Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout040-260-072t.n 8 U Z57 ise,° heat P�(b Rolexa Taylor rG aJB ,�!i ��, ;gra vase breeding kennel on•.,prape �L xoued..,a 5 ��. aligr1' acre parcels) f.agrYcuiural,�,., �prnpoaed^negatiVa do D ". lata I I regardi,ug .environr�eftax impact hay been x�er��nmended) � 11, ca�e Lane, �h j ,Pproximatel 700 „deet wee, of �' Road Isa r d do the sau , side o r Durham« Lnbt AP 040-2G 0-07 C2$30j ., ,( Via).: dentif�;ed ad NOTION: FIND THAT TOP, a 4F CONSIDEUDT ItEQUIRE2iENTS OF' CEQA SAVE BEEN COMPLETED AND FIND THAT THE �itbl�OSED USE INCOMPATIBLE -dx'TH �GRSCULTURAL OPERATIONS AND itES�DE USES IN THE IMMEDIATE YICINITX AAIi1 D$�ty THE pi20POSSh (p PERMIT ON Ap 40�-26-7P NTI0 '"0R ROB RTA oo PRIVATE gREEDINa KENNEL. TAYLOR TO BELOW A 25 t VO.TEs 1 X 2 yf; 5 3y 4 Y 5 Y {�'nani�iajxsly, :carred} r t' s4 ^^FFA ii��pp SS"� �, r.......iiil•HH \_.._ `-- ... � ,. �r"7fkr"i7 Y, R btrta Tet i or ----,� - proposed N2at i race `C�eG I stat lot' _ P regarding onv i ronment.a l impact and �Se , earn ! t, to a l low kennel on property Tone(! A; 5 CAgr I cu I tura I a pr f vate breed! rte► 5 acre parcels) located LotthRoaduthd�n I fpedLasra ti:ahe approx lmatelY -/00 ' AA` p-26-7Z., bdeham feet, open from f'ebruary t 1, 19,68) (C©nt I nUeCf Mrs TUrpin submitted, In addition to the fetters, In t. letters in favor or this protect. he pa`akets, cal I from Ms. Ta Taylors IVIr. Ntrpin sal'd there was a Y attorney 'ask I n for pho11d There g a cant nuance of One wa-� a packet of letters tUbmlteed :by the SICCA, mot kh+ The hearing was opened to, the hUbllc, Jeff They were not , Matter. They asked the Conmisslon to be fair to the publla notified f I e<i 'of a request for cont l ii`uancethis the land owners ?n the area had additional time tL, review this andkthetaktswer �wc<1nt a month r i d time the Comm l ss l oh looked at th 1 s a5 at triad 'd for , a.� no . ' He sa f'd i t wag ci, and den l ed I t . said the Commisslan has enopggh ihformatloh at�this time to dehy>t pertnit He said that thea ilcant was hot Control meeting Monday night Pr.�sent at: the q he :He 9 either, nlmat Can Carl Youhg. SPCA, submitted a comCterhed With the animals ting packet to the Commi slop. evidence he has now a kennel 11c nse�woulicnot�b He Was t-1e said With the BIIt Orthell said the kennel a issued. was concerhed With the Would be inctmPaat,1ble with the area, Commission Cohs i der theprob problem' of noise Sind odor•e . He People In the area, He requested the Commissioner Walter was absent at this t irrie . The hearlhg was closed. Commisslone"r Lambert unUerstands the applicant wthl negotiate with the SPCA ants contlhUance'would sthemaid docoedlhg to Mr' rmatlon, s contihued to ncst glve any heW g Young`s test'imohY a Cammissloner Forbes said at the last meeting the appllcaht neighbors were ready for the commfst m to reach'4 pliclut and the matter and the Commission was asked to continue this f ioh In this SPCA. He said there Is no roasan 'ta aontlhue this again have the SPCA report, or a report from ' 9 n becaucse they. 1t was moved by Commisslaner Lambert, seconded by Commissioner F and carried for dehici as follows! orbes, Av Fihd that the regitlrements af' CEQb have been completed consIdared; and ahtl l3 operations and residontlai t' p 1=1hd that the proposed use Wolid be ihcom atible with a rIc A Ulturaa .1ses In the IMmodiatOvlclnit x Y, and k Ra5__ e`t Ty , env i ro proposed 14e atij nnienta l i m a t ee :ora i an regard i.n kennel an' ct and Use Perm i'c O Property zoned -gr 1 to a 1 low a 't .r i vete located on A- 5 (Agri cUl tural Jr breed i,t4 , the south side,of Laura Lane acre parcels] ' was. t of Lath;, koad', identified as qp a appraximatelY 700 , 4i)-26,(1-7� aurham, foci, The Commission waived the reading of the Staff Findings, Staff submitted an additional a an aP i n i ar7 that staff m.�mo dated 2-E-88 . been on the site Cta f f said thou teas The hear'r n and this was not trio had riot 9 was opened to the public. C3. ' 8 1 l Murphy asked t to see. a be to brie in Th i tic was all r^ i ght with t e g h i.,, ` i�ottWe i l er building h,,,6,, h Com i, When the do s thick 'concrete Hal i �...�n m ss i on . He sa i d t for plop g are in the buildshe exi�t,In lncroased if this was ngi He sa'dthat will not be a prat. noise wil problem pr 1 vote breed i n 90 i ng to bo a boards n r�af'r i s Would ,too W111 not be alloweden- el He said these ar^eg kennels but this run loose. a per7s lye dogs Hill be a cuncernecJ, a Septic tank He said as g and this y Commission a 'is a condition can the as as Sanitation grant the :permit, permit is He asked the Commiasioner Walter y s' soutl . asked about Mrs. Ta lor9 He also askect about her relationoReratiin in the MI* Murphy sa d that to Mr, kirshner, Mr. K i rshnei^ was.. i"1rs , , Conmisy Taylor s son, sonar Walter Said Kirshner, i n, Cl enh County. there ►vas troubi e With the kennel run by Barry Mr-4 Murphy said Kirshner: Mr_,. Taylor will be ru said He showed the Co. ening this kennel these dogs are used mmtssion his 8 month old , ririt Barry y, the police as drug Rottweiler, We Commissioner Lambert said there is a re g dogs, not attack do from the gs� h SPCA. She asked if ilia a goes{; for a 8t1 da applicant i cant �aou l d oF.;,ject ., y cant 1 nuance Mr. Murphy said there is n the Commission out o objection if it is y: He in to see the site. necessary Peter bo y 1'toc! and - Wnirtg said he shares the danger #.G neighbors• He said Mrs. 1i+esto.ck, but Mrs. concerns regard Tau! or woo 1 r� day i or 1 s the # gard i n9 net i'sa distractIon Pram the p)ay music if,. 2 bi,,Oed0o, ih He Said outsize and t necessary to stop tho Us., ; de 1-ie, was the ON , o f h I wrau 1 d' he 1 P .,ame o the k�ehdent on this the propert p decrease thy' noise. pe1mIt, He Was in rtYorbut the sale Nas not; 'Earl Youn of th,e permit. 9 i Northwest SPCA r had no comp i a i nt with, t said there is mere to operatin a asked for* the th i rt g k kennel thin a he bu i 1 d i nQ H; county regard i n Y da)+ ektens good build 1 rtg, 11P Mg kennels ion boaause of was airs iiia -1 s run b prob 1 ams fin another, w tarem i ses at the :t i rite �"ayl oris sone and tho fabt t y Mrs that shg a n person Commissioner run a nWalter k enne 1 k pct who; the app 1 i cant is a respp� Nf:%l Mr. Young said the SPCA W -ill. decide if they do or do not get a I.e license. He said the courts are the only c �I the SPCA fora_ 1'i cense. PPeal place far a deni�, by He' said the applicant could ordinance trs the Board of Supervisors. appeal the Mr. Taylor, and to invest'i9ate the complainaidts nhGleeds to talk his had ,just received the letter regarding the hearing County. has received phone 'calls f rorn concerned ne i 9 • He stated ha, 9t )ors Mrs Taylor'aaid she had contacted the SPCA an use Permit first. SHe sad,e d was told she need County. d no interest; i n the kennel In �� had Btaff said if a person hes !Wore than 5 adult dogs the ha Staff sa l d there were :comments from Anl rite l Corr trtr i i n the sea f f ►ie t Y.Ls. findings• Staff stated that it Would be lna rr1 t o Ppropr ate t t issue A cont; t rn..t'ancenWasbtoore, i ssu i r5 the 1 and use, Perm i t 9 The request ancat:herw count w `.the SPCA to i nvest i qa�t i n format i,on frel7i County and to, talk to Mrs. Toy Ior, Mr. "Young said he hada co Taylor regarding the property Where t;herkennel GWasn County said to r. Copy of from 9r Mrs. Taylor Ware the owners of the p'`'aid Mr. Ond :property; Jeff Meith diascussed the inadequacy of the environmental document, sa t d he 1 s thisbelievesHe Penson who there was no on-site i nspect: i nn by staff. He said that staff just He said the barn has no window s,dnovsounduproafinthe edge of the proport:y. doors In place. e: no vert i 1 at i an s t,, Ne said there are houses all arouttid the property s Were concerned with the noise. He said the Arid ds'dynot buy their property to live next to � people who live there 4 kennel:: Robert Cannon said he lives across from the subject c=oncerned with this hurtingp p Property• Hca was his ro erty values. He said there compai^ison between dogs and cattle, was no this W 16 teed a petition toga i hint pro iect . He said d there was at least 1 f, 1 etters against the project in Glenn County. He discussed the danger _tors walking up and down the road to school. to the children tike Wakeran ,said inappre barn open with no sound rnhtalnment, He ,'i p 1 place fore kennel. He said this should be in an ihdustriai gone. Bill Orthel submitted a letter of concern. p�"opereY values and the y He was concerned with quality of life in the area. He asked who will be managing the kennel in Mrs. she Will .have, pp toY any abseh'to and how many etnpl oyees He was Opposed to anY kind of gun traihing. He asked What they were going to use that the people to coal the barn in :;ie summer. in the neighborhood were not contacted about theie, ccincer;hs c� Bil l; OCN' `l 1' Al ll C Cb `�. i'lri1;i'�5,�"(SI+I i i EIrian Me1th submItted a parcel map Out llnIrig the propert.1es of the people who are opposed Mrt6 Taylor's representative, Mr. Murphy, said there would be no QUM training He said the dogs are bred to sell as puppies He said th6 barn will be ventilated with fans in the summer: Countyay. for saiddshe e had nothing to do with the operation in Ole nn Karen Walters will run the kennel when she is away, She said that there are other barking dogs in the neighborhood Commissioner Lambert asked Mrs. Taylor if she ovens this property, Mrs. Taylor said the .property was i n escrowand sha will own it Whey i~let or not they get the use permit. scoff memo. y with the 5 additional conditions on t1l Mri, Murphy said they agreed Commissioner Lambert said the conditlons are as a result of kennel permits In the past. Terry Gibbons said she had letters from Arkansas 1n regards to how Mrs, Taylor's kennels are run. kay 00 61- er ryas against the permit. The hearing was closed. Commissloner Lambert t4' ,,J she needed time to read a l l the material given them today and would approve a 80 day cont nuanc®: Commissioner Walter said they need time to let the SPCA do their Job. The hearing was re-opehed It was moved by Commissioner Walter, seconded by Commissioner porbes and unanimously carried to continue this hiear i ng open to March 10, 1958 at 10.30 a.m.. Chairman Lynch said they should submit oohdItions to staff In writing if they have any additions. Gomm{ssiooer Lamb6rt asked to see a copy of the conditionstheComm i ss i on put on the Spr i -tg V81 1 ey k ent= •, 1 $ and the i,,,ai�ne l s on Wetk 1 ns Road and Honcut Road to retview. FILE NO.: AP 40-26-72 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF FINDINGS - January 25, 1988 APPLICANT: Roberta Taylor OWNER: Peter Downing REQUEST; Use Permit to allow a private breeding kennel AP NO.: AP 40-26-72 SIZE: 7:49 acres LOCJ,'T.ION: On the south side of Laura Lane; approximately 700 feet west of Lott Rodd, Durham area. EXISTING ZONING: . AS ZONING HISTORY: Zoned A-5 Aug. 19, 1967 Ord. 953 SURROUNDING ZONING: A-5 SURROUNDING LAND USE: Rural resildential and agricultural SITE HISTORY: Electrical change of single-family building permit final. I/IV1982, No other building permits on file. Parcel created via map 1/9/1979. GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATIONt Orchard and Field Crop APPLICABLE REGULATIONS: Butte County Code Sedtions 24-43, 24'-47 COMMENTS RECEIVED: Environmental Health: "Provide adequate sanitation facilities for disposal of animal waste as required by the Health Department." Public Works- "No requirements for this project." t BUTTE CQUNTy PLANNING COMMISSION ' STAFF FINDINGS -:'January 25, 1088 I Butte Count Animal Control: and we have no b' "Project to "Project appears to contacting us.01 the plan as , Call planned out Proposed, '`I'.hanlc you for No other comments were received, ANA— LY_ 5-- The A-5 zone district does not s ec` ? or conditional use, P call The .Board of y list. ken»els rrts a permitted decision a, to how kennels Su e,vi.sors On march 5 hould be bandled iii as rcquc�aNed to > 1986 the Board detelrPined that the a make a gxaUltural zones, a Use Permit in all agricultural private do livestock and zones:. The AY5 t Itennpls require acre. Poultry with no limitations on zoning district allows Kennels require a the number of q Use Permit because of the animals pqr surrounding resident,, and the need for sewage Potar�i�ial to impact disposal, vas .consideredin the insignificant. mal initia:i study, and rj barn, which will muffle ithesnoiWill be plaCed o7•ing d to be P within anXidt�ing concrete between 156 feet to 470 feet ntially. The further mitigated b to the nearest ba�r�;, is located y the zoning xnd Land uses PrePerty l,ir�e. Verse is Agricultural areas are not of the s;`•urban residential considered as ,I.htirnediate area, an is 110ises are cornmong�lccurQe se 3n t ensitive for noise as are She presence ox s animals, and. he jural arees. O the County. The Health Department will require all _animal septic system. The Health Department waste be Waste will funi�Clled into a condition. Both regulations insuro that animal reviewed water no Control have c Environmental or et`ea,te an Objectionable eviewed theiealuh and the Butte Dayton-Nelson Master permit and have no objectionsCounty Animal have beer; Fnviranhiental Assessment and Goals� The Durham xevteect fir guidance on this lJse permit request, and Objectives no Goals and Objt�ct�t,._;, whir<h are dirers applicable q Pri'Vate breeding kennel, 4 est, Thera are operation of a RECOMMENnATIoNo :' A• Find that the requirements consider ,and adopt of .+�1► k� etre been , a of Declaration;, LUtnPleted and B, Find CG.� i that the pro ase p d use should be compatible ivxt;^ operations and Comply residential use in the i aa"icttltural P y with Butte Count mmediate v,r� q � t , , specifically Code Sections 24.-43 y Lnd will and and 24"47 2 � r yr BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION' STAFV FINDINGS - January 25, 1488 C. Approve the proposed Use Permit on AP 40-26-72 for Roberta to allow a 25 dog private breeding Taul.oi! kennel sub'ect conditions: to the following I- ; Provide adequate sanitation facilities for d�.sposa waste as required„by the Health Department; of anima 2. No more than 25' dogs over '6 in^aths of age SbAl , be site at any one time. kept ons 3. Trainingdoors shall be limited to ra ni gaof dogs o t the hours ,of P 4. generated. by the X.ennel shall. not exCodd line. 65 dB at 5. .,scant must also comply with all other applicable rzid local. statutes, ordinances, State and regulationo, LMT: It Attachments to Commission and Cities: Site Pian Location &hibit i Initial Study r li fj �.it�t tli+ deaoriba" apyholier related permits and other puplb &uprovals hequired' for this pro e�;t, inciutl till Wtt Tonal state and Federal agencies: SeVlrir" 1�f2[tl -1— t Ing those rogUltgg I1�` k'� 1 IF 11I RSWENTiAL, Include the number of units, whether units are single or mUitl- IYftu Cif household size expected, Story In height, schedule of Unit sizes IF COMMEt CiAL,, indica nlit� to the type, whether heighborhoud, cii ,coding facilities, y�or reglonafly orlented, uquare footage of sales area,• ftllt� IF INDUSTRIAL, 'hdtcate type, estimated etn lo+ yp � Ment per�shlft and loading faalfl#fIF es, p � , andcommunit INSTITUTIONAL, ben fits to derived froe the, m tunetionp `estimated employn,dnt er shift es`il"14 �d oc Y ed From the prol_ot, ' P cupancy, loadlh'g facliiklttdi J ENV(hoNMENTAL .IMPACTS AND �. MITIGAj'ION hEAS1f;E5'* identlfY potentially sI iflcant environmetitel�inpes'aasobWed ,i itt the tsb �pe' rmit, yXhwla t Prdla"ct deign feture ot conditions of approval (mitigation measures aropro Proposed to rspeGltatpenVironmenfol laacts ( E— ; ENVIRONMENTAL' SETTING* P g epN so t3 Descrlha the project site as It eXisfs before the protect, Including,Infarmatlan on to o r ` y,, it stability, plants and unl* W&� LASE ElA S brical ' 'scenic as act ,qes rfbe arty eXistl aures on the'00, and the use of the structuros, J mals, and any. cultural, �ip�i/etlts- .�24' �/}{�nl �j/[;7` %.n% �� 13. I p d usd i g Y L. Desoribe the surrburidin rb iittles`� lncludln lnformetlon on plants and animafs,�hd an cUllurut Izlstorioal or scenic aspects, YP) t p Intensity se f g y. P p m nit Stores, etc , of nddscale of devello ment fhtolghtc frontage, setback, rear of lyard, etc sin lo-fdrriil a artments, shops, deport'. Use separate sheet for longer responses, ,)' UJ Tbu,-my— Y P penalty perjury, y g e. instruction.rlttd that, the foregoing statements are trite, Complete and correct b the beat of M knowledge and' beilef. ere ectire under enalt of er u that 1 have read arnd uhderstand,-fh ' "nate r Applicant's signature Date � . Property owner's signature,~ Wd Permit Number_ b~ Roquestt Use permit to allow J _ Location and 'size of parcel(g), W VF1 Lei A,P, Numbee(s) Ptblect Description OWhershipghing end Requirements Proof of Agency {ft needed) Location bescrfption LU 'poples of plot plan LL lb to Recelved C� /' ,. keoefpt Number i�11000n taken ley M . INSTRUCTIONS TO USE PERMIT APPLICANTS I If applicant is not the owner, written authorization by the owner or other proof of agency mwa be submitted in order for the applicant to legally sign the application. Application shall bit considered void if not signed by the owner or legal ttgt nt 2. All items on application shall be filled in as completely as possible, If All ,tont is not apply cubic, please indicate by the terra "NA.". 3, it important that the applicant supply an accutste description of the location of the proposotj PPO yet, including the following: a. Assessor's parcel number(s) (from the tax bills or Assessor's. maps), b. Street addresses (if available), c. Distancesand directions to named streets, bodies of water or railroadtt. ,i.. Twenty (24) copiers, of a detailed plot plan of adequate scale to clearly sjlew proposed build- ings and improvements, folded to 8 x x 11 inches, shall accompany and be trade 'part 'of ilia "Application for Use Permit,". If the use permit is approved, the -plait plan bouumes the'ap. proved development plan for ilia-preperty.The,�,-lot plan shall include the following inforinatitiii's ' n. A scaled drawing of Lite patecl((s) boundaries, b. Loaotien and dimensions of all existing and proposed improvoillents on the property,' eluding buildings, driveways, parking nrens,, wells, sepLiC tants and leach field,#, G. 1 tion and name of bordering streets, aocesfi roads, nearby crossroads, stretulis, bodies of water and railroads d. North arrow and Seale of drawing., h The "Application .for arse Perttlit" is subject to public bearings and approval by Lite Planning; Commission, Any special conditions of approV4 shall be made a part of ilia approved "'Use Verinit" and shall he binding an the applicant. The procedures for Couirty action on use per- mit applications Are stated in Chapte,24 of the, Butte County Code. b, The planning Commission, on the basis of the evidence submitted nt thepublic hearing,may grant use permits when it finds that the proposed Lasso of the property Will not impair the integrity atad character of the zone in which the land lies and that the 100 would not be aait, reasonably incompatible with or injurious to surrounding properties nor detrimental to the health and general welfare of the 'persons residing or working in the noighborhood nor, to the general health, safety and welfare of the county. 