Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout040-600-019�.• %� '� a �; � �. a � r 1 , � ! 1 4 dy: TENTATIVE 5UBDly X TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 1 PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION WAIVER APPLTCAI ION` (Please check appropriate box) oe VPEICANT: Cal State University Foundation RHONE N0. –1210198-5297 A, OR Attn: Mr. Ed Masterson. -Office of University Relations, Chico, CA 95,929-0155 OiNGR Chico Research Park, L.P. PHONE N0. (213 787-7628' DRESS: c/o Quest Property Corporation, 21221 Western Ave #110 Torrance CA , 90501 V OINEER OR SURVEYOR: `Rolls, Anderson & Rolls PHONE NO. (9H61895-1422 0, DRESS: ...965 Fir Street, Chico, CA 9SP28 RAIL NOTICE OF HEARING' TO Rolls, Anderson-1 Rolls, Attn: Ellis Rolls '965 Fir Street:-Chico, CA 95928` L.4CATION OF;PROPERTY TOWNSHIP 21 N.' RANGE 2 E SECTION 4,5,8,9,15 & 16 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: 40-60-`19 to 40-60-22 (1991-1992) TOTAL ACREAGE 1180 KtASE SUBMIT PRELIMINARY TITLE REPORT OR RECENT 'POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE (dated within the East six months) WITH APPLICATION. INDICATE BELOW THE DATE AND RECORDING 119FORMATION QY WHICH THIS PARTICULAR PARCEL WAS CREATED- -DATE 7-1841 (Ad:iusted)BOOK 123 PAGE 58-63' 04BER AND SIZE OF PARCELS BEING CREATED (including any,remainder): 7birteen (Average saze'100 acres, minimum size 40 acres 01STANCE TO NATURAL WATER COURSE OR-8T ORM DRAIN- On site. .Drains West PROPOSED METHOD OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL; �N/A i (Check with Health Department) PROPOSED SOURCE OF WATER: NIA (Check H►ith Health Department) DO POWER AND PHONE LINES EXIST TO THE BOUNDARY OF THE ORIGINAL PARCEL? NIA` IF NOT, ESTIMATE THE DISTANCE THEY WILL HAVE; TO BE EXTENDED: _NN/A ®UY'd'E t,... COUfdTTY GENERAL,PLAN ZONFOAMANCE REPORT OR�ArcEt NAAa oRsusnxVzszvN MAP ;I t'ns '1-4 to be �ompl'eted by a:p;iicant: _ 1., A PLICANT.NAME & ADDRESS jbiLVer tv Found alion California State University+, Chico: Ch 'co, CA95925 241 iPAOJECT DESCRIPTION 1,1 --Parcel. Parcel 'Maa 3,ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER(S) , 40-60-`19:lru 40 -60 -?,'2 (1291-1992) .4. PROPOSED USE Grazing; "The following items are to be completed by the Planning Department: :C RREN'f ZONING L4" _.. LAND COINSERVATION AGREEMENT GES . tAL PLAN DESTrNATION tz t vj '_ _ r�., t j L_�a nj r� A591CULTURAL-RES DENTYAL ES NO :1. .Agricultural CompatibilityIt is recommended that you perform e2 :dater and Sewer Capacity the following checked items: 3. ,Adequate Fire Facilities 4Road Capacity andMaintenance ARCHAEOLOGICAL RECORDS CHECK 5' ,Access to Commercial and Schools, ' �. BOTANICAL SURVEY ' GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 0.RCHARD AND FIELD CROP 1, Predominant 5-10 ac. Parcel Size �.._ YES Boundaries NO 2o Vicinity of Urban WITHIN DEPARTMENT OF FISH I. Ag. Viability not Impaired AND GAME REVELOPMENT ZONE: .� .� WITHIN FLOOD PLAIN: WITHIN AREA, SPECIFIC; OR 2msr LAND USE PLAN: :Staff Determination: Substantially conforms to: _ If Yetf Plan GENERAL PLAN: 1. ` Lane use, 'XName-of 2. Conservation WITHIN URBAN RESERVE: X 3. - OpenSpace X If Yes, —` 4. Safety Name of Reserve 5. Noise 6. Housing X : AIRPORT LAND USE PLAN: �. CircuIatfon comments: ""' t _ "' wwLb d-7LLo6,; i^r Staff SignatUre...s- r''` , Date AS THE ;APPLICANT, FOR THE REQUESTED LAND DIVISION,, I AM AWARE OF THE ABOVE ;STAFF I)ETERMLNA7ION REGARDING THE CONFOR MAKS ",E WITH THt GENERAL PLAN ONI Crate igOAture of App l icant Goxdoxi Fercho, _ r *This report will expire and be discarded a x (6) i� sr Opn a e o ie's o f si'ghature. LD1d006 (revited'6-$7)` 001, `' "Add ition'Al"goal s 'are for th e Foundatioh to°understated 1'and stewardship by Parti 'cipating actively as a land owner. The'laod owners believe filing maps is the most effective way of implementing good planning. Maps provide a means of segmenting issues for increased scrutiny.:: Maps do the following: 1 - Surface certain -issues. - Gail for precise definition and decisions. Provide right-of-way for roads and utilities. Further questions can be directed to the land owners. The Foundation has found the land owners . quite will ng to respond to 1 - QUESTION 3: Why should the county approve this map? RESPONSE: The map conforms to the zoning and the general of the county. No le islative act is 9 .'plan act.. requested, only an administrative It is the only step left between the'Foundation and a; sizeable gift. There: is no opposition from adjacent land :owners Which we are aware. or neighbors of The county has mapped the property in 1991{ PP' p P�rty before.: Once in 1990 and again 'No questions were raised at that. time. The county enviornmental check list log number 91=02-05-01 file; number 040-500-OOI dated February 2, 1991, page 7 item A -I0 states 40 acre density is possible:. QUESTION'4: Why does the University FOUndati0il, nof want to da an RESPONSE: Many studies have been done --copies of whiCh the county has from previous applicati ons. There; the site. are; no endangered species on It should take considerable time and money. What would be the benefit at this point and time? The land, wildlife; and ecology have prospered well for 100 years in 0 vate hands, No change use 'is ;n planned;at this time. Tile Foundation's goal is to secure ownership, not t property. Why does the Py a study the count y want an E: R. when there is no change in use? Now, does this benefit the county?' �I +t n QUESTIONS 9; Are you planning to annex to Chico? `} RESPONSE 1he.Foundation's first goal is to,gain `ownership. When ownershp is secured, the FoUndation will begin focusing on other issues. The Foundation has no applications pending with Chico. There is no obligation to apply to, Chico. Chico is in the process of revie�tifi)g its general plan. The City of ' Chico may or m-± not demonstrate' any interest in annexing this area. With changes ire the county planning and processing structure and the county 'updating its general plan, the Foundation is waiting to see what the county has planned for this area. QUESTION 10 Will drainage -downstream in Durham be a problem? RESPONSE: No development activity of any kind is planned at this l' time. If any development takes place, the Foundation canbe expected to act responsibly with "no net increase" in run-off from its property; Currently, the, Foundation has employed the Chico civil engineering firm of Rolls, Anderson, 'and Rolls to assist With the parcel map. Thiis firm has a long history �Ath this property and the Foundation. QUESTION 11: Why did the Foundation not use Sieve Honeycut,cr 'Tom DeGiovanni to assist with the parcel map? They know a lot about the property. RESPONSE: This a simp,ie map, not a community plan: Rolls, Anderson, and Roll's are the surveydes who had pro cess ed'the two previous maps on this pro11 perty. If the; county would like to employ and compensate Mr. Honeycut and/or Mr.,OfGioyanni, the 'r`oundation has no objection to working with them if that would heip the county, , v 4W j r QUESTION 2 Is the Foundation, capabl a 'o - p f. dealing, with a`high powered developer and his San Francisco attorney?, RESPONSE: The short answer is yes. The longer answer provides the following insights. Foundation has thought and worked on this , project for about; four Years. - The Board .of Governors is experienced,, c;autlous> and prudent:.. - Foundation has hired competent legal assistance to work on this i project. t Rolls, Anderson, and Rolls provides sound engineering help. Foundation has an option and is ender no obligation to proceed. Ther Foundation's experience suggests that these are honorable:people With good intentions. Does the county have any experience with thesi,R people to the contrary? , QUE5I�ION 13: Whyi!s the Foundation' p ressing for the 40 acre, lot ni mimum size. RESPONSE* For the record, the Foundation is not. The parcel of - record is 1,180 acres. The maximum number of parcels would be 20. The Foundation is requesting less than half that amount its :with request of 13 parcels. The average;,size is ,just over 90 acre (1)180/13. The Foundation is trying to follow county rules which shows clearly It his area to be zoned 40 acres. r a t The Untversity F-oundation California State University, Chico Chico, California 95929=8246 (916898-684:6_ 1p . August 26, 1992 Mrs. :Candace Grubbs Butte County Clerk RE: AP 40-60-I9, 20, 21 and '22 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 25 County Ceiiter Drive Orovi l l e, ,CA 95965 Dear.Mrs. Grubbs: On behalf of the University Chico, X wish to and hereby Foundation, California State University,' file of County Board of Supervisors a notice appeal with the Butte regarding the action taken by the Butte County Development Services Committee (See attachment 1) on August 17, 1992 relative to the Foundation'stentative parcel map application. I would appreciate your notifying me regarding the date, time, and place of our appeal hearing with the Board of Supervisors, Enclosed is a $559.50 check Treasurer--the balance owed made payable to the Butte County as stated in Bill Farrel's letter dated July 14, 1992 (See attachment 2). Please contact me at 898-5297 should you have any questions or need additional information regarding the Foundation's notice of"appeal. aincerely,' Ed Masterson, Director university Relation and Development cc: William Farrel Steve Finn Don Swartz Elaine Wangbefg Jay Zellmer Enclosures d �0 Q Orr f � i va Board of Supervisors' December 9, 1992 page, 7 4 A development impact fee for Sherif f Facilities shall, be paid_ pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 3, Article II of the Butte County Code, prior to issuance of building permits or { Use Permit in the case of a mobile home. Said fee amount will be determined and calculatedas of the date of application for the building permit or Use Permit, 5. Place a note on the map t* at states: "Wood stove and fireplace inserts installed in any home within this subdivision shall be EPA approved and designed', to meet emissions standards of the California Clean. Air Act of 1988 as amended." 6. Applicants shall comply with all other applicable State and local statutes, ordinances, and regulations. 7. Pay any delinquent taxes or current taxes as required. 8. Meet the requirements of .the Butte County Fire Department SPECIAL- CONDI'T'IONS, 1. Note on parcel map to read: "No structural development, roads'` or, other Improvements, shall be allowed except one single family dwelling on the entire property which is the subject of this parcel map, prior to an amendment of the Butte County General Plan and 'zoning for the property, which designate the intended area as suitable for development." 2. Place a note on the map to read,: ►►Each parcel as it develops' will be required to provide two-way traversable access RS-8- LD-I to a county maintained road. Frontage requirements for each parcel 'will depend on the type of, development." 3. Roadwayaccess shown on the Tentative Map shall be reserved in deeds as per county ordinance and offered for dedication on the final map. 4. Show 50 ft: building setback line measured from centerline of access easement. 5 . Place a note on map to read: '►Preva de road maintenance ` agreement upon completion of the road.' 6. Indicate, a 2O it.. building setback ,from the right-of-way, line of ,Skyway and State "highway 99. 7. Show, all easements of record on the final map. 8. Provide street name signs per requirements of the Department of Public Warks prior to! recordation of the final, map b Board of Supervisors December 9, 1992 Page Provide cul--de-sac on the access road at the southerly lot line of Parcel 1: 14.- Place a note on the map to read: "Development of any parcel will require construction of intersection with public road _ approach, left turn lane,- acceleration and deceleration lane at intersection of access toad, and Skyway.11 Place a note on the map to read: "Fach parcel as it develops will be required to contribute a pro rata share towards the installation; of traffic signals at the intersection of access road and s)cyWay. 12 Provide ,I ft. no :access strip ,along Skyway frontage e�tcept at the access road'. 13. Relocate access 'road connection to the Skyway to the Fast to im rove vehicle safety and provide better stopping"' sight p distance 14. Meet the requirements, of CalTrans for access to State Highway 99. 15. Place a note;on the map to read.: "Developer shall provide all necessary traffic safety signs including stop signs.." 16. Meet Butte County Subdivision requirements fcr the creation of parcels for continued agricultural use.. A statement shall be placed on the Final Map and .reserved in deeds for each, lot that "Lots within this division are not approved for sewage disposal"., 17. Place a, note cin the additional map sheet that states: "Fire suppression sprinkler systems shall be installed in" any residential structurp_ in accordance with the National Fire Protection association Standard for the installation of sprinkler systems in one and two .family dwellings and mo ile homes, NFPA Standard 13 D. 18. Should any archaeological artifacts be discovered during any work on site,, the work shall I cease until a qualified archaeolo ist .has examined amti.ned th g e findings and recommended in " writing `to the Director of` Development Services that the work be continued. Tra,_ Director s�ia11 authorize the re sumption of work.. 4rv� JY/. �t • � f Ka tiles." t � !! Y Y yP Y r S �t Cy 41 FdrNl }r S.-Dcrcdmentsent:bylend�agencv 4 ?fid ng &Waterways j 9C = ocutirent sent by sq, = t . _... ,: Stf estcddts 'bution - g8 � I Cdtal Ciinlmissii)n., , Vital Conservancy Ccrit�atado River Board Environmehfal AffalrJ Cert;�xvndon „_ _ Air Resources Board Fftb fic Game »APCl7/AQMD at;+` v,uY _,.,Califomia Waste Ma,, meet Board __pftce of Historic Preservation S'iVRCBi Clean Water Grants TAY ' Recreation , . �,SWRCH :Delta iJnit �ersnndon SWRCB: Water Quality Fy :$.;ty Conseryado &Development Commission SWRCB: Water Rights wawa Resources (DWR) Regional WQCB Business, Transportation & Housing Youth & Ad uit corrections .,e�anaua --- --� Coirectiors; :�Ir mia Highway Patrol District # Independetrt Commissions & ,OffiG _CALTRANS Lisrtment of Transportation;Planning (headquarters) .Energy Conamisuon. :.r7zEmng & Cdavrowuq Development4 Native American Heritage Commission --,-Public U04ties Commission -Food -4 Agriculture Santa Monica 14 lounmiri;rConser fancy w K921th & Welfare SateLaiidsCrmimissidzi 'r7 th Service Tahoe Regiou4ftnningAgenc stafie & Consumer Servfce$. ` General, Services Other_" _,dLA.,(Schdols) PPtsbltc..nevie: V ,Period (to be rifled rn.`hy lead agency) ,Date. October 28� "19$2 Endin Date Novtmbet 30,1092 g ;Si a Date .October 28 1992 'IxTA`tE 0T CAUFORNI,1, _ THE RESOURCES AGENCY PETE WILSON, dovema , j. -PAR MENT OF FISH AND GAME i UT aNii��US'ROAO, SUITE A Riop4CHO 4ORDOVA, CALIFC*141A 95670 C916- : 55-.7020 November 12, 1992 pepar�� � m Last � ar�l� 14r . To Department ,of Development Services 7 County Center Drive N CxovilLe, California 95965 p'allfovnla prone, bear Mr. Last. The epartmenttand Came ) areviewed the. Cal, 'Parcel S"tate'UniDe"rsityFoundation Tentative 'Parcelmap, a proposal. to divide APs 40-600-191 20, 21 and 22 (1,180 ac:) into 13 par(oels ,of 40 to 340 acres. Located southeast of Chico, theproject site xs prinarily a ,foothill grassland area, portions of which contain valley oak,., riparian. woodland, vernal wetlands, and oak woodlands. The land division can be expected to have a significant adverse impact on habitat and wildlife species. Large,portions Of the 13 lots would be altered during construction of 'the, University related research-industrial 'busines$es intended for the area. Project impacts and mitiga'tiors' "which should: be addressed in an env roriMehtal impact report for the project include 1. Cumulative 0-s:ses of grassland habitat. Grasslands support 'a wide diversity of species, and' species densities are significant. Land divisions in Butte County and California have caused large losses of grassland habitat. 2. Cumulative losses: of vernal wetlands. Any vernal wetland losses must be Mitigated pursuant to the California Environmental Qui al,ity Act (CEQA) Subdivision Map Act and Government Code, s:ctions pertaining to project,impacts "on habitat and sPe,cies. Compliance with those'sections;is an ac :ion separate from U.B Sec Tori 404, (C1ean Wat�;r ,Act,) , ecuirementS. A specific wetland mitigationplan 'sti.t�aldl be developed in consultation ,with State�..Federal agencies, 3. Any hardwood losses.' 4. ;Riparian habitat losses. 5. Reduced water qual.,ity in Butte` Creek,,. 'anc`vIts tril utar es : Intended uses of t�hs 13; bats have the. 6, Agreed, All, easements of recoird,, as defined in a title 'report, on the Final Map. 7. No; No street is, contemplated at this time. No signs will be provided prior to Map recordation. 