HomeMy WebLinkAbout040-150-0490
A
' �'•b. .,�r�r" y �` �( 1 ''fir'
JON i
or
• ' iIL
/+krY
_t :t. «
� N.•
dR
"µ � ..�'
' �
-; `• pf .4.
b
�
_t
iAt
R
0
A
' �'•b. .,�r�r" y �` �( 1 ''fir'
JON i
or
• ' iIL
PLANNING COMMISSION
APPLICANT Ravmond.D, Brinson
ADDRESS
OWNER
1'�ROJECT DES
LOCATION
MARY SHEET FOR LAND DIVIS orrG
ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBERS) 40-1k-49
ZONING SR -1 GEN. PLAN Policies indi catb
As=Ties PROJECT CONSISTENT?
DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED
En4 16/85
.9 Norlh.Rf 14n 377, Connors Cnit"ll Suite B Chico CA 95926
DATE PUBLICATION NOTICE WRITTEN
PUBLISHED
PLACE NEWSPAPER NOTICES) PUBLISHED - 0. C. P. G. ,B.
DATE MAILING LIST PREPARED
DATE MAIL -OUT NOTICES WRITTEN'
--_ -�_ MAILED NUMBER
DIRECTOR+S REPORT
DATE PLANNING PREPARED
ENVIPO "',..",At
DETEVM!,,.,rJON
AND DATE
CATEGORICAL =�MPTION - DATE FILED -.�..
�NEGATIVE DECLARATION _
]7ATS 1,.DOPTED
.r MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION -• DATE ADO.PTED__ �-
ENV:
114P
ACT REPORT - DATE CERTSETED
0
A/" + p
X/4.=*. �'` }�r4.,,e'
p✓ Y"'F��,� .`. 1 '� 4 ..�+'i' f ... ' '`.1C 4 /� C GT J � 1�+•I'�: i +d,G i..� ^�.A� ✓"." '�' �"l"G7"
C /
11
8b-506' NorthStar Engineering - on behalf of po
Ra nd 04
(1217) appeal on Condition No, 3 � Brinson, makes a late
(construct full street section ori access
road and one-half street section plus 12 -foot lane on Loco Road to
RS -4B geometric standard. Mirimijin structural section to be 2" AC
and 8" AB, SC 250 prima fog seal and 95% relative compaction. Submit
des;ern to County Department of Public Works for approval, "R" value
dete urinations and othor data may be required to support section
des.gn.) for tentative subdivision map, AP 40-15-49, four parcels,
property located on the east side of Lout Road 1200 feet north of
Durham -Dayton Highway, Durham area,
Motion: ALLOWED THE LATE APPEAL, FINDING THE PROPOSED APPEAL WILL
NOT AFFECT THE FINDINGS AND DETERMINATIONS OF'TI4C ENVIRONMENTAL.
REVIEW, THAT IT WILL. NOT BRIM ABOUT AN INCONSISTENCY IN
THE FINDINGS OF THE GENERAL PLAN OR ZONING, THAT THE FACTS
PRESENTED GIVING GOOD AND SUFFICIENT REASON ARE (1) PERSONAL
CIRCUMSTANCES
WITHIN
IFpTHE FAMILY AND (2) NEW INFORMATION A80UT
t
DIFFERENTA DIVISION ADJOINING THE SAME EASEMENT
THAT THEY WISH TO DISCUSS'
WHICH WAS INFORMATION THAT CAME
TO THE APPLICANT AFTER THE DECISION, AND POUND THAT THE PARCEL
MAP HAS NOT BEEN RFCORD,,�D, SET HEARING DATE FOR NOVEMBER 4,
1986, AT 11-00 A.M.
M S
Vote: l Y 2 Y O Y 4 Y 5 Y (Unanimously carried)
BOAAb Op' 5UPBRVTSOR8 MINUTES for 8dPi:04&er 16, 1986
ffiv.1a
January 8, 1987
-..........
