Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
040-100-027
n r, k •t ` i i 1► r o •' j � Y �r 1111� •i A 1, i r � • Y •re ,1 I' J ��yC� :.) >• •Sig ri0 y i 1 Mi .a r. R G S 'R �• y•�'.. .4 I� '•C :. i Ft '.�: ;� 1• �y + ` � ` �,('j �. .' e .. ee r 3.. - L.�- - t I ..� -_ _ re A• .{• � lr �.n 1 i .. �h. L � .3 .l� .. 1 L, SUBII.VIDFi�'S' STATEMENT Vamef 1 / /�/ J� nate t / 1 r .1 i ro VG'S eCC " Allp Existing use , (s) of the land / f f Proposed use (s) of the land Improvements proposed (See ;.h. 20-21 County 'code) r�a.�r�'r=fir G�1 �: � :� � ✓� 4 . Public areas ,pr"opos'ed S Free planting/or removal (Approx., nimtber 6. preliminary copy of any co.n:da L:i:on, re st'rcti:e reservations or cavenance existing ;or ptoposed Shall,. be 3tfi.aehed to this statement. attached ---------- none 7. State` type of division, i . e pr trate road; urban, rural,. 1 l i 1: L XQ40 + .0 h 1'Gr y DECLARATION OF PEL•'S DU , /Calif;o na a'i;:h `ancl Game Cade Sac on 711 .9.? C. U In ll1 MANE A13J3 ADDRESS OF °APPLICANT L ' zJ`> -Willi"am` Davis x.893 Garden Road purham, CA 95938 C:ASSZE�IC,AT?oN OF ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT:' i. NOTICE OF'°EXEMPTION/STATEMENT OF EXEMPTION 7 Statutorily or Categorically Exempt'` ;25.00 Clerk'; Docurientary Handling Fee ['XJ B. D.OMinimus Impact' - Certifir� a,Q ` of Fee exemption $25.00 C1erk�s Documentar Handling Fee`, y 2,- NOTICE OF DETERMINATION - FEE REQUIRED J A. Negative Declaration �� g Fee $1, 250 ..tate F.lin 25.00 Clerk''s Docarnentnary'`Handling; Fee [ ] B. Environmental impact Report $850 'StateFiling Fee _ $25.`00 Clerks Documentary Handling' Fere' OTHER ( Specify) $25.00 Cerk' S, Documentary I•iand] ing Fee PAYMENT%NON -PAYMENT OF FEES: t` [X7 PAYMENT. The above .fees have baen rraiel: See attached receipt(s). 2,' [ ] NON-PAYMENT. The above fess are, required. Not paid. a Chief .Plann:.,rng Official Valla Leasure Assistant Planning _ Director. Lead Agency.: DeveYapmen. Review' ComtT►itte TWO COPIES OF THIS FORM MUST BE" COMPY;ETED ,:;AND :SUBMITTED WITH ALL ENVIRCNMENTAIr DOCUMEIJTS FILED WITH:''T'T BUTTE COUNTY CLERK THREE COPIES. OF ALL NECESSARY DocumENTA''j,ON;ARE REQUIREb FOR FILING. 1 FL 'FILING CF' ANY DUE. AND P.AXA$LE .PRI H�, L N ALT; APP.LIG'ABi.E� FEB ".ARE � OR TO T _ I ENVIRONMENTAL ,DOCUMENT WITH THE BUTTE COUNTY CLERKS. OFFICE. ' T'1AIKF CHECKS :P,A 9LE TO THE COUNTY 'OP BUTTE. " .--- ..,,7"�: "y,� ,,,_� �--- ` l•�R�,�.�,�- '' F,,r � ;rr- ' :-.�* ,,•�„a•: s 'iitrtn x'j z-h':P"•ra7-7r-7 m MI 1 , '�'; ��x' :•�t;:7k-"r; !"�s � ^` arR r. rn•» ; tla'f Lr .rIFC,t(M'("_ rio, TOTAL h4igljC pcertfv;atl WogHi LA/CO U!Q rQgMiTq VAt(IApCIt ,. UaL pIC eunleryrs., 'i`tlN Nd, f Q/iV ^ OTHQr1. APPI.iG`A .'T REOCI(/ED rtR.�]M ��"*� `�' �� d� x—•a,*+r' _i.�l xe rxj 1£ �i I��'! e".c,�.r'.r •.wrF} �T^ri<"'£,r�: "'�' 1":lr+74 f' i . � t �:•i: ' ,- }jECE1►Y r' ' .ryoo to7Al..' RCCL'x1VGd PUOLId Yf4RN5 'IA.CO :.: 4fE "1'ERMIT6 VARIAN WAS PUI1GICa gOCl1M 6I1 TD L .`YONiNa 4"NU b1'i1EH , p A PLCAN: �/i6C[IV ECi ��M 777 Wx11„i am. Davis 'besting` Tentative Subdiv swon Map; AP 400-7.4 .arid 2'S, 5 lots on the s'outh',side of Garden Drive, 2200 ft: west of tptt.Road. Durham area. Engineer: Sierra West Surveying Viand Development Division conditions: Provide 26 feet radius property line returns at all 'street ntorsections'. 2 Indicate a 5b ft. building setback Eine from. the centerline of all roads. 2 Street signs shall be provided,by the developer at all street' intersections per County requirements. (Submit 5 alternate` names for each street- to the County address coordinator for approval of street names.) 4 Aeed 30 ft. from the centerline of the county maintained portion of Garden: Drive to the, County, of Butte. 5 Cdhs:truct full st,,,eet section on Garden Drive and interior street tt-,RS-7A geometric standard. Minimum structural section o be double chip seal coat and 40 A8. Submit design to County Department of Public Works for approval. ItR” value' determinations and other data may be required to support section design. 6 Provide mdtumentation as,,required by the Department of Public �- accordance with accepted standards.. Works in' 7 Street grades; and other features stall comply, with the Butte County ordinances, design resolution and other accepted engineering standards: 8Provide permanent'"solutivn; for drainage. gs All :easements of rec"ord to be shoran on the final map;. 1'0 Meet requirements of the Butte County Fire Departme:it 'or other responsible agency. 11 Provide road maintenance agreement. 12 Access to be reserved .in deeds' and offe "red .fbt 13 Meet, the requirements of the utility companies '"o.�:. Pacific Telephone'; water; sewer.