Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout041-120-094L . OL PLANT ADDRESS 1510 Park Ai OWNER _ same PROJECT I)LSCRIPTION Tentat o 9.17 to 1 z 57 ac-rns T,OCATION On the noel:. I COMMISSION SUMMARY ONF'DivISIONS— ARY SHEEN, rOR S 3OG .C6 rt east Of -its- inter_-er'r; 'A 9S9 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS ).. 41-1.2 - 9 4 ZONING A-2 _ GEN. PLAN A Residential PROJECT CONSISTENT? DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED S e n t e mb e r 6 1984 E11is Ro15 Ro11s, Ander n_�t Ro11s 96S Tir St. Gliico CA 95� 926r .DATE PtJBL -CATxON NO�i'I'CE IJRx'ITEN, PLACE NLVSPAPER NOTICE(S) Pt1BI,ISHED 0- C. P. G. B. DATE MAILING LIST PREPARED DATE MAIL -.OUT NOTICES WRITTEN --------y— MAILED NUMSI;;R DATE PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT P.REPAR&,) ENVIRONMENTAL OATEGORICAL EXEMPTION DETERMINATIONDATE S�'ILED AND .DATE _ NEGATIVE DECLAr'1ATION ,. DATE ADOPTED MITIGATED 'NEGATIVE DECLA%AION - DATE ADOPTED�,`�, ENV. IMPACT RI PO,pT - DATE CERTIFIED �.�.. m s 9. c.t_trtin. Van Ert, AP 4L-12- ! 1✓'� E, parcels on the north side F'c ra tz Ed . approx. octe m%l.e east of its of Durham Durham arera_ En�� y anter hctirttt With Clark Rct, 0b,R JDARiNG aznar•r: Rolls,. Anderson and Ro7,ls l%1 1:o' Rra1ls, an :Lcaecr, said the condition, axe okay, C t d ; E,'Ft11 D tAf2'L tjG Xr. Reid sttitt-d! havin reva.etaed the t✓nvironrrentz] rt'vi,eet f'1ttr�nin I}irector's Report Of t,;ov. 'iij, c!►'r,kList acid th#� roti cited my ata.ve de lira- on o!' env]rc�cnt,Iinuatn,ltJitn�actit-ik#'or ��}tic�rt to aclpL,t a parcel m�,p to cx•eabe x patcPlU on AP !�1 1c } fit" ��`tz't%n Van Ert Mve an ef'f'ort-, OtL the env,irontri+, fan413R,,; 1301"TE ce?(J "N ADVISORY FGF,;t.rc,,y�' ry N-Wumber 19, lgali this 06ac iaa>ovided the ,required mi.ti.�Vltion measures are complied with. ' mi'tt�;�tti.an measures are 1 throurf 1hos -R Report of l cv. 15, 1984. . Sh ed within the Planning Rir.'L.Ctor's ph k,krc Butte County General motlona�..,imacl'e not-Lng the project is It, Plan and Butte County ccaniormance unanimous ly. 5 Zvnin � dot an i "�4artdad, by Mr "id sta bed: noting that a mitigated nem date, T will make a motion to approve the e`rti• d��Of a tin wad; aelr pLed this 4 parcels on AP 41 J.2 -g4. A - Parcel_ map of Martin Van i:1r. b to create conditions: Approval o;t' the project is subject to the :t'ULl.ow:ing Public Works Conditions: 1. Provide two-uley Lravars t rom a county m�it��a5.n4.d able acc��s:�i,ry r'ach parcel .. .road or st:��his hi 11t4dy, 2. Access to be reserved in deeds as per c Offered for dedication on the l:inal ounty ot"dina r;rap, nce and 3. Show 50 ft.. building setback line measur access easement. ed fx'otrr centerline o 4. Provide road maintenance agreement tr�� iC,L a 55 ft. buil,lijng setback, tr<, Pentz Road, xt tii: cQAnLerl1ne o a 5. Show all easemonis of record on the final rra P 74 Provide street name signs per requirement:5 of the bepartmen of Public Works prior to recordation o1: the final: map.t $. Provide cul--de-sac at the end of the street if roadway s not extend beyond northerly Y doe,, line. 9: Pay any delinquent taxes or current taxes as required. ileal th bepa rtmon t coed i l ion,5 i 10. Provide a 100 ft. leacht±ield .tree setback around' e ..r wells either within the xi,,tin property or within 100 t=ti of the Property braumdarie , on parcels l and A. 11.. 8flO r a 50` tL► .10achfiel.d setj)ac�; from Lite,d �°rinac. parcels Xr 2 and 3. J Way on 14. Showa ] ft . l tchl zIl aet b rc:f; t t om the --,L)ri 13. Show a 100 ft,.1 .0 lrl ring Of) Parciel. 3. the prand»; on ctb ck from G11e highw�rter; line o parols l.r � and 4. COUNPC ADVXSORY AGED11CY NLIDICITr.,,c; MOVealbe-V 19, 1984 Page 15 MARTIN 'VAf!r CRT, T'F"A' 14. Show the.two alcre usable sewage dISPoGal area proven to meet I the requirements of the Subdivisi 3 r"Ild 4 on final ,lap. On Ocdinance on parcels L 20 The following mitigation; are also conditions of approval: 1. Utilize standar" of control practice*; to Minimiz measures and cone4tr grading activities. e erosion From'uction road develOPMent and other 2. Install cjjjve,rt- in any (jrait, d vo'.Yays. YrOI c) r 3* Complete an archaeological Comply With any Tnit, Survey prior I IgaLion to final Rlap and Potential redesign measures recommended Ign of the tentative map. including 80=nded by Mr, Tuttle and carried .10. Norarlm S .1 ,. Tresser, AP 64 6� 24� 3 P�irceis at the Of Paschal Wuy and Xjmsh�,w nOrbillMst corner , Rd- �L19R-Ii4v Engineer* 8i.r., jqr OPEV IMARjt,,G est SUrveying TOM VVInk,103 enginoc,,r, noted 9 and the Itr�_-ilth Dept. and Cilready cov:% by VUblic Work, '3 ax that sc'rne 'n*biga6iOn m0asure, d arf., redundant. Mr. Plendonsa said that mitifra�,',)Ij I nci rt"ZasUVt! , 3 is taken cOnd'biOn 9. Me dirp:!,re � c"Ve Or by r­at�lj,� Work ub C Ce "'th this st,"' ack is between no buildilig aria, no sewage system Within the 10c) pt' Ca Ms. Tuttle said ti -10 reat� ,011 for the no buIld,in- eroding) unstable bank;, and pos 'I U --CbbLlck v4nn because of the CLOOED 1WRIgG sib I f e .00d i na or other probjejm,-,. It M18 ai;rced to delete "jitig'ati I on KV, kcid ,d thy:ertvxron;n�antrti xev,ecj chacklist and the convemttoftu at this mao,time, 'T Will a mati I to lVironmentAl mittgato, * Norm' imp'act Por the 'd �"Ih Tt*e�jser PQJ�do.j map to cevzlto 3 par,,ols on AP 64-6,%P4� firloing that tilea pt'0JPC' t Cou L, f pe a b lti hqv�! t1h on tll�' envirMIMML, bub VM.1 not h,,iv,,, a r PY,10vidn.0 th,! rcquitled mit.tgnbl Q fu Ot in this canp 10h ape WILh. Thos'�' 1"4"lSl,lr0VG 41t'o to btt rait-it"at'lon mlzasn�vcfq 'li'.1 arvj �. ' 'tl . m1bil""AtIon ) L'01(, -hty, 113 b�ictius,,� It, is C(IVE4'red by a Public Wovkr, COMiti0ft- Thp motiLln jA ttot, t)ith tho Buttk, CourlLy r prier 7 I ha j;h(, ,610 BU(Itf,' COLInty I)rojoct in cofttort*ahoo Tuttle atld Mtllill,od Xullima, NOUrm asloontIt'd by r. �• . (.