Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout040-150-0694 h•w •b � ®r E ,y t A n IA)'N PLANNING.COMMISSION SUMMARY SHEV-1! VOR LAND DIVISIONS $3-08-03-03 APPLICANT Brian Hancock ADDRESS _U-7.30.-Desext Towers_, Provo, Utah 89604 OWNER Same PROJECT DESCRIPTION Tentative Parcel. Nift!) dividing 1.83 acres to create two parcels at 0.91.5 acres each. - .y LOCATION Approximately_ 800 feet north of the intersects on;. u'f Durham -Dayton I-Iig;1way,_tind Corbett Court, Durham area. ASSESSOR I S PARCEL NUMBER(S) 40-18-69 ZONING SR -1 GEN. PLAN Ag-ReS PROJECT CONSISTENT? 4; DATE APPLICATION PECEIVED 8/3/83 Eng..: Shields Surveying — 9/8-1 Lsnuon .oa , ur Tam , DATE PUBLICATION NOTICE WRITTEN �, 'UBi,XSt ED :PLACE NEWSPAPER NOTICES) PUBLISHED - 0. C. P. 0- $. DATE MAILING LIST PlltPARED DATE 0w1—CUT WRITTEN MAILED NUMBER DATE prANNINO DIRECTOg0S REPORT PREPARED ENVIRONMENTAL CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION DATE VILER 1%TERMIN,6,TION AND DATE NEGATIVE DECLARATION - DATE ADOPTED, 1► ' MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION � DATE ADOPTED \rll�, -. -%a ENV. IMPACT REPORT - DATE CERTIFIED SUB. COMMITTEE MEE'T'ING DATE ADVISORY AGENCY NEARING 'DATE ADVISORY AGENCY ACTION BOARDACTION COMMENTS ( APPPNIJI.X F NOTICE OF DETEiRMINATXOiIW' ' i TO; SecrrAary for Resources r w 1416 Ninth Street, Room 1311 GGT z 4 1983 Sacramcnto, CA 95814 County Cleric, Cc'a,nty of Butte ` ELEANOR M. BECKER, County Clerk Y 25 County Center 1rive B ��, soNnii f1"r� Ju1y Oroville, CA 95'961 Y" FROM: Planning Dopartmont 7 County Contor nrivre (Filed) Oroville, CA 95965 SUBJXCT: Filing of Notice of Determination. i,n Contpli,7nce with Section 21108 or 21152 of the P iblic8,tedev§ 3 Code Project Title Tontntivo Parcel. Pili All 110-1.5-69 lir an Hancock State ClearinghoLtse Number yW (Ifb tittod to State Clearinghouse) Contact Person Tele hone Number -` John Mendonsa, Public Works, (916) 5o4--4266 Project Location 800 feet north of the intersection of Durham- -.-Dayton Hi.ghwiy and Cor—gtt CoUrt. Durham. Project Description: Dividing 83 acres to create two parcels of .915 ech. This is to advise that the butte County Advisory. Agency ! R; (Lead Agency) has ntade the fol1614ing determinations regarding the above-described i project: 1. The project© will have a significant offect on the environment: tvi11 not 2. n An Environmental impact Report was prepared For this project* pursuant to the provisions of pRQA, and was certified as required by Section 15085(g), 14 California Administrative Codo; E A Negative Declaration was prepared for ttizs project pursuant to tho provisions of CEQA A copy of the Negative Declaration may be examined at the planning D"epart►nent, 7 County Center Drive, Orovilie, CA 959656 I, 3. A Notice of Exemption was filed indicating this project, is exempt from enviroftmorittil review, 4, A statrmont or Overriding Cons i.derat:ion 1418Was not, a: acYoi)ted for this project. 5': MiAIgation hlbftsures aclort`d by the Lead. ,Agency to reduce the inirlac t:4 o1 the Ciltp roved p e l oc t oc t See attached October 1$, 10$ o Planilor 5tc+phen A, Streeter y n1o2' Date yI 1. ! �''y •� F tLAND QF NAI URAL WtALTH ANOBEAU1 a DEPARTMENT OF 'PUBLIC WORKS CLAY CASTLOBERRY, Dlrer,Cor 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE, OROVILLE,�,CALIFORNIA 95961. TelepForie:(9.16) 534:4681 WILLIAM (B111) CHEMF DsL}o Co. PIODO'na Comm. Deputy Director October 10, 1983 r OroVill®, f,,BNCuwub _' Btial> Flancock itf; Air 40-15-69 U.130 Desert Towers Tentative Parcel Map Provo, Utah 8460+ Dear Mr. Hancock: At the regular meeting of the Butte County Advisory Agency held on October 5 , 1983, the Agency adopted the mitigated negative declaration regarding environmental review and approved the i tentative parcel map, for AP 40-15.69 subject to the conditions 4 listed on the attached sheet. If na appeals are timely filed --within ten (10) days of the date d of the Advisory Agency's approval --with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, this action will be final, When the conditions of approval are complied with, it will be in order for you to file your "final map" with the Butte County Department ;. of 'Public Works for recordation within twenty-four (24) months' of the, ' date of approval by the Advisory Agency. if you should have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office; Very truly yours; j Clay Castleberry ' Director of. Public Works Y, n Mendonsa ssistant Director JM/ds' attachment cc Planning Health k, Shields Surveying . r'+. .... ;... N Kr'CF�F.Ia h.,.ti--.i.'AE4=•-^S.-�. Brian Hancock, TENTATIVE PARCEL MAPt 2 parcels, approx. 