Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
041-130-021
I H. "• _ � � � � � I 41 ,j`, -254 A McIMTER On WHICH A PUBLIC HEARING MOTION OF INTENT TO APPROVE THE GHAS E �yBp N "LD �& , HAS BEEN ADOPTED ClaytonLAN AMENDME' Gunn - consideration of. appeal of the Planning C0_'V= ,ssion9s denial of a Genet Plan Amendment (pro ossa mitigation measures regarding env xonmE ntalaim act ion f , grazing and open land to a P ' property zoned A-5 fico] Lural -residential 611 tagr cuh sid , , ve acre parcels', Property Located on the south side of Durham-Pentz ;Rt�aQ`I' approximately 3,300 feet gest Of Clark Road AP 041.-=01. 6 021, Orovill.e Area,- action recquested - MOTION AND FINDINGS. ADOPT pgopogtq (TEE PUELJC HE PORTION OF TNt§`' APPEAL rjAs BEEN COMPLETED, INPUT FROM THE PUBLIC WILL Bir LIMITED TO COM#�3ENTS ON THE PROPOSED MOTION ,AND FINDINGS.) MOTION: I MOVE TO A. FIND THAT: 1. WAS C014PLETED INCAN INITIAL STOWOMPLIANCE WITH THg' CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL t 2. SAID STUDY. AND COMMENTS QUALITY �iCT. j" IDENTIFIED POTENTIAT RECEIVED RECEIVED' THERE691 EFFECTS OF ' THE PROJECT BUT CANT ENVIRONMENTA v (A) PROV1811w IN THE PROTECT PLANS OR PROPOSALS MADE BYoO AGREED TO BY THE APPLICANT MOULD AVOID SUCH.` _ E. -PELTS OR: -MITIGATE SUCH EFFtCTS' TO A POI?iT, WHERE CLEARLY NO SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTA EFFECTS WOULD OCCUR. CB? THERE SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE BEFORE THE COUNT IS �1;,6,CT AS Y THAT. EFFECT OTHE N TME E REVS,F1 N Y RAVE A SIGNIFICANT AGRICULTURAL THE PROPOSED' RESIDENTIAL GENERAL PLAT DESIGNATION IS CONSISTENT WITH COUNTY 'GENERAL PLAN Iii BU'ITB' 7 r Ir7CLUDING THE TEXT .AND a � MAP., 4. THE REQUEST IS CONSISTENT WITH SURROUNDII;G LAND USES AND ZONING BECAUSE;-, CD3, THE PROPOSAL IS CONSISTENT DEVE]AF�MENT LN THE WITH AREA, CB) THERE ARE OTHER PRSMALL � TY CELSIN THE �A: AND (C) tHE - BUTTE COLLEGE AND EXISTING UOMES TO THE NORTH ACROSS PENT2 ROAD • x1NA C DECLARATION WITH MITIGATION+ ADOPT A MEASURES: I' NEGATIVE DECPT RES OLUTIAN �3-101 APP ` GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT ROBING A } TO AGRICULTURAL RESIDENTIAL, ON AP ti41- -' r 5 M 13 � _021 CLAYTON GUNN),., r 'iidit 1 Y 2 Y 3 Y 4 21P 5 X (Unanimously, Carried' °� CE oUrrT i0A10 o si F viSa�s �txriux S = it l.y 13, i0.g1 f r at.t} aro • urtavtnr c`I»nr, posed p Di+til 'lin Amen }„I h from Gruen- r i-?�. with M iti atioh, md'Ap 'es. Relidentital for pr po erty zoned A 5 g and Open Land to ,A�grac f i I al, on the south side of Durhazn-Peutz Road, pro- 5 acre parols;d}ted (Aga7cul Of Clark Road, identified as A]P (41-130-021a F mately 3,3�q ieet'`st Qrovvle. File �-�1&� The Commission waived the reading of the Staff Findings, Staff said they mmendare reed ; �,pg denial: The .fearing was opened to the public. Mark ftisso A& (,� Engineering, said he was representing Staff Report does slot clearly show what :there is in the ;fie ap Ii ` P cant. He said: ire o,_ He, said there are:i Parcels along 'Williams Road. He said the soil septic: systems. He asked the Co Clay mantssion t0 support the Gnrai Plan and exce(leat it is thea Iic�nt's intention `to subdivide this P� ' change. He �d lots. fah Gunn said she wants to divide parcel. into six 5 a��-e I the roeand p pay for medical c e of her, mother. Sl`ie Paid a was a nicesarme of the areels to ,h''l 3' Butte College. ea. for some developin# ,i The hearin g-'was closed: Commissioner Ostrowski asked what the-5 ,Staff said it a.11dw; one dwellin Zoning Permits? at the General gunit per 5 acres. S Flan Policies. � acre tall said +th Co Policies. Staff said 5xussaon has :to lotrk olicaes. Staff said n z )nibg zs nr* this nea will. be a major focus for considerat,�,r� in the area prosect and the General Plan update. � � , .;�.y�tent with the, Central Btrttg Commissioner Lambert agreed with staff that considered E o this area and any new that tion should the General Plan. has been thoroughl�t General Plan ttpdate, "wait for the Central Butte z COMmass over Ostrowski noted the smaller parcel Sizes t-- . owards Clark IR oad. Commissioner ,Nelson said this is an example df an area where t here is a lack of se t , X ^ + He said the area °has been establishdd with lar rvices' �g o develop .... largo, acre Com:massianer meg• t-atnheri s"aid the Gneial Plan-updat4 is n prdgress end than request FIP P , `me. Sbe said :she ro�ald equest fg _ tox . , yr � ala ro� nate .and e-mature at this � rt, . p this chosde I BT t. Chi X3t'Y,'y gl+,4k - by .yyyyLI_ r. r, lr BUTTIE CO STAFF FINDINGS PLANNING COMMISSION, UN OS Novernber .10, 1992 Butte ountv;re. "This individual rezone has no ; accumulative e— a f t of rezOning to highimpact density dovelo ac F ton the .Fire .DepartnittllC� t?ut the p rotection services and higher costs to the County;" Pments is increased dentitiltl for firs; Butt e _Cou Public Works „ requirements of Chapter or of the Butte nt- "Create the e parcels in accordanett V1jt1) the the Mate Subciiysiori Mt#t] Act." i 'ButtCoun Environmental health De artment: change, However, soils in the area are ;not ve "1`10 problem with General Phtli/rezone 1 property. r5 good and they may not be .able to c fVjfjc the NW SIS i The applicant is requesting a General Plan Amendment to change from Grazing and Open Land to Agricultural Restdential: nge the land use sleitlt�tit�n zoned A-5, Surrounding Properties are primarily' designated 32 acre parcel is t tit'i'h'tlly The t� Public deli g7ation for Butte College. razing and Open Lon(1 With Residential to the west and northwesgbut' they do not abut the Is sotne land deli nated as the east and west are zoned A:S,subject Agricoft1j $ An A-lfi0 designation is Iocatedo the south . Propo7't,_a to the area range from 10 to 600 Iglus acres, but are pririmaril F r South. >.c91 ij $ in :10 acre parcel is located approximately 1/2 mile to the east. Y �0 acres or larger in si;�d, C,��'10 Thero' F pe ny was zoned A: -S in 1973. However; the General Plan designation of G��a� Open Land' �'as put in place in. 1979, 1'he 1979 change creat General Plan and zoning designation oil thin roe trt ural g ed an inconsistency ` property. rty Because of the shallow oilcotliliorrs� amllri the this area, which are poor for agricultural crops, 5 acre agricultural land �3nits. The 1979 Grazing and Gpen Land deli Iparcels are not pro,liclive rh ria. appropriate land` use for this `Based on the General Plan 1 olon vas determ,nett to be criteria. The for Flan policies for grazing land are consistent W` at the site and its surrounding. p ides and site itesiAaaCion with the e�cisting cori�litior�s The following :are the five General Plan policies for resource management of grazing land. q i.c Afaintain extensive areas for primary use as livestock 2.grazing land. MOW livestock, gratin on all suitable safes not g _. s .production, needed for development or crop 3 Prevent scattered development in grazing areas. 2 I` BUTTE CQUN y pLANNING COMMISSION STAFF FINDINGS - N'ovember lo, 1992 d= Discourage irrigation ofj grazing land with poor drainage or Which has tx Ali 1. I'is)* o.l mosquito production, J.. Retain, in a Grazing-Open Land category areas on the. end and natural conditions snake lands well suited r )r Use Map wh+o p (.ocatiun non-grazing use areas where urban encroachment has rntacgiel �oads. �i a coo ij, rV;f)9 for and where past official actions have planned areas for d3veloprnent. giJiCl Areas 1n analyzing the above, if. appears that the ,land is suitable for grazing g a d not corp, tulle with , p production. Changing the General Plan designation could Ieaci to tli'a.itered development in grazing land and set. a Precedent, for similar re �. ' p q,tc,sfs in this area The Site Designation Criteria listed below is for the G Land Use designation: razing And Open Land [i"ettl-pi T'ltin '�te T.?esienation Criteria• L Natural conditions poorly suitedfor plant crops or timber, 2. Predominate parcel of 40 acres or :more. Used for"grazingand secondary uses, 4. Adjacent uses conducive to livestock grazing. This criteria determines a pprapriate land use designation for property in Butte Coin "1„�tK;Se' g .t , p p ` criteria are consistent with the existrrt condtttons on the sub ect ro erty and its situ' t l tl e The: applicant requests to change to Agricultural - Residential. Site Iles` t /l g this land use category are as follows: tgnation Cri'f p for Site Desi nation Criteria. 11 Beyond service areas of common 1, Less than -slopes, water Les and sewer systems. I Adjacent or near to existing roads and public utiliti 4. Not within floodplains or knolm ,active faults. its. 5. Past offeial actions. This criteria is less specific than that of the Grazing and Open Land. this criteria could also apply to the roe kept l'or number S, p p rty.o�+vcver the most recent occur on #fie propert3' and its _:surroundings were: when the 179 General Inn update $cI�`on� to Based on those .acttons, tt appears that c%c+iurred, de ignatlon for this site. gncultttral Residential was not an appropriate 3 BUM'COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF FINDINGS - November 10, 1992 A final consideration that must be reviewed is the Conditional Zoning, aizd f) #VRjopmerl Criteria and the Zoning Factors. The A-5 zone is not consistent with 0, razing and O ,ep land and is considered a Conditionally Consistent zone with Agricultural IZesidoli ial;� A. ConditionnI and Deveionment Cr_ 't_ ena• 1. Compatible with neighboring agricultural activities. 2. Evidence of adequate water and sewage disposal capacity. 31 Availability of adequate fire protection facilities, 4, Adequately maintained approved road access with sufficient capacity f p service area. 5. Reasonable accessibility to commercial services and schools. B. Znnin Factors: 1. Existingparcelsizes and residential densities. s. Slope. 3. Soil conditions and water availability: 4. Effects on adjacent uses, crop production, livestock grangf. forestry #;=?urces extraction and: wildlife habitat. 5. Proximity to public roads and other public facilities. 6._- Distance from 'airports, railroads and industrial uses. 1 7. Existing 'utilities and drainfa 414t' age es. 8. Potential %r surface cracking, landslides anderosion. 9. Effects onnoise, traffic flow and safety, water quality, air quality] W.10 f6 j?abitat and general environmental duality. A Local. desires. 11. Potential flat pest insect breeding: In reviewing the above trite 'a,. it is concluded that the evsting zoning is in corlfi'" : with seweral Items for 'the Agricultutal Residential designation. Specificall A1., til B.4 are the most a y, 1l' A:S, BJj ;�, and . . PParent. Even though some criteria are c6nsistent, it is deterrnitt d that ntpatibt'e with the existin 5 acre lois are not co g parcel sues or uses in the area. vas also l SW4Y of conducted environmental issues has been prepared for till's project, A edlo " , t did not tdenti� an g 91 �ui'vey portion of the property is located within the Cleary Craelc100s year flo Op�on the pr�. A small measures have been proposed to eliminate or reduce potential impacts to .a l Arlt,on of }, g A Mitigated Negative Declaration is recommended, Ins tuficance. 4 f�+ 1 j DOTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMIS SI0Iy STAFF FINDINGS November 10, 1992 t_ R ECl�l1'[)d�IENDATIONS General Plan Land Use Element, the Find that the General ,Plan Amendme nt isnot consistent with palltl�'q or the 2. Find that the General Plan Amendment is not consistent with surrou Parcel sizes. r?,ding:latrrl 11Se0 and 3. Find that the project would result. in a development that would adv activities in the area.. ersely impjj{M f $t'nzing 4. The Planning Commission take no action, on the ernrronmental document, g'tj,; 5,, 'Deny the General Plan Amendment on the property identified (Clayton Gunn); as AP#, 041430=021: designation the Planning Comm' tin.d that . the Agricultural Reside S is consistent with the County potrcu�, then it v:ou d be niial Gene€tl t>tan, following motion: proper to ftlake, (lie MOTION: ACCEPT THE RECOMMEND) TION OF STAFF NOVEMBER 6, 1492. 14iAHI '['1 E MEMS) DAT,131) MAKE THE MOTION LISTED ' FIlv]7ING$ LISTED -C,.UNDER %o; AND Ui'1DER B AND C" A. Find the x • An ,Initial Study has been completed in compliance with CE A, 2. .Said Study and comments recd, led thereon identified potentially st "heunt environmental effects the project may have had, :but.' a Project p proposals made by o a. i i IZeV1S1onS in the r0 ect laps or r0 pplicttiit vtould avoid such effects or mitigate;, such effects teiIreed to bojlnt here clearly no gnifcant erivironmen€al' eifeCts would occur; aiId b• There is no :substantial evidence before the Com revi Wsed may have a significant ity that the project 'as effect on the environment. Tbproposed Agricultural VesiderttialGeneral Platt designvtiort is corisisteirt vit` the Butte County General I.lahi including the text arid,aria because f il. pr l it"f'Arlg61P CALIFORlJtR _ p�.