8. The access easement is for agricultural use only at this time, No 1 cul-de-sac will be built_ A.pp,icall" will provide an additional ` loop of easement around selectedparcels, if requested by ffie County. 9. Na taxes are delinquent. C+zrrent taxes are prepaid through December 81, 1992, Taxes will be paid through June `20,1998 at , the time of recording. 10. We have received no requirements from the Butte County Fire Department. Since no construction is anticipated at this time; we except to have no requirements. lt No additional note. on the Map. No construction or change of land use is anticipated at this time or by this Map. 1.2. No additional note on the Map. No development is anticip«ted at, tads time, No trafficsignal is warranted by 13 parcels general planned for grazing and open land.: 13. No development is, planned at this time. To limit Skyway access with no compensation is` unnecessary and without cause. 14. Agreed. Relocate access easement on Final Map to the east to improve safety andprovide better sight distance (see December 7, letter from Chico Research ParkLtd. - , o Foundation). 15.:Applicant and landowner seek no additional access to Stare Hi 11 99 at this time. Applicant and landowner"'have agreed' to cooperate with County to place,o 60 foot wide access to State Highway 99 in a letter to Neil MwCabe dated December 7 1902, Applicant Arad landowner �i*ill not give up any of tate existing agricuXtural access rights at this time. 16, No additionat Mote on the Map. Noconstruction is anticipated at this tune.Nosfreet signs shall be provided at this time, 2 }I 6 Agreed. All easements of record, as defined in a title report; on the Final Map. 7. I No. No street is contemplated at this time. No signs will be provided prior to Map recordation. � n�"r N�} 4lZ9014Oy% /�/&OYL 7V Mor' dZGr�v�c D�a>✓ rNc77✓ a.a AIAP 7"r1/1 -r" S116&41, 8. S'/414t i /,qtr' VI/ Ov✓ C�raa �r7"rr.� el-" � I*W The access easement is for agricultural use only at this time. No cul-de-sac will, be built. Applicant will provide an additional i loop of easement ar un selected par els, if requested by e �c. l -�-d� -- /2C, COUP„ y, .r'aG .d `''' �'' [�/ Cll � " eL e' �jZ " y'tlQa, V+�" r er ?� er t 7 Gilt, d.G - -ra ," 94 No taxes are delinquent.. Current taxes are prepaid through December 31,199,2,- Taxes will be paid through June 20, 1993 at the time of recording. Ws ✓s r-rc;v �,,� r�;: ,fir 7- C_O /e -V ,/>TN /`2PI;l I;qG7/2Z� at) IACIVCrl11S o��/t- A4-Grl, /S 10. We have received no requirements from the 13utte County Fire Department.. Since no construction is anticipated at this time, we except to have no requirements. ft_=ePtr1.&6- / CPI4fl_7•,, 4610- "S ra /��'��ic/�-rte ,/ � d ••• 9 �. �v �-�-� id.r'c�-�. l-^,.�/ - g t.. ?"moi i+ ­�r aer w�!-fin. ,�.o- 11. no additional note on the Map. No construction or change of 1 land use is anticipated at this time or by this Map. Vlkr,&V &,�" °zoml_, 01,19 12. No 7.-2,aser r"lJr-za2fx2 }srl ,avtG9? r& Ve7l&Z-Opp No additional note on the Map. No development is anticipated at this time. No traffic signal is warranted by 13 parcels general planned for grazing and open land. 5' ,✓✓.r��.: s !' a I 13. No development is planned at this time. To limit Skyway access with no compensation is unnecessary and without cause. A4-stli Aev ✓�rrn- �.-u3-.ter=.�� s`*�i�-�7"7� 14i Agreed.. ,Relocate access easement on Final Map to the east to improve safety and provide better sight distance(see December 7, 1992 letter from Chico Research Park, Ltd. to Foundation). 15,` Applicant and landowner seek no additional access to State Highway 99 at this time. Applicant and landowner have agreed to cooperate with County to place a 6Qoot wide, access to State W Highway 99 in a letter to Neil McCabe dated December 7,1992. Applicant and landowner svill;nat give up any of the existing, agricultural access rights at, this tune;. 44-4 7 ,O �64,�r iWW 1.6. /ytjr/{/y1�aj�^14 c. A ,ate) yI44,el, �7;4W.Ir/;- C 0;� Y,X; PV 1,41AIP a- ��� �+f�� No additional note on the Map. No.consteuction. is an ,a at this time. No streetsigns shall be provided at this time. -rLr v, e7, 2 t Az F ER&AssocjAw r nln 1 AMNEM ATtW � X30 ' �' Q DRAWERM30, � ? cluco; CALfi OMM 95927 .� (910 345-5 9 Y „F,. FACS1t UL k;1 345 -MO 40Stn1'F 23 L.I.%M [R SAN FFCAPfC IWS' 415) 781-4315 December 7,1997 `C'opy via Facsimile Transm ssiort - 53$-7120 Original via Regular Mail Mr. Neil, a t McCabe Chief Deputy County Counsel - County of Butte ?S County .Center Drive Orov�7le, CA 95965 Urd^versify* Foundation - Draft "Agreement R-anrdng Iv th fhe hand and Restricting,Development Thereof" Our file No. 2i43.01. Dear Xeih Thank Jou for your proposed draft: 74,=7reem.erit Running with the Land, and Restriciixtg Development Thereof' dated November 10.,'1992. V►re zeviewp- it and nava also discussed int widt representatives of the property owner, Chico Research It appears that the proposed agreement gees far beyond the scope or, e "Agreed mitigation Measures" approved by the Board of Supervisors unanimously ` at the October r,0,1992 hearing Those measures were incorporated verbal into the Notice of Completion &ted'Octobet Z5,19,91. Neither the Jniversity, F'otsndation nor the, property' owners is wali~In to agree to further restric6i= other dose which, Nvere ;agraed upon at the October 20, x992 hearing. We also call. your tstt6rdon fio the language incuded in tete. fiat as aph m t"he Notice of Completion at item 4_dy. sof Se ton V s hish, calls for a `'I'�`ote Qn parcel, znap an bix%diaa agreement approved by the County, land owner and applicant." do desire uito farnxa .Av fits point, the applicant and oWters not` fn enter a agreenn.ent but we Mould prefer, to simply agree on the, laxguage for the ,nota on the parcel map. As quoted above, this is explicitly allowed under item 4.ci. Accordingly, vre enclose our proposed l=gpa ge to he included in e nate on , the parcel znap. We also enclose art "Actino s�ecigeinent': io be signed by the Foundation toaddress the future clatters set forth in Item 4.d. We relrouxe your comments at your earliest opportc; lil�ty but believe that our proposed language INTER•-DEPARTMEINTAL MEMORAMDUI T0 Board of Supervisors PROM: Stuart Edell, Manager, Land Development Division SUBJECT 'California State University, TPM Foundation AP 40-60-19 20ri 21 and 22 DATE: November 25, 1992 This project has been set for hearing December 15, 1992, at 10 a.m. for consideration of an appeal of its ;denial. Should the Board choose to uphold the a ;,weal, 'the 'Public Worley Department would recommend the following conditions of approval: 1 Note on the map: Each parcel ,as it develops will be required, to provide two-way traversable access RS-8-LD-T to a county maintained read. Frontage requirements fot oath parcel will depend on the type of development. 2 Access to be reserved ib deeds as: per county ordinance and offered for dedication on the final map, 3. Shoe 50 .ft. building setback .Line measured from centerline of access easement: 4. NNototeleonon map: Provide road maintenance agreement upon P the road 5. Indicate a'20'ft.. building setback from the right-of-way lime of Skyway and State Hiighway 99. -6. Show all easements of record on the final map. 7. Provide. street name signs per requirements of the Department of Public Works prior to recordation. of the final map. 8. Provide cul-de-sac at, the end,of the street. `9. Pay any delinquent takes or,current taxes as required. 10. Meet the, requirementsof the Butte County Fire Department,. 11. Note on map: Development of any parce? will require construction of intersection ..with public road approach, left turn lane, acceleration and deceleration lane at intersection of access road and Skyway.''; 12. Mote OnL, map: Each parcel as it develops will be requred`to contribute a, pro rata share towards the installation of traffic signals at the intersection of access road and'Skyway. ivers�. � . t avert r° ctl0ii off' �� �'0,r wz and11, S�x�t donated .;1 `die foundation succi ods • be penalized for their. future B Puck ltiena, , ex ectations for the project, lie Y In attract;tkg suitable tenants far 1�1� G`i ] CaI1 111e�.S�1 'eOx 1 C` �i � vision iZZC`� sa d, He added that a full eco affylVriter the r=se ,J'lK park, bra b The acvv;,age is located IT, a nomic assessment should be done StlOP,OVILLE -- The Chico ?�e _ rezon!n to allow far suitable develo e t as part of the consideration of ,180 acre,, parcel fronting � pROVILLE - Mitigation measures attached g development, nt, Stale, University Foundation P future.development on the land, > • , h:°,hwa , It Is a: art of the 6,�Y°?. ,. iy ed negative declaration for 13- arcel; - Applicant acknowledges that an .EIR will be ,... averted rejection of its parcel ata Y ilp I4,. a prop, s g P p + _ "Every now and then you have , � p e aeras bat�4,.,n ilie Sk; �vay <E�d l,, i.,t division ma sou ht by the Chico State needed before al;proval of ani a plication. for a rY . , " _ y _ .. appllcatton for 1,130 acres on the cul Road,, >. ate ein circulated, general plan ame.-idment and rezoning. to take a risk," said Supervisor side of Hiehwa 99 Tuesday, N It % ,itversity Foundationbeing g P b Ma Anne H u Chico, "This Cast .. Y i Y+ The fotlrtdauon filed for a A 30 -da ubhe review period was authorized u The 'EIR will consider, the potentifroal Mary a x of and wort Boded of indications v ere the • could be a vehicle for bringing' tentative tnaya splitting the. � est y Tuesday by the. Board of Supervisors. The negative cumulative impacts of any proposed:: developments : , ,, it. m the prove n Ixt monrsors that good to this ara: - 1>l30 acres into 13 parcels so it dt lartian, if .:approved, would waive <�l full for the entire 1,1;30-acrearea, , it may approved next month. ^ F, i • Items t he addressed b the EIR will include > Her motion to authorize the board authorized, the :ircu- could nego iaie for the m�.st err ironmental impact (EIR), 1. o Y circulation ti a ed ne a- The _ _ i o of the ml g t g • � desireablet lac.,��lon of the offer,�d : The mitigation measures are designed to ensure protection of natural resources such. as creeks, lotion foto a 30 -day publti review - ' e used for grazing, until drainage courses riparian areas, vernal pools, blue tive declaration was seconded by ; -e od of a. mi ated ne ative land donation. > tit land will continue to b r g 6 15P Ed. McLaughlin of Durham, d, ri, n g g M g X7 an o ` the proposal to The applica.'Ion was refected 'any an ppropnate county general plan amendment and oak. trees and oak woodland areas, and sensitive aeclaration n p po approved on a S-0 vote. y p nin are approved pending the filing, of plant habitats: ;, create 13 `parcels, froth the 1,180- the count c,,relo ment revie,tr rez+T I think_ we have a lot of committee'. t aplAlcations forspecific development projects, •The property will be available for continued ,, "I acre pier.: - > agricultural use until eneral plan amendments and safeguards, McLaughlin said. I The tentative ma then comes The committee cited the tt cl.,o.f dttigation measures include, g p think we have to do somethine :o' - P an environmental, impact report No structural development, .roads or tither rezoring,araapptoved, ,, back to the boat on Dec. 1S for a p . , ,, jump start the economy: - -: IvLR idol would iderittl and, im tovernents circ t .for one single family Uhl!, con�rary applo�al is received from the decision on whether it, is to be i >,) P P The development, barring other - -:a t : v , nif cant; adverse, presently a 1 wed shall made nor t aunt ; rxistin stone walls will be r.,reserved P approved with the mitigated. n�ga- mitigate ori, s,g I dwelling as pr n y 1 h P �', : � � problems, would - enerall be k PP p g Y rive declaration} deferred' pending environmeneal am�ia,cts,> J.t alst to approval of a general pl;ut amendment and except fo:r vehicle crossings. consistent with the Board of reparation of a full environmental held that the hind divisnan aria _-- would be out «"' Supervisors' policy to channel impact rep, 1R or rejected future development._.. . _. amendment and rezoning area Lee ment to the east side P. p �} Jwith i viendad for the entire 1,130 acres immediate goal; would bang well g p urban d top ouinght: of confomuty �vaa the county s , d fol EIR vould be deme a in obs that wtlll ber(efit the proved> of Highway 99 toward the foot- The basic Issue is whether the general plan,. whir designates the a�t4 t°t l 1 paying $ j The roposal received Support hills so as to reserve high quality ,a .o an land, thffi, Farrel said, entire community, proposal. Pp _ . preserve g 9, _ tY map approval violates the county's land as gazing an p from several members of the agr,cultural lands to the west. P l , .Re iaid-there is no commitment She stressed that until specific general lari or whether it core::be The ruling was app.,alc'cl to the _: _ , p abler with ane ersan in,o o i- P' Supervisor -1. by ti -c :county to change the development plana are pi.,oposed, 1? P PP s "Chis policy was a kc tytone in found to nonfarm to the general Board of S pe o vela" - the land will sta in grazing under tion, P Y county dccela� meat �er�«,.rt.,i plan to, allow de p vii , Y - gz' tg . t1tC creation of the agricultural ' - I lan on the basis of special Bi11 Farrel, c u y, p_ P � . _. a ma agreement with the owner, which John Ivlet�x of Chico called the • . > i i mew, ,Meanwhile, with the p, g meat , services director, told ,iho board - _: ,, reen, line around west Chico mitigations agreed to by both public hearin rocess a oke g g - . , :. the iunndation could research the would conform to the eneral plan, p $ ,P . j Tuesday the commjtt�,e h,ic'i rfa € almost 12 years ago that was Intended to ive land s eculator. 8 oter,dal for develo ment of a Ed Masterson, director of uni g P E y e;, iiia r�, P P ,_ ,� _ intended to prevent further urban tale could be the future of choice but to refect the �ppl ti p At s eve o orttinit to market their , nese ch ark and:if it f rids at to bC verset relations and development, ry _ P y since foundation off!cial= vvete riot P Y _ P . encroachment into the agricultural. �, ..-.,,,;, develo meat an the east szde of � induct: g - , p feasible the, general fan amend- said the foundation. is a private P ,} . ,,.,.:, : special candlatn,i , g plan P . _ area. R,.a.... ., t ,: Hi hwa 99between' the Skyway in p He asked the appeal bed e t < <, y kY. Y .. cud be pursued, he agency and that unlike the, unrver- h PP en., d . , z mitigating .im acts that wcuId ment then could P y , a . , . cal road an what is generally for mi esti g P . s anti a decision is mode on Swartz and his former partner - <. „ x ��_.,,, c an N Y added. sit it would be bound b t count . ,. , a+ed the ElR to be Waived marginal a cultural have a oho > .•-'4� a eed to be m gn _ _ ,, whether the general plan, be d Blakeley d initiated., e � _ � _. This is �,e important far the planning, policies and regulations, C P Donal BI 1_ y ha..Ili and the ma roved:. very P P g. Po . land. P approved g amended: ,:... .,_• universit and for, the founda� if develo mentis ailuro.. loaning rocess far a major M LL> ,.ham ., . ,. The CSU Foundations ro ,>al thatsubsequently,tt,.. „ . �.� ,�: .r,�;., �,� � � .. „_, � .} � �, , �, , t ,. P 1, Ht, said th ti Jim Gallagher, president of the development for the 6,400 acres: ..,. lir �,,� ?- Y<r ,t3.a sold Elaine Van bE,r Nean�vtlile, the mitigation .cin mea g P p i : z � .3,.. � 4.. �,, . to test the watCrs for creatiary of a have been worfce:,l out ., _ Chico c t•,,.: mitigations _, _ b t an kind o .hl Economic Planning Co that could have created ori urban .a , �, _ g :. re sures will prohibit f g rP y , ..,�,,.. r, , river,.t vice provost .for P , _.,.n a r research ar of hied. the parcel t chao+es.an. Y P ., ,. w �, , ., . � ,,, , .; _. es k, _, w _ _ . P - and.. th.. , board,, f t .., . , �.. + :. - _ urged the 'board to sustain .the area, of some 10,000 to 12 000 ..,«„. ..,. i _P lino develo meet other than ;that al $ � � . 5ea,ch, -Our cam us as _lI, P _ _.., ma is a needed_ first step, could make a finding, that the parcel n i _ r a eal. -idents at buildout, fide project .:. P o p pp out of loved in the, resent wnmg, he PP res , r a onl}. 