Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
040-100-028
'cl . r• . P • aft. r COW.WSION. SUM''4A111' SHEET FOR LM) yq yryy n 1 `. a. Ramser, et al Log#88-03-11- 02 ADDRZSS 189 3 , Carden Road, Durham, CA 95938 v.�. -._ . r �*1C._._.CIS. +nF,l..w ue,.:kf.Y.I.Ww :.rw.!.MrYltt.• :gin. :u., Same OWNER PAOJVC'.T DESCR:SPTION TPM to divide 10.44 acres to create 2 paxdo1,, 5.21 acres and 5.23 ,acres LOCATION approximately 600 feet south of Carden RoadjX�?].r. west of Lott Road, Durham. A5SE8SOR' S PARCM NUMBER(S) ..w 40-10-28,_29_" OILING A-5 GNERAL P]r1�1� Orchard & TSRO�EC"T C;CJt'1I"aTT�;T7' awr.rw....ir.,,L., GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE REPORT w�«.m_.... Y ,..,.ter DATE OF APPLICANT SIG1��� Lr LAND CONSERVATION ,QCT CONTRACTS??._. DpT APPLTCA""101 RVC'.l;; IED3-1:a 88 AUPIT/SURV.EYOR/CIVIL MGINCER: Sierra West Surveying 5437 Black Olive Drive, Paradise, CA 95969 DATE PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPMT PREPARED , CATEGORICAL EMPTIOM - DATE FCIEDr. ..�. ANIS DATL, r .:�.� NEGATIVE DECLARATION w DATE MI T!IGAM NEG, DECLARATION MIT A,DOPTPM PNV 10111A,'T iti+ riORT - DATE CEl�mi 1>` Cr rt;r Irr L sr.4 f i. c i. .`.X ° 1 6Y.r...l1401.) l f' Ntri. DATV_ ADt1ISUM fit, I No Y Irt � M LNtY D. TE ' ,.,.ry yu ADVISOMY h(MU>y 11i."`.l"ION �...�...�..—::;,.�,. ,.., ,�.�.�.....�� tom,,...�.�.,F.rd�•,..w.,..,.�.:F,.:F . .F,, A1iPIii L81 A��15L 1 i IIi;AIiY1JCa i)�1��wj' �,1: )n1dV�1 ►�io.��X'I.riN :.�.�� F,..,;,w.�,,.�.. _ .,,���...,.�.r........�.�wF� �,�..�F.:..�.�..,....k...�..k�� .. .,.. w..�, C t 11 r' :.w y�..,,:r�y.�..y�,�,.„q�Yd►_..�.....w��..,...F�..�w..,ry.,�.�h... �,... f:- t v'` try Cf'0111�+ A118 POR VLI,At� UNU UIR ��C TOR' S Atr-ORT .............Fs 4r.rW..x...n.i:. a.iL,. iKw.. hpww«vw-rid+. luWi.w.Y.�r.i-.w.rY�w+.W+r, •-�� r4+.raw±FW'.1"F+.Lwyliw4wr.i..+..+M.+.wnYFw.iW:uwwJ:Fwr�.Lw.+wvw�ki�.J.4w��FA, iawk(iw.�MY`+M.FwiNSK+ii-<.�.w. —.I..cS rwsY..+f+.�!1 OV,HARn AND FIELD CROPS 1. PredomtMlnt 5-10 at. Parcel SixP I�'v�r�r� c��ulvrX; a-4_ cr•iyFt�,ar, n7c..A>y '. C''�1Vi�C�f-:Mf,1V[ ,, .�,. rz �rc�F1T` Star[I1nWrlilnat on. Substantially conforms to; (,'F',N>RAL PLAN: I. Land Use NAP oR - — l:t TS1C5 � Z. Conservation l l vihs 1-b to ba vohmavLod by applicant: 3, Open Space I. AP1'I,iCANT 1'lAMla AND ADDRESS: �L 5: Noise u ce—u..�1 G, Housing 2, 1`RflJrv,,.r DESCMPT.ION: ZONINc;: c7 r^rh�S 7 t. AS$ESSOWS PARCEL NUMBER(S)- UMBER(S):io. do.Pk01'f)SED USE, 1,110 following items are to be completed by tl,e Planni?ig Department: CURRENT 'CONING: LAND CONSERVATION At.ilt►r,(% r `, � y., .q_ PiLN1, Gt;NI RAL PLAN DESIGNATION:�"c f;.�nditinnal Ct'itc+ria' �� `' AGRICULTUqAI,-RESIDENTIAL 1, Agricultural Compatibility YES NO It is recu:mhended i':hal" following checked it(ghltjntl" prrC° t"hn 1. Water and SuWer Capacity � ARCHAEOLOGICAL RECORDS t11►ECK X 1, Adogt:ate 101re Facil i tic`'s }BOTANICAL SURVEY 1i, Road Capacity and Maintenance GEOLOGICAL SURVEY '+. Access to Commercial and Schools Y1:S Nn OV,HARn AND FIELD CROPS 1. PredomtMlnt 5-10 at. Parcel SixP Vicillit.y of Urban Boundaries a-4_ 6 Ag. Vlnbi.% ty not Impaired --I— -I_Start Star[I1nWrlilnat on. Substantially conforms to; (,'F',N>RAL PLAN: I. Land Use Z. Conservation 3, Open Space 4i Safety �L 5: Noise ,a G, Housing /.. CircUlation ZONINc;: c7 r^rh�S 7 COMMENTS: -,C) WITHIN DEPART14EI, - Or k'1fi11 AND GAME DEVELOPMENT ZONE: WITHIN F'1,OOD PLAIN WITHIN AREA, SPECIFIC OR LAND USE PLAN: 7Z If Yes,?c^ll Ar.r•..• CJ e•--== �Q.`5b�..., Name Plan WITHIN URBAN RESERVF:� ?