Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
040-150-089
$ '' � •a1 �•}� r � 'r a 1.� � °1 r f e ,,gip r1• r , r r tutl" . + f iD• r ° • R • t s 1` APPi,CANTnis Ryan Log#87-08-14-01 ADDRESS P,O. Box 5441, Marysville, CA 95901 w.,�---- owNMI Same w....+-.- _..aoi.os to cram K.e PROJECT DESCRIPTION Tentative Parcel Map to divide 5 i ,.M���.y+�.�-» 4 parcels, 3 at 1 acre and 1 at 2 acres. on the north side of Aubry Court approxiMatJy 600 feet opts LOCATION of its intersection with Lott Road, Durham area - ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS _ 40-�5-89 BONING SR -l.' L PLAN GENERA Orchard PROJECT CONSISTENT? --• - — ---�-ze-�d--C�ops� ,"'""...�:�.'...�.--- Policies would indicate Ag -Rosi GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE REPORT DATE OF APPLICANT SIGNATURE LAND CONSERVATION ACT CONTRACTS:? August 11., 1987 OAT -, APPLICATION RE r `IVCD, ...�w.w AGENT/SURVEYOR/CIVIL ENGINEER:. - ADDRESS ^ _..� .....a...; PATE PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT PREPARED____ ... .. .� ENVIRONMENTAL CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION DA'Z'E FILEiO DETERMINATION ,AND. )SATE LV'IaGAT1;VE DECLARATION- DA',CE MIT'IGATEO NEG. OECLARWION - DAVE A'OOP'SFaD�,.. — ENV: IMPACT RrPORT S°i'1�'I'E C''Ll"ARSCJaHC1USL NO. _ _ ,_ SUR. COMMITTEE MEETING +.c.w...rr'Y. V.=..wuf.yW.w.+w..n»rro..wn..wX+••:c.uk.4w.Wa-.ter-uM.wu..u�w.16vn.lr Yi.:*hJuWwM .±+W ADVISORY AMCY ITEATtING DIX'I'E l l AO-VI80RY Ac NCY APPEALED AMAL H 2ARING BOARD ACTION COMMENTS vol -I I)LANNI."!G 10IRECTOJ( is ljr,iipOjkT w.» y Y Y1 V BUTTE COUNTY�' ButFo Co. PlonwrI400?4`t'�I L !t GENERAL PLAN CQN} URMA�,'CE REPORT I oR rA____ nCLL rIAP oR SUBI)T'Vrsx p APR d 19n xtetns 1-4 to be completed by applicant: orovilln, cagforalA 1, Applicant: Name r✓�)r_ zi j Description Project Descr Assessor's 'arcel 4 PA�cirl Nutnber(s) do 15-3 4. Proposed Use I NL The following items are to be com Current zoning �- ,� pleted by :Ire Planning Department: -------- _Land Conservation A General Plan besighation greot»alar h`1 X11 CI.Z. Applicable Conditional Cr teria: r" t' Not Applicable Agricultural -Residential I. Agricultural Compatibility YES 'NO 2 Nater & Sel.;er Capacity 3. Adequate Fire Iiacilities 4. Road Capacity & Maintenance 5,. Access to Commercial & Schools Orchard &Field Crops 1.'reiomnant 5-10 Ac, Pnrcel Size z. V1 inity of Urban. Boundaries 3. Agric,, viability not impaired —' Staff Aeterminati()nt,/ Project does --I/— does not substantially conform to theGe era1Comments Plan. -V>cA` -- - -„- Staff f Signaeure bate AS THE APPLICANT FOR THE REOVESM LANDbrTl;R81NAT'1"0N ttPGARbING TIYSCON)'OIZI<iA E CbJLTHST�N)GE A1<f AiOARg OF Dated . l� ',"% NERAL PLAN Dila At3bV>a STAFF Signature of Applicant _ ..cant -kyr Pinta dao, Plartnlrtg r'onim, It +6,,g0j Iib 100E x`evi.sed pt;oyilly; C:a1,trate DURHAM -DAYTON -NELSON ^,ITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE implementation Measures/Action Items= (to be considered within the Planning Area and Area Plan documents) ].. Provide access to rear of lots fronting on roadways and backing up to orchards. As orchards are subdivided in future, provide access easements/alleys to rear of existing lots. 2. Verify accuracy of sensitive plant areas, e.g. riparian forest along Esquon Road and vernal pool area near Mcoa Road. 3. Install bus shelters for public transit stops. 4. Seek funding from the Southern Pacific Railroad for training firemen to deal with toxic spill: from poten- tial otential derailments,.. 5. Provide additional parking spaces in ventral Durham. 6. Adopt a land leveling ordinance (to P.ssure that drainage patterns are not disrul`ted, to minimize soil and wind erosion, etc.) 7, improve private road standards, including ditches :and culverts for drainage. Require dedications of rights- of-way for cul--de-sac streets to provide future circulation. 8. Review the possibility of including the Sacramento Northern Railroad right-of-way in the Butte County Land Trust. 9. Protect agricultural Uses from residential complaints Via ag• affidavits at time of building permits, ag setbacks on residential parcels of 100 feet minimum to property lines adjoining orchards, etc. 1.0. Invite CalTrans representatives to make presentation on Highway 99 widening project between Penta Road interchange and skyway interchange. 11. Relocate the "'Welcome to Durham" sign hthr Viking ,Freight Systems which is partially blocked by a light standard. 12. Establish school impe.et fees at such time as school, overcrowding is documented by the Durham Unified School District. u "i"t ()ff1ce 0f Planninb arl� „12cs arc > rr. Br1I t (Ctritttt.y 1,400 T.c�ttli Street, .Rem l2l It „; I'1,srrill .iitl� I)itliat't mrllrt Sacrtarnen: o CA 95814 Nou % d 1987 7 Cot,int'v tit+rtt,or DI � IVP J Crovi l 1r, CA 9590') t' r County Clc rlc CANDACC J. 0RUBS Build Co. Clork County of 8Utte By G. EB F" Deputy T'iLing Iof Notice of neterm,inAtion in compliance with Socti.orl 21.1011 or 21152 of the Public. Resources Cor;ir- ['ro ject 'Title AP 1f Namr Tentative Parcel Map 40-15-89 Dennis. Ryan _ u-0; Sante Cl.earingi,ouse Number Contact Person Telephone Nurrtl1� (if-,uI)mJtted to Clearinghouse,) Public Works John Mendonsa 539-7266 Project Location On the north side of Aubry Court, 375± feet east of Lott Road, Durham area. Project Description Tentative Parcel Map to divide 5.1 acres to create four parcels of 1 to 2 acres in size. This '1-, Lo advise that the .Butte County Advisory Agency (Dead Agency Or Resonsible Agency) has approved the above-described project On Novo e 1 T6, 1987 and has made (Date) (,he following determinations regarding the abovo- describod project., 1. The project will., \1 will note have ra .5ignitlearit affect on the env.lronmont An f nvironmecltal lmpact Report tw<,►s 'prepat`ed icer.~ this project prtrsuant to Lhe provisions of A Negative noclarhtion was propilrud Yor O'li.. projoct pursuant to the provisions of GEQA 3, II I i. i jlzlt loll Moa$ V0$ 011111111 on of Lho ,111111-tiva 1 of the prn 1 r C r. : 6 r) wr= A ;rC.1l,t�nont. t OvUr'l itli,rtg t. u.,I.sltiix � ta�'a.5 itllt� ail+�;1ti1_ra1 fo t III rt pro']of, t . I ThIS t.. 'I 11 t` `}`{ rlw�t -Hitt tlt4K t�itltetl i:I� tdlt.i'i IL�trr.,: =1t1�r"' Irrllt, �4 itr'ri� ��C'Cl�kll t .` projocl' rapproki' 1 is ival,lablo 't ICS 1110 I10nUldo x'0111 it; '11 butto Cour .;i L'Lo- !tt'I)art'111r`11i i (.utin't Al Utlt.r.'' 1 ti t dot"ovll,le. GA 959i,t tol, .1'"il inly «Anil i)r�tt r l� t i i yr i1 ✓/ 1'Ct.,t ltlg ,rt I)1'rt �t'...'6 b ;�ign�ttul^tt '1'urtxn, �Ci1 0' 1�lannL r ' ttltv3strJ Max�1t i�)8b Buie Co. Minn.fng CmnM. NOV 9 1987 Oroville, CaufQM14 Archaeological Reconnaissance of the Proposed Dennis Ryan Land Split, near Durham, Butte County, California. (AP #40-15-80) Prepared For: Dennis Ryan P.O. Box 5441 Marysville, California 95901 Prepared By Jensen & Associates Archaeofiogical Consulting and Research 41 5kymount8in Circle Chico, California 95928 28 October 1987 a _1 Introduction In order to assess the archaeological Impacts of a proposed land split involving approximately 5 acres of land located tear Durham; Outtt County, California, the owner contracted for an on -foo( reconnais,5 i11Co of the parcel in compliance with recommendations received from Wo Northeast California Information Center and the Butte County Planning hpartment. Accordingly, on Tuesday, October 27, 1987, the author conducted an on -foot reconnaissance of the project area for the purpose of 1008king and recording any evidence of prehistoric or significant historic use and/or occupation. The 5 -acre parcel (A..P.040-15-80) consists of a roughly rectangular piece of land located approximately 1 mile east of Bu'tte. Creek, adjacent to Lott Road, within a cultivated almond orchard. The current proposal *ails for a four-way land split with further development for general residential use. In view of the potential effects of these future construction activities to cultural resources which might exist within the area, and in view of the general archaeological sensitivity of th,, region,, Butte County and Other regulations required that cultural resources be fully invoritoried '-d formally assessed prior to project approval, pursuant to Section 106 of Brie National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as aMdOnd (16 U.S.C, 470), ,and procedures of the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (�6 CFP 800). This report details the results of the required archaeological survey and inventory and provides aplea•opriatd recommendations, All fieldwork Procedures followed quid0l' Ies provided by the stato Historic Preservation Office (Sacramento) „ old are in conformity with accepted professional standards. 