HomeMy WebLinkAbout040-280-017r17
%19
T!"I'll"
-pa
AW4
100 M 14,
oqo,
66,
0 , j
ov
lllii� IdIdIld,
, � lllili�,
doll" 4ilili
oll, I
Id 1111ilo 1111 10 1 ff I 1fo, 1, (11 R ii
WON-.--
Zx
Ile
x di
.6q.
Address�-I
SAme,
Type of 41POUCA40(li—
acre-Rarcel in a
. 1 1.11, _,p
Locatio4t -On the w_es_t 4
mile sou$�h
.9f _Pixrha -Oroyll.
A.J? 140 40",28-12
�u"a
D a
ts appllo!at�qn
Date not*tos mailed-
-30/jA numbery
Firat hearing;
pocond hoaping:
Addition4l 1-waxingg
Zoning Potlltiop 8jcjA4tUret
toatd action:
Ordinance 4doptedt
APPLICAVON FOR
Butte County plqnni,,q Commission VARIANCE
File No,
Data filled
Hearing date
Action 6y planning Co
friml SSIOM
Acfion by Board Of Suporvj�'ar"
PRE -$ENT ZONING,—
Assessor Map Book
–iD— page No, >L Parcel No,
REQUEST;
APPLICANT'S NAME,
ADDRESS. PHONE:
c4)
�kICANVS INTEREST IN PROPERTY.,
'TA C?�;�A
OWNER'S NAME,
ADDRESS, PHONE:
1)8SCRIPTION OP PROPERTY:—
�/AAv
44 lt2 -woo
The a6ove §f,,f s are 1. celrfifl6d 6y Ad Uhdo . rs I
ghed +a 6a corrb"
LOSignt' lift
NOTE: pie
U'1411 chOdk or Money otj6r
IL
Oro; Wot -0 an 3howl Ih the dindUlif j;ho
Piloperfles, hg the Joraf1dri
of 6XISil "16wo 01*010 to C
$ h'g rihd propiosied dUhty of BUffe, alib a
$ bn Y6,)r okop6iltY kind ori jho d�
itecelpi IV6. ay –al
NOTICE TO APPLICANT - VARIANCE
Ordinance No. 1333
AN ORDINANCEAMENDING ORDINANdE NO. 4715, XNOWN
AS THE BUTTE COUNTY ZONING ENA8I.TNG OR))XNANCE
"16.1. VAIIIANCES from the termb of the zoning ordinance
shall be granted only when, because of special circumstances
appIlLcable to the propertyj including size, shapef topography,
location or surroundings, the k-t-rict application of t_hq Zoning
ordinance deprives such property of privileges enjoyed by other
property in the vicinity and under identical zoning clasgif�cationi
Any variance granted shall be subject to such conditions
as will assure that the adjustment thereby authorized shall not
constitute,a grantof special privileges inconsistent with the
limitations upon other properties in t -Lo vicinity and zone in
which such property is situated, Any such condition imposed
upon 'issuance of a variance must be reasonably related to the use
of the property for whi0h the variance is requested.
A variance shall hot be granted for a parcel of property
which authorizes a use or activity which is hot otherwise ek-
prdssly authorized by the zoho regUlat�on governing -the parcel.
of property."
I HMnY DECLARE UNDER PENALTY OP PVRUURY MAT I HIM READ
THE POAMOINO XN8TAUCTIONS AND S2ATMMtNT8 AND UN0t'Q8TAND
THEM MEANING AND CONTEM
aA4
Date
A P R p, 1976
OROVILLF, CALIF'*
AS
76-25-2-6"�ol
5. KEENEY, MGRRIS, VARIANCE0 AP 40-28-17� to Minimum parcel size to
allow a 1 acre I Parcel in an A-5 zone', located on W side Of Stanf
Ln. , approx. 3/4 mile S of qurham-OroNfille Hwy., Durham. ord
Mr. McKeeman , stated that the purpose of this appl i cation is to separate
existing resijoential use from th%agricultur,,,1.1 use since the owner is no the,
longer able io"farm the land but oes hot witih to move from his home,
McKoeman made a motion to file a Negative Mr.
