HomeMy WebLinkAbout040-080-056er .t.
e
ENVIRONMENTAL T PAC es" and "mayl�.e" answers are, r.egYxx,red
Xp anat�ans n. a l Y
NO
ou att;ached ; sheet (s� YES;
Will the prop] sal re<sultin
in
1. EARTH,
Unstably earth cond ta.r„ns Gr in changes
s
a.: ...
:geologic substruct�txes? +y
d. sp,lacemen4s , ,compaction or
C
b`. Disruptions of thesoil ? �-•_:
ovexcovering
roundtopograsux.fac'e
'�hY
-.,...~
Change in ar g. "---
T el:ief features?, xficton; of any
or mod
R
d, estruc.tzann ,cry"vering _
cola a c or phys; cal ; featur.es?
unique ,g : g. water 'erosion ot
--�-
e . increase in wind or �--"
either ''bn ar off-site.
°Chan}Res "in deposlt:;on oxaan�ndeposition
m
.'
Sands, or changes in
which may modify the channel of
or
or erosion cean
a river ax stream or the, bed at the o
army bay),inlet' or
ura, ly DT aduct?�ve .spits'
Lass a� ple.'ag�icUl:
outside designated urban areas?' colo is
Or property 'to g g
h.�cosure of :people
hazards such earthquakes, landslides,'mud-
azards?-----'
h>
siides, ground failure' or s�.milar ----
�. ATR. Will the proposal-resu�t'in substantial:
detera.o11 ration of ambient
a Air emissions O
..�'
air quality?_
b: The, cre tion of object an:�:o�e odors, smoke
or umes? moistures or
Ci Alteration o-fair movement,
change, in climate,
,
.,
or any
temperature for ally'?
locally,Ox�
3. WATER. Will the proposal rehetcaursebatantial
a, Changes” in currents, ox
direction of water movements in eitherJL
.
marine or fresh, waters? drainage p7terns ,
absorption ratorf"es,
b. Ghnges;in
orthe rate and,amtsurface drai,nagelmpxeve_
�',►
c. Need for off; sz.t
'`nc7uding'VegPtatinn removal, channel-
meats,
of (load
ization or culvthe
d Alter8.t on. `to coureorIflow
waters?'
Change the amount, of surf ace water in a?�Y
e _
water., body? ar zn any
f Discharge into surface watexs� including
water gizaliy,,
alteration of surface
limited'ta beinperatur;e, dissL.
,
. bu�t°not
or turbidity?
oxyga a or rate of flow
Altera ion of th7 dir,,eati
-~
—�-
g.
Of ground v�atexs • ualit„ of ground watersr
in the quantity oi~ q . Y -
h. Ghang ; h daxect acldataons o with
either' through of an
"or
�
drawal , through' ,inte;rce'ptio
aquifer by cuts ar excavateoris?�
'amount or rt�lies?erwise
i.. Reduction in the
suf
AV for publio Ovate pp to wabex
or property
osire of people
'. Exp. h as floa;di,ng?
related hazards suc
�---
2
17-
YES
M1AYI3E NO
4
PLANT LIE
FWil l 'the' pxoposa],' :resullt in „strbsi antial
a, Chan9p in, the dIVersity o . s'pe.cie,s,, Or nUmb,er
iaY
rt,f any, species of p an`.ts (iricludIng trees,
shrubs; grass , :Crops , an ' aquat3.c. p'ian.ts)
V. ,Reduction „of the uutbers o- any unique ,
OT endangered sped - , I I plants?
c» Introductidn of neer ,species o �pl:ants iiitol an
Area,ox ri a barrier to' the normal replenish-.
inept of e.xsting. species .r
�(
d. Reductzon in acreag:ee of any, agricultu al cro'f't,?
5.
ANIMAL LIFE T Will the Iroposal result in sub.4taixtial:
a. Change in the diversity''of'specie's, or`numbexs
y
o£ arly species of 4 imaxs (birds, lana animals
a�
ancludIng reptiles, fish: ,and shell fish, '
bent}iic organisms or insects,)`?`
r
b.,. Reduction in th„e'fiumbers, o� any unique.,''rare
or endangered 4pecies of animals?JL
c. Tntxoduction of new species of animas into
.;
an area, or result in a'°b"arrier to the migration
,
nr movement o animals?(�
(1. 5etetJ 0rg ii,on"t '01 existing Fis'I l.dlifo'
labi tart?
6.
N018t. Will the proposal result inSubs tantia'1:
a=Acre'ases in existing noise levels?
b» Exposure of people to svexe r�oiso levels'?
