HomeMy WebLinkAbout040-150-0611'
I. PLANNING COMMISSION SUMMARY SHEET FOR LAND RXtVISION5
APPLICANT Del E. Hastan
85-04-16-02
ADDRESS 9476 Lott Road, Durham, CA 95938
OWNER Same
PROTECT DESCRIPTION Tentative Parcel Map dividing 3,8 acres intoatwo°
parcels, one at
146 acres and two at 1.1 acres
LOCATION On the east side of Lott Road, a
pProx. 1050 feet north of its
with D._�ham-Dayton tHi hH� Durham area,
i[1tG'Y$ecti02'i "
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS) 40-15-61
ZONING SR -1 SENG Policies indicate
. PLAN pg_RPc PROJECT CONSISTENT?
DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED
_ Ene.:. NorthSf ar E'noineerinQ 377__Con vnrr r --i. v.,_ _
DATE PUBLICATION NOVICE WRITTEN PUBLISHED
PLACE NEWSPAPER NOTICE(S) PUBLISHED •- C. C. P» G,, B.
DATE MAILING LIST PREPARED
DPTE MA,I.L"OUT NOTICES WRITTEN MAILED
NUMBER:
DATE PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT PREPARED
ENVIRO.,W T'AL CATEGORICAL EX MPTION DATE E
FILEDDETERMINATION
.AND DATENEGATIV8 DECLARATION DATE ADOPTED
MITIGATED NE3ATIVE DECLARATION DATE ADOPTED �}`,-/�•""
ENV, IMPACT EPORT M DATE CERT IF18I)
SUBy COMMITTEE MEETING DATE 8q`}
ADVISORY AGENCY HEARING DATE
ALV180RY AGENCY ACTION ,► --
BOARD ACTION
COMMENT'S
fit r t: r• . K _ ..,« , _ � 1! < C. �'.0'e* b_
7. Del. Hastain, AP 40-15-61, 3 parcels on the east side OP Lott Rd. a
1.050 ft. + north of its ,intersection with Durham Dayton Hwy. Durh ppxox
area. NorthSt�ar £n�ineering t am
OFEN
Myles Pustejovsky had no problems
Mr. Mendonsa said that the drainage consideration is the same as on the
Raymond Brinson Tentative
Subdivision.
Rr. Streeter said that there is only one mitigation about drainage
The other one is no ;Longer needed.
Mr. Reid stated: having reviewed the environmental review checkl.igi and
the Planning Direct Report of Aug, 30, 1985, and the converaoti,or t' ab.
this meeting, i Will make a motion to grant a to ttgated negative declaration
of environmental -impact for the Del Haatain parcel Map to create 3 parcels
on AP 40-15-61 finding that the project cuuld have an effect on the
environment, but will not have a significant effect in this case provided
the required mitigation measure is complied with, That mitigation measure
is mitigation measure #1 as listed within the Planning Director's iieport
of Aug. 30, The motion is made noting that the project is in conformance
With the Butte County General Flan and Butte County Zoning Motion
seconded by Mr. Streeter and carried unanimously,
Mr. Reid stated: noting that a negative declaration was adopted this
date, 1 will make a motion to approve the parcel map of Lel.Hastain to
create 3 parcels on AP 40-15-61, Approval is subject to the following
co.naitions:
i°,abl,ic Works cenditionwR
1. Verify .legal: access.
2, Provide two-way traversablo UCCOss RS -8 -LD -11 4o each parcel, i'r0. a
county maintained road or ;tate highway,
3, Access to be reserved in deeJ3 ao per caunty ordinance rariQ offered for
dedication on the final map,
4i 5how 50 ft, building, setback line Measured from centerline of access
easement,
5- Provide road maintenance agreement,
6, XtIdicate a 50 ft building setback from the centerline of Lott Road,
7, Show all easements of record on the final map,
8. Provide street name signs
Works prior to recordattionper of theuiremets finalnmapof the De �tmeit of i'ubl c
9• Provide permanent solution for drainage.
10. Ptiovi,de cul -de -.sac at the; end of the street.
adequate sight distance at Lnters�.ct on oStaf rc' road ai pr..°:�ieh
11. Obtain encroachment permit and r
the i.ntersectian. of accE,;s road Providing
d at'1!] Lott Road,,
12, Pay any delinquent; taxes Or current taxes as requi�-ert..
Health Dept. conditions:
13. Provide an area for wells
100 ft, leachfield ''rce seLbuCk ara,znc3
those areas en parcels 2 3
14. Provide a 1gt7 ft. leachfield free setback around ex.istir,g wells
Within the proP'Yrby or within loo ft. of the p ro.� k either
ter �.,undr�i:ies .