Declaration on this Project be-
cause the I -acre separation from a 25 -acre parcel has no significant impact
providing an existing structore is present, however, the precedent sot by
contin ' ued Variance approval could have a sigri'Ificant cumulative effect on
agricultural lands. Mr. Tu ;saint seconde'd this Motion.
AYES: JaY McKe6man, Howard Toussainti Gary Flaneryj and Dave Stratton.
NotS! None.
Motion Carried.
ERC MINUT8S
4/12/76
M
NLGATiVE DkC
, L A RA T 1,0
I NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVCN that the CnVironmenta,l
Review Committee oil tile County of Butte has
reviewed th� Project described below pursuant
to the Provisions of the Calif rnia
tal Qua 0 Environmen-
lity Act Of 1970 (Public Resources Code
Sections 21100, et seq,),' and determined that
it Will not have a significant effect upon the
environment, An environmental impact report will
not be required,
2.
3.
4.
5 �
ME
7.
APPENDIX o
APR .1 12) 1976
CLARK A, N'g'-j(QR C011MY Clork
By
. _ 0 ___
Dopufy
r) F
r'a'c'r'e`TION Uf �,ROJCCT: Varlane6 to minimum
ap� Parce n an A.5 zone, 10 1 C a t ed - Parcel size to allow a
On 14 side of Stanford U,,.
prox. 3/4 mile 8 Of Ourham-orOV11le Hwyi., identi led a S
AP 40-28-17, Durhamo f
The '-acre "ParatiOn from a 2j-acr,
IRICI),41141simpact Providing a Parcel.ha no s,Jgn1_
the Precedent set by donth existing structure is Presen s
* however
inued Variance approval could Itlave 4
NAME AND ADDREsS OF PROJECT APPLICANT: ficant cum signi-
MOR91S KttNEy ulatiVe effect on
Rt I Box 270 agricultural lands.
Du�ha�t� CA 95938
A copy of the rtivironnIental Review COMMIfteel
Wdinq
. the environmental effect of determination re-
public inspection at the Butt(, thl", Project is available for
Center Driveb OroVille, Ca County Planning Department, 7 County
to any Person upon paym 11fornia. copies thereof Will be Provided
ent by him of a fee of $1 00 for the f I rst
Paqe and $,.10 for e4ch additional page,
Any person Wishing I to contest tills Negative Declaration m
written protest specifying the reason', therofo aY file a
r. Such Written pro-
test shall be filed with the 8utte County Planni
Plahninq Department office ng Commission at the
this Negative Declaration Wwlthln fifteen
as 05) days from the ate
1A filed With the County Clerk, d
frItten protest is timely if a
filed, a hearing regarding the Negative
Declaration will be hPld by t h e P . lanning COMmission.
May be Presented either orally or Objections
in Writing at the hearing.
if no Written protest Is timely filed regard L
la�ation the application fol- the pro Ing this Negative Dec -
hearing ' Joci may be approved without
regarding the Negative Declaration,
ENVIRONMENTAL R8VIU COWTTLE
DATE April '12, 197 A_
B Y Lawrence J Lawson
�U IT rr �eec� t� � v V �50 1
f Planhrh��.
APP9NDJX C
0 49,
FINDINGS
Morris Keeney Variance
Applicant's Name Type of Project
Rt. 11, Box 270 AP 40-,9-17
Address Location or Parcel No.
Durham, CA 95938 4/2/76
Date Received
YES
NU
1. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of
the environment or curtail the range of the environment (narrow
the range of beneficial uses of the environment?)
x
2. Will the project cause impacts which achieve short-term, to the
disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals! A short-term
impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively
brief, def-iiiitive period of time while long-term impacts will
endure wall into the future,
x
5. Could the project cause impacts which are individually limit4d,
but cumulatively considerable? A project may impaCt on two or
more separate resources where the impact on each resource is
relatively small,, If the effect of the total of those impacts
on the environment is significant, an 81R. must be prepared.