�1��• J`1 I11! JAS /'� �,� �,. DEPARTMENT OF pUD41C HEALTH DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH Address (] 196 Momoria) Way Reply to Cbieo, California 95926 0 7 County Conner Drive Tolophono: 916/841.2727 Drovillcr California 959GS 0 747 E11101t Roed Tolophonor916/534,4281 POra45o, California 95969 Tolophone: 916/87 2-( August 27, 1986 Rolls 8u}�n CO- P1drnlingC r Anderson and Rolls 965 Fir Street SEP 2 1986 Chico, CA 95926 �ravlJa r GaGfot� RE TPMI/bLM! r - Van Ert Martin AP# 41-1,2-111 & 113 Dear Sire E/S 'Lost Bills Drive This department has Works. Land Development th`= Butte Count above 1'Sited a Section that Y Department of Public pplcation, we are Prepared to act on the Based.. on present in�'azmation, we can approval. recommend a Pproval or condita,aal Recommended Condition, X., roval 1 Show a 1.00' ] oachiE eld setback from the ponds on parcels 3 and 2• Place. a note on the �, 1001 of the usably sewage map that no water cvell 9 cia�eposal area on may be -located within if YOU have an parcels 3 and 4. Hu hes Y above li ted a0garding this � at the above listed .matter 10:00 AiN, weekdays �4dress or telephone r Please contact F number between $.00Tom Very truly yours.,. 'ward " Division or` r., 8. His/kf cc Plaliningf Department t LO—TICE OF Dril"6RMNATZONL E ". �. 1`0: Secretary for Resources [� 1.416 Ninth Street, Room 1311 Sacramento, CA 95814 DEc 4 1984 tte~�•�rr County Clerk, County of Butte Ei ANORM.BECKER County G�'rk t f 25 County Center Drive A. JACIN-f Oroville CA 95965 By c Deputy FROM: Planning Department 7 County Center Drive (Faked) Oroville, CA 95965 SUBJECT Piling of Notice of Determination in Compliance with Section 21.108 or 21,152 of the Public Resources Code - 84-09-06-06 Project Title Tentative Parcel Map AP 41-12-94 Martin 'V'an Ert State Clearinghouse Number (if —Submitted to State C},oari.nghouse) ..Contact Person •- Tel }umber Jo`hn,-biendonsa, Pub1c Works 916 534-426% Project Location On the north side of Dur am-Pentz Y inn approx. 1. mile east -of inter. with Clark Road Pentz are�i Project Description: Di;vidi.ng 40 acres + to create four parcels of 9:1.7 to 12.,57 acres each. This is to advise that the Butte County Adyisory�Agenc y (i,ead Agency) has made t},,e fo11oU'ng determinations regarding the above-described pro j act: 1., Thei'oject P D wi11 have a significant effect on the environment will r") t 2. An Environmental Impact Report mttb prepared for this project pursuant to the p.ravis:ions Of CEQA and was, certified as required by Section 15085 (g) , 14 California Administrative Coda. A Negative Declara•t i.on was prepared for this project porsuant to the provisions of CSQA; A copy o E the Negative Decl.aratlon may be examinet} at the Planning . Department, 7 County Center drive, Orov llo; CA 95965. � A Notice or ]vxemptaan i�`�s filed ineli:cating this pia `cct is Q.�OMPt from environmental re�viety. l 4 A sta:toment of Overriding Consideration mas,' w•a. a.t}optecl for this project;' 8 r}i-t'igkrtion mOasures adopted by the Lead Agency to reduce ,tale impacts of the approved project a c See attachment at1; aturc �tcphon A. S•treoter So —b —at. Novettt}ycz� ,iii, :L984 rte;; , t ni or P1,an-ter �rte •-- Aid 41-12-94 Nli��at;ion Measures Utilize standard erosion control measures practices to minimize erosion From road and constt°action other grading activities.. development and 2; Install culverts in any drainage courses crossed Y roads or driveways, 3. Complete an arch.. F; 1 comply with an a o .ogica' survvey prior to y m t final, map ani' Potential redesign, o � ntmeasures map - including p. Jensen & Associaoaho Archaeological Consultingassocrn�a, �n esearch Redding Ari' Peter M. Jensen, Ph.D. 916/244-,171,1 41 Skymountain Circle Paul K Rosendahl,Pha7, Chico, California 95926 P, ciflc Basil) J15%i�15-915 808/966-804 J. 7r )i.vnerin _ Grcat gagl)a prnjeGt Planning&development • field survey _ 7o2r2es aG tr excavation overviews�"�"-Y professional tours Arc haeo ogicai Reconmalssance of the ProPosed Mari)" Yore Erit Subdivisio., Butte Counter, COHIFOrma. In order to assess the archaeological impacts of a proposed subdivision project involving 40 :acres of land located along Pentz Road southeat of Chico, Butte County, C,'Ufornla, the firm of Rolls, Anderson and `'t of contracted for a complete records search and on—foot reconnaRolls i the au the parcel. Accordingly, on Tuesday, November 20, 1984 s author e of conducted an intensive, on—foot reconnaissance of the project area purpose of locating and recording any evidence of prehistoric or significant historic use and/or occupation. The 40 acre parcel, owned by Martin Van'Ert, consists of a recta, piece of land located adjacent to and on the north side of pop tz d'about 1.5 miles west of the intersect))n of Pentz and Messillo Vail southeast of Chico. The current proposal calls for subdivisionRoad about ey Roads into. four 10 acre parcels.., each of whish would laterbesubjectthe edtohomoaite `de?�elopment. 