} taxesas re quired. Pay ariy .delinquent taxes or current, q.' d. 5 Deve'lopez shall . provide. ,a11 required traffic ,safety signs N including'' stop signs. I , .........._.._ . APPENDIX ;COUPTTY OF BUTTE ENORQ]NMENZ'AL CHECRLJ�BT FORM 1tvALUATTOrTi"6;!,ENVTiONMLZJTAL '� TMPACT �iC� iPlo. Log No. Z., BACKGROUND AP# 040-100-014,024,625 Name of Proponent: wtlfiam DAVIS Address of proponent and fepr.esenl'ative IIr appllca`b.le). `t893 Carden Road, Durham, CA 9593a 3+ PrOJest, descriotipn: A feque"st for a vesting 7enta'kive Subdlvisi.on The Cenerai Pian designation `is, 0rchatd & Field crops, The zonlnd that noW Map to c"reale six I6) lots on 34, acres ranging In - zoning, A -.,o, Went into et'fe Of SUpefV(SOfS; the aQ gal Wa"s U held:a T p pt. The ilevpro e�ttWasvdetermminedlto Was In place When the ma was ., Sizes from s led p submitted was A-5, On March ro 2a, to 7 acres, 26,, 1992 the" e ben ConslhtPntQWlS ihegeptember 199Z, The project was appeased ptojecl; was submitted. see ataached 0aka sheet for additional descrfpilon.: neral Pian and Was Consistent Wjth•the to Board ._ plan when.tt)e ZI w MANAATORY . Tr'INDTNGB Off' SIGNIFICANCE YeS yu "° DISCus TOM OF ^ EtivIRONP2ENVAL A +UAi'ION t. Does,ihe prosect have the potential to degrade the thelf b of the, environment, tubs.tantfally reduce ` —"r the habitat of fish x This proposal will nak sighiftcanfly degratle the environment, or wildlife species, cause a I fish or wildlife population to drop, below ,self- - 3uskaini'ng levees, threaten to ellmina.te'a plant or animal community, reduce the .number or"restrtct the c 'r"are range of a or endangered plant & anI or el11minat,b'Imp ortant ekampres of major perjM' Ot 0allfor0la hJstory or prehfstory7 od z« 666s the Project have,. t4d potentlal' to achieve Short-term benefits tothe detriment of long-term' X environment goalst to This proposal may result in a short �beliefIt' by 0toYidtn9 additional housing environment brier shorf-term Impact on the is on, which .occurs in a' relat7yefy "impacts, .term opportunity; but th(s.may be At theEons term; detriment of affecting egrlcultural vtability endure perldd of tun's while tong-termwilt fnto the future.) Does the protect`have Impacts which are individual ly " `` Iimfted but cumUTAtlVefy consIderable7, dA pfOlect may Impact on;iWo,or Thfs proposal,may create.severa'I, sUbslantla'I cumufative '' more eparate resources, the impact b each Where n h resource I s refat'Ively small 'the si' tfnma't{i.,vc' jubactss��Vi'ces ,and-`1"frasructures. 'other signCficant cu u a mp- uld result �n gni4lcant but here effect oflhe total of those impacts.,landt on the loss -p/ prime' agricul.turai grid also confilcts With the proposed. land the enylronme'nt Is sljf,jca'nt;+) poi lc(es; fof they area. , use a,ctiGjl,J,es and " A, Does the prdjec` have enVironmental effects which iNJiJ cause substanttai adverse effects op h_llman x beings, either directly;or This phoposalwl;ll riottiaVe a,slgn1fteaht adyefse er'tect on "Human beings,.either Inifirectlyt dIrectty;or, Indirectly, I ENVIRONMENTALMPACTB V[s raAvnE r�o D1SCUSi3ION OF "ENVIRONMENTAL 'EVALUATION FARTH, WI 1 the proposal result in significant' a,- unstple earth conditions, or .oranges 'in X The proposal wl(i'not affect subsurface earlh conditions. "alogIc Substructures? -� b, DlsruptIon, df to acement, carnpactlon of the x This'proposal Will result in some dltruptl6n, dISoIacelnenL, compaction and overcoming of the as a result of constructlon overcovering of sollt _site act�fYltlesrelated to homesikes, dtNeways, and streets, The project site.' fs level and Will reg4tire ml nor earthwork to provide for adequate driveways; buildln9 pads, and drainage pattetnt, The proposed density 'wlll increase Imoo rV1ous SU.rfaces which will Increase runoff into the ;iocal area. C. Change In- topography or ground 'surface L�_ The: project. sl to is. characterized by ,level terrain'whl,ch ysIl i r.equlse development. relief (c aturest only minor dtaJfng to accommodate the proposed d. Destruction, cover _Ino of, modirfcat.fon of a nY x The site has no unlque physical features: unique geologic Or phys)cal,featurest e, increase In wind or water teroiion of softs, X The proposal WIil 'not cause erosloh. tel el they on at, Off We? f, Changes. in deposlalon of eros(on of beach X Thepropos'a) Will not affect any 'watetcoUr'se, Sands, or. 'changes In sllfation deposft,lon or ero3lon.Which may modiiy thi+'�chahnel.of a 'riVer or Stream or the Of the ocean _bed orany bay, inlet or lake? g. ;f Loss of ptiine agrldultUral V IrtoductlVd Tha project Site fs located in. an area that Is considered to have soils outside des�lgnated aveast prime agriculturally protluctiVe solis'. Approval of this project ,urban could Ultimately lead to the loss and agricultural productlVitY1o,V tlte- soils Lon, this -site- and May create secondary rcumUlatjve Impacts to convert adjacent -lands oto urban,.uses. Thts,property is not Within,, the Vi of any urban area, h, X' expos'ufe of peopi;e or ptoperty to �6 I'' jc hazards such. as earthquakes tan X(c> e. Even though thele ale `no known tautts.Within Ile vicinity, ai,l of Butte Counfy Is located,In a Moderate tarthquake intehsitY Zone VilI. s�ideS, iratdSlides;= ground faflUre ,of' ;,;,raIIAr hazatdsa construction of buildings. to uniform Uuilding code standards viii pro f te,jMIdaetiV_I gide adequate protection to occupants In case o Wiifthe pfopdsai result In ubstan tlay� All( emissl'ons or deter'I,oratian, of, am4'iien,' X Thee proposed project. wl,li result In a 'cumUlaClve, Impact on 'air. quaijty due to the related lncrease Im genera ed by the Air quality; �� ,traffic project �othetlresidential by-products tUch as, ood stoves apd ,,Rod agficulturat,ot otherrelatedbUfning,, The Cal ltotn �a,Alr Resources cottrol,Boafd haS`ldenll("led sutla county as a non«arta nment area Irlrmeeting the ozone. and particulate standard§ of the Cal iofnla alt Qua'Ilty Act The butte County Aft P011U'tion control P.