` 1f Yes Name of Reserve AIRPORT LAND USE PLAN: L ss N AS THE APPLICANT FOR T}iE RE UE5' THl CONFO*MCE WITH THE ED LAND DIVISION I AM AWARE ql TF[E A730VE SCOFF UI I`JkM1,NA'Il1N FtP�?.ttDiNG bated �G :Signature of Applicant, *TMs report Will aupire and be discarded six (6) inti the from tha date of Gth at LD 1000A (revlrt d 6-87)kLCaI�IVED SlrH IA Wt -G SLJF'v V1Wj I 0 0 N07TCE 0jr 'EON E 0 -ch Butte County Tice of Planning , VT -I %10 and eat Planning Department Tenth Street, Room 121 MAY 2 G 1988 Sacramento, CA 95814 7 County Center Drive or OANDAO�. ' gg utte Co. Clark a" OrovillCA 95965 ".Wd 2LX County Clerk By boputy County of Butte Viling of Notice of Determination in complianuo with section 21108 or 21152 of the Public Resources Code. Project Title AP # Name Tentative Par, al Map 40-10-28,29 J. Rams.er, at al. State Clearinghouse Number Contact Person Telephone Nu,ibo (if submitted to Clearinghouse) Public Works L7ohn Mendonsa 538-7266 Project Locotion Approximately 600 feet south of Garden Road and approximately 1000 feet West of Lott Road, in the burham area. Project Description Tentative Parcel Map subdividing 10.44 acres into two parcels consisting of 5.21 acres and 5.23 -acres. This is to advise that the Butte County Advisory Agency (Lead Agency or Responsible Agency) has apl—oved the above-described project on May 23, 1988 and has nude (Date) the following determinations regarding the abovo-described projoct., 1. The project -Vill) X Will not, have a significant, effect on the environment, An Envitdnraantal Impact Report Was prepared for this ptoject pursuant to the provisions of CEOA. A Negative Declaration Was prepared for this ptojett pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. 3, I-IlLigation measures X w0to_i —were riot, made a condition of the approval of the project. X 4. A statement of overriding considerations 4AS) —a—yl"w not, adopted for this project. This is to cOttilY that the final RIR IoJth comments and rosponnon mid record of project Approval is available to the general public att Butte County Planning ro-partmonit 7 County Center, Drive Orovilleo CA 95965 Data Peteived for Tiling and Posting at OPR —'— , Ramser, et al TPM, AP449-10-28, 29 Mitiga.tiOn Measure ro,tndwater mitigation measure p oposal: 1. comply with the g " "Provide verification of winter Comgplete�s� tcrand �a�hexn prior to recording the final map l improvements elevationeucnto rsl;a sfacLory required physica verification groundwater Inter-Departr#1' 'Memorandum To, Advisory Agency tr t FROM, Planning Director SUSJKCr, TENTATIVE .PARCEL MAP FOR J. RAMSLR AP#4.0-10--28, �I:CYs DATE;3 April 14, 1988 The proposed project consists of subdividing 10.44 acres into two parcels consisting of 5.21 acres and: 5.23 acres, The project site is located approximately 600 reot south of Garden Road and approximately 1,000 feet west of Lott Road, in the Durham area. The proposed project is in conformance to the Butte County General Plan and Zoning Ordinance. The Property is zoned A-5. Under, the current zoning designation, five acre minimum lot Sizes are required. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the character of the surrounding land uses The initial study identified the project site as an area of high archaeological significance. In response to mitigation measures recommended, the applicant contacted the California Archaeological Inventory, information Center to request a records check. The Information Center has determined that a archaeological survey is not needed for the project site. However, should anyr historic cultural materials be encountered during project operations, all work should ceasUre immediately pending an inspection of the site and materials by a