1n vie ch of the potsntial adverse effects construction to cultural resources which might exist within the are County and other regulations required that cultural r of future Inventoried and formally assessed prior toproject Ula, Butte resources be fully Section 106 of the National Historic Preservaion Act or approval) pursuant to (16 U.S.C. 470), and procedures of the Advisory Counci65 j as amended Preservation (36 CFR 800). This report details the results of { n Historic archaeological survey and inventory androvides he required' recommendations. All fieldwork procedures followed guiaelines appropriate by the State I�tstor1c Preservation Office (Sacramento) and provided conformity with the highest professional stOndards, re in Location The Van Erit parcel is locatc.d within a portion of the northwestuar Section 26, Township 21 North, Range 3 East, of tate U S.G,S. Cherokee, California, 7.5' Series Quad. (1970): q ter , k ee Records Se#arch pt'ior to going into the field the at°r California information Center (CStJ-yChico)l were/ c;s, mf ed for tai Nor a' '(1st. recorded prehistoric or In additiorr, the Natlonal significant Historic places Wash y,ti�? inroject area. situs are currently recorded for the project area r also itr►mediatej elated, No parcels; y adjacent Ethnographically the project area falls within territory which was Occupied r y the NorthtVestern Maidu, or iCohkow Indians Ci�lddell 19761, Figure 1), ' Although the ethnographic data; do not identify any area; this information in combination with the s'es within the projet previous archaeological 'surveys within the regioh s�lts obtained from �icnsen 1879 1983)1 suggested that a number of prehistoric site typos � g., , could. bo locates;' within the area, including the following: (1) aboriginal middens -x ;ated on benches adjacent to springs or overlooking small tributaries of Dr/ Crook (located about L-e mile to the south), (2) aboriginal milling stations, including bedrock mortars, (3) isolated finds of aboriginal lithic flakes and artifacts, and (4) small rock shelters or overhangs lacated along tht margins of the volcanic -capped dome at the north. end Of the parcel. Such sites have been recorded within the Immediate pruiect vicinity and throughout Konkow'Indian territory generally. Fieldwork As noted, fieldwork for the project was conducted by the author on November 20, 1984. The on -toot survey involved Criss-trossing the rectangular parcel from east to west in survey transects sp&ced 8PP..Oxim8tely 15-20 meters apart. Examination of the surface involved Inspection of all road cuts, holes and other disturbed areas ,for evidence, of subsurface cultural material. Vegetation consisted primarily or irrigated pasture grass, 'a minor *riparian* association has taken hold near the lower of the two ponds which have been excavated within the Parcel, although this did not pose an obstacle to surface inspection. Survey Re:sultz, and Recomraendation No evidente of prehistoric or significant historic Use or occupation encountered �,-Ithfn the 4o acre parcel. Wa 3 In view of the 'negative results achieved during both the records search and filsld survey, archaeological clearance for the proposed subdivision is recommended. HoWever, should future construction activity reveal evidence of subsurface prehistoric or historic material, a qualffled archaeo Jcgj8t should be contacted Imn, ediateiy in order to assess resources involved. s the impactsof the project to the cultural Jensen, Peter M. 1979 Archaeological Reco'hnalssa - hce and overview for the Proposed Southeast Chico Development Project, Report on PH California informatior, Center) C,8U_ChIto, _0� Northeast Oroville. and Cook & Associates,. 1983 Archaeological Reconnaissance Of the PPOPosed Masek Subdivisloh Nort Projectheaoil Keerer Roadi 8utte County, California: Report on, File, California InVormation Centeri CSU Chico. Liddell, Francis A. 1978 Maidu and Konkow, Mo Handbook of Nortli American Indians Volume 8' California, Robert F. HOW, )editor, PP. 370-386. smit'hsonlan Institution, Washington, D.C. United States Department of the interior 1983 National Register of Historic 131°ices. F'ederai Register through December 31, 1983 Washington, D.C. 1 c Project i, to .h ; 1(, C J- �G,'lf;r�t./rS tC,'•. -1�` . J from U.5.C.S ioroke- , Ca. Cj.J n+� 7SSeries � , ^a ! �� �! I /rSr'�l� v , �i A rii 1�1 i � I :e *• "' , I� I f � ` q�, lJ �� � ` C� n a � �! , ,.i �� /' s�• ({t tt t(�( �� �� � ♦31F, `� •p,ia' t lur 15 ' -':� 'f �� II.? o' • rr''�• �( ` r 1 4 , ij ,� «� ,, �� . '14 LI: t JJ((j �� ��,• e r 11 l ;. i � t ♦"` ri•%� 1 J rrrr. eimaap �6. Ir � \�'�j� rU 7" 1� [ ``.,:Y y���Jl ��1 ��������� V'.r` , ✓i. r(tr.,,� ,' '�V,.. '� � Ap / ��11���11 L�,,,.r ....••' ,.. �y, � <�\�c1, /(�" r �ti fl� �/ ..li,. 1, ,ir- '1{/f �1/ t.�'-,Y. �\JQ n. �r r��S.. %•j}Ck, �-y. x%92 b /r ? rIC I'.rr I /_Z,tl� pnp 1. i, jir !i ry 11 ry•IR��. U �t"` f, tea/ C ''•bf�y + Yl °jY _.•� � r •�,� /' 8 I r,��y�rr I'✓ r +.,� t. M l� / p ..r � nab x `�� r f r 543, 40' ) {wriy iP. 1 Ir {Qr y�� I ~�` Id' �'�.�,, i�{ ,�� .' •. Y ssa a4 a.. t, Y�-}!! 3 1//��, �r� f/r• r 1 '• �1 ` r, ".� r •.rte `' : ! ,rid p�1,/ ��f� .. Y'/ •1..,"-4 1l! , �..rr... y• ee' t•� �'k6y5 Ir 'F' "r ti vt• I` f :'."--�`rf. j (l. l t��l, 1. w � 4 'r�, .;,,•� V b �. Kpo r y1y"�I Olear ek 1 �I +r r `� 112 „p.. _.•••- ,I w f �'�p �Y•+. , J .� /��' rl .. / /_:'. '�N�� 'r �� �•°r ', �S` k+ ./ p ,1 �. A'"(� a r^`��'��.-'`t� I. . a. I r r � •J� ''i � / `� �1��w { ♦ i"' f r' rr � 4 1fea+tlta Yalley 4 � � � � �' t\� "7 b 'j in, r V W; {,.,./ JI/ Al �rss• �,.,,,r'* �'°.,. / j� . Srli NY � .B}i'^•; �`�'. C� ,< ,.