►an.does no address a", � !al'ltYand Impacts of„`small teSidential devel;opments'far 0,1t x1atl,on measures, pos'stble� b. The creatl'ap of obJ,ectlonable odors, smoky short term air quality :;impac,tt�'Wifi pfobab�ly,`tesult, durlrt9 `the or rumest _1 .2t conitrUction phases of the deVelopir,en t ol,the iesidegtlat housing. trtcr'eased vehiculai and equipment emissions, at Well as increased t dUst,during site grading and pr,eparallon Wlli Occut, ivhl4h shouidbe i mfnfrQiz°e,d� by' C9unty air qual1ty' s,tandards, - C ,•' Alaeratlon of air moVemQnt, moisture Or`0, ,__ _ The ok*65af Will 'not aff_ect t116,11.060here. .• terBpe a,tUte, or any ,changn ih clfmate locally 9, or regionallYx s 3, wAT WIII the proposal result In:sUbstantlal: ` a. Changes In currents, or the course0Or X The propbadi Wlil not affect; any waterccufse. in either marInelor i 'esh WaCerstvements t b, changes Tri absorptlon rates, drainage' X The proposal may result In an Increase In surface water runoff .due pattarns, or the rate and amount of Surface to reduced absorption from Impervious surfaces, and In a change In - runoff? the drainage pattern on the site, However, the lot sizes, and sol'I types': wlII provide .some mltl.gation. All added runoff 'from th'e expected development Is required tobe retallned on^site, C. Need I for off-site surface drainage X Drainage ImptoVem e his, Will be requlred pet, Pub IIC Wo hi srtandard;s. imprcwer,,ent3fncluding vegetation removal, No o/f-site lmprOvtmJdnts, are expected, channelizat.on rr culvert installatlon7 d, i AItaratfoils, to the course or NOW UI flood`, ; X The Oroposai;VIAl not elgnlf.lcantly affect ary ifood control -channel t' water3t or wafercour-ses, : e. Change in the amdunt of sUrtace Water In any, X the proposal 'Wil 1,not affect any watercourse. water body? e, f SurorquatltyY' x The proposal Will not Sign,r:Icantly affect Sur iaca v&1dr quality atterat�onfnof urfacWater aWate`r dlisolved iturbidll`yrtemperature, Oxygentor y I g. Alferatlon of tfle,difectton'or fate of floW� _,tom_ The.proPOsal WIII not atfect'lhe dIt'ectlon or flow�ol dfoU" waters of ,ground Watersf h. Change. In the qusntl`ty or quality ground t X T'he `re_ls general concern W[thin the Urham area that;lndlvldual 'we t is y waters, either through direct addltions or located on a :parcel to patcel ba,sls`Wil I Increase the potential to withdrawrrls; cfr through 1nkBrceptlGo of" are degrade ?tie aquifer, aquifer 'by cUft' or excavatioptP .r` �f . Reduc;{fan tntbe atriounf of water olherWise�. x �� The p,ropozal ;BVI ►I ql. iesUl t i1i the: loss of Water topubl is Kao avatlstisse for pUlti lc:° water supp1:1esx suppl j,es, t• BXpo$Ufe, of .people Lor, propet, ty, to Water- X c , The „proposed 0r6lect'ts Iocat'ed Within the Butte Creek too Year Hood related hazards such: as tioodfngt Plain according to the Federal Emergency ,Management Agency Flood ataps, constructed DeyelopmdhtL of the state�Wil1 be required One footrabove the baseflood etevali,ont to hf1ve toundat ons Thls';item Is required to be addressed andshown oil plans submitttrdfor �bulldin'g: 4. PLANT trFF, Wfll' the �Ptop "asap result in u sAn �• a, Change In t'tle diversity 61..sp6CI.`es, or'! X Ttlis proposal" wl,ll rlesUlt i,n the foss. of an.alMon, orchard p'„Iiloti numbe'f ofany species of plants (I�n01Udfng , could create ,addit.lonaI dU6U14tIVo I pacts: And th'e loss sof +thea trees;k af►rubs..gras',§, crt7ps, andagUatia' �grICU.ltural crops Wlthiq the area," plants!' b, keddetforl of t'hanuinb'ers of a nnyt'srique, tare X 7liefe are no ,known u' igUe, rare or endangered species of n p,iatils Gtr or endangered species of pl a site." o, tntroductIon of neW �speC,IGs Of plants into' '16 X The ptopos;ai tilli nolo affect` existing piant�ilie., an area., .d"r; ;Irf1 a barrier the normal teptenisNmenti.ot eXist`in9 specles7'' fn,aclOago of any agriqufturai ctopU X, ;, see 4 Rl1�2t . ChG'C7�17 fi +� ;';�iYd� lii3 ],©Yft �f' EnV �pYiiltBall�$a Trit�tBa$ 5 la 5, ANrMAL LIFE. will the proposal result i'n substantial, aT Change In the diversity. of speoles, or nu numbers of any specles of animals (birds. x The proposal` WIII not affect animal Ilte because the si,Fe does not support slgntflcant animal or Habitat, land animal Including reptiles, ish and ,Ilfe shelffIsh, behthtc organisms or, lnsects":)? b, Reduction Irl the nummbbors of any unique, rare,x or endangered specl'es of animals? : There are no knoWn unfgUeF rare or endangered species of animals on site, c. Introduction of neVrspecles ct animals into an area, of. In a battler to the migraflon _ f( The,proptisai Will not affect ,eX[W ng"'animal Iffe; or moverent of animals? da hab �tattation of eXlsEfnB ltsh or wlidll,('e x .: The site contains no sIgni n cant wildlife habitat,, d> ikil�s�. V0 f'[ the proposaf 'result in substajitisi a, Increases In existing noisz lirvdIs �X --- The proposal wKil got result In a substantia,) tnorsase rn nolse createtl on s to or n the vicinity.; b', Exposure of.pebple to severe noise Ieval.ii X The proposal Wfll not expose peopla tb severe nolse ley efs. l 7. LICHT AM NAR . Will the proposal` prodUce, s,gn rcao g t and glare —' >r . The proposal W1fi not; result in a substahtaal Increase in light or glare cr.ea.ted,orr, site or (tithe Vlc;i'nity: e, nNa ts>. Will the p.roposal�result in a substantial` a Brat ori of the present orplanned land use of an k The' proposal represerits a conflict`w(th the neWxoning designation areae fr5r ,the area, An addition th-e pCopefty d6es,notracet the cohdi'lfonal zoning criteria. of the, orchatcl & Fiptd Crops land Use desiOnot.lon, whtch d;id not change. 