Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout040-150-0934PPX41CANT Mike Loofbourrow Log087-05-15-07 AD17RES5.954Y, .4 Athena Wa Durham, CA 95938 �.— OWNER Same ------------a.---.._.. PROOICT DESCRIPTION Tentative Parcel Map o tvid� die 2.0 acres to create 2 —Parcels of T acre each LOCATION south of Aubrey Ct., east of Lott Road, Durham�_ ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER(S) 40-15-93 Orchard &..., ZONING GENERAL PLAN -•F-xe1_d--er0p•S— PROJECT CONSISTENT? GENRRAL _PLAN CONFORMANCE REPORT DATE OF APPLICANT Sl%,tt111'.CURE LAND CONSERVATION ACT CONTRACTS? DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED 5-12-87 AUNT/SURVEYOR/CIVIL ENGINEER Sierra West surveying ADDRESS`` 5437 Black Olive Dr., Paradise, CA 95969 .. _ DATB PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT .PREPARED ENVIRONMENTAL CATEGORICAL EYEMPTION �- DATE 'I7,Eb UTERMINATION .,, AND DATE • NEGATIVE DECLARATION - DATE ADOPTED -_ MITIGA'.tED NBG. DECLARATXON Dr?I'1; ADOPTED `- ENV. IMPACT REPORT - DATE CERTIFIED �.. .. STATE CLEARTNGROUST, No. S08, COMMITT88 MMITING DATE ADVISORY AGT CY t1EARING DATE ADVISORY AORNCY AC'T'ION � aUrTE — . ���i110 Co, aniilll''amrri. COUNTY P� -- CE REPORT •gRAL PIAN CONFO MAN � % ARCEL MA OR SUBDIiliSION MAP O R 1. F QtoviUm,llioraka „!� to be complete by applicant;(,�/rrr,�..t C ;cros 1 .address Nance bnd ....� Applicant t Descr r4ption sar' 6 Parcel Number (s) Ames _ proposed Use Department: w feted by the planning DeP mp items are rec Ment It following to be .coLand Conservation Ag Current. zoning•Ky -• 1,:x.1.•. gnaton 1 General -plan DesNot Applicable licab A I le conditional CriCesia: YES lip. Agrictlw.ural-Residential , , / / ,..,.,... Compatibility , 1. AgricOltuzal ap Cacity ._._- i. Nater & Sewer Facilities qu-- / g. Adequate Fire � Maintenance ....-- aLry1oCO. V'tannin9COMM 4, 1:oad Cap&&CitY ercial & School s 9' q Access to Comm Mho 12, 19B7 .Orchard &Field.Crops Qrav'►14o, camotrlaa jzd P S`�•, I 'Predominant Urban Boun10 Ac.daries *2, Vicinity not impaired :3; &6ric viability �oes 1;ot ,_:_ snd zoning. project does to the General flan �� `^�-[" t , staff Determination. substantially conform �.x..�n, S tit -' _ Comments % y & M. Dare gtaff gignatuxe l AM AWAKS Or 'rkiT� �UCIVI S'F FSTED LMW DIV181C AND z(%%NG, w s T T FOR Tff, �11 RCOrTE'o NCE VaTa ' GENE ) AppX,ICAN iNG ETERMINA'I7ON REGARD �r . nature of`ApPlieanC ,^ gig sip-RFtAWEST v DATE �.. 6&tuLAckOLIV a iVPt S1�R PANWGF., GA OtOG9 r'ter .0 LST ` ► :ON �I K7 - LCE 0 Y rV r ' 20I„� BUTA tt County Office of planning, and Reseatch �1- 1?1t1t1iTlt��: Departntetah ,1400 Tenth Street, ROOM('121 7 Cowlty Centiut' Sacramento, CA 05814 A� AUG � xt �`�?�! Oroville, CA 95965 or County Clerk County of Butte k�V , G.:.EpAEFl4.. . ,. Filing of Notice of DeterminationinCOMPlianrn w1Lh Sect'l.on '11108 tTF3 xEG2 or 2115'? of the Public Resource C Name i)roject Title 40-15-g3 Mike LouLktourrow Tentative Parcel Map Contact Person '1`elephond Nwnbor State Clearinghouse Number (if stibm tted, to Clearinghouse) 538-7266 Public Works John Mendonsa 1�t:ojcct Location on the east side Df Aubry court, approximately 750 ion with Lott Road, Durham. deet east of its intersect 1 �rQ"-eDescriptio►i Tentative Parcel Map dividing two acres into two parcels of one acre each • - -"--" Advisory Agency , .�.----- "fhis is to advise that the Butte Co�Lead Agency Or Responsible Agency) r roved the above described project on August )D,at ].98 7 and has made ling app (ate�W_ the following deta:rminations regarding the above-described project' Will, X will. 