15: Provide "he required usable sewage dispru;al aren, on each paxec;l; C
with an adjacent' parcel any parcel not proven + o,lbine
disposal area required by the Subdivision Orditjt%ce. r: thy, usable s wage
16. Locate an if necessary relocate the sewage d.is,pc.aal sysf,em CP-rvins the
existing dwelling onto its respective parcel;
The following mitigation measure is also required;
1 Pr_.vide a permanent solution to drainage, includ'n
pon
and ne'.ghboring properties, and install the requ-redfacili,tier�of .down;;tream
Motion seconded Lby Mr. Streeter and carried aflan,mauSly,
w;1
A
y .rZ .,. �
cit
LAND Ot NATURAL WCntIIF AND BRAUi
a ?�
DEPARTMENT OF PUOLIC WORKS
N WILLIAM (Lill) CIjrr.,'I', blraCtor
i7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE . OROVIL.LG, CALIFORNIA 95965
Telephone; (916) S3,1,j6.11
RONAI.D D, McELRDe
Deputy Director
:., .. :, September 1,( 1935
Del Hastain
9476 Lott Rd. RE: AP 40-1 -61
Durham, CA 95938 Tentative parcel Map
Sear Mr. l asta n
At the regular meeting of the Butte County Advisory Agency held
on September and
1n85
declaration and , the agency granted a mitigated negative
referenced approved the tentative parcel map on the above
property subject to the conditions Listed on the
attached sheet,
If 110 appeals are timely Piled�-.-within ten (ld) days of the
date OP the Advisory Agency's approval --with the Clerk of the
Board of Supervisors, this action Will be final.
When the conditions of approval are complied with, it will be rz
order for you to file your. "final map„ With the 8utte Comity .Depti
of publ-c Works for recordation within twenty -fray ( 4) months of" the
late of appvcVal by the Advisory Agency.
Lf YOU have any question„ regarding this, matter, p].eaw,� tw
Office. contact this
Very truly yours,
William ch €rff
Dirr�ntur of Fiab.l,ic Works
d ",M.dn ,
A siatant Director
attachment
cc planning
Health
WorthStar Engineering
Del
E. Hastain, TIsNTATIVg .,i I MAP; 3 parcels oro the east side of Loa t
' 'Road,
approx. 105^ ft. r:orth t-,2 its intersection with Durham-Daytori Il'wy.
Durham
area.
AP
40-1$-61
Engineer:
Xorth5tar Engineering
Public
Works conditions
Ii
Verify legal access.
�P,
Provide two-way traversable access RS-$-LI?-11 to etacr: parcel from ra
cb-,-duty maintained road or state highway.
3.
Access to be reserved in deeds as per county ordinarlcie and offerod Vnr
dedication on it -. final map.
4.
cS:,ow 50 ft building setback line measured from centor.i.`tnQ Of accass
easement.
5,
Provide .road ma .nte:rin.oe agreement,
6.
undicate a 50 ft building setback from the curiterline of Lott Road.
'ri
how all easements of rr.cr',rd ori the final ::-ap.
8i
1'r-ivide street nam(,, signs per regUireMt!r.t'.: ,AC the, i)op,jrtment, of i•ublic
Wurko. prior to rec zil ation of the final wip.
9.
Provide permanent -ilution for dr:ain3ge.
10.
Pr:)vile c:,i1.-de-oae 3t the end of the strFeeti
Ili
Obt iir, encroachment permit and vonstriiet :�tandnrd rr X+l :approach providing
adequate sight die.tarcie at the intev8ecti zn ",f ,Iviceon r-ad rani Lotto Ho-J.
Pay any delinquent t axe::7 or current to;,.uo Bio r.quirr,d .
Health adept. conditions
13.
Provide an ar,..,o for will, and 100 ft, 1.},i�,,idaeld �°r, 7�: c.ei,bacJt. ori ' fll
tho e area8 on Parcels w and 3,
l41
.Provide a 100 ft. leachfi,eld free setback around exiting welly either
within the Property car within 100 ft. of the prupert,y boundaries.
'15,
Provide the required usable sewagti dispo al area carr each parcel. Comb.Lne
with an adjacent parcel any parcel not proven to coritain the usable sawagp
disposal, area recused by the 8ubdivis on 0rdaiiance,
16.
torate :arl if necesoary relocate the oew,` ge diaposail ser'+Jqg, tide
existing dwelling onto its respective parcel.
Ui.i
following miti.gration mensurc is al,s,- rc d..iz'rd
1 .