9. NATLAiII RES O(dtCM 5,, WI (I the Prop65al resUl subs tan a7-T� a, increase 'in the rale of `use of any ;'rlatut,I' resourcesf x The proposal wll-I tick affect 'any natural. resources, :,:: b� tiepletfor? or any non rendWab(e .natural resourcesi The proposal WI not depiet�o any netUral'resoutces�° 1p, �'R15K of t1P5BT: V11t the f proposal I,nyo,Ve; ` a.= risk.ot explosion or relea'seof hazatdous'._ tubs tanC@s (Inclddfng but hot I)mI`ted to. k The proposalWlil not lnyo1ve the use of hazardousmateraa(s no ofI,,pesttdldes., chemli ak or radiation) In i is It: located close :to any ;,tacilItdt Which store or utl:'tize"such maler;ials, e th event of' am' accidonl Or, upset condi t IonsJ, b. Yossl�ble inter.fererice With; an emergency spo rerise pian or emergency evacuation pian? x �; The pr,'aposal WIi! .poll af'fect:��anyeroergepCy 'strylces, 11i OPULAiION.. : Wfi'1 the prpposa! alter 'tocatlon, on densf ty or9rowih rat'. e of tffe human �, k c This propoi'aL�wlll'resulC fn`the a"I�te'at o � r i h,to the dtstrlbut'ion and odufaClo densft;4'ed of p ulations lank for the ar oP P ea. tz. wI rl. �h pt Ing, , Or:Cje o osaf affca, hoszfing?hou or create a d ernand f r addj ?ton u - x : The proposal ,vtt_I 1 n demuntl, not slgni(tcahtly"affect ?iousing polls TRANS060TAT ICY.�1iCIRCIJ' Al,1C*4 ' w111 the, raQ0t61, resu .t, sn� �.�'- a, Generation df substantial addltioh6t VehIt10 The proposal W111 represent ah incremental Increase In t:ratllc -1n movements the area. The proposed project could generate approximately bo vehi'tle trips per day, According to the trafflc mode( for the pUrham area, present traffic operated at acceptable levels of ss:vice, The tralfic study considered future but Idout ( which this prolect Is T31Ts Protect , -Wll( not add s gnlficant lrhps to the Sys tem, b, I _on existing parking faclli ties, of x The proposal will not affect parking because the proposal Will have dEl demands emand for_nxi packings to comply with the parking requirements contained w(thtn Bwtte County Code section 24-5 C, substan tfai impact on e>ylstIng x Tfie proposal will represent an Incr°ease in fraftic in the area, The transportat•lon systemst system Is not 'Impacted or strained at this time, b'ut the, cumulatl5e impacts ,of several projscts in the Durham area may significantly impact, the circulation system. :. d. Significant-afterat�Ions trrprssent.^patternsx =- The proposal- wtl l ,not alter the present'pattern of circrhafiop n' of circulatlon or movement-oJ people and/or' the area, goodst e. Alterations. to waterborne,, rall`or air' .x The 0r6pospt.w111 pot ar`fect:raIf or air traifIt traffics 1, increase in traffic hazards to motor x The proposal.w(II not result in an iridremenla'I Increase in ttatG)c vehi:cl.es, blgVdl I t`s or petlestd4nit and related hair lc'_hatards in the urea. - 1aµ &606 sEkvrc8s. •Wi 11 the 'proposa have an effect upon; or resultin a need fol ,new or altered , GOVel;hment servir�es: a,Flre protections k The proposal WI 11 result In aniinctemsntaf Increase in demand for 11 fire protection in the aria, The area currently Jacks any -water "system Pressurlxed which a development of this scale would requ(tp, It hydrants are no provided, ,internal flte, sprinKlers be to ' will requlred mttigate this concern, in addition. the County q,P, Fllre�Depa'rtment has indt`cated that a new ,tire; stafsoh may be warranted because of the cumilative Impacts of, new development prop'o'sals, 6 In' the but ham area. b; P 0 1. tc0i, protections x The proposal„Witt result in an lncrementa'1'. 1'ricrease, to demand for poiIce ,proteclion In . the area which cannot 'be served by the present Sher 1,114s Department. Developmepl Impacts an, the :Sncriff's Depar, Me i a County Wide concern and cannot .br) instigated by an individual projectµ Ths eU U e county Board has ,of;supetvfisors Afttetl a inl;tIgation fed pursuant to Section 3 A�tlals tf of tris t;ulte County. Code to offset this Impact which Should reduce It,td'a level, bC Ins1.gnlTIC ance., c, S2hbblsi x:- The propo6al-wIII r'e'sult In an inerementa( (narease ln`demantl fore schoo'1,isrv�ces, In the area Currently, fhs Durham tfiPtted school District is ofther At.capacity or hear;eapactty and this deVsi.opment WI I l `result In the `need for neW tial I f les. �7he Durham Unl f led SGhootDistr'�ct (Duro) has 'indica led iha� this pro)sct wi'i7. cleave i a $luniIIcan adverse im ac;t_ on the strlpt s s rylces,. P e ' d. Parki or other FecreAIIohal facliLtlsss x The Rtbposal'wi,ll result In an tncrementaJ' increa'se,ih demand for park,and recreatl'on `f5cl i I tfet