�.I.... � (•}, ��•" ''j.tj�W1 ......� ����"� `-VV, " ��. r✓'/ I ./ ..� � �'C•n �. I , i;•�� �/j' • ��`,Y '`"='w, �rr7.1 `fir' -.-� _.�i_�J._;�I C ..a 1�ri_�.�_��"��C l,'•, I" f fib'�r✓r � � t 1 —1, too 4d�L,' /' y ? y �' 4 i • .l' r �1 ._ f �w GI ,3rd ✓V.:S �.«_...� •1�'r+ a .,,r lli lr r•,/^ ; ( (`.'� J .J -4 J. I raj ✓` 30 Chat y L� ( t t / t < ' r + Tall' 'r• �' ,! '�i � A �•( _/ _.�", Lf70 r / .� �.,, ~e fir'• � �f�f,�""'�."'St /•.\ { I "',ry,. .r `+• y: CET T"N •�ilrr+" }� (+. ��r/ (i? la 1� ��; r�t� `, w`. ry J ` JtNrr'kr�i'"r 'Park r � ��%+j.n�ri �;� I, +�}p �'�� � •ter mow. i .•�� � %!. � ��...� 1 '..j _r'+'.` I� l lYtt J[ -`�� S rl l i ' � -� �•!r r � r�+il,r' O �r�y�y��,�s, 11 II �a 1 ��1// -..�:. J r•`•'� T��{ Y r �' yYJ i1 n � m J� r /t ,d. 11C �..,,t''�� / , �. a[�r� r1, ' n ' r r. �s 1 . r iY Y.� p 14 ii•" 7 ''. % +I 4'...d y,r' ! v•3C rtY,++1 * l+ifAlr;p3 a».§` J �� r+ �. �.,... rla (�DJ�. �.. .«. r •.:rr} � »I r}'��.[_..:'r', ,. .. -1..,,e ,..r� M. "w`'J' 1J ,r••' ��� !,1'�r Il ��i f1:�) y � " t"]`,yf�Y. (r �� �W. 16 i ,.�1 � l vd,+r ✓ r'':.` i a✓ , -J�'lr �, ,.. 11 ��^.r � � I �"'"�f'%i��j'7XG'.r /- �agg r'r • ,a"a"= A.r ;�'r�` ��. ,'%, mss.. r r •.a"`. .,,A. „+ �/. +• ..,... rte•'".-. 41 �r i f �,• r' r �" � .!""_. � ,y / I. r. / ' ,� \r�+ +4 r `'I. }y � •p 4,44 �Y�t� r� r�+l. r p1,r dti� Y I 4;..•, c..4��i 1� I. `r... �y�' •,+k4 'I, .�-•,�'�•:� "� 1) ry�l i1 l 1 ' �k�.�, rr' +'r.� •' ijf`'' 'i y;rl v jr .+oz �t �j4': i�r � r••��.,'' ' I �r t� ,J y �t I `+ ti b�- „,,,�ftt�J �,�/ rJ/ 1�+r� �ir' �' .. � + `t' ���" olrt C. ; y �,�'i' � I � `,I r r \ n 1p'`� � a' 1, /rj1i+,,+.,,,,.•M1 � `.E 3,,"rw1' ,.W''+tlr, 4. r•,. Y.;4 'n �� p '•i:,;„ ,i✓/'Y. / al ;,,•k: " "' � .... , ��..a�.ur>», ....�..�.� pA ..�:...� ; '' ,. '#�> S'r,�`+a� S'1 � 1 �,,• �•P / -r",v. tAN0 0r N A 7 UKt, DEPAnTtml t4,1` ;.. y`1MLIC WOR1<8 7 COUNTY C':JJTLR T)RlVt - Ort("'J7` LL Crll IFORNIA +7596 Todt,pkorto+ (916) rz3A-.1Fgi November 1.9, 1984 ' Martin V n, Br t RE: ;AF 4.1-1.2,.04 1.510 park Avenue Chin,, CA 95926 Tentative pay cvj Map At: the regular meeting of the Butte County Advisory i'+goncy held November 19, 1984, tho Agency adopted the mitioated r/cSgative declaration regarding environmental review and apProved the "3,c}nt:.aLive Parcell Map for yAP 41-12-94 subject to the conditions as ��4J4 `v� on the attyach` d shoot. 'ti n() '-ataPeals arae? t imel.y filed" -within ton (10) days of tl�r d�tw;r rpt the Advisory g:.�TrJ 's al:)�. r0val "'-with the Clerk of tho Board of SuPervx:"", this action trill, be final. Whoa the QondiLion,8 of approv& arc JrrSW:Pliod tiJi.th, it: wJ A be i ardor for you to file your "final map" with the BuLto - Inty i` 0pat'lJr ant of Puhl io, Works ks for recordation within twori ., -tour { q months A the MO Of approval by the Advisory AgC''t7oy, If You should have: any clwgwtiono regarding this arJnt1_:er, lease contact Lhis offl co. r �" Ver,•y truly ytju rss William Cheff Director o1: ppbl. io Works Lu- �_ ZA/A I i �, 2 -_ Jahn Mandahsa i:;t nt DirocLor Atthchmot Cc:Vl.an;Y' 110 - tlnvirOra,:onLaal Rev io,,1 Canvl ct nr,n.!n al ROOM 00part.tac>lat:. �uffaCO. Plannn Rol :l r hrlc.lcirryv.aa ant�l t all ,gCq+nm: h10V 2 0 1884 Ornvlle, C:alitatntq Martin Van Ert, Tentative Parc ' F/4 el Map, 4 Parcels oil the nor[ -h side • of Dur-harit Ponta Road, approx. 0110 11jilo , cast 'of ics inLersectlon. Witt, Clark Road. Durbalri area AP 41-12-94 Engineer: 1t011 -S, Anderson and k1ol.j.,q Public Works CondlLions: 1. Provide two-way traversablo accrnss gs-S-LD-1. to each parcel frOlt, a county malnLained road of stat o hjghw,-jy. Access to be resel.-ved in dr!cds ah, por County Offered for dedication on ttle fahaa mat). -Irl Ordinance z d 3. Show 50 fthullding setback line mc1;1sured fr*()ln cenLerline of ,acces8 easement. 4, Provide road maintenanca agreement. 5. Indicate a 55 it. building, setback from the CIMHrline of Wentz Road. 6. Show all casainclits Of record on the final map, 7. Provide stro,�L- name Si(.1118 per requiromonLs OF Lho D3-pa-rtrilerit of Public Wot-k!.; prior to rocord,�t lon of tho final map. 8- PrOVi(le CUI-00-.sao at the "d Of' 010 S(-Xu0L if roadway do's, not extend b(.,Yond nortjlGrjy jij,fi. 9, Pay any <1i,,j* 111OULML taxes Or current Heal(Al, I7c ja >^ttnbitl l condiH.ons: 10' 1roviclrl'a 100 ft' loac""Old fr0t' set; I I n �ca�sar,irrci raga w0lls OiU'011: Wit Han tho propel—Ly c)r within 100 Lt. of thog proVurty on parcc,41S I and 4. S11" ') 50 ft- 10achf'Old scLhk trik rmil tho drajll,�,Iqo Way on parools 1', 2 and 3, 12 i Shaw G► 100 ft., lj,� t 3 high�,,*,ltar lino or 1) a r c c.; d 4 14, Show Lho LWO ac"O ustiblo sawiljo,arra proven to mootLho 1-eqLl111aoill-!nU13 of tho Subdiv 'inqo' 'Or(j-tj�j� net, on ur kml J. 2 and 4 oil r - 'ell 0 Following o com) I t. Ions or approvol; I tTt.i.l izo standard ):orjon cont rol llloasurn" a n (I o . s vilotion Pl."i'01-1coni Lo mitlinlivo orotolon trom ro.1d dovolopmullL cilia 0010'r l 'i 2* Install. culverts in any cra :inago courses crossed by ro4fdt'; or driveways rd 3. Complete an archaeological survey prior to Ei.naJ snap and comply with any mitig ltion measures recommendoO including poWnti.a.,l redesign of tete tentative map. Inter-Depaameintal Memorandum M Advisory Agency FROM; Planning Director SUBJECT: Revised Report on Tentative Parcel Map of Martin Van Brt, A[' 41-12-94: DATE: November 15, 1084 This is a proposal to divide 40 acres to create four parcels of 9.17 to 1.2.57 acres each. The present zoning is A-2 (General). The