�t�j SANS Goanfil+tc CALI1F0RNIA REGIONAL: it ,CATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD—` Q, ,N1 -RAL VALLEY REGION w: HAa3T',41rCASCADS WATERSHED BRANCH OFFICE: 41t� 11iS ;5 L��LCREST DRI,V> S U L 6 f `MDO`10dr:rrr CA 96002 pJH,0Nii 1010) 224.4845 j JF4AX: (91;1+01224.4357 3 July 1992 Mrl Larry Paints. ;Butte County Planning Commission 7 County Center Drive groville, CA 95965-3397 f� 'UNERAL PLAN AMENDMENT, CLAYTON GUNN, AP p041-130-021 ,WP have reviewed the subject project notice, ,The following are our commenTi Sufficient information must be provided by the applicants to enable ev.alua;iail►l sof the treatment and disposal options in relation to conditions in the aroo uch as local ground and surface water hydrology and soil types and depths, j Potential impacts which must beaddressed, include potential contamination' ef �'. aground and surface waters, protection of public health, generation of vecto�� or nuisance conditions such as odors; and short-term impacts during construction such as accelerated erosion. in order for Regional Board staff to Conmtent further on the proposed proJec §,r ;please submit the information required in the Regional .Board's tllnfornatiorl I; :Needs. for Waste Disposal from Land Developments"i, In accordance with the acurrent policy between Butte County and the Regional Board staff, we will 6tilly Provide further comments if we have objections to the data that is supplie'dr The State Water Resources Control Board is in the process of promulgating re a ations for stormw ater permits. These regulations will apply to any facility with more than five acres under development. The Developer shoul"di contact this office �o determine the necessity of a stormwater psr`m it before any cort ruction begins. Ifou have e any questions, please contact me at ('916) 224-48$8 or the above address: Ronald'S. Dykstra, P.C. :Staff Engineer SDctch 1 cc. hr. Tom Reid, Butte County Department of Environmental Health, Orovilte I� t.; 1 I, R i: PJ -SI RIC f OFFICE AT OUNTY No QU ,,, AT] MENT ' ''�71+ �,,E%�. `(?it OI Ok�lvlL'i'.1: A1RFt2RT 51 .17 �.E�RICII� i�Q/#Ii ' � 1; LneKJr. AOAD OROViug, CAL10FO W,1F.195965 JAWS A, dAbfY NH(916 133-5038 ?dANAC f� 342-7350 Plan11if1Cg, b b4pnt (1AX (916);534-9916 JUN 1 f,0 c5ravlll+�, ��iilr�t�1A June 15, 1992 Larry Painted. BLL to County Planning Commission 7 County Center Drive Oroville, iA 959.55-3597 Dear'j�4r. Painted; 1.ie have mace an on--si,tQ inspect', ."on this parcel,ma of the parcel Iiste( C p. Hobby farm sized pahoels su.. develop new mosquito breeding sorlL,,es due to as. these o #3*n development and use of the property, -C i,nproper jd..jqd In the eventthat any or the proposed irri gated, we recommend the use of sprinkler .irrigation arcel is - td g :o flood irrigation methods. Irrigat>on a °p•�`o'"' t fed to prevent exr>ess. ve runoff .from the ixppgate���reas how � ,�� used to accactmoriata surface drai nage should be Ento rade aintained free of obstrfsctve debris and emergent Vegetatoi��� j ur W�: ge the PropeKty owners to assume;' responsibility r pg good. mosquito prevention practl,;�i establ.ishin w , Ct,-a .cievel o ed and used. eloper water tnanagemerct as theeke e�1 errP list f�reventng mosquito problems in ag-resrenial de�,e1c,nme.nr_ There commences are consistent with the Districts ado' policy called "Guld'eli"nes, Checklist and 8t,a lards J or dopted P,�-even.t.ion: in brobosed Developments,,h x,f you have ,any questions oregarding our r recomttlendatians, please .feel free tori :.o1r►ments, suc{gestD ntact our office, _ _ Sincerely Carl. G: A CGP -dm soh, na supervisor I- r, a�. ,p Ali, AM 1 �, ' , U1iA1�J>I I n�O DON ,CMcNELIS,.D SYr�ctupeP,O. BOX 5()0 nt"e rldentCALIFORNIA ` c FAX (916),895-4692 1Sy3 ( G)"1575 11()AItI) G�'r` TKUSTY I S Ric hard L Anderson tnelshti "M ..y ...RU��V �� Klnl a+. l Edwin F- 1Ryon M11601 hicllonultl t - Andhrny u•r�tiry October 20 .1992 �--- ---:; Mark. ;Risso ` c/o A 3c Q Ellgineering 1230 E. 9th street, Suite C C'hica, CA 95928 '1 Dear Mr. Russo: Pursuant to our Onversation today,, T ro o$e that the proposed 'e oniP 041-130-021 be conditioned; as P follows: neral plan am'endiri?tlll(, I L Payment of fees are due and payable at the time of issuance of a 0 11�permit by Butte County for rler�o meat build* P of the land pay the fee established b land. Owner agrees to is $`x,584:00• Y 'he district on a per unit basis. The 1991-52 fee ?' A note on any subdivision or parcel P mitt' g6n fees will be required' by theDurhamap for �Unifiede land v�ll state thin "school to the development of any parcel or lot.'' School .district prior developer ee , This p gr Ment satisfies the school mitigation issues for the { schgtll D strici relativeto this Proposed gej*drat plaxx amendment DUrhtim Tlrtr t;tl,.. have an questions, Plt►se eall I 1I r!(5t1 �incerelY> �, Ali Donald Cr 'Iwicl`tets r Superintendent D "Wav, 1J 1 } D t1Rii ih4 ; [1vTERU SCIIooL bt1R:W JIAft$ J 7pkts"t`nN t iiGn scttooL PkITiCII',{ Pfi�H'S sSSn95 �. 'IES b. CiJV1c7C' .rA71 1'hrr rRr�totrar., r I t'A.itsa 4 f p �R Prnxtmicy of water ror #ire ri hlin p ' "xx # g spur oses,(hydrdttts0onns, eta s^: Call c.). Butte " a e strat9.on %�aross road.No onsite jrater-� scource „ Will excavation dr9Nd3rlgbenecessary?,. ' s . Cubic yards (esti-ate). 370 y} yi List and describe any other yllated perrriits and. those required by city, regi OnState and rederal age ►e esbl c approvals required 1Wthis $5fbjv't,4� ncludhlA ubdi�risir"on o tbVd j , Bu to County _ (;oulnty ee Area fOr s_ ewaae di,s psal .:. NW11ZC?NMCN7`AL TMpACTS AND'71TIGA�ION A41;AS11R>~C Identify potentially significant environmental impl,cts associated rvitll the General P' Atoject design features or special conditions of a Plan Aritettdix�ttt, 1Vltnfi- Potential environrlcntal impacts? l�proval (Mitigation measlures) are propo'kea, t�� ,tUlcvlpt.o no sigilificant environment=al impacts tivrl✓N1"AL5DcsTTts�i ,scribe the project Site as, it exists he.rore the project, including inrormation'on to plants and annuals alto an' cult pogrophy, soil 4.tfAl)ijIly' and the use or thestructure~t, tst Describe alt ► y ' tral, istOrieal ox scenic aspects. y existing s(ructurc5olii' site, v; Area is :rolling rangalaxid aYt, ai' oi_ P traversed" b of dam, clay � caro over '6.t Y C�ea;r r; '� k . ,x.eet o aampie�sad s':zkd s _ , NO Cultural or hl4st;or:ical aspects�spoc+�s are in ietr of nearby, buttes � bescrihe thesurroundin g properties including information oft plants and animal ttn t landr .danyeulturafif}�tt,tal Or Scenic foamy apartment Indicate tS ops, departrrien-es�dent 0 commercial, etc,), t1?tehsit r nt~ lar7 p type i d tt.xac. setback-, rearyard3etc. , stores, etr ,'j» ttrtd scale of de�cic�pcttenteii fYrtc, 5tiogdtadirfg properties' consist; o roll ng .r" ►ftc Rwland� spar=s=e hative �regetatkok� except tFree�:inedx are i 13tsi tsr oly eae . e`ii banks, ld f E test anti - acetit sites 4g0.acres in s.ze, Easterlie -'---�-n_r and 2-5 arse u 'co' S' Baine .agr�i+�aUS�l�uai cient:es oar eat;teri: a c l% No III L or surroUhdahg -dill X-' .as ecus also kith aria. other thth those 118ted cin the site abb N8TRE1CTlONS T(3 A FPLTC4N. T VOR GENERAL PLiAN .AiVI� ' � N1 I. If applicant is not the owner, written authorization by the owner or ttthec ,proc?It �er1 must be submitted in order for the applicant to legally sign the .hpplic;tf on. �+tiltllcttti.�i�a shall beconsidered'void if not signed by the owner orlegal agent. { 2R All items on application shall be tilled in as. coni letel as p }' Possible. Very f`ew lions rtbomftf be marked not applicable by the t-, rnt "NIA". 3. It is very important that the application include an accurate and MrWcte .zr.seriptititi, o;l the property proposed for amendment, Tare application will not be processed until wt reCCivt" the ollowing.i.nforniation about the area(s) to be amended. C a. Assessor's parcel numbers) (from the tax bills or Assessor's ilyfaps), '.' b. Street ad' dr�„scs 0r available). C. Distances, and direction's to; named street$, bodies of water or railroads, d. Legal description (stibdivi*n tet numbers, fractions orsections or distancm;, and. bearings °ti; perimeter dimensions). }• ropirs of map withareas) outlined (Assessor's map, subdivision roap, toliing. xnap or other M,tP showing parcels) and a reprotl-tcible roaster of the map. 4. Because the California Governtrettt Code reclukdt that local general plans be integrated and: p() l rntemally consistent, amet dinents to the Land Use Fran ,\la s of the I3utfe Lottnt Certeral' Platt must be consistent with rtiritten policies and standards Contained in the adopteel eletnents o the plan. �f..The `SApplication ror Gemhil Plar;,Amtxndment" is subject to public bearings and approval . byboth the Planning Commission,and Board of Supervisors: & Application fps as of (date) are S Pots may be paid its cash or by check made payable'to "Treasurer of Butte County," Fl 7. Befoxe �sbrttin g theapplrcationapplicant is ,st"e uestrd to discuss riff all qt estonsabout application requirements. C00okY procedures, site desighattori crttt ha and li!#lit y considerations. 1 8, a d encourage is requested cob s camplcte al poss:lble in striting the masons for �'he aplalication and en eouraged to discuss in %,citing the liroposal*s coktformance with the policies and critaria of the Land ttse. lettrent of tixe Butte County General Plan„ _ APPENDIX G NEGATIVE.DECLARATTO 'REGARDING.ENVIROiJMENT N TT9 ACT .: NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the project de`scribed below has been reviewed girouant the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act put�l3 P Code 21,100, eta seq.) and a determination ;has been made that it of 1970 �pu have qa s gnif cant effect upon the environment. l Assessor's Parcel, No.. 041-180-021 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: General Plan Amendment Agricultural Residential. from Grazing dtyd, Op #tj, sand ►r west of Clark Road, Oroville. Road, approximately( 114,00 fee{ LOCATIOM OF PROJECT., On the youth side of Durham-;Pentz NAME AND ADDRESS OF PROJECT APPLICANT; Clayton Gunn #8 Catalina Point Road Mark Ri$,,so, A & Q Engineering Chico,, CA o592$ 1280 E. 9th Street, Suite C Chico, CA 95928 MITIGAT'IoN MEA8Mu-S: See attached ' A copy of the initial study regarding the environmental effect of this pttr_, t js an .file at 7 County Center Drive Oroville, This study itas: X Adopted as presented Adoptee; with changes. Specific n attached odificatiohs and'';Iupportinq re+A;gpha are Public hearing on this Negative Declaration was held by the decision ma�lia� k�pdy teariiYg body„Rutte count$oarci of Su ervisrs Date Of Determination: July 13 1993 t3etermination: On the basis of the initial study of environmentalact, presented at, hearings, comments received. on the proposal and n rh ow'ni� � edge and independenr research: find the proposed p ProJect COULD NOT 'have a significant af�ec f n the environtrent, and a NEGATIVE DECLAMATION is hereb Y1e y adopted+. _., find that the project COULD have a t' significant effect 4. v the environment, but Will not in this case because of attached ill,#:iort mea;sur_es described in ittm 5' above, which are b Lonclitions of pro ect app -6v 1. P, canditianal NEGATIVE this bEC1, K "fX N e hereby adopt -ed Si na re RARY ?{, GKAIRMp,N _Butte County Bard df Ei►be ..sr. o ..' Title October 12 1993 Date 'tl - I �r. 1 . A a} II I`r r MRCCTOR'!S CFFtCJ DEPARn4FWT OF'O VeL15pMENT,Z9 V10E6. 7 000NTY CENT R !)RIVE . OROV14LE, CALIPOhNIA 9544 107 TELEPHONE: 191011 E35r7Gdi1 FAX: 191.61 $JR47.$ i Joly 'K 1993 Cit yton Gunn Catalina Pont Road. Cbicot CA 959221 Re: General flan Filey m92-423 Dear MW., Gunn: At the regular ,1eeting of the Butte County Board. of Supervisors held Jilliv r13, 1993, RaW i.iion No. 91.101 was adopted appro.nmmg a Geileral Plan Amendment from Oithzing and ©pelt ,1, nd. to, Agricultural 'Residential -gin propert�, zoned, A-5 located on the south, ,;ide of Durham#-POIltz Road,, identified as AP 041-130-021, Oroville. Recently enacted Iegislation (AB 316$, Chapter 1706, Statutes of 1990, effi.ct ve January it 1091), requires that, the .Department of Fish and Game impose and collect filitil, fees as spe # ,,?I to defray the cost of ,managing and protecting fish and wildlife trust resourcE:s. These -Ming rea Are colle, �ied during tl a environmental review process and are to be paid at kht; tine the County 11�es a *Notied o£ Determination" with the County Clerk of the County in which the project is 1Oejjt ,, This procedure, is required pursuant to Section 21152 of the Public Resources Code. To increase adrainistrative efficiency, the statute delOigatied the ,collection o£ filing fees w tete County Clerk and provided the County authority to collect a 525.00 dodudientary`rhandli" 'Rte fey for a Iye il%Iir imus Negative Declaration is the W25.00 documentary handling Qr A nh ,tk 19, ].993; $25.00 should be subil tted to the County rh�ecic nt�ade a ,able to the County in the amount of , The time within which judicial review of this d"IMon must be sought is Lkai?gOed by Cullff"1114 Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6, Judicial review must be sought n6 later than then Vath day ,following the date on which this decision becomo: final, except that vvlieie n shorter time limit is provided by State or Federal law, such shorter time limit shall, agp1y. 17ti s � ResoWi�n Nar�Xa RESOl` LHON OF THE BOARD OF SU`PERVISORS OF THF, COWITY OF Bt= APPROVING THE ADOMON OF A GENERAZ, PT -AN AMEINDMENT TO THE BUTTE COUNTY LAND USE ELEilil� �w WHEREAS, a private individual, Clayton Gunn has petitioned the '4440 County Planning Ctlmrn''-cion and Board of 'Supervisors, through ` p x a _g ri ' apptdp1°ftit application, to amend the Butte County General Plan Land 'Use Element, for fa, j ljjgp�e from Grazing, and O en Land to Ag rcultural Residential for that property identifi,04 on Exhibit .rA attached. hereto; and WHEREAS, the proposed General Flan Amendment has been studio tl?d reviewed by .the Butte County Planning Commission and a Pit is hearing held p'uw),O t to ;law, at which time Idl interested persons were heaidi and WHEREAS,, , the Butte Coturty Board of Supervisors has k old hear nn �� � -_. the; General Plan Amdhdm+ nts 'at wm h all interested parties were heard•, an66T WHEREAS, the Butte County Board of Supervisors finds the props)�.d amendm-Mt complies 'with all elements of the Butte County General Finn and comes an overall internally consistent whole, specifically: 1 The amendmeia complies with the policies.