HomeMy WebLinkAbout040-150-079•d
r
'r
.. � _ r Q�, F r • l , , M
X11
t /
r
r
1hL
•d
r
'r
.. � _ r Q�, F r • l , , M
X11
PLANNING COMMIS,dWN SUMMARYSHEET FOR LAND NFJTP`
APPLICANT: Craig Hawes Loa#85-11-27-01.
ADDRESS 180 Cohasset Road, Chico, CA 95926
OWNER Same
PROJECT DESCRIPTION '.tentative Parcel Map to divide 4+ acres to create
4 parcels at 1+ acre each.
LOCATION At the Northeast corner of Lott Road and Aubry Ct.,
Durham area.
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER (S) 40-15-79 ( +
ZONING s P-wGENERAL PLANU.41, - /pq PROaECT CONSISTENT?
GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE REPORT
DATE OF APPLICANT SIGNATURE
LAND CONSERVATION ACT CONTRACTS'?
DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED November 27, 1`985
AGENT/SURVEYOR/CIVIL ENGINEER: Sierra Nest Surveying
ADDRESS: 5437 Black Olive Drive, Paradise, CA 95969
DA'Z'E PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT PREPARED
ENVIRONMENTAL CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION DATE' FILED
DETERMINATION
AND DATE NEGATIVE DECLARATION DATE ADOPTED
MITIGATED NEG. DECLAW% TION - DATE ADOPTED =:?t
ENV. IMPACT REPORT - DATE CERTIFIED
- STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NO
SUB. COMMITTEE MEETING DATE
�A' 0;
r
Craig Hawes, Tentative Parcel Ma 4
Map, Parcels at the noz,tlzr:a,st aorrier
of Lott Rd. and Aubry Ct. Durham area.
AP 110-15-79
Engineer: Sierra West Surveying
ICAIrTNG OPEN
Tom Wrinkle had no questions
Walter McArdle, a neighbor, said that they are interested in pxotoct ng
the rural environment. They dont want the fertile farmland turn(!d into
small lots with houses. They are concerned about their well Wat-or and possiblo
shortages of water and contamination.
Mr.. McArdle said also that they don't wane added tastes foci the purpose
Of additional protection Which would be necessary. He had a petition signed
by 16 people in the immediate area of Aubry Court, which states basically
What he has already stated. He submitted the petition,
iiFARM CLOSED
Mx Streeter said that this is a redivision of the Albert Amator parcel
mop. One of the mitigations on that map Etas to show a 60 fti no -founding
a.rreq on the east property line near the large agricultural parcels. The
:,caning is SR -1 for one acre parcels There is a corridor on Lott Rd that
hors small. parcels. 'There needs to be changes in the General Plan in this area,
Until. that is done, the toning and surrounding parcels arP the main things
to consider, although farm land should be Maintained, However 4 acres is ,t=rt
a commercially viable parcel,
bir Streeter said that in terms of policie � this Property is considered
Agricultural-I'iesidential which allows 1 acre parcels, He noted the mitigation
measures which will be placod, on the project. Tne project; does conform to the
toning and Geaeml Plan,
Mr, Reid tated: 1 will inuke r motion to grant rr rrri.tigat.c�Mi rr, gativr,
declarati� tr of environmental impact for
the Cr, Glawes prarccl. map t , arcate
I� parcels ore Al, 40-1.5..79 findingthat, the 1acFrnvf.I an effect on
the environment, but will rL)t have a aigrr, .ficanr, effect in this carte provided
i he required mitigation meawures are complied with. 'l'hur,3ra rfiitigat'Gon measures
are 1 through 3 as listed within the Planning Direoburrs ,linpI !rt of i' b: 11, 19�'b,
The motion i;; made noting that the project, is in c trrfox�mrrnc:f with tlafy 1 utte
Cotirty General Plan and Butte COUnty Zoning. Nfatir,rr set�o,rr,Ir�cl by Mr, r4treetc�r
and carried unatrimously.
RV, ;rets stated; noting th rt a mitigated negative ,iecicriratt >n wCrc ;:�:topted
this datt:, 1 will make a mLtiott to approve the parcel map f'or CraigIawe j
to create 4 parcels on AP 40..15:=79, The motion La Made casting that tine project
will not be detrimental. to the health, safety or welfare of the lar'-Vle
of Butte County providingtho required items of construction are rumplieisc with
as listed Within the Public Works conditiL)n , The motion is rel 1 c t the
following condi t ions .
