HomeMy WebLinkAbout040-160-077• a +o ;.
<�
f
� �
� � � 9
'
a• ru, ` .
��
' �
- � • L
'
'
o
� a
a
`,
a
. „ �.
w
i
�
,�
0 �
�
1
.-
r
y � l2
V �
•^1
`
�
� I a
I
� Y J •
� t
M�e�,
1
��'Id'
+
a�
Q: y
�
�
z
.d
.5
� ,
F
ap ..
e
� a
'OR,
Cary Jones & Quentin. Nakagawara .88-05-23--0,
�i M�NI.I IM +'�^"� aww...h..r^�`.•rr^w>'ww..rr�M4kr��.�..'••"'T•�^Lrrr..sNwWW'MhSr 1:. iYr ksribNavxfi ir.aw
- 9700 Marichert Ct., Durham, CA 95938
Same
TPM to divide 5 acres to create 4 p.a �e'j.� i. 1.3
.�ojvon DESCRIPTION
rtoresr 2 - 1.4 acres 3 - 1.01 acres, 4 « 1.23 ac�:es
DCO uN 4 parcels on Marichert Ct., 300 feet south of C kitniiings Zang„ >a„�
Durham area.
ASSESSOR',; PARCEL NUMBEI�(S)40-16-77,78.._ �...�..��.., ..�.....r. .._» �«.d......
SR -1 GENERATE PLAN Orchard & PROJECT
zo7JXNG ,
Oi;NnZtX11,LAN CUNk'OR�1P►NCE RE
pORT April 17, 1988
.__._.
DATE OF APPLICANT Sx%.
NATUI�I
ACT CON"TRACTS?..__ No
LAND CCtN,Si'1�`�t�T:>:Ol� ,...._..._.._....---r.:....,.r,.,�.._...n,....� ,+�.J:.,�._... ,b�.,..>,....«.»
May 20 , 1988
/1Sl d.1l'AC'A.I ., CA,M`l14 i1�C'14 Jir .l:V G1J
Sierra West Surveying �-
ACktn/ sUlIVEYOR/Civil ENGINEER ..�., . ... .-- .....
ADR L;S 5431 Black Olive Drive, Paradise, CA 95969
DATE VtANN".CNG DIRWTOR' S 'RFPO%til'
1010 1111014MENTA4Y CIATEGORICAL EX MPTION DAIM
N ;GATIVB MCLAR.ATIOVDATE
R'� �'j A13t 1 �S17. -
r i a �
OA1D
MITIGATED NEG. UE'CLARATION
PN'V`, 1MPAOT REPORT DATE CERTY11i'CE�
STATE, CpTNCRc U1151
11xaVUSORR'
M.A Y 1, 111-,. RY AGENCY ACTION
VOR PLANNING DIAEC!i�T�'
w+fwi..�iiw+M.MM-W>+.'..iw'»_ww.w:i.«w_.>.'r.'w4_�k_�I?M14f YiYrM•....�« +• Yw�'w.�.ss '
I3'CTC :T'E COU'N',I:'Y
C3;NEi"2AE. PLAN Ca'ONEOHMANCE RE -POE -T
VOR PAR.CEL `MAP- OR SUP LV SZO]V MAP
l t e nrr 1.-4 to bpi jompleted by applicant:
f
1 I APPLICANT NAME AND ADDRESS: �J�V�$
7• PROJECT DESCRIPTION:_ -ems
3. ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER(S): °�� " l� ' 77� Z ---------- - ...
1) . PROPOSED USE:.� �TrA L
The following items are to be completed by t1lo Planning Department:
CURRENT ZONING: � "" LAND CONSERVATION AGRI;F#di;�rl' -W_�
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: CiCHA
ConditioLlnl Crite: icy:
AGRICULTURAL -RESIDENTIAL
1. Agricultural Compatib0 ity
2'. Water and Sewer Capacity
3, Adequate Fire Facilities
YES NO It is recommended that you perform Ito
following chocked items:
ARCHAEOLOGICAL RECORDS CHECK
BOTANICAL SURVEY ��...
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
4, Road Capacity and tfa,intonance
S. Access to Commercial and SchoolsYES NO
.. WITHIN DEPAR1TtF.NT OF FISH /
ORCHARD AND FIE0 CROPS AND GAME DEVELOPMENT ZONE: v
1. Predominant 5-19 t4. Paicel Site
2. Vicinity of Urban Bbundari.es 1 WIVIN FLOOD PLAIN:
N/ -
i, Ag, Viability not Impaired •-1L WITHIN AREA, SPECIFIC OR
star pntermination: Substantially conforms to: LAND USE PLAN:
GENERAL PLAN: 1. Land Use L I£ Yes,
2. Conservation ;Z, Name of Plan
3. Open Space 10WITHIN URBAN RESERVE; Y
i,: Safety
If Yes,, _.