—
North tar
Engineering
Civil Engineers • Planners • Surveyors
County of Butte
Department Of Public Works
7 County Center Drive
proville, CA ~5965
Gentlemet:
In reference to drainage facilities and drainage solutio
Subdivi8ion we have these statements; ns for Brinson
�• Per RS -7 road:
Adequate facilities and/or grading will be ;taken care of at
the time of the road construction which is covered by the
Letter of Credit from Tri—Counties Bank.
2• Per Conditions of Approval & Mitigation Measures,
'there is nota permanent rolution at this time. If final
slope/grade is toward Lott Road, the constructed road a
will divert runoff to roadside ditches. approach
east, a seepage rf slope is to the
pit will be constructed to prevent runoff
onto neighboring parcels. Construction costs of possible
seepage pit is covered by said Letter of Credit, r
facilities, such as culverts r
etc,, will Other
necessary, be installed
as
We
Proceed, these statements will be satisfactory to allot our:project P deet to
. RR: d
very truly yours,
NORTHSTAR BNGME91N'G
Rick Rodriquez
377 Conhors Court, Suifo 8
Chlco, `CA 06996
(918j A93»16G0
... - ffm tie Coun
IAfr rI 1'"kr+,d 4AL ! F � F
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
WILLIAM (Sill) CHEFF, Director
7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE . OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965
OtAie Co, Planning Gomm.
olophone (916) $34.4661
RONALD p, MOCLROY
NOV G 986
November 5, 1986 Depoty Ditoctor
orovlJle, Calitorida;
Raymond Brinson
Re: AP# 40-15-49
9496 Lott Road
Tentative Subdivision Map
.Durham, CA 95938
Dear Mr, Brinson:
At the regular meeting of the
Butte County Board' of Supervisors
held November 4, 1986, the
Board of Supervisor's upheld your
appeal of condition #3 and
replaced the condition to read,
"Construct full street section
on access road to RS-7 geomei.ric
standard. Construct public
road approach at intersection of access
road i�)d Lott: Road."'
All other conditions as approved
by the Advisory Agency remain the
same,
Should you have any further
questions regarding this matter, please
contact this office at your
convenience.
Very truly yours
William Cheff
Director of Public Works
feg
;Toho ,Nendonsa
Ag$lstant Director
a h
cc : iP� n Ting
L"nvirontnental Health
Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
NorthStgr tngineering,
877 Connors Court, Ste B, Chico, CA 95926
e
NOTICE OF DETERMINATIC9l��® APPENDIX x
TO: Office of Planning and Research FROM: Planning Detme'nC , EllD
1400
Tenth Street, Room 121 7 Count Ce ter Drive
Sacramento, CA 95814 orc+vibe, CA 95 � a p_ 2 3.
or
X County Clerk CIIANOR M. BECKE--R, County GlcA
County of Butte
SUBJECT: Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21108 or 21152
of the Public Resources Code,
85-04-16-03
jest Title AY E Name
Tentative.Subdivision Map AP 40-15-49 ,Raymond D: Brinson
State Clearinghouse [hum Contact Person Telephone Num , —r
(If submitted to Clearinghouse)
John Mendonsa, Public Works (916) 534-4266
Pi;DJect Location On the east side of Lott Road, approx, 1.200 feet north of
its intersection with Durham -Dayton Highway, Durham
ext Description
Tentative Subdivision Map dividing 5,3 acres into ;four parcels, one of 1,51 acres
and three of 1,28 acres each;
This 1s to advise that the Butte County Advisory A ency
l.ea Agency or Responsible le Agency '
has approved the above described project and has made the following determinations
regarding the above described project.-
1.
roject:1. The project will, will not, have a significant effect on the environment.
2.An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant
_...' to tho prewi sons of CEQA-
„X A !Negative Declaration was pit -1 ed fo fids ti;,,rc je�;t 1 tfQant to the
provisions of CEQA.
The ETR or Negative Declaration and record of project approval may be
examined at
Butte County Planning Department
4 7 County Center Dr:lvh. Orgville. r.n 95965
I Mitigation measures ..�L were, were not, marls a condition of the approval
of the project.
