The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About040-150-001'r 1,. �' rEir ,. r Y 1 r�. , 1 .f Y 1� • f �` " ' i1 , r, � . �. • I [ + fll % f 1 _ r • F � .i � 1 Y � • _ .. ..� '�' G .di• . �� r , . , ♦ # . „ , r � � 1 ( , I (.j �`r I • � . . � 11 ' Y. , •�'r� R$$�� • IA. r i I. � •+,Y ' . ! Y•+ _ ..* . � • � � R , Y 1 .� �.� _ V � 5 f - � r � • 0 0 * • f � ar V r Y � . + �, r'ylr�:. �'V 1 . . . M V • - •� • r • YC yt� . ' ' • { ref ��9"; - 'P • • Q •t ,� r W , III 5 : I I _ I t4 I , 14 �. • r VFORMAT/ON'al - r+OM DYV'''S i7iYS' f f .:. 11 .yr •� a (� Lo 11 90-09 -24-02 Roger Sohntey �< 9674 Lott Road, Durham, CA. 95938 .'' dame as applicant P C D,rSCP.s??n-=O 3 TENTATIVE SUBDVISION HAP 'to divide 104�-%- ,acres to ctet ,» , A,g at 1,.0 aures and .L at 3.$ acres on the east sk a of Lott Rd, approx. 800 ft. south of Cummings Rd. Durham area. S 040-150-001 ....: Cwt... //��ryry�� SR�1 ISLE w"L"Sli PI,Ai'� Vt7ei tr ,.. �611.i1 CT CO S". S....:iN7l �r,j4, fA�l13Ji...... iy �� pL- pPM-A.��I^ P. OP." Aug. 22; 1994 DFiT. OP tyPP 1C NT S1CjN-r.TU �+�Pr_•-+eC �r�TYf:,D Sept. 21., 1990 ,/SuRVr.v3 /CSV.iL ri�G`Z`i.. No'th5ta Engineering a Decla?•ation Dri.vey Chico, CAL 9592 A►1'<<.+ �'i.,.�tij?fj'i'�iV 7t.:a y =--=OF 'ayR=',..?�::.� t,,s, r Lt:sa»'1 V L D C" :�, a; s D?4 DA =m ADOPTED.. D,cs.:,.. ...__ .... ILi. M�4.:25i D��. y�rm� 'SLCr�'T"..`.+T� _�rr.�.w '•.r+ y1YY ♦ 'L: uC ''r7~.- ORT.. ~ i A=,r.,r.1 i.iE Fi+J:E .�wL' •r.... .i. � .... 51arl, CQTMt L""'s''= =' t,=DcIXING D 'T 'v: ».Q_`+ G NN P,:. ,SING Dry " ADV=SOP.Y AG C'` BCS ACTIOPt - 01 0 M w T8NTATIV8 SUBDIVISION 'TENTA.TIVE PARCEL MAP ED111tI;LXNCLNARX SUBDIVISION' � WAIVER APPLICATION (P1Pa'se check appropriate box) APPLICANT: �G � fll! Std 14 AJ R 11 PHONE N0: CiaN[,t3_ :iyl P,�X/C lTT' PHONE 110: M011�tt� i'M OR SURVEI B: t7OW4T �`i?Gz'IiEE•E>lll�`r PHONE NO: 'Oyu/dy !1>JI)Ct[�S 2Gt JECG9,P�9�/Ce�T �'. Cy/CO, G9'i r9l:,QL'6 MAi} J 'NOTICE Li. -1 J • . /�,.n �/. y �.y/'� �j�/�y��a�' iflliYlLU.1 G TO,: /7��^ C•IVGf� .. Ld �.% r[ �[T`!!� ✓ 1'j:CA,IgOA Or M- OPERTY.; TOWIVSHIP Z/l1: RANGE Z-� SEOTIuN �,� AC;)t 0OR'S PARCtt, ttt IBER; "lS OJ 'TOTAL AC.E'p-AGE A' 11 at PIT,AUIi u,t1LMI'T FR8LI1tINARY TITLE MPOAT OIt RUcENT 'POLICY OF TITLE INSuRANCIE (dat od within Inst s�..+c months) WIZ[ APPUCAT ION. :INDICATE BELOW 'IIIE DA`LV.' t ` b "ANI ► [2I COF%DIJIG INFt7jVAT=T BY JIHICH .THIS PART CtJLAR .ARCI;L WAS CRFA'i'E DATE. DibK PAGE NUMf31!:12 AND uI'LE OP PARMLS' BEI 0 CREAIMD ( incl lading any remainder) : i?7:y'1'11T C1, 1110 NAT MI, WA'T'ER C4UR3E OR EVORM DIIA19: p!2(gX)O ;t) b ,THOD or SE4 AGE DIS POSAL- �1lYr✓!f�l�Gd�G r�i�J7G �XS�c lS�� (Check with Health Department) 1'ltC)T'�1t�f�i) tslotJRCE OV WATBAi. ' Check with H alth' Departanetit ) ftC J'Xi ltytt 011) P110rlls' r3144"Ia EX � 1,' E s13btTI�TaARY tjt i1ln, OR1GIr.ArPAitCt i7 Y 5 t., Noll-, l.�r',11MA'lti IIS DIIJ MN � �IIL� LAVE '1b a f y ti t .' f>;t7 a FOR O�-t fLY:, lloll,o Cotttity Planning Dapt. Receipt H. 7 .C.wimy Center Drive , Orov 1 14o, CA 959,05-'1397`` AFFl cant QQ (91 fi ) 539-1601 Ar 1/ � � � 0 Subdivision N�ime (if'appli.cabi) . a APPENDIX i k LAND DIVISION APPLICAT,IONS a i. Supplemental Informat i -)_n for Planniiin, beoartme�it I. List :arid describe any other related: permits and other public approvaLs rortuErOd for this project; including; hose requited by r.ity.; regional, stain and federal tgrncies.; "l, Proposed sch-.dining/associated projects: el,� s%t,� et�5 1. Anticipated indremental development (phasing of subdivision units, frai,u'rr development plans): !i. 4Ctrat etl,od wi l L be utilized to Acco=odata surface drainage? Describe how oc-site and downstream drainage channels will be affected, " Proximity 'of w��awr` floe fire tlgtkting puxpusis th'ydratittj ponds) etc,) Ulf�j,i.r1 6, W l 1 I okc:nva'i, ton nr grading he ntcessaty! Cubic yards (last ►,nate) t 7.s lot)!; for travel: to property (rural and Mountainous areas only), VNV I RONM NTAL IMPACTS � AND MITIGATION i•1E:A51112i?5"� - I'dont i't'y pt tr'ntially significant environmental impacts ,associatedwith t lre1,1111 d vision. What; project design features or spacial conditions (sf approvnI tmitrlgation measures) are proposed to allevial,e potential 4 r►vironmerttal impacts? e�7=-g5 l?NV t f#OMI"sNTA[..ScTTING I Pil m,st.eibe the project site as it exists be Fore the project, 61;x-1titll.rrg inform�itiun on copography, soil stability p;laots ,acrd itrilmal:s, ;and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects, 1)(—.scribe, ,triy existing structures on the- site, and the use of tilt, st ruet.ures �f7G��' � zgl�r,C't'• ,�:5r.✓��E'S Crrrr.�rr ,��-r,� a,�c,�,�. tr) ncei:rribe the surrounding properties, includici,r information on lol.urts ,ind animal; and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects, 611rtivato t.19e type of land use (residential, commercial, etc. ), i11t t:tis i t y of land use (one-family, apartment houses., shops, depart- r,oent st:ur4:�:, etc.), and scale of development (height, fronLage �:tsrlrack, rear, yard, etc.). ,r9G -;2,�`�51,�..' G�Yll�f��C. ��1�l�C�"tli' O,�'C•�'��,., U � :r�'1'itlta: [ hereby dertifv that the statements furnished above and in d'1,tr1"l f'I t; (ho of t,.ttlattl Oxlttbits present the data and itifoimati.on required for this '111`1l,il is iltIALIon to the best nz my ability, and that the facts, statements ;itt►f iol"orowt.i.on presented. are true and correct to the best of my knatw,ledge rtiatl ha 1 1(tr: w AA— �R 5 �riri t.0 e �7ta.4t:i)tFtl'�lt't� .51i!!et �.' 16,ager 'resp ns.es. ' + IUsWdoIOA0t717uel 065L z J n �xz Lifi3 �� Aaf rGa SUBDIVIDER'S STATEMENT Name'¢ ,�/11� Cate Project��rrC�a-r AP n 9D /f=CJf 1. Existip a use (s) of the. land A,1-$ r G 2. Priopored use (s) of the land5'r�El1l 3. Improvements proposed (See Gh, 20-21 County Code) Public areasproposed _ 5. Tree planting/or removal (approx.,number) 6: Preliminary copy or any condition, Vestrictive reservations or covenants existing or proposed shall be attached to this state►Herm. -. attached none 7. State type of division, ie,, private road, urban rural,: etc.,. LD 1040 G 14, /.^7i_'" i - - r B�LTC1 COiJ�TC�Y ' GE`N'r`i�..A.LR � P7�,AN CtOY�TF'CSPr1ANCE REP'C3RT ��G F'02� P. �,.FC'F-"`s'- MAP OR STJBDT'c7TSTON MAP 1 9p 1-k to be c let jt; =p ed by applicaatj t�!d'PISCA3iT NAME AHA ADDRESS, as ,Z, PR0JECT DESCRIPTION: S',• ASSrE SOR' S PAR= ,'i[MEa(S) : AY . PROPOSED USE: erre. following ite= are to be cccpletcd by the Planning Department: `" LAND CONSERVATION AGREEMEVT; �'i".r�A`iT ZON�iG �! PLAN DES1GUMON;�•�i6'7lfi�__C�F� �rc.��'� Cc-ni:tional Crite+^as p CULTU-.RE--aM%5 YES Ito It is recc=ended that you perform the 1, Agricultural Ccaoatibility following checked items: ?. 'Water, and Sewer Capacity ARCDMLOGICAL RECORDS' CHECK, �— ." 3. Adequate Fire Facilities BOTANICAL SURVEY ' 4G Road Capacity and Maintenance GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 5. Access to'Cocrercial and Schools - YES No 0&,.-3ARA MIM FIELD CROPS TWI HI'N 9EMMENT OF 'FISH AND GAME D VELOPM rL ZONE: Z. Pred'c=inant 5-10 ac. Paul Siza .. Vicin t••1 of 'Urban Bazndar es _ iITfiIN LOOD Pum. Ag. Viability not Impaired, v - ARa►, SPECIFIC OR Stas£ Aeta=ination: Substantially cct£nrms to: LAND USE 2LiN+�:-� ,um -L -,AL PLAN: 1. Land Use .. If, Yes, Y F A/ 2. Conserxoticn,_ Name of Plan 3. ,Opo Spam _ .. it=31 URW RESERVE; 4. Saxetp 54 Boise If Yes, dace of Resena 6. Aowir.? _ 7. C3.rculaticn ktOPORT Iu.m USE PLAN 14, /.^7i_'" i - - T ;.. _ .._.-- Planning DepartmentNASfE SOHNRLX SUBDIVISION x Environmental Health Department X CDF (Forestry Department) AP: 40-15-01 .n, Attn: J. Craig Carter (on areas north of 'red line on map)' Butte. County Sheriff PG&E (check title report for easement) x Pacific Bell Butte County Nosquito Abatement OR Oroville riosuxto Abatement ement (areas within large map in cabinet) ,School District.. wa l ma Water Company (if ifidi,vtdual wells are not indicated on applidation or bap) UL , K Durham i1futual Water Co. -Ppb California Water. rviC Company (Chico area Oroville-Wyandotte `rrigation ,District (Oroville area, SE of river) Thermalito Irrigation District (Thermalito area NE of river) Limesaddle Community Services District to lake) (Paradise area along Pentz Rd. Del 'Oro Water (Paradise Pines area) Buzzta 1. Waterworks (Doe Yfill Ridge/Forest Ranch area) Paradises. Irrigation District City of . . (check wall maps for spheres of influence) Oroville Chico Paradise Biggs Gridley MrV1 LE AREA ONLY: Lake Oroville Area Public Utility District (see large map in cabinet) Feather River Recreation District (see large map in cabinet) E1 Medio Fire District (check wall map, a small portion of Oroville only) BlGr ,ag, RICHVA.LE, GRIDLEY AREAS (SOUTH BUTTE COOTYj check wall map and title report to see what applies. Some areas overlap. Drainage District- 71._ .Drainage .District rw.2 Drainage District I100 �..----Drainage Distr1 t n200 'Reclamat'ion District #$33 Reclamation District A2056 ,Sacramento and San Joaquin. Drainage District Butte Creek Drainage District IN CERTAIN CASES ,Superintendent of Schools (only ;for 'subdivisions) Dept, of Fish and Game (near water and in rural and mountain areas) Cal Trans (near State Hwy, 32, 10, 99, 149 (Chico cut-off), 162 (Olive Hwy, & Riehval.e Hwy.), 191 (Clark Road) State. Water duality "ontrol Board (projectt with more than 100 hots or units) United States Fore,4t Service (if project bordersUSA land —thedit A..P books) LL Parks and Recreation Department (Property State Water Resources Department(prperty�i� nearLake Oroviil.e} e Oroville -- watershed) :lock Creek Reclaimataon Dist. (west of Chico Airport, south of Rock Creek and east of Hwy, 99 (see wall map) Chico Area Recreation & Park. Dist (only for subdivisipns) SMIAL CASES,, check title report for any tthtion of special services or easements such ite as to Thermalito Irrigation District (numbered ms) AGENDA INFORMATION AGENDA ITEM 4.04 PROPOSED FINDINGS AND MOTION PREPARED BY STAFF PURS TO MOTION OF INTENT AND INSTRUCTIONS OF tbARD OF SUPERVISORS ON 3'24/92 I will make a motion to adopt a Negative Declaration of environmental impact with mitigation measures as listed in the initial study for this project, to uphold the appeal and approva the project finding that the project could have an effect on tho environment, but wil;, not have a significant effect in this case provided the requiredmitigation measures are complied with. This motion is made finding that the project is in conformance with the Butte County General Plan and Butte County zoning as follows: 3,. At the time of f iling of this tentative map application purstlant to Butte County Code Section 20-62 the applicable zon.'Lng- ,was SR --1 and the established policy was to interpret and apply the Butte County General Plan in the neighborhood, in question in a manner which allowed the subdivision and development of land to one acre parcels;. 2. Subdividing the property in question to one acre plus lots is consistent with the established pattern of development of those. properties commencing at the subject property and bordering on both sides of Lott Road, from the subject property south to Durham -Dayton Highway. Said properties predominantly developed to residential uses on lots of approximately one acre in size: 3. Said SR: -1 zoning and policies of interpretation of the General Plan remained in. effect at the time of the Advisory Agency hearing on this map, at the time the appeal was Lade to the Board of Supervisors pertaining to the Advisory Agency's action on this map,, at the time the hearing tads opened before the Board of Supervisors on said appeal, and at the time the motion of Intent to approve this map was adopted by the. Board: Having found the above, I further move to approve the- project subject to the follow, conditions and finding that approval will not be detrimental to the health, safety or welfare of the people of Butte County provided the required conditions are compli3d,With. These conditions are: The 18 conditions as listed in the letter Public 'Works to the applit.ant dated December from the Department of Pu ^` listed in the memo from 18 1991; the 7 conditions 2�s Environmental Health, to Public Works dated January 27, 1992; condition 26 Place a, note on the final map that states "A development. impact fee. for Sheriff's facilities shall be paid pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 3, &xticle II of the Butte County Code prior to il3suAnce of building permits"; and the 3 mitigation measures as Listed in theinitial study. �sohnrey.doCi ----- . Sohnrey !�•ubdivision,, (Roger SohnreyTSM, AP 40-15--01, 1 lots locatdd ..pan the east side of Lott Road approx. 800 ft. south of: Cummings Road. Dburham area. Engineer: NorthStar Engineering Public Works con Ltionss 1 Submit road and drainage plans to the Department of- Public Works for approval and install the required facili-t-its. 2 Provide 20 ft. radius property line returns at all,treet intersections. 3 Indicate a 50 ft. 'building setback line from the centerline of access road. a A Street signs shall be provided by the developer at all street intersections per County '-requirements. (Submit 5 alternate names for each street to the County address coordinator for approval of street names.,) 5 need 30 ft. from the centerline of Lott Road to the County of Butte. 6 Construct full street secticn on access road to RS --24 geometric ste� vAth curb, gutter and sidewalk. Minimum structural section to be -2" AC and 8 AB, SC. 250prime, fog seal and 95% relative compaction. Submit design to County Department of :Public Works for appr6val "R" value determinations and other data :may be required to support section design. 7 Provide monumentatIon as required by the Department of Public Works in accordance with accepted standards. 8 Street grades and other features shall comply with the Butte County Ordinances, design resolution and other accepted engineering standards. 9 Provide permanent solution for drainage. 10 All easements of record to be shown on the final map. 1 Meet requirements of Butte County Eire Bepaitment or other responsible agency. 12 Street lighting shall be provided in accordance with lutte County .g 8 requirements, accepted design criteria, and recommendations of PG&E: 1.3 Provide 11 ft. no access strip for parcel, 1 along Lott Road. 14 Pay off a5sessmehts-. 15 Deet the requirements of the utility companies (i.e., PG&E, Pacific' Telephone] water, sewer) - • �t rye r !tj'�.� �,,,w;;%. 'a • ;. `+R P t, ; w-.« ,� a'�Vii; ; ' ': i..� '.,.,` M 4`7 .. a✓'mow iRs}`Y t 'P r. y L..y' " »`J INTER-DEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM ' �,yam,•,. +,..f„M1loc•:',;(�. `} 'TO1 Land Development, PublicWorks FROM: Tom Reid, Environmental Health- + SUBJECT: Sohnrey Subdivision, Els Lott Road, Durham APO 40-15-01 r C N t DATE: January 27, 1992 #<Theabove subdivision was denied by .the Advisory Agency on P .,. y ry Zoning g proposed Janua 27 1992 for non-conformance with the Durham- Da ton-�Nel.son General plan and Zonis Amendriient. If the denial is appealed to the Board of Supervisors and the a appeal_ upheld, this Department's recommended conditions of —approval are as follows, noting that Condition 5 is asci a' mitigation 'measure agreed to by the applicant; 1 ?provide the area for wells and 100' leachfield free setback ,around those areas on parcels 2, 31 4, 51 6 & 7. 2. p rovidp- a 1000 leachfield free setback around. existing'wells�tl either within: the property or within 100' of the property boundaries on parcel I 3 Provide eth�y sl sewage disposal area on each PthparcelCombine w an adjacent parcel any parcel not proven to Contain the usable sewage disposal area required by the Subdivision ordinance. 4. Locate and if necessary relocate the sewage disposal system serving the existing dwelling onto its respective parcel 5 Comply with the winter groundwater monitoringnitigati.on , measure. "FroVide verifl.catic`n Of winter groundwater elevat-ion prior to recording the final map. Complete site and other required' physical ,improvements subsequent to satisfactory verification of groundwater elevation.'' 6 : Meet the sewage disposal requirements of the Butte Count Flood , :. Plain Ordinance. 7 . , Comply r.