S. Noise Name of Reserve
6. Housing
). Circulation AIRPORT LAND USE PLAN:
WNW-
�O4tt1E1VTS;dA1�Nlo .Nle �t1_C�L�I�!RiJ'MJ%Wd�f2i"UlFlal _
e/gm-W4 Dd�RAM .QRFsA _pnl t!/RRi1JTzi'
.y. A- 6�5 AJ t Tf~
�ntt� s'�Co� Ta`t'ls07b
Staff Signature
Uate
AS THE APPLICANT FOR THE R qft-'STED LAND DIVISION, I AM AWARE OF THE ABOV ARF 14 NA" tE NG
THE CONFORMANCE WITH THE GENERAL PLAN AND TONING.-�- "
Dated .�A "+/ 7 " 0 DJ Signature of Applicant
*Thts tdport will agpire and t� distarded ba#k (6) months from the data of the staff signaturd.
FIECEIVP-o ' ,� 7vQN ?"v 5»I'A eA) '
LD 1000A Ob)kTt �`a '�'` j�� �! ��3,�'7�k. c,�. kyle
--
�'0'rXCE OF DE TERM=NA'1:10
anti Research �t. Butte County
TQ : Office of Planning � r Planning DepartIllOnt
?400 .Tenth Street),4
1..1 7 County Center Drive
Sacramento, CA 95814 JUL 12� G 1;K -I Oroville, CA 95965
ox
County Clerk
County of Butt=
_ .90
SUB -TF -CT Filing rr- Notice of Determination in Compliance wiLit Section 21108
or 21152 of the Public Resources Code.
AP I1 Name
Project Title Gary Jones and
Tentative Marcel Map 40-16-77,78 Quentin Nakagawara
State Clearinghouse Number
Contact Perscn Telephone Nu►1 bOr
(if submitted to Clearinghouse)
John Mendonsa 538-7255
Public Works —
Project Location Three hundred feet south of Cummings Lane, at the
end of Marichert Court, Durham.
Project Description Tentative Parcel Map to divide 5 acres to creast
four parcels 1.3, 1.4, 1.01 and 1.23 acres.
This is to advise that theButte County Advisory ency
(Lead Agenr,.y or Responsible Agency)
roved the above-described project on 0u1y 25, 1988 and has tltade
has app p (Date)
the following determinations regarding the above-described project:
1. `The project will, 2iwill not; have a significant effect on the
environment
2,
An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project
pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the,
provisions of CEQA:
3i mitigation measures _were, X fv,ere not, made a condition of the
approval of the project,,
4, A statement of overriding considerations was, X wr;lil not, adopted
for this project.
This is to certify that the ficial nxR with comments and re'spon-908 and record of
royal is available to the general public at'
project app
Butte County Planning Department
7 County Centet Drive
Oroville, CA 95955
sate Received. for Filing and
Posting at OpR
4Sitgna4tUe g�.11 Turpihi Sena.or Pla..nner
9015 Title Revi§ed March 1986
inter-Depart a "Memorandum
Advisory Agency
0110Mc Planning Director
SL) RJECT: REPORT ON TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP FOR GARY JONES ANt)
DATE,*QUENTIN NAKAGAWARA ON AP#40-16-77,78
July 12, 1988
The proposed project consists of a 'Tentative Pul'ce1
to divide 5 acres to create 4 Map
1.3
acres, Parcel Two at 1.4 acres, Farce Parcel. Arte at
and Parcel four at 1..23 acres.' Parcel Three aL 'L.01 acres,
single family resident-Lal homes on Is it op bra develop
The j C rf9�tl,ed parcels
Project site �s located 300 feet south o
OL the end of Marichert Court in the Durham aro`:,
Ct;irrtttiings Lane,
The proposed subdivision will allow the devel
additional single family homes in this nei eloopMant mGnt of two
Zsroject as proposed is consistent with thegreside:ntiaThe
character and rural setting of the surrounding
The majority of the lots in th,� vicinity consist of one parcels. The properties.
1 acre project site is zoned SR-1 (Surburban-ROsidential,
parccls) by the Butte County Zoning Ordinance. The
SR-,l zoning requires a minimum of one acre
Project conforms to the current tonin however, dwelling. The
meet the requirements of the Genesi Plan, it does not
General Plan designation are not consiswent inethios�a area the County. It has been the a of
in the past to follow the zoning�designationthe lrather than thent
General. Paan in this area. an the
development of residential housing at icy has resulted the
area of Durham: s in this
The ability to provide an adequate level of giro
sery;Lces in the Project area protection
due Lo the' rapid urban has deteriorated in recent years
growth. A water tender fund was
established to finance the additional. fire
demanded by the increased r Protection services
$200 per lot has sidential development: A fee of
been established for any new loL�s Oreat
fees
subdividing; The Butte County Tire bepartmen( 9equiaes such
fees ho paid pr' to recordation of the final
The initial study required as archaeolo i pad; col map
Conducted through the De g al recon°ds check be
State Chico. Stich a recordscheckanoarol1Q(,)olo �c
} p gy at Cal.iforniia
Clearance for the Proposed project, g al
Gary Jones & Quentin Nakagawara
Page Two
July 12, 1988
A Negative Declaration has been prepared for this �yrd�oo
pursuant -to the California Environmental Quality t+t , No
significant effects were identified by the init' study.