hand Use Plan Map of the Butte County General Plan designates this area as Agricultural. -Residential. The proposal does not conflict with County zoning nor any adopted or proposed element Of the Butte Count, General Plan nor any County, specific or community plan. Thj.s finding is based, in part, on Past official actions by the County in this vicinity includi tentative approval by the ng the Advisory Agency of a four Parcel division. (two at 7' acres, one at 10.5 and one of 14 acres) on AP 41-1.2-93 in March 1983. Though the adjacent large parcels to the north and east one under hand Conservation Agreement grazln..g contracts (160 acre ttiiri mum contract acreage) , division of this parcel, as proposed�isnot expected to set a precedent for extensive land division activity nor substantially affect livestock grazing in this vicinity. Recommend approval, subject to the following mitigation measures: 1. Utilize standard erosion control measures and construction practices to minimize erosion from road development ai-id other grading activities. 2. Install culverts in any drainage courses crossed by toads or drivet•ays 3. Complete an archaeological survey prior to final map and comply with any mitj.gat.ion measures recommended a ncludingotential redesign of the tentative reap. p 8A8: It cc: Martin, Van Brt 9611s, Anderson and ,Zolls TCI: Butte County Advisory Agency FROM: Planning Director SUBJECT: Report on Tentative Parcel. Map of Martin Vanfi7ri, on AP 41-12-94 DATE: November b, 1984 This is a proposal to divide 40 acres to crease four parcels of 9.17 to 12.57 acres each. The present zoning is A-2 (Genera)- The Land Use Plan Map of the butte County General, Plan designatoo this aria as Agricultural--Residential. The proposed map is inconsistent with adopted policies on pages 31 And 49 of the Land U50 Element, specificall.ye Is Maintain extensive areas for primary use, as livestockgrazing land (sails highly suited to grazing) 2. Allow livestock grazing on all suitable sites not needed for development or 'crop production. 3. Prevent scattered development in grazing areas. 4. Compatibility with neighboring agricultural activities. S. Evidence of adequate water and sewage disposal capacity (soils Underlain by hardpan ) b. E:aist'ing parcel sizes. 7. Effects on adjacent uses, crop production, l.vestoc°k grazing (growth inducement, complaints of odor, urs),. AP 41-1.2-94 Page 2 8. E;;i.sting utilities and drainage -Facilities Adjacent parcel sizes: north -- 60 acres, 320 acres south - 199 acres, 40 acres west -Four at 10 acres, 557 acres east - 227 acres, 462 acres Rolling Nilly Estates is 2000 feet southeast, divided 'in 1967.prior to toning or General Plan. parcels required a Cert i l icate of ampl.iance to show they were legally created. The as yet un -finished central Butte study r,acommended residential. development occur in already developed areas served by transmission lines, drainage Facilities, etc. to protect grazing industry and limit sprawl The proposed map is inconsistent with adoptedand proposed plans• Government Code Section 66474 requires a denial ;of any map -Found inconsisten#- with applicable plans. L T: I kt r_c Martin VanErt Ralls, Anderson and Rolls 0 965 FIR STREET • CHICO, CALIFORNIA 95926 + TELEPHONE 916,895,1422 Rolls Rnrierson Rolls Octobea: 2, 1984 CIVIL ENGINEERS Buffe Co. Planning Comm,, Planning Department 007 4 1984. County of Butte 7 County Center Drive ,'Oraville, California Oroville, Ca. 95965 Attention: Laura ,M, Tuttle Subject: Tentc-ttive Parcel Map A. P 41-12-94 Gentlemen: Based Upon subject Parcel Map, we submit the Follow%n Comments: effects of the Your initial stud of the environmental g mments Item 10, The only homesitera ose Of the property has been don the steeper portion graded: The grading was plan - nod to minimize erosion potential,. Item id. The only portion of the property which exceeds 1 is the northerly portion of Parcel 4the , where slope has already Been graded, hom:site Item le Interior roads and driveways will be gravelled. Item 1g'; The property and many nearby ou acres in size or smaller, wiichris�no are condrret lto40 rangeland grazing. Irrigation of the Will occur with development, will property, which grazing capacity of the landi greatly increase tlye stem 1h; resign of all structures is required to com 1 seismic standards of +~he Uniform Building mply with the i3uilding Oficial feels that a local, hazard justifies a more stri119e,nt seismic design , he has to require such design+ the authority Planning Department County of Butte October 2, 1984 Page 2 S Item 3b. Any increase in storm runoff caused by development has been offset by the attenuating effect of holding ponds which have been constructed on the property. Item 3f. Placing gravel on. interior roads and drivewapi will mitigate this impact. Item. 5c. The existing graded homesite area is in the central portion of Parcel. 4 at the toe of the steeper portion of the property. A home in this location should noL cause any problem to migrating wildlife. Item 8. As stated in Item lg., this property and many nearby parcels are currently 40 acres in size or smaller. A 40 acre parcel is not practical for rangeland grazing. Conversion of these lands to irrigated pasture, which can occur with development, will provide a practical use for parcels of 10 acres, and will greatly increase the grazing capacity of the land. item 20. It is proposed that an archeological survey and clearance be made a condition of approval. of the Tentative Parcel flap . It is noteworthy that 40 -acre parcel to the west of this property was recently divided. Into four 10 --acre pa,fcels. Please let us know if you, need additional nfortu���n. Very truly yours, ROLLS, ANDERSON & ROLLS 4VI'5 C. R 9,1`s Ellis C. Rolls tcA t lep APPENDIX l ' t,L1i1NT�' �,rr 1�t1T�'x. hNVI RONW-WPA1, C HE CKIA ST 1aC111bt (1-0la comple-HolT11 1,ed jR611c-v r l.oLt i! 84-09-06-06 l BACKGROUND, It it 4.1-12-04 l.. Name of proponent !