qualified archaeologist. Recommend approval subject to the following Qonditioht c' ed__tor f-, �t� th�T� 13utte bun on g C-rdia-nco._w.hich applies to said BMjmc cc! Sierra �Oest Surveying J i Rams or 't' ra(ifoma Archaeologic. -1 Inventory TO: Bukte County Plan` O7 C�tf Center OZ. ille, Ca. J5?63 evrrE I7eparfm r4 CN. x"`561 ent of Anthro Rw.s s+s.uYou Catifornla State oolu8y, e lssrr. MMA&," Chico. l 1Gq 'OOOC �»..rr CA 95929. (916) 895-6256 Date =A>,r 7.r< tn�q ►►Hing � �,,�, A�'" ortjvi1113 1 7Ca100mia re; AP -40-10-28 &29/Ram --.Ccurit:Y Planner, a�ar ger review Of t1]@ abcve projec�, has revealed the. fo.Liowinq, ax: The area indicated acc.5aeoicxrica '� within k�`1e pro'e,.... uY serL w -I e. " ��aries is be } r Present are: " tbrtsicred `Y mess to natural Flat source s of Nater and/or east Flat land near wate South /or east faring slopes r Prevztxtsly recorded .sites in Ct:her; the vicinity Re ssrrC,,,l j, re ---gym,_ .."---------, the area .,d that: an archaeo -- --------- a 4ualfied ercha,�l� xcc'cal t�:rtnais:a: Prepari _ � St and a riate t,,itigaticxt ►r are sof Aki CWn site or t to Pro ' t s ha., �, ��� �%er.?t=cns 1321 Q` dV� �,1 ,fir � : We re ti. 1 -1 have a n a a riousl;�r rewrced in +fie ro 'er-� area 'rrre:x3 that a ��ifie^ , � _.tw',ve urcact on p 7 ccti� nenty ar?c or W �r,.,,�locts't Wiese cu re.tc-eu ire a "ut alive pr;,t sul.. ccntacc-i to assess site �thr: surveil is + " Howe-, no teen ed mage �exf sinew x a,a :,, `+� knmenc fpr ,,�,e Wrt,�� 'lads -tip ear �►jnteted tni�:c h s`ot o�rr Project. sttou,.c cepa.; . rlurZttq ,pt n C. r;il t'�tral sr -e and *..;tmmcc�a;aCe,v �ec,� opc:t8ataoris — macer Ppn,n.• ail pe q " r ----_-. -P �� 1 L t7 c7 e� tl t 1� it WOu.La Y 8 Itdda.rl�p -� i1yipt:t"faLc�[t OJ: telt Thank You for the r ,re a0le arc,naeo oq`�s`- -� .tunic to suggest rhx,, us know khat de I8., ,y are Y to review ar�d aE�E�rop,ria I~ mi. ►TM�de r tit dt1 ttt a gat1On measures. S�ncerel}�, regarding the projectPr° i. Please let Cr. otn r �rtheast K��,z InEt.rmaticx Centerrrinatvc APPi~NDIX F ".OUNT Y OF BUTTE ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST" FORM (7o be completed by Lead Agenhy) Log No. 88.03.11,02 I BACKGROUND AP No. 1. Name of proponent . _s,_ J RAMSER, et al. 2. Address of proponent and representative (if applicable); J4 Ramcer, et al. � -..: _a., ,. _ . Sierra yWes t lett: v'yl 3tx -Durham, .cA 959.34 54Pa�37 Black 0� 1. e Drjve ad -se 3. project description: Tentative Parcel Ma li. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICAN,,, YES Ivll1Y13E NO 1. Does the project have potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substfantlally reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, .cause a fish or Wildlife population to drop below self -sustaming levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the-, range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminalo Important examples of major periods of California history or prehistory? ............. .. . G� 2. Does the project have the potential to achieve short -teem benefits to the detriment of long- term, environmental goals? (Ashort-term impact on the environment is one which occurs to a relatively brief period of time while long-term impacts will endure into the futur(,.) . , , , , , , . , 3. Does the project have tmpactswhich are individually limited, but cutrtulativelyconstderable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively Small, but where the effect of significant ti ......... the total of those it pacts on the enuironnYentis .. , ...... . , ..... ... d i 4. Goes the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings. either