RECOMMENDATION:
A. Find that the requirements of CEQA have beef Completed
and considered in making this decision and adbpb the
Negative Declaration; and
B: Approve the Tentative Parcel Map for Cary Jolloa and
Quentin Nakagawara, AP#40-16-77,78 subject to the
following conditions:
1 All lots created shall adhere to the applicable
zoning regulations.
2. Pay the $200 per lot fee required by the Butte
County Fire Department prior to the recordation of
the final map.
BMtjmc
cc: Sierra west Surveying
Gary Jones & Quentin Nakagawara
w(um-Mon .01E
California PENN SHASTA
@� �� nuwS S,SM*W
Archaeological LAssEN I'ENAVA
inventory .Oooc T131mirr
-- pate'
Zp• Butte County Planning
tt7 County Center Df-
oroville► Ca- 95965
Dear County Planners
Wie Co, Planting COMM
JUN 3 () 1988
orovill®, California
Department of Anthropology
California State University. WOO
Chico, CA 95929
(916) 695-6256
re; Ai i� 16 -7 s/Nakc awara
A review Of the above pro'ect has revealed the following:
7
project boundaries is considered to be
The area indicated as within the prc�J
archaeologically sensitive. Present are:
Easy access to natural sources of water
Flat sla`aes
laid or flat land near water
South. and/or east facing ,
Previously recorded sites In &e vicinity
<-----
r� �.--------------- aissarice be conducted of
------- - ate
We rt that an archaeologicalMitigation measures
w�. stror►gly 1st and 4VCOP
the area by a qualiled archaeolog
prepared. ro'ect area:
A known site or sites hash
ave been previously >+ecorded in the p J
rations will have a negative im?a t °be contacted to assess n t:hese cultural esi site
protect olo that a qualified archaeologls
we recarR>etx9 r sal • on r .Ccs►°lii
components and prepare a mitigative p
���t has be pc' 'd at your
11 re evaluation of this pi o� y ._
otheC: :,aona a►► :mar or► s
y,�t j^`,c3uc,s as�c on 1: r.
w�a are' i� atig1.ng yaw: I.QCamme�ct r �
C`ap C.ti.
�:I;fTli . I-11"
- .a; a l- ar.0 :K , nt on this pcapos6l. Please le
a on Masur,c;s
you o a e opporturtlty to review and come
m,ank Y arding the 'prOlect.
tis know what decisions are made reg
Sincerely;
L,6Gia
" t,.
br M6koto icowtanator
Piortheast Information Center Coors
Department of Anthropology
M0vU�„Irc California State Universty, C
hic§
Caiforrn.a cTs,.AsrA
Chico, CA 95923
Archaeological � ��@P mu. s s+s.�.ou
usseh it"Aw. 91 895-5256
inventory u000c rw.»ir♦ ( 51
Date:
Bul{e Co. Planning Comm.
70: Butte County Plannilg JUN I fl 79$8
a7"County Center 9 r.
oroville, Ca- Orovillex California
res Ap 40-15-77
tear Colony Planners
A t evied of the above project has revealed the following;
indicated as within the project boundaries 15considered to be
X The area
archaeologically Sensitive. present are,
G X Easy access �wlto natural sources of water
X Flat mead -and or flat land near water
South and/or east facing slopes
Previously recorded sites in the vicinity
Other:
r �
be conducted of
W., strongly recommend that an archaeolcgic".al:` z
a tes asance non it,easurr,s
`- the area by a qualified archaeologist and op
prepared.
ded &nthe ro' t area.
A known site or, sites has/have beer previously ternthese a r,vo u),* r, --
A
--
operations will have a negative impact
Project- alifzei archaeologist be contacted 4o assess ".te
We rec_,ar+end that a qu"
components and prepare a mitigative proposal.
Outer
g1lank you for the opportunity to ee�ri�* and coctrne
nt on this proposal» please let
us knc+ what decisions Lite made regarding the prajtact:
since ly,
or. Makoto Ccavta
Northeast Lhfartnation Center Cooedinator
APPENDIX r
COUNTY OF BUTTE
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
(To be completed by Lead Agency)
Log No. 88-05-23-01
Ate No, 40-16-77,78
1. 1:3ACKGRrJIUN
1. Natmn of proponent GARY JONES & QIJENTIA 13?ICI�GAWI#5�
2. Address of proponent and represenintive (if appltcf)bl('),
Gary Jones & Quentin Nakagawara siert"'n- West Surveying,.
-54 37 f1 a�]c 01ive I)r J.�ra
97UU'"'Ma"zither Ct.'" Paradl,titr CA 95969
lluxham_CA 95.938 - .