800 ft. north of the intersection of Durham-Dayton Hwy. and Corbett Court. 'Durham area,. Assessov's Parcel number: 40-15-69 Engineer: Shields Surveying. Public Works conditions are: 1.. Verify legal parcel. 2. Verify legal: access 3. Provide two-way traversable access RS-8-LD-11 to each parcel from a county maintained road or state highway, 11. Access to be rosdivcd in cloeds as per county or0inauca and offered. for dedication on the final map. 5. Show 50 ft. building setback line measured from centerline of access easerdent 6. Provide road maintenance agreement. 7- Show all easements of record on the final map. 8. Provide street name signs per requirements of the Dept. of Yublie Works prior to recordation of the final miip 9. Provide permainent solution for drainage; 10. Provide cul-de-sac 6t the'end of the street. 11, obtain encroachment permit iron construct standard road approach providing adequate ;sight distance at the intersection of access road and Lott; Rd. l2. Pavy any delinquent taxos 13. Meet the requ!VbItents of the to County Fire Dept. ieaith Department tpnditions ares 114, Provide an area for wells and 100 ft, leadfield free setback ' around those areas on each parcels y y 4 6 p ll i5: Provide the 'required usable sews a disposal, area exists orieach parcel.. 1.6. Praviae dompli4.ance with groundwater mitigation measure. The following mitigation measure will also be a condition of a;pprbVal. 17. provide verification of winter groundwater elevations. If tlevated gOccurroundwater subdivs3.ahooni.inatiaeede33gr1 the lot's to, comply inter-pnar�� p `(raflklemorandum -rg; Butte ;County Advisory Agency ' FROMI Planning Director SUBJEcrr Report on Tentative Parcel Map Of Brian Hancoc'k on AP 40-1.5-69 DAVM September 12, 1983. The project proposes to divide li 83 arses to create two parcels at .915 acres each. 7-110 present zoning is SR=1 (Suburban Residential, l acre parcels). The Land Use Map of the Butte County General Plan designates this site as Agricultural Residential, and'the Safety Element indicates it is in an unclassified .fire hazard area .• (urban or irrigated).7'}lorr! ,.II are no specific or community plans in the arca; � The proposal does conflict with existing zoning which requires I acre parcels. However, on May 19, 198, the Planning Commission granted Brian Wancock a Variance to minimum lot size on AP 40-15-69: The proposed project does .not conflict with any existing or proposed element of the Butte County General Plan nor any County, specific or community plan.. Recommend approval on basis of previous findings with the following conditi.oni 1. Certain areas within t11e subject property be dedicated as public utility casements (PGF-) LT1kt l,. cc Brian Hanc6tk Shields Surveying i 1'1�S MAYBE Nn 19. RECREATION. Will the proposal result in an impact pon he, quality or quantity of existing . recreational 0 p ta 20. CULTURAL RESOURCES, a, Will the proposr, result in the alteration of or the destf, _ct;ion of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site? b. Will the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure or object? c. Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious or .sacred uses within the potential impact area? V. DISCUSSION :OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AR 40-15-b9 This pro iect is a. tentative parcel map to ;?i.v de 1.83 acres to create the parcels of .915 at;,res each. They are located 800 feet north of the intersection of Durham -Dayton Highway and Corbett Court, Durham, T21N, R2E, Section 29. The: proposed density of development is l dwelling unit per parcel, .91.13 acres. The nearest public road is Durham -Dayton l ghwa't. The method of sewage disposal is septic. Source of water is individtlal tells. The proximity of the power lines are at the original parcel. The ot7imitedfor unlesstthe'land arceldivision rezoncd butdevelopment great P p this parcel ate p on adjacent parcels: Environmental Sctt:in _i .- fl _ alto al iand with slopes of The terrain of t110 project is at agrac 1 0.2 percent. The elevation is 155 to 165 feet.. The soils are Vina loam with strong soil profile and variable texture and stratified sediments underneath: The liquifaction potential is moderate to locally high._ The land has feet natural hazards. The most important is the proximity of the earthquake zone: The project is located 4 miles West of the Foothills Shear zone and 3'miles east of the possible faults as identified on the But -to County Earthquake Fault Map, There is no erosion potential, no laiidslide potential, It is in an unclassified fire hazard area arid, there is only moderate potential for soil exn pasivity. The project is located h mile northeast of Butte Creek and is i.n an area of heavy rroundisater withdrawal. Annual raintall on-site is 24 to 26 inches, l.imi.ting factors for groundwater is the potential for subsidence from heavy groundwdtor, withdrawal. The plioj`oct has beei1 idontifted on Butte County maps as being in an area of High arch:loolog,ir.al sonsitivi.ty prior to dcveiopmcnt., a surrey is tocommended: Butte "lati dosignation is Agricti]tuiitil-Residential. The existing zonl_,ng 15 Suburban rlesidontial. 