-Vth any additional: requirements of the California `l:,: - + Regional Water Quality Control Board: „ Tit tilf yY1 {.5{.; rla fff{aaa�4 i C92 - led. hearing NorthStar Engineering on behalf off 36 Contin Raymund Jans - consideration of an appeal of the Advisory, Agency's denial. of a tentative subdivision map (proposed negative declaration with environmental mitigations),. AP 40-07i-04, seven lotsr property located 'an, the west side of Tones Avenue approximately 700 feet south of Blossom Lanc{., Durham area, MOTION: MOVE TO DENY THE APPEAL FINDING THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT CONFORM TO THE GENERAL PLAN POLICIES OF ORCHARD AND FIELD CROPS AND THE LAND MSE El' NT OF THE GENERAL PLAN. S M y TjOTE : 1 Y 2 Y 3 Y 4 NP 5 Y Unanimously Carried) i y are 'm'3 ,.4•*5.S«"",�,t *+tStitC' v w"'"'"% r'1 i..��.�'rw«:H �. i',.,, �,�elJr uC�+M a�'2�.'�k,`.,,i' /��r *� tt�.c'r�yY;�TAT7� �I Ctl p SA�.�+,i4V .1.r7��i331y7R..,{" J!'�f 'r6t 1twn,..:F . r Inter=Depairimental` Memorandum TO; Butte County Advisory Agency FROM: Planning Director SUBJECT: Report on Tentative Subdivision Map for Raymund Jam, AP No. 040-010- 004 DATE:; November 4, 1991 This is a: proposal to divide .353 plus acres to create 7 lots, six at 5 acres each and; one at 5.3 acres. The present zoning is A-5 (Agricultural, 5 acre parcels). The Land Use Plan Map of the Butte County General Plan designates this area as Orchard and Field Crops. The General Plan stipulates that zoning and land division below 20 acres are contingent upon meeting three conditional criteria, (1) ,Predominant parcel size in the area is 5 to 10acres. (2) The project is within the vicinity of urban boundaries. (3) agricultural y will not be impaired. A literal reading of these The ricuiturai ♦ iabilit of the site wr policies would indicate that the project does not meet criteria (2) and (3); and, therefore,; could. not be found consistent with the General Plan. However, in 1987 the Butte County Board of Supervisors made the findings on. an adjacent parcel that five acres were consistent with the General Plan based on a .number of findings. It must be noted that these findings were made specifically for that project and do not necessarily apply in this instance. The project is also located within the Durham Dayton Nelson Planning Area. The Planning Commission is currently considering two different zoning proposals f for the area, one of which proposes an A710 zoning for this area, the other an ALO' zoning. it is anticipated that the recommended Plan will be forwarded to the Board of Supery siOrs within the next month, With this in mind and the fact that the project may not meet the policies of the General Plan Land Use Element,, it is recommended that this item be continued mita the zoning for the Durham Dayton ;!Nelson Planning Area is resolved. If the Advisory Agency chooses to take an action and approves the project, the following Mitigation Measui'es and Conditions should be applied; Mitigation Mfeasures 1. Place a' note on the additional inap sheet that states, "Automatic fire suppression Winkler systems shall be installed in all new residential structures in.. accordance with the National Fire Protection Association for the installation of sprinkler s 'stems in one and two family aweilings and mobile homes} NFPA ' .-,ldard 13 y purpose j stallation, of espri sprinkler fires Fns is i for additional safety and D. The T1u pose of the in property protection in the event of r > l fires, Ibis installation will reduce the dernand fo'r structural fire protection services in those instances where they are installed", away from the SouthernAll residences shall be constructed at least 8011 %ef Pacific Railroad Track. Show,.on the additionalmap sheet a line that delineates this boundary. onditions Provide an adequate gravel shoulder along the Jones Avenue frontage to alloy school buses to pull off the road to pick up children. This improved shoulder area should' be approximately 100 feet long. 2x 'Place a note on the additional map shi.et that states, "A Development Impact Fee for Sheriff facilities sbrdl be paid pursiaaint to the provisions of Chapter 3, .,Article 2, of the Butte Cuuinty Code prior to issuance of building permits or Use Permit in the case of a mobile .home park. Said fee amount will be determined, and_ calculated as; of the date of application for the 'building permit or Use Permit". CBS.bd cct Raymond Jans NorthStar Engineering Public Works' Department Envitronmental health Department iz C =N GFNE't�l�"�, PY_,A."^T Cr�rJF'ORN{Al`7CE FccEPORT �, FDRPARC' MAP' QR StTBD�t7TSZC7N TKAP Stezz 1-4 to bei, 41d jetted by apnl'scant: 1. AFF ICANT XAHE AND-ADDTcFSS: . / .�'' ,,,�C�r`%l_•r✓. Lc C1 1. «_ "� Z. RoJEC1 DESGTtTPiZOK: 3. ASSESSOR'S ?ARCEL , , (S). r. PF'OPOSM USE:, �.'r 'y' enn1 x"'16 ol.lowing items aro to be completed by the ?lannin3 Departoent: CM' fr, ZC,fnj4G , LAt D XNSERVKTIONAGR.�Et�: A21) c IM L PLAN DESIGUATION: G gtti I C= teria: AGR Ci,*I.Ii+'RAL- ,.SIDENl?aL Yr..: NO It is redo=ended that you pertozm the 3. AAg=icultural Compatibility following cheated items: Z. 'dater and :,aver Capacity ARC�IXEOLOGICAL RECORDS C:DrC.Y 3. Adeatsats r:ze Facilities BOTANICAL SURVEY 44 Road Capac'tYf and Maintenance, GEOLOGICAL SURVEY S Access to Co=ercial and Schools YES NO ORC3.IP.D An F . D DROPS r� STIi" n DEPARMID"T OF MH AND WM DEVELOFKM- ZON A: i. P,-edomivant 5-10 ac. ParCe7i Si a V" 2. viciaity c£ 'Urban 3cundaies x S irm n=o PLAIN 3: As. v iabill tt not Iapai red WI=N AREA, SPECIFIC OR Staffs Detetainar on Substantially canfor= 'to LAND USE PL1N r�i AL ?►'t la Land Use t! Yes ,/V' 2: Coaserration, Y. .._:._ Name or Plan 3 Open Space idl� UR:tAN RESERVE! VE; 4. Safety X If Yes 5,: Noise frame of Reser^e 6, Ecusing 7. Circulation. AiY.°OR2 i.AN17 (FSP ALAN• J y V �l ��A �7 �� r orf i �,;+�,:r��t �� ✓� « T1/' �- �+ s�7'' / u�� G t %`�1+. % X17 /� t t�' 1!✓G /2, ✓PY rel �:C ; t'.'✓ � /� �-''/� �� /, �.= :✓yi-�y .�"� r rsrntr�.,tr� % wf � j,t.. fr �' �`" 1''�„-y, ,,r_,�r .:� � . � r" /�✓��'' " Stash SiRnatsza % t / r :��- e`''L>. Tiate AS ME APPLICANT FOR EQUEES= "Im bIvItIc to I All AWMI S OF t1 . ASOYE STAT OE�"•..HrVA"' dN EGAMI!;G =M CONFOR`W?Ci �T= GENERAL PLAN ANO ZONING. ted Da Si .sar.Le of Aoplcxnt ✓t,7�.�. �anozr •rill expite and be di'scardea s:Uc (6) months i .. ,� c.� w r^ ;d t".e bate or �.e s;,af° s atu:e. LD 1000A (tavised 6-81) r i,� '�- DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS WILLIAM (6111) CHEFF, Director ~ 7 COUNTY CEMrt-R DRIVE . OROVLLLE, CALIFORNIA 95965 Tetephone.(916)538.7681 RONALD D. McELROY Deputy Diurefor December no, 1991 Raymund Jans RE: AP 40-07-04 9895 Jones Avenue _ TSM Durham, GA 95938 Dear Mr. Jans At the regular meeting of the Butte County Advisory Agency held on December 30, 1991, the agency denied your tentative subdivision map On the above referenced property. The project was denied because it does not conform L:o the General Plan policies of Orchard and Field kCrops designation and the Land Use Element of the General Plan. if no appeals are timely filed -- within ten (10) days of.the date of the Advisory Agency's approval (Jannary 9,_1992) -- with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, this action will be final: If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office: Very truly yours, William Cheff Director of Public Works John Mendonsa `-Assistant Director XM/ds , Cc Planning Health NorthStar Engineering i 11� 1.1 Raymund P. Jans RE': Raymund'Jans Subdivision 9895 Jones Ave, AP 40-07-04 Durham, CA 95938 Tentative Subdivision Map. Appeal, Dear Mr. Jans At the regular meeting of the Butte County Board of Supervisors held February 25, 1992, the Board denied your appeal finding that it does not conform to `cne General Plan policies of orchard and Field Crops desigination and the Land Use Element of the General Plan. if you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact this office at 916-538--7266. Very truly yours, William Chef Director of Public Works Stuart Edell Assistant Director SErk;p lnvilo!m�Rnt l HealtFi Depar'tment > 0 e rk of the Board' NorthStar Engineering, - lr;..--•-*.,-- ,wi.-++,r w .. .r::.,....., e.,++ -r:. -:..0y.+�+++, ;,et.— , �� _ y, i..v Inter De artmon aG Memorandum rrss Board of Supervisors �►vcAs Advisory AgencyG stt acv: Raymund Jans - Tentative Subdivision Map AP 40-07-04 cr�r: January 14 1992 At their meeting of December 30, 1991. the Advisory Agency denied the subject map based on the finding that is does not conform to the General Plan policies of Orchard and Field Crops and the 'Land Use Element- of the General, Plan. These findings are stated in the Planning Directors Report of November 4, 1991. As stated in the Planning Director's Report, it was recommended that this item be continued until the zoning for the Durham Dayton Nelson Planning Area is resolved, Mr. J ans requested immediate action even if it meant denial. Should the Board choose to deny the. :Appeal, a Motion to Deny finding that the proposed ` project does not conform to tfle General Plan policies of Clrchard and Field Crops and the Land Use Element of the General Plan. Should the Board choose to uphold the ;appeal a Motion of Intent, with,findings that the prajec't is in compliance wi h policies of the General Plan, is recommended so that staff can help in preparing a motion with all necessary, findings k.p Iry t' CA 4. Raymond Jans, TSM, AP' 40-07-04, 7 hots locttted,,on the west side of 'La�ye. 'l Enginbones , , 700 fr� south of Blossom Durham are a. Ave,,- = ?roxPp `NovthStar Engineering Myes Pustejovsky was present. Sanders said the project is within the Durham Dayton Nelson planning being; The zoning area, %where the zoning and General Plan are ,rt- ,_sed. -i,s either A-10 or A-20 which coriflik r ith this prope 1. being considered The project should either be continued until the zoning -- clettled, or denied, or redesigned to 10 or 20 acre parcels, Raymond Jans said his property is surrounded by 5 acre lots, Although and he he 3s o posed sutidivisians in the past, it has been to no r wail +p and he needs the money. taarxts to move on a 1Jike McDonald said that the recsntly created 5 acte parcels have been in lock in the sm;�ller parcels response to the tON plan with people trying, to is rezoned. Several pa before the arearcels have been on their property split on Pape.., This is a farming area, but the 5 acre paY!cels are a too large detriment to farming. Eive acres are too small to lease and They become breeding grounds for agi`icm1tural pests. for residentdal ;lots. He would liki to, buy the Jans property but cannot afford tt! i(o so at the after the price of 5 are parcels. He wants the; hearing continued uitil trying to ick in their DON plan is settled. At thin point peoplQ are before the DDN plan is settled'. Ten and 20 acre prce: s would be profits of a size th.ar. d,ould be leased by the surrounding farmersy e meeting vtss interupted, at this point by several peo�'1+� who had gone the items, tabo��t which to the wrng room and: had missed the hearing of i they, Were intttrested (BAC TO RAU OND .TANS, TSM), i fiir. PutStejovsli is some information that U:tipported 5 acre y said `tpiat there ptircels for the Jugam Subdivision on Jones Av:ehde. `Mr. Sanders Sdid that the Jugum Subdivision wa.s not supported at; the The Hoard of Supervisors Pl,ann.ing lfept, or Planning Commission level. made the d.eti-�.ion to approve that subdivision; rix`. Jans tZid that development on Jones Avenue is not going to stop. It he just: t int just the wra,y of ti e .future. With all the d velopment 9 bng on, wants to get dut of it. Mr. Puste'iovskry asked about Publ is WotYt condition #3 regarding road xmprovemettt, which hd; wrote a letter about. Mt,, '):.dell said. that, Letter WWI filed without being responded to. That date, a�ttr meetink; Will Bill Cheffi condition could be modified at a later BL►'. E COINTY ADVISORY AGENGY MINUTES PAGE 6 DECIti -j iER 300 1991. Mr. Reid asked if the applicant w4,ld prefer to revise the map or have action taken on the .map as is. He could revise the map to 3-10 acre parcels. Mr. Jans said he would like action taken today. Mr. Sanders said that-3 10 acre pArcels might receive the same rejection by the Planning. Dept. It was noted that the Board of Supervisors had not given any policy g g thx� s !p size of arcel '�.s this area when it gave approval regarding direction. to the Jugam subdivision. Mr: Sanders made a motion to deny' the tentative, subdivision map for Raymond Jans on AP 4047-04 fi.nd',ing that the project as proposed does not substantially conform to the iGeneeel Plan policies of the Orchard and Vi,eld Crop designation and the 'land Use Element of the Butte County General Plan, Motion seconded by Mx. Reid and carried unanimously. AK.�'�, .w..il�f�lu%Si.'iu. f'.'i ?r ,.au,..u�dl,� ai 4 s': ,1, ,r ,inn.+'h��" 5 !tiN`� .�i�Y" v+r:4r•., rv"`lr• r. Tr.N''A'I'I SUBDIVISIONS FOR CONS IDrRATIOU: 1. roger Sohnrey, Te;ntative Subdivision Map, AP 40-15-01 7 Sots located on the east side o,f Lot:. Road. approx. 8001 south of Cummings Road. Durham area.. Engineer: NorthS-"ar z:ngineerirtg R4r.k.:Rodriguez was present. Mr, Reid said that there would he a. groundwater mitigation measure. One of he items on the environmental. checklist should be changed to a "maybe" (that Would be 3FI. Mr. Rodriguez asked if the project could have the RS- 3 -B road standard if it is built out before the adoption of the rD.N Plan which calls for the RS- 2-B road standard for parcels of 3 acres or less. The RS- 2--B standard would cost about, twiceas much. The DDN Plan is not adopted yet and. the RS- 3-B road. standard is the current standard, Mr. Edell sailt that the policies of the DDN Plan are basically decided and the. road standard has been decided although the Plan has not been adopted yet. 'Public Works would have required the lesser standard otherwise (RS- 3-B). Therefore, the higher standard, will be required (RS- 2-B) Mr. Rodriguez prdserited a map showing the size t,t lots along Lott Road which are in the same zone as this property, and are of similar sizes as the proposed parcels. Be said that Lott Road has been pretty extensively developed already and parcels maps have ,recently 'been approved. tir. Rodriguez ,said that this project must; be in conformance with thEi existing and proposed General Plan. It hoes not conform to the proposed General Flan, or the existing General Plan. In the past, because of oxisting lot"Sizes to the south; projects have beE!n approved that seemed -In conformance to the AgResidential desi `gnation;;, although. the area is acturllly Orchard and Field Crop which: does not not allow 1 acre, parcels. It seemed that that type of development already there; met the .Ag-Residentidl polices bettolr than Orchard and Field. Apparently the Board and Planning Comrli55ion are not recognizing that now in either the proposed General 'Plan or Zoning. The Planning Dept, recommendation is based upon the proposed policies. Roger 8ohhreyj the applicaPub, said that he gets lots of complaints from area residents because of1 'zis agricul.atural activities such as spraying or noise or dust, The setbacks that prohibit spraying, for ihttance, make it itpracticable to farm some narrow logs, it is dust getting impractical to farm and he though to split up the land so if he is forced out of farthing, he will have another alternative.' .. :.. _.,, ..., ,ter..... .. ,.,... ..:-.. .:. ,. J%TTE C',OUKIry SUBDIV.> aio coP2-JITTEE MINUTES CCEMBER 1,8 '1991 pj�S�« '. - ;SANDERSAIG ALS cPRES,.NTu DDIANA S UEY ELI, TOM ERDICK R.ODRIGUEZ, BILL DIN'SMORE, ROBERT AND 'TORY STOUIETT4 8. TENTATIVE SUBDIVISIONS OR 'REVIEW: 1. Roge% Sol=ey, Tentati% Suhciivisioin Map, AP 40-15-01, V lots located on the east side of 'Lott Roacl approx. $00 ft south of Cummings Road. 1?urham area. Enginee:c Nor. hSt,sr Er►g inEeer i ng ;2i.ck Rodriguez was present. He had no prohlems with Public Works conditions'. Ma'. Edell said that the Durham.