4• A 6tatement of Overriding Considerations; wase was not, adopted for
this project
Date Received for piling September 18'; 1985 w �
SigSigna
Stephen A. Streetex
Senior Planner
t r,►
Revised January .1985
k
r
P
Mitigation Measure Raymond D. Brinson, AP 4v-15-49
1. Provide a permanent solution to drainage, including, protection
of downstream and neighboring properties, and ins'toll the
required facilities•
Bt.ti:tO CQ rt,y Advisor, 9
1� tl�c_rsc,y
K' (IN Pl ann i ncy iii, r^Oc•Lor
L1a CT F?op orji an ]'�t�t��� � u� f�4�r-c�l Map
fOt' PcWmarrd Do ltr i
n �7n f1 4r'r_1 t.7 ,
proptis<..1 t
da. Vid� , °
crrd H,ilr"r tl 1;, 3t c1P X14 �. ,t»c? i t`1�rtr"
'irfeat��vi1 .4 r� t:.1m eat
1. �rr�--= ����r^� err. i �r-�r•.�r:�r� �_ .9c7r�a nt� � � y
I", OU'I�E�r. Oonrr'.Al' Plarw dc�r .ia� y ►.. nd ,�. �I -y, S`arth�rr~kr rr
�ptn t Chir- caCr1 tht� Y1►tt
i r crl z a. i t arJi r
.ate) « Inc �r^x� ��, �1r,�r� cul L �t.0 °c�1 It��
r�4kar r1 rstrwr firr�rrrnrttri `'idni1
Y Pl tn;4 fnr t.h�,
ccrry if Iwrar�Y :,onir►r r�rar^
or my mmrtrsi t..y�h � t�t�i�r ":a�trt y Cjonsrr.,�1 1 nr a✓ c-drrptQd or�
�r C1t tl r;r„1 jr�r to
QVji r9f„y ti11 1 43'eo l un fi9f' t alCr” n
7 xi PI t'wi dr?
ctr rylrt i n Pry til"'R.ixr Lf�'
rrMr:r st'Crsafrl wtitt� r1?j r�ry!ir° pl"c=tr:rc!, r.►diri f
h and
c �'=
Nor #.}r`�jt'zr L;rrti<<n°r' I rre.r
7',7 C.+�rtr�rrr L,r +tr i
i Ll
a
Butte Cr. Planning Comm,
.--, ...,.� JUN 61985
- � +Chbvllls, Calitorntn
ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF A.P. No.1'
4�0-x.5`.49 8c 40=,�,�,E1,
BUTTE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
By
James P. Manning
PROJECT DESCRIPT-ON; The archaeological survey covered
adjacent parcels of land, os3 two
acres,of land and the A.P. No. 40-15-49 covers a•5
proposed project is to divide the
Property ;into four parcels.. A.P.
1 coves
acres of land and the proposed project 4oi�to6dyvzde�^3 � 84
Property ins
to three parcels. the
PROJECT APPLICANTS: Del, E
HastitLn Raymond D, ,,
9476 Lott Road o nson
9
Durham, CA. 96 Lott R,au
PROJECT LOCATION: Durham, CA
The two properties are located adjacent to
the east side of Lott Road a
Of the intersection with PProximately 0.2.5 miles north
Properties are located in theaNEI of Se east of Durham,
R 2 E., Chico 4 of Section 29, Td 21 ,The
Quadrangle, 7..5' serles. N.