This finding does not apply to tvo or 'more separate projects
where thp impact of each i- insigilificant.
x
1
4, Could the environmental affect6 of Vhe projeci� cause substan-
tial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or
indirectly?
x
NOTE if any of the above four findings questions are abvwered
flytslo the project will be found to ha%rd a significant effect
on the envitohmenti
DETERMINATION
This project will not have 6 significant affect on the environment,
A Negative 6etldration should be prepakedi because the I Acre separati0h frOM a
acre parcel has h6 Significant impact proViding an'Lixisting structure is
preseht�_hbwover, tho precedent set by continued Variance approVal could
haVe a slpnifft�ant cuNldtiVe effect on Agricultural landt,
This project could have a significant effect on the dhVitohindht.
An 91R. is required,
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMME9
Date— Ao�r i I , 12 1 � 1976 by, Lawrence J, Lawso,h__.
Director of Planning
4/2/76 MOWSK88W AP 46-28,-17
DETERMINATION RE SIGNIPLCANT EMCT ON ENVLRqNMqNT
Morris Keeney, Rt, 1, Box 2.70, Durham, cA
Applicant0s Name and Address
Variance AP 40-28-17 4/2/76
Typo of Project Location or Parcel No. — Date Receiv ed
An environmental impact report is required for anyproject which may htive a sig-
hificant effect (substantial adverse impact) on the environment. Effe4-.ts include
environmental consequences of both ptimary and secondary nature.
The following questions shall be used as guidelines to decide whether io make a
negative declaration at an environmental impact report. (If answer is unknowo,
write "unknown" in yes/no columni)
CHECKLIST YMS NO
1. could the project significantly change present use8 of the
project Area? (Sod Notesi)
—X
2i
Does the project significantly conflict with the Butte County
General Plan or any element thereof?
x
3.
Could the project affect the use of a recreational area?
(See Noteso)
x
4.
coutd the project have a substantial and demonstrable neg-
ative dffect on an area or feature of aesthetic value?
x
�54
Will any natural at man-made features in the project area
which,are unique, that is) hot found in other part4 of the
CoUnty, State� or Nation, be affected? (8ee Notes.)
x
6*
Will the project involve construction of facilities on a
slope of 15 percent or greater!
x
7.
Will the project involve significant cuts at, MIS?
x
84
could the project cause substantial flooding, erosion, at
siltation?
x
9i
Will the project involve coh6trUdtion of facilities in an
atda of geologic hazatds!
x
10,
Could the project change existing features or involloo can.
struetion in special building permit areas along the $Act& -
mento kiver, the Podthet Rivot r�loodway, in any area subject
to iaundationo in, an Area in close proxiiiAty to any rj�rerj
ttroomo lakej reservoir or hAtUt4,1 drdihage channel?
x
11.
is the project one of a spirier. of cumulative action) Which
although individually smhllj may �a a whoje have bighificdnt
dnviropmehtAl impact?
x
l2i
Could the project breach any published nati6nalo �t4td� at
local standatd# teliating to solid waste or litter eofiLrol!
I
4s
P
13,
serve as
boea the Project area or the project site a labitat,
V
food sourdep nesting plate, source of watero etc. for rate
or endangered wildlife or fish species!
14.
Could the project significantly affect fish, wildlifeo or
plant life or cause substantial interference with the move-
fish or wildlife species?
ment of, any resident or migratory
15,
Are there tiny rare or endRngered plant species in the pro-
ject area?
16.
Will the project remove substantial amounts of vegetation
including ground cover?
17,
Could the project change existing features of any of the
region's watercourses or other bodies of water?
_X
18,
Could the project result in significant change in the
X
hydrology of the area? (See Notes.)
19.
�ould the project significantly affect the functioning pf an
X
established community? (See Notes.)
2o.
Could the project physically or economically result in the
displacement of community regidento
21.
Could the project significantly affect an historical or
atchaelogical site or its setting? (see Notes.)
22,
Could the project serve to encourage development of presently
undeveloped areas or intensity development of already devdl-
oped Areas? (see Notes,)
23.
Are you Aware Of a substantial body of opinion (present or
X der) the project
anticipated) that considers (Or will c006i
or its effect to be adverse to the environment!
24,
Will the ptoject.create new or aggravate existing health
X
hazards,?
25.