Public WW►rk e-agditons:
V S+DIt� AGENCYANOM38 Feb. 24, , E
`"01wW � t 4�r
5Deed to the County of Butte 30 ft. right-of-way from the (,(.ntorj
Lott Road , I lit f
6. Inu:,Cate 6 50 ft. building setback fr,,,,.ra the (W Lott lid.
7. Show all easements Of record on the final map,
8. Provide st-reet name Signs per requirements Of the Dept, of Public
Works prior to recordation of the final map,
9. Provide permanent 'Solution for drainage,
10. Pay off any assessments.
II. Provlie cul-de-sac at the enI of the ntreet )v building free turn
around area.
12, Obtain encroachment permit for all driveways, new or e istin
and construct to county standards. g,
13. Pay any delinquent taxes ur current taxes as
required,
Health Dept. conditions:
14 Prwid,i ail amn for wells and no ft, leachfiela free setback arc)und
those areas on each parcol,
15, Provide a 100 ft. leachfield frese setback around -existing wall,,,
either within the property or within loo ft, of the property boundariep.
16. Provide the required usable sewage disponal area on nach parcel, Combint-
with an adjacent parcel any parcel not proven toy Contain the usable
Sewage disposal area required by the dinan(
on e Oubdivisi()r
1 , t..
17, Comply with the mitigation measure tr_� verify winter ground water,
elevation.
Planning Dept. conditionst
18- MIOW a 50 ft, building Setback line fVUm all access easements per
the Zoning ordinance,
All parcels
zoning. to be at "east 1 "are gross to comply With the SR -1
COMY ADVX90A)t AdtWdY MIN=8 Feb; 241 1006
1
Provide two-way traversable access
RS -8 -LD -i to
each parce'L from
a county maintained road or state
highway.
2.
Access to be reserved in deeds as
per county ordinance and offered
for dedication.orathe final map.
3.
Show 50 ft. building setback line
measured from
centerline of
access easement,
4,
Provide road maintenance agreement.
5Deed to the County of Butte 30 ft. right-of-way from the (,(.ntorj
Lott Road , I lit f
6. Inu:,Cate 6 50 ft. building setback fr,,,,.ra the (W Lott lid.
7. Show all easements Of record on the final map,
8. Provide st-reet name Signs per requirements Of the Dept, of Public
Works prior to recordation of the final map,
9. Provide permanent 'Solution for drainage,
10. Pay off any assessments.
II. Provlie cul-de-sac at the enI of the ntreet )v building free turn
around area.
12, Obtain encroachment permit for all driveways, new or e istin
and construct to county standards. g,
13. Pay any delinquent taxes ur current taxes as
required,
Health Dept. conditions:
14 Prwid,i ail amn for wells and no ft, leachfiela free setback arc)und
those areas on each parcol,
15, Provide a 100 ft. leachfield frese setback around -existing wall,,,
either within the property or within loo ft, of the property boundariep.
16. Provide the required usable sewage disponal area on nach parcel, Combint-
with an adjacent parcel any parcel not proven toy Contain the usable
Sewage disposal area required by the dinan(
on e Oubdivisi()r
1 , t..
17, Comply with the mitigation measure tr_� verify winter ground water,
elevation.
Planning Dept. conditionst
18- MIOW a 50 ft, building Setback line fVUm all access easements per
the Zoning ordinance,
All parcels
zoning. to be at "east 1 "are gross to comply With the SR -1
COMY ADVX90A)t AdtWdY MIN=8 Feb; 241 1006
The fallowing mitigation measures are. required.:
20. provide a permanent solation to drainage, including install theorequi�edof
downstream and nieghbozing properties,
facilities.
21„ Verify winter groundwater elevations
and
tmodihe fyithe parceing cel design
cr
sizes, if necessary, in accordance
Place a statement on the final map that any archaeological rvsnuroe%
uncovered during constxuction trill be' reported to anu investigated
by a qualified archaeologist -
Motion seconded by
Mr. Streeter and carried Unanimously.
N
DUTTE COUNTY AbvISORY AGENCY MtAUTE5 - Veb 24 r 19 6
w
Ee
441.