7. In approving a use permit;, the Planning COmillissionmay ;include suelt conditions as fire deeniod reasonable and necessary under the eiraunastances to preserve the integri;iy And character of the zone and to secure the general purposes of the Butte County Csetaera; '-tan and Chapter 211, of the Butte Court), Code. lush conditions may include, but are not l'.°aced to: time limitations, development plan Approval, hours of operation, foitcing, dedicat' ','4 of rlght-of-wny, and street and drainage improvements. Conditions imposed upon issunnct,a use permit must be reasonably related to the use for which the permit is requested. , 19 M AfA 8, Application fees As ef�- .�._ (date) ase ,«l.0' _: ..:,, l'"ces anay be paid in cash Car by cheek ftmde payable to "Treasurer of .Butte County", y. Before submitting u use permit application, applicant is requested to discuss with stn Fall questions about application requirements, County procedures, %citing provisions and pooible conditions of approval, r �U f1 `�`' 'I:N'l?1T�t1AEIl�T�il, twill?C;�l,1Ti`l` 1(1111, of $t c" o�tipiet LC lj l,etirl 1g `tiilj P+ J,U; ii 87-1.2-011{ 03, 13ACIiCR0UNl1 it 40-10-72 l Name of proponoilt Roberta Taylor 2. Address Or proponent Ind represonta 1843 Laura Lane tive (i t' t,pltlicabxe) Durham, CA 95938 3. Project: description tTse Permit I T . MANDATORY FINDINGS O rSIGNIFICANCE YES No a. hoes the Project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially tOd t the habYtat'of A fish or wildlife apecies" Cause a 'fish or wildlife liapulation to drop heloJV SQ3f sustaining levels; tlf,reaten to eiiminato a. pinttt or animal comrntln ty, reduc6 the number or "restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or anininj or eliminate ,impor. tant exam 1 its of the major parlods Of California historq OT 'Prehistory? b. Does tine Project have the potential to acll,avt3.. d._.,. short--term, benefits to the detriment of long-term, environmentalgoals? oafs? (;4 short-term impact go the go a. envienment e which occurs in a relatively environment of time while long-term impacts will Endure into the future .) .,[ C. does the project have impacts which are indi.viLltt- ally limitod, but ctimilhtive'ly cohsidcrablr2 ( Project may impact on tjso Or mora separate rct;oj i es ttihere 'tile impact on o. c;h re.500rce is relat ivel v sma<1 , bUt where t11e effect .of the total of these impacts an the environment is significant,) d, tlo^S the project ha,1•e entyironmental errects which wilt camse stlbstontial adverse erfects on human beings, 02 ther directly or indirectly? Dt-LE RT(TNATt( t1c ernitltet,ed b`' the ,Lead Agency) On the basis tai' this i:niti;tl evaluption r�nilc. theicr� iirc�rtm nCLys�LiLjprdje4t COLD ivC1T' htty a �itplit c(Int t P c1 , T1 a hhGAi"T ltl, tll:Ci.AU T TdN will bo preparcd , 1/Wr rind that alt[11'tt►;t11 the 'Project could h�alye a signi ri . cah't el root• on the onrironmt nt, the+re will not be h s gtif ricFin orrer:t it: 'chis ctlso ht.•c"IM140 the PITTIGAT'l`ON' MHASUlt8S descrihod on the ari.'a,hod sheet ha1tW been added to the t11;C1,.1l1.1't'TCti till i)t:*' ,PrtptlreLl. project. A N1zCA'1'TVIt '/'VP r1nd the PraPoSed Prolec`t MAY linkro a signiPicAnt e1,fect: ern the pht'rrr�rtsilt�ttt, -Ind all ,8;r`VNONMr-N1TA1. 1AtPACq Jt>:hQitT is rotlU rt,tty I`A'1'i. f January 11. . 1.988� 11 INTY til BU7'�'ti, PIaANN I Ni Cltlirllll"I'PtCN'1 - Labra M. 1't� -tld Assotriate Pldhno Prt�i, {ctl�'ttl` li1r •I'1C, Y ENVTR0NN1 ,NTAL IMPACTS �p anations o . a " es•, and " Y " ears are y ma be answ on attached sheet-(s%) requi,-d J. 1. EARTH. Will, the proposal resultin sigr�i£icant YES a. 'U' stable earth NO conditions or in. changes xn geologic substructures? b. ptions, displacements,,. compicton or ovz: verin9 of the soil? c. C'harijo in topography or ground. surface `--• relief features? - ii. Destruction, covering or modific:atio.n of t,„ yj -unique geologic or Physical features? e. 'increase in wind or `water erosion. either on or off-site?x" E. Changes in deposition or. erosiono�.`beach sands, or changes in s'Ztat;ion, deposition or erosion which may modify-the channel of ricer' or stzcam or the, bad oftheocG,ill o� any bay, i1liet or hake:' $. Loss of primer ilgriculturally productive soi.`.s outside desi.gn;ited urban areas? h. EXposure of people or property to,. hazards such as earthquakes, landslgidegmud slides,' ground failure or Similar hazards? AIR. Will the Proposal result ; a substa.ntti al a. Air emissions or deterioration Ofambient air quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors, stnoko or fumes? JL Alteration c. temperatureo£ornchange or y in �. climate,, Locally or regionally? ,. NATER. Will the proposal result in substantial: a, Changes ill currents,' or the course or direction Of water movements, in either marine or fresh wators? , b, Changes in absorption rates- drainage ' ar the rate and amount of stt ,face runoff? c. Deed for Off-site .. ,.. surface drainage improve meets,, including vegetation removal cnanndl- Ita.tion or culvert installation' d. , Alterations to the course or clow of flood wa to r,; Q. Change mhe amount o t sii7•fac,r� water ill any Water body! f, Discharge %vita surf ice i,�,,tters, or iia rine alteration of surface wator quality, including but not lira tod to t-emperatuve, dissolved oxvg ti or turbidity? g. Lteration of the direction or rage of £hair.... �.. Of ground waters? -, hi Change in the q«a.ntxty ion clu6.itV of, wabo s either through direct additions off, With-unci' drawals, or through interception of an agllifer= by cuts or excavations Reduction itt the amount; oty wager otherwise Or pltbLxc grater supplies? avaOlVt F l Exp ��.1rle of People or property to grater related hazards sucix as i:loodiiig? ;, 2-, YES 4 . PLANT ,LIFE Will result z1�osubstantial: a G_ange in the diverstysof l: fl specieal Of any species o plants ,1, r number shrubs (including! trees, b, Reduct onrofI thernumbersaorganvyUnique,�lts) ? or endangered species of plants? . are C. Introduction of neer srec:es o area, or in s into an a barrier to the normallantreplenish- Milt or existing species? d; Red jAction in acreage of any Agricultural crop? AN-tml, LIFE a. C , Will the proposal. -- result in substantial. . tinge ,in the diversity . of of species, or numb any species of animals (birds, land including animals reptiles, fish and.shel,l fish, benthic organisms or insects)? b • Reduction in t 7e numbers of any Vniquts or endangered rare c. species of animals Introduction pecie.l of a o: view s 'animal's cyto an area, or result in a barrier �•`" to the or movement of ari'i,mals 7 Migration, d, - Ueteriorati -r ro. existin habitat? g 1`ishor wildli.re 6. NOISE. Will the proposal result in suUst•antidl a� ncreases i11 existing noise levels'? EXpasure of people to severe noise levels? 7. LIGHT AND CLARE. Will the proposal produce si,gni T.C- ght and glare? LAND UJE �. proposal 8, Will the ro nsal result in p su s3—tans a , land use of antarea? cin Of the p1 o4orit or pl<�t��lrti 9 ,. kL TUP Aq kr- O,OU CE, Will the propos result 5u stanta.1 in a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural, resot�rt,r;s' b. Depletion of any non-renewable - at,aral - resources? , .. .[0. RISK OF UPSET Ni11 the pros, --�:L `hazard— e plo>,;.on: off' .rho11010asLlveof . 0115 sllbt tances (includinoi but > not, �. Oil, � � L'i lclL c.?�emic_als car rAtli event cctaonti�i tpj �� r,' at) in the :ar <� i �,on; 1o �� �a ►s�b � Cond! tions 7 b. Possible [liter raronce with an emcr'gollc response plan or emergerIcy evacuation plat,? l'Z� l tho proposal, alter the location s c3ert5i Ly, or �opulat,��r4►n�n' growth rate of the human 14'ill the propria, affect existing housing, or create a �iti5marad Co i; addltzonal hbusiq7 9. TRANSPORTATION CIRCULATION. / result Will the Proposal a. Generation Of substantial additip movement? nal 'Vehicle „ b. Effects on existin fi p��rlc3.ng facilities demand for cr. -----. , new parking?' C. Substantial impact on existing, trap systems? sporta.t i on d• Significant alterations to sent patte of crns ircu3.ation ar Ofepeoplee :. . movement , ana,/or Alterations e. to Waterborne, rail or air traff' c?, f- Increase in -- , traffic hazards to bicyclists or pedestrians? tnotvr v�?1.CeSr _ 14, PUBLIC SMICE5. ' Wipo 1 the proposal have an lect uovcrnmentaluser�r g cesneed f"'r new or altered ., a • Fire protection? b. Police prater..tion? c. Schools? d. parks or other recre,ztional facilities? e. Mainteiian�e of roads? public facilities, irt�ltldin —.., f. Other gavernme`ntal services? 15. ENERGY. IV-11_ thep pia osal 'result n: a Use of Substantial amounts of fuel , or enet 'gy 9 b• Substantial increase in demand 'upon existin sources of energy, g '�-- of new sources of}enerTeauire the development Syr 16» UTILITIES. Will the —- result in atoathei'or new systems, or substant .-. all alterations following. a. Power or natural gas? COMM{ Wateunications` systems?', avai'11'11i i gt'y r• x d. Sewer or n,, Li,(s tank. e. Storm water drainage? Solid waste and disposal;? 1 t1UMAN_IfiEALTH. Will the Propn ,at result it of _,.. an)� healt)t ha41trd or potential Health hazard (excludijIg tent heait'l)? b, h.tpards? of people to potential health hazarcls� �W 18. 1ESTIihTIC5, {V11 the proposal result in the btru`ct�on of any scenic vista or osal the public, or will the open to teview creation of an aesthet cally offensiveqults tetheen to public vi.e,v? p �4. 19 • RECREATION. Will the YES, upon t pxa oral result in ., «.... � an i quality or quantitympac.t opportunities? of existing recreational 20. CULTURAL RESOURCES, a`III he posal result in of or the Wiest,- the ,alteration _olOgI o a Prehistoric ojy historic archaeological. site? bb Will the proposal result in 'adverse poric hysical or aesthetic Affects to a historic huildi;ng, structuxeorsabject�r C. Does the �. proposal have the I to a se a ;physical change Which` would affect unigotential ethnic cultural values? d. Will the p�"oposal restrict existing 'religious,,, or sacred uses Within the areal �btent al impact V l77SCUSS.iON OF ENVTRONME�lTAL LVAL�ATTON AP 40-26.72 See attached, OIS�CIJSS i'bN OC= ENtiTiZclN�iFNTA�CVAl�i1A•r�N ' AP 0 40-=26-72 A CJsr_ Permit has been requested to allow a mas.lmum of 25 dogs w.1 l l be private breeding kenn�'l anticipated at this time housed in the facility The A i Eottwe i 1 ors , L,-) H d 1 b : An existing 280 s farllit q• ft• concrete barn Y No additional canstrur_t Ion is antic { gated 1 a.sbeatrer this l.l:se Permit a Which pP i i cation . Thca ;barn '► s surrburld d esu l provides containment should an of the cCo•° � �.� �y a `fenced otl�da Y g 1-'g1�aPe the barn, i9= Soils on-site are of agr� i cu l tura i toll. 1 . the V i r1a Farwell l 1 Assoc i at i on , f y The property 1".�•>(,me agricultural commodities . Operation noofnow i n comrrrierc i a l produe facture planting or cu 1 t i vat i rn on the west hal f a f'� �} ken vat i,1 1 not 'rt���-';, pro ert Objectionable odors could be ` ma;ntained. 9enervited t f the One of the purposes of Env i ronmenta 1 kennel i s M6t W 1' 1s bre minimize objectionable odors. Wealth re u1 ot i oPys Gyoundwater disposedcoui properly ropd be adversely' effected if e rl d f • Environmental n 1 as1 wastes ar4t f►c+t application and Health has reviewod W require disposal of system• The location of the all Naste into a Plot plan. proposed septic system a�mPbhe Y em i s shown on iho 6a: The primary impact of the kennel will be noise. from running dogs aut-.of-doors No i se w i 1 t r� tra nano. Noise is cut -of -d to before exercise, trainin'' es�tlt. when the owner i g' 'sr�d 9n working n greatest during r1g daylight hours 1 inside the ooncrete 9 with the dogs. At night the In noise should barn , no i se w ° l 1 be muff' 1 eci', dogs v� i 1 i be be substantial , the A l ti~°rugh the i urease. stonii'icant. The bawl varies from 156 Compact 1s not contldared prod°erty line. The 470 feet from the n�,. northeast. nearest houses are located :west Both of these hour to tt°te southwe�- anti outside edge of th% barn. houses are aPpr'oK i matel Y 3 6 feet Fer- , the Noise '-:s further mitigated b land uses of the immediate area. Agricultural areas ar"e not cons'rderr�r as sFnsltive for poise as are suburban resi_derrt-ai Y the zonirrq and presence of animals, and animal, noises are me rural areas Of the County. The r _nt_ in the. 8• The land Is 'oned 5 sere minimum Pian. designation A-5 � Agr i cU � >�r it"a 1 •- A . is Orchard and f=ield Cro s. ). The Generai i" y 9r i cu 1 tune and anima 1 1-°usbandr� � • The k The land has been O character es, sheep, cows- or .p°n9 0l' dugs as ter W1th surround',h ! goa.ts, sh��uld not be but A45 toning d 3 sir 1 ct . land uses; and 1 and uses r -.;e"01 i tted under `f the 12: As rioted under i to m 6 to the southwest and northeast nearest house is a mot be adversely affected by operat i an of the these rel s 7p feet, The residents Offpthese kennel 1 , houfis s! ►ou 1 ei I Sa : The kennel w i 1 i generate a minimal amount of traffic from trip and from ;o the, vet ora i ni i1�j dress 1 paten•ti a 1 put"chasers of pu i pp rrs r f d r. V Total traffic by the ken vehicle tri Ps per cJa ne 1 i s qs i mated td, bc� less than half op d,rl ve. day. The site ht i ] ] adcss Laura Lane ai4e1'� Laura Lame loads to Highway. . Lain i?oacl 'r s Lott Road, and thence to Durham.. have ode uat�s narrow bUt has a 00d surface C i�te�n 9 capacity to accommodate the additional traffic I146eds 'arty mod i f i ca i on w i lout 6d • fl separate septic system shall be i r►stel cid for t I (Il Individual i duo] rung w i'th i n the barn aha1 l be des i � he 'ka real i t let into the septic system,. onod ` to dra i n ir� �; as 4 20at The property has either a use b moderate or a h i sh t"otent i al for Y American Indians, ons and the presence of archaeological PrAl or Since the proposal does not involve construct]san, a ologicali11t,iPObs required. Y not b A Migotive Declaration approval include is recommended. installation of a, Appropriate cond i t onq' y a f regulations enforced b septic system, comPlianwt wljth p Y Environmental Health, and _. Pr'e*Cerit l on of Cruelty to Ani mals and limits Soo i atv foi," the should be attached to the Use permit on no l Thew card i i srys 1_M �. ,4A ... I " t Appllcant Roberta Taylor, A. ss ess 0 r, s pbrce AP 40-�6-72 87-12" A' 1- 03 DATA SHEET A,. -Pro ect Descr i on I. Ty.Pe of Project: Use Permit S'r 'i of DeScr• i pti on' Use. per m r t to a 1 10�l breeding kennel. a 25 dog pe'' i nate 3 Location: On the south side of Laura L feet west of Lott; Road on�r, pprox mat aiy 700 Proposed ��ensitDevelopment:r Durham area. iW Proposed n `d t)1 s y� of X 00 s Use of o Sq, � �. t: fenced area.. q' f"t , 5• Amount of Tmpervtous Surfaci,rlg: 6 Access and Nearest Pub 1Yc Roads 7„ Mettlod of Sewage Dis oso'1: Access Off Laura Lana. Source of WaterSu p Septic tank, loachfield. pp`1Y= Wil t existintu; 9. Proximity iof Pokor L l ne-q : TO Property. 10- Potential for further- 1 and Limited by zori :ng and ci i v i s i ons and deve l opmeo parcel size B. Fav rcrnmenta i Sett; l na Phys%rtvi i^onment 1 Terre i n a. General Topographic Character: Lever volley lands b Slope$: 1 �/- C. Elevation: 150-155 ft An.L= d, Limitilry9 !=actors: Nene. 2 Soils ''- TYpeg and ChMrbater i +,t i cs : e:!Pine V i na-�Farwe 1 1 to modassoo . , coarse rate l y �' i ne texture sa;,dy l oasis, 1 odm � moderate to moderate -slow Permeabi'lit b. Limiting roctors: yf C1 ass I' acuf soil Moderate to severe 1 1 m i tat i ons for septic leachFields, Natural N8z81^ds of the Uind ai. Earthquimke Zone.: Mcderatu b• Erosi oh Potetyt i al Nome d. Lands 1 1 erePotent i' a i None � d � Fire Ha�:�rd c Unc 1 ass i i?' i ed d of ogY pani vi es e 501 1 �' 4. Hoteriti al : Moderate Y 'I am Surirace Water= Outtle Creek , br Cround ;later; Es�cellertt 300-510 ftp west~ c 11 Dra i n8ge: ClIbr-act-er i st c :Qua 1 i ty and quantity. Good �- Annual h;l�ihi~�►11 Clnormal:� c'�,6�r e. Lvim itIt19( C=acyiors. Nome 5. V i 5usl /:poen i c, (�1' 1 tY- Goad '\ r r , L - _ 1i 7. Acousti, 'Oual'ity: Good Air Duality: Good B ii a 1 ao i ca 1 Env � rahment�„ 8: Yegegtion; Irrigated pasture, ttleeo/ornamen talsA house, s i dal cea robusta fr i t i l 1-aria p1 ur i f 1 o r lurid threatened s i 9 f��c t es south of Butte Creek eh lah `l�l"�d ahrJ Wildlife Habitat,': Limited oh=site corridor. o good a 1 ong Butte Ditieit Qul tural Env i i^ --- - onineht, ID. Archaeo 1 og i ca l '`. andModht erate to ' Historical Resources 11. sensitivity . In the xrr"en Butte County General Plan . dasignation: Crop.',-. . Orchardand ' I o1 d12 - Ex I tt i ng Zonings t$'- A-5 \ Existing Land 'Use '1 4. onsite:'' stable, barn, water tower, Single 1 yarn 11 y res i dent i a l unit Surrounding ng Area: poo i4 a. Land Uses e, Rural re9. b.. sidential Zoning: A-5 and a C. Gen. Plan Designation: d : Parcel Sizes = Orchardand P I e l d` Crop, Average 5 acres, rain ii: From e� Populatlon't Rural dehsities 910eFro 1-27 15 - l acres. g uri i t per ! Charac'ier of Site 1 b . and Area 1Vearest Urban Area Rural a''" g . cornmr�r� i ty ; Town 17. $- m i l �:s north of Durham 2 m 1 l e hortl twest, Ch i:Ct ' Relevari - 18 Spheres Of Influence:" Durham Barkand Flood Con trb l b i strict #!5,, '` Racraat i on , I]urham Mosquito improvements p 1 to 19. Abatamar,t. Standards Urban Area F i ra Protection Service N. A a yNe C S erwest County mi tate yi F i R--Station. Durh am Sta tlon 2b• Water Ava labl'itEng1ntb Capaeity, Schools inArea: i swInmihj pod120. N/ .. •moi,.