=Dayton -Ne lson Area Land Use Plan i'r still i.iv limbo at the'Bcard of Supervisors. fl Lon the P?Pnning Director's Report relates to than outcome. A2 on the Planning Director's Report relates to non-conformity with the General Plan, which can stop the project by itself, Mr. Rodriguez pointed out that there are other parcels nearby of lone acre., This is s b_a,sical ly tin. $'in-fillR project, Parcel maps „ave been approved w, ith this size of parcel. Mr: Sanders said there is a conflict between the Zoning and General Plan. Parcel maps have been approved. Ain the past based upon the text of the General Plan rather than the map of the General Plan because the Ag-Residential de,signiati:on seemed to fit better than the ~Orchard and Field crop designation. Mr. Rodriguez said that this property owner and the one to the north should not be deni.6d the pr.i.v,iledge of Subdividing their property, which rhe neighboLt have, enjoyed, Mr, Sa,2de,17s said 1-1-le major focus was based ori the Durhann .'Dayton-\'elson, A strong case would. be difficult to make the Orchard and Pield Crop designation based on past actions of the Planning Department, Mr. Edell said that one of the polis-itis of the DDN plan is that p rdels- created less than 3 acres require fttll urban improvements which mean rurbs, gutters and sidewalks. That would t1hAnge Publid Works condition #b t& ?-8-2-B" road standard even though the DDN plan is not adopted yet. That has bee; required On otyler subdiv ions. That polity has been ,agreed upon by the Board of Supervisors and the Planning; Commission. Hr. Reid Said :that the Health bept, needs some information about soil from bacl;hoe holes, for percolation and groundwa.ter't then the conditions can be Wtitten. up This item was set for Advisory Agency on January V, 1991. Public Wbtlu§ will recomRiend the o"lowing tonditiobt., U fE COUNTY SIJbDIv1 aION COQ MZT'TPE' MINTITES DECEMBER 18, 1991 PAGE 2 Public Works conditions.* 1 Submit road and drainageplansto the Department of Public 'Works for approval an-I install the required facilities: 2 Provide 20 ft. ;radius property line retur, at all street intersections. Indicate a 50 ft. building setback line from the centerline of access road: Strizet signs shall be provided by the developer at all street intersections ;per County requirements. (Submit 5 alternate namiws for each street to the County address coordinator for approval of street names.) 5 Deed 30 fn from the centerline of 'Lott Road to the County of Butte. 6 Construct full street section on ,access road. to RS-2-E gernetric standard tidth curb, gutter and. sidewalk. Minimum structural section to be 2" AC and 8 AB 8a 250 prime, fog seal and 957. relative compaction. Submit design to County Department of Public Works .for approval. OR" value determinations and other data, may be required` to support section design. 7 Provide monumentation as required by the Department of Public Works in accordance with accepted standards. 8' Street grades and other features shall comply with the Butte County Ordinances, design resrsluti'on and other accepted engineering standards. 9 Provide permanent solution for drainage. 10 All easements of record to be shown on the f nal�map 11 Meet requirements of Butte County Fire Department or other I responsible agency. I 4 12 Strnst lighting shall be provided in accordance with Batte County requirements, accepted design criteria, and recommendations of PW. 13 Provide l,ft, no access strip for parcel 1 along Lott Road, 14 Pay off assessments. 13, Meeh tha requiremevt5 of the utility, companies (i.e., PC&E Pacific Telephone, Mater, sewer). 2 will make ay motion to adopt a Negative Declaration of - will impacti withe th mitigation measures as Zst* i In rove initial study for �:'__ project, to uphold the appeal and, app `ect finding 'that the project could have an effect. on the ro the 7 environment, but A,11. not have. a significant effect in this case provided the 'required mitigation measures are complied witt.2. This Viat the project is in conformance with the motion is made finding Butte County General plan and Butte County zoning as follows: At the time of filing of this tentative map application pursuant to Butte County code ;Section 20-62 the applicable zoning Was SR-i and the established policy was to interpret and apply the question in a Butte County General Plan in the neighborhood in manner Which allowed the subdivision and development of land to one acre parcels. 2. Subdividing the property in question to one acre plus lots is consistent with the established pattern of development ,of those Properties commencing at the subject property and bordering on both Road from the subjr•.tct property south to Durham• Dayton sides of Lott properties predominantly developed to residential Highway. Said uses on lots of approcimately one acre in size. 3, Said SR-1 zoning and policies of interpretation of vhe General ng Plan remained in effect gat the ptime e 1 the Amade todvisory the Board sof on this map, at. the time the app dvisory Agency Supervisors pertaining to the a's action on this map; •d c-.� the time the Motion of Intent to approve at he time the hearir was opened before he Board of Supervisors on this map was adopted by the 3oard; Havinc-T found th- above., I further move to approve the project subject to the following :onditions and finding that approval will not be detrimental to the healthi safety or welfare of the people of Butte County provided the required conditions are complied with. These conditions are: The 18 conditions as listed in the letter from the Department Of Public; Works to the applicant dated December is, 1991; t�P 7 conditions as listed in the memo from Environmental Health to public Warks dated Tanua�y 271 1692; condition 26 Place a note Sheri ffs facilities tshall states paha development !>mpaot fee f Qthe pursuant to the �.�rovisions of Chapter 3 , Article II of and the Butte3 County Code prior to issuance of building permits"; mitigation measures as listed in the initial study, (sohnrey:doc 4. wt � �. ,,,Y,.rC.'t, i • ' " _ , / „-; . t.: •«r + 4 i i a v - s '� , - � Ica I. FIN 40 is. _ j ,. i'. t - �` • 4$ y t�NE�•.7yyufR�'t•..�� 4 � �a q � �' • .c S w �{� �;if � h A�^�YN7�k��'Y�.y , ""MK1.. rc K}' • S rh r of t .1 t" r �( �i41 : 15r'c� ��, P C� x t. ,.r—s+'• •L, F *•r'"S�1i.`?i'� A+'tw. nl��'vitil��`� t' t,b. •�yWCt'�� go •V� F"t t : • �M `�+!rNNIN Lo -04-25-01 tc MIT_ Jaksf 4�'f6I• 1' •CA 95928 +ryyeV ,t} :`•'7L"i owntlTV ti!le BUiitr :`rxifp: �"{u LIk+�� ac lau •- 4 sv,-:,x is iF�,',, ti a .y4i��4�'r� fey JY"y,, s t ; • t � l ..}d r t t�ti•.. x yti• M. � 7i Y� J%�,� F�.?�y�lmo}`,Y=14 rYai k �.{a iY t • {, u� • �, �k{s 4'", •.'A ' ��1 �isk Cm l;'It�t�ca �r � YYjt ' s ii a � S s � , � � ss". . ,: Sw� C i��' G `• iFT, F " r aii'y�m t1 k rp Wi�"� t a t �,, ♦ Y " �.. ; is r Ay,:Yaq' xi'^Y.�,,,', +i � hJ � L4J uA6'I"Ad��b �r r L;�' p bl � ; ' • r' 1 . - ' '� d • � �'Y ;�1� � 2"31 "�'M (,gNN��`�, �J�1 �4 µ` ,� � ,? `fin+ ,`IFby S 1..✓ r t� 1 i :t .�T.: : a�' , t , t'p�$ � y;t�i> ` t21 ' �:{�%r`itx4 ��'S�'h�'�t � `��`'i i R. ti w' t � ' �' � ��. �• e�v r 1"�� yx < yt.l "., 4}' S{'1 7W1'.',Ia,i ,C.x 4'C,�1.° ii 1Cr ia/'v� ` �r' iii. s t �,t +r+,. •. ♦ _Y'.. 5 .e. i'% - ; r+iY:irT:i•�i na t N1 nf. �-n�•_T'glaf.l�i. Mn�a �--'---�--U3�i:.it,3.�.3: :t :5 1•A to to cgr^glotdd ty applicant# :. AtP3.:[,5.4L Yr.'+� A.ti� ALbF�'SSt 1ti: vY Vie-A'r, I. w1•:3w�t)Y.' r"MtrL ,#.t"`IBFd!;5ir , ;• ;a^ T't7�( Y7F h "'"'_-----�-- '�� Pnpft}5}� tiS%s «✓!Y,#Gyc w ��.+�tit �r.� ,, , �' To33WrinC tcaa afa to tc cc--p3otad, by trio pl&tknipg fleparrrertt ,--.LYS_ -- w�•4tAI Pflli ._. ium Inter-Depart inti o !V!e morundum *0° Advisory Agency c: rpowi Planning Director $Lwcct' TENTATIVE PAFjC.tL %jAP FOR MARK & VICKIEAD11Muc owtt: May 16, 198$ , t1P140-15-©9 The proposed Project consists of di two one «cre parcels. ng two acres norto create th end o£ Reo Court,.Tapprdividing Cis located'at the sitsrt it t►te Durham area, :tte, ro ect300 feet north of Aubry by the 13utte Count Zai n j site is zoned sjR_l conforms to the SR-1 zoningOand niscconsThe T nwithvthe / character of sltrroundin Parcel +fap designation .for this g subdivisions. The Cenera; end the p project site is Ar t t +r d e Ymap also a onforms with such a: P ul a + a. + h µ * }Lal Ryan. rtrlt that � _� deet in Auttrt• + .d a'; a f,. '! is e d,,e they h r ,. , ,, A. it.:i,, rr,':3 Leslie Proposed project w: it criGF "' lots. 5'his and Leslie Ryate pa re, ` �t of' the orifi pial Dennis in orde,: (,j mitigate the financial impacts whic ct zL'tr 'A'y'r the butte County Fire bepartms %4 h hew development FuIld s.am been established. l)ayc�nt of $200,00 Ter pa -he Fire pe , a equer ienier beca�xse this rip only creates ore new partmeht requires tcel prior to recording of the map. bebdj#�gsloh t�ich Paic? such fees ,last Parceltfroa the Original requiredpay the S200,00 for the pplicant will neW lot only. A Mitigated ccOative Declaration has been prepared for this Project in actaxdance to the Environmental Quality Act, RECOD:.'�MINDATIOft A. Find that the requirements of CE0A have cc.m�tlCtcd and considered in .makih,g this r'=cisibeen on and adopt, SMI 1 icLated Negative beclaratictih; aril h. Final that the proiet t, could have a 914nificattt 1�1`ic•e: environment, but will not in this case lsec tt1;tC or t (te, k un the ado )Led mitigation measure attached, oriel C, ApprUve the TentatiVe Parcel Map subject 6o tiro t"cil lowing Condition (C) and Mitigation Dlobsurt (*N'/ 1; Al.l. .lots must conforiii to the but;,e Cfiuhty 2ottin9 Drd:.triihce, CCl 2' PAY$200.00 to the ;Motet. Tender Bund as ret;uirekl County Fire Depattmeht b for the newly creitr:d Y the Butte Bjf: jm ►parcel. cc: Hoxth;3tar Ergirveerng Mark 'Vid%ie Adams 1lS�SCIc,S2Glet IOk' GNVIRpNMENTAi EVALUATION AP M 40-15-89 1111 some nominal amounts of disruptions, dir.placenents,compnetion, or ovurcovering of the soil will occur as a result of this Luntative parcel map, The tentative parcel 'map divides a 2 acre parcol Into two parcels which 'will allow for tin additional single family ronl4nntiul dwelling, thun only minor impacts will occur in relationr,lip to overcovering and compaction of the soil.. 1ce The proposed subdivision is within an exit -Ling almond orchard, which is relatively flat. very little grading will be nocnnssary for preparation of building pads and driveways. Very little change i8 ey.pected in the topography or ground surface relief features. c Yg; The on-site soils ae designated as Class I for agricultural use, Tate two acre parcel is not in itself viable for commercial agricultural production. This property has subsequently been subdivided to provide far suburban residential lots. :,b No impacts aro anticipated in drainage patterns or the rate and amount of surface runoff, Ttus acreage has been subdivided in the past and, therefore, has received the necessary drainage improvements to hccbmmodate single gamily dwellings at one acre diansities. No new drainages facilities will be nadessary to accommodate the additional lot which would be ct6ated by this subdivision, 4a,dt The removal of almond trees will occur on the additional lot to allow for a :future single .family residential home,. Without this subdivision more trees could be maintained within the general neighborhood. 8; The r-oposed tentative parcel map would conform to ether tentative inapt; nlong the Lott Road corridor within the. SF; -1 zoning. The General [''i.�it designation for this pzaperLy is Agricultural Residential and the mai;' also conforms with sttch designations. This property was subdivided In august of 1987 by Dennis ajid Leslie Ryan. At that time, they had created four lots. This propo"seo subdivision will create one more lot on the original Dennis and UfslieRyan parcel ma;. other land. eivisions acted on by the Advisory Agency in the vicinity include. Tentative Parcel Map fat, James Bl,hck, AP 40-15-81, september 1186, Tentative Parcel Map for' James Black, AP 40-15-18, February 1586; Tentative Parcel Nae for Cray Haas, AP 40-15-79, February 1586; Tentative parcel hiap for Albert Almato'r, AP 40-15pm7e37-16, April 15"841 Tentative Subdivision Map foo itaymond Burson, AP 40-15-49, September 104. liat The proposed tentative parcel map will create one addit16,161 parcel in this neighborhood. Such an addition t.+ould generate approximately 10 extra vehicf.e trips per dayi the most recent traffic Cot::tts on Lott Rand show an, ' 3ratje daily traffic. (A,D,T, ) of 810 vehicles, No 'significant impacts are: anticipated in t•elationship to the transportation at citcukation system. •Kwfv } Y t ��,Y s° �'v 1#a �� o 1 t �. ♦ q .« r�S �iL ��}'<k��rY <}�µ�r rw,t�S rr �'K •a p :3'y .. r'n ! •� Y - - ,Y Aitr�Y,�.ii�}�f 47,. ,. 'lir. _!.., q. ,i • _ - !�•'/ s G it�"rr�/rMwi6,tr,4r ,' eQ - SZ'y� ' « l"� i 3 '�'Xr�•'t'" `r r r'� a" ; 1; i p t �. -. - .. 1 �•er' ..li F,rw'Vi2,s.M Xc }f y� 4i �r s I tti .r fes; ' 15 �• 5 i �J � �`d � �fn� Sjr •'a' L �:' :t �e i • �y } « !� � � t y l*'f';*o � 7� J t�� ! t j,r J y' J ��y t kR, -,101, u`v�v tip4�,. Say wrt �0, • � t ' a�•• .� dl �� r` • { yM { 1111 rs F t t t { lip 44 i ' �RfA1Yt J do fah 1 .y✓S� N«�, i • M.�j. gi pvdJ Ott .. �Y•'� � rJ t ,,.,N � g13 ,k ," w ,� x�• Y ;r ; "r�'�r`�y};r Al •"'= yTyp l tiMv a�ary�//'(!.s, ' ��ia�'yb*r� :,l!�\ t r " +• M3 &«6, s a ; � " V . P l 6� ��! rJp�� r1,��lk��f. „� ° t ro �j�k-fry ��,r '. .�S'. ,E 4 •� ! �„• pI, - ,/ . lr;. i �•'1.� ,. 1�3< i a ;��q� `�� yS �(4.�laL tix 1 � � + �"�iL+ tv�� Y. •v ,� el - ' v" ." r. ! � �1 - y�'pluryjYvir aZigj>, 'h �y�X .y i , :V. _ „�1.�.. + ��• - _�'2`la� `;Fd �tutS4"4 kA H+ :.1'�! ,v •Y.r•. i, '..p �S .�':L Ir Ya.S.. �' p•'gfrJ .:� iti rR+ y�. ��,t,l a r W)•a•; :dlT� " f.,rn'":7'+ri�•� WH it .ui - YpRy _ pT 0: Irter-Departm�.Memorandum .u�'rta cc, Advisory Agency un} ,aou Planning Director turr1CCT• REPORT ON TENTATIVE P4RCEL MAP FOR GARY JONES AND QUENTIN NAKAGAWARA ON' FiP# 10-16-77 r 7A' July 12; 1988 *+z+' The proposed project Consists of a Tentative P.rri3e to divide 5 acres to create 4 parcels, Parcel pyre•at 1,3 acres, Parcel Two at 1.4 acres, Parcel Faroe � r � and Parcel Cour at at 1.at acres; it is proposed (q d 7 , acrQs, the U develop :tingle family resfdetstial is o;, i newly crJ The project site is located 300 feeL south of L'uurrtrittgcd saLanes at the end of I•tarichert Court in >� �. the Durham arca, fis The proposed subdivision Will u 'llok the development Of two additional single family homes in this neighborhood,, The project as proposed is consistent with the residential, " character and rural setting of the surrounding properties-. The majority of - the lots in the ricinit;�ti� Cor$s2 0 one Sarre yarcelsw he project, site 'is zoned SR-1 (SuzburUan-Residential, 1 acre Parcels) b• the Butte co tv � Wa. 2VWgs Q4ds;.7r?,4rzt, '>y •'+!J7rC' �lYrL 1e }�i "trlWeil ll(3 � i�tt+ DV0 11001 ect 6htdl-ma to the curront tonin ► 119WRVpr, t t doth r *�° r not tutlat L110 roquiromuntg 02 010 00hovhl 11hni Ilio /.1h ttj _ tieltarai blah cleplghatian and not constst 'te d o the County. It has boort the p0116y of the Planning Department= in the past to follaW the zoninc, dpsigna,tioh rather than the Gaheral Plan in this area. Such a policy has resulted in the deveiapmunt of residential housing at one acre densities in this. area of Durham, " The ability to provide: an adequate level of fire protection set`viC,*s in the project area has deteriorated in recent years due to the rapid urban growth. A water ten orfund was established to finance the additional fire protect'ion seev cos demanded by the increased residential ddVQlop10cnt. • per $200 lot A fee of [ has been established for any ttew loL•:c created b t.thcButte, t i€vs. Y ding. The _ county vire D.epartmenL requires such fees be paid prior to recordation of the final parcel map. The initial study required an arrh.'teoloilical rocorcjs check be conducted through the Cepartment Of Ahthropo)ugy Ot California Stage Chico. Such a records chock granted an u4tc1lueol6gical clearance for the proposed project. Gary (ones s Quentin Nakagawara hage TWO July 17, 1988 A negative Declaration has been prepared for t"i0rojccr. pursuant to the California Environmental Quali'y ALL. do significant effectu were identified by the initial RtUdy. REMi UNDATION A. find that the requi rements of tEQA. hate been completed and considered in making this decision and` a(lo,t the Negative Declaration; and 13 Approve the Tentative Parcel Asap for Gary ,tones and Quentin NakzgaWara AP140-16-77,78 subject tq the folld,wing conditions: 1.. All. :lots created shall adhere to the applicable zoning regulation 2. Pay the $200 per lot fee required by the Ilutte County r,ire Department prior to the recordation of the final map. SM 31 mc cc: Sierra West Survcyang Cary Jones Quentin Nakagawara i 03SCUS?i10N UP CNViI UNMrNTAL. CVl1LU,rTI-ON Airh 40-16-77,10 Icy: Some nominal imounts of ditiruption, �isplacem,4Rik:R crta+l'+acti'r,1a Ufjo overcoveel'mo of ttlt`r sc 1 Hill r CCUr as n t--ttsul t bf thIs tentatl vtr i parcui mflp. the Aropos4d srubdtvislcin will create four prirc zlt; lf-rattR 3 tlTresI Currently,, tho back a.wo pWrr_r is have btq_n devoi+ju-1d wil.li s i ntr l vs -If am l 1,1 housi till. The other parco l s hate road occisaa, anfl r,ti l y bulldItig polis ore n•:edod. Ors$ e minor grtadini4 will bt, nL,.cNssat1v 1r) prefaat-e but I d I nrq' pfstis. Ica Tho ler-opased subd;ivi-tion -s withiel an a. -listing atiititsnt! 