� eColt
• LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND 6CAUTY
{ _ DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
WILLIAM (Bill)-CHE14F, Director
7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE- OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95966
Tolephonet(916) 534.4681
RONALD D. McELROY
Deputy Oftecior
February 25, 1986
Craig Hawes MAP 40-19-79
180 Cohasset Road Tentative Parcel Map
Chico, CA 95926
;Dear Mr, Hawes:
At the regular meeting of the Butte County Advisory Agency held on
February 24, 1986, the agency granted a mitigated negative declaration
of environmental impact and approved your tentative parcel map on
the above -referenced property subject to the conditions of approval.
listed on the attached sheet.
if ,no appeals are timely fi_ed--within ten days of the date of the
Advisory A&jncy's approval. --with the Clerk of the Board of � ,cervi curs,
this action will be final:
When the conditions of approval are complied with, it Will be In order
for you to file your "final m.f � with the Butte County Department of
Public Works for recordation within twenty-four months of the date
of approval by the Advisory Agency
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this
office.
Very truly yours]
William Cheff
Director of Public Works
IJ n Mendonsa
A sisCant 'Director
Craig Hawes, Tentative Parcel Map, 4 parcels at the northeast corner
,f Lott Rd. and Aubry Ct. Durham area.
AP 40-15-79
Engineer: Sierra West Surveying
Public Works conditions
1. Provide two-way traversable access RS -8-01 to each parcel from
a county maintained road or state highway.
2. Access to be reserved in deeds as per county ordinance and offered
for dedication on the final map.
3. Show 50 fti building setback Line measured from centerline of
access easement.
4, Provide road maintenance agreement.
5. Deed to the County of 8LItte 30 ft, right -of" -way from the centerline of
Lott Road
6. .indicate a 50 ft. building setback from the centerlihe of Lott Rd.
i, Show all. eAsements of record on the final map,
8. Provide street name signs per requirement, of the Dept. of Public
Works prior to recordation of the final map.
9. Provide permanent solution for drainage.
10 Fay off any assessments
11. Provide cul-de-sac at the ead Of the street or building ,Free turn
around a.:ea.
12. 3btain encroachment permit for all driveways) new or existing,
and construct to county standards
13• Pay any delinquent taxes ar current tuxes an required,
Health Dept, conditions:
14. Provide ail area for wells and 100 ft, leachfield free setback around
those areas on each parcel.
15. Provide a 1.00 ft. leachfield free setback around existing; Wells
either within the property or Within 100 ft; of the property boundaries,
16, Provide the required usable sewage dibposal area on each parcel, Combine
with an adjaceut parcel any parcel, riot proven to contain the usAbl.e
sewage disposal area required by the Subdivision Ordinance.
17. Comply with the xilitigation measure to verify winter ground Water
elevation.
i�
CRAIG HAWFS TPid
Planning Dept- conditions;
Show a 50 ft. building setback line from all access casmenta p'
1
the zoning ordinance.
All parcels to be at least 1 acre gross to comply with the M
lg, zoning.
The fallowing mitigation measures are required.
ludin protOCUOn of
ermatlent solution to drainag�:� is g
20, plovide a p ro nes, and install the rnquirc'd
downstream and n lghboring properties,
facilities
�'�j
2 1, Verify winter groundwater elevations and modify the. parcel design or
Vnecessary, in acco
sizes, if rdance with the monitoring results. (9'
r� oar
22. Place a statement on the final map that any archaeological resources
or
uncovered during construction will be reported to and investigated
by a qualified atchaealog st'
APPENDIX 11.
NOTICE OF DETERMINATION
TO: Office of Planning and Research FROM: Planning Department
Count Center Dryra
1400 Tenth Street, Roo 1 _Y
Sacramento, CA 95814 U vine, CA 95965
or
xx County Clerk FEB B 2 % 19$6
County of Butte
5Ui3.7EdM Filing of Notice of Deter6ft"1 MMEGRERj �i - ty, t .S2
the Public Resources ode.' 1_'g�!IDC�;Ejb"u.� � th Section 21108 or 2l lr
of E�j -- peputy
ject" Title AP # Name
Tentative Parcel. Map 40-1.5-79 Craig Hawes-
tate Clearing ouse Num er Contact i?erson Telephone Number
Of submitted to -Clearinghouse)
Public Works John Mendonsa 534-4266
Project Location At the northeast corner of Lott Road and Aubry Ct.
Durham area.
P�Oj Des P ort Tentative Parcel Map to divide 4+ acres to create
4 parcels at 1+ acre each.
