauati an sl
'`n�r unique , -rare
b + Re A Cion of the numbers 0.5,,,,a_.,
'spe.cJ 'bl�ants?
�;ox eilcl.ange:xed es Of
c. 'ntrac�uct din' a .new, species ' of plants ',.in an
axea,; a' barra:er to the 'normal r'eplgnish-
or in
trent of e'Xistin4 species?
d. Reduct'jon it acreage of; any-agx" cuytiaral crap?
5.
ubst txi ttl
ANIMAL i'rE. It , f tho propdsai re:�.u�r in s7.
or mbers
a. C ange in the , 'OT qty a species, n u�..
o any, speca.es ofanimals (birds, land animals ,
inclining° rept=iles,°isle and shell. dish,.,;
bcnthc.ox anxsm;ox insects
any ;uniq ''
'b . 'e'duc"ti in the Aft,beTs a.f. ue , raxe
o° -enidangered specles o anzmal;:s?
r
c. Introduction of new ,species Of: animals into
an aTE.'a j or result in, a barrier to the, mi gxat .on
°movement
or of animals? ,
d.. Deterioration to, existing wish or, Wl.IdIi:fe
habitat?
--
b.
NOISE,wilI the proposal result in substantial:
a. Increases in existing noise; J.eveIs?'
b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels?
-•`�
i.
LTGHT AM) GLARE. Will th0: }osal produce
sign ,1aant light. and g1are:
8.
LAND` USt-4 1Vill the proposal resu1.t in a
suF9tan�tial altexaltion of the present or planned
land. use of at area?
- --
TtA'd'tRAL REaOURCES : Will the proposal result in
subs'tantal:'
a. Invrease in the rate of use of any natural
resources
b. Depletion "of any non- ronewab ,d natural
resources ?
.-.
10.
RISS C?p UPSET. �V`i11 the pr invbi
of exp1osion or the xel,eiase of hazard-
ous ,substances (including,' but not limited tb,
ail., pesticides, chemicals ar radi.ation� in t}ie
,
event of an accident or upset conditions?"
b . � possible " i ,terferenco 'with an emergency
respanse';pan or emergency evauati:an plan.:
ll. , POpIJLA't"ION. if 11 the propos'a1 a1ter the locatie�n,
dist�ibutaon density or `growth rate o the human
populat-ion?
1 HOUSxNQ. �Vi11 the proposal affect existing housarig,
h6us,ing?
o crea� e a �de�;iaxid fd a lda to oral
tr
i
'
/1
4-j 1 YDS MOB B NO
p
'�RANSpC�R'',"IdNIC1TCUL,TON,. Will rlx� proposal.,
res�xlt in:
Gezierationi'oi substantial additional' vehicle...
,
a.
mavement? 6j
b. Efi•edt'S `ri existing parking iacilat es, or
demand, dor new perking? tray sportat 4 on
Substantial impact on e;�i, ,ing -
C*
sys t1e,ms
d. sigtt;Lficant alterations to, presentleatt rnr
of p P
o£ c,ircu ation or movement"
x
g.o o ds ?
at to waterborne, rail or aix traffic?
e.
Increase in tra££ic hazards to motor velxicles,
.
.
bicyclYs'ts or pedestrians.?
l4. PU L7C SERVICES ill, the proposal have an: effect
III need nerJ or a7 tere:d
upon, or resialt a .for
governmental services'
J
a. F zxe p-rate ct'oY1?
b , Poi°ice protection?
C.Schooi.s'G
recreational facilities?
w. --- -
d. Parks o7 other
rldirtenance of public facilites, �ncltxding
r;
rpa.as?
Other governmental services?
15. EhR, �Y:11 the proposal result
NGY
substantial amounts of fuel.or energy''
a �j'e of
b. Substantia increase in demand upon existing
or retiuire the development
sources of energy,
of new sources of energy?
need �or
16: YJ'TILITIES,- ►Till the proPaT�alteratinrisresult in. atoo the
su'ostanta
new systems, or
`
�o1lo�aing
a, Power or natural gas?
,
h
b , Gommunica. tions sy5tems?-
C. Water `
d, tic tank?
Sewer or sep
�.'
"
e , Stcirm water drainage?
disposal`?
--- JL
. Salid waste and
ro os al, result in
1 HUDN HEATH ..Wil ] the p P
health 1Yazard or q�otenta al
a, Grea'ton of any
health hazard (e:cludin mental health)?
�,o health
b Exunsure of people patentiial
.
hata�ds?
18. AESTHETTGS. Will the prt�posalesult in the
or view open to
o structaon o any scenic.vist.a
the pubis, or'w�ll the prop osai resulti in the
site open
cxeatzoz� of an aesthetically of'ensive
,
ublic id,
to�
yEs;MA�
r�o
19. -RECREATION +, Vill the'pxoposa% result in an impact
upon th.e quality car quan it.y a existing recxeat;ianai -
oppartun,ltiec 7
20. CULTL RESOURCES.
a. Wz71�-tliie�
proposal result in the alteration
Of ox the iiestruc tion of .a pfehistc�xic or
h S",
ori.G arch,a aiogicaI sita'f'
b; Wi11 'in
the propdsa result adterse physS°cal
or aasthet� e e fects �t a ''pre;�i sto •`Zc or
hfstox�iC
bualdin9 st' acture o object?
Does
c. the proposal have, the potent al: to cause
a physical change whi,eh would affect tan que
ethnic 'C.ultural values'?
c�. 1Vi11 the '.pro,posal xestrict' exi;stn G� g ous
f
cr sacrs uses wsthiri the `pot "n. amp:a�
area?