PRIOR DATA REVIEW. The archaeological, site record
Northeast Information Ce geological rhven-tor�1'es
maintained b the California Arch y,
any previously recorded cul'turaleresourcesdwere to dlocated
e if
Within, or adjacent to, the project areas. No
retarded cultural resources were located within or
to the project boundaries, ho wever, the nearest previously
site lies a � � adjacent
Ppro�imately one mile to the west. t recorded
DATE OF FIELD I'NSMCTi'ON May $; 1985
ENVIRONMENTAL SE;TTIIVG:
level agricultural area wi'ehp'nojectSareas lie within a
approximately 0.5 miles to the east of BuuteoCreeki
4o-15-49 contains two houses and a walnut orchard,
,4o-15-61A.P. No
co:ntains one house, a kiwi orchard and a walnut
No:
orchard. No surfaca water sources are located on either
r
SURVEY ,METHODOLOGY: The focus of the survey
inspection of the ground surface for materilt�aoraual
idcative of prehistoric or early historic actDrit features
survey was accomplished bar Walking a series of linear The
trah8e
cts
C�, bott �fdCoJ�°7 G�bQboC�d4�4°��Da��CJ�J _
r interval
covered
spacing over the entire area
with ed by both Prop,five mete
properties. Ground visibility was very
good on both properties prehistoric
features indicative I P ection
FINDINGS:
No materials or were observed during the inspection
or early historic ' c,tivity
of the two properties• ological
ended that archae
It is recomm areas
gECOMNIENDATZ01�5; both of the proper'.Y
clearance be granted for
described above°
in
James P. Ma Consultor t
Archaeology
4
,
' '' �t��a _ �' a ``— c�, {`•r
w
17
G , Cif 195 �✓^
W/Bp I I e°ter»a-: =.ce • c>=,y.: �.._.�' c,.,''�._,,;,✓ ` y
If// I�175
41
117
12
k¢� ria
{ W
ell/ri�. , e .:M ESA• ROAD
' • o • �•. I1.+' ; SCS p1
.� ,/// ,. excntt :::saa cm sen mnpe s:_dazvne: w: i - Itg�
�, (Ik�iaz•`xccVt: u:c kes
kq
,r, P� w azame unaanm�
4A
.160
cr
. i • • i o
�'�iµ I, a fif •
,
a • • t '`"o`""'� 0
`l •:: ' e 157so
n Du am
.. � _ � • ISS.,,!
BM
6153"
. `.. i
31
p� I"°'' aa. i ..rte•^^"' ` 147�atls.iifise'a .....,.,•, \
O ,
f �' 7 a• _-gym-'� ���,�p as •s
t3
`
144
.. •• M d4 ``�• ion "' a itlp ��_
f
�s
�^y 1 If \..NCi.$iil'l 8,0 M1.... • IHtCgIOA-O
y �y
4/ �V pLd°I°ht, �UY1VEY 1Vrp111HdA'tlN p. 4�' 1!1fi ESfi CION I.4Ml. (,���m �+ :.
Xta�wsv cps 121"45'
f M+LI rpt
ROAD CLASSWICATI0N �%
f OOVOLityLI 11►'titl'y t'`c",
= ey
Address 196 Memorial Way
Reply to Chico, California 95926
Iola hhonai 916l89.1_,r07_
Butte Co. Pfan"100 Poomnu
JUL 11, 1985
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
IJ 7 County Center Drive LJ 747 111hott Rood
orovllle, California 95965 Porodise, C011(orn,o loj +" +
Telephone: 916/534.4281 Tolophonai 916/872.2963, fixt, 58
Raymond Brinson Rn' Raymond kris►soil Parcel Hap
9496 Lott Road Lott. Road
Durham, California 959311 Durhin Area
APP 40-15-49
Dear fir. Bri rson`.
This department has advised the Butte Count), Department of Public
Works Land Dovelopment Section that we are prepared to act
on the above ajaplication.
Based on present information, we tan recommend approval or conditional
approval
hecommended Conditions for rjijarova
1 Provide an area for wells and 100 fact leachf'i.eld fret setbacl;
around diose areas on parcels 2 $ 3.
a 100
ld free
2, eitherewithin thetprope}rtyeor withine100cfeetotihd off theisting property1ls
boundaries:
S. provide the required usable sewage disposal area on each parcel.
Combine with ;111 adjacent parcel any Marcel not proven to contain
the usable sewage disposal area required by the Subdivision
Ordinance,
4. hither relocate the cxiswinr, sewago disposal systelii out of
proposed road casement setback or obtain approval of publIc
hrorks and the Health I)epartment for tjle systelit location,
H yoU have any questions r6garditng this Tetter, please contact
the Chico Off co between 8,00a.m. and 9:00 aart, week6ys.
Very truly yours
.f
Thomas Reid, 9.8.