Provide a Permanents solution to drainage, irioluding protection of down tream
and neighboring propertios, and install the rorluired rapilitiea.
�T
TO:
or
X
SUBJECT.-
Ni
NOTICE OF DETERMINAYN nPPLtruxX ►`i
" �
a Era ,0D
0
Office of Planning and Research FROM: P�nunin e1400 Tenth Street, Room 121 Pnrement7ont Center_Dr _t'
Sacramento, CA 55814 "�—
Otovlle, --CAJ.-
County Clerk ELEANOR K 8ECKH Cour' Clerk
County of Butte N
8Y A. 1�1'INCH . Cay pL4'/
Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21105 or 21152
Of the Public Resources Code.
t'o ect Titli AP # 85-04-16-02
Name
Tentative Parcel Map AP 40-15-61 Del H. Hastain
tate C earing-fj�use Num Contact Porson Telephone Num r
(If submitted to Clearinghouse)
Piiiject LocationJohn 'Mendonsa, Public Works (916) 554-4266
_.
On the east side of Lotti Road, approxi 1050 feet north
of its intersect ion kith Durham -'Dayton Highway, Durham
ject Description Tentative Parcel Map dividing 3.8 acres into threearcels
one of 1.6 acres and (LWO of 1.1 acres each P' '
This is to advise that the tut:te County
Adviser Agency
a ppro �v. Lea Agency or Respond le Agency
d the above described project and has made the :`ollowing determinations
regarding the above described projects
I. The project , will, . ! will not, have a significant effect on the environment.
2. An Environmental Im
pact Report was prepared for this project pursuant
to the provisions of CEQA.
3..
A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the
provisions of CEQA,
The EIR or Negative Declaration and record of project approval may be
examined at;
13utte CoWity _Planning Department
...........
7 County Ce toe .1).e"ive, 0
Mitigation measures were
r
of the project. , -were not, made a, condition of the approval
4 A statement of Overriding Consldera'�Ions
this project. wast ,X was nit, adopted for
Date I2ecev!ed for Filing 9/18/8S
5igr�at " o R. -
Stephen A, Streeter
Senior Planner
Title—
Revised j�inuary 19►$5
Mitigation Measure - Del Hastain, AP 40-15.61
1, Provide a permanent solution to drainage, including protection
of downstream and neighboring properties, and install the required
facilties
n
�• R . _ ! I
A':
i �11-�
,I it
I'
�k
I;
tt
rrlt t"-Y.l,tt C uunty i" dvi. airy Agt�nr4
Fr,'t`ihlc �'].��r�tYin�,� l��rr;r°��►�
`;,t.JrAJrm'r; Report. cin
for Dol. E« AP 4(s -1,9—e
TtTi u a t, a proposal to di ., � -wcc r es!, into 1-hree �„a►~ R r51, �, n care at I «
ac.' cap-. tAnd two at 1.1 ;-jrrI0-5 eacri. The, pT eswrti'i• zoj,j%pfl SCt_l (SUhlli'ttart
rr- pkrrc:l.) « The, Land Lts i�"1rawY MAP (4tt t~+u
t r�r Y"r3l l Tri d Y mates this "r oa O.s Agrir--kA,tural rOT'7. dvnti ctl tpal i,r i c:
a,nc,licat )« Th erv rr:, rice p n:.i3°3. r�r t,ra►rimr_trY3t,y plMY►,� °iur the area,
Thrz proposal sal doo-- not con f l a: cut w i tt, r QLI,n k, y : qni nq wnr arty adopto:d or
pr,. TtTr � d r 1 �mE rT (l; t hV' EkUttCb i' CAAnt+y Oe.rier a1 Plan nt,)r aw,, 'CrauYrtty,
�-*IJCMA'Fir ON' communi-i.y plan.
o thf °Fo11owi nq mi tie jt,a.cawi nY r,Y:tiF :
t'ta 4 � c;��a [.- ,ti,��r�Y l its �G�iAr► Ez
t « t;'r°e:a� i,ri + t; t t�k'+ir► tY�reY '~rlt:lk:a r c k.G d Y9 rt Yr; >� i r� kr.tt►i.n�;t pr•ofi —ri:i e►rY rxt+
�el� �rY P't+•+eYr►1 c�nY:t t'lt.?7 i � t�1C71"] IiC� j:jY'.C:lpeC``ti e o, Lint', i l'Y's:+'t;f411 ' -he r-kqu:l.r(: d
rr Nor',[tcbar Fri FirYf.!�vr• i r°iq
177 Connors 1�,ciurt, bl"utv� 1.4
91,'02
AV MW
4 1 %
NorthStar
Engineering
Civil Engineers • Planners • Surveyors
August 13, 1985
County of Butte
Planning Department
7 County Center Drive
Oroville, CA 95965-3397
Attention; Dave Hironimus
Re; Hastain-$ririson Tentative Maps, AP 40-15-49 & 61
Tog #85-04-16-02 & 03
Dear Dave;
On behalf wf our I,i,ents, we wish to express our concern to the suggest*A,
mitigation measure to the drainage problem by your Department.
