HomeMy WebLinkAbout041-400-009A .r
PLANNING COMMISSION SUMMARY SHEET FOR LAND DIVIT.1IONrs
A:t)I.'IaICANT - Cathy F, John. Davis Log# 85-05-29-05
AIJIjI2I " -- _ 3878 Dulcinea Drive, Oroville, CA 95965
OWNER Same
PrjOJECT DESCRIPTION TPht to divide 14.11 acres into,oK parcels;
q,2.
-e
-» acres • 1 -parcel 4.28 _fires
LOCATION On. tlje_ sol Ags - o:rlleI: of lcinea-Drivo and ,1ar'b,f."L-rad7se.
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER(S) AP # 41-40-00
"BONING AR4114-3 GEN. PLAN _. PROJECT CON618TENTY
DATE :APPLICATION RECEIVED
I ng Lim ncott_P,_
DATE PUBLICATION NOTICE WRITTEN PUBLISIM-D�
PLACE NEWSPAPER NOTICES) PUBLISHED - 0. C. P. G D.
DATE Mt,TLI;NG LIST PREPARED
DATE MAIL -OUT NOTICE$ WRITTEN MAILED _ NUMBER
DATE PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT PREPARED
ENVIRONMENTAL CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION - DATE FILED,
DETERMINATION
AND DATE NEGATIVE DECLARATION - DATE ADOPTED,,,
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION DATE A)OPTED
ENV. IMPACT~ REPORT - )ATE CERTIFIED
SUb. COMMITTEE KEXTI:NG DATE
ADVISGPY AGENCY III!;ARING DATE% ': �� » _ % • ' w w rJ ' .x!31
ADVISORY AGENCY ACTION
130ARD ACTION
COMMENT- kit ,n" /_,,orI _ 1«"t i`%_ .tya •. �R�?�,
AOUtte
.y .
DEPARTMENT Df" PUBLIL) WOIiI(S'
WILLIAM (r3111) 0LIEfTr�IPa�t�,
7
COUNTY GGNT R bRIYC - nNOVILLt, CALIFORNIA 95165
falr�honp N16) 510,76U 1
1 rbrtlary 0 19,911 RONALD D. MA LRoy
DnpvIy jkU+fanr
Lippincott Surveying
P. 0. Box 671 RI'; AP 41-40-09
Paradise; CA 95967-067 'Tentative parcel Map
Dear Mr. Lippincott;;
At the regular meeting of the ]Butte County Advisory
February 8, 1985, the Agency granted a time extension gotc36hmeld on
onths
in order to file the :final, map on the above -referenced property.
The new dete of expiration is February 3, 1991, l �''
If no appeals are timely filed--aivithi.n fifteen (15) days or
01" the Advisory Agency's approv.l-- ly " the date
Suprrvisor.s, this action Will be finalthe Clerk of the Board of
Ti you have an questions regarding this matter f
office, Please colt
Y Quest
Contact this
Very truly yours,
William Chaff
Director of public Works
u
2I,91stant
h Mendonsa
JN/ds DirecLor
attachment
cc! planning Department ✓
8-nvironmental Health Dopartmetil
John► and Cathy Davis, 3 378 Dulrinl a Driver Orovillo; (A 05965
jj 'f 7 N \ V 1
4 �• �yyt f��pp
1 J���IQ4E�is
1 P
APPENDIX H
NO'!'1LCE OF DETFIRlvllNAMON
'fit office of Planning .and Research FROM; PlannIng Department
1�1)0 Tenth Street, Room 121 7 Count,% Center Drive
Sa: amento, CA 95.8.14 oroviN,
9!IT65FD
or
X County Clerk
County of
Butte FLC3 1 " 1986
$UWECTo Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21108 or 21152
of the Public Resources :ode. ELM11OR M, BECKER, County Clerk
By, A% J,ACWTH = Deputy
o e t t le AP 1t Mama
Tentative Parcel Map 41-40-09 Cathy and John Davis
State Clearinghouse Num Contact Person Tele one Nom r
(if submitted to Clearinghouse)
1'L1b1ic Works John Mendonsa 534-4266
PMJect Location On the southwest corner of Dulcinea Drive and Ciwrk
Road, Paradise,
Rect Description Tentative Parcel Map to divide 14.11 acres into 2
pa reels, 1 at 9.82 acres and 1 at 4.28 acres.