7:
p. p
L-1 MY ANI) "CLARE. Wi11 thexo osal produce
signs f scant lz;ght and gl.axe'`
8»
LAND USE., Will the proposal, result in a
sYu st'antiil alteration of t}ie present or planned
land use of. an area?
.
9.
NATURAL RESOURCES-; Wi11 the proposal, result in
su stan.tlas:
a. increase in the rate of use. of any natural
res.ourpes7
b. Depletion of any non-renewable natural,
rosouxceS?
10.
RISK 0P UPSET. Will the pxopO's aX involve;
a=,. A x�"- sof explosionor the release of hazard-
nus suUstarices ;(including; bit riot limited, to,
�»
oil e, c`
y p ides, chem�,cals or: radiation) in the
event Of an Accident ov upsetconditions?
b Pc89ib,1e interference with an emergency
response plan 0, ome- cy eyacuatI n plan?
X1.
POPULATION» Will the. proposal alter thelocat',ion,
.»
Tistra utTon, density, or growth rate of the human
hulatio.` ?.
o P: n,
s
12 .
HOUSING . tiVil1 the proposal affect existing housing,
lt' n l ho
or create 'a demand ox >add ` o 'a ” using
:v
.3 r
OYES MAYBE
I10
I.,
TRA:NSPORTATTON/CrRCU'L.0.T C ON . Wx U] tine proposal.
_.0
�e t
x „cul '�np
a,' Generation of substantial` add 4tiona.l vel i.Cle
movement?
SL
b.. Effecr'Cs on existing parking facilities, or
demand for new parking?
11
�
c. Substantial`impat on existing transportation
systems?
A .- Significant alterations to present patt.orns
of circulation or movement o Epeople and/ -ox
goods?
e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or aix txaffic?
f. Increase is traffic hazards to motor vehicles,
bicyclists or pedestrians?
14;
PUBLIC SERVICES.` 14111 the proposal have an effect
upon, or result in a need for, new or altered
governmental services;
a. Fire protection?',,
b. police protection?
X.
'
C.Schools?
d. Parks oc other recreational facilities?
e. Maintenance of public facilit,es,, including
roads?
f, Other, governmental services?
15
ENERGY. Will the proposal result in:
a., Use of substantial amounts of fuel.or energy?
b;' Substantial inc ease in demand upon existing
Sources
ources of energy, or the development
of neer souirces of energy?
16.
U'ZLITIES„ Will the propos�i result in a meed .for
new systems, or'subsAtantial alterations to, the
following;
a» Power or naturals gash'?
b ' Communcationsystems?
c Water availab ill ty;w.
d. Sealer or septic an
e. Storm water drainage?
--
f. So] id �,sste, and di sposal?
17.
HUMAN HEALTH, Willthe proposal result in
a. Creation af� any' heal Ch hazard,, or potenia
het tl-i hazard �ex,cluding Mental health) ?
b . Exposure of people to potential health;
hazaxW''
18,
AESTHETICS.: Will the proposal result in the
o strUction of any scenic vista or view open to.
the publa c or ;,rill 'the proposal result in'' the
creation of an aesthetically offensive site open
to public view?
r�r
MAYBE NO
19 RE'CREATIOIC *i the pr4osai result im,n impact
upon the Qualityor quant .,I:v ;r,f existinge.crea'tional
oppoxtuni'ties ?
20. tULTURAL RESOURCES.
a. Wi] 1 l e= propos11,TeSult in the, alteration
of ,br the dent, action cif
'' a 'pre as:torIc °or
Historic archaeiJlvgi al s>lto?
b- Wi' l the p'ropo�al result' z1,1 adVerse""Phys; cad.
or aesthetieffects to a; px� -I.Iistoric or
his�ox c buildilig, structui, r object?
r,
c. Does the proposal have °tlie pO,L e.ntlal °to cau"se
a'"pbfati cal change which would affeO zur ique'
M'
ethn ,c cultural �vjalucs?"'
d v' fYiil the pro,possx restxict ing iotts
or sAcxed usesw;xthin tie'' potential impact
ar;e a?
U. DPl?rTUSSION ''O.F ENVIRONMENTAy EVALUATION
{,-
See A�taah�d
JlM
'r n
Nor
ip
v k':
d,
.;o
+A�plioa'nt0 Car.'l N W' Dlvgan �&1rcel 0
4A-Q8-56,,69
-
Lou e6-0�J-22r0�
ATA.SMEET
AWi. ...�Q,ar,3�ri�r;�,r
1
,F9,00, Of. Project--,, , Lgnd Ai+,r.isi,ori W ,
2r
OvIef 0 aS:r. tdres�r.l.cinC
;lrta 4 pairc,lx at5tCr+�s anti 1 at,, .,at�r. eft
3»,
t„c+Gal,ion"At the► ricitth�Aost c orn.e:of ''Lott Ctoacliij, Ackerman,
I
t5utrh��m .