'not, have a significant effect on the 1. The project — environment. t 2. A. An Environmental Impact Report Was prepared for this pro7ec pursuant to the provisions of CF,0k ,.e tired for this project pursuant to tate X A Negative Declaration was p" p - provisions provisions or CEQA, were i - - � , X were not, made a condition of the Mitigation measures approval of the projeoti was, X was not, adopted ent of averxidi.ng con,iderations ..:_.._ A statetfti for this project. I, o certify that the final. 21:11 With t',Ommt"tS project app At rasi�otjsos and record of phis is tlic royal. is available to the }e�tet`al. p 13tttte County Planning Dapattmdnt 7 t,oun -y Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965zZ Date 'Received for Filing anti "' Posting at OPR ,=Si na `u e `- T lien 5txeete Senior Planner T.ttlt: ttavised mdedh 19B6 To,, FROW !i1 /��'' a�� a � Inter -Depart #�1 I'Memorerid um �o4y�_, n'r Advisory Agency Planning Director suaJtCT: REPORT ON TENTATIVE PARCEL ;MAP FOR OR MIzCB LOUFBOURpoW ON DgTEi August 6, 1987 This is a proposal to divide 2 acres into 2 each. The present zoning is SR -l. The Lanc�pTr���� P1,111. s tit Z acted the Butte County General Plan designates this eaas Maphof and Field Crops. Pursuant to the Policies o Element, this property is interpreted to be dO �1i1gnated use Agra cultural -Residential, one acre mini Element indicates that this mom` Unclassified Safety fire hazard area. 'There are pnoJspecificnor cla for the area. y plan The proposal does not conflict with county zoning nor any adopted or proposed element of the Butte County General Plan. The property is located within the Durham -Dayton Planning Area, where an area plan is now in progress. Planning documents prepared in tha tion to improve access by t study recommend continuous circula- fire fighting and other emergency vehicles. it is xxecommended that the map be redesigned to oxbond Aubry Court to Brinson Court Public Works conditions to upgrade ll Planning's concerns f_or accesad impactCtorthe rhouse tatathe southeast corner of Lott and Aubry. A G0 foot residential building setback is shown from the east property line to separate residences from intensive a lands. School District commented that they need a safe ubus msto1find vicinity of Aubry and Lott,. The aPPlicant contacted the school district, who requojted the bus stop be located off of Lott Road. Since the applicants ty does tot froon Lott Road, and will Only be adding rone radditional house the school district's request was not made a condition of a Water Tender Fees will be collected in lieu of re pprov. drafting access to the well:, n record search ha8 beennprepared from the Northeast Jhf"O mation Center'; who in 7 >c;�tcd a survey not be required. Recommend approval,, no conditions. LT, Jmc CC., Mike Lou�bourrow Sierra ftst Surveying SIERRA WEST SURVEYING LICENSED LAND SURVEYING 5437 Black Olive Drive - Paradise, CA 95969 Phone: (916) 877-6253 Buff,- Co. Planning r �_ J U L t 1987 ©�cvillo, �.ciltorei� June 3o, iJu7 Butte County Planning Commission 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 9596,5 re: Loofbourrow Parcel Map Attn.: Laura Tuttle Dear Laura, This is what we received from Durham Unified School District. Since this area is not on Loofbourrow's property, there is nothing he will be able to do. The tree limbs and brush in this area have been recently cleaned away by the present tenants in the duplex. This will be an asset for the children waiting to board the bus. Sincerely SIERRA WEST St RVEY y Gordon L. Sh`elds GLS/kh WEST SURVFyING 4V ,I,AND SURVEYING 1,1(11,NSD . paradisc, CA 95969 j,jjj 11jack 011*10 D (9 16) S77-6253 ?J ,no Dept. County _21ann' Coanty Center Drive oroville? CN 95 53c 