directly or indirectly)....... ..... III. DETERMINATION: iTu bras r,onipiPtmJ by Ilae Lead Aguncyj On the barjiy� ref Ihifa initial ovaluatec ire Ll "'Wt- hntt ihP proposed projrct COULD NOT how, %I signelrcanlnif(%t xan ihrF r,uvrinrnnr�rrt, Band a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will bo, prepared 1m IiWE find that although tela proposed project could have n signefecrtnl offr.!rt ran Ilii, e+nvirontnent.tttr=rovrrtll not V� be a significant effect in this ctisc be+wrtrisn 11110- MITtCATION MCASUf1�Sr9wa (,nt,r,rl rsn theattached sheet have been added to the project, A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will he prepared EJ PWS fiend the proposed project MAY have a significant offect on the enviroil rnerit, irnd an ENVI ONM NTAL iMPACT REPOAT is required, COU bUT1), pt'A : '� i'M'NT March 18 1988 DATEBre' t � R 1 _ re> ocaate Planner pew lewed byC 7 0 0 " IV. LNVIRONMEN TA+L IMPACTS b. the creation of obfectional odors, smoke or fumes)...., ............. , ... , ... « .. , . , ..... 0 (I:xplanations of all ,"YES" and "MAYBE" answers are required on attached sheet(s),) I;V c. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperature, or any change in climate, locally or 1. EARTH. Will the proposal result in significant: YES MAYBE NO a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures?.—, , , , ,, , ---D , d IV b,, Disruptions, displocemerts, compaction or overcovering of the soil? ... . ..... . . . .. . . . . d 0 tt�C- c. Change In topography or ground :surface relief features? . ... . .. . .. . . . . . . 1. . ........... C7 L"7 l d. Destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical fealurau? , , 171 13 ED -- o. Increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off situ'? ............ .. ....... fresh rwatt+rs%.......... .......... .............................. ... .,........... 0 f, Changes in deposition or eroslon of bench sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or L b. Char. in "-akasorption rates, drainagu patterns or the rate and amount of surface runoff?.. erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream rat the bad of the occarr e)r any bray. inlet or lake'? ....... .............................I .... .....I,.,,......... 0 C3 i U, of e"l"ite agriculturally productive soils outside designa rid urban area;";") ... , . , ... ©, C`J (VC h, Eyposiire of people or property to geologic Hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, ttl d. Alterations to the course or flow of floc d waters? . ................ . . . . . . . . ... . ........ mudslides, ground failure, or similar hAzrards? . .. . . . . .. . . . . . . .............. . .......... 0 .0 r'lY 2, AIR. Will the proposal result in Cl ( a. /fir emissions or deterlotalion of ambient air quality? ..... . ........... . ...... . ... . . . . 0 0 IV b. the creation of obfectional odors, smoke or fumes)...., ............. , ... , ... « .. , . , ..... 0 Ci I;V c. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperature, or any change in climate, locally or regionally'? ... ............ ., ..... ................,.., ... 3. WATER, Will the proposal result in substantial: a, Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements in 'either marine or fresh rwatt+rs%.......... .......... .............................. ... .,........... 0 C L b. Char. in "-akasorption rates, drainagu patterns or the rate and amount of surface runoff?.. L c, Noeu tot off-oile surface drainage: improvements, including vegetation removal, untannelization or rulvnrt installation? ......... , . , .... , , , . > ................. 