'
DISCUSSION OF ENVTfiONMENTAL EVALUATION
r
1
,
AWLy
u
1a: 1`he Arta L-Ct wild.: M%gl.t, ir the g�r►eratirrn Of irici~ea5ec1 tr�� �
_
77
C
(app'! iCarit: Hog Eanch Estates r!455essar.'s parcel
40--f�2-1.
Lag `' It 84-1205-04
A. Pro,iect .UescriQtaar►
Type a , P* C) ect : Cen'�ati we Sutrdi vi s' art Map for 24 par-cels`. (,,in
cnn i��nctii n Wr th a'; rase permit fcsr an aic�po;yf »
Dr%ef;:Descri,ptaan; Davading 147 aC�-;e �! ,Into �a .parcc'1s. of
acres each and ane parcel 0+ Z2 acres,'
;S.
br-ati. on: Qn tPze south side of Mary pillRan h Road,
ippro�; i matel y }!'4 mz l e east of the Midway, south of Chico o
4.
Proposed Density of Aevelailment 5 -acres ped dwelling unit
S.
Amount of Impervious Surfacing;. minimal
6.
Access and Nearest Public F:c►ad.ts) :, S'1i riV�aY, ap�►r.ra�a matel�r `�/4
mile 'via Mary Dill Panch Rgad,
7.
Method of 5ewaale Di,slaosal : in"divi.d�ual septic systems ,
9,
Solar ce of dater Supply: Individual molls
9.
Proximity of Power, Lines: To prope-ryty,
W.- Potential for further land div si ons and development';
General Plan rind zoning allow 26 acre minimum parcel 5i�es.
Same ester tl al` for even sma
p lIer;parceis:
Environmental. Setting
Physical Environment
S r
Terrai n
a. General Topographic Character: FI at valley land
b. Sal apes: 0-, .1
c . El.evati, an1; ASL
d. Limiting Facto:rst. `` {rani?
2.
Suits
a. Types and, Char-acter•ist.�cs: Vitra laamq Vitra laauri with
Y all soils rand cobbles at
cobbles Redding�:a 1aam Sh
commonin the area.
b.U mi ti ng. factors: Sha11 aw 'soi.l z its some areas
,;.
N�aturax Hagar dS of the Land
ar Earthquake Zone: Mdderate Ear=thgaal a lfttlphsity Zone VII
is. Eros-,Pbtentxal, None to slight,
,acid .l i de < Pot nti al : one ,
d. Fire 1-larr �l; UnC�..sss� Pied
e„"Expaatisi�re:Sc�il Psatential: ihader`ate,`
Hydr o ogy;.
ar Surface WGiter: 5everal p`Ar.ds, e'i5t onsite, 'hist[7riC°
clrairtge swales tr-avere pr-taprr-ty.
r nr and Water: Abundant' valIp' aquifers
to Y
C. Draikia a Characteras.tics- Pr`o r-ty :siraxns enerell'
g. 1 p � Y ib
the aoiath and soUthwest towards: Dar•hatnr
d. Flnnuel Rai rt�Fal I (:Q 24, ? : 24 to 26 'inches per year
e. Limiting i-actors" Uhtt!rtairiV drainage char-acter-istics dine
icr regr-ad r7g in the area and di;s'tance, tQ nat:uui'sli wall
de,O, i ned dial n gra UJc�yBr
S:
Vi sisal l,St6n`ye Qu'a Gtir�d i
L7'r
�t+yy
Acoustx c u rl a tom, .: �SSQ�Id
7. _
Air Quitkl i ty Goad
Bi of ib i dal Ervi r-onmen t:
G.
Vegetat can e Irrigated i arta land and or=cFiards, ri pari an
;tatsitat to the n.ort�s: al Ding Mary Dill Ranch' Raid.
9 ,
IrJaldlif Habitai_: Lower Sonoran L.i.fe Zone, raPar"xarti habitat °
along glary Bi 11, Ranch Road.
CulturVai n irantfiertt:
tcJ
Archaeologi.caj and Historical RosoiArcgs in tha. ar ear High
serrea ti vi ty area
11,
Butte C. PtAhty General ' Plan des gnati on: Cfrch"a� v and 1~ i el. d
Craps
I!?.
Existing Zaining: A-2
1 :� i
Eitistina Lanri Use on-mite: Farm land and pati;sting hosrtsites:
M.
Surraaun."iirigArea.
a. Land Uses: I'ndustraAl to the: north., :agricultural uses
elsewhere, scattered residential uses, at rural rural
b,. Zoning-'r ' A-2, M-.2 to the 'north, R--1 to the east acrass
Hutte Creek.
C. Gen. Plan desx.gnat� c,nsp drehard anal Field Craps,
Industrial and Low Density Reoi denti al.
d. Parcel .53 es: 1 / 4 acre to 1501 acres, generally 20 to 40,
acrd Iparcels
e' i Popul ate on a Spare
15.
Character o+ Site and Areae Agricultural
16.
dearest Urban Area. ChieLo
17.
Relevant Sphere% of InflUence;e Chico,:
18.
Improventents Standards Urban Area. iso
14
Fire Pi-dtectiran Service._ .
a. Nearest 'Cournty t8tate). Fare Station. %-kat ion 444 ih
Chimu* Staticin #45 in Durham.
-.
br Water Avail abxl.ity. Fiira tanker only
20.
Scho 1% in Area Chico Ctriifi:ed S'rhaol Dxstrik