9(35- 91 Attn- ura Tutt* -Le 00 MIS June form that was Dear raAlra j,00nmenta cbec1rli5t anileto the. en, 15 0 1981, to yoji I r VeOOM- re0eivea by O-ur. office On -the answers I , t We hereby s,�ibltl Wc t,,,ti,, on the eXisting item 0 mended M1 recOretardan be rotained. -ndition Of app by tile Depart and Will I I tion measilre This Will be r'c i• 1public �qorltg? not a jAitiga approval by the Depart- ment Of a condition of app siareo 3) This Will be not a Mitigation mea school Anent Of Vtiblid 940r1"Sl �With the D'arhaln 4) we are in contact the Depart- ps'lrt ancl awaiting an answer oval, by li on Ot appr sure. b condition' , a mit igtLtjon Iftea, e a were not 5) ot%ental jjealth­# no cel Maps h for th1s Ment Of znvl previous Par cl rG �cjjj the f 0'ar rctjeStea a Sea ro) h1thOV we have reqilited to ao Sol Item, parcel� any ""00%011' a,4 W 0 r ec As soon orc, reL 6)0 we will fwal p. of your Recommended Mit'- It cry mvvoval that xt appears that the maJ conditions gation Measures are in realityb other County Departments and laced upon the mai? y ellvironmentfxl cc)nc:ex�ue Wil Ue p to de with any have little or nothing regarding this projEct, sincO re ly, SIERRA wr SURVEY. `G 07 by Gordon L. Shields GSL/'kh � LT llfllo"./QUuuc�.tltU�"J� ... Octyartmenr a1 Anlhrbt c 1o0y C;alifo�nia �} C�f,,,% Carifoln+a S1311c Un+V&SIly, Ch'cO ArchaeofogrcalChico, CA �59,79 Inventory , L.r�...... gt6f f39a Ci+� . Buffs C"o, P14 Ming ll Yle iF' JUN 241987 To. Butte. County Planning Orovfllh tai #7 County Center Dr. oroville, Ca. 95965 Beat' County Planners, A review of the above project has revealed the following: x Tie area indicated as within the project boundaries is considered to be archaeologically sensitive. Present are: k Easy access to natural so+,trces of Nater x Flat meadowland or flat lard near water South and/or east facing slopes k Previously recorded sites in the viciriiey, Other we strongly reconmend that an archaeological reconnaissance be conducted of the area by 'a qualified archaeologist and appropriate mitigation measures prepared: A known site or sites has/h8ve been previously recorded in the project area.Project operations will have a negative impact on these cultural resources. We rec0mT-e6d that a qualified archaeologist be contacted to assess site coapD e,nts and prepare a mitigative proposal- xx Other: A survey is not re�xrelx ncicd Cor the 4�k�ove pCo t, W -du- ngif any pre istarlc- ar historic c.�I tuba .r terra s areycncoanter Cec tion pro ect s, operationa wor , 5F'', cease Lot >,� e y inn ung an an�pTi1atGrlas 7y �J� l 1e OE lift.' SLte an c�CC1 CU7CXjl r 7tiank you for the appoy rtuhi.t to review and oemI*nt of 01k, Proposal' Please let us krx.)w what decisions are m-xle rens+rci rig the proj(�t, Sir,ocrel;y „,r - � t.r r i rr., _ .,a:i • �+ h`r.;r,... I)t : rA)koto Kowtil W)rthj�5st information Center 0�rtlirratOl A f11'I'l;Nrila lc rtluN'r`Y at w tir i t'r, (- r7C: e(1- --I C`tk't Y t,_ C[lC J t cllcy) AP Ni1mc� clI' llrn{ycjlirrl;l: MIK_ E LOUFBOURR9W_�,.,.— ---� iunk�llt iln(1 xcyprO,s('til(ativc' Ci.1 a.11 Aokl l'c s a o I } ro �,r S_uI=V y ll"f 4. �ie�rs�_..Y�_ • Mike: Loufbour•row _ r.., 5437 Black Ole:.., 9544 Athena WaY Paradise, CA„ 9596.9 burYiam, CA 95938 ...,. , , h r ., I tic �• r a }at r r,ll Tentative Parcel _Map mAY Mi NO }1. I t tlnrrlln'►'t�tY r�rr�ni�u��� l 11,1 CANC,1: radc OL il. I)tlO>; tl1(. ilirr►('e1 h;lvk� thrM' }1ca5�lUS1 inti�llv�retlllce�lt, }loll rty tit' tilt"t'u�°lrtltln,rnt I lccies, causeor rt t}i+' }iiiliitat clC rl 'i illylrtiluti(anitc 1(Irt1}tllae`l.pw sclf- C15h tit' lvrlilr ilc: I I ti11St11iIli lip, Ievk'Isy tIlrC+ilt(,n' to ) C1inIlIl1itC` � }7lwlllt