This Is to advise that the Butte County Advisor} AGenCy_
has approved the above described pm)ect and has made the followlt�g 6teeminatlons
regarding the above described projects
1. The project will, X will not, have a significant effect on the environment
2. An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant
to 'the provisions of CEQA.
A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the
provisions of CEQA.
The MR or Negative beclaration and mcord of project approval may be
examined ate
MILLe Couxity Morminp 1)(*I);►rtmicti:
7 County Cehter I)rlver _-_orovil.le, _(,,A 95965
3. Mitigationproject,
measures, were, were not, made a condition of time approval
of the roject
4. A statement of Overriding ConsideratlohS� was, was not, adopted for
this project. `
Nate Received for filing
Signature,
Stephon A,. Stz"ootor
son i r �nnr r
Revised January 1985
Mitigation Measure
Cathy & John Davis
Tentative Parcel Map
AP#41-40-09
Show on the. Final map a no development area to
the banks of the West Branch of Clear Creek, catec� witha.11
to the fact that this area is an cultural area.
(This �. s d tr:��
agri
c
land is being utilized to the banks of the creek. This
areik is necessary for the development of the
proper Ly
oulte Go!�d
LAND OF NATURAL WI'IrtT1I I�Ni)[1[A U
—' - DEPARTMENT 01+ PUBLIC wo"I(S
WILLIAM Will) rani f C'� Wrt'ctor
7 COUNTY cl
TER DRIYG CAL.IrOgt41A'gb965
Tolophunot 01/ii 534-1160
Rt)tdALO`D�M�� �RClY
DOP41Y
Buff aCo. Planning Cotnm 111rtla,r oury 4; 1986
FEB 5 1986
Orovillej Cauk"14 RE: AP 41-40_09
Cathy and John Davis "Tentative Parcel OW
38'($ Dul.ci.nea Drive
Croville; CA 95965
T:Ierar Mr. and Mrs. Davis
of the Butte County Advisory Agency held
At the regular meeting
on February 3 ) 1986, the, agency granted a mitigated negativeved Your
cleclaration regarding environmental impact and roto the con"
tentative parcel. map on AP 41-40-09 subs_
U f approval. listed on the :attached sheet.
if no appeals are timely
filed—within ten clays of the date; Of' �:ae
Advisory Agency's approval with the Clerk of the Hoard of 1JPPVVIS'ert;;
this action will be final,
Dihen thr: conditions of apP
r':val aro complied with, it will, b(3.n order
for You to file year "final nm�p'�with ourenou�hs of"uth� clate.o�l`at!iulc
!��" yv�rl,
�,iorks for recordation wa. th
by the Advisory Agency,
xf you have any questiorlo regarding tills: matter, pl.eta;u contract, this
office
Vary t-ruly yours;
will.iram ChOf
Dirsctur (IV "Public VlOrks
Jr hn Cy1rtCtdonsa
As.li.(Itrarat, Slirr.:rftdr
V/d s
a'btar:ament
cc planning
Health
1,ippinoott/Guth Associates
W
�r)IN DAVIS, TPOTATIVE PARCEL MAP, 3 parcels on the rscac.a ,hwent corhf-V
or I rticinea Irrive and Clark Road. Paradise area,
AP 41-40-09
V"agincyer; 1P1))pi11cott/Guth Assoc,
pgj)l,i(, Wcirltta conditions;
1 Verify legal parcel.
Vot-if'y legal access.
it+jvide t,wo-way traversable access M -8 -U) -x to eant'1 l tll'( 01 from rl
ac)unty meiritained ruaJ or otate highway.
4. Access to be reserved in deeds as per c ,unty ordirmner, rltid offerml
for drnd i.catiuri on the final chap.
Ghraw 5r; ft. building setback line measured fr,.T centurLitin of ace'rrc r
em."onc rit,
6. 1'rravl.ie road maintemOnoe agreement;
r . bf ec1 to thr: C)unty of Butte 40 ft night -cif -way from the center.tint,
of Clark j^ sad .
8, Indicate a 55 :1t, buildiag wetback from the centerline 01' Clark R. oad ,
9, ',how all eaucments of record on the f1rral rnaP.