C
Will the project involve the application) use or dir.,)bsai 03.
potentially hazardous materials in an Amount sufficient to
X
cdttse a substantial adverse effect? (See t4otGs,)
26,
could the proje I ct generate significant amounts of dust�
smokei gag* odor6t or other Air pollutahtO
21,
Could the project generate significant fiOibal
28,
could the project cause tofit4mihation Of a public WatcO dUPPIY
system or adversely affect ground watetl
25.
could the project significantly affect the Potential uset
(See 'NotesO
'extrActiono or conservation of a natural resource?
30,
Could the project result in damage to 8oil capability or logs
of agricultural land?
31, Additional remarks:
C-3
APPLICATION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
When application has been made to the County of Butte 1-0" approval
of a project which is not ministerial and is not categor�
icelly exempt
from environmental review requirements, the applicant is required to
submit this additional application, together with a fee of $10-00, to
the Environmental Review Committee, c/o the PlanniFg—De�part�efi-F.--7
County Center Drive, oroville, California, pursuant to Sections 5B
and 5C of the County of Butte Procedures for implementation of the
California Environmental Quali
tY Action of 1970. 4Rr- Irl -131941
APPLICANT TO COMPLETE
Name & Address 1JC)gP
AP No A
1. 'Project Description (30 r
1.!r iAJ.?
L)
2. Applicant's status (local public agencyt state, agencyt private firm
or individual) I I ly I::> % V1 P(.)/4 L-
84 Punding SOUtCO (FRA, HUDt etcj)
4i Locationj general
de8cr'pt�on (LOca'b'On Map to be provided)
5 Oeni��raliZed physical description of the project Size, type of
tOtraink Outstanding physical featurest otc,,.Cu It,
6 Total Projected cost
lo Anticipated scheduling_
8i
A880c*ated Projects (include the ultimate project oven IU,the
Project is to be completed I
in stages or phases)
Signature
401-20-16 1';--4-0--28--56 40-29-52
D. R. &- Victorine Shaffer Morris & Agnes Keeney etal i Tohn &. Marian X�Jrjin
w vrl 13
Rt I Box 1173 Rt I Box 270 Tit I BOX 1158 'K
Durham, CA 95938 te:Dwriamf, CA 95938
Durhamv CA 95938
40-20-17 40-28"68
11alvdan & Mary Bollerud etal[. Terry, & Mary P Orris
P 0 Box 337 Vt I Box 1157
Durham) CA 9593P Durham$ CA 95938
40-26-27Y 40-27-01
R- W- & Bettye Peterson
P 0 Box 476
Durham,, CA 95938
40-27-14
Josephine Martin
1560 Stanford Lane
Durham) CA 95938
: 40-29-03
�'Larry & Sharon Porter
Rt 1 Box 1150
Durham, CA 95938
414
40-29-54
Don & Frances Logan
Rt I Box 1159 0
Durham, CA 95938
40-P9-56
I'larrell & Lorraine Hamilton
P 0 Box 87
Durhamy CA 95938
40-29-04 40-29-57
Day.."d & Kathleen Singletary Viola 'Ross
Ilt I BOX 1148 Box 1158 R
Durham, CA 95938 Durham, CA 95938
40-27-15
40-29-28 1%,
40-"'-9-58
Chester & Margaret Graves
4, C. P. & Dorothy Dehart
S6sse & Pauline Horr
1540 Stanford Lane
Durhamy CA 95938
.1 Box 1160
DUrhamyl CA 95938
Rt I Box 1156
Durham� CA 959�8
q'4
40-27-16
40-29-34
,Mayfield & Agnes Boons
Rt I Box 1166
Roaney & Bettye Peterson
Rob6r+ & Evelyn Distler
buzham� CA 95938
P O.Box 476
Duthamq CA 95938
Rt 1 BOX 1156
IDurhamp CA 95938
X
40-27-17
William &,Linda Boone
40-29-36
'Virgil V6rjo 8ohlecht
4 '4.0-2-64� 61
& Grace Sanderson
Rt I Box.744 B
Durh6l) C�k 95938
-1
Rt I Box 1164
Durhamy CA 95938
"Rt I �BOX 1155 T
Durham� CA
959,38
40-27�18
Sames & Sherry Smith
001in�on & Nellie Ptebobtt
P 0 Box 205
Durham) CA 95938
40-28-16
Dome Tractdr Company eta!