The existing drainage flow is to the northwest. There exists no driveway
or private road culverts. The existing Lott. Road is constructed on a
built-up road section and ther,� exists no roadside ditch in this location.
Therefore, we request that we offer no mitigation measure to this concern,
but we be allowed to review this matter with Public Works and work out
an equitable solution with them; this could then be a condition of approval
from Public Works on the tentative map approval:
If w4 can be of any .further assistance to this matter
office at your earliest conveftience, � please contact this
Very truly yours,
NORTHSTAR ENGINPRRING
My1�s L. Pust;ej v� y
MLP: d
au9fo Co. PlanningJUN 6
Gin
IC
DIP
Urovi1140 Ceiifornlq
ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF A. P. N �'~�
NO. �0-1
BUTTE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA S~4� 4015_61 P
By
James P. Manning
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The: archaeological
adjacent parcels o1 land, survey covered two
acres 'of land. and the A.F. No . 40-1.5-49 covers 5.
into Four Proposed
Property P"oj'ect is to divide the
acres of l Parcels, A.P. Tdo. 40_l r
and arri the proposed project is 5 61 covQ1's 3.84
P�''Gperty into three parcels.
divide the
PROJECT APPLICANTS: Del E
Hastian
9476 Lott Road
Durham
Raymond i.7d Brinson
CA 9496 Lott Road
PROJECT' LOCATION; Durham, CA
the east side of The two Properties are located adjacent to
Lott Road approximately of the intez^section with y 0.2� m� l es north
properties are located in thearn 1i way, east of
R. 2 L. , Chico N , Of Section 29, T. 81 N. The
�2uadrangle, 7,5' series.
PRIOR DATA. RE
maintained b VIEW' The archaeological site record files
Y the California Archaeology
ical Northeast Information Center were consulted TnVentory
anY previously recorded cultural resources we
Within, or adjacent to to deocated if
recorded cultural resources wereelnca�dstvit r` located
L the j No previously
Pro'Oct boundaries, however, the nearein,recordedadcent
site lies approximately one inile to the west.
b�=TE OF FIELD ZNSPEGTI`ON May 8,, 1.98
ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING: �
lOVel agricultural area within the
pro 'ect areas lie within a
4pproximatOly 0.5 miles to the cast
Soi'r13uttooCrcok y►
4O -1S-49 contains two houses an,d a wof
40-1 orcherd,' A.P. No
5-61 contaIlls one house, a kiwi or and a walnut
No.
orchard; No surface Water sources are located on
Property,, alt�ut
either
SURVEY METHODOLOGYr
-Inspection o the The focus of the survey was arir;ual
indicative of ground surface far maters. l.s ar k'ea•tures
serve prehistoric or early historic activit
Y was accomplished by walking � Yi Tile
a seraea of linhar transects
r;
-2-
With a .five meter interval spacing over the entire area
covered by both properties. Ground 'visibility was vevy
good: on both properties.
FINDTNGS: No materials or features indicative of prehistoric
or early historic activity were observed during the inspection
of the two properties.
RECOMMENDATIONS; It is recommended that archaeological
clearance be granted for both of the property area;
described above.
James F. Manning
Archr,eology Consulta �,\t
1985
r u�Co
r �
e, ortalq
row 1 lif
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
Address i_7 196 Memorial Way d 7 County Center briva L1 747 Eliiolt Rood
Reply to Chico, California 95926 Orovillo, California 95965 Paradise, California 9$969
To aphono: 916/991«2727 Telephone-, 916/534.4281 Telephone; 916/872.2961, Ext, 58
July 17., 1.985
Do! E. Hastain RE; Del Hasta:in Parcel Map
9476 Lott Road Lott. Road
Durham California 95938 Durham Area
Arg 40-15-61.
Dear Mr. 11astaint
This department has advised the Butte County Department of Public
Works Land Development Section that wto are prepared to act
on the above application.
4ased on present information we can recommend approval or
conditional approval.
Recommendod Conditions foY.Approyal_.