Ira, provide strret name s gns per recluirerrients )f the Dept, nP P;ablic
W frks pri•.,r to recurdat1un of the final Inca[',
11 , Jrav any delinquent taxes or current Naxos ac required,
.W
12. Meet regairemunU of Lal m- ,,$ at, intersection of D atc i cxoa arrive
And Clark Rcsad,
health Dept. eurOitions3
h Provide €i 100 ft, leachfield free wetback around: exi .ting wells either
within the property or within 100 ft. of tine pr:aperty F,caundaries on
parcel 1
14, '21how r, 50 ft, leac:hf'i,01,3 setback f'rorr, the drhinagc' wray 'and dry pari,'
41,01l on parcel: 2
15. h m a 100 ft. lonehi' .eld not -buck from the highwuter 11 do of Gine; urct
Un prarca,l.:" 1 and P.
1.6Xhow the usuble' sewage disposal when proven by percol„aWGan Lat;'La and "loll
depth testb to meet the :�cqua,xanenbo of thu Subdi.vi.o;ltm Ordfiltuice, ail
parcel 2.
17, place a note on the map that no water well may be Jmr'rai'J%d wit;lain 101l ft,
of the usable sewage disposal, area on parcel 2.
18i prove that the required quantities of donresti.c viater aro aVni.lablo to P11MG1. 2,.
�1!
`JOLT 8c CATHY DAVtS� T
PM
The following mitigation measure is',
19. Show on tine required;
Of
the final map a no
area iSWest $'aneh of Clear Cr 1dpmen{ area
Of the c��ekgricultural are The (this is located.�i the
This a , a. land i Ue to tlla 'Crician1t'.n
x ea Is nece,ssar s bea.ng u .l..f rai , that
,Y iot the develo �� , Lc the hrlriltrt
inia!l1., aE'l�e hr„l.10k,i;�r.
Ff
C
Inker-Departm
"t-
morandum
•ics: Butte Count
y Advisory Agency'.--
gency ,
rc�t1: Planning bireutur
8u1JJtc;r: Report on
.Tentative Parcel Map of Sohn Davis on
0ATC: November 25, 1985 AP#41-40-09
This ,is a Proposal to
1 parcel of o divide 14.11 acres
82 acres in size and 1 into Z parcels,
aces in size. The presti
cultural Residential nt tonin AR -Ml 8. 4.28
Use Plang is AR -MH -8. lAgri-
of the Butte County Home - 3 acre
area as Agricultural Residential, �' The Land
General Plan designates t
or community Plans dor There are no s - his
this area, pecific
The proposal does not conflict with county any adopted or proposed element of my tonin
General Flan nor an the Butte Countnor
Y' Countyr specific or community plan.
Recommended Approval subject to the following
llow n
9 Mitigation
1, Show on the Final Map a
located within the ho development area.
of Clea banks of the West .Branch
Creek. !This is due to the fact
that this area is an a
The land is bein agricultural area,.
the Creek. g utilized to the banks of
development This area. is necessary for the
pment of she property.)
Note; An Archaeological Surve
clearance is recommended. y has beo-'A
performed and
DRFi
:cmc
Buf a Co. Planning GaYnm,
ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF THE DAMS PROPERTY
A.P,No. 41-40-9r
BUTTE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
By
James P. Manning
PROJECT DESCRIPTION% The
ro poseored project is to divblo an
existing 14 acre parcel
o e parcels for residMlt'lal
development.
pRO;TECT APPLICANT s Jo1zn & Cathryn Davis
PROJECT LOCATION: The project area is located
ilesdnorthUof the
to ee
west side of Clark Road, approximately two m
intersection with Pentt Road, six miles south of Paradise' of.
rtin of the S! of the -LT
The property covers a pHamloin Ganyon QuadrangleN 7-5'Sectseries.
15, T. 21 N., R. 3 E.�
PRIOR DATA REVIEW: Prior toldmaintained bythe ethesC3l�.fornia
urvey the
archaeological site record files
Archaeological Inventory, Northeastousl.yrecorded rmation ecu1tural
Consulted to determine if annter were
y p
resources were located within, or adjacent to the hin, r
area. 1Yrecorded sites are located within, or
No previ�usl
adjacent to ti -e project boundaries.
DATE OF FIELD INSPECTION! July 161 198,
ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING% The property is characterized by
gently rolling foothill terrain with a general north to south.
slope. The vegetation consists of open oak-gratThesl Branchana of
riparian vegetation along the drainages.