2 Records Search Prior to going into the field the archaeological records of the North000l California Information Center (CSU—Chico) were exai°riined for any existing recorded prehistoric or significant historic sites within the project area, In addition, the National Register of Historic Places (USDI 1987) was also consulted. No sites are currently recorded for the project area or immediately adjacent lands. Fieldwork As noted, fieldwork for the project was condwted by the author on October 27, 1987. The on—foot survey involved criss—crossing the orchard from north to south, examining the surface for evidence of past use and occupation. Numerous ground squirrel and other rodents' burrows have exposed subsurface areas throughout the parcel; and these were Inspected for evidence of buried cultural material. Survey Results and Recommendation No evidence of prehistoric or of early historic use or 'occupation was encountered within the project area. in View of the negative results achieved during both the records search and the field survey; archaeological clearance for the proposed land split is recommended. General Provision Should future construction activity reveal evidence of subsurface prehistoric or historic material, a qualified archaeologist should be contacted immediately in order to assess 'the impacts of the project to the cultural resources involved, t 3 _ Reference Cited United States Department of the Interior 1985 National Register of Historic Places. Federal Register Notice dated June 8, 1987. Washington, D.C. a I II ' � ..S V. , . N • • .-s Y � • p p)r . 11R� ,.. � ` , x,y u � 1 iis� I �• 0 N I ,y r ♦ • ►~ � � � ,- • • t .', ,' • a1LINE9 •'tl. i 44! � r • • ��t � aj �, _y,,, -..•,..r _ w co PJL a mrr•s– p. ^.� �. yie.i+, ,.e atj AV C• �� � r.J�a7l _!2/ N A tv • r• ° I co ` .', w, rr �..!"' f ill •-1 M M ft ��( •cl • y . .�. 7 l e n�,rp .a �•., tel! 'r �� � h e t. ��' n r . • „ •... ars \ . _:.. _.._.—. + • , • a.0 is IPI, , W ♦�aaarnaryl� f. 0. .,�� tRf ��.C: *ss\ � •+N f atl• .A a 44'drar, � � �' d� /H pa I � �'. � !( +�, r . p• • ', � •i' , `haw, �� �Trn "!;'. a , r i a •ate tRxIJr1�Pc'. ., • i .... �t � w •.. i• n n � Y "*�` t°at<4 16 I �. ► -.: � t�' .r.. ♦ w it 1 1 w,. •'•. i • � �� ii 1 h.i♦ •. . k m..„ m e�ae �'-••�G,l+��,� 'c��'":.•'..;♦� •�_ r'♦. z,Y , r • � • if LOT ': ,a •1( v. i y .. r[ ,•y y yy ... �• i. • •' • +•• • •: •r ,, _ • ...„ a• .• rte"� ,r • • • y r r i • .a tin • + '• li n a N , : - - ,: _ e �� r , •• • 'L i � 'tt ..moi �.+j'i' '� �,'.. a i I r * r Ea •. , ry i _ 4 r ROA Y ♦ .,� _ 9oUON. p Inn � N(p J 4 a::L J i.. ai Mlc naval` +p • • ... +• 1m11 ,A' `• ��0. �` ' i • �.J-1.:° • � Y „ter s �'�..�r" ��� '. r .. /�� � 1 �, �I,a4 �� • f,a.i �t ,;;FOl�1lV1V:L♦; l�# Ail.,. M d M1 ti) (AL)Y, )h9 ca YLNIA e;ITY /C.1l.It' T!fl nri Arl to PNh'ML IN CANYON) w a.. t661 It NW .. I i7rl"F�q))'Aemorandum Inter-Departa 'M Butte County Advisory Agency PROW Planning Director sU of ECTr. REPORT ON TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP OF DENNIS RYAN ON AP 40-15-89 nATE: November 9, ,1987 This is a proposal to divide 5 acres to create a total of four parcels; one at 2 acres,, one at 1.1 acres and two at 1.07. acres The present zoning is 8R-1 (Suburban Residential - 1 -acre par- cels). The Land Use ;Plan Map of the Butte County General Plan designates this area as Agricultural -Residential pursuant to policies. There are no specific or community plans for the area. The proposal does not conflict with County zoning not any adopted or proposed element of the Butte County General: Plan nor any county, specific or Community plan. Recommend approval subject to the following conditions - It Show on the final map the existing 60 -foot building sothack line on the east portion of Parcel 4. 2. All parcels to be at least 1 acre gross to comply with the SR -1 zoning; 3. Redesign lots to provide circulation by connecting the proposed court to Blacks Lane. The property west of the proposed road should become part of Parcel 1. CBSISjs cd Dennis Ryan 0010 Coe p1am�{nth C% October: 29, 1.387 140V 41 ()r0V%0, nutLo County Planning Department 7 County Center Drj, vcy drovi i.le Cal.iforni,a 95965 %TTEN'PION Craig sanders RE Ali 4C 15-89 Fent. P.M Appl i.c. Gen L �1 e men The purpo$0 of this t.ij l tq,. i t L.o inform m yogi .tha.t I have reviewed and diseussod w i k=b V131.1 Ous "Urcet' the proposed mitigation measuz car; for the above referenced parcel map application and am in substantial, agreement with resolutions and compColi Y . yes as agreed to with various staff memebers At this time, I wish to request that the application be scheduled for hearing before the Butte County Advisory Agency at, the earliest possible date. Denn1 S Cyan N% . % ' in 4ib OP � InBUTTE Department of Anthropology n�� California tJLNN s,,,s,•, California State University, Chico Archaeological @ (w r ,,MAS SISKIYOU Chico, CA 95929 Inventory LASSEN TEHAMA (916) 895-6256 MODOC TRINITY Date: 70BuLte County Planning #7 County Center Dr. oroviller Ca. 95965 Dear County Planners k re . B1,00 Co. Planning Corp,, OCT 18 Iz7b� Qroyille, CalifornI4 A review nf' "` above project has revealed the rol,lowing:- %, ndicated'as within the project boundaries is considered to I(' 2 ica.1.1y sensitive. PCeset.l: are: ,.,asy access to natural :sources of water Flat maadowland or flat tai 3 near water `�— South and/or east tacing slopes Previously recorded sites in the vicinity _ Other We strut, _y re nd that an archaeological reconnaissance be conducted of the area by a qualified archaeoltx3ist: and appropriate mitigation measurt;.1 s A known site or sites has/have been previously recorded in the project area.. Project operation's will have a negative impact on these cultural resource. We, recon�nend that a qualified archaeologist be contacted to'assess Si a coxnp;�)nents and prepare a mitigative proposal. .; Al''I'liNl)l�� t; 1..NVIRONW N"I'i�l CLIF C1:1 X1,"I' hgleiio (`t.'ri`� i�c 4c,talsl��>~ecC�i� l.eftri "_ y) labs, Il 87 -fab -14-01 1P 40-15-89 .i ° 13ACK(ilti�llNl) ,. � .,_..,.._.. _ .. t r.c�l?srnt�nt L , N;tlttca o l° i " Aclare:as tt (' lr.roltc�rlt*t11 ttnu rc�l5t.'� ;rni �t t ��°fix i [ appl It n4l o j P.O. Bax 5441, Mary va 1 ] e, CA 95901 . r tl` i c,II TentatiYe Parcel M:ap ., ...._ - v 41'"� piltYl�t: N0 T.I tlIANDN1't)11) "V.1NiacN(�� 7�ct ter i httvtw 'thtr p�tt,c�nti;11 to degtttcl rho t1+ ltoo * t11r 1 r, J al)strantilllly+ redttt' ticlrtl 1 t�^ cr 1 t'Itt� rrty t I•onutt�ttt ,; g 1"li,lthabi�tl�Tlil'�� Ilrr;�trl°tttltatllto dIIr��"1te�ies, �ttta;e a ' ` l drophel.ow stet 1"y stt I11111I.