116 acres. We are _ present tnrrr out to be the forerunner of conforms to the general: plan: a ,, said until such time a eneral lan tiVe do not believe they should. envisioned 4,200 residential units. development of the. area The general tan designates Ilia spat , g P s r She said the offer, of land < fide foundation wants the ma g p and 0$ien to pave the vvay for- receiving a lThe deliuongdoes notnllow fur Provides the university with a �® grant. of 40 acres for; a ,future commercial and residential, devel unique opportunity to perhaps s ®' research park of light. clean expand the -campus ata tone when opment, : hard economic times are forcin ;ndustries and possibly as the site Foundation officials haire con- > g of a Chico State UniversitY corn- tended that. until there are: actual cutbacks in resources. Alex, plans for development of the She said if the foundarion can, P d ce appropriate ' u es for :.the . ” - I. -SO .. . r, ald Swarms eeneral artner' research ark, :tlie land will con- ro u,.s %SQ ,rn. in The University Centelr'- Free and Open t0 the Public ,. I7onlr�n► h at Y P •., • an 'receive up to 140 pp g •pier coin Swartz. • tri:5,400: acres in Vance �ybn tinue to be used for grazing and I d it could ret, � p :east of Highway 95: has offared therefore. there would be .ria < es f �, (�, g� ® $ • '4 the .inundation an initial. donation violation of the general plan, • `Weare confident the concerns a d �; i� i t � p P o iL R , 'p t p would. not be can be addressed,"' she said, another 100 He. would � �e Allowed until the general }plan is She said the research park, the y, Oct.. 23 and Saturday, Oct. 24 _ ,. .. arida 992 _ 7:30 p.m. in Harlen Adams Theatre nXver, Doitar GS U Ch i c0 Jazz Ens r b l Periarming old and new ' fa nda ds, and' rx�c o -25th i vocal numbers featunng Jeanette ,Blakeney ther 23 , � `Tckets� $� at Qnfniversi 8 Office or thd,&or'. l: Map Foundation Parcel for the Urxa.versit Eo l ,��ctober 9; 1992' ,page 3 Item 3.f. Sediment basins, silt traps and vegetated setbacks to be required to minimize sediment reaching any drainage courses. - Ite5rt 4.a. 'Riparian habitat and vernal. pools and location of blue oaks and other oaks to be identified on parcel map. Notes on the map and designated no -development areas, to 9n P } t be shown to retain these areas free of future disturbance b construction o� roads, ads, Y p buildings, etc . 'item 4 Note on parcel map, easement or similar binding agreements approved by the county to be entered into prior to approval of final map sufficient to ensure no structural, development, roads or other improvements of any kind to be made prior to an. amendment of the General Plan and zoning .for the; prop�tes which for'1 designates the area as suitable Y'velopment. g use I iti itions shall Further, the above a rscultural remain in, effect until preparation, at the owners' ;expense and adoption by the County of a Specific Plan and Environmental Impact Report for 'the 1180 acre property by the County pursuant to 'sections.65452-65457 fprovision s *� the CaliforniaCala.fornx.a Gave ode.Tis xumenNX211ding intended to ensure the: 118Qis for,.; of the able continued agricultural use until all e plan and zoning changes are made. Item 5.,a.. No specific siti.gations necessary as retention of the site for agricultural uses peritem. 4.4;. above will g habitat. result in no current chane to wildlife h Item ;8. Refer to ,mitigation for 4.d. above. 13;c.' Easement(s) or other provisions for at least one; additional primary access points into the site from' either Highway 99 or Neal Road 'should 'be shown on the tentative map. 1g.f. or mitigations necessary as mitigation 4.d: limits use to existing agricultural activ.tiew;., 14.a,b, No mitigations necessary as m-, igati.on 4.d. limits use c,e,f. to 6kistli ng agticccltural activities, 16.. Mitigation 4.d. limits use to existing agricultural ' activities and therefore no increase in, runoff is anticipated. In addi..tion,> the, project, if approved, will I be conditioned to defer internal road construction until after plan and zoning amendments and approval of ,a specific pian as referenced in mitigation e"�4�r9f�i �•y�l�� *�1�' �61ilQIt�Vi 7�. as7 �ie ti�M�� x » ,� r , . - �, a �. ��' ,, ���' ocument sent by lead a enc}�° X-1.)octuncnt sent by SCAT,., , •,. rwn & ,^' 1. ogling .atey �="Suggested dutnbtu.#ori ' "" Coastal Commission, Coastal Conservancy Colorado Rixer Board Environmental t\ffalrs (CationAir Resources Boyd is & Game APCU/AQ1iD , ___ 1;a esxry California TVaste anagement, Board i"lt;e::of Historic Preservation SWRCB1 Clean Nater Grants _SWRCB: Delta Unit _ ]a natiot SWRCB: Water Quality IS, gay Conservation & Development Commission Si?YRCBi eater, Rights Wgier Resour.es (DWR)Regional !'VQCB_ Bus cess, Transportation & Housln Youth :& Adult Corrections -Aeronautics_,_,__Correction Culifornfa11MghwayPatrol Independent Carnmisslons 3 Offlces CA1.TR-A-NS District # L Energy CoijjCan on , Depajtment of Transportation Planaing (headquarters) Native Arnencan Hez:tage Commission "-T,ousi ►S & Community Development' Nblic Util des Commission S Food $ Agr cultctrenicaMountains Santa.Mo Conservancy aaealth& �FJeifara State Lands Commission _ .ewth Sertices _ Tahoe Regional Planning agency' Stale Consumer services i General SerFices tither, p+ f?1SIic Review Pericid (to he filled in by,lead,agency) St ZIL-zgDate. October 28, ,1992EndingDate Novm'ber .30, 1992 _ ie, Date October 2&: 1992 ,.QaaQoc� Jy Mx. William Fatter October 27';1992 Page 2 of 3 pages x._.,.4mq,ibXOk-. ,htk44'M,.P4iiw^k�a�� tt die ttie mai ago�ro" 1 a. -^.-a• F.�7'N.^-.--, .. . �a •.mow t.,. ,ax.,eM n ., *aa+-d�k,4.....,1��" , .�,•. r crxdkai? xap„r I betteve tit we wePe m cli;.ar aQreemen ar4'Ehs issue ut prior discussions with you., Stuart Edell, and Tom Last. If that is not your understanding, please advise rite fix=ed ately and with a written explanation of your reasoning. atara.xrr ctays� t has bean well over a year, inre our initial peice� ome d>#culty with scuricg ' the application process. As you know, staff, first deemed the project, to be in compliance { with the General Plan. ,irk,. gin , was asked to Pip provide additional ztfc�rataii'or►"i�tai you fedi" w ti'��ess - �.-,�¢"feY` e a . lic:adon was ' deemed' complete. In fact, the ,information was in yai r files. Then we had tfie problem of the agenda for our bearm, ctobex 992 r ` ort Alt this point, we simply want to on take the most direct route possible for approval plete and will be acted p PP , r ap i . is omd, ley the toarcl December 75 1.992. _ our tentative rxta a � _ Ixcatton. I understand that our � sxafE-� n ,r 1i est be opP � roJe N� . �1 ik at" M ...� t the I supply regzzest teat siaffTIaw tTie diene. of''tie 1.30 " "-+*. ,#-0.,.' t2blisit the Nti ted lti e at%ve Declaration so that the Board can tae ke ofinal, a d otion of the Deceu�er;x5, I9�2 he3ring� ; Please contact xxte to arrange finalization of the Mitigated -Negative Declaration. Very truly yours, The Univensity Foundation, California State UniverszEy, erica Ed L. Masterson, Director t3niversity Relations and Development Chico .enterprise-Record/Wednesday, gcto ger 2i, 1989/6A naation a, -&,sect' Uinversity F ou Verts rej, ion of ma for Swartz land x By Nick Ellenct donated if thb foundation succeeds - " Staff Writer in attracting suil:61e tenants for ''�� //��' •¢ 4• be penalized for their futtI e the research parks 1: itior� ion �.easures' o expectations' for the project,,, lie The acreage is located in a b r �a2� division niap said, He added that a .toll eco- Oe University _ty The Chico g noetic assessment should be done State University Foundation 1x1;80 -acre parcel fronting the , . ht hwa , It is a- art o : OROVILLE Mitigation measures attached rezoning to allow for suitable a as t averted rejection of its oriel ma highway, Y . f the 6,400 development. par of the consideration of P _ F p to a io posed negative declare application acres between the Skyway a P , P, , - g tion for 13 -parcel • A plicant, ackno' a future develo mento pp n for 1,,180 acres on the Y and land d v : p .. wl dGs hak an EIR will be developmenton the land, Neal Road', r ision map souglrt• b the Chico State needed iefore-a roval Eve _ east side` of Highway 99� Tuesday , - � : Y _ PP of ,any a .,plication, for very naw and, then you have - Y The foundation f University Foundation are bein circulated, general _ l i _ +a and won favorable indications o tied iar a g, g pan amendment and rezontn to .take a risk, said Supervisor teniaave rna A 30 -day public mview enod was authortr,.ed gChico. , i from the ;Board of'Su ervisor that p splitting the westerly P The EIR will consider the otent i Mary Anne Houx of "This, P S Tuesday b the Board of Supervisors. p _ ia. - Y y p rvisors. The negative cumulative im acts o „ it may approved: next month, 1,180 acres into 13 parcels so it impac any proposed develo merits could be a vehicle" for bringing. . P- declartton, if approved, would - . l' ,. P _ : ,:. f The hoard authorized, _ c u FP + tvatvc a full for the enure 1;] S, macre area. ood obs to this , razed the circa o_ ld negotiate for the most environmental impact:re g J arae ..port (EiR).. Items to be addressed b >the E v' _' ..Her -motion to authorize lation for- a-30-daypublic review desireable location of the offered •. r TR will include bonze the idThe mitigation measures are designed to ensure rotect� - ' period of a midgated -negative lana donation. • -- g : P on. of natural :resources such as c •++ - circulation of the mitigated y . g:(lie land: will continue to be u re ,ks, e a ' declaration on used for grazing until drainage courses ri avian areas ttve. declara the proposal to The appUeation was rejected b a ' � p , , _, vernal pools, blue tion was seconded by ' _ J Y n appropriate county general lan amendment and oak- tree create 13 parcels from the 1 1 - the count de eo I p. sand oak woodland areas and Sens t r Ed McLaughlin of Durham an P , 8Q y v l pment review rezoning, are approved, pending the filing of plant habitats. , 1 ire a ro g d acre piece, committee.. applications e _ FP,., ved on a. 5-0 vote, The tentative ma : P forsp specific development • The property will be av I think p then comes The committee cited the lack of P P Y , „ arlable for continued rel. we have a lot o1 back to the Mitigation measures include: agricultural use,unul general safe wards ,' �on bee, l5'for a an environmental im act report $ plan amendments and safeguards," McLaughlin said. f " r p P No structural development, roads or ocher rezoning roved think decision ,on, whether if is to b"e ()rIR) that would identify and p t' PP: � , »� ��'e have to do something to Y improvements except. for one single a " g approved with the mitigated F sig f milt' •Unless contra approval is a um St the pp ted nega- rrutrgate any significant adverse �' e r ce1ved from the J economy." tie $ _ dwelling presently allowed shall be made rear count exist p v declaration, deferred' endin environmental impacts. It l� _ Y, existing stone: walls will be reserved- The development,, barren other P g P al to approval of a general plan amendment and except for vehicle ' . p - g preparation of a full environmental held that the land division and P crossings. problems, would generally be impact, report (EIR), or rejected future development would be out consistent with the Board of outright, amended for the entire 1 l30 acres Supervis-rs policy to channel - of conformity with the county s , _ immediate oal, would brio w. amendment a The basic issue is whether the general plan, which d and the full EIR would ,: g well red rezoning are ap- urban dc, els merit to the east side g p designates the ou be done paying Jobs that will benefit the proved. P - map approval violates the county s land as grazing;and open land: then, Farrel said, entire communis ', of highway 99 toward the foot - pr The proposal received sir ort general lin or Whether it c' The Tulin w He said PP. , hills so as to reserve hi, p an be g as appealed to the there is no commitment She stressed that until specific from several me P high quality p , tubers of the agricultural lands to the west. toured to conform to the general Boar,,, of ��upervtsors, by the county to change the develo meet loris are public, viii • plan on the: - ' p , P proposed, P, , h one person in op osi p basis of special i3�11 Farrel, county development general plan to allow develo - the latiit will to n do P This mitigations _ , P -S Y i, grazing under n. policy was: a, keystone in g s agreed to by both senices director, told the board ment, Meanwhile, with the map, a eeinent with the ' the creation F owner; which John Merz of Chico called the ration of the agncultutal'. sides. Tuesdaythe commnittee had no the foundation could research the w -,; ,'J �,_• -- ould conform to the general plan, ubhc heating Process a - ,, green. line around west-l.,,ico At stake could be c potential P _ i $ P Joke the :future orf choice but to refect the application P retial for development of a Ed di :: irate - - almo�t: . ._ . ,, rector' cif ani. tided to give land. eculato s 12 years .ago' that was development on the ._ n research P_ rs F east side of since foundation officials were not arch park and if it finds it to be verset re t , .: , . y relations and. develo merit- eve o brtunit to intended to regent further ur Highwa 99 between the,S wa in, a reement o feasible he a erg _ p . , rY ,}iP Y market their prevent bort ky y g n special condit:ons , g ne ral plan amend said the foundation is a ovate coduct. encroachment into the agricultural' and Neal road on what is generally for mitigating impacts, - acts that would ment then could be pursued, be p P g e Y to g P P agency and that unlike the univer- He asked. the ap eal be denied urea, meed to be marginal agricultural have allowed the EIR to be waived added, p. ' t.- sett', it would be bound by county until �a decision.- is made ori - ]and, and:thernap approved,. This is Very im ortanc for the Swartz and his former partner pp p planning policies and regulations whether the eneral ' plan - ,- The CSU Foundation's ro asal . uruversit and , g E should be : Donald Blakele had initiat P _. P P He said that subse u Subsequently, Y for the founda if develo mentis: Ursued. amended, Y ed th to test t q e_. y, the ,, F _, p , he waters for creation of a tion, said Elaine Wan ber - planning process for a major mitigations have been worked out g Meanwhile, the mita attain mea= Jim Galla, he re ' J research, ark, o g S r, P sident of the Bevel park,, , of which he oriel university vice _ :_ development for the 6,400 acres_ ' . _ parcel, and the board, if ~iE chooses c Y . _ provost for re sures;: will prohibit an red , Chirrn Economic ma as -a a ,, an ,, _ P y kind of o iii Planning, Co , that p n eded first step, could m search. friar campus devel could have created an urban ake a finding that the, arcel ma am is small, opment other than that al urged the board to Susi -• rp turn out to be the forerunne P l? acre the area of some .10 00 t r< of only 116 acres. 'We, are out of locoed in the resent appeal, t) o 12,000 conforms to the general plan. : Y_ „ p, zoning, he PP al, , r , . development of the -area sac •, residents at buildout., The project The general p e. said, :until such time a general plan; We do hot believe the . P J c g plan designates the ; . _Y should ,envisioned 4`200 residential u The foundation wants the Map She said: the offer of land , tuts., P Iand for grazing :and open Land. to pave the way- for receiving; a The designation does not allow for provides the universit�� with a7-1 grant of 40 acus Fpr a .future commercial' and residential Bevel- unique opportunity to perhaps: research park of light Crean expand the campus at a time when } opment. P pCSC d industries and possibly as clic site Foundation officials have, con.- hard economic times are forcing k. of a: Chico State University com tended that until there are actual: cutbacks it; resources: Ple> plans for development of the She said if the foundation can - i Donald Swaitx eneraipartner _research ark the produce - * :g . Park, , land, will con: r .ace appropriate uses, for the':. ,. - _ r in 6,440, acres, in ;Vance Canyon time' to be used far razin and Pared ,it could c Tvnl Hitt t! 7 3� .ni?. In The I n ve .. g g re ewe up t, 140 9 P r rs ty Center Free and Pen to the Publitr east of Highway''99, has offered, therefore there Would be no acres,ifrom Swartz, .:_ the foundation an initial donation violation of the menti lan, "4Ve are co ., _ g nfidsn,t the concerns A a of 4o acres. irk with Piet Guth Whit He has stated that Development wood oat be can he addressed,"' she said: ' t� n' another 10,0 acres, wo aid be allowed, tm til the general ,plan is She said the research park, the' Friday, Ct: 23 and Saturday, Oct. 24 a 7:30 ;r�. in Marlen Adams Theatre, DIST p ... silver �► ' � S U � 1, C O S t �ZZ e, S, AGREED) MITIGATION MEASURES -University Foundation Tentative Mai October 20;1992 Warg n references are to March 4,1992 Initial Study) initial Study te?n Item 3.d. No mitigations necessary in light of mitigation 4.d. below, Item 3.f , No mitigations necessary in f fight of mitigation. 4.d. below. Item 4.a. Riparian habitat, vernal pools, the location of blue oaks , and other, sensitive habitats to be identified in future in the event an EIR is prepared which must occur prior to any development. Item 4.d. Note on parcel map and/or binding ,agreement approved by the County, land owner ,and applicant to be entered into prior, to approval of tentative map. Such shall be sufficient to ensure no structural development, roads or other improvements beyond oh �Gx. to�!W Prep% e,,&,r, t -those p eseff4y alleewable will be made prior to an amendment of the General Plan, and zoning for the properties. which_ ; 1�8v accts designates the intended area as suitable for development. Applicant must also acknowledge prior to approval of tentative map that an Environmental Impact Report (HIR) will be required prior to approval of any application for a General Plan amendment or rezoning. Such EIR will consider the potential cumulative impacts of any proposed development and the potential impacts of likely future aFplications for development in the entire area. C fi?