Clear Creek flows through the central: portion of the property
With two intermittent drainages.The property currently
. ond.
contains a mobile home, a garage and a small dry p
SURVEY MENrHODOLOGY ' The focus of the
Sur field inspection was
a visual inspoction of the ground
features indicative of preh .stor' c or �:a�^J.y hlotor' a aO t;i vitt'
The survey Was accomplished by wkns ac ngyover t c68 Of nentil0
transects with a filre meter intervalP
property. area; Ground visi`b'ility
was very good.
FxNDGNGS: No materials o,r ;Features i�r�iative of prohistaric
or early historic activity" were obserVoU during my inspection
of the project area:
Lpe CWS�G�d(7PG`Cada CUG��N1a4C�G�
(n @4aa �',{
Ife
r
RECOMMENDATIONS; It is recommended that archaeological
earance be granted for the proposed project area.
a
amen P.'Mannng
Archaeology Consultant
0 AC''t:CVt1l S l' 0
VINTY til: 1111TT1-
ENV1RONMIINTAL C111:CKl,1ST VORht
(to be Complete y LeaAgency)
Al' 41-40-09
1. BAC_KGRC1,�UN11
Name a r proponent Ca'tily ails) Join. Davis
Aticlres.s of proponent id representative (if appliClll'114)
Cath and John DaVIS L� ,ncott-(WW1 h Associatc$
y - �.
'5878` Du c.nea" rivc`.� .., o e lttistcl
10 q 7 13 a 11 �.
�"` �.��aracla �
c .. GA
Tentative Parcel, Map
3 Project description
{ {, D)AN R_ i,INL7xhG'� �1 _:pit-'-NI1 ItANCI:
Yl?;� 1+11 y 13, NO
ct,, Does tilt. prt� jr*ct have the potential to degrade t lac
dual I ty o r the onvi ronment , suhstantial.ly reduce
the habitat of a fishr lldli,fcoSllecl:�wlesiseli c :X
rich or wildlife Population or
sustaining level:,lepclucettheen tnt;bcr'Lortrestrcttthe
animal crarnrr�unit cant or animal apt'
range of Ra rare or endange vc,d ll periods
eliminate important examples of the major 1
or California history or prehistorv?
h, tine pro,eet hays: the potential to schlevter
Does the detriment or long-term,
short-term bonet'its to
environnaEnta�t goals' (A, short-term impact on the
environment is one which occurs in a lattsew 1.
lY
brief periost or time While long-term impacts �^
endtare into the future")
c, plies the prOicet 11,1ve impacts which arc i.ndi-Vidu-
ally limited, but cumulatively c:onsiderablc't (A
project may imp pct on tiuo or more separate resources
where the impar on each resource is relatively
small, but where the effect of the total Of tiaose X -
impacts or, the env ronweatt is $Igni.rleant.)
d, Hoes the project hclve envia�onmental, e1'fccts whleh
hili cause stahsttaaatial adverse effects on human y
beings, either alreetly Or Inciire>,at't '
) T) llli'1'li1ZtIt' NAT I ON ('I"o ht� c ciin)il s+t t+,C Illy tilt,
Oil tilt, hwi� is of than, C ni t t;a1 ev.alutat Iran:
I JIY1; C' bra
tht.
►�s'ivl ttA"I"1vI11 {
I11i01�ARA'i't't N►Wi l I't��,t+tprrj�tt
(in the.: rn� a
fitasl that nitttou{h ®hntrltt,l)tirt�tel7w project
ottrta��4lttltt3� Tnifieantti-
'V(r Ct on the rnv.tt
th s case bovauge tilt+ t`Ct'I`It;AI"ICIh �t��Ar��41,�} I��*Nt:CA`1"�Vfian
the at:' .'Ckv I� 5tacet have: been IkItI tl� to tate p j
111 Ct,ARA"I . 'N v ll lat+ uretiared„
1'intl the tt,. r, t+st project MA1 1aar:•e 11 s 9111" tint crfeet of
. Che c+na i r��nmen�t , +i.nsl ,at 1:�1 "'1 ttt�Nivlt.N't Ai. IMPACT' 11t:pCltl'I" i:3 ronui rcd
July j.l t 19 g 5 t°,c1UNIVY OF 'Kr1"C`t'ti, lat.I1NNTNC I)111�Att"C1�IFN'C
141torlimuss ,A sos crate P"iincr
v
� M
Itov iLwed ay t
�� .�, ,� be`'° answers. are re�Ui`r"ell
LNVZIt(7NMENons IM CTS es and ,maybe', Xp anatzons o a 1 y yps
on attached sheet(s))
oral result in-;,ignifa.cant:
Will he prop es In
i. 'A_ RTH�changes
Unstable earth substructures?ns or in caang
geologic displacements, compaction or Vic,
Di stus,
b. overcoverng of the soil'?