Tri- the areaThe• 4urham' Recreation and Park pistr(ct has expressed cbncsrh with the cumulative Impact” s pr po't,entlal (v freatedlby the new oJo'ct proposals In':ths Durrtam area,; e. Maintenance of public tadTI Ales, InclUding )Z The pro posatWill hot rssult (n an incremental inc.rehse In the need roads; for maintenance of (bath avid othsr public facllittes in the area, {t f, Other governmental services? x The proposal will ndt resUII in an incremental increase In de?nand for' "all otter governmental services In the area, 15. ENERM W111 the proposal result i.n; a, gUbstanliat amount3 of flet or x The Proposal will not utilize substantial fuel or energy, enerpyt b. substantial Ihttease in demand Upon C-91 sting x The proposal wili not rsubstantfally ;Increase the demand for energy. sources of. energyi or require the development of neW sources of energy? IC fin_ M YCEs. 0II1 theprOposal result i� a need fot the new'' Systems of tub slantIIa.1, altat at oris to followings a. Power or natural gas:? � " x The proposal Will not affect electrical power or natural gas, _ � dlstr button systems; b, cocmgn144tions systems? X The proposal WI not"affeel�commrinfta.tlon systemsy c, Water avalIAb'IIIty?x c The` applicant has indlcated th'elr desl.re to into the DUrham,' �— .annex I'rrlga!t)onalstrict toprovide for adequate water services._ However ,r Should thls.annexatfoo fail, water availability on a communfty water system should be developed to serve the site, d. seWer or septic systems? The,proposaI Will result in the Increased need tot a community sewage, dliposal"system jr) the DUtham_atea. �Howevet:, soils in the area are, generally aderjua a fof• la'rgpr parcels (t+ acres). ey storm, tl water rajnage;? X This proposal 'wlil have to prov I(Jd a permanent, sofutldn for drainage. At this point, there Is,no master plan for storm drainage.: f, tolid4aste And disposal? _�� � The prop W11I hot`afte�ct''sofI'd waste disposal.': �7. "AN'HEALTH.^,'WI11 the proposal result InF a. creation of any heal th hazard' or potentai' X Tffe proposal will nal- create _any health haxrird, hazard (excluding mental" health)? b, Exposure of:pe�+ie .to potentlal 'health The proposal wlli. notexposepeoplr..to any health hazard. , hazards?' .� 16, AESTHe7res. Will the proposal rusUJt 'fn the x The proposal will 'hot result In`an aeslhetically 'offensive view," o s.tTi ructIok of scenIc'Vis,ta or View, open to the publlc; or will the proposal result In the creation' of an'aestheticallt� off nsfve site; open A the ` Ubl1 19, REcREATioir. frill the proposaj resullG in an"";; mpaci X _ The proposal, wi11 result Inan incremental 'increase In demand for'', " upon, a qual IV or gUant.ity :of eXIstihd park tend recreation t cilltles.(see 1,4d). � +, retreational 4jpporlunf,tte s? ;- o, CULT(JAx RECCXRCSES r � a. will the, proposal'resdItInthe, alteration x(oY Theproposer]pt.operty sfocat�edwlthl'nanareaofhlg�liarcheologlcal�. or.destructiao o(a p_rehlstorla or, hi lor`ie' Sensl.tiVlty, :An archaeological surge hair been conducted on the: archaeological sltet: property brit no historic 'dr prehistoric archaeofogIcai slt'es Wete found. ;. valu77 C @` tk , 8 e ►�2]xt{xlt� b. Wl l l the proposal result In adverta Ohysf ca`j or aesthpttc ettedts to a prehistoric or x T The pro osal WII is site;, p ) not affect hlstor ht.stortC builtlihB, structure or obJectt c, goes' the psoposaf have the pOUTA at _ cause a physlcal..chanBe which would afte.ct k The proposal wilt not at(eat cultural resoprces. Unlque clhr)',tc cultural values7. d, N61I' the "'pfonosaf t s'tlict exfsttfig reilgtous or sacred uses Wt thin the x The p,roposaf Wlll not affect religious res'oufces,�' poteptfa1 impact ar'eat I , i i , e r I _ r i 9 DATA Si-1EEi: I`. A„ :P..rojecl oescrIptIon : .., _ .. I. type,91 Projacl: VesCln9 Tentative tsi SGbdTV''on Magi,. 7, AI(quality: ty:` rood sxcepl dilring periods of, Stagnant valfeY aif, ' 2'. brief oescriptLon: A'request" to subdjvfdd .34 + acres Into f niolopl"cal Environment: Iot.S. 31 Location: The :South side Of Carden Road apo oxlmalelY 2,200 a, vegetailon: Almond Orchatd Ieet west 01 Lot I, Road. g. Wit diife Wabitat. Noiendangered Wildlife Is'eXpected to d', proposed benslty, of oeYelopment: Approximald,(y f dweiling occur on Site, small! ,wildIIre eXpecled In an orchard and urban fringe area may occur, units per 5167 acres, a, ,Amount .of ImperVloUs surfacing:. Appr:oxlmalely 20X cultural Enviro ment: 6, Access and'Nearest Pub11c Road(s): carden Road'. 30, lArcha6dCogidal and HI"storlcalResources in the area: A high archaeological sensltlylty area, z. Method of sewage Disposal• indlv(dua;l septic systems, i1. Ilutte county Cenerat Plan desl(gnatlon: orchard and Field! a. Source of Watersupply, Individual Wells'. Crops 0. Proximity Of PdwCf LihCs: A1,606 Carden AOad, :t x. Existing zoning: A-14. to. Potent fat for (urther land divisions and deveiopment; Not 13, Exlsting Land Use on-St.te: Almond ottha;rd,. under the cutrent cehe f a Ir Plan designation. - i4, surrounding Area: F 8,' Erivlronmentaf settlnir a, Land Uses: Orchard and Aesiden(lal:' b. zoning: A -1e, Physical Envirornnent: c� cen, Plan Designation; Orchard & Meld Crops d. Parcel sizes: 2 Ro 1, Terrain ao acres; e. P ulati op on: Rural a. ceneral:Topographflr Cfiaractcr Leve( b, slopes: Leve( southwest trending a5. character'0f s to and;Area: Agrlcuilure to rural residential C, :Ievatlon; APPr0014 'alY 168 feet, above sea level. 