�1, 1c°vi�15j t'hroaten, to i:lintznrrCr� n pitlrtr or am cl ratnmlt utti t) irrt cxn tan l;el cclttll�lttn t or uni rtlt, 7rtht� t.trrt tY c,l ;t r"tr. povious C`11'''ltn:ltl`. itttlyc)1"tiro" l;Kitllt)'1�5,1�1St()lry+�lttii'�[t �� f t. 11 i i'crt°tt i "t It stat° " 10 (IT°j"� I.a. l.lovs' tho pf•ccject h"Ivry the l,otclttit►1 to tchieve titter ntbtll 1. long -t file �:rltrlI`t tG�t�in h��nc�o"i-1;•yics \lte 000satcyi t ter�n�tt�l n�' I the anti i i°r i nv^ i rolunent l otter 3al'l l c h c�V� ut tt !mptt' l s f 1.1 1'v v i ort o f t i tit(. telt i 1 t l 011g -term t trt r t.t r, tv .. cinclitt}e irittt . indl ltor the°#a.1'raic'taritlt�tit�lrlr'tltivel`,tvlctottl4i lot`ttl1G vldli- (A ".Illy" Itt"t7�-G�L�t t(�•l.y itlltilt;t tett ttV"t or Inrt�tr"� Se1)Itril�'t` t°a�irrprt'c�:+ . ' l s reltlti-voly` - tahet.'c tltr: lull?tip.t oil � ('CICIt at'yC�tY�T'1 � I� 's ma II , 1)sr 1t lallk�I. r h v t��l"optiter tttttl rt i' tltc)�r ititpilct's oil the onvironliwil iti siltntlicttltt.� llo(' s" tho cl1rtolt�j.ot ctliilrtat'vc: e lnvivotilliontuirltlcY '1r'tl; f[elt5011Ci will t'11,150;cadverse0 htlttIs,ltlitllrtlttltit,.r h . I lty the l l t , lil:1'l ltEl l NAT II NN Cl'o ht� rutttlt l l� K .. tett tll� C�tt� i�; c,C Ibis Irttt iat.l cxti"tlercctlutti cant lrE hiitl thr, l lopusod �prolol'1 i:1khl.,Ott.(�i�AIIATIONOT havvatl�a��I�tthet111elinnoLlt,�t r � !t'1 l � 1 c�n tht° lrttvlr sttut.�rtt` a "tract r1 NIJX nl;;t��l pro,lc,t`1• wilthe l lr"tvrt eta sihttil°i� i jltl" I'ittcl thi t "tl7ll�rtnv'llrcttlur�i)tc,l tltr 'e w1ti t Ilot �ttt, 11 sll;ltt l acttrtt t c: tint to fVc t t. It it l L [CIA WN �i 'A,1° 11 1` ; tlew t t hn�l oil t,11°r'4t ttt that c m;v hCG"illtNG t.l1c the "tttotclt!.�t ,lttac�t h"tvr� beoll "trldrtil tlt thr! It1`>tlrxr l ►1 Nl'l(itlf"lVt's ►tl;C'1„At.�'tl l t"tti tq l l 1 l)b. q�tt t`t��l . "IVI, Itltcl t.lt.t;� prct(acl��r°ra Brett ct �iz1,1 ltnvt o Sll;yttlletint r'I"1'tl>�t rat � t ontn���n"t �, "tltrt t1,lt� !a�'�' I I�ttNtwll"N..l. Xhil'J1t.'1" tllatc).11"I" t s rcrllt i': roll . tht r r►v t �� , i l)l;htll.`I'h11 € I 987 coUN'l'Y Ol RUTTV 1I,ANNIN( llA"l 1. ,A_6W ir' ? n Cra g S ders PS,anning.T� hnici 17r;vitr~tl Ityl ACTS rt/. ENVIRONMENTAL .:xpa anata.ons o• a "yes" and "maybe"" answers are requirod on attached sheet(s)) YES 1. EARTH. Will the proposal result in significant: `unstable MAYBE NO a. earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or . overcovering of the soil't G c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? d. Destruction, covering car morli,fic4tlo;n of any " .unique geologic or physical features? e. Increase in rind or water erosion• of soils, either oa or off-site? C f. Changes in deposition or. erosion off, beach_- s'ands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify -the channel of a river or stream or the 'bed �of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? C g. Loss of prime agriculturally productive soils Out$i.de designated urban areas? h. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud- slides, ground failure or similar hazards? �( 2. AIR; Will the proposal result in substantial; a. lair emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? " b. The creation of objectionable odors, smoke or fumes? x c. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperature, or any Change in climate,, locally or regionally;' 3. WATER. Will the proposal result in substantial: a. changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements in either marine or fresh waters? b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, "�- or the rate and amount of surface runoff? c. Need for of -site surface drainage improve" mentis, including veg�.ta.t on removal, channel- ization or culvert installation? j( d. Alterations to the course or Slow of flood orators? e. Change in the amount of surface water In any water body'; f. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water duality, including but not li,ihited to temperature,, dlissolved oxyge1, or turbidity? g Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of o d t 41 h. Chane in the 7- Change quantityOr clual.ty� of ground waters;.. a .ers : either through direct additions or with- drawals, car throagh interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? X I, Reduction in the amount of ,Fater otherwise -- available for public water supplies? A Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding? -2- YE 8, H — 4. PLANT LIFE, Will the proposal result in substantial: a. Chang—e in the diversity of species, or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)? b. Reduction Of the numbers of any unique, or endangered species of plants? rare C. Introduction of new species of Plants into all area, or in a barriertothe normal replenis . 11-M ment of existing specji-,? d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? S. ANIMAL LIVE, Will tile 'Ploposal result in substantial: a. Ch—ange in the diversityofspecies, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shell fish, benthic organisms or ins-ects)? b. Reduction in the numbers of any unique, rare orendangered species of animals? c. Introduction ntrQdUCtion of new species of anima)s into an area$ or result in a barrier to the migration Or movement of animals? d, Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife Habitat? 6. NOISE., Will the Proposal result in substantial: 1 a. Increases in ex1. isting noise levels? b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? 7. LTGHT AND GLARE. Will the Proposal produce gignifiEa_n_tlight and glare? 8. LAND USE. Will the Proposal result in a s_UFS_tantial alteration of the present or plaio.110d land use of an area? NATURAL RB80URCE8: Will the Proposal result in substantial: __——_ - a. Increase in the rate Of use Of any natural resources? b. Depletion of any non-renewable natural resources, 10' RISK or UPSET- Will tl' Proposal involve; a4 A f'j_sjM5-k;�' explosion, or the release of'hazard- Ous substances (int',-idingo but not limited to Oily pesticides, clomicals or radiation) in tAe event of an accident Or upset conditions? b. htlible intOrferen.c with an emergency re"-SPOftse Plan Or em, r9ency evacuation plan? 114 aPOP21, ATION Will the p oosal alter the location- s trj papula uta.on, density, ox growth rate of the humall MOUSING. Will the IV 1, V, Isting housing, Or croate a demand for a Iditional housing? NO _X_ C v MAYBE Nol3. RANSPC)RTA^'TON/CTRCti " 4 LATTUN. result Will the proposal a. Generation of substantial additional vehicle movement? b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or """•` demand for new parking? c. Substantial impact on existing txansportati,o'jj; systems? d. Significant alterations to present patterns"' of circulation or movement of p-:ople and/or goods? e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traff.`j ,? f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicle:x, u. bicyclists or pedestrians? LL. 14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Will the proposal have an effect; upon, or r in a need for` new or altered governmental services; a. Eire protection? b Police protection? ----- c. Schools? d. 'Parks or other recreational facilities? e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? f. Other governmental services? 15 ENERG` Will the proposal result in of substantial amounts of fue,l.or energy? zbstantial incy ase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? 16, t'^: TT E°TL1Ti ES. Will the proposal result in. a need fcr ., ,..._..I _ sy, 1'ems, or substartial alterations to the Ec il owi* a. Powr-.; J. natural gas? b. CbmmtAIcations systems? c. Water availability: d. Sewer or septic tank? —. e. Storm water drainage? f. Solid waste anti disposal? 17 HUMAN HEALTN. 'Will the proposal result in: a. Creation of any health hazard or potential, health ha a,rd (excluding mental henith) 7 b. exposure of people to potential health hft%ards7 18 Atoolr-}UTTC�, Will the proposal result in the o�Gs ruc`—t o�n of any seen].c Vesta or view ripen, to the ptiblic or Will the proposal result in the creation Of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? 