1 Acro ►ninimum. The lntid use on=Sita is vacant. The sutroundins Arad +land use is scattered residential. and agricultural with zoning of SR -1 and A-5. C enortll, Ilam desiglultion in tile, su,t roui d - ars over ing area i.5 Agri. Cultural 40-5 dolltia'�1. Oenot lly 'parcel sizes 1 acre, rang�ig from 3 to 51 a:crt;s With 1.2 acrgs Common. ThO rtoarest urban area is DOrbim and Durham is the sphere of ,inl?1110nee, The improvement standnrd8 need d on tilepai'ce1. wuuid ho prover 3Cce9s to 1parcel #2 according to our s6t Subdivision st;lnIdard. piro protection 1„ will be providod bt0ti Al' 40-15-69 })ISCi1SSIQN 014 tile EVALUATION (continiiect) OXis t.s in an open stato with lb, e; 3b; �1'hiic tho parcel. currently l for no c}evc�lop►ttent, the approval of tlli.s project �vou}.tl opet side devol.o}aticttt of two house sa.tc:s, acce.sort' buildings, garages) rostt laude}ittg .pads and driveways on and w,, ' �- c ,his co5oa.lpicont wt'll'ror kl t in some compact.. ,}ha dv1,Ir et v�rca� �rt 1 ng i.nct'e'asc ill im}?e'rl rrates racez wnd.1 clra i,nrgeepatternsrof�the o$oilite and will 01ange absorption on-site. As the. project js very .flat and has a law erosion potential, this .tnprict is not sagn4 f.icanto r ividual vell.s .and will 3h; The project Will be supplied by 'in r. The is located directly impact' the tivahtity of groundwateproject On site of heavy groundwater witharawal nderlyangas iChicotandeburhamntire Dhas ahad hno� area. At present t}te q problems with capacity and the addition of tivo nrLvate we1.1s will be insignificant. 5a,7 4 Development willincrease noise and light levels in project ect area. 8: The proposed project mayresent in alteration of present land list in the area as it tvi'11 not conform�G oto C ov rtlnacrenxn zoning SR-1 and all of the neighbors have p parcels will. be less than 1 acre.: Di vectly to to the hen north of that is .s a proposed project is a 3.3/4 acre parcel, parcel, The development of the two ots stessor's 5 acre p l�_69 may sur those twp adjacent parcels into further 'Parcel 40- y P population , and t st ation which would result t increased density, p p and resulting environmental impacts associated with residential development. 9a*, Residential development will, j.nc'rease the rate and use o£ ces: is alter the location and.. grew*h ra e natural rosour 11, 12! The proposed project ' may of tate human population in so fd` as it has the potential 'to put t dev�:lopment pressure oil neighboring 'parcels. There is a possibility that neighboring parcels co1l1d be further par>;elized down to one acre or less than one acre: The character of the area would changes �+ s and ri producing conflicts tchangerthe1zoning ing �c orchange lthe ePdtmitbednlot about a need to e1th ' n the zoning. T ro�tiinately 12 to 20 vehicle sizes �1thf,he roject >�i11 result in app Corbett Court 13a.�cy P trips per day. The access `roads on the onto til are h and Almond View Ccnrt, carrying tixaffad running north so�thvilfihis }{ighway o running ll � cast -west or Lott Ro is a very s11 btitg ntaes inctratfic hazar'dsstoiothe n tf vellic'lesf'c and},�bicycl tsband minor increas pedestrians in the area: Appendix p page 6 AP 40-15-69 D18CUSSION OF ENV' OND1ENTAL EVALUATION (continued) resident development does put a demand on existing public 14: Any � greater, services and governmental services. Residential use requires fire protection and police protection than do agricultural uses; they produce school children, imtana�cenneedssofrpublicitoads. Thet.project and often increase the main t6 only bring about a very minor incremental increase to the demand arce for public services iatheangaaboutbutfars gn f3cant1impact onitheseate a substantial demand and services. 16c: Nater will be provided by individual wells: l6d: Septic tanks will be constructed on-site. 16e! No provisions on the tentative parcel maps have been made for storm water drainage• Ase increase facitli faces will bring ties about a, resulting increa. lie find the proposed project could not have a significant effect on the environment and a Negative Declaration is recommended