til I' ,tn i ,nrl1 a RBnttttl r(itlh �cr(l11}11111 nt or animal kul.th'r rallt;c� cit .I rlllt' (ll enol b ,+M lelintl t�iilniniltk` iu}iurt;>nt �xa.mplc:; c�i' the 1ua�(li c81° I:�i �lltat"t1 '1il hl` tr?1'1' Or l'�crllSti71'y. h. Iluk�s tV1c� }�rciic•Ct 'ha�t� tile` }Icltcntial to aellivVe lon ri` t(111 tc rnl, br1(art ti�rnl IWIlvi' t� tea tiishnrti�tiern, °let 1x11 the ,till �Ciilrti'. (A Ailt.lv�'�v V It k* t'onlne>t 4 �nc� ��hich (kc(,itr:a In �l v'nvIronnici'lt 1. x 1�5,1c.t; will llriol pericltl tit tittle WhIlc ficin -ter'ua }' un(lure intra the, I'uhul'ts.) 11tl�'s the' }irrl)(�ti't l�iivc� rnl1,llets which arc indlvltVll� I 17u't eltlnuliitivrl�' etltlsicicrn}11c'' (� -illy r imitc't ttrt) tai ill 1i`" g�1Ji11`(itC t'�SOI1"I`4C`. r project Ilmy 111111 -act laic hClllt'lt` is 1•Ctilfltivrly wl1C`i'C' t11C` Illlli;lct t1 t1 t`iiMrll 1'C.: Ot'C1i di' those` tit8all, V1ut lvll>�i'i` tV1r cont c11'!" nirictillt.] }"Illllkwtw fill 'tliC' C'1iv1i'nnnient 1S t „- �I }lryc 1 tV1c' }8t'.t il.lN,•r~ (�1t It �c1t4t`ic'l f�fcet5�allt11t nallnt li c8)k'( Will k'�lll°1 l` tillll'iiUiltl ll. ,.i� bVinl;ti, titlit^r Jirectly or inilirnetl�•", ll }, }iril'L',li�il{i1"I'1t1 l'1„ Itij c(ilsill'lt�tt'tI IIS tVi(� r�r�itJ �1)ttiYe.�,} t'1I thc lril•I tit iItI:, IIIItia} vV11it'll iutl o tr?�'t' i V 1 11I,la.e�lt 1'}' I tlly will he. iii nlim."l . tr tTril(tt;t`�I 1'aii1IC�C,t. ['[1tt1,11 I1J1VC' it �iiif�lii.�ietlnt I� 1/1q, t 1111 t h(' 1 I i[11r1 ;l !l (,i1 tilt, Oliv i romitrtlt , k} /111iV,}t; et"iI nIc(lry.'I rri,r 1lc t°111 'llcpll l'ltlA`i'1'e`N tvr�ltti 1uilk%il 18111vet c111Itl lit Ili -it uitlloklgli 'till irl Ilot � I ti(tOlem, l t[ a wtt , ,Iii }tl:A`'il7t 'i j\ CIAL}'t'tr'I t,?1'1C4'c"t Iii tli1� C,1. _ hC`lwti l�lll��l ttl til.( 1111 tilt. ill t:lk'1lC'll 'illl't't llillt' }il t'1.w11`�V l tlhr lr' i 11 1'( }lI't'}lilt'C`lt . 1Ji?I1�rir:e t tit(- ,1, kBa,'Wjittrr ' I `'1t ''1�1eV.1'ttl lI Is tilc t•Ity i 1,111111c.t 7, ttlN1Y tl; j r "t kFlcl } ►Ii Y i t r, �I i98 "i ar l _ .� ..�. _ ��. � ems.-"'----�-� V�Lfi aura >jj .16t } � �sSoo a P3planner'I ,wy evir*l�ed by'. -- 4 F IV. ENVIRONMENTAL PACTS -o (Ex--p-I and tions a "yes'► and "maybe" answers are req�a i•ed on attached sheet(s)) 1. EARTH. Will the proposal result in significant: ES Y` a. Unstable, earth conditions MAYBE NO or in changes in geologic substructures? b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil'? c. Change in topography or ground, surf„Icc relief features? d. Destruction covering or modif*64 Qn of any .unique geologic or physical features? ri e. Increase in wind. or water erosion• of soils, either -X on or off•sito? f. Changes in deposition or, erosion oXf ,beach sands, or changes in -- - siltation, depositi.an or erosion which may modify-the channel o r. a river'or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake'? g. Loss of prime- agriculturally productive soils outs'i,de designated urban ."'" areas? h. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such --- as earthquakes, landslides, mud- slides, ground failure or similar hazards? 2 AIR, Will the Proposal result in substantial: , a. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors, smoke or fumes? C, Alteration of air movement, moisture, or teriperature, or awy, cliang�= lin;climate, . locally or regionally? X 3, WATER. Will the proposal result in substantial. a, Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements in either marine or fresh waters? b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? C, Need for off-site surface drainage improve- meats, including vegetation removal., channel= ilation or culvert installatiotl? G. X tv ati,ons to Olo course 014 flow of y� waters? o. Cl,ange in the amount of surface water it any Water body? Discha.Vge into bur fac, waters, orin any alteration of surface- �..... .. water qua,li�:y, iIicluding but not limited to temperature; dissolved oXm3n or turbidity? ge Alteration of the direction or rate of flow Of ground waters? h � Change in the quanti,tyor quali,t , of ground waLero, either through direct �. additions -or with- drai,rals, or througli interc ;Jption o!' an aquifer by cuts or excavations? it Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public Water supplies? 1. exposure of people or property to Waterrelated hazards ha ;a,rds such as flooding? yp ,,q MAYBE NO 4., PLANT LIFE. Will the proposresult no substantial, species,er dive y of a. ange in the of any species of plants (including trees, ? shrubs ,rass , Crops, and aquatic plants) of the numbers of any unique, Warp b. Reduction or, endangered species of plants? of plants into Al c. Introduction of new species in a barrier to the normal, replenish- area, or ment of existing species? in of any agricultural cxdl'? d. Reduction acreage S. ANIMAL LTPE. Will the proposal result in subs tantia"I diversity of species, or numbers a, CHange in the any species of animals (birds, land animals of including reptiles, fish and shell fish, benthic organisms or insects)? Reduction in the numbers of any unique, rare ` b. or endangered species of animals:? of animals into c. Introduction of new species result in a barrier to the migration an area, or or movement of animals? ---- Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife "" d. habitat? 6. NOISEA Will the proposal result in substantial: levels? a,- Increases in existing noise b, Exposure of 'people to severe noise levels? , (» 7. LIGHT AND GLARE Will the proposal produce slgni .cant lght and glare? 8. LAND USE. Will the proposal result in a su stantial alteration of the present or planneet. land use of an area? 9. NATURAL RPSOURCES: Will the proposal result in SL1tas Increase 111. the rate • of use of any natural ,resources? b. Depletion of any non-renewable natural �. resources. �^ . RISK C?E UPSET. teas net proposal 10 ; age of hazard— e a A s st: o p but not IiMite�t tro, OLI5 Stlt�stal'loe:i (including, ofl pestis des, chemicals or radiation) .ta the t1 oris"? --- event of an accident or upset condi b. possible interference with an emergency k response plan or emergency evacuation plant `POPULAT'ION Will the prop osal alter the location, rate of the Ixulnan ; astri utibn, density, or growth population? housing, 1,2. HOUSIM Will the PoxPOS al - or create a demand i additaonalthousing7g + YES MAMYIjfj NO 15. `1`R NSPORTATTON/CIRCULA.TION. Will the proposal.: - result Iri a. Generation of substantial additional vehicle movement? b. Effects on exis _ing parking fac'Alities , oar. demnad for new parking? C. Substantial impact on existing transporta'l„10 i systems? d. Significant alterations to present -pattern,, of circulation or movement of people and/oy1' goods? e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air tT Ffic? :. f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehiclos, bicyclists or pedestrians? 14. PUBLIC SERVIUS. Will the proposal have an; erroct upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmr -atal services a. Pine protection? b. Police protection? c, Schools? d. Parks or other recreational facilities? e. Maintenarice of public facilities, including roads? f, Other governmental services? . d 15. ENERGY. Wil.i the proposal result in a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel ,or energy? b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energ or renuire the development of new sources of� o%ergyy? 