�u r ,acres Among such other things as may be appropriate, such EIR Will . address the identification and protection of natural resources including but not limited to: Creeks, drainage courses andriparian areas w Vernal pools Blue oak. trees and oak wuoe,'Oid areas Sensitive plant habitats Applicant must also acknowledge that, prior to any development, the County intends to consider whether a, Specific Plan should be adopted. which could address .w RECOMMENDED MITIGATION'MEASURES (Margin references are to March 4th Initial. Study) �n tial Study Item Item 3.d. No miti ations are necessar as miti ation 4.d activities.beld. limits Uta to existing agricultural Raad construction will be deferred until following future approval of a Specific Plan. Xtem 3.f. No mitigations are necessary as mitigation 4.d. below ` will cause the properties to remain in their current usage and there will be no increases in discharge of Surface waters Item 4,a. Riparian habitat, vernal pools, the !0cation of blue oaks and other sensitive habitats to be identified in future intheevent a Specific Pl.a`i and EIR axe for or the property which mwst occur prior to any development,, 4d• or similar bindingItem Note agreements approvd by county to be entercid into prior to approval of final map sufficient to ensure no structural development, roads or other improvements to be made prior to an amendment, of the General Plan and zoning for the properties which designates the area as suitable for development. Further, the above agricultural use i.imtatons shall remain in effect until preparation, at the owners.' expense and adoption by the county of a Specific Plan .'and Environmental Impact Report for the 1180 acre property by the; County pursuant to sections 6.5452-65457 of the California GovernmentCode: This provision :is intended to ensure the 1i 8`4 acre ,holding is available for continued agricultural use anti] all of the above plan and zoning changes are., made. Subsequently, development of individual shall be requited to comply with tl+.e ,parcels standarc,3 of the adopted Specific Plan, Among other things the ;Specific Plan and EIR shall address the, identification and'proteatien of natural resources including but not limited to: ' - Creeks, drainage courses and, riparian areas vernal pools Blue oak trees and oak woodland areas Sensitive plant habitats Item 5.a. 140 specific mit gat ons'necessary';as retention of the site for agricultural uses per item 4.d. above will result in no current change to wildlife habitat. Stem 8. Refer to nitigatian for 4.d. "move. L i 77777 7777-77-7-7- 7777 Recommended Mitigation Measures Page 2 13.c. Easements) or other provisions for at least one additional primary access point(s) into the site from either Highway 99 or Neal Road should be shown on the tentative pap. 13.f. No mitigations necessary as mitigation 4.d. limits use to existing agricultural activities. 14.a,b, No mitigations necessary as mitigation 4.d. limits use c,ef. to existing agricultural activities. 1 Mitigation 4.d. limits use to existing agricultural activities and therefore no increase in runoff is anticipated.,. in addition, the project will be conditioned to defer internal road construction until after plan and zoning amendments and approval of a specific plan as referenced in mitigation 4.d. are completed 19. Wo mitigation necessary ;as mitigation 4.d limits use to existing agricultural activities. 20.b. The tentative map will be conditioned that prior to approval of a specific plan for the property that existing historical stone walls will be retained. Mr. Stuart Edeil. :February 13, 1 X92 , F,age Five If we can be of further assistance, please contact Mr. Ron Bertram, Associate Wildlife :Biologist or Sys. Patricia Pet k, ins, Wile life Management Supervisor, telephone (916) 355-7010. :> Sincerely, Jamas D. Messersmi tl-Regional Manager cc: Mr. Ron Bertram Department of Fish and Game, Rancho Cordova, CA 95670' Ms . Patricia 'pexkins Department: of Fish and Game Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 - 'I TheUniversity roundatior CaUtorniaState University,chico Chico, California 95929-0246 (916) 89$-£844-.-,t � Rlaur�ing pan�nt AUG 2 6 1992 � August 26, 1992 l7ravlile, Calltornla; Mrs. Candace Grubbs RE: AP 40-60-19, 20, 21i and 2 Butte County Clerk TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 25 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965, ' Dear Mrs. Grubbs: on lbehalf of the University Foundation, California State University, Chico, I'vish to and hereby file a notice of appeal with the Butte County Board of Supervisors regarding the action taken by the Butte County Development Services Committee (See attachment 1) on August 17, 1,992 relative to the Foundation's tentative parcel map application. I wouldOppreciate your notifying me regarding th,a date, time,, and place, lace �f our appeal hearing with the Board of supervisors: u Enclosed is a $569.50 check made payable to the. Butte County i"reasurer--the balance owed as stated in Bill Farrel's letter dated July 14, 1992 (See attachmerit 2),,. Please contact me at 898-5297` should you have any questions or needadditional information, regarding the Foundation's notice of appeal. Sincerelya; Ed Masterson, Director University Reiatons, and Development cc: W! 11ia Farrel Steve Finn,: Don-Swartz Elaine Wangberg Jay Zellmer Enclosures t. K „ � i r Area of Butte County threatens the continued economic viability and cultivation practices of commercial agriculture in the,Chico Area. c. At present, the Chico Area of Butte County is substantially surrounded by agricultural gncultural Lands on its northwestern, western, and southwestern borders, These agricultural lands play a vital role in the overall economic vitality of Butte County and must be . conserved. d, The Chico Area of Butte Counlf has experienced the continued, conversion of valruable agricultural lands to urban and suburban development, Unless theL f and Use Element of the Butte County General Plan, as it pertains to the Chico Area, i;3 amended to include an urban limit line and a clear policy text, it is likely that the Chico Area of Butte County will continue to experience such coinversion in the future, with significant adverse effects on. the viability of agri',cultural uses in the Chico area. e. it is critically important to the citizens of Butte County that the Chico Area Greenline be established in order to conserve agricultural lands and to ensure that the agricultural viability of agricullurat is lids In the Chico Area is not permanently destroyed by premature and hutppropriate conversion fto non-agricultural uses. f: the population of the Chico Area of Butte County will continue to grow: ine City of Chico General Plan estimates an urban area population range of from 56,300 ja 71,100 individuals by the year 19 5, which will result in urbanization of up to 1,600 acres in the Chico area. ?I herest tin thea Chico Area of ,Butte County productive agricultural sails alreadyca�?itted to future urban add subei bari &velopment, nasi population grmdli and of cone nt a ;.� : _ ..r:wF r .,,:.• *::c Axea " " are carried out. 4. Iqothii.ig herein is :intended to relieve the propc.i.enys of future urban land „^ developments in the Chico Area of all proper and rein tbEe ass ss��ients, fens or, charges required in order to fund the cost of arovia.n public services to such y urban. Sand developments or the residents thereof. For purposes of this polis*/ the fallowing words and phrases shall have tree meanings ;resp ctively ascribed to them by this section. � =� a ;*Chico Area" means that geographic area shown. c� i the Chico area Land f U, se Ilan Map, a part of the Butte County' L4nu tJse Element. ten: b', Official Chico Area GreeTiain-_ P a:pS mean he Chico Area- band, use, ��• Plan and that large scale maze certified by the ;Planning Direcror and on file in the Planning Department office located at 7 County Centex Drive, Oroville, California. C. "Chico Area Greenline" means the boundary'line established by this policy and delineated on, the Official. Chico Area Greentine Yap which line ¢' separates urban/stiburi�an land u ses from agricultural land'uses in the Chico =° d, "Butte County Land Use Eldfrierif" shall refer to the Butte County General � Plan Land Use Biement, 'which element was adopted by the Butte County Board of. Supervisors on October 30, 1979,and as ,amended from time to, :a ume e "Agricultural" land use designation and 'Agricultural Uses" mean the 'Primary Use_ s" and the "Secondary Uses" set forth in the "Orchard and field Crops" land use designation of the Butte County Land Use Element as it existed on March 1, 1982, acid as amended from time to time. f. ":Agricultu'ral: Resitidntialk Iand 'use designa43ori means ttie "Agrticultural . Resid ntial" land fire designation of the Butte County Land Use Element . _ as it a xisted on Mar 1, 1982; at�d as amended from time to time. g; Urbar%/�ii�f rbartn I ,arid`a Uses"}; : ears Ali ` l: wful�'uses 4 of_ land': linclt3dt g =agncul` u al and' agncul< cal21esidentiallarid' uses) ,a 1u'�.a�.i«r:aaY..i N-.wA-.F s,,.. a, ..._.• ''i�.,c w,_ . < «, '. h. "A Acoltural Side of the ChkoArea0feeplihe shall -refer to lands within s ` the Chico Area which arc loa�atc;d westerly of the Chico Area GreenIine. {y4 722 t r. Vis# a +r i, �f8Y2l i!f1L CI1CI�T� �lii� tf tJ1t1y11 'Chico Baca#eiweasteriymf,teC%ccr AreC�nr�een7in. # e, Areawlhich are s* �- C.. D. 3' GREENLINE The General Plan: of the Cou.l l of �3utte is hereby amended as follows. , a, There is hereby established the Chico Area Greenline which shallbe located as shown, ore the OfPic at Chico Area Greenline 'Map. The Official Chico Area Greenline Map is incorporated into this policy by this reference; b, Should a dispute arise or ambiguity appear as to the exact location of the . . A g Chico Area Greenline, the followcng rules shall be applied in d..tertninzn the'.exact location of such lire: 1, The Greenline shall be, identified in the Chico ,Area Land "Gse xylan with a bold dash line as shown on the Chico .Area Land Lyse Plan Map. Th,e Greenline is specific; large scale chaps certified by the Plannina Director shall be consulted in the event of a dispute: 2. Where the Greenline is indicated as aporoumately foilowina, vtreet alley, railroad righf-of-war, creeX ar charuzel lines; the centerline of such street, airy, railroad r gght-of-%vay, creek or channel lines shall be construed to be :lie location of the G'seenli ne- 3, Where the Greenline is indicated as approximately following a lot line, such lot dine shall be construed to be the location of the Greenline- 4. b''ch respect to> property that is not sutidiviued, and where. -the Chico Area Greenline bisects a lot, or parcel, the. location of G-r'eenlme, unless the same is indicated by dimensions shown upon the Oficial Chico Area. G reer line Map=' shall. be determined by the use of the sc-ale appearing; on the 0iVicill +Chico Area Greeoiline wrap, The .Chico Area Greeniind shall conafiitute the bounds between the C. "Urban Side of the Chico Area reenlir e" and "A4dw Ural Side of the Chico Area Crreebline". d. Agricultural f{e id inlial land uses may occur on the �? ricccltural Side o:� the Chico Areii Ore'nlfTle only `7r'ctliin those as .designated �r �"':iCulil;ral eSldefitial iYf' ,on, til �3€iC;ai CkL`b Are Green:tnef�air_: er Except as ps'oAded f6r in :s::bsection (d), of this section. all land use on the A a rLt:l tu« ai �.1¢1S'".'.: i.:?:^+»0 1'. e`� `� r�srSll3i�4 Shalj c.`Jr. l,¢' 71 Agricultural land uses as provided by Th'-, Fns :t*teld Crqa designation. f. Land, uses on the Urban Side of the shalt be �-Uided by the policies of the Land Use Element and, —gi;e tppiicable Lrnan land use: designation as contained in the Land Use Eleme.-It. S 8TABLISH�iENM OF QEMD .,REA I..ANM'ZS;F, 'PLIT Tat order to minimize or eliminate the adverse effects which premature a;Yd inappropriate, conversion to °urbanlsuburban land uses are likely to cause to 'f e agricultural fonds in the hico Area of Butte County, the following poiic_es are hereat' ,:.ido ed as part of the lAnd Use, Element of the Butte County General ,P an,apf,Yl eb!e to rhe Chico Arta of utte County: a. It shall be the policy of Butte County to coliserve and, protect for Agricultural Use the funds in. the Chico ,area that are situated on the Agricultural Side of the 'Chico Area Greesdine, h. ;it shall be the policy of Butte: County Io accommodate " future co; G-p "SUPPLIlMENTAL/AMENDEb `l' AP k"TLSNG" y � 'PRELINgNZ A'AY REPORTOi1'li'LET8 • TITLE MANT Butte Coy. ty Itle E5TAiBL1S11E1S Authorized agent.for Fidelity National TitleJnsurance Company PARADISE OFFICE- ORCVILLE QFFIUE CHICO OFFICE: i tf,4284wuy, Pnrod ase. CA 05969 PA Bax 8151 194 F. 60h .5trret, Chico, CA 919,28 t911i1 ti7i ti 1G 1 1909 B44&., Oroville, CA 9596.: MM 3434716 1; DIRECT ALS CQRREaP0'ND1✓Z`aCETO Iiarhara Woo wa d Your No. 40221/8W Outio CHICO RESEARCH PARK 'L, P . ,. a California Limited Partnership jl?E Dalaclie Drive Lasix insured: over 5 years iranr"ho Palos Verdes, , CA 90274 RUI=,LS , ANDERSON & ROLLS t 965 Vir Street Chico, CA 95928 Attn.. (Mike, Bird) I s In response to t1w aboverefereneed application fora policyof,title insurance; BUTTS COUNTFTITLE COMPA, Yhereby ". reports thatit is preparers to issue, orcause to be issued, as of the date hereat; a policy or policies of title insurance describing the land and the estate or:interest therein hereinafter,setfortn, insuring against loss which maybe sumained by reason ofanyderkt, ! lien or encumbrance not shown or referred to as an 9xception Lelow or not excluded from coverage pursuant to the Schedules, I Conditions and Stipulations of said policy, form, ' The Exceptions and exclusionsfromcootrage ofsa d, policy orpoliriesare set .forth anthe attached cover. Copies:ofthepolicy . ` :shgt�cl,�u'Fxf1e (ErM,�rXLav 1� Ise hs�¢d this report., forms�a � I This report (and &nysupphllnent hereto) is issued solely tot the purpose offacilitating thei5suarice efTa policy ofiitle insuronce ` and no liability is ossumed'hereby. If itis desired that liability be assumed prior-to the issuance of a policy of title insurance, a I Binder or Commitment should be requested, i • i ;r - 1 ' Da ted .at 600 a.m. on, FebrUar7 r 1.992 Auth rized Signature y i The estate or interest in the land hereinafter described or referred to covered by this ,Report is A F'ee Title to said estate or interest at the date hereof is vested in: CHICO RESEARCH, PARK, L.P ',, a C.a 1 if or iia l.imi.ted partnership The form of policy of title insurance contemplated by this reportis, erage ALTA Loan Policy —440/90) with A�.'P, E'ndorsement Forrn 1 Coverage CMk Standard Coverage Policy --,1990 d Other At the date hereotexceptions to coverage in addiiipn,''to the printed exceptions' and exclusions contained in said.policy form ,�. would be a$.. shown ort tfie following pages. 0W 1•t Di T.. oder I+00 Tqr440'27/.BW ;5(1BJRCT Td-,: la The lien of supplemental taxes,, if any, assessed pursuant to. the provisions of Chapter '3.5' (Commencing with Section, 75) of the Revenue and Taxation Cade, of the State of California. 2.Easement and 'building setback line and, notes regarding further development as shown on the; parcel map referred to, herein, filed in the office of the Recorder of the County of Butter Stafne of California, on July 18, 1091 in Book 1.23 of Parcel Maps at, pages 58 through 63 under Butte County Recorder's Serial No. 91-029191. -. Basement, .30:0 feet in width for ditch, to>g-�=,Lher, with per- petual right ofingress and egress to, in, apon,and among the, 'line of said ditch right of way, as provided in t1hat certain Deed from the John. Crouch Land Company, a_ cor- poration to Chas, F. Lott, recorded October 31, 19GS in Book: 108 of Deeds, at. page 409, records ;of Butte County,' California. Affects a portion of Section 5, Township 21 North, Range 2 Basit, M. D.B:, & M.,, lying wholly within the easement area: covered '°oy Exception No. 5, recorded October 24, 1960 in ,Book 10812 of Of Records, at. page 565,. records of Butte. County, California:. AP' No. 040-500-020. 4. Reservation and conditions coatained. in Grant of Right of Clay for w 4,:er ditch and appurt.enances thereto, conveyed to I State Land. Settlement Board, recorded May 17 19181 in Book 169 of Deeds, at page 436; records of Butte Couqty, California -r 5�. 