3, project descriptions:._.-Tenet.a.t-ve--Pa3:ce.l`MELP--.-
11. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCI_ YES MAYBE NO
1. Does the project have potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially
recluse the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop
below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the
number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal oreliminato important
examples of major periods of California history or prehistory? ....... . .................. • .
2. Does the ,project have the potential to achieve short-term benefits to the detriment of long-
term, onvi-
ong,-term,envi onmentaigoals'i(Ashort-termimpactontheenvironment„ one which occurs ina
relatively brief period of time while long-term impacts will endure into the future.) ..... , .. 0 C) 4 '
N,
3. poen the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively •onsiderable')
(A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact act carp t. tech resource
is relatively small. but where the effect of they tc)t(al of those Impacts on fhe environment is. � 0 f
significant) .......... ... ...... .........«...�,
4. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantival adverse effects on /
human beings, either directly or indirectly') . . ....................... .... , . « • •
. 0 Gl X11'
I11. DPT 13M1f4AT1ONt flu be coniplrtsid bytfici Lead AIloncyl Oil ]lire ba",r; of lso.. initiaa ev,aluatiizn
VWE find the proposed project COULD NOT havt, tis r,irjnihCarit f1t,V.t rsii Ihrr t,iiviro imurit, itnd a NEGATIVE
DECLARATION will be prepared
1,'Wu find that although the proposod prr�ji�c r r riuld tiavri to siriniticar'tt oftnc I ilii tool iynvil onm--nt there wilt i of
be a significant effect in this casae beeoauna ate It ITIOtATION MEASURES d"`,r t�ur�rl on ltle tittache d sheet havt�
been added to the project A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be preparod
I WC find the proposed project MAY have ac significant offact on the envtroramnrit, and an t-NVIRONME NTAI
IMPACT REPORT is required.
CC7U EC1 CTE, L" NG R 1'N) NT
June a...
r F;TE, ► 988 fly, _ 1. _s e y •satiate anner
.,�.. Brent L
f3eviewed by:r
a,
Ll
4. PLANT LIFE. Will the proposal aside in subste-nhul:
r � , "a ... , . . , y..... i0G of ....... i,Irri�t trr,t:S.
a. Change in the diversity of species. or rttirnber of an species tai triktrr'ta tirii.li ,.. . �
shrubs, grass. c taps, and aquatic plantbf
b, Reduction o1 the numbers of Any unique, rare or endangered sper.rOS Of l.rtirnfr .......
c, IntrradtlGElcrn of new aP0688 of plants 11114 an area, cr in it bill nor to Itl4« 1Vrrrrrlclf
C 7
r'eplenishnielt Of existing species? ..... ........... . . .
Ill. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
on attached shoet(s),1
IV
(Explanations of all "YES" and "MAYBE" answers aro to
YES iVIi1Yt3E
NO
1. EARTH, Will the proposal result in significant.
a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures) ..........
ta. Disruptions. displacem.'nts, oornpadtu7n or overuoming of the sodry ....... ..
c, ti3hango in topography or ground rurfaci* r0li0f ((ahturc+,? ........
d, t)r,�:itruction. covering or moddiration of tiny Unique Oetrlrrrldr, Or Physrr,rrl tt ttturr�r,`
Y �
e Increase in wind or wetter erosion of ;;oils, !zither on or off A rtr 'a .... .. .... .
C)
I, ;hangcs in deposition or erosiol, of beach sands. or chc„tgr+�, in siltation, doflo,,Mlon Or
channel of a river or s'trearn or the bed of the nt;rwtrn r+r r111
erosion which It, modify the
Ilay, inlet or laW'! .................... .....
prutiuCtivo soils oulsido desirfri;001 urbolr �1I(Nr�,`�
( J
t us5 of prima agri;wt,lturall"y
h. Exposure of people or property %rj geologic hazards such as o arthquakot,, 0
.....
CEJ 1
mudslides. ground failure or sirrolar hazards? ., ... , . ...........
2. AIR, Will thu proposal result in substar'tittl
q. Air ortrissiuns tar dett:�iioranon Y ftn�tiii'rrt .air ttriahty?.............
u, Tire creation of objfzct►onal !odors, snioko or furnes"a...... ...... ..
Alteration of air rnovi?mant, moisttire, or temperatur(). or any change in climafn: ftac 'illy or
c.
it-grunally? ............. ........,....... ..,.....,..
WATER, Will tnir (4r 4";'"' result in Substantial,
a, Changes in currunts. Of We course or direction of water nroveymurrtS in either tit Irrtit
ta or 0
tiesh wiliot5'� .. .. . . ...... .. . , . ...... r
b, Oil alIgrus in rates, drainage patterns, or 10ie tilt rr.In(I anroil ntoIsurfxrctminot I?—
C. >vi�eti fear rslf,sitr� Outface drainage rnrprr.lvpm[rnt5 iriC:Nut7ing vt�rinttttion xt�rnnvtrl
Giiarillt'Ii«'�rtit3n [7r +ailvelt im tallalion 7 p i
f1, j�►lo- °latir�n9 lir lir' c("Irse tar Of Ilrachd waters'," . • . ............
rr. r.ii�uriii� In the aiTiourtt of sill face water in any water body'? , ...