0 f� ttl d. Alterations to the course or flow of floc d waters? . ................ . . . . . . . . ... . ........ v%r e. Change in the amount of surface wator in any water body!.. . ..... . ... . . .. . .......... Cl ( d f. Discharge into surfieu waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limilod it, tomperaturo, dissolvocl oxyaen or turbidity? ............. zj, Alteration of fixe diter;tton ors rah' of fluor of 9totinri w"°aters? .. ........... . . � � �'` fr, ('Jw jia rn the quantity or duality til ground waters, either through ditc,ct addiliorv4 or withdwwa%,, r,tr through intoruplion of anaquifer by tuts of OxctYvatlons'? 1, Rodirc;tiron in the amount of watt"r othtirwine available for public water cupplint,"rt 0 ak I. Expuiyuto of people or property to water related htaznrus such as flooding?, A. PLANT L IM Will thu proposal result in substantial: a. Change in the diversityy of species, or number of any 4pocios of plants (Uncludittt) Irr)e5, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)? ................ . ....... . . , . , , ....... l 0 b. Reovction of the nunaoers of any unique, rare or endangered species of planta"." ... , .... 0 c, introduction of now Species Of plants into an area, or In n batrior to the normal replenishment of existing species? . . . . . .. . . . ....... . . . ........... . . . . ...... . . . . .., , , , L1 0 d, Reduction In lacreago of any agricultural crop? .. . . .. .I .... . ... . . . ...... . .... . . .. , , , , , 0 ` 5, ANIMAL LIFE, Will the proposal result in substantial,. YES MAYBE NO ecies, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land a, Change in the diversity of sp �I animals Including. reptiles, fish and shell fish, 6enthic organisms or Insects)? ...........species . , , .... , . , species of animals" , , « , . b, Reduction in the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered I 1 c. Introduction of new species Ofaniniais into area, Or resultin+a barrier to the mor ....... movement of animals? . . .. . . . ..................... d, Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat?.. ......... I .... G, NOISE, Will the proposal result in substantial, 0 0 W in existing noise levels? , , . • ... ............... a, Increases � b, Sxposurd Of people to severe noise levels? .. ..... + . 1, LIGHT AND GI;ARE, Will the proposal produce significant light and glare? ..,.. B. LANA USE, Y'yitl the proposal result In a substantial alkeration of the Present or planntrrf Ian p We, use of an Area,) 3, NATURAL RESOUFICES. Will the proposal result in substantial: t3a, increase in t'r;a rata of use of any natural esources? , . , » . + ", " "» .,D o, Depletion Of any non-rene,vable naWfal resources? ................. 10. AISI( OF UPSET, Will the proposal involve; ncluding, but a, A risk of explosion or release of ha I nrdthe` event to ces acic�dent �r upset cion it ons limited to�il+.. 0 p I,. pesticides,, chemicals o r � �-- b, Possible interference with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plait? l alter location, distribution density, or growth rate, of the. 11 POPULATION: Will the proposa............................... „�,,. ........,.. human population? ....,..•. g .Y ...........,,., or create a demand for 11001110ill 13, HOUSING- Will the proposal affect exrstin Isousin' ........», housing ............... ,........ . J3, TBANSPOATATION/01RCULATiON, Will the proposal result in: a; Generation of substantial additional vehicle movement? , ..... .. » , , . • . , .. , . G� l9'" b, Effects on existing parking facilities. or demand for new parkirig? .... ++... .... , �] Cl c Substantial Impact on existing transportation systems?, - , ... , . , . , .' rl, Significant alterations to present patterns of eireuihtibn nr movement of people nridlor goods"? ... ...... ft'''+ e, Alterations to waterborne. Tali or air tralfiel........... , L Increase in traffic hazards t.5 motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians" 14, PUBLIC SERVICES, Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for now or YE.0 MAY0111 NO altered government services: a. Fire protection? .............. .................. ............. .... b, Police protection?...... .........,Y I. .............. ..,,.... ...... , .. • , 1 1 Cl [ASC. c. Schools?,, ........ ..•.............., d. Barks or other recreational facilities? , .. , , .. , . , . • ... , • a. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? ................ ........,.,, , ublic f. Other governmentHl services? . . . ............ • , • • .. , . .... 15,. t:NERGY, Will the proposal result In; a, Usr3 of substantial amounts of fuel or nnrargy? , , • , ... . , b. Substantial Increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or n noire tht , , t dt;vrIppment of new sources of energy? .., . . ...•..,......Y.....................a 16, UTILITIES, Will the proposal resultin a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following: , a, power or natural gas? .. , .... ......... � systems? ,,..,. ............ ............. b, Cr)rnmunications . • .. ......... G ...,.Y.., ... d Lti., c, Waterevarlabllity? ,. ..Y.. .............YY ..., .......... .,.., d. Sewer arseptic system9.,... ,..Y ... ............ .... ......... .a.. Cl Cl (l' e Storm water drainage?........,, ................. ............... [� f. Solid waste and disposal? , .•......, ......................................... 11. HUMAN HEALTH. Will the proposal result in orvallon of arty health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding me°nittl hw?althl? aY b,t=xpi,)sviro of praople Io potential health' hazard �' ..:........ . . sta nit 18, aE T S. the tin the the jtlontion of any c i an aiesthetic llyloffnnr, vtG site Open he prr)7osa,llresu lul bli,;, will tm cro the,t?ubll,..rarwl f f .,..,. ,... ,....,Y...•. to public vlew'7 . • .. . .. . . . ... . ...... . . ... . . 1'9. REC1115ATION. Will th(D Proposal tosult ill all Impn+.:i ul,urt Ih(= quality or qulrrrlrty Of Oxl11Un(t rlat;rrr;�hur�ill opportunities) , ... . , . , . , .. .. , „, , ....... 20. CULTURAL RSSOURCSS. ul r�r tlr�� rYt'�,tructlon �taf a prr hiatt�ric� Or ItlrYtc�rlc Will the proposal rr-sui't in the alteration ,..,., archaeologicalsitc-9..................Y,.,,.........,, ttort lkIltc of to a prehi ,toric or to c ire adverse physical or nestte b. Will the proposal result ......... building, structure or Ol�jwct'7 .... , , . , • . .. ^ ...... • . ' ..... the have the potentittf to cause a physical change wl�Ich would off.... unique t3 c, Does proposal . ethnic cultural values' ...... Y .. • . • ... .... bsai restrict existing or sacred uses within the potenslai impact �,• d. Will the p f ..t.......,Y.,a.a.t., rCt tla /� . are`? v ....,.1.,,.Y,Y.,Y. L) LS C _US S I QN �_Qf� . CINVIRONMENTAL EV61�QATIQLII AP 40-1 O -P8,29 .1 b., The proposed dens I by of one dwe 1 1 '1 no Lin 1 t per r, I vo acx.