4141ver in 'favor of the. Stage. of California of any claims for damages to said land by reason of the locatjons:l constructions., landscaping or maintenance of a freeway cont.?.guous th:'-at and Relinquishment., en. of Abutter's Rights, as ' contained in that certain Deed from the Parrott Triuest-- meat Company, a corporation to the State of California, recorded Jansaary 28 1,952 in Book 616 of Official Records, At page 477, records 0f Butte. County, California. Affects tTnat., port in of the hereinafter described property Within Lots 71., 2 and 3`, of the R. W: Durham Estate4 r continued)' arrly impr,+vument rima rFarttite:in t( nX Ater at ittan: Or or a 4. till tyiitt;y' S tfiP Any grsfmmental police power ,sot evcludedby sal -above, except Yo the eaten! that ,wootace ciQhe exercise thereof or a notice of defect, ;lien or encumbrance resulting; fir im a asr.4aiion, or alleged violation affecting, the tand has been recorded In the pubf is 61 reminds aft Date of Policy: ,� Rlpfhtsofremtnpnt domatn unlesS'iiotise of the iexertnsethere9f has been recorded irr [tit-Srufiitt xi' -cords at Date of Policy,lxit eat exc(udin�lram coverage arrr taking whiGit. hri!::ctrarxd priartblDateofPoficywhithcvoufdbeismd;ngortlhertghtsolapurrhase� lite- Aw” sviihout ktavfedge. � dlitft ;,� f:�a:. encumbrances, adverse claims, Ar tuher.ntatters•. 7. tat`�err�artr'J, ;yullered, assumed ,or agreed to by the irestrted claimadt: AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION OVt AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION LE, SCHEDULE OF EXCLUAIONSEAS' FF .ae r>u,w unr,eJ u„s pouryi or damage to the insured dafrrtant; i sub” I ent to pate or Policy', or mage which vacxrtd not hate bO-_n t+.rstalned of the insured claimant estate or interest insured b[ this policy, lien dthe Insumdi rnongage because of the lhab'ility or failure Of Policy, or rise inat lily or failure .of any subsequent owner of , mpty with applicakF'o doing, business .laws of the state in whish bihty of the lien o(theinsured mongaga or claim the,;eof, which ion evidenced bf the insured morigage, and is based upon usury protection or truth in lending IXv, tabor ,t materialsaet thelien'o.the insaired morty,�ge1 seting from or kodt Mated to Ow (anal which is contracted for and commenced u. ur is uungatea to aovance. rh,whichariscsout oftheuans�creating"theto:trestoflh6-- n8agee'irtstrred ollcy by reason o(tlre operation ottraf banktu,tty, state insolvency, or similar :rights lam POLICY 14.6.90) AND JWNERrS POLICY (4.6.90) AVERAGE me tuntcnyrrigrraasx'iare e..pressiyexciuceairomtnemeragaotmrspoltcyanoMeCompany will (ftttttpay Ipivt or damage. costs, attorney's fees or expenses w(lich arise by reason of has OccuiredpriortoOat ". rPflicywrhfirs+ouldbe'Wihdirrgontherightsmfapurchaser for value without knowledge l itil3rrrrr lar,ryto,ftanrC orgovernmenrai tegulation (including but riot limited to building tnttlittnss ry litws ordinances, or rtgutanonsl � ftrictio& prohtohing or relating to p) ilia, CALGfORNtN I> T)Tt.E"ASSOCIATION STANDARD COVERAGE'P Y j 199th; EXCLUSL t S FROAi,COVERAGE ti?�5ttarrti�1't17t�1rarrcxptessiyeiiudckffnxrtttuterweragenfthispcifi�artdthcCompany wiili IrtN pg�r slut"r:tii darna{ter cods, dttgrney f tees or expenses which adse by reason of (a)tercated,suffered,assunrd-oragrpadtpbythrnSuredCiairttanC b) not known to the Com>atrf, not recorded in the public records at17aIe of Policy but 11)�Ar3vljail}1, rrfrtrutCetyrgrrrCrnmc�+cal"tilattonfyidudihf,but cwtlinifte wWitdTngi itces, arrcguWnun41 IRs ri,'t �rd.yra 10tt bfirs, ardinsrng, pin ibiimg or rel"ang'to (ij the tri" enjoyment of ibe land. Nit t charaeter, dimensions locatton 'nowntotheinsurcdc! ugantandsaatdisclosedrn prSdng[atheCgrnp,?nyln+themsunxi claimant prior tn.the dile thehirsute claimant became an inured, circler,this Po►icy, r^,C,tX;tlit:iutt;rlr'tI•'%+t, or of i, erkrrrn(Hit+s+JrrslrrX my or hereafter erected on the tarso: fiii) a separation in ownership in diet Dimensions or area of the land crony the land (cl resulting in no 104s or damage to the insured clamvant; (d) attachin or cteatrti subsr+.�.queot to� pato o(Pplicy, or tYsrAdfiangtjk parcel of Whichr is or zts d prUtt c rly) erriuunmentat protection. or the effect of arty violation of thesk, laivsi (e) rewhing in loss Of damage whichuoold nrk hatiti tseen sustained if the insured claimant had paid value for the estate or interest insured. L9r this policy. crttKtdmtnea,> ?Jr W1ArnmrnWI regulations, exCept to the extent that a notice of Lha r rty(n!r'>M�tiri tP'=lRereof ora notice of a defect, tion ure,�cumbrance resulfing from a v►oration 4{ Unen(orecabllity of the lien of the insured tnon$age bt'rausr of rite inability or failure - or the insured at pate of Policy, oc the inability or failure of atty suhwxluent owner of �Pr yt►t sgg� s!ltllttffon affecting the land has been recorded in the public .records at Date rrlf'Irlfiihr the indebtedness, to comply with the appi=cabje doing business hews of the state in which the land is situated, i(ty1 rY7*r gt rwrfnmental police power not excluded fir fad above,.except to the extent that vtSterin t yti`dtir, rtrrrrcise thereof ora notice o a defect, lienor encumbrance resulting frorhn 5. (rmd►dity or unenforceability of thelienof sheinsured mongage, or cfalm thereof, which arises out of the to,ansaction t!videnccd by the insured mortgage and is based upon unsury wr> fatf+s,i , ter: altcged violation affecting the toed has bern.rkcorded in the CYA I , Oc records or arty consumer credit protection or truth in tending iaw ' 2, ilttg� t'r�.f i'nillrtt nt domain unless notice of the exerrist dhelebf hay oeen recorded in the; GpN191r" trrtrutds at Date of Policy, but not excluding from covcra%e arty Laking. 'winch has 6, Any claim, which arises but of the transaction vesting lir iheln3urecl Ifle estate or inlerext insured by this policy or the transattioncreming the interest of the Insured tender, by reasonoftheoperat ones[ederatbanknoptcy,state(nsolventy,arsimiiyrcrt ; rYt ,itpoor try Date of Policy *bfch would be' binding on the rights of a purchaser litors'iightslaws, 'Hrrariftu' �+tibout krimvledge. kU-.PTfONS FROM COVERAGE ITFn izricy dries not insure against loss or damaAir (and the Company will not pay costs, atfointys fees or expenses) which afistt by rejsart of. 3 �f£ t , auins, encumbrances, adverse claims, or Wier matters �. Easerrrt ntsW liens or.ettrumbrances or cCaiuns I ereof, w lzirlm�e nor shown Ilyr thgpublid reeotds. SCHEDULE .B EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE `ihw, ttry itlo rs not insure against loss or damage fand rhe Company will not: pap costs, anorney's fees or expenses) which arise by reason oF. PART '1 i, Jjpr deo mpes.smrents which are not shown as ek stingliens by the records of any taxing �(ttbgrt Met!106es taxes or assessments on real pmpeny or by the public records. 3, Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, which ate not shown by the public records. ,pttiee�d n)oa 4 r-publtc agency which may result in taxes or assessrnertts, or notices aSauchpntn ngs,Whethrrornot shasrl the recaxdsofsucitagericyorbythe publirJacuwhichacomett 4, Discre nctes conflicts In boundary ry Ir 'rte shortage in are rt, encroachments, or anyolher survey would drse�and which are tx4shiyrgibythe publictttiords `t ore A"rt#t Aog ,fulls, Interests or claims which are not'shuh-h by the pulslic records but which, : fat Vnpatentetl mining claims: (b) reservations oy' excgAboris in patents or in Am authoirizing rite issuance thereof, (c) water rights, clams or tale to water, whether or not 61tpt td$rr a1,„a rtained by an irispe,ctfwt of the land of >^hison ch may be asserted by persons rrt.t ?ata in ther6o(. 01e matter excepted under tal, (bl, or (d are shown br the public mecords. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION LOAN POLICY (4.6.96) WITH A.L.T,A. ENDORSEMENT - FORM 1 COVERAGE AND AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION LEASEHOLD LOAN POLICY (4-6-90) WiTH A.t7A.;ENDORSEMENT ,' FORM 1'COVERAGE SrHEDULE OF EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE lite"taliryw,ntiPnrr inersart" expressly .xcluded from the rarera#of thls pot cyarid the Company Will, mof PWtiv%, or daloage. costs, aaorney s fees or senses which arise by reason of; t r.o,an., rn,w r...1.r. .ern -n. e. ..o....,.a»„r. 'J,.:..., .-a..M...L..... L. ....... L_:._J._x.....r�r__.. b) not known to the Company, not recorded in the public records at Date df Policy, but k Bast to theinsured daimaptand not disclosedlnvwritittg to the Company insured _.:_ . 1. ... .. _ arrly impr,+vument rima rFarttite:in t( nX Ater at ittan: Or or a 4. till tyiitt;y' S tfiP Any grsfmmental police power ,sot evcludedby sal -above, except Yo the eaten! that ,wootace ciQhe exercise thereof or a notice of defect, ;lien or encumbrance resulting; fir im a asr.4aiion, or alleged violation affecting, the tand has been recorded In the pubf is 61 reminds aft Date of Policy: ,� Rlpfhtsofremtnpnt domatn unlesS'iiotise of the iexertnsethere9f has been recorded irr [tit-Srufiitt xi' -cords at Date of Policy,lxit eat exc(udin�lram coverage arrr taking whiGit. hri!::ctrarxd priartblDateofPoficywhithcvoufdbeismd;ngortlhertghtsolapurrhase� lite- Aw” sviihout ktavfedge. � dlitft ;,� f:�a:. encumbrances, adverse claims, Ar tuher.ntatters•. 7. tat`�err�artr'J, ;yullered, assumed ,or agreed to by the irestrted claimadt: AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION OVt AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION LE, SCHEDULE OF EXCLUAIONSEAS' FF .ae r>u,w unr,eJ u„s pouryi or damage to the insured dafrrtant; i sub” I ent to pate or Policy', or mage which vacxrtd not hate bO-_n t+.rstalned of the insured claimant estate or interest insured b[ this policy, lien dthe Insumdi rnongage because of the lhab'ility or failure Of Policy, or rise inat lily or failure .of any subsequent owner of , mpty with applicakF'o doing, business .laws of the state in whish bihty of the lien o(theinsured mongaga or claim the,;eof, which ion evidenced bf the insured morigage, and is based upon usury protection or truth in lending IXv, tabor ,t materialsaet thelien'o.the insaired morty,�ge1 seting from or kodt Mated to Ow (anal which is contracted for and commenced u. ur is uungatea to aovance. rh,whichariscsout oftheuans�creating"theto:trestoflh6-- n8agee'irtstrred ollcy by reason o(tlre operation ottraf banktu,tty, state insolvency, or similar :rights lam POLICY 14.6.90) AND JWNERrS POLICY (4.6.90) AVERAGE me tuntcnyrrigrraasx'iare e..pressiyexciuceairomtnemeragaotmrspoltcyanoMeCompany will (ftttttpay Ipivt or damage. costs, attorney's fees or expenses w(lich arise by reason of has OccuiredpriortoOat ". rPflicywrhfirs+ouldbe'Wihdirrgontherightsmfapurchaser for value without knowledge l itil3rrrrr lar,ryto,ftanrC orgovernmenrai tegulation (including but riot limited to building tnttlittnss ry litws ordinances, or rtgutanonsl � ftrictio& prohtohing or relating to p) ilia, 3.: Detects, liens, encumbrances;, adverse taimsy or otlyef matters: (a) cteated, .suffered, assumed or agreed; to b/ the'insured claimant or,;,uparrryr, else, or enjoyment of the land: fit the character, dip,'ensiorts t}r location of Inw impee+vgienr now or hereafter wKied on the land; WU) a se�,aration in ownershl (b) not khmvn to the Corin y„ not recorded in the public records ut Date of ('hllcy, but knees to the insured claimant and not d;•sclosW in writing to the Company tr/ the inwretl brrat chazte� in the dimensions or area of the land or ar para of which the land (s rir ieras a rrart� or (ivI e.t trnnmentat protection, br rive erect of a,ry v-lolanon of these or Claimant prior to the date the Insured claimant became an insured undert this policy; (G) resulting in no,loss or damage to the insured claimant: lgsOvi roidrrt artces grnemmenta( regulations, except to *e extent 'hat a notice of the rte!%terert�erattiierec(orariotiteofadefect,lien ofenZtm;3ranceresultF,YGfrom aviolation ': ryn,ithegshrf t irifation affestimg the lama has been reco+d.d in the t records Uate (d) artach)ng or created subsequent itr Date of Poky,', cW le)tesulmsinloss ordamage which N%pxMrtathavebreensattazrinedif.thefrisuredc)ainwnt pub! at r>fikitltr y lite rtlbtexclu'tt� (hi! Vrrp prxrt°tnmental po prnvE ed by (al soave except }o the torrent [het had paid valde (or the estate or intirest insured by�-thii, policy:: 4, Ary claim, whlcharitesomofthetrarkWooncreatmgtheinterest ofthe mortgigeeinsred by this policy by reason of the operaticri of federal bankrtrocy, state tnsolvency; or similar artatire u(tlse exemclsedhereof or a hgtite oCa deierz« lien or encumbronee results�g IrplttY,x alleged he Ianiihas -Te di#oW rig(tts favus, vrolatityn or viola(iori aift+c(tng been rete"riled in thetsublic rids at Elate afllalicy ` 1 R:(}lEtts tt( eminent dotrtatn unless nbuct� of the' t�rearse thereof t,at'beep recgrtied in tt:s. tpubhc rt?rr>rds at Date of Pdl ic}+,' but nett r.�t(udrng frarrt ccivetage rtny takiriy„' which the ,sla t ALTh.pohty iomss n> yy ire issued to arichl either Standard Coverage of t:rttended Cows igi in additiorf to rbcs above Exclusioos from Cmprage, the Exceptions front e%trage in a 5(arw,)o cove pohcywill also, include the, 7all6ving Centltal rKtititfatts SCHEDULE Q kU-.PTfONS FROM COVERAGE ITFn izricy dries not insure against loss or damaAir (and the Company will not pay costs, atfointys fees or expenses) which afistt by rejsart of. PART t ft 1 rxsrn tsissments vvbAch are not 5itrhvn as existing (lens fry the records of arty tatting guo,tlrrt that levies taxes or assessments on teat prbp•:efy or by tilt: public records. �. Easerrrt ntsW liens or.ettrumbrances or cCaiuns I ereof, w lzirlm�e nor shown Ilyr thgpublid reeotds. t✓ ops by apublic-agency which may result an taxes tar ass,Wssa(tents, or notices rA+#r rhptgcl clings wltetherorhot shgwn bythe rerorrlsp(xuchagert yor(rj+the,pu6lfc A. Drstreplirtcies, conflicts in boundary sr3haaatage in d ea,crcclCarhmento, or any other (arta w(ticft a rgrrecl surrey would d*cfW and which are hot shawl~ by die re's. l(rnp�s, rfPltfs, interexts of maims which ate rio(shownby the publictetords but.which' an ins tti'dn o(Ihe land orwhiclf era ascertained by p may be assert by nelsons public records. 5, (a) Unpatented mining claims, 0b reierYaiar,ns or t xceptiaris in paferits br in Acts, authofe; Ing the issuance thereof, (d water rights, claims or title to tis f nsse,siori tkaercof, ,y water. whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b), Or (cI are shown by the pubfic recd i : J EX IBI !, R(CAIJ LAND TIM_`ASSOCiA .IOP LOAN ,PC11I W#fh -ALU MOR$EMEIJT •�'FOFtAt (: COVERA , " X96*01.0 OF tXCLUSIONSFROM C©VEOAGE {n, ftdltrA+ifrlt# isra{tars are' pressly ekdte# 3gynt the d erage,of'ihfa ixllicY�.: ;isw rttm scat police pa. r, blArryT aar, orsisrwnfeorga rnrrx C,al regulatipn n:latinR ' 1, pefects, liens, encumbtancr; ttlr+C e, tlaftns, $r ether rrtattetY (d) drrr:A"ted, sufferetf, assumed ar agreed to by the insar4 Gta►moot, Ibt not known to the cor0 my , Yrrp rrrtr al orei it"tcLA t� Ta<+r xlinanseW g nlrtental re ulationlmaluding hrtrnoT;'itblifetltobudr)in and not S11mvn by the puhpe rergcds but known to the insured claimt!st el fser at #).plc ok Pelt ey orzonmisar ncestrbiritrirtgsirregulatengonprahtbrtntg tIC r# . uryittry, use aY a ayrnent or e diind, ar rcgtJatinf rile charade ,dimensions yrr irirr tmri of any improvement ntyw dr hrdreaftct erred on ore Land, or prahflrtling a' orAtthe date such claimantac<tsut'tl the insumd man i e aril rttn'ti the oat s uch i uYt Orate or i� ittisliolitytuacquir od ,rrsed#n rate o t the surd ci,�rnsatu a the Com a an Yn #�krttirfnitttrrrrrersbiporacharee?n tflsedimerrsrisnstrrirraalthdtandrfanrryparGt�t tt ttm CAntf issirwas dt priorta insured tfaibtant traced tit+u Glx h+� un4reti (df re3U$!np nalossstdama ctathetrsyrM0,41mmani.ldlaitadtmgot rcatWsubsequehito:oato , iYtsvttc a am, � A1Scxtdfarryvtotatiaaoftha matters excluded uthi r.GeN+#UToGlcT above, tin Cys lVdnGC nd dg((Ci, lienar LnCumbt ince fesuhirtg from of Policy (exce} 110 the extent ynwry tee is afforded Herein as to any statutory Nen for labor ° o Of P)s'ftt3nrha4 been recons Cd t' Age 43lohcy in tlym n usx Fac tccprdcii,�nder$l to ;fatutt scdo fit, nwrt es, 'udgrtient tiero wt Ns or mater al or the extent 411wince is afforded herein a to Aifi 5menls far suet r � Improvements under rmnstruatdn or roTlnnletc�i It C1hre of �ilili U intpaivturiArCtivengil0toputchasertar±rthe6ridforvalueand without knrnvlrtlyg, t+ssi orottoAt do(• : i iieexerstseolsur#t enforceability of the iced of the tpwred mon ge Ikc wse df failUtc of tris in urht7 At date ofpolicyorofarrysgf ctucntrnvrtrrtlflberndtNyitxtncsxtdeartttsiywiths,"pti hln *9jiltt , unless notice rf n$hl appz Ars in slie pubiii: rrq__'ortli ill Clam of fti llcy. ;dole business" haws of the state in which the larid is siiudttd. 