6i-iji,tRt9 anJ rEttidential development. fiery little, t4riadliio will brit r,gcaysary fur s'rpg3r1 rinn of bultdln+g, pods, drivektays &ricl roadw7yr,. Little, 111<, io* is oopectecf it) thli topograPhY of thlr �Wourid SIA,face t*ollof featul.•:+ lii: the ors -ripe Sol is al -e, ;desIonated as Class I fere 13grIcuItnit:aI use. ttywz<.ws , LI ie loss Of pr14mrs agricul turaily Piloductivo svi'1 11 tv.L o occ:,,r as A reKu1i: of 'thrr pr^opOsed prpJect. F'rrevlous, subdivisions oxave fragmented tha size of the aiverage par'cal to ,as Lo rendr:r it Cearrovmicaliy unfeasible for- any commercial farming opuratic,n. 'Ib-* 140 negative Impacts or'e arttil ipattd on draltroagta patterns or on the tate aw'- atw.'unt of 'surface vwttof r:. The density of ono dwe#i l inta Per t4411 tial: 0419rilficarifly ener-!ask surface runolf, lraditidnal dltc,- ,knell•*sveinent5 fie-«Sociatuel with -oar �co'nstruchlon are airltitipaLod tc, j;ny ,".otentiai runaf! ream tho prropos.eul deve'lopmehf-_ -frill The pr•ol�ostld SUbditislon .wi'II npk, Impact nijo l;iveiy upon tho "IfIrent almond trees rdmbinim,* on rhe proposed lots. t-lany troes have ttiready oecn clearobd to anticlipotiory of future resldantia,'l dL-vetopmonk. s The proposed subdivls s!7ln iNi I I .at iasro this tiavolc+pment of two Adjitionat sinUle-(amily hams in this 0%.1rl18rrl 00ie-4hboilhood. The proposed dove l opment Is cons t s`ton'€, w 1 th the surroundi hia ,res i dent Iol ciwaracter 01d rural setting. lho ma,Iorit;y of the lrtits In the viclnll v ccristst of I -acre parcel>— The pR-oject site is 'toned SR -I by the FJW.t tWtunty ZOW-rl O'ci ttahco The ;peolbosed P'lo,:1ect comforms r+lth the r'et�t;rrrtt :CO'siti•a. 1fi? ianerat Elam rdu4�ignatfon Is Orchard. 4% F.`idId Lr,s:+Y,. Haile tOel Vrojoct m"'L% i.he baa1c i•gquirenldnts of tho zoning, Ordlrttyrt,w, t,, does nr5tr hcfwevert mtaat the requirements 6e the GFnsral Plan - rJuaignatiori. The lar-oi,r>s d pt"°ojoct Hill cr,,,htinui= thi'3 It?aptrog i.'v1'klt IzaR+tra* ptt1tarn ,5f thti i?i-htifRi area, lbdditlii to t iii uruan devekii•r 00 Lo3,t .h. r:id. .14hicit I •ttl.0'14e.11' 0!E0�lilt'!rtt ''l'Oth tnty I,if`*ah bouttdol ... ta'-': M;utlx C-n'iy 11111t.i u;4' fit 'tl, tart 1:i 0"t. L'aat R: i.--eti!t' AvA I%;.)) y e.vopl ark i�t.' ° 4 f t...,.. f o!� 14,-wo, efra' 3i f •:ret I rir tho .ar ttv - Q ;ai'tti Iftaiil'it ;till tl)il MO' i,.h it'Ig.. U'. Lkt,' 01 'I.rt1.1 fill 01MOtlrl Gt'.t't w—j '61 r;t'ut;OFIS4 The 01101.'"ed jo-o ek,, C Carl I Ictf, wi1.11 iJkik ,01.1j1hIno .11 i.,-trlatiwas L%dthg PI*dPr-'St 1 for 1,11-? woo fit this IAms:kr 1:3411 The 1.-'ropoked tertttrotive ;r,,.it"tel MOP Will C'eaLO� Lho potential f+at tivo odditt hall s'1r jle--family +. ,l i irc y itt khls tTf ighbut•hood, Suet. ata addition wou'id o0nHrlatse appeo, imatoly 0`-)!3 oiddl Elonal vehicle trlpa i+ttt' day, The ttio'st rec_nt traffic counts r_ri Lott Ro9d show in ar-esti(. -la, t r trafflc of $0) vehidles. No sigililficarit 11npact5 are ahl:Ialpatet X11 _5L �. ,'�qk� U'j rl,Aflty4r'i' 1 '�•. 4 'y, _ ! 1 Ar`u„'� 4 �; ih' °�� •� r t r Jr A tq "t •.•1 t .:it ,�r 77:7-- T : yr r 1 t ` ��,�, x • A r ♦ + fM _r . ♦ x 1 ,.. C ilh. r�y• `xW:ij JI �i�' c %��'; �:dt i �A��:p�• � �k. S4 r ., � rx t i``�v p�'p - .\ 4 ! '�T • x n, a�l • r 4 • ,., 1. ".ag �jb !`1 N$.,. k y.} tr .-.. `5. • {.. rR �'1r '..; ._0 /) '"!ill ..li `e�;{r.,," at4lrltk.r+ _ :: .f ��nn k i 1 \ K A { t •CK t �l Sy�A ! �{M t.3 CY.i11$.,r,1".. . 1 • i '+ ! �v i N r ••f= + yt. 1 1K� y+"Y"1Lk{ } ry 4�•. tit irv' Yvi H+t • ! : 11'1+¢!•}, ' ,gym a' r '�y r s a' s • • �r �a 4 �a .. , \ SW" "1Yxiif yA tI, �ir� ” �f fc'}t�wrPt�l��s • t��y�k'f4't�'�'��'i„ylafY.' - ur•» +1v+• � t�j ��iy �i. iii! ,4'r � p,' _ 4Y, ` yh 4 �+t b -arl i"�y"rti. • •e �r 7.5�{`w(r`4 4 r�,'. �k."t ' t "TA V, Iv'j • v x'r�ae�ro,�v j�4, r n tL 1 cytr�l !�r ��J �� `✓ ir��$ j . a �"h�!•�+ t' r�?ff~��}..; t • ` { • , 1+” lfi��f r v��jw.. ' A �yR� + .dam rr; r VVA% • • • • 6 � k1 vl�;^ 'lam a � ' +riw •` �1 _�idi'.�[a1 — rn�•aa�.,2,"?r"�"�,1,`✓<._! .•1 . M 4!� �""��{{ �'i�'* j� � 5 3 jykyir { j h ao fr ;,:+ ° . • _ r�N r+ ° 4 ;t� w,7n � 13-� 44 �r"� a{-�i++! ir,, r .d � r• �v . � r� _ � ' x_ ,. �. r p r r�-1�`�a tyY ' { 15W7i',n�is ,z �}}�,fr �- .wt {.+ n"♦<. .. ! ++'`}}@`tl �raF r y. •,rq`lspn ��,,��y�.oy�i ru$ � i � 1 i+r"' � •Y � � . - � - - �� r s i r i. {t '{ r , 1 � �� 1�+i1Q "N!r'y� ��c1+{taf rid, i �# r .'f'i'r 1 A i`•. . .. i k _. ...�i r '� o4�J lr d,iM nMe1 ! rnry dtiyr '' rti ! f{ a- r . . ,,r +` {� �•. µ1Tn `, tt r�tt V.1,, �wsC714At C. MSA„'gqi� rq'i'�. ��rw ��1+lar �{"11 iljta�"1 a3uA��,+{ N+.. { � , ,�.: � �u v . dl �� ,r {t Jf •. r+ fYt SM a*t e {•� isc p !F tiy„4,�IA � p ,.r1 G r 'A,;,. t f 1! I 1 a�•Y _ ,�� yelp +y`w r a 7 .r u r •(ati{a�1 � h .y1y x { � + f t o � 4 W ." +txl�, m', p f-4 F ! .y, ! Ki. r 3p 4 v j t: r r ♦ '^y rd� � ,1 . � �� . "y� � r• •M1 �u �gr5�{ �� k v � This is Parcels:a Proposal to divide S acres to The presentOne zonC Z acres, one at ltl acres a total of tour g if -1 s and two at 1,01 acres. cels) , The IJa in is S (Suburban Residential - f°" 't designatesgtisd Ilse 7?1an' Ma 1 -acre par- ' r area as A P of the Butte County General plan P01-1dies. Thera grioultural-Residential 'pursuant Plan kt are no specific or community Y Y Plans for the area, ��. or The proposal does nit conflict with Count county, elemen�' sasf• the Butte Count Y aonirq nor any adopted �y i Y, specific O '•,ominunity plan. Y Qe'tieral an not any Recot7mend apProva ^uiti4cy to the following conditions; .t r uJ 1; show on the final lh`x P t!e existing 60 -foot building setback line on the east par Ci Map of Parcel 4. 4 2. ft AN Parcels to :t zoning, beat s to cont least 1 acre gros, 1 e w� art P Y with the 3 , Redesign tots to p.avide proposed court to Ala circulation by connecting file Proposed road should tx h�pp, eks Lane. The property hest of the �s become Part of Parcel 1. CBSfsjs _ cc= Dennis Ryan r � is w w 5 p'�•f, t ^�'�-+, P:Z —•�-•-/yrs 1 f a - - Y- _ ' • f 111% �rl�'.+�+•tf._... .� f P , d fi ' . •n ' lT f jkr iJ �s ��f� � S►, � I y • ;z r :• t ,' S -,A•, o T r Iry � J r -+i r ""'f '•r a I ' C. y5 e €.i ' 5 i1 ._, ,I .... _ { �r -!• .Y •� a �Y F, F i�•,IM� v-w.,,,y.�p y1 t iit ' S �.' ;. :h fw rR+ t 1F I rp t .• L �3d �r�" t h 55. yq , 5 4Ii niY(L yh''vjb� 5 A•i '� a 4 I t.° .. t,lf'q .sy �tf ai77 � �,F ALp}I't•�� '" �. lot - •':,#: '- F � � .. ! � 5 V •` t �•, , .. :;dtwa> Cdr <Y'Ri �++. �r✓fiid A s�p�1`�¢ • , / , 'e. � '� rt '. k J,�r.. •a �.� �'k�4�� S -M51 �7"/ �yy +iJd�"', • f y s. ti Yl !1 s,r J� t 5 p.•' 11 to,�rY�' /1AP• 'Ep i 1 �tyYyyj7tt. � br'� � f `IMer J4 •'' 'i kh'T f''�tltf�, i41 satte • Advisory Agency" t/• ��¢44hLY k v � This is Parcels:a Proposal to divide S acres to The presentOne zonC Z acres, one at ltl acres a total of tour g if -1 s and two at 1,01 acres. cels) , The IJa in is S (Suburban Residential - f°" 't designatesgtisd Ilse 7?1an' Ma 1 -acre par- ' r area as A P of the Butte County General plan P01-1dies. Thera grioultural-Residential 'pursuant Plan kt are no specific or community Y Y Plans for the area, ��. or The proposal does nit conflict with Count county, elemen�' sasf• the Butte Count Y aonirq nor any adopted �y i Y, specific O '•,ominunity plan. Y Qe'tieral an not any Recot7mend apProva ^uiti4cy to the following conditions; .t r uJ 1; show on the final lh`x P t!e existing 60 -foot building setback line on the east par Ci Map of Parcel 4. 4 2. ft AN Parcels to :t zoning, beat s to cont least 1 acre gros, 1 e w� art P Y with the 3 , Redesign tots to p.avide proposed court to Ala circulation by connecting file Proposed road should tx h�pp, eks Lane. The property hest of the �s become Part of Parcel 1. CBSfsjs _ cc= Dennis Ryan r � �, 1 -\ t - - . • _ _ -_ tea_ = � n J � � � ` —�- , -a � c � - s, l ti 6. *•.. '•Y '•d; s ♦ 1. r rl'r '"y 4• , t o'l r ^.•r 1 t, r K rs:i.'}�� i -' Y� f;'� ! �P, [. � i • � • ri d r3•ip I of K. 9R v ir" r%,"� k,.i �L, „r.. '.� /� R r q �c �„., !. � tf • � �.y'i!i"4t .rr+F1t �C;�� tr tk 1,,, t,'% I ,.. •. k J .� , _ e r s _..,a k q,y •r le! r d n'a,(. a� �1 ;.,e 1 , -�'. ' � ... �. r .. r.r - .,• ' 1 . •�, � raS- • + �,� „CYl kf •frr� A �V yr7 + „ i � � 'ro r 1 '. • pe.a� k��o�yai��v ti�krti ! `: •�. fir. .•_ . ,..1 - 4 . •�. •9 1 .1 �v��1r ��i lt�. •�' •r i;^v� vk• fT'+ ;f it x,✓ ' • t. li .,. !rk -••• ^ ` F r y 5 w, {vk y Yt r J K ti r. �?" " s i S F 1 r! Y •^c rt, d „7, \ r U t+ t t 1_„r i + y a�'F �d 4k • tr tJyad� i • e i + rtv -f ,� ! _ i1 s , t - klfvh� e r w •' �' , + .:, x.r t'Aut:i}.0/fit r1p - '•l 1 fF a ra..,,� ,d--� .,- • ('3 .• j +y �i�,l��yyr - r L_, •y `+!%,r'��v ,t'� U, .a ,•rte•,/,L ai} .�., `. r��. {' • r o ,�:.+ -`�ryr-rte;'' a,,.� 74rr�3 +: • "�” F•, vNY' ! ,s�i,{r� nisi �'� ► ° 1 {.v, •r - svi�� Z ' '3 � P r �y� �,id q�: tit • • b �;ri � � , w .✓r• ri av-.v"� h' e.k;� it t e_ �� fi..x - ; �µ � Y1'�'' 4 • , 0�'U+ s'1r�,„�1�w• CY�m� ""•� y � �kn �iSy'� r 2' • 44 i . r fir'-TTY j,YV•�r hdel r• y � • r r� t �'�w�w"W��X ry�sT^4"w+M� ur�;�� ,��{^;`•� • • : �yd u ��5 - • • xr*t��+'� 1"�}M arrr+s�r"�°.. fs it�i ''F n`�r T�rif , }�� ova f„$.. � A` rvfl > trig dy 3.". " • ' b t � J«; rJr,r yss �,, 11 yaaS�ryy":� ••' • � r 'dl``'� - ' - '�'�`rr�,1�Sx�Y.. dq��2 er.��,. • �l�'�as ,� v 4. �' n,,,, .•I/'de % iy�,1Y��,,r=� gat � tk� «" r�C. {lr�rroy � pry � �� • �:.� 1' ^ L -' ins��lk�s ,�.q'ift7"t��' • " �Y""nM,�.a'1 * �� +s'•�'h5"� itk< tlr�r�<''v 'Y. • i f. r� '.r � r • • �,�.�,��, . r+ 4" �tr��r"°I r.Yt �(.�^ a i v d•,fi •L"1�fu +.`,• , - Y :�� s 1 .,..�, i i { � �� 1e�xl��l� � f► Y,��''i� NIA, ! ,F il•��1 4p�ii+ � + � i g�'}ry, v''+ik irk c= r z ' ' „ "f �Y`�,r,�i�11W "';ro kis �'t4 K T •i r , ax i rl c tt "B.". , ! l r. vi�i� r•'L +Y Jtc. µ ��`•.x' Ir�i ! !'�' C'�y :l,.t •'+ ,.rs{ r F.y' �,'�,-or - � aS�, . 0. :� : f G'.r .l ` �° � ��` �i �� ^ h"Y, � �. �`'a ' ,!, � 7 �J1 �� s' i t n!' � ��,,. hS • s ,. f,r• may. . « :«r i ... ! d ti *,! • ! 's ' tv R•YJ•` kl ft •f :.�+. {i �'•r i ! �r' �.r } A ,•, 1' t rr''wb. ,r ri i>.'ir•`i„o. .Sr•t}!xi .,'rC wr a'�n�`. .. i.Jt'�,+�•Y� ,,'! ♦ -.; q^ h� r A, i r r Ws' E > .«' ' '�' . ."!k � ..! . '✓ . i! .. 1 • . �i . <�a , 'f . Y ,.,ii J7ti•�' d + rl.� 1 ` } Thisis a proposal to 810Ae 5 acres to create a total of 4 parddl§p ,r 1, @ -,04 acres, 1 @ 1.4 acres, and 2 @ 1401 acres. The present zoning is 5R-1 (Suburban Residential - 1 acre parcels). The Land Uso Plan Q $+� a Map of the Butte County General Plan designates this area as Agelt'dlWral. z fn4 r - a De artment a! Memorandum p Rdsidential pursuant to policies. There are he specific or community _ Tot Butte County Advisory Agency y'` taoN: Planning Director 'r ++srJ;+ Aunlccr: Report on Tentative Parol Map of James R. Black on AP 40-15-78 tv.t 1581 r^ DAY C' February llf a A MitigaEed Negative Declaration regarding envivonmentai Impact is rerotnended rid#" * with the follo-o ng mitigation measures: ` } Thisis a proposal to 810Ae 5 acres to create a total of 4 parddl§p d Z:k 1, @ -,04 acres, 1 @ 1.4 acres, and 2 @ 1401 acres. The present zoning is 5R-1 (Suburban Residential - 1 acre parcels). The Land Uso Plan Q $+� a Map of the Butte County General Plan designates this area as Agelt'dlWral. 7 ?lace a statehent on tha final map that any archaeological resources, uncovered during construction will be reported to and investigated Rdsidential pursuant to policies. There are he specific or community by aqualified archaeologist, &au;' plans for the atea. f 4 The proposal does not conflict with County zoning nor any Adopted 'or tv.t proposed element of the, Butte County General Plan nor any -county, specific r^ or community plan. a A MitigaEed Negative Declaration regarding envivonmentai Impact is rerotnended rid#" * with the follo-o ng mitigation measures: ,t 1, Provide a permanent solution to drainage, including peoteoti:'n ni dovnstrears and neighboring. properties, and install the.requirt+d facilities, ` } 2. Verify vin:et groundwater 'elevations and modify the parcel design of sizes,,f necessary, in accordance With the monitoring results, ?lace a statehent on tha final map that any archaeological resources, uncovered during construction will be reported to and investigated by aqualified archaeologist, &au;' pF to the foilovtng Approval of the tentative rte is recommended subject �a, conditions' 1 Show on the final map the existing 60 foal building setback line Op the east 'portion of parcei 4, T�st 2, All parcels to be at least 1 acre gr,sss to Comply With the SR -1 i zoning, ,t if MM lb: An a ��F^��EYA' ATtnn� overcov sttma eyted 3 rho 6x al' 40' -i5 -7B: ed GY bUleach c(dlhe stru a Parcel wo to F: i'r'oper constr tures and drtvewaysuld e compacted and erasion Rote action Potential technl'�ues wtll and. thus deposition of minimlze the igt The o'1 -sit sediment limit The 5- a Solis sre designatedto nearby dram a Production.�parcel ►s nut in Itself I as Class I eos, Drainage f v1able For commerc or agrIculiura1 use 3b,cs tal cultural existing ee improvements ma generated. skructurPs Y b"- necessar 3hot5d Environmentalenlarged Lot to handlelcug.facetaated a.nd elevation ma 1 runoff Y occur {eatt6 indi:cate,g rdroundwattr el in this vicinity" that a high ofnte evat(o" is 1/erlF( ter. needed. cation 9rouhdwater: A huf:b.4r of almond "easonal to accommozate trPa$ wi1i lhl future homesites" need to be removed Amator" s Parcel repres on approved i Parcel each parcel en s of that tentative nape Adv s ! cf the on o was cry Agency, on tenCzt(ve map For On the ONSte edge o. to Shot, Agri ( Albert cels 1 ed F the w a residential! 1�Ft4, A condl%[on can FltCtst and 4, the ortginai parcel 4Uil9eq bgtweers purpose of t to a dbAth A setback line the of pursulis on lar res►dehtta► development 60 feet i the east Parcels (with Pment and uh to miniml,ze hta ae La.ja'Con servat106 Act agntcultural 3'• This Land CO acts) to Lott 'aivisio road ce,r'r I dor° n wpU i d con For General Pt "'tthingn SR-Icn o other tentative Fie( �owopsnto, A9 Icul urloh wou1 69 proAe»8. tentative expected i:long the Pian undo al- ly a t -+' way, Ret3tdential the as PaetdIF the From and 13crFi Four ham Area PS per P°tot i ho the Lott oay� A.lcne-Footp,, out 90ne koad j.)" rata u ehw road Far Parcel 'age of Parcel Cess strip shouldP to �ltx v cutar chi±. t w°'Id Im t" Llmikln b. consider. ess-:cdrIvq,, y encroa Prove 'traFF access -a along chmeht, tc safety alo t° the southerly I 4 AdGltlonal 'res'Ide div n9 Lott Road k,Ith o"Vehave been GerviceS:n Levey elopma tncr retlucP of -nt will ease -d by rete services Provided demand For ai! t6et' New or nt t,ount�, budget cutbAcks, en to the, Durham area.. by Public works. ged ttorMwater drainage FactittleS ma_- e 20ai Butte Count y, b- rewired itt911 arc 9PCaprecnrds ind(cate� t haeot° sensltivi"ty" Parr_e'I map Nat, he project is wlChtn archaeplo t° place a st5teme logical r A n. the Fin measur an area of The s esouri:gs than: nt dh the Find! a ror the ame sEatefient wit might be Amator- archaeologicat I be rayutred unc°vered during y survey, n8 Cons sn Y is °btained to on this tentative tructicn: 91ve clei'Oance. maP unless; an -6- oil r f 51 yrsA .1 FINDINGS PERTAINING TO THE So BY SUBDIVISION MAP ,. At the t Mme of filing of this tentative map application pursuant to,Butte County Code Section 20-52 the applicable zan4ng was SR-1 ,.find a est fished policy was to interpret and applyr.the 3utte Count era n in the neighborhood in question in a manner which lowed e subdivision and development of land to one acre parcels. Subdividing the propert�_ � question to one acre plus lots is consistent with the establislL d patten, of development se Prop erties commencing contiguous on both sides o t d oommen ing from this property south on both sides of a and urhaL cyton Highway, whichxr-ispradominan�ly dere oped to residential use,, on lets of approximately one acre in size. 3, Said SR-1 zoning,, id policies of interp tation f the general plan remained in effe'd� at the time of the /Advisory gency hearing on this map, at the time the appeal was mad the;. Boa. Supervisors pertaining to the Advisory Agency's ac o on is maps, at the titre the hearing was opened before the Board of Supervisors on said appeal and at the time the. Motion of Intent was adopted by the Board indicating thi:c Board's intention to approve this map. DUR AM SFA 7-,E' LAND , ETZL6MEN1` 21 IV IY2t .D. e.am�,Qr R Flo b Y �w�,rY ka �T .. Q to, it . 