1. Provide an area for wells and 100 toot leach Field free setback
around those areas on parcels 2 & 3
2. Provide a 100 fo,)t leachfieid free setback around existing
wells either within the property or within 100 :feet of the
property boundaries
3. Provide thy; required u;;abl.e Sewage disposal area on cath
parcel. Combine with an adjncent parcel any parcel not
proven > to contain the usable sewage disposal area required
by the Stihdivi si.on nz-d.inance.
4 Locate and if recess;try, re-locate the sewage rlisposal
system I-orving 'Circ oxisting divolling onto ats TeSpWL-AVO
Parcel,
II' you have: piny questions regarding this letter, 1lluase
contact the Chico Office or rnvironmontal Health between S;OQ a;m.
and 9= a,m, wockdays fit the above address and phone number,
Sinca�oly,
Thomas Reidy R.S.
lAvision of C-nvi.rormental floolth
TR .1
ecI Public Woi°ksl Land Dovelr.11ilticnt
Plaiming Department
North ter Enginrerin
APPRNWX I
COUN'T'Y OF Bui rF,
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
(to be completed y Lead Agency)
1,09 11 85-04-10-02
I. BACKGROUND AP 40-15-61
1.. Name of proponent i
Z. Address of proponent and representative (if applicable)
9476..i.ott Roan _- N.o.rth'Star.- Fag
Durham C_,A,95938 -,. .. X17 S�n119s�s9t!7`,
-- Chico, CA 95926 -.„....
5. Project description Tentative_ Parcel Ma
II. MANDATORY FINDINGS Or SIGNIFICANCE YES i`1AYBE NO
a, Does the project have the potent•i:al ' o degrade the
duality of the environment, substant°.ally reduce
the habitat of a 'fish or wildlife species, cause tr
fish or wildlife population to drop below self-
sustaining ining levels, threaten to eliminate a pliant or
animal community, reduce the number or restrict the
range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or
eliminate important examples of the major periods
of California history or prehistonr? X
b, 'floes the project have the potential �o achieve
short-term benefits to the detriment of long-term,
environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the
environment is one whichoccurs in a relatively
brief period of time °,h 1e long-term impacts will r
endure into the futt,re,)
c, Coes the project have impacts villich are individu-
ally limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A
project may impact on two or more separate resources
where the impact on each resource is relatively
small, blit where the effect of the tota? of those
impacts on the environment is significant,)
d, hors the project have environmental effects which
will cause substantial ad',worse effects on human
he*inns, tither directly or indirectly;' ,X
III ,
DETERMINATION (To he; completed by the wad Agat),cyI
on the baw is of this :initial uvaluartion
I/M' find the pa�oposad pro lect COULD NOT have a gi,gnificant effect
(in the env i ronmen,t , and a kI?f;xmirI; ii cLAitATION will be prepared.
1/10' find that although the proposed proect could have a signifi-
cant effect on the environment, there will not bea significant
effect in this casebecause the MITIGATION MHA5URnS described on
the attached sheet have been added to the project, A NCCATIYF
DECLARATION will he prepared,
l/WH find the proposed project NIM have a significant effect on
the: environmelit, and an H.M1RONNIiNTAI, IMPACT RP.PORT Is required.
May 9,1„ 1985 LL MUN"Y (ti IIUTTPI PLANNTNG DHPARTMV.NT
. r
David R,., iiironinlus
Associ fie, Planne
Reviewed by:
IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPOTS
7EXPI'ana a+ins of all "yes' and "maybe" answers are required
on attached sheet(s))
1,
2;
Will the proposal result in significant:
justable earth conditions or in changes in
geologic substructures?
b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or
overcovering of the soil?
C. Change in topography or ground surface
relief features?
d. Destruction, covering or modification of any
unique geologic or phys*cal features?
e. increase in wind or water erosion of soils,
either on or off-site?
f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach
sands, or changes in si'ltatlon, deposition
or erosion which may modify the channel of
a river or stream or the bed of the oeean or
any bay, inlet or lake?
g, Loss of prime agriculturally productive so -,Js
outside designated urban areas?
h. Exposure of people or property to geologic
hazards such as earthquakes, Landslides, mud-
Slides, ground failure or similar hazards?
AIR. Will the proposal, result in substantial
d, Air emissions or deterioration of ambient
air quality?
b. The creation of objectionable odors, smoke
or fumes'?
c. Alteration of air movement, mos.stuTe, or
temperature, or any change in climate,
locally or regionally?
MAYBE +C
c.
X
1
WATER. Will the proposal result in substantial.:
a.
Changes in currents, or the course or
direction of water movementsin either
marine or fresh waters?
X
b.
Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns,
or the rate and amount of surface runoff?
c.
Need for off-site surface drainage improve-
ments, including vegetation removal, channel-
nation or culvert installation?