,....... ..........
i. 1 ri"star«lisle: urtti tro fain° walers, or in any, alteration of :,iulacr=water quality, inc,lurlii7q but o n
rrrrt iurtntud to Itinitvr+ature. dissolved oxygen or turbid,W) .. .
xy Aliviation ;,If tele Jrir.•ctiran or rate nfaltlw of gr¢)urrd
h. r t�.rnrli .n tell• rar;ar�htwt7r quality irf ground wG#tt,rS lyitnc r tirriiririli direr t .riGiitnrrr,rar
«aitt+iiiawair, ra+ irirt.�urfri intercuption of art aquifor f,y nota lar pxr:atvatiorvi'fi
r. htraduc°Uun rri the amount of Wdtar uthtrrwl,,e a",rail,nhtrtl l0r publiv, will(Il sol }ilrra.°° .. , .. , , - Ll
E x usutir of f,,(:rapir+ or property to watr.,r relalr'�1 `ua4.>,rf.� euulr as ftutrdinrl"`
fr
Ll
4. PLANT LIFE. Will the proposal aside in subste-nhul:
r � , "a ... , . . , y..... i0G of ....... i,Irri�t trr,t:S.
a. Change in the diversity of species. or rttirnber of an species tai triktrr'ta tirii.li ,.. . �
shrubs, grass. c taps, and aquatic plantbf
b, Reduction o1 the numbers of Any unique, rare or endangered sper.rOS Of l.rtirnfr .......
c, IntrradtlGElcrn of new aP0688 of plants 11114 an area, cr in it bill nor to Itl4« 1Vrrrrrlclf
C 7
r'eplenishnielt Of existing species? ..... ........... . . .
0
L1
IV
d, Reduction in acreage Of any agrictiftutal drop?.......
• 0
5. ANIMAL LIFE, Will the proposal result In substantial: YES MAYBE No
a. Change In the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (girds, land
animals including reptiles, fish and shell fish, benthic organisms or insects)? .. , . .. El rd
b. Reduction in the numbers o, any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? ...... 'C]
c, movement oemopnt animals? cies of animals into an area, or result in abarrier to the migration or
..
d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habnat?. ............ . --- ........................ 0
C�1
0. NOISE, Will the proposal result in substantial.
a.lncreaseo,in existing noise levels? ......................... ......,.
Ij
b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? .......... ........ ........ ........ ...
1, LIGHT AND GLARE. Will the proposal produce significant light and glare? .... .......... 13 CJ I�f�
8, LAND USE Will the proposal result An a substantial alteration of the present or planned land E rj rU f
use of an area9............................................. ... .,.....................
0, NATURAL RESOURCES, Will the proposal result in substantial:
a, Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? .............•...••.•....». ' r
b, depletion of any nonrenewable natural resources? ......... ........................... d
10. RISK of UpsET, Will the proposal involver
a, A risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to foil, [J
pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an tccrdent or upset conditions !'
f''"p,s ,'p q+ierfetentP with all emergency response pian or emergency evacuation pirarr?.. Cl 1�1
11, POPULATION, Will the proposal alter location, distribution, denoity. or ,growth rate of the
human population' ........ . . .. . ... . ... . ..................... . ... ......... [� � t�]
12. ROUSING. Will the proposal affect exisliratl horising„ or create a domand for .addillonal
IaurlMsln>g'? . . ..... ....... . . . . .
13. TRANStaOSTA'TION/CIC CULATION. Will thea proposal result in.
a, generation of substantial additional vehicle movement?
b, Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? ......
...,«., .....,... CJJ C�
c, Substantial impact on existing transportatran systems! .......... .....•........ �
d. Significant alterations to present patterns of circulation ar movement of people and/or
goodsl
e, Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic'7.........................
I, Inurease In traffic hazards to Motor velaiclas, bicyclists or pedestrians?
r ,
"ll
hove an effect up
on, or result In a need fcar now OrYw-S IAAY13E NO
'1A, pUBLIC SERVICES. Wll the Proposal � ❑ C�
ovecnment services . , .. • . .
altered g �
a, Fire protection? , . , . , , , , , .
b, Police p ..,......... ..... p C
.. .....
C. Schools?.... ,....,..., ..,,..
other recreational facilities? .. • • . , .. 0 tier
dr Parks or ..,
ce of public fac'illtteb, Includlncl roads? . , p
e,
Maintenance p .... ,... ..,. .,,......
..
L other gcvermmental 5nrvicns? . , . • • , „' ..