e in topography or ground surface
cChang. ,
relief features? or modification of any
,
covering _
d, Destruction, or physical features't
unique geologic
._.
e, Increase in wind or water erosion of soils) .
either on or off-site? beach
han es or in deposition or eros1
change*ondoepo ition
f. C g s in siltation,
sands, modify the channel of
or erosion which may yC
a river or stream or the bed of the ocean. cx'
any bay, inlet or lake. Y productive soils �
rime agricultural) p
g, Loss of P to geologic
outside designated urban mud -
ho of people °r property landslides,
h. Exp such as earthquakes,
hazards
Aides,. ground failure or similar hazards?
jV1l the proposal result in substantial: ,
2 ; A;C R . �K
a. Air emissions or detexiorat1on of ambient
a-.% T. quality? of objectionable odors, smoke X
b, The creation
or fumes? mr�isture, or
Alteration of air movement ) in climate,
�x
' c. temperature, or any change
locally or regionally
kr
Proposal result in substantial:
WATER Will the ror the course or
�
Changes in currents, either
direction of water movements in
marine or fresh waters? atainage patterns, e
b . Changes in absorption rates,
f surface runoff?
or the race and amount ff"srtsurface drainage improv
e
C Need for oremoval, channel -
including
vegetat
ionments_
,za
tio.� or culvert installation
d. Alterations to the course or flow of flood. �—
waters? . arllou t of surface 'Mater �n :any
e. Change in the
water body? or in airy
Dischar , of Surfacegurfaccr'aterrquality $ �.ne� utl�.ng
alter atIOTI dissolved L
but not limited to temp eratuxe�
oxygen or turbidity? flew
X.
g
Alteration of the direction or rate of
of ground wateTs antity of ground waters,
h, Change in the q ox 1 its'
either through d.ighlntedreeptinn of an
drawals , or throng ---- ~—
aquifer by in theI cuts amounexct of water , otherwise
peductron liesl
prrUlic water: supe
available for erty to water Xy.
r3xposure of people or Prop
related hazards such as floodrra,7
YES MAYBE
NO
4. LLAW LIFE. Will the proposal result in substantial:
Jan e in the diversity of species, or number
of any species of plants (including trees,
and aquatic plants)?
X -
shTubso grass, crops,
b. Reduction of the numbe-rs of any ur.Lque, rare
or endangered species ( ) f plants?
C. introduction of nekq species of plants into an
area, or in a barrier to the normal replenish-
ment of existint" species?
d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop?
5. ANIMAL LIPE. Will -,.,he proposal result in substnOtAIL11.
a. CEinge. in the diversity of species, or nujlit'�4v
animals (birds, land aniiiial"i
of any species of
including reptiles, fish and shell fish,
br,nthic organisms or insects)?
b. Reduction in the numbers of any unique, rare
or endangered spocies of animals?
animals into
c. Introduction of new species of
an area, or result in a barrier to the migr&tion
or movement of animals?
d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife
habitat?
6. NOISEe will the proposal result in substantial:
zi—.1ncreases in existing noise levels?
b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels?
7.
M
M
10.
11.
12.
LIGHT AND GLARE. will the Proposal produce
t"j��jj-FMca—nt7-1""1ght and glare?
LAND USE. Will the proposal result in a
z
substantial alteration of the present or planned
land Use of an area!
NATURAL RESOURCES,' Will the proposal result in
sAbs - tantial:
ai Increase in the rate of use of arl, natural
resources?
b Depl.etiL,1j,of any non-renewable natural
RM OF UPSET. Will the proposal involve:
A Ti-s-K---oy explosion or the -release of hazard-
ous substances (including, but flot limited to,
ojjj pesticides, chemicals or radiation) ire the
event of an accident Or Upset c0ne,Iit'ots?
b. Possible interference with an emergency
response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
POPULATION, Will the proposal alter the locrLtioti,
T,I`s�tri UUHion, density, or growth rate of the human
population?
HOUSING, will the proposal affectexisting housing,
or create a demand for additional hotising?
13.
14.