X.
d.
Alterations to the course or Elow of flood
haters?
.
e.
Change in the amount of surface water in any
body?
water
f.
Discharge into surface waters, or in any
alteration of surface water quality, including
but not limited to temperature, dissolved
"
oxygen or turbidity?
g,
Alteration of the direction or rate of flow
of ground waters?
h.
Change in the quantity of ground waters,
either through direct additions or with-_
drawals, or through interception of an
X
1�
aquifery' � wa ?
oamount
i.
Reda ction inut��ets
owater otherwise
o f
f
�
available for public water supplies'?
_
j.
Exposure of people or property to water
rela,l. ` d hazards such as flooding?
,, C
-2-
k.
YES
4. PLANT LIFE, Will the
MAYBE NO
proposal result in substantial:
mange in thy,; diversity of species,
or number
Of any species of plants (including trees,
shrubs,
grass, crops, and aquatic plants)?
b• Reduction of the numbers of any
unique, rare
or endangered species of plants?
C. Introduction
of new species of plants into an
area, cr in a barrier to the
normal replenish-
ment of existing species?
d. Reduction in
acreage of any agricultural crop?-
S. ANIMAL LIFE. Will the proposal result in subsea
a. C_ ange_in the diversity al;
_XC_
of species, or numbers
of any species of animals (birds land animals
including reptiles)
fish and shell. fish,
benthic organisms
or insects)?
Reduction in the numbers of
X
any unique
or endangered species rare
of animals? ,
C'. Introduction
of new species of animals into
an area, or result in a barrier
to the mi
or movement of animals? gxaton
3.
,Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife
habitat?
6. NOISE. Will the proposal, result in substantial;
a• Increases in existing
noise levels?
b• Exposure of people to selere noise levels?
7 LIGHT. AND GLARE. Will the proposal produco
ssht gnica:�t 1z
g
and & :ire?
8, LAND USE. Will the proposal resultox in: a
ubstantial alteration
of the present
land use of an area? planned
9 • NATURAL RESOURCE" ; W'll the
su stantaal proposal result in
a. Increase in the rate of use o: any natural
resources?
b Depletion of any ')Ion -renewable natural
resources?
10. RISK OF UPSt"T. Will theinvolve.
-'--`--� propos:�al involve ;
explosion or the release of hazard. -
nus substances (.including; but
not limited to,
Oil, Pesticides, chemicala or radiation)
Possible
in the
b. pose `
a1ttorferenceent OWithaari Condit ons?
re.r�<�nsc: »l, art or emergency en emergency
me gencplan? .�. _..
use" Wite
denspopasal alter the location,
pops l'.. Y growth rate of the human
HOfJ�,rJ . vel the proposal affect existang hOusiri
or c:rp: • .remand :for additional housing?�'�
10
FJ
YES
13. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATIOr�.
MAYBE
MAYBE No
result iiY: Will the proposal
a. Generation of substantial additional vehicle
movement?
b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or
demand for
_2 -
new parking?
c.. Substantial impact on existing transportation
systems?
d. Significant alterations to present patterns
Of circulation or
-
movement of people and/or
goods?
e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traff.tc?
f. Increase
in traffic hazards to motor vehiclkas, LL.
bicyclists or Pedestrians?
X
14. PUBLIC SERVICES'. Will the proposal, have an effect
upon, or result in
a meed for new or altered
governmental services:
a. Fire Protection?
b. Police protection?
C„
C. Schools?
—.
d. Parks or other recreational facilities? `_
e, Itaintenance
he
of public facilities, including
roads?
-�-C
f• Other governmental sorvices?
iCC'
15. ENERGY. Will the proposal result in,,
a. Use of substantial
aniountsemaf fuel.or energy?
b Substantial. increase demand `—
upon existing
sources of en er
of new the development
gy,or:ener
---
sources y?uire
~�
16. UTILI S . Will the prQpb al result in a needfo r
new systems, or substantici alterations
following: to the
a. Dower or natural gas?
b. Communications
sYrtems?
C. Water availabil i. z.)r
d. Sewer or septic tank? --.
,
e. Storm water drainage?
X
f. Solid waste and disposal?
�C
17, HUMAN HEALTH — "`
�Vil1 the proposal result in:
a.reatlan of any health
hazard or potential
health hazard (eXcluding mental
health)
b. Exposure of people to potential health
hazards? �.
18, AESTHETICS, Will the proposal result in the
o s�� �a of
any ;,ceni,c vista or view open -to
the public, or will the proposal. result i
creat aesthetically n the
ion of an aestheticao£fensi;ve site aped
to Public view?
p
_.