- ,.., , 48r26..,i - 40-26-72 David Scott 722 Douglas Lane Chino, CA 95926 Peter Downing Y, �R 1843 Laura Lahti Durham., CA 959:38 _ 40-2G-20 40-26-12 0' '%lits, Landry 18:x..: Chestnut St. Roberta Taylor San Francisco, CA 94123 1843 Laura Lane Durham, CA 95988 4q-26-21 40-26-74 ge Laura & Forest McNabb 8911 Stanford Lane M. Wacker Durham, CA 95938 P:O„ Box 308 Durham, CA 95938 40-26-2.6 Ray ()yler 9337 Frederick Lane` Durham, t':A 9593$ . 40-26'-25, etc. ReltT a Vernice X/O-. r Pott 556W an Lane r r Lt, L©x- p a n--rH61. �3Cy tA) �9 -ti F-)=691 7rL , -P adise,A 95969 40-26-56 etc. w Dorothy and Henry f 1823 Laura Lane Durham, CA 95938 40-26-60 u Frederick & Colda Dgqert y 9207 Lott Road - nurh am, , CA 9 5 9 3 $ 40=-26-61 Steven and Dorothy p ` •Eggert: 9199 Lott Road Outham, CA 95938 40-26-6J Btian & Cord.elia Meith 9223 Wacker Drive Durham, CA 95938 4o-26-70, etc. Sally Mowat p:d. ,Beet 47 Durham, CA 95588 V`\ n ' � Co: pfo,�ili► C .<AW OFFICES OF W=JL�1L T. MU72PI-jY � ,% 9 �E►�t1, WILLIAM T. MURPHY 55 MITCHELL BLVD.,'SUITES e & 9, �i '�'OAY 24 SAN RAFAEL, CALIFORNIA 94.903 of COUNSEL ' ;'"�adJh, Calffors RICN',RD G. 'GOULD (415) d99.11825 April 28, 1988 r 25County '' `ti•:,',4 A y Center,, Qroville, CA 95965 7 ia"Wry 5i i ��..0s��..R NL '0f Re: ,1 .X"r.'! Heai:ng 5/3/88 Gentlemen: I• This letter is a follow-up to my ser,x•tary � a, conversation with Rike Pyeatte 'regarding the above mat ;tcr r This office requests a continuance of the h;mating, on our appeal from May 3t 1988 to Ray 24, 1988. t will: Cie unable to attend the hearing On May 3 because my soil has roc:ently been I' admitted to the hospital in San Francisco and diagiiosed with j leukemia. It is necessary that 1 be an S<tn Fraf,Iai8co with hit, Thank you for your consideration in ',,his matte Siiiterely, William T. Muxph W T.1 t I e cc Earl Young, A;Y�A%al Control Jeffrey A. M(,JLh, Esq. Laura Tuttle, "Ja;ning Department Roberta Taylor �j r. Y e Y � it I COUNTY 'OF BUTTE 25 COUNTY'C[N7ER DRIVE _ QROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965.3380. (916) 5387631 o MEMBERS" ild 00A _ "� RpI MARTIN J, NICj4b iASKOL A, WINTURr CHIEF.ADMINIvMATIVE'OFFICER JANU DDLAN KARcN yftRtAUSE RD MaLAU6HL;IN Lr;14 VUL-roN 4, 1988 IZabflrta Taylor Laura Lane Purham, CA 9593 Re: use Permit, AP 40-26.22 11"ar; i'is. Taylor,- At aylor:At the regular meeting of the Butte County Board of Supervisors KAY 3, 1988, your appeal of a denied Use permit breeding kennal on property zoned A-5 locdbed p ps held t+d allow a private L-1111rr Lane, a art the sauth side of approximately 100 feet west ofr Lott hadi Durham, was C1.E^,I'iiEr�a. 'b"ulcl you have any guest ons regarding this matter, i PlAhning Department at 538-7601, between 10.00 a m, and31,00 contact the, p.m: Ve,• tv my 'yours, dp Markin J': .Nichols Administrative Officer bs Public Works Department (2) Aealth. bepartmerit Department of Forestry ,r. r , 1 ofi. �i �."►.-. z PI A,NNISIQ 0fJMMISSII N 7 COUNTY CENTER ORIYE -. Ol;pyli.'LE, CALIFORNIA �'59d5. Fr•10�i�i s��d<7d01 X397 March 12,, 1988' Bu��Eca.�lanninr� MAR Roberta Taylor 1543 Laura Lane t?rayillu, C.aliYoralrsq�1t� QN``��ytitA Durham, CA. 9S938 0 Re: Ur.e itAP 40-25:.7'2 OPSUPIEFOQIR�' ,Perm, near Ms.. Taylor; aoAso At the regular meetIII,. of the Butt ,,e $ e County Planning , hlarck .:10, 1.988, your request; for a coif N Lomlission held ' on th,a subject use Permzit was einsid6redz�andcrejectedrAII(I the P1ann ' public hearing C oznmission dezziz,e your request fora Use Permit to ra��ata a ing breeding kennol �n p:. 1jerty coned A�;S private Laura Dane> approxsznati-1 locatdd on tho South side of y 700 feet west of Lott Road, OtItham. Should you desire to appeal this (lecidi,on With, the appeal fee of You must do ao, azi writing,, Supervisors,`?.5 $75•Qf� to the Clerk of tha' Board of County Center brive„ Oroville, the expiration of the 8-da , CalifOtni,a, prior to friday, March 18 1988, y al peal period which ig at 5:00 ,p.m., Should you have an questions re ardi»g this this office betweenn q 10.-00D0 S ter, please contact tn. matter, Sion p;m, Sincerely, A. Kircher birector of Planning nAK:lr A 4 northwest Society ForThe PrOVOi t'an,of Cruelty Torront� i 2860 51h' AVtj p r ORO�,�IL. E, CALIFORNIA 95965 a (916) 533 7636 &et)0?NOr111Crh GnllforNia March 1, 1008 MS: Roberta Taylor 1843 Laura Labe Durhilltr,Ca,95938 Ucar Ms. Taylor; I`t has been decided that itt order to make a'`,fair decision regarding your request fora kennel license, a meeting open to the public should be held ht as to what, �f alloly hp bath you and the people in this area to express ;your thoughts an,y» t►`ting will change the neighborhood if a 1d oper- ated. This meeting shall be held Monday, is allayed to be built of qday, March 7, 1988 at 7p.nl. in the Gijange (Tall in Durham, California. This Hall is located on the Da+ S ton-nurhanr Hwy. in Durham.accross front the host. Office, """se plan to attend and bring any pictures of the proposed kennel you May have and wish this panel to view. The findings or- this committee shall be given the Butte CUUhty planning Comrn7ss7ott at their March 10th meeting: Sincerely ectt e+ pir"ecto r&Chiefil, �1 f Preud f6h Not d-timcti'rrtr �-' ' City of't_ittle Rn _. Mark Stodola 61Y Attorney s City Hail Markt Little ok tarp at 8rdadway 5011371 4627kansas 7221)1 February 22. 1,988 Earl Young Northwesit SPCA 2868 Sou:wh Fitt Stye Orville, Galifor et nla 95965 Re: Future Roberta Rarms Rottweilers Taxi er, owne.r/o DPerator ear Mr. Young; A t+hoFarmroug Check of haves Rottweilers, Or' br records or have Tayler Show that neither Limits o L evelr had apermit - oberta Tatler 'uttir.e Or L �.tl ,, Rock. operate Darr <a kennea within Kirshner It ism with n the Christ Y understandin tri,t�r Y Allen, was ,that e of oor I 1701 West inv� ted of Animal C Your 36th Street Y Roberta 7'aYler topnt�"1 Orr. cersr county officials and was then aslcecl to Vis her also have received describin write kennea the establishment,wasronOOus f what she Observed; a letter t6, suspicion xnformati.on Christ since that this kennPbosea to have. Gegarding a permit may the computers was anythin risty had no that permit, she relied were down tivhe g other than reason to incorrect, on anotiher s,ottrceho Christy in ui reputable and g zed about the infOrmat on that was 1: hope this in_ further Of is �Yel i assistance, pf'ul, Lei SIIbce, fie know, if T Can rely, be of SEAN, K. DCJFrEY ��;;:�.. • , 4�a* r A8818TANT CITY *. ATTORNE AWN Le, -_;-- - I r'. trt►ssr:Smciety Far 'ThQ P^, r6ventian C?i` �:r Nor th ¢` . . �. , uelt T1.o ntit�it Y Ani ,. O- BOX 1602 • ORO'V'ILLE, CAA.WO,RNIA '913665 • (996) 533•i636 ServingNoetherlt California Mvetinq of citizens at Durham Grange ball concerning 'facility belongir,1g to Roberta. 'rayl or. g t<Droposed kennel t-lPntinq 3ponsorki by the Northw�ayl r conciucteci by Earl Youn °'1 Cn .s Dept. of nnimml Cont tol, and Young, Ce�uti.ve Director. caPOQity were Mrs. Jane Burns and Dr. Present 6I1 an advisory TA' -y,z1 were, 15 people Charlotte cwnma ngs UVM. parcels, p ` }� e in the audience, primarily owners 0-t neighboring Maung cl art fa c � the meeting and stated that this ►Deet n term;;,ne where the planning g would not de- g cthe wh on stood k - but rather that 7lnimal Control, needed to look into.. the taho'le a Picture of this p x'tnd make ke a determination about a.c,t g.v'ant`in KJro used facility The planning rott►mission has the authority kennel License, to Taylor. , property, bttt the actual fennel license comes to gfrom rant A ume permit for the concern itr is to know the animals na{.tt1t*tl; ,COntrol.Whose' cared' for and no public nusiance is ocrurings site arC! b` eking properly Reviewed x wGt,-r.. l: et•t ors and '4 eports Froin various ga.rdih Taylors previous business deala.ttgs, people an aga;lcies re These included; letter from the City Attorney of Litt stating Taylor under the name of Future Farms Rottweil rs ` a permit to Operate a kennel there an affidavit l� ltocneverkhad 'as OC Taylor s dav� t Lro►n giving her opinion of what she believed to a farmer employee 7nri breeding practice and numerous reports from Glen be poor whelping cine nusianre problems— /also included weret letter from K. describing ` Little Rock ACO stating Taylor K. 11l l 1"'• Jonas statin Ta Y ran a good establis}lment tort, a ut7ble; a tat ingter Taylors kennels in the Lodi f letter from a �, solvang area were rep-- 009g'J from Taylor; VonKil,lian�Ro��weil� Texas nvTexasnaand�ano1 ,I Purchased twC3,11or owner from Little Rock., Arkansas. +her Rot theyTherewo ldwas �hoolonger certit the Ort;hop�iic PbUndation at }?Y Papers and switched dogs. Y Taylors dogs be."ause she lad►� alsifiederica �ng lChic' ' } ... fahojors voiicedhthehrCconce��► hregard Identified themselves .as ltattwe3ler, Mi8topresented the breed in varix rtdaan .the breed. T1ycy felt 'Taylor told b Ta for and her atin va y 'ixhey felt there were lies Y Y Rottweiler breeder. y► including ,Caylor beitIg t}te 'numL t o Various audience comments included: owns a I it }3ull 11, is in a en a W11, p t residence � ' Taylor it seems .Pa .. edPle down the road can heal: this donoyseence and it barks at night. t:►e in an Old milking barn and there is a question Photo. 5 bark. The Proposed kennelWill' ader uatel l even if the building is "sooner this can } Y prohibit soutt mliereoilsrtheeareal comntettt„ r dproofed It eg�rding the waste and draarlage prOblemo a has a high water table and the ares a new septic syst"►t would go in is prone to fl,aodi ng when negllbr�rn irrigated' g pastures are Also of concert] was t}te safety of 'the neighborhood, t3eo past history in Glen Co. , residents eXpressed wc�,rr o{ ause of Taylors large and t11e danger to children w:io daily Palk the s , Y dogs running at `Taylors residence. greet ih front of preventi6h Not begthttetion e and ierNce also expressed khat 3, no lirnit on the number o' do f th'c lcennel was a Young stated he thought ther�swerebe housed t the e� neved there was ap'oLlseproxilnaaei , 3cennel. housed et the 1-,ennel and an undeterruanec� ziiamber of rn�� T11e audience wondered how the 25 bitdhes to be 3 n grid out of mason presence of this man l e' rt hllrest to livestock, would attract rosining male dog. '4tilales corning ante people in the area. g and thus pose fi discussion Of where `Taylors dogs tha'ta had b4 Prob.I-Ons inbeen rea.olbsted after, Gecl Co.G'were at this time. h�•tri b -.en rarinPd out to be on peo,Pi,e thought they a t: tea . da.Lferant locations �.n GJ.�+rt CO.:and the fincier,soh. Thr, '1trri') rric�e r~+�),r.e.�r�r ri t)tr the` x,eason nisn Y no e �7 rr, irinr�}:71f�7t}t�a��r,t_ht:ISr coriytn the noisc-1, got then )ted tfloVe<i front '�c.ities"'was to unity aria '1'hpir conrti �t yet away from Th 0. ' . included the arFss ol; saC�t prooekty valur-.s surrounding _ y� no, -rnt :aana.tation. cu rri. 5 hP Ftt o),ost kennel. ! 7t was cteneralJ.y felt t}�c'`vsrLttes wattke kennel 1�awre. wou].r� becomA dif fic ult to se1.L also dis fi "OL -t -l"4 ].er owner >r eco ar}ci land srirci.al socias i,zitt; a n t)iettdience} stat:.. that ItOttwe,Llor;� required that- neck. J and nt lterous litters of pup} es could hot 'provide t7hen the audience was asked iE the w hood, they unanitttously voted r1o. y anted Z 'I'he audie-nce was encoura kennel a n their 1eighbor• t'tar'ch 10 and voice thy' ged to attend the .lahn' a r concerns. Ca g comttt,.a iOh riteeting �"oP,i, c,� oiw 1 ett��rs frorri o.Cfa,cers of PJ -.Inning conunssion wer_o 'the Am or "ottw , ttati a eceiv a nL-raduced. 'Phase i.oh tet s std i, i ez Glob ho the numerous cortt�tlairits about '1ayors dos a�''i!d that ithe At2C r ec4i�►tn encs }ter 9 ► and they 1could not err - , KENN r G" �l i s t r '.Y� I /i r'"�.:; � ,f`G'/Jir•',L�„t�Ti`� � �+'r� y_ VV wr (.j+'x, y, �✓ ,,� f �-� -� � � 4VZLC"L' t �1� 4 W i �." "'r,...l,..�(��'1 "�` �i'i'1,. � �"'>} �r)t••��r�„r'`r I,�`Y�/ / ��' "� ./"� } ,�� r+�" '� � ,•t�c�'(�. ,r .: y i :+c � L � 4 �'� { 110 a ' ' OnifC,opedie 94,,,( flog dolt c_Ahtb a& UtitvPS+iT OF M[SS°VRFZOtUMRUC. ' w s• - pursto�tR; Ci &At!tt. tMa- 65201' Q�f�,C 1P_ u-mdafion bt December g,; 1986 � (Afi11(1Y.S .^cxbta vUo. 65201 (3141'-7+2-0.418- 1arilyn & Clyde Crookham: Mach 26 1987 212 N< Harding Haskel'1 Ar 72015 Dear hr. 6 Nrx. Crookham: On November 24, 1986 the OEA received a radia;rape (dent(£+ Jenn Burg.. 4a as being of Futurefarms Me to eceiv MJF-710kjo this entifas. P.O pox 393 further (dent(((ed as having. d Jamul;. ;.A 92035 registry number RG -8076. Furthermore,. received OFA breed Cear'Ys. Burger.. - previous, - documentation on the + you had provided me wft4 purchased it _from Roberta Taylor, of this dag since you On March 13th the OFA received the radio ra being, Of F`aturo Farms J 8 Ph Identified as On September 25, 29$5 the OF.i-received a radiograph 3dentifiew February 2,7� 2,981 at Sud SVndy~• This radiograph was taken on as being: Future! to T.R.r GF 710456. The aPPropriaC-1 v _etersnary Ggi'nic_ was sig>•_d Roberta Tay.Ier.. The radiographs were examined8brify Y identified a& is ,of diagnostic quality( o&raph is the three consuIting radiologists and the dog -was assigned OFA. The Problem is that on breed registry number'RO-9676 and was rated an excellent hip radio rah October 20 1986,: the OFA received a. 8 P identified as being Of Future Farms JR Sand Joint conformation.. number WE-7IC455. The owner of retard was the radia ra Roberta Ta y' AKC JnYortuna tel y-, when evaluacin 1986. 8 Ph was taken by Dr. L)C,, Frtichmacl on October 2nd etibmiss£on, [he radiologists. ata eaNdvember 24, 1986 This radiograph was evalusted by the 4FA 8 that tfis. does not a aandiassii ed and was found to be 'of good hip consulting to be of the sate dog, as previously submitttd. appear g the OFA number RO-11666. P j°Int conformation: in Since you have stated that the do in The radiograph =` possession at the time the first radiogcesh;wa�was in Your that you submitted from Jud V < is o£ a different dog, Since you certified thatthe y Clinic dog is now registered -to you rather thsrr RobertatTaylor. am Roberta -Taylor':, In Y possession is Future Farms JR Sanddogin left With no o?tion but to ervoke'RO- tl.l meanwhile Y, Your problem is with letter,. �-9076 by of this Tette notif in 'Tam revoking;RO-11666 and the affiliated brae cy, a copy of this this action.. Y 8 tha.affilisted breed clubs of re'sd notified. Sins matter .is now between you: and Roberts Taylors Thi You and Ms, Taylor should check cerely, this submission. The OFA Should ybe nour ottards for accuracy on soon as possibl-d so that the records. can be clarfieded of the esulta as Sincerely, Y_ A.: Corley,.V.M., Ph.D. Project Directort&A - zaA. Caz2ec„�°t�.?i..r Plf.Fk E.tC/aar Project Director cc:: Roberta Taylor EAC/cas 11701 West 36ttr Li ttle Rock cc A£Yr.7 r . AK 722II- fated=Breed Club Representatives L O.`"Fritchmsn, D.V.M. y J -D'- McMasle DV.K.oerta Taylor - 6311 Asher ' _.Ff. _ "Judy Veterinary Clinic Little- ;Rock, AR 72204- - Hillcrest -Animal Hospital 2900'Kavanaugh Little. Rock. Ar 72205: OFA'affiliated-Rottweiler Clubs v CATIHRME M. THUMPSON Pr slliylit hC I 8UNO Co. Planning Ckmv ri (Z,`/ MCrica2 `F�otti��ler' FEB 18 158 o ., CIub �toxille, Califatnle� February 12, 1988 X l Butte County Planning Coitmission 7 County Cente''• Drive Orovi l le., CA 95966 Dear his. Tuttle, RE: Applic:ation for a Use Permit for a kennels at 1 q3 Lara f DW'ham, CA, by Roberta Tayloran. e, While serving as President of the American Rottweiler Club (198 -•1985 'i l p y . � rather extensive file of coil laints�-most invol e � otv have a 1 received nur�ierou., letters of complaint on Mrs. Ta lor. In concern alledged switching of dogs. isrcl)Nsentation and In conversatijon-with Dr. Corley of the Orthepedic Foundation for Attiiiall� he said ries. Taylor could h0 longer use their services as there were at least 3 cases of scotched dogs (ane dog being x-rayed and that certi- ficate given a second) and more being Suspected. In my one meeting with Mrs. Taylor; with her unaware of my knowledge of Rottweilers, she totally misrepresented her d;t allow n►e into her kennels (Norse barns) and brought o1ut th0. eesar�eldogs not than naOnce sao'tngeceived,different "bin winners'i, She also claimed titles Since Mrs. Taylor has a long standing reputation of questionable ethics T do not believe it is inthe best interests of the Butte County Planning Corronissiort to approve her application: nning Sincerely' 4 r Catherine M Thoir►psoh ,/ Past President, Memberof the Board of Directors American Rottweiler Club RD 2. )BOX 384 0 YELLOW8�00�t �i7. � TH8 WOW, N:J, 07728' I� Ln`. l� a► Peltie r Izc �rner;c.�rZCTorrticEilcr Secretary In Club lBiilitngs, MT 59101 Buhl Eo. ,Woo ccm, February 25., 1988 B.A. Kircher i Planning Com `mission �kou',71o, Celd(o 7 County Drive Drov i l,l e , CA. 95965.3397 Dear BSA, Kircher , Receive 'd y`Our letter about Ms. Roberta Taylor and your attached 1`etter.from Catherine Thompson. Catherine Thompson, is indeed past President of the American Rottweiler Club, and is one of o:t,r valued Directors, on out, Board at present; You can indeed depend upon Catherine. Thompson's letter and her comments On ,. Roberta Taylor! first-hand Roberta Taylor's I ` k. tion and filthy � p condition of her dogs. it is a matter of record, and please feel free to contact Or. Carley of the Orthopedic Foundation for Animal s,that Ms. Taylo), has repeated her abuse of one of our good foundations. in no w4y Will Ms,, Taylor be a bene,ki t to your community; if she continues as she has in the past; she, in fact will most probably be a detriment. It i s a pleasure to kholi that your F l anrii rig Commission looks into these matters. Let me assure, you that Ms Taylor is NOT a top broeder in the U.S. with her Rottwei 1 ers ! None of her dogs are 1 � sted i n``our top ten, and she certainly would never be referred tea, for pt.'ppY b0YP •s from me. Si nterel y Kay Rel tier Secretary, A.R.C. t 40 Northwest For,The Prfevention Of Cruelty To Animals , 2868 S',. 5th AVE. .* OROVILM CALIFORNIA 96968 •916 ( ) 5334636' . 