4 X C - .L - Ise w YES MA-�-M NO r q h 19. RECREATION. Will the proposal result in an,impart ':' upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational ;4 opportunities? 20. CUI, i 11R`1L RESOURCES . a. will the proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site? b. Will the proposal result in adverse phys5 cal, or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric -or ' structure or object? historic building., J C. Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affectunique ethnic cultural values? ,. -- c. Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact � x area? _...4., V. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AP 40-15-80 ' Sed: attached. UISCU ON OF ENVIRONMENT EVALUATION AP SFU 1b; A nominal amount C3 -l7 of each parcel would be compacled and overcovered by build r,� structures and driveways - proper e f : {groper construction techniques eei ment to minimize rr earby dra l n al ietrosAny potential and thus deposition o :�1a53r�n (7 i the year grading involved should occur during the non -rainy 19, The on -s lte soils are designated a esignatedaa Cl ass I forcal al I a arm i cr�l l Us - 1°he 5 -acre parcel is n.ot in itself viable production, Urt to 3b improvements may be tructuresary mayalong AubrV need to be e0 c Drainage lar49ed to Lott Road and exist n9 dralnage structures handle surface water runoff generated. Er1v i r•nnmenta l Health Indicates that ai Hintera high thea season l ter h,1Gd Verification elevation may occur in this vicinity: groundwater elevation is required. ; Removal of almond trees wi11 occur an each parcel to develop « id t, ru[tt.rre homes i tes s parcel represents Parcel � of the bnnApril e21 rcel 1984. iv1a� condfor Ai tont ihl p the Advisory Agency Arrr�ii;or approved by was. to show a res i dent i a 1 building setback 1 i rre of that tentative map on the eastern edge of the )r i se of the setback depth I S to minimize 6et 1 n1; i els 1 $ 3 and 4 . The F= . se conflictsween resldlstCwt heLandpConservatoionoco tracts)ltorthe erc bet ...pursuits on large parcels east. This land division would conform to tither tentative maps along .the f3: T -' The General Plan Lott Road corridor with 1 n the SR -'I han f ng . may be amended from Orchard unci Field Crops as part Of the deslgnatlon Y ourhom-Dayton-Nel son Arca Plan [loW under way tither land divisions acted on by the Advisory Agency in the vicirl", include:September '1966 TPih for dames 91 ack , AVS 40-16-81, plyl For, James O1 ack' AP 40-15-78, February 1986 '1 19E1 TPM for Craig Hawos; Air 40-15-791 February 9716� April 19'l 1 P1�1 for A i bort Amator, A�' 0 '' t 1 , - September 19'j!a TSM for Raymond Or 1 nson $ A 1;3c f Four t gal homes i tes Would generated PL ,(4� w 0 Yeh'l cUl aan trips per day„ The most recent traffic counts y traffic CA:G,T. > of D'i�-. average dai7 esldential development will increase demand for all nal r I � Aomental sere { ces . l.,eve'l of services provided bo the CSur'ham area has been reduced: by recent and anticfgated 'County budget cutbacks- M 14a: The Butte County Fire Department requires payment of $200 per parcel Into the water tender fund: or es DiI 14a The Durham Unified Schoolcistatctheatime�ofebudilldingpPermeits which apt 1 y to residential prgle "�e on June �� 19s7. The d i s I.t�' 1 ct also These fees became effectiv djacent to the road for a sc�l00 l bus stop. requests a graveled area a mwater dra i'nage facilities tr��jy be required I bee 1Jew or enlarged stor by public Works, Oa, The Ilaster Environmental Assessment for f;�urham-LJ�+Yt%on-Net san Indicates the project is within an area of Amt4.prtparceflro�apowasato sensitivity. A mitigation measure any archaCiOldglcal place a statement on the Fina+ map regardcolearance for this nstruction An t might be uncovered during archaeological records search is required to give c t'en t;at l ve parce'1 map commended M i ti �t i an Measures tecti ovide a permanent solution to drainagea�ndiinstallgtheo' ncludion of 1 � i'rrequired rapert i es, downstream and neighboring p facilities. levations and modify the parcel design Verify winter groundwater e $• or sizes, if necessary, In accordance with the monitoring resin Show the existing 60 -foot residential building setback 'line on the sinal Map - 4. Conduct am archaeological records search with the Northeast Information renter at CSU, Chico: AppllCant: 46 Dennis Ryan DATA SHEET, AP # 40-15-89 Log #- 87-08-14-01 A. 1. Type of Project. Land divis t on - 2. Brief Description: Tentative Paocel Map to divide E5.1 acro"- to create four parcels of 1 to 2 acres In S170. 3. Location: North side of Aubry Court, a75 foot +/- east of Lott Road, Durham area. 4. Proposed Density of Development.* One dwellillg I.milt per acre maximum. 6. Amount of Tmr,-,rvious Surfacing: 6. Access and Nearest Public Road(s): Aubry Court to Lott ROOd- 7. Method of Sewage Disposal: Septic systems. 8. $ource of Water Supply: Individual w0lls- q. Proximity of Power Lines'. Available to parcel. 10. Potential for further land divisions and development: Parcel 4 could be redivided under SR -1 zoning. g.,jrqnM%U:tai1 Se�tti na PhysiC#',� Environment:. 11orra i n Rptlativaly level valley a, general Topographic Char&ator" terrain. b. Slopes t 0-2%. c. Elevation; 160-165 feet above Sea Level4 d, Limiting 1:7actorst. None. 2. 86118 A. Types and Characteristics". VIna Loam/VIna t=ine Sandy Loam, we'll draining soil capable of supporting an extensive range of crops, 'b. L 1 m i t 1 no raat-ors * Moderate liquefaction potentIaI 3. Natural Hazards of the Land In ai e6rthouako Zbro-: Four Miles HOst Of active fault f=oothill Shea Zon-.) four miles east of Inferred f au I t - b. Erosion PbtOOA,- I al : t, Landslide Potential: 8� Fire Hazard: Unclassified - irrigated OreO, ExpanslvO 8011 Potential' 1*10derate- 44 Hydrology A. Surface Watert Butte Creek 1000 feet 4./- north and west; In. GroUhdwbtort Durham area ai=juiferto Ot-ainaqo, Characteristics. Good natural SOIl drait'89ell' drainage solution needed for surface water runoff. d. Annual Rainfall (nOrIM-1l)-' 26". o. Limiting f=actors .t Subsidence potential. g. Visual/Scenic Quality: Rural area with Orchards. 6. Acoustic Quality: Low ambient noise levels with 1 f i nrm i ttc�rt 1, noise from agricultural machinery and vehicular trdi'{;Ic 7. Air Quality. Good. Bioltygica1 Environment: ~$, Vegetation: iviature almond orchard with underlying grasse)s- 9. W i i dl i 1`e Habitat: Birds and small mammals typical of viz 1 1 gay orchard,-s. Cultural Gnvi-ronment 10. Archaeological and i-1 I stor i Cal Resourc ;n-s in the area: Moderate sensitivity- .11 . ensitivity11. Butte County" General Plan designation. polIaIes indicat'l Agricultural-Residential; map indicates Orchard and R1eld Crops. S2. 5x stinq Zoning SR-1 18. Existing Land Use on-site» Almond orchard 14. Surrounding Area: a Land Uses: Almond orchards with residen'101 uses on 1-acre +/" parcels along Lott road. b. Zoning» SR-1, A-5. c. Gen. plan designations.'Agr1cultut^a1-RestBenti al Orchard and Field Crops. d. Parcel Sizes; 1-57 acres. e. Population: Oa". Transition from a9ricuitre to 15. Cl- racier of Site and Ar rural residential. 16, Nearest. Urban Area., Durham; S tulles +!- southwest. ences Durham, Durham I 17. Relevant Spheres of Influrrigation 01strItt, Durham Mosquito Abatement District. 18. Improvements Standards Urban Area» 1q Fire Protection Service= a Nearest County (State) Fire Station- Station 445 1n Durham b. Water Availability Fire truck oapacitY future wells with draft connections, fire connections at wells adjacent to property on north. 