(rN I I I not I .r i+ I, I T r„ I n any sit gn 1 F I can b d 1 sr LApt 1 on , d', sp 1 agement 3 C, WIII sat, I loor in or e.,Vorcover I no of the so I 'I . Ho"ever, because of the i ol �,, 4, iv., t l a4,;res, i, 1,.he terra I n and the overcoveo I rig of the s I to by din lvewayss sldewy M8 and a roadway comiri>j 0-om Itor-6k;n Rload, sllo-ht. Impacts on soil and filtration Could 19'. Tho r -)r- Oposed Project w I I I i-esul t. in the �rcat. I (it, cjf, t;W11 I'JeIAJ 5 -acre parcels. The surrounding acreage Is SLIbdivlriod lrii-o t_hesamr,, density of 5 -acre parc�'is. The almond orchard!in tl,le vicinity are all operated on small t�t- and proposp-d project will not h -v,;- a significant IMPW-'L It'LlIt.ural lancl usoz nor will It result in {-,he loss of prime hrind - 3j: F I ood I no n- 1 Ono t he SLItte Creek area I s a I ways a pro 11:) 1 1 1 ty i Hoiip-vei-, Flooding at this location Is not expected duo to the levelt: systam along Butte Creek, The crc-t--k is no , dors lonatc:,:Id as a Special rlood Flazord Zone by the Oerjatptment of HOLISIrig and Urban Developine ot "Flood Haut rd Bound-ary Map." 4a: $ome- mature -a almond treys may need to be removed to aCcOmMOd@'1;,0 the access road and building padso Sit"' PlanS foil the proposed two Pat-telS ShOUld be prepared in such a manner as to as Inarty 11[1101ld trees as possible. 8: Thi, pi-oposted project I,- In conformance Wth tile Butte County Ut,dlnance A-5 -.one 8�, we]I as the Butte Coi,.,inty Land Use Plan UL)Signat 1011 Of Orchard and Pleld Creir.r., The project I--- predominantly Minded L -, ex, istil rig parse I s I zes wh I &. range from 6 to 10 acres - t r i au di a. I on , l ie pr, 0 5 en t s t atU S of aq t'hl I CU 1 tura 1 pr:oduc, t I on w I I I not; be I Un I f I cant: I y irMpm1v,r -gid by the proposed -project This area is out-t,ently under- review due to the development szf o coulty land use are,a plan for, the Durham viclnity+ Several land 1.ise f,3cenarlcis and olternative,z are t)e1ilg develol,:)ed) one of which cies loiiates this area rOt- 10 -ace -0 MinIMUM parse SlZes. IF such an alternative viere adopted by the Board of these properties Would become nonconforming parcel sites. 14b v.., '�'UbSeqUent SUb,31, I Ing and reels ldent lol development within the Qu -haill Ul.%7111 the rain wratieyrie of the SN -1,1 f I-- UoPar t as we I aq t; ,oral dis!riccs . The riwt-ham Unified School rilsti-.c�t Is a result o iii -ban +jrlowth --)rid, deYelOPMellt W11thirl it -5, L)OLInJaWir--t�a t- 1�ve th I em � o t�ehool Imp,'4ct fee ho;;; been est abl 1 -shed for al I i 1-.!ntinl do s -,i l o�"dnle- is In the Ourham School DhztrIct aoan. '\,,!y drive loprio, 1, thl!:� ptept-m-t-Y will r --c qLA I f410 that such FeeS be pa I d at fire t I me o r rr%r bul I r1 Ir perm I ts 16aob! Public utilitles and communicintions syztems oi.'l VJ- provi d-od by the Pacifll-- Gas and V.wctrI(.-. 1,*ompony and Paclfltz Oet'. U(JrV I Ce prob I enis artan 1: 1 c I pated I n Supp I y ng th I S property 1.11 1,h I " I ry sere I co, The proparty I s not adjorzent to ex I st I no ut 1 1 1 t I e5 41 thoref'ore an oxtens I on o F I I nes of approx I mato I y 600 f eet w I I i to be Installed to provide serlvlre: -5.. ific* Wot.er 1s ava11av1� kay Individual wells for both litY Is or, iaY ,'tjrtq y,,iells located ond 01 s ey���°��tdat-�cfir�m rae7}sr'I�ullr�skatw�a�. All �gorrera 1 l Y good a Mase 00 er^ �}ual 1 ty and quant i tY reclu i re-nents of the Butte i,4;ai.,int y Iw i po C,iral ortment and the Environmental Health department rt►u<, i be mclt, iso The PrOPQsed ! ►" o jeaeas� � �.