This i5 to advise that the Butte County AdvisorA enc
or Responsible Agency
has approved the above described project and has made the following determinations
regarding the above described project;
1. The project ,_,;, will, will not, L ave a significant effect on the environment.
• p project pursuant
2. '
to the provisions of Impact sport was prepared far this ro
A Negative
of CEQA tion was prepared for
this project pursuant to the
• provisions
_
The 1M or Negative Declaration and record of project approval may be
examined at
Butte County Plantingbepartment.
7 Co" t"V Center Wrive, Oravt�l�_,_[d,�..
3. Mitigation measures , werco were not, made a condition of the approval
of the project.
4. A statement of overriding Considerations was, .,Y., was notfi adopted for
this project.
Date Received for Piling -27-86
- a re
5tnphen X1. Streetor
Senior Planner
MIT Fe
R
Revised 3anuarY 1993
Craig Hawes -
riitigation Measures
TPM,, AP#40--1.5-79
rov de a permanent solution to drainage, including
1. P ro erties
protections of downstream and neighboring p P
and install the required facilities.
y the
2, Verify winter groundwater elevations sin accordance
parcel design or sixes if necessary,
with the monitoring results-
that any archaeological
3 E,lace a statement on the final map , , n will be reported
resources uncovered during
ualifiedcarchaeoiag s'..
to and investigated by
anter-®epartmenfa1 Momorandum
To, Butte County Advisory Agency
F.aoM: Planning Director
SUBJECT. Report on Tentative Parcel Map of Craig Hawes on AP 40-15+79
DATE; Febeuary 11, 1986
This is a proposal to divide 4+ acres to create 4 parcels Cil 1+ acres
each. The present zoning is SR -I (Suburban Residential -
, acre
The Land Use Plan Map of the Butte County General Paan deSignatespthisls).
area as Agricultural Residential. pursuant to the policies. There are
no specific or community plans ,for the areas
The proposal does not conflict with County zoning nor any .adopted or
proposed element of the Butte County General Plan nor an
or community plan. y County, specific
A Mitigated Negative Declaration regarding environmental impact is tee
with the following mitigation measures: mmended
Is Provide a permanent solution to drainage, including protection of
downstream and neighboring properties, and install the required
facilities,
Verify winter groundwater elevations and motlii'y the parcel des'r►.in
or sizes
if necessary, in accordance with the monitoring results.
Place a statement on the final map that any archaeological, resource
uncovered during construction will be reported to and s
by a qualified archaeologist, investigated
!`pproval of the tentative map is recommended subject to the following
conditions:
is Show a 50 ,foot building setback line from all access easements per
the zoning ordinance.
2. All parcels to be at lenst 1 acre gross
zoning, to comply with the SR -,1
`r
✓ r
SIERRA WEST SURVEYING
LICENSED LAND SI.IRVEYINC
5437 Black Olive Drive , Paradise, CA 95969
Phone: (916) 877-6253
County of Butte
Planning Department
7 County Center Drive
Orovi,lle, CA 95965
Attention: Stephen A. Streeter
RE Craig Hawes Tentative Parcel. Map
P #40-15-79
og
#85-il-27-01
;�aua
In response to your, l',tier of January ',O, 1986, the following
Items 1,411 be adhered to:
Item #31 C & H and Item #16, :ct Storm Drainage
v additional drainage generated by this project will be
mit: sd by any new or Azpgraded facilities, as required by the
Buti' u"unty Public Works Department ox, the Butte County Hoard of
Supervisors-
Lt ems# 161 b _
All new septic tanks will be installed under permit from,
and to the satisfaction of the Butte County 'Environmen' al Health
Department
Item #20 At_
The same statement regarding any archaeological resources
that was plaoed on the original Amator Parcel Man will be placed
on the final map.
item #1 : Public Services
S:lowo steady growth has been the pattern of developme.ht in
the Durham area for many years. During this time, the various
4
Craig Hawes TPN!
January 15, 1986
'age 2
agencies have' g
raded their facilities to meet the this
needs of `
'upsteady growth. It is to be expected that any additional needs for
public services will be handled the same as before with special
assessment districts and/or mitigation fees as allowed by
Sincerely,
Craig Hawes
By
e��
Gordon L.
GLS r
� nPPIJNhI; x
J
COUNTY OF BUTTE
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST IORM
(to be Complete y l.oa ,1gency)
Lig A 85-11-27-01
l KC;ROUN1) AP H 40-1.5-79
1, tnc
1.