1. Limac Limiting Ftors: None 16. Neares f'Urban Area: DUrh7tn x Soils a, i"rYpos and eharAcf,erist'ics�� .Ulna loam`. a btotiynsobl 2 17. Relevant spheres of Influence': 6urfiam Parks and. , Recreat.lon,DIStrIcl and the iSUrham tAo'Sgitito Abattemen ` to 3 fedt thlclt, 'Irthat retali)s 1n0tstore. Weil and IS Dlstr-I c3 � permeable, rood di I' 00 characteristics tinD'Factrirs: Norte to. (mp`roveinents standards; tirba[i Area: nlgne. a= Natural HAzards of the :Land Fire Pr6tcc41o` 5civice:, a. Earthquake Zone. AtI Of,butte County (s I.-ocaled vrithI Moderate Earthquake Intent(ty lone Vllf, a. NeareS't approXImately county (state) Flre Station:" staLloll @AS 4 b_, Erosion Potential None - mIIes;away;, b' water AVallabilily. tankers,; c; Landslide Potentlai None a Fife hazard: CJrlclassi-tied agricultural area io. schools:�ln Area: Durham Uniff�ed School Ois((Ict, �Expnnslve sot( Potent . LoW I A�. ttydrotagy I a. 5uffaCC WalCtr None On sltC b. Ground Water: unKnavn, moddta,te I"igtlelactlol patentlat and possible subsistence are -1.. c, oralnagc characterlstics 5oUthWesl irending d. Annual Rainfall' (hormal) ' 24 lO 2'6 nche5 pe( year, e.. smiting Factors: rhe`projecRSite Wlthirra Flood one based on the FEMA Maps. -- 5 visual/scenic Qtjai l ty: '' Cootl�` 611 AcoUs to c, Qua i l (y: Cbod '1:0 ENVIRONMENTAL REFERENCE MATERIAL 1, Butte County Planning Department, 'Earth "Uake and, Fault Activit Ma 111 SSeismic Sa etY Element. 12. Butte County Boafd of Supervisors,; OroV 1, 1. Le, CAS CH2M HI 11, 1977. AW [CU l.tU ta I Preserves Maij, established b :Resolution No. 67-178. Prov e: CA?,, 2, Butte County. Planning Department, L1guefactIon Butte `County P ann ng'Departrrlent, 1987. Potential Ma 11-2 Seismic SVetV element. orov e, CA; CH2M Hill, 1977 13, National Flood insurance Program. Flood Insure Rate maps. Federal Emergency, 3. Butte Caunt Plannl de artment.-: Subs y ng p Idence:and.. -. en Management ;Agency, 1989. !_ands) ine,.,' tential Ma 111-1. Safety E I ement. &rov I I Ie, GA CH2M HI 1977 14. Quad Maps, Chico, photo revised 1969: 4. BUtte COUnty Planning Department. Eros on 15, soil Map, chico (1925)`/0rOy'110 (1926) Potential Ma 111=2 Safet Element. OroVIIl'e> CA.: Area.n to States Department o C12M H1 1 it 1,977, Agrculture. S. Butte County 01'a,nn,ing Department. Ei-Dar�sive Soils, 16,,` 011 Sue of Chico 1925 'Orov I e Ma 111-3 Safer element. OroVifle, CA: CH2M 1926 Area-, united States Depattment.of H, 1977. Agr cu I tUre`. 6, Butte CtiuntyPianning Department, �' Noise element 17. Butte' Pianning'Department. Butte. Ma IV='1 Scenle Hi hwa" element. rrZi V i"Te, CA: „ Counter F.ire<Protection furl hs CH2M H 1977. " Faci l i tt,ies MaD,. ,,Butte. county'lire ire epartment.and, Cali3Orel Department ot 7,` Butte County Planning Department, 'cenIc Hi hwa�, Forestry, 198.9. Ma" V-1 Scenic Hichway'-Element. OroviTI e; CAI CH2M H 1977. Butte County Pianping.Departmen t. NatUral.Fire , Halard _cIA ses .Ma _,1'11-4 Sa�f6tV E-Iement, - " Orov 1 lie, CA' 'CHU H 1977. 9. Butte,,County Planrll'0 Department. �Ar_chaeoiodlca�l Sensiti�VitV.Map�. Orovi le; CAs James P. Manning, i,9aa, �0., BU"tte County Planning Department.' Schoo f.bl.slrlct; M= OCA .LroVi ; tern''0191r'ict pepartrrient,,o'f Water .Nortiiyre Meso, rces�_ 'C:hico Nitrate StU Mii'trate; -i -ow Co cent-rationni Si a i wells,. I The, Resources Agency;, State of Cal IJ orrri.a,;1983 „ y L.�'N wr NATIJIA Ww+�."1 a_N LAND DEVELOPMENT DIVISION QEPARTMENT.oF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES "! COUNTY CENTER DRIVE pRQVILLE, CALIF4nNIA _95985•) A7 TELEPHONE (sic) 550.1266 FAX: (9161 �530.2140' Planning, 00061trnent Nov 19't November 18, 1992 rt ,Aril/w),'U�1[rVi i�lt± Sierra West Surveying William Dav;sr Tentative -5537 Black 01ive Dr' Vesting Subdivision MaP harad'se, 'CA 9596.9 AP 4Q-10-1;4; 24 & 2,5 Appeal Cent l emen At th 6r regular meet i n9 of the Butte County Board bf Supervi soars held November 17, 1992,, the Board continued your appeal open to Oeecember 15, 1992 'at 10:30 a.m., at your request', 11 you should ;have any;questio"Ins concerning this< matter, please contact this office at 916-538-72ri6, Very truly yours,, it Stuart Ede1'1 Managerp Land Develo inent D' 1V. 5"E/ICp CcY` PT3nK17yC�9 Department y" Environmen.al Health Department 01 erk 'of t;fie l�oartl ` William' Davis,'1893 Gar:den,Rd.', Durham, CA 95138 ,L �. + gyp, s �� ���'M 60 ��Ililllll6 {ill /Q6mlIY d@,duig a Butte County'' Adva.sory Agency ;►s: Planning Director Report on Tentative Parcel Map of%ncja�r.�.n 68 July 1 10,85, This is a propria] to divide, J,,6.L± into 3 par -cels at 5.4± acres each. the Present ' zoning ,is A-5 ( gricultural, - 5` acre .par-c.e i . The wand Use Plan 14ap,of the General. -Phan designates this area as Orchard ..and:. Field Crops. Thete ate, no specific or' commuri$ty plans for the area. T'ne proposal; does riot conflict with Gaunty zoning nor any adopted or proposed element of the Butte Covnty General Plan nor any County, specific or 'community plan. Note: An archeological survey has been completed and clearance i.s � recommended. r " X.MT : lr „ cc: Willadseri Orchards Sezra .GJest. Surveying IY r 0. TW AavisC--y AQcnc T' Di:ar°ectcr Pi rte.: T.rl �.s,..