•. of the Butte C611ri:ty General Plan, ents provide for compatible devolo meat with Z. The amendm p e-�196.09 land uses. r u S?u i; cou�-- wi r DIRECTOR -S OFFICE DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMeNT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER OArVE p ROVIiCIEi CALIFORNIA8596a�;�";k'r i TEIEPLiONE: 181(6 E38.7601 ` 7uly 14, 1993 FAX: (91,131 51I847785 { f>Clartorx, Gann. ll g 'Catalina Point Road Chsdo, CA 9598 r _ Re: General Plan File, #92-48 Deax Mr. Gunn: At the regular meeting o£ the Butte County Board' of Supervisors held July 13, 1493, Rescti�l�. - No. 93401 was adopted approving:a General Plan Amendment from Grazing; and Open° }'1 �nd to Agricultural Residential on. property zoned -A-5 located on the south side of DurhaniWj?rZ Road, identified as AP 041-130-021, Oroville. Decently enacted legislation 3158, Chapter 1706, Statutes of 1990, effecrive January -'1. f`,9' 1) 1i g requires that the Department of Fish and Game unpose. :and collect Klin feel s specifre defray the cost of managing g and protecting fish and rv>idlife trust re;,,oi2rces. 'These gling fee's grc ` p are: �I'�to�t ce o Determination" hwith the County oCterk of tbr� noun n�ct a� �e tpme the County ,���r� 'ej in which the project is loc%4T,d. This rore.dure p isrequired pursuant to Section 21152 of `the Public Resources Code, County Clerk and provided g filing To increase adrauustrat va efficien the statute delegated the collection of film fee ' � cy: s to �>�0 ry p de�xi the County authority to collect a $25100 doc'.►rneltltary handling �wecp 'ate fee for a De Minimus negative Declaration is the S25,00' docutncIditn y handling i`tig . Check made payable to the County in the amount of $25.00 should beto the C ,,�Ilubrnittecl c��#jlly July 19s 1993. + 1" .. ` i + r . , ., .. be sought The time within t�vhich ` edictal review of thus decision must Code of Curti Proeodure Section 1094 gnv lAter by Califc901h 6 e � .Judicial revte.v must be sou a Y � h day following the bate on which this decision becomes final except that tvhear�er,tt than rae l%mxt is provided by ;State or Federal law; such shorter tine limit shall apply, - kA �, 9 Un doffiffiEnow- .�D OF 'I�AtURA� co VlEAtrla ��1�5rt.�`ALJA`� '`- OIRECTOR'S OFFICE, Y y f 4 DEPARTMONT OF DEALOPMENT SERVICED 7 COUNTY CWTER 13RIVE - ONVILL[, CA WWN(A ot;96§4091 ,� 7);LEPl1tlF1E; {ilti9`1 538.760f o , FAX: 1910) 058.785 MEMORANDUM TO: Butte County Board of Supervisors FROM: Bill Farrel, Director of Development Servir,6s Thomas A. Last, Project Planner ,SUBJECT: Clayton Gunn, General Plan Amendment, „File 92-48 Board Agenda July 1:3, 1993 DATE: June 18, 1993 REQUIESTt la on ung proposed ,Negative Ueclarl4ionWith Mitigation measures regtii'rdit�g ens#ironmentai impact and General flan Amdnci, enf fron Grazing and ('&n 1AH41 'P Agricultural Residential for property zoned A-Agricul;lural - 5 acre par'\els) lae'al on the south side of Durham-Pentz Road a y , Qarkltlr Identified as AP 041-130-021 Oroville, pprr'X►matei "3 30Q feet west of ,1 BAGKGROL ND q i y, �g .the 'General Plarn. Amendment request was demed,� b the Planning Comms{tsiott �tJ January 1�#, 1993, Mr. C,tnn :ubsequentty appealed to thyµ, Board of Sipervisor� Alit' sonduCting a public hearing al the .April 13, 1993 meeting,; a motioit of intent to tlppf the ,request Was unanimously carved by the Board. 1'h{ ; hearing item was C60intle'd closed from the April 13, 1993 Boars d Su,pervisnrs .meetCi `g in order for staff wVettJttt with the ,formal amendment resolution containirig the Boar findings: rwcommtNDATTONSt Based on the direction from the Board, the, following actin is requested: A;. Find that -1 1. An initial study Was completed in corripliance: With the - C1al4'tdrttia - Environmental Quality Act. Emits, - i DIRECT'OR'S OFFICE DEPARTMErtT. OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICCS 7 COUNTY CENTER ORtVE - OAOVILLE, CAiLIFORMA d+ ' 1 07 1 (y TELEPMONEt 1916) 538-7601 aid i 3 j FAX: 19161'536.7765 E April 14, 1993 t �Claftoz Gunn •#8 Cyatalina Point Road (Cheo, CA 95928 , i R, 6 General Plan Amendment) File 97,48 Dear Mm Gunn: At the regular meetsng }r r hearing ontan l o£ the Butt O tn� hoard Of S� )PErvi5,, r8 hel�-' ��ipril 13, 1993 li e p? oder .ot . rari�i�es{' for a General Plan ArnendIl griculturalZe ,,loi�ti'aI for ro e p p rty zoned A-' located ori; .hath slde,.ct£ �7urhan:-Y'entz Road, ident�£ied a5 AP Q41:1 0 -oro Oro zon; The meetingWill h,� il--. held in *he Board of Supervisors' Room, County �vunty Center Drive, Oxov lle, and yo),will be .notified o£ the time Administration Center, _ of this hearing; Kiddott have an c uestions re ardin this matter, pie " y � 8 ase contact this b Vezy truly` Yc� Fsa f } Partment; Mliant Farrel e'J61oP +edit iervi DtTBCior cc: A & 0, Engineering 1280 E- 9th Street suite G Chico, CA 959213 r , -• 17 .0, ou I LAND OF N A K 4L � A L t .H 11 t4 l` �T A u t i DIRECTOR'S OFFICE 1 DEF'ARTMENT,op DtVELOPMEUT SERVIIJEt 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVIs 0110VILLE, CAf. POAN(A Yrftt, 4401 PAX, iD 1 C3) 63rr,> 7r35 I MEMORANDUM I' T(3s Butte County Board of Supervisors ` T'ROivi.Bi!! Farrel, Director of :Development Services 9 Thomas Last, Project Pianner SUBJECT: Clayton Gunn, General Plan Amendmetit File 92-48 DAM March 25, 1993 - RE0110; 'rrRi, r nx r vt>✓NnATro xoposed Negti ;Declaration With mitigation .measures regrie,°(1,1' envi, orutttstt��l impact and General Plan Amen____ clrnent from Gratintnd_ P P y C g g Open :Un'c� �n on th,P. south std of Derham-Penfz Road a Agrrultural Residential for ro ert zoned A-5 (Agr," S acre parcels) lt�da,� identii>e,d as AP 041-130-021, Oroville, Pero tmatel5 3300 ,feet west of Clary 161,4► Staff grecttrttn�erds the Board concur with tilt' Planning Commission and subject 1,` fl findin .s listed in this report, deity the General Plan Amendment, J � ANAs; Y 1 asst applicant is requesting a General Plaid Amendment to char '1'ite g ed A-. Approval 'cultural Residential the rand,i P currently zcit�pen Land to Aart. ' Pared is c y � g of 'this re asst vv re ►gin from Grazing and C1 q ould , quest a subdivision ti;ttlt parcels as small is 5 acres under existing l Oiling, Suror�c(i' properties are primarily designated as Grazing and 0' �,�nd vt+�ith a public desi u'jit',�3 for Butte Cdege. "There is sone land destgnatecl as A :,And wit - g West and nortlnt est, but those area do not abut the s+i�hjee� parcel, Pr perties to th�� �, '��� GSI and west are zoned A-5, An A-160designation is iocAted to the south, Lot axes i't �,�, area reinge 'from 10 to 600 plus acres, but are primarily 30 acres or larger in size. 10 ac�t�e parcel is located approximately 17'2 rritle to, the east. n The property wasi toned^ A-5 in ,1973. 1"-iowever, the Generrtl Plan desi nation o g created an tnron�stc icy X p p ; and Open Land was put in lace in 19�9� The 1919 chane °n+r~y t 10 V between the General Plan and the zoning designaf*nn on this pro ert the shallow soil conditions, in thrs area, which are poor fo • agr cultui al crd`' s a"� acre 1 'the p r kifftc ire trot Producfive agrtculturW land units, The 1 `79 Grazing and Open Land destgrt jlPn 'Was determ,jned to be the appropriate land use for this; area based on tl�e �aerrertt algin. policies.and' site designation criteria. 'The General Plan, policies for.' � � e consistent w grazi.ttg nud '4 it t the existing -conditions at the site and its surrounding, "Ae feilorvir and: iig are the five General Plan policies for resource managemon,t of gtif1lt , an P0�- lied 1. Maintain extensive areas for primary use as livestock grazing land. 2. A111Rty Iiveslock grazing on. all suitable sites not needed for ;deve(oprnont of production. N I Prevent scattered develoatnent in grazing areas. - 4Discourage irrigation of grazing, land with poor drainage or which :has a, hi " o f mosquito production: 5• Retain, in a Grazing-Open t.and category areas on the Iand Use Ma pr and natural conditions make lands well suited for grazing .land, %,J.& considering g ing use areas where urban encroaL,'Ment has i made fimug(la into grazingfo areas and where past official actions 1 development: have planned ' area. for jraz n analyzing annot thec breve, it appears the claracteristics of the protserty, re g y g otnpattble ��rtth cropproduction, tender it suitably l`6r P Changing the General Plan desgxtttr{{ couldIead to the scattered residential development in grazing 'land grid seta rece for similar .requests to this area. P . etll The Site Designation. Criteria listed below is for the Grazing arid Open Land 'Geri .Phan Land Use designation: ,er"al .SitedSIPnation Criteria: 1. Natural conditions poorly suited for plant crops or timber.if t Predominate parcel,. ,,of 40 acres or more: 3. fused for grazing and secondary uses: 4. Adjarosit uses conducive to livestock grazing; These criteria determine appropriate land use designation for property in These criteria etre consistent with ' the existing conditions on the sub'ect utte f ejunty, surroundings 1 property aid. ll The applteant requests to change to Agricultural Residential, Site Designation Cr tetet for this land use category are,,€�s follows; n 0 ii Site L)esi nation CrlteCra L Beyond service areas of communif 2.. Less than 30% slopes, Y water and sewer systems, 3• Adjacent or near to existing roads and 4• Not within floodplains or known active foau public utilitiEs, j �• Past official actions, Ifs. number 5eihe ria e c .less specific than that of the, Graz' y could also 'apply to the ra ert Grazing and Open .and, actions aftectinb the Propert p p y However txcoll T or Y and its surroundings were fhe 1971 e most recent �; verity .At that time the Agricultural Residential was determined not fo General lxie, designation for this site. l'!ah i� be a i p I3Ni .te A final consideration is the Conditional . n ,a ray t Zoning ?'actors. iftonal Zonrng and Development The A-,5 zone is not cons' Pmer�t considered a Conditionally Consistent zone withnAwi Agricultural .,rit�la arida Mlle Grazing and Gfien ,'land cal Resdentidl. r Hra�li 4t' (.onditianal Zoning and Deneb menu Criteria; 1.p . i Corn atiblE with neighboringagagricultural actrvitieo5: 42. Evidence of adequate water ,and sewage dj , Availability of adequate fire protection facilites I. capacity' Adequately maintained approved ' service area. Pl oved roach access with sul{jcent �° 5. Reasonable accessibility to conlrrtercial ses arid 2ervic ca pacify AV ' H oni____ ri� �actcrss scltt�ols� 1. Existing parcel sues and residehtifies 2, Slope: al dens 3: Soil conditions and. 4*,►,Ater availability. 4. Effects on adjacent uses resources extraction and Wildlife habitat, d ction, li'vesfoclw 5. : Proximity p frazing, fc�rt�str,, ti instance from a c roams and other public facilities: l'roximit to 7• Existing trports) railroads and -industrial � rr n utilities 8.g and drainage f,Acitities, uses, i Potential for surface crackin y Effects on noise, safety)trafficlatvg,Ardles and erosion. water calif Y. habitat. and general envronrheital quality... quality,, air x ,� j0. focal desires, qualit yildlue, 11; Potential for pest insect breeding; several Hems for g concluded the existing Zoning r the A ri4uttur r ni ' 'arid reviewing fhe above critert`i al Res* oncl i . ; __ -g n —'s in i , f3,4 are the entta, destgnatonk Spedf;Calgl'` n eohflici with- determined a g, YA,L A 5 determintfd that 5 acre lots art, not coin atible ` , B: 0 J pparent. 11�en tliou� h some. cuteria are.. consistent,.. ii is` the area. with the exrstin , g parcel sizes or Lses 1 • Q 'L. r 4 Ani Initial. Study of environmental issues has bee 1 conducted, ni prepared r".or this proj,eCt. A ss4pmall po tion of ile y Was also, but did not identify osny A e` %a r0 Ic' Property is located Wcthira ftueg geologic k rd �on tile 6perly, Mitigation measures ,have f, n proposed to eliminate Qr re P level of in -significance. nificance. >, P dine Fear flood!��,��n. A _ to g potential im fit a 47.E a NE Negative De'laration is recommended: ae A TERNATPV S' Should the Board determine to support 'with a motion of intent and the hearing continued to the request, general .find,'ngs slloulrl ,be atrtilletl July 13 —PL ANNiIVG CUMt�IISSC4IV ACT'iON 1993 ftil- action; r g The Plannin Commission heard testimony regarding this project, that this proposal was ina ro p olect, Co took an action to deny the Geri rQ rPlanaAmpre-mAtendmentre at this times inissianert .o0' The Comm1,t§j3)p RE—CC EMENDATIONS Z- find that the General ;Plan Amendment request is not consistent �� ith the oar of the'General Plan Land C,1Se Element, , p ci'e 2. Find that the General Plan Amendment request is hot land uses and parcel sizes, consistent tivith surrountif9 3+ Find that the am adversely endment could lead to residential de impact grazing activities in the area. velo pmenf that, �v6�1E� 4 T'he E3aard of SuperVOOrs take no action on the environmen tal document; and, the ne al Plan Amendment on the propertY01(YoGtnn). identified as AP# 041 -lx /Ir n �pY�+..*M 1rrv�a�v '"'�''� T��/y �y ]y moi+. = . Li.ri �l JI.