15
YVS MAYBE NO
resultORn: 1v/CIMUULATIUN. Will the proposal w
result in.:
a, Generation of substantial additional vehicle
movement?
b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or
demand for new parking?
c. Substantial impact on existing transportation;
systems?
d. Significant alterations to present patterns
Of circulation or movement of people and/or
goods?
e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traZr;jC,?
f`. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicl.o,,j
bicyclists or pedestrians?
PUBLIC SERVICES. Will the proposal have an effort
upon, or result in a -need for new or altered
governmental services
a Fire protection?
b, Police protection?
c, Schools? ....,
cl. Parks or other recreational facilities?
e. rIainten-tnce of
roads? public facilities, including
f, Other governmental services? --w
ENERGY, Will the proposal result in.,
a. Use of substantial amounts o -f f el
X'
Ye
u .or energy?
b, Substantial increase in demand upon existing
---
sources of energy, or require the development
Of
new sources of energy?
16, UTILITIES. Will the propsal result in a need for
new system's, or substantial alterations to the
following:
a. Power or natural gas?
bi Communications systems?'_
c. Water availability:�
d. Sewer or septic tank?
X
e.. Storm water drainage?
f Solid waste and disposal? ----
---
----- .X
17. HUMAN HEALTH. Will the proposal result in.
`r
a: Creation of any health hazard or potential
health hazard (excluding mental health)?
b. Exposure of people to potential health
hazards?
X_
1$. AESTHETICS. Will the proposal result in the
Obs- ruc :n
of any scenic vista or view open t.o
the public, or will the proposal result in the
creation of an aesthetically offensive site open,
to public view?
��_ 4
YES MAYBE
NO
19, RECREATION. Will the proposal result in an impact
the or quantity of existing recreational
upon quality
opportunities? -�
20, CULTURAL RESOURCES
`j. Wall t e proposal result in the alteration
of or the destruction of a prehistoric or
historic archaeological site?
b. Will the proposal result in adverse physical
or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or
historic building, structure or abject? _._.
.t.'"•:
c. Does the proposal have the potential to rause
a physical change which would affect unique
ethnic cultural values?
d4 Will the proposal restrict existing religious
or sacred uses within the potential impact
area? _
�.....
V. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AP 41-40-0
See attached sheets
3
ON _OF -aKYMQHUEH1AL-SSAL-UA1LU AP 41-40-09
1boc,e,f;3b,f: The creation and development of two additional
building sites will result in some displacementp disruption,
compaction or overcovering of the soil which would lead to an increase
In runoff and erosion Poteritial on sitoo Due to the aze of the
proposed parcels these affects are not axpected to be significant.
1h: All of Butte County is within a Moderate Earthquak4- Intensity
Zone VIII. The subject property is located approximatoly 3 miles
northeast of faults associated with the Fc-.,thill Shear Zoneo which
supported the 1.975 Oroville earthquake o�,' magnitude 6.0 on the Richter
scale, and approximately 2miles southwest of an inforl,"od fault line
associated with the same Foothill Shear Zone. These faults are all of
unknown activity. Construction of homes to Uniform Building Code
standards for seismically active areas should provide adequate
protection to residents in case of Laismic activity.
5d Potential impacts to wildlife on this property are twofold:
Pirsto the area is within non-critical winter dsoz-i herd area. Due to
surrounding similar development which already impacts the area, this
project should not have any sigtificant effect on the deer herds.
Second,valuable riparian habitat Iodated along the west branch Of
Clear Creek should be preservedi It is suggested that ho -building,
areas should be required on either side of the creek in order to
preserve that habitat. Also, any creek crossings must meet the
requirementS of the Department of Fish and Game.
13a0c,ft Creation of two additional homesites in the area will
Incrementally add to traffic and turning movetents off or Clark r -toad)
thereby adding to traffic haZard8 in the area. The addition of 't;WO
lots should not be a sIgt1f:cant increase.
14Though not 6ignificantq this project Will represent an
incremental increase in demand for public services in a rural area.
20: The subjoat property is located in an area of high archaeological
sensitivity. An archaeological survey must be performed in of -der to
determine if significant sites exist on the propertyo and if so%
adbqUAtO mitigation mdasUrO# iust be deVeloped.
6
�u��z�asteci . Mi xi,�ati:i7rt t7ctasures
1 . Show on the final map a 100-foot no-development are&% ic)oa�.(Ad
both sides of the west branch of Clear Creek. Devei.opl,10114 for
road purposes is excluded from this requirement.