20. Schools in Area., Durham Unified School D str1ct�. Uu t tRC j'q0 !40^ 4 A ti t � � r cis D A� Y � 1q1 Oq �,. E Coto p�tment i1E E �P' Nil gvn�ma 10do 1 Fotostry ON,—, f,�,.,.,,,�,,•�-^""'•��Y--r�,) fpC111, CgrSd Do�O,eFct�pPiotecucn,. IOtA ,r t4wm �i the Unt Con%$,6- 1+ cqu i remCnt standards ` rfi "" t must yet hQutte County dsl of the BILL HOLMES ,I this code amCnde p0 (Fire stantsrfor this galtallnnoml euildin9 uiret,. chect�ed). 13. with sectioe Water req dards, are th,e1 a�r•z78a r to accprdencc dards`APPlicab, e stars ly for lnpro`�emcnt tLarc: A Hater sUPP OrOF'ROrVC ntv g arc roi anent Class "required.urtzed vtater c,uco,ctuLtfo �ar�Seze P el /P all Neatiter tion not b rens dire d XXi 13.01-1 Re u{re H�11 2, A P is is pre" t , direct rotec Class dranequipped with 13,01p2 Re mutate numbers of by the following adeq not feasible,ent require- or more+ access4 or. not ( .system Nit if this the fire dePartm of 1p,,po0 gallons n or draftin a system Ni11, farted.. satisfy capacity (S -?g); conne°Gtio such standP P dwellingx� option Hillor te a tanks w th a connectAon drafting source ch l0 t be stora9 a depar u{PPed w aa1,1e wat°►' sort located for eaisions mus dititot `en; f� es5 and fir ols eq a regi scally proal con ;,,,ming Po lambed to and stiratearated source all all wcatdre�ta a,d l abl e t �• round sw a system P th, avai two seP for usa t{ve by s,.i r b• in .9 StandatP "tin len9 r of water ld require ede's$iale aired . ienta Indicate t, !� C. a coed 1�00t �Q,000 9al�lndwellin9ss ata {}able anasystem require be exactly t sixr t ,t rM ,," be arta,. Example:, red is a1waY R,unitY water locations feet. hydraeation tJ&O eci f i '°1r0ni °�, f. the.water Store els@{nary map' final spacing pub is corks sP Minute. Bpct plied pto ade to ' ek:tt�c "r�t'`x ';t4 the alta maximum h�deccordi 9Y to Butte County Per draht 13.01'3 R Lr.''' ,ra to t a hY ed o the �rar ,�;.•�" end install ares—~' system is ocat ons reriu{rx«� d fire f1a h is �•. .re the Preferable stem involvin9octnta- record � Req Number of Ydran ��_ u� 1 wate't ttet" a required. feasible, a sy stem is su °. n mo 1oGa wa it.,t9c+tt',.. r,�rtion {s. is not Such a sy coed . f19a� ---'i n and vquRrements ,d under other for irG . m if this uc a system + allons; Pravis Hater u��*pMeni be to d i pes rna, s Niti� tion flows 1t Class the fire flow req Stan P eIr flow from � n uirement and..drY %able war must be t: within 1 .0p0 f �e ay int^. sy Ol-a Re s. of meete�Ar stoxa9e °Elie aVa1 in storage Co caPacayailable deyelo er m° e d based stela wPmP stats {ire departmeyblume of water is roteGct, is . nt(s) the hydrant f l3. l of the .ded is ma'n for fit f{re, h7�'`'' ..- ate pendent o minim fee ro er �inu 'f he wH, toxic+ the app a teethe syst� Prov1 the ares tee in �- , APP, . frontage urized ti f in `° Press cost ° to '" pt'inal ntaP• gallons to Class ring f -C-� the nttaclt4r an• insu be 0185 Re ire@enln eu of be'd. PaY in -lieu the redline ons and record �truCti h t fun s ind� d by de by survey building ru'•' w» 13. ce s•ent y `CaiO be ma ded-Streets• riot to create Pdepartc dran frontage, i tion include o crating P C fire a foot• a cacula tr`e'at an ll ed and P are"I per fro l frontas of the Sr be instZ00. Ear' frontage. Oils1y25 P pins u� 4s S on w ince fo ire Pr°�ection to t�c� r;--- Tpnrl5c p1l1NT S" calcu at Nater system �} Other re ndi ti ans •-r-- t o th 'Batt' -i.an "'!00 to i:hr' t} �Q�Fp � tnutes ; �1.C�00. .k- pay _.--- s is as fdilows� .�" "'� minutes t 3 fit' - e for ( Response ttta .. =-Y-"'"--'`. �<- `�r-�-'"".. ��r-,.� ified• asW a�-. �.. stationf----'" clay this project are General Plan, l gjpWt� 3. Station 6 the 8tlttc Coun�Y s�vi �irednt of atiden t;a0ntY �, ... ( ) to the Safety rea' if i .Etre By, ���t-a son r . bn nbte restrict ent5 for hydF require-' total cater ay ll August 11, 1987 tURHAM lJNMED SC y �L DISTRICT pZI'CT I)ONAUD C:. kicNRIS, Oistrict .StIpe'riolomhont F',C), BOX 300 • DUkHAM, �a(lp",1;A . "')9 'Ili • (916) 895.4675 13O• RD01'TRUSUL% hicltardlt All(fvrsc),,-Rul)%O.Kinirnetl liu(--AriliurL,tvinart"Ni$'I('5t P�.wtr��u���ky•hi.tint'trrn�i4:r,�rc (Ir. John Mendonsa County of Butte Department of Public Works 7 County Center Drive proville, CA 95965 Dear Mr. Mendonsa Thank you for your letter of August 10, 1987, regarding the tentative parcel map for AP number 40-15-89 The four parcels 'will be subject to recently enacted developer impact fees at the time of permit application. I would also request that developer provide a graveled area adjacent to the road for a school bus stop. I appreciate the opportunity to respond on this matter. Thank you. Sincerely, Donald C. McNe1is Superintendent DCM:jt DURHAM W -MEN ARY SCHOOL NOLL ), I3LIT'1• L[k PRINCIPAL PlIntu ATp;;1W y Iy.C7, Hr>� w DURHAM INTERMR)Wt SCHOOL LINDA M. RROW PRINCIPAL PhoPt- 893-400 PI), Box VIII DURHAM HIEN SCHOOL WILLIAM m. )lNSIN NllNC !14(1 Phone 114".4 d1U P-0 11ox tllNl i AZA PL,TC.A ADDREbq Vickie Adams Rt. 3 Box 209. 9, Chico, CA 95928 Lo�,-J# S 8`Q 4`-25-01 OWNER Same "-.. P1tCq DGT X7ESCRxATx(JN TAN! to di- Vide 2 -�w� acres to create 2 acre J,:) arcel LOCATION at- the north --- ._.__--w----�-y,� .�.... Y.�Y}._.,_ end of Ileo court p rox. _.,....., t .. �- i r�~{ 11 01' CourL- Durham area. I, t �.1u�ary ,... t..r,Y ASStSSOR,8PARCEL NUMBtR LC7N XN SR -1. ---� � GENERAL PLAN AJ Resi O'ME[XtL PIAN CUtV'ORMANCE cs3 �__.� PROJ,EC T C:Ca�+l4a.�,tT L'�iTi� REpaRT �yPAPri1 7 4, 1988 nATmoF Arpz,�cANT LAND CONSERVATION ACT CUNTXIACR,S? No DA`V8 APPLICAI-10*4 P8CEIVE0 April 250 1988 11G.E„ ”N T/ VRVEyOR/C1V1L ENC;IN E12: Northstar Eng ne ring A4y1"'��pp �►Yn 20 Declaration Dri V- --�" .d1� X15 re ------- ._. , Chico, CA 95926 DAU PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REpC)RT PI E � Z ABED NJk ,C'Er VrJn��'t�'1.',�,ir-�-----•.-.`_""""--'------,.•->Y.,...Yr.�t.,.__., r....�.., ri?ATTON ,_ CA"EGORICAL EXEMPTION AND DAno FXLno ...�..�_ N81ATxVt UCT,ARAT1:0NrY DATE ADr4,PM Y� PNV xrn � l�� r7Er r �.DATE rx.,o•w4r�� r MIA,, V.l.�l.'Ad `1.7. �1� It11Ad'M ! 91Vj I �l� 1 A♦� r�'� , ..aw �w . . n ...a.., .w .,w. �w,_ + c n -4 ♦MY ! Ir. �! 1 1>kMa�,, i.Y+4r'ntilV -Yv . .:bY9M.y MWtvr. U [/V f� •,. PAM e,.aweKY luv AGENC"fir C"rt°1C1N �.., �'?t! }�q p p 1 '��irwyw.,4w.• YY.YAtt«Y3y'.. rY'_r. p Yw J�.J.2P rra�yy♦♦ _ 4 � 1.VlY�•VV �Yp � {y �'y} p���y r+r.w.w.w acv: ,Wzaw.��r,ar�r. 1 x;wY� u+.Na...+i4w:is WA+.rWw. w#.rw..wluti.Mr.�'Y...wrh ,y 'w4Y.4Y Ma.4,wYyrwwl^'Wf,wi."4t.:yy q,N4.}w`�� ,»yr.Ml ..-.„,144r'.r:'.++WJ!�ww•"r..'i+ti`.Y+"w`w+�Y.t ...-..'... P......rr,.w..:wY*WY'plil V.air.,'irMW.a�✓4.'M4In n.YYrtYMt...u.ai%+n rrawW N�:i. TLC ?8 COUNTY PT..AN CONI-'C73:�MANCID a W7i+ '� P42—M MA1 O} Sid}�t7�> GV '� i � .� A JP Iters 1-4 to bo Completad by applicant; .1. APPLICAN"r NAttE AND ADDRESS: ,L-JAg^. Ie. rv- 1i a 2, PROJMT DESCRIPTION: G 5l W A j 3. ASSESSORrS PARCEL NU MEP(S)., _ A FORTEW OF r 4. KOPOSM USE: --- el I Iti1 & t.FFAM I Lam{ I F S f hJ T I k L Tho following items are to be completed by the Planning Department: CL72riEhT 'l,ONItiG: �. LAND CONSERYKPION AGRM,24rwrt 1 �! — C;,"i;::RAL PLAN 'DESIGNATION: rt ��� JF=E2�I� & Cc,C-nditiannl Cr.itrrl11 AGRTC`LTURAL-RESIDE►iTIAL YE, 140 It is rdcommanded that you perform the i. Agricultural Gampatibil2.ty � •'following checked ittemut 2. Water and Sewer Capacity u'' ARCHAEOLOGICAL RECORDS CitECK 3. Adttymutto Piro Facilities 130TANICAL SURVEY «, tioxd Capacity and b,aintcn, nce vt GEOLOGICAL SURtta Ace= to Co tnerdial and Schools !// ----- YE, Ito APtO FIELD CI OpS WITHIN DEPARIMIi'E 01, FISH P't:3omin:Int: 5-10 ac. Pareal Side A4iL GAIL Di:V>rLi1PMi:,i'.I 10111:: - Vicinity of Urban Boundaries 11:zln FLOOD PLAIN., 1. A;;. Viability not Impaired SLafi Cctcrmttlatio:i: Substantial) conforms to: t4 ND U ARM, 5J?EGIITC OR Gl;;IPETI,AL PLAN: 1, Land Use If Yesy 2, Conservation_. W,.. � tintnu of Plan 3. Oppn Space -yG, 4. Safety �+ WITHIN URBANItEs[ItVt 5. 