►J J1y �.f. i Y: �,i- 3." i�� T3N`{1 y or 33 U'T`I` cf 1 25 COUNW CENTER DRIVE OROVILL14 CALIFORNIA 9596.573380 ° Tekiphone (916) 53a.7631 d Fax; (916) 5387120' MEM8s na<' IIiPu doHN 5. SLACKLOCK tAF�Y"ltil tHoux ci�;llfr'AWAINisTRAME FFICC � i,[rHLIN anp b"110MAs Vabruary 19, 1993 i Clayton Gunn ;5 Catalina point Road Chico, CA 95928 Re: General Plan Amendment, File 9248' ?.dear Mr. Gunn: The Clerk of the Board of Supervisors -set a public hearing date for April 13, 1993 ,we 4:00 axi., to consider your appeal of the Planning Commissions denial for a Gen,6fliq Plan Amendment from Grazing and Open `Land to Agricultural Residential for property idd etp,4 on the south side of Durham -Peutz Road, identified :as AP 041130-021, Orovilte. The meeting will be held in the Board of Supervisors' .Doom, County Adminisfratit5rt .,° 25 County Center !hive, Oroville. Should you have an questions regarding this matter, please contact the Planning Y Y g n z, {g'zltrlont at 538-7601 between 10.0.0 a.m. and 3100 p.m; r Very truly yours, r, Sohn S.. Blacklock Chief Administrative Officer !SB -1r r� a t r . PLANNING DEPARTMIrNT 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE OROVILLE, CAUPORNIA-4.Ian• 3397 TELEPHONE, (91$)3F1760i January 14, 199 Clayton Gunn 8 Catalina Point Road Chico, CA 95928 Rei General Plan AmendmentFile 92-48 Bear Mr. Gunn: At the regular meeting of our request he Butte Coun . g mmisson 'held Jazz r Y ty -planning Co Agricultural ,� q far a General Plan AmendmentGrazing , aurY 14 g ltural Residential for property located on tate soutd o f Ijimbw 01, identified as AP 04jg80-021, Orovil.le P Lacr�d ft,� was denied'. entz Rovd, Arep rt of is >. It youodesirehto matter will be made to the: Board: of Supervisors a P cors on Ja.nu board appeal this decision YOU ;must do so ary 26, 190�f to 5:00 With the onlay, eal fee �ehru$558-50,25 County Cennter Dri e 10 orv�le,tCalif,he Clerl: of tib' F m'' February ,rni date of this .report... ,the. end of the. S�da a � Pr+�o�` Y appeal period from. the Should you have: any qu Sincerely, estions regarding this matter, please c Qntact this oMce,- °rcher Director of Pla ging 8AX!' i 7 COUNTY CANTER DRIVI! + OROVILLEw CALIFOANtd ,0�#A-3397 f TEL EPHONe, (916) 538-7601 December 8, :1992 Clayton Gunn #8 Catalina Point ;Road_ Chico, CA 95928 Re: General Plan ,Amendment, ;File 92-48 Dear Mr. Gumi: triclosed is �nendmentafromy of the Grazing and Findings concerning ` &� g your application for a General ���Ari p p� tY g Open Land to Agricultural, Residential for rcD � r located on the south side of ]Durham Pentz Road identified as AP 041.13¢-021, Ox6jge A public hearing has been set for January 14, 1991 at 9:00 a.m. The meeting will be held in the Board of Supervisors' Roo ' p m, 2S County Center Drive, Oroville Califtifl�, The Planning Commission recommends that the applicant or their authai��7.� representative be present at the nearing to respond to any questionstlr COMMsslox� VA4 have. In the event that no one will represent the applicant, please contact the Plajf@ cifice prior to the scheduled public hearing. r Should you have aanPm. questions re 9ardirrg this matter; please contact this office betl 10:00' .m. and 3:04 Sincerely B. A. Kircher Director of Planning Thomas A. Last ,Senior Planner lrnc� cc: Mark Risco, - A & Engineering APPENDIX a COUNTY OF BUTTE ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM EVALUATION:OF ENVIRONkENTAL'IMPAC7i' clt; NO; AP 041-130-07' File 140. 92-48 11 Ag GROUND i Name of )ropohent.- ctaylon Gunn. Address of proponent antt representative tlf appticabiel. Ra cataltna Point Road'. ChICo, Ca 95938 Project descriptions X request to change the mineral Plan itcxn Oraxin g a Open Land to Agflcultural-Resldtntial, see data sheet 'faf A06 040"Ied descrrptlan of property. YES MAYnr, to DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL L'VAtII2'iTX I., MANDATORY FINAINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE y..- Does the suoject have the potentlal to degrade thedegrade the ep� Viti31 quaftt;r at the enalr,�nrsent, substantially reduce This ptoposal will not st�ghiltcantlS the habitat of a fish or wildltte species, cause a fish or wifdlile populationto drop below self sustaining Levels, threaten to eliminate a plant ;or animal comunity, reduce the number of restrict the rAnge of a rate or endangered plant or animal or elimtnate, important exan,o101 or major periods of California History or prehtstOW polo �_ This proposal will not Impede 109 -term environmental goaf3. l ve pit---l�cr pdenef,f t$ to they detitoaent loft 10099 lefrtl envirrnr�nt goats# (A 311011 -term Impact on the environrweht It ohe which occurs in a fefatrvely btleI period of time whlie long-term Impacts wilt endure snip the future.) envlKanmetttal will _not have a s1g' tiro lc+p'a�t 0A, (M In vacts� which ora Individually nt(tcant tumul5t'�. e s; . . s trio project. Ab lef (A ptoleLt mulatively On �iei f�acctled tonueanh tk orulceparate resourcrsswhetd but where the ettect.Of the total of those;icoact on the dnyttonment is slsintlicant.) ti beings. adverse citedi�t otS fi'f� project have envitonrental ettectx which substantial adverse etlects on human Does the eiei_. directly or lndirectlYt df � This, proposal writ rioE have. a si9hificaht .beings. either re Y '. � �I AYETSRMIK* k!."IONnittaf evalua#lon: + 4 0e Has so Is' teWf find the proposed prolect WJLD NOT have a significant etlect an the environment and a NEGATIVE DEt".1lifATo wltl be prepared, ifW rind that althaugh the ��oposed prosect. "gin th�v�ttacheeistieettheVeeb en on the Orroldct. A Will cAT VE bEciAkAfi{Stvriyi be pied �"!+?-s rasp. because th. hOTICATION Ai; RS Es describe nt effect on the ehvlronmeh any an t NtgoWENTAL IMPACT REPORT It requl'tc-d- i wt'find the prmos d i�tu,` t 0.y hrvQ a,signit.f"" r rt EPARTi.�CtvT 1. 00u4iir Or tL`rE, "rLAftri oACE� sepkcnber lb, 1992 T s Last, sen or N Inner k .. Reviewed bys / f'l t , ri Mai ntal Checklist * EValuatio-n of Environmental Impact I' .:. E renvur DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUA'irl x ' ZRONMENTAL IMPACT 1 CARTw. will the proposal result in significant: a unstable earth CV. dItions, of changes i.n sal wilt re ult In some dt earth- Gondtitons geologic substtucturest . on of X This proposal r urtace ea stUPtion, dFsptiaCb��iltril compaction ill nl c s1 F x The proposal will not affect surfs � l ts, IDrstuption. displacement. omP -- compaction and overcovering of the site as a rdsllft of d..Yetht� overcovet Ing Of the sol l( of structures, driveways, parking areas, etc, he PtaPosal wt ii not affect topography because lite eulldtnp' 00lily c. Change In t grax T phy of ground surface hneatly feYel. relief leaturesi d. uestructIon, eAwerinoormadtdicationofany x The site has no unique physical features, i unique geologIC or physltal featuresx rtrtt c tnelease tr+ wind Or water erosion of soils. x The Proposal may rause some erosion due tb disrupt ion. dtspfaCerta' i either on or ofd sitel compaction and ovdrtovering of the sJte. V Changes in dets4sitlon of et0slon of tseacit X The Proposal will not a(fecl any watercoutse sands, ericcsIn siflotllf oosionwhthmaY modify channel a rivet at stream or the bed of the ocean t.ossny 5aY, tniet or lakes ter a of prime agticulturaflY productive x this ropertyl due to thect the atnd uAt s. owever thadutitvP Solis 'Outside ,designated utban areasx the property due to the smart land units. Naxever the proper only a 33 acfe parcel Al this tlma, h, pxpasute of people or pro„^eftY to geolrigic x The Butte County Seismic safety Elemeht Indicates that two i'a'yI'is pass either through or heat the Ptoperty. A Ceoioglc Studd +� b Il hazards such as earthquakes. tandsltd$s form tiuildlhg code standards worici provide adequate pat"tly mudslides, g*$ a taiturs of slinitat conducted ort the site and no evidence of an active or gated 1t1,4 hazalide active fault war found on tha propert con; ruction 61 but t+ of oc reporttate seismic attlVftY aGCArdin$ to the tdii.rrs~ns i. tom.,. velli 'the proposal resell in substantial: g, Air emisttons or datetfbtation of arrbieni X The tuber of vehicle not 5is hot rsi9111110nrcause the increa;e i'rt! ,t b. asit qualityl r Cl creation d( obJecttotrabie odorsf sraolie x The proposal will not create objectionable Odors. smoke of tulhl.; 3 c, Alteration ofo� air vicehme'rfit, moisture or x The proposal will hot affect the atmosphere, of fumed ter,cgtalure I rt'o in .tilrtAte, locally or tdglOnallyi i i d, WATER. IYitf the ptop+ssal tesult in substantlai: s, or the tourse or X The ptoposai efcour3e. A. Changes in current --=-- direcilon of grater moven +its In plther Will not aifQ.cC any war marine thahop of Ift Absotptl n tateS. ;dratnage ?S To reduced Abso� tfohlltot.4 afii ttvlou� surtacry cs. Anlact dInff 60 11e h Wattrst to reduced p %r esu 'tn b. Patterns, or the fete and amount of surtace the diafnagh pattern an the site. liawevel+ no ilihmeam a6k runcftt impacts ate Anticipated because the large parcel Sizes exile@ted , this Proposal would not lead to a stgniticant Inctease In fuh'b'ftf t� Ent . ironmental. Checklist Evaluation of Env oninen taw -,,impact c. Need for off -slue surface, dra,nase x NO off -sett drainage 1wrovements would occur as a result of a`$+�f�'!al Improvements. Including vegetationtemova.l_ of thl; OtojecL. chatinellxatlon or culvert lnsral'tarfon? Lf d. Alterations to the course or flow of Itobd x Tei.: proposal w I I I not significantly atfect any flood coottof t$!#rifA`4 waters? or watercourses. 6. Change in the amount of surface water I any x. The proposal will not affect any watercourse. water bodYl f. Discharge: Into surface waters. or tit any X The proposal will poi. significantly affect surface water'gre'aqPfir alteration of surface Water qua IIIV. Including but not limited to leroerature, dissolved oxygen or turbidityr g At teration of the dlretlion or rate of fizrw X The proposal tri I I not alfect the direction or flow of groundw',trfX14 of ,ground waters? h. amoge In the quantlly dr Qua?k1ideI ground _ X The proposal Will riot directly affect any aquiter.. Wh tees, el the through direct addlsions Of withdrawals, or through Inter cept fort of an Aquifer by Chis or i�Xcavatlons? Y Reduction in the aeiount of water otherwfse avattabte for public Waltr suprl'ics? x This proposal Will not result in a signitleanI teductloro tlift amount of water supplies avallable for the public, j, at or p to water- - X property is liycaled within the Crew -44 lop-yearflooidpl floodiy related hazards such as tltsodlrtgt related ds such p {tn«thThe rloodp alnbouhdaties have been ide'idr p on the prr)Posed ma A No Development Zone Would be establ ish�l l04 map.h di the cenletline of ,(14 Creek theteb eliminotld eestare of or property of fmprovrmenls to 11 related bawds. Lite, Will the Pr.oposar tesult in suitstanl A. Changeify or cies, or X will not affect plarf lite because the site cui'� - Wf1s The proposignificant tnctutlfna spgfassksof 01anun uWet ria slgnlficant Dlanl lite.. stiany d dquatir: p'lanisyt U, xeductlon 61' toe hu bens of any Wilque. rare X ` ;he site contains moi rare Plahis. AMIL or endangered species of pfantsP t. Introduction of new spedtes ortY Into X The:Prdposaf will ;not affect, exlst;Ihg plant life, an area., or In a bait let to theptarihormal. toolentshmnt of existing speclesY d. Reduction. in acteage of a`nY hVl,ultuta'f, r .� ops: 1hls property dolt hot contain any agricultural hcr a, irtiiaAt. Lr esul t in L will the Propa§at r susaa:lan ra` In 'the dl" -t, ItY 'df species. of _ k:�� the ptoposa will not affect animal 1110 -because the site &6s p it ' Chhabngc eti 'or Any .specleY of anlY�ts tbitds. support significant WWI 1116 or habitat. land xnlnals lncludfng reptiles, fish and shelf in, benthit brganl3ms at inserts ' b. dtderctd3 d huab totoara3lrn K$tQue, raft x _ The slid contains no tare anlmals. nc d.rWVtttort'of '. hewtoo:itl of arnaals into � ,. X-.. the Pro osal will hot affe pct tktsting anfinal ilfe. An�area, of In a bFtrler to the lalgratiori ; rnoYehtnl, Of atilmals? jd 01 nq�i ronmental. ch cklist * 'Eva]:uatzazi of ` Envf rOnm,ental Ialtpacat Deterioration o{ hxisting fish of trildlife � „ The siic contains no ilpillcanl wildlife habitat habitat'? _ , tpI Witt the ptoaosal-resttit in substairtial. r The vtoposal will not result in a substantial increase tti ft6a4 a increases in existing noise levels.t created on sit: Or In the `dltlnlly. Exposure til people to severe noise. (eve'lsl ---- The pr osa'oposall wFit not exposepeople iti�al suEs! httat rtn ease In 11p14'd Or e gre Prbp Sr9t1 AND light and glare? the propoSa produce s Thre t,teated an site or In the viclnitx. 7, — e? x— of�theaarraeal cl1dwver. thelaPPlicantrIs�Asking lot Achangh Yrt �t LOX5USE-, Will IhepraPosal result Ina substantial ----- tanduse:destgnatlonlar the Property. Thetetluesl tett*�italityWGl'4ad a terat on of the present or punned Iansi fisc of an bring the %bnliig and the General Pian into cenfattoance t�.rtlt r'aNle atear another, however the site designation criteria and the condlfixiA ,I -maln4 capability and "development cttterla Would not apPeht (0 consistent. p. hrMILO A kEsblRCEsr Hill the proposal result in x The proposal ,will hot a!1'ect any natural resourcet. a suns tan a. Increaso In the tate at use of any natural _ resoutcest plete any natural resour"S' b. repaeltpo of any non-tenewable natural t twtlt not tie resourcest +t the I}taposa tp, RisIC f5a'-tis T. W111 the Proposal lnvbive. x Tlie proposal will not involve the use of haza(dous Mtettal$, �,1?�r a, x tisk of Iincludt g,�E�,tandt �41edlo is locatdd close to any facil-t Lies 'Which slate dr, trtitixe, e�ttG substances_( n In,ma.tetlal olI, pestltldes, chetalCal t Of fedi atib i�. the event of an accident or upset condiilbdttx The Ptaposal will not affect, any eftroency services. b, pbssibtb Interference with an emerCency the area becausd! ttitle tespontevla'� or emergency evacuation plan? k this proposal maywonld be nUtasedation of tt tclsat it. ptesentiy ,IA) Ijie proposed density cord result in secondary Imp ,In additibna) (640' a 1t pdp,n xriaJ. will the ptooasat alter iocatiari� area. Thi UOU but on, density 4t grawlh rats or the human in Inct.easlno dentnoles In the 001 Col lege_afea« population? Y The Oloposaf will igrilticantly attect hOUsing demand. or create Will th ptoobi effect extStlnt?,ltaiising, --t. additio_naf housingt t TEiNaswtxtr�rrik�rRCU h. will t'h$ ^proposal rel t n x Tfbe Pr"UPbsal cilli represent an increh�ntdI Ihcreaski ih trarfsl'tt ti.ft a. op movementT ionalVehicle -.- the area. cenerationot subs tent cal adrit t x The nr loswltth the parlcingeteauitementseeoitt lllcd wPltistn aut(er< t10ty b. ellects on exi.sling parking Iacfitties, Or _ to is Y n demand for new Reciting? tbde section za-as, t gtrti osai,Witl teatesent a,n Increase in costsldgIdn1aOdmalrtl"etCbi 0d r>erits on atea roads. g6ty �m Sys ei at i °R e�tistttt9 , 'd:.