+1is .11 glyf' archaee1 a��ca1 �s l n Iif l catrc of r.;� � ;c.r•rs i 't i v I ty map as an ar ,-eccr fs search Shaul d be cr,rr+4lr,toted by the Call far�nfi a Ar��h aor�l ar i ca r xecords s In h $1-10ild f�enter° at the Cher„al-t,ment: jai' Anihr°rrjol0()Y cad= Crwal i fern l a State University, Chico, to asr�er.t a i n i F ��n4i r°�k�l°iraw mitigation measures are necessary In relationship, to Ole orr haeOI 09i C81 or CU 1 tura l ree ources Of t1•1 i s site. meq,,. pmenderi } , f:antacty this C�epartment of Anthropology at Cal fear tilo St,- Ut-i i -/ers i tY r Chl ce, to requests a records checktc tlxiterm i rte the ._Arch-wjl0.01Cal signlficane of i-ie site: UL' Applicant; J. NaMsf-n', et a I DATA -SHEET 0 AP1 40-1 Log # A. ft—pklb i; Descai,ption 'I. Type of P-oject: Tentative Parcel P. Brief Description: SUbdIvIding 1014-4. acro,, cons istino, of 5.21 acres sand 5.23 aci os. 3. Location '. Approximately 600 feet SOUth Of Road ;_`it10 approximately 1000 feet west of Lot-: Road, It, f"ho Dut-ham area. 4. Proposed Density Of Development: One dNol'Jitly aril it por- ,acres . 5. Amount OF Impervious Surfacing:: 10 -''ti . 6. Access and Nearest Public Road(s): r,,arden J�iijzj(j 15 8PPrOxImate lY 600 feet to the north of U,jfj 1=aj-Opot_.01:j pj-Q'j(-Yj.j site. Method of Sewage Disposal: Individual sc,p-Llc and learl iflold systelll-. f7,iurco of Water Supply: Individual wells., 9- Far oximl:ty of Power Lines: Along Garden Road. 10. Potential for further, land divisions and dove I opjjj0jj,t,. N o fa.irther subdividing under existing General Plan ties hgnat, I on of Orchard and rield Crops Is ayjol,ied* Phys-Ic8l Env ir merit: Ter*rla I n a. Geneiral 'roPooraphlc Character"., Flat Valley archar-d 1,, -in b. Slopes: 0-11., c. evat I on 4 155-158 feet above Sea I _eve I d4 Limiting Ivactorls: None. 2, Soils 8. Types, and Characteristicst Villa Loam, topsoil brown to l-Ic-h U`Owl", R-3 feet dee-P, subsoil approxjm8t�nly 6 fee -i: cher, lAjoll drahillriczckij) Permeable to wat01-, and coria; i d o r, e d cN >,,,z, e: I tj tL a,,rr I CU 1 tUr-a I oil1 bi Limit inn ractOrs: Norio. 8Natural Hazardt, )-. the Land a. Carthquake zonn^. Moderal.e Earthquake jnt;yrj lf-j Zoo!,L VISI. bA ErOs 1 on Potenti al Nonu, c, Landslide Po'tontialt Norle. d. 1: i t',o 148mard Unc I I f I eel ) I t -t^ 1 @aterj L e- 11-XPVIMsIv-- S011 POtGnti:al.- Mode -rate. 4. Hydro I ogy a,- Sur Pace Water'" I rr", ),gat I an dltt-%h runs throw0h propor-ty. t6 Groundwater; Excellent. Or c ana i nape Characteristics: �lnCt drains toward drains i s rel . f?, i Val y r' tat d. Annual Rainfall (nor�mal>: }. e- Limiting Factors: 24_y 5, Visual/Scenic Quality:None. 6. Acoustic Qualit i=xcet,ent 7 Air Quality: y'- Good. y: Good. l3ics'Lo ical L vironrnents 8 Vegetation: Nat<uro 1 ve Operations arrc Orchat,dsg tat i an has kaeeri r,li,,�r4tt'rkyo l b `� - W i I d i Pe � !-.ab `r tat : r Smy f'artn l n�;1 W' d all an l tna i s arid b i r..d,. r r,uaarion 1 y U w i `' h Orchards., Cui tural Env'ronattent;: Archaer�'10 t g l cal and Historic,, 110tources i n Butte County General P 1 an designation." i on tstle area.* Crops, and e ici 12 Existing Zonn t�t•w~;har and Fie1t'f i Existing Land g- A-��. i h Surround i ng Araraa: l)'"' on-site- Surrounding n -site Almond Orchard farrtt i ng , a- hand Uses: feral r e�ider�tlal .and almond �. b. Zon i rig: A-6. crwl cards. „f c•' Gen. Plan designations: d- i'arce1 Sides 1-_ Orchard and pleld Crops, t r^edorn i pant l y* 5_,10 _,i0 acres. °t'j +~, Population! mural residential densities. 'ILS- Char�acLer of Site and Are;. 1Cy, Nearest Ur itEa; Orchard f'Ear^inland. m 1 1 G:s "t Ca f-he S t, o star e i ty of Durham a ��pproY i traatei y Relevant Spher-esthw� *• or the project si to, c�F Influence; l�t,,r�llam rr^19-8tiOn District, Durham yam l�lui;a as l Water Q i sf. v i c t, t 3. Improvements Standards Urban Are; . 1 Fire t'rO bect i' on Service: No a. Noarest County Y (St-ate) Fire Stat 1 on Stat i on lk�• i i n b. Water Availability, P0. Sctaodls 'n Area; Tanker ikrucik Qt ,a -f yam Unified School Li i str i ct.