Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout040-070-010,.� APPENDIX 1' r COUNTY 01'BU-T!'1 GNV1R©NMENTAL ('31U LIST PORM (to be 'complete .. y Lea gency) Los N 06,410-30-1011 AP 0 40-01�1b 6{;d, iSACKGROUND 1, Name of proponent JUGUM RANCH 4: Address of proponent and representative (if .app1 %e.Fth 6) Jugum RAnch _ Nor�:�x—Eng3.a=ag Jones Avenue 37.7 Connar�_C4.11tir 9.648 Durham,. CA 95938 _Chico, CA 9592A 3, Project descTa.ption _ T'entatlye S di i eti QII it , �„ — TT; MANDATORY FINDINGS OFSIGNIFICANCE Y }AYti}3 N0 a Does the: project have the potential, to degrade the quality 'of' the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a or wildlife population to drop below s.e'1f_ .Fish sustaining levels, threaten to eliminat:o a plant or animal Community, reduce the number or restt t the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or the eliminate important examples of major periods of C'aiifornia history or prehistory? b. Does the project have the potential to -achieve short-term benefits to the detriment of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the 0nvtronment is one which occurs in a rm ly w 1 + p acts r.xet Pe of time wa le long-term impacts p +r,f� dare into the iUturP. c, Does the project have impacts which are indi;viclu- (A t ally limi'tedt but cumulatively considerable? pa.oject may, ,impact on two or more separate resources is relatively where the impact on each resource small.; but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is sign1ficant.) tl, Docs ttxe project have envitonmental cFfects which on human wl11 r_airse substantial adverse effects - being5r either 4irectl;;+ or indirectIV?` 1T1. 1) ON (`1'o he eompleteo'la�• the Lead; Agency] I,xt the basis o'( this nit,lal (<va.luatl,on, T�iVfi C nd tft�o pt'oposeei pro i,C,ct CO(]11I} No have a : l,gn't l`i�cttttk`� effect m. ' , U itio}�arod, NialrAl'IV1 l�1aCIJlIIA'IION tVS M 1 1,1 orti thcer� ^ i i ti it��en , anal .r I/Wi, C tid that altbough tr1t4`'`01,0tr>Set 1)1,6i0ct C.ou'Itl ilaVe ti signifi- rhei'L" eta i 1 } nt5t btu ti s i gtti.l' i'(a�tt "�" giant e i''Cc�"t ion the en`v�,i �`otiniont , t:"iect in t1tf..s c:a chet�t�5c� the }11'I'IiiA1'11N tii,.AStli}ll�; tli4oTihCd ren t1�e atTciciie I .i oe,t hav;c )'t vis utld:c+�l tc�'tht� i�"rt�;ec't� A'.NP,CiAI`IVE IICi.ARAT tnN'wiil �hc 1)��.4�pwtrt��. l/}VI (iYid tlt'c, l�rolio±Gri' prc�,iwc�cit `1i�� h1iv( �� sll,nifc:trnt Cftct ott.': yi{�l } f•.t1k�, it f ��t� i M� ACC ftN;I OR 1 t$ t e, ul V the GTI r ronilic�'iY t , t►n�l .t�;it i°tttlN'i1 tli� ►i11C'111, K, N, 6 IN VAI I'1n"IIIt ' 'Iii' • ,.•�;...�.., ite> t.t*lived I;t�' f `I r ACTS ENVIRONMENTAL IVanatlons p of all sryes. and "maybe'i' answers are required on attached sheet(s)� Y13S 'MAYBV NO 1. EARTH, Will the. proposal resultn significant: a Unstable earth canditions or in changes in geologic substructures? Ib Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? c. Chane in topography or gground surface re,llef features? YES MAYBE. Nf� 4. PLANT LIFE, Will the proposal result in substantial: ha`ng:e in the, diversity of, species, or number of any species of plants i�cl.uding trees, shx'ubs , grass , c � crops and(a aquatic plants) ? g P Re chop. ue rare b. 1_ u _ n of the numbers of anti ,unx or endangered species of plants?u C., Introduction of new species of plants; into atl area, or in a barrier to the; normal,, replena,oll- anent of existing Sppgies? r d.. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural rr(p� S. ANIMAL LIFE. Will the proposal rG$Ult in Substantial: :a. Change in the diversity of species, o°i- nunibors of any species of animals (birds,; land ani,trlals including reptl�;s,'fish and shell fish) beiathic organisms or insects)? b. Reduction in the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? C. introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration o`1' movoment of Animals? d. Deterioration to e -fisting f1sh or wildlife Habitat? 6. NOISE Will the proposal result in substantial - T. Increases in existing noise levels? - b. llxposure of people to severe noise levels"? 'II 7: LIGHT AND, ':GLARE, Will the proposal produce signs j.cant light and glare? 