3 7634 SeruingNorther►t Calif'ornta March 101,1988 IEarl Young, telephoned the Little Rock Arkansas Animal Co, p - '11:ra1 Office this date and asked to speak with Officer Christi Allen, as I was told by Roberta was RObi�rta Taylor and her attorney they had a letter signed by her that the.kennel oporat4'�d by R legal and acceptable to standards for kennels in that area, zn factibeforR I left lts. Taylor's home, she presented me with a copy of the letter along with several others Which commended her on the ability of Ms. Taylor to operate <t kennel; Christi filen was not in, so I asked to speak with Animal p p Control's uupervisor. A Tina Debrow, acting control,animalosupervisor -dor Little Rock 4At4kansas "City Animal: 9_ operate a kennel in the City of little, Rock, Arkansas at the address stated on her business cards. She also said that this ever had a license or permit to operate within as she clues not noi^��has.she kennel was being operated in violation of the City Cade p n the City. intha County she did not need a permitorlicense, but when her property was anexod into the City she did not receive "grandfather ri hts to operate. She stated that Christi Alden had been to tate kennel several times but she personally did not know What was in any reports made by her, if in fact any reports were made, I read Ms pebrow the letter sent me from their City Attorneys office and her remark was 11 yeah? I guess then we will probably have to go out and see what is going on." t�.vCCc1 t Preuentlo" Not D stt•uetion 4341 Beethoven Street a. a..N.Mg CMM Los Angelesi California 90066 February 8, 1988 PO 9 1988 �a Ms. Karen Tuttle Associate Planner Butte County Planning Department #7 County Co nter Drive 1 Orovilleo California 3590 i RE: Use Permit for' Breedin K2nne1 on' Parcel 40�- 6..7Z Dear Ms. Tuttle: Enclosed is a copy of .a letter make certain we sent to Mr. B A. Kircher. working on thisuParticularaUsePPeas wellrmit. ' We were told that We wanted to you are We sincerelyhoe 1. making i you will =ocus on the total scope of this issue when your decision; its inherent problems, unpopularity in the commu and the impact on the families that live about the area. nity Uur familywas ver much loo liven ht imagine' we are haven secondrthou thoughts., to Durham. N6W 9 g as you / change our 9 g g We at� a fully avtare that would adveesl� g 1ifeatdog and more kennel (and training 'kennel.) g cross the street from a do brePdin. kennp the property, than likely severly do"va.lue Please consider our pleas and do not issue a Use Permi kennel (or training) an Parcel 40-26-72, t for a breeding Thank y and ct�hsideratiorl. Please let you for our time � of this issue as soon as possible, its know the outcome Si6cerely yours, Mr► and Mrs. Gary Givens enclosures { 17 9199 Lott Rd. Duehaini, CA 959a March S, 1988 Butte County Planning Pubiis Bearing Commis Ion Butte County Board of S County Aziminlstrution Ceriterisors-e ROOM 25 County Center 0rovllle,CA 95965 Gentlemen. Thus letter is to a Use Permit address concerns r, AP #40-26-to Roberta wI I 1 Taylor, Gardl.ng the granting of 72, Our Jobs 19 3 Laura sane meet I ng and riot all ow us to + Durham, CA r' Present this materlal attend this Inow In detail 1n ,ou se, safety, and sanitation, The issues of n� ipre � t I on, Feb. 30 Previous letter to .. wer,� addressed' there hasbeenam the four weeks thatuhave dat{s+ Tay I or's lot of refl ect Ion on the t .� i ncg padse.r! kennel. After all the t �iSlc of Ms, are theoughly convinced that hou ht a discussion, Vie, be a mistake. granting this U;,' permit would Even If the proi�� I erns of solved, there Is one seriouse and sahltation "Ou ld solution short of kennel �e lalacin . Problem for wh cla there 1 s no location,, g the I n a ;nuc The problem Is the stra ► hi More remote attracted to the kennel � .dogs that CUmmingis of the Durhnel area by the bitches i W11.l be will be Vet Cilni'c has told uIn heat, Dr, strays a lot of dogs attracted In sorb that there y may be lacking pro er a Mantier, not be particularl P Rabies v�cclnatlonis„ These W11I friendly to '!'hey ma length pO E _ Laser! as threat to chi l dr , As such, these h y Erie y humans school bus. ora Lane twice dally an who must walk the dogs They will y going to and from the Who Work !n the kiwi and. a serious threat Taylor's nd nut orchards that surrofarm workers property. They wI1'I pose a ser and lis. livestock awned b contains one y neighbors The nal hborhoodrea.t to the a wide v pony farm, a chicken ranch area sheep. All Variety of eXotic: fowl ; ori a 'carIn that ralses increases, these will suffer snter+str"asmal 1 flocks of y dog Population ll r CHJTNISTRATIEV10- COUNTY OF:BUTTE UTTE C ogllTrcrq 25 COUNTY CENTERDRIVE - OROV ' 1LLE CALIFORNIA 95465.3380: (916) 538.7631 r i r°uNt� MEMBERS OF THE lll(jAW MARTIN 1 NICHOLB HAsk EL. A. MclhitUR CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICtR JANE gJOLAN KAREN VEROPUIE ED MCLAUO'wJL N I -CN FL14toN. March 22 1988 Roberta Ta-lor 184'3 Laura Lane Durham, CA 95936 Re: Use Permit, AP 40-25.72 Dear Ms. Taylors The Clerk of the Bard of Supttrvisors set public hearing for MA3 .1988 at 1.1:00 a.m. to consider your appeal of the PlAnni denial of a Use Permit to allow ilg Commission's a private breeding k0nt4�l on propert y zoned A-5 located on .the south side: of Laura. '.Lane feet west of Lott, Road, Durham. , t�tppraximately 7010 The meeting will bo held in the Boar4 of Supervisors' Administration Center, 25 CountDrive, oroville, Cali Room, ornia, y Center County Should you have any e contact the questii�l ons regarding this matter, eae Planning Department at 538;7601 between 10t0D a m, and dds p.m. 'Very truly yours:, Martin J. Nichols Chief Administrative Officer J tJN i lr ��� •'��+ w«. ;fir., `.,n•~�„ f liter F PLANNING COMMISSION i COUNTY CENTER DRIVE oaC►VILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965.3;1y� I°wD14el: oa•7641 March 12 19R8 Roberta Taylor 1843 Laura Lane Durham, CA 55935 Use Permit, Ai' 40-26-72 Dear T1s. Taylor: At the regular meeting of the Butte County planning March l�, 1988, your requect for a continuance of Commission held on the subject Use Permit was rsonsidered and a of odr P tt1i Commission denied public hearing: breeding kennel your request for a Use Permit to Planning _l on property 'mixed ASS 1�cated on allow a private Laura Lane 'tfti1 SOut�h side �a�yPro�cimately 7q0 feet went of :Lott ;:toad -- of Should t Durham. You de�;zrs< to appeal with the a this decision you mu;t do PPeal fee of sr�, in Yvrtiilg, SuPervisors, 25 Count X75.00 to the Clerk of 1;1te Board of Y Center Drive; O�e'��1e the expiration of the 8:;,:da a ' Caltt-ornia, prior to 'ridaY, March 18, 1938 al period which is3 at 5:00 p.m., Y PPe Should you have any questions regarding this matter, this office betWadn 10; oo a_ijni And 3-00 Pleaet contact- P..m. Sincerely, A. rchee Director 0, Planning BA ., I r i r - Jf..k� li . w.. el LAW OiiMMS OV WMLY,AM T. MURp IY WILLIAM T. MURPHY 55 -MITCHELL BLVD„ SUITES 8 & 9 OF COUNSEL SAN RAFAEL, CALIFORNIA 94903 RICHARD C. GOULD (415) 40.1625 March 3, 1988 Re: Application of Roberta Taylor for pr,yate kennel To Whom itmay Concern: tnClosed herewith is a photocopy of the setter, dated Rarch 1, 1988, fvon The tl�erthwest above-rs erencedfor matthe Ler l Pre' ent"on of Cruelty t6 Animals con- cerning ust admit, I am at a loss to understand the purpose of yet another public meeting. 1 eannot help but thinit that this demonstrates discrimination on behalf of the CountV of BuLta against MrsA Taylor and herxwul enterprise, Sincerely, ..,�All, William T. Murphy W`M:pap enclosure �o Cn K y�4 e 51 „r y`-0 111 ai ,n Y�r t SRC Kay Peltier fa7ecar� hof!'ileY` �ecrefa 1012 Franklin Lig. pIM G1ub. Billings, MT_ 59101 Auf fo CO- tlanntng February 25, '19J�i_ Ci. A. Kircher F4A. 9 1t Planning Commission �Caii�e 7 County Drive Oroville, CA. 95965=3397 Dear 5.A. Kircher, 'Received ' letter abbot Ms.` Roberta. TaYfor and your attached letter from Catherine Thompson Catherine Thompson, is indeed past President of the Ameri carr Rdttweil er Club, and is one tf our valued Directors, on our board at present: You can indeed depend upon Catherine Thompson's letter and her comments on Roberta Taylor! 1: myself,.. although having no first-hand knowledge of Ms: Roberta Taylor's kennels, ,lave received complaints on her misrepresentation and filthy condition of her, dogs. It 'is a matter of record, anu please feel free to contact or. Corley of the Urthepedic Foundation for anima►s,that Ms. Taylor has repeated her abuse of one of our good foundations4 in no way will Ms. Taylor be a benefit to your community, if she continues as she has in the past, she in fact will mojt probably be a detriment. It is a pleasure to know that your Planning Commission looks into these ►aatte�'° , Let me assure you that Ms. Taylor is NOT a top breeder in the 11.5i with her, Rottweilersl None of her dogs are listed in Our top ten, and she certainly would never be referred to, for puppy buyers from me Sincerely, Kay Peltier Secretary, A.R.C. , t ■ ,l . GAT%iRI , NE M. 'THOMPSON, Pry %'etat cA R 'Bulla 00. Ptarei "'I C X4mencall,FEB Ot�'Ne1',1�e1'�' 18,1988 Club , Clong. February 12, 198£3 Butte County Planning Commission 7 County Center Drive Oroville$ CA' 959.66 Dear Ms. Tuttle, RE; Application for a Use Permit for a kennels at 1843 Lara Lane, Durham, CA, by Roberta Taylor. While serving as president of the American t I received numerous letters of complaint On 1'1dvisWeTay7or`ub1 how3havo a rather extensive file of complaints-�-mo,t �i hVol ve ►ni s rel�resentat on V and a few concern alledged switehin Itching of dogs,r in he saidMrs.tion `Ta lonc�ouldCnol�o of the Orthepedic Foundatioh for Animals at least 3 cases of switched dogse(oneedog servicestheir eias there were certi- ficate 9 g x-rayed and that cerci- gi given a second) and more being suspected. In 'my one meeting with Mrs, Taylor, with her unaware of my knowledge of RottweMe ilers, she totally misrepresented her dogs to me She ;:,could not allothanwOnceinto sayingritewasls �Hor8e differentb'ab: si a -i br6ught out the same dogs more, and awards not received, g Winrieti8ll, She also claimE:d titles Since Mrs. Taylorshat a long standing reputation of`questiona I do hot believe it it in the 'best interests of the B ble ethics Commission to a t _ ut'i0 COUnty' Planhing pptove her a;�plicatron: Sl.ncerely. acherine iri �homp oh Past PresidentMember ember of the Board of Directors' Ottweiler` C%b 90 13 BOX 384 6 VEI LOW13RO( DCS Ii;b: kir a OL,C►, NA 0,1028 x. s, ,mow,, ....► - N 1 1`, r) N, 00 W rN N +~7 too O Q W 1. All animal was to be confined to. an underground ' > ��0 P4 � septic tank and wastewater absorption field installed under Permit and inspection 'frim LAe'`�' X X Health Department. Z. Shielding or construction to be developed to keep noise levels;to a minimum and not to exceed 60 dB property,:line pursuant to the Noise Element of the General Plan. 3a. Kennel facility to be entirely enclosed with ventilation, or X 3b. Plant; a fast-growing screen of trees cottonwoodstc ,, eucalyptus, e. (Poplars, at 6-f000ttintervals rvals around the structure prior building permit, to issuance of final X X 4. This permit is expressly limited to training of: dogs in Programs lasting a mini;num of 3 months and boarding Of those same dogs in a private kennel, on site. Any expansion a change of use will :require X X modification of the Usd Permit put8tivnt to Butte County Cade Sect4on 24-48.4, 5. No firearms; 'Will be used on site for dog b training4 � , 6, Dogs exercised on site out of kennel 6ompounds X Only under the direct control of ttain-ers. 7. Applicant to ca?n1 r Y With all other applicable State and local. s.tat'utes, ordinances and regulations. X X k 81 Verify that the existing septic system and well ate y with two adequate to serve the kennel facilit travel trailers. X 9• Obtain encroachment permit from the Department of Public Works and upgrade the existing drivewa nec'esAM to meet their requirements; y' as X 10 ComPly With any requirements of the Building Division of Public Works. 11; lrirearms will be used an site for dog training only during daylight hours;, 12, ptbvi:de the Society for the Prevent. X ^ pp y .ion of Cruelty r p g� pct the facility to Animals the o ortunit to i,ns e p lar to o enin � � 4 f epi ry 0000 w O 41 1 13, , Provide the Society for the pPH to Animals revert on ,of 0ruelt4+ t .4 F° record of current rabies vaccinations every year for the owner's personal clogs. X No development shall be t floodplain, aPProXimatele permitted waw h the ':ZOn Of ;AP 28-�03-27. y ; ocated on bhe north hall: X 15: No more than,25 dogs oy g ier /six :months of 'aS�±.t shall be kept on site at any one 'tulle 16 : Tra3:ning of ciags out o f;' doors rs of 67: shall .be limited, tb 00 a.mti to 7:00 the hou P.m, 17, Noi86 generated b dB at ;y the kezlneI shrill not exceed 65 Property lane. s 1f;-Install andX maintain a 6~10ot :fence around the Proposed kennel. slats. or Wood. Fence shall be chain link 'With ?C 19, Dogs to be enclosed in 6-foot"high chaw �, rR P . wnk runs,, H vrszgn a%; +: times; on a leash, or under close su er Betweebe n the hours of 7' 00 P.m. and 6,:00 a, 4, dOg:t shallbe to their 'indoor The concrete brunsr' o the house, • e uct is the only str :dor the lt�+nnel facil,l,tyure approved, X ;, et tsar Thep revzotsan 'O,¢ ruolty To � nimais t ..� N arthwest S act v ORQV1r L1FOPNlp 95965 id (916)533»7686 r 2868 S. 5th AVE. .► � Serung Northern Caii forma w March 1, 198$ Ms. Roberta Taylor 1843 La,tra Lane Ourham,C�, 9508 Dear Ms Taylor: It has been decided that in aider to male a fair ded,01gn regarding Your., err to th!. ubl i C, should be''hel d al ,)W! ng equest for a kennel license, a meopen p �p r bath You and the people in this area to eXpress your' thoughts gas tdha',, if any - will change the neighborhood if a kennel is allowed to be built ant' open- . 1� thing in the Gr�'nge aced, This meeting shall be held Monday, March 7, 1888 a"�. 7P -m, Hall in Dunham, California.'This Hall is located on the Dayton-purham HwY-`in Durham accross from the Post Office, Please plan to attend and bring any pictures of the proposed kennel you may have and wish this panel to view. y ,ng The findings of this Committee shall be given the Butte Count Planning Commission at their March loth meeting Sincerely .c, �- Executive 'Directtir & `Chief• c.n ' CO CO pr rtentidtl Not lestrudti6n, r r - 1Ir�'t' MINASIAN, MINASIAN, MINASIAN, SPFIUANCE, BAKER, DAVID Hr MINA3rAN, INc ATTORNEYS MEITH & SOARES to pARTNERSH( GAUL R, MINA3IAN, INC. AT LAW P COMPOSED OF PRO AT CORPORA'ClbNsl .JOHN CARLETCiI.I GRA Y 1 WILLIAM H. SPRUANCE, INC, 1681 LAIRD SrSREE �YIL[-IAM H, nABr4R 111, INC TAT OAK STREET �Y$.1�� JlCIrPnZy A, Mt_ITH p. O BO, 1679 CARLETON 13pAY, Ibp8PAUL JACKSON 11044 Nil ANTHONY 30AR,8:3 OROVILLE, CALIpMlN3ORNIASS965.1679'. A 1AN+.(03;l.1_001 TtI.CPHONE,(016) 533-2889, ISI tI°AlY1. VI OF-XTON TCLECopIER (3t6)533.01§7 Cp;' ��Rtiip�y AfAR 3 i9$� March 2, 1988 0nnVille Butte Count nterPlanning i Count Commission County cen.. Drive. Orcville, CA 9.596 o Re: Log 87-12-01-03 AP No: 40-�6-12 Application for Use: Pexnit Ladies and Gentlemen Since it ap,j8!ars that the time to limited, and since we believe that there ar respect to i„ make ora a. prosentations$ his matter which must be considered b n issues with Commission Which were not addressed in e certain to emphesize the defects which have obc y the Plan>ng review of tris the first hearing, we wish Process to date: urred in the environmental 1. rnadeauate observation of facilities on ThO-re is no s yo: point in further debating Whether "was an onsite inspection undersigned Onl reported Prior to preparation of the or not there i P rted in earlio, carresponf e report. The advised, and T stand by that statement as et acdend of what J was told by the staff e renditi was r what he on onsite told then the inCansist+P_nciesming ar hearing, that are +� ted at, e' present throughout the enVironmenta areportOral certainly ind ca,t-, even if there was an onsite m it was cursory at best. I reiterate the reports findings of a fence around' the kennel, t sPectionr that further construction and the failure to he lack of need doors, or soundproofincg in the kennel - need for conclusion that the sail is Visa mote the lack of windows, ♦ and the erroneous loam. 2. Failure to set forth .a with clarx �r 11 they can be reviewed b ro riate mit atian measures the ub_ lic; Precedent an CEQA is replete With.repeated the re ulatar g E documentationyigencies that to the extent admonitions to Prepared formal enviranmenta environmental doculalent,t,r hand a negative declaraten is formas:. ). members of the .jitiblic interested in y Page -2- Butte county Planning commission March 2, 1988 this proposed project must have the proposed mitigation mdAsures, Opportunity to reviet� those: Mesa V. 32d District of Acxricultrur loncerned Cit i envy, lens of costa ronmental documentation ig� t efare,gs) 42 �al3d 929). The A. No mitigation measures ' The as follows: the public in addressing the installations of,�orth for review by control measures within the barn -and outside the barn. noise arn. B. No mitigation measures are set insuring absolutpl}, forth related to prior experien haVeta history ofimals ben` whic,i apparently from contained, at all times g vicious, Will be of the kenneled animals with thhI etelgh manth o he 3 parr�el. A comparison was paraded at the hearing is a classic n Old house pet that comparison, aPples' and oranges,, C4- No mitigation measures are set forth With clarity which would address the disposal of animal Y. Mr. Murphy made light of the need for such h an Waste mal waste, While generated by up to 25 adult. animals Weighing system, the human, livingin a g ' oonfined area is no t as mucsh as a fact that the Proponent will construct aosepticatank.,in accordance Witrule$ of the Health De � Again, the I does not set Portia an ,z:rtment is a addressed b y facts or ci7 conclusion the ' the public concerned about', tthis Methodology. can Since groundwater in this area can rise to within a few feetsonce surface in the wine trate discussion of the system`s f the would have been a p e. impact The commission should be advised that the Health has no regulation which would r nor has c plan been submitted t:or,Any p review give any guidance. We would add that we are extremely concerned that the ].ovation of the is an area. which is not Proposed septic tank sc3.1s, as well as �ietable due to the With the p large pieces of concrete presence og clay proper operations of such a septic system. �- interfere mast be assured that whatever system anstal5.ed _ y ,.tem is y wh�.ch wilMox'eo'ver, we in a timely manner, and that it Will will be and retention of all animal waste generated at the twill insure chment cat' kennel 4. The Sound Standara-is made `nate: A reading oe d5 decimals - type t: mars -as noted J i 'without, clarification as to the dju of instrumentation, and how it will be calibrated and adjusted, is grossly inadequate. By way of analogy comparable to stating that something still be adjusted b , it is y the _ iw Page -3 _ Butte County MPlanning Commission arch`2, 1988. 