'1? 0 136 X 34
Durham, CA 959�8
40-28�17
Wohard & Mildrbd Wareing
P 0 Box 41�
DUrhami CA, 9,5958
40-2-8-4,2
George & Heleft j�holmjjson
Rt I Box 1159
bdrham� CA 9�9�8
40-29-38
Louis & Al Ina Pyl e
Rt 1 Bo 1159 A
buthaM2 CA 95938
40-29-41
Ralph & Catherine Maynard
ttt I Box 1159 if
Durham, CA 95�38
40�*-44
:- W -i & Virginia Malmquist
334 W i2th Ave
Ohico� CA 95926
. 40- , 29�4 2a
Leo &I rM
P 0 Box 31�5
I- dhico2 CA 9,5926
A,
4�t
y 4:"�
VL
Al
4 6i
inter-Departm�'.%'nt"0.1,Memoraii,dunI
TOt F i I e
FROM; Mary Dodson, Clerk
SUUJ ECTI Keeney Variance
416176
A coPY of the aPolication and Plot plan was sent to Bill Hazeltine,
Mosquito Abatement, for review,
A form letter stating this aPPlIcation has been made was sent to
the following:
1, State Divi of Highways
2. State Water Quality Control Board
3i Durham Union School Dist.
4. T�rham 'Recreation Dist.
5i Out -ham Mosquito Dist.
6, Drianage Dist, #1
Wd
Butte ezlounf�,
Y
LAND OP NA'ruRAL WEALTH AND B C A U 1
PLANNING COMMISSICIN
LAWFIENCE Ji LAWSON
DIRECTOR OF PLANNING
7 COUNTY CCNTER DRIVE - OROVILLEj CALIFORNIA 95965
Telephonc 534o4601
April So 197C
Morris Keeney
li aox 173
Durham, CA
rzo Variance
AP 40-28-17
Dear
Please be informed that the Butte County Environmental ReVieW
Committee 1
. Will consider yourVnriance at its rejularly
scheduled meeting onA))Hl 121, 15M
should you have any questions, Please feel free to contact
this office,
c e r e I y
JAY McKELMAN
ENVIRONMENTAL COORDINATOR
By'..
Ki iwY1,!-0- -d s �on C I o r k
JM/md
cc: hadhtioi Lno.
MF -F -TS NtGUL.AhLY ON THC- �OUA THU0180AY8 OF 'IIAOH moNTH
m
01
T
'0 IO�.' 11"'11'e'reby
1.:4 SAVon by the -BUtte County p
(I on all4iA5 Commiar;Ion t,,hctt; v0lid
Unt'y Boat I 1'1Iu2'8daYv May 20, lq76 6,,t,
10 otvlmcs 1 0 � 79,30 p.
1859 13ird S ROOMY �Utta 0 in the Ilutte
of "t,
Otln"'y kdmildstratm
,tl,netf Oprovil I On llmiading�
lay oa-lifOrniap regax(lims the rollovirict4
ITIMIs) ON lkqf_tC;H
DR.
0 Norris Kooney - Varianoo to mi
2. PaVael in an "A-5" (Agvj,,jtUnirAUm Parcel GUO to allow a Ono a0la
100a,ted on the west , aide of 9 PATOolo) Zono On PrOPOrty
00uth Of Dtj,-4hahj RI LdYAD a
-PI):k'OZimat6lV 3A Mile
GAWaYp identified a* tP 40-28-479 Durham.
2. Olen Ambe - troo PolwLIt to allow otor
87al- Undogrouna gagolin, t WC) on page Of 'Uf1tWvn,%bl0S "to 29000
COMMOPcial) loc%a�.Gd oil 'a roperty %olled "C-2" (Genorai
f,j Sd as AP 42-32-31v Chi,,. 110,v 32 aid,
GIOMmOod kvo., 14anti. the southeast OOVIlOr 01- Stat
3.
sapplyo Use Poxvit to allow a )-anasoal
um�T)P'7 bUzinSO8 and ) 0 aha
zoned (nommltr 'I U00 On prop
erty
looatea On tho northwerst OOrner
'katon 'Roaa,
Oip p
chioc. an U 44-44-29 (portion),
�he 4bove mentioned applioationq- pr
tj t
,jonso M.