`Martin Van Ert 2, Address of proponent and r('lre e11ta1t.i�c= (if appllc.a1h1c1) ] 510 Park Avenue Ro11.51nde s,4,;_.sz.L,:. _. _ y_Chnco, CA 95926 965 Fir. Street h;cow .c1 Js�J26 a. Projo *t description Tentative Parcel Maj! h_IANDATQRY FINDINGS OTS FI CANCT YES MAYBE NO a. goes the projct have tj�­ potential to dvrrasl(, 1°hc, quality of the environment, substantially reclll('(5 the hal"It•,t Or a fish or wlldlifo species, (:a111Ne Cl fish or uil(ts,ife population to drop 1-loji self= ,.allstaini ig It' 17Cl.i, threaten to 111;111t or Animal community, :educe tilen"3tl1�i4:�' `?2 restrit.-t file range of a rare (ll• ondallger0d plant Or animal or eliminate importantt cxanlltlos of the major perio(Is of Ccl]1 rami(! history or I)rehls-for„*” !l, lioe( the rzojoet have the potential to achieve short-term henefits to t11(. J(Ytrimrjlt of 11�11Rw�c1'm,. environmentalL;nals? i.1 short-term impact o11 the ctllvir(lrlm}�nt is nne which Occurs in a relatively brief perioc" of time while long-term impacts w11'I endure into the future') L, Does the projec, ba,,c impacts which are individu- 111)' limited, but cum117a1t;ivetu collsidu.able? (A ps'Uject may impact o.11 two Or anal°v se pat',+! , resourceswhet°o tile`. impact. Oil (.aalch resource is la;1't1vVD,° 5111x1 � , but where the e f i'ect of thi, total of tho' so 1ml)rlets on tll(, vtI1' rOnmelit is si ,rlificant. ) u d. I)Oes tll(' pr(lit' t have= en1- ,°on11entall eiTeets lvllich will Glut e luhst.ln"111' II(I 'SO C rl`00e.S (1n 1111m,111 beings, olthel' dir('t�tly or inalirectIv? 11I `1I?RMINA"f,ION ('ro hL, k,timtllrte*c( liY thcs i.e;iil Ai enc a" On the hrl;.—z or thin illitiall (ralllral.tit�t�: I/M! Tints the 11ropilt oil project r'=)ULD NOT hav(. a significant effect u°a) the enVi runlaom , and Aa: ,1"1GATI�T. DECLARATION wi l 1, be prcparoq ' I/IQ find that olthoulh tuck J)rollosed Jiro eel: could Ilave It tiigrli' Cant effect on tilt, �'nvironmentj thol'L' will not 11e a .51 ni f7,I"�71t r fl eLt it, 1111 � �t'a1. '�(�rt1ust' tis: ' IT'1'I GATION NWASURI-S descri.bo.d on tilr< attached Sheet id.lve hood a1t.1detl tip 010 1"I"JOct, A N4GATTVI' MEl:LAT A'l MN w i 11 I)v prepared,, 1/1Vl, M`i'nd t1W prnpasCJ Pro,,'ect MM Ilalre a1 .: tl;►►', rrr.ect on th( (S t1 {r(rtun(�nt, artrl la I.NV RONMPNMAI IMPACT I.I i:s rc tlireel, Septelllbor 27; 1984 ('t1Cl,"V'l'1' of CiI17'"I'ti Jll,'1NN1NG 1) WARTNIi:(<.,.t Chir elrytj 1trle Associate Pjanhat iteyviewod bV ENVIR(?NMEtaTAL ACTS xp' anatxons a a114 �„ and ".maybe" answers are required on attached sheet(s),�'yes 1. EARTH. Will the proposal result in significant- YES `a. N MAYBE No Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic stybstructures? b, Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? d. Destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? e.. Increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off-site? f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach stands,or changes in siltatioxi, deposition or erosion which may modify tine channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or Lake? g. Loss of prime agricuiturall.y produc•t.ive soils outside designated urban areas? h. Exposure of people or property to ,geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud- slides, ground failure or similar hazards? 2, ATR. Will the proposal. result in substantial; 3._ Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? _. b. The creation of objectionable odors, smoke or fumes i Alteration \)" c. of aix movement, moisture, or temperature, or any change in climate, locally or regionally? 3, WATER. Willproposal oal o-tult� in substantial: ilthe psr ior he course or direction of water movements in either marine or fresh waters? b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns or the rate and amount of surface: runoff? c, Need for Off-site surtace drainage improve- ments, including vegetation removal, channel- iza.tion or culvert Installation? d. Alterations to the course or flow of flood hate rs ? e. Change in the, amount o-" surface water in any water body;' E. Discharge into surface waters, or in any ."".. alteration of surface water quality, incltiding but not limited to tempoc•ature, dissolved ozygon or turbidity? g. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow cf ground waters? h;y Chan6e in the quantity of groundd waters, either through diroc t additions of with- draawa:l.s , °,)r through interceptioll of an aquifer �v p°Llts or exca.r actions ? i . Reduction in the amount of hater otherwise availab_e for public water supplies? j Exprasaare of people or property to water related hazards such as Elooding? .. YES MAYBE NO 4. PLANT LiFE, Will thero osal resin p p t in substantial: a.— Gt,ange in the --w. diversity of species, or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, brass) crops, and aqua,.ic-plants)? b. Reduction of the nuii,bers of any unique, rarcs or endangered species of plants.?' C. Introduction of new species of iIants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenish- ment of existing species? d-. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? S: :ANIMAL LIFE. Will the proposal result' in substantial; a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (bads, land animal,;; including reptiles, fish and shell fish, benthic Organisms or insects)? b. Reduction in the numbers of any unique,'rare or endangered species of animals? ems. Introduction of new species of animals into an area., or result in a barrier to the mi,gT11tion or movement of animals ? d Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? --�-j ;VCS, Will the proposal result in substantial.: a• Increases in existing noise levels? b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? P . LIGHT AND GLARt , Ji.11 the proposal produce signi icant light anu glare? 8,. LAND USE, Will the proposal result in a subpial alteraltion of the 'planned presenr Or land use of an area? 9. !'dAVrURAL RESOURCES: Will the proposal. result in substantial; a. Increase in the rete of use of any natural resources? b. Depletion Off' any non-renewable natural resources? 10, RISK OF UPSFT . Will the Proposal involve,, a, risk of explosion or the release Of hazard- Outs substance_ (including, but not Limited to Oil, POsticiLks, chemicals or radiation) in event the of an accident or upset conditions? b. Possible interference With an emergency respOnse plan or emergency evacuation plan? Qt,M0, Wilt 0101 proposal, alter the location, tr�bt t on, i ,lepra tv, or growth rate Of the hurrah population',, 1 . VOU,SING. Will the I)roposa,l affect 13xisting housing, or crcatO a. 1'or additional hou8ing? YES MAYB y NO 13.'tRANSPOit,'ATTUhT./CII2Cu"'ITOr1. Wil the Proposal � result :� :: a. motto-. Matron oX? substantial additional vehicle b. Eff,S ctK on existing parking facilities, or _ demand for new parking? c. Slxbsta� tial impact on pvisting transportation — systera ;? d. S�gnifi w•a.nt alterations to present patterns Of circulation or movemc�ttt of people and/or goads? e. ! [;'erations to waterborne, rail or air traffi(,,? f rizrea,se, in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, - "IcYcl )-sts oz. Pedestrians? 14. PUBI t C SEE.VICEs. Will the proposal have an e t";Fc c;t uP()r,, in a need for new or altered goW rnmental services a. Fire f:rotection? b Pal iC ,, protectio7t :' C. SC1Ioo.IS? d. Parks or other recreational facilities? e. Ma:ini.,vnance of Public facilities nciudin�; roads? f. Other governmental services? 15- ENERGY. dill the proposal result in: '97—Use of substantial amounts of Fuel or energy? b: Substantial increase in demand upon existing sour es of energy, or require the development of new Sources of energy? 1 'Ux�IiTIES. Will the propsal result in a need for ......_ riO4 Systems, or substantial alterations to the fo L l owirr g a, Power or natural, gas? b, Communications systems ;? --- C. Water "Wer or Septic tank? e. Storni water drainage? f. Solid waste and disposal? 17,,\1AN E�EAX� 'Il. Will the propersal result in: .. zea �dn of any health hazard or potential health hazard CetiCiuding mental health) b. Exposure of people to Potential health hazards? 18. AESTNE��S,, iVill the proposal result in the o structz'on of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the PI oposal result in the c eationcof aestheticallyan?offensive site open — No 0 M YES MA)` NO I:9. RECREATION. Will the proposal .result in an impact upon the truality or quantity of existing rec-eati.onal oPPortunities? 20. CULTURAL RESOURCES. a. Will tl.6 proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site? A b. Will the proposal result in adverseh sical: or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric nr historic building, structure or object? C. Does the proposal have the potential to causr a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? d. Will the pro oral P restrict existing religiotas or sacred uses within the Potential impact area? V, DI5CUS5ION OF ENVIPaAfitENTAT, EVALUATION AP 41-12-04 1c. Amount of grading necessary is dependent upon,tghere the access roads and homesites are located. Proportionally site disruption will occur oo t11 �t'It1Ut)et gdnan ea entlerd n slopes over 20 terrain.. ld: The Pentz foothills are highly scenic in a pristine state, and Should be preserved Limiting development to lopes o; 15 or less Will effectively limit impacts to the foothill,s le: Dirt roads are highly susceptible �L') erosion. anterior road, dravelling the riveway, and. roadside drainages ,;yllCstahilize the roads and limit erosion. 19t Pentz soils have a. high suitability for extensive range use, Creation of ranchettes takes the property out of agricultural use and increases opportunities for lana use conflicts 1h: Immediately north of the property is an inferred. fault of foothill shear zone,, it represents a moderate hazard. tllo : Storm runoff will incr surfaces, 4ase from roadways and other impervious 5f: A small stream is located on the gest side of Parcel 4, So -is eroded off of roads and driveways tvil.l (li schaxge into the stream the rainy season, 4d; The property is nOW used as an irrigated p:lstUrc, 5c Nortlierri p ` ort�on Reof Parcel 4 3. *s w�.tlti,1 the whiter deer herd area: stricting development to the southern end of Marcel 4 should reduce any possible impact to migrat Ing vi dli.fe, S Central Butte is home for the Coun ty's lar grazing industry. gest ranches and razi.n The County has adopted policies to: a) Maintain e=xtensive areas for p rtnary grazing: la;nrl, use as livestock _y ♦ Al? 41-12-94 DISCUSSION OV ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION (continued) b) Allow livestock grazing on all suitable sites not needed for development or crop production. c) Prevent scattered development in grazing areas,. See Butte County General Plan Land Use Element, page 31. Creation of 10 acre parcels will set a precedent which will o: ode the very foundation., of the grazing industry. Though the parcel is designated Agricult:ur:iI-Res idontial with to 1-4n acre parcel size, policies on pages ,I an,! 