Name of proponent CRAIG HA�II ,S
2
Address of proponent and representative (if applicable)
cra g Hawes �siersa_:We.si~ ..Suave --Lag �
180 Cohasset Road 5937 81ac C, 've eve
Chico, to 95926 Paradise, CA 95969-
3,
3,
Project description Tentative Parcel. Map
r.T,. MANDATORY l INIJiNCS 01 sTC;NrI irnNOT; YES MAYia i �O
a,
Dons the project have the potential to degrade the
duality of the environment, substantially reduce
the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a
fish or wildlife population to drop below self-
sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant: or
animal c�onmunity, reduce the number or restrict the
range of a rare car endangered plant or animal or
eliminates importa%t examples of the major periods
of California history or prehistory? .
b.
Does the project have the potential: to achieve
short-term benefits to the detriment OF long-term,
environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the
environment is one which occurs in a relatively
brief period oc long-term impacts will
5 t future.)while
o
e,
Does the project have: impacts which arc indivi.dtt-
ally limited, but cumulatively ccnsiderabl& (A
project may impact on two or more separate resources
where the impact on each resource is relatively
small, bit where the eyffeet or the total of those
Impacts on the environment is significant.) �C
d}
Does the pry �vQt have environmental Wcysts which
will. cause , atintantial adverse urrerts an human
beings, either directly or indirectly? �
l l'1 T1'f Tlii2Tll"N_nry'Ftl% fTo btu rqmplckd by the Lend Agener)
On
the basis or this initial evaluation:
[At, find the:^ ''p1,011 rf1d project C;OULP NOT nativ P sig,ni ficant arrect
_.. �_.
an the environment, and a NPGA'i IVU DUC1.ARATI ON will be prepared.
Xim
rick) that alt nigh the proposed project could have a signifi-
cant effcyc't on the envircrnment, there will ntt he a significant
effect in this cpgv because the MITIGATION MHASUREN described 'ren
the nttac;hed shvet We hvvn aside`s) to the project A N13VATTVr'
DEC;URATION wi 1'i lie propai o l
i/WH ('incl they proposed project MAY have a :;nificont. oflect' nn
�"-
the environment, and an UNCIRONhit_iv"iAL IMP�AC'V Iti:i'ORT .is reciuircO.
i14'i i, K
►7aiivar 10 y_ j 9 6 C°tttiN`l' ' C7i�_ BUTTE ISI. ` NTNG; 13HPAR°�!� ENT
S' en A. S •-Yeater
Sena or Planner
is
IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
xp anations ol a -"'lyes" and "maybe" answers are required
on attached sheet(s))
YES
MAYBE
No
I. EARTH. Will the proposal result in significant;
a.
Unstable earth conditions or in changes in
geologic substructures?
b.
Disruptions, displacements, compaction or
overcovering of the soil?
c.
Change in topography or ground surface
relief features?
d.
Destruction, covering or modification of any
unique geologic or physical features?
e.
Increase in wind or water erosion of soils
�`
either on or off-site?
f.
Changes in deposition or erosion of beach
sands, or changes in siltation; deposition
or erosion which may modify the channel of
a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or
any ay, inlet or lake?
C
g.
Loss of prime agriculturally productive soils
outside designated urban areas?
he
Exposure of people or Property to geologic
hazards'such as earthquakes, landslides, mud-
slides, ground failure or similar hazards?
2. AIR.
Will the proposal result in substantial;
a.
Air emissions or deterioration of ambient
b.
air duality?
The
creation of objectionable odors, smoke
or fumes?
Alteration
c.
of air movement, moisture, or
temperature, or any change in climate,
locally or regionally?
3. WATER, Will the proposal result in substantial
a.
changes in currents, or the course or
direct4on of water movements in either
marine or fresh waters?
b.
Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns,
or the rate and amount of surface runoff?
c.
Need for off-site surface drainage improve-
ments, including vegetation removal, channel-
ization or culvert installation?
d.
Alteratio, = to the course or flow of flood
waters?
e.
Change in t '.e amount of surface water in any
water bod).
f.
Discharge irto surface Waters, or in anV
alteration c;f surface water quality; including
t
but not lir:, ied to temperature, dissolved
oxvggn or . i 'bidity?
or rate of 11014g, Alteration, f the direction
of round w��•ters :
h.
Change in � .,o quantit- or duality of ,gtouncd waters,
either thm.gh direct additions or With-
draual.s, o through interception of an
aquifer by k:uts or excalrations?
�
i.
Reduction the amount of water otherwise
s
available :or public water supplies?
Jo
Exposure ► people or property to water
related ha,"4,ds such as flooding?