- r, l OWNu� MR BnVi t xe�rlr������. Gbg d Evaluation of En�viroia;aterital I%,past i =K a d-Ig" lficant alterations to Ptesent patterns 9 cir?"'a t lon or movement or people a letrI 9oCdsa x The Proposal will not alter e• At r fistlct ons to waterborne. fall or at,, the area the Presenj pattern of ' krAitctPCulaf���ilt►t i tnsrease In X - The proposal wilt not affect r vehlcles, blcycfItjS Or hazards la motor all air Redestttanst z traffic, , � ll relatedataffte hazrosul in the a area. atdsn an in f �aFr sed I A to Quite Colts This ptoierl�asls Pry Irafir' AN ic3'r ttrrViCp&. Willincreased trarlkc hazards ge„ This cogfd i0caled-ii Elle OVe or resui :he Proposal have an effect being iocated )us south of the area due toradd,t o�la�oh ��a�id up gdVrSrr)inent setviceS. need Cat new or altered 1 this entrance,' o*G sr ,44 a. Fire Plotect'fon7 k tire The proposal wl i 1 result In a Proteclion incremental I Oeparlmentical fornla0 the The Inc cuattriative deve? bFNFSFbnreoi butte In demand rtr PfGylde fir opment in rural areasFoi tfSitr[ ha$ I CICaN 0ill'i"a of automatic s r ndicated Iri�l 8 Ni'Ces, The omatic rite sU yhave aWact Milk abifliVY,lri stru4itrtes, t ppressFon skated that insta'iiAdi*dg b' smppty systams�aduseuOf tir support bul systems In resldetdr;rlpi Poltce proteCtion7 re resistance building materials the demand for f Fre tsport the s rlh N Bel x A devef men Pt[akectot the trier system wiC � t impact tee Muni.I to khe provisions 0' slo:r,Fr -s farltllies pursuan for Muni. Cade, pr tot to lIsaance bf bulldlrr` Atticle fFsbfll be6rPr {a, d e of a mobs le home pant. g be:rml is or use the school sl and Of as of the date of as i Permrf 0,4'. or use »aid fee amount will be detcrmre.1pq Detroit• �P icaiion.fdr the building The wr000sal wilt result in a Petarl school scrvfces lit the area, Incremental d Parks 9f othet tecteatl wit ted The app IIcan t increase In d�nd, jl& cmat faclflflea eeSPr osal�w istrlcl� to deterhlne a must meet Wlth the putrt a k ptoPriate ml Pat t 9 torr measurel e« �uaihtenaincerrf"Pubo �tiiltles, The 'Will result fn a .-oadsa khctudtng Park and tecteatforr iac[ItIn incremental' 1' X In the area, nCrease In demand fG I• other cover tamentaf'iptNicesz Wilt resuit 1 The Proposal Mafnte;«erne of roads and other ptiti► ntaf increase i The r tacitIUds 1 n the ra. fat -�.RM will the Rtoposal resUl an; P opasat will result in a n the area, a other gover�hial services incremental Ihcrease t • use of $ubstantlal a to the area, h demand fdr all energyt mounts Ot Suet be fa• $urces 0 Increase ih demandupon— The proposal will not Uttllxe sUbstahtlaI fuel of end devefedament of rig • lly. pr oextstiny x 94�. of tenetrluire w sources of ertetgyl he The Proposa t1TFl;IT[ tS. 1r I will not sU15Siantialt new sys ems will the ot obosa1 tesult th Y fhcreale t demand fo Nflowlrtg; , or' sut)stantlof .ajtcrationsnt Kot eherpy« the h�' ;i Pdwer or natural gas? l.e Proposal will not afleCl electrical slribUtIch systems di . Power or natural r 1 �I � n 1 [13 XL v, o, r U lk 6 n t a 3; Chi k ist Evaluation ,of EnvikOnrIt htA Impact, +� -------------------- COmmunitations Systems? x The proposal Will not Affect communication systems., C. Water' avalfabllttY7 r_ -- k rhe proposal will not affect public Water systaMs, d. sewer or sepilc systemst x 'the proposal WiII have to meet the to trice rlyfrOhmetital Health Dep'l. q tents of (he tlutid t,6011V e. Storm water drainage? -- k 'tire proposal willhave to ploylde a C. $olid waste and dispo58t7 Permanent solution for drahl"311e' $1 AA)i . "CALI"W1 It the proposal result in. X The Proposal wail not affect sol td waste dFsposat. �\ a, Creation of any hearth hazard or Potential tr hazard (excluding, marital health)? k the proposal Wiil not create any health hazard, b. CXPOsure of people to. Polehtlal",health hazards? X The proposal will not expose people to an tiEs rres. Will the health haxprd. Proposal result In the siruCt an of any scenic villa or view open to the Y heal Pubfrc, Or will the proposal result in the creation k beccau e it Is Will trwithtsurt an aesthetically Offen3lve 'm0y of an aestheticatiy offensive site open to the opment. Publtc view? to. aC rATiot�r, will the Proposal result in an lmpati upon ne quality or quantity Of existing X the proposal may result In an t'perementaf retrestjonal opportunitles7 park and recreation faclitties. Increase In demahcT �qr tri'. Ct1llTtirsY.. RFSCxrtCEs n a. 'Will the Proposal tt5ult In the a'lieratlOn of destruction of a Prehistotit or htsiorlc x the proposal will not affect arChcOlogfta,l sites, I archaeolOgtcaf site? 1 h. WI I l the proposal r,esul,t jhadverse physical Of ,aesthetic effects !o a pret,lxioric or "—X— ' the Ploposal will not attect historic sites. htstoric building, strutture or object # ,z floes the p cause aePhysical cal change vrhTch Would atfett have the potential to The Pr Osal will not affect cultufai resources, C• Physical � x � unique is cultural valued„ Potential proposal restrict cXtstthe X 7hP. sal Will .hot atfe A d. tri 1 T the Inspatt arced uses Within thr. pr'opo , or sac , � e,at ct religious rolources, 1 _ .:.. " p2lCt ..ssVito= ntal checklist * Evaluatt�ion of Environmental � • Im SUGGESTED MITIGATION MEASURES il; Pla e a note on the linal map stating, ~Aulcnatic IIre supptessinti sprinkler, systems MOO be installed In all Ptatet res Asccord ncn with the Na Tonal Fiat �{rust,ures In accordance witft the National Fire he installation of sprinkler systems .Inlone or and twos f;amilV dweMnas and mcolte homes, NFP Standard 13b. i'hc purpose of the Instatiatibrt of sp.inklet systerns Is for additi'onar. saletY and saxopertY protection In the event of residential rhes. ThIS Installation will Iedtrcethe, demand tot structuraf fire protection setVRces In those instances where they este installed.- 1. Place a note on the rtnal Map that tid devet4hment shall occur within the aoo year .iltedplaln. a Ptact~ a note on the mat" that slates the lolicwtittgc construction oI dvrellings resisternt 1 11 to Wetal latces, as cufllned in the aeorxwternent"s ot the latest edition of the Wttmtn building code, shall be provided to iiktsite theVatt lot shallbential t ,hoed''atds of on the aitsRRrts. Should raobi le hares be placed on the , q to ,be tied down. braced« or olhetwise treated so as to resist lateral forces from ground shaking. No, ailtgation ineasure has been developed tot the � Dutha.m tlnitied school bisttict lboaets. The tiplktYcar~t. sriatt meet with the buftsarlutlrled $tfibol 0111rict toy develop ap,otoprtate mitigation feet of otheir methanisms. The school dislritt has , �Citetwaed that a 19,544 per residential urll tee 44, actepttble tot rti t 1 ga t I dn., aiowever, , the AtscrllcAM Knust agree to thiol of some other 1ml ti0A Cleo ;"thanI sm j } EnV �'onme- tal Chee list *----._.. Evaluation o£ EnV ro nititental. Impact A, PrOrCra Desttr lotion ... _DATA s{ICFr 1. `type of P(otect: 2.Cane ral Plarg amendment. d• Annual Rainrali hrfef Descrlpttor4 A request t4 amend 32+/- acres from year. normal): ZB to ap inches e. yealting Factors Odf tg and open Land to A9ticUttdral Residential Cental Plan Moderate `Craxtn des, na,tioris. Dotenttal. In to high liguefa4ft,%4 I5 located within a too a portion or the of Locatlona The f lhth a too year flgtld �E/'�� t'iurham-Peutz p coerty is Iocated on the srxtlh side of $' visual/scents ftlain. Road. approxirimatet #,300 It Quality: Ctlod, :r west of Clark Road. 6. Acrwstic 4w Road, Densis of Quality: Penta Road ttalllc. allow to densities ,tentoial y.do ne'tr3 606$e rots. 7. Air Quattt With the oresenl A-,6 zoning a dedownr o lacretlots. t would Cood acres would be expected, Ht However niotooical Environment s. 9 Unit ev s Amountot t �� a, Vegetation: mpervfous sula rtacingY Negligible, the vlrinil}' h weVernttttHlblscUs and Butte CttexkerbMrikr},pft G access and t�eare3t Pub i� grasslands property is located ittictiy frit M RoadW.- Botham-Petltz Road. �` Idethod oI " 9, irtldlite Habitat: tease Dtspo3al: Indi,vrduar septa's tanks arid tat, wildlfte and b leathllefds„ the gra�siands habitats in the County, irds expecttd In 8. source of Prater supply.Cultural trrvito Privatecllanrrmnt- g• Proxlmfty of Power Lines; 10. Archaeological and Mtslorlcai Penh ►toad. }!oderate to IoW, Resources I ttl. _Tequ6ttaf for further land divii1 n the ,tea, request WOttid allow far ar►s and deYef t1` L �dfe County Cenerai Plan lest property, more devet cumeott 7hii designation,. ,toxin cement to occur on the g and f5fieh 8.. rnvlrorni-niat sdtyin 12+ ;Ekistln 9 zoning: A -s.. t'iryiiCdi nVironrnh#u t3. [Xining land Uae O r1 SIiC: Vacant, i+Iterraln 1011 Sur rcxmdi'n 3. g Arca: a* Cenetal ropogtaphlt chatacEer Land Uses: Oban College bj (offing topography. Level to sifght`Iy P'rfmariiyy vacant VAZI ig located to the ` Stapes! None on-sFtd. ►esidenttal Bevel 9 lands Wlth vet hottIII c. tteVatlorlt 26tl to 380 feet above sea levet, 4. Zoning: A -16e in the area, tUtal dW Limiting Factors: Dorth,.AL6 to the �h0 south, P -Q 'and k S o None, C. aSt and West, t lhc, 2., Cen, Plarl Designation• solfs Crazing and - Public, Qua si-0ubIIt,� 'r{ ti�pes AA ChatacterisLlcst P Resldeht(a),�en Lands and Agt1cLftUFaI surt`act and poor etistIcir drainage. d. Yatcel sues: b Llmlttng ractoPS» y Lp . Codd to aotl + Parcels In the atea ran'e Crot2 prodUcC10- The. 'softs are acre's but ptimattty are all 9 Iitom 10 poor and shallow tot e. 70 + herd each, tri e7ccesg r5( # PopUlatIon: RUFaI ttatutat WZArds of the Land is. a, EatthgUiko Zones Faults with unknown activity are on daractcr of site ' 0r a ""',tit td the Aute, and Areas Rural grasslantls, b• Etoston Potential; sflght. 16, NearcAt Urban Area. tr Land' �� otovt7te. tr. st�de Potential. Ww to, Aodetate. 17r kelr;arrt sphetes of inlluence� lt/dt l FF a ttvOrdt itoderatd. Notte. e. t:xpary3Fve soft Potential: 18„ i w a� Nfgf1. ►rotoven^"" Miridards Urban Area;, 40. aw snrt3te ltatdt t Ch=ar Creek t9W Fttr Ototectfon service. eastern ctrtnot of the properCyoes tfirou a. Nearest causal b' Crou, iratcr: ah the south y istatel sire station• C. Asea of heavy gttlund watet withdrawal. 6. 25 Siatlnn rr � Dralrtage ChaFaclarfstics: South trending, 20� bales Availabltity: Water schoots In Area, tankers, College, hufhamUnlf fed school tslsitlet and bot:to , + 9 t y�xo7mm�en tal Checklist * Evaluation of 'Environmental Impact I , _:._:......, ENVIRONMENTAL REFERENCE MATERIAL. 1. Butte County Planning Department, Earth Uake and Seismic Sa ety E ement, 12 Butte County Board of supervisors, A ricultural Preserves Ma �establlsiiWd. FaUit Actly t. Ma 11-1 OroY ie, Ca:. CH2hfi I , 1977.. Res07-U tIon NO: 67 178. rov -fe, A,. County Planni�n9 Department, 144 2. Butte County Elanning Department. �e_Fe�c efactfa Patentiai_ Macy "I'f--2 .seismic 5afet dement. 13�. Butte National Flood Insurance Progral11. Ff001 Ca` CH2M H orovit e, » I ,. 1977. Insurance Rate Maps. Federal EmergeniY 1989. r• Butte Caunty Fitanning department: subsidence'arid Agency, Management Agency, 3. la dslide Pc�Aential Ma 111-1- safety E ement. 14 USES Quad Maps, Hamlin Canyon, oroV e> Chs GH2M.HIt .`1977» Photorevised, 1969E 1anni Safet Elht. Erosion Planning Departmen BtlLte County E rovigle CA: 15, Soil Map, chico 1925)/0rovi l ie i1926y. Area. Unitep states Department afi Potential Ma H 11977. Agrculture, 5, CH2M Butte County P'i,anni"n9 DeOilttment. Ex,�aGnnsIV�2 is 16» Sol[ Survey of Chico t1�25)/Oroyi ie. Un to states Department a 111-3 Satt� element. aroVille, 1926 _Area. H. I, 1977. Agr cu tore,,' 6. Butte Count° plan0169 department,oise.element hwa a emerit rov ,e, CA: 17. Butte County Planning Department. BUtt- Fire protection urisd`ictiorts a Ata iV-1, Scenic Hi CN2M NI !• t977. Count _ac Ides Map. Butte county re Department and California Department O 7'. Butte County Planning DePattment. Scenic HIhWa s Element: Orovl e, C4, Forestry, 1989. a V.1 5ce"1c Hi hwa CH2i•1 N 1 3 977 :. >. Butte County` Piarnind Depalrtment, Natural Firs, 111_4-. Safet Element:. utird classes-Ma Oroy e, CAS CH2hti H I 1977; 9. Butte County" Planning bepartment, A__-cha�eoio l cal orovillew CAu James P, Man- ning, SensitivitVftaa, `i983» `t!4, nUi"te Count y P' I lannIng Department. School District Man,- O rent CA 11W: Vistri'ct Department of Watttr Nor'thwces. stud Ma. Nitrate, Rosaurces.rn Chica.Nitrate Concentration _s a ow We s, T e Resources Agency, State of Ga ore a, i983. r G , BUTTE COUNTY PLANNINGC'�SM�i D'SSION, NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING • Notice is hereby given by the Butte County Planning Commission that public heliC 11as -Will be held on Thursday, January 14, 1993 in the Butte County Board of Superyt,;tll'�' Aoomn County Administration Center, 25 County Center Drive,Orovil'e Cai3t't� 1'egarding the .following items at the following thine: ^'t rrvAx ,f1*Y -- g. p g LII,d �; 0 a m. Clayton Gunn -General Pian Amendment from Grazing and O epi to Agricultural : Residential on property zoned A-� (Agricultural, 9gie parcels) located on the south side of Durham-Pentr, Rd, approx.. 330(1��'�rAt of Clark Road identified. as AP 041-130-021, Oroville area. (Fite �a�Z MM DETERMINED TO BE CA'i`EGORICAZLYEXEMPT FROM ENVIRO AL:REVIE'W 9:00 a.m. Rosa Rogers- Use Permit for permanent second residence on propf zoned A, -R (Agricultural -Residential) ,located at :2554 Oak Knoll Wilry, I approx. 