2. Meet the Department of Fish and Game's requiremen p;Any crook
crossings.
3. (No specific mitigation measures are possible at thbl time. An
archaeological survey must be performed in order �e doberinine if
archaeological sites exist on the property). and ,if kjoy adequato.
mitigation measures must be proposed.)
Applicant; John and Cathy Davis Assessor's Parcel, 44
41--40-09
Log # 85-Q5-29-'Dt
DATA SHCET
A. proiP^t bpscrption
1. Type of Project: Tentative Parcel Map.
2. Brief Description: Dividing 14.11 acres into $ PAVOOlst e of
4.91 acres and 1 of 4.28 acres.
3. Location: On the southwest corner of Dulcinea Drive and Qhark
Road, sough of Paradise.
lopment
4. proposed Density of Deve': Approximately 44acC'e+� per
dwelling unit.
5. Amount of Impervious Surfacing Minimal.
6. Access and Nearest Public Road(s): Property fron'4 on Clark
Road ( State highway 191). systo�ns j
7. Method of Sewage Disposal: Individual septic
V. Source of Water SupP1Y= Individual wells.
9. Proximity of Power Lines: To property.
10. Potential for further land divisions and developmante None
under existing zoning.
B. ,,nyronm nt�i Sottin
,,vml ,a7 Fny i ron►nQ,_n_
1 ain
a,. aoneral Topographic Character; RollIng canyon bottom.
b. Slopes: Generally 0-10%.
C. Elevation: 450-500 ft. ASL.
d. Limiting Factors: None.
2. Soils
a. Types and Characteristics: Pentz ajacl Peters 5oii,Series,
generally well drained with moderate to slow permeability,
with Very shallow soils.
b. Limiting Factors; Slow permeability and shallow ;oils.
3. NatueAl Hazards of the Land
a. Earthquake Zone: Moderate "Earthquake Intensity Zone VIII,
b. Erosion Potential: High.
c» Landslide Potentia].: Moderate,
d. Fire Hazard' High to Exi�reme.
e. 8y:pansive Soil potentia`. Low:
4. Hydrology
A. Surface Water: The west branch of Clear Creek and the
Shirttail Canyon Creek both traverse the property.
b. Ground Water; Unknown potentially limitod.
c. Drainage Characteristics: Property drains to Shirttail
the West Of Lear
Canyon RaVsi ee.onAsdr�► pondite AndtaISO exists bonnpr`oposed Parcel
Creek on
2.
d. Annual Rainfall (normal): 35," •}5 inches.
e Limiting Factors: Setbacks from, creeks and dra,knageways.
Potentially limited groundwater buppl.iea'
5, Visual/Scenic Qual.ty High
6. Acoustic Quality, High.
s�ppa y 7. Air Quality: High.,
1:7 iolo��a� 1"'nV7 Y+nn_�in G��t
8 Vegetation; Grasses and Blue Oaks.
9 Wildlife Habitat: Non-critical winter deer herd arca, East
Tehama Deer Herd. t,
Gultura7 -'ri•,� ronme
10• Archaeological and Historical Resources in the area:
sensitivity area. High
110 Butte County General Plan designation:
Agricultural -Residential.
12. Existing Zoniig: AR -MH -3
13. Existing Land Use ,on-site,
open land. One single-family dwnilinkt ancl,
14. Surrounding Area:
a. Land Uses: Scattered single-family dwellings at
densities. rural
b. Zoning: AR -MH --3.
co Gen. Plan designations:
Agricultural -Residential.
d. Parcel Sizes:
To the west side of Clark Road
3- to 5 -acre parcels, some lar.eO , generally
Road, 40+ -acre Parcels. To the east of Pentz
e. Population: Scattered.
15. Character of Site and Area:
16. Nearest Urban Area; p Rural residential area.
17. Relevant Spheres of Influence: approximately 5 miles north.
18. Improvements Standards Urban ArtNone.
194 Fire Protection Service:
a. Nearest County CStatej Fire Station;
Volunteer Fire Station. oroville- gutta College
463 approximately 12 miles south.. Nelson Avenue Station
b. Water Availability:. Fire tanker and wells
West branch Of Gleam Creek, and water, prom
20. Schools in Area: Golden Feather Union School
oroville Union High School District. District and
0