15. ENERGY. Will the proposal result in: , .. , .. ...... .. , . .. , .
a, LJse raf subslanllal amounts of fuel' or oner�c�y? ° _ � ur rrar�tnrv� lhti � �I ttY
r
sours ens nt energy,
10 merit of new sources of enQrgy? • • r ,
b, ubetanhai Increase in demand upon exlshng r
de1.
p
roposal result In a need toil new systems, or substantial alteraUo" tri thr,
IJ7lLl'Ctl~s•Will the p ..,..
following .........................
El. Bower or natural gat.? ......... , .. , ... Q
rnllnlCatlf711"a systems?,. ••••••,,,,�••• .• .,,...,.,•••� C3
avallability? , , , , ,
C. I ster or systenn? ..... ................. ,.... •' ...
Ci
d, Sewer ..
tte�r drkitnage'r,
e. Storm wI ..., ..... •
1, (;L�lid waste and J15posi19 ..... . . . . ... .
osal result
ln: C 1"
17. 1�1111vIAN t-fEALTI'a, Will tly� frrap l�a�rY'ter�inl nt=rlttflt"' ... • � [�
ott':r;tlat ttpalth h,r,a16 tt.xclud (l9 ald o� I�
a, Cl eaUcn7 of any health .... , , .. , ... .
b, �„��Ioslrky cal People to potential hr�altfr ha<<'trdr" ,...
osal result In thr, obstructtl n tIf .any scenic vista jj jvo ) tr�i0 to
1tt, At ST ViE,'r1 will the p"', p . ... ... - . .
.ill the. prnposttl ra�strlt in thr� rteatuJn of anaesthetically pffen5lvh �.,Itrr of r'
Ihl� inlbllt or w
trr fluhi1c: view'? .. .. .........
Iru ttlhtli r��5uit rn "In Inrpact tll�t,n thE' c1u�I►11? of (ttI nClty ref ....xtt.
p G1
1r •,: �`'NiA 100. will t11t, 1 l .. 110k......
< 1,,��h,1Etl cpfrortur�itte's"'
ZIP, Cl)t.i'llpA4 ;.tf;5�st111r;IrS' �rehistrlrM Or 11"Ayric
�t� rr 't Ir. fh N ,,Iteration rel nr thr? dustruc u�r� ref a f ,
n. WIII the propo stir' .....
drehe%elcg I I auver,G Physical l ur d .sttif,trc tft'tf5 tri a prehlVstnrlr r�r In.... .
b, Will the proposal res r oh ect" . • ..... , ,
building, structure or 1 ......
hich would gflectt,Inlclur�
c a ` hYslual ctIeingd'w
t�aUa 4r .. ,.,,,.
d, fees the propacal have the p • . , , ........ .
rat values? , ..... • otenti'At impact Cl
ethnic cuhu ,, sacred uses withirl the p , ........
restrict existing rt.ltd� 7u. .. , .... .. , .. ,
proposal res ,...,,,.,.
e1 Will ►tie. pl'et� ,,,,..•...,.,.,.
area? ...,,,..,,,.
fl,
s
'77 70
USSxON Ut= ENWIRONMENTA1r VALUAfTON40-' r ]rr1 Mi
1..115Cr~ ► s 1 acement ccantfaac A-. .
t l on s i
amounts of d I sr Ftp a reSUl of t.11 i r C r^c:rlrt
l b" SOrne nc�m i rraiOccur .�s 3r'c' a
of the sc`i 1 will i 1 i create irsr.rr, {� t,
evercover i ng The >ar^ nosed 5u�d l v i s i can w e r �nt1 c rr71 y
parcel rnaf� . the hecl� t;wo parcels s h, a�, heat, dove i �rlied w i ,
aac
acres, C,urrentlYs The ott�,er parcels havew�dbness> �/ t.
s I nol r'�" 1 rr,n i 1 y i-rcaus`i r7g only mi nGr gra' tt'
bL 1 1 rt I rig packs are needad .
rare building pads ,r and
prep -�:� t st i n!y �r1 iYrc.•rnd 1 tar
1 e within an rir�e��s5,t 1 rj
The prgpased subdl v► sWerY 1 i til gr^adl ri a w i 1 1 I't'
tl e r,1,,►r1V'ie
1c- development. ani r°raad►^tays•
residential ads, driveways
preparation of building p a�urlcl sur, f ac (,, r�al 1 of 'featur c.,0. t
expected I n the tol5ogr el�t"ty ca f the gr i-r:►r ,-11 use,
,ted as Cl ass I for' a"•fir I cul
are de i 9n scl 1 i s, nrr1, deemed
�t1a
The ren -site sr�i75rlrtre agr"icultr.rr�llY productive
the 1 oss of prime ra"ject . Previous subd v i I i Ons
Hovievor` y eeul t crf tt-►e p,-01='used p arcel so as to re
nder° 1 ti
. occur as e r the average p o Drab an
the size of commet"'c e1 Perming �?-
Irati e i ragrnc ,tied i -i the
ecO►l cm i e l l y
unfeasible for any a h i- eros r>ir on
artt i s p,taed on drainage P r al 1 t ng per
31 ,,c negative impact are The density dltbh
r,rfer_'e runoff. Tr°�tdltir�r►al
wand amounts OF s t r�rr�ase surf ace runof f
t'a e 5 n i; I canal Y construction a► -a anti c i pal e'd to
r° r i i 1 I no a i o the prapcsed Cleve'► caprner""
i rnf-yovements associated
a�l r runoff d from the
arty pp
r ,we.rrmmadat act negst i vel Y upon
eaa5 have
The p �aropased lots. It i al
w► t d ro rased subd i v i s i ren Will not Impact
reG i dank i al clerrFti bprnr�r►t.