YES
1
MAY I)V. NO
19. RECREATION', Will the proposal result in an impact
I
upon tihe quality or quantity of existing recreational
opportunities?
20. CULTURAL RESOURCES.
a. Will the proposal result in the alteration
`
of or the destruction of a prehistoric or
1
historic archaeological site?
b, Will the proposal result, in adverse physical
or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or
historic building, structure or object?
Ci Does the proposal have th.6 potential. to cause
a physical change which utould affect unique
ethnic icultural values?
,.'
d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious
or sacred uses within the potential impact
area":
V, DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AP 40-15-61
See aY.tachment
5S`SCthl"C3F�ENVI�CINI�IEI�TFIL,���W'�LUATxgl�l AP 40--15-61
of building
c Construction of roads, driveways and preparation of the sail. The
action and ovOrca hichg require off-site
sites will lead to a compaction
runoff which may loav or culvert
result may las an increase in
surface drainage improvements in the farm �,f ditch dl ea a,ng
installations. tallati ons. The Department of public and unless s thosegcandititans are
permanent solution to st��mtsdir.-Q'•ne�gtibari.nq properties .could occur
imposed, sgni.fearrt imp..
'�, acres of kiwi orchard and wa��t-t�hsepran�ec�.11 be
10: Approximately � production due
effectively removed from ecanr.mIc p
onsidering surrounding development a dcd r,di sizes, this involving
economical operation of the existing
e
expected to be a significant loss.
Atte County is .within a Mader Ear'•t'nq�.ta'�e l ly Jtea.lesy
ih; All of D� ra erty is located approtoughmateth
through the town sites
Zone V x l I . Thee sub a ect p p , mi es satthwest of the
northeast of a possible fault location running
of Dayton and Nelson ant asupp rted y �
ill. .shear Zone wi'tiieh supported the 1975 Qroville Eartt•iguaEe►
Faoth to Uniform
Building Code standards far
conGtrCati to of homes adequate protection to
e,
ssmi.cally active areas Mia activity. provide
rG-jsidents in case of sex5dt"ts to
area i s sub�ioct to peritatiic localized flooding
9.
The entirea ermanaOt solution to drainage
ublic Works requirements should
1='ravidin`� p
,farm water rum ht Mc-
alleviate
J c•
pursuant to the Departmet,t,f
al 1 evi ate any potential impact%, 4�ee also items ib and b
4d see item ig
project, along w ocher similar prr�jects in the aria,
tenet a.ted Onto Ltatt
9a,c,f; This prop g Due to the small
will represent an Incremental Increase
inethe are
c g expected to be
Road and to other n dw any impacts are not - p
amounts taf traffic bt ^ ng gena, aced s
substantial this prt,�eural area•et will represent an
14
Though not significant,
a r
incremental incre�•�se in demand far., public services inn
ria �ti►'"t•/ is 7,acated in art area of hi�5 required in
20a 'The subject p � art archaecliiagi,a survey
archasological s nsit�v ty. mitigation measures«
eteI wen if sity'' At a archaealagical sites exist
an the
order tad w a rta riots ►nitig
praper�ty l and if a to develop pp p
Appet'►di� i! w 17�gs b
i
GLl G� "fGiS�i�ixT1GAT p l�;1�EASURES AP 4.0-15--61
provide a permanent solution to drainage and salve any drainage
problems on Lott Road affecting the property as well as downstream
problems resulting +ram the property.
2: Mitigation measures may be required regarding archaeological.
sevrsitivity. An archaeological survey is necessary in c,rder to
determine if significant archaeological artifacts are presenia and
if so appropriate tnitigati.on measures must be adopted.
DRH 1 kt
,w.
Appendix V .- Page 7
Assessor's Parcel
#
Applicant: Del {�. Ha�tain
`'- 1
Log # e5-04-16-02
'
D�I
A°
14 Type of projectt Tentative Parcel
Map into three oarce��~ one
' 2. Brief Descr�pt1on% Dividing :5.8 acres n , �
—� two of 1 1 acres �a�h
of 1 6 acres an , +
° " �-� ~' ~ - -- -- - - �m�te�^� 10�0
-� � � east side of Lott R r �
3 Location: n be e n�p� ~ -^'-_--, - -
" " ^ ~~- ---- -- with Durham -Dayton
ton Hi�h�ay, �n
feet north of its intersection w am -way ,
the Durham` area.