reporta dva:ej, 0
"gatiVe repov�ln a" On fil* tnd aVrAl4blo Pov
nv
At the Offia/olo:c tho Butte oomatl 'lamtLtIc nVartment; publio viov,,jix
I 't r
'PI)aVir0=10' tal Im 0,04ter D�i�o
11 ptl 0
0011090 Und 00WAY libraries. " vevortb aro also available at
13�Tqljq 001)j
0 svm
L.vn.IT.,'Wcrq j.
bVIVOT011 ol"
TO DM, Tjjr!,
t4ay 2ij 3.976
Morris KeeAOV
Rt, I Box 270
Durham., CA 95938
Pet AP 40-2t-11
Mr.
At tile reOMj-,,r mp,�tinq of th,!� Butte COOntV Pla=inq COmmie-qi011s
jiftld May 2ot-1976? tti,e comirj.ssion avxproved your application for
a variance to minimurn parct-1 sizq to allow a cn.,�-acrp Parcel in
an 4,,A-50 ()rjqri4t�ulttral) ZO.-IISP located on tho Webt 8ids of Stanford
Lano, approx. 3/4 mils Soutil of Ourhani-Oroville, I[wVo Durham,
q-11JO variance Is granteZ, 15ubJect,tO an apneal dkirillo., the eight (8)
clay apj),!�al period which ends at SOO p,m., on tlay 20, 1976. If A
Jv-dt yotir variandi? will bO cOnsiderOld ctrante"
no appeals arp- rece
after that dat�,
Should you have ar.y 47ut,,otions t1its, matt, -r, pleaza
contatt this offio,-�.
LAWSNI
1)jroctor of PlatrI'hq
/bw
PLI-bli-
cc: be -pt, of
Health DA -Pt.
,7una 1. 1976
Norris meney
Route Is Bok 270
ftrliam, Ca.
Ile: ia) 40-28-17
Dear -Mr, Reeney:
This lettOr Will be Your O�fficial notification that your ra-
quest, for a varianco to minimum parca-, sizo. -to allow a Ono -
acre parcel in an llix-511 (Agricultural) zone, loc-a.-ted on the
west side 0� Stanford Lane, approx. 3/4 mile south of Durha'm-
OrOVillO HWY,, Durham, is 0=31'derad t1rantod mince, no appeals
weto teooivad within the appeal pariod,
wiould you have any queations regarding t1liz matttr� plea3a
fael ftee to contact t1iis, of9ice,
8ihcLirolyt
LAMUMM' T* LAWSON
DILRnCTOR OV PLANNINO
cd: BUtte County Health bopt4
Ddpt, ot Public Works
COUNTY Or BUTTE
PLANNINO COMMISSION
7 County Center nrive
CA 95965
834-4601
D"Rte June,2, 1976
Morris Keeney
c/o Bachman Enqin.qerincj
pt. 4 Box 525 A
Chicot CA 95926
Re*- AP 40-28-17
Dear Sir.,
Please be advised that the Butte County 8ubdivisioll committ6e,�1111
xeviaW �YOu.1c 4 tive
"PlicatiOn for a tenta for the
mar)
property at the Committee Meeting scheduled
above identifift-6
for �Jonday f- L L7tin 7. 1076
at 1-30 P.M. t in
ence 15drMET—ce-h-1-6i Drive*' Orovillet
the Public Works Confer-
California.
Should you have afty questions reqarding thio niatter.. P18ase contact
thig office,
,Sincerely,
LAWRBNC4Z T.
LATISON
UtP-Ctor of
Planniixg
��ara� Z"e-t
Ba,
aus
/bw
0=
BUTTE COUNTY PLANN.'MG COMISSEXON
STAPP FINDINGS - Nay 20, 1976
I
Co VARIANCE
1. Morris Xeoney - Variance to minimum parcel size to
allow a one -acre parcal in an A-5 (Agricultural
5-4cro parcel.) zone on property located on the
wksot�side of Stanforel T.,ane approxim4tely 3/4 mile
south of Durham My., identified as AV 40-28- . 17#
Durham
This variance appliqation, is to allow a !-acre parcel in a zo'he
that raqux1res a,5 -acre parcel.