43s 36 a O ,-q 53 /r TABBY LANE- 4634 /5y 5$ q 2� ' NOTEIThls map Is for assessment purposes only /7p`�� q9 Pt.°< (C. r and may not constitute legal ,parcels. e5 � . — J ??0 83 T��i591 a 62• S5G 93 O 1, i00 �7 02 2 2 2$ _ wcox� ,r58 er o lazasT f . " lxmv Nr.OZAc 171.60 154.58 D 6LPlN48.5!r L r Ie0 ~ vo LN__ti e -a ibt—GO PM)67-46 � h• 0, 6P 9 a 3 s!s azo vv� M N V 20,5AC ci IA y a;• . !10 r . Acy9 ,;P411O5 f rr rel. e+ AUBRY GOURT tAC nzo.s "PM9T 1 . las 34+ -seo zJ� 1e7 75 t A ' )r �x� 1.25• t ' 4 t �Lof Y_�O {" 1'0, 6 to !ll 9.sAe 777.i2.JC. � ` 4c . :%- .. .3 4 704:2 990/0. BRINSONLANE 1,129'L129' / 3a7.5f W.51 1L/ BRINSON SUBas La+ Lo LANE ITA -� 3BAc bELR: t� na 11 f2 1 ` �/11dr 61 �fa ? .903 6L3, 36.mAL 43f.93 9 b 7J: 1 ti 3 [ 7$ - — o , ALMOND 'VIEW CT, i so � Y + b 1 3 54AG 514.20 i 990 7J20+3 . VA Y Assessor's &tap No. 26 Counfy of 8tiffe;'aJiF » 6RINSWi sub,, t04-M.0.R.wee, 2-4=190 Rrvls�b 10 90 bURHAAr 5rari" tANv SEtI-tEME,NYr 61•f,o.R.2J , bib, i ii _ . r „ N �_ ,a •'»` N0T(::TAIs mop is lot assessment pufposes onlp ' and mop not consrllult legal parcels. b �4 NO 40050"W « ^, t,e,a� 2rp.�sLIAVE t02. 7_ t0a.i9 fa0 R97+ t Z07.p7 - !ao lt�-� tSt.9e... 1 31 2 :y ,7] tf r3i:3 $4 94 Zi ,� 2g ,3a 4 O « ~2 a 3 b 27 v 3/ 3Aw o 116!4 LIGAC a IAG �• t.13:AC 1.06AC1.03AC3AC 1 AC = AC b rtlrdC ! AC .. IP:d04.404 1 ]o ATEpid 2JA -os.di ,. n 1 CORBE T X ^ I" Y'r c i.,w R 1 1 f!!h tr 211,dT us esr t 626 r„ r _r , _ Zrf�� ` �` rs,so fir i �- 1,pgAC r� , 30 C a r 31 ! PMIII-8t• EO- _, T_,A r - - �.� �� 26 In 1 29 w 1.' « 3r1 p is<s�f �9. rao Za 1 33 V� ^1 4e? nil r:p o11 4 ,r s n e ? JJ 1 '� 193AC ' °°+ 61GAC 12 1, 1.20AC h e IAC `M1 3 e 2 l «r AtffAO !$ 17 ,^ 22 1; 1 PA( st-10 2A ��121A n 362r1.9d 1... " l AC O Y 9 a." 1 v2d.37 � � M 4 rtd,,o 11 1i10AC �� 1125AC 1.03AG t AC? T /•13AG o 25 'c I zar.rd o 34 I.h ssslgo x. Z. 3 ssaso .. 1 n I- t 9 2,,OIAC3y� a4 3 12} 1-:1 IPM/05 23 t ' 1 .95AC t ac ,1 h� 1 7� - .,.a 1pUito 2; U,, l3r.os e *fir I ixh1, 1 AV to _J p1 1 g A x 3 I .sae s. wrsl. r9. t� * 1 t2.55AC r:ad slo.)4 laa: l 1 hfBAC Rr] ds tli °i Ti �-� i]3.2a r _ oWASo3e wr IAC- . .4. 2t bs 'r',$`'r»7 ItS.">?] 3 !. 1] ,ao t � 1, 02 'rso �- j 1a ti� �� 28 2"1.3raC x / t11 i 4}t.n2Ac� a x:c . J m .lac 72�C t.72AC o t w R „ ra �� 1 3i to a. sro,7a 1 i 2s (01 kL / Id r!s.ro 1 F' vi t.13AC „ 1.72A �� , :_� taoAC 4' 35 I "_T] © S/ Q A Flot 6 r w ^ 4 ?. , w Jlnn ..1.81 0" e�4 k01AG:� 07 x ,b I ^ ,1 w 1 AC el CJ 1r ��.,' 1.20AC n � .'.. � ml a nMAC 01 i 1 I7 - n`r � 1aG Q n 1 -PM53 45 w = 1 AC BRIlSON,,- .St/e� A107.6 PM65.5 1 PMAc-67 ! ,yy 1.0IAC PMGso Sdv i ^. DAM rsrc9er. + t ;roost 143 1ss'.Ni 1 ssr.eo > PVf01-a6t :I PKi6p 1s 'PM o.� .s. tss.ro l »: rrd,�rY es.ro zoo .. ^ � :rd.dd . . ROAD LOT 7• nr_ l T 4.1 Cr. WI o Assessor's MP No. 46-58 County of 501tetColif 6018S411 SUB, 104 M.O.R. 67M, 2-4 1987 REV16E01 g • 89 DURHAM. StAfE LAND St MEMEHT , $ M.f H. W24* 0-IJ-1910 (40 :15) v- v + pUf�H,41�1 T.47",E l AN .�-ET�'LEA'�NT' T 2�'N. �2�: :��.. ��11� OgoxAreoCodi7o- GARON ROAO 35.4 9695 3588 ' rwosras� zrls (8[0AC b 3/9 ti 170.E f ' 29 .4' M ^Q , O 55 56 M e ti:"J 33 /4 --154 5.47 4e. Z 29Ac , 9 1.89/Sc 2.OAc« 3 08Ad, jj 2 93 . 0 f r195 ` .. `-'2AC. 7t� q Q O 4 ' i a : 2V. 99 /9Ac. / s OD 02. /7AC. h 9 t B99 i Li. �sG� 4a' 42 /8 / h 10A 41 Ac.204 2/.49Ac, yy , i 42 N„ A, j. «' T ?' Lo ora 91 lz L2zbe. N 760-4 At 7-a �eo.I . 7 0� � taacp � JrT . 9 88 PtL+l _ M y. -' !7 .3 ACr .vy *r 77 3404 AC i203 c " t7JF 3.56 AC 1 t aCL r b s. $ 47 53 i? lj N 4 5) MESA " � rl [ems , .. — �.: Y 39/.54. P Al 4b-56 � AG PCL 1 . 2 b L7/ _ i PNS.'I/T ��X74 R PCL {i I#A 2rt 1 /qap h 5AC Py PCL3 PI CflhlM/NGS z, gi42 s;..7'r.' P/AI 4'9.63 �° o $ SAC ry. / 2 tLl.l h PCG2 "! 0, g RljAJ �" ko m a r 2t 5.02AG 5.l4 A /l%Gi 44 40950 366.55I Pea, : Q !' 1 576.66 L,7 0 59 b PCL 't ed OR AC �,i -� 1r ii ✓ , N b 6.ab6 Ste pJN„E`CL. 3 b n. �w ,ttikN igz�5�� 1 7Ri, 040.0"x0-liG d9 ,61 - MS5 +5 ti 259 hr rp114 pet 3s 4' tivr LY H k6aA4”' Pk 638 V-a'' a Assessor 5 MOP d. 90-rrY OVR,YAA? STAt S' LAA10 SE—MA!•tENr Af.OR Bk. B dyes 2 ; 27, 368 8 count' o ,6ufCs �r:vfszrrz..st __ ays4 i OR�9�� ry NOTICE OF DETERMINATION!' { 1;P. Officia of Plan.& Research Dept; 1400, Tenth Street Sacramento, CA 95814 ffi r-9 or, x Butte County clerk APR 29 1992 rvbtfs Butte County Planning CANDA CE J. GAU13k39, &ttoCo.Cj 7 County Center Dr., Oroville 95965 jay A. Millar deputy sugi CT Filing of. Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21108 or 2152 of the. Public Resources Code. ..rojoet Title: Tentative Subdivision Map V 10 5 AP number. 040-150-001 Vane: Roger Sohnrey State: Clearinghouse Number (If submitted to clearinghouse): None Contact Persons Bettye Kircher Telephone Number: 538-7601. project Location: on the east. side of Lott Road approximately 800 feet south of Cummings P:aad, Durham area. project Description: Tentative Subdivision Map to divide 10.0 +/- acres to create 6 lots at 1.0 acres and 1 at 3.8 acres +%-. 'Tihit, is to advise that the 'Butte County board of Supervisors (Lead Agency or Pesponsible Agency) has approved the above-described project on, April 7, 1992 And has made the following determinations regarding the above-described projects - 1. The project will, -_X_ will not, have a significant effect- on the environment. 2. An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the pi rvisions of CEQA. A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQAc 3. Mitigation measures X� were, were not, made a condition of the approval of the project: 4. Astatement of overriding considek�,i was, �X` was not, adopted for this s p j Thio is to certify that the final EIR with comments and responses and record of project approval is available to the general public at: Butte. County Planning Department 7 County center Drive Orov,ille, CA. 95965 Gate 'Received for Filing and Posting at OPR_ gnattir = B ttye Kircher Director of Planning__. Revised March, 1586 Title Forma A.INOD r w ZHONREY SUBDIVISION ' FOLLOWING MITIGATION MEASURES ARE REQUIRED; Place the following nate on the alternate or additional map sheet of the final map,: "Automatic fire suppression sprinkler systems shall be i nst a.l l ed in all residential structures in - naccordance accordance with the National Fire Protection Association Standard for the installation of sprinkler systems in one and two fam-t l'y dwellings and mobile homes, NEPA Standard 13D.-- The purpose of the installation of sprinkler systems is for additional' safety and property protection in the event of residential fires. This installation will reduce the demand for structural fire protection services in those instances where they ar'e installed". 2 pay the $200.00 per lot development impact fee to the Butte County Fire Department/CDF for the water tender fund prior to recordation of the finalmap: A finish floor elevation above the flood plain should be determined by a resistered civil engineer and be placed ort the final map prior to recordation: DECLARATION OF FEES DUE (California Fish and Game ^ode Section 111.4,) NAME AND ADDRESS OF APPLICANT Rrger Sohnrey - FILING NO 9674 Lott Road _ �----- Durham CA 95.938. _ CLASSIFICATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT I. NOTICE OF EXEMPTION/STATEMENT OF EXEMPTION' [ 1 A. Statutorily or Categorically Exempt $25.0,0 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee [X,] B. DeMinimus Impact - Certificate of Fee Exemption $25.00 Clerk's Docuiientary Handling Fee 2 NOTICE OF DETERMINATION - FEE REQUIRED A. Negative Declaration $1,250 Sta,'ce Filing Fee $25.00 Clerks Documentary handling Fee B4 En-"i,ronmental Impact Report $850 State Filing Fee $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee 3; [ 1 OTHER (Specify). $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee PAYMENT/NON-PAYMENT OF FEES: [Xj PAYMENT. The above fees have been paid. See attached receipt(s). 2 [ ] NON-PAYMENT. The above fees are required.: Not ,paid, Chief Planning official By `Bettye Kircher - Director of Planning Lead Agency; Butte. Co Board of Supervisors April 241 199 TWO COPIES OF TH18 FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED WITH'Ajjt ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS FILED WITH HE BUTTE COUNTY CLERKIS OFFICE - THREE COPIES OF ALL NECESSARY DOCUMENTATION ARE REQUIRED FOR FIYING. ALL APPLICABLE FEES ARE DUE AND FAYABLE PRIOR TO THE FILING OF ANY ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT WITH THE BUTTE COUNTY CLERK'S OFF CE. MAKE CHECKS, PAYABLE TO THE COUNTY OF BUTTy. 7� CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME CERTIFICATE OF FILLING FLEE EXEMPTION DeMi. Lanus Impact Finding (*Fish and Game Code Section 711.4; Section 753.5c, Title 14, California Code of Regulations) Project Title/Butte County Location: Tentative Subdivision Map. Located on the east ;side of Lott Road approximately 800 feet south of Cummings Road, Durham area• ;Project .Description: Tentative Subdivision Map to divide .10.0 acres to create 6 lots at 10 acres and 1 at 3:8 acres +/ Fi< dings of Exemption (attach as necessary): 1. The County of Butte has conducted an initial study and prepared a Negative Declaration so as to evaluate the potential of this project for adverse environmental impact` 2. When considering the record as a whole, there is no evidence before the County that the project will have potential for an adverse ympact on wildlife resources - or the habitat upon which the, wildlife depends. y tin 753,5 d of Title 14, California the 3. The County of Butte has, mon �t �, basis of substa lual evidence, rebutted ode presumption of adverse- effect contained � of Regulations, if applicable, 4, The project is hereby found to be de minimis in its effect on wildlife and exempt from the State Fish and Game filing fees required by Section 711.4 of the Fish and Game ''ode, Certification: I hereby certify that the County of Butte has made the above findings of fact and p the project will not individually or ed upon the initial stud and hearing record that has y g cumulatively have an adverse effect on wildlife resources, as defined in Section 711,1 of the Fish and Game Code. Bettye Kircher, Planning Director (Chief P1 nine Official Lead Age y: County of Butte Board of Supervisors Dater 7iviY 0 1 w y 4 ti �w V U fic coull t t r ir�iJTi CrF hiALRAi V+ 8 A<7H Atte B;A" , DEPARTMENT of PU3LICWORKS WILLIAM (8111) CHEFF, Director j COUNTY CENTER DRIVE . OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965 a CERTIFIED MAIL Telephone: (916) 538-7681 RONALD o, McELRoY Deputy Direetoe April 8, 1992 Roger Sohnre.gr RE; sohnrey Subdivision 9674 Lott Rd, AP 40-15-01 Durham, CA 95938 Tentative subdivision Map 1 Dear Mt. sohnrey FL v,*- regular meeting' of the Butte County Board' of supervisors 7. 1992, the Board upheld your appeal of 'the Advisory d A al of your tentative subdivision map and' adopted a negat'iyeof environmental impact With mitigation measures Your p.rojedt was found to ba d?v mimus in its effect on wilds 1,fe and is exempt from state Fish and Game fee of $1,260,00. The $2.5.03 document handling fee must be soak! by you to the Planning Department no later than April 21I 10,92. The t silt At i ve subdivision map was approved s .:h i ect -cc t,, O4 1 i c Works conditions 1 through 1 g, Environmental Health bhp, , coed. t I crhS i 9 through 25j Planning Dept, condition No. 26 and Ms t gas ion Measiii' : through 3, as noted on attached sheets. When the condi t'i.on's of dpproval are complied with, it will be ire order for you t6 file thy, "'final map" with the Butte County Department 'of pull i d 'Wor°ks for recordat ion Within twenty-four (24 months of the id,otir, of a0prova1 by the Board of Supervisors. hu� p y Alk SOHNREY SUBDIVISION, Tentative Subdivision Map, AP 40-15--01, 7 lots located on the easit side of Lott. Road approx. 800 ft. southof ,CUMMings road, Durham area. Eng neer: NorthStar Engineering ;pUBL.IC WORKS CONDITIONS: 10 Submit road and drainage plans to the Department of Public Works for approval and install: the required facilities. 21 Provide 20 ft, radius property line returns at all street intersnc'tion,s. 3. Indicate a 50 ft building setback line from the centerline of 4Lccess road,. 4 Street signs shall be provided by the developer at all street intersections per County requirements. (SUbmnt 5 alternate names for each street to th"? County address coordinator for approval of street names) s,, Deed 30 ft. from the cer.terlin`e or Lott Road to the 'County of Butte: construct full street section on access road to RS-2-8 geometric standard (kith curb, gutter and sidewalk. Minimum structural sectioth to be 2" AC and 8" AB, SC 250 prime, fog seal and 95% relative compaction. Submit design to County Department of Public Works for approval . "R'` value determination And other data may be required to support section desinn. 7. Provide monumentat ion as required by the department of Public Works in accordance with accepted standards,, a Street grades and other features shall comply with the Butte County Ordinances, design reso ution and other accepted engineering standards, 8. provide permanent solution for drainage. 10 All easement's of record to be shown on the final map. 11. Meet the requiremP,nts of the Butte County Pire Department or l other respotsible agency, 12, Street lighting shall be provided in accordanc2 with BiJtte � accepted design criteria, and County re p aortseb�nt. recommendations PGl�E: 13. provide i ft, no access strip for parcel 1 along Lott Rbald= 14'. Pay (1,"f assessments„ f� J 1%1, V.' 31i T— SOHNREY SUBDIVISION conditions - Page 2 154 meet the requirements of the utility companies (i.e., PG&E, Pacific Telephone, water and sewer) . 16,, Pay ;any delinquent taxes or current taxes as required. 17. Construct pu:bl is read approach (S-1S) at access road and Mott Road. °1 Developer shall provide all required traffic safety sign3, including stop signs. HEALTH DEPT. CONDITIONS; 19.. provide the area. for wells and 10t f't. leachfield free setback around those areas on parcels 2, 3, 4, raj 6 & 7. 20. Provide a 100 ft. l eachf i e l d' free setback around existing wells either within the property of within 100 ft. of t'rye' property boundaries on parcel 1. 71'. Provide the required usable sewage disposal area on each parcel. Combine with an adjacent parcel any parcel not proven to contain the usable sewage disposal area required by the Subdivision ordinance 22, Locate and i f necessaryrelocate the sewage disposal system ,serving the existing dwe1Ting onto its respective pat-cel 23: Comply with the winter groundwater monitoring mitigation measure."Provide ver'ificatier of winter groundwater elevation prior to recording th" Hrial' map Complete sAte and other required physical mproverrents subsequent to satisfactory verificaticn,of groundwater elevation" 24. Meet the sewage disposal' requirements of the Butte County Floud Plain Ordinance. 25, Comply with any additional requirements of the California State Regional %Vater duality Control Board, PLANNING DEPT. CONDITION: 26 Place a note on the final map that states " A. deVeiopment impact fee ,for Sheriff's facilities shall be paid pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 3, Article II of the Butte County Code prior to issuance of building permits". r, HONREY SUBDIVISION p i THE FOLLOWING MITIGATION MEASURES ARE REQUIRED: Place the following nota on the alternate or additional mao "Automatic sprinkler sheet of -the 'final map: fire suppression be installed in all residential structures in systems shall accordance with the National Fire Protection Association Standard for the installation i)f sprinkler systems in one anti mobile home,, NFPA Standard 13D. Th two fami ,y dwellings and of the insta.'llation of sprinkler syste j is for purpose additional- safety and property protection in the event of installation will 'reduce the demao residential fires, This for structural f`ar'e protection services i,n those instant' w=� where they are installed". 