49 do not sup --)ort -this small a parcel size: 12 Land divisions can put great development p;rossures onto surrounding properties. 14: All services will be provided by Butte County; 13 The pentz foothills are highly scenic and visible for miles around. Homesites will alter their natural appearance, but will not be aesthetically offensive. 20a: Butte County maps indica.to the property is highly likely to contain' archaeological remains. Prior to development, a survey will have to be prepared. Ix. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICA14CE b Preserving lands :dor grazing is a long-term goal, of Butte County. yy _ ,. • Applicant : Martin La} Aleseor,n Parcel ,,. DATA SHEET ERD Log # 84-00-06-06 A. Protect Description 1. Type of Pxoect Tentative Parcel Map 2. Brief Description: Land rliyi S'i nn of All paxcels Of 9..17 to 12:57 acres 3 Location; On the north side of Durham -Mentz Road 1 mile east of its intersection h Clark Road., (��n ti -, 4. Proposed Density of Development: 1 DU/parcel 5. Amount of lmparvious Surfacing: Slight Vii. A00ess and Nearest Public Road(s) Pen•tz Road art acent to thee SgUth 7. rlethod of Sewage Disposal: Se tic tank S. Source of Water Supply: Individual well PrOxizit of Power Lines: Y To origi9 areal 10i Potential fOl' further land divisions and developn-o : "t Unknown B. EnvironmentalSottin Physical Envi. ?^onment �. Terrain a. General. Topographic Character:, Rolling foothill b. Slopes:., Parcel 1 � 1-7•o Parcel 2, ,-l0 I'a1Srs1 i �� ano Parcel 4. 1 n . anA- c. ,levaUon 380 to 600 feet ASL d. Limiting Factorsl: - S1es graatethan 20Pa . Soils a• Types and Characteristics: Pentz 10s8 than 20" browny lUAM grey brown, pale saxld. s _ motlerat� :7�h`I•mr.;n h�; 7 ; :,. Suitabil'tv Eox ox ensI'Ve ran e_ u.se b Limiting; °actors. 2 10 � sur, ace roc-- ---------------- Natural Hazards of the Land a. Earlhquake Zone:�,lmrhedi�teh.south o� inferred --��.�t,.�z`ti]—" fault in rootllil7 b. Erosion Poteti al : Ifi h c. Landslide Poteq't�al ; Moder ate d. Fire azard :z Moderate -High .. Oil El. Expannivo Sail. Potential..—r _ _ . 4. Hydrology Low a Surface Water: Vahan Unnatfioa spring to Clear Crook Oq feet east: er C`ealC _aloe 0. .. or. o P ... Ai�La �iw►di.� _F (a Data , Sheet continued All 41-:1,2-94 b. Ground Water: Unknown resource c. Drainage Character sties: Well drainin soils ------ ' d:. Annual Raiv-r ,ll (normal): 3'5+ inches :�. Limiting Factors : 5. 'Visual/Scopic Quality: Hzghzy scenic Good 6 Acoustic Quality. anarama views �- ' Air Quality: Good —"-' Bilocal%�-iz'ol`vnent: 8. Vegetation: Open grassland, , one or two trees on I�,zr ... E,_• cels 2 L11111 9Wildlife Habitat: Northern. portion within tuzn.t:er deer herd area Culw turalEnv roc ment 'IQ. Archaeological and Historical Resources in theHi arr.�A : gh 11• Butte County General. Plan dosi nation: It g Agricultttrai4Residential 12 Existing; Zoning; A-2 13. Ztzsta.ng Land Use on. site:___ Parce_l Irrx aced pasture remaining parcels 'undeveio ed and residence, 14. Surrounding Area a. Land. Uses. pew residences on lane arcels a to Roll, Hills Estate pont,oothilissturesa b. Zonins : _ _ A-2 GTen. Plan desi natio - ' nst �ricuitural-Res}dential, and Open :ta.7d _ _ d Grazing d.i`nan Parte + LIS .1 Hills est- e a lon C ar};s e. Population. -ad 15. y '1C. �eara.ctor of Site and A"ca: Central $utte - iotver� . arOst Urban. Area: orovill.e 10 Eootha--- .._� 17b Pel evaliphers onfluee: miles south Paradise 9 miles �- Noire. 18 l mprovements Stand,ard.s Urbana. Area, : ,._ NIA 'iq. Fire Protection Service: a. Noaveat Count Durham #45, itis miles west Slate) Eire S'tat,o : Con cow #37 b Water Avall,abil,ity? Nonr .10 Miles no 20. School; in. Area:: Golder, r6,1+1, Appendix F bbl 4 D. B. I. 4 i. I .WR W6e ! ,-r.. �•�-`."..._'--"-�--._..,—_'.,,�--.,� s gg a Yr' it - t 1 � ...:...� ' �' '%� � �,Lt.:,�,,..W.. " e"� ., . , . � 4 �` ,. ,r iF : r . 1 1fr ✓ Y tXi �7RCi (7 / r .. ... 40.45Ac 40.39At V } ty 462'.566Ac '+ 6''5,84 �„� 663.$5 6 �IOA a;c r. tke� _o��:��" �a M 2,1 Ile Of .3 i yUJ5 , r , w•`� ' F i I N too., + e Z 1$4.7 V. ,✓7.K. w, 7.t alt• �. 14 C�a ku 0-7 V 7,d f a4i"�'[1.JIt; w'E t 1f +;✓' l; p, d.F�t i y - N _ _ J til �Wyw �il C.l•!YI"/ r .r � 4 4 �, � ,.e�..✓` cGMtl�"J'• ,,r:?tr �i'. e�88d.�.22 r (r'A'f P`vLl +t u6tFC t'� r `^�. } y' { t� M\' ,eta {��t �• ,f x.i, fir' .,iJ.�, i�tl I«�i��1. i'•t"..•' yq,. c �� �k � ,y ,.' . b .. ° 1.•.«»....,:_.._.. .w.�+....�:,..,...�a.�s,;...". � ',4„ Ikk t,5 1 � P 3 yz, ,q) ,'ry` rlrUa t1: Ir 7' Pn) • JVI ,3 51•;7 t', Fl , �• i !tt"3"a .:� W �>� �9`.i` �+S. ."d '`r"! �.'� j � �'�"."� qtr ,'� � y a;w.,. e � �� d ��r� � �j� ` * ., i� ....,..."w+.r,•.•.,.r.,».,.a.W..ww.�...:.«...».....�.z,.,. 'f >._,w>.ka,�.�,. . �.�.i.}�•G:,..._. j.�...1...,... �;y } �5Wt� V pi�',Ol" SL �� � .� a, . Assessor's Map ;h o. s q JyAP �141'la ,/Kj County >, P ! ,%) P fire � �G::� J� 'a `%f ��� J'7 Pq u''1'' :'.•t; '' a r` � �" $ %� ..t°i ^.t 0'l Y'a ;:4 µ.{at �. �' �� 4�w M. �p.