1AMERICAN LAUD TITLE ASSOCIATION, RESIDENTIAL TITLE INSURANCE POLICY (6-1-87) EXCLUSIONS is iri�aiddrtion Ta II i Eliceptions In Schedule g, jpaare not Insured against loss, cosis,aitornq and r*Ijwrtwj; resulting from: fi �ro+errmair?titaL police poxe r, and the ex tente of violation it err, taw or government tottittHtittiti.'fhfs inchxlt!s twildirigand zwn[ng rirdirsancesand afsa laws awl rt 3. Title Risks: • that are created, allawcd, or, agreed to by •that are kntxvn Co you but not to us, on Puolicy Pate- untass theyd aced in p guiatians Banc rttriing; (iiyitdttso the public records • that result In no loss toesu i i n irfw'ements on the land ikeod division • that(irstaffect}ourtitleahctthe NOW Date-thisdoesrshflimnthelaborand material lien coverage in Item a .of Caseri d Title Risks ern vgronmenta l proYectfon ibis in�..luaian does notApply to wiatan�ns or tilt enforcement of these matters which in tltP< S. La�ktofA right Iou far your arra. bnyy 1t outside the area specifically destnbed and. referred la in Item 3 of l �i,ppratr pubNt rc[rdat policy �'tne. M)v i� &lion does not limit the zoniox gage desarbed !rr, itc�ns t3 2nd 13 of Schedule A On i r 4 ' ItT by eEis sexes t r ght the • alloys. or limit the that touch vast Tend. exclusion This rxcluxion does not limit the access coverage in [tetrt 5 0( Catered Till@ Ri '001160ts�ng the apr rs in public reooids an the F'o'ity Dale ttfir-takwahappened prior to thel�i Date anti is Nod,ng,on you tfy,ou bougbt sks n g piling tlhr' fend Vfit out krwwled a a( the i SCHEDULE B EXCEPTIONS „nar3fd'stiantlutlspWusions,you are no(insui�edapiostfosy,cols, attorneys"fees,andthe. e iytstrp +s rrtldlhng frprri 3. Atryfacts atwuttheland which acorr.­,surst�rssauiddiscloseand wftichare not5hti+vn by the public records. Thi 4o --.1t 'limit%he forced remoiai coverage i Item i2 of Gavered g 1. Anvil 91104 interests, or claims of parries Jnr posset0bri of theland not shown by the' pubtli� ztnrartis Title Risks. d, 1, Any++,,,tst diems or liens not shown by rNewlific records. This does not limit the lien Any water tights or claims or title to water in or under the land, whether'or not sho+Vit by the Public records, i' oVetrtrtCtt if) ftem 4 of Covered Title R'rs,Z;s 1 i, AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION OWNER'S pO1(Cy (t0 -2j_% SCHEDULE OF EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE tiro S illrrivinll'- triaN,rtarr rnpre5Sfy exttudedfiomr2tieGa erageo(rh,S pGfityarrJ rir�'£ompfny ,wdttruat pay, troll of damage, costs, attomey"s or etpenses which arise by reason of; a violatfan gratf nd Violatirtrraf%cirn rite larsrl hx5 btert em in rho pubtie rrprds at Date of tUity' g 'i. 4111 Any+go.ernrnewal regi frit ion tincitxting but not, limited to }wilding txiJ, rrnUsiy;'law5, ordinances, or tegulatioasFvr striding pro 0 ting or relating to tit the cel rpnir>xy, ust or enjrryment of the rand; t y the cfiaracter, dirisensions or ! cation of 2- RiStsts of entinent <tomain untess rrottce of the eacrttise tt tctiC has beery recardetf in rile public words At Vale Of Pntieg, but not eu luding from cm -era any taking which has Bate twits nrtipri t�S nittnt odw or hereafter ereded ooMw land, brit a separation in vwher;hfp atcurred prior to of Wiry vshich r+oold bo Winding on the tights of a purchaser' for value without knawtedgr ( twal idtanitt�' In, Ifie dimensions or area orlhe Rand or any par:el of which the laird is or I wAts a pnr,i,{ar Gtq r rrvtrdnmentai protectiar aAr he effect of ariyvtolation of these levo, 3. Deteds, liens, emutribrant' adverts claims, or other mzitte.s taI created, suffered, assarrre of agreed to by this insured tlatmant: ati�l rraaresi at rxcHismtusCat tegidations„ emcepr to the Meat that a ndlice of the er ffsnG�titsnil',theteo(ara iced a defect G la' nr crstumbranceresufting from vfOlation tbf not known to the.i ompArty not recorded in the'pisbRc records at pate of Palley, but a off Iletittcti tidlatiod affecting the land has Meat new in the publfC records at Date rdpd ' known to the insuterlc a.fniantand not d3 dosed in writing to thieCornptil by the insured oral r� ma t prfor'to tilt date the insured rtaimant became an Insured under this FlidT gtitvurrRrnental police power' not e d Icy' fat aboie ricept to the extent that atntofw, W0r?'sllte 0*41se therea(or a notice A edea, tied t� policy, resulting fn no rets or da nage to the insured claimant, , fdl attaching or seated su sent to Date of f'alicy, at orencirribfarsce tewiting "in .' W retultrng in loss orilamig0% t ich woutdnot have been 3ustairwd Ifilic irutired oral or had paid: value (or t#e estaWbr fnlert!st insured by this policy* AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION LOAN POLICY (t041-87) WlYa A.L rA: ENDORSEMENT - FORM 7 COVERAGE SCNEDUL OF EXClUSLONROhd COVERAGE Thek4lowinomiallers Are expressly lxdlltfed ftgtY4 CCSlrageOftllK i, sand tf}C ClWtipat� fay created; Sll etedp a5$Qmed pt agreed to b lhC frjSllled wtfi a Deas fa tit darrwgrv� ousts; attorney's ar expenses which `ari?P by reason aG Cidlib�nR ibi Trot known to the C'amparry, nut. recorded in the public records atbut Date tit Poffcy, 1, (jl Aay four tirditiance or governmental teg� a Uv4didinan.�n'tinchkliti but not limited to t ulldtng or restm to (ii tfin ro i;%,K acadort known insured claimarit theeclaimantry l a ma the wroed dFac msed inwriting an Rsvred to the un eby tholnsured SIIcyF to ior e ri o hereafter t oes, aor onreli ��ricgi *so, orf t a land � she cltaiacter dimertslons be uaatktrss9 of MY �.ann� n l4 rrtp t erected act t se 1«nd, (ifiN.a se rAtian in ownershi ant tflhDaie li claimant,his dl attaching c tett Budamage, lass createdsubsequent is or rile dimensions o a cm ,t Ott ens r to o the #bird or arty parcel of which the land is or (ey resulting in tit oiitd not have �a wsWirkd I t►sei n. f m red dlairti nt w>«;,a p0V Of tivy krn+iranrneatal proiectiork, tWAhe effect Of tpy violation of these laws, orr'rr,Arsc s r avrrrirrseiitaT re ulalions, er4 pt to rise-ixrent. that a notice of the had td verso for the estate or interest insured t by his policy h then ardc!abiiity of the lien of rite insured mortgage bedause of tfie fnabfll" r or failure itr'iXvenaetafi t f pia:t Mice on defect lien or trmbr4^ncem3uhid fr�sm a Violation or at,eci va}etroti atfrng the land has taz retarded !n the public reconts at Bate of lite inured at Date of JPobd , of the Inability or failure of oily xitf ui`.nt owner of the indebtedness to comply witfr applicable doing business fxivt of the state in which land oT WiTtGi� fblmiltgruerrmontalpolicePowernatdrelWeid'by(afabts except totTtetotentthaf the i5 situate&, S. tris e, grt1aimt#ictctif;whldh a"AdOUf�,reamc"rsctnereofora notice ofAr' t. lien orencuntbranceresultin from asAtidityprupentorceabitifyoftheherldPrhoihsurtdrrsoriga isesaurafthett�nsictiortevidrrrted#tythtti,hsttreddttyorrgag�anttistNsedupdnuxury a vitAariorr,iaratift0d virrlation affecting the 14M. -has been recordod is else Public x�tell at' OAS# a f t ?it Y b or any consumer credit projection or huts in lending task, r, arty statutory lien for serYices tatx)t 5sr nwterral3 Cor they oleins a. 2. lei �fsof rrvt,;saeot domain unless notice of the: e rdtse'thercwf fiat been recordW in the Date - priority o(anp statutory lien for servts05, Gabor or hater als over the lien of tate insured mongagel ansing from an improvement or walk delated to:he fend pu re rgrrx1J$ & Of'Poll Wy but not os tferd, frons tow- ragge arty taking which has owitted- prior ,to Date of .Policy whirls Nastas Ere #ridding on rise tights of a urthaser ti svhich.is ca'itracred for .and comment& subsequent, to Hate of Pohdy and,i not Irtrbnted in whole or in n by proceeds of the indebttwinass by Ory4foi* wt �.ttdu#. knc4l6dge. setth t insured mon eRe vvhrcli at Date a(' oti0 the fnsur04 has S. Dt eirm tracts, encumbrances, adverse elairx% or #loser matiersr advanced of It obligated to advance o, complete items 1, and/or 2 for additionaf°tdr�?lces, ` wish to xi, ceiu e following services 041 ar +: Coinpiato. items 3, and,4a &,b. - �' *Print yt)ur, ttarna acid addori the raedit3$ of this fotnt sa ` that Wecart roiuro this card to you, ,- feels 1. Atfdrgsoea'ir�Addrea / ` +- r+,ttaeh this form to the front of t'ltie maitpiece, or on,the /ry backs/ space; does nptWink. �. �. �� Rat3tiictetf f�elim�� � ,Write Return Acceipt Requested" on the rttaill�iec� the articie.number� next t Consult AoSttrinster wrf 3f Attigia Atldr aad to; '. ., 4a, Micid Wurr)ber l J - ;;3 State `Univers;.tiy Foiiildataori' i96 16 Z0 At,�ri:; td ;i!lasf:erj6n 4b, 5¢rvloe iyrne - Ci fiegistordd [`f Irt$ured O c.: t� Unve s ty Re a intns Certified COD � o,ttico, Ca '95929 OI55 Exprdss Mail d Return A060a¢f fok _ fvlerchbndieg .. . 7. date o��pf qty ery , Sig `'` e . dresse t3. X 7tbdseq's Address f-tbgttested'}` acxf. fea is ,paid? net t PS For , . to era s. G6 iss —z et p4mc-STIC 95T,PRN t r.� B E COUNTY Consultant List` ENVIRONMENTAL INTACT REPORTS Abrams Associates Michael Brandman Associates 2775 Mitchell Drive, Suite 117 1750 Creekside Oaks Dr., Ste. 200 wValnut Creels, CA 94598 Sacramento; CA 95833 415-945-0201 916-649-8401 Fax 916-641-9222 Ralph ,T. Alexander & Assoc; 591 Redwood Ifighway CH2M PTiu lvtill Valley, CA94941 2525 Airpark Drive P.O. Box 492478 'l.. Barrett Redding, CA 96049 ;Energy & Environmental Consulting 916-243-5831 PROF Box 4521 FAX 916-243-1654 Chico, CA. 95927 345-7265 CH2M 11ill 9300 Rosin Court, Ste 110 'Robert Beira, W'n i. Frost & Assoc, Sacramento, CA 95834 ` 14725 Alton. Parkway 916-920-0300 P.O. Box 19739 x Fax 92078463 Irvine, CA 92713-9739 714-472-3505 CSU, Chico FAX 714-472-8373 Department of Geography Chico, CA 95929-0425 Bendix Environmental Research Tncr 916-895-5285 Fok Plaza, St;: 902 1390 Market Street Castrillo &. Assoc. San Francisco, CA 94'102 7956 California Ave. Fair Oaks,. CA. 95628 BiosysterAs Analysis, Inc. 916-967-1801 $152 Paradise Drive, Bldg 39 Tiburon, CA, 94920 Randy 14. Chafin 415-435-0399 1125Dartmouth Avenue FAX 415-435-0893 Roseville, CA 95678 . 916-782-1,098 Brady &Associates, 1828 Fourth Street Leonard Charles & Assoc. Berkeley, CA 94710 58500 Bohan -Dillon Rd. '415-540 -733, Cazadero, CA 95421 1 Michael Clayton & Associafes EBASCO Environmental 16 Digital Dr., Suite 200 2525 Natom" Park Drive, #250 Novato, CAI 94949 Sacramento,, CA 95833-2933 415-883-9211 Fay 4,15-883-9238 ECO -Analysts 1025 Village I.ane Community Concepts Chico, CA 95928 P.O. Box 249 342-5991 Mariposa, CA 95338 ECOS INC. CommuM'W Dynamics 1500 Sacramento Inn Way, Ste 116 780 N. Euclid St, #108 Sacramento., GA 95815 Anaheim, CA 92801 916-922-5807 Fax 916-922-4919 Community Planning Consultants a 303 Potrero St., 29-105 ERG Env. & Energy Serv. Co. Santa Cruz,: CA 95061 201 Spear St., Ste. 1660 - San Francisco, CA. 94105 Cook .Associate's 415-2274370 2060Park Avenue Oroville, CA 95966 Earth Motr cs, Inc. 7000 Marina Blvd. 4th Floor Sedway Cooke Assoc:, Brisbane, CA 94005 300 IYlontgomery Street 415-742-9.900 ,Second Floor San Francisco, CA, 94104 Elgar Hill 415-495-2400 P.O. Box 690 Fax 415-495-739$ Penn 'v e0 CA 94951 Cranmer Engineering, Inc. Engineering -Science, Inc. P.O. Box 1,240 P.O. Box 7109 Grass Valley, CA 95945 Pasadena, CA 91109 818-585.6047 Dames & Moore- FAX 818-585-6336 9300 Tech. Center Dr., Ste 1.00 Sacramento, CA 95826 Environmental Analysis &. Plaxuiing 916-364-8698 826 St: Helena Avenue Fax: 916-362-7987 Santa" Rosa, CA 95404' 707-�84-4000 Dennis Dickman '& Assoc. P.01 BOX 390 Engineering` Science Inc. lVlokelumne Hill,, ' CA 95245 1301 Marina Village Parkway; Ste 200 209-2934488 Alameda, CA 945,01 510-769-0100 ., Duncan &. Jones, FAX 510-769.!,,92,44 2161 Shattuck Avenue Berkeley," CA 94704 4leinfelder' Environmental Science Assoc; Inc (ESA) 1370 Valley Vista, Ste '150 1930 9th $L, Ste 220 Diamond Bar, CA. 91765 Sacrameato, CA 95814-7044 - . 714-395-0335 916-325-9344 - FAX 916-325-9349 LSA 157 Parr Place Environmental Science, Assoc. Inc (ESA) Pt. Richmond, CA 94801 301 Brannan St., Ste 200 415-236-6810 San Francisco, CA 94167-1811 Fax 415-236-3480 415-896-5900 Fax: 896-0332 Oscar Larson ,& Assoc, P.O. Box 3806 Envirosphere Company Eureka, CA 95541. 2550 Ninth St:, Ste 205 707445-2043 Mountain View, CA 94041 FAX 707445-8230 Geological Technics Inc. McClelland Consultants 2601 River Roaa 1540 River Park Dr., Ste 117 Modesto, CA 95351 Sacramento, CA 95815 209-538-6424 916-646-3535 FAX 538-5852 McLaren Environmental Engineers Greystone, Environmental, Tnc. Brenn Pullen/Chris Word -555 W' Benjamin Holt Dr. Ste 414 11101 White Rock Road Stockton, CA. 95207 Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 - 209-477-2833 916-638-3696 Fax 209-477-2874 J. Laurence Mintier & Assoc. Harding n. Assoc.Lawson.813 ``i~F" Street 7655 Redwood Blvd. Sacramento, CA 95814 P.O. Box, 518 Novato, CA 94948 Nrundie, and .Associates' 415492-0821 3452 Sacramento 'Street San Francisco, CA 94118 Heritage Partner 426 Broadway, Suite' 305 Nichols - Berman P.O. ,Box 3659 142 Minna Street ' Chico, CA 95927 San Francisco, CA 94105 916-893-898241- -957-1982 Fax 916-893=8985 Q der Ebviconmental & Energy Services " Jones & Stokes Assoc,. 1 221 Main Street, Ste 1400 2600 Y Scree, Ste 100 San, Francisco, CA "94105 Sacramento, CA 95818-1914 415-227-4370 91b -73i-3000 FAX 41522;--1736 Fax 91:6-737-3000 3 Planning and Design Solutions 4770 Campus Drive Seacor, `Newport Beach, CA. 92660-1834 4989 Golden Foothill Parkway, Ste 4 714474-1660 El Dorado Hills, CA 95630 Fax: 714-474-2016' 933-0995 FAX 933-2946 Planning Assacia#es 6622 Azalea Ave. sierra Environmental Consultants . P.O. Box 1527 1481 Kearns Road Redding; Ca 96002. Placerville, CA 95667 916-121-0440 916-642-8303 Fax 916-211-6963 Slakey & Associates - '1'he Planning Center P.O, Box 944 2277 Fair Oaks Blvd., Ste 450 1.2 Onnda Way Sacramento, CA, 95824 Orinda, CA 94563 916-646-0325 415-254-4164 Fax 916-646-39211 FAX 4154254-0679 Planning Concepts South Coast Environmental Co. 309 Commercial Street P.O. Box 944 Nevada City, CA 95959 Orinda, CA 94563 916-265-8068 FAX 916-265-6042 TA1vIS Consultants, Inc. 1855 Gateway Blvd. Ste 250 QUAD Consultants Concord, CA. 94520 2530 J St., Ste 302 Sacramento, CA 95816 TSS Consultants 8.413 Jackson Rd Research Associates Sacramento, CA 95825 4048 Nem "York Ave., No,, 1701 Fair Oaks, CA 95628, Urban Vision 916-863-051a Sixty Corporate Park Trvinex CA 92714 STV Consultants 714-851-3091 P.O. Box 1257 Fax 714-851-0382; Stockton, CA 95201 209-463=110$ Wade Associates ' 2140 Pio&ssional Dr., Ste, 140 SWA'Group Roseville, CA 95661 2200 Bridgeway .Blvd, 916=7$3-8980 Sausalito, CA 194965.'- From Sac, 916-9694980' 415-332-5100 FAX,415-33-079 .:�. 4 PROPOSED MITIGATION MEASURES TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP' LOG #92-01-22-02 I Nunail Deweryornseptfcksystemaisaapprovedrd note that says no building II. Public Works A. Locate T- intersectionon Skyway with existing island break iust east of P.G.& E. power lines. Record this information on -the final map. B. Avoid' existing stone wall where possible. Align access right-of-way imimediately adjacent to 'stone wallwhere possible, keeping wall outside right-of-way except for crossings. C. Note on map that Caltrans may seek future right-of-way for possible Butte Creek interchange. This affects parcel 9. Neither land owner nor applicant owns or has any right to the northeast quadrant of the Neal Road and Highway 99 intersection. This parcel of land is owned by a local third party, Il. Department of Fish and Game A. Pay state mandated fees to the Department of Fish and Game at time of recording: 8. , Provide a note on parcel 9 that prohibits, increasing direct run-off into Butte Creek. C. Provide recording data on the map to highlight the existing rights of the irrigation di; cher that cross parcels 10, 11,' and 12. D'o Record existing Butte,County "right to farm" language on parcels 101 111 and 12. to protect the right to continue. to use, maintain., and operate irrigation as+ has been the practice for more than 100 years; 'i IV.` Drai'hage Provide a note, ;on the map that requires prior to building anypermanent structure, a detailed plan must,be submitted to the Department of Public Works demonstrating that water retention is designed in such a way that there will be no net `increase i r n run-off from the pa cel - nn which the permanent structure is being,!planned. APPENDIX i Fide r�. Log No. 92-01-22-02 AP'No. 040-600-019,020, 021 ,and 022. Z BACKGROUND 1, Name of. Proponent: California state unfversfty Foundation. 2. Address of proponent and representative (Ir a0llcable), Ofc, of UniversItY Reiatlons, Chlco, cA 95929-oi5s 3. Project descrlpttort. A request to subdivide i.1ao acres .Into 13 parcels ranging in site from 40 to 340 acres. 'this land It a portion of the old slakely-swartz proposed development. Even thoytgh,It's not stated In the appiItat;lon, there are future devefopm°nt plans being considered that would substantially Increase the Uses and Intensity of ac(lvity on the land. This request represents the last stage or phase that could be taken on a l {tree po►iion of the land unless a general Phar l+mendment is apriroved.. The useofthe 'Tiering, concept t Is expected to be utlil2ed.on tills site. futureact o v U f i and Ins that result In more intend e uses will require an tnvlronmen al impact keport (E.I.R.)