Division of environmental Health
TR: j l
cc Public Works
Planning
Northstar Cilg hodrin
At7I'I:Nl)[X r
COUNTY 0B 111'1`I"
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST DORM
(to e Complete y bead Agency)
Log fl 85-04-16-03
AV 1t 40•-15-49
I , BACKG
1. Name of proponent ___Raymond D.
2. Address of proponent and representative (if, applicable)
9496 Lott Fuad NorthSr Enc --•
Durham, CA 95938 377 CunoXA-JC tit Su.ii:e—B.,
"-" - Chico C- A�95926 ..,
3, Project dcscrr.ptian Ten_�tatve Subdivi-�-:..on..Map.....
SI,, 1`IAN11AT0R1 FINDTNcaS Cp 5lCN1rTCANCI
v __ L.�
a. DOC, the p'ro.icot have the potential to degrade kite
duality of tine envir'onmerit, substantially reduce
the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause it
fish or wildlife population to drop below self-
sustaining lovels, threaten to eliminate a plant or
animal community, reduce the number or restrict the
r
range of a rare oendangered plant or animal or
eliminate important examples of the major periods X
of California history or prehistory'?.- -�-- ----
b sloes the project have the potential to achieve
5hort�term benefiti to the detriment of long-term,
envinnmental goals? (A short-term impact an the
envi onmor.t is one which occurs in a r of atively
brie iod of time while long-term impacts will
end:u to the fUture , )
c, hoes the project have impacts which are individu-
ally limited, but Cumulatively considerable? (A
project may impact On two or more separate resources
Where the impact an each resource is relatively
small., but Where the effect of the total of thaw
Impacts on the environment is significant.) � _ —�--
d, hoesthe prOiLlct hark° onvirortmental effects which
rustlrc�t'sd�vor'se cfi`ets on htrnrrrn
beings, ectly rr indirectly?
Il, lli:artIDtlNkl,ON ('ro 'Ile e()mI)Ivtod by the k,rel Agency)
ern the basis Or tills Initial "rlllati()n;
i/n, find thu Benita a(llir!r ,. A`rlVlCOULD
t)Ii AllATt0Nawill berpreplredl
"
On the env i ro�nment , �tzt< <
I tVli firtcl that ale envlthe ir•onmcirt' therelrw llcnotobeC'ahave
significantfiy
cant o rfeet ort tl c
effect in this case because the l•f1'I'IGATTON I`tLASU>7tS described on
theattilched sheot have been aided to tine project. A NUGAT VII
OKI,
ARA"C ON will Ire pre;7aredw
1 r proposed project MM have a Si,�nifitant offect. on
/iVI: rind tilt_
IMPACT IlPPOIZT is 'required'
tile r:nvruntnottt; nncl an CNV'tt2Crlvl`II:N'rAl,
rx� "�ell htl'ri'I,, plIANNI'NG NPAtM11INT
bay �. Hi.ransmiis
AA��V,'( iftte- P15pnelt
Ravi.ewed by.' �
IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMTS
xp anations o• all "yes" and "waybe" answers are required
on attached sheet(s))
1. EARTH: Will the proposal result in significant; YES
a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in
geologic substructures?
b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or
overcovering of the soil?
C. Change in topography ar ground surface
relief features?
d. Destruction, covering or modification of any
unique geologic or phys cal features?
e. Increase in wind or water erosion of soils,
either on or off-site?
f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach
sands, or changes in siltation deposition
or erosion which may modify the channel of
a river or stream or the bed of theae
c an ox
any bay, inlet or lake?
g. Loss of prime agriculturally productive soils —"
outside designated urban areas?
h. Exposure of people or property to geologic
hazards such as earthquakes5 landslides, mud-
slides, ground failure or, similar hazards?
Z, A'IR. Will the proposal result in substantial;
F—. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient
air quality?
b. The creation of objectionable odors, smoke
or fumes?
c Alteration of air movement, moisture, or
temperature, or any change in climate,
locally or regionally?
3. WATER. Will the proposal result in substantial:;
a. Changes in currents, or the, course or
di'rect;ion of water movements in either
-
marine or fresh waters?
bi Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns,
or the rate and amount of surface runoff?