650' east of Lower Wyandotte Road, identified as AP 036-111-; rWp GrovWe. area. MMI T MI ON WH7CIT A NEGATIVE DEC LI& ATIQI REGARDING _ G ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT HAS BEEN RECOMMENDED (Agricultural,I&Main• Dutch Ravine Sportsman Club - bezone frow, tom. D. 10.30 a.m. Randy D S -acre parcels) to Fit40(Foothill- Recreational, ecreational, 40 -acre parcels) approx, 840 acres located on both sides of Swedes Flat ,ltd. 11/2 miles east of Oroville-Ban or III ap�,t� g gh�vay, identified a AP 028-17tt0l3r 028-320-003, 072-330-016 & 018, Oroviile area. (File 93-08) The above mentioned applications, maps, and, Negative Declarationfi are on file j1�j[l. available for public viewing at the office of the Butte County PIanning Tjepartmel, County Center Drive, OrovMe, California, Comments may be submittedin writing add time ,prior to the hearing or orally at the meeting listed above or as continued to a ,ater date. If you challenge the above applications in court, you may be limited to raisi�i only those issues .yon or someone else raised �at the public hearing describe►l in, �N notice or In written correspondence delivered to the Planning Conunission 'at or t'i�3t' to, the pulntic hearing. ' BUTTE COUNTY PLANNINGG CUMMSMN B.A. XIRCHER, DIRE TOR OF PLANNIN To bepublished in the Croville Mercury on Thursday, December 10, 1092. t 111 S A& Q EAGbN'-8E)?jjV(3, 'u'0 I", 901 Strew S1,11tL' Zw t A 01iro, CA 9$928 89.3.0631 September 28 1992 j Department of Developmental Services Planning Department County of Bunte n 7 County Center Crive Orovilley CA 95965 Attention: Thomas Last Reference: General Plan Amendment AP # 041-130-021 File ff 9.2-48' Dear Tom, {lit, Reference is made to 1,Y ing the .init.al stud your letter dated September 16 mitigation measures contaHinedxthe�reirie acceptable to y' thexet��i�rc�- propped The fit, , it- r , statement that the :.develo rr�,. map will include a state rev, concurrence of the Durham Unified Sn �pf Distridt EMU b �,e, V'3�-m-nt of any establzsned fees. that no +chil It should teat .Ch .mit- atfinal ar tent'ative ma mltteci to r•�' �, �� be attached to any rezot 9-i rt�011 tO ,sures P P has been s ►; pro osed should prob6, f a map submittal. Please include this office as a.ecpierjt to respondence regarding the General plan Ameidmeht pr'Y ..,' Sinc 1 _ Mark Ris'so ~ MER -'ch cc Gunn October 9, 1992 Su perintendant of Schools Durham Unified School, District P 0 Box. no Durham, CA 95935 Attention: Don McNelis, Superintendent Reference: Proposed General Plan Amendment, Pentz Road AP # 041-130-021.. Dear .Sir, After reviewing your suggested mitigation measure; for the 9,VPJect General Plan Amendment, which sets residents Ell Unit fs at $9,584.60 per unit, we agree to abide with the fiitigat�ori'Y,�; arsuat subject to the. following conditions: 1. re ,Payment of the above stated. fees are consistent`, ap- plicable Califoril a State Statutes and Butte County Ordini tjj IA-S at the time of development. 2. fees are due and payable in Y dAjunction with the iss biAtpo of a building permit by Butte Count for development of the 1,6111,4. 3. A note on any subdivision or parcel map for the lana will state that "school mitigation fees may be required by f)M ham Unified school District prior, to the de�telopment of any p6tagii or lot" r ease if the above satisfies the mi.tigatian measure notify the Butte. County Planning Department, 7 County, donterr Drive, Oroville, CA., 95955, Attentan Thomas Last, at yt�r ear- l.iest convenience so that the amendment process can contirtt�d; If the wording of this letter is not to your satisfaction e)jk; 'your wj.sh additional iz formdtion, please contact Mark Rig;5o, 4' ),� & Q Enclineer,ing, 1280 $ 9th Street,, Ste. �'C", Chico, CA'. 95g:7,#y or, Call Rtw RIsSa at 893-0631. sine_..ly, -"mar a Gunn Clayton dUhb o-copse vators for Leaf Gunn 5 cc!' Butte County Plannihq uepartment lanntngbQ �rfms C ,Attnt Thomas Last ..,' Ora�iUo, G�llfomt jr. LAND OF NATU1 AL WEALTH ANS^ 0r.AUT -� department of D ev 1 .y PLANNING %i=p,� f: i' er 7 COIJNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE; CALIFORN'NAN gA9.g5•1397 TELEPHONE: (916%Septembe534.7F�01 r° 161 1992 1 Clayton Gunn 8 Catalina Point Road Chico, CA 95928 Ile: Oeneral Plan Amendment AP #041-130-021 Vile # 92-48 Dear Mr. Gunn: An initial study of your proposed project, a General Plan Open. Land to . Amendment from Grazingd Agricultural -Residential, indicates potentially adverse 'impacts L; these environment (refer to the enclosed environmental checklist). To reduce or:li to Otherwie an impacts, s i table miti ation measures are required as �mitigation part of the projg'�Ca taI Impar -t Report (EIR) is required pursuant to the calif > a 'Environmental Quality Act. tiro early response to this notMcation, sent to the Dep +xtment of Development Plannin Divisia xp pment Service, g n, will e edite the scheduling of your project. Please forward 6yx written response within 15 days from the date of this ,letter. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this o� ep 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m, Office betd. Sincerely, B A. Kircher Dixecto' of Planning AI( 'T11ordaS ,Last' Senior PlAnner rT"AL:jlo 1, i 11 i bH f ✓h ,.. _ .,. ci ^I �Y,� . is PHILIP A. VDON v t. i --�^ -• Consulting +Geoln isi r •1!��, ; . ,.,` 2948S Verbena Way, '�- 592 ;"�^- __`., Chico, California 9 6 August 25'., i POTENTIAL SEISMIC HAZARD AT THE GUNN PROPERTY (AP 41-13-12) DURHAM - PENTZ ROAD., BUTTE COUNTY CONCLUSIONS No ev i de�1Cp_ Of an active or y -act i was found, .�:,r� the Gunn Potential 1 ve ("activity grjktiown`') shown Hoivever�, two faults atilt �► Map II -;i1 of the seismic safety Element off' tfie General Pian pass through 6r near the property. The faul�r; shown as shown in three recent passting.thrauSh the 'Property, is not is not vis'b1e on 1oW-leyej airlphatostsacO\ering the area on the ground rid was at detected n The other fault; roinci_ding With the estimated Of an extension of the active or potential position MOnocl'ne fault, conies nO closer than abort -a West margin of the y..active Chico PrOPerty. mi from the GrOun&-`shaking during a future earth potential 4ei.smyc hazard on t)�fe Gunn property, ertk,e is the chief according to the requirements`of'the UniforMYE3ui d,ntrGdtion should provide ,g Ocie damage belOW levels that�othermitiwiseOwnuldduc Ing pafs�bYs) homes a`re to ba occur, , ream include placed on Prod the set`uif mob�'le provision for resistance to lateral forces should INTRODUCTION 4 The Gunn parcel (AP # 41-13-21) of 31 for division into s1X lots of 5 to 6 acres each. is pr'o� Rod of fcated in SW -1 /4 Sec. 2.8, T21 N, R3E, ML)B&M, on t The parcV. `i s munityrcol college. Road, across from the entranceetoouth gutte p � community Collsga. Staff of` the County Planning Department determined_ i the project is in a "sensitive geologic area" ha% which a geological report 1s required,, A & as a result 0l Chico retained me to prepare that report. Q Engineering off` Telephone conversation with Mr: Thomas Last, Senior Planner, elicited tho information that "Sensitive geolo is area" refers to the pr6ximit o'r the g parcel to faults shower the Seismic Safety Element of the County General Plan; Pl arje?-Irjo nepartment staff, accord ng to Mr.' Last, had no geological' concerns other than seismic safety, Consequently, phis 'c is limited to that topic, rep rg x exam'ned the surface geology of the 12 1992. Additional work for this report involved ,review d the geological literature and analysis of low-level, stereo phic, black-ar.d-white air photos CCartwrlght Aerial su,rvd , Sacramento Rol15147 Sacramento, , photos 2-19 & -20, and 2-33, 34 ' August 25, 1975, scale 1.24,000). , ~'✓t On the whole, topography of the site is gentle;`maximur relief, measured over anorth--south di„ tahce about 20 ft. However, steep drops are Commonof 2600 adjacentttoiOd:r Creek, which flow, thrbUgh` the southeastern corner of the l parcel, and two small, south -draining intermittent tributaries in the south-central part of the property. Clear Creek hes nearly -vertical ;~auks'; locall },ributaries hive banks 1 to 3yftph�gha ft high, and the GEOLOGY AND BOIL. The. Gunn_ parcel is underlain by sedimentary and volcanir, strata of the Tuscan'Rorrriation, on which rests the mixed Pentz and Peters Sar'ies. grayish soil of Soi l�-Vegetation Su'rve According to mapping by "t y`(MAIlory and , P Powell 1580) a ils grayish -brown to 06 16 brown entz soil sc5i 1 is sandy loam, whereas the ,Peters a dark -gray clay; Both ils sedimentary'orocksrt�rerelatively b; .'2 ft deep. lz��d$r1 . Y,•n9 voloatio r�l'X�t sof;,.,,, howeve ,sand would by consi,dered a, soil in tree engineering sehs,e (tFiq, readily be drilled, ripped, or worked ist they 6911 ), Pentz soil has hazardi and has r�drainsowell, has moderate; erosiot�l i permeability,,' 1+ 9 potential. Peters soil is aitfilij� t except that 'i t has s l rsw permeabili`ty and slight erosion fid -Vo-# � (Mallory and Powell. i g��u} In the field, Peters soil is characterized by eyi,de;nd.sr strong to extreme shrihtc-swell activity, caLASed by smectitd ("montmorillonite") clay, Over significant areas of the property, there are sirinkage,ceacks 1 to 2 inches wide that can be probed to a depth of 1.5 ft deep, commonly these outl4ne soil polygons i to 3 ft ;cross. The mapping by Mallory and Powell shows that the westernmost part of thei �;� optwty (corresponding to the woswn half or third of proposed `lrts 1 and 2) is underlain by Pant * sandy loaM and the reme hder by Peters clay and Pentz load i n termixed so intricatel.Y. as to be not separately mappable Tus :an rbrmati on roc's a.re eXposed only In the hear -- Ver". '0 banks of Clear Craek and its tributaries, They dip+ get, � toward the sauth,,+test, hiving an incl inatioh tFiati� c��l '� s1{ greater than the gradaent of Clear Greek (aPpro'im=;� i y 'I' -, cent, based on colitours 5hot�tn on the 11. S� Gee"l og i c�a Survey Hamlin Canyon 5-xin:ate quarlratgle), Streambank exposures t;how ";,hat the u t 4 ft of Pper`most unit cons- §t0 of about grayish 4olcanic sediment, which ranges frc�} a coarse pobble and cobble--bnelcmerate with small sandy layer"' to silt or coarse sand w7 tai thin Pebbly layers. Both types o~f' sediment are compact and h�,,ve enough cohesion to form Stapp stream banks that do not f"ail by spontaneous slumping. Sedimentary unit appears tp average about 4ft thThis streams in the southern pal{l-, of the propertyick along , but might be somewhat thicker in the northern part' � J Beneath the volcaniC+ sad ., imeht it a layer of compact, offer white to orangi sh--browPn 010n,"ice sandstone It probably for 6 by er`'osih.n of a volcanic -ash or �tUff dapasit sotrleWhere northeast of the present location byosouth►�f��1t 161oWingystreamsortation to its` p y, followed b traps r 4 5 p �t is expos6d only aloe stream banks iri:,.;bout the southeastern ...quarter of the parcel , but probabl; i�x4 1� .nds under, the remainder of the pt*operty as well r r , Only locally present (Point C, attached geoloy s a thin layer of white, unweathered, vgical may i itric tuff.' It ranged f rom 0 to 2 ft thick at Point C, where the low banks of art, i intermittent stream show it resting on the orangish-brown Pumice sandstone. It is 'exposed for a few tens of feet northerly from point C. The only other geologicalp •y , unit exposed on the , d the loose sand and minor :gravel present in the active ochan a � P of Cleat- Creek. This was mapped as Upper Modesto Por"maticir iY �. Hellef and Harwood (19x5). Structures would not be built'a►1 l'r this material, because it Lissentirely within the 100 -year- flood zone marked on the Tentative Parcel Map FAULTS AND LINEAMENTS In the field, no evidence of active faulting w,o6, found 9-11or adjacent to the Gunn Property, although Map fT-l" of the Seismic Safety Element of the General Plan shows a unknown.' crossing the activity parcel, arid a graUp of short lineaments about 2 miles north of the property trend toward'1itw The enclosed map of faults and lineaments shows the 10catian of two "faults activity unknown" scaled from Maps 1 of the Seismic Safety E4'ement. The easterly of the two faults is7 mi long and passes through the Gunn property:! westerly fault i s about 10 rni long, passes about 0.7 mi scant i+ West of the property,' and trends northward from thq comple'!s bi faults in the Oroville area (where a magnitude 5,1 eaethoUak occurred in 1975): Three geo'Yogical maps covering the general area of the; Gunn Property have been published since the Seismic Safety Element of the Butte County General Plan was adopted in 1977' I Hatwood and Fielle.y 1982; Helley and Harwood 1985; Harwood an+ 1 -tel lay 1987 Ca final Version of the 1982 map] ,Lind Sauced 1988. b+� ne of these naps shows the easterly of the two'fau��ts' from MaI p 1I-1 Wel ley and Harwood s 1985 map, which su'rface dempN�asi,? eposits, does not show the westerly -Fault, e7'ther lv features "tater paper (Harwood and ;Welley 1ss7) emphasizing subsut-faid* v)OVer, they provide evidence , hofar the existence `"cif A major buried fault (the Chico Monocl'ine fault) that extends from near Ped Bluff to southeast of Chico along the base of th foothills, fctrmi ng the l i near eastern rrtaY� gn of thb Sacramento Valley.. They believe (p. 20) that faults in the Oraville arEti • • v may be the southeastward continuation o faul t. f the chi Mortoo7� i�p On a map (scale 1:2,60,000) ompanyi Plot the estimated 'locatioOfthecChic g theih southeasternmost plot tPd noel ine Paper-- t�JY property, Extend' Position is 2 mi northwestfault. g its trend 2 mi farther so of the, dyrin the Would pass sl i ght i y more than half a uth :shows th'A, it the Gunn 'pro ert mile tc� A Y in, the same the southwest two '"t quits -- Activit position as Y unknc; fn "" shown n s the wostoi l y of •the location as co Monoclinep TI -1. Saucedd° f au 1 t i , .�; j988 ma shows the buried Chico Postulated „Oy Marwood and Helley, n the eak� N � From various lines of ev. P. 35) conclude that the Gh ,cO Mono , Harwood and delle movement aloe .