21 Pay the $200.00 per lot development i-nact fee to -the Butte the � . tender fund priot" to county Fire Department/CDF fnr we' recordation of the final mai 3... A finish floor elevation attvp the flood plain should b�, register6d civil engineer and be placed o,, the determined by a final map peior to recordation. {{ II . Iffy f 1l 4 S i 4 ID r. ! � � � •'�-,,"•,� eco. � �A tete'aur�t i LAND G F N A�I IJ ,'i A, t WEALTH A 1l! r5 A L �= DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS WILLIAM (5111) CMEFF, Director 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965 Telephone: (916) 538.1681 RONALD D. McELROY Deputy Direcfot March 24, 1992 F,o.ger Sohnrey 9E Sohnrey Subdivision 9674 Lott Rd. AP 40-15-01 Durhai1,CA 95938 Tentative Subdivision Map Appeal Dear fit i 8ohnrey kir-the regular meeting of the Butte County Board of Supervisors held Aarch 24, 1992, the Board made a Mution of Intent to uphold your rp(ea1 and continued the hearing closed to April 7, 1992. b If yd14 have any questions concerning this matters please contact thi' office at 916-538--7265= Very truly yours, �y William Cheff Director of public Works' i - J? Stuart Edell Assistant Director kv,i,14 rt Eilyironmaotal �ie�xith Departmen Clerk of the board j46rthStr; r Engiheering r, �I 1WAX.� P U,Is ;i`� ... , J, J 92 ].37 Clused hearing NorthStar Engineering on behalf of Roger Sohnrey - cons deration of an appeal of the :Advisory Agency's denial of a tentative subdivision map (proposed negative declaration with environment mitigations), AP 40-T5-01, seven lots, property located on the east side Of Lott Road approximately `�00 ,feet south of Cummings Road, Durham area. (325) MOV'CON : I MOVE TO MAKE'A MOTION TO ADOPT A NEGATIVE DECLARATION O,L' ENilIRONMENTAL IM7,ACT WITH' MITIGATION MEASURES AS LISTED IN TIE INITIAL STUDY FOR THIS PROJECT, TO UPHOLD "'HE APPEAL AND APPROVE THE PROJECT FINDING THAT THE; D H PROJECT COULAVE AN EFFECT. ON THE ENVIRONMENT, BUT WILL NOT HAVE A S?CGNIFICANT EFFECT IN THIS CASE PROVIDED'ME; REQUIRED MITIGATION MEASURES ARE COMPLIED WITH. THIS MOTION IS MADE FINDING THAT THE PROJECT IS IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE BUZiE COUNTY GENERAL,PLAN AND BUTTE, COUNTY ZONING AS FOLLOWS: (1) AT THE TIME. O FILING OF iHIS TENTATIVE MAP APPLICATIb�,PURSUANT TO BUTTE COUNTY CODE SECTION 20-62 THE APPLICABLE ZONING WAS SR-1 AND THE ESTABLISHED POLICY WAS TO INTERPRET AND APPLY THE BUTTE COUNTY GENERAL PLAN IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD IN QUESTION IN A MANNER WHICH ALLOWED THE SUBDIVISION' AND DEVELOPMENT OF LAND TO ONE ACRE PARCELS, (2) SUBDIVIDING THE ACRE PMTS LOTS IS PROPERTY:IN QUESTION TO ONE CONSISTENT WITH THE ESTABLISHED PATTERN OF SE PROPERTIES COMMENCING .AT DEVELOPMENT. OF THO RTY AND BORDERING THE SUBJECT PROPEON EOTY SIDES OF LOTT' ROAD FROM THE SUBJECT PROPERTY SOUTH TO DURHAM-DAYTON HIGHWAY. SAID � PROPERTIES PREDOMINANTLY DEVE t,OPED TO "v RESIDENTIAL USES ON LOTS OF APPROXIMATELY ONE ACRE IN SIZE.: (3) SAID SR"I ZONING A14b �I I 92-13:7 POLICIES OF INTERPRETATION OF THE GENERAL PLAN IN EFFECT AT THE TIME OF THE ADVISORY REMAINED AGENCY HEARING ON THIS MAP, AT THE TIME THE APPEAL WAS MADE TO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS PERTAINING TO THE ADVISORY AGENCY'S ACTION ON THIS MAP, AT THE TIME THE HEARING WAS OPENED BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON SAID APPEAL, AND AT THE TIME THE MOTION OF INTENT TO APPROVE THIS 14AP WAS ADOPTED BY THE BOARD., HAV,nl, G FOUND THE ABOVE, Y FURTHER MOVE TO APPROVE THE PROJECT SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS AND FINDING THAT APPROVAL WILL NOT BE DETRIMENTAL TO THE'HFALIlf SAFETY OR WELFARE OF THE PEOPLE OF BUTTE COUNTY PROVIDED THE REQUITED CONDITIONS AE COMPLIED WITH. THESE CONLITIONS ARE: THE 19 CONDITIONS AS LISTED IN THE LETTER FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC 'WORKS; TO THE APPLICANT DATED DECEMBER 1.81 1991; THE SEVEN CONDITIONS AS LISTED IN THE MEMORANDUM FROM ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH TO PUBLIC WORKS DATED - JANUARY 21, 1992* CONDITION 26: PLACE A NOTE `. ON THE FINALMAP THAT STATES "A DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE FOR SHERIFF'S FACILITIES SHALL BE PAID PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 31 ARTICLE II OF THE BUTTE COUW Y CODE PRIOR TO ISSUANCkl OF BUILDING PERMITS'; AND THE THREE MITIGATION MEASURES AS LISTED IN THE INITIAL: STUDY. S M VOTE-. 3.• Y 2 N 3 Y 4 Y B Y (Moi .ion Carriea� � - �• uT�E, n S OUNTY BOAAb OE' stJv�RvlsOR i�,� �r.,y - Apral 7, 1 g92 V Fj =CERTIFIED MAIL DEPARTMENT OF _PUBLIC %YORKS WILLIAM:(6111) CHEFF, Director 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVi IFORNIA 95965 Telephone: 19161 5�L538-7266 RONALD D. McE.'LROY Deputy Director February 10, 1992 ;Roger Sohnrey REi sohnrey subdivision 9674 Lott Rd. AP 40-15--0`1 Durham, CA 95938 Tentative !subdivision Map :Appeal ;near Mr. sohnrey Please be advised that the Butte County Board of Supervisors has .set a public hearing date of February 25, 1992 at 11=30 a.m. to hear your appeal of the Advisory Agency's denial of the above referenced tentative subdivision map at its meeting of January 27; 1' 9 9.2 This hearing is being' scheduled in order 1a comply with the provisions of section 66452,.5(a) of the Clifo'rnia Subdivision Map Act; 'Which requires that an #,;,pea11 hearing be held within 30 days of the date of this appeal be nt,) f 1 ed . The hearing will be opened; 'however, action wi,11 not be tl*en on the project on that day. In order 'to comply with the jjrovisions of Public Resources Code, Section 21091, which requires a 30 day public review period for negative' declaration of environmental impact With mitigation measures, the hearing of February 25, 1992 will be continued to March 24, 1992 at 10.45 a.m, at which time action may be taken on the project The meeting Will be held in the Board of 5upe1l'Visor Room, County Admi n st rat ion Bu I di ng, 25 County Center Dr. OroV 111,e Cal i forsta r � �� „\ `I "'•rye - r u Hount DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS' WILLIAM (Bill) CHEFF, Director 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965 Telephone:(916x :33.7691 RONALD D. McELROY Depuiy Director January 27, 1992 Boger Sohnrey RE:. AP 40-15-01 9674 Lott Road TSM Durham, CA 9593 .Dear Mr. Sohnrey:" At the regular meeting of the Butte County Advisory Agency held on January 27, 1992, the, agency denied your tentative subdivision leap on the above referenced property, The map was denied because it does not - meet the eurreat General. Plan policies or the proposed General Plan policies and zoning of the Durham Dayton Nelson Area plan. If no appeals are timely filed =- within ten days of the date of the Advisory Agency's approval L- with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors; this action will be ,final. If ,you have any questionsregarding. this matter', please contact this office. Very truly yours,; William Cheff Director of Public Works r Stuart Edell Assistant Director SE/ds- cc planning Health N.orth5tar Engineering Butte coun� -='.rte DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS WILLIAM (Bill) CHEFF, Director 7 COUNTY VENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CAL1'FORNIA 95965 Telephone' (416) 538-7681 RONALD D,. McELROY December 18, 1991 Deputy Dlrectar ti ger Sohnrey RE: AP 40-15-01 9574 Lott Road TSti Durham, CA 95938 Dear hr: Sohnrey A.C. the regular meeting of the Butte County Subdivision Committee held on December 18, 1991, the committee reviewed the above -referenced 'tentative subdivision. .Asa result of this meeting, Public i,'crks will recommend the enclosed list of conditions: This project has been scheduled for the Advisory Agency meeting of January 27, 1992. The meeting will commence at 9:00 a.m. in the .Board `of Supervisors Room, 25 County Center Drive, 0roville:; CA., If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office: Very truly yours, 14illiarn Chef ' Director of 'Public Works fi John Mendona Assistant Director J.kf/ds attatMent cc: Planning Department Environmental Health Department NorthStar Engineering y (' g y TS . g located, Sohnre Subdivision, Ro er Sohnre ), TSM, AP south�01, 7 ,lots on the east side of Lost Road approx. of Cummins Road. Durham area. Engineer; NorthStar Engineering Public Works conditions I Submit road and ,drainage .plans to the Department of Public [forks for approval and install the required facilities ?rov-.de 20 rt. radius property 'line returns at all street intersections. 3 Indicate a. 50 ft. building setback line from the centerline of access road, 4 Street signs shall be provided by the developer at all street intersections Per County requirements. (Submit 5 alternate namFs for each street to the County address coordinator for approval of street.names.) 5 Deed SQ ft. from the centerline. of Lott Road to the County of Butte. 6 Construct full street section on access mad to RS -2--B geamtric standard with, curb, gutter and sidewnik. Minimum structural section to be 21' AC ands AB, Sc 250 prime, fog seal and 95% relative compaction. Submit design to County Department PP oli value determinations and otherdtamy be requiredto section design. 7 Provide monumentation as required by the Department of :'•tblic Works in accordance with accepted standards. 8 Street grades and ether features shall comply with the Butte County Ordinances; design resolution and other accepted engineering standards. 9 Provide permanent solution for drainage. 10 All easemonts of record to be shown on the .final map. 3.1 Meet requirements of Butte County Fire Department or other responsible agoncy. 12 Street lighting, shall be provided in accordance with Butte County, requirements, accepted design criteria, and recommendations of PG&E. 13 Provide 1 ft. no access strip for parcel 1 along Lott Road. 14 Bay off assessments, 15 Meet the requirements of the utility companies (;.e., PG8F:, Pacific Telephone, water, sewer, 0 Tr d0l„e« ouin_ . ' DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, WILLIAM (Bill) CHEFF, Director 7 COU `t CENTER iDRIVE • OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965 'CERTIFIED MAIL Telephonet (916) 538.7681 RONALD D. McELROY December 10, 1991 oePuty Ditector, ,Roger Sohnrey RF: AP 40-15=01 9574 Lott Road TSM Durham, CA 95938 Deva 14r. Sohnriq i Please be advised that the above—identified tentative subdivisori will be reviewed by the Butte County Subdivision Committee can December 18, 1991. The meeting will corrmence at SIM a.m. in the Data Processing Center Confere ce RoLn;1; located on the ground floor; at County Center Drive, Oroville, California. The Butte County Advisory Agency will review the project on January 27, 1992. The meeting will commence at 9:00 a.m. in the Board of Supervisors' Room, #25 County Center Drive, Oroville, California. Public KtI will recommend the conditions listed on theattached sheet. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please ,contact this offic:: Very trulyyours, William CReff Director of Public: Works 49hn Mendonsa Assistant Director JMIds attachment cc: Planning Department environmental Health Department NorthStalr tngineeri g Sohnrey Subdivi§ion, (Roger Sohnrey), TSM, AP 4o-15-01v,10ts located on the east side of Lott Road approx. 800 ft, south of Cummings Road: g g' Durham area. Engineer: NorthStar Engineering rn Public Works conditions: 1 Submit road and drainage plans to the Department of Public Works for approval, and install the required facilities. Provide 20 ft. radius property line returns at all. 40-eeut W ntersections. 3 Indicate a 50 ;ft. building setback line from the tentr°cline of access: road. 4 Street signs shall be provided by the developer atallstreet intersections per County requirements. (Submit 5 alternate names tor each street to the. County address coordinator for approval of street names..) 5, Deed 30 ft. from the centerline of Lott Road to the County of Butte. 6 Construct full street section on access road to ..R-3-B oeometric standard. 'Minimum structural section to be 2" j`'and 8 AB, SC 250 prime, fog seal and 95% relative compaction. Submit design. to County Department of Public Works for approval: "R" value determinations and other data may be required to support section design: t Provide monumentat,on as required by the 'Department of Public Works in accordance with accepted standards: 8 Street grades and other features shall comply with the Butte County 'Ordinances, design resolution and other accepted engineering standards, 9 Provide permanent solution for drainage. 10 All easements of record to be shown on the final map. i1 Meet requiroMents of Butte County Fire Department or other responsible agency, 12 Street lighting Shall be provided in accordance with Butte County requirements, accepted design criteria, and recommendations of PG&F 13 Provide 1 ft: no access strip for parcel 1 along Lott goad, 14 Pay off assessments: 15 Meet the � :gittrements of the utility companies (i.e., M&B, Pacific' t'e'lephone, water, sewer). {4` 77 SOHNREY TSM 16 Pay any delinquent taxes or current taxes as required, 17 Constrtct public road approach (S-18) at access rood and Lott Road. 18 Developer shall provide all required traffic safety signs, Including stop signs. oun , 4 - LAND LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE QROV.ILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965.3397 TELEPHONE. (916) 538-7601 November 1, 1990 Roger Sohnrey 9674 Lott Road Durham, CA. 959 Re: Tentative;Subdivisioa Map, APN 040»150-001, Log No. 90-09-24-02 Dear Mr. Sohnrey The Butte County .Planning Department has completed the environmental review of your praject.in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act and forwarded to the Butte County Advisory Agency within the required 1,05 days pursuant to the California Public Resources Code Section '21151.5. ,In addition, the Planning Director's 'report required by Sections 20-6.5 and 20-99 of the Butte County Subdivision Ordinance has been completed. Please find enclosed the Environmental. Documentation/Planning Director's - Report which has been prepared for your project, Please review the enclosed Initial Study/Planning Director's Report with conditions of approval if applicable, If you note any errors or omissions in our evaluation, please bring them to our attention. The Environmental Documents and Planning Director's Report for your project has been sent to the Butte County A,dvisoryt kgency for their action. California, Government Code Sections 65950 and 659521 requires the Butte County Advisory Agency set hearings and approve or disapprove your project within six months from the date on which your application was received and accepted. The t"x month time limit for your project mandated by state law, will occur or! March 22,1991. The :advisory Agency will notify you of the time and place of the public hearing for your project. it there are modifications to your project, not related to mitigating an identified impact, re= evaluation of your project shall be required,. INTER:-DEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM TO: Butte County. Advisory Agency FROM: Planning Director SUBJECT. Report on Tentative Subdivision Map for Roger Sohnrey AP# 040-150-001. DATE: November 1, 1990 'Phis is a proposal to subdivide 10 + /- acres to create six parcels at one acre each and one parcel at 3.8 acres +/ The present zoning is SR-1. The I-and Use Plan Map of the Butte County General Plan designates this area as Orchardand Field Crop. The Project site is located within the Durham-Dayton-Nelson Area Land Use Plan which is currently being updated. The proposed project conflicts with the recommended alternative adopted by the Butte County Board of Supervisors for the Durhann-Dayton-,Nelson Area band Use Plan. The Board of Supervisors' .recommended alternatiire calls for A-5 'zoning and Orchard and Field Crop general plan designation for the project mte which does not allow one acre homesites as proposed by the Sohnrzy Subdivision., map. In addition, the current zoning is, not consistent with the current general plan: The Orchard and Field Crop general plait designation, does ,not call for one acre densities; but rather, only allows a minimum of five (5) acres per homesite._ California Governrnestit. Code, Section 65860 requires the zoning classifications be consistent with the General Plan Designation. The Government Code Section 65850 (c) further states: "In the event that a zoning ordinance becomes inconsistent with a general plan by reasons of amendment to such a plan; or to any' element of such a_ plan, such zoning ordinance shall be amended within a ,reasonable time so that it is consistent with the general plan as amended." The planning process which the County has been er:gagedin over the pastthree years updating the Durham-Dayton-Nelson Area Land Use .flan has been seeking to bring zoning Classifications and general plan designations into conformance. An Initial Study was cr'aducted in accordance to the California Environmental Quality Act and a Iviitigated Negative Declaration is vecommended for the project. All environmental documentation has been forwarded to file Butte County Advisory Agency within the ,required 105 days As mandated by the California Public Resources Code Section 21151.5: Recommend denial of the Tentatve St,l;uivision Map for Roger '8ohnrey APO 040-150 001 based on. the following findi,igst 1. The proposed Tentative Subdivision Map does 'not conform to the preferred alternative for the Durham-Dayton-Nelson Area Land'Use Plan recommended by the Board of Supervisors. �i - 2. The project site as currently zoned SR -1, does riot conform to the General Plan Designation of Orchard and Field Crop. If the AdvisoryAgency cannot make the above findings then it would be appropriate to make the following motion: Recommend approval of the Tentative Subdivision Map for Roger'Sohnrey AP # 040450- 001 subject to the following mitigation measures: 1. Place the following note on the alternate or additional map sheet of the final map: "Automatic fire suppression sprinkler systems shall be installed in. all - residential structures in accordance _ with the National. Fire Protection .Association Standard ,for the installation of sprinkler systems in one and two family dwellings and mobile homes, NFPA Standard 13D. The purpose of the installation of sprinkler syst-,ms is for additional safety and property protection in the event of residential fire; This installation will reduce th.e demand for structural fire protection services in those instances where they are installed." 