C* Need for off-site surface drainage improve-
ments) including vegetation removal, channel,
ization or culvert installation?
d: Alterations to the course or flow of flood
waters
e. Change in the amount of surface water in any
water body?
f. Discharge into surface waters, or in any
alteration of surface water quality, includitg
,- bttt not limited to temperature, dissolved
oxygen or turbidity?
g. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow
of ground waters?
h. Change in the quantity of ground waters,
either through direct additions or with-
drawals, or through. interception of an
aquifer by cuts or excavations?
is Reduction in the amount of water otherwise
available for public water supplies?
. Exposure Of people or property to water
related hazarda such as f-loodi:ng?
MAYBE No
X c -
X,
kC
yES MASE
Na
T Will the proposal. result, in substantial*
4. PLANT LIFE, species, or number
of
a. ange in the diversity trees,
of any species of plants (including
�{
shrubs, grass, crops) and aquatic plants)?
of the numbers of an7r unique, rare
X
b. Reduction
species of plants? -----
or endangeredspecies plants into an
c. introductionnew barriertotheonomal replenish-
x
a°f
area, or in
Ment of existinb species?
c�.
of any agriultural crop?
d, Reduction in acreage
proposal result in substantia
5, ANIMAL LIFE, Will the numbers
diversity of speciesland
a.f C ange in the animals
of any species of animals (birds,
shell f sh,,
(-
including reptiles, fish and _
insects)?
benthic, organisms or ue, rare
the numbers of. any uniq
�(
r ;eduction in r an�.mals? -
or endangered species ox
speciesof an into
C. introduction of new , to the migrationC
result In a barrier
an area, Or .�
or movement of animals? fish or wildlife
to existing ._..—
d,
.Deterioration
habitat?
Will the proposal result in substantial;
6, NOISE. levels? --
----
as~,rexistingncTeases in existing noise
of people to severe noise levels?
b. Exposure
LIGHT AND CLARE, Will the proposal produce
"�
7, fare?
sxgn� a�cant light and g
g, LAND USE. Will, the proposal result in a
the p resent or planned
X
fustantial alteration of J..
land use of an area?
NATURAL RESOU�S - Will the proposal result in
s stantalt
in the rate of use of any natural
a, Increase
resources?
b. Depletion of any non-renewable natural f .r
resources?
14, RISK ilk UP5:iT. Will the proposal involve!
- explosion Or the release of hazard-
d to,
a. A Tis o p
ous substances (including, but not limited
radiation) the
'.+�.
oil, pesticides; chemicals or
or upset corlda ,
event of an accident eneys?
b. Possible interference with an emerg lap?
evacuation p
response plan or emergency
Will the proposal alter the location,
ll+ POPULATION, rate of the human
j st-fibutIbn, density) or growth
_ .
Population?
y:en ,housing,
hoiing?
IOU5ING. Will the proposal affect ous in
or create a demand for additional
f
YES
MAYBV NO
13.
TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Will the proposal
result in:
a.. Generation of substantial additional vehicle
movement?
X c
b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or
demand for new parking?
c. Substantial impact on existing transportation
systems?
d. Significant alterations to present patterns
of circulation or movement of people and/or
goods?
X
e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic?
f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, `-`-'
-
bicyclists or pedestrians?
f<G
14.
PUBLIC SERVICES, Will the proposal have an effect
Up—on, or result in as need for new or altered
governmental services:
ai Vire protection?
XC -
b. Police protection?
C. Schools?
X G
d.. Parks or ether recreational facilities?
X G
e. Maintenance of public facilities, including
roads?
X c
f. Other governmental services?
-
15..
ENERGY: Will the proposal result in
a. Use of substantial, amounts of fuel,or energy?
b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing
sources of energy, or require the development
of new sources of energy?
16.
UTILITIES. Will the propsal result in a need for
new systems, or substantial alterations to the
following:
a. Power or natural gas?
b. Communications systems?
c. 'Yater availability:..�.
d Sewer or septic tank?'
--
G. Stoxm water drainage?
f Solid waste and disposal?
17,
HUMAN HEALTH. Will the proposal result in
a. Creatio7a of any health hazard or p atential.
health hazard (excluding meatal health)?
bo EXPOsure of ppcple to potential health
hazards?