1.6UTILITIES. Mail! the proposal result in: a treed for new systems, rr substantial alterations to the following; a. Power or natural gas? b. Communications systems? c Water aval.la.bil i ty d. Sewer or septic tank`s e. Storm water drainage? f, Solid waste and disposal'? 17 ia. W reat�.onYofNany hiea.lthohaza.rdrorupt in: "'”" potential health hazard (e.xclttriing mental health)? b.. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? 18. AESTTIMCS, Will the proposal result in the o struEt on of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? 4» 0 YES MAY i11 IN RECREATION. Will the proposal. `result in an. impAc 3,9 , �re�rea'It�,t�lz�.7. of existing upon the quality or quantity opportunities? % 20. CULTURAL RESOURCES. W 1 t e proposal result in the alteration a of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site? result in adverse physio[ e, Wi11 the proposal or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric .or or object? historic building, structure the have the potential 'to callge c, goes proposal a physical change which would. affect uninuo � �* ethnic cultural values'? the restrict existing re l%giols d. Will proposal sacred uSr5 within the potential impact or area? DTSCUSSTON OF ENVIRONMENTAL' EVALUATION AP 40-15-93 V. See attached. RONMENTAL eYALUATIQN AP 40-15-93 1b: [disruption, displacement and compaction of the soil surface Wlk',I) the construction of one house Is not sigrificant. However) a substantial amount of the soil surface will be disrupted and compactod with upgrading of Aubry Court. '19: Soils on. site are of the Vina-Farwell Association, a Gloss I and i I agricultural sol I . These are classified as prime aqrIcul(-,Ur8l with an Inherent high fertility. 'rho actual loss of these sollv occurred with parcelization of surrounding properties. It Is no lon(jor feasible to "arm these soils as an economic unit NII;h residential encroachment. 2a: Bringing Aubry Court up to Ccwnty standard will reduce the amount of dust now generated by vehicle traffic. 3b: Drainage will have to be provided pursuant to the Subdivision Ordinance. Normally, drainage is not a problem with these well -draining soils on one -acre lots. 4a,d: Properties to the north and east are developed In orchards, Unfortunately, the parcel to the north has already been divided am can no longer be considered intensive agricultural production. However, properties immediately east arm{ under Williamson Act contracts for productions These properties are now planted with a young orchard, with row crops planted between the tj"oo.s. A 60-foOt residential building setback has been shown from the east property line: When combined with the access road on the aq parcel, the effettivt setback Is approximately 85 feet. This setback will help to provide a buffer between the residential and agricultural Uses. Improvement of Aubry Lourt has the potential to remove some mature olmorid trees on the north stale of the easement. boob,V! Aubry Court Is just now developing with single-family homet3i As each lot is developed and occupied, traffic will necessarily hiareasoi Ihe nolle, dust and glare associated with the Increased use of Aubry Court may att=est the residences at the Southeast corner 0� Aubry and L,ottrhe house Is only 8 to '10 feet off the edge of trio 8: Division as proposed complies with the SR -1 zoning district, Ihis tort-ldor along Lott Road has toon interpreted to be designated for ooricoltural-re.sidential uses compatible with the adopl;od zoning district. Uiylslon, provided II; malhtalMs a o0e-acre ifs InImum parco-O