2. Pay the $200.00 per lot development -impact fee to the Butte County Fire Department/CDF for the water tender fund prior to recordation of the final map. 3. A finish floor elevation above the flood plain should be determined by a registered civil engineer and place on the map prior to recordation. 1 rdm cc: Roger Sohnrey 'NorthStar Engineering Public', Works Department .Environmental Health_ Department + � M- _... - uite county DEPARTMENT OF PU13LIC HEALTH DIV181ON; OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH Address 0 196 Memorial Way � AI'7 County Center Drive 0 747 Elliott Road Reply to Chico, California 95926 Oroville, California 95965 Paradise, California 95969 Telephone: 916/891.2727 Telephoner 916/5387281 Telephone., 916/872.6308 ,Docember 20, 1991 Roger raohn'rey 9.674 Lott Road Durham: CA 95938 RE: Sohnirey S'ubdivision� E/s Lo°tt Road, Durham Area AP## 40-15-01 Dear Mr. Sohnrey: This departh lent has advised the $utte Coto-Ity Deportment of public works. Land '''Development Section that we are prepared to act on the_. above appl'icacon. 3ased on present information, we can recommend approval or conditional approval provided satisfactory soil and percolation tests are. on file with this office prior to action by the Advisory Agency. Recommended Conditions for Approval_ ^f__satisF'aci:ory�soi _data is on file. ---- --- I Provide an area for wells and 100+ leachfield free setback around those areas on parcels 2 3� 41 5, ,6 & 7. 2 Provide a 100' leachfield free setback around existing wells either within the property or within 100' of the property boundaries on parcel. 1 Provide the required usable sewage disposal area on each Parcel ith an adjacent parcel any parcel not Pardo" Combine w � p roven to contain the gsable sewa a disposal area required by the Subdivision Ordinance. 4. Locate and if necessary relocate the sewage disposal system serving the existing dwelling onto its respective .parcel. ,1 . ,n Roger Sohnrey ,december cLO, 19911 F Page 2 1"Jmply with the winter groundwater monitoring mitigation measure. "Provide verification of winter groundwater elevation prior to recording the final map. Complete site and other required physical improvements subs'equet7t to satisfactory verification of groundwater eltzvation." 6, Meet the sewage disposal requirements of the Butte County Flood' Plain Ordinance. Comply with any additional equirement's of' the California State Regional Water Quaii7y Control Board. If you have any quL tions rec;ard.ng this letter, please contact the Chico (.office at the above listed address or telephone number between 8:00 - 9:00 A.M. weekdays. Very truly yours, d'`homas Reid, Director Division of EnvJGronmenta.l Health co: Public Works Planning NorthStar OL gdiite Co ftt .� .•�y - -.� lF4ND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA. 95965-b397 October 17, 1990 TELEPHONE; (916) 536-7601 Roger Sohnrey 9674 Lott Road Durham, CA _ 95938 Re Tentative Subdivision Niap AP No. 040-150-001 Log #90-09-24-02; Dear Mr. Sohnrey An initial study of your proposed project, aTentative Subdivision. Map, indicates potentially adverse impacts to the environment (refer to the enclosed environmental cher,,klist). To reduce or eliminate these impacts, suitable mitigation measures are required as part of the project: Otherwise, an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is required pursuant to the California Environniental Quality Act. The proposed project Site is currently under review fora zone change and General Pian update, The Board of Supe." visors are proposing to zone the project site A-5 which would not allow the proposed density of this Tentative Subdivision Map. The Planning Department will therefore recommend denial of the project because the density of one home per acre does not :meet the requirements of the proposed plan nor zoning. An early response to this notification, sent to the Planning Department, will expedhe the scheduling of your project. Please forward your written response within 15 days from the :date of this letter. Should you have any questions regarding '►'iYL r matter, "please contact this office between 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 P.M. :Sincerely; B. A. Kircher ctor of P F nni 7 rent'L. Moore Associate Planner Enclosures cc: NortlhStar Engineering BI:Mbb APPENDIX j , COII2ITY OF J3C�Jmn ENVIRONkfEN' ALi CHECI L--rBT F072M,. EVALUATIONOF EPtViRONMENTAL IMPACTi'� Pike No, n10-150>001 Log No, 090-09-24-0 13AC1GROUND AP No.. 040-150-001 }: « 1. Roger sohnrey 7. 9614 Lott Road, Durham, CA. 43ri38 3.. Project descr ptionr T4rntative subdivision Map to divide io +I- bctes .to creale 6 lots At 1 here and 1 lot at a.a acres. max_• MANDATORY FINDINGS ..OF SIGNIFICANCE YI � Dx8CUS8ION ; OF ENVIRONMENTAL EV7ILFJATION` i. Does the project have the potential to degrade the x This proposal will quality of the environment; substantially reduce the "--" I not significantly degrade the environment. habitat of a 11th br Wildliferipecles, cause a rists of wlidlIfe population to drop below scat -sustaining levels, threaten to eliminato a plant of animal his perinlmal at eliminate if a lroortant6exaroteseOfdinal rt pe ands of California wrmunity, reduce thy, heirber cit restrict the range tory of prehistoryt California t, Does 'the protect have the rotential to achieve yr Th, short-term benefits to the detriment of long-term — -" environment goaJst tA, short-tet.m frnpact on the is proposal Will not Impede long-term environmental goats' invironmen1 1s one which �lcturs In a relatiVelq brie[ period of time white Itfng-term Impacts WiI1 endur.ti Into the future.i S. Does the NoJect have Impacts ahlc!i are Individual iy - x . This proposal ma limited but cumulatively consldetablet i'A project may environment. V have a slgnl icant cumulative im;,acr ort the Impact on IWO Of more seNrate resources where the J fa.I an each resource Is relatively small, bul Where the etfect of the LDtat of those impacts on Use envltorment is siglMf:ant,) 4. WllaueroJbntanaesnfcets uwhich cssustaild ieefetson hm x Thirs proposal wfil not have'a stghificant adverse effect ot! h belhgs, either dN ectly or ln?Oltectlyt �� belings. uinan IIL. DETERMTNATt6N on thebasis tl1Ts rnitial evaiudtlt+I: I/Wt find the s/wE:find ►hatparthb bscd �- ugh the pioposed pto ect.cd&o ha 'a slgntti• environmentect do the and a iJgoATIVE liEcLAgAhJriN wilt be prepared. cast becaute the A]TICATIOnitktA�IS LD describedave atnCthefattachedicant fJti e!t ettecttn envI`jtbNtrlt, there will not be A significant effect in this h Ye beers added to the ptotact. A MCATIN't DECLARATION waif be prepared t/W find the proposed protect l4AY have a "signtfircahl efrecf tib the thYJtonraenit, and An Etmii), MENTAL IMP TRE.PCA is tequl'ted, /1 C{XMY .. / DATf:r "O:.►tiher it, logo� �AttilN„ pm IT 8ren, ' ROYcwed by», en.'v,3aton=eatal Checklist * $va.Yuatxoa of .Env�'roiltaeutalr' Intpaset ZV' ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS s YES "Y" ►.z>!- lwISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALU7VTION; , t. EARTH. will the prcoosAl result 'In signtflcant: a, unstable eKtth conditions, or changes In: x The ptoposal will not affect subsurface earth condlllomt. geologic substructures?' b, DI'MPtfars, displacement, cotrpactioil or X. this proposal will result in minot disruption. displacement, overccNerfog of the soil? compaction and overcovering of the slit as a result of development of structures, driveways, parking Areas, otc. the proposed division would allow the development of seven homes on io acres. The average densityy of one dwelling unit pet t+ acres will minimize the eatthwork intenilty. The Ilii valley terrain also minimizes the need for C. change In topography or _ground surrace x Thecnrojectast�he It chatacterized by flat valley land Which fends relfel tea.turesr Ilse f to residential development without the need for targe amounts of grading„ d. Destructkan, covering or m"idiflcat fon of any -- -- x_ the project ifte has no unique physical features. unique geologic or physical featUres2 e. Increase in wlnd or wales erosion of sons,, x The proposal will not cause erosiono either orr der off site? f. changes Irs OposItIon, of erosion of beach X.- the ptopotai wilt hot affect any watercourse: sands, or, changes In siltation, deposition or eroslorp *hlch may modltY the chahhol of a river of stream or the bed of the ocean or any baY'. inlet or lake? g. Loss of prlO4 agticultueafly productive x _ This t.�4,.MAI does not represent a significant foss' of Grirre soils outside designated urban of#,ast agricull Val solis. the existing parcel is to acres in size, which Is hot considered latfie enough to be a viablerommefcial-agricut lural sitein additlon, the project site is stlroUnded by residential deVeiopment which imttaits agricultural Uses of the site. h. Exposure of t>eocle or property to geologic - X Ali or Butte County it in a Moderate Earthquake Int:ehstty Znneiillr. hazards such as earthquakes, landslides.. ConStfuctton of buil-dings to uniform Building code standards til mudsildes, gtound failure or siml lar provide adequate prolOdllon to occupants in case of setsmic attly ty. hazatds7 2. Atm,. will the pfopotal result In substanti`al- a Alt, emisis[osrs or deterioration of Ambient -- x _ No slynificbnI Im6att to aft �Ual1ty Is expected as t. result of this air quality? Object. b, the dtieAtJoit of objectionable odors, i6oke x the proOcitkl VIII not create obfectibnabie 6dots, :smoke or rutnes, or times? c.Altetatiod of air rilovetttent, moisture or x The proposal will not affect the atmosphete, tettperature, of any change In climate, focally or regionaliYt S. wATEC Will: the p.oposal result In subst'inilalr a, chhAget In of th,. zoutse .of X_. The proposal Will not affect any watercourse. .tuttents, dlftatron of Valet movements In either mat ,illi` or fresh WAtef s#' b. Chi1des to absorption rates, dtaiAe •. x_--. the p'tdposed pfblect will nave an InsignilIcAht Impact on absorption P,hts Oal erh's, or ;he rale and amount of $oilate' tate, or' the rate and nmouht of surtace tunotl. ur:lflt f� r r �amaiui�znl; checklist * Lrtv3rannreirntal^ Rva hilt *nay <n�¢ 3 Impart ENV lRsl AL DMACTS (continued) YES MAYBE W DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EV PUATION (contlnuetll C. teed IM off-site surface drainage _ - x It is anticipated no new surface drainage Imptovemdnts ire'necessaty to accormodate the proposed TentatiVe Parcel Map« ltroroyoa-nt.s, including vegetation remiWal, channeilzation or Culvert installatlon? d:. Alterations to the course or flow Of flood x Thrproposat Will not signl""ticantiyaffect any (food control channels WAters t or watercourses, e. Change to the amount of sur lace. water In any )c The propositi will hot affect any watercourse, water body? (« ofscharge Into surface waters, or In any X The proposal Will not significantly attect surface Wateir quality. T he proposed siie of the parcels will allow storta water and alteration of surface water quality; includingraio 17CIt not limited to temperature, itfigation water to remain' mostly ion the prOjeGt site clue to the relative flatness of the: protect site. g, dtrectb �tty? AlteoratIon►waEetheof ta(t* of Ilow ° x The proposal Will not attect the dl'reetl_on or flow of ground waters, of .ground ' h, change In the oUantIty or,qua IIIV of ground _ , _ 1�� The proposal will not directly Affect any aquifer, waters, at that through direct additions or wft'hdrawals, or through interceptlon of All aquifer by cuts of excavaifons? l.- Reduction In the amount of 'Water othetwlse __ x It is oroo ed that the project site be 3elvlr,ed by private Wells. We,l$ drilled for domestic use is not ant elpated to have a available for public water supplies? Seveh sltrnifi,cant '!mpact on Water supplies in the area. j, tlxposure or people of property_.tb water- x-- The project site Is located within the Butte creek FloodPlain. All of the projdct site is identified as a zone "A` flood#— by the such as tloodingr related hazards s Fede al emergency MAnagemeht Agency Flood A4ap corrmunf ly Panel t 06007-o22tll in order to mftl9ate the potentlat of and the toss of property it wilt be necessary Ao estahiis.tl flaw hazards the base elevation for each parcel,. A llnish float eievatiori aboi++f the . food ( ocd plain should be determined by A regi teriid civil egq:neer and placed on the map prior to teeordatton, LIFE. "III the proposal result In s -sl antIa a. Change In the diversity of specles or x- No substantial reduction of the dumber of exlsti69 i�pecfes, is anticipated "due to the parcel sfze"s requited by the exfxting zonlbg nuuudt of any species of plants tIhelUding trees, shrubs, grass, crops. And aquatic classification. punts)( b, duttlodhdAlge hSpeclests off any snique, rare }t-- The project slid contalils no rare or endangered plank. b I introduction of new specles of plants Into �` x. the proposal Will hot affect existing plant lift, C. an area, or in a battler to t+e notmai reolenishmept of existing speclesa d, Reducti0n In acreage of any agricultura %. See Sg above. crop? 5, AMMAL Lf FE. will the or0oosal tcsul t In a.substantial- a, change irl the diversity of species, .of x rhe ptopbsal will not affect animal life becaus^e "the 'site does not suppott significant anlhW life or habltat. sit numbers of All species of animals (bird$., land animals ihcfUdlog ieptiles,_fish alit( 001rish, benthid otganisms of lhibctt)? b. aeduelfon iII the numbers of any unique, rateR .� The slto contalns no tare animals. or enalangered ipecles of ahlrtlals# I �1.. Am 4 Eyt jronaental checkli st ' * Hva luation of Rnvironiental ami, act 1r'NvXRONl ENTAL nMACTB (Continued) _YES MAX2 Na DISCUBOXON OF ENVIRONMEPIM". BV[ r°UA'J?IU `i' (continued) C. Introduction of new species of animals Intox r...�1.1 the proposal will not affect existing animal Isle An area, or In A battler to the migration . : of movement of antmalsi d, oeterloratlon or existing fish or wildlife �.: X The `site contalhs no significant wiidilte habitat. babltat? 