almond trc�eS remslnin� °atian�of f
r 1 r ,eadY been c l ea4 °ed i n ent t �' p
r.►►' .ent
the development of A, The
The p i n ti -i 1 s Dtart"1em no I ghborhoad 1 dent t a t
�^ pro as�d s�ladivislcrn will allow
i ng 1 e-" f am l 1 Y homes t,fwre sort*ou► td i no re ' v i c i n l i ;r
aciditlonal is conslst3►1t with of the lcats In tine Btjtt"e
►to Osed development The ma,Iorl LY
P1 p
roact S1 to I `s zonedf-'1 by the
kt.haracte�r and rur�11 setting.
I � acre pat"ca l s . 'Thep r�o,�ect cot'1 f r_arrrra with nlrh
world St of The proposed p 1 � �►r^chard Fr W 181 d
t;o�antY mon t ng r`ird i rianc . des i gnat 1 on the Zoning Ord 1 ri;ar rr-0 s
:inn l n� 1'he
General flaw
,-,Urrrent: r.. utrr?mer�ts °f r -ion Y1 an
i c r"�ci � t iw} ria
idhl l e the 1-�rOJc'-ct:° rnet�ts the thus. rt�pu I rerilents tisk l cap+`rog
r,! t h�lwever" i Mee � ' . , +. w I 1 1 continue t va t (4i troJ1t
it does she rcaposed r r°''l1 adri t n!') to I 1 a�:a tar tach t
des I gnat Iran . the Durrt�rm area y
,�ttt�rn of 1 sal cit"sae, frcarrl �rr1y tar„b,in�b� 1r,�w Y
t,ave1 (�,pman #a p' which
,.t 1 k rrg
Lott faced a rwtse F't"�`i ={;�71 e:ievf"1 �aI �+�,i t r wet:, �;i�wns r r � �'1r, t r;1rm° i.rh�r
'en USO 1 �r1ti'�
t }.t � ai. ► 1 ° +rwr 1 r f,at., 1 lured oi-CI 1, r
,r� cy�rt ��,. (stilt, p. e o , art j
F�(J% 1 .> W Y tr"s�c' .5 1.t a�3 1 t e rtri 1 1l
`t1r►g
l,r c�: c:r °v " cant l I ct. 'w t I I.r i nrc's
r �arid rnetrntr�rac,ed� t�t�i
�w ” I ort .>. The ► .aroprased for a,he ar"era ��t
ta��,'� " ^� bell
n"� 1'
at 1 ve"� t„,� l.f-r, p
oterjt; I'.
par, -10-1,1 n1a1� , � 1 cr ,wa a "'
tentot ive w1 l ltl s reel hbrar 1`,ocd
The pr<iposet SF r
13a=f arnl t y, dwal 1 1 nC=� �i r1 ,
d N4 j
zincle.., �, ;atditlt,rlat vewttrl+ t1 c`
two add l t t a n 71r�r ►eratw'a apprr�a 1 ma to i Y on t�
add f t i rat"► ►>►oul d " ntt pond sh+aw► an averar w
daY.
'Che most recent tra f f I c� c u i f i ca ,t Impacts or
anla i r: l pater:9 r,
t>rof,fI of 3i vrhlrb1e�. �Jca
V
relation to the transportation or circulation system, 1'1-10 �%
SYst(011 has the abi I I ty to accommodate adds t ion a I tr,j I (,f I C 'Lirrent
, �Jerl
the woposed project. I orated by
1 `'a= The Butte County i~ i re Department requires PaYffielilt; of $'i!igi per
parcel into the Hater, tender, fund, Such feeS are
,
mItigatc- any sl9niflcont IMPOct on fire dep,,irtmits,rit r,,,j�yrv ces.