-_ Analyzintl the protect as stbmi'tfed, 13 resldentlal dwe#iings would be constructed should the map be approved,' This project represents the second requested action on the formertblakety- Swartz proposal since It was abandoned. This fs representing all fncrementai proposal to minimize expected Impacts created from a larger Otopcsal« yes ivivrjg WD DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ;EVALUATION LT . MANDATORYFINDINGS Off' SIGNIFICANCE s. Does the project have the potentia** to degrade the X '• Tfils proposal maysignir'Tcahtly. degrade the envtronmen.t. the quality of ;the environment, substantlally reduce applicant must address Issues ralted In the checklist to determine the; NO tat of a (Ish or wi'idlHe specim. cause a the'slgnfflcance and/or required mitigation measures to eliminate ` fish or wildlife population to drop bAlbw self- potential Impacts, sustalning levels, threaten to eliminate a plant, or .animal corrnunity, reduce the number or restrict iTte range of A rare Or endangered plant or anfmO ar eliminate Irnportant examples of major periods of California history or prehistory? 2. Does the project 'have the potential to achieve X This proposal wilt not impede long-term environmental goals. short-term beneltts to the detriment of long-term ort -term lrrpact on the pccurs In alonl;term briefopernodgo tioneb filleich impactsfwill endure Into: the tu:ture ) 3. Does the project have lmpact's which are Tndfvidtia#•I;y X- This proposal may, have a 3fiintficant cumulative Impact 45n the limited but cumulatively considefabfe) (A project envf(orunenk but this project ca, -t be mltigated to A level of may impact on two or more separate resources where insignificance. the impact on each resource i s relatively ,smail. but Where, the effect of the total of those,fmpacts a on the environmen(I s signifTcant.a ;Does the prosect have envitonmeritai effects which X This.proposat wil,�l'not have a sjgnlfJcant; adverse effect on human cause• substantfal 'adverse effects on bi n beings, beIl. ings, dithef dTrectty or lildirectlyt ;til'.DETMZkINATION On the pasts' o"01 in, jnitlaj, evaluatlon: i/wE find the Proposed project fOULD NOT have a s7gnTffcan# elCect on the environment and a NEOgfiVE t)EOLARAT.ION will be prepared. I/WE find that although the proposed project COAD have 1 significant et'fect 06 the environment, there Witl tial. b3 a,sNOI icapi effect jn this case because tris Atl:rfCA71oN MEASUtEs described ort -'the attached shee# have been added to the project. i1 NEQA7IVE oEctAkATierJ w[I1'-be`prepAred. _ t/wE lind the proposed Aroject MAX have a sig ntl�fcxnk effect oil the env.I'ronment;. and an tWilt"ENtAL 1 PALT'REPORT Is required, " pumT PCANJI D PARTMENr G(C DATE: A A r 04,, 1002 k • Thomas Last ASS C to Pl annel ' kevfewed byp iiiv; io nine . al. Checklist ;Evaluat2.'an of Envy ra�rxmentAl impact IV'., ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS vrs yuvnn No DISCUSSION .OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION 1, EAkY . Will, tate proposal result In Ogntficant; a. ns table arch ns, or changes In x The proposal will not affect subsurface eatih conditions. c6n esir geob. nlsrupldonE its displacement, t' compact ion or x c4"c' and love rr,esui overcovet Ing of a� covewing olsuthelsite a sla t .otldevelopm nl of structut'es. driVeways, parking areas, etc, Due to the of sizes, minimal rad[ wFll be necessary g fig to provide for proper drainage and building pads, This Impact Is not considered significant because C. change in lopography or ground surface_� x standard drainage and giadtng controls will be enforced, The proposal will result In some change in topography to relief features? accommdate access and building,pads,, d, Destruct ton, covering ormodiI[catIon of. any x The Site has no Unique physical features, unique geologic or physical featuresr ��� e. Increase In wfnd or water 6rosfon of solis, x " "` The Proposaf may cause some: erosion due to disruption, displacement., hither on or off site? compactlorl and overcovering of the site, standard cons tr.uctIon, techniques required duiing building phases Will reduce this Impact to a ieVel of Insignffleance. t,qja. In deposltian of erosion of beach x The proposal may result in some sittation, deposition or erosion of sands,. or changes In slitatlori. deposition of area drainage ways. Apptoprdate setbacks and construction standards erosion which may modify the channet of a 11r Iver or s tieam of the bed the will' be requfted. This impact Is not don sJdered significant. of ocean or any bay`s inlet of lake? - g. lolls of plume agriculturally productive ,,_ x Thus proposal does not contraln prime Aar Irsoils„ solis outsidd designated urban.Areasi h. f people�or propetly to geologic 6 x Even though there are no known faults In they area, all of Butte `zone hazards s as earthquakes, landslides, bazar s bt County II fn a Moderate Earthqubke Ihtenstty Vlll. construction mudslide ground failure. or 'similar of buildings to wltorm Butiding code Itanda'rds wt l) proVlde lade-gUate ptotdctton to occupants in case of 'seismic activity, 2„ AIL will the proposal result in substantlalr a, AI,( emisslons or deterioration of: ambient — x : The proposal wtl! not afledt air quality because the increase in the air quality? number, of vehicle trips is not significant. b. The creation of obJectlorlabfe odors, smoke x The propos0 will not create obiectlonable odors, :smoke or fines, or fumes r. c. Alfera.tion of alw movement, moisture of X The proposal will hot affect the atmosphere. temperature, or any ct+ange In climate, ` locally or tegfOialiy? I., WATER; W1.II,Ihe OropoSA 1,d$. uit fn substantial; a„ cnang"es ln, currents, or the cotrrs6 bt x The proposal will not change lite current :or course of direction of direction of water movements Srieither: water bodle5, marine or fresh waters? " b, Changes In absorption rates, dralnage, >r. The ptoposal May r6SUlt In an increase In surface Wafer runoff due patterns, or the late and amount or surface to f`c?luced abso ptlbn trrxn ImperVlous surfaces, and in a change tri runoff? the dt,tlnage paR rn or, the site, However, no slgAdilGant advotce impacts are anticipated because standatcldrainage techglque sviiI be requited. C. Need for oft—site surface dralnage_ tL tto oft—site irrorovemenis are expected. improvements,EncludfngveaetatIon. iemoval, channellZatlon or culvert tnstalla.tion7 d Alterations to the course or flow cl flood x Access to the lots will require road crossings over several waters? lntermfttent creeks-, Crouch RaYine being the largest. Culverts or channelizatlon may be necessary_ Catch basins and holding ponds were deemed necessary in the drainage study conducted to 1988, e, change In the amount of surface Water In a'nyx ._._ .�. ... The proposal WI i not affect. any watercourse because no excess runoff water body?' Is permitted• 11 Discharge Into surface waters, or in any x the proposal may affect surface water quality due to siltation alteration of ittrfacd 'water quality, resulting from erosion caused by road and driveway construction and incfudIng but not lmlt6(VIo temperature, grading of building sites. The Department of Fish and came requests dissolved "mygen or turbidity? no pollutants enter Butte creek, g. Alteration of the direction or rate of iloW erid x The aircwosa wH fnot affect the diteetlon or flow of ground water's. of waters? h. Change In the quant 1.ty or qua iity of groundx, The proposal will not directly affect any aquifer, wa((ers, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through Interception of an aquifer by cuts or. excavations! 1. iteductlon 1'0 the amotrol of Water o X Thls°proJeck w11I hot result in a reduction of water availability, available for pubtlo water` suppliesrerwlse J, Exposure of people or Property to water- �x..... The proposal will not expose people or property to Hooding. related hazards such as flooding? 4. PLANTan LIFE. Wf l the proposal result In a, Change In the diversity of species, or k The site Is 'located primatIty In an annual grassland habitat with number of any species of planus (Including limited BtUe'oak savanna and mt,Xed riparlan woodlands. A botanical trees, shrubs, grass. drops, and aquatl:c report 'was prepared, by )ones and'stokes 16 1988 as pati of the Olanttrees Btakety-Swartz Proposal,, Veinal pools were "Identified throughotit the property. Mixed rlparlan woodfand was Identified on proposed tots 4, 10-, 11 and 11. The riparian habltat and Vernal pools need to be Identtf led ori the t.entalive map to determine potential Impacts, Fermits may also be, requited Iron the U.S, Army Corps of Engineers. b. Peductfon of the numbers of Any unfque, fate X According to the 09a, Study,, the sfte contains no, rare plants. '. or endangered species of lants7 c, introduction of new specles of plants into' x � The proposal Wilt not tittt;c,t existfn9 plant Tile, an area, or, in a "barrier to the normal replehfshmerit of existing species?'. d. Reduction In Acreage of any ago cultural % � The s�lte does not contain any Agricultural crops, -'but Ls used' lot crop? seasonal grazing. According to the Butte u' dOUnt.y Farm Bureas OffIde, this area is considered' to contain some of the lowest productive grazing lands in 'the coon, ty. 4o acre tots would sustain 1,,3 cattle for a few months each year. jberetolyd,. the economic vfabl'flty of 40acre units, is consld@rect tncons{stent with the policies of the cehetai f?lan< 5. ANIIAkL LIFE. Will the, proposaE fesull in surstantra A. Chanje 1n the dlvetsffy of species, or x ` "rhe proposal will not affect animal itfe because site does not .numbers of any species of animals thirds, .the su p t signtf scant an Emai I.IP p e or trabitat: or luno animals Includicig reprises, to sh and' shellfish, benthic organisms or lnsectsl7 b. stepun I rare, angedh reds n the eciesroroanim - r-- x The site contains no rare or endangered animals, The provisions of O ND t� velopment' setbacks adjacent to sensitive habitats will rJ lspgUe' ordenduct - to impacts to some species, c. Introduction of hoW species of animals into x The proposal Will introduce domestic pets to the area but there are An area, or 'in a barrier to the migration no migration routes or sensitive species In the area. or movement of anirr2llsT d. Deterioration of exI'sting fish or wildlife x The site contains no significant wildlife habitat, habitat? 6. N019t. Will :the proposal result In subslantlai a. Increases In exfsting noise levels? x The proposal Will not result In a substantlat Increase In noise created on Mew in the yi,cinity. b. fkposufe of :people to sevete noise levefSt _ ,_ x The proposal will not eX00se people to severe noise levels. 7, LtCHr. Aor� G<:AR'E. JWili the -proposal 'produce x The privosal will not, result In a substan4'fat increase In ,i fghl or` s 9nr Ratti g and glare? glare created on site or in thevicinity« a. LANOUS15- 4111, the pri>posal result 1n a sub$(antlaI x The primary use designation Is grazing. for theCrazing and open Land CeneraI Plan) LentAs As indicated 1n a«d«. the ecancradc wlability a teration of the present or Planned, land use of an of acre oar cats for grazing cannot be met' In. this area. 'This area areal bon Ve +mast uses y ;be requested in the near future. However. thisnreque would take ylablerlandsunitsout of oraztn9 Productlot„ q. NATIrtAL RgsmRds. WIiI the proposal result In su s, ant:. ; a'. increase 14.this rate of Lite: Of any natural x - .�. �.. The proposal' Will not affect any natufal resources. resourcesr b, oeptetlori of, any 'nonrenewable natural x The proposal ;Mo 11 no: deplete any natural resources. resourcesrl to RMSx,OF (PSET'. Witt. fhe proposal Involve - a. substances (including, release of hazardous g, but not 1lmiteG to,' x;_ The, proposal W1I+ not involve the use of hazardous materials, not is located ciotroto any facilities Which, store or u11112e such of), pestloides, chemicals or radiation) to mafeT ials. the event a( an accident of upset_ condi' ttons7. b. Passible Interference With an emergency x the p'rdposal VI 1, 1 hot affect' any emergency 'services« response plan or emergency evacuation plan? tt. OPULATfON. Will proposal atter location. the human k .. The proposal. may atter, thelocatlon, dfstrfbullon., or density of population of. the area because this could head to more development d strrbutron densEty or growth rate, of Popula't1onRthan Tsptanned and beln9.dexeloped;In the area. tz, rrougf Wii7; thcprosai atltct exlstln9,ttousfn9., x "� The pr4pbsal'Wlli eat slgniftcantly aftect�housing dercand oror creaTe� a demand for additional hoUstn9T i.3 TRANSP t�T.A_aro4NCIkdJLATiay. will the proposal' result n a. GelleCattonot substantial ad�ilttonal'vehitle _ x The ro csaf 111 represent an litcremen(aI increase to traffic to P , p w p rroOmentt the area, ,, t b. Effects on exlsting parking fact II ties, or x The proposal will not affect parking because the proposal will have demand for new parking? to comply with the parking requirements contained within Butto County code section 24-35. C» substantial Impact on existing x The proposal Will represent an Increase in congest ton. and maintenance transportation systemv requirements on area roads. cal -trans has requested approved access at points on Highway 99 that are not represented on the proposed : - maps» d. significant alterations to present patterns x The proposal ;may Altor the present pattern of circulation. In the of circulatloo or movement of people And/or area, goodv't e. Alteeations to waterborne. raft or air x - The proposal Mail not affect rail of traffic, traffic? f. Increase Iin traffic hazards to motor X The proposal Will result in an Incremental increase In traffic and vehicles, bicycilsts or pedestrians? related traffic hazards In the area. Access standards required by the Public Works and calTrans Departments will be required. 11. P(Atic_SE VICES, will the proposal have an effect upm.., or result in a need for new or altered' goveinment service,,: a, Fire pro►ect'Ion? r x The proposal will result In a incremental Increase in demand ior' it r e protection j The Butte, County Fire Dfvislon of has Indicated that Department/Cati110rhia IVW' dumulaDepaftinenl/Caflfornla rurair 'areas Will Impact their" ability to provide lire protection services. They have stated that tnstallation of automatic ,fife suppression sprinkler systems In residential structures, the use of fire resistance building materials and Water supply systertis adequate to support the sprinkler system wl.11 reduce the demand for fire protectfon services. b. Pottce p.fotection?x •. The proposal wilt result. In a incremental increase in demand for polIce, protectJon In the area, whlch wlll be mitigated by payment of a development lmpaCf fee for sheriff s fachaities pursuant to the pioVlsfons of 0, 1 t_i 3, Arti'sle II of' the Butte County Code. ' C. Schools? x The proposal will result In An Incremental -.Increase In demand for school services In tfae area» Appropriate mt t.igatfon with the Durham school District Is required. d, Parks``or outer recreatfon:Af facilltlest _ The ofopost1 wlII iesu It in an ihdtr mental increase in demand fof'' park and ,-cdre'SA10n f3cllities In the area,.' e. Maintenance of publ is faclI I t1031, 1netudlno , x "the pr;oods,t.r �wilI result In a l0a6mental increase "in the need far roads? I maintenance of roads anO other, publlc faclIIties in the area. f. Other governmental seevlcest x The Proposal will fesult fn a Incremehtal Incroase Ifs demand; for aft other governmental services :In the area. 15. ENER6Y WIIi the proposal result Int a, Use of subs'tenttai. amounts of fuel or _ X The proposa�I'wlfl not utfli2e subs? nt)aI toil or e►let9Y» energyl b. substantial increase fn demanrtupon exlstlno x The proposal Witi not substantially increase the demand for energy• sources of _ energy;., or fequlto the development of new, sources of energy? ib. tM itt ES.. Will the pfoposaf fesult Ina need for nex systems. ,or substantial alterations to the followahg� 6 ?xtvjat`onmental Checklist Evaluation of ,Envir'oatmental Tmpt3ct a.' Power or naluraf gats X The proposal will not affect electricalpower or natural gas distribution systems. , b_ communications systems? �;� x _ The proposal W#ii not affect cormun#c.atlon ystots.` C. Water availability? x The proposal will not affect public water systems. d,. sewer or septic systems? x The proposal will have to meet the requirements of the Butte county Enyitonmentat Health Dept. 61 Storm water drainage? x .: ,. Their proposal WtII have 16 provide a permanent Solution for drainage.: Drainage improvements may be necessary to retain any new runoff. f. Solid waste anti disposal? x The.ptoposal Will not, affect solid wraste disposal, sa. F"JAFI HEALTH,., will the propas'al result, 10- a, Creation of. any heafth hazard of potential"` X The proposal Will not create any health hazard. hazard Wdludln2 !,ental health!? b, Exposure or people 'to por"entlal health x The proposal will not expose people its any health hazard_ hazards? .. 