11 11 , , CPT without any specification as to which when it Will be measured and from What h CPX Will be used, a method is also inconsistent with th�+:,.tate a rygeograph3cregion. Such Services Model Noise Ordinance which Butte Count Pye.1 nt of Heal'cl Y, certainly refutes the adehile not yet adopted, by standard. quacy of the proposed 5• No _baseline environmental data has .been concernn ambient sound level bow of barn ard; set north as do s which the re ort a ,. mals as .t� y rea : arentl -assumes .�.. },r tiff is ,!cent in thea �--_. assu � ,,.. yAgain, absolute levels of. consideration of what the amb3entnjevel isatthIi inadequate.w3thmeans No consideration is boundary line level of annoyance Of�66 beyd6ciond establishing a can be taken to reduce even that level of sound, decibels b t of what steps. y any measure and. 8ikt3. y_£ve ignores this with the boldxconclusionithat the v ,et the report tolerance to such sounds in here is a neighbors be subject to 65 decibel adogbarkng When greater have no such noise at this reas.Why shoult the decibel S point? HOW aan the n in fact they presence of 6 g arks o the boundary be considered no Impact, if no such noise exists nosy? The report correct! y finds that noise Will be a significant impac -. This is an env rf finds t Which must clearly be miti�"�xted, but then the l impact dropped" because the .report takes no s proverbial �I,ball is mitigation. Clear) tees to effect that inconsistent with the Cos- �auMesancasenCite' oabovand state that llbare conclusion and assumpt3ons91 are not II are acceptable environmental review t which tells us -view Costate at 935patable with, G• No consideration has been Iven to the fitness o_ articular a licant for the rd osed.,use. Applicant's a criteria in thus fitness must be when, as here, the operator 3s in to the e - circumstance acceptable operation of the kennel, nviron ohtally commission must be directed to assuring Your discretion as a g a use which is compatible with the health and taelfare of the co ability to Properly care �for and confinenla large animals applicantos integral to that conclusion,els is fleast itness of the operator ,is critical eto� very > review of the negative declaration is appropriate. prior r. Whether or not a county, on pro art fitness is p y, owned. by the Applicant reports from ulenn a major issue in this matter, indicate that r and at simply begs the j) �} • . e Page -4_- Butte County planning Commission March 2, 1988 issue to defer to Other authorities agency, when n your agency is the lead r 7* Applicants misstated the facts of Commissa on. the use to the Both Mr. Murphy and Mr. Downing made reference,,tO Occupancy, of the site by 80 head of cattle.' apparentl 'that statement was, y, intended to lead the Commits. to con 'id pt'oposed fennel would:- mare .a. 9 �.,v x de that ,:t? pxO r��* , .•, N k. ' -goal �sr. � na,.Ax,, . �. _' , r � e partiel oc *; 1 he area of t 'uui:}�.�,� i�3ngs, T,ha ma.muzi usab2eMliastura a 1sd by a use and several 4 1/2 acres 1 g proba There have not been 80 cattle perin$ntantly�] located ess than an t;�c parcel in recent hist o OPPOtition. to the use '• ` Nir. WaolcOrr who testified h which the subject permit, .formerly owned the whole 7 parcQl is a part6 It was at that tile, parcel of combined 23± acre pai,cel and could have; in prior tinel , accommodated a large herd, While Mr. on the Down,in has battle parcel, it is indeed a misstatement to the Commission to allege that 80 cattle were ever regularl On occasions, it would a y present on this parcel. Appear that Mr. Downing would bring many animals in, but only for �:emporar sale or shipment on a ro�.i:• , y periods prior to, appareht►y► p aaneasis, the permanently located cattle site did nog. eveJ;� ,pr�•na,:,n aU c� not so infer. ,nd this commission should Finally, we believe i*0, kltkanimous opposition of t neighborhood to the ,se prssents not onl he full EIR is re �� s, :� required par'- s•� - buff y a case where... for denial of the application as beisgnforaa use whichOverwhelmiis'full inconsistent with the existing uses. Y CONCLUSION Ido .not think anyone one oh this that, a a Comm, state kennel does not have �.ssion can a clear annoyance factor within st to establit,hed neighbbrhood. The report concedes that o nt relianceldss, to upon theapplicant authorize -,a negative declaratiOY `' pplicant s oral and/or informal plant to appease the concerns, is highly ina ro nate; based pp p The report is quite simply, on three unfounded assumptions. fine less he ekisting facilities are ade y are that t 10Sens tive00 to annoyance such As dog barking, a1 areas are t r and that clog barking noise of 65 decibels or less at my clients9 . is of no impact. All these statements are unsup>�,rted property line r , .[u .. y I facilities factuallyinaccurate► Th 'that are Uhf The oun ed and �.n the case of tine adequacy of the three dogs are on Page -5- IlUtte County Planning COmm s8ion March 2, 1988 site nOV Produce' significa I nt annoyance, and they are,, kePt or sheltered i� any, WaY, which would Ili hot being, tigate that, sound.. Therefor6i for all the foregoing reason the ehVironmental documentation is i st wo bolieve that' OnVitonMentaj . inadequate IMP4Ct report is re , and that a ful qUired.for thi further bej�'eve that the envi O&OjOcts We. roomental doCUmenta Clearly inconsistent and,not in conformance with t6h to date is, st I a "I nda . rds set forth in. the case of Con he clear legal M-qslla V.-I'2d bistrict p, cerne IF�pgicultu .. .... ... ........ .. ::�al Ass6ciat* :11,;LQb-80f Costa e s'MPIY, been d�,PtiVed Of' an OPPOrtUn ju-b—I —ic .17h � ., ity to Wike il-101ependento reasoned Judgment about the an, F!��Unt Rate� Distrif. ty Proj ect'. (S�ael S anti a-cro V. OL -Q -Kin qe 3d.j 830, 841.), ap� - RespoctfUlly submitt,d, MINASIAu, M . IgASIANO jq3:RAS:rAU SPRUANCE, M, SOkRE'S B 'A. EX. 7 ffu tic t, 0 Unir LAND OF NATU�____ ��y RAL WCAL-r1i AND BEAUTY PLANNING COMMISSION 7 COUN Y CENTER DRIVE � C)ROVILLE, CAUFORNIA 03965,3497 February 19,, 1988 PHOHU� $30-7661 Ms, Kay Peltier 3-012. Franklin Lane Billing8, MT 59101 Dear Ms.,pejt, I ex,: According to the Arneridan Xennel cil,lb, you are the I National Secretary - of -the ROttwOiler ub -Ing some information aboUt ,arn interested in secur Cj_ members of the c lub) and speaking with a club official. ms,. I . I Roberta Taylor has file APPlication W: 3. d a Use Permit ith Butte Countyt California, to 611OW "i 25 dog private breeding kennel. , The dogs Will be rottwOilers. She has reVt adcOinPlished natio Osehted,110rtelf a.�-, an in the nal breeder, the second, 'Lop brooder A8 the Planner assigned to the f PeOP:Le have been in lle, a ntunbc-,c of touch With me about her busiboss Practiceg_ Catherine Thonips")n, Past- President and member -Of the ,�Oard Of Directors, of the Arneridan Rottweiler ciub has eXPtessed concetns a U8d Perm4t4 I bout Mrs, Taylor's tocause Of the serious nature of her , i ,important to verify that Catherine Tho letter' it is Past President and raomber of the B., mpson is the the American RO rd of Directors of ttweildr Clubj Her letto for Your revieW, and oonneht. r is attached The Butte I County Planning Commission Will be cons�de the Use permit teque8t Ma ring any inforroat, rch 113. 1988. Wo Would lot' you Might have �oj�,, i .-ciate derning the quality of MtS. Taylorlt optratibnt and whether any legitimate complaints have been filed against her. Thank you for Your assistance in this rnatt-er, Sincerely, A. XjPCH8R0 planning Director Laura M.eT-uttie Assoo.i,atc Planner LMT: rof attch. /oz: Y v t&—L:-J)A Are., Cl. 0-9,.; q, 7C E 00 4'� " njno� C. For si A% 13 'PLO 4d.MAC VOtOr bowning s I?to,p "I'rO9 �AC O��nerS havd. signed thep*etit:�,h, aqajtjs� 'R -I obOkta 'Taylbr to date., F -0 r op e wners w�obe lare pelld si�hatukesi 7, - �v �4" cu do o q0g X C. .11, Butte county Planning commission V County Center Drive OrOVillej CA 95965 FebxmAry 16, 1908, Dear Sirsi I am writ Ling in regards to the application, for 1843 t4tlkA Lane Durham, Cal- special Usd n If6tniaj the permit would five dog breeding k ennel aacbmpahidd Vith OUtdook trainb4ntij "tin .,for a twdnty_4 am wkitinq to expr6ss my quh. traini 0 to the use po be incompatible with the are PPOsition emit, I think it Would irrepairable financial loss, a and Would Cause MY neighbors and myself 'Of life. emotional and mental, stress "cl, loss of qqaljt�, 1 bought my Property so that I obuld ra. sdttingiand be able ise my family i t r, a to have rootj for an otohard and horse rural 4tteadtion of the LaUrd Lane a th -rda Was its quiet 16 main environment. Presently there ate many quail and Peaceful m�ting and very safe and secure arda, and rabbits around 4%nd it 'The fdjj6wj hg ate MY major concerns and reasons r -be 0 Noise. T,he noise from twent I Y-fivd Or more djog's is unlike an from I v6stock now in the area and far 9tdAter" Ogg y noise at night, When their sounds D - typically bark ig travel a great di0ance becu. h h Pitch barks and howls4 Wi Or One bark W,, th a large numb( 6 of their bat4t to be ut,"I get off the entire dr Ir of dogs a noise bd at th OUP- ThO Propoted concrete shutters which e kennel hat a metal roof I would hot itsuliate noise, and metal Window Would have to be Outside Most of the t kukth6rmoteo ozo dogs t . he heat. There it now one - ime in �-air weath&t wire mesh run on file dud to the f1ribg of- blanks Zoe gun tea of the batn. Lit I$ Oce any noise &LIki-ently ihihg Would be VeeY disturbing and .n the akda4 Shell., the Potentia -I ismelj the sanitation tom twdnty-five Or Tdord d64!� is runt and any 6upk6blem Would :hot only be in th,,3 c6hdldl�kablo And Water Atdat where training was ta kennel, but in the outside requirements to dis- king place,, The labor only fdAbibl Pose Of dog -Wa j� 6 'WaY' to di8POse of �,�he, Wa w Uld be ret:e areas would be to wash le Ste in �hd conc very IrdM-, the t: into the Sept 4 1 E Pluturd rdsiddhdG6. lie to 3c em- Since a S6utjjWe.tt Winds W-� - the n6kth of 'the prOpjjgd y Of, dkistihq and 4� ould carry t 4 kennel. thi� spkinj and bUmmc sn Whd -, _to WhL bm6'11 -toWatd these hloindsi PreValling itiftWs and doors ate typi , The smell in Vch Would be 4G A 0 Planning co=i8sion Page Two Safety.. The Proposed kennel could have up to twenty-five adult Rottw6ile.rs and no limit on dogs under six months old., The perimeter fence around the kennel property is not adequate 'to contain dogs if they escape the fenced kennel Area Or When they Are OUt.training, or running loose. Rottwe,lers are extremely strong Protect 1 iVe anirnalsi, I have two children ages two And nine. They Would have to Walk,past the kennel school bus or 90 to the p property to CaItch the property which it just a atk4 They would also be playihg on our cross from the kennel property, The mail boxes for several houses are alto on the West end Of Laura Lane next to the ptoposed :kennel property., I wi family and myself a great deal of st This Would cause my ife, ress, fear and anxiety, We would never feel comfortable When bu"r children Wetk! outside playing or walking in the area. Road: Laura Lane it very narr0wi I believe a.kehnel with tW6hty"fiVe or 'More dogs would generate considerably more ttA'Alfic than a single r-amilyresidencei. Employees w , ould 'be needed to m4ibtaih this number of dogs in addition to customers, training ttips, supply and veterinar* iah Vinanc4 ,3 -al l0tst One Of the !?H -Mary %aluOt of this aredis the quiet quality of life. A kennel next to Prdsent valu6� the value 6 6Y PkoPerty Would lesbdn Jes part of my teh-acre, proper f a future home and the ability to sell by if i�- Was ever split. Water quality and sanitabion: The soil type in the area PtOVidOs Mode to severe limitations on septic systems. This coupled with the he,, rate water requirements for disposing Of animal waste could ca VY contbutinA use tiOn Of well Water or sani-Lat, 'on Problems. �'111 Closing don't believe thd Proposed kennel it dOmP'Atibld with the pkd8 A"A dnd w6uld caU86* a sdver ent e finahcial-and emotional hard8hip andIdssen the quality of life in this Area, A kennel Would be a constant sour a n I, Cd Of conflict lonarea residents, many of Whom Are t q4timO kdtidentt. 6tiredAnd -have been Sindereiy, �4illiam Loki Otthel 11 A, -PETITION We, the Undersigned landowne rs,, In the Vicinity Of A.P. 40-26-72, herewith express out OPPOsition'to the, � grant of a qse Permit in the proceedings known as log No. 81_1 I OPPOsed to the grant Of a use pe We are rmit because jt�wj 12 substantially change the character Of the nel ighbothood., it, 'Will introduce annoyance and Unreasonable levels of no, ise ollut, P Ion an.d'impo8e Potential 8afety hazardsj and i t Will, in out opib r0dude our property Value ion, and deptoss Out property'values. Respectfolly zUbt4. itted, r A Nat I e (Print) A 4) Y zr, Hame (Print) Address Address le *,�_ ASignatur ..... ..... 11111 ure a me 4(in� me int) — / 9 5 4 a LL re-) hw N am e PA. A d -d -re—,,, -s Addrest S gn" u, gnature Name (prih. t Address r e ss Sighat re Sb12�' S 9 re 19 2�r �e PET'ITION wof the Undersi 19ntd lAbdblMerso in tile 40-26.-72f herewith e' MPres8 oUr opposition to pemit in the Ptodeddih(Js kliOWh as ;10 'grant of I OPPostd to the grant of a Ube perra' It because it will s I Ubstantially change the character 0:� the neigli 'bb 'ho bd intrOdUoe annoyandO'and Unreasonable. r Will and levels of polljjtion� i�MpQse Potential s&-fetY hazards, and it t in but o tbduca bUr probertv Val" - r q"d QePrGss dut,prop 'Y values Ott Pespectfully. 8Ubjnjttea 4w-', A Name (Print) alnG Print) Z'j Ze-17�e, Address z- "i �IOF et 6 Lqm,m Lqvw- Address Print Ina+ v Add A�L L t M& S 15 ?RaRZ u �re Sign Name Print) JV 11415-lrj-�4J A PETITIO14 We, the undersigned landowners, in the vi0i n i +-'Y of A�,P. No. 40-16-72i herewith ekprdss our Opposition to the grantok a use permit i n the proceedings known as log No. 37-12-01-0,3. We are Opposed to the grant of a Use permit because,it Will C"' substantially change the character of the no-ighbothboa, it will introduce annoyance and unreasbnablo. levels Ot po =L�e' : llution, and impose potential safety hazarft, and it,wi'l jt�� in our Opinion, reduce our pro PdrtY Value, and depress Out property values. RespdCtfully submitted, ame Pri Aaaress Lttzg a ad Addr ss 00 r S, g n �a, te Signa,ure At t Ni!,,� ie (Ptin Ny�� Name (Prin 40± —Ci Addre,r�41,, Signature signaFu—re so (t -0 -V -UA -6 -6 ft Name (PrinTt-))L,--' �Ul( SO IV 'Name Address Addtdss �Sgn`atur�e��� ri aturo Robert Taylor, is the Wishing Kennel License in the D Our office received a d 'Utham 'area. if this People In our of fice saw nothi Uagtam of I on Lott R 0 '1 ng wrong with the inte Oaq,,tha However, there is much more, involv n6ional buildin abuIlding. yo ?d ift-6perating a kennel tha 9 U Must- consider the size of 6 noise it, will bring into the area. the busitless,and n JUS — 'amount of a, large commercial. business is being maintainedt then it 'fill bring more trzi,efi 100ked inside a sound proof building at; night c-1f.dOgs at Prob,'Iem. Other dogs bark I at nig ther(i Vill be a n e not aroused group ht and if so, the:racket fro Oise Of dog',c!, can 'be 'devastating, Stray cabs mov,ngm an the area can cause I the same, commotion. around These are some of the regular things that need to be Ire the ways 'the kennel and ground will b - looked ab, as .All this is Part of an inspect' e kept; cleahed an a A konnel license is 1011 Performed by d s�njtjzed graiited. OUt Office before HOW OVe r f in tht consider Is PArtictlar case, we would as k, bliab this n, the'"Use permit and vatiahce b oard not U. eing requested for t lb was brought to but attention st y hirtY days, other areas hav estetday that o e had' Problems with this fa and we wish more ffiCials in time to investiga mily regarding their clogs te. It seems :better 4-0�,investigate all aspects before granting a kennel license rat' I i 'her. tharV,'hasb grant the 110-ftse' and later have a batl ely it removed. tle Possib -'in court to hav� b I v i e Raymond Cavier, Chi(ef Animal formed me Control officer of Glo,nh County in - Yesterday that Roberta Taylo a kennel license several times. He gavt and her son JIad requested -and infor.mj4d �,hem they would have to e the . 1"In the for�ds to fill go be 11 out fore the Planning board to get a permit. They didn't do bbit, Instead kennel. After: the Planning 13 bheY started building oard 'was informed or this, Glo X"PocbOt8 sbOPPOd the biAid h44 The family still MOV , Onto fth County 0 1 h b rolebproperby without benef' b dd twenty d gs hen Ordered it f a permit Or licdnsei The A Glenn County's first those dogs removed from Olenh County, himai confrontation with this Sohj Betty Kesslet had a family, was 'When the that dalli At vicious Pit bull all that time Mr, a they had to go Kessler showed Jnb Out on permit from that county to keep 'wild animals, ero8b in ob6Aifijftg a Fish and Game was the proper department bt d and V48 told that the fit8b asked how he and his, mothe ontadb' That is Vheft he CaVler slid at la r tOUld get a kennel licOnse-Mr. 3. Sb count he had reported to him they had �5 dogs. Also at 'one tiMO,d4e of their dogs g. A.C40 Chet 8hbdgtas8 as it had abbat Ob lObsb and had to be killed - by daPtUtbd alive4 ked a, ditizenj cou - These People also operated - Id hbb be Atkaft8aS and we would a kennel in Llbbj - and operated cor....,Y.like biffie to 'investigate it it � , 0 Rodkt 'Was Malftb6ihed 1 have furn1shed each. of yOU V,b the ihdidehbs 'which took p! 1 h stat"b"s of Public record act ih, G10hh County, AgAl"no %request a bhlrby day, sibn from bhis Board in further hv08bjgaEt this situation., Order b�' COUNTY OF GLENN A,tli-mal Control Office 720 �o. Colusa St. Villows, Ca ' lif. 95988 534-2147 Rzsl�rnond Cavier Sr., Director August Zb:$' 1987 Barry Kirshner Rt. 2 Bx 352�1� Orl and, Ca . �,9596��-, Mr. Kirshner, In regards to our conver8atioli on August 20, 1987, 1 am informing you by letter tha�t you must appl',f%for your kennel application and perm"It. This situation requires immediate Attehtio6 on 5'�Iour�,part. The reason for 'this is you art already in p(ssesion of a large AU!mberof d6gs (approx. (16) with ActiVitias that require a permit applicatton and licenses at Which time you or the property Wher do not posess,� If you fail to com�, v With Vie County ordinance the result will be the �suance ff a citation to the Glenn County justice Cour,.,arid It -be removal of all the dogs in question. You will have five (5) workinf:, days in which to obtain a Use permit at tha Planning bopartMent, Any questions, please ,.all 866, 41'361-. Thank You� � dl 4 ,yOon�, Gavier SF�?