%TB S'UBD-rtr1S2'CN rte`92 «. The-c;-zseCl 'crc'j�c-� �rY,GiSr oT SY�'`r_C�",Q` L_ ac`_es tG �'""i.1'.4Y �.`2-eG 4, t✓yL.S- �..:.,l.:.. .i`.. f:.p`'L).r. .r'i._Z:i0Jr't�'.. •i.�yv-"�'�T.,✓r ���.1 A. �S _l..ls �. u:�.. A'�.'a L. .y..,'iZG i, -C..C� S:.ry i:e .�+, fir., Q}i �.1 i'L��.�r,- � _ ..:: C 1, vee scau;�1c_ Ana G_o, .�l.le-�n.t-c y ae� cep '; r a � 1 -16.0 tae DIur-iam area. nie proposed Tentati.N e Su di VIMzp. is consistent with the _ surrounding oharri;-: ter Of the vicinity. The majorlty df the surrounding aave been subdivided ,into,5 acresi or , less. The =rrett Zor-:: s :-1liC allows.' ..�� r oz. a m%n=J m lot size of acres. . file Cz-e� a_ ?.i an des;ianat:ion:i.s orchard and. Field, the project glee .s the basic recruiremients of the zoniti- cF-rd Genera llar- desgr�tion it 'does not con;orr;� 'under st_=c crt�tsn- to Bila - s _ Policies or the Gen'era? Plci.r ;hdr: 'elle az, I � { � - _n6 sse plain es bene d:eveleoed or the Son ?:?"ea ?lc!:.. Tale :propoaed broject wa-1l GOrt '.,e "the: lean it g Bevel caTsnt patternof the' DtLthat are s add. to t'rr= urba* - developr,�n4 along Lott. Road, whio l is rely tiv, 1 isolated fsQr,, axxlr ,urban boundary. in additi iii, it appea. s that .a,yricilltura.L proeuction may D6. irnp«irod by S acre' parcels rather than one 'larger, 3'!6 acre parcA'" . The current land use VYcposal deve owed b!f tna Dxrham-Dai►ton=2velsor_ C tiz:eils Adviso�-�1 Co*n.:, ttee calls �;orwer densities f6r the area, to. preserve a*�c I i ^rain the es»IstIng tracts of land for f itu�e almora ''orchard operations. 'I'ho pros sea" project conflictwith the 1:1 . 3nirig al=er_iatives being proposed for tis area, idvISO'r'V .�:'�e-1^V cl]005"e 3 tG au7�Cl�'C ]7is' p_oj!ec,t ,ani agricult�ralsetrnac}: on the nortne:n 1cG 1-L,- shou?'c ba' Cons?a=rid no create .a buffs* zona betc'reAn t:mb0 Pnticll = confl cn. ng land uses the property- to tiza ±:ortY± o- he. or06? se h: i, v1.5:10n 1S ciirrentlV ba Y n �a-a� IiCSC�C� c tAG pith.+ c `� al �ar.r`, ilc practices arezranr unplp� «,_::t ane, unhe3rr. ng for an almond p_ � _,.- a �' ' rLs, the V . p' i r•c-!0:1 0.4 pests^1 CLAS �l DaC'.ca.r a, r - _ c ,c;r to. a. ed provicln'g a � Ore residential user t„ -al uses con -uic s _ - -µ x. _ a ati i it ..^b r a. '`-.^."� a..., w a''W At4r teA. r �..�r ' «�• n}". '.~iu ,r G.�'_ to hh/'1 "In r�r }'ter`:, Y.:f^^�11L qt .. - •.., d- -Mi P. EtyD Y GD Ci; : m C: Ct, A''. °'�,� to w- n" t W,. ...� :� .. `�:wJ i J,' !f S, �JVnt. e mos, fble, riew d,'vclopMent shall plan arterial .roadways on all. sectio Rri line' ,,ind collector aro,adways :on all li � section linesIfto 'provide for effci �;nt: ci�',�ulation. t 4. An e� s1:- res interlink laetween Da I am -Da, on Highway a�id the IVl dway skull �; e adoroted prior to anyr subdivision aliprovals for property located north of the: -school. in addition, a north s6riath route shall be considered as P4 rt of tkie erxculation System to ti -le area north of the scho§l , OBJEC'TM.- 13icycle and Pedestriarn' safety: 1 Frovide policies and programs to ensure.ssifer conditions fo'r the. bicyclis' olid pedt�st�;'iart , Z. Z�roinot;4' aria +".°ncnurage bi tycling for re2gins> of ecology, health, economy as d erijciyrnon PO1LIt;IES; �'hE* C'.ounty sli;ail: 1'► ;0o.voi6p, g cot munity-vvida bicycle and';pci estrian plan in accordance with u1e, Tr"Ort Development Act; Eneou .oga. new residential subdivisions' to implement bicych- and pedF, tz *� kc -di in the, subdiv sion design. 3: Condo K';trafac safety studies in eonnei tit.n with residential developm+int, a_ and idt�n" e'destrian tra£hc confliet " pfy p C1BJ E�C'IYis. ; Ayiadbo and railroad service. 1. Ensure the viability .of private air stri►s iri'thn the area for `t]�eir izriportance to ag icultum-; Ensure that rail service cront'Lr to ti►e provided through' the "Planning Area; and that' `rail facilities are utiliz�,d . for the best in; terast o'f the public. POLICIES: '.Che County shall; ' 1, .Refer all developriiertts which airy im�}�ac't upon any agriGvltural aviation i�peration to the Butte County Airport'L4�tn4Use. Commission for review. 4 >QB,fE,C_rIVES: Protection of sail. resources. I. To eliminate potential for soil erosion or degradation of its agricultural productiv'1,y. POLICIES, The `Coun shall: 1. q rosion-control measures and construction practices to Reuire standard e minimize soil erosion. 2. Protect agricultural lands which currently produce, or have the potential to produce,,from encroachi g,urban;uses. OBJECTM-4$: Protection of water resources. 1. Utilize surface water resources for multiple uses such as recreation, ; farming and industry, 2. PreservA 'the quality, of all water resources throu& control of the intensity of use, tfie density of population and the type and amount, of development. POUCIM The County shall: 1. Identify andprotect groundwater recharge areas within and outside of the Planning Area 'to assure adequate. groundwater supplies meeting the standardsof the California Safe Drinking Water Act. 2: Require subdivisions adjacent to existing water systems to connect to them. OBJECTIVE: Manage natural .gas resources. 