,zhe applicant states that, they Ttiotild like to separate the farming
trout the uon-farwing activitietj aad that they want to set, out, the
oon-4cra parcel which has the evitAting residence4 Thoy also state
that they are not in the =tal property business but In tho
businega.
'Plis Butte County Geneva]. IlIan delineates tlie azea as orchard and
giold cropil� txrnsi,,1.W,2,-L1nqr to low-doxi.4414--y ):(2sWehtJ.al,, I to 4
dwollinq %mite pe�c acrG4
The 8nvtrca,.%=iita1 Aeview committea filinq a Negative Deolaration
,Regardingr tnvironoantal Impact on kpril 12, 1976, finding-. "h one -
acre gep&ration ftom a Zi acre parcel has no oignificant impact
PrOviding Wa Mdotiny.stvucture is ptosentj howovor, the precedent,
set by continuiihiq could have a -jighificant
cimulative effbot on landa."
$oction, 165,, Variancozj a� the 13utto County Znablinq Otdinwiceo states:
�'Varianapus Eyora Cie totow ot- thL- zoning ordinoAoe Miall be granted
only Whone bdoatad of apecial oikdowatmides applicable to 'the propetty
including siza, shape, topography, location or silrvouadings, the
attict applieatiou ;of the Ordinance deptiVaa ttich ptopetty Of
Privileges enjoyed by other p=pefty �ifi the vicinity and wider
iftntidal clagoification.
It the Cbmideion caq raltd thage Ahdingsg it would be approptiate
to grant the varitince ereque-wat.
.*9"
0
BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
MINUTES - May 20, 1916
C.- VARIANOV
Mocris Keeney - Variance to minimum parcel size to Allow
a one pazcel in an "A-511 (Agricultural -5 -acre parcels)
zone on property located on the west side of Stanford
Lane approximately 1/4 n1ile south of'Durham Hwy.,
identified as AP 40-28-17, Durham
76-49-2-230
Staff findings were read by Mr. Blair.
Proponents; Cal Bockmant engineer for the applicant,, spoke in favor
ofigrantihg this request.
QppQnents- aanies Sand
erson,) Stanford L&aeo Durhamj said that the
property �iad b6"en,,,yacajit.,f6r months and expressed concern about access
to the almon h r
d rear of the house if this acte is split
off frorn the balajace of the propertyi
Milan Winstand, ROtte lo Box 1141 -Co Durham, was concerned that this
would open the whole area for subdivision,
Larry Potteto Route 1, BOX 1150. j. L,, Kjtlin� Box 1158
f I -A *F Manuel
Peres, Sycamore L,'Ine and Doug Debattj Route 1, Box 1160 -.-all of
Durham spoke in opposit'oh.
In rebUttaij M. ao Keeney, 13OX 81, DUrbamr stated that the ubject
Property had been vacant only 1 1/2 months since he,and hisssoft had
purchased
tho PrbpOftY afid that the almond huller in question hact
been sold and the equipment would be moved. tle further stated that
the subject, plarceJ1, had just'-tecently been, planted in a hew orchata.,
that he and hiz son were farmers# not subdividers and asked that the
tequetted parcel split be allowed because it Would be 4 better farm-
ing oporationi -
the hearing was closed and motion made by Commissioner camentind,
secdnded by Commissioner Thebadh, to grant the vatiandej making
t t
staff filidih4s a part of the -motion, and '-' ai -1- do go would
Ing a
hot be grantih5lotheiapplitant any tpodjasl Privilegso since there
are many small ts A the area along Stanford taft�r and it would
be in conformance with the Coneral Plan,
A Y E; S Cbmmig6i0herb Calnenzihdo Gilbertr Mboret Thebachi Wattets
and Chairman sy1va,
Nots...' Hahfotdi Smith and Watson,
Motion carried,
AC)P-
t SeN"&r.-44Y
H -A INS El UT TIE COUN
DATES,
COMM18.,q, JONI--
Ro, Xd
A p ICANT.'
OWNER,
"A"leal
7il
ol�
SC LE