HomeMy WebLinkAbout040-170-124DUN 0Q-r"falling0omm..
MAR`r', G 1982
bnty Cr�ant,d�. Drive
(Mou1
Oxo+rll.la., CSA 65 �rnvil.Ic�, C�AI`str71�
MarcYa 25, 1902
Cl.a�r and Meaner Bacon Re ` A�'
Application for Determ3,nation
892; ;�4ay�Lee Drive
Durham, CA 9595
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Bacon=
Inclosed please finch a Cagy, of floe dortisicate of dompliance issued
'V�orks was
by the 13��tte G0=by 'Dept. of Public �� which
in Doak 2'703 i
recorded 88 March 1 % 19 2. ,
Bt;CE7b�. Gaunt�Y
1?EL
-Recorder:
Should you haus any. t1 g clan 'L`us matter pleaoa contact
uOstiOnO " ar
tni's office
Very trLly ycuxs,
Clay Ga,Stleberry
Director, of 'Dabl:io Warks
L-
Jin Menc�,onsa.
" 4osistant Director
Jt no
'moo.
ec: nning `Dept.
Health Dept •
LD X330
AfibL
a
S
M._.Y Ff `�?
2 Mandato'z r. in ,SOf Sl
a. Dons tt,.cl px;oject 1�ve talcatextr�a�;
lredu"
to uality
de;�'a�le tlleutastant a ly
the habitat of- a ,fish or W;.lctli:��
speaios, MaL,s� a f'ist� OG W.7ldlif�
to dropb.el,OW
poPulatio .
;51.1St'aining evG�.S , tZix atc'Tl
" o
comp
e7 imnate a plant or animal
x`odlace ttzeoendmbet neredxict
munity,
o a raxc:
tt-le rang e
plant or attimal or e7,x:t��o xiraYit
%�
(' periods ' 5tor l
kaXaC(lpleS: 'of the Mal
ha;tnr. or p�"eh� �' J
Galoxna.a
the project have thepotential
b . Does to
tub1 edc*
to�L5
achieve sl lox ted
detriment Of ib l
the
ell rirY ,mental goals?
--
long . term
C D oCs the prod ect Have imp'�.ct5 Which
limiteCl, but
are indi.viduallr
eble'? (e, prajecG
cumulatively cols.--.te)
mr�y impact: on tW' or more scp&rat.
pact on each
resources Where -he imp
sma�_l; but
resource is relo;t:_vcly
wherE: tYa,e e ect al
of zottmen - Is
those impacts on �_ v
..
,
siQnif cent';
d` Does the project have envixonmen�al
substanCial
eoect's Wh,cklcause
ects on
adverse of
ei her: etc-'ct ly or l xldirectly
.'".
7
Appendix F ...pi e 0, 9
y
_
' w.r�,,,t,.J.f,H�a. n7 ✓ � . _ C�4,r .Y
N0604uAd
LAM D
r71, NA ruRA1, V!rAtT11��*1f , t y
-�
f7EF'AH"rMEN7 0 i t1�31 l WORKS
CLAY CA aTt"itURRY, birpetoC
7 COUNTY CENTER ORV , fIOVILLfw, CALfFORNIA ?,'M$
7alaphohw (71,6) 514.4681
HI, W. MaPON ALD
bopwy Gltreeiar
o.Ci+��t silsarhMp
October 19, 1.981
Rodney Petarsonebvi�i� t Ali#�rni,
RI;. A0�� lI
9-72 andl 38 7
Richard Faterso:i
Boundary Hine Modifirat on
,Bill Pippin
P" 0. Box 1,13
Aichvale, CA 9597
t�entlemets: ,
At the reguldr meeting of the, Butte County Advisory Agency head on
October 19, 1.981, the Age ncy approved your boundary 3,1ne- modif-, cati;on
on the above -referenced ,property, ,rioting the: project is exempt from
environmental review and ,mbJect to the
following conditions s'
1. Tho riecesnary deeds be recon ed .
2. Contact the lsrxes or's office aid requ�st that the necessary' parcc�s
b: comlai ned so that no new parcels are creatad..
Bay bla1, ree:a"eyance for any '
' trust, deeds.
4. Pay any dalincivierit taxt'S .
5: F,Itle a record of survey:.
6. Shwa all oasementp of record 04 the
record of isutvey.
Should you have any ttuest`ion; xegar:.ng
this tattar Tease contact this
office.
Very, truly yours
Clay Castleberry
Dre0, or, of Publit: works
,
It ilialtt, Cheff r
A&Si Cant iJ.r-46tiOr
ca `:lnng
Health
A s s esaor/Cps
n'
X],S 1XBh
NQ
?,;? . t�fartor_ 1;` i nrl:ir�-'s oti. rnC Cance .