2
YES
MAYBE NO
4. PLANT LIFE. Will the proposal resultinsubstantial.,
'57-7-Ftinge in the diversity of species, or number
of any species of plants (including trees,
shrubs, gtass, crops, and aquatic plants)?
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare
or endangered species of plants?
c. Introduction of new species of plants into an
area, or in a barrier to the normal replenish-
ment of existing species,
d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop?
S. ANIMAL LIFE. Will the proposal result in si"Ust(Intial:
a. CFianiTe—in the diversity of species, or numbers
of any species of animals (birds, land animals
including 'reptiles, fish and shell fish,
benthic organisms or insects)?
b. Reduction in the numbers of any unique, rare
or endangered species of animals?
c. introduction of new species of animals into
an area, or result in a barrier to the migration
X
or movement of animals?
d, Detori6ration to e-cisting fish or wildlife
habitat?
6. NOISE. Will the proposal result in substantial:
Y
a. Increases in existing noise levels?
b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels?
X
7, LIGHT AND GLARE, Will the proposal produce
signs fscant light and glare?
8. LAND USEi Will the proposal result in a
substantial alteration of the present or planned
land use of an area?
J. NATURAL RESOURCES: Will the proposal result in
substantial
ao Increase in the rate of use of any natural
resources?
b, Depletion
of any non-renewable natural.
— C,
resources?
- -
6 n1CV OF "DctT Will the s a 1 involve:
a. A rii�,of explosion or the release of hazard-
ous substances (including, but not limited to,
oil, pe8ticidesi chemicals or radiation) in the
event of an accident or upset conditions?
b. Possible interference with at emergency
response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
11, POPULATION, 11111 the proposal, alter the location)
di$tTibution, density) Or growth rate of the human
population?
iz. HOUSING, Will the proposal affect existing housitgo
or create a demand, for additional housing?
_X_
01
`YES
AWB`E
NO
13.
TU,, NSPORTATION/CIRCULATION: Will the proposal
result in:
a. Generation of substantial additional vehicle
movement?
b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or
demand for new parking?
X'
c, Substantial impact on existing transportation -`"—
systems?'.
d. Significant alterations to present patterns
of circulation or movement of people and/or
goods?`
e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? `r'
f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles `""
bicyclists or pedestrians?
14.
PUBLIC SERVICES, Will the proposal have an effect
upon, or result in a need for new or altered
governmental services,
a. Vire protection?(
b. police protection?`
c. Schools?'
d. Parks of other recreational facilities?
e, Maintenance of public faciiities, including
roads?
f, Other governmental services?
1.5.
ENERGY
, Willthe proposal. result in
o
substantialTT amounts of fuel -or energy?
k
b, Substantial increase in demand upon existing
sources of energy, or require the development
of new sources of energy?
16.
UTILITIES,, Will, the proposal result in a need for
Hew systems, or substantial alterations to the
following;
a. Power or natural gas?
X
b, Communications systems?
C. Water availability:
)c
d. Sewer or septic tank? "�'`
e. Storm water drainage?
Jr, Solid waste and disposal?
17,
14UMAN HtALM Will the proposal result in:
a. Creation of any health hazard or potential
health hazard (excluding mental health) ?
b, Exposure of 'people to potential health
hazards?
18,
APSTHEVCS. Will the proposal result in the
o`GsMzc�" of any Scenic vista or view open_ to
the public, or will, the proposal. result in the
creation
of an aesthetically offensive site open
p -
-..... _ TES
MAYBE ni
act
19. RECREATION- Will the anoPt,saof existing recreatesult in an ional
or
upon the quality quantity
opportunities?
20. CULTURAL 'RESOURCES.
t e result in the alteration
a. Wi11 proposal
of or the destruction of a prehistoric or
historic archaeological site?
the proposal result in adverse phys4cal
_
b. Will
or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or
object?
----
historic building, structure or
Does the proposal have to.ca Se
c. whichtwau dtential
a physical chat affect unique
�
ethnic cul.tuxange
values?
the proposal resttpoter►tialg
d. Will the impact
or sacred uses w _�.
area?
V. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AP 40-15.79
See attached.
AP SFO -15-79
1b: An estimated 69 of each parcel would be compacted and overcovered
by building structures and driveways.
le,f: Proper construction techniques will Minimize the limited
erosionPotential and thus deposition of
. sediment to nearby drainages.
19: The on-site soils are designated as Class I for agrIcUltural Use.