1 4c., The Durham Unified School DIstr-ji-,,t has adoptElt, level op(Tiont,
which apply L-0 res jdL_e1tjaj
Develooment fees Projects at the L-Ime Of bUilding
Must be paid to mit"gate Lhe of ur
devefloPment on the SCI -1001 district. ban
Such fees are C'01-151dered
in mi"gating
all school 'IMP--3ctZ caused b� PrOPI,5.Aid
16: NO service Problems are anticipated 11" rDt-OvIdInFj Fhe proposer)
sural lvisjort with ..sower,
Solid Haste djspo�Sal. Col"imul"cat iOn systems, saHer, potable Hat("'It oil
rhe Master Env i r'Onmental Assessment for the Durham-Dayton-Nelion
Indicates that the pr,oject Is within mn area of IT10derate
arcl-ioc,ological sensitivity. As a result,. It will be necessary to
porf.opin a records Check bhrougt) the Department of Anthropology m -L
California State Unlvers lty, Chico, In order to deterrrine *If
significant sites might be located on the Property. The records rjjr
archaeological survey Of the Property will be
will determi-je whether an arol
mece�,58aryj or any other mitigat joh measwres*
'RecomiTiondpri M , t;1 crit- Lom—Measure .-
In ot-der, to assess the potr_,Mtlal for adverse Impacts to
81-cl'81001091cal resources and determIrte whato if any) (r, I t I oaton
measures WOU I d be 8PPropr I ate, the app I I cont shou 10 Contact the
NOrthe' astT nformation Center, at Callrornia State University, Chico.
.1
App IIcaro L'-' Gary Jones ex Quentin NakaqaHzoa
DATA SHEET
AP :11 40-16-'17,78
Log lfl,3-05-23-01
A. PRO JLCT DESCRIPTION
I 'type of ProjectZ. Tentative Pei .,,ol Map.
2. Brief Description: To divide 5 acres to ai-oat<,-o fUr
Parcel I - 1.3 acres , Parcel 2 - 1.1 acres, t�arcial 3 - i.(.)l
acres, and Parcel 4 - 1.28 acres.
S. Location: Three hundred feet: soul,I,') of Cumminos Laney it 1110
end of Mar lcher i, Court, I)UrhaM.
4., Proposed Density or Devolopuielit,' One dpqe`111M�,j UtIlt P,01 Tyr Cl -
5. Amount of Impervious Surfacing'. 5-107..
6i Access and Nearest Public Rtids : Mor Ichert tourt and Ck,immint)-s
Lene.
7. Method of Sewage Disposal.* Individual SePtIC and leachfiold
systems.
S. Source of Water Supply: Individual Nells*
1). int oxinill.-y of Power Lines: Adjacent to py,,oploty,
10. Potential for Further Land Divisions and D,.velopmiant: No
f,jrther SUbdIvisioris are possible under current: zoningi
B. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
Physical myl ronmeni,�
1. "terrain
a. General -topographic Character: rlat zngricultural land.
b4 S 1 12117. .
d. Elovation.4 155-165 feet above Sea Level.
d. Limiting Factors.' None.
2* Sollu
and Character isbicat Vina Loamstrono soil
piKorilej variable textu."es strat I f I ed sed I merits
Lindon-moat.h,
b. Lithf0mo Pacbors: None.
3. Natural Hazards of the Land
a. Earthquake Zones Moderate Eorthquoko Intensity Zone
b. Eros I on roton t 1 z3-1 Law.
a Ai Landslide Potootial-' Logi.
d. r- Ire lla2ard'- Una 1 ass i f I ed land.
em Expansive Soil Potential*. Iviodarato
4. Hydrolooy
b. Surface Water: None on 81te,
bi Groundwater: Heavy groundwat-or w I tht It awo I
c.4 Drainage Characteristics". On r>lto-
d. Annual Ra I rif al I (normal > 24-26".
e. Limiting Factors". Noma
5. Vi.sue l/Scenic Chia lityt Good4
6. Acoustic Quality: Good.
7. Air Ouality: Good.
P_Iqlocalcal �nyironment
64 Vegubation: Almond orchard.
9 - W *1 1 dl I -fo blab i tat Small game and birds
farm I no are' -As.
,Cul,tural Enyi-ronment
10. Archneological and Historical Resources' in bile Area: 1.11 tall'i
sensitivity.
11. Butte County General Plan Designationt Ot"Chard & Flold Grops.
12. Existing Zoning: SR -1.
18. EXIsting Land Use on Site: Pres ldent lal/orchal-o.
14. Surrounding Area:
a. Land Uses: To the north is single-family residential
development and the SUrrOQndI,19 vicinity Is rural
residential .
b. Zoning: SR -1.
t. General Plan Designations. - Orchard & Field Crops.
d Parcel 817 -es,: Predominantly 1 -acre parcel sj-,es.
e Populat!Otj: Rural residential.
'16. Character of Site and Area Rural res identilal/orc,hard .
16, Nearest Urban Arent Durham.
17. Relevant Spheres oF Influence= Durham MOSS, Alto Ah-I,,etnenl�
District, Durham Park & i-N,.2areation
18, IMProveMetit Standards Urban Area: No.
19. Fire Protection SerVice'.
aii Nearest County (State) Fire Station : �O-,-Iftty 171-4 Station
#4b In Durham:
b. Water Avallobillty: Fire truck capaclt.y and futuro v4el1-s
with draft connect ions.
20. Schools in Area'. Durham Unified School DIstrir-,b.