� Monod ine farmed i Y {19"S 9 , is buried fault between 2, n resp f , Years ago. Geollogical structures along 's and Sacrrlmenta Valle 1�1' millions Y� including the Chieog the east side of thea. react*ivated between Cl and 0.h million Mortoc',i ne fault; were, 1990i P. 190, Modern earthquake activityear$ a foothill 1 s at,., ih� Ch i ca `�° Unruh, Oro!ri 1 le regionYinn the Sierran reactivation o�`� seism.idlt continues to tl� present t r of Mines and Gea)o• t p that this 9Y atUrf 1979) . Prudence d i ctates,ti me f Di Vii,. chica Monocline i�'ault should be considered at le active, that the a. � patents a,l; Ex`a:mination of 1ow--level air photos ahs of and neat~ the Guhn property failed to reveal evidence faults, including those from Map zto , streiam banks ,�l layering or of dehce of _ny Offsets of 5t�dimentae Hated, haver r, that streambahk ex osu►_ot Lound rock -soil contacts were h not contih� ,,_ �, p os on the It shuUrid b# �t thus is possible t Propert given i n ti�a fa following i r (though, Y ares far the reasona� completel g Paragraph, not like t Y�hdden ,�',au'lt could ly} that a Pass through the ' Other property possible fa,y�t-related features looked for a farirtd away from streambank exposurtrs include rasulting fromt changes in sail t linear and not springs, r, a ot" water -loving plantsa1 igned ire' Patterns Mounds,or de " ► ahs s getbtim Ar`esstiohs., mall str^ps' A lineament satellite phottz ra line or band, usual"y see features i p �' that results from a an aerial or �tclUdit g Vegetation, s �l shmertt of visible stream beds,, tonal pr ngs, 6traight se, patterns, saddles, Valle 9meht8 of ' as 1bihts or, changes in, roave ekvt typo) of geological ca4► In Ype) besides faults. sF.s such Hei1ey ana �Narwood (1985) show a broad band Of hundreds of extends from near Red Bluff to southeast o The » h't these lineaments "fractures``, burL-. n theirf Chicoi' Theytc'i l earlier report CHrlrwood et al. 1.981 0 Pointtext (and in 0 the lineaments are faults having offsets of aU't that many O few feet. They probably were caused b verticalw inches t` the Chico Monocl ine fault. movement along A few llneaments were seen in the air northwest of the Gunn property. One, photos, north td first rapped by Hel ley and Harwood ^al group of l ihear66fg 1 property, blit no lineament from thlst...5) trends toward .F�e closer than 2 ini les from 'it, group is visible .any weakly expressed as a total chane is from another qe&` Up aligned with a steep, northerl ) field ' of `a hill, is about half a mile west of gthel off on the east• ,a4d attached map of faults and lineaments.) Property. (See. j A brief summary oi'`the discussion of faults andhe 'lia d i$ in order. rti re tt (1) No'direct or indirect evidence of a fault or lineament dtj the Gann property was seen on the ground: (2) Map 1I-1 of the Seismic Safety Element show two through - activity Unkhown". The easterly one through the the ». passes Property, however, it has not been shown of any of three geo7og»ioal maps Preaared, published after Map Ir -i waif it was hOt seen on the ground, and it is not evident in low-level aerial photographs. M The westerly fault lies about 0.7 mi southwest of t of the he et property, lies within a seismically_' the appears to coincide with the southerlyexteve eieoof" andac Chico Monoclirte fault.: This a continuation of a zone of ac fault, in tarn,_ might Oroville area, and should thereforefbelronsideredea potentially active. at let OTHER POTENTIAL SEISMIC MAZARb8 �1 r a �GroUnd 'shaking during a strong earth Make ori..gihating off ofethe Foothills the Property i principal seismic hszard'. Numerous tUd' ,e. r 1s Rauh System, Undertaketol after the 1875 �c5tie��ia�1►-th'uake, have concluded that an of theacti►�e or : y -active faults in the System should be considered capabl�s of producing a magnitude 6.5 earthquake. EVideiice is, ,% summa rized by Division of Mines and Geology Staff "0 979)1, Harwood and Helle i U Y (1987 )' i nd �., ce that the Chi cra Monocline fault is active, and suggest that it is 66nrne6t4d with the Foothills Fault System in the Oroville area, Therefore the general expectations regarding the strength o future fault activity in the System should be extended to 414, Chico Monocline fault and the intervening area. The Seismic Element of the Butte County General Plan concludes that a. maximum intensity of VIZI+ on the Mogiff6d Mercalli scale should be anticipated for future earthquakss''p most of eastern Butte County; this Ii in ' the expectation of a Magnitudo 6.5 earthquaker(Haysr1980jt ���th ( The Modified Mercal l °i scale of intensity ranks the ,ddtfiag done to structures by an earthquake. Damage at the VIII+ ray, might include heavy damage to and ` str�yctures not designed to rprr party al col 1 apse of mason"y:: , �`st lateral forces; wooden atfU4,- tures could shift off 'Fuundat l ons if not bolted down; and underground pipes rt;uld break:) Can `action of dwellings resistant to lateral forces 9 out ? i,,ed in the requirements 01F the latest edition of the Uniform Building Code;, should provide reasonable mitigation. Of the potential hazard from ground shaking. This does not guarasntee that no dama!4e will result from strong shaking; however si?Nce most mc.dArn, 1►o�d-frame housing constructed according to code on suitable sites has performed reasonab'l'y well during recent earthquakes in California we can expect that foliowng similar practice here should reduce any damagd below tlj6' levels that otherwise wou'l'd occur. f mobile homes are to be placed on the p mitigation would be to",require that they be tied down, bracidd or otherwise treated so as to resist lateral forces from grdoA'd ithakings I Stethbrugge et al. (1980) have prepared a co'rre,latio ll curve relating earthquake intensity at an affected sitew,�ith average monetary loss, when mobile homes have not haat made: earthquake resistant, The expected lass'amang non-re8istlint intensity VIII to X) would avera a 12 magnitude 6.5 ('their aluapy mobile homes from an earthquake of ma ' g 2 percent of their vol r�� - According to nils curve. Los from injury in mobile homes i#! generally similar to that experienced in wood --frame dwelling,4. Besides ground shakin other g� Possible effects of an earthquake are liquefa_tian slumping; lurching, and differential settling, J Liqu fact:zon occurs when saturated, more or less uniforM- x 1011 , ill ,.. sized sand or, coarse-silt soils are vibrated; soil particl'e's rotate to a more compact position, water in pore spaces i6, eXpolled, and the soil flows like a liquid, fi.. The places Wha susceptible soil's would most likely be found are i e t to modern streamcourses. The normal setback of construct dk) from active waterways should provide adequate mitiggtiic;n r' potential liguefAction. Slumping is the landslide-like failure of soil that is vibrated during an earthquake; conditions favoring its occurrence include low to moderate cohe�' slopes, and a saturated condition. Shallow slumpon in �ngomi�htt4� CCcur along steep stream banks, especially if there is a I,Ud (structure) on the ground and the soil is thoroughly wet Avoidance should provide adequate mitigation; this Would involve not building structures closer to the bank of an acfi�i�ti'e or intermittent stream than about three ti bank,. met the height of:he Lurching results when soil that has low cohesion (cause'dr by Lack of clay and fine silt) is vibrated horizontal y, causing hummocks and cracks to develop on the surface of th`d ground The clay and silt content of the 'Oils on the: Gunn 5rty -should prevent this from being a significant Prop(! � probl enr., REFERENCES CITED Butte County,, 1977 Final Butte County General Plan: County— Planning Departmentunpublished, sec. 11, Seismic Element, 23 s P p. plus ma scale , a safety' pproX� i:250,Ooo. Department of Water Resources, 1579,. The August 1, 1975, orovlle earthquake investigations! Calif. Dept, Water Resources. Still, 2b3_jet 669 p;; Division of Mines and Geology Staff, i979, Technical review of, the seismic safety of the Auburn dmsite! Calif; Divy Mines and Geology special Publication bd, 17 p, Harwood, D.S., and Helley, E.J. 1982, Preliminary structure contour map of the Sacramento Valley$ California, 6hoWin'c major late Cenpzoic structural features and depth to sp ed usJmaP, Geo l og i i al Survey %pen~Fi 7 e Report .SP- -73i f 1 _ t n Harwood, D.S. , and He11ey, 5, U • 198?, Late Cenozoic Of the Sacramento Valle tecGoxi",; SurVey Professional Paper 1359,046ia P• U,S. 'Geological ' :Harwood, D -.S., et al. 1981,.Geologic map of the Monocline and northeastern Chico California; U.S. 9 Part of the Sacramento Series 8i cal Surti�eY Mise, x n, Valley, Map i-1238; scale 1:62,500; nYest7g�itiQi Hays, W.H•, 1980, Procedures for estimating e motions! U:,S. Geological' Survey arthquake SeOU6d 77 p. Y Professional PapQr 911�,r Helley, "." and Harwood, D.S. Cenozoic deposits of th! Sacramento Geologic m Sierran foothills, Cali , Sacr U.S. p of the 1&0 Misc. Field Studies Ma d nar ey scale 1.62,500r P Map. MP -1790, Survey a 24 P- ,plus map; Mallory, ,1.T•; and Powell W R , map and tables, Hamlin Canyon (7 SSGiIMVegetatlon SUrvey 2� Butte County, Galiforn4 min) gUadrangle; 40' Univ. of California �a: Ga1if. Dept. Of Forestry, piles ma and U.S. Dept: of q p, scale 1:31,680. grculture, S pµ, Saucedo, Gear e 9 1958, Geologic map of the Chico Calif. DiY, Mmes and Geology Regional Geo Quaran9ter Ser"iOSi Map 7A, scx :e 1:250,000. logicMap Steinbru 9ge,. ,K.Y , et x1., 1ile home" s and earthq 1n California:' C980' Mobafet uake SS�x79�07, 29 p, alif. Se-IWO Safety Comm. 15Sion,, Unruh, U.,R, r0 a. , 1990; St ti�graphY and late C 7n the Orovi`lle area, east -central SacramentodValleatiOn California: UnpuUlished Un1v. California, Davis thesis; 272 p, y, _,, Ph.D. Ph 11 i p A Calif. Registered Geologist # 14 ono l osed daps of: Faults and 1 i:`1eamnts Geology and soils E te �♦• •• u a •11••rpr•• ±Gunn a o • �. dD• a #. •; ° •• Property d" •~' e Ly#O ° • e w• • # • • • •o • i•b • Ic • ►sk �x r40 • 0 AF 10 n 4 • . 0 49 • • • • • • • 1' • • • kr �., r r �•� �• • • • �• '•r • f • 0 Orb • * •, r • •• •s 'yell � s � l_. • � '« •+�` * w •� ` o a r •• . • •. • • :a s •:� .. r a s • • issemct•••ws•r� • ti * »♦ • • i • O ,-•# . ,..x It .644 a #i - Y 1•s+ .. ••# • 411 ge a' • • • • � � ,�Y a ��• � , • • ° • E w ••,w ... + e It 0 6 If •it 00 00 IN 00 0 to • • •. to It • • # • • OO, ° # Is . eA e • • s r ,4 JI • O s� -� 0 640 err 1 • • a M• x scale feet See attached, Explanation GEOLOGY AND i�OILS Sheet. OF GUNN PROPERTY - r PI;A« Lydon AUq"t 1992 f a 0.5 1,lp scale miles ' r d , E7rIN,�'Y, 0� Civil Engineers ` l280 E. 918 street Sate C/111COt CA 9',5928 August 26:x, 1992 i Punning Department 7 County Cen':er Drive Oroville-, CA' 95965 Attention Thomas Last Reference; at:atus of Application for PtOPOsed General Plan Apmendment - File, 92-48 Dae ax Mr. Last P.nclosed is the Geological SOrvey for this project prepare )by Philip Lydon, 'onsulting Geologist. This report shotld complete the application as requested by YOXIr ,7ane lZy 199,E letter. Please continue the application process and .advise this i;irr7 ' theub`lie liear� n "s sch F g eduled.- _:9�n pleA8e call if you have any questions �Xncerely, tM r ch Encl.. cc Gunn �ifend r s ) ` ` t , a:4 . •r¢ +__ a'; ,.:_G.R. r. :..:, ... .... .. ., ., . ...k � i `»'.,.. ,. ...IA.. r'�l}�1�.�Xir��., ,._... . ,r i.►.� 0Pai'tm04 0141 RIg teens 1-1180 -P oil, 511•eer A. 1992 $tfite C I'll za, CA 95928' August a„5. 1992 1 planning Department 7 County Center Drive 1 Qroville, CA 95955 Attention: Thomas Last _ .Keferen,-eSSt, atus of Ainmendment Application for pro 0 -- File 92--48 sed Genera, Plan Dear Mr. Last] p The b- Plain Onthe Property.IS ash�win, flood lain boundaries and Panel ndary delineation their 2,25 ,of 1' of x was taker�h from:A Mr. Phillip Lydon has been �I Ex cal survey retained to dod Y end the the �hortlresults requested of the survey Y should be Of GeQ Oshortly'.; f6rthcc Yt ng_ . pl04se direit a copy of tion to this office eny future c so nor. Thank you. that action � n be taken e on in thia a s a timely mangy sc -.re _ Mark E. Risso MiM ch - Enol. cc Gunn Ci - f t; �l ;a V,JCM-['Ss.JYd 1x1NI MD, DONALD C. McNELTS, T��strict Superznt6ncicrit P.O. BOX 300 DtJR,HAM CALIFORNIA 95938 4 FAX (916),89$-469_1 OARD t'`i1,'"VIST1EES Richard L Anderson Rub ' .,. Ry 0. Ki,nrh rlsltut Edwin ,E. Ryn a_ M, Anthony Sojt res- ij August 5, 1932 i Larry painter ' Butte county Planning Department A� �I % County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965-:.397 010V►!l®, 0a1110fill ;i Dear Mr. Painter.- Thank ainter;Thank you for the opportunity to respond to the Plan amendment for AP x 041-1.30-021, proposed gelidiiit~ The f3tiverha impacts School District is concerned about cumulati�re 1m acts trOm increase in enrollment as numerous rezones and tentative a result of ttlta ids bou,Parcel maps on property within ta' ` al District. Asa conseque�4d the Boird ofstees has approved_ A devela of the Durham Unified Schoa polis phi Y cYre4uites rk school facilities. y-mitigate-its impact u�I ptae,nt Within the district to full al cost of The tot providing tiic necessary .. interim M foci Cities, transportation 4nd admi administrative ermanent i i ie t facil' r- es amounts to $90584 pet a up dr p includes the � p � •sadent�al unit, This amour, . $1, G5 per square foot developer fee. to determine this 'cost is rather complicated and is e formula used lable tor reveal if you ,k�ii�sh: The position. of the district ais1 that nn iti g� ted. t be approved only ;if s is impacts a schools is fu�,�y: a mitigated. y The districts pusitimt is fully suppo;:te", bz triC acently ado tt , Durham .Dayton Nelson Plan which states in pert the folloWhgs 'Unless assuxanae is obtained that an ad.e quote level of public,,, i residents including schools,y will be available to future no incteasethe densityofsoandThe assurance shall be falser to ranee shall inc'ut�0 detaals of how any impacts ident"tfied as a resul proposed !anti use actions are to bamitigated. j► t of the �� scnool�,7L"11141pi1►25twgt�atj Dt1RI t;R .a'oCtL P�tINeb?J�T. �tlNCiP�L JAMES n: u� 1'luine t3 �-4 95 T'hahi-d 9( rMN _ , ,.. ,..,.r•, ..;, ., ,;, hnts� X93=d1Gl��k x►s w g, PIN i �ti a. • T�,t 7 _ 4 ',IS t iroF�� itt OFt7kOVIZt.