-;— Qlehh-"County Animal Control Officer RC-,ek cc! gill Quint, Buildings & Grounds ban Mao� Pl�nh:ihg bept, bon Holmsj Health Dept, 47! f Pbtifodr and 2 when adq1t :Ttjn N to" V desired .. ................ . jol t r ad to you. 41"1 "'0 -0 t 16 a re ve'm v acom rho r t Plate Itene 3 and 4, Of ""M-31ur or ce a If allure to and 4. SW I n 'a .7 TV do thli will prive OU f dilm to n t�tjh 1, L, ShO* to foraddition I GjI f 'a -�, whom d6ljqMd are 3. Article A quo �tt ddrafted to:,, Col. and *WdI 6ddr�,Ss. 2 4. Arft Numbft Ice. Ll c rtl d Insured coo 15. Sig at At r wall Obtain slg-jI )XC qmnt and DArg D E1:LlVI or JA ACIIAd rquelledand ee �dandf 7- D of J)allv 9, 38m .1936 nnRk - PSTI ("A P -T.11 a 111, t' I PT PS Farm2800, jun.) OB9 W FIW rd ti I Oro 201641ment Y25 fflo,,,(A sirArs sit DIVERSIFIED FARMING "WI"(411 Water Is K1,9" ('9,16) Danny Maot AICP Plarining Director September 11, 1'987 Mr- and Urt. Bob Taylor Rti 2i BOX 2119 Orland, CA 95963 Dear Mr, and Mrs. Taylor; RE: Violation of Glena County Zoning Code Dog Kennel On September 9� 1987, this Department made a Iodated On the field south side of fity Road 117 * east of County Road dapay 37-13-0-007-5, 10 acres), The Purpose of the inS area(TAPN: Cou it inspection of Your property verify whether there is a dog ken PeCtion was to that you do have a dog it nel 10c4ted on your pr ! - OPertY, �te have determined You do hot hav ennel with At least 21 dogs on Your property; And Operate A doa Ct--aitional Use Pdtmit from the Count however, 9 kennel at this location. Y that allows you to construct According to Chapter 19.38 Of the Glenn County Zoning Cbde,j to apply for a Conditional Use Permit for a you drd Patmitted may not construct or operate a dog kennel - Og kennel oil Your property.- You aPPtoved b. th unless the Condi '31a y e . nning Commis tional Use Permit is On Thursday$ September Sion or tile Board of Supervisors, ,for a Conditional tj 10j, 150, Your repteo0entative submitted an applicd st PetmitZ*14­'howevety this application dould tion because the Develbitmelit Plan was not, complete not be accepted i'011owitIg requirements f - The J. orLthe Development pjah� "httrudtift form lists the 6. DevdIo men an Re'uirement8o The Development PIAn shall contain the following infotm&tio a complete evalua tion ma n in order that y be 'Made by shall be drawn to a scale (on sheets the decision-maki-ftg 1 Vt or la bdidsi the Plan -gibly and the Pl-fth shall ifidita t9dr) which 9'i'Ve6 all, informatior, 10 Of 8j" k d'md'nsiOhs, the follOwitig i,nfotmaej6,i te d1datly and with full (a) Property d'mdhsiOfiS and acreage, (b) All, 6!kisting And Pto0sdd buildings and sttUdtures from ptopdtty I including Iodation 'hes) size) -Aild height and proposed use. Pagd One of Two 66� Violation, of (Uenn County Zoning Code DOS Kennel, Continqed-- (C) Walls and fences includij, locatio "g , . ni height and construction materiald (d) Off-stre et parking And IoAd,kng areas including location) number of spaces, dimdnsion,, typ6 of 'surfacing and internal Circulation pattern, (e) Signs, 6 - �v Including location, site, ' material And illumination. (f ) Names Of all adjoining streets. (9) Location and nature of allutilities inc fields, community s 'luding Septic tan.kss leach ewage systems and �potable 'Water sources in, accord- ance with the Health Standards,. Please note that the develoPment Plan,"sh-all be drawn to scale" And on the Property must be shown including, existing structures (note if that everY�hing be temOved5, Proposed structures, and fences�",- I they ard #1 driveways,must be shown As we- Also parkl�hg and lo 0 as utilities such as septic t ading areas Afid 'Well. ank, leachlinet and Youp as the landowner, are resPomsibla to ebtrb-ct r his,,, zoning violation., PIease submit a Conditional Use Permit Application within days from the date rOCeivihg this letter or a shall b of 4 issued. P1668e contact the Planning DdPattment if y 04 have, Any Iu0stiOns regarding t1lis Very truly Dann ao) a i g ctot d.c: J Matift, Board of Sup'exVi8bt8 11 Quint, Building Inspjjctbr /.ay CaVi4t� Animal Control Of ficet Two Of TWO x - W-14 lz SOUth.Murdotk Willows, California 95vaS Building AUI,".- Phone (916) 934-3069 p M. ton DireCior Or (916) 934.597 COU 'y Road 2()d doancl�r,Callfornhj 9606j August 14 Phone (916) 86S�3y4j 1987 Bob G and Robert Taylor 11701 W- I 36th Little Rock, Arkansas 72211 RE.* 037-13-0-007-9 It has ther been broug�t to the attention of this your "- is, a Poten,tial Building And 20n Office t1lat property located �or, irig Viblati Avenue-) Orland. Capay Avenue 'between on on 4th And �th An ifitarrisl SeArth. of our records have been Issued for this Oarc6l, reveals that n 0 permits and a physica made on August 6, 1987 hat deter nspeckjoh is in progress, Minod that a " I new structUtd The Property has been Posted with a resulted in a dall "STOP t4oqysi has been I Your Tennant, Bdrr , order, Witch informed, ti y Kistinet., I nil Kennel 1 . - the PrOJect he 11 s in mind rd idehse, and I Use Permit , a virQ8 a fro the Planning Depa in Addition tO'the Building P8rmit,m V tment 140- ate bringing this Matter as the p , ropdj-ty owner to Your Attentions because you to will be held r6spo uhautho I,ed work redommmtnce' nsj'blo should any Please fee.1 free to dall our df�ice, if YOU h� Q any Sidderely, Will, BU, lam L I QU. n 'Idihg Inspection WLQ/cm dc.' Danily Plahning b.itectot Ray Cavjet� Animal Cdhtr6l Officer Btedjo �Vjn and, Work Home of Amolcon & cbmid)a-h Champlo #Ufut' hd a You"O Ad Mcc4sion'14t) U11i ndb6tib thylot 7 1.11101 W'Uth Sir* le 00ck, Atk� 0 42 Pi Noo Visitors W, September 3, 1987 J Glenn County Board of Supervisors Willows Office 526 W. S.Vc6more Street Willows, CA, 95988' Rat Xaeping kennels in residential area,, MY husband and I retired to this "eal because of the quiet and PO&Oeftl living� about 6 or 7 years agoi it had bean very enjoyable until Imtely when a neighbor began greatly disturb- ilig the Peace and harmony of the neighborhoode Barry Nechner of Rt 2 Bbk 211,9, Capay Aveai Avei between 4th.and h 0 it b6tting up kennels and keeping MSM dogs,. ThO ROtweilera and Pit Bull otdasiOnallY ax -e loose and we don.It feel safe to walk or ride�bikeb down the street anymore.. -this we have with And I have i4titten a letter before. put up� Now the barking has been keeping us awake for weeks. OrI6 morning we were up at 2s5O alto 3$30 am, 4$15 amo Ind 5�100 am# How can a nyoh I a sleep With this irritation going oft donstantly! When we moved here and wanted to 'put a doublewide mobile home on our daughter and bbn-in-l&ws property, letters had to b I a sent to all neighbors to see action. We )' if they approved or disapPrbVed thim sidlingi Ott. lad, at various times, to send photos of ldhJdcaping, DO DOGS NAV9 MORE RfGHTS THAN We the neighbors Would ljke� to see som, 0 action taken on this matter immediately, We Would appreciate any help you can give us oh this 6itUktionj As W6 Innot go on like this* thank youo Hetty Pa satr =Iia Rt 2 Box 21,16 Orland, CA oqo8� do f Ahlmdl Control Officer Planning Dept. i Danny Mat Shdritfls Office LT 44 I .4j to 4-1 11 r"D III r L fit 4-t t, Ill 131 1-, -C 'H TI 4J UJ Ul 11 1 In a 4-1 10 -1 0 13 4-1 01 4J 4.j j aj, +1 IV > 4 -,1 -0 -P Q IV I at u H U C rp 1.4 1 1: 4-J 1: 4- -P 13 4- t�q M > -a ni. L: I 4J 4-J Ul U lit *-4 tt 0 at 41 1)" 4j "I al I rj I to J.* '15 at IJ 1�4 r_- 4,1 -ij > > VIC IIJ Ll 4-1 0) C zi J: Sl 0 4j rI 11) L. u (',L U 4rj Ill U �-4 'o Vo 010 W U .4 w .2 44 lr4 fs I T3 4-1 G # L C'4 1: Ill 4j t 27-774 BURU-:80N, _jpz,�f A- ii t ft t I� Lt I 11 ti'le, tw t'zlrr*.y 11 4j s d t the dog tj�j=�d t. t g,��t :�t 11M, L h 4-1 the?14 she- hizid h, a coirpl,11 aboUt WOL'Id t4 �tl ell !,-Jje?�tJ4 mw;t t , mow ENN COUNTU- ANIMAL CONTk IVITNE5,S S TA7ZWENT b -A 7-E COMPL TNT # STAMWENT OF: ......... �40CATXON - ---------- ACO# .0-r/Apw.M. WAl 1111111� OWR M V Karl PE MWIM WARP, .............. Mw Ro WOURF'®rm Zo rArA Ip ''FIRM Ac ...... ...... A/ J y# neu.,::za—Y4 1 1),-.4 -,/ J, A FeA /' -Za r -' Al e", I t 0 GLENN COUNTY ANIMAL CONTROL 720 North COlUsa, Stre,q Phone (916) 931-2' - W1116%vs, CA 9698a ,141 jjj- (916) 8654301 OIRDER No TO COMPLY Date 9$3 Time Name, - �pm Address Phone tio Animal Narh4 color Breed—_ Animal Sex Breed Cojoe,.' Anim.11 Na Sex 41 Breed colop 0 DOG(S) NO*r LICENsgt) (Art Sex�� Aim 0 DOG V Ser-, 8,04,170) (S) N"T'"6CINATE' D'(Seo 10-1 Health & Safety Code) 0 V'C'OUS b0G.' (Art. IV St1c, 8.04� 1400 D NUISANCr.- Ej NO' 'OME ANIMAL (Art, fy 8,04. 1!50) Ru,N)VISIG AT 0 QuARAN"I'INIE. (Art VI (Art, it U4.075) 804.830) 0 ANIMAL CiWSLTY'(!5q7'PendI Code, Calif.) n LIVIESTOCIC '(Ag. Code t)IL V: ............. . ........ The abo vo hamed 18, Iowhd to be., in of reason(s) checked abo-v following m"' e; Yoil are herebynotilied the Glen'n er., to eonpik w1ountv Code tdr the th this or er 121 ibe VL6 ....... ai, re- to ot Issuati.l. d p, W10h tills order in I e mann wi In nh co rcstIlt in the issuance a ov Gle lit itittite court. e of h cltatlolnL d 'Notice t Appdgtti to License Fee Late FeLi ro arty �rna p ur S Of a ontro c,�oundatfbll �oh LAwl-Ach -07 u"'"A"TT OF MISSOMI�COWMMA Decembor 9, 1986 LM(). 69201 Marilyn 9, Clyde Crookham 212 Ni;,flarding liaskei.1 Bento March 26, jog7 Ar 72 15 bear 11r, & Mrs. Ctookham: On 140vember 24,' 198-6 the ,is being of Ilutu aFA received a ra' reforms Me to diograph Identified Jean Burgess P-0- BOX 393 Jamul, further identified :is having J -R., WF -710436. This previously t6teived'OVA t8giatry number RO-90764 dog,was breed CA 92035 Furthermore, previous documentation on rho hi You had Provided me with purchased it from of this dog since Door Ms. Burgebt! Robert, T6ylorstory you On September 25 1965 the OkA received On' Mar.ch 1�th th 6 OFA received the radiograph identified as being of FutUre.Farms jR So hdY- This February 27, a ra as being putUre'Heto J.H., WF�710456. The diograph identified W66 signed Robbeta, TOY10tt application card 1987 a radiograph Woo t�koh t Judy Veteri approprintely Identified and is nary Clinic. The rad lograph The the three consult". ''radi r6diographs Were examined by dtO&LstA and the dog Was breed registry is The ptd6jem is that on act of diagnostic quality, number Ro- aosished 0 Joint conformationo Nib and was rated an ekddllent hipVA radiograph idehtifibd as belbe' 20, 1986, the OFA recoivdd Ing 6 , number WF�710455. -"'Utut'd Parms Unfortunately, wh subW an evaluating the November 24, l9a6 idiii0iii the The owner of ip Sandy, AKc record waa,Rob the radiograph was ta�en by . ekl , ert4 Tay1dr,,and 1986i Dri L.C. r This eadibgr chmail On Octobe radiologists Rkate d that this tjoOg hot appeAe to be of the Rome dog as Previously 'aph wat,evolo ated by tj it 2j radiolofiStb and was found to b ie OFA consult ng and dxg good hip sUbmift, 1d. 8'hdb YOU have le-jbf joint gned the OFA number x0- 666, ddnfOtmdkion stated that the dog in jueskjon was in Your ,gOdscssiOh at the time the first radiograph woo taken 09 is now 'registered The radiograph is of a differenhat You submitted from Ju t dog. dy Veterinary Clinic and the to You rather than Roberta Tdylorj t m YbUr possession is ,,, Since you dertifiod �,hat t, � 004 In_ RobeLrtik re Forms A Sandy left W'tli 'no Option but to 11evoke R070616 otter# Elie affiliated bree ') ��y a ddPY Tayloj. your $ prob em 1.h with b In th hwhile, I a6 revoki Of this letter' notifying h8 RO 11666 And of this notified. This .�,cbPy a action. the dUillAtod bre' djubo of matter' it how between you slid h6berta Taylor, Sincerely, You a hd l4o, Taylor 8 libuld check Your records lot 6dcUeAcy this Submission. The On OFA should be fidtified of the results no soon 68 Possible so that the records don be. clarifibd� Sinc6fely, E,A. Corley, Aft PrOJObt Diruttbe' ItAC/cod 9,Ai Project Dir , octoj- cd., Roberts Tayjb�t 11701 West s6th EAC/cag Little ROdki AR �22jj J dd! Affiliated Breed Club ReptegbntlitiVeb 'L,Co Pritdhmah� D, HcHhtjoy, ti.V,H, 6i �11 Aghdr D.Vtj, Roberts Taylor Little Roc'kj jkft 12-204 Judy VetoelhAry Clinit flitlCrObt Animal hospital 2900 Rdviindugh little Abbk, At 122t)� OOA h6ttWejjbt Clubs Ap 9199 Lott Rd. Durham# CA 989se February 10, 1�988 Butte County Planning commis8loh Public Hearing Butte County Board of Supery County AdmInIstrat'lon C I enter 180ts" Room 25 County Center Oroville, CA 95968 Pentlemen: This letter Is to address concerns regarding �)Lt% a Use -Permit to Roberta Taylor, le43 L granting or AP 446-2.6-72, aura Lal,.,,, Durham CA, I Our full time Jobs w,111 not atten�cf the�.Publlc meetIng In person. 'us to Even though Our Property does not� Immediately 4djoln Ms. Taylor, the barking that of of dogs currently on hor prem,lees Is alreadit, an annoyance. The POssIb16 addition of 2 could only magnify this problem, 0 more dogs Your commission states,J it -18 Interesting that n patagraph'sa Discussion of 'on page 6 Of the Envlronrfienta�l Evaluation.- 11 cu The,Pelmary impact of the kennel Would be n6ls6 Agri ItLI r4l areas are not considered as sensitive to 40i re8ld6ntlal nolghb n sd as are subUrb.An othoods." Barking dogs are as Objectionable In agricultural areas as they ave"St residential areas. � : suburban rural setti,Ig 1 One Of the major attracblo In s the Peace and quiet. ms of the neighbors of Ma, Taylor live on sm6l Since M08b Of the big tahchori--i, Rather they are a I, Parcels� theV are hot escaped to the r I ' group of Peopla�Who tTaVe tu a setting seeking peac have enjoyed such a settin - 6 and qUidt. We 0 9 fOr more than ten Years�o and It is not fair to rob Many, f their sought after' tranquility ,-*Or the gratlfttatlOn of one, Your commission addresses the nolse dOnceth �41th the PrOPertV line noise liml tYI36. ate ver� ml t Of 65 dB. sleading. Nolse mete MeaSUrements of thl noise level t's measure an aver s Occurring over a Pet -loci of tl. age a dog is hot holsOiat a constant le Me* The barking of!, an englhe.i V01, like the droning of by a short pIt 18 a short burst of 6rlbd of all encO, Al Very IbUd noise f011bWed to be withi- thou h I t may atVetage but n the accept-able'65 d�D I- g time neighbors areSu6Jedted tr, u "Mlt' for a lot Of the nacceptable noise levels, it It these that create theannoltance4 Several Of Ns. Taitlorls A61ghbots have shd6p, �anlmals ate especlall:y vulnerable to dog aLttatk Thep6 sma I I Strait dogs are the maifr source of such attacks. their first, dog attack on Our sheep exPerl.6006d, mauled and c .e Week ago. A healthy ewe onsequently d1ed. lamb'w�as reality, though not Sheep attack by dogs lea, the lack of, now a major Problem In,out, area due to resldent�stray POPUlatlon. Ms. TaylOt's k0fin6j with females Qomlng'�ln season strays In Would attract and hold More .Our area.:,,, The Possibility 0 sheep losses is ObvI f Increased lamb and Population c Ouso An Increase In the Str also Impact th r I ay dog e larger animals and 'Orses, common to our area. Hke cows USU11:111Y killed by dog attack, These AnImal$are not wok, but Increased Injury Aid not be surpri,sing. I t is 'Incident$ hot fair to ask many to sacrifice their livestock for th e gratIfIcation Of one. In Paragraph 12 on page 6 0 1 . EnvI Of Your comml tohmthtal Evaluation you state., 1, ssiOn's Discussion 'of house Is approximately 37 the nearest 0, �eet to the'.-so'U.hwest and northeast. The residents of t' t adve �t hese,hibuses ShOUld not be alt.fected by h -P operation of th barking Off, The �25,'�dogs pl, 'is 0 kenn 'knd th 01n,undetermined n c of I tzaYs alone vi .6 atti,a t:j, Umber of pUPpje(3 tie I ghbors I n �-t�qr adverS,7i'/Y af f ec,t areaf even those cons all n the 87o feet you IderablY'�tnore distant mention. . Or-bundwater is a most valuable resource, esPeal I ally In an area A Ike ours where everyone d0ends on, a COnt4'hInatIbn oll this resource Well Water. Ond I e COMMIS -910h adm.j�'s that occurs,, it Is ,too late. Your tile �2'kktrh contamination IsPOSSIble proposed kt�nne I . The 4 With Install 0 ation of a septl olution YOU PrOP Se 18 the Wrong and aH 0 system, Provided nothing goes 46 acceptable Waste 18 Out into the Sept sblutlon,�, 'ri, 10 SY,�Item, this IS And/or waste Is not Owever' It ANYTHI'q(",dO05 go wrong, Supplies c6old be, endAh Ctly disposed oj-, a)!! Of our -water Is only certaln With a Oared* Protection of'our geduhdwat6r Cohs6ijuoht stringent Ij 'denial of the Use Permit and Popula'tloni mit On MS, Tay)Qrs canine Ms- Ta YlOr's prior recotd as akennel owner IS hot the hete� gowevet, it Is the Only M&ans we have to le"I Of E'eij:ponsibility and sehsltlV Judge her Previous kennel Under her ownership ItY to her neighbors. A Provides &Vldence that 8 -he does not In Glenn county. meeting responsible I have a good record of those gUld011ne'tt Or showing consideration for Who I IV of the time e nearby, The fakN.t that she and hot be f�� tr,70, Will travel most _ PrOtfilse8 of this pr Posed kennel combined W1 th t"'I toddrld of fal I Ur6 to meo guidelines only �e Of Us Who do IlVehee6 that U':O�'v 6t the approval of the tyj t"'t � I I - Would be a grave nd for the kennel on, Laura Lane to risk Our trahqU1)I%o,1,'' It Is not fair to ask all of us etc�' for the benefft� VOttuznk security, water purltyj PrebatibUs, whose dod,jc4t Ion to the atev ion Butte County planning COmm'8si #7 County Center D3::Lve oroviller CA 95965 reb3�uarY 10, t 1988 bear Sits% Special Use PQtm't at ards to, the application. for oulcl be for a twenty - :L am..,rriting in reg .,CaLjfo'rnIa- The Permit W training. e buth'ami outdoor training and gun 1843'La=4 Lan ni,6d With, five dog bre6dihq kennel a6comPa cmit. I t'hihk it would my opposition to the use 1, Pe: myself to ej�presl. my neighbors arid I am vkit d would caus of quality be incompatible With the area an jonal. and mental sttess and 1000 ittepairable financial 16SS�r mot of life. e my, f ami I IY I in a tranqUil rural could rais t Sds, The main my property 80 that I ard and h6, I bought; d be ablt' to have, room f or an orch peaceful dattjhq and -otting, an quiet and nd and it 5 the Laura Lan6 area W't's� its its arou IELtttactiOh dtf