1. Ensure the safe and efficient extraction and use of the area's natural energy, resources.. PQi�ICIES Th6:County shall: i identify all natural gas resources an prepare "an energy; natural resources and,, recreation elernent of the Butte County General Plan. e s ace and a 'cultural land use surrouIId' rodi cilOn areas. Locate op n p. gra g, p to reduce Inc ompatibl'e land. uses.: ,z I leek;' historic des ation for locall sr ''icant sites and stiucture_ s in cooperation, vnith local = � r y � � , - � � w� �, c' . � ,�. n � � / - 11� � a 1 � 0 f i .. -. ..� . . Ner3:C:-E 03F nXV,1 P1 c c Hutt y To Office of Planning a 121 e Count ,,, � Planning Department Sacs Tenth street, ,RO , n 1..1 7 County Center Drive Sacramento, CA 95$li MAY 7 - 1987 Oroville CA 956 X County Clnrk County ol. Butte CA�IDACE A�1ATH U#8 Co. Clark By Deputy AP 11 Name Project Title Boundary Line Modification AP Project. Davis Ramssr tl,e southside of Garden toad apprOXimately Project Location On --Specific a , loon feet west of Lott Road Project Location - City Project Location County Durham.��...._ Descrfpt}or of Nature, purpose, and Beneficiaries of 'Project Bo�.xndary Line Modification Name: of Public Agency Approving Project Butte County Advisory Agency Name`of Person or Agency Carrying Out Project Davis & Ramser Exempt Statue: (Check One) Class 5a Hinisterial (Sec. 15268) Declared Emergency (Sec. 15269(c)) Emergency Project (Sec= 15269(a) and (b)) XXX Categorical Exemption. State type and section number. Reasons why project is exempt: Project meets the definit- on of a Class 5a exemption. Area. Code Telephone Extension vontact Person John Mendonsaj Public Works (9l6)5�8-7266 Tf filed by applicant 1i Attach certified document of exemption finding, covin the 2. Has g notice of ekomption been filed by the public agency aPP g project? Yes.. No_ Date RectiVed for Filing Signotu�: e Otephen A,4 Streeter Senior Planner Title '+� tcvi5ed R&rch 1486 a� mite Colin I'AN D OP NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS WILLIAM (Bill) CHEFF, Director 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE-OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 05965 Telephone: (916) 538.7681 6ufl-bCo.Planning CcM1% RONALD D. McELROY CERTIFIED MAIL Deputy Director MAY G 1997 �taville, +�aU#onr May 4, 1987 DavJ8 and Ramser REc AP 40-10-27,28, & 29 1893 Garden Road Boundary Dine Modification Durham, CA 95938 Dear Gentlemen: At the regular meeting of the Butte County Advisory Agency heldon May 4, 1987, the agency approved the boundary ;Cine modification on the above-referenced property; noting that the projeCt is categorically ex6mpt from environmental review and subject to the conditions of approval, listed on the attached sheet. If no appeals are timely filed--within ten (10) days' of the date of the Advisory Agency's approval.--with the Cleric of the Board of Supervisors, this action will be final, The conditions of approval must be compliedWith within twenty=four months from the date of approval by the Advisory Agency, If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office. Very truly yours; William Cheff Director of Public Works hn Mendonsa Assistant Director JN/ds attachment oc: Planning Dopartment Environmental. Health Department 8iLrra'West Surveying J! Davis and J. Ramser; Boundary :Line Modification, AP 40-10-27, 28, and, 29, on the south side of Garden Road approx. 1000 ft. West of Lott Road. Durham area. Engineers Sierra West 'Surveying Public Works conditions: 1 Prepare necessary deeds for recordation.. Submit to Department oL Public Works for checking. 2 Vetify that partial reconveyance and/or modification of trust deeds has been accomplished, if necessary. 3 Verify that there are no delinquent taxes due prior to recording deeds or map. 4 Prepare a map showing approved boundary line modification and submit to Department of Public Works :for checking., approval atld recording. 5 After recordation of deeds, contact the Assessor's Office and request that the necessary parcels be combined so that no new parcels are created. 6 File a Record of Survey map or approved alternate: 7 Show all easements of record on the map, 8 Prior to recordation of boundary line modification deeds) verify separate ownership of parcels land 2 as shown on book 48 of )daps at Pago 96. Health, Dept. conditions: 9 Locate and if necessary relocatc. '-he sewage disposal system serving the existing dwelling onto its respective parce" 10 If map or plot is recorded, show features of record as shown on the original parcel map. W' Inter-Departa�erotar iMemoranda. To: Advisory Agency FROM; Steve Streeter, Planning SUBJECTt BLM FOR DAVIS & RAmstR,, AP440^10--27, 28, 29 OATMt March 4, 1987 Zoning: A-5 General Plan: orchard & Field Crops Land Conservation Agreement: No BLM acceptable so long as all resulting parcels yield 5 acres or more to conform with the Zoning and General Plan designation. Recommendapproval finding the project is categorically exempt (Class 5a) from environmental review. SAsjmc d0i Davis & Ramser Sierra 'West surveying r.