14oise Yes, G, `Housinta ./` Name of Rot:arvo ;'. Circulation AIRrORT LAND USE PLANT l,! Lt.;k Ment tura r/ -2 5 6 111E REQUT8TM 1441) DIVISION I AM WOE vi•' lun, n1ovl., knmrtt l:l l'1ItiI1r1A'rTct' ►;tsCt?�I pxN'.r 141111 TILE OF1v"1 &L RM AND ZONING: � t Sightituro of Applicant �� V-.".On 1-Tort Will oYpird and bo distard0d ci:t (6) months from the dahe of this t.tufl' ;illnatuYrn, =GE ovi DETERMyN �T'nN r{RIM _ butte County X0 Office of Planning and"Research"" planning Department 1400 ,Tenth Street, Rc bm 12.1 7 County Center DrivO Sacramento, CA 95814 ,SUN � $ ���� oroville, CA 95965 or IE Cuunty Clerk County of Butte By�.,�.�».� STJF,.7 CT ):,ling of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21108 or 21152 of the Public Resources Code. Project Title AP it Namc 40-15-89 (ptn)� Mark & Vickie. Adams Tentative Parcel Map Telephone Number State Clearinghouse Number Contact Person (if submitted to Clearinghouse) John Mendonsa, Public Works (916) .538-7266 project Location At the north end of Reo Court, approximately 300 ft. north of Aubry Court, Durham area. project Description- Tentative Parcel Map to divide two acres to create two 1 acre parcels. Advisory AgenC; This is to advise that the Butte Coun'� enc or Responsible Agency) (Lead Ag June 27; 1988 and has made has approved the above-described project ori (pate) the following determinations regarding the above-described project' 14 The project __will, X w=4'1 not, have a significant effect on the environment,. 2 3. 4, An Environmental impact Report was prepared for this proaec pursuant to the QA. provisions of 0E X A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. X were rltigat3.on measures were, not, made a condition of the approval of the project. � considerations _ was► was not, adopted A statement of overriding for this 'project. This is to certify that the final. ETR with comments and responsd!j and record of project approval, is available to the general public at: Butte County planning Department 7 County Center Drive oroville, CCA 95965 'Date 'Received for Viling and r , Posting At Opp, ignatU e Bill Tu, a.n; Senior Plrinr' 'µ Tit? R©visad Match 1086 r Mark & Vickie Adams TPM, AP440-15-89 ptn Mitigation Measure 1. Pay $200.00 to the water Tender Fund as required by the Butte County Fire Department for the newly OkoaL•ed parcel. M P Inter -Depart n .. Memorandum Advisory Agency .. FROM, Planning Director sUe.1ECTr TENTATIVE PARCELti MAP FOR MARK & VZCKIE ADAMSA , P'If �J Q OATEE May 16, 1988 15-8g The proposed project consists two one acre parcels, of divdin north end of Reo The ro osed g two acres to create Court, approximately p p project is located at Court in the Durham art ea. 300 feel. the by the Butte Count Z The project site - north Of Aubry conforms to the S Y oning Ordinance. is zoned SR -1 R-1 zon n The Tentative Parcel Map character of surroundin Ing and is consistent iii L11 designatioh for this g subdivisions. The the and the map also conforms Project site is A General plan Property: with such de'cultural-Residential was subdivided in August of designation. This Proposedprojectthat time; the 1987 by Dennis p Project will create y had created four lots. s and Leslie and Leslie Ryan parcel ' one more lot o This Map. n the original Dennis In order to mitigate the financial impacts creates for the Butte Count Fund has been established„ y Fire Department�lich new development Payment of The Fire De a Water Tender BO -Cause this map per parcel prior to recordnn requires Subdivision ;�' only creates one g of the map, be z"ec�ured to ch paid such fees new parc'4i1 £rom the o Pay the last yearn thea r1ginaS $20Q.00 for the necv lotapplicant �V.il.l. A Mitigated Ne project in ar gatJve Declaration has been11 ..corftnce to the Envihas b en Prepared for this RECOMMENbATxON,•ualt p y Act A A. Find that the considered in requireme,is oe C..8 making this K Negative Declaration• QA have been comp,a.t1t:ed and decision and ado' � and adopt a Mj.t'1gat ed f w . Find that the. project could environments but; wit have a signif%can cl"Cy7 l not adopted mitigation n this case becafase o.t. . c on the measure "'ttsached, 1:10 C• Approve- *the Tentative and I Condition Parcel Map sub'ec � ) and M ti Subject t to the E-01lowing gaLion Measure (M), s must conform Lo the 8• 11 lot ULte county Zo 2, nay $200:0 ni.115 Ox^ct[nance: (C) Count to the t^later. Tender r Fire Department for the and as ret�uirtai: r , BMe jmc newly created pa,r- �, ` Lhe Butte cc' North tar Engineering Mark ' Vickio� � .Adam_, APPENDIX F COUNTY OF BUTTE ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM (To be completed by Lead Agency) Log No, 88-04-25.01 I. BACKGROUND AP No. AI' 110-15-89 (pl n) 1. Name of proponent .. .—..t. Mark and Vickie Adams 2_ . Address of proponent and representative(If Applicable): Sox 209 NorthSt;ar la , Declarat on Drive u Chca CA 3 Project description: ; . 95 26 en at3ve Parcel Map to divide 2 acres, .,o cnea�t;taUtFe acre parcels, II. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE YCS MAYBE NO I. goes the project 1 t have potential to dograde the duality of the onvironmrrnt, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife p, jralpkton to rlrtr , below setf�sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal cornrnt�nilyt reduce Chir number or restrict the range of a rare ur endangered plant or animal or eltminato important examples of malar periods of California history or prohistory?, , . , . , • 1. Goes the project have the potential to achieve short-term bonefrt„ to the detritrient of Irrng- term, environmental goals' (A short-term Impact on the onvrronment is onewhir,h 6} xurs to a relativEAty brief period of time while long-term impacts Will endure into the trrture) rj 3. Dees the project have Impacts which arc individually limited, butcumuitattvely considerable fA project may Impact on two or more separate resources where the Impact on each resource Irl telatrvtaiy srlaalL but whore the effoct of the totitl of those tmpacCs on the environment i significant,) .. .................. ..I .... 1.! t" - 4, Goes the project have onvironmental effects whroh will GausO substantial advcr$0 elfects ran human beings, either directly of indirectly'...... .... • III` DETERMINATION; tT,, I1,, t,rrrrrl,lt�tr,!ti try ftLuna iio ilia 11,1115 rif tltrrd initial v�aluratt�rr} I,"Wt (arid thf! proposed projo ,t COULD NOT iuivi' a �ItlIII licit nI r=ffv( t r,rt ll'.r, anvu�,,rrrrrcr�t. and a NEGATIVE DECLARAT,ON will br,, w3rf.p,�itrd 1 Wt- tied that although the proposed project �rrtild have! o sicjntlhcartt nffn�;l rrrr lhrr. r+►avir�rnrrtr�riP, thor�r;�rrtl nisi Hoastynrfkpanteffectrnthrsgasabec�su e'thr+MlylCATIi N�IBA Up 5r1'q!,r:rri,rrrirrrrlhrkullt�IttaEadsho,vilj of been added to the. Project A Nt GATIV5 OECLARA° I0N will be orepared IMWA find the proposed project MAY have rr :;o,;)r„heant &ta ct ora 1NiPAr'T PfPGIp'T is rr'r{�Iired the envirotimlint. and tin ENVIRONMENTAL COUN F RUTTY 'PL Nf” f" A T ENT DATt- May 2, 19$8 / Brent z -0 a p�.ant�er _ k0viewod by: 3.b,e t 1% ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS tC.xplanations of all "YES" and "MAYBE" answers arra required on attached shee:tcl.l YES MAYBC- NO 1, EARTH, Will the proposal result in significant: a, tJ'nstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substri:rctureO ........ G b. Disruptions, dispiaooments, compaction or overcovering of the, snail? .. . , c. Ghango Ire topography or grinund surface reliuf features? , . , . . d. Dostructrun, covoriti~r or modification of tiny uruga,io geologic rye physical f(lalureari7 e, Increase in wind or water orosion of soils, either tin or ofi site" ..... f. Ch in depcasition or erosion of bes .." sands. or chang0s it, siltation, dopooatiain or ero,ron which may modify tele channel o' n , ,vet or stream or the bed of the ocfr,iri t.ar tany bray, inlr:t or kil<0 .................... e g. Lor,r, of gime agliw<ulturially productive ,oils outside designntett urban rrriy&,' rarty to gQologic7hazarcis such as earthquakc4, latidtAldoil h. Exposure of people or profa^ Y i mud Aides, Aground failure or similar hazards' 2, Alit. Will the proposal result in substantial: � r. Air (kmrst,rons or detenor.ation of ambient ,air qual►ty? ... , . 4r. rtlira rroatinrt of oblekctional odor,, .smoke: or IumeCe .......... or an change in Climate, ear, c. Alteration of :air movement, mrarstcrre, or temperate . y regionally''.......................... .......... ........... 3. WATER. Will Itro preypiaw":"l resisit In twb,tantrrat a, Ghang'os in currents, or, the course or direction Of water mcvunaents in either rnttrine or � Iresh wators'). ... .. ..... ....1....,.,....,. 0 0 04� b. C;Iia►,;jt s m iabsnrl',llon rales,. ... draimige pattern$, of the rate and amount cel surfrscv,- runo'fP .. C. ldtre±d fele oft»site -surface drainage improvements irlCluding vegeltation rrrmoval, r culvy�rr inrtallatfearr' . . ctaariniJrz�PaCion .aj hi:y Writrr,r� ear flew C�.1 d Alta_�rations tr � t r. t e, Gjiavirje in ttbn arr+otsnt of surtace watpr It, any water body' f. Chj,t hirrclu mfrs urtaCs? water or rn .trey dltoration of st urlacrI w,�tF:ri r�ualrtrv, ini hidinrl but ril�t ikrrutrjd tea ti''rikr,taratured, drrsolvr^u raxvtWrr or turbidity" r- j Aili�raWlri kit th" r,firr1Gtirart of k,1tCk .G rhoa'r *I ground tvatvr'4, ` �l h. i .l+,i�ikli' lir tine 1l+i,rnhly �'i r.lii,a,lrty All grrkrrlul wator.,, i ithi�, ,lireiurlh deer. r ,►rlifiU»rr;a rjt Vurtttrfi<yw71'' ,lir throwill rtite'.tceptioir of 3n dt'lUifiAt by t°rit5 Or "(;"r'�""'On,..°� � �` i. lit'tao tioli irk Alii; ninorint of wialm othotwi!se ,ivnifsahlea for pirhlic wale r j, Exposure of n(,,optn Or property to water relatod "raaard ryucft ttu ilOO(11nrl') G. PLANT LIPPI, Will tie proposal rosult in subblantral: � a Change An the diversity of species. or number of any specters of pl,ants trnuliaxiinll trr}erti L � Shrubs, grass (..miles. and aquatic plants)) b. Reduction of the numbers Of any unique, rare of endangered speolos of plants': . 0 a. Introduction Of now w lrtt)0 res of plants Into an Aron., or 1n a bdirlor to hi? normal � � roplenishmont ref g ... res, . N . i 1 .... . . ... . d. rXtrdubtiran In acreage of zany agricultural ramp?, ... . , ... ... I 5, ANIMAL LIFE. Will the proposal result in substantial: YES IIIIAYI3r- NO a. change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of anfnials (birda, bind animals including reptiles, fish and shell fish, benthic organisms or Insects)? Y , ... Y ... » . I' I �• b. Reduction in the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animt I,,-,9 c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result Pil a barrierto the mirfrolluri or I `) movement of animals? Y ................... RY.. ........ .,.f...Y,,...,,Y,. d. oeterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat"?........... ..... . 6. NOISE. Will the proposal result in substantial: Lj a, increases in existing noise levels? . i ..... , b, Exposure of people to severe noise levels? .............................. 7. LIGHT AND GLARE. Will the proposal produce significant light and glare? Y • ..... 1... .. . ri 0 ll, LAND USE, J,'ill the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the present or planned land.. use of an area'? ........... ............Y...,. ......... ,.....,....Y... C7 �) 9. NATURAL RESOURCES, Will the proposal result in substantial: of Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? .. • » b. Depletion of any non-renewable natural resources? ................................ io, RiSI( OF UPSET. Will the proposal irivOIM •. l f a. A risk of explosion or rebase of haxa� 10ussubstances (including, but riot limited to. oil. pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditioris b, Possible interference with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan?. , 0 Ci ii, POPULATION. WIII the proposal alter location, distribution, density. or growth rrtte of the IL -4 t ,....... ...Y....,YY..Y».,.., hurnan popu alion'? »..... R,Y 92, KGUSING. Will the proposal affect existing htrusing, or create a (jumand fui raddilional huilaingl ........ .Y............ f,. .....Y .... , .,.,..,Y»Y til RANSPoRTp+TI'ON/CIRC'ULATION. N,ill the proposal result in, a, Generation of substantial additional venictu movement? r ... • Y . » b. Effects ori existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking'?..... r o, Substantial impact on existing transportation systems'? , , » ...... , . d. Significant alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of 1)(iopio ondlor 1. goods'? ........................Y waterborne, rail or air traffic? .. r ...... Y .. ....... , ...... iR Increaseinn traffic hazards 10 Motor vehicles, bicyclist$ oredestria p na?......... f7 20. CULTURAL RESOURCES, Will the proposal result in thea altr:ratlon of r)r the destruction of n prehr uric or hV,I>aric, archaeologicalsita? ......................... . b. Will the proposal result in adverse phy.wwal or aestiaetrc eifectr, to a prehistoric or Isi'Jorlc; building. structure or object? ........... ............... ..... Y .. , c, Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical changi,which would affect unlctuO ethnic cultural values?.,... ..I ... I..— .... ,..,.,.. .... d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact tA areal . Y ..Y. 4164. ...l4 f1. 11 ...Y i..4hk •YX, ..-.4.....4.4..4'4! .... MI ! .. ... v Y. ....♦ 1 14, PUBLIC SERVICES. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or a ltorod government services: YES MAYBE NO Cf a, Fire protection? .4. ....,, „».,...,.. . ,. ... .. ..;., ..... b. Police protections . ............... •,.. ., ..... ...,,. ..... ........ 13 1 c. Schools?....» ................... ............ .,,.,...., .,.... 0 0 . d. narks or other recreational facilities? . » , . , .. , . , , ...................... , ... , ..... , . e. Maintenance of publ;c facilities, including roads? ...... :......... .................... f, ether governmental services?. . . ....... ........... , ............... .. ........ . 15. ENERGY. Will the proposal result rn; a. Use of sub5manliai amounts of fuel or energy? .................... to b. Substantial incroase in demand upon exi.0ncg Sources of energy, or rr+rfirro lhi, 1 development of new sources of energy? ..... ....... .... . . . . » tr t 10, UTILITIES,.Will tile proposal result in a need for new systems. or substantial alteralions, to tho following: a. Power or natural gass .................. ....... X....... _ ..... IA b. (,,,onimunicatlons systems"... .... . ..... . ...... . .... . ... . ........ .. . . a C. Water availability"? , . , ... , .. ........... ...... 0 d, Se'we'r or septic system9 ................ . • . • • . • • 0 o `h e, Storm water drainage?.. . ........................ — ............ ..... .,......,..., o C3 f. Soho waste and disposal? . ......... .......Y....,,......,........ ,......,......... ... Ci r 17, HUMAN HEALTH. Will the ;proposal result in: s.. Croation of any health hazard or pnlnntital hoalth hazard tc;xcmludinq mer'tarr J`T allVr .. , 0 t4 b, L),p ?sure of people to potential health hazards'" ...........— ......... ...... ..... .. a he Will os runts. n ofy sevista (fir %�r;w ui;01 Ira p y 18. ArESTHETI Sa lthefpr7o al rn iriltri the obst I paesthetically offerSiv%. 500 nrrrrrr l " 1 l lr, pill Ilw vii v'L ....... .. ..... ........ , ....... 19. IfiE CneATICN, Will than ptopo-ml rrt",orll it) an umpa,rc.t up oil the quality or quantity of ��xi�lhnfl m 0 rr+(,rr�alliultal opportunitie!i? . , . r ... ... .. ' ...... .. ..... ...... , , . 20. CULTURAL RESOURCES, Will the proposal result in thea altr:ratlon of r)r the destruction of n prehr uric or hV,I>aric, archaeologicalsita? ......................... . b. Will the proposal result in adverse phy.wwal or aestiaetrc eifectr, to a prehistoric or Isi'Jorlc; building. structure or object? ........... ............... ..... Y .. , c, Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical changi,which would affect unlctuO ethnic cultural values?.,... ..I ... I..— .... ,..,.,.. .... d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact tA areal . Y ..Y. 4164. ...l4 f1. 11 ...Y i..4hk •YX, ..-.4.....4.4..4'4! .... MI ! .. ... v Y. ....♦ 1 0 DfnCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION. 9 AP # 40-15-89 ml.l. Some nominal amounts of disruptions, displacements, compacl�ion, or ovo covering of the soil will occur: as a result of this t;enttative parcel map. The tentative parcel map divides a 2 acre parcel into two parcels which will allow for an additional single family roo Ldential, dwelling, thus only minor impacts will occur in relati,onah.ip to overcovering_and compaction of the soil. lc: The proposed subdivision is within an existing almond orchard, which is relatively flat. Very little grading will by n000daary for preparation of building pads and driveways. Very li.ttlo Change is expected in the topography or ground surface relief features. Ig: The on-site soils are designated as Class I for agricultural use. The two acre parcel is not in itself viable fo'- commercial agricultural food ctionan chis property subsequently been subdivided to provide p P P Y g . 3b: No impacts are anticipated in drainage patterns or the rate and amount of surface runoff. This acreage has been subdivided in the past and, therefore, has received the necessary drainage improvements to accommodate single family dwellings at one acre densities. No new drainage facilities will be necessary to accommodate the additional lot which would be created by this subdivision. 4a_,d: The removal of almond trees w111 occur on the additional lot to allow for a future single family residential home. without this subdivision more trees could be maintained within, the general neighbor;huad: 8 The proposed tentative parcel map would conform to other tentative mops along the Lott Road corridor within the SR -1 zoning, The General. �?l an designation for this property is Agricultural Resident.*�1 and the pjap also conforms with such designations. This propertly was si,.bdivided in August of 1987 by Dennis and Leslie Ryan. At that time, they had created four lots: This proposed subdivision will create one more lot on the original Dennis and Leslie Ryan parcel map. Other land d i v.,::,,,1,6 o n k.1 acted on by the Advisor�� Agency in the vicinity include: Tentative Parcel Map for James Black, AP 40-1.5--81, September 1586; Ten{ative Parcel Map for ,Tames Black; AP 40Y-15-78, February 1986; Tentative Parcel Map For Crag Maas, AP 40-15-79, February 3.986,• Tentative Parcel. 'Map for Albert Aiw.ator, AP 40-1.5--pm/97-16, April 198+x; Tentative Subdivision Map for Raymond Burson, AP 40-15-49, September 1984 13a The proposed tentative parcel map will create one addi.tion,al parcel in this neighborhood. Such an addition would generate approximately 10 extra vehicle trips per day. The most recent traffic Counts on. Lott Road show an average daily traffic (A.b,T.) of 810 vehicles. No significant impacts are anticipated in relationship to the transportation or circulation system: 14a: the Butte Parcel The the County Fire Department water tender fund., required payment of 14CI�.�ct Durham Unified School Dist X200 per to residential District has adopted development aPPf0obecame effective Projects June ects 9the k�ment fees which at 987, The time of building par[,,its. gravo•laed area adjacent to tha road for school District ict questedThese a stop.- re s 16: All utilities p• subdivision have already to service which created the ori ^y been installed underd also the gi.;lal lot. the original. proposed 20a: The master environmental asses Parcel map indicates the assessment for the sensitivity. As apro�ect is within Durham Dayton surve result on the ori an area of modern arcaeoloe�son y was conducted b ginal parcel ma gical further surveys are required Jensen and Associates. Itpisn archaeological quired for this project; deemed that no Recommended Mitigation measure- 1. P aY easures1.'ay the $200 County Fire Deer parcel water tender fund partment, as required. by the Butte BLM:l Applicant: Mark and Vickie Adams Assessor's 40-15-89 Log # ,88-04-,25-01 DATA SHEET A. Project Description 0 1. Type of Project: Tentative Parcel Map 2. Brief Description: Tentative Parcel. Map to divide 2 acres Lo create 2 one acre parcels. 3. Location: At the north end of Roo Court, approximately .300 feet north of Aubry Court in the Durham area. Proposed Density of Development: one dwelling unit per act~«. 5. Amount of impervious surfacing: 1-5%. 6. Access and Nearest Public Roads"): Property accessed by A00 Court off of Aubry Court. ?. Methodof Sewage Disposal: Individual septic and leachfiold system. 8. Source of Water Supply: Individual well. 9. Proximity of Power Lines: Adjacent to property. 10. Potential for further land divisions and development: No further land diviz: on. possible under existing zoning and General Plan designotion. Environmental Setting Physical. Environment: 1. Terrain a neral Topographic Character Flat valley y land occupied by almond orchards. b: Slopes: 0-1%. c, Elevation: 160 ft. A.S.L. d. Limiting Factors: None. 2. Soils a: 'Types and Characteristics: Vina loam/Vina fine sandy loam, well draining soil capable of supporting and extensive range of crops. b. Limiting Factors: Moderate liquefaction potential 3 Natural. Hazard;, of the Land a. qvk4 miles west of active fault it Voothill Shoat Zone, 4 miles east, of inferred fault. b. Erosion Potential: None. c. ,Landslide Potentialt None. a. I"ire Hazard: Unclassified - irr-,gated area. e. Expansive Soil :Potential: Moderate: 4. Hydrology a. Surface Watert. SUtte Greek is 1000 ft . +/- north a West. b. Ground Water; Durham area aquifers. 5. U 7. 10 11.. 12 13. 14. 15i 16 17- 18, 19. 20. c. Drainage Characteristics: Good natural soil drainAU0 d. Annual Rainfall (normal'): 26" e. Limiting Factors: None. Visual/Scenic Quality: Good. Acoustic Quality: Good. Air Quality: Good. Biological Environment: Vegetation: Mature almond orchard with under7yjng gras oa, Wildlife Habitat: Birds and small mammals typl ujal of vall,e y orchards. Cultural Environment:_ Archaeological and Historical RPsourcat-3 in the aroa Moderate sensitivity. Previously surveyed by Jim Jenson and Associates. Butte County General. Plan designation: AgriculutUral Residential. Existing zoning: SR -1 (Suburban. Residential 1 acre parcels) Existing Land Use on-site: Almond orchard Surrounding Area: a. Land Uses Suburban residential. b Zoning: SR -1, A-5. C. Gen. Plan Designation: Agricultural. Residential, Orchard and Field Crops. d. Parcel. Sues 1-50 acres. e. Populations Rural residential Character of Site and Area: Rural. residential. Nearest Urban Area: Durham. Relevant Spheres of Influence: Durham Unified School. District. Improvements Standards Urban Area: No, Fire Protection Service: a. Nearest County (State') Fire Station: Station 1145 in Durham b. Water Availability: Fire t,- ,k capacity; f=uture wells with draft connections, fire connections are wells adjacont to property on north. Schools in Area: Durham Unified 'School District.