there- are many quail and ra�bb environment. Ptesettly Area. is a Very safe and.8ecute 4 m&IOt concerns 6,nd rea s'o"S fOr OPPOSI The foil-_-.,jjhq ate my . ore doqS is unlike any noise from twent-Y-five or m ogs typically bark tjoise, the noise Ow in the area and far greater 'D because Of their mvestock h groat distance f r6iii I "r sounds travel & dogse & noise gh�L when the . . a large number of at Iii and howls �qith proposed doftdtote high pitch barlts so., off the ehtitd group. Wtiaow or one bark Wtl'l rLhel has a metal toot and metal barn to be used as the ke the dogs 3.11sulate ndisd- weather duo to shutters �ihidh,,Would 'not , time in fair of the barn. e Outt'deinbst of the wouia have to b 3- 6 mesh tUft On the Idest side how Ono W3. the he�,ti There 1 ,ry disturbing and f iring of I bla,*,S f Or gun training 1, would bo- v. the y 4h the ateao unlike any no so burrdttl 'or more 'dogs is smell from but in the outside Smell i The Potential - Ily be In the kennel, The labor , roblem Would not Or taking Plac The sanitation P tt,ainitg Was ulcl.bo great4 the runs and any Outside aro-ast whetG g Waste WO very t. to dispose Ot the concrete Atddt Would and W�Ltot S bte of the waste in : of existing and 11 1 to ditp since a mdiOtity .,tvalllnq only feasible wa 3. into the septic system' d kennel, the Pic 'the north of the propose the Is''rheil in be to W6.8h "L lie to these homes 0 1- 1 ould be 'd hCS Ily open W tutute resl e the smell toward -A southwest WIh&S VA�eld c heh windoWt and doott ate typic the spring and tqmmor, w bgtantiAlo pl6nning Commission Page TWO Satdty: The proposed kenne1could have up to twenty-five adult Rottw6ilers and no limit on dog8, under six months old. -!the porimetdr fence around the kennel property is,hot adequa,�d to pontalin dogs if they escape the fenced kennel area or when they - are out training or running loose. Rottwellets ate extromely atr6ng protective animalr�. I have two children ages two and nine* They would have to walk Past the kennel property to catch the school 'bu,s or gq, to the park. They would also be playing On our property which Is just across from the kennel property. The mail bokoa for several bouites, Are Alto on the west end of Laura Lane next to the proposed kennel propettyi This would causo my wifeo family apa myself a great deal Of tttdtsj feat and anxiatyi we would never feel comfortable when out children were outside playing or walking in the aredi, Pbad- Laura Lane is very narrow. I believe a kennel with twenty -;-five or more dogs would genetatd considerably more traffic than a tingle. family t6sidence4 Employees would be needed to maintain this number of dogs in addition to customOrs, training trips 0 supply and veterinarian Visits. PihAhajal l6sst One of the pritaky values of this &tW is the quiet quality of UU4. A kennel next to my property would lestdh its ptd8dnt value, the value of a future, hote, and the ability to sell part of my ten-acte property if it,wits ever split. Water civality and sahitationzi The soil type 'in the aeea.ptoVidd9 moderate to severe limitations on septic systems. This coupled with the heavy water requirements for disposing of animal waste could dAUSO tont,iminAtioft of well water or sanitation problems. In clotihq I donit believe the proposed kennel it compatible with the present area -5hd would cause' a severe financial � and embtiohal, hardship And lessen the quality of life in this area. A kennel Would be a constant source of conflict and Irritation Ito, the Area tesidohtt, many of whom are retired And have been lohq4time vesidontt-. Sihdekerly:j William Lotil orthol It. 1 4., A N D 0 F NATURAL WCiALTH AND Bt�AUTY 'PLANNING COMMISSION 7 COLINtY CENTER DRIVE OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95966-3397 PHONEi 630,76o I February 12, 1988 Roberta Taylor 1843 Laura Lane Durham, dA 95938 Re: Use Permit, AP 40-26-72 Dear MS. Taylort At the regular meeting of the 8utte held Vtbruaty 11, 1988, the County Planning Commission public hearing Was Qo4tihUod open to March 10, 1988o at 10i30 a.mj , to cdftside,*�, yOU:t application for a Use Permit to allow* -a Private breed'nq ennol on property toned A-5 located on the south -tide of Laura"'[ Lan0k approXiMately 700 feet West of Lott AbAdj, Durham area.. This meeting Will be held' in the Board of superVisorst R- 25 County Center Drive., OrOville, California. oomf Should YOU have any questions regarding this Inatter, Plea8t contact this of�ice betWeen 10,.00 a,,m. and 3 .00 Sincerely, 'IRC148R Director Of Planning BAX/sjs 4341 Beethoven Street FEB 9 Los Angeles, California 90066 February 8, 1988 M1% B. A.,Kircher Director of Planning Butte County Planning Department Y17 County Center Drive Oroville, C61ifo" , �,nia 95966 R8- Use p rmi t for Breedin Kennel on P bear Mr. Kircher: We are currently in the Proces f Purchasing'On escrow) a home directly ,adjacent to the property propos o fdCllitY for Rottwei sed to be a dog breeding,kennel and training lert. The distance between Our future home 1836 Laura Land to the area where lo 900 yards. the dogs cated at Would be kept is app-roximattly As a yourig family (we have a Young child of 15 month from -the heavily Populated and Polluted City of S) we chose to move sa Los Angeles to the pUral countryside where our children could play and enjoy the outdoors (and feel fd) and whore we could enjoy the Peace And quiet of the Durham a rea. We feel Putting a dog breeding (and training) kennel in a residential area (re ga rdless of the t;Pe of zoning) Is a fO 116wihg are our reasons: Pretty frightening idea, The 6 -N-0'A.L'—bllUtI6h - When One d starts barking, they all f by 2aLny number Of thing's barkih� _Ms can be s6t ofo' start Passing by, 6 car driving by or birds a animal not ihtOrOstOd in waking UP in the m1ddedrly In the morning. We are to hoar 28 d6gs barkihg and/or I le (if the night, every Aj.9 ih-tdhdi lowling,, _htV 9 on using 11 In addition, t�e�y a, n gUh training" as part of the dog's trainin'ge4 We think that this type of training should be considered llout-of�-Placoll in a residelital area, 6 Exceemoht and- Disease 25 d6gs Can R -ORE kennels Produce quft "e alOt of exctdrilent- ir k0linels by All -of the homes, in the area t squirting them but with a hose.' U"bUhding, the, 11 rotp Proposed kennel" �well Water' Whd� thehv would become onsibi us; for dointafflih6ti6h of the we!! watet,1 6 for the Monitoring getting th E We certainly do, -C611i bacte I I - not want risk ria Into our water supply, Ind�eate in Population of bugs And fleas to the ... In additibnj the known hugs ar reao � -as it is Woll� 6 attracted to excrement and, I am sure agree thatw, Durham already hat a 161-96 bu OverYb))d Would 9 population, Mr. B. A. Kircher Butte County Planning Department February 8, 1988 Page 2 o increasn in traffic — Laura.Lane is a very quiet* peaceful street. It is our inTent —that it remain that way. A klenneljs A business and it will certainly increase traffic. o Endanqerment of people,.fami.ly pets and,106stockl— The ROttweiler 1i recognized as being "a big Pit Bull." Tl� �Fh__a,ve the same tempehnent and relentlessness. The Rottwij�Ier is also kiiown for its, powerful "biting pressure" which isbetween 1800 to 82.00- pounds P�)e square inch. This is the kind of biting protsure tl�at4real e (For ks bon si example: Man's biting pressure it about 45,'p�r.41,,j We will not want our children, pots and livestock,out on our pt'-pperty if there is 2any chance whatsoever that just one of these dog�k_ could get loose, The park" is Only about a—quarter mi 6 from the proposed site." This would not only put*our neighbovhood at risk: it would have an impact on the entire community. Is the planning departmel:it willing to take on "that" responsibility? o De-waluation of property " We are "in escrowto with this property On Lau'ra Lane. We Intend on stopping the escrow immod-[atoly until this situation is resolvedi We will not purchase the proper�y If the kennel is permitted to operate in the "proposed's,1te." There is no doubt in out- Minds that thi's property would lose -its 'value: that's if we could ever sell itl We hope the pl6nhing commItsion would contidee, the impact that a kennel would make on t'his. residential area. If these homes cannot be retold, the county will los�, out on ,larger property taxes that are realited after a piroperty is sold, Not to mention a lot of,ahgry home ownerst Please rescind any notion Of PerMittihg a kennel on Parcel 0-26420 Durham is a wohderful,peacetul area and does hot need the likes of noise p011Utlohv diseases, w�tee pollution, safety issuest moire bugs and loss of property valubt. Thank you for your time and consideration. Yours truly, "Mr. and Mrsii Gary Givens dc: Mt. Ki Tuttle 1886 Lauratan6 Durham, CA 95930 (916) 895-1412 AP #40-26-75 FebruAry 1 50 1988 8atte County Planning Commission B. A.. Kircher, Director of Planning #7 County Center Drive Oroville) CA 95966 RE: Uso. Permit for Breeding KN�hnel. rjn Parcel #40-26-79 Dear Sirz W6 wi8h to voice Our ob-Soctions to the issuance of a uqo pot%,Lt for a twenty�--five dog kerViel or the above parcel of land locatod Oft LAura Lanej� Durham The following reasons are cited. - 1. Moise: There are already s everal dogs in the neighbOV,1106d but this use permit would increase the number of dogs 'by jj6V6ral hundred percent. I am sure overyone has heard one 406v bArk and every dog in the neighborhood joins in and returns LM bark, Also a group of dogs In pens tend to bark more than d68A that are by themselves* Dogs cannot be compared to farm atimals which are biuo� quieter and leso W'�roublesomet obviouslyo one of' the r0asous thby are not listed with raerA animals as a permitted 'use ivi an A4 Add to this the, additional nbis4 oaueed by gm ttainjng 4rid the potential for objectionable noises, increa.ses greatly. 2. lncr�eabO in teaffic 3, Endangoinnent of the sheep and cattle alnaady on the neighboring parcels should the dogs break free of their confinement, 4. Obj6ctidaable odors if the kennels are hat maintained ppopej�-lyj, C4 MINASIAN, MINASIAN, MINASIAN,,SPIRUANCE, BABERI, ME11TH SOARES ATTORNEYS AT LAW DAVID H. MINAMAN� INC. (A PARTN EPSHIP COMPOSED OFOROirESSIONAL COW36RATIONs) 401,114 eAALV.T0N 69AY. 10�,190 PAUL ", MINASIAN4 INC, im 131RD STREET AT OAK STRECT cARLI-:TON 0.9AY. 160il.iv,14 PAU4 J�,CKXON MINASIAN, I-Ot3i 108 1 WLI-JAM H, spsu*Nciz, Wc- P. di nox 1670 Wil.,LIAM H- MASER Mo INC. okoVILLE, CALIFORN$AOS965-t619 ittrptittY A. MEITH TELEPHONE (0 16) 533-2885 M, ANTHONY SOARES TELF-COOIF-R (91a),533-007 MICHAOL V., SVXTON February 8, 1988 4 4/ Butte County Planning Commission 7 County CentetDrive Otoviller CA 95965 Re: Log 87-12-01-03 AP NO: 40-26-72 APPLICATION OF ROBERTA TAYLOR FOR AVStl MP14IT To OPERATE ABREEDING I�ENNEL'AT, 1843 LaUra Lane, Durham, CA,, Dear Ladies and Gentlemen*. but firm represents a number of landowners in t I hevidinity ,of the above project. We intend to appear at,"the heariog on February Ily 1988. The purpose of this letter 10 to addke'Ss 0 concdths -specifically about this'particular matter' do that Lhe Commission' and staff has the benef 'it of our analy(i is pti6t to the tizo of the meetilhji We, of bourse., reserve the right. to subtit additional data and information to the Commission at the time of the heat.ing. tNVIRO=9TAL CHECKLIST FORM AND ANALYSIS We believe that the Environmehtai Evaluation Chddklist and study of thi's proposed project has been ibnadequ4te,., The rdAson ithat the Board of Supervisors has te4uired aLU--e pet -tit Wh'slilever a kennel is placed in an agricultut-al Zone 'is 'to Usure theto. is .specif ic study of the 'proposal, the surrotindihy. area I end the I equirem'e co potential itpadt# The r nt're- qnizes the burden this usage can place On adjoining lAndbUmet8 and the need for datef-10 study - I k6nnels are noisy.. we fttthor believe that the Board of 8upervisot0s, specific requirement ot a Use Pertit Was. intended to address the Significant itPact this tyt��. of. operation can have � . I kA on a surrounding comtunicy'i It was itpoted to insure that such ptopos4lt ard thoroughly studied to elitihatt annoyance to the h�Biqhborhobd- It 'is with these thought,��, in mipd that . you Yaust consider this proposali We do not believe that the study has been �ade(*Pi.ite ill this p -ticular base fbt the fol 1 ar low4hq teab6no#. ........... t7z: Page -2- February 8, 1988 Re: Use permit I. Upon comx�lnicatl`Oh with the planning 9taf f i we Were advised that Ad on"site inspectio,�,� had been made prior to the preparation of the Environmental 6heck List, and Environmental Docilmehtation. We were advised t�hat the staf f was familiar with the area, "had driven around it", land had reviewed aerial Photographsi This. type of a. project Ademand. on"site ingpection as and familiarity with the �details of the PtOPO60d pro'ect, 'Certaihlyj, in litigation, it is questionable whether 3 ehVironmen- tal documentation prepared Without oh -site insPbction,', withstand judicial 'scrutiny .Could even - ' Moreovee, 'we believe an �On-site iftspection would identify the inadecfuacies of the exis facility for a kennel and Would irm the clients. cOncernt� O�f otir ,2t The site plan is, ih ail Candor, absolutely M41,mentlar and providts no detalled,plan or mitigation y permit an informed review a measures whi0h Wouia hd analyses of the ptojedt nor the adequak)y of InItigation" measures, 3. The report appears to be based ph incorrect as8uMpt-oh.,, as follows! (a) The soil, at the state contains a substahtial amount Of clay and is not loam as indicated in�the r -1 -1111 - is most i epot, , This mPOrtant when Considering the w4std disposal Pl,an�;., (b) The Project refers to the keeping/ t the an.I.Mals in the eXisting barn as a noiso mitigatlidh Mdasur6-, This ]barn har xorArs Of Mig-Rilhg.wihdoWS' On i�a- side, . largti access doocs at ch M411Y Points and a tin roof it it an aged and dilapidat Ad barn not a kennel. it will sdrVej ac6ustidally as an enhancer W6 ithout major renovation. The effect it Produce an. echo chambeti hot a noise dampener. We believe that a sJ_te vlsit� t� witness tht noise Whioh is being Created even nour'by t we believe Are kenne he two a gs led the�--e, Would have made that poi t qui 0 obvilousi, A te 4, The report notes that the bXistin fence woul dogs Within q u, keep the 'the PrbPdrtY linesi. The 6Xtetnal Primarily a sheep wire fendet with barb ekiSting fencing is wire strands which was Used to contain cattle 'Which were previot,,sly on sitept closdr to the barn is a bar fence� obviously JhAddqUabt to keq) dog(s near the bath. The tktdridr fence Was inadequat retention at the datt' d O�Ven for Cattle 16 frdclue�ntl-,y escaped,, An Jhspe tdVeal that the t -en(--- 'it in bad shape, and saqgihc Ctibn would in Some areab, I j Very getiOU- I A re'srldw Of kellhdls in thIs c0uht� W6UId show s that they always '.rely ot a chdi-h :Link, fence to I animaig ate hot allowed to dsd��pei Insute that the, J page -3- February s, 1988 Re: Use Perrait, 511 There are no noise deterr t,� 6hts between the existing barij which,as notedabover ac s as a sound enhance.,,,- a chamberf and the surrounding houses of my clie �d an echo vegetation, fences or any,other type,' nt, No ber-insf � Of sound aboorbing 0tr or vegetation has been installed or is proposed t Ucturo under the ;site Plan. Given 0 be installed ROttWdilers the -noise that. twenty-fivd (25) Crucial. can take in a confined space, such mitigation is 6i no The assessment a .ise iszue� that noise,issumes p age 6 in its ahilysi� day light hour�� s expected to be a s of thd when the owner --greatesi: durih Anyone 'Who is working wit has been around a k h the dogs.11 barking b there�,Js bubttantf bth'--'day and nightf Pdrticul ial which i's thel atly in a bL cobtintou proposed operation., (,)ur,l Zeedibg kenndlf s barking on 'occasion clients have endured almost Y during Morning hours between 2:00 especial' the ea I breed inVOIV6d, Rott:weller 4:00, iY I S, are extr Orsovet, he, qe.hbrating a Much deeper, emelY large do P, capabb�- ci 1 f louder and resonating ba q� normally be 00nsidered the case- Again, kk than would. 'a site inspection, ' to listen to the noise the eX' just lated this fact. day and night, 'Would have ZUbstahti, 'sting dogs make both 4 The assessment ind0krectlY assUnie.".I Calat noise is by' zoning and land uses. - nothinq'Ito do with mitigation of The zoning of the area has eh the establI's'l, sedOndlYo the land in recent, years has be noise. resi -riell-L of dent tk�l ho use mes on fiveacto_ parcels near the Pr6j,,qCtI Which ig accelerating with 4 to SneW parcel split, r a trend Under consideration. The exist: Currently with the existing uses in rdin-0. Lag homles were planned� an d located ,breeding kennel m hot W'th the idea of having a dog Ove into the a'r6a. Unoccupied agricalt:qral la 'The kennel wilI not e - noise 6 nd and therefor(- the impa XiSt on In the adjacent residents `8 s1lbsta " Ct, of the apparent -I I tialt as the Y tecoqniges4 Keep in min report the t0sid I d that a large percentage of I dhts in the aktIA are retirees at their residences all daYj every day, hehcei, the importance of- effectiVenoise control. 