18
AESTHETICS, Will the proposal result in the
obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to
the public, or will the proposal result in the
creation of an aesthetically offensive site open
to public Griew`?
_A-
YES
MAYBE NO
19., RECREATION. Will the proposal result in, an impact
upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational
opportunities?
--
20. CULTURAL RESOURCES.
a. Will the propnsl result in the alteration
of or the destruction of a prehistoric or
historic archaeological site?
b. Will the proposal result in adverse physical
or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or
historic building, structure or object?
c, noes the proposal have the potential to cause
a physical change which would affect unique
ethnic: cultural values?
d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious
or sacred uses within the potential impact
area?
X
V, DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AP 40-15-44
See attachment
i,
AP 40-15-49
Qy3b1n; Constractioi of toads, drivoways and preparation of building
sites will lead to a compaction and ovpraovering of the soil. The
reGvlt may he an increase in storm runoff which may require Of -site
warfare drainage improvements in the form of ditch clearing or culvert
installations. The Department of Public Works will require a
permanent solution to storm drainage, and unless those conditions are
imposed, significant impacts t j heilz Goring -properties could occur.
1g: Approximately 4 acres of walnut orchards will be effectively
removed from swahomic production due to this project. Considering
surrounding development and difficulties involving economical.
operation of the existing orchard sizes, this is not expected to be a
significant loss.
I h : All of Butte County is within a Modemts Earthquake Intensity
Zone VITI. The subject property is located approximately S y, as
northeast of a possible fault location running through the tow; rites
Y Dayton and Nelson and approximately 3 miles southwest of the
Foothill Shear !one which supported the 1975 Oroville Earthquake.
Construction a+ homes to Uniform Building Code standards +or
seiGmical ly active areas should provide adequate protection to
residents in case of seismic activity.
Q: The entire area is subject to periodic localized flooding due to
Yarm water runoff Providing a permanent solution to drainage
pursuant to the Department of Public Works rt Krementz should
alleviate any potential impacts. See also itoms in and 3b1c.
4dt Soo item 1g.
SalcJs This project, along with other similar projects in the area,
will roprosunt an incremental increase in traffic generated onto Lott
Road and to other major collectors in the area. Duey' to the smail
amounts of traffic being generated, any impact% are not o"pocted to be
substantial.
10 Though not signUicant, this project will represent an
Incremental inti in's in demand +or public in ta rural area.
2( A: "n -ie subject property is located in an area of high
archaeological sonsitivityr An Archaeulaginal zurvoy i% roqnirad in
ardor to determine if significant archaeological nitro egi%& on the
property, and if so to develop appropriato mMqation measures.
Appetdik V - Page 6
�1
SUGMSTED_MjT7gATION —MEASURES AP 40-15-49
1. Provide a permanent solui'ticn to drainage :,nd solve any drainage
problems an Lott Road affecting the :property as wall as downstream
problems resulting From the property.
2, Mitigation measures may be required regarding archaeological
sensitivity. An archaeological survey is necossary in order to
determine i -F significant archaeological artifacts are presunty and,
,f sol appropriate mitigation measL.res must be adopted
DRFI:1 kt
Appendik V' w rage 7
Applicant; Raymond D. Brinson
�f Assessor's parcel
Log # 85-11-34-16-o:3
DATA SHEE1
an
i« Type of project: Tentative Subdivision Map
2. Sri.ef Description: Dividing 5.35 acres into four.
Of 1,, 51 acres and three of 1.28 acres, each. parcels, one
. Location On the east side of Lott �taad approximately
f eot north of its i Otersecti on with Durham-Dayton Highway, 1. t c
the Durham area. in
4• Proposed Density of Development,
5. Amount of Impervious Surfacin
6. Access and Nearest Pttbl i c g' 1�7 to 15i;
Lott gioad Coad ts) ; Existing parcel fronts on
7. Method Of Sewage Disposal:
a.Source of Water Supply:individ►,tal septic systems
9. Proximity of �'oweri,nes: ndivitdual wells
1wj« er landTdivisionsgand�ideveXooperty
Potential for furth
under- oxi.sting Zoning pmonta None
,��etti.ng
�'hys%�al ��r�vf ranm�nt�,
I* Terrain
a'« General Topographic Character: fiat valley Rands
b • Slopes. t:a to 2I
Elevations Appro;timately i6o feet ASL_
d« Limiting Fartors: bone
2. Soil%
a« Types. and Characteristics,
feet thick and a saubzurf acO l ayeraWi th��irdece layer 21 to
t
more -feet of rich brawn joapth of 6 or
b« Limiting �•a4.torzh None M.