The 4 -acre parcel Is not in itself viable for commercial agricultural
Production.
Bb,c: Drainage Improvements may be necessary along Lott Road and
existing drainage structures enlarged to handle surface water' runoff
generated.
Shojisdg Environmental Health indicates that a high winter groundwater
elevation May occur In this vicinity. VerifICEItloh of the seasonal
groundwater elevation is needed.
4d: A number of almond trees Will need to be removed on each partol
to accommodate future homesite-4
This Parcel represents Parcel � of the tentative map for Albert
Amator appr,-,ved by the Advisory Agency on April 2, 1984. A tion
of that tentative Map Was to show a residential building setbackcondiline
On the eastern edge of the Original Parcel to a depth of 60 feet Into
Parcels 1, a and 4. The Purpose of the setback is to Minimize
conflicts between residential development and ongo*M0 agricultural
I I
Pursuits On large Parcels to the east.
8: This land division Hould conform to Other tentative Maps along the
Lott Road corridor Hithin the SR -1 zoning. It is expected that the
General Plan designation would be pr"operly amended from Orchard and
Field. Crops to Agricultural-P.esidential
Plan MOW under Hay, as Part Or the Durham Area
lac,f.l Four Potential homesites Hould generate up to 40 vehicular,,
trips Per day. A one-rc�ot
the Lott Road ft-onta the strip should be cOn-,l(l0red al
for Parcel 4 would 190 Or Parcel 44 Limiting access , Aubry Courtong
loss driveway encroachment., Improve traffic safety aIOMQ Lott [Joad with one
149 Additional rosidential development Will Increase demand ro
governmental services. Love) of services r all
have been reduced byrecent County budget Providd e.to the Dwrham area
Cutbatkt
16e' Now or enlarged 8tOrm"at6r drainage rac!
by Public Works, titlesMay be required
206t OUtto COUMtY records Indicate the project Is Within an area of
high archaeological t0hZ;jtIv)tY* A mitigation measure for the Amator
Parcel Map was to Pl4adG a stabemenL- on the L
archaeological resou�,tot that might be unao final map regarding any
be required or, this tentative 8ti."uCtIont
The same statement Will ytt-ed during con
archaeological curve. It obtaVe map unless an
ined to give clearance.
Applicant: Craig HaWes
Assessor's. Parcel
40-15-79
Log # 85-11-27-01
DATA SHEM
A. Prg,lect D-escriply Ion
1. Type of Project: Land division.
2. Brief Description: Tentatlye Parcel Map to divide 4 acres to
create four parcels at 1 acre each.
S. Location: Northeast corner of Lott Road and Aubry Court)
Durham area.
Proposed Density of Development* 1 d.u./I acre.
5. Amount of Impervious Surfacing:
64 Access and Nearest; Roblic. Road(s): Parcels 1 and 4 front on
Lott Road; access to Parcels 2, 3 and 4 available via Aubry
Court,
7, Method of Sewage Disposalt. Septic systems.
8. SoUrce of Water Supply: Individual NeIlVo
9. Proximity of Power Lines: Available to Parcel.
J0. Potential for further land divisions and development: None
under SR -1 too lng; all parcels must be at least i acre gross*
B. Environmental Set -tin
EbY—sL,1�110-1,..vlirdnMent!
1. Terrain
a. General Topographic Charact0r: kOJOtIVOlry level valley
t(,Jr1-a I m,
b. Slopes: 0-29i
t4 Elevation t 160s-165 feet ASL.
d. Limiting Factors: None.
2, soils
ai Types and Chat-8ateristleg: Vlmo Loam/Vina Fine Sandy Loam
- Well draining soil capable of supporting an extensive
range of crops.
b, Limiting Fadtorgo Moderate liquefaction Potential.
S. Natural Hazards of the Land
6. Earthquake Zone: Four miles West Of active fault In
Foothill Shear Zone, four miles east of Inferred faulti
b, Crosion Potehtlalt
c. Landslide Potential:
d Fire Hazardt. Unciats1fled - irrigated area.
0* Exp6h5lvo Soil Pbtentlali., Moderate.
4. Hydrology
a. Surface Watero. Butte Creek 1000 feet */- hor'wh and West.,
b. Groundwater: Durham area aquifers.
c. Oraloago, characteristics: Good natural soil dralhage4p
drainage solution needed for surface Water runoff.