>: AtRPpttr 5I17 LARKIN;R®AD 1 T oS9R+O.AD FHC;M(gJ6)s33-(M/$ Ottt3YILLE,CALIFORNIA 95,965 7AMS A. CA&ff A mW FAX (916)333•.9916 Planning uep# ont ;1U N1 { June ZS195,E 1 Larry p'aih,i;�x 13u'tte County i lannin C' 7 County Center Drive °Inmission arovillCA g5 i 965 33,97 Dear bir. Paster: s"e have made an on-site ins esti this parcel Ana ' p on o>` the. th pa olsl listed_ 60 develop- neer mosquito' Hobby ct ' par,. zs such deve].o me P y s Sources due as these o �'t 4j� t? �nt and use o the ro Property., ir�lproperai`i'. rn the event that any or the jor2flated,we rec=men,d the use n s proposedooc� izr +�' Parcel is to,. ga. ican methods. SPI. ] rrlgat*011 as o tuned i`,o prevent excessive rlln�, lEr gation .a ppogt lls0d to d Ppllcatio.ns should. aticommc*date purl ace drainage s 1r)igated . 9 hould be areas . r�rt lla� free of abstrUctive debris and emergent ve grade .. afi�` Maintained et a urge the 9 anon;. proper( F`St3':�tZ . tl] n ownE:rs to assume res good mosquito prevention pra-tikes p°nsibil ,ey in, are c'eveZc�ped :and used; as the I n _�reventi nv BIOS ui to proper water mahagemeh t is propert on Problems in a the y'eY eleote t g tesld;:ntiS�1 developments. These comments aro consistent- olIcy vallt: "Guide i hpWith the DistrictIs }"� Prevention J h Proposed Developments st and, nd S`kal�dards dor ado ,tc¢ Ve..cla you. h4tvf .all or re��ornlnendat�,ns• � questions regarti.n `•``� please feel ;free' ``to our comtnen n ta„ge t� otis t ur ota'ce . \` Sincerely. P Carl t;. dill .l?.-�sollraC .. �1L\, p ser � CGP. �, r; 1'I 1 r i `y 11 , I - " ` cy a B(IT- CO[i�bTy PLAiVNIVG COriiMISSIAMT ;7 County Center, Drive;° Oroville, CA 95565-339T (916)538-7601 � 1' Public Works '.4t'.C3-z Environmental Health Def.�JundSheriff's Department N Fire Department RE: PROJECT REVIETI & Regional dater Quality Control ENVIIJONMk;tJTAL EVALUATIU'M Durham Unified School Distract GENML, (PLAN AMENDMENT No. 92-49 Butte Co. Mosquito' Abatement District Clayton Gunn r,%jrlosed is peel' ' da -a of` has received or generate' ( cos_cerning e following project: RAL PLAN AMENDMENT from Oxy zLn ; t ' gpen .Land t Agricultural-Residential on pro etty oned A-5, located on the L6�; ml �— �t �� of Durham-Pen tz oaaximate v 0 feet west cif Clark Roads idents, *9.A.#04.1-130-021, Oroville. Wia are ;Waking an assessment vy possibie, environmental impacts ato, *411 b-&,' prepar,ing an environmental •document, either a Nega-give Declara &-�•Qnt Ntac ive Declaration With Mi tigation Measures or an. Environmental; mmpe,ot Report (ETR) PladCe provide any factual statements, ideas for int estigation, d opinions you can offer in your area of concern or expertise that tiglate to dither physical, social, Or economic impacts that this project x gy �.ene;rate. ?Ieat5e respond within 14 &` Vs of. the above-noted date . if no tddI Qn.8e .is generated by this inquiry`,, then it shall be assumed that them` ArIe. mo significant, environmental impacts whish. are �-' �, Project. p potential from the We appreciate any assistance you can provide 5�.ricerely i r 1„a.rry Painter FUnnung Technician Cotnments a _ 660S Your Aq wish to Of th eiVe ititia studycfor Negati�re`bee�.arat�on (Fithe +arhWitF outritai r�ocum tlt mitigation Measures) or tlk ,for this project)` A chi t' ZYi'i111 HERI(VCr F'�12�*''3PYd:s►i J,2180 It « 9a t smerr State C' t tt CA 9,5925 1893-063t y yj October 23, 1992 3' Planning Department County of Butte ' County Center Drive OrQvlle, CA 95965 Attention: Thomas. Last l Reference-; General Plan Amendment, AP 041-130-021 File #92-48 , Dear Tom, inclosed are the suggested mitigation conditions for project as stated by Durham Unified School tl' he sub�eo` District, The the enclIca is have agreed to abide,bY the conditions . c►utl%' nett 14 Please cpntinue to process the application. r belie" �iComplete the environmental hasc vfr that this` « � p « of the schedule the Public, hearing as soon e o process; practica.. sncer,.glY so pled -e t _ -" MER:ch .9ncl, CC.* GUn Z, INI IED sc#mR�+�7w DONAIla C Mslh'ELTS District . ict SuperJti�i4lXdettli P.(J. B(� 3()0 DURTd.Ahr Ct1T�TFORNIA 95g1�.�(r'^675 91, F, '& (910, 895492 1i0AIW 01"'TRUSTEES tt#chf `*d L Andili-son Rub y O Kimme"stlue, M101ji6f ii:llcUon#l[rl t"Awin E. Ryon hi,,thngy b#ire October 20, 1992 ...� ,..«_ P. j Mark Risso c/o A. & Q Engineering 1250 13. 9th Street, Suite C Chico, CA 95.928 q q .Dear Mr. Risso: Pursuant to our conversation today, t propose.;#hat the proposed general l . on AP 041,-130-021 be conditioned as follows; Pan 'Whetit r WI)t 1. Payment Of fees are due and payable ,at the time of issuance " permit by Butte County for d+�� a building evelopr,a�7t of the land: owner agrees W is $9,584M. ilding The � pay the fee established by the district #�ti a per unit basis... The �91991-512 fee -. A note on any subdivision or parcel map for the land will sfate that school ?E �� mitigation fees cui'll berequired by the Durham Unified ,Schoolnistrict prior }' ri to f I li I he development o� a parcel or dot: �. z5 'his his developer, agreement satisfies the school mitigation issues for the Du > elloul District relative to this proposed getierat plai'i 'atneridtnerit please ca tltn tTr�ll� �. ave tiny, questions. 11 rtYc Yotl h a cerely h G Donald C, McNelis Superintendent n , 11a � niritil�t { 1'%I-EAi>:h7�'X�tY sGFitlOL I?r'TE1#:Mk'DiA'rE 5(.iibAL r i,¢�GH sC�TfJOL ,1 i 1fA1t2iAli/1. J JC1HTtSTON PtuxCMAL s .'::REN ,1. moso PIUNCIPAL ��i i1fE5 I3. GwYN , Pbbtte 8954d9 f�hdhe 89. 4490 I2111Gi[PAL �) bn �5--nkil . MANY 7711 lr/ .Z NI AHEC-1 y (JpiNIF ECfONAL WATER' Ct4JALlTY CONTROL E3OARb T3f�L VA> �.E °` REG.ION '' SR4X;4 A 4IA41CADE VIATERSNEo BRANCH 6PPICE^ �+ �.C'I'iEST i3pIVE � ,i Fi'irrfi. GA 960032 W'iNV drib) 224.4845 016 $?24-4857 t rvvy;irat Cc9lt + ttt 13July 1992 Mr. Larry Painter Butte County P,1anning CammisSion 7 County Center ,Drive Qrovi'lle, CA 95965-3397 GENERAL. PLN AMENDMENT, CLAiri`UN GUNN, ,'AP #041-130ti021 'e have revEwed;the subject ,project native. The following a,.e our cothments,� Suf'Ficient Information must be provided by the applicants to enable evalu `, of the treatment and disposal options in relation to conditions i such as local, ground and sfdr ace water hydrology and soil types n the at7dr� Potential impacts which must �e addressed, include Patc)ll l area,. 9 ound and surface Waters protection of public healtn and contamination 01- nuisance ntam�natan of construotiotiCsu+tlttasnacsu such odors,,a d shcrt-tes•m impactsaduner in of vectors d eroion. during please submit. the information t � r .. . Itf arc►cr, for Regional Board staff u7red0°Invent fut Cher on the proposed: rc� ect Pteeds Or Waste Disposal front Land Developmentsegi0nal Board's "Infai'matianr current poIiry between Butte County and the RegionalBoardwith the pro�ride frxrther rram�ent5 if we have objections to the data that will only The State uPPI ad+ t onstafor a�eoou rceS etrol the process of promul gating gi t M fac�T7ti ns f more thaces Control o7 goaThese regulations w ll a g g contact this office to determine the net,ess� : a apply to any n five .acres undel4 development, The Developer should A y begins. y a startnwater an construci ionpdrmit before Tf you have any que,stians, ,Tease contact me at X916} 224�4a5 a:ddre'ssW M 8 a"r the above Ronald S, Dykstra, p,t Staff ngi::eor RSD.ztch cc� Cdr. tom Peed, Butte County Dep art4febt of tnvirohmehtal health, Otovi11 1 w A tai D Q F AT WE'ALTIq Ah1 8E�AUtV - Department of Development So> r J 'Id'!g ILANNINC DEPARTMENT JU,fil e 12, 1992 7 COUN rY CENTER oRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIPOi NI)` G5-3397' TELEPHONE; (916)53@-7E;01 Clayton Gunn #61 Catalina Point. Road Chico, CA 9:5928 i SGfBMCT: Status of Application ;fox Proposed General Plan AmeliAnent. File '924$ Dear .Nfre Gunn: The T3utte County Planning Department staff has reviewed the a ac�ornpanying information for the referenced prarposal. The u Ppl>cat>on �d: adti'se you whether your application is complo:te. 'rhe a pUr ngstatuss notIco 'j4 to pertains to your application. Please call tIhe assigned Planner named below ff #1> �j� any questions conce mi7g .your :proposal or this notice. ,le1`d, g° - contact o . and. -....._ Viae. applieation is complete is ben g Processed.` Planning Oaf ` A j)l. you tf o f clanificA�tion or additional information i later date you wdl reo•eivc� ;a .Letter uiil analysis s need�,►'c�, At a.. lcadion of yott� sch,edufed hearing date.,y a of your Proje�,'i tend A '10 if s i'he application is Mcontpfrte; see the attached forth for `rEcjpirgd informixt>on to be received before the application can be processlMl, The Califori is Department of Kish and Game (CDFG) requires payment o for all projects that result in the potE;retial *loss of fishy �villdlife, or their baht 'il><ng ;lriti ; tion. and land use conversion, .. ta>1, ttirrgj This filing. fee is applicAble to your pr�S jeot s collected by this Department On bep;alf of our prgject s hearing date of the exact amount due. ptia ure to Pay the Iot wil; prior{' 1 0 You Will be notched p y ht Your project from blbd6ming operative vested or final (Public esaurce Cod p,retio#tt x.1089' (b) )• ;, �ectfdn u have Any b twee n the hoursof 10 regarding "this n;ailt�r please call this offitttr an E arjYO long, a,rr�. andctao.,. y wf,�cly enib , ,Planner' Before your taxes) agglicatinn can be considered complete, the foilowing items (seri c�',�,�ed be must prepared .and submitted to the Planning Department, sI . Your project is in a higrl archaeological sensitivity ars'+a Cort" the * p 1:!' State Northeast Information tenter in the ,A:n..hro olo Lab at Clfco' . „ University.Have a records search performed for your pro1edtx an Archaeological Survey is require%A, have it performed by a ied archaeologist a list is ) , g ( provided ,, Submit, the report to the ����wnin Department. Your project is in a sensitive botanical area. Contact a qualified96tanist to determine if a Botanical Survey for rare, threatened or end ' &ered plants should be performed. If a Botanical Survey is required, J it performed by a. qualified botanist (a list is provided). ,Submit tita" f ort to the PIanning Department. j l Your project is in a sensitive geologic area. Contact a qualified #arc do$ist .J or Soils Engineer to have a Geologic SI'irvey performed, Submit tine.' � port to the .Planning Department. Your ,project is in an area of special 'biological importance. Contac ;the t_J U Department of Fish & Game Codetermine ita Wild • r 'llife Su�vy i ed; If species of concern are present, perform a 4Ildlife Survey, as rE+,gyfifed. Submit the report to the Planning Departmerit, Other: As part of the General Plan Site Del�ignation Criteria for AoictdtUre Residential distr �"�ts the psopetty'; sh&gld not be located 4t;fi > flordplains or ilealc areas of active:.faults. Since A pottion of the site is located within a floodplain, ;those food bounclazt,o';§ deed to be definer ted on. the. map to determine the signilicanre. �l i ,F u l\ f n I (•� n .if .� . LI 0�►1 f13j0 040 000, a�I41))•�I5!l PTI VE WITT,ICK RALPH, $S GR0 13OX 116 IAEGLE CA 96108 • 041 130040 1 �'WITT'ICK ' :000 STATU§sj` RA PH CTIVE E SS P 0 BOX 'i 3 b . GRAEAGLE CA 96103 L: 041 130005 000 MCCLURKIN L H & EtHEL .RSTATOS: 2633 WILLIAMS RD (;ROV I_LLE CA 45965 L: 041 130 005 000 MCCLURkIN L ;y & C(; T1.91E MELSTATU9t 8633 WILLIAMS RD ' OROVIL'LE CA 45965... L: 041 130 .Qi49 000 STA "tJS: JACKSOIV JEWEA2 LL & FAYLENE HA1t i'iU JACKSON JEWELL E PAYLENE R TRU`: P [D 80X 62ggo G CHICO £A 95987 Ls 041 130 049 000 JA 130 3EWELL F STATUsa A�r(`jV`2 :,ACKSON JEWELL E & FAYLENEAM Tft-' P O ISO, X' CHICO CA 95487` L: 041 3.30 008 00kt tATUS: AU '51 PORTER MELISSA A k, P O BOx 180 4 CHICO CA 95987 . .. L : 641 3 30 / 006. 00r� PORTER M LISSA A STATUS: AC`>"I t� P 0 BOX 1801 S' CHICO CA 1j rr L : 041 3 30 0fb9 000 11 PORTER MELISSA A 46 rfl CHICCI CA 954E7 l L Y 04.3 130' 00t / 000 STATUS: ACTT Va t'ORTEt`t MELYSSr<�, A \l , P0Box 1801 CHTCO CA 559 - 8 7 Le 041 180 056 0g8 115 1 lU81�S FLORENCE LOU188 E iAL d r TG ST Pq �AN R� buAHAp1.. ,. ct 7 . ti BU ' CQUNTI�} PLANN�LNG COMMIS t 1 ` l;Ou 1 ,j 17 Cee flrbvil.le jer 'Drive,' CA 135_95-3.397 (51;63 5.38_7601 =�1 i Public Works 0 « Environme;ita1 Rea lth Sheriff's Department DATE: June 2 1992, Fire Depaxtmen.t i Fie ionalWater RE: PROJECT REVIEW, Quality Control Durham Unified Sc:ixool District ENVIRONMENTAL E1TAL1JATItijq GENERAL PLAN A4FNDPtEh1T 0: Butte Co. Mosquito Abatem(snt:District Clayton Gunn �►lclosed is preliminary data our ti �fa.ce Concerning the foll.,owin has received or :coject: GENERAL, PLAN A14ENDA generate a -en Land to A ricultur_al-g�_sid �~�`— 1ENfi fro;n Grazzn . P �. ` R i ent%1 0n property zonedA;-5 ----- located �n the goad- =rJo of Durham-Pentz Road "a roximatel 3300 fee........t f Clark toa c I d, aq, AP#041-130-021, Orcrvill;e. Iden : We are making+` i an assessment of possible environmental im act,. be preparing an environmental dacume-nt, either a Negatives P w,t. Negative Declaration with •Mtigatiorri, M�iasures or f# Impadt Report. (EIB, an Environmpnrat. lecla°� y Iae I factual statements, ideas for x,.� i you can offer n y dux. area a c cc<rcern care`'stigation, oda �enera�er h rr ..a1r soc;�.a,., '�� impacts that 'that x�.�:�; P y-�?,r g �, at this project, 'lease r�;� . days of �. e above --no i i �:,. Within l � da ..h is generated. by this intir i ted date., If no resst� no s� gnzf cant env rc�nmellIq nta Li.mpact:;, whichlare assumed, that there ° (Project. Potential from the We appreciate any assistance you ca4'provide j :sincerely, !Arr .* Painter ?,Ienning Techriaian >mments : Thusndividurl �•etane I►�c:s no u' } impact one dire Ede �rrrmnt, ane acr`um'u ailve c�"Pec o reg '1ln+ 0 22fFr Cr?x15i Y e(optnEan•t�.r`�`s a � ' det call dorerre xc�tect on sonvkts ohd higher �colit is th0 r*ounfy. ._. Doesagency V:6{:.4. .O. .:. i :study _wish to receive a c.)p,Y'' of the en iro ental ciocur cn Y �_ (initial study for Ne�cs-atrre Decla.ratior (c,rth yr withouEt �i:ti atio , �teasuresi e�,r. EI R br th:-s protect) f g n gQ t.,.... . u