8. LAND USE. Will the proposal result in a su stantial al.;terat on'of the so � xe nt or planned _ ann_ p P _ land use of an area? 9. NATUPAL RESOURCES: Will the proposal: result in su scant al a, increase in the rate, of us,e of any natural a:'e5011T�eS ? b. Uep'lotion. of any non-renewable natural resources'?, 10. RISK 0 UPSET. Will the proposal. In�volve� a. A rasa of explosion or the release o°` hazr�T� o'us substances ,(including, but not l,i nitad .l,o; oil~, pesticides; chemicals or, radXat on) B the event of an accident of upset condit:ior s? b, Possible interference with an emergency response .plaai or emergencyVacua tionp la e Tt? ll. POPULATION. Will bhe proposal. altev t 6 1,o'cation, istri Ut�.on, density, ;or rotvth; .rata of the human 12. NOUS;IM Wi11 the proposal affect existing housin ox oxeate', a demand' for ;additio:na`l housing? w� IRL, �tSS LIMLS ._0 13„ IRANSPORTA'TION/CIRC'ULATION. Will `the proposal a. Generation of substantial additional vehicle movement? b. Effects on existing narking facilities, or demand for 'neva parking? ..._ C. Substantial impact on existing txansportati.ozl systems? d Significant alterations to present patterns le and/or of circulation or movement of peo P goods. , e. Aiterations to waterborne s rail ar air txa ,C7: £. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehir.10.4, bicyclists orpedestrians? . ---- 14. PUBLIC SERVICES.. Will the proposal have an e;i?'foot uan, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services: (� a, Fire protection? b, Police protection? c. Schools? facilities. d. Parks or other recreational° .�-- including tic faca.litxes, g e, maintenance of pub... roads? f, other govexnmen;tal services? ls. ENERGY. Will the proposal result in:' a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel , ox energy? _ b. Substantia. increase in. demand upon existing sources of energy, or.require the development of new sources of energy? 16: UTIL� Tom, Wil tTie proposal result an a need for the E67 systems, or substantial alterations to f 11 owilig : a. Power or natural gas? _ b. Communioations systems? - - c: Nater' avaa.lab;l ity: d. Sewerox se tic tank? p - e, Storm water drainage' , 'd JL fr $6.1'd Waste, andisposal? 17: HUD1AN HEILTH. C$il1 the proposal result o any health. hazaacd Or potential a. Creation health hazard (e, eluding .ment1.al health)? b., Exposure of people 'to- 'ot.enti.al Health i azar ds ?'' 18. AESTI�ETICS. Will , the propria L xesul t in the"l o view, open t ;o stxucton off any scenic vistaox ro osal resin t in the the_ c, or wi l th:e P p pubf.a e sa ve s;i to op- t , cxeat�on of ari aosthetacally off n To public viet�r? 4 Yn$ MAYBE NO 19 t]3CT�,RATION. Will the �, proposal result. in an impact tpon the quality or Quantity of exi.sLing recre'atic nta opportunities 204 CULTURAL RRSOURCES, a. Va.11 t e propo"sal result in the alteration o or the destruction 01 pre,histovit or historic archaeological :site? b. W:ll the proposal result in adverse phys a :0 -" or aesthetic effects to ;a prehistoric or historic building, structure or object? c. noes the proposal have the potential to cautjo. a' physical change which would. affect unig4. ethnic cultural Values? d. Will the proposal restrict axis ting religi'ptly or sacred uses within the potential impact area? V• 1�xSCUSSION OF RNVIRQNMcNTAL EVALUATION APL '40-07-10 etc. See attached. Y 41 i k a mm��� Advisor's Agency Page May TWO `27 3,987 - - 2. Creation of 13 parcels' of 5 acres each where 4 now oax:l ii t MM: Redesign for'10 arse parcels. 3. Growth inducement, to surrounding large parcels at t,110, north- under east end; of Jones Avenge, some of which are Contracts. rm�GA"i1 , - MM: Deszgnat a minimum 100-f-oot setback f 4. Loss of the primarily agricultural. economy in =1'1wt MM Commit to retention o the orchard:; 5. nd The division is incompatible with the adopted goals a including agridUltural objectives Of the Durham planning area recreational and noise. MM: Implement agricultural mitigation measures and dgmon'strate construction will attezuate 45 deoibelS indoors. 6. Loss of productive almond and .walnut trees. of the orcha-rd. MM.: Commit to retention 7. Introduction of flowering; landscapes, possible impacts on pollination of orchards. MM None. 8. Presence of two 90 degree turns on Jones Avenue which need traffic. realignment ,prior to handling more Provide realignment of Jones Avenge► dedication right-of� MM: way and construct 200 degree radio turns. g. Poor access ,at Blossom and Midway which needs improvement MM. by the prior, to handling more traf f is . No advised Department of Public 'Works. 10 Lack of police ,protection: No MM available. 11. Low level of general: governmental;services avaia,able in ru"r,al areas- No MM available. l2 opportunities by -compromising the Loss of recreatibnal;oppo the railroad right-of-way. MM» Of=fer railroad right-of-way for future bike pai=h• Potential for impact to archaeological resources. comply with x,ecommendat�ons� MMc Submit survey and l4 Division at: this time may oomproma se action.,cn'the ,community- wide planning effOtt.now.under - y: Please submit maps after the Durham -Dayton -Nelson plan MM: is adopted wh-ich W uI provide guidance on the appropriate land use density• I