-'7 -
d. Annual Rainfall (normal) 26"
e. Limiting Factors: Subsidence potential
5. 1/ I sual /Scenic Quality: Rurarl area with orchards.
6. Acoustic Quality: Low ambient noise levels with intermittent
noise from agricultural machinery and vehicular traffic.
7. Air duality. Good.
�g� t i tsar
Environment:
8 Vegetation". Mature almond orchard with undurlying grasses.
9. Wildlife Habitat: Birds, small mammals typical of valley
orchards.
I'z l ural Eny i ronment
10. Archaeological and Historical Resources in the areae High
sensltivtty.
11. Butte County General Plan designation*. Policies indicate
Agricultufal-Residentlal.
12. Existing Zoning. SR -1
13, Existing Land Use on-site Almond orchard.
14. Surrounding Area;
a. Land Uses. Almond orchards with corridor of residential
uses along Lott Road:
b. Zoning.SIR—I, A-5.
c.. Gen. Plan designations: AoricWltural-Residentiall Orchard
and Field Crops.
d. Parcel Sizest 1-57 acres
e. Population
15. Chbracter of Site and Area .4 m ins i t i on from agriculture to
rural retidential.
16. Nearest Urban Area= Durham, S miles 4-/- southwest.
1 7`. Relevant Spheres of Influence: Durham, Durh4am irrigation
District, Durham Mosquito Abatement District
18. Improvements Standards Urban Area.
19. Fire Protection Service
a. Nearest County (State) Piro St8tiont #45 Ovi-ham.
b Water Availability: Fire truck capacity, future Wells
with draft connections, fIre connectlons at wet1s:, adjacent
to property, on north
20. Schools In Area. Durham Unified School District.
a ,
21t.75
Y-111— ", e"'
te�as--
7 ..r•" . ,_ �, �� ►. '• 1. 4 11
r
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
] 7 County Canter 5rive ] 747 E►Irntt Gond
Address fL,196 Memorial Way County
Californiater-ri 95965 Paradise, Calrin(n,n 95969
Reply to
Ch Co California' Tnla hone 216/S31.A281 Tolophono+ 9141117 2961, Ext
Teipphonet9l6/891.2727 p
Cr*,d&1 11awes
c/o sierra IlOst Surveying.
4.),lllack olive Drive
Paradise, California JSt1ClD`
i)eal `r kis toes
January 7, 1986
iAutle Co. Plarmie►r i3ornrlt.
1t)✓: (rra�.�; flet!~est'arcc�s���s��lli�t�,;aiifolt�
Lett ],load and AUbry C;,o11rt
Durham Area
A1111 n—IS—i;t
'Phis departnWilt has advi. e:%j the lout c Cobd unty
Dopantlte7ithe tlO t'`ublly�liWorksnLand
ncvelapll►cllt $eCtlt,xl that ��!�` .ttr noel
Based on prrsent informaitoll) `rye CO -11 � :1�r,r nd approval ur oi�►lclil Tonal
approVai,
1ti� U►111netieleel Clal cti.t_ions for f�nt.frayal
a.rol:irtu thosefr
� nvi,rrc an arelt for l��ell; elft! 100 feet 1earllrt;lcl IrcC sethae:l:
l�
i cress on each parcel
ltrov ale a 100 toot IeaollCield Coe sutbatk arouml i:1vi.stinl; ► I's uathcr t�"it. �1.
the 1 x,lpexty of witlli,11 1JC1 fe,e,t at thL, hruporty lsounelari.os, i r elo With.
1 `� ►tt;,i11 Cele user!la svwago
Prcyrr cle the reyuit eel uslibl e sew lie elf s 1os111 erea on each, li�rrt l . �olnlytnislaclsal
L1n adjacent part -0, ► any ilat-c:e:1 net lyravrll e
J
area re: luireJ by tho Subdivi 1,'1011 vreli na.n"
Co►liltly with tho m,1t.i.I;ation 111c sure to vora.I'y WilAt. r �rt�i�11e1 1��ttex rievR>tintt,
1i` you have any questions regarding this latter, ploaso euv.tact It
U-111, alld 11',00 "'ll" wockclays .
Cltiuu Office beti�cc.n 8-.00
verytruly yours;
W'° '1'lttlnias Reid) lt,S
iuparvicing Sallitttll,Jn
Division Of l;nv :tonmClltAl Health
11: j 1
cc / Land Vidv lopment-Pub lie Works
Planning 0e.19arttllOnt
(Sierra 1Ve8t �aurvGy)