size) can be found compatible with the General' Plan, 11 , 12: 01 v is I on wi 1 1 J maremen tri I'l y I ncreate the ren I doti,i- I a I uses I n this pocket and In the burhnm tOT1nML1nitY- Ulven the 61 o of the project) this Impact Is not slonifIC8111t. 1 Ba .1 Trw-*f I c 'geherat I cn 11 s est 1 mated at 10 veh I c I e ir- I J.)s pet-, day - `6_ ,130 r, proper*1,V frontaoa will have to be improved from -Lh-_ est llilted '16 feet of orov(il surface area to a 26 -foot road constructed to the following gUmndard: 61' Class 2 aggregate base With a double seal coat. rhe 1*omainder of Aubry Court out to Lott Road will ha,,,e to be Improved to 44 feet with a 4" Class � aggregate base and double ­,eal coat. These required roadway Improvements will be a substantial change over the minimum standard gravel road which now exists. 4hr'Y is paved from Lott Road approximately 400 feet east. 1.1, Demands for all governmental services will marginally Increase H)th this project. All wells should bo fitted with drofting connections, or Hater storage should be supplied for use In fire fiohtlno- The Durham School District has indicated that they are In need OF a safe place for the bus to pull off the road and pick up children. rhe developer should contact the School District to come to an aqreeMektjt as to where the bus stop should be located and how it sh#,Duld be. constr4utted or signed. l6e: As noted Linder Item S, this parcel size will require CraInage pursuant 'to the Subdivision Ordinance. 20a,lla: A records search is required from California State UnlversitYo Chico, Northeast Information Center. The purpose of the records search is to determine whether or not an archaeological survey should be prepared. Records on file with the Butte County Planning Uepartment, do not show that a survey has ever been done on this property, yet It has a high sensitivity for archaeological resources. In the event the records, search recommends agoinst preparation of a survey, it will not be required by the County. file mop should be redesigned to show Aubry Court extending to Brinson i,jjLirt. The purpose Of the roadway extension 'is to provide Increased eiraulotion and access by fire fighting and other emergency vohlcle­t GIasters of one-acte homes Ites cannot be served off of cul-de—saCs on efficient manner. EXtOhSlOn of' the roadway would comply with policy considered by the Uurham-bayton Planning Area Committee. Recommended "It I t I oat Lon Measures Ij Maintain 60 -foot residential building setback from the east property line. 2. Improve Aut-Iry to standards ident lfled In the 0,ubdIvi s Ion Urdinanto, Intiu-1ing but not limited to removal of, tAie tight ,90-deoree turn at the property frootage i This aLMOItIon May cxit8ll removal o° ,;ome exigtino mature treog. jo rhe pavement on 1` f­.ry Gourt, should be shifted 1:0 tho north within the existing 60-. of easement to provide some PrwOVOutlon to 'the house immediately !;OUth. Un 1 1 ed Schoo l ID 1 stfri u i remernts of the Durham stoP Ileet Lle re ov i s 1 ons for a safe bta5 cl l n9 pr I i . i nol on anv now vis c;�Install CDF,-approved drafting connections earth from the Northeast I n f armat t�Ct ,Ubtain a records UniversltY� Chico. California Siete 1 0 can't, IvIlke Lou fbourrow Assessor's Parcel al 4U -ib -93 Log # Ue- (17 VAIA—SHEET ect Deg t A. 1. lype of Project: Land division. mcrAes 111t, I I . 'I'entative Parcel 'lap 2.- 13rief Description' I5 Of I 8r -re each, apr)r-0,A1111cluely 7bo two partede of Aubry GOQrt, Un tj�e east ad I L)Llvhrl111 3. Location Intersection with Lott RO t Of Its l d.u./scre, feet east I of Development: OxImatelY lbo OU0 50uare ,1. Proposed Dens I ty ous Surfacino: Appr b. Amount Of Impervi off Aubry GOurt-- feet. I Rood(s): Access Access and Nearest Public is the nearest public road- leact"iflelds - Lott Septic tanks, Vl Method Of sewage DISPOS8 Individual wells. 