4. proposed Density of Development. ~
' �5~ Amount of Impervious Su_rfa^cingm 1~0 to 15%
6~ Acce$sand Nearest Public Road(%). Fxistlng parcel f' ron
s On
L/ztt Road
7~ Me/thod of Sewage Disposal: Individual septic Systems
8^Source of Water
Supply: Individual Wells
T exist�ng home oM property
q~ pro�imi+�y of Power Lines: � o t None
lC). Potential for further land divisions and development: o
under ovlsting zoning
t:
l - rain
~ /="
a. Gentr,-A l Topographic Character: Flat valley 1andV- '
b^ Slopeto. %}to 2%
r^ Elevation� ApproximatelY 160 feet ASL
6. Limiting Factors: None
Soils ' -- -l� e� �n �o
Vi loam. Surfacexs�_ -
a. `rp== and ~''a`--------��� 1�h depth of � o�
thickZ feet d su6 4ace layer w a .
more feet of rich nrowrl loam'.
b~ Limiting racrore.a None
�l Hazards of the Land
~
Natural
lone: ModerateEetrthquake Intensity Zone UIII
6. Erog1oM F/oteMti% None
c~ Landslide Potential: None
d°re Aatard: UMcI�Zsi+led
'- i e Soi1 P�tonti��1: Moderate
e" �Xp`g�� v .
AP
40-154-01
4. Hydrology
a. Surf ace Water: Mane can -site
b. Ground Water: Abundant valley aquifers
C. Drainage Characteristics- Land drains generally to the
south to roadside ditch
RaiFactors;
(normal)% 24 to 26 inches per year
d, Annual ,
e. Limiting actors: Storm drainage facilities are minimal
and localized flooding does Occasional lY Oct- t~"
5. Visual/Scenic 0,ualij-_y% High
6. Acoustic Quality: High
7. Air Quality High
Epi oic�g;ig.al _�nv_irnnmerit?
g, Vegetation. Orchard lands and kiwis
q»' Wildlife Habitat'.Small birds and animals common to orchard
habitats
10. ArL.haeolo9 ical and Historical Resources in the area. High
sensitivity area
11. Dutt;e County General Flan deli gnati cans Flol i ci es indicate
Agricultural.-Residentialvaidg
12. S;ti.sting ZOrlinge dwelling,
i,;„,. S;,isting Land Use on= -site% 1 single family
and walnut. orchard
14. Surrounding Area:
a Land Uses' Clrchards in similar usage, single +F kmily
dwellings at rural densities'
b» Zonings SR -1 and Aµ5
c.
Genu Flan designations* Agri cul Lural- Rosi denti. al and
Orchard and 5iOld Crops;bra to
d. Parcel Sites: 1 to 5 acre p�-rcei5 along Lett Fioady
W acre parcels to the east
e. pop, tj ati. on 4 Rural Uen3ities
15» Character of Sate and At Agri
cttltural orcharc, land
16: Nearest Urban Area: Chico
ii 1",elevant Spheres of In -fluence. None
M Improvements Standards Urban Area.
No
Fire protection Service.
Nearest County (state? Fire Station;
b. Water Avaalabil�.ty: Durham Station
045
a" Fire tanker and wells only
� Schools in Areae I)Ltrham lJnified Schbol District
Appendix F W
A"
i
,
ti, 1, tVia+-� i byn. .pe e p w• i
e r
L WD
tl5
1/
10.c
rr�
3PA Cot
00,
IT
.... ........
C. u, ;�4",�.� ,�>, O'1I r � „•r �A ,. w.+:.w .w,.«:...,ra., ,rf-.�.,w,m:�.:., rorta..+,....w,w...�wa.,.,.
W4 , p i �j, •/may
AU�f�Y" c:�•,�.��t i' -'-k.. �D:Y ,, " , Y{k,+,�7j�' .« "' _ ,y .+� y - e aa. -.,.-M. '�7p
�w+ww+Y7-1p,K
-,^r3 c 2 .i(` �-- •: WWW »."� 4 'i d.'aC"�
,
i✓ t i
ell t` a
,,� ,• ����.,»�.�:��r � 1 � � ;Raw„
14 A
K
IIr r�„y. rt T .41 a1`O49t k�1�i
78
;z dAc
i ! !J ;1� / � � �1� �,' .t PC < ►� ` ! GylNi y � r r. l s �I m µ
roti �I l#_rL" .I Wk I �
Alp .'! W ea w w dd
q i•4V»Y 7f
f,M raaR.W.>aa..:W ss-.ar _.,srNa•s - la,.rM .Gaae►,ir
MOP No, 40-1
-county of Butte, 'COUP,
�t'r���dh? �'�"'��`>�"` ! ��� ,i5',�'i�,�'��M'�'tVr�''` ��f.� r�. t��'.!� �"o$
�� sw
r
�/
r
r