'4.
y )C
n .P' jbpm��t n O.0 a 1 J.'. aC.rQ W
Pro li�3xg�ity of t�c�ve
�y� O.U./5
5«
Axmsunt of Impervious Gurfac3ngA Nliriirnal W
6.
Acoeaid rindNear+eat Public Opad(s J 91 Ppontage bit Ackerman .
7.
Method of 56ioagei bispasa19 Septic tank and leach lineaW
'aii
source of QataruORy=. jrid.ual wolfs.
�«
Prcixicnity c� peer L3.nes To ari'i:raal parcel.
10«
Potential far fuirtherr land div,joi onsi and develagsmeeAtp llivia'iorti
w it l pet^rriit` .construction of f.ye hauses. �
7 r j•'n'V 1
Phys�cgl VnVirondnent•'
1
Terrain
a» General Topographic Character» Level valley land.
h«lope: Less than L 2`"percent.'
c-. Elevation= 180 :feet
A. Limiting Factors: tVone.
a» Types .end Characteristlais wins-Farwoll A6SoCj;ation� very '
daep, nearly lever sand and gravel deposit's al;orig butte,
(
Cre,-.rk Y
b» -i,im ,ting Factors: Moderately swell to e�cCessive:ly drained
soixs.
Natural hazards of the Land
a . Eaarthcivake ZgynAe" Moderate.
�. on:...PMoiLt lal
{A
C » Land ide•Pbtentlak-` None.
al. Pira Hazard: ° On�c�lass,if3:ed i
�: ;.. Exparesive 503,1 Potdht:i.al i.Moderate.
Hy+drealogy,
�•. Surface Water= 'Butte Creek is 'Nest of, propdrtY:Iineal
bill'' Ground Waters AVeo of heavy 'grauindraa sr� withdi^aural.
c. brn nagd Gjharactd itjt3.ca3 Natural clrai;ria is tiaestorly to"
d. Annual Rainfall C norm, 941 yr �6
e. Limiting pactora Ztix►e .A fla.aciing' along Butte Creole,
�.
V'isuavScenle Quality. Scenic s'''hard views.
fir.'
Acoustid tuurAiiy;
Q ity,t vAir
Siola� ;dal
pnvrran¢n„�,,rLt,,;
9
� E
Jt
'
$
�, O
CUofr.r3_
n Ns� sens �tiwt_. or r wildlife l_ n vicinf` tY
gc6kr'a�imrtd
9.
411413 fe Habitant= Uiuitsd by tagricultural operations in''thes
vicinity;
1 dD.
d1i^chka��cyArrgt c,nl Artci Ola i cri"Lea, 1, Re>srsurrcool "in :fie! nr"ea,=: Mrader^ater
�
thigh' etE3k}ta'bsvtY e:�
`$1.,
tutte Gruuktg; era real Ptah den gnatiOnn Orchard sld Crop.
1
�Cac h�5.
g2
15 u
y�i�t9n� L000 00
1 .,1 �y
' L::tiatirig L.81rki� Wl$,� nn-aita;. CD�^Ci'rtrd dr�el ling r
14.
Surrroundlud ;Area x
�. Land us . Orchards, lillm .ted reside.niAAlo kc wi Is.
0 « Geri 4 Plan deoignrationa. Orchard field Crap,,_".
Agr~.i cisl total-Resdenb1
d. Parcei 81zes3= Xverage is, 9 w 11 , medifari is
e. i'optialat$trn r Spar:;xe , .
15
Ciao - acter of Site and Arena Generally agricultir�rl faith earns
resideritiral. �rrcroachtgent.
16i.
N airest Urban' Arena Cl;y of Chico - 54- rn,i is es
17.
Rele"mt. S' here of Influence« fl ood contr=ol mainteriarice 05:,
.Durham Mosquito Ab.atament
E
1an
YraiFrov erste Standta da ie�^b genera : ' tllA .
19
Firs: "Pratect3 an ;Service
er. = Herarast cbiU tV (State) Fire Station046.
b. Water Aveilabilitya Migijne capaci'cy bnljr.
20
sc-4 i018 in Area Durham .Uni f ieEt.
a
i
,
io