6. Noisr, will the proposdl tesult In substantial: m. increase; in existing noise levels? x: The proposal will not result in a stibstaotlat Ihcteme in noiss created on site or In the vicinity. b. Exposure or prople to severe nolse levels? X The OtOPOSAt hill not expose people to severe ,noise levels. 7, LicNT MO. CLARE. Wlli the proposal produce X The proposal will not result A a substantial Increase In light of S gni .i can rgh and glare?- glare created on sl to or In the Vicinity.; 8. LAWLMEy will theproposal result in A substantial x The project site is zoned SP -i which Allows one dwelling ,Unit per a tera,troo of the preterit or planned land use of An acre and is designated by the Butte county General, Plan as orchard area? and Field crops. the proposed project site Is curtently under review" for a zone change and General Plan update. It Is proposed to zone the project site A- which would not allow the proposed density o. this TSA?. The Planning Department, wltl recommend denlal of the prWect because the density of one- duelling unit pet acre does not adhxrd to the otoposed plan and 'zoning rot this area. q, NAE,"AAL RESOU2CtS. Will the proposal tetilk Ill DS{antra A. increase In the tate Of use of tiny 'natural x .. The proposal WiII not affect any 'natural resources. resources? !,. bep'letioh of ally non-rehetvabtie naturae )t The ropesai Will not deplete any natural tesourtes. tesourcest lo. OSK OF LOSVT, t If l the ifroposal WOW; a A tlslt of ee'xpiosion of release of hazardous X -, The proposal will hot Involve the use of hazardous riaterials. not Is 3ubstahteii dfn , but not limited to, ance,petti;ides, located close to any facilities which Store or Utilize. such, Oil, dee. Chem itals or radiation) In maler,iais. the event of an accident or upset conditions? b. Possible ihtetference with an eftMigenC X . "The proposal will hot affect any emergency services. response plan or emergency evacuation plant 1.t. POPUtAT104. will the pt old alter focuklonn x - pr'oposai wilt hot Ytgnrllcantly at thepoputatibnof thearea rstr nuuoii,iienslky or growthb3a1 rate of the hums distratlon? be exceed that planned and being tlevelseedhlnptheoateadenstt*does not exceed pbou z. tcrtrSrNc. will the orbposal atfect existing hoUtrng, X _ The proposal will not significantly affect housing demand. or create A demand fir additional housr1.9t fiat tRaNSl�tiRTATIi^hllCtft(XlCAT1r1N: "Ill Ili: VOPOW je to« a. rinetati rld! tUbstantiAl addl'tlonat'vtthic°ld " X _. Theproposal wi11 rept@sent sn lncrernbntai increase In traffic In theatea. The proposed project WH Igenerate approximately 10 vehicle ' trtps Oct day. The pto'ect site is setviced by Lott Road Which has the necessity capscity to carry 70 additional vehicle trios per day li without a teductlo; to the level of wvltd. xOnKeniil 5 Lnpact Checklist,* EvaluatiOn of Envixaaikehtal 17- ENVIROMM AL TJOACtS (witinued) nTSCUSSION QF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION YES MAYBE No (Continued) b. effects on eXfstfng;'parking facilities, or demand for parlangz X """: The proposal will not at fact parking betause the proposal Mitt have ..^.CA to comply with the parking requlrements c6n;alned wjthln Butte county Code section 24-35, - c; substantial Impact, on existing 111011portatlon syslernsi x The proposal wlII not slgnlf(cantly Impact the transpSrta'tion system: d'. Slgnificant.aiterations to present pattat hs of circulation or movement of people and/or X- The proposal Will not alter the present pattern of circulation to the goods area, e. Alterations to watetborne, tall of air trattict The proposal will not atte.ti tall -or air traffic, 7, increase In traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists of pedesttlans? ii The proposaI Will not result Ina signlf'icant increase lie traffic' +� and related traffic hazards in th,e area., -:14, 0MIC SERVICES., will the proposal have an effect upon, or result In A need for hew or littered government servim, A. Fire- protection( X �� The oroposal Wlli resint in a Intremental Increase In demand tot Ilse protection in the area. The Butte County Fire oepartment/CalIfornia Division of F6restry has Indicated that cumulative development Inrural areas wlII Imo"act their ability to provide fire protection servlces. The Fire bepatlment has developed mitigation measures for rural p i*nt whichbe to reduce the demandi lot Ore .services aor�dtilonal systems in resldential structuret, it Is reclxrmnded the sprinkler s`olibw ng note placed on the alternate MapSuppression gyp, `Automatic fire sUppresslon sprinkler systes shalt be Installed in all residential structures in accordance with the National Fire Protection Association Standard for the lnsla7(at,lon of sprinkler Systems In one and two IiiM°ly dweilings and mobile homes, NFpA Standard 131), The purp6se of the installation of sprinkler systems is tot AddItIonal safety and property protection in the event or tesidentidl tires. 7hlf Installation will reduce the demand for stroctural tire Oroted1on services in those instances where they are Installed" In addition. Otovllde Wa(e( tendelieequlpnkntofor bdeft serviced by a prefsurized coamnily Nater system with fire hydrants, It Is anticipated the paymerlOt' the Abeme Impact fees and residential lire suppression sprinkler system will adequately mitigate the impacts on hire ptotectloo "service to less than tignificant level. a b. Putice protectlon7 X '--- The proposalwill result Ina incremental cf 6ai demand for IY ehandsfor" d the entice protection In the area which cannotbeSheriff i bepartment. Since 1460 the p county nal / �oflroisButt Incteased b over M. While at the same ttme the pollee force has been decreased in petsonnel by Sox due to liscal dttiiculRles being ' experienced by Butte county. currehtiy, Butfe County rias the lowest ottiters Oct capita In the state. At recent legislative Committee Hearings on eutct e.outtty,s Fltcal crises county officials teslifidd that police ptotection serVlces are presenntly Inadequate, and do not meet the service expectations of the publl Continued to'al deVdlOpmeht hat fest,lted in cumUlative impacts on 611te protectftln services which continues to reduce the Sheriff's bepattment capacity to provide adepua :�pbljee 'services, bdyalopment IrApAtis on the th6t';r .; departf6ent It couhtywide and cannot be mttipated by:one Indi.ytdizat Project, 'rho dumulative jrvatts t�ealuatiox� ,; f � t'virolmesalts"1' 7Cmg��.4 .. w--lore----wr ATa L1fTff Ttf nt.Tllf L,►.iril'A t;. 'C'Qli TJVAM Tt1M 6 TV RUjUC&W,,AL 'FACTS i,continue') YES MAY6t w ".Ly..,. --Mal .,a .�................___. _---------- (contlnued) of development on police protection has been documented by the county Administrative -Office.:in the report -county of Butte, annual Fiscal Review." c, Schools# z The proposal Will result In a Incremental increase In demar»' for school services In the area, However, school impact fees colli, led by the local school districts is antirlpated to reduce school ln+pacts to less than a significant level, No further mitigation measures or requirements are allowed ih accordance to government code section 65945. d. Parks or other recreational fae.1111.1e0 ,•_,_ x _ r, 'rhe proposal will result Ina incremental Increase in demand for park: and recreation facilities in the area. e. maintenance of publittacllltles, Including _ x _ the proposal Will result In a Int.rementai increase In the nged for maintenance of roads and other public facifities In the area, toads? ►, othergoservices# - __ ._ x The proposal wlII result In a Incremental Increase In demand •for all other goverfwientai services i'n the area, 7,t. EmtRcY. Wit Che proposal result Ina a, Use of substantial amounts of fuel, or x - The proposal wlII not utlIize substantial fuel or energy, energy? b. Substantial Increase in demajd upon exl.sting x The proposal .wiII not substant 161ly increase the demand lor,iinecti.;; sourr.,�of energy, or require, the deVe►u;fi1ent of, new sources of energy? ic» ifrfOtIts, Will the proposal' result in a need for new systems, or substantial atteratlons to the faoilowl npo*br'or natural ost x Ti;r ptoposLl WiII not affect electrical uowef or Otutal gas distribution systems. b, Camiunteattons systems? ^� ,� x The pfopbsal will not' affect communication systems. I, c. Water avallabllitY? _ ..� rhe proposal will hot affect public water s0 l,4ns, - d, Sewer or sep[fc syskems? x The proposal will have to 'meet the tequl'rements of �,t he Butte tountY' _� Envlronmentai Hearth Wept. e. Storm water drainage? x- The proposal will not affect drainage. 1. solid waste and dItOosalt the proposal ;will not affect solfd waste disposal. j7. the HEclreat.lon - � A. oif 'a'Il healthahazatdlOflPotential _ The proposal will not 'create any health hazard, ha*atd`(excl I no mental health)? b. cxposu're of people to poterMal health . =, x The proposal Will not expose people to any health hazard. hazards? sg,' �F S��° ics. Will the proposal result, in the x The proposal will not tesul't ih an aeslhetitallY offensive View because It is `cbnslstent with surrounding development. r. SL c on nl any stento vista of View open to the ofbian adstheitll ailYtb fetsiveusite the creation publit ? ig. ec Ea tort wl,il the proposal tesul't in ar; impact �._ x µ And pte eaatio Yfaclllitltf yan incremental Increase Indemand lot park upon tom- d'ualIty or quantily of exittin9 Cecteatiohat opRottunitics? A ` Envy ronme>iltfial Chef;kl ist * VValuationt of ;Envs.rontnenta3 �l 7 Impact ;! fair fr ZVi" ENVIRONMENTAL X"ACTS (continued), YES MAYaE No DISCUSSIOif OR ENVIROidMENTAL. EVALUATION (Continued) i za. CULTL.RAL RESOLRCES. a. Will the proposal resufI in the alteration is- or destruction of a prehistoric or historic The pro)ect siltl It identified as an area of low sensitivity for archaeological resources, archaeological siter b, W111 tha Proposal result in adverse physical x or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or The proposal wl(i not affect historic sites. hlstoric building. structure or cblectt c, Does the Proposal have the, potential to _ cause a ohystral change which would affect The Noposai wil'.) not affect cultural resources. unique ethnic cultural values? KAj Will theal restrict existing X reIIglous or sacred uses wfoin the The pto►osal wtsl not Affect religious resources, al fmoaopos u V. BUGG),,'8TED_ MITIGATION MEaSURES ia. it Is t0 orrmended the fol1cwIng note be placed a. A finish floor elevation the ofilial abrns_ the flood piliaih n or additional maep sheet should be determined b a registered CIVii Englrl and placed on the map prior to recordation. eer sthl systems�f systems shall be installed in alslloresECenliel {{alte,nale s el fh4tomatordaalledire ce Fire + Protectton Assotlation standard for the Installation or spt.inkler systems In one and two famitY dwellings and mobile hbrres'. NFPA.Standard 13D. The purpose of the Installation of sprinkler systems Is tot additional safety and property protection In the event of residential fires. This instalfatloh Will reduce the demand for structural tlnstalledrvlces In those Instances *here tifiey pt ocounlyoxo et elopnt ck tee tri the Butte Fire bepAe tment/Co � or the water Tender Fund prior to recordation of the ifnal map. 1 �iroanerxtal' CheckJlist * Eval.nation Of HAViroinmental Iliitpa.ct ii■ _ 8 'g1M92R0kUC 'AL I!?IFACTS (continued) YES MAM ND DISCUSSION OF ENVIROWMENTAL EVALUATION: (continued) it. cen. Plah Designatlon: O&FC DATA Si%'ET _ d. Parcel Sizes: 1 to 20 C4, Population: Rural 4, Describiton 15. , character of site and Area: Rural/Ac ,Prolect 16. mearest,Urban Area: Chico 1. Type 0r Prolect. Tentative Subdivision Map' 17. Relevant Spheres of Influence: DUSD. 2. Brief : scripllon: TS(A to divide 10 +/- acrys to create 6 lots ia. IwOravements standards Urban Area: N/A 3. ' - At 1.0 dt(@s CdGh and 1 lot al 3.8 +%- aC(C;, oad in the Derham area. on tlor LAaxlUnt 19. Fire Notedtion Service' h. Nearest county (State) §(alio(( a45 4. Development - Proposed~Uensily of oevetopment� tunit/acre Density Water T nder On:' b. Mater Availability: Water Tender only 5„ of � minimal 26. 20. schools in Area : Durham milled school Diitrict 6. Access and Near0st Public Road(s). Lott Road ` 7, Mlhod of se+ra9i Disposal• Septic/LeaChfleld a. sourcn of Water supply. Private ;tell 9. Ptcx)raity of Poorer tines! Adjacent it) property to, potential for further land divisions and development: No further potential under current toning classification. K. Environmental setting 11 Terrain ' a.. General 'Topographic Character, Ftat Valtey Land _ b, slopes:_:o to 1i. _ c, Elevatibn : 160' ASL tl. Ltmi drug Factors. None z. :Bolls a. 'types and Characteristics: Vlna Loam. Prime Ag soil. b. Limf timo Factors: clone '3. Natural 1lazatds '.ot the Land a. Earthgd!We xane: Moderate Eailhquahc intensity Zone Vill. b. Erpsion Potential.- None C. Widsl iltle Potentlal : None d. Fire Ftapatd:.tmclaisilied e., ExpAo&Iv'e soil Potential., Moderate 4. lwdrotb9Y A, surface 0raler: Nene b, Wound batter: Cenerail'y avallAble. c. Dralnago'characteristics: 4n site. d. Annual RAI nfall (normal >s 23 e: Limiting Factors: None, +N; visual/Scenic Quality: Excellent E. Acoustic- Qua IIty( Good 7. Alt Quality: Good n(olaglcat EeyR fron„tent: andscaes 9. Wlgdllre Habitat, S�rallnbirds�!he, Animals.conmoh 16 ag area s. culluri EnVtrorment 16. Archicolbglcai And t41atorical Resources to the *tea; Law Seniitivtty,Are ti. odtte County cancra( olan designation: orchard k 'Field Crop 1Y, Ex'sting Zoning: Sk.-1 1s, Ex�sting Land Use on-site: Agr cultural-Resldentlal 44. SUtroilndfng Area: w. Land Uses: Drthards, rural r6ladentiai t1. Zoning: SR -11 9 E7nv,ironmental Checklist :* EValuat an of ,Zhviro� Impact 7CV. ENVIRONMENTAL IM3.'ACTO 4cont(nued) YEsi�t� 'fin _ DISCUSSIOR OF tNV±kONMENTAL EVAtUAI IgY (continued) ENVIRONMENTAL REFEIRENCE MATERIAL I , 8atthquake and FaUlt Activit�± : 5eiImlc utte U;unty Genera Plan rev se a ety l le ent2M 1ap7,II-I H,, h 11-2, Liquefaction Potent►fi Se�ismiC Safety y�v (pitl,i Butte County General P.an rev sed 1-77, by p 111-1 Subsidence & Landslide Potential: Safety hutte County General Plana evis ement r e�, 1-77, by Hili ' MN 111-2. � ._ 1� � - COUntiG�iiLEf,."A1+�evi`sedl 1 77febtyY 1 ie^Artrent,l Butte .'_'' Ex a iVe Soi Is• afe- Y llemeHnit But • t E t,�nLy Y:,Jnera� 'fan revised Ii7: by Gi2h1 i�il 6. MTpnl rev. Nog sle. Nob( set !�Frnlil butte r�tr rrat't t�eriera l 7, Map V , Scenic 11a, Is: Scent hay Ie nt, d c1.3,Y tvi �f I I Butte ounty Genera P��n revise 8 ;✓l p eI I i- Natural FIre HaNd Clas�es: 5�afe't:, utte Cotlit'I Genera Pan rev sed 1-,71 by CHS Linin(, , 9.ArchaeologcCal Sen itlyity Map by lames P ManP'ng, for Butte aunty Plann ng l7epartment. 198. 19, 6choo[parnle District Map, Butte County PIand Ino 11� CWTI itra $3 Stud g Sp,bNiti�ate.Concentr tic in Resource Nf t t > �lstrNa tme�e Wesouarces Agency, Sate°0ThCeMor �nia} ""'12.ic (Lural P[eserves Map, established byRego ution�8,r6uT-178, Butte County Board of Supervisors,ecember 5 19870 13. Progdamns cneraa gmergeitcy Management Agency. R98e , i4. USGS Quad Maps, Chico. Photorevised 1969. , 15.61 1 Map, Cglco Qg9 .e,)�Orovl I le (1926) Area, U,S, " Aepartment o Agr.cu to e. 16. "o,i 1 Survey o Ch1 co( 11925)jbroVI I I (1926) Area, U,8 department off AgMCUl Lure, V. put oUn Flre Protection ,Jurisdictions and Ca� i ��s a ar mentte of°U�oest�r, Deurt eenCounry ann ng �epa tment, COUNTY OF BUTTE r DEPARnMgT OF PUBLIC WORK_ S ? � 7 County Centex Drive ii Orov lle, CA 95965 (916) 538=7266 September 21 1990 Roger SOnrey RE.' AP 40-15-01 9674 Lott Rd. Tentative Sdbdivison Map ut Durham, CA 959.38 Dear fir. Sohnrey; this is to notiiy'yau that your application for a tentative map for the above-referenced property is being submitted to the, Planning Department for environmental determination,. and to the Envirormantal Health Department for its review. his application will be considered complete when we have received notification from the Planning De;7artment and the Environmental Health Department that all necessary dat:,t have been received. These departments will contact you regarding- any additional information they may reau re Ver*; truly yours, Will mfi Chef Director of Public Works a iq�hn N1 ndonsa si.stant W.rector Xi!flkk cc Planning Department Environmental Health Department NorthStar Engineering