8- Wd have consulted with the Stato Depaftz6ht of aealth SOrvicef� 3:egarding noise S*x an appr6pr.,late means of' measurement o ty-five (63) dbI is no'�, noide -f sound sUdh as 4 dog bark. We have been fur for an OiMPUlseti is highly, Unlikely that the otunty b ther. advised that it the sophisticated equipment he r any local agency would have with any accUtady. This 6tate d668AkY to tearWtb such an impulse 'ig Amodel noise control ordi does not in fact. recommend such a mechani hahce the noizL of bark'n- The report is thetefore i , 1 9 dogs j - sm for assessment of failing to address the impact Of such Itijupulseit ,,,hadequate in its A �J Page February 8, 1988 R : VSe Permit e toposdd standatd will do dttat'6n, and its measur6l M�Mt`. The P, nothing to eliminate annpyapae since it is unehfOrd0able%" --fets to jun training the dogbo wiaat 9. The repo.L%.. -;-:. ing of guns aroUndthe mitigation is to be taken for the fir exi I sting,homes? tal ,,the foreg . o . ing reasons -%ie believe the tnvironmen For a C. .1 4 -Ossly inadequate and that the llftqa :L.Ve Documentation is gy or jUatitied for as prepared,��,is not approp.qiate Declaration"I Aieve that�:I-the PtOPosed WOO - this projVe'c::t. We further,be -,ng ', opme 7t 4 1dential enVir abtblutdlY incompatible With the exIsti, res' been establishedi ,�4hichjhas pRoPOSED MITIdATION HEASUMS 1')'i due to Although we believe the Use permit shdiild be d'afti n -.hiq r,'6ighbor- y With the established uses i t lack of consisteno 1,6h spad'ify the t)f an abundance of caut' r hood— We must, O'd st be taken before the PVOjdct is minimum measures which mu We believe that, at a -minimum, a zOrc thorough considered- y must be made and a 'mitigated. A04ative environmental stud 1 he pro'ectt and OhlY *f declaration must be prepared for t I orated into the mitigatibn -Mea�votes are indorp substantial 2. does hot We further belidVe� that if the COmmidbioft -- 4 � - - love document. hd substahtially :L-mpr adopt ap)ropriate zit3igation measuresp a um n tained in the ex 8tinq dod 6 tation, the study and opinions c h 4 1 atei. it the tommigsion that the dbOUML-nt wj,lj be legally inadequ cons'der the permit in the ab'sence,,L-Nf such is do-termiv�ied to I then we believe the following mitiqatio.n. meastt-- e I documentat' - on a mitiqj�ted, negatiV aeolar�tlbh for this c must be in ludda within project Jlowevdt, these tequi'6"eZents should not Vd taker as 4 - I our subtgtantial argument that the. eriviron- waiver or telGAse Of m6fttal documentation is legally J-nfirmi (1)i The proponent should be reqi�Ured to provide a building, in the br&,,dinq kennel plan of improvements to be construct (I with' must be - C Atea4 The plant and not the siT*16 sketch subm'ttd' received gtigK to the considet-ati0h of any Permit and, t h o. d I I t, 6 animals improvements constructed PjLI--q—r .. 0 introduction of t ' .11 C) imum, the plan must include installation o:P, s 0�adl of all At a MITI ustical insulation, and efidld�sure .-d barriers and batflei�-,j ACO e that the sound is maiht��iO open Windows and doors to in8qte within the barn. The dkIst'ng tin rOOf5r which have no.E'Ouna only serve to accentuate the hol-Ale- Ail deadening 4UalitYr Will 6 ekisting tin roof with Jhbulated cd4ling must be built below th- 3. c;odhd absorbing material, acoustical insulation or MMMMMM�-7 1 1 1 1 1 Page FebruarY ., Use permit tplaced topdrty should, be te ly, used, in Existing fencing on th' liror. fenL",jr as IS commor ind their (2) question# ost In the t -a six (6) feet chain- t1le dogs in W3. Size of a I d b�6 f0rem G iV--Ti the, . I to, s �, f ety shoul kennels- atteriltl-on ,otential f:erod3*-'tY? rator. 'that of the County and ope- minds ed no assurance qidents are ptovi i d t�o ah PPen qeVer- The �'djo-.Lning� rf )t regress a tire V nc 'ie 0ith t3) system .ff the wast S, 1. .1 to hose nal for an the proposed,-SePt"d O,-osal Is 0�b-tjts an irr3gation da!' erit to be �,fte!� allf 'L -he, Pr- j::his-area l for efflu In additlOr', the potentia hoS6 ncreasing adjoining Property 0 1 arc0l's�- the ct-k r r . jed to �,-,he adi 'in' -'ng P snould. be, allowed at any time (4) NO 'gun traillincl' a the barn arta property Ould be Pushed.up aroun. , immediate escaping f rom tb 0 � (5� nar�;hen betmS s1l id the d. 9s wil �ther barrier against g, neighborhood as as a fu to the surr6una'kn auring the daylight hourr V,-,.,%ctjjre kenliel, broeding de thp- st- should be be allowed outs' Lie exterior fetde, act# inside ti Oir e or Visual i111P 1b, to avoid n (6) TW", 't,�rt Planted w it'�' perehn1a such as e required to demolish the eil�ev �ropone,n hould at least one 'RottV The t -t to�the barn as bemolitilon -of this Les adjaCen is not --tab" currently it existing U� 6 1. itructure .�6 will insure 4 Lncj in the 's kate stru r Is be: dilaPidated and inadecV nel in the fqture- heard from used f or a ijoise, whir-h'cah be the r nq q,inate 1t.ion , egatdi be -modified to e1j, The cond' . -so should oundariO a standard that cont'nuoust be the properi:y b anti to siibstituto 'ded 6Ato should no decibel limit table to the tnay..ie at the pr.pettYllite to is detec distqrbanc I d be to elimin8Ltd batIting whic*-h, an annoyanck% or shoul a - Vel t i,) b e Iftitigat-3-On te ldivels Of :)al O�,! th, aosiave moaeta " the baj�k!04, ,the neighbors, T'le g( the Aeighb6rsi not to state that If reVoked, ,yandel to the, 'pe- 6it should W. 11 be 'In — 'he use permit 3, annc short, t barj�jng. 0 the no,'j�klibors t - . I amount of for the is an annoYanc I d I nd their :)pearr. Ina equa , p _,le,ks r - dijit Rott-W - a-minated 6 septic Zlystela 611 (9) Th I d, by 25 a area cont - will be qjetate4ng td4dired for L a ble, in anY zeWacje that. bbi S and ill be NO Pero tet, �tiona dationst , br , I te'rs.. t f o�t'jn .4h'ch Wi lIt 4 tock 1! Al and cemoth 'r and fecal m4 tegUlar basis fol amount of %4�-:kte slab floor 0 ,nt for the off the large eve , I - by !losing gene tea k "te hOsei W, f ism Page February 8, 1988 ,Use Permit CONCLUSION The Environmental Chec1clist,and Project On no detailed inspectiort, 1,10 Personal knowledge Analytist based oituation � and ba ed on thei,incor Or reView of the otructt �. - s re�i's and fencing will,��be redt assumption that dilapidated r 5adequate for a breeding kennel for�. ,dogs which can ea:'I i v Weigh " w 12 to 150 pounds, is grossly -e belle"ve thiE,,4 Proposed use should be denied� but, Lf Your 00mmission determjnj�s to Ptooeed t listed above ate the minimum which 1 he mitiq4ti8h measures 4cOOPtablea i I , ' 11 make.this'�Zoject I nd We belIeve they are the binimum'Which I would insure adequacy of the BnVironnielital Documentation for t his Project. Careful fOrethought-r1ow wil 11 serve as a model county Planning in this area. to for futtire homeowners adjacent to s �avO3.d ill'ustices a�, to V,,0kPerienced by, tch oper .Ions and simmeriligi endless disputebetwee danother tOPhty already has enough. n,,'neighbors., Of Which this should your Commits, Ion determih-e that it is inappropriate to address these concerns through a mitigated negatiVe then we tdquest thatthe propohen+! declaration., be directed to prepare all Environmental Impact Report for the proposed 1proj' isstlescab be fully explore OOt Where the d and studied thoroughly. We look forward 1:6 address' Meeting,, ing these conce- .rns at your very truly yours, MINASTAN SPRV— NASIAN? MINA81ANj BABER, METTA 4 SOARES sl By� 00: Roberta Taylor EY A MEITH 1.843 Laura Lane Durhati CA 95038 Bat& count. L A N D C) F p. �j I. P A I W t Ij � I,! PLANNING COMMISSION 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE — OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 0sqd5,3jqj P"ON01 Sib -7601 JanUary,26, 1988 Roberta'Taylor 1843 Laura Lane Durham,, CA 95.93g Use Permiti AP 40-26-72 Dear Ms. TaYlort Enclosed is a copy of the Staff Findings concerninp your appl, for a Use Permit to alloW a private bteeding kennel Ication A-5 located on tile south, side of On property zolle-d West of LOtt Road, Durham area. Laura Laftdj apptoXimatdly 100 feet A public heAtl ing ha -t been set for February ll-, 19,88 at 900 a -int This meeting Will be held in the Board -- Center Dr'Vej orovil � Of 8upervisdrsl Roo,", 2 10, CAlIfOrnia4 5 county The Planning Commission recommends that th or their authorized representative be present atthd Ilee Applicant Ating to rOSP6hd to any qttstibns the Commission may have. In 'the event that no one will "PtagdIlt the applicahto Pltase contact the Planning office the scheduled public heat! prior to ing. 8hould you have any qutstibns toga�r .d,ihg this mattbtj please contact th'-t office bet1wedh aani and �"00 p -m, Sincerely) B. A. kitcher Direttbr of Planning Laura M. A!�-qOeiate Planhwe E Inter -De' partmental Mdmorandum Planning Commission TROM Staf f SUBJECT: Roberta Taylor, Use Permit Ap. 40-26-72 DATE- Pobruary 8, 1988 Three neighbors have contacted Planning to voice the kennel. Gener tboir -doheat'ns with rally, the comments fall into hdist, attracting stray dogs, and impact to liv, throo of the Farm AdvisprIs offi tstocko 140b Willoughb adjust o the. do ice states "livestock' y t and OtW aftimals -will ,gt presence and noise.!' Livestock,. negatively affected by th Will hot be problem, -e dogsi lie did not consider pLt, OY's to be a Ail ,imal dontvdl Agreed that a Properly run kennel should hot attract SttaYs. They did recommend that dogs be l6c I ked u in A building at night to minimige barking., p Because of concerht voided by neighbors, PlAhhing rOM46nds, additional conditions: these 1. Install and maintain 6 6 fti fence around Vdhce shall be chain link with slats or wood. the Ptopomed kehndl. 2, Gun traini*.,,,� on-sitt I 18 Prohibited'. 3. Dogs to, b�'ehclo$od int ft. high chain link runa) on under ClOse- SUPOtvisibn At all times. 4 leash or 4* tetwdtrj the hours Of 7tOO P -mi and 6i.00 a.m., confined to their indoor runs or the house, dogs shall be 54 The c6hordte barn is the only ttrjActurp a facility. Pproved f6t the kennel LMT. -1t act Roberta TAYlor ...... . . . . . . . . ...... ...... ..... BUTTE CbUNTY_ELANI�ING COMAISSION NOTICEOF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given by the 'BUtte County Planning Clomm ssion that pubi ic hearings will be held On Thursday, February 11P 41988� in the Butte county 8oard of Superv,isOrs f ROOM, County Adminis;- tration Center, 25 County Cente Drive, Orovillo Califor r, I I nia, regarding the following item at the following tima.. -8 D ITEM ONWHICH A ECLARATION_RtOAR-D, NEGATIV ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT.HAS ,BEEN RECO� �ENDE�D 96000 caim4 Roberta Taylor - Use Permit to allow a PrivAte breeding ,kennel oft property zoned A-5 (Agricultural, 5 acre parce-ls)j located on the south side Of LaUra Lane, appr�o:kimately 700 feet west of Lott Road,, identified as A�P!040-26-0.aM, Durhami The. above-mtntloned application, map and Negativo Doclaration is on 4.IJe and available for public Viewing at the office of the 8utte County Planninq Department, I County Center Drive', orovillet , California. if You challenge the above applicatioft in court, you may be limited to rAisinq only those is6ues YOU Or tomeone else raised at 1h bublic hearing desc-tibed in t�,.A!.s �ftot,,,Jca or in written e oorrespc?ndence delivered to the Platning C0.17tniSSi0no at or prior to,� the public! h.earing. 'BUTTE COU14TY PLI-WMING jZ,,A4-.KIRCHER,. DIRECTOR OF PLANNINO To be published in the Chico tnterpri8e Record, r�n Thursday, janUaty 28, Los co��nty T L A 1`4 P LANNING COMMISSION 7 COUNTY CF-14TER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFONIA 95965-3397 PHONEt "9.7601 january 13, 1988 I�Oberta Taylor 1843 Laura Lane Durham) CA 95938 Re: Uga Permit, AP, Dear Ms. Taylor" The, Butte County Planning 'Department hat completed thd initial study of potential, environmental consequences� anticipated. In COntleCtiOn with the It being forwarded to YOU. above-men,tioned project, a copy of which i, Please review, the enclosed checklist, noting particularly any environmental probitts: wbich could be minimized or avoided by the care and manner in which the project is carried out, Also* please review any recommended mitigdtioii" teastir'09 Or conditions of approval, After reviewing th(,k checklist, you may see ways to improve, the project design, Design improvements to minimize problems art endbt-�Aged- If you not any errors or omissions in our evaluation� plea.se- bring them to our attention. you will be 'notified of the time and place of the public hearing for your projeat. 11 you have any questions regarding environmental review, please contact this office. Sincerelyj Kitchet Director of Planning Laura K, Tuttle Assoolato Planner tnc: P -16A -AIT ri+;IFla R'blOwN1�16- ou�k/e4Z VA 81 Wea TvWr-4-Ajt4L, 4,n "07-. - T "R -9090 ra Al LY =CvMgST! 0 otd, 1 ovamy guffd r,^- n*0 Comm OCT 1,14 1981 A/f Al 1 *-.-.00 Ito it, 14 —4d I? --own" 1 -4 1 Ab ount PLANNING COMMIS 7 COUNTy CENTER DRIVE _ ONO SION Roberta Taylor VUE, CALIF0,9NIA 1843 Laura Lane PHON E� �630 �601 Durhain, CA 98538 October i971987 tjse Permit AP# 0 40-26-0-072-0 DOar M.8. We received Your pre-applic.atiot reV,ew Xe4u.,t subject tjs e Permit. or the COubtY Public Miorks and En received the vironmental 1jealt J, Depar� information 3. h have aftertment 14'11 'consider you' 8ubm,Itted, Tho pl We hav this anning the e as8UraAces from application compl... 0111Y PrOJOct compli the above departments that k any condit, es with a PProPriate Ord, "n8 itPOE;ed� Can et. inances and it is the applicants be m responS4 additional information ibility to provide an B-nv- needed by Public , Works oi:' Y Ironmettal Ifealth to meet their rdqultOments, Public Works may be con and BnvirOtimen tact'ed bY telephone at 838--7266 tal Realth at Mation as 'to their evaluatio for further infor- 3. n Of the their t0quitement'8. Proposal and The Planning Dep 'he Ipplication attment staff will for any 8p6cial 0 be revieWin that. are apptopt, 9 about conditions a-atei, Should you have ahy qut8t,, Ions the Pre"a plicat, Or MOdificat Of fi ce. p '-On tevie;4i ohs Sl- Please contact this Incerelyl B*A. XIRCHtA Director of Planning Craig 08anders Planning Technician C,8.- JM0, –st'4,oUnty Public Wbrks "'CooUnty Environmental Health R�E:SQXjTZC]C- rLA City of Bignt's State water Resources DepartM CitY of Chicb Forest Servic e CitY Of Gridley U.S. Bureau of, Land Management .CitY Of OroVille BUtLe County Mining Cbmmitteo Town of Paradise,, — State Department of Fish & GArne Planning Depattment — Calif6rnia N_4tj,Ve Platt Sodioty ftation Department St gta-:—e�TransPo, ate Div. rqtostry - attention CrAig Carter Regional Watar oUal. Cont tol, bd. 'D0MxC.S,x:rC W State;Reclafttj,0 1 " n Board Butte Water Di,–Strict, C I &11f.Ornia water Service Co. Del,Oro Water Co. Richvalle Sanitary District OWID North Burbank Pub. titili Thermalito Ittigation District Skansen Sub* (CSA #21) Other — Stitli'ng city 8., — Thermalito wet Maitt. Dis4i (CSA #26) Irrigation District T C;A'X:r — PG&E North (Chie,-o) 4 � i �'O�x ,I PG&E South (M' . Biggs-W.Gridley'Water District — Pacific Bell arlrsvl,lle) Butte Water District State TV cable Durham Irrigation District Viacom TV Cable OWID Paradise Irrigation District RiChvale Irri94tionDisttjct- Table Mountain Itrigation,I)ist. El medi.0 Fire PrOtedtion Dist. ThertalitO Irrigation Distr.'dt County Fire Departmeht/nDF Durham, Oro PR6 I i71EC---L-:tC)N State County Sheriff 9CHOO btsxIR-re–r- i t, tA r.:&g:r T 3:,r Chico Area. Recreation Di–sttict Pa-radj8d Pines Architectural �'DUrham Atea Rdc4 & Park Disti � Cotitt Feather RjLVer )Reo' 4 Park D'St, 61 Committee Para i8e Rec. & Park Dist, Butte, �C6Unt)� Farm BUtdao, Aidhvalle Re!r-- :4 park Dist, Community Association: State Parks & RO-0, & ... ........ CD. BUTTE COUNTY PLANNt�4G NOV 'PRE-APPLICATIO.N RE DEPARTMtNt V EW FOR�j Ville, cof, r 0 n rn e nt a I Health Vanha.rt, Date: 10-29-8,7 RE: PrO-ApplicatlOh 1"formation ROber'ta Laura Lane RnclOsed is prelimina Chic 1 0, CA .9 5 9 2`6 Concerning the followr-Y data Our 0 lng pro, act,: f as ved or " i c'e ec 'to allo AP'40-26-572�! U11p, pe genor4,tO4 a PrIvate breeding kennel, Located On the south OJ6 Laur located on t'he so a Lane Uth side area. 4nlately 70a f: ze: 2 Itw 6 6 �t ---------- DUrharn Your resPonse by checking t aPPrOpriate box. No re'qu�' ItOmtnts for th, 1-5, ",he ProJect as P Suff requirenlents. �rOPOsed can Meet this the applida lent proof D nt can mec has beeepartrnobts approVed: Ot the n given 'that t0llOwinj condit' Ions tAx The I)tojecj. cl, .3 P�-Oposd 's not rneet of Orno"8 of this department he Project W�Jl I)e net - �' i A revi.qio,_, has be0h Contacted ith thessar�-., phe ant infOl-mation. C*. Div. reg CO- Plan tng CqraL NOV 2 1981 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMBNT PRE-AVPLICATION REVIEW FORM TO: Public Works Date4L 10-29-87 John Mendonsa RE: Ptp-Application Reviow Information �,or� Roberta Taylor 1843 Laura Land Chico, CA 95926 Enclosed is preliminary data our office has received or generated concerning the following project: �AP440-26"72 - Use Permit to allow a privatebroeding kennel, located on the south side of Laura Lane approximately 100 feet west of Lott Road, burham area. Please indicate your response by checking the appropriate box. No requirements for, this project, F-1 The ptoject as proposed can meet this bepartments requirements. Sufficient proof has been giVen that the applicant can meet the. following conditions approved! 'rho prolec4- a-, prol-�o8vd oaxi/doo.s noe iTjoo�t t),Iv, requiremonL*s of this dopartmtht. A revision of the projett will be necessary, The. applicant has boon Contacted With this information, 07 77. CO-UoTy PLANNING CQAMISSI�v Bur. 7 countY,Contet Drive 0,roVille, CA 95565-3397 p6r�Tncj Comm (916) �38-1601 DEC -I b DATE: TO: rjutte, Cotinty Animal, C,0ntrOl PROJECT REVIEW 2668 S. 5th Avenue RE: ENVIRONYSMAL EVALUATION Oroville, CA 95565 ff4ce has receiVecl or generated tnclQsed is preliminary data Our 0 3. 1 �, lor AP#40:2 n^l-�im.vta Tay -Owi- 1, project: Concerning the foil U 'k nhuul, located on the South to :,allow a Private breedinq e Use,, Permit Rbad Durham ane apprOXimately 0 0 :�ec§t West Of IjOtt 'Elide of 1jaiAra area. -al imPacts'and wi3ll ssible: envltonm6ni - 1 1. rat.�onj We are makin5'a:n assessment Of PO ufLent either a NeqatiVe D�..c a enVironr(iental FaSUreEl or all Envi r L OnMental be, preparing an tittation Me Negative Declaration;with Mi Impact Report (EIR) provide any factual 8tatP_V1ntst ideas for investiqatiOnt Or Please 'h offer in your-' ",a of dOncern or exp6rUse that relate opinions Y I OU 041 m'c impacts that this Ptoiect may ither physlical, social# or ocono I to el generate- e_note(j date. If no response Please respond within 14 days of the abov I t there are ry, then it shall be j�E;sumed tha is generated by thi's inqui 0 mental ilttpactt� which are potential',,TOM the no slgftificant enViton, project. d'roVide, We appreciate a I ny assistance you d�­ Sincere!Yt 'Xath Planning T h h:i. c i �a n W LO uj tj Comments document of the en1Vjronmeht%'kl agency wish to receive a dOP clatation (w'th or withoiat M tigAt'On 060's you (iPjJ634 Study for t4eqative Oe � t) or tIR for this �PrOlJec 1 7 E do . . . . . . . . . . 6- tj WA 4J v -4 - Cd I't Rif? tl 14 &W Aq Q41 VIA sliffe Co. FlannIng Comm 0 141887 T 0 Old .00 CO -tv IN ZIA rl 001 .21 ON z .16 CD C� ts iro - O'l v 4o, 0 4c e, r lip ff. D. a a /Y. 17 Eol, w TO Ott- -�'DUR"m-mQW N --- 779J e'L'l i4 ourhoa? porR k 102* Z-1 44 17 13 Tpm IVOA4t� C",r 14 AT, 60 /;"Ac It b� IF15 77 ; R70 AO 6.014C OSA 0. C, .-Oo jeA 4 "1' 14 .6,04 45 Z A'A 0, &-V54 r Lit$ 89 mill 14, ON A C Ac U ell 014 4 1 k 1,OA 0, PrN 3 40 3 4.71 r 0 4 69 Opt 1)4o 4 * ss IT cp- U S rA rl.- AVD Serr4rM,&--N;r 1W, 0, R, a*, PrIs j6 d.v I er.1