]does the p*"J eco have the potential
to d'egi ade the qualif}y of the
environment, sub s tctn tia ll jr reduce
the habitat of a fish or wildlife'
species; cause a, fish or wildlife
_
population to dropbelow self,'
sustaining levels, threaten to
eliminate a -plant or- animal c6m;-
munity, reduce the number or' restrict
the range of a rave or endangered'
plant or,C-Mimal or eliminate important
examples of the major periods of
Calit:ornin- history or prehistory?
b, Does the project have the potential
to achieve short teem benefits to
the detriment of ptibli.cly adopted
loci Cerin envxrotimen
g tal. goals?.
c. Does the project have impidts which
are, individually l imi.ted, but
cumulatively considerable? (a project;
may impact on two or more separate
resources where the impact on each
resource is relatively small, bitt
whera the effect; of the total of
those impacts on the environment is
s i.gni:Eicant
d. Does' the project have environmental'
effects which will cause substantial
adverse effects on htiman beings,
a they directly or ift irec,tl.y?'
Apperidix F
age!,7 0f
Paul A.
,, two �Paels on Giral'e "J''Road;
Loci Linala TVITATM ;PAULL MAPrC
approxim,aLe.ly 2000 ft. West of Clark Road, Pen
Assessor
s parcel nojnber; 41-08-98
Engineer;
Baird Engineering
p4blic
440rks conditions are;,
1
Verify legal parcel.
2,
Ver ii~y legal access,
3.
Provide two-way Lraversab'le access RS -8 -LD -T to each Marcel froal a
county main'Lained road �r state highway;
4.
Access to be reserved in deeds as per county ordinance and offered
for dedication on tile final map=
5,
Shaw 50 ft;. building; setback line measured from centerline of access
easement,
g,
.Provide road maintenance agreement.
7.
''Show all easements of record on the final map,.
providtse street name signs per requi,�amenof the Department of Public
.'
Marks prior to recordation of the final map.
9,
Pay off any assessments.
10i
obta'n encroaChMent permit and construct
the tandardd oadofpacoad
distanCces�s raatl
providing adequate sight
and ,C f ark Road.
11.
' Pay ,any del i nquent taxes
12.
Meet the" requiremenis of 'the butte County Fire pepartinen't.
Pr°ovide bridge,or culverts atcreekcrossing capable ofuppor'tin9
20 iron 1 oad:'
iea'!th Department con�ditians are:
ld e
100 it. leachfeld free setbackt�ouro ertytboundarieseontler
ei". Provide a Is
of p p
within tfe property or wthin,100 ft.
parcel tvo.
r
Showa 50 ft:' leach;field setback f om the drainage wa.y ori parcels one
and two.
1fy:'
fs
Show the usable sewage disposal area proven t ninumtusahe bleuareqmaeoli
of Ithe Subdivision 'Ordin;ance an parcel one - rrm
37.000 square feet.:
1`a
Prove that: the required rluant7t.7es. o.f domestic water are avai able or
that domestic j
place the statement on the qaP thq 'there is no evidence
water is. available" for arcel one:
A2
41-08-j0a
X11.
DISCUS810N or. )JNVIROAMIEaNTAT. EV}kIi(JP1 XON '
3?ro j Oct pescription
T3r;i o�f. Do. cx'ipt-1011 Land d.iv, 1.Z, on o'% 55 � acres c'� eat �ng thxce
parc.o3.s of l,G..gB 8..2�J, a7�cd S' S1, acres:
2,.
0C: tt 0,31 bast s:Ld.o ofCl.ark Road; ap . roximat,el.y 6 8 0 P feet
no't tl� off' C:i.rcle f'J" Loacd, cite e�ista ol;" the Paradise
Airpo,ft, scut}i of the Town of Paradise
3.
Proposed T)e�nsity O Development: Average 17.6 acres per
�.
p"arg0i
Access arid Nearest, Public Roa(s) : Exl:st:i,ng un:improvved a,,ccess
along easement fromno aoid of E Clark Roacd.
S.
Mothad of Sewage Disposal..: 0,n -site septic�le" ch .Cie1ds.
- 6.
Source Of water Supply: 111d1vidual, wo-Ils
Proximity of Power Lines: Adjacent
8 .
Potential, for :further land d ivxsions and dOVelopment Terrain
restrictions severely limit futvre potential,.
tnvjLronjjjejjtaj Setting
1.