�. Naturi 3l Ha-ards of tl7e Land
a« Sari;hquare xaner Moderate tEartnquako Xntensity Zone VIII
b* Erasion l'otenti a1 g None
CR Landslide Poten,ki al None
d Fire Hazard,. Unclassified
e Expansive Sail potential: Moderate
Appendix r t�)
AP 40-15-
4. Hydrology
A. Surface Water: None an-I'te
b. Ground Water; Abundant Nalley aquifers
t- Drainage CharacteristITSA Land drains generally to the
South to roadside dieche5
d. Annual Rainfall Kormal)t 24 to 26 inches per year
eo Limiting FActorst ""m drainage facilities are minimal,
and loval ijed floo,ng does occasionally occur.
54 Visual/Scenic Quality; righ
6. Acoustic Quality: High
7, Air "'Aality: High
0- Vegetation: Orchard linds aid kiwis
9, Wildlife Habitat: smal, birts and animals common to orchard
habitats
10. Archaeological and Hintorical Resource, 4M the area: High
sensitivity area
it- Butte County
Aglitultural"RGenees0entiral pitalh dusignationt policies Odicato
12. Extisting Zoning-.
1xistino Land Uso on -sites 1 single
WaWt orchards family dwelling and
14. Surrounding Area:
ak Land Usest OrchaNds in similar uzaool single family
dwellings at rural densities.
b. Zoning: SR -i. and A-5
t- Gen. Plan designatiompt Agricultunal-Rosidential and
Orchard and Fiat Cropig
d. parcel Sizes: 1 to $ a" Parcels along Lott Road, 30 to
50 acre Parcels to the east
0. population; Rural dam4itins
it. Character of Site and Area; Agricultural orchard lands
K, Nearest Urban Area; Chico
R01MY*Mt Spheres of Imfluonawn None
"Movements Standard% Urban Area: No
194 rive "hecti0h Servicet
a. Nearest County (State) Fire Station; Durham Station 445
bo Water Availabililyt Fire tanker and wells only
20- Schools in Area: Ou"ham Unified School District
Appendix V (b)
"td
} •
G
l 1 tt
Al
Ay V„n
Y
Y 7!
”' �`'"'.
5'
W Y
f
w oV
451
"
tp ��.. .. .
•Yy
IOACt :1 a /.'. t gyp � � d'V '. • �. y
+W A it S,
L
Tr SY fAVE- - A.f93
55��
74
�l
ca 0w .
n, Y r 10203
to
.r�'Jw
• � ",'
M �Yw A 240.0 aQia .
4 . ✓' al J R s
„
6 07
wy
�.. *L Air fir 704 Z
SRINII A, LAN
SIP
y
1
57 7S
Y
ALMOVO "t W t°T.,
r..�
r `': °
„... a ,it t � 41„39
"
0 D I V I d d MAS
Aw' '
O�N'�,� 6? 4'd AtI rr'64)a �� k
!{hllip r"?+�"���i•'3'a
,' � � �l.+a<.,.�����L....iY-�..4�'i.'.+ .v._. _ �v. �� wa...4,a...+:..F-,4.:++++.�:. ...:..:-..,....__....,...,�._..,.r.+n-...+y..rww u+::•mar.n,.--aar...w+.+:w�:«....r�.+xa�s- ....r_.,.ws., wlr r«xn.ky.--u+1.r++.+a.r..w.r,iL+rwm.p� ., '�>aa.o..r�w.uw..
County lot
1,955
�...., _
•
f
,, ry
{t