4. ljD4 rfc�s. titin the prc*gsal ?exult in the. x The proposal. will not result In an aesthetically offensive view Dost— rue, on of any scenic vista or vt'etr open to the because: it is consistent with surrounding deVelopmentr pubflc: or will the pr sal result its The creat -lo". anon poi an aestheitcally offensive site a open t the ' public views s9. RecneATIOW. Wit the proposalresult, In- an Impact x 'the proposat may result in an lnctemental increase #n demand for gouallt uantftY of existing Park and recreation facilities,. recreational pporiunitiest ,20. CULTURAL RESCI.RCES. a. Will the ptoposal restitt in the alteration X 'The project site Is identltltd as an ates of high sensitivity for or destruction:of A prehlstor IG or, his_tot Ic Archaeological resources. tut Atchaeologfcaf Sutvey was conducted of archaeological site? the project site In 1962, "The survey documented some evtdence of In an Within the, pr olect slid and aa cerias gantedrcbaeologicalclearan. b. Wlii the proposal tesutt In adverse physical x The proposal mazy affect htstortc structures such as the starie;Wal Is6 ' or aesthetic effects 'to a prep€storfc of Al Ligation Is tequlred.to reian hese; walls to the extent. pbssjble historic building. structure, or oblect? and intefporate them Into the'project.'' c. Rhe proposal have the potential to` a; k The.proposal w1''II not After.t cut turali:#esources. causesphysical change whicli woutd affect unique ethnlc duttutat valuest d. WII`l the- proposal ':restttct existing x The proposal w@11 not affect fcllgraus resources. reilgious or 'sacred' uses iri,thlrf the potential irrr'Act !tea? •, t, . 'I av onm�rital c;itecklist * Evatluation of. E>i 2, onme�nt , Impact DATA SHEeT a; Project Descrl fp lona C. Limiting Factors; Potentlafify Iimited groundwater f. Type of Projects Tent,aaive Parcel Map S. visual/scenic Quality': Excellent, 2. Grief M-Scrlptlon. TP to divide 1,190 acres to create 13 6, Acoustic Quality: Coodr parcels ranging In slid fto?r, d0 to 340 acres, 7, Air Quality- cood, a. Lacat!011: Last, at Highway 99. 560th of SkyW'ay, sough Chico area. Biological Emrironment:, 4. Proposed Density, of Developmer%la: 1 dwelling unit per go a. vegetation: Crassiands and oak Woodlands, some riparlari acres, habitat. is. Amount of impervious Surfacing. Minimal. 9. wildlife Habitat; small birds And animals common to foothill areas., 6. Access and Nearest Pub.1IC Road(s): Skyway, SR 49 ,. ..cultural environments Ir. Method of SM.90 Di sposal: Spptic�rleachfletd to. Archaeological and Historical Resources In ;the area. Htgh 0. Source of dater supply: Private vrel►s, sensitivity area. 9. proximity of Poorer Lines.- Adjacent to property. 17. eu[te County General Plan designation, Crazing/Dp en Lands to. Potential for further 'land divisions and deVelopment;, some 12. exIsting Zoning: U, SH parcels may subdivide to 40 acr,e densatles under the-cP 00lvnay[,n. 13. Existing Land use Ori-3ile: Crazing Land S. rnyironmental seftlnp 14. surrounding Area: a. Land uses: rural residenUaL Physical Envirorurent! b. Zoning. U. SH C Cori. Plan Designat ion• Ag -Rest, Urban Reser e , l`. Tettafn "d. Parcel sizes~ 40 t6'',I.boo0' ac. + a. Cenral: Topographic character: Ridge 'tops and canyon do,Population, , [ow Po. Lands .top. b, slopes: Yary tram 2 to 30 z 15. Character of site and Area: Rural t0 3 C. Elevation: Steep sope�bove.sea level. d. LlalitIr Fact00`: e el 16. Nearest Urban Area: Chtco i. SolItTypes and Characteristics: Soli Is mostly 17. ReieVarit spheres at Influence: N/A characteri2ed by the Aiken Stoney Phase- stones ''is:: Improvements standards urban Are a: N/A comprise approx mately 50% or more of the the soli. Soli Is approximately six` feet volume of deep in the 19. Fire Protection service: project area. Residual Solt from lava flaws, rough a, Nearest county (State) Fire Station: , station a 44 rock ou,croppiitgs, boulders, and slfailar sof;ls ti. water Availablfity: 'Water lender only, f � overlying Tuscan formations also exlsts on the site, Limiting Fact, its, ors• shadow sa 36. schools in Are School Districts. a• t)urham & Chico Union 3. natural"'HiZards of the'Land a, Earthquake Zone: Moderate Larthquakp intensity zone . VTIi, b. Erosion Potentials M911 c. Landsflde Potential: Moderate d, Fire. Hazards Extreme e. Expansive Sol( Potential:- Low' a, Hydrology a. surface hater; Nance Canyon creek b� Ground Waters Unknown C, Dralnage Charactetlsttcs: Project drains toWards the d, Annual Ratstail (natmal); 14-3S inches per year, )„ nmen�tal check] ist Eva luat an of IBnvironatentia,l impadt EWIRQ14MENTAL REFERENCE MATERIAL I_ Butte County Planning Department. EarthgUakkee and Fault Activit Ma 11-L Seismic 5a�e%v Elem2nL_ 12. Butte County Board of Supervisors. Orov e, CA CH2M Hill, 1977, A ricuiturai Preserves Map,, established b Reso ut on,No. 6 -178. QroyIlle, CA: 2 Butte County Planning Department. L1 uefaction ` $utte County Tnnin Department, 1987, Potential Map 11=2 Seismic SrMtetv element,- _ orovi e, CA: Ch2M H, 1977. 13. National Flood InsurancePra ram: Flood . Insurance Rate macs. Federal Emergency 3. Butte County Planning department. Subsidence and Management Agency, 1989. Landslide Potential Ma' 111-1 Safety T"ement, o;I?v 1, 1 1 e, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977, 14. USGS Quad 'Maps, Chico and-HamlIn Canyon. 4 Butte County Planning Departrnent. Erosion 15., Soi 1 Map, ehico (19'25)/Orov' I le (1926). Potential Ma 111-2, Safety" ElemerrtOrov'ille, CA Area, niteci5tates epartment o CH2M HTT r 1:9.77; Ai r Culture. 5, Butte iounty Planning Department.. Expansive.5offs 16, Soil Survey' of Chico 1925 Orovi1le '- nt. orovi'tle CA: 2M _ Man 111..3 ._Safe�y element. , �— 1 26 Area. u rte tates ue artment of _ n__ p _ H . . 19774 Agr cu ture, 6, Butte County Platm ing Department Nolse element 17. Butte County Planning Department,; Butte MaIV-1 Scenic Mlahway.element.rpvIlle,'CA: oUntv Fire Protection' )urisdictlons- a0 <M H1 1 1,0 1977. FaC tlP.s Ma Butte county re Department and California Department of 7,, Butte County Planning Department. Scenic i hwa s Forestry, 1989. maarV-,11, Scenic Highway Element. orov e, GA; Crl2{ M H i I 1, 197 Butte County Plarinin9 Cie, pax tment..;Natural Fire Hatard classes Ma'111-4 S"afet Element. rov I Iri e,, .CA: LH2M Hill, 1977. 9.� Butte, County Planning Department,Archaeological. Sensitivity Map. Orov111e, CA: lames P. Mann ng, 1983a 10. unty PIanning Uepartment, Schdo'i District 6atte 0 tovi I l'erCA 11. Northwestern District D_epartMeM of Water " Resources, Chico Nitrate Study Mao, Nitrate Concentration S a Tow'weT s. T,e Resources Agency, State ot California,. 1983. i I N� if . i Additional goals are for the Foundation to understand land stewardship by participating actively as a land owner. I Tire land owners believe filing maps it the most effective way of Implementing good planning. Maps provide ;i means of segmenting is ues for nncreased scrutinygaps do the following: - Surface certain issues.: - Call far precise definition and decisions. - - provide right-of-way, for' roads and utilities. { Further questions can be directed to the 'land owners. The Foundation, has found the land owners quite willing to respond to questions,: QUESTION 3 Why should the county approve this _map? RESPONSE4 The map conforms to the zoning and the general plan of the county. No legislative act is requested, only an administrative acts 1t is the only step left betwsen the .Foundation and a sizeable Clift. There is no opposition from adjacent land owners ,or neighbors of which we are aware. The county has mapped the property before. Once in 1990 and again ` in 1991. No questions were raised at that time. The county en.videnmental check list log number 91-02.-05-01, file number 040.600-001 dated February 2, 1991, page 1 item A-10 states 40 acre density is possible. t QUESTION 4i Why does the University Foundation not want to do an LIA.? RESPONSE: Many studies have been done --copies of which the county has fr6m previous applications. There are oo endangered specieson `the site. It would take considerable time and money. What, would be the benefit at this _point. `and lime? The "land, wildlife, and ecology have prospered well, for 100 years in private hands No change Uuse is pl`antied at this time. The Faundation's goal is to secure ownership, not to study the property. 'Why does the county want an E.I.R. when there is no change in use? Howidoes"this benefit; the county? Ploo. Top iRamen protest/3A 0 `State of the C1ty1B5 0 Wall Street Center sulks, _ d'�'i!t. : o',?'Rpr"1.''n•,.yyV� y �, .e.,.. ": .X.� .�., , . ..., ,. „. .. t, •:>. ,•n• ..'-".' ''�7f'f' i f'[. M . �.wrn.•,,.,.. ,. �,:„* ff"". . r. ... Sr 'a•:b !.'. ^` .� .'L r,ro ,.L..,, ,,, SFr /� *vJ �rts.aliF: ®: r �.� 6A . ,.: r• .�,i.,: .$ G'%Sl. � �r<.li "� m`i.,�i':.r! x.'.+' +f�' • '�i�� Nva "'.aJ� . ,'7 A. .% �r �k;� '�`�, _ - _.. ..--ee„++TJ$.,iK�w. • �yy r91 ' ' .,,1 � �` � �vM ,w x .,.,�,,�y,,yy.: J ,�`.d �4�; � .. �• K[r,?tiF`,� � ' 9 f(i�r 4w, .rlr; � .s�. �v.. `� •�-• .mar v .. ..,.. $`' , � � � ,. :.�.tt+�' � ��IF, �:: . �.. • vr�:.•'k ,. a * � R xis r1J,, , „.,k . rp4 .- : ., �+<.�$,-�,+,.r,: '`�', S , .k'�.. .�'i'r. N!., 1• .,.,'.W^:�' :C ,. fir. a�,,... ,,,. t,'. : t r ^cFh�i -r., �+t. +�;• •`: tak ':• � "'-j-t ,�'�„','_ 5;..a-•r.�.+««,..r��,:r.y�,, .,fru:. r,; ,G::+u�a.a S±F'r..ia. Ar..yw .:Y '�_.; ! Sww4Sa `� P"' . h r; a. s:'. .n. t . Y ^�sr is• �i j'• ` rr.. ._ h' !. v.. r y �.. e.. ro 6. �.' w i..��, •a i p'?t ".� �•.-�., .ri? N'.. e �, ,.. "�k.. ,J�v., �Yr �. y,. j� a�` .�# s�:% ,,. _ '^,. +k�• a r 4:r: ate. Y' .- ,r`.� s.a 's}ii'�.� k�, :: ✓ !$:moi'. 1�iarcA'�. .C.,: , �`.v 4� '��. ir'�.� � r ) � w. � p ��rt." ra.,d ..� '( nor' � �" •�. • ?^` ... �, =. `""!- we. -ws •,�. ",.. '"`c<s';'if;a" .. .. ,,.,",,;". i ie',..,>P. :,.. ta4e�''S"". � - ;rti � !.•.ro'}t jai -u y ,�.,wd. 4 v , . ,,;-..:r.�...fp,�,. •r,'�7�. +.;a'f y-rv`*"'Mr.,,•�-- . - • ..rake .�!-*� , .. �%'� .. ,"},`Tt {"t't' .. . ,� '� - f a:� nnyyv� ''h� ( t � , .. s , e ..' fYr.. 6 s, s .� , d1' `•p. .. TrS .. t- �3'r .:f., ( a 1 £ ...,. ;. i r .. s.i: M,w r7"--i'�.ay �. 1 � a (� da �s r. « k kr2., H . '�t^� .,. A •>.; fit: .2 int � il_ �;,�� R•� ,��, - .,,.,�... .,�k. .. . r� ..,',�."�?. ,. . 4�}'` nSr A.+. ).: s .� ,x `(o.r. .t »-fry`' .;y�'+'✓�- +, i',. w�q ��4�4�y� � s4 ,. ;i ay",Y�*T(.p, .. r. ," n. iVY4.. �Y� 1���4�.�, v'M-,f':Y/`Y: "'Sb, u ,. i[.�-, a». V.. N2..: ::: �•(`�, � J, M% _ Y� ,a+ T .. �•::'a Y. eF 't' ♦ �,..,.. �. �.±+!'FX, • h +tF�Y?I�,!�.'fi:�s�Yn� »�. ' ..+.' ° ai. W ,,y�. 21992 CHICO ENTERPRISE.RECORD 139TH YEAR—NO. 78 PHONE 891-128 CHICO, CA FRIDAY, JANUARY° 31, 1992 33� PEFi COPY --32 PAGES Firo. es uItt ciflandtats r r 4r •*b� o q, F foundatil-in111tdo-III!:. a .. deal w sty e ' By Randy S. Foster the onetime B' lakeley-Swartz le- the litter," Swartz said. "We tember 1990, with Swartz keep- , Staff Writer velopment= the Foundation will Want them to be the focal point. ink about 6,400' acres east of �- . receive additional and, ad scent. $ -taking Plan cuts tea( onald, Swarm, general 60- and 4Q -acre parcels during begin to plan." down, ellen we Il Highway on of about 2p0 acres 3'�A IOaCI 1111SeS ell partner of the Nance " , r P the next L0 years. Swartz, a Los Angeles devel- west of Highway 99. Canvon site: southeast Y, ? , p The ma problem SACRAMENTO The sites have not et been o er was a arfner 'with Gerald Dot Chico, has donated selected' but `the Universa, Blakeley in a proposed hi -tech bleak -u major bacluto vledse�d 40 acres, of prime -potential real Foundation has its choice among research residential and o en P'.. May 1991 agreei estate. to the U:nivFr;sity Fotinda- P at the time, was the loss of ready '�- California State U the 1;180 acres that ,, comprise s ace development rte Nance 'financingthat Biakele re rem' tion at Chico State Utriversity, at Chico Research Park, L.P., Canyon, which stretches from, the senteda , Y p r t ¢ gals an ty was announced Thursday. south of the Skyway and east. of skyway . to Neal Read and High.- professor cur ct corpora- Highway 99_ ivy 99 almost to, Paradise. Swartz is now a partner with h load by increasin Provided rt can attra next fall.i r, tions to leaSer part of the parcel, -Ve. offered them the pick of The partnership ended in Sep- See, R.F.SURCW;1A Donald Swartz That agreemen public at the time students who,ate 5t kkato get scarce: class _ �a increases. " : a " 3.` , mbrAf faculty work Durham home +` ., ,� ;,, .. ,. � 3 makes no ,sense at a y�. w <v *yap " . t%,J like `this," said Liz st�irat14�1 w California State �. form SMr.' t tion, who noted d M, s � � .» w, � ` r, `..- d{,ents already are `fc Ian ren ected y . cat - �' � � .,� ,.:,.�� �'�r,,,-�,,,��..r-- �. geticlasss degrees be cat u 's x with dec'e5sina nh, Historic mansion planned as a u�dIv1S1 a �"� .- .. � w 1. rather get rid "of t' t7n � = a incrfdse acuity we the cornerstone o� � �, » ,.,. 5 CHRONOLOGY' 198$ a iaxy - Blakeley Swartz submits GPA, Zoning,; Development Agreement and Parcel: Map Applications. Ap`A. Blakeley Swartz asked by County to scale back application to a GPA only. -- Blakeley Swartz submitted GPA application; project description book and eight supporting reports including a fiscal impact report. 7 ppli cation deente'd complete, by County. A129ust County contracts Vith Planning Concepts, Inc. as augmented staff. Blakeley Swartz, deliversa $$5,000 check to County :dor contract. zaabober , - GPA applicationamended to narrow the uses permitted under the General Plan designations. County & Planning Concepts, Inc. distribute ETR Initial Study. liiivember' BCAG contracts with Roberta Mundie &'Associates as staff for cities. -Blakeley Swartz delivers a $15`000 check to-BCAG for contract, & Pla ini.ng ""wic?pts, Sncv; distribute Request for Proposals for EIR. December - County seI.ects EIR consultant. 1984. F'gbxuary County and Blakeley Swartz agree to 'suspend the %R proceos pending the update of the Energy, Natural Resources and Recreation Element. ,,r the University'Foundation. which h• More than half would. be ate- Carnrttitie d Kdftuses its resources to spark Chico sorb by increases in financial . weeks; if .ado t; 'arth , -State growth. aid ing and inflation. would be forv� Swartz estimated the total t. t leaves about $2 millior, fornia State Sti Fmm 1•° value of .the gift will reach $l0 that might be available from the "The 40 1 E trillion to $20 million over, the proceeds of the ,fee increase for is not the on Stephen Finn, an attorney with next decade, restoring cuts which this year fact, it is the , the law partnership of Brobeck, ,Swartz said lxe pians to move totalled over $11 million," he Elsom said Thi Phleger and Harrison of 1 Mac- to the area in 1993, and plans to said, "We can't ket Plaza, San Francisco. focus his attention on the Nance If my estimates and guesses tional methods Finn, who specializes in real Canyon development, are correct, it would mean that problems," Uc estate development law, did not "There ought to be enough attend Thursday's announcement there. tokeep a d<ne busy a long,- at Chico State's Alumni House. v; 'When hiss lit with Blakeley was announced, :Swartz said the ® A Nance Canyon development was Ai in a state of pause." SE 9 Thursday's announcement pre- - sumably put the development 'back on t. -ick, Chico State University's role CIS in Nance 'Canyon is to act as a ' • • seed. The University Foundation in- Jsaoa 'p-'Ii tc !=se some of Its land to gine or, more corporations probably hi -tech firms that would GRFAT ,provide. Chico State with .research FAL! °"a'• and training opportunities — with proceeds from the lease forming ,$..�a� an endowment. Y jrc h. Corporations the, university ®$' Burger $ s �e$iZ C ovum would like to attract would be Large Pepsi,and. a "clean," perhaps Biotechnology, Dessert Suntdae ,computer or telecommunications %Aj LU U.J related, Once the endowment matures, 3rd The Copies, covers, binding, collating, color co it would fund the Construction of & Almond university research facilities to be Broadway Orchard �� �9 .determined later. Telecommunications, a strong 345-5523 895-8883' program for. Chico State, would kimnkommodir. robably play, an important role, 'eurget Basket served oMyat The �� both in attracting: industries cepa- Atmor+dt?rchpires2-a-sz 134 Br blepof using the .technology and the �j COL +�(j j� ������ DOWI1�0� as art of future research facili•, ties, said Elaine 'Wangberg, vice r ,provost for research at Chico .State In return, Swartz receives 'a You a r � � v' `� t seed for ':his own. development and ChicoattractSL new ecogomie-Opening e c e pt i tte ' growth and new _and ber-pay uig job oppportunities, "It, would strengthen the whore communitylti said Swartz. s`Ip The :