Terrain
a. GerieraJ. Topographic Character : Narrow gcnth;i e ridgel. and
r
bor dotoc� by steep calxyon slopes , '60 extens ion ,o;C Clem:ents
Ridge f roit, Paradise
b. Slopes. Gentle 9.n the cej trail, property a7 ea,, ex, essive
80) :i.n eastern areas. 2Q=30� along Clark: Road.
c. Limitiri;: Factors: Major at,oas al site are Baa sheep o-
Factors:
Cor de rel.opment or road construct°ion
2.
Sally
a. Types and Charact;oristx.cs : Macdetatcly shn l
rocky ioarn/clay o f volcanic 0riga.n an t lie i~icdgc exhibiting
'hall
m0aera e permea�ba.l a t.y: Very �Toomes, gr�ave1;Ly l.o'am
sox On steep slopes within canyon.
b. Limiting; FaFtors: Shall:ouness' oC sail. --,Cor onsite scwagc
disposal. ; stoniness". Steep ter? a.n/sails o E minimal
depth ,'on cranyon lapels undevelapabl 0,..
3.
Nat Hazards of the" Land
,ural'
hta n.
a. �a tht{uake 2bne : General. foothi,I1 sa.tsc regio
b . Erosion ip'otentJ. ., : lig I,
c. Lanelslide Potential: Aloderatc
d. Pie Hazard: Higix to'; Dattxeme
,
APpendik F" -page 3 0£ �.
F
r:
ire rk Karr ra ' 'rzry • ✓��,rr ,ti,�,_. ,>,rt,..�.iau�,;.l {'�14r� u�n�q.,..�a:, 'C� tai-.."�bt,� `'t � 2 P604" n
Su�„�ld, Alf t� t%��5
y
AP 4:1-08.1.08
II
II. DISCI.ISSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION'
Pro j 0c . Doscr:iptioD
1
13T.i.ef. Description: Land. dirision of 53+ acres creating three
parcels of 16.48, 8.2:91 and 28.51 acres.
2.
%,ocati,on: Past side of Clark Road, approximately 6800+ feet
north of Circle "J" Road.; due east of the Paradise
a
Airport, o ., Par aciise .
3.
e a
Pro i itouo�f Devolo ment : Average .7 .6 acres per
�osecl Dens,.
p arcel.
4.,
Access and Nearest Public 'Road(s) : txistln unimpraveil access
along casement ;from north and off Clark Rocjd
S.
Method of Sewage Disposal: On-sate septic leach .fields.
6.
Saurce o1: }Vater Supply: Tridivi dual: wells
7,
Ad `actin
Proximity mit:Y o,Cf Power Lines : a
8
Potential :for, ;further land divisions and development Terrain
restrictions severelylimit :future, potenta,al.
IanvironMental Setting
Physical
EnyIronnment ;
1.
Terrain
a.. General "I'.opographa,c Character : Nacrow gentle ridgeland
bordered'by steep canyon slopes, an extension'of- Clements
Ridge from paradise
b. Slopos: Gentle in the central property area, excessive
(30-8gga7 an eastern areas. 20=30o a1.ang Clark ;Road:
c. Limiting 'Factors .,, Major areas o: Site- are toa sheep or
inaccesslbl;e :for development 'or road constructi'.on.
a. Types and Characteristics: Moderately shallow (Zga40,
rocky loam/clay of volcarYic origin on the ridge' exhibiting
moderate permeability. Very shallow Toomc gravelly loam
soil on steep slopes within ca'n'on.
b. Limiting Tactors: Shallowness of so3.l :Eor onwwsite sewage
disposal; stoni ess;; Steep. terrain/so;ils of minimal
depth on canyon lavas xndcvelop;able;
3.
Natural ,I-iaza:ds of the and
Eq Earthquake zona: General ooth 11 seismic Tegian
� b.. Erosion Potentia li g}i
c. Landslide Potential: Moderate'
cl. Aire i-iazard: 11ig�. to L�xtr;eme
Appendix F gage ;8 0f . 5
IV.DEtERMXNATTOO
Wo be: completed by the Lead Agency`
on
the basis of this initial evaluation;
T find. the grogased pr+ ject COU. NOT have a significant"
effect on the: environment, and a NEGATSVR DLCLARATION
s r covzended.
0
1find that although the proposed project could have a
significant effect on the environment, there will. not
be a significant effect in this case because the
mitigation measures described on an attached sheet
have been added to the. pro"ect. A NE-CoATIVI' DECLARATION
xS 'RECOT N]7ED.
0
I find the proposed project MAY have a significant
effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
AnPORT is required.
Date
Jany 26, 1982.
uar
(Sz.gnature
91 chardG MO -1 e a ;.
Ass.ociatP�T
Bu te oun ,y ann%n�5en`.
Reviewed by,:-,
II
Appendix F -- page 9` o£ 9