8. Source of Water SUPPlY2 into original Parcel. 9. Proximity of Power Lines: d development: al for further land divisions an dwelling '10. Potent, I ermit construction Of' one additional Division will P Sett, n�a t Terrain oraphic Character: Level valley land. 84, General topg bi Slopes= U-25' C. Elevation: lqome. d4 Limiting 53c,bors: ell Assoclat)00t solls Characterls-bics-' Vine -Farwell 9 d types and sandy loam, 00 moderately fine texturOd s h fertility$ coarse to vnoderate to low Permeability, high drainage, class I-II. Moderate to severe limitations for bL , ,m, -1,-,0g Vectors: . I loachfieldse the Land 8, Nature'! Hazards Of I tylooerote Gloss V1 11 . 0. Larthquake Zone : NonO- 6roslo" Potential` b. al: NoMeo Landslide Po'belltl I.-, re Hazard". Una loss 1 f I ed d, A • Moderate e. ExpanslV- - 18011 potential. 4. Hydro logyButte Cree k I mile West" a. Surface Water Uver'lles area of heavy OrOwndoatet" b. GroundW8ter*- withdrawal - Drainage Characteristicst d. Annual Rainfall (normal): 24-26" o. Limiting Factors: 5 Visual/Scenic Quality Scenic views of orchard Ln east,. 6 Acoustic Quality: Good. 7. Air Quality: Fair. I3 i cr l oza i ca_' -Environment. - 8. l nvironment8. Vegetation: nature a 1 mond trees $ younger orcl°trjr�r� w i 1:1r raw crops to the east. 9 Wildlife Habitat'. No significant habitat avF-i 1 100 1 e or, s i to Cult ral v_. on e tc 1U. Archaeological and Historical Resources in tho area: f�eCords search requlred. 11- Butte County General Plan designation." drehar^d and f= I e l d Crops. 12. Existing Zoning: SR -'j. 18- Existing Land Use on-site One homeslte orchard remnants, 14Surrounding Area: a. Land Uses. Pocket of new houses under construction on Aubry Court b. Zoning: SR -1; A-5 c Gen Flan designations: Orchard and Field Crops, d, Parcel Sizes: 1-5 OcrKes, 57+ acres. e. Population: Rural densities. '15. Character of Site and Area: Rural encroaChment into orchard. 16. Nearest Urban Area: City of Chico. 17. ReleVant Spheres of Influence. Maintenance District #5, '18 ImprovemoIts Standards Urban Area: n/a. 19 . Fire Pro'. , ion Service a. Nears„ :ounty (State) Fire Stas: l o '1 = #�15, 1 _ 1 / Miles west'7 4- 4 y 5-1/2 miles. b. Water Availability: Engine Capacity only. 20. Schools in Area: Durham Unified School District. May 20, 1987 VURHAM UNIFIED SCOL DISTRICT DONALD C. McNrLiS, District Super nt ( G) ent 895-,1071')'p.O, aOx 300 • DURHAM, CALIFORNIA 95936 - 80AItD or 71t USTCC5 itichartCl..An&rsnn*Ruby C),kimmi~Ishuc•Atiht,rl.t��a�rr����1y1�!s1..Pusfnjar>lcy�hl Butt© Co. planning coqulu John Mendonsa, Assistant Director orov►►►oo'i`�°rnt� Department Public DriveWorks 7 County Center oroville, CA 95965 Dear Mr. Mpndonsa: submitted r ose of and to the tentative parcel map The purpose this letter r is to resp erning parcel number q0 by Mike Loofbourrow conc-15-93. School District does not wish to contest so that aebusomayapulll The Durham Unified provisions be made for a bus stop would request that p ick up and drop off school aged children. Also, X have safely off the road top governing board. attached a letter :dealing With a recent action of our Sincerely, Donald C. MCNalis Superintendent DCM:jI ENC DuP.HAM LLIEWNTAky SCH001. NOEL 1. NUWUR PRINCIPAL 1jfC�)Ll80401 Bo>x 100 - nU1tHAtv1 1NtE{2h1EDIATC SCHOOL LINDA h1. l3I�PJWN -PRINCIPAL Nnnt: 4qi•400 t)lal►11AI�1 11101150100L Wit 11AM N1. ILNSLN illoNcIPAL Pholio 1141,4640 I'.CI. Ilex 000 IS,ra. Oox 310